Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return now to your readily scheduled program. | ||
| We return now to your readily scheduled program. | ||
| It starts now. | ||
| Let me tell you what we have coming up for you today. | ||
| First of all, we're going to be joined by FBI whistleblower in the second hour, Garrett O'Boyle. | ||
| And really, he was the one that made it a big national viral story about the FBI or bad actors inside the FBI in there destroying evidence. | ||
| He was really the one that blew the lid off of that, made it a national story about a week ago. | ||
| He's going to be joining us in the second hour to break all of that down, explain things from his perspective, and then whatever he can share with us as far as intel he's getting from other whistleblowers that ultimately led to him making that announcement essentially to the American people of what he's hearing. | ||
| So he's going to explain that. | ||
| That's going to happen in the second hour. | ||
| Now, leading up to that, we got a lot of developments. | ||
| Tulsi Gabbard has responded now to that story where you have these people at the DNI and the NSA, and they have these little secret chat rooms where they all talk about sex orgies and gay sex and trans sex. | ||
| Having hermaphrodite babies to advance the trans cause. | ||
| I mean, just crazy nonsense going on. | ||
| Well, she's addressed that today, so we're going to tell you the latest there. | ||
| Not to mention, so much hypocrisy. | ||
| You can't... | ||
| The American left swims in hypocrisy. | ||
| And we highlight that all the time on this transmission, but the latest one here, I mean, well, actually, there's multiple cases. | ||
| The hypocrisy from the left is crazy. | ||
| So whether it's the IRS and them freaking out about Doge, and then you find out, oh, it was the Biden administration that actually released hundreds of thousands of people's personal information, violated hundreds of thousands of people's privacies. | ||
| But the same people complaining about Doge and Musk are silent on that issue, aren't they? | ||
| Aren't they? | ||
| Of course they are. | ||
| Just like they're complaining now, and we've got an announcement from Caroline Levitt today about the press pool shakeup. | ||
| And the same people complaining about the press pool shakeup said nothing when the Biden administration did it. | ||
| But see, there's a difference. | ||
| The press shakeup that's happening with the Trump administration is inviting more people in and opening up the press room for more people. | ||
| The Biden administration locked it down and rejected hundreds of people. | ||
| Yeah, that's right. | ||
| But you only heard one side of that story, didn't you? | ||
| We're going to give you the full story today. | ||
| Now, I've realized, we've always kind of known this about the Democrats as well, but it's more apparent today than ever, and now the analogy is clear. | ||
| Whenever there's a big move inside of Congress, or a policy gets publicly stated, the Democrats... | ||
| are like a wind-up doll or like a pull-string doll. | ||
| They only have a finite amount of responses, and they can never learn a new one. | ||
| And so the same thing is happening. | ||
| Oh, this budget bill. | ||
| You're going to die. | ||
| I'm not kidding you. | ||
| The Democrats, you go to any Democrat public statement after that bill passed last night, you're going to die. | ||
| Oh, yeah. | ||
| That bill is killing you. | ||
| You didn't know that. | ||
| The Democrats want you to know that the Republican bill passed last night. | ||
| Which just goes to the Senate. | ||
| There'll still be more changes back and forth, but yeah, it's going to kill you. | ||
| Literally, Democrats are telling you this bill is going to kill you. | ||
| Probably your kids, your grandma, whatever other survivors in your family you have. | ||
| You're all dead. | ||
| So that's the Democrat wind-up doll. | ||
| You pull the string. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This Republican bill will kill you. | |
| It's one of their favorite responses, and they're all saying it today. | ||
| So we got that, we got some illegal immigration news, and then a big stack of geopolitical news. | ||
| With Trump clueing us in that he's got a peace deal in the works and it could be done within weeks. | ||
| and Zelensky might be coming to D.C. as well. D.C. | ||
| as well. D.C. as well. | ||
| But it felt like it went for a couple hours and just about everybody got a statement in. | ||
| Just about everybody got some time to answer questions. | ||
| And Trump explaining some of the recent developments with Doge and domestic policy, foreign policy, the war in Ukraine, other such things. | ||
| Elon Musk clarified some things. | ||
| RFK Jr. clarified some things. | ||
| He's good at public speaking, and he's not shy about it either. | ||
| He likes to talk. | ||
| So he talked a lot about some of the plans with the commerce. | ||
| But I think what you're seeing now is it's not only the most transparent administration, it's also the best at communication. | ||
| It's the best at communication. | ||
| And they really do have a job to do when it comes to communication, because why is Doge doing so well? | ||
| Why is Doge right now, or the activity of Doge, why is it the top-rated thing in D.C.? Why does it have the highest approval rating and all this other stuff? | ||
| Because you can still tap into the average American that might not be political, and you can find what they support. | ||
| Common sense stuff. | ||
| And so this administration is so good at communicating, hey, what we're doing here is common sense. | ||
| The challenge is they have to go up against the entire propaganda media, the entire propaganda coming from the Democrat Party, and the media and the Democrats are basically the same thing now. | ||
| But we're starting to overwhelm it. | ||
| We're starting to kind of turn that ship over as far as the media is concerned, and we're really competing with it. | ||
| A lot of that probably has to do with X, but still not everybody's on X. They have to get out there in front of the American people and explain what's going on against all the propaganda. | ||
| But they're great at communicating. | ||
| And as long as they can do that well, that's the big challenge. | ||
| If they can communicate well, Democrat Party policy will become completely defunct. | ||
| Democrat Party propaganda will be completely defeated. | ||
| And that is a mandate. | ||
| That is what we want this administration to do, absolutely. | ||
| But it's the same thing that we're seeing today after this bill gets passed. | ||
| Been seeing it for years, folks. | ||
| The Democrats have been doing this as long as you've been alive. | ||
| Anytime Republican policy gets through with a bill or an executive order, whatever it is, the Democrats are like a pull-string doll. | ||
| They have a finite amount of responses and they can never learn a new one. | ||
| So it's the, this is racist, any sort of Ad hominem attack, like it's racist, it's sexist, it's homophobic. | ||
| That's in their poll string audio box. | ||
| But then, of course, the this is going to kill you and your family, that's also in their poll string audio box. | ||
| And that's what they have today. | ||
| This is going to kill your friends and family, this bill that just passed, which is still a bloated budget bill. | ||
| Thomas Massey, the only real physical conservative left in Congress, voted against it. | ||
| He was the only Republican that voted against it. | ||
| It passed through the House. | ||
| It's going to go back to the Senate. | ||
| They're still going to be... | ||
| Some negotiating to go on. | ||
| It's not the final bill yet. | ||
| But it's funny to me. | ||
| They say this is cutting into the charity food programs, the SNAP food programs. | ||
| It's the charity that you pay for with your tax dollars so that other people can eat. | ||
| They don't want to take care of themselves, I guess, so they get the nice government food package paid for by you. | ||
| And then it's Medicare and it's Medicaid and it's all this stuff. | ||
| And they say, they're cutting, they're cutting. | ||
| Actually, what you're going to find out when it's all sudden done, and they balance the books on all of this, the difference between whatever cuts come from this bill and then whatever is gained from the Department of Government Efficiency, it's going to balance out. | ||
| So understand that. | ||
| The budget that they're complaining about when it comes to these entitlement programs that shouldn't even exist, by the way. | ||
| But let's not even get into that argument. | ||
| And I don't know if anybody is seriously trying to stop all these entitlement programs from existing. | ||
| We should. | ||
| They shouldn't exist, but kind of entrenched now. | ||
| It will all balance itself out. | ||
| So whatever cuts are getting made, the money that's going to get saved from Doge is going to be, it's virtually going to cancel out these cuts. | ||
| But see, when the fraud, waste, and abuse is discovered, hundreds of billions of dollars worth, And we haven't even really tapped into Medicare and Medicaid yet. | ||
| We're starting to get an idea of Social Security. | ||
| It's going to be hundreds of billions of dollars of fraud, waste, and abuse across all of these things, and it will all balance out. | ||
| But the Democrats aren't complaining about that. | ||
| They aren't complaining about that. | ||
| So if they really cared, if they really genuinely cared, which they pretend to do, keyword pretend, if they really genuinely cared, Would be supporting Doge. | ||
| Then they would be reporting on everything Doge is discovering. | ||
| And they would be reporting on the fraud, waste, and abuse. | ||
| And they would be celebrating on cutting it out. | ||
| But they're not. | ||
| And of course, the logical conclusion is they're in on the fraud. | ||
| They're getting kickbacks. | ||
| They're getting paid. | ||
| They're literally getting rich off the fraud, waste, and abuse. | ||
| And we've barely even begun to tap into that with stories like Sheldon Whitehouse, the Democrat from Rhode Island, who is passing bills that pay his wife's nonprofit tens of millions of dollars, of which millions go directly to her. | ||
| That's like the opening act of the president. | ||
| Really, I would say. | ||
| It's like we're in the opening act of Doge. | ||
| The curtains have been pulled. | ||
| The crowd is starting to settle down. | ||
| There's still some murmurs and people finding their seats and the ushers kind of showing people around and the flashlight still. | ||
| So you're still kind of in the opening act. | ||
| Everybody's not settled down yet. | ||
| It's a little commotion. | ||
| But the curtains have been drawn and people are on the stage and you're starting to see the play and everything. | ||
| And it's like, oh, okay, yeah. | ||
| Here's all these government contracts for nonsense that you've never heard of. | ||
| Transgender plays, gay comic books. | ||
| Everything else. | ||
| Teaching shrimp how to drink gin and run on a treadmill underwater. | ||
| I mean, just fantastic stuff. | ||
| So here's all these contracts, and they publish all of them on their website. | ||
| You can go download them and print them all out. | ||
| Then, now you're getting into, well, where is the money actually going? | ||
| So we see contracts, and then we see a name of an LLC or a nonprofit or an NGO, and then where does the money go? | ||
| Oh! | ||
| It's going to family members. | ||
| It's going to friends of politicians. | ||
| Oh, I see. | ||
| Oh, I'm starting to see what this play is all about. | ||
| Oh, okay. | ||
| As the crowd is still shuffling a little bit, settling into their seats. | ||
| Oh, oh, I see the play here. | ||
| They make these hundreds of millions of dollars in these contracts for NGOs and nonprofits, and then they're on the receiving end of it. | ||
| Oh, I get it. | ||
| Oh, this is going to be good. | ||
| So, why don't the Democrats complain when Doge saves the entitlement programs hundreds of millions of dollars? | ||
| Because it's hurting their bottom line. | ||
| What other logical conclusion can I reach? | ||
| I know Democrats are liars. | ||
| I know they're all fraudsters. | ||
| Maybe they're all criminals, too. | ||
| But if they're going to complain at this bill, and they're saying it's costing us all this money, well, so is all the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| And you didn't say anything about it. | ||
| So what other conclusion can I reach other than you're stealing the money? | ||
| You're benefiting from the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| So how do you communicate that to the American people? | ||
| How do you get the American people to understand that? | ||
| You have press conferences. | ||
| You have full transparency on a website. | ||
| You have full transparency. | ||
| Publicly posting everything on social media. | ||
| You have entire administrative cabinet meeting where you take questions from the press and explain what's going on and you let Musk speak. | ||
| And the American people are getting it. | ||
| And even if it is the Democrat Party propaganda, how do you open that and then repackage it? | ||
| Elon Musk and Doge. | ||
| in waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| So how do you repackage that? | ||
| Okay, they're cutting entitlement programs and that are going to kill you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What? | |
| That's where they're at. | ||
| That is literally where they're at today. | ||
| And you can go find any Democrat posting on social media, any Democrat whose office has released a public statement, and they're all saying the same thing. | ||
| So somebody sent out the memo. | ||
| The Democrat poll string doll. | ||
| Today's response is, the Republicans are killing us. | ||
| The Republicans are killing you. | ||
| But the evidence of hypocrisy is right there in front of you. | ||
| It's all going to balance out. | ||
| Doge is going to save probably 800 billion, or excuse me, well, maybe billion. | ||
| Actually, it will be billion. | ||
| It might be a trillion. | ||
| Doge will probably save 800 billion when it comes to all the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| It will expose All kinds of waste, fraud, and abuse, specifically in Medicare and Medicaid, the entitlement programs, and Social Security, and it'll all balance out. | ||
| When you look at the books, it'll all balance out. | ||
| But the Democrats only care about one side of it, and that's the money that's been going to them. | ||
| They're in support of the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| They do not care about the bottom line at these entitlements, and the proof is in the pudding. | ||
| Because they're not complaining about the waste, fraud, and abuse that cost $800 billion. | ||
| They are complaining about the bill that cuts it by $800 billion, which is not even entirely accurate. | ||
| So before you're sitting there screaming at your radio or your screen today saying, that's not actually what's going on, that's not actually what's going on, it doesn't matter. | ||
| That's the message that they're telling people. | ||
| That's the propaganda that they're selling people. | ||
| It's not adding up. | ||
| It's not adding up. | ||
| Let's go to the White House before we start to get into all of this news, and you can see how they're saying it's going to kill you. | ||
| I mean, literally. | ||
| Elon Musk joins Donald Trump's first White House cabinet meeting, and just as I told you yesterday, what was the email requesting to know what you've been up to, what you did this week? | ||
| What was that email really all about? | ||
| Here's Elon Musk explaining it, clip five. | ||
|
unidentified
|
About half of the government employees so far appear to have responded to your request for what they've been doing over the past week. | |
| Is there a timeline in place for next moves for people being fired and bunking in there? | ||
| and people expect to see results of that. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Well, to be clear, I think that email perhaps was best interpreted as a performance review. | ||
| But actually, it was a policy check review. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you have a pulse and two neurons? | |
| If you have a pulse and two neurons, you can reply to an email. | ||
| This is, you know, I think not a high bar, is what I'm saying. | ||
| Should anyone can accomplish this? | ||
| But what we are trying to get to the bottom of is we think there are a number of people on the government payroll who are dead, which is probably why they can't respond, and some people who are not real people. | ||
| They're literally fictional individuals that are collecting paychecks. | ||
| Well, somebody's collecting paychecks on a fictional individual. | ||
| So we're literally trying to figure out, are these people real? | ||
| Are they alive? | ||
| and tend their right email, which I think is a reasonable expectation for the American Republic. | ||
| The American Republic would have at least that expectation of someone in the public center. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Mr. Mastermask? | |
| Roughly. | ||
| So Doge is sitting down and they say, OK, we've got to go through a process. | ||
| It's like an onion. | ||
| There's layers to the corruption. | ||
| There's layers to the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| How do we go through this layer by layer? | ||
| So they sit down, and a lot of these people have run businesses. | ||
| Musk has run businesses. | ||
| And they say, well, here's a pretty simple one to remove the first layer. | ||
| Why don't we just send out an email and see who responds? | ||
| Pretty basic. | ||
| Any business could think about that if they were trying to tighten the budget or get rid of some of the fat. | ||
| So they say, let's send out an email and let's see who responds. | ||
| And then the people that don't respond, we will know. | ||
| Let's look into that further. | ||
| And let's see if this person either exists or is even alive. | ||
| So it's just like I was explaining all week. | ||
| It's not even that they necessarily care about your response as much. | ||
| I mean, they might at some level, but no. | ||
| It was really just about, are you there? | ||
| It was really in attendance. | ||
| Like I was saying yesterday, Bueller? | ||
| Bueller? | ||
| Bueller? | ||
| Bueller's not here, sir. | ||
| Bueller's not here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So... | |
| Now they're probably going to, I don't think Musk says this like a joke. | ||
| He has the sense of humor, but I think he already knows. | ||
| People who are dead are receiving government paychecks. | ||
| Now this is like, now you've got a whole other thing you've got to figure out. | ||
| So if they're dead and receiving paychecks, is there a bank account sitting there with a bunch of money in it? | ||
| Is the government able to claw back that money? | ||
| Or was it a family member or somebody else who let the paychecks keep coming in so that they could collect the money? | ||
| Non-existent people? | ||
| How do you end up with people that don't even exist on a government salary? | ||
| Well, that's just straight-up fraud. | ||
| That's just somebody stealing money. | ||
| So I don't think Musk says that. | ||
| I mean, there's really two possibilities. | ||
| Either he says that and he's telling you this is what we're looking for, which is, I mean, that is what he said, or they've already found that and he's saying this is what we found. | ||
| But, I mean, folks, the dead thing is, dead people receiving their salary still is one issue that maybe there's room for error there. | ||
| Somebody that never existed receiving a salary? | ||
| That is just outright fraud. | ||
| Outright fraud. | ||
| And so they're just trying to stop it. | ||
| And they say, well, what can we do? | ||
| We go into the office and nobody is there, so that doesn't really work. | ||
| We can't do an attendance check at the actual offices. | ||
| Nobody is there. | ||
| Okay, let's send out an email. | ||
| And let's see what happens. | ||
| And now they've probably already found dead people getting salaries, people that don't actually exist getting salaries, and that's what they're finding. | ||
| Now, the Democrats won't say a damn thing about that. | ||
| And maybe that's because they're the ones... | ||
| Kind of like they all have these secret little nicknames. | ||
| What was Joe Biden's nickname on Hunter Biden's laptop? | ||
| Like Peto Peter or something? | ||
| They all got their little nicknames. | ||
| Peto Pete. | ||
| Yeah, maybe Peto Pete was working for the federal government, getting a nice salary. | ||
| So yes, it was an attendance check. | ||
| It was a pulse check. | ||
| Elon Musk confirms that. | ||
| It might not even have mattered of what you said. | ||
| You could have said... | ||
| I took five dumps this week. | ||
| Well, okay, you got a pulse, so whatever. | ||
| Now, once they get to the next layer, once they remove this layer and they say, here's the people that don't exist, here's the people that are dead receiving a salary, then they'll report those numbers. | ||
| Then they'll probably dig in and say, okay, now what are you actually doing? | ||
| What is the role you actually play here? | ||
| But they've got to remove, this is layers of fraud, waste, and abuse that they have to just slowly pile drive through. | ||
| It's been so successful, and I mean, I guess they've done pretty... | ||
| They're going through it with a fine-tooth comb. | ||
| You know, I'm not really into logistics and data analysis and auditing. | ||
| I'm in news. | ||
| But these guys are into that. | ||
| They like going into this stuff with a fine-tooth comb and finding these little things. | ||
| It's like an Easter egg hunt. | ||
| So it's been so successful, but Trump wants them to move faster. | ||
| If you can believe that. | ||
| So here's Musk saying that Trump has called him and asked him to move even faster and be more aggressive in clip four. | ||
| So I guess it was like last week the president encouraged me via Truth Social and also via phone call to be more aggressive. | ||
| And I was like, okay, you know, yes, sir, Mr. President, we will indeed do that. | ||
| The president is the commander-in-chief. | ||
| I do what the president asks. | ||
| And I said, can we send out an email to everyone just saying, what did you get done last week? | ||
| And the president said yes, so it did that. | ||
| And, you know, we got a partial response. | ||
| We're going to send another email. | ||
| But our goal is not to be capricious or unfair. | ||
| We want to give people every opportunity to send an email. | ||
| And the email could simply be, What I'm working on is too sensitive or classified to describe. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In fact, literally, that would be sufficient. | |
| I think this is just common sense. | ||
| And what is your target number for how many workers and employees you're looking to cut total? | ||
| We wish to keep everyone who is doing a job that is essential and doing that job well. | ||
| But if the job is not essential or they're not doing the job well, they obviously should not be... | ||
| Now, I think March is going to be a very telltale month about where we actually go as far as the action. | ||
| Because they can cancel contracts. | ||
| Now, there's federal judges, there's Democrat judges that are trying to stop them from canceling these contracts. | ||
| It's going to be a battle that will go to the Supreme Court, is my guess. | ||
| But I think in March... | ||
| That's when you're going to find out, okay, what staffing cuts are they going to be making? | ||
| And then that's when they'll probably announce the dead people or the non-existent people that are getting government salaries. | ||
| I think that'll happen in March. | ||
| And I think that because the Office of Personnel Management and the Office of Management and Budget basically just warned such of a thing. | ||
| OPM directs agencies to plan for layoffs by March 13th. | ||
| Directing agencies across government to turn over plans for widespread layoffs of federal employees. | ||
| The memo, which provides more specific guidance after the February 11th executive order from President Trump mandating layoffs, requires agencies to break down their plans for a reduction in force and broader restructuring of their agencies. | ||
| So it sounds like the plan is now, and maybe this is why Trump is saying get more aggressive. | ||
| They've got to go in and they've got to find out. | ||
| What people are doing. | ||
| And in the process, they either already knew it was going on or they found out it was going on. | ||
| Dead people getting salaries and non-existent people getting salaries. | ||
| So that's easy. | ||
| That's easy to cut. | ||
| But they're going to have a deadline and they're going to have basically a mandate. | ||
| Maybe it'll even be a specific number. | ||
| And they're going to say, this is your goal. | ||
| Plan accordingly. | ||
| And we've given you the roadmap to do so. | ||
| Here's the dead people. | ||
| Obviously, they're fired. | ||
| They're not getting a salary anymore. | ||
| Here's the people that don't exist. | ||
| We're not going to pay them anymore. | ||
| And then whatever the difference is to the number you have to get your agency down to, that's on you. | ||
| And we can send you all the emails, what'd you do this week? | ||
| And you can go through there, or you can do it on your own, but that's what's going to happen, and it looks like that's the plan for March. | ||
| And there'll be, you know, you'll see the IRS agents crying on television interviews, and you'll see all these government agents crying on TV interviews, the woeys me thing. | ||
| Hey, look, you know what? | ||
| I'm not celebrating anybody losing a job, but when you're a government employee that's... | ||
| A little bit different than the private sector. | ||
| And where was the media with their sob stories? | ||
| Where was the media with their in-focus pieces and hit pieces when they shut down the economy over COVID and people lost everything and people lost their businesses that they built for decades and lost everything? | ||
| Where was the coverage of that? | ||
| Where was the sadness on that? | ||
| It was nowhere. | ||
| And now they want us to be sad because government employees who probably don't do much get fired? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Making talk radio great again. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Troyer. | ||
| Well, the Democrat hypocrisy is everywhere. the Democrat hypocrisy is everywhere. | ||
| And it actually goes all the way back to the 90s. | ||
| And I know we covered this before and played some of the clips, but it was actually, to their credit, Bill Clinton and Al Gore. | ||
| And by the way, Clinton had a good economy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
me. | |
| Maybe it had something to do with that, but Bill Clinton and Al Gore, they, in modern American history, were the original doge. | ||
| And they would do press conferences, and they would explain how they're slashing federal budgets, and they're cutting into all the fraud, waste, and abuse. | ||
| Ironically enough, the Clinton Foundation ended up being one of the biggest benefactors of the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| But, you know, I kind of, to get off the rails a little bit here, I kind of wonder now about Bill and Hillary Clinton. | ||
| Maybe were they always corrupt at one time? | ||
| Maybe they even did like America? | ||
| But they had weak constitutions and ended up in some bad places like Epstein Island and basically just got so compromised that, you know, I mean, it seems like maybe Bill and Hillary are just on video doing some just nasty stuff. | ||
| So they're just totally compromised. | ||
| But that's just me kind of going off the rails. | ||
| Like, were they always that corrupt or maybe they just got compromised over the years? | ||
| But getting back to the issue, it was Bill Clinton and Al Gore who originally were doing a Doge-like phenomenon cutting into the federal government. | ||
| And of course it was celebrated. | ||
| It was celebrated by Democrats and it was celebrated by Republicans. | ||
| And it was one of the, it had some of the highest approval ratings from the Clinton years. | ||
| And then Barack Obama had a federal institution. | ||
| I forget what it was called, but it did the exact same purpose. | ||
| Now, it didn't do that much, but it was the exact same purpose. | ||
| And then they just renamed it the Department of Government Efficiency. | ||
| But the institution already existed under a different name. | ||
| Now, the Democrats never complained about any of it. | ||
| The media never complained about any of it until now. | ||
| Until now, the Democrats, And that's because they have to attack Trump on everything, and now they have to attack Musk on everything, but also because they're actually doing it. | ||
| They're actually going in there and doing what they said they were going to do, and they're exposing the fraud, waste, and abuse. | ||
| That is benefiting the politicians and making them rich, benefiting their friends, benefiting their families, making them all rich. | ||
| But then they write stories like this, and it's all over. | ||
| All over the media, all over the syndicated internet press. | ||
| Economists are starting to worry about a serious Trump recession. | ||
| Oh, it's the Trump recession. | ||
| Now, we'll see what happens with the economy. | ||
| Trump has really not done much on the economy. | ||
| The bill that just passed through the House with taxes and everything, it'll be nice, but it's not. | ||
| We got to do energy. | ||
| We got to get on energy first. | ||
| We got to get on drill baby drill. | ||
| We got to get on cutting more taxes and regulations. | ||
| So really the economy has not even been barely touched yet by the Trump administration. | ||
| A lot of work. | ||
| He's gotten some investments to come in, but they haven't really manifested yet. | ||
| So we really don't even know what's going to happen with the Trump economy yet. | ||
| That's still an unknown factor. | ||
| But oh, it's going to be a recession. | ||
| Now, how many of these—you'll see it. | ||
| It'll be all—this will be—maybe they'll start it with next week. | ||
| There'll be a week where they just decide, this is our story, and we're going to say Trump has caused a recession or Trump is going to cause a recession. | ||
| That's going to be their next big hit. | ||
| They'll finish the week out saying Trump's going to kill everybody with this policy, that they're already doing that. | ||
| But then they'll say he's going to cause a recession. | ||
| Now, Obama actually did have a recession by the technical standard. | ||
| By the actual technical textbook standard and definition, Obama did have a recession, but Biden was a recession almost the entire four years he served. | ||
| It's like 75%, 80%, whatever the number is, of the quarterly reports were actually, by the textbook definition, a recession. | ||
| And they never called it a recession. | ||
| Then they tried to change the definition of recession. | ||
| So that they wouldn't have to call it a recession. | ||
| But now Trump, where there is no recession yet, and we haven't really seen the impact of the Trump economy, he's been in for a month, and there are still some problems, no doubt, but we really haven't even seen the effect yet, and they're saying, oh, it's going to be a recession. | ||
| So Biden actually has a recession. | ||
| They never report on it. | ||
| They changed the definition of recession, and now they're saying Trump is going to have a recession, even though we don't actually know that. | ||
| And all signs would indicate it's not going to be a recession. | ||
| But get ready. | ||
| That'll be the... | ||
| Maybe that'll be next week's propaganda of choice. | ||
| The Trump recession. | ||
| Because right now it's posts like this from Democrat Party propaganda agents. | ||
| $880 billion in Medicaid cuts is insane. | ||
| A lot of people are going to die. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| The Democrats have been cutting political propaganda ads telling you you're going to die because of Republicans for years. | ||
| You can go back to the 90s. | ||
| And I just referenced the 90s because I was alive in the 90s. | ||
| But there was a famous ad where they had somebody pushing grandma off a cliff. | ||
| That was Democrat Party propaganda claiming that Republicans are going to kill your grandma. | ||
| So, again, the Democrats are like a pull-string toy. | ||
| Like Woody from Toy Story. | ||
| There's the ad right there. | ||
| Look at that crew. | ||
| Man, is the Infowars crew the best. | ||
| And we do it with a fifth of what Joy Reid's crew does. | ||
| And probably a tenth of the money. | ||
| Probably less. | ||
| That's efficiency. | ||
| So there it is. | ||
| Republicans pushing grandma off the cliff. | ||
| Old political propaganda ad from the 90s. | ||
| Same thing. | ||
| Medicare. | ||
| I mean, it's literally the same thing. | ||
| You cannot make this up. | ||
| The Democrats are like Woody, a pollstring toy that has five responses to everything, and they can never learn a new one. | ||
| Never. | ||
| Reach for the skies. | ||
| Except it's not reach for the skies. | ||
| Republicans are gonna kill ya. | ||
| Republicans are racist. | ||
| Republicans are sexist. | ||
| What are all the Democrat poll string responses? | ||
| It's a finite amount of responses and they can never learn a new one. | ||
| Never. | ||
| It's the same one. | ||
| There's your proof right there. | ||
| That was from the 90s. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The Republicans cutting Medicaid is gonna kill your grandma. | |
| Oh, and then they mandate a vaccine that actually kills her. | ||
| And then they mandate the health protocols that actually kill her. | ||
| They'll promote, what do they call it in Canada, guys, where it's now like the leading cause of death with the euthanasia? | ||
| Like voluntary suicide? | ||
| But, oh, you know, Republicans are going to kill you. | ||
| Don't you know it's the government's job to take care of you? | ||
| See, and that's what the Democrats want. | ||
| That's the entire ideology of leftism, is that you can't take care of yourself. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The government, the government has to take care of you. | |
| You can't be trusted. | ||
| You don't know what's best. | ||
| The government does. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And by the way, we have to run the government. | |
| And it needs to be bigger. | ||
| And if you disagree, you're killing grandma. | ||
| So, oh, people are going to die. | ||
| Jasmine Crockett. | ||
| I challenge Jasmine Crockett as an aside for some fun here, but I really... | ||
| I would like to see Jasmine Crockett present herself in public one time with no cosmetics, no makeup, no wig, no eyelash extension, nothing. | ||
| One time. | ||
| If Jasmine Crockett presents herself in public with no cosmetics whatsoever one time... | ||
| I'll vote Democrat in the upcoming elections. | ||
| How about that? | ||
| That's a pretty good deal. | ||
| She has nothing to lose, right? | ||
| Jasmine Crockett. | ||
| One time, Jasmine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is what a deal with the devil looks like. | |
| It's a deal with the devil. | ||
| It's a deal with the devil. | ||
| And then she goes to the floor and says, yep. | ||
| Get ready to pull the string, guys. | ||
| Pull the string. | ||
| Pull the string. | ||
| Jasmine Crockett, here's her string pull response, clip nine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Instead, we're pushing conspiracy theories, and some of them are killing people. | |
| It's the same thing that we have coming out of Doge. | ||
| It's the reason that people are dying. | ||
| It's the reason that farmers are losing their farms, because we continue to peddle conspiracy theories. | ||
| It is time for us to say, Mr. President, guess what? | ||
| Russia invaded Ukraine. | ||
| Can we at least agree on that one? | ||
| Facts matter. | ||
| Yo, this is literally potentially putting us into an international crisis. | ||
| We may be heading towards the next world war because we have a president that wants to pal around with Putin and wants to do everything to make him feel good, including lying about who invaded who. | ||
| She's about as smart as her little acrylic nail there. | ||
| One time, Jasmine. | ||
| One time. | ||
| And you get my vote for an election cycle. | ||
| One time. | ||
| Think about... | ||
| I mean, this is really not a smart woman. | ||
| So we shouldn't be surprised at the inconsistency. | ||
| So, Putin is the big threat and might cause a larger war. | ||
| So therefore, getting along with Putin... | ||
| Getting along with Putin... | ||
| And stabilizing those relations and relieving the tension would somehow be a bad thing. | ||
| Gotcha. | ||
| I see. | ||
| You'd be great on foreign policy. | ||
| Fantastic. | ||
| I'm sure Vladimir Putin would take you very seriously, too. | ||
| In fact, I'm sure world leaders, when you show up, Jasmine, with your pound of perfume, your wig and cosmetics and eyelash extensions and... | ||
| Three-inch-long fake nails. | ||
| Nobody knows how you even wipe your own butt with those things. | ||
| Truly a mystery of the world. | ||
| I'm sure, I'm sure you'd be highly respected. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
| Very much so. | ||
| But what did I say? | ||
| There it is. | ||
| There's your poll string response. | ||
| Now, I could go, I could do a three-hour show and just go through all the Democrats, every single one telling you this is going to cause you to die, this is going to cause people to die. | ||
| Their statements, In the Capitol, their official press releases, and then all their other propaganda agents as well, all saying the same thing. | ||
| It's the Woody doll, pollstring toy of politics. | ||
| They have a finite amount of responses, and they can never get a new one. | ||
| So they've been saying it. | ||
| Republican policy is going to kill you. | ||
| Been saying it for years. | ||
| Because you can't survive without the government, folks. | ||
| You just can't. | ||
| You just can't do it. | ||
| Now, yesterday, it didn't get much coverage, but there was a Doge caucus press conference in front of the Capitol. | ||
| And I'd like to see more of it, quite frankly. | ||
| It didn't get much coverage. | ||
| There's so much happening in Washington, D.C. right now. | ||
| But here's some audio from that. | ||
| First, let's go Ralph Norman talking about how we're not actually cutting anything, clip six. | ||
| To find out what's going on in this country, he's not for cutting anything. | ||
| What he's for is finding the waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
| They're good things in a lot of programs. | ||
| But as the first program that he looked at, USAID, what's the amount of fraudulent claims that he fined? | ||
| $154 billion worth. | ||
| He did that. | ||
| So this was about an hour or hour and a half long. | ||
| It was all Republicans. | ||
| Every member of the caucus that went there to speak was great. | ||
| Here's Elizabeth Van Doon from North Dallas. | ||
| She used to be the mayor of Irving. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And here she is talking about what Doge is up to, clip 13. Similarly, I've also introduced the Reducing Expensive Departments and Unnecessary Civil Employees Act, REDUCE for short, that codifies President Trump's executive action to shrink the bloated bureaucracy. | |
| The REDUCE Act will force agencies to eliminate duplicative positions and reform hiring practices to rein in the administrative state. | ||
| With exceptions for immigration, law enforcement, and public safety, the Reduce Act requires agencies to remove duplicative positions and hire no more than one employee for every four employees who deport the federal workforce. | ||
| These programs and other efforts that have been mentioned here today are outright necessities. | ||
| To ensure the federal government stops stealing the vitality, the innovation, and the economic strength of our nation. | ||
| Just like then Presidents Clinton and Obama recognized that the federal government has become too large and too bloated for our nation to bear. | ||
| We have this incredible moment to make significant and long-lasting changes. | ||
| The American people are with us on this. | ||
| They have entrusted us with this critical task. | ||
| It is our responsibility to deliver in the most important endeavor. | ||
| And if not now, then when? | ||
| And thank you very much, Erin. | ||
| Beth Van Dyne, I told you she was good. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, this is the Doge Legislative Caucus. | ||
| And in just a moment, we're going to take your questions as we go forward. | ||
| But first, I told you there's a chance he might come. | ||
| He is here. | ||
| And it's my pleasure to introduce one of the partners of leadership, the co-chair of the Doge Caucus, who has been a great partner, who has been here a long time. | ||
| The experience, the brainpower of how his mind works of did you consider this, did you consider that has been put to use today as we are bringing people together to file bills on those days. | ||
| That does shrink the federal government, that makes government more efficient. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, the co-chair of the Legislative Doe Caucus from the great state of Texas, Representative Pete Sessions. | ||
| Thank you very much. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you very much. | |
| Co-chairman, thank you very much. | ||
| What a great opportunity it is to join you. | ||
| I apologize for being a minute late. | ||
| We were in government reform having way too much fun. | ||
| Today, what I'd like to do is to highlight a bill which I have dropped with Senator Joni Urge, who is the Senate side leader. | ||
| It needs to be full-court press on this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Making sure that we correspond not just on the byproducts. | |
| You've got the Doge website. | ||
| We can go ahead and pull that down, guys. | ||
| We have the Doge website where you can go review all the stuff they're doing. | ||
| You have Doge on X, where they publish a lot of the stuff they're doing. | ||
| I don't think everything, but a lot of it gets published there. | ||
| And then you have Trump, who sometimes gets into the details, but he's more focused on other issues. | ||
| And then you have Musk, who will sometimes go into details whenever he's given the chance to. | ||
| But I also think that's important. | ||
| I think the Doge caucus needs to be having probably weekly press conferences like that, definitely when Congress is in session, and they need to build up this momentum. | ||
| Because eventually what you'll have is a massive press pool out there asking questions. | ||
| So they really need to make it a regular thing. | ||
| That's what I would do. | ||
| I would make it a regular thing, a weekly thing when Congress is in session, and it'll become a big phenomenon, and they can get into the details of what it is they're actually up to. | ||
| This is such an easy win. | ||
| You just have to win it. | ||
| This is such an easy win. | ||
| It's like the United States playing Canada in hockey, but then there's no cameras around. | ||
| It's like, no, people want to see that. | ||
| People want to see the hockey game. | ||
| People want to see America. | ||
| People want to see the fights. | ||
| It's like people want to see the government getting cut. | ||
| People want to see the fraud, waste, and abuse getting exposed and shut down. | ||
| People want to see that. | ||
| So you've got to take these wins now, and you have to make sure the American people know what's going on. | ||
| And find the ways, the different packaging mechanisms to get people to understand. | ||
| Here's a great one from Mike Lee, and he actually got it from Glenn Beck originally, but he posts this last night. | ||
| He says, in response to Glenn Beck, you will work a third of the year, a third of your life, just to pay taxes. | ||
| And what are you getting out of it? | ||
| So Senator Lee says, working a third of your life to pay taxes equals tyranny. | ||
| Serfdom by degrees. | ||
| That is not what the founders fought for. | ||
| Think about that. | ||
| And again, you know, I got people that want to just stay negative. | ||
| They can't get out of the negativity. | ||
| There's people that just can never get out of the negativity. | ||
| They're totally black-pilled. | ||
| And I get it. | ||
| Washington, D.C. is so corrupted, and it's just, it's so bad. | ||
| But you have people that are just going to be contrarians no matter what, dissidents no matter what, blackpilled no matter what. | ||
| But what I see is a message that used to exist on an island. | ||
| Let's just say Infowars, just as an example. | ||
| A message that used to exist on an island. | ||
| They would put us on this island and they'd say, you're a conspiracy. | ||
| And they'd put us on this island and they'd say, you're this, you're that, you're an extremist, you're everything else. | ||
| And they'd put us out on this island and any time our message reached the mainland, we would get censored. | ||
| Now my message is in the mainland at the top of the highest tower being broadcast for the whole world to see. | ||
| I've been talking about how you get taxed 33% of your earnings since I started coming on InForce. | ||
| Now it's senators. | ||
| Now it's mainstream media. | ||
| Now it's the Trump administration. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do people think about that? | |
| Thank you. | ||
| Do people even realize that? | ||
| Does the average American realize... | ||
| I mean, if you earn more than probably $50,000 a year, I mean, there's different tax brackets. | ||
| If you earn more than $50,000 a year, which... | ||
| If you don't, you're probably considered poor in this day and age. | ||
| If you make more than $50,000 a year, 33% of your work is getting taxed. | ||
| 33% of your work, your blood, your sweat, your tears, your body, everything, your mind, everything. | ||
| 33% you're working for someone else. | ||
| You're working for someone else, something else. | ||
| It's being stolen from you. | ||
| Your labor, your life, your money is being stolen from you. | ||
| 33% of it when the numbers are all said and done. | ||
| With all the different taxes and all the different transactions. | ||
| 33%. | ||
| That's a third of your life. | ||
| That is outrageous. | ||
| That should anger every American that a third of your life is essentially indentured servitude. | ||
| Serfdom. | ||
| Slavery. | ||
| Oh, and I gotta sit here. | ||
| Oh! | ||
| I'm so sick of this crap. | ||
| With the left wanting you to feel bad if you're a white person for slavery. | ||
| Hundreds of years ago that America actually ended slavery and set the standard for the world. | ||
| America set the standard for the world. | ||
| And maybe we're about to have our third standard set. | ||
| America changed the world. | ||
| First, we changed the world with the Revolutionary War. | ||
| The idea of self-government and independence. | ||
| Really, it was kind of the idea of no government. | ||
| Really what it was. | ||
| Self-government independence. | ||
| We changed the world. | ||
| We showed you the entire world. | ||
| It can be done. | ||
| You don't need a king. | ||
| You don't need a ruler. | ||
| You don't need a governing class. | ||
| You. | ||
| You know what's best for you. | ||
| You have rights to be free, given to you by God, the creator. | ||
| That changed the world. | ||
| Then they came around and we fought the Civil War, which had other issues, but slavery was a big issue. | ||
| And then we ended slavery. | ||
| And then that set the standard for morals around the world that, yeah, you know what? | ||
| Slavery is bad and should be outlawed. | ||
| That was the USA. And in both of those instances, Americans bled. | ||
| They fought and they bled and they died for the ideas of self-government independence and then making slavery illegal. | ||
| And then I'm supposed to sit here and get told I'm racist because somebody owned slave hundreds of years ago. | ||
| And then I'm sitting here and a third of my life I'm basically a slave for this corrupt government. | ||
| And so are you. | ||
| And you want to talk to me about something that happened hundreds of years ago? | ||
| Bitch, you're a slave right now! | ||
| I don't care what color your skin is for a 30-year life. | ||
| But see, that's the distraction. | ||
| That's the big distraction. | ||
| Oh, look at something that happened hundreds of years ago that you had nothing to do with. | ||
| That's the big crime. | ||
| That's what you need to focus on. | ||
| Oh, look at this race issue from 100 years ago. | ||
| Look at this race issue. | ||
| Look at that race issue. | ||
| Focus on that. | ||
| Focus on everything happening hundreds of years ago. | ||
| Focus on things that happened. | ||
| Generations ago, you had nothing to do with, you never experienced it. | ||
| Focus on that. | ||
| Don't focus on the waste, fraud, and abuse in government now. | ||
| Don't focus on the fact that one-third of your life you're working for somebody else and something else you don't even know about. | ||
| Don't. | ||
| Don't come together on that issue. | ||
| Stay separate. | ||
| Stay divided. | ||
| Think about something from 100 years ago you had nothing to do with. | ||
| Don't live in reality. | ||
| Don't be zen. | ||
| Don't live in the moment. | ||
| Don't think about your life. | ||
| Think about somebody else's and stay divided on that. | ||
| Don't be free. | ||
| No, don't be free. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The show that digs deeper than the rest. | |
| Welcome to The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| All right, in five minutes, we're going to be joined by Garrett O. Boyle, FBI whistleblower, American patriot, American hero. | ||
| And it was his statements a few days ago on the Benny Johnson show that really made this story one of the biggest stories in the news cycle this week, and that's the FBI going around and destroying evidence. | ||
| And so, good for him doing that because it was kind of obvious, I would say, to any critical thinker that follows the news and politics in D.C., it's pretty obvious what was going on, but... | ||
| Was the awareness level there in D.C.? Was the awareness level there in these entrenched bureaucracies and what we call the deep state? | ||
| I don't know, but thanks to him, maybe now it is. | ||
| And thanks to him, maybe we're stopping some major crimes from being exposed, and we're exposing some major crimes that are happening in real time. | ||
| So, looking forward to talking with Garrett coming up in five minutes. | ||
| Folks. | ||
| Remember, everything we do here is sponsored by you. | ||
| We don't get some government fund. | ||
| We don't have some big billionaire donors keeping us on air. | ||
| No. | ||
| You, the audience, keep us on the air. | ||
| And we actually have an audience appreciation super sale happening this week at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| 30% off all t-shirts and hoodies. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| 30% off all t-shirts and hoodies. | ||
| A free hat with orders over $50. | ||
| That's your InfoWars trucker hat that you'll get in your delivery. | ||
| A free hat. | ||
| And then 60% off supplements like HydroForce and so much more. | ||
| Not to mention a free bottle of 30-day gut cleanse with every order. | ||
| And of course, gut health is so important to all other health issues that you may have. | ||
| So this is all part of the... | ||
| Audience Appreciation Sale happening right now at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And so you can go there and check out all the hats and t-shirts and hoodies that we have available. | ||
| We've got a lot of classic apparel for people that have been Infowars audience members for years, for decades. | ||
| You'll notice that some of the original apparel, going back 10, 20 years, is available there. | ||
| And then we've got some new apparel that we're updating the site almost daily with new apparel. | ||
| And then we have a bunch of new supplements coming as well. | ||
| The latest, the Shilajit Complex, which is so incredible. | ||
| In fact, I can tell you about that. | ||
| Listen to some of these incredible ingredients, folks. | ||
| And you can do your own research about these things, but we've obviously done the research, and that's why we decided to put it all into this supplement. | ||
| It's crazy. | ||
| The ashwagandha for stress and mood support, magnesium for muscle recovery. | ||
| That stuff is so key. | ||
| I can't get enough magnesium, honestly. | ||
| It's just fantastic. | ||
| Black pepper for nutrient absorption. | ||
| Black seed extract, which is good for your immune health. | ||
| Burdock root for detoxifying and cleansing the body. | ||
| And Irish sea moss, which boosts skin health and energy. | ||
| Those are some of the ingredients, not to mention the PQQ and the CoQ10. | ||
| So key for a lot of different health issues. | ||
| That's also in here. | ||
| I don't know how they got all this stuff in there. | ||
| I mean, the fact that they were able to get all that goodness into these capsules is really incredible. | ||
| So it's the Shilajit Complex Super Infused Supplement, your daily boost in vitality at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And you can go there and there's some sales and some specials on that as well. | ||
| The biggest discount is when you become the automatic renewed shipment and you just get the monthly shipment. | ||
| Then you get the biggest discount on that and it'll be automatically renewed and shipped to you every month to make sure you don't forget your order and you always have it in stock. | ||
| And for you, we'll always make sure it is in stock. | ||
| So even if it sells out, you should still get your delivery because we have that into the system to make sure you get it. | ||
| And of course, with this appreciation, audience appreciation super sell, we have to give a shout out to our VIP members at thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. The sales are great. | ||
| We've been doing pretty good with sales. | ||
| That's how we fund ourselves. | ||
| But it's the VIP members that budget us into the future with that sustained membership. | ||
| So we really appreciate that. | ||
| TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP for more information. | ||
| And if you go there, you can see all the different benefits and all the things that come along with being a VIP member. | ||
| So TheAlexJonesStore.com audience appreciation sale happening right now. | ||
| We really do appreciate our audience. | ||
| And I really appreciate... | ||
| Garrett O'Boyle, who is joining me next. | ||
| This is a big story, folks. | ||
| I'm glad he's able to join us today. | ||
| We'll be right back. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Trigger warning. | |
| This broadcast contains subject matter that may offend liberal snowflakes. | ||
| It's The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Watch the live stream at band.video. | ||
| Joining me now is a great American, truly, FBI whistleblower Garrett O. Boyle. | ||
| And, you know, Jarrett, I want to kind of provide a little context to, I'm sure, what has been a crazy week for you. | ||
| After you went on the Benny Johnson show and talked about what's happening internally at the FBI and talking about perhaps some FBI sources that you might still have. | ||
| Of course, you are an FBI whistleblower yourself. | ||
| You know how the system works. | ||
| You've testified in front of Congress about it. | ||
| But I would like to kind of give you the opportunity now, with perhaps a little more clarity, seeing the aftermath of your interview and really you... | ||
| Probably created the number one news story for the news cycle this week, I would say, at least so far. | ||
| I guess we've got a couple days left. | ||
| Who knows? | ||
| But you really kind of created the number one news story. | ||
| So I'd like to just give you the opportunity now to kind of maybe rehash what you said or reclarify your message. | ||
| Or if there's anything you want to add to that, because I know how it is sometimes where you're just talking or doing an interview and, you know, maybe kind of breaking news but not intending to, and then it becomes this big national story, and then you kind of sit back and you say, hmm, maybe I could have said this different or explained this different. | ||
| So I just want to give you the platform now to kind of re-discuss the whole issue now that you've created the biggest news story so far this week in the news cycle, Garrett O'Boyle. | ||
| Oh, and thanks for having me back, man. | ||
| I appreciate it. | ||
| And you, like not too many others, have faced FBI's weaponization firsthand. | ||
| So I always appreciate the opportunity to help expose some of their wrongdoing. | ||
| And yeah, like you said, I wasn't intending to break any type of wild news or anything like that, but it sure has blown up. | ||
| And I was just trying to think of recent examples that I've heard from inside the FBI about what's happening there. | ||
| And to clarify for people who maybe aren't up on it entirely, but I was told from somebody very, very close to the subject, and I was able to forward that person's name on to Director Patel and others who are actively working on it, but that there are these standalone servers that the FBI maintains that are separate from the main system that, like when I was there as an FBI agent, you had your main... | ||
| Secret, classified system that pretty much everything funneled through. | ||
| There's an unclassified system, a secret system, and a top secret system. | ||
| That's a common usage. | ||
| So when I was told this information, it was news to me as well that there were even these standalone servers that existed. | ||
| I can only speculate as to what's on those servers, but I would imagine that it's some of the most damning type of information that the FBI has. | ||
| And then essentially right after the election... | ||
| Is when this malfeasance started taking place, from what I was told. | ||
| And it makes you wonder, well, what is on those? | ||
| Well, why suddenly is an intelligence agency? | ||
| Because I know people look at the FBI and think, oh, law enforcement. | ||
| They always say they're the most powerful law enforcement agency in the world. | ||
| But really, after 9-11, they turned heavy-handed into intelligence. | ||
| And by federal statute, they're listed as one of the intelligence communities. | ||
| And so... | ||
| I speculate like everybody else what's on those type of servers, but I wonder what, you know, this week we also learned that Jim Comey was directly involved with this honeypot trap against President Trump starting in 2015. Maybe that type of information is on there. | ||
| Maybe additional files related to UFOs or who knows what is on these servers. | ||
| I'm hoping that Cash and his team can get to the bottom of it and find out. | ||
| If possible, to restore the information. | ||
| But I was told that once it's destroyed, that even Elon Musk couldn't restore it. | ||
| So I guess time will tell. | ||
| Well, I want to kind of hone in on this standalone server. | ||
| And I guess to what you just said to finish your statement there, I guess when it is a standalone server and it's not connected to anything else, like a cloud or any of the other data systems, I suppose that's how if they erase it, it's basically gone. | ||
| You know, it's like if you have a computer that you never connected to the internet or never uploaded anything into the cloud and then you smash it with a hammer, I mean, you know, it's all gone. | ||
| Whatever was on it, it's all gone. | ||
| But what, I mean, do you know, what is the intended purpose of these standalone servers? | ||
| Is it for, you know, critical intelligence so it can't be hacked? | ||
| Or why do they even have these things? | ||
| Right, that's something that I'm not entirely certain on. | ||
| I will say, if you look at it from a traditional law enforcement standpoint, There are some standalone systems that are even out in the field for agents who work on things like child porn or things of that nature where they can review this material that's not connected to the Internet. | ||
| Now, when you take a standalone server in a place like headquarters, again, I'm only speculating what's on it, but it would have to be some of the, in my opinion, based on my training and experience in the FBI, in law enforcement, I would assert that... | ||
| Most likely what is on those type of informations are very siloed intel type of cases. | ||
| Could there be other things on there? | ||
| Sure, but I would bet all the back pay that the FBI owes me at this point, 29 months, that it's some very damning or sensitive information. | ||
| And then just logically thinking about it, okay, let's say that is the case, that there is some very sensitive information on there, very sensitive cases. | ||
| That not a lot of people are read in on. | ||
| Okay, well now why are you destroying that information? | ||
| Because we had a peaceful transition of power after President Trump was elected. | ||
| So in an alleged land of the free, why would one of the intel agencies start destroying things that only exist on a standalone server like these? | ||
| So again, I know it's speculative. | ||
| I'm sure people want more hard, you know, more concrete answer than that. | ||
| But... | ||
| I wasn't told the type of information that's on them, just that this information is being tampered with and destroyed. | ||
| Well, and I don't mind speculating with you because I do think we can kind of reach some, let's say, using deductive reasoning, we can reach some fair conclusions. | ||
| And maybe if we kind of go through the list, it might enhance what was really done there. | ||
| But just to clarify, and if you don't want to answer the question, I fully understand. | ||
| Do you have... | ||
| Sources inside the FBI that are sharing information with you? | ||
| I do. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| So they're witnessing this stuff. | ||
| They are. | ||
| Do you suppose, and now we can maybe get into the speculation aspect of it, but I'll lead with this. | ||
| Based off of what you just said, do you think an Epstein case would be something they'd put on a standalone server? | ||
| So before I learned about this type of server, I would say no. | ||
| I would say that that would be one that's just very compartmentalized on the normal classified system. | ||
| But after learning this information, it really makes you wonder, is that the type of case that they're putting on there? | ||
| Because we know the little bit of information that is publicly available, re-Epstein, that there's red flags all over that thing. | ||
| We know that he was connected to Mossad. | ||
| We know that he was connected to very high-level officials and celebrities in our own nation. | ||
| And then I guess when you pull that thread a little bit more, why hasn't the Epstein files been fully released at this point? | ||
| Why hasn't Attorney General Pam Bondi released a lot more of that info yet? | ||
| Well, let me kind of just respond to that real quick and then put a bunch of red meat in front of you to kind of chew on here. | ||
| The two things I'm hearing are because Maxwell is trying to take her case to the Supreme Court, there's some legal issues with diverging some of that information. | ||
| Now, again, whether people buy into that or not, I'm just telling you this is what I'm being told. | ||
| And then the other theory, and this is not what I'm being told. | ||
| This is more of a theory of thought. | ||
| The other theory of thought is that the Epstein list or whatever is on there is basically being used in reverse blackmail. | ||
| And I don't know if that's the best. | ||
| But basically, the people that were originally being blackmailed with the Epstein list are now being used for the people that have it now. | ||
| So not Epstein or Mossad or whoever else had access to that, whatever other intel communities that were using it to blackmail people. | ||
| Now the new people in charge are using it to get people to cooperate. | ||
| That's more of a theory of thought. | ||
| More so than the actual case that Maxwell is trying to take to the Supreme Court. | ||
| So my deductive reasoning, and this is where I would like to get your response to, my deductive reasoning on this is, okay, everything is happening on a timeline. | ||
| And if this was about Barack Obama and Comey illegally spying on Trump, then I would assume, and there's room for error here, but I would assume they would have already destroyed that evidence. | ||
| They would have gotten rid of it before Trump got in for the first term. | ||
| Why would they have waited, say, eight years to destroy that evidence? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I guess that could be a potential thing. | ||
| With the Epstein information and documents, I'm more along your line of thought is that that's going to be spread wide. | ||
| I mean, when you get into legal cases like this, there's files and paperwork. | ||
| And I mean, it's like in triplicate in multiple systems. | ||
| I don't know how you can really put that on a standalone server and just isolate it over there. | ||
| I don't really think that's possible. | ||
| So I... Based off of this deductive reasoning, it had to do something in the four years of the Biden administration. | ||
| So I'm either thinking about Hunter Biden and whatever Hunter Biden was up to or whatever Hunter Biden files there might have been, or perhaps what the Biden administration was doing to Donald Trump when it comes to all the legal attacks on him, maybe even specifically the Mar-a-Lago raid. | ||
| So that's kind of where my reasoning takes me to figure out what are they trying to delete right now. | ||
| And I know we're speculating, to clarify here, but that's what my deductive reasoning takes me to conclude, that it had to be something during the four years of the Biden administration. | ||
| What do you feel about that? | ||
| That sounds like sound reasoning to me, Owen, because the primary pitfall of the FBI, or at least a lot of... | ||
| People who promote within the FBI is their hubris. | ||
| So I like where you're headed with this because I think it gives a lot of credibility to what happened in the last four years. | ||
| We saw the lawfare front and center against Donald Trump, against even people like you or maybe even like me to some degree. | ||
| I wouldn't say definitely not at a level like the Trumps. | ||
| So I like this theory of yours because... | ||
| The FBI, or high-ranking officials in the FBI and in government, probably didn't think Donald Trump was going to win. | ||
| I fully admit, I didn't think Donald Trump was going to win. | ||
| I was as shocked as anybody when he did. | ||
| And so then it starts this effect. | ||
| They probably thought, oh crap, what are we going to do now? | ||
| And got to work starting to destroy evidence right out of the gate, right after November 5th. | ||
| And I think that you can stretch that across. | ||
| FBI, CIA, NSA, probably any of the intel communities. | ||
| Because I heard recently, too, that the CIA had similar standalone type servers. | ||
| So it really does make you think, with the division we've seen in our country, I think you can certainly point to at least the Washington, D.C. elements of a lot of these agencies. | ||
| And I'm open to discussing them writ large. | ||
| But certainly the headquarters elements basically having a subversive... | ||
| Well, and of course we already know, and we're being told the criminal investigations are ongoing. | ||
| Cash already knows all this information, by the way, and so does Dan Bongino, and maybe we'll kind of go there next when it comes to the illegal operations on Donald Trump in 2015 and 16. So that was the Obama years, and then of course what they did In the Biden years as well. | ||
| But I guess, I mean, my assumption would be that whatever sources you have internally at the FBI, if they're willing to talk to you, they're obviously going to be going to Kash Patel as well. | ||
| And I would imagine they would probably do that immediately. | ||
| And there'd probably be multiple people reporting the same things to you, reporting them to Kash. | ||
| And I don't know if you can't answer this, but... | ||
| Is there any way, you kind of mentioned earlier that there's no way to recover it, but what can Kash Patel do about things that happened before he became FBI director? | ||
| I mean, aside from maybe firing people that might have been caught doing it, is there anything he can do as far as seeking justice for the American people with this stuff? | ||
| Or is it kind of like what's been done is done and he can only move forward? | ||
| No, he certainly can move back to some degree if there's enough evidence. | ||
| I mean, this is criminal. | ||
| You can't have people in the FBI actively destroying files, whether they're on a standalone server or some regular server. | ||
| That's criminal in nature. | ||
| So they certainly could, especially now that he's the FBI director, if they do an investigation and they determine some of the people involved by name, what their level of activity was, if it rises to a probable cause threshold. | ||
| As far as criminal statutes go, they certainly can move forward with criminal charges in that case. | ||
| And now that he has been sworn in as FBI director, certainly FBI employees can start going to him. | ||
| The legal term is a designated authority. | ||
| In the FBI, if you want to make a protected disclosure, you can make it to your first-level supervisor, on through your chain of command, and the FBI is... | ||
| Director is explicitly listed as a designated authority. | ||
| So people certainly can start going to Director Patel and start making protective disclosures right to him about some of this information. | ||
| And honestly, they could provide more information because some of what I'm being told, I'm probably not getting all the details because it's probably classified. | ||
| And so somebody is not going to tell me something classified because that opens up a whole other can of worms for them. | ||
| But they can tell classified material to the director of the FBI. And I would encourage them to do so because he's the director now. | ||
| So use the authorities you have as an FBI employee to start making those protected disclosures right to him. | ||
| FBI whistleblower and great American patriot veteran Garrett O'Boyle is our guest here. | ||
| And you and the group, you guys refer to yourself as the Suspendables now. | ||
| You mentioned Steve Friend earlier and, of course, Kyle Serafin as well. | ||
| You guys were kind of in on what's being referred to as the intel agency wars now by members of Congress, Republican members of Congress, talking about intel agency wars. | ||
| Would you like to expand on that concept, intel agency wars? | ||
| What do you think that actually means for the American people that might see that? | ||
| What is the intel agency war happening right now? | ||
| The one happening right now is subversive Marxists in these institutions. | ||
| By no means is it everybody, because since the election, and then definitely after Donald Trump nominated Cash Patel to be the FBI director, and again, even more so since Cash was confirmed last week, people in the FBI that I'm hearing from are really excited about the change. | ||
| They're looking forward. | ||
| I had multiple people who don't know each other tell me, and from different field offices. | ||
| Tell me that they are looking forward to being able to be proud of telling people that they work for the FBI again. | ||
| Now, of course, this isn't something that's going to happen overnight. | ||
| But when you talk about this intel war, and I think we saw it, it was today or yesterday, that the CIA is, there are people there who are threatening to sell classified information to foreign actors if the current administration doesn't do what they want. | ||
| Well, that is called a coup. | ||
| And that is what subversive Marxists in government are actively trying to do. | ||
| Like I mentioned, based on people I know in the FBI, it started right after Donald Trump was elected on November 5th. | ||
| So, yes, we had a peaceful transition of power, but there are people who are actively working to subvert the current government. | ||
| You know, you just said something that I think is so important. | ||
| And, look, I mean, I'm all for abolishing the FBI, I'll be honest. | ||
| But that's more of a... | ||
| I'm with you on that. | ||
| But that's more of kind of a libertarian, you know, tiny, minuscule government you can fit into a thimble type of mindset that I have. | ||
| But actually what you said is very key here. | ||
| And I would kind of rephrase it to say this is an opportunity for the FBI to restore its image. | ||
| There was a time where the FBI was highly respected. | ||
| There was a time where an FBI agent was looked at like You know, like a hero. | ||
| I mean, you know, kids that wanted to be in law enforcement or a spy, you know, stuff like that, they wanted to work for the FBI. They wanted to catch bad guys. | ||
| It was kind of like a badass job to have. | ||
| Now these agents, like, oh yeah, they want to say it under their breath and kind of mumble it because it's like, it's an embarrassment how corrupt the FBI has become. | ||
| This is like a redemption opportunity for the FBI. I mean, I can think about, I mean, how many examples might people have in their life where You had an opportunity and you failed. | ||
| For whatever it was. | ||
| For your sports team, your family, your office. | ||
| Big opportunity and you whiffed it. | ||
| You blew it. | ||
| But then you had the next opportunity and you thought, okay, this is my chance for redemption. | ||
| I can deliver here and I can redeem my failures and we can be back on track here and everything can be great. | ||
| I mean, I can think about instances in my life. | ||
| I'm sure a lot of people can think about instances in their life. | ||
| Your chance at redemption, right? | ||
| This is a... | ||
| Huge chance at redemption. | ||
| And so I think about Cash Matilda, I think about these FBI agents. | ||
| I mean, you're sitting here with the biggest criminal enterprise in the history of this country. | ||
| The deep state, USAID, everything Doge is exposing, the illegal spying on Trump, everything they did against Trump. | ||
| I mean, assassinations going back from the JFK thing. | ||
| I mean, so you're sitting here with an opportunity to hit the game-winning shot. | ||
| Game 7, NBA Finals. | ||
| You've got the ball in your hand with three seconds left on the clock, down by two, a three-point shot. | ||
| I mean, do you think that—does Cash Patel have this mindset? | ||
| Do you think members in the FBI still—like, do they realize this is our chance at redemption? | ||
| Like, we can save the FBI as an institution, and we can expose the biggest criminals of all time and arrest the biggest criminals in the history of this country and redeem it. | ||
| Do you think that mindset exists? | ||
| I do think it exists. | ||
| I've heard from people across the country and various field offices that are eager to restore that image. | ||
| And I certainly know from conversations with Cash that that is his goal. | ||
| That's what he wants. | ||
| And the thing I probably love the most about Cash and what he is looking forward to doing with the FBI is restoring it to its rigorous obedience to the Constitution. | ||
| He talks about his love for the Constitution and his background and even how he ended up or his family ended up in America and how, as a first-generation American, his love for this country. | ||
| And I think even with his past work in government, what he saw, and now in the position he's in, he knows that it's Game 7. He knows that he's in a tremendous position to help not only restore the FBI, but... | ||
| Restore people's faith in the FBI. You mentioned FBI agents mumbling under their breath. | ||
| I'm with the FBI. I started to see that when I was there. | ||
| And it turned quickly for me to introduce myself, show my creds, because often you're going to a police department or a sheriff's office and you're following up on whatever lead you have or whatever, and they're often the best place to start. | ||
| And as soon as you say FBI, they kind of look at you side-eyed. | ||
| That started when I was there. | ||
| And I know from people who are still there that it only got worse over time. | ||
| But I would often then say, I used to be a police officer, though, and that would help kind of break the ice and help kind of build some trust and rapport. | ||
| And I know that that is one of Cash's goals, too, is to start building stronger bonds and relationships with local and state departments. | ||
| We used to hear about it all the time under Chrissy Ray about how he would talk always about our local and state partners. | ||
| But for people who work there... | ||
| And including me when I was there, you knew because you were going out and doing it that that trust didn't exist. | ||
| So I'm hopeful and I'm eager to see what Director Patel will do going forward. | ||
| I know he's got the right mindset for it and that he really does want it. | ||
| And he knows. | ||
| He knows that's a heavy lift. | ||
| It's a heavy lift because it has gotten so bad. | ||
| But if there's one man for the job, he's the person I advocated for all along. | ||
| And I'm going to continue to do that, and I hope he proves all of us right. | ||
| Garrett O'Boyle is my guest, FBI whistleblower. | ||
| We have a short break coming up here, and I want to get some more thoughts from Garrett on the other side. | ||
| But, you know, to kind of conclude with what you were just saying, when I was dealing with the FBI after the indictments and everything, I met some field agents in the process, like when I was turning over some stuff, and I could tell even, like, even they were kind of embarrassed. | ||
| Like, even they were like, yeah, we know that you're not a bad guy, but we have to come here and deal with you anyway. | ||
| So, like, even them, they were nice young guys, but they were like, yeah, this is like... | ||
| Eh, sorry, we kind of have to take your stuff here. | ||
| We know you're not the bad guy, so, I mean, people get it, folks. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where the hidden agendas are laid bare, welcome to the War Room with Owen Schroyer. | |
| Really appreciate Garrett O'Boyle's time today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| V-Suspendables.com You can also read his work, lastline.substack.com or at GOBactual on X. He also does a podcast with fellow suspendable Stephen Friend. | ||
| And so all kinds of ways you can follow up with Garrett O'Boyle. | ||
| And I guess Garrett, and we're concluding with you here, is this, how can I ask this? | ||
| Is there any interest from you or any of the suspendables in getting back into your agency work, or have you moved on? | ||
| Oh, and that is a good question, man. | ||
| It's one I contemplate. | ||
| I didn't used to really contemplate it. | ||
| I thought, okay, we move forward. | ||
| We fight this. | ||
| The day I got suspended, when I got walked out, I remember vividly thinking, I will fight this. | ||
| With every waking breath until I have one penny left to my name because I knew it was wrong. | ||
| I knew it was reprisal for the protected disclosures I made. | ||
| And that pretty much has been proven at this point. | ||
| We had other whistleblowers who I don't know. | ||
| They worked in the FBI's security division, what we call SECD, and they were working on my internal investigation and they became whistleblowers because of how corrupt and how evil and how... | ||
| Bad. | ||
| The things that were happening to me and my family were at the behest of their quote-unquote leaders in the FBI. So part of me says, if asked, if I'm asked to come back, part of me says, how can I say no? | ||
| But then on the other hand, I really just want to move to the mountains and be left alone. | ||
| But also, when I testified, I mentioned it in my opening statement, it comes from Isaiah 6-8. | ||
| Here am I, send me. | ||
| That's kind of become a motto of all of ours. | ||
| And so I don't have a firm answer right now, and I've not been told. | ||
| I've not been asked to come back yet. | ||
| So there are still things we're working on to try to resolve the whistleblower retaliation that I face, and that's true of Kyle and Steve as well, and others that aren't publicly known. | ||
| So we'll see what happens, but I don't have a good answer for you on if I would or not. | ||
| What do you think? | ||
| What do you think I can do? | ||
| I'm sure it's something you've been contemplating with the recent developments. | ||
| I almost don't even want to answer that question because this is a you thing. | ||
| But since you asked, I think what I'd like to see is the suspendables basically take, let's say, a one-year offer. | ||
| Just sign a one-year deal to get in there and just do a job. | ||
| Just get in there, fulfill a duty. | ||
| And then give one last salute out the door. | ||
| That'd kind of be what I'd like to see from you guys. | ||
| You deserve the redemption. | ||
| And I think that that would be kind of the perfect closure arc for everything you guys have gone through and done, is to just get in there, sign a short-term contract, if you will, complete a mission, and then get rewarded on the way out the door. | ||
| That would be kind of the beautiful conclusion. | ||
| But again, I mean, for you and for Kyle, I don't really know Steve well. | ||
| I don't talk to him. | ||
| I do talk to Kyle. | ||
| You guys, it sounds like mentally you guys are beyond it. | ||
| It sounds like mentally you guys are kind of beyond it. | ||
| You've moved on. | ||
| You've accepted your new life. | ||
| You both want to live in the mountains away from everybody. | ||
| So I respect that. | ||
| But I feel like, I don't know, it would be great redemption to see you guys just get in there, finish one more mission, and then get accolades and rewards out the door in a short-term contract. | ||
| So that would be my response. | ||
| But my final question for you is this. | ||
| And you do have the Kash Patel hoodie on there, so I think I have a pretty good idea where your mind is at. | ||
| But I look at it like this. | ||
| We have Kash Patel and Dan Bongino now leading the FBI. These are two men who have literally written the books on FBI corruption, literally. | ||
| They've done hours of broadcasting, talking about laying it all out, all the corruption. | ||
| I mean, they know the names, they know the players, they know the dates, they know the whole flowchart of the corruption, and now they're running the FBI. I mean, to me, and this kind of goes back to the earlier question, to me, if we can't fix the FBI with Patel and Bongino, then it's toast. | ||
| It's done. | ||
| I mean, this is as good as it's going to get. | ||
| You can't... | ||
| You can't pick two better guys for this role at this time. | ||
| And if they can't do it, then nobody can. | ||
| And I'm not saying they can't do it. | ||
| I'm just saying it's like, this is it. | ||
| Like, these are the best guys. | ||
| You couldn't ask for a better duo there. | ||
| So, I mean, if we can't fix the FBI with those two, we can't do it. | ||
| So my final question is, how much faith do you have, let's say, in Patel and Bongino to fix the FBI? And can you even think about? | ||
| The results that they're going to get, or what are your expectations? | ||
| I'm coming in hopeful, which is not a word I've used very often in the last 29 months. | ||
| And I know that both of those guys have the heart and the determination to do what must be done. | ||
| And they also have a tremendous amount of doing ahead of them. | ||
| So they know, like you said, they've written the book on FBI corruption. | ||
| Especially over the last decade or so. | ||
| They both are well aware of it, and now they're in these positions. | ||
| And that being said, there's going to be Vipers around every turn. | ||
| And a lot of those Vipers are going to look pretty or like they belong there. | ||
| They're going to play nice. | ||
| They're going to act nice. | ||
| They're going to pretend to be on Cash and Dan's side. | ||
| And those guys are smart. | ||
| I'm sure they already know that that's going to happen or is happening. | ||
| And what they need to avoid more than anything is getting insulated from being involved in the restoration because historically that's what we've seen. | ||
| You had Chris Ray there who was completely just an empty suit who got insulated right out of the gates and the FBI was run by the deputy director under him. | ||
| And now we have Dan Mangino as a deputy director. | ||
| And in a large way, the deputy director is who kind of runs or oversees the day-to-day operations of the Bureau. | ||
| And so when you got a duo like Cash Patel and Dan Bongino there, I do have a lot of hope early on, but I'm also just going to be observing. | ||
| If they don't bring me back, I'll just be observing ad nauseum to see what they do. | ||
| But I know that they want to rectify some of these issues. | ||
| Absolutely means holding people accountable. | ||
| I don't think that's something we've really seen in recent history, but it must be done. | ||
| You know, you mentioned my substack, which thanks for doing that, but recently I've been going down a little bit of a rabbit hole regarding revolutions in the 1980s, and the ones I've touched on recently were in Czechoslovakia and in Romania. | ||
| In both places, had secret police organizations. | ||
| In both places... | ||
| Even after the fall of the Berlin Wall and the overturning of their communist governments, the remnants of those secret police organizations in those countries persisted. | ||
| And some even say that they persist today. | ||
| And I think when we look at the history of the FBI, through the Hoover era, certainly you had things like COINTELPRO, but even on to the present with Russiagate, with these servers that we were talking about, these standalone servers that... | ||
| People are destroying evidence on. | ||
| That is what a secret police organization looks like. | ||
| That being said, there still are good people there. | ||
| I know them. | ||
| They talk to me. | ||
| Like we talked about, they want to look forward to saying that they're proud to work for the FBI again. | ||
| So it's not going to take just Kash Patel and Dan Bongino. | ||
| It's going to take all of the people who actually meant that oath to the Constitution to step up, to step forward, and to bring true resolution. | ||
| To the malfeasance that they see or have seen. | ||
| And they need to start naming names and people need to be held accountable. | ||
| If there's no accountability, the FBI will just work its way through this era and its history and proceed into marching down that deep, dark path of being a secret police organization itself. | ||
| Well said, and I think that that applies not just to the FBI, but everything in D.C. right now. | ||
| I think that that same logic needs to apply to everything in Washington, D.C. Garrett O'Boyle, really appreciate your time today. | ||
| Great interview, and we will be in touch, and I'm sure there's going to be interesting developments in the coming months, and maybe you'll be a part of them. | ||
| Sounds good. | ||
| Thanks for having me on. | ||
| Of course, there goes Garrett O'Boyle. | ||
| Really appreciate his time. | ||
| We're going to upload the entire interview to band.video. | ||
| We're going to upload the entire interview on X as well on my account at owensroyer1776. | ||
| Probably put it on the Alex Jones account as well because it's just such a key interview. | ||
| So be on the lookout for that. | ||
| Share with family and friends. | ||
| If you really want to understand what's going on behind the scenes, that's about as good of a source from outside the lines as you're going to get right there in case you couldn't tell. | ||
| Now, quickly, let's do this since it's back trending and in season. | ||
| I believe this was from, I didn't actually check the date. | ||
| I think this was from, was it September 2021 when this originally happened? | ||
| But we re-shared the video. | ||
| James Comey back in the news as reports are that he's being investigated for the illegal spy operation and what they did to Donald Trump. | ||
| Do you remember this moment for new audience members? | ||
| You may not have been around for this. | ||
| I actually had an opportunity to meet James Comey, and it went like this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah! | |
| James Comey! | ||
| James Comey! | ||
| The fired FBI director, James Comey! | ||
| The deep state hero, James Comey! | ||
| The Democrat hero, James Comey! | ||
| You did it! | ||
| He illegally investigated Donald Trump! | ||
| Thank you, Comey, for weaponizing the FBI against Donald Trump! | ||
| Thank you for covering up Hillary Clinton's crimes and setting the stage for the FBI to cover up the Biden crimes too. | ||
| Come on, y'all! | ||
| Let's hear it for James Comey! | ||
|
unidentified
|
Come on, we love the FBI! We love the federal government! | |
| You guys won! | ||
| You don't love the FBI? | ||
| You guys don't appreciate James Comey weaponizing the government against Donald Trump? | ||
| Come on, James, don't you? | ||
| You two are happy. | ||
| Donald Trump is the bad guy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We should be happy if Comey weaponized the government against Trump. | |
| What the heck? | ||
| I'm just, I... | ||
| I don't understand, he's a hero. | ||
| Oh man, I'm so excited. | ||
| I don't know why these people aren't as excited as me. | ||
| Sorry, my excitement officer. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We are here because of the work of the students. | |
| For those of you that have questions, please know that we have no cards outside. | ||
| If you could just write your questions and bring them, I will work through each of the questions. | ||
| They're gonna screen your questions. | ||
| Who killed Epstein? | ||
|
unidentified
|
I was four years old when I was doing that work. | |
| And so I feel like I'm totally invested. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It was obvious it should be a woman that's pretty bad. | |
| And so I couldn't go to the trial. | ||
| She didn't mean anything. | ||
| We're also in the middle of seven, three-year-olds. | ||
|
unidentified
|
This is where I get the whole life part of it, I can say, from the other girls. | |
| My view of life, my whole existence is in shape. | ||
| I've been surrounded by... | ||
| My heart is beating out of my chest. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's interesting because you... | |
| What an honor, guys, I'll tell you. | ||
| To actually see the disgraced and fired FBI director in person. | ||
| It was truly a magnanimous occasion for me. | ||
| We'd like you to leave. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, you'd like me to leave? | |
| Oh, she'd like me to leave. | ||
| Comey can stay, though, right? | ||
| Comey's cool, right? | ||
| We love James Comey. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, he didn't disrupt the library. | |
| James Comey. | ||
| He just disrupted the whole country. | ||
| Yeah, he didn't disrupt the library. | ||
| James Comey just disrupted the entire country and a presidential election and a presidential term for Donald Trump. | ||
| But, wow, I mean, my heart is just fluttering that I got to see James Comey. | ||
| Now, there's a full about 10-minute video that has a lot more to it that was on bandop video. | ||
| I just kind of cut that up for a two-minute upload to X because people like the shorter videos there. | ||
| But there were also other crew members there that confronted him. | ||
| There were also our friends over at the Liberty Broadcast that were there filming and confronted him as well. | ||
| So we may try to get actually all of that footage if we can by the end of the show for your viewing pleasure because there's nothing like confronting a corrupt bureaucrat. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yes. | |
| And now James Comey apparently is under investigation for his corruption. | ||
| So that's long overdue. | ||
| By the way, like one of the parts that we cut out of that was the fact he's talking about how he appointed his daughter to handle the Maxwell case. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hmm. | |
| That's not suspicious at all. | ||
| No. | ||
| Of course not. | ||
| Totally normal stuff. | ||
| I'm sure it was all above board. | ||
| With James Comey running the FBI. Yeah. | ||
| Yeah, so we'll see. | ||
| We'll see what James Comey's fate and legacy ends up being. | ||
| Now, General Flynn has been doing some interviews today. | ||
| He said James Comey is going to prison. | ||
| And the only way Comey is not going to prison is if he turns and gives up somebody higher than him. | ||
| In other words, cooperates with a criminal investigation and gives up a shark bigger than him, which would have to be pretty big when you're the director of the FBI when this stuff is going on. | ||
| So that's going to be some things developing there. | ||
| I don't think the James Comey saga is over quite yet. | ||
| No, I don't think so at all. | ||
| What is the other clip that we have? | ||
| I'm talking to the crew. | ||
| Okay, well, let's go to it now, then. | ||
| This is also our friends at the Liberty Broadcast and the Infowars crew. | ||
| After they escorted me out, the Infowars crew had a bit of their own moment there with Comey. | ||
| We'll go ahead and air that now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
My name is Rachel. | |
| I'm a local here in Austin, and I just have a few questions. | ||
| Firstly, is the fact that you're a criminal, did that make it easy for you to write a criminal novel like this one? | ||
| And then also, would you be writing any new novels about your own criminal doing? | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Appreciate it. | ||
| Is that a no? | ||
| I'm sorry. | ||
| Did it make it easier for you to write this novel? | ||
| I'm really asking. | ||
| This is a real question. | ||
| A lot of people want to know. | ||
| If it was easier for you, since you have so much knowledge in being critical. | ||
| Are you a friend of a Trump president? | ||
| You can come back tomorrow, but I do need to remember today for some things. | ||
| I was just asking, I know. | ||
| We're done with that. | ||
| We'd like to be totally perfect at you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| I'm sorry, I'm sorry. | ||
| So, ladies and gentlemen, that's what we did. | ||
| You're a liar and a fraud. | ||
| You're the one who should be in jail, Comey. | ||
| You're the one who should be indicted. | ||
| Not Trump. | ||
| You got a fake still dossier. | ||
| Don't worry. | ||
| You think we're not coming back? | ||
| Cutting the crew short there. | ||
| They had more gas in the tank. | ||
| That's what we do, folks. | ||
| That's what we do here at Infobars. | ||
| So, going back in time. | ||
| Was that 2021, guys? | ||
| I think that was 2021. Oh, that was only 2023? | ||
| Good Lord. | ||
| It's a blur, man. | ||
| It's a blur. | ||
| That was June 2023. Some of my crew back there, they were there, they were filming, they were confronting. | ||
| Was that... | ||
| Man, is it me or guys? | ||
| Is the time just a blur now? | ||
| That seems like so long ago. | ||
| But it was just barely two years now. | ||
| Holy smokes. | ||
| James Comey with his book deal. | ||
| They always get a book deal, don't they? | ||
| So, that's what we do here at InfoWars. | ||
| And if you like what we do, we would encourage you to support our work. | ||
| And keeping us on air and... | ||
| Not just the work that we do here on air 10 hours a day, but if you've noticed, Alex is putting out more reports than ever. | ||
| I'm back out on the street shooting hours of video at these events. | ||
| And so we got all kinds of stuff that we're still doing, despite being under massive attack all the time and all the burden and stress they put just to try to shut this thing down. | ||
| Now, no, we're still on air thanks to your continued support at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And we have our audience appreciation sale happening right now, our audience appreciation sale. | ||
| Some of the items on sale include 30% off all T-shirts and hoodies, 60% off supplements like Hydro Force, and so much more. | ||
| When you shop at thealexjonesstore.com right now, you're going to get a free bottle of the 30-day gut cleanse with every order. | ||
| Plus orders over $50. | ||
| We'll get a free hat. | ||
| And that is the InfoWars. | ||
| Trucker hat. | ||
| A free hat with all orders over $50. | ||
| So go do some shopping. | ||
| Support InfoWars. | ||
| Go do some shopping at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
| The t-shirts, the hoodies, the hats, the supplements, all of it. | ||
| It's your support there that keeps us on the air. | ||
| And of course, we want to express extra gratitude and appreciation to our VIP members at TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP. It's that sustained membership that budgets us into the future. | ||
| Find out all the benefits of becoming a VIP member by going to thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP, and you'll see all the benefits that come along with that membership. | ||
| So very appreciative of our VIP members and very grateful to our audience continuing to shop at thealexjonesstore.com and making everything we do here possible. | ||
| Okay, let's... | ||
| What should we hit here? | ||
| Let's hit the illegal immigration news quickly. | ||
| I think we can do that. | ||
| Now, Christy Noah made a pretty big announcement. | ||
| But you had this happening. | ||
| And anybody in Texas, specifically in Houston, has known about this for a long time. | ||
| And I think this investigation is just getting started with how bad it is. | ||
| Colony Ridge, Texas, illegal immigrant operation. | ||
| 118 have been arrested, according to the latest ICE report. | ||
| Housing development that was literally funded and built for non-citizens, for illegal immigrants. | ||
| A massive development complex. | ||
| And it kind of turned into a bit of a disaster. | ||
| But that was the plan to have this huge housing development all for illegal immigrants. | ||
| It kind of fell apart. | ||
| And then there were people just living on trailers and people living in empty lots. | ||
| Some of the houses got built. | ||
| Some of them got halfway built and then got occupied. | ||
| But... | ||
| They've gone in there and they're just finding pretty much everybody there is an illegal alien, which is exactly. | ||
| That was the cause. | ||
| They were trying to bring them all into Texas. | ||
| And this was part of the operation to probably turn Texas blue, maybe even over the times, move all of these illegal aliens into this part of Texas, gerrymander, flip a couple red districts blue, ultimately try to flip the state if they can. | ||
| So they all are getting arrested and hopefully deported. | ||
| Now, you also had this story. | ||
| Uber Eats driver accused of raping delivery customer. | ||
| And it was a Colombian national. | ||
| I wonder how he got into the country and how he got a job. | ||
| And so, I mean, you don't want to instill fear. | ||
| But I've been talking about this for a long time now. | ||
| And I guess it's major cities where this is the biggest problem. | ||
| This is in Massachusetts. | ||
| I mean, you can't even, it's like in the service industry, you can't even find people that speak English anymore. | ||
| It's crazy, and it causes a disruption. | ||
| And now you have probably illegal aliens getting Uber Eats driver jobs, and this one accused of raping a woman. | ||
| Yikes. | ||
| Thanks, Democrats. | ||
| Here's Christy Noem talking about the Alien Registration Act. | ||
| She makes this announcement earlier today, clip eight. | ||
| He joins me now. | ||
| All right, Secretary, what do you guys have in store? | ||
| Well, we are putting in place and enforcing the Alien Registration Act, which is using every single tool that we have at our disposal to do exactly what President Trump promised the American people. | ||
| The Alien Registration Act says that within 30 days of being in this country illegally, someone must register with the federal government. | ||
| They will be fingerprinted. | ||
| They must announce that they are here. | ||
| And if they do so, they can avoid criminal charges and fines, and we will help them relocate right back to their home country. | ||
| And what this does is provide them an opportunity to come back someday and to be a part of the American dream. | ||
| If they don't register, they're breaking the federal law, which has always been in place. | ||
| We're just going to start enforcing it to make sure that these aliens go back home. | ||
| And when they want to be an American, then they can come and visit us again. | ||
| All right, so this act, I mean, this is from 1940. This is Roosevelt. | ||
| This is signed into law by a Democrat president and has been on the books. | ||
| I mean, that's what they're supposed to be doing now, we're saying. | ||
| They're supposed to have registered with the federal government. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Where are they supposed to be registering? | |
| Well, we have a website that is live now. | ||
| It's at USCIS forward slash alien registration. | ||
| You can go there now. | ||
| And these folks that are here in this country illegally can self-register. | ||
| They can avoid the criminal charges. | ||
| They can avoid the fines. | ||
| And we will help them go home. | ||
| And what that provides for them is a safer environment. | ||
| It's safer for our communities. | ||
| It saves us taxpayer dollars. | ||
| And it allows them an opportunity to come back to this country and to be an American and to live the American dream, which is truly what our Now think about this, folks. | ||
| The Democrats would try to get as much funding and as much individuals involved in processing illegal aliens into the country. | ||
| Total criminal activity, total invasion, and they would get lawyers and they would turn all these law enforcement... | ||
| Bureaucracies into illegal immigration wings. | ||
| Literally. | ||
| Well, now, and this is a good plan to get self-deportation, but you watch. | ||
| They're going to struggle to even be able to run this operation. | ||
| And the same money and effort that went into processing these people into the country could be used to process them out of the country, but you're not going to get the fervor from the Democrats, are you? | ||
| They want them here. | ||
| They ran the invasion. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The American way of life is under attack. | |
| This is The War Room. | ||
| Black shadow hanging over your shoulder. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The woke mind virus. - What I can show. | |
| Can the people of California defeat the woke mind virus? | ||
| Nicole Shanahan asks that question, and she put this video up on her X account today. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Clip 10. Deep in the heart of Los Angeles lies a terrible and menacing monster. | |
| Born out of the swampy depths of hell and unleashed upon the citizens of the world. | ||
| A mass contagion of manipulation. | ||
| It is the woke mind virus, a disease designed for destruction and despair. | ||
| The woke mind virus thrives on crime and corruption. | ||
| The woke mind virus wreaks havoc upon unwilling minds. | ||
| Even Newsom, you know, the governor of California, you'd think he'd have his hands full right now considering all the problems that California has. | ||
| He's got time for a new podcast. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| Gavin Newsom, he says he's launching a new podcast. | ||
| He's going to change the conversation. | ||
| He's going to be talking to people he disagrees with, people he looks up to, and the listeners, he says. | ||
| Egg prices, tariffs, doughs, we're tackling all your big questions. | ||
| And he wants you to subscribe, so he's going to make some nice money, I'm sure, for his new $10 million mansion. | ||
| Gavin Newsom, the governor of California, isn't busy enough destroying the state. | ||
| He's got time for a podcast, too. | ||
| Let's hear his announcement, clip 12. We need to change the conversation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's why I'm launching a new podcast. | |
| And this is going to be anything but the ordinary politician podcast. | ||
| I'm going to be talking to people directly that I disagree with, as well as people I look up to. | ||
| But more important than anything else, I'll be talking directly with you, the listener. | ||
| Real Conversations. | ||
| What's going on with the cost of eggs? | ||
|
unidentified
|
What are the impacts, real impacts to you, around tariffs? | |
| What power does an executive order really have? | ||
| And what's really going on inside of Doge? | ||
| Look, there's an onslaught of information that we take in. | ||
| So let's take it to the sources without the typical political mumbo-jumbo. | ||
| In the first few weeks, we're going to be sitting down with some of the biggest leaders and architects in the MAGA movement. | ||
| This is Gavin Newsom. | ||
| Huh. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| The biggest people in the MAGA movement. | ||
| What is really going on with this? | ||
| You know, there's a couple observations that I have here. | ||
| One, he's somebody... | ||
| I mean, there's no effort for whatever setup they have there. | ||
| I'm sure that was an office in his house. | ||
| They literally just installed a microphone and a light and a camera. | ||
| So barely any effort to even make it look like a studio or professional at all, which, I mean, it doesn't... | ||
| Maybe even matter anymore. | ||
| But it's like, okay, how much effort are you really putting into this? | ||
| But is it him trying to come across more moderate to save his political career? | ||
| Is it him desperate as a failed Democrat leader of California to try to reinstill some positive vibes so that he can run for president again? | ||
| Is it just a straight-up propaganda operation? | ||
| As they're losing the narrative war and the information war to just have another outlet for pure Democrat Party propaganda? | ||
| But how is he able to do it? | ||
| How does he have time? | ||
| He's the governor of California, a state that's collapsing, and he's now doing a podcast. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Unmasking the elite's deceptions. | |
| Welcome to the War Room with Owen Schroer. | ||
| So we had a lot of shakeups happening in the media right now, a lot of them. | ||
| And the White House press pool is going to be one of them. | ||
| The White House Correspondents and all of its elitists are angry that the White House is taking back control of access and are now opening up access for other people to get in there. | ||
| So really it's long overdue with the changing media landscape. | ||
| It's also long overdue because of the power plays that the White House Correspondents Group has been doing. | ||
| Very elitist group, very pompous group. | ||
| It's actually kind of funny, you know, you can see that they're threatened now. | ||
| Like Jackie Heinrich, who's won a couple awards. | ||
| She does a decent job. | ||
| She's not really that groundbreaking. | ||
| She just gets the access is why she's rewarded and so popular is because she has the access. | ||
| So you can see even with Jackie Heinrich from Fox News, she's like panicked about this. | ||
| So it shows the, what is the word to use here? | ||
| Lack of confidence, fear. | ||
| It shows how they know, and it's the same with the mainstream media. | ||
| They know that really, at the end of the day, they're not in a competition. | ||
| They get the access, they get the airwaves, and virtually there is no competition to make them irrelevant or to expose them. | ||
| For really not being that talented. | ||
| And so even Jackie Heinrich is, like, freaking out over this thing and attacking people who are promoting the correspondence group, losing their power, and now there's going to be a new one in charge, and it's going to be open access for all people, and, like, even she's panicked. | ||
| It's like, yeah, you know, you're probably not going to be the only good-looking blonde in there anymore, are you? | ||
| You're probably not going to be the only one that gets to go in there and asks real questions because the rest of the media is a bunch of clowns and morons. | ||
| And propaganda agents. | ||
| So yeah, I guess your time of having it really easy up there is coming to an end. | ||
| And so you can see the fear of exposure. | ||
| I don't know why else she would be panicking over this because the logic doesn't add up. | ||
| But that's what's going on. | ||
| So Caroline Levitt took to the White House press podium to explain what the changes in the press pool are really all about here in clip seven. | ||
| As you all know, for decades, a group of D.C.-based journalists, the White House Correspondents Association, has long dictated which journalists get to ask questions of the President of the United States in these most intimate spaces. | ||
| Not anymore. | ||
| I am proud to announce that we are going to give the power back to the people who read your papers, who watch your television shows, and who listen to your radio stations. | ||
| Moving forward, the White House press pool will be determined by the White House press team. | ||
| Legacy outlets who have participated in the press pool for decades will still be allowed to join, fear not, but we will also be offering the privilege to well-deserving outlets who have never been allowed to share in this awesome responsibility. | ||
| Just like we added a new media seat in this briefing room, legacy media outlets who have been here for years will still participate in the pool. | ||
| But new voices are going to be welcomed in as well. | ||
| As part of these changes, we will continue the rotation amongst the five major television networks to ensure the president's remarks are heard far and wide around this world. | ||
| We will add additional streaming services, which reach different audiences than traditional cable and broadcast. | ||
| This is the ever-changing landscape of the media in the United States today. | ||
| We will continue to rotate a print pooler who has the great responsibility of quickly transcribing the president's remarks and disseminating them to the rest of the world. | ||
| And we will add outlets to the print pool rotation who have long been denied the privilege to partake in this experience but are committed to covering this White House beat. | ||
| We will continue to rotate a radio pooler and add other radio hosts who have been denied access, especially local radio hosts who serve as the heartbeat of our country. | ||
| And we will add additional outlets and reporters who are well-suited to cover the news of the day and ask substantive questions of the President of the United States, depending on the news he is making on that given day. | ||
| You know, I can only assume she's talking about WMAL, the D.C.-based radio station that does politics all day long and has some pretty big-name hosts on there that have some pretty big followings. | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| She says local radio. | ||
| I mean, that's the big hitter. | ||
| WMAL. So I assume that that's who she's talking about giving access to. | ||
| But think about how genius this actually is from the White House. | ||
| And it's really just long overdue common sense, but it's actually genius for them to be doing it right now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Because look at what... | |
| You think about White House or you think about government transmissions. | ||
| Historically speaking, they're not popular. | ||
| Nobody watches them. | ||
| The only way you would ever hear or see a clip, let's say you go back 10 years maybe. | ||
| Even 10 years ago, you're starting to kind of enter the new phase. | ||
| But you go back 20, 30 years, no. | ||
| Nobody is really watching C-SPAN. Even the press briefings, very low audience. | ||
| So it really was all about clips. | ||
| And it's still about clips. | ||
| It might even be more about clips. | ||
| I'm just saying nobody saw it, nobody heard it, unless somebody clipped it out for a TV show, for a radio show. | ||
| And so these legacy media outlets, like she's talking about, that are clearly jealous, it's like a King of the Hill thing. | ||
| Or no, it's pettier than that. | ||
| It's like a high school lunch table. | ||
| And they don't want everybody to sit. | ||
| It's like, you can't sit with us. | ||
| That's what it's like. | ||
| It's like a petty... | ||
| High school popularity mean girls thing of you can't sit with us. | ||
| So it's really petty. | ||
| It's really immature. | ||
| And it's embarrassing, really, that they're showing their pettiness, that they're upset other people are going to get access. | ||
| They're not losing their access. | ||
| They're upset that other people are getting their access. | ||
| You can't sit with us. | ||
| So that gives you kind of the attitude, the arrogance, the pompousness, the pettiness of the White House press pool. | ||
| I don't mean to target... | ||
| Jackie Heinrich, but she was like, that was really sad. | ||
| She really showed her true colors with that one, which I just don't get, except that I guess she's part of the Mean Girls DC lunch table. | ||
| She didn't want anybody else to be there. | ||
| But think about how genius it is. | ||
| Now that government transmissions, whether it's these hearings that normally you would only have on the C-SPAN cable channels, now they're everywhere. | ||
| Now internet channels stream them. | ||
| Now, X channels stream them. | ||
| Popular streamers do live coverage. | ||
| Clips go massively viral. | ||
| These things are bigger than ever. | ||
| Government transmissions have never been bigger. | ||
| And the White House press pool is playing into that. | ||
| And they're going to tap into that, and they're going to say, we're going to provide access to everybody, and we're going to make it easier for everybody to watch. | ||
| Genius stuff. | ||
| Genius stuff. | ||
| Long overdue, but they're doing it the right way. | ||
| And so now what you're going to have is popular hosts and reporters and streamers and all this other stuff, they're going to get in there, they're going to get access, and they're going to make these things bigger than ever. | ||
| And there's going to be more people watching this stuff than ever before. | ||
| And so I guess the petty people that are afraid of competition don't like that. | ||
| They don't want anybody else getting that access because that's the only thing that keeps them relevant. | ||
| But when you hear liberal media outlets or Democrats complaining, saying, oh, you can't do this. | ||
| And by the way, they're lying about it. | ||
| Nobody's getting purged. | ||
| They're just opening up access. | ||
| And some of the legacy media that had permanent access doesn't have the permanent access anymore, but they're still going to get access. | ||
| But this is what happened in the Biden administration. | ||
| White House purges 442 reporters using new press credential rules. | ||
| Over the past three months, this was August 2023. Over the past three months, the number of reporters with access to the White House dropped by 31%. | ||
| There are now 442 fewer reporters with a coveted hard pass. | ||
| This is a press credential to get into the White House press room. | ||
| The result of new rules announced in May that took effect. | ||
| So this was the Biden White House. | ||
| They are the ones that limited access. | ||
| Trump and the Trump administration is opening access. | ||
| They're giving more access than ever. | ||
| They're making White House press briefings bigger than ever, more popular than ever, more watched than ever, more access than ever. | ||
| The Biden administration cut off access. | ||
| Literally. | ||
| But they didn't say a damn thing about it. | ||
| it. | ||
| They didn't make a national news event about it. | ||
| They didn't cry censorship. | ||
| They didn't cry foul. | ||
| They didn't complain when the Biden administration did it. | ||
| Now they have an issue, even though the Trump administration is doing the exact opposite of what they're claiming. | ||
| Isn't that amazing? | ||
| So just know that. | ||
| Just be informed on that when you start to see these propaganda hit pieces about the White House opening up the press pool. | ||
| Now, they've clearly accepted at this stage of the game. | ||
| That the White House Correspondents Association is done. | ||
| It's done. | ||
| It's on its last breaths. | ||
| It's basically been put into a defunctory status because of these new rules. | ||
| So what does the White House Correspondents Association do? | ||
| Well, they're working with MSNBC now to get the former head, Eugene Daniels, to be the new replacement for Joy Reid. | ||
| The only difference between Daniels and Reid Is that Daniels has natural hair on his head. | ||
| But this is, of course, a gay black man. | ||
| Very flamboyantly gay. | ||
| So that'll be fun. | ||
| That's going to provide plenty of comedic relief on MSNBC where we're going to be lacking it once Joy Reid is gone. | ||
| But they're replacing it with a new form of comedic relief. | ||
| So this guy's about as flamboyant as a queer man as you can get. | ||
| Looks very good in high heels. | ||
| Looks very good in dresses. | ||
| Looks very good posing with... | ||
| Man-lit Barbie. | ||
| I don't know what these guys are that he likes to pose with here. | ||
| He likes to wear nail polish. | ||
| Very trendy. | ||
| Looks like even here he might be wearing a man bra. | ||
| A man's ear, perhaps. | ||
| So this is, yeah. | ||
| This is your new replacement for Joy Reid. | ||
| Oh, and of course he's married to a white man. | ||
| Sheesh. | ||
| Every time, isn't it? | ||
| Every time they marry a white man. | ||
| What's up with that? | ||
| So this is your new replacement for Joy Reid. | ||
| That's going to be fun. | ||
| So we were all concerned. | ||
| We thought, what are we going to do without Joy Reid being our comedic relief on MSNBC? Don't worry. | ||
| Eugene Daniels will deliver. | ||
| So the former president of the White House Correspondents Association, now defunct, they're going to be replacing... | ||
| Joy Reid with him. | ||
| It's probably only a matter of time before he's fully put into the Joy Reid role. | ||
| They're kind of introducing him in weekend shows. | ||
| But my guess is they intend for him to probably follow Jen Psaki, is my guess. | ||
| Okay, well now hold on. | ||
| The crew is asking if it is his real hair. | ||
| I would say it's probably his real hair, but I guess I don't know. | ||
| I guess I don't know. | ||
| Can you still buy Jerry Curl? | ||
| You might have to go onto an eBay or something. | ||
| Or is Jerry Curl still on the market? | ||
| I'd say it's probably his real hair. | ||
| There might be a lot of product in it. | ||
| I'm sure he pampers it, but I'd say he's probably got the real hair. | ||
| But I don't know. | ||
| I guess that's a fair question. | ||
| We really can't say for sure, can't we? | ||
| Another media shake-up news here. | ||
| Again, let's see the results. | ||
| Jeff Bezos overhauls Washington Post opinion section says it will focus on personal liberties and free markets. | ||
| What does that sound like? | ||
| Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos said that the paper's opinion editor has decided to step away, decided to step away, as the section takes a new direction, focusing on personal liberties and free markets. | ||
| Now, I wouldn't expect the Washington Post to... | ||
| Become an honest source for information. | ||
| It will almost certainly still be anti-Trump propaganda through and through. | ||
| But you got to wonder, this has to do with Trump and Bezos and whatever relationship they have, whatever communications they've been having. | ||
| It might even have something to do with Jeff Bezos' personal politics changing a little bit. | ||
| I think Bezos really just goes wherever the wind blows more than anything, quite frankly. | ||
| But are we going to get like a tidbit, an inch kabibble of patriotism from the Washington Post? | ||
| Jeff Bezos claims he wants the opinion section to focus on personal liberties in free markets. | ||
| Now, of course, that could be construed to somehow become anti-Trump. | ||
| But I'm curious. | ||
| I must say. | ||
| I'm curious. | ||
| A couple other items here. | ||
| Protests are going on. | ||
| Actually, this is happening right now in California. | ||
| I mean, there might even be a live stream out there, guys. | ||
| I'm sure it's still going on. | ||
| There was a recall Gavin Newsom press conference in California today in Altadena. | ||
| SavingCalifornia.Vote. | ||
| Another recall of Gavin Newsom is underway. | ||
| Let's see what kind of momentum this one picks up. | ||
| But there's a press conference regarding this. | ||
| And Mel Gibson was one of the headline speakers. | ||
| Surprised that didn't get more press. | ||
| But that might have concluded. | ||
| It might still be going on. | ||
| So it looks like another recall of Gavin Newsom is underway. | ||
| Meanwhile... | ||
| The left, the Democrats, they have their own protest plans. | ||
| They've got some plans, too. | ||
| This one, well, starts Friday. | ||
| Alice Sharpton's DEI boycott plan. | ||
| A 24-hour blackout on Friday, February 28th. | ||
| This is the first step to counter the attack on DEI. So there is no DEI, but there is DEI. There is no racial discrimination, but there is racial discrimination. | ||
| And if you shut down the racial discrimination, then we'll protest against the shutdown of the racial discrimination, even though we deny the racial discrimination that we are clearly engaging in. | ||
| Sorry, just trying to catch up here. | ||
| So this is the Al Sharpton, the fake reverend who can't read. | ||
| Do not make any purchases. | ||
| Do not shop online at Amazon, Walmart, Best Buy, McDonald's, any fast food stores. | ||
| Don't use gas. | ||
| Gasoline, so I guess don't drive. | ||
| No major retailers. | ||
| Do not use credit or debit cards. | ||
| So they just want you to stay home all day? | ||
| Only support small local businesses. | ||
| Why it matters. | ||
| Corporations and banks only care about their bottom line. | ||
| And what about you, Al? | ||
| Did you ever pay those back taxes? | ||
| Al might support shutting down the IRS. Disrupting the economy for even one day sends a powerful message. | ||
| If they don't listen, we make the next blackout longer. | ||
| Blackout. | ||
| Our numbers are powerful. | ||
| This is how we make history. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm going to make a bold prediction. | |
| There will be no boycott. | ||
| Al Sharpton's boycott will fail massively. | ||
| In fact, maybe Friday I'll spend a little extra in support of ending DEI. Maybe I'll get a diverse group even to go out to dinner or something. | ||
| I'll get a diverse group. | ||
| I got some Asian friends. | ||
| I'll get some Mexican friends. | ||
| Get some black friends, some white friends. | ||
| You know, we'll get them all. | ||
| We'll get them all out there, and we'll all support ending DEI. Thanks, Al. | ||
| Yeah, how successful you think that will be? | ||
| Here's another one. | ||
| Jameel Hill. | ||
| She's not very bright. | ||
| If the White House insists on hand-picking reporters, it's the opposite. | ||
| It's been hand-picked reporters. | ||
| Now they're opening it up, so you're wrong right out of the gates, but it's expected. | ||
| You're not too smart. | ||
| If the White House insists on hand-picking reporters, and she'll be a victim when DEI is over. | ||
| She's a DEI. Yes. | ||
| Yes, the people that are begging for access, the people that are crying and wailing about not getting access or other people getting access, I'm sure that they will voluntarily give up their access. | ||
| Yes. | ||
| That's gonna work great. | ||
| The Al Sharpton boycott and the Jameel Hill boycott will both be miserable failures. | ||
| It's gonna be fun. | ||
| Yeah, the people that are begging for access to the White House and are begging for that territory to not be claimed ever by anyone else, I'm sure they're gonna voluntarily step away. | ||
| No, of course they're not gonna do that. | ||
| If anything, they'd be so scared to do that, they might just start living in the White House press room because they're so afraid of losing their access and losing their seat. | ||
| Good luck, though, Jamil. | ||
| Good luck. | ||
| Yeah. | ||
| They're trying, though. | ||
| You gotta give them that. | ||
| They are certainly trying, aren't they? | ||
| RFK Jr. targets psychiatric medications, SSRIs, in Childhood Health Review, claiming the drugs have been insufficiently scrutinized and are addictive. | ||
| When you learn about the kickbacks and why all these kids end up on these medications... | ||
| See, and here's the problem. | ||
| So now they're trying to blame... | ||
| Because let me tie these two stories together. | ||
| Now they're trying to blame RFK Jr. for a measles outbreak in Texas, which I guess you could call it an outbreak. | ||
| It's 124 cases, and one person has died. | ||
| And, of course, it's the unvaccinated child, a child who was not vaccinated that's died from measles in West Texas, the first death in an outbreak that began late last month. | ||
| So, of course, they're not going to cover how the measles came in from the southern border. | ||
| They're not going to talk about how the disease poured in from the southern border, the open borders, with the illegal aliens in Texas. | ||
| They're not going to talk about that. | ||
| But see, here's the double standard. | ||
| So, okay, because somebody decided not to vaccinate, they're to blame for an outbreak. | ||
| Or anybody that pushes against... | ||
| Vaccines. | ||
| They're to blame. | ||
| They're to blame for this outbreak. | ||
| But see, what about all the problems that children do have with health? | ||
| The mental problems, the anxiety problems, the chronic disease, all of that. | ||
| Well, nobody's supposed to be blamed for that. | ||
| And God forbid if RFK Jr. get in there and try to figure out what the hell's going on. | ||
| So you see the difference? | ||
| So they find one case. | ||
| They find one case of somebody that didn't get a vaccine that gets measles and dies. | ||
| They don't even tell you the real cause, which is the open borders pouring disease in. | ||
| But they find one case and they say, see, see, everybody gets vaccinated. | ||
| You must get vaccinated. | ||
| And RFK Jr., he's to blame because he's against vaccines. | ||
| So none of it is even in reality, but that's what they do. | ||
| But you have millions of kids. | ||
| Millions of kids with all kinds of mental disorders, all kinds of learning disabilities, all kinds of chronic disease. | ||
| It's a serious problem. | ||
| And we say, hey, let's find out what's going on with all the problems we have with the youth of the nation. | ||
| Let's get down to the bottom of it. | ||
| Let's review some of these things. | ||
| Let's observe some of these things. | ||
| Hmm, let's see all these prescription drugs that aren't seeming to help anything. | ||
| Let's review that. | ||
| Oh, no, no, no, no, no. | ||
| You don't dare. | ||
| You don't dare question the big pharmaceutical industry that pays for the media, pays for the government, owns them. | ||
| You don't dare do that. | ||
| But one case, one measles case, and a kid that didn't get a vaccine, we got to make a federal case of it. | ||
| We got to make a big deal of it. | ||
| We got to make sure everybody gets the vaccine. | ||
| And make sure anybody that thinks about not getting it is scared that their kid will die. | ||
| But when it's millions of kids suffering mental problems and chronic disease and RFK Jr. wants to do something about it, no. | ||
| No, we don't talk about that. | ||
| We don't make a case out of that. | ||
| Just the one kid that didn't get the vaccine. | ||
| That's what we talk about. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Unmasking the elite's deceptions. | |
| Welcome to the War Room with Owen Schroer. | ||
| All right, we got a couple of breaking news items here as we begin the last segment of today's Infowars War Room. | ||
| First, the IRS is closing more than 120 offices. | ||
| They also offer taxpayer assistance centers. | ||
| The plan is outlined in a letter from the U.S. General Services Administration that was obtained by the Washington Post. | ||
| Well, it would appear, given the recent events and then this breaking news today, I guess they're going to let... | ||
| This tax season go before they either gut or completely shut down the IRS. That ends | ||
| April 15th. | ||
| And as the administration is working to reduce agencies' headcount and scale back the footprint of the federal government, last week the IRS started laying off approximately 7,000 probationary employees. | ||
| At least 128 taxpayer assistance centers will have their leases terminated or not renewed when they expire. | ||
| So, again, I guess they're going to kind of let things go with the rest of this tax season and then maybe really limit the size and scale and scope of the IRS. | ||
| I would like to see it completely abolished. | ||
| I don't know if that'll happen. | ||
| That might be wishful thinking. | ||
| But they are in the process of scaling it down, no doubt about that. | ||
| The American people should not live in fear of the IRS. But I think you can kind of... | ||
| Deem the IRS worthless by just cutting all the taxes. | ||
| And just cut all the taxes and get it down to just simple sales taxes for each state. | ||
| And just go about it like that. | ||
| And then the federal government can fund itself with tariffs and repatriation of funds that get sent overseas from people that come here to work. | ||
| That would be my approach. | ||
| But make it so that we don't even need the IRS. Cut taxes so much, reduce that burden on the American taxpayer so much that we don't even need the IRS. We get taxed so much now that it's like, I guess they feel they have to have all these agents. | ||
| So then we also have this. | ||
| The DOJ Panbani's office has just responded to Anna Paulina Luna's request for the Epstein files, the JFK files, and more. | ||
| Now this is basically boilerplate stuff, which... | ||
| Unfortunately, it's kind of pathetic to me. | ||
| But here it is. | ||
| I'll read the full response here from the Office of the Attorney General. | ||
| Dear Chairwoman Luna, thank you for your letters to the Department of Justice dated February 11th and February 19th, 2025. We are sending an identical response to the other member who joined your letters. | ||
| In your letters, you requested briefings about any documents in the department's possession relating to the investigation and prosecution of Jeffrey Epstein and about the declassification of records regarding the assassination of President JFK, Senator RFK, and the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., and the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., pursuant to the Executive Order 14176. | ||
| You also requested written confirmation of the date and location of those records released. | ||
| The integrity of criminal investigations and prosecutions is essential to every component of the department's mission to uphold the rule of law, keep our nation safe, and protect civil rights. | ||
| The department remains committed to meeting its legal record-keeping obligations as it pursues that mission we are repatriating. | ||
| We hope this information is helpful. | ||
| Please do not hesitate to contact this office if we may provide additional assistance regarding this or any other matter. | ||
| Patrick D. Davis, Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General. | ||
| I mean, that's a boilerplate response, folks. | ||
| That's basically no, is what that is. | ||
| That's basically no. | ||
| Anna Paulina Luna requests these things that were an executive order from Trump, mind you. | ||
| This was an executive order from Trump. | ||
| And Pambani's office just said no. | ||
| It's what they said. | ||
| That's a boilerplate no. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No. | |
| There's two conflicting ideas here. | ||
| Well, there's two, let's say, back and forths, and then there's kind of the overarching umbrella issue that people will always have, but I'll address all of them now. | ||
| People are saying, be patient. | ||
| She just got in there. | ||
| Patel just got in there. | ||
| They need time and all this other stuff. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well... | |
| It's really hard to ask the American people for patience right now. | ||
| Our patience is wearing thin, if not completely gone. | ||
| And the Biden administration had no patience when they pursued Americans for political imprisonment and persecution. | ||
| When they went after Donald Trump, there was no patience there. | ||
| There was no waiting game there. | ||
| There was no following the rule of law or acting with integrity there. | ||
| And now you're asking that of us. | ||
| Well, it's tough. | ||
| That's a tough ask for the American people. | ||
| Whether it's legitimate or not, debate all day, but that's what they're asking here. | ||
| But this is an executive order we're dealing with from Trump, and clearly something is going on. | ||
| I mean, folks, at this point, clearly something is going on. | ||
| Now, of course, everybody is, well, I shouldn't say everybody, but... | ||
| As always, one of the leading trends in this discussion is that they're protecting the intelligence agencies, specifically Israel, specifically Mossad. | ||
| Now, I don't know if they can go in there and erase all evidence of Epstein being an Israeli spy and a Mossad agent. | ||
| That would just be too obvious. | ||
| So, I don't know, maybe they're going in there and erasing individuals, but that would be a crime. | ||
| I don't think they're in there committing crimes. | ||
| So what is the delay about, really? | ||
| This is just a boilerplate no. | ||
| This doesn't tell us anything. | ||
| This is a boilerplate no. | ||
| We're not giving you the documents you requested, even though it's an executive order for them to be released. | ||
| This is a boilerplate no, that they will not do it, and then they give us no answers. | ||
| So the only reason they released this statement, Paulina Luna made the requests on the 11th and the 19th. | ||
| So we're talking weeks have gone by. | ||
| Bondi's been in office for weeks. | ||
| Patel has now been in for almost a week. | ||
| So this is a boilerplate no, is what this is. | ||
| The Attorney General's office just said, no, we're not going to give you the documents. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So what the hell is going on? | |
| It's a fair question to ask. | ||
| Results are all that matter, folks. | ||
| So I'm impatient, just as you are. | ||
| I don't understand what the delay is about. | ||
| Nobody really does, except those that are engaging in the delay. | ||
| But results are all that matter. | ||
| And right now, we have no results. | ||
| If there's a strategy, if there's a reason they're holding back, then ultimately they'll get a good result, and we'll sit back and say, okay, great job, you did it. | ||
| It was a process. | ||
| Okay, you got the results we wanted. | ||
| But this is an executive order. | ||
| This was a promise that was made. | ||
| And now we're sitting here weeks later and they're telling the members of Congress on the committees, no! | ||
| And the only reason they had to release that statement is because of the public pressure. | ||
| We want the Epstein files. | ||
| We want to know what's going on. | ||
| Not a single Epstein client has been arrested. | ||
| So here's this prolific pedophile. | ||
| Here's this prolific sex trafficker. | ||
| But he had no clients. | ||
| He had no clients. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| And then we get an executive order that says release the information. | ||
| And then we get promises saying we're going to release the information. | ||
| And then we don't get the information. | ||
| And we say, hey, why don't we get the information? | ||
| The Attorney General Office just says no. | ||
| So you see, this goes back to the opening monologue from yesterday. | ||
| It's like, what is the move here? | ||
| What is the move here from Trump voters? | ||
| What is the move here from MAGA? Is the move to be patient and let them work and give them trust, whether they deserve it or not, doesn't matter. | ||
| Is the move to be patient and support them and be a guy on the bench, let's say, cheering on the team, hyping up the team? | ||
| Or is the move to... | ||
| Put a fire under them and say, hey, what the hell are you doing? | ||
| We're pissed off. | ||
| I can see, honestly, I'm split. | ||
| I'm split. | ||
| I don't know what the move is here. | ||
| Because here's the problem historically. | ||
| And it really goes both ways. | ||
| The reason why Republicans have struggled... | ||
| Politically, even though the party of common sense, I mean, it's clearly the better political party. | ||
| Clearly. | ||
| On policy, it's clearly the better political party. | ||
| It's not even close. | ||
| But why do Republicans struggle? | ||
| Republicans struggle because, and you're seeing it right now, whenever new people join the party, whenever new people get into a position of influence in the party, the voters, the conservatives, go crazy. | ||
| And they attack, and they destroy, and they dismantle, and they insult, and they're never happy. | ||
| And so then people never want to become a part of the party. | ||
| And then they get in there, and they get attacked, and they get ridiculed, and they say, okay, I'm out, I'm done, I'm not dealing with this. | ||
| So that's always been a big issue. | ||
| But that's just one side of the coin. | ||
| So it's like, if we attack and start going after Bondi and stuff, does that kind of hurt our cause? | ||
| Or does it get her moving and help our cause? | ||
| But see, and then the other side of that coin is the other problem with the Republican Party is they just don't deliver the results. | ||
| They just don't. | ||
| They don't. | ||
| So it's like you're stuck in between these two phenomenons right now. | ||
| It's like, okay, do we go after the people that are now in charge that we think are on our side and are going to be working in our favor, but they're not doing what we want right now, and so do we go after them? | ||
| Try to put a fire under them, or is that going to demotivate them or dissuade them? | ||
| Or do we put the fire under them to actually get results because we're sick of not getting results? | ||
| I don't know. | ||
| I'm honestly split on it, but I'm telling you right now. | ||
| The only reason they released this statement, which is just a boilerplate no, that is a no. | ||
| Hey, can we get the Epstein files? | ||
| No. | ||
| In a legal boilerplate statement, that's what just happened here. | ||
| And the only reason they did this was because of the public pressure. | ||
| So, I mean, what are you doing? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Who are you covering for? | |
| I mean, that's it, folks. | ||
| They're either covering for somebody or something, or there's a strategy that they just can't talk about. | ||
| There's either a strategy being utilized with that information that they can't talk about right now for obvious reasons, or they're covering for somebody or something. | ||
| And of course, everybody's going to point to Israel since Epstein was a Mossad agent. | ||
| And of course, why wouldn't they? | ||
| Why wouldn't they, given all the circumstantial evidence? | ||
| So that is just ridiculous. | ||
| Speaking of the Israel issue, there's a bunch of news on that today. | ||
| But first, let's go to some statements from Trump regarding the geopolitics. | ||
| Let's start with Trump talking about the EU in clip two. | ||
| But I love the countries of Europe. | ||
| I love all countries, frankly, all different. | ||
| But the European Union's been—it was formed in order to screw the United States. | ||
| I mean, look, let's be honest. | ||
| The European Union was formed in order to screw the United States. | ||
| That's the purpose of it. | ||
| And they've done a good job of it, but now I'm president. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What will happen if these countries where the EU retaliate? | |
| They can't. | ||
| I mean, they can try. | ||
| Now, America has all the cards when it comes to this, and specifically NATO. And I think that they know it, and that's why they're trying to kind of reshuffle their deck if the U.S. stops funding NATO. But Trump is obviously the master negotiator, and the U.S. has all the leverage. | ||
| With trade over the EU, and it's only going to be better now with some of the plans Trump has. | ||
| Now, he's also talking about a peace deal between Ukraine and Russia, which people are saying is starting to manifest, starting to become a real thing. | ||
| We may have a good idea by the end of the week just how real. | ||
| Here's Trump talking about the situation in clip three. | ||
| If Biden has spent $350 billion without any chance of getting it back, now we're going to be getting all of that money back, plus a lot more. | ||
| And we provided a great thing. | ||
| I mean, we've provided something very important. | ||
| And we'll be working with Ukraine, and because we'll be taking that, we're going to be taking what we're entitled to take. | ||
| Now, they spent $350 billion, and Europe spent one. | ||
| $100 billion. | ||
| Now, does anybody really think that's fair? | ||
| But then we find out a little while ago, not so long ago, a few months ago, I found out that the money they spent, they get back. | ||
| But the money we spent, we don't get back. | ||
| They said, well, we're going to get it back. | ||
| And we'll be able to make a deal and... | ||
| Again, President Zelensky is coming to sign the deal. | ||
| And it's a great thing. | ||
| It's a great deal for Ukraine, too, because they get us over there and we're going to be working over there. | ||
| We'll be on the land. | ||
| And, you know, in that way, it's this sort of automatic security because nobody's going to be messing around with our people when we're there. | ||
| And so we'll be there in that way. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But Europe will be watching it very closely. | |
| I know that UK has said and France has said that they want to put, they volunteered to put. | ||
| So it sounds like the deal is going to be Ukraine will maintain some integrity of its landmass. | ||
| It will sacrifice land. | ||
| They'll probably have to remap it. | ||
| And they'll likely not get Crimea. | ||
| And then a lot of the eastern territories will also go to Russia. | ||
| That will probably be a part of this peace deal. | ||
| And then... | ||
| The leverage America has, as Trump just said, hey, we paid you $350 billion. | ||
| You lost more than half of it, and now we have nothing to show for it, and you lost the war. | ||
| So you have no protection. | ||
| You're an illegitimate president, and there are likely groups out there that probably don't want you to do much talking about what went on with the money laundering and the weapons laundering. | ||
| So tell you what, why don't we protect your life? | ||
| You make concessions with Russia. | ||
| We get our money back by going into these areas with the rare earth minerals, and we're going to be in charge of the production and the manufacturing of getting those rare earth minerals. | ||
| Sounds like that's the deal that's going to be done. | ||
| So however you want to Monday morning quarterback it, when that deal gets done, it looks like that's the deal. | ||
| And whatever issues that may arise, it sounds like that's the deal that's on the table. | ||
| So Russia gets some important... | ||
| It's not even about the land necessarily for Russia. | ||
| But the people that live there are pro-Russian and they've been discriminated against and treated awfully by the Ukrainians for years. | ||
| So they get to be Russian, which they culturally are Russian. | ||
| They speak Russian. | ||
| And then America, we get our money back in some way, shape or form with the rare earth minerals that we're going to be in charge of producing, manufacturing. | ||
| And then Zelensky, I guess, gets to live or gets to not be the worst president in the history of the country and go down as a criminal or whatever else and get to claim peace. | ||
| He helped negotiate peace. | ||
| So it seems like that's kind of the deal that is on the table right now. | ||
| And I would say Trump is likely right about, in whatever fashion America is over there, I don't want it to be militarily. | ||
| I mean, let's be clear. | ||
| I don't think we can rule that out. | ||
| But whatever fashion America is over there will be the best situation for Ukraine. | ||
| Because it will offer some form of protection. | ||
| And Trump has also said NATO is off the table. | ||
| Ukraine cannot join NATO. They will never join NATO. And he even said that it was NATO that was responsible for the war. | ||
| And so now they're all pissed. | ||
| And Steven Feinberg, Trump's Pentagon number two pick, avoids... | ||
| Ukraine question. | ||
| And so now the rhetoric from the White House has changed and they're saying, well, it's kind of Ukraine's fault. | ||
| It's kind of NATO's fault. | ||
| And so they're all panicked because that's against their narrative. | ||
| And if that narrative changes and then American people kind of let it sink in how our money and our weapons were laundered with that deal and that false narrative, then people will get pissed. | ||
| So they're panicked over this and they would like to see an end to it too because the Trump administration clearly, this is a tactical move, a strategic move to change the narrative that, yeah, you know what? | ||
| Maybe Russia... | ||
| Isn't the only bad guy involved in this? | ||
| Oh, they don't want that. | ||
| So they're freaking out about that as well. | ||
| Now, Trump posted this video. | ||
| I don't even know if it's worth playing. | ||
| I think it was probably just in good fun. | ||
| But the Trump Gaza AI hype video. | ||
| So there's obviously a visceral reaction to this, and everybody's so invested in this thing, and I'm just so sick of it. | ||
| I want nothing to do with any of it, but whatever. | ||
| It's inevitable. | ||
| It's impossible for us not to be. | ||
| So it's like, okay, it's the utopia. | ||
| It's the beachfront utopia. | ||
| It's the sprawling metropolitan area with everything else finally developed and commerce going on and everything. | ||
| It's like, okay, well, who wouldn't want that? | ||
| You'd think everybody would want that. | ||
| I don't want the audio, guys. | ||
| Please. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| So whatever you think about the situation and the war and everything, I mean, everybody should want a better situation for Gaza. | ||
| If you want to get into, well, who's going to live there and who's going to be in charge of the government, then that's a whole other thing. | ||
| But I think from Trump's approach, it's look at the situation here. | ||
| It's a disaster. | ||
| It's now just a rubble zone. | ||
| Let's have something here. | ||
| Let's build something for the people here. | ||
| So I think that that's really what the video is about and then in good humor. | ||
| But I don't know. | ||
| I don't really want to think too much about that. | ||
| What is happening, which I've been telling you about, the American media will always ignore it, and that's... | ||
| Netanyahu is a desperate man. | ||
| Now, I've got some news on that, but this video right here, I've never seen it put together like this. | ||
| Honestly, Netanyahu should really be one of the more, if not the most, despised foreign leaders by the American people. | ||
| Oh, how can you say that? | ||
| Oh my gosh, he's such an ally. | ||
| Well, I want you to watch this compilation of Netanyahu coming to Congress for decades, like he's the president, using Congress to declare war on his enemies in the Middle East. | ||
| Tell me this doesn't enrage you. | ||
| I was enraged to a whole new degree when I saw this compilation of Netanyahu telling Congress who America needs to go to war with in clip 11. | ||
|
unidentified
|
If you take away the Soviet Union And its chief proxy, the PLO, international terrorism would collapse. | |
| If you take out Saddam, Saddam's regime, I guarantee you that it will have enormous positive reverberations on the regime. | ||
| Obviously, we'd like to see a regime change, at least I would, in Iran, just as I would like to see in Iraq. | ||
| The question now is a practical question. | ||
| What is the best place to proceed? | ||
| It's not a question of whether Iraq's regime should be taken out, but when should it be taken out? | ||
| It's not a question of whether you'd like to see a regime change in Iran, but how do we... | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are there any other nations that you would recommend that the United States launch preemptive attacks upon at this point? | |
| The answer is categorically yes. | ||
| The two nations that are vying, competing with each other, who will be the first to achieve nuclear weapons is Iraq and Iran. | ||
| But a third nation, by the way, is Libya as well. | ||
| Libya is trying very rapidly to build an atomic bomb capability. | ||
| So you have here now three nations. | ||
| All stand together to stop Iran's march of conquest, subjugation and terror. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| I know that... | ||
| No matter on which side of the aisle you sit, you stand with Israel. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How is it that Netanyahu has so much influence? | |
| How is it that Israel has so much influence? | ||
| Well, obviously the money. | ||
| The money that pours into American politics, the money that pours into American politicians, the money that pours into American media, the assets, their actual physical human assets that pour in to the American media and politics as well. | ||
| But how do you not see that and really reevaluate the situation? | ||
| Is Netanyahu the president? | ||
| How is he using Congress to go to war with Israel's enemies? | ||
| Is this what the Epstein and Maxwell blackmail rings were all about the whole time? | ||
| To get U.S. politicians compromised by blackmail so that we always go to war with Israel's enemies? | ||
| He comes here and makes a demand for regime change in Iraq, in Libya, in Afghanistan, and we jump too? | ||
| And hundreds of thousands of American men and women die? | ||
| And they want Iran next, folks. | ||
| That's Netanyahu's final goal is Iran. | ||
| But the American people are not going to die for any more wars for Israel. | ||
| And by the way, Netanyahu's not that popular in Israel, too. | ||
| This whole story about the dead babies, they're not going to tell you this in the American media. | ||
| The family of the dead hostages are blaming Netanyahu, and they're telling him to shut up. | ||
| Not going to hear that in the American media, though, are you? | ||
| No, because everybody's supposed to be pleasing Netanyahu in Israel. | ||
| No, not anymore. | ||
| President Trump's been fighting the globalists for years, and now he's got them right by the throat. | ||
| But there's a lot of traitors, a lot of cowards hiding in the shadows. | ||
| That's why we, the American people, have got to stay focused and have President Trump's f***ing back. | ||
| That's why I'm counting on every person in the Joseph War Army to step their game up like President Trump and Elon Musk and the rest of the patriot crew of Spartans are doing! | ||
| That's why I'm more committed now than I've ever been in the fight! | ||
| I'm 20 hours a day committed! | ||
| And I hate it when I go to sleep! | ||
| I jump out of bed more fired up than ever with a spirit of 1776. That's why I'm telling the globalists we're coming for your asses and this matter. | ||
| Nothing you can do! | ||
| You're fu- It's time for all the manga and maha maniacs across America and the world to wear their colors brown so the globalists and all their minions know we outnumber you 10 to 1. So get the shirt now at thealexjonesstore.com or get the big balls or biggest balls ball caps today and keep Alex Jones at the tip of the spear in the fight. | ||
| I'm counting on your brother! | ||
|
unidentified
|
We're in 1776! | |
| We'll commence again if we try to take our firearms! | ||
| If you are receiving this transmission, you are the resistance. | ||
| It's Alex Jones. | ||
| Fight. | ||
| I got some exciting announcements. | ||
| It's in stock. | ||
| It's popular. | ||
| The big balls Trump had with 47 on the side. | ||
| Bungee operation. | ||
| It's beautiful. | ||
| Folks love it. | ||
| And then... | ||
| Everybody thinks it's just for Trump, but you can wear it too. | ||
| Biggest balls. | ||
| Both hats now available at thealexjonesstore.com, and it funds the second American Revolution. | ||
| And then, I've been asking for this a long time, it is a high-quality tactical dagger, and it has InfoWars inscribed on it, and it funds this operation. | ||
| It's available exclusively at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| There's a limited run of these. | ||
| Get yours now. | ||
| It is great to have in your car. | ||
| Great to have personally. | ||
| It is amazing. | ||
| Look at it right here in my hand. | ||
| This is how you defend yourself quickly and easily. | ||
| And it doesn't run out of bullets. | ||
| Everybody needs the Tactical Dagger Limited Edition 1776. On one side right here, as you can see, 1776. Inscribed right there. | ||
| And then on the other side, you've got InfoWars. | ||
| What a piece of history. | ||
| And it keeps its operation on Aaron the Nice. | ||
| Scabbard that snaps. | ||
| It's a SOG, a really good brand. | ||
| And then it can go on your belt as well. | ||
| So get the InfoWars Limited Edition Tactical Dagger and the latest Limited Edition coin that's selling out fast. | ||
| Tip of the spear, veteran of the InfoWars. | ||
| Pure silver coin at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
| And it funds this operation. | ||
| Thank you for your support. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest. | |
| However tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. |
Export Selection