Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
Please stand by for further details. | ||
We return now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
We return now to your next time. | ||
Where are you from? | ||
You've been deported before from the United States? | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
Well, this is an example of sanctuary cities, right? | ||
We got an illegal alien convicted of sex crimes involving children. | ||
He's walking the streets of Chicago. | ||
unidentified
|
You've been charged with sex crimes with children and never been deported. | |
Let's take him in the process and lock him up. | ||
Tom Homan, who's the head of, who's directing a lot of these ICE operations nationally, etc., he went on TV practically crying. | ||
Because what ICE tries to do is that they rely on people not knowing their rights in order to enter buildings, in order to search workplaces, etc. | ||
So when you know your rights, you are able to tell them no, and they do walk away. | ||
There's no chance that there's not kickbacks or something going on. | ||
When you give millions and millions of dollars to somebody that stands to look at something for 15 minutes and walks away with millions of dollars. | ||
That money's coming back in some form. | ||
And AOC and Chuck Schumer, look at their bank accounts. | ||
You can't accumulate that kind of wealth as a senator or a congressman or even a president. | ||
These are lying, scamming, thieving monsters. | ||
You can stay silent. | ||
If they have detained you, you can say, I would like to remain silent. | ||
You invoke your right. | ||
Tom, you got AOC out there. | ||
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, Congresswoman, putting out a webinar, doing a webinar to help illegals avoid, I guess, apprehension. | ||
Is that impediment? | ||
Is that impeding our law enforcement efforts? | ||
If so, what are we going to do about it? | ||
Is she crossing the line? | ||
They ask you where you were born? | ||
I don't have to answer that question. | ||
They ask for your immigration status? | ||
I do not have to answer your question. | ||
They do not, unless... | ||
You are being officially detained if they have a judicial warrant. | ||
And by the way, you do not have to sign anything. | ||
And if they want to keep asking you questions, you say, I would like to speak to my attorney. | ||
unidentified
|
According to the American Immigration Council, because deportation is considered a civil sanction, not a criminal one, those facing removal from our country don't have those same protections. | |
AOC is a very dim bulb. | ||
And it's sad. | ||
But there's still in God's perfection that God creates a beauty for us in her totally unselfaware, sadly moronic consciousness. | ||
In New York and California, in New York and California, you have a right to an attorney. | ||
unidentified
|
Because deportation is considered a civil sanction, not a criminal one, those facing removal from our country don't have those same protections. | |
And you can get your own attorney, or you can procure your own attorney. | ||
So you say, I wanna talk to a lawyer. | ||
And she's said a lot of hilarious stuff over the years. | ||
Remember, every time I mention I wanna find the video and play it again. | ||
She's like, she puts on a fake, I guess, Hispanic accent. | ||
She's never talked that before. | ||
unidentified
|
She goes, we have these community gardens, and there's too much cauliflower grown there that the white people eat. | |
We need other things grown, not the white people food. | ||
And what the hell does cauliflower have to do with white people? | ||
We need to have the mentality that no means find another way. | ||
No means try again. | ||
No means look somewhere else. | ||
No does not mean. | ||
Stop trying. | ||
This is not a game. | ||
When we show up at these sites, this is a dangerous job for the men and women of ICE and Border Patrol and all the DOJ agencies. | ||
To have that type of interference puts our office at great risk. | ||
All she does is regurgitate talking points and act confident. | ||
It's all a facade, but in that is beauty. | ||
God takes evil and makes it pretty as good, as in an instruction to us. | ||
Do not be like AOC. Ladies and gentlemen, it's Tuesday, February 25th, 2025. This is the InfoWars War Room. | ||
The fastest three hours on the internet starts now. | ||
I am going to really dig in. | ||
unidentified
|
To, let's say, issues. | |
Top issues. | ||
It's the top story in the last 24 hours. | ||
And that's dealing with what remains of the deep state or the Biden regime inside of the bureaucracies. | ||
Specifically, perhaps, the CIA and the FBI doing everything they can to undermine the Trump administration. | ||
And even going so far to consider committing treason outrightly. | ||
So there's some shocking stuff developing. | ||
Now, before I get into that, we've got a lot of stuff coming up today. | ||
We've got all the drama on Capitol Hill. | ||
Whether it's the Epstein list being released, whether it's the FBI, the CIA, whether it's Doge and some of the stuff that's being revealed there, we got all the drama from Washington, D.C. today. | ||
We're going to be bringing that to you, including some of the craziness that continues to come out of this NSA, and now it's leaking into other bureaucracies, but these secret chat rooms where they're fantasizing about Hermaphrodite sex. | ||
So, that's what you got working for you at the NSA, which is a little concerning considering what they have access to. | ||
unidentified
|
Hmm. | |
Yeah. | ||
Might want to think about that. | ||
Might want to consider that. | ||
A massive Democrat voter fraud. | ||
Operation was uncovered in Connecticut. | ||
We'll explain that to you. | ||
We've got more issues at the airport. | ||
Seems to be every day there's a story about this. | ||
In fact, it was a hero pilot from Southwest Airlines that probably saved a lot of lives by making an emergency maneuver to avoid a collision. | ||
And then we've got some more drama in the media with the Joy Reid ousting at MSNBC, Trump's response to that, and so much more. | ||
Okay. | ||
Let's get into the big story, and I'm going to kind of lay it all out for you to understand what's going on. | ||
And I'll just say this at the outset here. | ||
I am very hopeful for the future of America. | ||
I think that Trump is a good person and an American patriot. | ||
I think that he's surrounding himself with smart people, good people, and American patriots. | ||
There's no doubt there is a war happening in D.C. for power and the future of this country, and everything hangs in the balance. | ||
And sometimes when I see some of these developments, it's hard to really present them without sounding negative. | ||
So I'm not negative. | ||
I'm actually very positive and very pleased with the things that are going on. | ||
But this delay of the Epstein list and some of the drama surrounding it, including now what we all already reported was happening. | ||
I mean, it was a pretty easy assumption to make. | ||
People inside the FBI erasing evidence. | ||
Data from servers and who knows what else. | ||
But I gotta say, it's a little strange now to see this drama playing out over the Epstein list and over the FBI destroying evidence when we're supposed to be in control. | ||
We're supposed to be in control. | ||
We've got the team assembled. | ||
We've got the White House, the House and the Senate. | ||
And some of these huge issues we seem to have no control over and nobody seems to know what's going on. | ||
And it just doesn't make sense and it doesn't add up. | ||
And you know what I say, if it doesn't add up, you know it's corrupt. | ||
So let me try to boil into this. | ||
Let's first start with what is going on at the CIA. So CNN publishes this story and they have a hard time. | ||
They kind of out themselves or they out some of their operators. | ||
It's like their puff up the chest moment to act important and then in that moment they kind of expose themselves. | ||
How Trump's government cutting moves risk exposing the CIA's secrets. | ||
So you see the CNN headliner saying, hmm, Trump is doing things that could expose. | ||
National security secrets with the CIA? Well, that's not exactly what's happening. | ||
Because if you read into this, they say, on the CIA's seventh floor, home to top leadership, some officers are also quietly discussing how mass firings and the buyouts already offered to staff risk creating a group of disgruntled former employees Who might be motivated to take what they know to a foreign intelligence service. | ||
unidentified
|
Selling out the country. | |
CNN is either making this up or they have real intelligence, somebody telling them that, and look, I mean, some of these names are known for fake news. | ||
I mean, Natasha Bertrand, I mean, she's, you know. | ||
Fake news stamped on her head, but is somebody telling one of these reporters at CNN that the top leadership at the CIA is considering committing treason because Trump is president? | ||
Is that really happening? | ||
Because Doge is going into the system? | ||
And looking at all the CIA payments? | ||
That's what they're complaining about. | ||
That's what CNN claims to know here. | ||
These actions highlight the depth of unease among career officials that Trump's effort to speedily slim down the U.S. government may be putting American secrets within the grasp of foreign spies and hackers. | ||
No. | ||
As you said here, they're doing it. | ||
CIA leadership is apparently doing it. | ||
People that work at the CIA, I guess on the 7th floor, that narrows it down. | ||
They're the ones doing it. | ||
It's not Donald Trump. | ||
So, this is the logic. | ||
Doge is coming in here and looking at all of our financial data as part of an agenda to stop government waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
So, we're going to leak Intelligence to foreign countries. | ||
And that's Trump's fault. | ||
So Trump is coming in here and auditing the CIA, so we're going to give foreign adversaries, we're going to give foreign countries national security intelligence. | ||
And that's Trump's fault, according to CNN. Now, CNN could be making this up entirely. | ||
Wouldn't put it past him. | ||
And yet, even with the tiny possibility that this is true, think about how dangerous this is. | ||
And leakers, anti-Trump leakers is nothing new. | ||
It's nothing new for Washington, D.C., whether it's reality winner, whether it's the Roe vs. | ||
Wade leaker. | ||
They've gotten all kinds of people that are leaking stuff. | ||
Some of them get caught, some of them don't. | ||
So is it really that far-fetched that some anti-Trump bureaucrat, some anti-Trump leftist bureaucrat, would leak national security secrets? | ||
Would leak top security clearance level intelligence to foreign countries just to spite Trump so that CNN can write a story and blame it on Trump? | ||
Seems to be what they're suggesting. | ||
Seems to actually be a threat. | ||
Don't you dare. | ||
Donald Trump, send the Department of Government Efficiency in here. | ||
Don't you dare audit us, or we will sell the nation's secrets to the highest bidder. | ||
Well, I would say an investigation needs to be happening immediately on the CIA's seventh floor. | ||
Immediately. | ||
Because that... | ||
That is beyond criminal. | ||
That is about as bad as you can get when it comes to traitors at the CIA, if it's true. | ||
Now, Anna Paulina Luna weighs in. | ||
She says, there is a massive war happening in the intelligence agencies right now. | ||
The corruption being exposed right now is actual treason. | ||
What's going on? | ||
A war in the intelligence agencies? | ||
This isn't something you just tweet about. | ||
This isn't something you just post about. | ||
This isn't something you just go to an interview on Fox News for a soundbite about. | ||
No, this is something that warrants significant action. | ||
Immediate action. | ||
Because the Democrats already have a history of leaking stuff. | ||
And you can already see what they're doing. | ||
They're threatening to leak stuff and then blame Donald Trump. | ||
Blame Doge. | ||
And CNN spilled the whole beans in this story. | ||
Unless they're making it up. | ||
But you can't really take that risk. | ||
Can you? | ||
With a story like this. | ||
So there's a war happening in the intelligence agencies right now. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
So what else is going on with the war? | ||
Well, you had Garrett O'Boyle, friend of the show, do an interview with Benny Johnson when really he states the obvious that there are corrupt FBI agents in there destroying evidence. | ||
Now, we've been warning about that for weeks right here on this show. | ||
Now, Garrett O'Boyle is an FBI whistleblower. | ||
Garrett O'Boyle, I think it would be safe to say, if not he himself has said so, that he has other whistleblowers or other sources inside the FBI that are telling him this is going on. | ||
Michael Schellenberger also wrote a big story about this that got a bunch of traction. | ||
FBI whistleblower Garrett O'Boyle confirmed to me that a source inside the FBI said FBI employees were destroying evidence on servers. | ||
And that Kash Patel has been informed. | ||
He hopes Pam Bondi, John Radcliffe, Elon Musk, Relan, Paulina Luna are preventing this. | ||
We urgently need disclosure. | ||
So, this is a big moment, folks. | ||
This is a big moment. | ||
CNN reports insane claim about CIA agents potentially becoming traitors and selling our nation's secrets to the highest foreign bidder, or anybody. | ||
You've got FBI sources and whistleblowers saying that there are agents inside destroying evidence. | ||
So this is turncoat, this is heel behavior, this is treasonous behavior going on right now. | ||
Inside the FBI, inside the CIA, and I can only hope that the silence from Bondi and Patel and Ratcliffe means that they're on top of it. | ||
But I'm not really getting that vibe, if I'm being honest. | ||
I'm not really getting that vibe. | ||
I'm not really feeling it. | ||
No, I'm majorly concerned that nothing is being done about this. | ||
And I can kind of work my way around in my head about the Epstein list and it being released and not being released and everything that's going on with that and some of the drama. | ||
This is something that requires urgent, immediate action and we really are getting the silent treatment here. | ||
But you have rogue agents inside the FBI and apparently inside the CIA that are willing to commit treason and destroy evidence. | ||
For who? | ||
For what? | ||
Because they hate Trump? | ||
Because they committed a crime? | ||
Because somebody else committed a crime and now they're being hired to cover it up? | ||
Dan Bongino, new FBI deputy director, he said he's going to do his show till... | ||
Mid-March. | ||
Then he's going to go fulfill his role as Deputy Director. | ||
So I guess that's when he'll get sworn in. | ||
So it's still a couple weeks before he gets sworn in or officially becomes Deputy Director. | ||
So that was the announcement he made on his show. | ||
He's going to do it until mid-March and then go serve as FBI Deputy Director. | ||
Dan Bongino called the FBI irredeemably corrupt. | ||
Now I did a deep dive into this situation with Patel and Bongino. | ||
If we can't... | ||
If we can't clean up the FBI with Patel and Bongino, then I don't know. | ||
Then there's nobody to clean it up. | ||
Nobody. | ||
That's it. | ||
That's about as good as you're going to do is Patel and Bongino. | ||
And if they're not or can't do it, then just shut it down. | ||
Which they both have suggested needs to be done, by the way. | ||
Patel and Bongino have both said it should just probably be shut down. | ||
It's so corrupt. | ||
I'm just saying, when you've got these stories about the CIA and the FBI going out there, and we've got our whole team in place, and we're getting the silent treatment, and what evidence is being destroyed? | ||
What national secrets are potentially being sold? | ||
It's kind of a big deal. | ||
Now, if you walked through the Capitol on Washington, D.C., you were all over the map. | ||
Your pictures were plastered everywhere. | ||
They published hundreds of stories about how you were an insurrectionist and everybody made sure to know who you were and try to destroy your life. | ||
But apparently, you're inside the FBI or the CIA committing potentially treason and we just get the silent treatment on that. | ||
That's just, mum is the word on that. | ||
General Flynn responded to this story. | ||
Those destroying the records, you will be held responsible. | ||
And for every page of evidence you destroy, we the people want one year in prison per page. | ||
I suggest you stop destroying evidence. | ||
Now again, Garrett O'Boyle, the FBI whistleblower, is going to be on this show tomorrow to respond to all this. | ||
So that's going to be at 4 o'clock tomorrow. | ||
Anna Paulina Luna says she's following up on this story immediately. | ||
Cash Patel will discover exactly who destroyed these documents and they will be held accountable immediately. | ||
Folks, that's big talk. | ||
And we've all kind of gotten used to not getting any results. | ||
I want results. | ||
This is outrageous. | ||
I had to spend months in prison for my speech. | ||
The legal battles we have to go through here at Infowars and everything else. | ||
And you in the audience have been through it too. | ||
And dealing with the IRS and everything. | ||
And if they can sit here and apparently try to leak. | ||
National intelligence, security, national security, high-level intelligence, and sell it to foreign nations, or brag about it to CNN, or at the FBI, destroy evidence, then we got a problem. | ||
And a light, a fire, needs to be put under the Trump administration on this deal. | ||
And I'm blowing smoke around people in D.C. and around congressional sources about this, and they're like, yeah, nobody really knows anything. | ||
Nobody's really doing anything. | ||
So I'm just telling you what's going on. | ||
I don't want to be really downtrodden about this, but I got to tell you, it stinks. | ||
It stinks. | ||
And we haven't even talked about the Epstein list, which we still don't have. | ||
And maybe before we get into that, I would say it's likely whatever's going on at the CIA with CNN is probably being blown out of proportion. | ||
CNN is blowing out of proportion, and if there are any traitors at the CIA, then they will probably make the right choice to not commit treason, or they fear they'll be caught and won't do it. | ||
My guess is CNN found one rogue leftist at the CIA to write this story and make a big fuss about it to blame Donald Trump. | ||
My guess is that's probably not a big thing. | ||
CNN is just doing fake news. | ||
The FBI thing, I'd say, is very real. | ||
The FBI thing is very real. | ||
It's very obvious that this is going to happen. | ||
And so then you have to wonder, well, what evidence is being erased? | ||
They would have erased anything before Trump took office the first time under Obama if it was anything from those years, illegally spying, Russiagate, all that. | ||
They would have tried to erase all that evidence. | ||
Whatever went on in Trump's years, they would have erased if they had anything to erase immediately upon Biden taking office. | ||
So it's likely whatever they're trying to erase has something to do with the Biden years and Trump. | ||
Maybe the Mar-a-Lago raid. | ||
Maybe the assassination attempts. | ||
I'm just trying to figure out what happened in that four-year period that the FBI would be in there trying to erase evidence, trying to destroy evidence of. | ||
So that would be my best guess upon what are they trying to destroy if something that happened in the four years of Biden that they've got in there that they're trying to get rid of. | ||
Then there's the Epstein list. | ||
Now I can understand if there's reasons this hasn't been released for strategic reasons and reverse blackmail reasons and everything else. | ||
But now there's drama happening here with that and the JFK assassination files. | ||
Anna Paulina Luna, who's on the committee that's supposed to be releasing them, said on February 11th and 19th, the GOP oversight sent a letter to the Justice Department asking for status on releasing the Epstein files as well as the JFK files. | ||
The DOJ has not responded. | ||
Anna Paulina Luna says she's reaching out on X because she can't get a response from Pam Bondi. | ||
She says, Pam, what is the status of the documents? | ||
Many of these documents were ordered to be declassified by Trump. | ||
Now, Bondi has basically, I think, made one public statement that I've seen in the recent days saying that the file is on her desk. | ||
And that's it. | ||
Haven't really seen any other movement out of the Attorney General. | ||
Haven't really seen any other statements out of the Attorney General. | ||
And apparently, neither has Anna Paulina Luna. | ||
That's concerning. | ||
And just by the way, if you're seeing that video, not that it makes it any better, but that viral video of Pam Bondi talking about red flag laws and gun control, that's from 2018. Not saying it makes it any better, but people are sharing it thinking that that was a recent statement. | ||
That was actually from 2018. But moving on, Lauren Boebert says today would be a great day for Pam Bondi to release the Epstein files. | ||
Nothing. | ||
Marsha Blackburn. | ||
Types a whole official congressional letterhead urging Kash Patel to release the Epstein records. | ||
Even Ilhan Omar. | ||
How about this? | ||
You're at the intersection with Ilhan Omar. | ||
The attorney general still not releasing the Epstein files is weird and raises the question of who she might be protecting. | ||
I think it's pretty obvious what Ilhan Omar is probably referencing there. | ||
She's not a big fan of Israel. | ||
And, of course, Epstein was an Israeli intelligence asset, and as Dan Bongino has said in the past, whatever files Epstein had in New York or on his island, so did Israel or whatever other intelligence agencies he worked for, the CIA, MI6, who knows who else. | ||
He was probably at least a triple agent, getting blackmail operations, sex operations, honeypot operations. | ||
But here you are at the intersection with Ilhan Omar, Asking for the Epstein files. | ||
And now we're all saying, well, it's past day one. | ||
Where are they? | ||
Why don't we have them? | ||
Hopefully it's a strategic thing, but I'm getting concerned. | ||
The FBI is looking into James Comey's off-the-books honeypot operation targeting the 2016 Trump campaign. | ||
New leadership of the FBI is starting an investigation into the origins of the agency's plan a decade ago. | ||
To infiltrate the campaign of then-candidate Donald Trump using two female undercover honeypot agents. | ||
The off-the-books investigation launched in 2015 by former FBI Director James Comey was revealed by an agency whistleblower in a protected disclosure to the House Judiciary Committee last year and was first reported exclusively by the Washington Times in October. | ||
In the intelligence community... | ||
A honeypot commonly refers to an undercover operative, usually a woman who feigns sexual or romantic interest to obtain information from a target. | ||
Well, yeah, nowadays it's a, if you're trying to expose Democrats, now it's a gay man. | ||
But that's kind of a newer phenomenon with the gay dating app that they use to trap these people in undercover video. | ||
So now I hear this story and I think... | ||
Well, maybe they are going in there and trying to find the evidence from 2016 and erase it from FBI servers. | ||
Because I'm thinking, well, they would have already done that. | ||
And when the first Trump administration came in, they would have wanted to scrub all that already. | ||
So it had to be something during the four years of Biden. | ||
But now you see this and you wonder, is this what's going on? | ||
Is this what the FBI... Or some rogue agent or corrupt agent over there at the FBI is trying to destroy the evidence of what James Comey was doing, what Barack Obama was doing, the illegal spying, the honeypotting. | ||
Because keep in mind, it was Dan Bongino who literally wrote the book on this. | ||
Spygate. | ||
The attempted sabotage of Donald J. Trump. | ||
Dan Bongino and D.C. McAllister. | ||
It's also worth mentioning that Kash Patel has written books on this. | ||
So maybe in the first transition from Obama to Trump, when Comey was still there, they weren't so worried about it. | ||
And then they got their guy in anyway with Chris Wray, so they figured... | ||
It was no big deal. | ||
They didn't have to destroy the evidence. | ||
Nobody's going to go looking for it or even know where it is or even know what to look for. | ||
But now that it's Dan Bongino and Cash Patel running things, maybe the red alert signs went off. | ||
Somebody made a call. | ||
Maybe James Comey to one of his leftover rogue agents, corrupt agents, and said, hey, look, we're all going down if they find this evidence. | ||
We're all going down if they see what we did. | ||
Might be worth making sure they don't if you catch my drift. | ||
Now, I would hope that there was enough foresight from whoever can engage in it, the oversight, to make sure that when people do go in there and destroy evidence that there's some way to catch them doing it. | ||
But maybe that's what it is. | ||
Maybe somebody's trying to cover up. | ||
Maybe it is from the Obama years. | ||
Because that was my first instinct. | ||
I was thinking, well, this is to cover up all the crimes they committed in the Obama years. | ||
But then I thought they would have already erased that. | ||
But if it was Comey and then Ray and their people in charge, they figured they didn't have to. | ||
But now it's Patel and Bongino who have written the books on this, who know the names, the players, the dates, the locations, the money trail, everything. | ||
And so they figured, we've got to erase this evidence now, before Patel and Bongino get in here and find it and blow the lid off of this. | ||
And it really is, so much of this has been about protecting Obama. | ||
Protecting Biden, they couldn't really care that much about. | ||
After all, they threw him overboard. | ||
But Obama, he's the scandal-free president. | ||
Obama, he's the first black president. | ||
He's the untouchable. | ||
He's the anointed one. | ||
We can't destroy the Obama reputation. | ||
We can't expose how corrupt Obama was. | ||
We can't expose what Obama was really doing. | ||
No. | ||
That would really hurt the morale of the Democrats. | ||
He's still the face. | ||
He's still the name. | ||
He's still the soul. | ||
He's really still the one on the mountain. | ||
Democrats, if they're looking to show you a face or a name of who is the most influential in the Democrat Party or in Democrat politics in the most recent years, it's still Barack Obama. | ||
So they've got to protect Obama at all costs. | ||
And you've already seen the lengths they've gone to to protect Obama. | ||
So maybe it is all about Obama after all. | ||
You're so vain. | ||
Bet you think this FBI destroying... | ||
Documents is about you. | ||
But maybe it is. | ||
So this story kind of puts it all together for me. | ||
But who's doing it and who's ordering them to do it? | ||
They should be able to get that information. | ||
They should be able to find that. | ||
If the FBI and the people in there are as good as they claim to be, then they should be able to identify this person. | ||
And then identify who gave them the command. | ||
Because I doubt they're acting on their own. | ||
They're acting at the behest of somebody else to protect somebody else. | ||
And I would say, leading in the clubhouse is James Comey and Barack Obama. | ||
James Comey making the call to protect Barack Obama. | ||
And everybody else that was engaged in the corruption. | ||
And all the illegalities that they did to Donald Trump when Obama was president. | ||
Okay, if you were looking for another little clue to connect the dots, there you have it in today's Washington Times. | ||
And it all makes sense with Patel and Bongino now in there at the FBI knowing where the bodies are buried, figuratively speaking. | ||
But then again, who knows with the old Obama chef that met his demise. | ||
By the way, how many chefs? | ||
That cook for Barack Obama have died now. | ||
It's actually three. | ||
It's actually three. | ||
So there was that chef, and then there was Anthony Bourdain, and then there was a female chef. | ||
I believe she was a Mexican chef who cooked for Obama. | ||
She recently died, too. | ||
But I'm sure that's all a coincidence. | ||
I'm sure it's all a coincidence, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
What is Doge up to? | ||
What is Doge up to? | ||
Overwhelmingly popular. | ||
Is Doge. | ||
Elon Musk touts Americans Doge support. | ||
Every poll it's showing Doge is getting 70% approval rating on average from all Americans. | ||
So yes, even Democrats support Doge. | ||
At least most of them do. | ||
Now here's what Doge discovered in reporting today. | ||
U.S. taxpayer dollars were going to be spent on the following items, all of which have been canceled. | ||
This is ridiculous. | ||
I mean, folks, and it's every day with this. | ||
$69 million for the Eurasia Foundation to do digital transformation activity in Europe. | ||
unidentified
|
Good God. | |
Who's getting the kickbacks from that deal? | ||
$32 million to enter news for programs including, quote, media enabling democracy. | ||
Inclusion and accountability in Moldova. | ||
And the promotion of sustainable media outlets. | ||
32 million. | ||
That's all been cancelled. | ||
So we're already up to about 100 million. | ||
Not even halfway through this list. | ||
7 million for the American Bar Association to promote the resilience of the Eurasian legal sector and civic society. | ||
Where do you think this money is going? | ||
I hope the forensic auditors, well, this money's been cancelled, but where would it have gone? | ||
Oh, now we're getting, now we're encroaching a billion. | ||
520 million for a consultant to do ESG investments in Africa and mobilize private sector resources and expertise. | ||
Listen to this stuff. | ||
520 million for a consultant. | ||
To do ESG investments in Africa and mobilize private sector resources and expertise. | ||
That's just, I mean, this is just straight up stealing, folks. | ||
This is just straight up money laundering. | ||
Who's getting the kickbacks? | ||
Who's cutting these deals? | ||
$25 million. | ||
To promote biodiversity conservation and promote licit livelihoods by developing socially responsible behaviors in Colombia. | ||
Yes, the people of Colombia are out in the streets to promote biodiversity, conservation, and promote licit livelihoods by developing socially responsible behaviors. | ||
It's all the rage in Colombia, and you're funding it. | ||
$40 million, not anymore, $40 million to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants. | ||
unidentified
|
What? | |
Again, this is all just money lining, but let's try to translate this. | ||
$40 million to improve the social and economic inclusion of sedentary migrants. | ||
So $40 million to make sure that illegal alien bums and obese individuals can feel included in the social and economic civilization. | ||
Yes. | ||
Very important stuff. | ||
$42 million for Johns Hopkins to research and drive social and behavior change in Uganda. | ||
Man, I was thinking about going to Uganda, and then there were just huge, massive riots about social and behavioral change. | ||
And I said, I can't go. | ||
I can't go visit the wonderful utopia that is Uganda because the rioting over social and behavioral change. | ||
Is out of control. | ||
And so Johns Hopkins is going to be paid $42 million so that you can go travel to Uganda and not have to worry about the wild, out-of-control social and behavioral change riots. | ||
But now Trump has canceled that, so I guess you'll have to cancel your trip to Uganda. | ||
What a shame. | ||
$45 million to address the needs, opportunities, and challenges identified by activists and other civic actors engaged in nonviolent collective action. | ||
What did I just read? | ||
What did I just read? | ||
Address the needs, opportunities, and challenges identified by activists and other civic actors engaged in nonviolent collective action. | ||
What is that, Soros money? | ||
Must be some Soros money there, which we do have some more of that. | ||
And then $52 million for the World Economic Forum. | ||
So that's almost a billion dollars. | ||
About 700 million to be exact. | ||
That's almost a billion dollars. | ||
And would have been spent on these worthless, needless, money laundering, kickback operations that Doge has stopped. | ||
And they're all panicked. | ||
And of course there's a reason why they're panicked. | ||
And it's not just about their money. | ||
Most of them are already millionaires, so they really don't even need the money. | ||
They've already stolen so much, they've already reached their hand in the piggy bank and taken so much that they really don't even need the money, but they know if they get caught that potential criminal charges could follow. | ||
Or the public embarrassment of being known as the most corrupt politicians in the history of this country, like Sheldon Whitehouse. | ||
Now, Democrat... | ||
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse has been one of the most outspoken critics of Doge, nearly every day complaining about Doge, complaining about Elon Musk. | ||
He's done multiple bully pulpit, slamming his fist on the podium in the Capitol. | ||
He's done press conferences outside of the Capitol. | ||
This guy every day has complained about Doge and Elon Musk. | ||
Well, maybe now we see why. | ||
Ethics complaint targets Senator Sheldon Whitehouse over millions in grants to his wife's non-profit. | ||
Isn't that beautiful? | ||
Ethics watchdog flagged Senator helping wife rake in millions of dollars for her non-profit. | ||
That's right. | ||
Democrat Senator Sheldon Whitehouse is being accused of violating ethics rules after backing laws. | ||
Isn't it amazing? | ||
I'm telling you, when you really dig into this, the whole Green New Scam, carbon neutral, green energy initiative bullcrap, it was one of the biggest money laundering operations of all time. | ||
They get their friends and family to start up different green energy enterprises that don't actually... | ||
Have any real agenda or business model except that they can get Congress to earmark billions of dollars to these startups, to these non-profits, and then it's their friends and family that get the millions, and then they get the kickback in the form of campaign donations, which they then use to fly around on fancy jets and stay in fancy hotels and have fancy apartments, and it's all for, you know, campaign. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, yeah. | |
The Democratic senator and climate hawk voted for key laws that provided funding for grants to the environmental nonprofit group that works with his wife, Sandra Whitehouse, and pays her through a consulting firm. | ||
unidentified
|
Mm-hmm. | |
All adding up here? | ||
The shell game? | ||
Yeah. | ||
The ethics watchdog, the Foundation for Accountability and Civic Trust. | ||
Is asking the Senate Select Committee on Ethics Chairman James Lankford and Vice Chairman Chris Coons to investigate White House to determine whether he violated the Senate ethics rules on conflicts of interest. | ||
Oh, man. | ||
When you dig into this, by the way, millions of dollars, millions of dollars, millions of dollars his wife was getting, and now it's been exposed, and Doge is going to expose more, and this is why Sheldon White House was panicking and freaking out. | ||
This is real conflict of interest. | ||
This is the prime example of how they engage in the money laundering. | ||
But you know what's funny? | ||
Because Sheldon Whitehouse is a Democrat, the mainstream media will ignore it. | ||
Now, if Sheldon Whitehouse was a Republican, it'd be their top story. | ||
And they'd say, total proof, this is how Republicans launder money through government funding. | ||
But it's a Democrat, so they won't touch it. | ||
But they will continue to report fake news. | ||
This is Democrat Congressman Greg Cesar, a product of the Austin City Council. | ||
And he's still sharing this. | ||
This is from today. | ||
He's still sharing the totally debunked fake news. | ||
Donald Trump's State Department tried to funnel $400 million to Elon Musk's Tesla. | ||
They got caught. | ||
They lied about it. | ||
This isn't efficiency. | ||
It's corruption. | ||
Greg, you must be behind the times. | ||
You guys already tried this deal to attack Trump and Musk, but the problem was this $400 million deal was signed in December. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Yeah. | ||
And in case you didn't know, I guess we should go all the way. | ||
You are not very smart. | ||
You're not a bright guy. | ||
You're just a dirty commie. | ||
And apparently not very bright. | ||
Joe Biden was the president in December, bud. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
And actually, this whole story, you guys tried to bust this story out last week and it got totally debunked. | ||
But here you are, a week later, still sharing it. | ||
So, will that be corruption when Biden did it? | ||
Well, no, of course not. | ||
He's a Democrat. | ||
They'll share fake news. | ||
Democrats will share fake news about Trump and Musk that was really about Biden and Musk. | ||
But they won't say a damn thing about Sheldon Whitehouse making sure his wife's nonprofit gets tens of millions of dollars to make him and his family fabulously rich off the taxpayer. | ||
Won't say a damn thing about that, will they? | ||
Well, some will. | ||
Black Lives Matter leader Rips Democrats' performative anti-Doge protest says it's right out of the George Soros playbook. | ||
Well, it looks like they were about to funnel more money to George Soros. | ||
And they got caught. | ||
Before it was shuttered, USAID routed funds to Soros-aligned causes, terrorists, and drag queens. | ||
Now, whatever we just reported in Doge about... | ||
Civics and behavioral social change. | ||
That's all Soros. | ||
That's all Soros group talk. | ||
That's all Soros propaganda. | ||
So they were going to get hundreds of millions of more. | ||
But before Trump got in, they flushed as much money through USAID as possible back into the Soros groups so that they could get all these Trump protests going again. | ||
And now it's they protest Musk. | ||
They protest Trump. | ||
They protest deportations. | ||
You know, who knows? | ||
But that's all what they flushed all that money through USAID as much as they possibly could before the Trump administration took over and now it's being cut off. | ||
And you also, this story has been kind of ongoing with Soros trying to buy up all those radio stations. | ||
FCC to brief lawmakers on George Soros investigation in closed door meeting. | ||
The House Republicans are getting an update on the Trump administration's probe of billionaire George Soros' influence on local radio. | ||
A source familiar with planning told Fox News Digital. | ||
And the FCC, for whatever reason, let Soros buy this without any of the normal obstacles that you would have to go through. | ||
And I'm not even trying to take some stand about George Soros buying the stations. | ||
Obviously, it would be against my interest and the nation's interest. | ||
Can do it legally, then he can do it. | ||
The FCC, though, did not go through the normal protocols. | ||
And they basically just streamlined it so that Soros could buy it. | ||
So this is where they're going to have a problem. | ||
The Republican Study Committee is hosting the FCC Chairman Brandon Carr at its annual closed-door lunch tomorrow. | ||
The source familiar with the planning said Carr is expected to brief GOP lawmakers on the FCC's investigation into Soros, including an investment firm he's linked to purchasing over 200 Odyssey radio stations nationwide. | ||
So this is Soros trying to expand his propaganda model via these terrestrial radio stations, which Well, | ||
you know, we kind of got a problem with George Soros in general and the influence he's had and all the taxpayer dollars he's received. | ||
So, yeah, maybe the investigation of George Soros shouldn't stop with the FCC. Maybe it needs to go a little deeper than that. | ||
And, you know, we've got to investigate a lot of things here. | ||
We've got to investigate the Democrats in Connecticut engaged in massive voter fraud. | ||
We've got that story. | ||
We need to investigate what's going on at the NSA. Now we also know it's the DNI where they have these secret sex chat rooms where they talk about how much they want to have orgies and transvestite babies. | ||
Not even kidding you. | ||
Not even kidding you. | ||
That's what they're talking about. | ||
I wonder who they vote for. | ||
I wonder what their politics are when you're talking about that in the chat room. | ||
Yikes. | ||
Yikes. | ||
They're not a fan of Tulsi Gabbard either. | ||
So we got all that coming up for you as we are about to enter the second hour. | ||
Now, we are down to two days left when you shop at TheAlexJonesStore.com to also get your free hat. | ||
That's right. | ||
With all orders over $50, you will also receive a free hat, compliments of us, here at InfoWars and The Alex Jones Store, for supporting us. | ||
And we really appreciate your continued support at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
It's not just the free hat with orders over $50. | ||
We also have 30% off shirts and hoodies, 60% off probiotics, also supplements like Hydroforce and the Sambucas supplements. | ||
So, so much going on at thealexjonesstore.com, but remember, two days left with orders over $50 to get a free hat with your purchase at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
So whatever it is, whether it's the supplements or the apparel, Any order over $50, we will send you a free hat. | ||
And of course, every purchase at thealexjonesstore.com gets you multiple entries into the Ford Raptor Bronco giveaway plus 10k cash. | ||
The Ford Raptor Bronco giveaway plus 10k cash happening right now at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
When you become a member of the VIP club, you get double entries with your purchases. | ||
So you can become a member at thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. That's thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. And it's that sustained membership that budgets us into the future. | ||
So when we have the sustained membership and we can know the numbers there consistently every month, that budgets us into the future. | ||
So we really appreciate our VIP members. | ||
Learn more at thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. So the phenomenon happening right now with the access. | ||
Given to the media inside the Oval Office and the White House in general, these legacy media outlets have felt that they just have it owed to them, or really they think it's their right to be in the White House. | ||
And so you kind of have to talk to them like they're children, and they behave like children. | ||
So Caroline Levitt has to talk to them like children, and Alina Haba was addressing the media at a press conference, and has to say, hey, you don't actually have a right to be here. | ||
You have a privilege. | ||
And now we're also getting rid of the White House correspondents that have been in charge of inviting you in here, and we're taking it over ourselves. | ||
Now, if you recall, I did a series of interviews with Chanel Rion, the host over at OAN, who started the new White House press corps, which is going to go official next month. | ||
I don't know how much is public and how much isn't, and I'm talking with them behind the scenes, but... | ||
That should go public next month. | ||
I don't know if the White House is kind of helping them out in this or the White House is just kind of acting unilaterally organically with this, but they're basically declaring that it's done. | ||
The legacy media and their access to the White House is not guaranteed. | ||
We're bringing new people in. | ||
We're opening it up. | ||
And the legacy media hates that because it's all about status for them. | ||
And if they have the White House press pass and they have access to the White House and they can be on camera in the White House, it's just, they're prestigious, their status. | ||
And when you take that away, they have nothing. | ||
These are really empty people. | ||
These are really empty people who have nothing if not for their status and prestige. | ||
So now they're panicked because they're losing it. | ||
So White House Press Secretary Caroline Levitt went to the podium and explained this and how it's going to be handled here in Clip 8. As you all know, for decades, a group of D.C.-based journalists, the White House Correspondents Association, has long dictated which journalists get to ask questions of the President of the United States in these most intimate spaces. | ||
Not anymore. | ||
I am proud to announce that we are going to give the power back to the people who read your papers, who watch your television shows, and who listen to your radio stations. | ||
Moving forward, the White House press pool will be determined by the White House press team. | ||
Legacy outlets who have participated in the press pool for decades will still be allowed to join, fear not, but we will also be offering the privilege to well-deserving outlets who have never been allowed to share in this awesome responsibility. | ||
Just like we added a new media seat in this briefing room, legacy media outlets who have been here for years will still participate in the pool. | ||
But new voices are going to be welcomed in as well. | ||
As part of these changes, we will continue the rotation amongst the five major television networks to ensure the president's remarks are heard far and wide around this world. | ||
We will add additional streaming services, which reach different audiences than traditional cable and broadcast. | ||
This is the ever-changing landscape of the media in the United States today. | ||
We will continue to rotate a print pooler who has the great responsibility of quickly transcribing the president's remarks and disseminating them to the rest of the world. | ||
And we will add outlets to the print pool rotation who have long been denied the privilege to partake in this experience but are committed to covering this White House beat. | ||
We will continue to rotate a radio pooler and add other radio hosts who have been denied access, especially local radio hosts who serve as the heartbeat of our country. | ||
And we will add additional outlets and reporters who are well-suited to cover the news of the day and ask substantive questions of the President of the United States, depending on the news he is making on that given day. | ||
Now, there's kind of two theories of thought, and I think they're probably both true. | ||
Is this to spite the fake news media that has been not just anti-Trump? | ||
I mean, they've been anti-Trump, but they've been anti-truth. | ||
They don't even try anymore. | ||
Is this to spite them, or is this something that's been long overdue? | ||
I think it's probably both. | ||
It is long overdue. | ||
And what you're going to see now, I mean, you look at a Joy Reid. | ||
Joy Reid will have no audience wherever she goes. | ||
Except other than just kind of being unintentional comedy and kind of a psychotic like a Keith Olbermann type that talks politics. | ||
But now the real audience is shifting over to the internet. | ||
It's shifting over to X. It's shifting over to podcast platforms. | ||
So that is the new media. | ||
So I think it's kind of both. | ||
I think it's kind of spite of the fake news, but it's also there's a new media. | ||
Wow, even Fox News, or at least their White House correspondent, is complaining about this announcement today. | ||
I wonder why. | ||
I don't think Jackie Heinrich is going to lose her seat. | ||
It's all prestige, folks. | ||
It's all prestige, I'm telling you. | ||
It's a whole culture of status and prestige. | ||
So you take away, you knock them down a peg? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh. | |
You mean I don't have a White House press pass anymore? | ||
It's like, you ever seen American Psycho with the... | ||
It's such a brilliant film, really. | ||
It's such a great commentary on elitist culture. | ||
And really kind of liberal elitist culture. | ||
But when they all show their business cards, it's like, ooh, nice. | ||
Let's see your business card. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
Oh, what color is that? | ||
Oh, that's bone. | ||
Yeah. | ||
Oh, look at that subtle off-white coloring. | ||
Ooh, is that raised print? | ||
Yes. | ||
It's all about status. | ||
It's all about prestige. | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, you have a White House press pass? | |
Yeah, I have a tent on the east lawn, and I'm in the second row, third chair, center. | ||
Yeah, it's pretty nice, isn't it? | ||
Yeah. | ||
What's your White House press pass? | ||
Oh, yeah, I have a White House press pass. | ||
I'm in the third row, first chair. | ||
We've got a heated tent on the White House lawn as well. | ||
They're Monday through Friday. | ||
What do you think about that? | ||
Nice. | ||
Impressive. | ||
It's all status with these people, folks. | ||
I'm telling you. | ||
It's all status. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, I've got a press pass. | |
I'm in the press gaggle. | ||
I get to fly on Air Force One. | ||
The White House press corps. | ||
Ooh, very nice. | ||
Very impressive. | ||
How'd a nitwit like you get something like that? | ||
But now, that closed loop is being opened up for independent journalists and real competition who have real loyal followings and audience and actually do critical news reporting and analysis not like them. | ||
To them, it's all handed to them and then this status competition. | ||
Oh, folks, I don't know if I can even properly explain this. | ||
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
Even when OAN got access, they flipped out. | ||
OAN is not supposed to have access? | ||
I mean, you understand, and I'm so, the culture here at InfoWars is so anti all of that, obviously, but it's like, I'm so glad because Yeah, we could tick a lot of people off by showing up in there. | ||
But we've shown up at big events. | ||
We've shown up at big press galleries and everything. | ||
And you see what the legacy media does. | ||
And you see how the establishment people panic just when they see Alex Jones or see me or see an InfoWars mic flag or t-shirt. | ||
I mean, it's like total conniption fit. | ||
Because they don't want actual competition. | ||
They don't want actual competition for an audience. | ||
They don't want actual competition intellectually. | ||
Just having to look at us and be in the same room with us. | ||
unidentified
|
The aura. | |
Oh my gosh. | ||
But you're going to see when these independent journalists start getting in there and some of these legacy types lose their status, there's going to be, I mean, they're going to panic, folks. | ||
They're going to freak out. | ||
They're going to panic and they're going to feel like they're empty now. | ||
Because they were always empty. | ||
But they filled their emptiness with access and status in Washington, D.C. Now they're just going to go back to being empty. | ||
By the way, remember how they were all complaining about Doge exposing private tax information? | ||
unidentified
|
Ooh! | |
Every time, House Republicans claim IRS leaked Trump's tax information during Biden administration. | ||
Not just Trump's, but apparently hundreds of thousands of Americans. | ||
Republicans in the House Judiciary Committee are claiming that a new disclosure reveals that the Internal Revenue Service leaked a larger amount of taxpayer data, The IRS admitted that the actual figure was over 400,000 compared to the over 70,000 claimed last year when Representative Jim Jordan began inquiring into the matter. | ||
The IRS's admission confirms the committee's suspicion And recent reports that show the scope of the leak was much broader than what the Biden administration's IRS initially led the public to believe. | ||
So they've been sitting here, the Democrats, that is, they've been sitting here complaining about Doge sharing private taxpayer information, which Doge never did. | ||
Never shared anything. | ||
They were going in for an audit. | ||
They never shared any private information, and the database was already there for people to see anyway, so there was no new revelation here. | ||
There was no new database here, and it was never shared with the public. | ||
But the Biden administration actually did it! | ||
And what are we going to find out? | ||
Are we going to find out? | ||
Remember Rachel Maddow going on TV with Trump's 20-year-old tax returns that showed him making $75 million or something and paying all of his taxes? | ||
It's like, wow, you just made Trump look good. | ||
And you, as usual, look like the idiot, Rachel Maddow. | ||
Did the Biden IRS intentionally leak hundreds of thousands of people's tax returns hoping Trump's would show up? | ||
Was it a fishing expedition and just dump something out and hope that you find the blue lobster? | ||
AKA Donald Trump's tax returns? | ||
Was it targeted and then the rest of the people were just... | ||
Just some of the damage done? | ||
Just like, oh yeah, we're going to have some collateral damage here, but just release them all. | ||
What do you know? | ||
They sat here and complained about Doge sharing taxpayers' private information, and it was the Biden IRS that did it the entire time, and none of them said a peep, and they lied about it. | ||
Every single time, man. | ||
Whatever it is they accuse you of doing, they are doing. | ||
Now, this private information is a little more disturbing. | ||
Following up on the story from yesterday, my goodness. | ||
In a secret NSA chat room, NSA, DNI, and Spacecom officials claim that Tulsi Gabbard is fervently anti-queer, a Russian agent, and a member of the MAGA cult. | ||
These employees, including at least one, they, them, It's an LGBTQA NSA chat room. | ||
But that's not all they like to talk about. | ||
They like to talk about trans sex orgies and having transvestite babies to further the LGBTQ initiative and the trans initiative. | ||
Yeah, this is what's going on. | ||
Christopher Ruffo has all these receipts, by the way. | ||
NSA and CIA officials expressed their desire to have hermaphrodite babies in order to advance trans ideology. | ||
An intersex birth would be a great opportunity to raise a kid as non-binary and let them choose later. | ||
The people who run the surveillance state are insane. | ||
What was it that Musk said about this a couple hours ago, guys? | ||
I thought I sent you the tweet, but it got lost in translation. | ||
Said something like, these are the people that are supposed to be protecting our national security and instead they're jacking off to trans porn. | ||
Well, I don't know if they're just watching it. | ||
I think they're probably having something a little more personal, shall we say? | ||
A more personal touch. | ||
Let's not forget that the Democrats had a staffer get caught sodomizing somebody in the Capitol. | ||
Remember that one? | ||
Yeah. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
Those are the type of people fantasizing about trans orgies and hermaphrodite children in text groups. | ||
You know, it's really insane. | ||
It's actually insane. | ||
Because... | ||
This is the lifestyle these people live, which I really don't even care. | ||
It's not my life. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
We thought they were super spies. | ||
Meanwhile, they're whacking off to trans porn. | ||
So, I don't really care. | ||
These people can make whatever decisions that they want. | ||
Wouldn't promote it and would actually advise against it. | ||
But these are the people that work in the highest levels of government. | ||
Do you think that's just a coincidence? | ||
Who's hiring these people? | ||
Where is the discernment in the hiring process? | ||
This isn't somebody that's like... | ||
You've probably heard about somebody that might be a... | ||
What do they call it? | ||
A functioning alcoholic? | ||
Or maybe there's people that can smoke weed or... | ||
These are people that are severely demented. | ||
These are people that are severely perverted that sit here on chat rooms discussing trans sex orgies. | ||
How do they get into these positions? | ||
And how are there so many of them proliferating these major bureaucracies? | ||
It's by design, folks. | ||
These leftists intentionally hire perverts to protect themselves. | ||
And it's multiple layers of protection. | ||
It's the protection of these perverts will protect us from perverted activity, but it's also we have such high levels of incompetence here that we have plausible deniability. | ||
Lurid sex chats among NSA agents Exposed as Intel Chief Tulsi Gabbard vows to punish workers posting about kinks, fetishes, and polyamory. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm sorry. | |
Oh my gosh. | ||
Pardon me for getting a little immature and nostalgic here, but do you remember... | ||
For those that grew up in the 90s, probably this is the most will resonate with us, which is most my crew. | ||
Do you guys remember you had AOL Instant Messenger, and that was kind of like a different form of AOL's actual messaging service. | ||
It was like if you had AOL Internet, then you were signed in on your screen name. | ||
But if you didn't have AOL Internet, you could get AOL Instant Messenger. | ||
Served the same purpose, but they had chat rooms like that. | ||
And, you know, when you're a teenage kid and a bit of a rebel rouser, and, you know, you like to click around the internet and find goofy stuff, you end up in one of these chat rooms, and it's, like, the funniest thing you've ever read in your life. | ||
And so you're, like, a teenage kid. | ||
You get into one of these, like, puppy kink, like, weird chat rooms in AOL, and, I mean, it's hilarious. | ||
It's hilarious. | ||
So they've taken this like weird niche sex chat room activity from AOL and they've brought it to their government servers and their government bureaucracies. | ||
So stuff a goofy, immature teenager used to go into these chat rooms and make fun of perverts, these are actual government agents that do it. | ||
And love it and brag about it and bring in other people in. | ||
Probably having sex orgies. | ||
unidentified
|
Literally. | |
Washington, D.C. Good Lord. | ||
There's going to be more. | ||
unidentified
|
I promise you. | |
I promise you there's going to be more that comes out from this. | ||
I guarantee it. | ||
Because I can already tell what Rufo and I forget Hannah something that they're kind of tag teaming the story. | ||
They're doing like this slow rollout because each screenshot is more ridiculous than the last. | ||
I guarantee you they're still sitting on a bunch of screenshots. | ||
I guarantee you they're still sitting on other stuff that they're going to reveal. | ||
How does that make you feel? | ||
The highest levels of government. | ||
You've got people online while they're working fantasizing about kink fetishes and having hermaphrodite babies to own the Christian conservatives. | ||
This story is only going to get wilder. | ||
unidentified
|
I can already tell. | |
Okay, where do you even go from there? | ||
I don't even... | ||
How do... | ||
I can't recover. | ||
I've got a buffer here, guys. | ||
I've got a buffer. | ||
All right, let's do this then. | ||
Here's how we'll buffer. | ||
unidentified
|
The... | |
There... | ||
Guys, I gotta get off this. | ||
Thank you. | ||
I can't. | ||
unidentified
|
It's... | |
Yeah. | ||
The crew's pulling up all this other goofy stuff. | ||
We gotta... | ||
I need a buffer here. | ||
Let's do this. | ||
Let's go to... | ||
Can you imagine? | ||
You grow up... | ||
This is so fake. | ||
Who grows up... | ||
I want to be an IRS agent. | ||
Well, apparently, this gentleman, who is now crying during a TV news interview because he lost his dream job at the IRS. Do you believe this? | ||
Look at the type of propaganda they're putting out against Doge now in clip five. | ||
unidentified
|
A former IRS employee right here in Houston, he was one of thousands of federal employees abruptly laid off this week. | |
He sat down exclusively with Michelle Choi to share how he's feeling. | ||
And his message to those in power. | ||
Nothing there. | ||
Nope. | ||
Nothing there. | ||
As he waits for an official termination letter to arrive at his front door, Jason Charles shared the toll the last 48 hours has taken on him. | ||
I can't believe this is happening and it happened so fast. | ||
Like I said, I was just in training. | ||
I was just in training. | ||
I waited four months to go to training. | ||
Just to be fired. | ||
unidentified
|
He's one of 6,000 plus federal employees who work for the Internal Revenue Service fired this week as part of mass layoffs happening under the Trump administration. | |
The majority of those workers, like Charles, were probationary workers employed for less than a year. | ||
Charles told us more than two dozen employees were laid off from his office here off Gessner. | ||
He says it took over a year to get his dream job as a tax-exempt officer dealing with nonprofit organizations and compliance. | ||
I wanted to serve the people. | ||
And despite recent news, he'd held out hope his job would be spared. | ||
How are you feeling? | ||
Numb. | ||
unidentified
|
Confused. | |
Sad, angry, lost. | ||
When did you get the official notice? | ||
Or was there an official notice? | ||
I'm sorry. | ||
We never got official notice. | ||
unidentified
|
I got word from managers that had to be in office yesterday. | |
It was his dream job to work for the IRS, guys. | ||
unidentified
|
And he lost it. | |
His dream job. | ||
Every kid. | ||
Every kid grows up thinking of three letters. | ||
unidentified
|
Not MLB, not NFL, not NBA. No. | |
IRS. Hey, if you've got tax skills, you can work as a tax agent. | ||
Plenty of work available in that field, man. | ||
I'm sure you'll do just fine, but oh my gosh. | ||
I'm supposed to be heartbroken because the Trump administration is... | ||
Cutting all the waste. | ||
By the way, non-profit organizations is such a misnomer, if not just hyperbolic on its face. | ||
How much do people that work at non-profits get paid? | ||
unidentified
|
A lot of them make a lot of money. | |
I don't really know if non-profits should be a thing anymore. | ||
But okay. | ||
We needed a little buffer from the NSA trans orgy time. | ||
So we do it with the IRS. He lost his dream job, guys. | ||
He's real broken up about that. | ||
So we feel for him. | ||
Now, let's go back to the Capitol here. | ||
Let's go back to the Capitol. | ||
Let's go to Representative Jaya Paul, who again is saying the big lie that immigrants are being deported. | ||
Yes, the big lie that Democrats keep telling. | ||
Here she is, clip six. | ||
Okay, we are having some technical difficulties with the video boards. | ||
So then let's do this. | ||
We cover election fraud, voter fraud constantly here. | ||
And this false narrative that it doesn't exist, it's never happened. | ||
It's completely ludicrous. | ||
And of course, it's Democrats that want you to believe that there's no voter fraud, there's no election fraud, because of course they're the ones that are engaging in it. | ||
And of course, the largest example would have to be 2020. But these stories continue to break. | ||
Arrests continue to get made all around the country. | ||
And 90, maybe 95% of the time, it's Democrats. | ||
It's Democrats, folks. | ||
It's happened multiple times here in Texas that have resulted in arrests. | ||
And now the latest in Connecticut. | ||
Five arrested on charges of ballot tampering. | ||
Five tampered with absentee ballots in Connecticut local elections, authorities say. | ||
Affidavits detail Bridgeport, Connecticut ballot fraud case. | ||
Dozens of pages of arrest warrant affidavits made public this week documented the specific allegations underlying charges prosecutors lodged last week. | ||
Against five people in connection with the 2023 Democrat primary between Mayor John Ganim and challenger John Gomez. | ||
Certain voters for whom absentee ballots were submitted and counted in the primary reported to investigators from the chief state's attorney's office that some of those arrested told them who to vote for, actually filled out the ballots themselves and or submitted their ballots for them. | ||
Occurring to the affidavits. | ||
One woman who said she used to campaign for Councilwoman Mariah Perea alleged Perea misled voters who supported rival candidates into casting new votes the documents showed. | ||
So Democrats rigging their own elections. | ||
Oh, where have I heard that before? | ||
Oh, I don't know. | ||
Hillary Clinton? | ||
Joe Biden? | ||
Kamala Harris? | ||
They rigged their own elections and now they got caught. | ||
Rigging their own elections. | ||
But this is why you can't do, I mean, even absentee ballots, absentee ballots are fair, but even those are ripe for corruption. | ||
But imagine how mail-in ballots will be abused by Democrats. | ||
You know, if I could just sit here and explain in 60 seconds how Democrats rig elections and then we could stop it, they would never, Democrats would never hold power ever again. | ||
It starts with when they changed the process of how we got our senators from letting the state's legislatures elect them, where most states are red at that level, because it's harder to rig local elections than it is a state election, but then the Democrats put it to state elections and then they can rig them with the big city votes and gerrymandering, and so now Democrats get Senate seats. | ||
They wouldn't under the old rules. | ||
They win house seats by gerrymandering and siphoning votes out of the major blue population dense areas into the suburban red areas. | ||
So the suburban areas, the rural areas that would normally be all red, they siphon just enough votes out of the city to flip them blue and then they get more seats in the house than they deserve. | ||
Then there's their mail-in ballot fraud. | ||
Apparently their absentee ballot fraud. | ||
They go into old folks' homes. | ||
This has been well documented, by the way, by undercover journalists. | ||
Democrats will send people into old folks' homes with mail-in ballots and vote for them. | ||
And basically tell them, this is how you're going to vote. | ||
And the old person there is just, you know, kind of just minding their own business, not really sure what's going on, and just says, yeah, okay, vote for them. | ||
And it's always the Democrats. | ||
Every single time they got caught at the mail-in drop box, at the mail-in drop boxes. | ||
They got fingerprinted. | ||
And so then they started wearing latex gloves so nobody could identify them. | ||
I don't know. | ||
If the Democrats haven't been cheating to win elections for 100 years in this country, I don't think they would ever win any elections. | ||
And really, our country would be much better off. | ||
All right, let's go to some sights and sounds from the Capitol. | ||
Let's start with Jayapal. | ||
Who continues the Democrat Party lie that immigrants are being deported and Trump is targeting immigrants. | ||
Of course, that is inherently a lie. | ||
They refuse to say the truth, which is not immigrants. | ||
It's illegal aliens. | ||
They're intentionally getting the words wrong. | ||
They're dishonest people. | ||
So here she is lying in clip six. | ||
unidentified
|
We can't let them continue their lies and their distractions. | |
We can't let them deport the millions of families across this country who have been doing the work that keeps our economy going every day. | ||
Now, pause it right there. | ||
Pause it right there, rewind it a little bit. | ||
Do you understand what she's saying here? | ||
And the Democrats always say this, and I refuse to believe it, that somehow the United States of America, the economy, Would not exist, would not be able to stand on its own weight if not for illegal aliens. | ||
Somehow non-citizens, illegal aliens, illegal border crossers, somehow they are saving the country every day. | ||
They are propping up the economy every day. | ||
It's them, not you, the American. | ||
No. | ||
No, no, no, no. | ||
It's the non-citizen. | ||
It's the illegal alien. | ||
They're saving the country. | ||
They're saving the economy. | ||
Does anybody actually believe this? | ||
Do they actually think, which by the way, I mean, even if you believe that, that's kind of a strange admission to say that illegal workers are essential for our economy. | ||
But see, it's the same thing. | ||
Oh, bring on an IRS. He had a dream job of working at the IRS. Bring on a fired IRS agent. | ||
And humanize this one man who lost his job. | ||
And it's such a tragedy. | ||
But when they shut down the entire economy and destroy entire businesses, then it's good. | ||
Then it's good. | ||
But we need to see the U.S. economy. | ||
It couldn't exist if not for illegal aliens. | ||
Do you actually believe that? | ||
She's got more outrageous statements in this short clip. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Keeps our economy going every day. | |
We can't let them scapegoat and criminalize immigrants who contribute. | ||
Immigrants. | ||
unidentified
|
Who are our neighbors, our friends. | |
They're not immigrants. | ||
unidentified
|
Our churchgoers, our community around us that we deeply love. | |
Immigrants are us. | ||
Okay, that's good. | ||
Pause it real quick. | ||
Again, what is she talking? | ||
First of all, it's not immigrants. | ||
It's not immigrants. | ||
So she's just completely wrong and lying here. | ||
But let's say. | ||
If you correct her, she's talking about illegal aliens. | ||
So first, it's illegal aliens prop up our economy. | ||
Our economy wouldn't exist without illegal aliens. | ||
The whole country would collapse, folks. | ||
The whole country, the United States of America, as you know it, and the economy would totally collapse if it wasn't for illegal immigrants. | ||
So that's her first claim. | ||
Then she claims that illegal immigrants are all around you. | ||
It's your community. | ||
It's your church. | ||
Is that true? | ||
When you go to work every day or you go to church or you go to dinner or whatever it is you do for social life, whatever, are you surrounded by illegal immigrants all day? | ||
Is it illegal aliens that do everything? | ||
I'm sorry, whose experience is that? | ||
Whose experience is a life surrounded by illegal aliens all day that do everything for them? | ||
Kind of sounds like maybe Nancy Pelosi's house, but that's a different story. | ||
I mean, am I insane here? | ||
See, words have meaning to me. | ||
I actually listen to what people say and then I analyze it. | ||
If it's not for illegal aliens, our economy would collapse, she claims. | ||
That's outrageous. | ||
And so she's standing up there with a bunch of Democrat members of Congress. | ||
Are they all illegal aliens? | ||
Is she surrounded by illegal aliens right there? | ||
What is this idea that somehow you walk outside your door and you see ten people, nine of them are illegal aliens, making your life possible? | ||
What is this? | ||
And of course she says immigrants, so she's not even really talking about what it actually is because nobody's deporting immigrants. | ||
But okay, here we go. | ||
The final one, the cherry on top. | ||
unidentified
|
Immigrants are us. | |
Immigrants are us, and we all deserve respect and dignity. | ||
If you look at the food that's on your table, think about who picked it. | ||
If you look at your homes, think about who built them. | ||
If you look at your vulnerable elders and your kids, think about who's taking care of them. | ||
Okay. | ||
So an illegal immigrant put the food on your table. | ||
An illegal immigrant built the table that the food is on. | ||
An illegal immigrant built the house that the table is in that the food is on. | ||
And the illegal alien built the economy that you purchased the house and purchased the table that your food and purchased the food on your table. | ||
It's all... | ||
Illegal aliens do it all, folks. | ||
You do nothing. | ||
You basically are worthless. | ||
You, the American citizen, you do nothing. | ||
You suck. | ||
You have no role. | ||
You're insignificant. | ||
You could disappear and everything would be fine. | ||
But if we got rid of the illegal aliens, we'd have problems. | ||
You would have no more life, no food on the table, no table to put food on, no house to put a table in to put food on. | ||
It's all illegal aliens that make it all possible. | ||
They do everything for you. | ||
You do nothing. | ||
You're a worthless American. | ||
We're all immigrants. | ||
No. | ||
Actually, no. | ||
Immigrants are us. | ||
unidentified
|
Wow. | |
Thank you. | ||
And again, nobody's targeting immigrants. | ||
I'm just... | ||
It's just frustrating, folks. | ||
It's just frustrating that we have to deal with such low-life, dishonest rhetoric, such complete misrepresentation of reality. | ||
These are politicians. | ||
These are policymakers. | ||
These are lawmakers. | ||
These people get elected to office, and they're completely dishonest. | ||
It's sad, and we can't have a serious conversation because of these people. | ||
So we can't have serious immigration reform. | ||
We can't have serious conversations about border security because we got freaks and geeks like Jayapal who says illegal immigrants do everything. | ||
You're worthless. | ||
And you're an immigrant, even though you're not. | ||
And immigrants are being targeted, even though they're not. | ||
But somehow your life as you know it would cease to exist if there were no illegal aliens. | ||
All right. | ||
So the Democrat propaganda agents on X, which get boosted and promoted, by the way, and my guess is that somebody, maybe it's Musk, maybe it's not, I don't think he really has time to deal with the idiosyncrasies of the X algorithms, but I think somebody's boosting these left-wing accounts so that they don't go over to Blue Sky or Facebook threads or something just to keep them on X. So it's an interesting strategy. | ||
So you get a lot of Democrat Party propaganda kind of forced into your X feed that you don't want to see, you don't follow. | ||
And they still complain about it, even though it's true. | ||
But this is the one now that they've all been pushing. | ||
This is the Democrat Party's push. | ||
They've finally done it, folks. | ||
They've got Elon Musk. | ||
He's toast after this. | ||
Going viral on his own platform. | ||
Funny enough, boosted on his own platform. | ||
Millions of views on his own platform. | ||
They've done it, folks. | ||
This is it. | ||
And it's Jasmine Crockett, of course. | ||
Jasmine Crockett has, quote, destroyed Elon Musk. | ||
And that's the propaganda line. | ||
They sent out the message to all their Democrat Party propaganda agents, and they said, share this video and use destroyed in the post. | ||
Somehow, you know, Musk is destroyed by Jasmine Crockett. | ||
So this is it. | ||
This is the epic takedown, folks. | ||
You're never going to see anything like this. | ||
It's the most epic intellectual takedown in political history. | ||
Only a genius like Jasmine Crockett could come up with such an amazing siloquy of brilliance here. | ||
It's Jasmine Crockett. | ||
She's ended it. | ||
Elon Musk is done after this brutal takedown, destroyed by Jasmine Crockett in clip three. | ||
unidentified
|
If you could speak directly to Elon Musk, what would you say? | |
Fuck off. | ||
That's it? | ||
That's it. | ||
He's done now, folks. | ||
He is done now. | ||
Brilliant stuff from Jasmine Crockett. | ||
I don't know where she comes up. | ||
Who writes this stuff for her? | ||
That had to be a team of writers. | ||
Award-winning writers. | ||
To come up with something so brilliant. | ||
That blew my mind. | ||
Now, to something serious. | ||
The big budget bill is being discussed. | ||
The Senate, the House, the vote is coming up in March. | ||
Representative Thomas Massey, and I will say this, I've talked about this before, but the holdouts on the Republican side of the aisle are going to be a lot more staunch, both in the Senate and in the House, than they were in the last Congress. | ||
Because now there's a new mandate from the American people, and... | ||
That mandate is stop all the fraud, waste, and abuse. | ||
So where they were able to whip up some of these votes to pass these spending bills in the last Congress, I don't think it's going to be so easy this go-around. | ||
And there's going to be a lot more holdouts at both the Senate and at the House. | ||
So there's a good chance that Johnson and Thune on some of these votes will have to get Democrat votes. | ||
Now that will all play itself out. | ||
Here's Thomas Massey explaining why he is a no-vote. | ||
In clip seven. | ||
Can you just talk to us? | ||
Are you still a no? | ||
unidentified
|
Is there anything? | |
They convinced me in there. | ||
I'm a no. | ||
Is there anything? | ||
Look, let me their own numbers. | ||
If the Republican plan passes under the rosiest assumptions, which aren't even true, we're going to add $328 billion to the deficit this year. | ||
We're going to add $295 billion to the deficit the year after that, and $242 billion to the deficit after that, under the rosiest assumptions. | ||
Why would I vote for that? | ||
Sir, are you solidly a no? | ||
Yeah, they convinced me. | ||
I was a lean no until this meeting. | ||
And then this no confirmed you. | ||
This is a no. | ||
Why, what, why? | ||
They're talking points. | ||
Look, look, this is, these are not something I made up. | ||
This is from... | ||
This is the leadership's talking points. | ||
It adds $328 billion to the deficit. | ||
It adds $295 billion to the deficit the year after that. | ||
The only way they get to this magic thing where it's not going to kill our country is five years from now, they imagine that 2.5% growth accumulates. | ||
Even right here, they say they're going to cap discretionary spending. | ||
You think we're going to cap discretionary spending and then spend at the rate of inflation after that? | ||
That has never happened. | ||
So their assumptions are wrong. | ||
But even if you take their assumptions at face value, they told us in there they're going to increase the deficit in 2025 by $328 billion. | ||
And I've been here long enough. | ||
I've been here 12 years. | ||
I've seen a 10-year plan or two come all the way to 10 years. | ||
Under Boehner, we had these 10-year plans. | ||
Under Ryan, we had these 10-year plans. | ||
Anything past the third year never happens. | ||
And of course, it was Thomas Massey who accurately predicted last year how The spending bill would be handled and how Speaker Johnson would handle it. | ||
I mean, he predicted it to a T. They went on to vote right before Christmas, just as he predicted. | ||
And they got a big, fat spending bill that they promised they wouldn't do a continued resolution with. | ||
And then they did. | ||
Massey predicted it. | ||
And so the fate of the budget resolution is supposed to be voted on tonight. | ||
They were originally planning on voting at 5 o'clock Central, 6 o'clock Eastern. | ||
So it's supposed to be happening in 15 minutes. | ||
You just heard Speaker Johnson say, okay, we're going to do the vote tonight. | ||
I'm not so sure. | ||
Now, they could pass the bill without Massey, Sparks, Davidson, and Burchett. | ||
They could pass it without their votes, assuming everybody is going to be voting and in attendance. | ||
Which, based off of the chamber vote on the rules for debate, the numbers are there. | ||
They can do it without those four votes. | ||
So if he has the votes, they're going to bring it and they're going to vote for it in about 20 minutes. | ||
If they lose other votes in the House, if they discover that there's two or three other Republicans that don't want to vote on the bill, then he's not going to vote tonight because he doesn't want to take that loss. | ||
That would be too devastating. | ||
So we actually have physical conservatives in the House that are not going to vote for deficit spending bills. | ||
They're just not going to do it. | ||
And if the vote doesn't happen by the end of this show, then that means they got... | ||
They have enough holdouts that are actually physical conservatives. | ||
They're not going to pass this bill. | ||
So, we'll see what happens if they vote tonight or not. | ||
If they don't, they don't have the votes. | ||
Period. | ||
Johnson is not going to put this thing out there unless he knows he has the votes. | ||
And he'd love to get it passed and then go back to Trump and wave it around like a victory. | ||
Because that's kind of what he's turned into, is like this little dog that wags his tail running around the Capitol. | ||
But is he actually a conservative? | ||
Not really. | ||
I would say not really. | ||
Some other news here out of D.C. Biden judge dresses down DOJ lawyers over USAID disbursement, orders Trump admin to pay foreign aid contracts. | ||
This is nuts. | ||
This is crazy what these federal judges are doing. | ||
We'll take a look at two different takes on this. | ||
This is the Gateway Pundit. | ||
A Biden-appointed judge on Tuesday blasted DOJ lawyers over USAID disbursement and ordered the Trump administration to pay the foreign contracts by 11.59 p.m. | ||
on Wednesday evening. | ||
So they have to pay the Democrat NGOs. | ||
This judge is forcing Trump to pay the Democrat money laundering operations, kickback operations. | ||
The U.S. District Judge for the District Court of Columbia, go figure. | ||
Amir Ali, a Biden appointee, temporarily blocked President Trump from canceling foreign aid contracts. | ||
Oh, but where are they when Joe Biden cancels the contracts to build the wall? | ||
Oh, that's right. | ||
He still pays them and then sells the materials and we don't get a wall. | ||
Judge Ali ordered the Trump administration to restore funding for the foreign aid contractors. | ||
After Trump froze U.S. foreign aid for 90 days last month, Trump's executive order to halt foreign aid grants, Secretary of State Marco Rubio issued a new guidance to temporarily pause spending on most foreign aid for three months. | ||
But now, Judge Ali says you have to pay those foreign aid projects. | ||
You have to pay those money laundering operations. | ||
You have to pay them. | ||
Well, that's a corrupt judge. | ||
Obviously. | ||
And he needs to be impeached and removed from the bench. | ||
Obviously. | ||
ABC News. | ||
Federal judge rules Trump administration has to pay millions in foreign aid to non-profits. | ||
Sounds like they make a lot of profits, don't they? | ||
Federal judge rules Trump administration has to pay millions in foreign aid. | ||
Ordering. | ||
The Trump administration to dole out millions of dollars to multiple nonprofit groups. | ||
unidentified
|
Uh-huh. | |
Judge Amir Ali, a Biden appointee, excoriated the Trump administration and Trump's attorneys during a lengthy hearing on Tuesday over its failure to pay the groups for works they conducted prior to President Trump's executive order. | ||
No, Trump is the chief executive. | ||
He has every right to do this. | ||
So this is, again, Democrat judges. | ||
We're supposed to have separations of powers. | ||
Three distinct branches of the government with distinct duties. | ||
And these Democrat judges are reaching across into the executive branch and basically acting as fiat dictators. | ||
Man, we got... | ||
So much corruption in this country. | ||
So much corruption. | ||
And these leftist activist judges are one of the worst aspects of it, folks. | ||
These Democrats, they get you into a courtroom with their corrupt judges and they destroy you. | ||
They crush you. | ||
They imprison you. | ||
They take your money. | ||
They take your business. | ||
They reach across the aisle and they say, nope. | ||
Even though Trump is the elected president of the United States and then in charge of the executive branch, I'm a Democrat judge and I'm going to make policy decisions. | ||
I'm a Democrat judge and I'm going to make executive orders. | ||
No, Judge Ali needs to be impeached. | ||
Impeached. | ||
But that's not the only one. | ||
Here's another one. | ||
Judge indefinitely blocks Trump's plan to freeze federal aid. | ||
Another federal judge on Tuesday indefinitely blocked Trump administration freeze of federal funding. | ||
U.S. District Judge Lauren Kahn enjoined the government from implementing giving effect to or reinstating under a different name the White House Budgets Office Directive to freeze assistance while reviewing the spending. | ||
Who's making these calls? | ||
They just don't even care, folks. | ||
They said, we're going to launder hundreds of billions of dollars. | ||
We're going to give it to our friends and families that have non-profits and startups. | ||
We're all going to get massively rich and nobody's going to stop us. | ||
And then Trump gets into office. | ||
Doe starts to investigate. | ||
They stop it. | ||
And these judges just say no! | ||
Judges should be stopping corruption. | ||
Instead, these Democrat Party judges are enabling corruption, greenlighting corruption, and are now part of the corruption. | ||
There's no other way to put it. | ||
They are part of the corruption. | ||
Yikes. | ||
But maybe there is a larger plan. | ||
I certainly hope so. | ||
Now, Elon Musk said, you play to win decisively, and shared this clip while all of this was going on about the FBI destroying evidence and people trying to abscond the information from the Epstein list. | ||
Musk posted this. | ||
The timing of it makes me think it has something to do with it, but maybe not. | ||
But here's what he told Tucker Carlson in Clip 10. You just went more all-in than I've ever seen anybody, ever. | ||
Did you ever doubt? | ||
unidentified
|
Or did you just decide to go all-in and you just did it? | |
I mean, my philosophy is you play, you play to win. | ||
You don't play it by half measure. | ||
Now, this is our best hope right now with the people in charge to do something about the corruption, folks. | ||
It's our best hope. | ||
But. | ||
unidentified
|
But. | |
Sigh. | ||
*sigh* I mean, if we can't get the Epstein list, and if they're holding it back for strategic reasons, fine. | ||
But it's just like, if we can't get the Epstein list, maybe forget about that. | ||
If we can't get the JFK files, if we can't get these corrupt judges off the bench, if we can't stop money laundering... | ||
If we can't close our borders, if we can't arrest criminals, I mean, we have the team in charge to do it right now. | ||
And if we can't get it done, and nobody has a long-term plan to get it done, you know, I mean, it's hard to sit up here and not start to get a little shadow over this whole thing, to be honest. | ||
So I hope there's a long-term plan. | ||
I hope they've caught these people destroying evidence. | ||
I hope they've caught these people laundering the money. | ||
But it's, I mean, it's like they get caught laundering the money. | ||
A judge says, nope, they get to keep laundering it. | ||
Nothing happens. | ||
They get caught with this honeypot Jeffrey Epstein sex operation and they just hide the list. | ||
Nobody goes to jail. | ||
I mean... | ||
It's like, winning elections is great. | ||
Getting good policy and good rhetoric is great. | ||
When do we get some results as far as people going to prison? | ||
Because this is ridiculous. | ||
Doge has exposed hundreds of billions of dollars of waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
That's by design, folks. | ||
Somebody's doing that. | ||
Somebody's taking that money. | ||
Somebody's getting rich. | ||
Okay? | ||
A judge gets to determine what the executive branch can and can't do. | ||
Wrong. | ||
There's nothing unconstitutional, nothing illegal about what the Trump administration is doing. | ||
And a judge just says, nope, the money laundering continues. | ||
So, I hope there's a plan here. | ||
I hope there's something else going on behind the scenes and the people responsible for all this corruption are getting caught right now as they're engaging in it in live time. | ||
But it's just like, if they can get away with this, we'll have, hey, we'll have a good four years, at least a good two years. | ||
Maybe we'll get the economy back up and running. | ||
We'll have, you know, we'll get a fresh oxygen tank. | ||
We're drowning in the ocean. | ||
We'll get a fresh oxygen tank and that'll be nice, but... | ||
If people don't go to prison and this stuff isn't just completely eradicated from U.S. politics, then, I mean, this is our only hope, folks. | ||
There's not going to be another Trump. | ||
There's not going to be another Doge. | ||
unidentified
|
Give me all of them. | |
Look. | ||
See that? | ||
Trump was right about everything. | ||
It just came in. | ||
unidentified
|
Somebody said, I said, this was sent in by a fan. | |
I said, I think we should make some of them, right? | ||
But we were pretty much. | ||
You want one? | ||
Are you allowed to take one? | ||
Because he'll consider it. | ||
I know him well. | ||
He's sort of a stiff. | ||
unidentified
|
Brian, you're not a stiff guy. | |
He'll take other things, but not a free hat. | ||
Always say yes to the president. | ||
Always say yes to the president. | ||
Would anybody like one? | ||
Trump, how many, all right, what are they going to, it's going to be like a whole paragraph on the next hat. | ||
That's a new Trump hat. | ||
Trump was right about everything hat. | ||
So, but he said free hat. | ||
We have a free hat. | ||
That's our thing at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
And one of them actually kind of looks like the Trump hat. | ||
It's the red InfoWars cap with the red front and the red bill. | ||
It's the trucker cap. | ||
And when you go to thealexjonesstore.com and you make a purchase over $50, you get a free hat with your order. | ||
It'll show up with your order. | ||
So whether it's the supplements, the popular supplements like the Ultimate Sea Moss with burdock root capsules, whether it's the latest in the InfoWars Alex Jones Store supplement line, the Shilajit Complex Super Infused Supplement, your daily boost in vitality, scientifically formulated. | ||
For maximum performance and wellness, you should see the ingredients in this thing just loaded. | ||
The Shilajit Complex. | ||
The ashwagandha root for stress and mood support. | ||
Magnesium for muscle recovery. | ||
Black pepper for nutrient absorption. | ||
Black seed extract, which supports immune health. | ||
Burdock root detoxifies and cleanses the body. | ||
Irish sea moss boosts skin and energy. | ||
And that's just some of them. | ||
Not to mention... | ||
The cumin extract, not to mention the CoQ10 and the PQQ. So this thing is absolutely loaded. | ||
I don't know how they were able to squeeze so much goodness into these capsules, but they did it. | ||
They did it at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
The Shilajit Complex is on sale, and when you subscribe to the monthly automated ship and delivery, You can get it 50% off. | ||
That's unbeatable. | ||
Shilajit Complex, the latest and greatest in the supplement line at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
And again, with every purchase, not only right now for the next two days do you get a free hat, but with every purchase you also get multiple entries into the Ford Raptor Bronco Plus 10K Cash Giveaway. | ||
So this is part of the... | ||
Sale happening right now at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
30% off all t-shirts and hoodies as well. | ||
Yes, including the biggest balls and big balls hat. | ||
Including the knives. | ||
The knife collection that we have, also on sale. | ||
A lot of entries when you purchase any of the knives. | ||
I think the limited edition dagger is still available, but it's on a limited supply last I checked. | ||
The limited edition InfoWars dagger was a limited supply. | ||
I don't know if it's sold out yet. | ||
You might still be able to get that. | ||
But this is everything we have right now on sale at a discounted rate at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
And it's your support there that keeps us on the air. | ||
But, hey, buying, we really appreciate everybody that buys the products. | ||
We really appreciate it when we open up the phone lines and people call in and talk about how great they are. | ||
Remember, the best way is to join the VIP club at thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP because it's that sustained membership that budgets us into the future. | ||
So sales kind of come up and down. | ||
They come and go depending on the time of the year, the time of the week, what the hot sales items are, what we have in stock. | ||
But it's the sustained membership at The Alex... | ||
TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP that budgets us into the future. | ||
And so we're greatly appreciative of all of our VIP members. | ||
Go to TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP to figure out all the things that come along with that membership. | ||
All right, we're in the third and final hour of the Infowars War Room. | ||
We're going to cover the rest of this news, and we'll take a couple phone calls, too. | ||
That's the sound of the FBI agents destroying evidence. | ||
Oh, yes. | ||
And now, the reports are, Kash Patel had either already started the investigation into James Comey and the FBI illegally spying on Donald Trump, or when the evidence started getting destroyed, decided to launch the investigation. | ||
So, I'm an impatient person. | ||
I'm having to practice patience. | ||
I'm getting a little impatient. | ||
It's really the silent treatment that I think is driving me crazy with all of this stuff. | ||
I just want to see the criminals go to prison. | ||
I just want to truly drain the swamp. | ||
I don't want to stall it for a second. | ||
I want to truly drain it. | ||
I mean, double flush, courtesy flush, air spray, you know, the whole thing. | ||
And so it just gets a little like, ugh. | ||
They're deleting evidence. | ||
They're stopping Trump's agenda in the courts. | ||
They're going to pass another massive spending bill. | ||
Did Soros just buy a bunch of radio stations with USAID money and they're still flushing more to him? | ||
Just corruption on top of corruption on top of corruption. | ||
And then it's just like we're just sitting here begging, begging for it to stop. | ||
And arrests to be made. | ||
Now that's where we're at. | ||
All right. | ||
We're going to take calls this hour. | ||
We'll give out the phone lines now. | ||
The number will be on the screen. | ||
The phone number is 877-789-2539. | ||
877-789-2539. | ||
And anything we've discussed today is fair game. | ||
Now, what is going on at these airports? | ||
Video shows near miss between Southwest Airlines flight and a private jet at Midway Chicago. | ||
And when you watch this video, you can see the pilot here probably saves everybody's life. | ||
Now, we don't have, at least, I haven't seen the audio from air traffic control get released, so the communications are still unknown, but based off the video, it's pretty clear. | ||
Somebody gave the Southwest Airlines flight, they clear, to land, and it does hit the runway. | ||
And then a private jet goes right across the runway, and the Southwest Airlines plane pulls up moments before an imminent collision with the private jet would have been made and probably would have been a major loss of life. | ||
So it's unclear at this point what happened there. | ||
I mean, it's unlikely that the Southwest pilot would have landed without the clear. | ||
So, either whoever was in charge of air traffic control shouldn't have cleared the flight to land, or whoever was in charge of air traffic control should not have greenlit the private jet to cross the runway, or perhaps the pilot on the private jet made a major miss and shouldn't have been crossing the runway, but nonetheless, that pilot probably saved lives. | ||
The pilot on that airplane... | ||
The Southwest Airplane likely saved lives by making that emergency maneuver to get back up off the ground after having hit the tarmac. | ||
unidentified
|
Every day. | |
Every day with the airplane stuff now. | ||
Seriously. | ||
Culprit. | ||
Behind disturbing government TV hack of Trump kissing Elon Musk's toes revealed. | ||
Remember that one? | ||
We covered it yesterday. | ||
Somebody hacked the HUD department TVs and had a strange video of Trump kissing Elon Musk's feet. | ||
You know, here's what I would do. | ||
Because I said, it's probably, you know, probably just fire the guy and just, you know, let him go. | ||
I got a sense of humor. | ||
I got a sense of humor. | ||
And as disturbing as the video might have been, it's, you know, there's a little bit of comedy, too. | ||
It's a little funny. | ||
I would call the guy to the office. | ||
Now, he has been relieved of his duties, according to these reports. | ||
They discovered who it was yesterday and escorted him off the property, and his firing is assumed at this point. | ||
HUD located a person connected with the bizarre incident and confirmed plans to hold that person accountable. | ||
Legal ramifications are being explored. | ||
Additionally, termination or suspension of a certain services are being explored as it relates to the department. | ||
I would call the guy in. | ||
Now, it's likely a deranged leftist that did this. | ||
But, you know, maybe it's just somebody with kind of a disturbing sense of humor but has some potential. | ||
I'd call him in and I'd say, so, you know, get him to admit it. | ||
Did you do the video? | ||
Did you hack the system and play the video? | ||
Yes, yeah, that was me. | ||
Yeah, okay. | ||
All right, well, you know, It's a bit of a disturbing thing that you shared on the video screens. | ||
And it's a bit disturbing that you would hack into the HUD department TVs to do such a thing. | ||
But, you know, I kind of look at this and, you know, you've got some potential. | ||
You were able to hack the TV system and... | ||
And you were able to make a video here that, even though it's a bit disturbing, maybe had some comedic value and maybe a little humor. | ||
So, if you want to stay employed, do you think we could maybe redirect your talents to something useful? | ||
Would you be interested in that? | ||
Clearly, you've got some potential. | ||
So, you know, if you respond to the Doge email of what did you do this week and you say, I hacked the HUD TV systems and I... Put up an AI video. | ||
You did something. | ||
You actually did something. | ||
Probably more than 90% of federal employees. | ||
So we kind of like that. | ||
So would you like to put your talents and abilities to good use? | ||
That's how I'd treat it. | ||
Now, if it's some deranged radical leftist, then they'll probably wanted to get fired the whole time anyway. | ||
But I'd say, you got potential, kid. | ||
And even though I disagreed with what you did here, you show potential. | ||
You actually did something at work. | ||
You plied yourself. | ||
You made something happen. | ||
Would you like to actually do something around here? | ||
Or you can take your stuff and go home. | ||
Really doesn't matter to us. | ||
What was that other story that you guys pulled up? | ||
Some other hack into a DC department? | ||
Somebody hacked the speakers. | ||
Did I see that you had on the screen? | ||
It didn't look like... | ||
What is this? | ||
Oh, it was the same story. | ||
Federal agency TV show Trump signing executive orders on soundless loop following A.I. Musk foot-sucking fiasco. | ||
I'd say, listen, kid. | ||
You got some spunk. | ||
You got some creativity. | ||
You got some gusto. | ||
Would you put it to good use? | ||
That's kind of how I would handle it. | ||
But they've apparently found the guy. | ||
So there you go. | ||
I wonder if we won't see something like that again, though. | ||
I kind of feel like you're going to see something like that again. | ||
All right. | ||
How about Rachel Maddow? | ||
Very upset that Joy Reid's show has been canceled. | ||
It's breaking her heart. | ||
Now, this is ironic, but let's show Rachel Maddow last night on MSNBC crying about this racist firing of Joy Reid in clip nine. | ||
I will tell you, it is also... | ||
It's unnerving to see that on a network where we've got two, count them, two non-white hosts in primetime, both of our non-white hosts in primetime are losing their shows, as is Katie Fang on the weekend. | ||
And that feels worse than bad, no matter who replaces them. | ||
That feels indefensible, and I do not defend it. | ||
Now think about the premise here. | ||
So you can't be fired if you're black? | ||
unidentified
|
That's interesting. | |
But that's what she's insinuating here. | ||
You can't be fired if you're black. | ||
So it doesn't matter if you bring in no ratings. | ||
It doesn't matter if you put on a bad show. | ||
It doesn't matter. | ||
It doesn't matter if you look bad. | ||
You can't even present yourself for a TV show. | ||
You are on TV. Do we have to kind of look good? | ||
I don't really, you know, like to doll myself up, but I'll, you know, comb my hair and comb my beard and put on the jacket. | ||
It's part of the job. | ||
But no, if you're black, you can't be fired or it's racist. | ||
Think about how dangerous of a proposal that is. | ||
Think about how dangerous of a concept that is. | ||
But see, that's what they expect. | ||
That's what Joy Reid expects. | ||
That's what all of these black leftists expect. | ||
I'm entitled to a job. | ||
I don't have to do it well. | ||
If you fire me, you're racist. | ||
That's the entire mindset of this whole thing. | ||
And that's how Joy Reid ends up on television. | ||
And it's not just in TV. It's in all kinds of different positions. | ||
They just think, oh, I'm entitled. | ||
Because of my skin color or my sexual orientation. | ||
Now, I've got a little bit of a follow-up on that. | ||
But Rachel Maddow is so upset because of the great crew that apparently is no longer going to be employed because the readout with Joy Reid is no longer on TV. Now, Joy Reid apparently had 30 people that worked on her show. | ||
30 people. | ||
Joy Reid's show was an hour, I think? | ||
Pretty sure Joy Reid's show was an hour from 7 to 8 p.m. | ||
Eastern, considered a primetime slot on MSNBC. A 30-person crew. | ||
Now, just to kind of put it all into perspective, It's typical for a TV crew, a live TV crew like that, a network TV crew like that, to have a large crew. | ||
That is pretty standard. | ||
30 on an hour-long TV show seems a bit overkill. | ||
Now, I've worked in network news, and I've worked on TV trucks and everything else, so I've seen how the stuff goes down behind the scenes, but 30 seems way over the top. | ||
I don't know what you even do with 30 people on an hour-long TV show, to be honest with you. | ||
So I don't know where 30 employees, what it all is that they're doing, and maybe that was part of the problem too, was because it was just way overweight, way inefficient, and not producing ratings. | ||
So they had to just cancel the whole show. | ||
But, quickly, let me also say, how many guys do we have back there today? | ||
Five? | ||
Do we have a five-man crew back there today, guys? | ||
We usually have, what, four or five-man crew? | ||
We have a four-man crew today? | ||
That's about your average. | ||
We'll have sometimes five, but it's usually four. | ||
Sometimes we have to run with three. | ||
But imagine that. | ||
As interactive and agile as this show is, there's the crew right there. | ||
We have a four-man crew today. | ||
So that means somebody running audio, somebody running video, somebody running clips, somebody cutting clips, somebody running the log, somebody pulling up the graphics, soon to be somebody answering the phones. | ||
We're able to do that with four or five, sometimes three people. | ||
This is a three-hour live show with no teleprompters, no script. | ||
I mean, folks, I basically get 30 minutes to coordinate with the crew before a show because they're here working all day. | ||
So, I mean, you can imagine what that takes. | ||
And I'm in charge of all the content here. | ||
And then I send it to them, and then we might do a couple things where I give them an agenda item or two. | ||
But, I mean, it's all pretty much live, agile, versatile, multimedia, live operation. | ||
And we're able to do it with four, sometimes three, sometimes five people. | ||
In a three-hour live show that has live phone lines, too. | ||
Joy Reid, in an hour-long TV show that gets no ratings, and she makes millions of dollars, has a 30-person crew. | ||
30. And not a single one of them said, hey, you might want to do something about your look. | ||
But, okay, disregard that. | ||
Big shout out to the crew. | ||
Does the work of 30 people. | ||
So each one of the InfoWars crew members is good for about six other TV workers. | ||
So on average, an InfoWars crew member is good for six TV crew members. | ||
I think that's probably, yeah. | ||
That's probably about right. | ||
The average InfoWars crew is about six normal crew members at a network news station. | ||
So big shout out to the crew. | ||
But back to Rachel Maddow. | ||
So if Maddow is concerned about these 30 people that lost their jobs, did you know... | ||
By the way, see if you guys can pull up Joy Reid's salary. | ||
I doubt she was making Rachel Maddow money. | ||
But Rachel Maddow makes $10 million or more a year. | ||
Her net worth is over $100 million. | ||
Rachel Maddow's. | ||
So Rachel... | ||
You could easily start a new show. | ||
You could easily start a new platform, and you could hire these people back. | ||
You have the money. | ||
You could launch a YouTube news network and hire every single one of those people back with a living salary with your $100 million net worth. | ||
But you won't do it. | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
You could actually forfeit your airtime. | ||
You could forfeit your primetime slot as a gay man. | ||
As a gay white man. | ||
And you could give Joy Reid your airtime. | ||
And you could pay her to do it. | ||
You could literally give her your airtime. | ||
But you won't do it. | ||
unidentified
|
No. | |
No. | ||
The network executives are supposed to sit there and take a loss on Joy Reid's show. | ||
That gets no ratings with a 30-person crew. | ||
But you won't step up. | ||
You won't start a news network for these people to work at with your 100-plus million dollars. | ||
You won't sacrifice your airtime for Joy Reid. | ||
So here's an idea. | ||
Why don't you shut the hell up? | ||
Here's what Donald Trump had to say about it. | ||
Low-life chairman of Concast. | ||
Concast. | ||
Brian Roberts. | ||
The owner of Ratings Challenged NBC and MSDNC has finally gotten the nerve up to fire one of the least talented people in television, in television history. | ||
That's my addition. | ||
The mentally obnoxious racist Joy Reid. | ||
Based on her ratings, which were virtually non-existent, I feel like this should be read in a Trump voice. | ||
It's too good. | ||
Actually. | ||
The life chairman of Concast, Brian Roberts, the owner of Ratings Challenged NBC and MSNDC, has finally gotten up the nerve to fire one of the least talented people in television history, the mentally obnoxious, racist Joy Reid. | ||
unidentified
|
We all know her, unfortunately. | |
Based on her ratings, which were virtually non-existent, she should have been canned a long time ago, along with everyone else who works there. | ||
Also thrown out was Alex Wagner, the sub on the seriously failing Rachel Maddow show. | ||
Rachel rarely shows up because she knows there's nobody watching, and she always knows that she's got less television persona than virtually anyone on TV, except perhaps Joy Reid. | ||
Then there's, of course, low-IQ conman Al Sharpton. | ||
Fake Reverend, they say. | ||
Fake Reverend. | ||
Who has perhaps the lowest TV ratings in the history of television. | ||
What is he doing to Brian Roberts to stay on the air? | ||
This whole corrupt operation is nothing more than an illegal arm of the Democrat Party. | ||
They should be forced to pay vast sums of money for the damage they've done to our country. | ||
Fake news is an unpardonable sin. | ||
unidentified
|
Your favorite president. | |
What is Al Sharpton doing to Brian Roberts to stay on the air? | ||
Oh my goodness. | ||
Thank you for that one, President Trump. | ||
Thank you for that one. | ||
Speaking of entitled, did you see this? | ||
Speaking of NBC, the black middle class was built by federal jobs. | ||
Now drastic cuts by Trump and Musk are putting it under threat. | ||
Much of the middle... | ||
The black middle class was built by federal jobs. | ||
Now that's going to change. | ||
Now, according to these numbers, at least 60% of black women with a college degree end up working for the federal government. | ||
Is that shocking? | ||
Hey, you owe reparations. | ||
Well, you already have charitable food programs. | ||
And apparently, The vast majority of federal jobs are held by non-whites, and the highest per capita is black female college graduates that want to work for the federal government. | ||
And so now it's racist to slash government jobs because they're held by so many black people. | ||
And that's how the black middle class was built? | ||
You know, this is all so insulting, really. | ||
The left sits here and tells the same thing to black Americans every day. | ||
You can't make it. | ||
You can't make it without federal aid. | ||
You can't make it without nonprofits. | ||
You can't make it without the Democrat Party. | ||
You can't make it without a big government. | ||
You can't make it without us fighting racism. | ||
They tell this to black Americans every single day. | ||
When are black Americans going to get sick of it? | ||
When are black Americans going to get sick of the Democrat Party telling them you can't do it? | ||
Maybe they already are. | ||
Maybe they already are. | ||
Let's take a call. | ||
Let's go to Sean in California. | ||
Sean, you're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
Howdy Owen. | ||
Is my call coming in loud and clear? | ||
Yes, we have you. | ||
unidentified
|
Excellent. | |
Great. | ||
Regarding Kash Patel investigating all this corruption in the FBI and the FBI scrambling, when we comprehend that the government is ran as a corporation, corporations are to grow. | ||
It's up to we, the people, to prune those branches. | ||
So whatever Kash Patel uncovers, it's going to be on top of us as a body politic, if you will, to stay on top of that and make sure this problem never occurs again. | ||
So I've always invited you guys to go check out national-assembly.net or restore-america.org. | ||
And while I'm at it, folks, support the Infowars store. | ||
I referenced it earlier, but I am starting the ultimate sea moss diet, and we are going to see how that all turns out. | ||
And I'm looking forward to it as I get in shape this spring. | ||
So keep doing the good work going. | ||
All right, you're going to have your summer bod with the Alex Jones summer bod, sea moss bod? | ||
unidentified
|
If Alex can drop that weight and look svelte, I definitely can do it too. | |
I've got to get this 38-inch waist back down to a 32, so I look a lot more attractive. | ||
You know what I mean? | ||
All right. | ||
Well, we're going to be cheering you on, Sean. | ||
And we appreciate you shopping at thealexjonesstore.com. | ||
I'm sure we'll be hearing updates from you on the phone line, too. | ||
unidentified
|
Will do. | |
Take care. | ||
God bless. | ||
Thank you. | ||
He puts it interestingly about the growth and pruning the branches. | ||
That's why it's such an odd position to be in right now. | ||
Because I don't want to be overly critical. | ||
In these early stages, and I don't want impatience to come off as criticism, but, I mean, Doge is doing great work. | ||
A lot of good things are happening. | ||
I just, this whole shenanigans going down at the FBI destroying evidence, this whole shenanigans going down with, why don't we have the JFK? Why don't we have the Epstein list? | ||
It's hard for me because I can deal in realities. | ||
I can't really deal with the unknown. | ||
So it's like I could fathom that maybe there's a bigger plan and slowly behind the scenes things are happening and we will get total exposure and total transparency and arrests and we'll save the country, but that's an unknown factor. | ||
What I do know is I don't have the JFK files on my desk. | ||
What I do know is I don't have the Epstein files on my desk. | ||
What I do know is the criminals that are trying to destroy this country are not in prison. | ||
Well, the CEO of Goya Foods, Bob Unanyu, who was a major public voice in support of Donald Trump, and really he was kind of one of the first big brand CEOs to support Donald Trump, visited the White House, and now I believe in a political move. | ||
They have removed him as the CEO and so he made this announcement. | ||
I recently received news that came as a big surprise. | ||
The board at Goya decided I would no longer be a leader of the company. | ||
While the decision has left many questions unanswered, one thing is certain, I will not waver in my fight against child sex trafficking. | ||
Now, he's been working to expose child sex trafficking. | ||
He was one of the major voices exposing the... | ||
Hundreds of thousands of children lost by the Biden administration. | ||
He talks about it a lot. | ||
And again, also a supporter of Trump. | ||
I feel that this was a political move. | ||
When he says it's a surprise and that he's stunned by it, tells me that it had nothing to do with, let's say, the bottom line, the numbers, and everything to do with politics. | ||
So, political... | ||
Discrimination, I would say, it would appear in this case, the political discrimination against Trump supporters continues. | ||
But we salute former CEO of Goya Foods, now Bob Unanyu, who is doing everything he can to raise awareness for child sex trafficking at the southern border, where you had this news story. | ||
Let's hope this doesn't become a trend, but you get the feeling, With the, let's say, the war on the cartels now, you might see and hear stuff like this. | ||
Two people killed by IED at the Texas border. | ||
The Mexican cartels are the suspects. | ||
Mexican authorities have issued warnings about cartel activity. | ||
A 74-year-old rancher was killed. | ||
Wife was also injured. | ||
Three people were in a vehicle that ran over an IED. At the U.S.-Mexico border, the rancher died near Brownsville, Texas. | ||
Sid Miller, the Texas Agriculture Commissioner, is on top of this, urging extreme caution after a cartel suspected explosive device kills Texas rancher. | ||
So, you hope that doesn't become a common thing, but you get the feeling it could. | ||
And I think that's kind of the concern now as the Trump administration is going to war with the cartels. | ||
So now ranchers and people on the southern border are going to be extra alert at the situation that's carrying on. | ||
Okay, we go back to the phone lines. | ||
Let's go to Luke in Kentucky. | ||
Luke, you're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
Hey, can you hear me? | ||
Loud and clear. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm just kind of curious your thoughts on Doge, the money that they save, if it should go to taxpayers or to the deficit. | |
And I also want to thank you all for all your work. | ||
You're doing absolutely incredible work. | ||
Appreciate that, Luke. | ||
Let me answer the question. | ||
The proposal, the last proposal I saw, was the 20% would be used for the U.S. taxpayer's dividend, be $5,000 per person, a dividend. | ||
So not stimulus. | ||
They're lying about that. | ||
It's a dividend. | ||
It's money that was already budgeted to be taken out and given to these NGOs and these other contracts, and they just stopped it from going out, so now you can budget it for something else. | ||
So that would be a dividend, and 20% would go there, and then 80% would go towards paying off the debt. | ||
I think that's a great plan, personally, for a couple reasons. | ||
Paying off the debt. | ||
Do we ever pay off the debt? | ||
I mean, there's, you know... | ||
So there's that issue. | ||
But giving people $5,000 of a dividend, for the average person, it's not going to be life-changing money. | ||
It might help them a little bit. | ||
For some people out there, it could be life-changing money. | ||
That's just the truth. | ||
And we saw some of the horror stories about the current financial status of Americans in the Biden economy. | ||
Majority of Americans don't even have $1,000 in savings, is what we were told, or don't even have a... | ||
$5,000 net worth in some of these major cities because life is so expensive there. | ||
So it's not even necessarily about the money as much as it is. | ||
If you put a $5,000 check on the table, the person's going to say, well, what for? | ||
Why? | ||
So it's really just an opportunity more than anything is what I see. | ||
It's an opportunity for somebody to say, how come I'm getting a $5,000 check from the government? | ||
And for them to find out, you're getting this dividend because the U.S. government was about to spend a trillion dollars in waste, fraud, and abuse. | ||
We're not going to do that. | ||
Instead, we're going to cut the debt by paying it off, and then we're going to give you a dividend. | ||
So this $5,000 was going to be spent on a trans play in Peru or a gay comic book in Argentina or sustainable economic green development in Uganda and all this other crap. | ||
Now, instead, we're going to give it to you. | ||
People need that. | ||
They need to understand that. | ||
They need to be aware of what's going on. | ||
Still, the average American probably doesn't know what Doge is. | ||
Still, the average American doesn't really follow politics and know the day-to-day. | ||
I think it's more now than it ever has been in recent history. | ||
But still, people need to know. | ||
They need to understand what's going on. | ||
You give them a $5,000 check and explain to them why they're getting it. | ||
That's like big red pill stuff. | ||
That's like big, big permanent pendulum political swing right there. | ||
Huge. | ||
Enough that can even change election cycles for years. | ||
For years. | ||
So that's why I would do it that way. | ||
Of course, people are trying to stop the dividend from going out, and likely for that exact reason. | ||
Likely for that exact reason. | ||
You'll have committed fiscal conservatives that don't want to do it because they're going to say it's irresponsible. | ||
We need to pay down the debt. | ||
Fair enough. | ||
You'll have Democrats that are going to stand against it because giving people free money is their thing, even though this isn't free money. | ||
But that's what the Democrats do. | ||
The Democrats buy support. | ||
The Democrats buy votes. | ||
So they don't want Republicans getting in on that action and then exposing all the fraud and waste and abuse that they've been engaged in. | ||
But I like the plan. | ||
I'd say, you know, 80% for the debt, 20% for dividends. | ||
And then make sure that you have some sort of a message delivery system with that check that explains to people what's going on. | ||
I think that's a good plan. | ||
But we'll continue to be following that. | ||
Thanks for the call, Luke. | ||
Let's go to Tim in Washington. | ||
Tim, you're on the air. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
How's it going, Owen? | |
Good. | ||
unidentified
|
Good to talk to you again. | |
I just heard you talk about the airport and you were talking about things today. | ||
I haven't had a chance to call in. | ||
But I just wanted to say, that Toronto crash last week, With the landing gear shearing off and failing? | ||
How is that DEI? I'm sorry. | ||
Even though it's a woman pilot. | ||
Well, I mean, let's just start over. | ||
You're talking about DEI and the airport thing that happened today, right? | ||
The almost collision. | ||
Okay, so you're talking about the one today where the pilot avoided the collision. | ||
Okay. | ||
unidentified
|
It just... | |
No, no, no, no. | ||
That just kind of reminded me of last week with the airplane that rolled over. | ||
Yes. | ||
unidentified
|
Okay, so I heard Infowars say that it was a DEI incident. | |
Interesting. | ||
Because when I watched the video, the landing gear sheared off. | ||
So there's other reasons for that landing gear. | ||
So, okay, so let me, I'm trying to understand what you're getting at here. | ||
When you watch the video, the pilot, the reason the landing gear broke off, because the pilot did a horrible landing. | ||
The pilot landed with way too much weight and force on that right landing gear. | ||
It didn't break off because there was a problem with it. | ||
It broke off because the pilot had a horrible landing. | ||
If you go back and you watch the video, you'll see. | ||
You'll see that the landing was a bad landing. | ||
The reason why it's being labeled as a DEI incident is because the group that was flying that, Endeavour Air... | ||
All they do is promote how it's all women crew. | ||
That's their big marketing pushes. | ||
Oh, we're all women. | ||
Oh, we hire only women. | ||
It's all women. | ||
It's all women. | ||
And then it came out, the pilot was a woman. | ||
So that's how we landed on that conclusion. | ||
unidentified
|
Sure. | |
Well, I've been calling you guys for years, trying to get you guys interested, trying to hook you guys into what happened to Fukushima and the release of the Wigner dust. | ||
There is a lot of avionics that are on planes that fail after flying in atmospheres that are radioactive. | ||
There's a ton of fallout in Toronto, Canada, mostly because it's completely downwind from Japan. | ||
A lot of the times it's an easy dismissal to say it's DEI when there's an actual bigger specter lurking that's never talked about because it's kind of ominous and scary as hell. | ||
But if you look at Wigner dust and the Wigner effect, you will see that it might not just be DEI. I love you guys. | ||
You're the best. | ||
Everything is DEI. It's not the case at all. | ||
It's kind of a scapegoat. | ||
Okay, but now hold on a second. | ||
Hold on a second. | ||
I'm not going to... | ||
I can't really debate you on the Wigner effect. | ||
I don't know much about it. | ||
But Toronto is downwind from Japan? | ||
What? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, it's west of Japan, right? | |
I mean, all weather systems go from Japan over Canada. | ||
The fallout has been spreading for 13, 14 years now. | ||
Toronto is on the east coast. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, it's a small ecosystem when you're talking about something that's open venting and spraying radiation for the last 14 years unchecked. | |
Alright, well, I mean, I'm not sure I agree with your analysis. | ||
I don't know much about the Wigner effect. | ||
I'm not discounting it. | ||
I'm just saying, if you go watch the video, it's very clear the plane lands with way too much force on the right landing gear. | ||
I mean, it's pretty obvious to see. | ||
The pilot was a woman. | ||
They brag about hiring all women. | ||
So, I mean, I don't think it's really a conspiracy theory or let's blame DEI on everything. | ||
I think that it's, I mean, it's pretty conclusive circumstantial evidence that that's what's going on here. | ||
As far as the Wigner effect, I can look into that. | ||
But I'm pretty confident that was not the case for what happened in Toronto. | ||
And I think the video is pretty self-evident as well, Tim. | ||
Thanks for the call. | ||
Let's go to Bob in North Carolina. | ||
Bob, you're on the air. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, Owen. | |
Thank you for taking my call. | ||
You guys are doing a wonderful job, and you covered everything great down here in North Carolina for the storm. | ||
Yeah. | ||
unidentified
|
And my problem is 1913 and 1919, unconstitutional legal. | |
We needed an executive order yesterday to not pay taxes, because I overpaid my crap. | ||
This is getting ridiculous on that, you know? | ||
I mean, I love what everybody's doing. | ||
I understand it's going to take a long time. | ||
Do you want to circumvent that judge? | ||
Don't pay your taxes. | ||
They don't get the money. | ||
That needs to be done. | ||
Yeah. | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah. | |
No, I mean... | ||
unidentified
|
That will cut that judge's stupid crap. | |
You cut that now, you're not going to pay these stupid LGBT crap. | ||
Or whatever stuff that's going across Europe. | ||
Yeah. | ||
And... | ||
One more thing, and I'll let you go. | ||
All across America, you're calling towns, cities, as an excuse to collect city taxes. | ||
Washington, North Carolina, is not a city. | ||
They need to stop collecting city taxes, too. | ||
So, I mean... | ||
Well, they want $4.5 trillion in tax cuts in this bill that's coming up. | ||
I don't know why you need a bill to do it. | ||
And really, you can... | ||
Kind of plow through all of this with abolishing the IRS at the end of the day. | ||
That would be the simplest fix. | ||
So, yeah. | ||
Let's... | ||
Yeah. | ||
I mean, don't even get me started on taxes, Bob. | ||
Don't even get me started. | ||
I think most people here would agree. | ||
Something needs to be done to cut the taxes. | ||
I mean, get rid of the federal income tax. | ||
Get rid of all property taxes. | ||
Property taxes should be completely illegal. | ||
So yeah, we get taxed way too much. | ||
Now we find out where it's all going. | ||
It's all being stolen. | ||
We need to do something about that system. | ||
Thank you for the call, Bob. | ||
A couple of stories here before we close it out with a few more calls. | ||
Go figure. | ||
The gravy train. | ||
The roller coaster. | ||
Pfizer taps FDA drug chief Cavazzoni as new chief medical officer. | ||
Isn't that amazing? | ||
That's right. | ||
Former FDA drug chief now gets a nice, cushy job with Pfizer. | ||
Yeah. | ||
That's a problem. | ||
And all those Democrats that sat up there and hemmed and hawed at RFK Jr., you better not take a job in Big Pharma after this. | ||
Are you going to take a job in Big Pharma after this? | ||
Are they going to say anything about this FDA worker, former FDA worker, now getting a top Pfizer job, probably making millions of dollars? | ||
unidentified
|
Hmm. | |
Yeah. | ||
Antidepressants may be worsening dementia, but doctors still prescribe them. | ||
Uh-huh. | ||
Yeah, and your FDA recommends them and all the people that work at the FDA then go on to work at the companies that... | ||
Sell them, just like that last story, and RFK Jr. wants to stop all this corruption. | ||
All adding up. | ||
All adding up. | ||
Another big issue we got to take care of. | ||
Another big issue we got to take care of. | ||
All right, let's take a call from John in New York. | ||
John, you're on the air. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. | |
Hey, Owen. | ||
I was just wondering, like... | ||
If you could do an executive order for geoengineering, like you're taking off all over, like I'm getting so sick of just this sun. | ||
I mean, it's a sunny day in New York, and I don't even know how long. | ||
I'm wondering if InfoWars could find out if that could be stopped with an executive order, or is there more to it? | ||
Well, there is more to it. | ||
Yeah. | ||
So there's all these different programs. | ||
NASA has a program. | ||
This is just what I know. | ||
NASA has a geoengineering program. | ||
There was... | ||
It was either a leak or they just published it. | ||
Videos and their own documents of them doing the chemtrails. | ||
Public information. | ||
And as far as the federal government engaging in it, I don't know if there's any other... | ||
I mean, I'm sure there is. | ||
My point is that... | ||
Most of it on record is done at the state level. | ||
From my research, most of these weather modification programs are done at the state level, at least what is available for the public to see and consume. | ||
Texas has a very public program. | ||
They have yearly hearings. | ||
It's called the Texas Weather Modification Program. | ||
It's not a secret. | ||
They call it cloud seeding and there's all kinds of other stuff. | ||
There might be private institutions that engage in this stuff. | ||
I mean, Bill Gates says he wants to blot out the sun by spraying stuff into the sky to block out the sun and stop global warming. | ||
I mean, that's mad scientist psychotic crap. | ||
That'll kill the planet. | ||
So I don't know if an executive order is... | ||
I guess... | ||
Yeah, I guess Trump could sign an executive order basically saying... | ||
Kind of like he pauses federal AID, but... | ||
He could just sign an executive order saying, we're no longer spraying anything in the skies. | ||
Any programs that spray chemicals or heavy metals or anything into the atmosphere and in the sky, we're pausing it, we're researching it, we're going to see what's really going on with it. | ||
So I suppose he could do that and then deal with the legal fallout and just battle it like that. | ||
But most of it's done at the state level and any of the federal government programs are all top secret classified. | ||
We just happened to get a NASA video and documents released like four or five years ago about the whole thing, where they just showed the videos of them doing it, explained what they're doing. | ||
I don't know why NASA was doing it. | ||
So it's probably really prevalent, and who knows, probably private companies do it too, and they get some kickback, some secret program to do it. | ||
So, I mean, yeah, he could sign an executive order. | ||
How effective it would be as far as, you know, the teeth are concerned. | ||
I think that that's, I don't know. | ||
But any executive order he signs, you know, he's getting pushback. | ||
So of course he would get pushback on that. | ||
So how about this, though? | ||
Trans-Americans are turning to guns for protection. | ||
This is like the third story I've seen now in the last couple weeks about how liberals are getting guns. | ||
And it's all about how they're getting guns to protect themselves from Trump and the Nazis. | ||
This is the Washington Post. | ||
They all might have been in the Washington Post. | ||
Until recently, May Alejandro Rodriguez was a big supporter of gun control. | ||
A 21-year-old Mexican-American trans woman. | ||
I'm not even sure what's happening in this picture. | ||
A 21-year-old Mexican-American trans woman. | ||
That's a lot. | ||
Who is a student at Western Washington University. | ||
She was interested in producing music and snapping photos of her friends on Fuji 400 film. | ||
But Rodriguez, who voted for Kamala Harris, changed her views on guns when Donald Trump was re-elected. | ||
Donald Trump! | ||
unidentified
|
Who could have thunk it? | |
Donald Trump has turned liberals into Second Amendment activists. | ||
And you love to see it. | ||
Congratulations, liberals. | ||
Welcome to the... | ||
Second Amendment Club. | ||
Now, the irony of this, I really don't even want to get into. | ||
These are the people that want red flag laws and, you know, everything else. | ||
So, do you have a problem with a man that dresses up as a woman, pretends to be a woman, cosplays as a woman, wears woman face, cross-dresser, carrying a gun? | ||
Or does that disturb you? | ||
Well, they have a Second Amendment right, unalienable. | ||
And now they celebrate it. | ||
So they're so scared of Nazis, they're so scared of Donald Trump, that they are now Second Amendment activists. | ||
So does that do it then? | ||
Are we done with the gun control deal? | ||
Are we done with attacking the Second Amendment now? | ||
Because the liberals are scared and want guns too? | ||
See, imagine they have this thing that's totally made up in their head that they need to buy a gun because of Trump or Nazis. | ||
But it's like a woman who's walking around the city at night in New York or Chicago and she can't have a gun to protect herself. | ||
No. | ||
It's like that's a real thing. | ||
Or in New York now, they're trying to stop you from using your own car to drive into the city. | ||
So let's say you work in the city. | ||
You're a bartender. | ||
Maybe you work at a club, whatever, a magician. | ||
And you have to get in and out of the city at night. | ||
Well, now you can't drive your car. | ||
You have to ride public transit. | ||
You can't have a gun on you. | ||
You're right to be a victim. | ||
But see, no, nobody fights for their gun control. | ||
Now it's the poor leftist that's scared of Donald Trump and Nazis, something totally fabricated in their head. | ||
They need a gun for that. | ||
But, you know, the average American that might actually need a gun for self-defense, they don't care about that. | ||
But now that it concerns them, now, okay. | ||
But it's always consistent. | ||
You always have to have your own awakening process. | ||
It always has to affect you and hit you somehow. | ||
So now they're scared of Trump and Musk and the ghosts of Nazi soldiers from the 1940s. | ||
So they're arming up. | ||
So I guess that's what it takes. | ||
All right, let's go to Keith in Texas. | ||
Keith, you're on the air. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, how you doing? | |
Good. | ||
I know why the Democrats think that we can't live without illegal immigrants. | ||
They think all illegal immigrants... | ||
I mean, they think all immigrants are illegal. | ||
So if you have brown skin, you're an illegal immigrant. | ||
So you think they just think everyone's an illegal immigrant? | ||
unidentified
|
Yeah, if you're an immigrant, you're automatically an illegal immigrant. | |
Or if you have brown skin, you're an illegal immigrant. | ||
And they see, like, who was that Pocahontas in that speech? | ||
You know, I guess it would make sense because they see anybody by their skin color, they already assume anything and everything about them. | ||
So I suppose that does add up. | ||
You know, they judge everybody by their skin color. | ||
So I can see that being the case. | ||
Thanks for the call. | ||
Let's go to John in Texas. | ||
John, you're on the air. | ||
Go ahead. | ||
unidentified
|
Yes, sir. | |
Good evening, Owen. | ||
Thank you for taking my call. | ||
First, I'm calling in. | ||
I just wanted to share my perspective on that I... I personally don't think that the range of aviation incidents that we're seeing reported on the media, I'm going to say this a little bit lightly, but I really don't think it's that big of a deal. | ||
I went through private pilot ground school about 10 years ago, never actually got my private pilot license, but during that time you learn a lot of aviation accidents, statistics, and throughout general aviation there's a thousand to a few thousand incidents per year. | ||
And then in commercial aviation, there's also a range of incidents that happened per year. | ||
And I think that it's just being highly publicized right now because it's a good opportunity to attack Trump and the Trump administration. | ||
But I'm just north of you guys in Williamson County, and there's an airport up here where there was a... | ||
Speaking of aviation, there was an aviation accident that happened up here about a year and a half ago. | ||
Sorry, we've got a green helicopter flying off right now. | ||
And yeah, that really wasn't highly reported. | ||
And so, yeah, I just wanted to share my perspective on that. | ||
Yeah, I think it's a fair point. | ||
And you could use that for anything, really, the media coverage and hype and just the scale of media being so much broader now that anything could seem like it's happening more often. | ||
But I think when it's commercial flights and planes flipping over and running into helicopters, I mean, it does warrant a bit of attention. | ||
So, I don't know. | ||
I do think there's something going on still. | ||
President Trump's been fighting the globalists for years. | ||
And now he's got them right by the throat. | ||
But there's a lot of traitors, a lot of cowards hiding in the shadows. | ||
That's why we, the American people, have got to stay focused and have President Trump's f***ing back. | ||
That's why I'm counting on every person in the Jones Infoar Army to step their game up like President Trump and Elon Musk and the rest of the Patriot crew of Spartans are doing. | ||
That's why I'm more committed now than I've ever been in the fight. | ||
I'm 20 hours a day committed. | ||
And I hate it when I go to sleep. | ||
I jump out of bed more fired up than ever with a spirit of 1776. That's why I'm telling the globalists we're coming for your asses. | ||
What does matter? | ||
Nothing you can do! | ||
You're fu- It's time for all the manga and maha maniacs across America and the world to wear their colors brown so the globalists and all their minions know we outnumber you 10 to 1. So get the shirt now at thealexjonesstore.com or get the big balls or biggest balls ball caps today and keep Alex Jones at the tip of the spear in the fight. | ||
I'm counting on your brother. | ||
unidentified
|
1776. | |
We'll commence again. | ||
unidentified
|
We're going to take our firearms. | |
If you are receiving this transmission, you are the resistance. | ||
It's Alex Jones. | ||
Fight. | ||
I got some exciting announcements. | ||
It's in stock. | ||
It's popular. | ||
The big balls Trump had with 47 on the side. | ||
Bunsy operation. | ||
It's beautiful. | ||
Folks love it. | ||
And then... | ||
Everybody thinks it's just for Trump, but you can wear it too. | ||
Biggest balls. | ||
Both hats now available at thealexshowstore.com and it funds the second American Revolution. | ||
And then, I've been asking for this a long time. | ||
It is a high-quality tactical dagger, and it has InfoWars inscribed on it, and it funds this operation. | ||
It's available exclusively at thealexjohnstore.com. | ||
There's a limited run of these. | ||
Get yours now. | ||
It is great to have in your car, great to have personally. | ||
It is amazing. | ||
Look at it right here in my hand. | ||
This is how you defend yourself quickly and easily, and it doesn't run out of bullets. | ||
Everybody needs the tactical dagger, limited edition, 1776. On one side right here, as you can see, $17.76, inscribed right there. | ||
And then on the other side, you've got Infowars. | ||
What a piece of history. | ||
And it keeps its operation on air on the nice scabbard that snaps. | ||
It's a SOG, a really good brand. | ||
And then it can go on your belt as well. | ||
So get the Infowars Limited Edition Tactical Dagger and the latest Limited Edition coin that's selling out fast. | ||
Tip of the spear, veteran of the Infowar. | ||
PureSilberCoin at TheAlexJonesStore.com. | ||
And it funds this operation. | ||
Thank you for your support. | ||
unidentified
|
Attack rapidly, ruthlessly, viciously, without rest. | |
However tired and hungry you may be, the enemy will be more tired, more hungry. |