Kash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard face Senate hearings amid Trump’s plane crash claims, blaming FAA’s 2015 DEI hiring—including disabled recruits—and Lockheed Martin’s autonomous Blackhawk tech for the 67 deaths. Patel denies FBI misconduct allegations but highlights FISA abuses, while Gabbard dodges Snowden’s "traitor" label but pledges to block leaks. Border Patrol whistleblower Zachary Apotheker links fentanyl deaths to criminal alien policies, praising Trump’s border shift. Trump’s executive orders target DEI and COVID-era restrictions, with 1776 Law Center’s Barnes pushing FOIA audits to expose corruption. Legal battles for January 6th defendants stall under immunity laws, but Texas courts offer slim hope. Meanwhile, Alex Jones credits natural supplements for his 55-pound weight loss, contrasting with pharmaceutical reliance. The episode ties systemic failures—hiring, surveillance, and border chaos—to broader calls for transparency and reform. [Automatically generated summary]
Ladies and gentlemen, it's Thursday, January 30th, 2025. This is the InfoWars War Room.
And let me tell you, we are going to have to be extremely efficient today to cover all of this news.
In the first hour, I'm going to do my best.
I'm going to try to give you all of the highlights from the Tulsi Gabbard hearing.
I'm going to try to give you all of the highlights from the Kash Patel hearing.
I'm also going to go to President Trump's press conference on the plane crash from last night.
Give you some of the most important...
Comments from Trump as well as Pete Hegseth.
And then I've got a stack of news and information here regarding the plane crash.
Not to mention multiple video angles of the plane crash that we will be reviewing as well.
So first hour, that's going to be what we're going to try to cram in.
And if we have some extra time, there's some other executive orders Trump has issued that we'll get into.
Some other political action taking part across the nation.
We'll try to get into all of that.
But that's what we're going to do in the first hour.
We're going to be very efficient.
We're going to get it all in.
Needless to say, it's pretty much what we expected.
I thought Patel's hearing would have been a lot more confrontational.
It wasn't as confrontational as RFK Jr.'s or even Tulsi Gabbard's.
And yet...
It did manage to produce plenty of fireworks.
And you can tell without a doubt, the Democrats in the Senate are scared of Kash Patel.
I mean, that was really apparent today.
Now, I also have big guests coming on today as well.
We're going to be doing another January 6th profile.
Now, this is interesting.
You have likely seen this man before.
This is the man who is standing at the barricade.
And had Ray Epps lean over and whisper something into his ear right before they went over the barricade.
Maybe we'll ask him what was whispered in his ear on that fateful day, as well as his story.
We're also going to be joined by Border Patrol agent Whistleblower, who's now being punished by Border Patrol under the last administration.
We'll see if he has hopes that they'll bring him back now that Trump is president.
Zach Apotheker.
What's crazier about him at this current time, as I was talking to him the other day, he was actually friends with the Border Patrol agent that got killed near the border of Canada two weeks ago.
He knew him well.
He was actually set to go hang out at his house for beers and barbecue before he tragically met his end.
So we'll be talking to him about that too.
And then I'm going to be joined by Attorney Bob Barnes to cover a lot of Trump's executive orders.
And then I also want to talk to him about Trump ending the federal income tax and the real ramifications or the real legal precedents, let's say.
Because Bob, with all of his civil rights work, also does a lot of work as far as tax law is concerned.
Now, let me just say this for the sake of time, because we've got to dive right into this when we come back from the break.
We'll probably do the airplane crash first and then get into the clips.
As I'm sitting here watching the hearing, so I guess I'll do a 60-second monologue here.
As I'm sitting here watching these hearings, it is a not-so-subtle reminder watching these senators.
A not-so-subtle reminder of the absolute trash, the absolute garbage, the villains, the scumbags, the liars, the weasels, the rats that are our congressmen.
And I just sit there and I ask myself, how do these people get into office?
These are pathetic excuses for Americans.
They're horrible.
They're weak.
They're frail.
They're pale.
They're fragile.
They're performative.
They're lying scum.
All of them, almost.
Susan Collins, pathetic.
Maisie Arono belongs on a short bus.
Richard Blumenthal, stolen valor.
How do these damn lying scumbags get into office?
What the hell is going on with this clown show?
You just can't help but wonder.
How these pathetic excuses for Americans became our senators.
And I mean, it's just one low-life, lying, performative scumbag after the next.
And I'm just sitting there watching them attack superior people.
Way more legitimate.
Representatives for our country like Cash Patel and Tulsi Gabbard and RFK Jr. And I'm watching these sniveling weasels.
Senator Warner and Blumenthal and Hirono and Collins.
They're pathetic.
Adam Schiff, a pencil-necked, bug-eyed, watermelon-head freak.
And they sit there attacking real Americans, who I hope every single one of them gets confirmed.
It looks like Tulsi Gabbard is going to be up against it as far as the numbers are concerned.
Aside from the normal rats of Collins, Murkowski, and McConnell, there might be a couple other that go against Gabbard.
But before we get into all the highlights from the Kash Patel hearing and the Tulsi Gabbard hearing, let's go to President Trump addressing the nation on the plane crash last night.
Biden would have been asleep and probably still wouldn't have had a press conference in regards to the plane crash that happened in D.C. A real president stepped up, made statements last night, and stepped up to the podium this morning.
And so, let's go to his opening statement to the press in clip 15. I have more to say about that.
I do want to point out that various articles that appeared Prior to my entering office.
And here's one.
The FAA's diversity push includes focus on hiring people with severe intellectual and psychiatric disabilities.
That is amazing.
And then it says FAA says people with severe disabilities are most underrepresented segment of the workforce and they want them in and they want them.
They can be air traffic controllers.
I don't think so.
This was in January 14th, so that was a week before I entered office.
They put a big push to put diversity into the FAA's program.
Then another article, the Federal Aviation Administration.
This was before I got to office.
Recently, second term.
The FAA is actively recruiting workers who suffer severe...
Intellectual disabilities, psychiatric problems, and other mental and physical conditions under a diversity and inclusion hiring initiative spelled out on the agency's website.
Can you imagine?
These are people that are, I mean, actually, their lives are shortened because of the stress that they have.
Brilliant people have to be in those positions.
And their lives are actually shortened, very substantially shortened because of the stress.
Where you have many, many planes coming into one target.
And you need a very special talent and a very special genius to be able to do it.
Targeted disabilities are those disabilities that the federal government, as a matter of policy, has identified for special emphasis in recruitment and hiring.
The FAA's website states they include hearing, vision, missing extremities.
Partial paralysis, complete paralysis, epilepsy, severe intellectual disability, psychiatric disability, and dwarfism all qualify for the position of a controller of airplanes pouring into our country, pouring into a little spot, a little dot on the map, a little runway.
The initiative is part of the FAA's diversity and inclusion hiring plan.
Think of that.
The initiative is part of the FAA's diversity and inclusion hiring plan, which says diversity is integral to achieving FAA's mission of ensuring safe and efficient travel.
I don't think so.
I don't think so.
I think it's just the opposite.
The FAA website shows that the agency's guidance on diversity hiring were last updated on...
March 23rd of 22, they wanted to make it even more so.
And then I came in, and I assume maybe this is the reason, the FAA, which is overseen by Secretary Pete Buttigieg, a real winner.
That guy's a real winner.
Do you know how badly everything's run since he's run the Department of Transportation?
He's a disaster.
He was a disaster as a mayor.
He ran his...
Sitting into the ground, and he's a disaster now.
He's just got a good line of bullshit.
The Department of Transportation, his government agency charged with regulating civil aviation.
Well, he runs it, 45,000 people, and he's run it right into the ground with his diversity.
Now, the truth is, there's way more to that angle than even Trump got into here that I'm going to show you.
It really started during Obama, but you can look at the guy that was in charge of the FAA, and you can even look at lawsuits against the FAA for these hiring practices.
So this was a very well-known issue that we'll get to, but first, let's go to more from Trump.
Now, talking to the media, and it's nice to have a president just, he just speaks like he feels.
And so, throw the political correctness out the window.
Throw the liberal hemming and hawing out the window.
He speaks how he feels, like this in clip 14. It's all under investigation.
unidentified
I understand that.
That's why I'm trying to figure out how you can come to the conclusion right now that diversity has something to do with this crash.
When you have 60 planes coming in during a short period of time and they're all coming in different directions and you're dealing with very high level computer work and very complex computers.
And one of the other things I will tell you is that the systems that were built, I was going to rebuild the entire system and then we had an election that didn't turn out the way it should have.
But they didn't build the systems properly.
They spent a lot of money renovating a system, spending much more money than they would have spent if they bought a new system for air traffic controllers, meaning the computerized systems.
There are certain companies that do a very good job.
They didn't use those companies.
They used companies that should not have been doing it.
I think it's very important to understand that...
For some jobs, and not only this, but air traffic controllers, they have to be at the highest level of genius.
Yeah, we do all the diversity hiring, and we claim it's all about diversity.
But then when a big tragedy happens and our fingerprints are all over it, no, don't talk about that.
Now, oh, where's your diversity, equity, and inclusion pride now?
It's a matter of life and death.
And they put their political agenda above it.
Now, Trump posted that statement last night, which, again, he's saying what we all saw.
We've got the videos of the crash.
And he's saying what we all are thinking.
What we all just saw.
Put the statement back up on the screen here.
The airplane was on a perfect and routine line of approach to the airport.
The helicopter was going straight at the airplane for an extended period of time.
It is a clear night.
The lights on the plane were blazing.
Why didn't the helicopter go up or down or turn?
Why didn't the control tower tell the helicopter what to do instead of asking if they saw the plane?
This is a bad situation that looks like it should have been prevented.
Not good.
Now here's...
Well, we'll show you the actual videos, a zoomed-in video.
In fact, we'll just go to these now on 11 and 12, and you guys can...
Pick whichever one you want to roll with.
Eleven is the close-up.
Twelve is farther away.
But you can see in this close-up right here, the helicopter is traveling right into the airplane on a straight line.
How do you not see it?
And if either one of these aircraft is going to make a maneuver to avoid...
A collision, it has to be the helicopter.
Now, it's still unclear about when exactly the warning was given, when exactly the imminent collision was detected.
It appears that they had probably at least five seconds, maybe close to 30 seconds.
It could have been avoided, but this video is damning.
When you see a helicopter going straight into an airplane, from right in front of it, right in its line of sight, It makes no sense, and there were warnings giving out.
It makes no sense.
So Trump just saying what we're all saying, what we're all thinking, doesn't make you a conspiracy theorist.
Just, that's what we see.
What the hell's going on?
Don't you dare say it could be because of a diversity hire.
Here's Pete Hegseth addressing this quickly, clip 13. But I want to echo what the transportation secretary and you, Mr. President, said, because it pertains to the DOD as well.
We will have the best and brightest in every position possible.
As you said in your inaugural, it is colorblind and merit-based.
The best leaders possible, whether it's flying Blackhawks and flying airplanes, leading platoons, or in government.
The era of DEI is gone at the Defense Department.
And we need the best and brightest, whether it's in our air traffic control, or whether it's in our generals, or whether it's throughout government.
So thank you for your leadership and courage on that, sir.
Now, I'm not a fan of the DEI policies anywhere, but let's just try to be rational here.
If you want to do diversity on the set of a TV show or a sports show and you say, hey, we want to bring in an Indian person to attract an Indian audience.
We want to bring a middle-aged woman to bring in middle-aged woman viewers.
We want to bring in a black guy to bring in black guys watching.
It's not life or death.
When you're talking about doctors, when you're talking about air traffic controllers, pilots, we're talking about life and death.
Life and death.
The real world.
Big difference.
And this is why I always say, this is why Democrats, this is why liberals need their own little tykes politics over here.
The plastic knives, the plastic oven, it's all fake so nobody gets hurt.
Because when they're in charge of the real stuff, people die.
Literally.
Now, do we know what the major cause of this is as of yet?
No.
But we will have the diversity, equity, and inclusion debate.
We will observe and report the facts.
This is the head of the FAA. Here he is, talking about how it's all about diversity when it comes to air traffic control in clip 26. Hi, I'm Brad Mims, Deputy Administrator at the Federal Aviation Administration.
unidentified
We are looking for the best and brightest to join us as air traffic controllers.
We need a diverse group of air traffic controllers to bring distinct perspectives to handle the ever-changing aerospace landscape.
I'm calling on students and alumni from HBCUs, Hispanic-serving institutions, and tribal colleges to apply now to become air traffic controllers.
I don't want anyone interested to miss out on this amazing career opportunity.
Make sure you complete your full application during our application window.
The short application window ends on May 8th.
We need a diverse, next-generation air traffic workforce with people from all backgrounds.
Still don't want to talk about diversity as an issue?
Wall Street Journal, June 5th, 2015. Obama.
Affirmative action lands in the air traffic control tower.
We all know what that means.
Federal Aviation Administration has moved away from merit-based hiring criteria in order to increase the number of women and minorities who staff airport control towers.
Diversity, equity, and inclusion as a potential problem?
Well, did you know that the FAA was already involved in lawsuits because of this?
The FAA is being sued for throwing out air traffic controller applications based on applicants' race.
We all know what that means, don't we?
And again, this was all brought in by Obama.
Not Biden.
This was brought in by Obama.
A class-action lawsuit by the Mountain States Legal Foundation has found a substantial amount of documents showing discriminatory hiring practices by the Obama-era Federal Aviation Administration Initiative, which rejected qualified air traffic controllers based solely on race.
FAA lawsuit claims agency discriminated against air traffic controller applicants if they were white.
They didn't want the best and brightest.
FAA rejected qualified controllers.
FAA turned away qualified air traffic controllers based on race.
And this all came from policy in the Obama administration in 2013. So, are we still not allowed to talk about it?
Does the liberal media want to sit in the press gallery and pretend like there isn't something real here?
You just heard from the FAA deputy director about the policy.
You just saw the lawsuit about the policy.
You just saw the headlines about the policy.
And then you have an air traffic control issue and a deadly crash and you bring it up and they say no!
It doesn't exist.
You did it.
You were proud of it.
It does exist.
And it might have caused 60 plus people to die.
And now you don't want to talk about it.
Now you've never heard of it.
Here's some of the other headlines.
Shortly before fatal crash, jet pilot was asked to change runways.
I still don't think we have the full picture as far as what happened in those final moments.
And really all we can do is just look at that video and say something went terribly wrong.
And look at the warning system and the air traffic control system and say somebody was asleep at the switch here.
Whether it was the helicopter pilot or somebody in air traffic control.
I mean, there's really nothing the airplane...
Pilot can do at that point.
He's already on the route to land.
I mean, it might even just be like AI landing the plane at that point.
But it's already on the descent.
It's like 20 seconds away from touching ground.
It's already on the line to land.
Staffing was not normal at Reagan Airport Tower, according to FAA report.
Apparently had some staffing issues.
Air traffic controllers warned U.S. helicopter ahead of crash, according to the audio.
It does appear at this point that whoever was manning the helicopter is the most at fault, from what we can see and know so far.
Trump blames DEI hiring practices.
So who was the helicopter pilot?
Which, by the way, they say was on a training run.
A training run.
Now, they're saying so far they found no survivors.
There was a large contingent of world-class figure skaters on this flight from the skating club of Boston and other well-known world champion figure skaters, including from all over the world, like Russia.
67 believe dead after American Airlines plane collides with Army helicopter.
So it seems impossible that this could have been...
I mean, how you fly a helicopter right into an airplane right in front of your face in your line of sight is mind-boggling.
How air traffic control isn't all over that and stopping it from happening is mind-boggling.
But there's another report talking about the Blackhawk helicopter security systems having known issues.
Warnings about Blackhawk helicopter safety systems back up decades.
Talks about how there's been 10 major accidents since 2014. And then, yeah, here's the story at Infowars.
I had the official letterhead from Lockheed Martin.
Kellen McBreen wrote the story for Infowars.
Headline, Lockheed Martin boasted of remote Blackhawk helicopter technology three months before tragic D.C. aerial disaster.
Well, I have a story here.
This, I believe, was from even longer ago.
I think this one was from years ago.
The date didn't print on my printout here, but nonetheless, well, yeah, okay, this one was from 2024 as well.
Command an autonomous Blackhawk helicopter from 300 miles away.
LockheedMartin.com.
The Matrix Autonomy System.
So, all kinds of questions.
The video makes this thing look really bad.
The diversity, equity, inclusion initiatives to make sure it wasn't about who was the most qualified, but who had the right skin color or sexual orientation to be hired at these jobs of the utmost importance where it's literally life or death.
Is certainly a problem.
And so these are the things that we are investigating and looking into.
But I will say, it was just nice to have a real president up there telling the truth and addressing the public.
I just got off the phone with the SELCOM commander and the chairman, the Joint Chiefs, talking about our efforts at Guantanamo Bay.
That is ongoing.
We're leaning forward on supporting the president's directive to make sure that we have a location for violent criminal illegals as they are deported out of the country.
No one's going to wait on the Defense Department, and we're working that in real time.
But I also wanted to give an update on the tragedy that happened last night here in Washington, D.C., and provide a little bit more information as we are actively working to investigate and understand what occurred and why.
At about 8.48 last night, a UH-60 assigned to the U.S. Army Aviation Brigade in the Military District of Washington, Fort Belvoir, Virginia, collided tragically with a civilian airliner.
The unit involved, the Army unit involved with Bravo Company 12th Aviation Battalion at Fort Belvoir.
It was an annual proficiency training flight.
And when we look at the crew, and not all kin have been notified, so we're going to withhold ranks and names at this point.
We do know on our side who was involved.
It was a fairly experienced crew, and it was doing a required annual night evaluation.
They did have...
Night vision goggles.
The 12th Aviation Battalion, as of now, is granted a 48-hour operational pause on contingency missions as what happened is reviewed.
And a senior-level aviation team, an investigative team from our Aviation Safety Center, was deployed last night and already is in Washington, D.C., to investigate what's going on.
We anticipate that the investigation will quickly be able to determine whether the aircraft was in the corridor and at the right altitude.
At the time of the incident, as I mentioned, next of kin notifications are ongoing.
It's a tragedy, a horrible loss of life for those 64 souls on that civilian airliner and, of course, the three soldiers in that Black Hawk.
They're in our prayers, their families and their communities, as people are notified, I can't imagine.
And I know it's gone from a rescue mission to a recovery mission.
We're with all the first responders that are moving actively, too.
So at the Defense Department, our thoughts and prayers go out.
We are actively investigating to find out what happened and why.
It's so refreshing to have somebody that talks to you like a normal human being, to have somebody that's bringing you the information as it's being made available to them, making comments and answering questions.
As quickly, as rapidly as possible.
This is real transparency.
We have real leadership.
It's hard to even believe that this is what's going on.
I don't know if that's just because our government is so untrustworthy at this point.
We're just so used to being lied to.
We had nothing but scum and trash.
Barely even communicate with us during the Biden administration.
That's how things should be handled, and that's how I anticipate they will be handled by this administration.
Immediate statements, immediate press conferences, and as much transparency as they can provide with the information they have made available to them, also made available to us.
You hear about this and you say, okay, well, we'll find out the details about that flight pattern and what led to the helicopter not being able to identify its airspace properly.
Or was it an air traffic control issue at the end of the day?
Was somebody asleep at the switch?
What was going on in that air traffic control room that people weren't screaming and shouting off alarms?
All right.
But we got to move on so much to get to.
Let's go.
To Kash Patel.
And we'll just start to fire these off one by one.
Maisie Hirono, short bus Hirono.
Again, it's one of those examples of how in the hell does this woman get elected to anything?
It's an embarrassment to our country.
It's an embarrassment to the state of Hawaii.
How are these people senators?
We should be electing the best and the brightest.
Instead, you get short bus Hirono.
And she thinks she's a genius.
She starts all of her questioning sessions off like this because she is just such a genius.
Clip nine.
unidentified
Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
Mr. Patel, as part of my responsibility as a member of this committee, I ask the following two initial questions of all nominees before any of my committees.
Since you became a legal adult, have you ever made unwanted requests for sexual favors or committed any verbal or physical harassment or assault of a sexual nature?
Could he just answer the question if he said that the FBI headquarters where they investigate cybercrime and terrorism should be shut down and open as a deep state?
If the best attacks on me are going to be false accusations and grotesque mischaracterizations, the only thing this body is doing is defeating the credibility of the men and women at the FBI. I stood with them here in this country.
In every theater of war we have, I was on the ground in service of this nation and any.
Accusations leveled against me that I would somehow put political bias before the Constitution are grotesquely unfair.
And I will have you reminded that I have been endorsed by over 300,000 law enforcement officers to become the next director of the FBI. Let's ask them.
Before I call on Senator Lee, could he just answer the question if he said that the FBI headquarters where they investigate cybercrime and terrorism should be shut down and open as a deep state at the museum?
Did he say that the headquarters should be shut down?
I deserve an answer to that question.
He is asking to be head of the FBI, and he said that their headquarters should be shut down.
If the best attacks on me are going to be false accusations and grotesque mischaracterizations, the only thing this body is doing is defeating the credibility of the men and women at the FBI. I stood with them.
Mr. Patel's loyalty includes touting conspiracy theories that threaten and theories and threatened efforts at President Trump's enemies.
How do we know Mr. Patel's theories, his beliefs, what What motivates him, what he really believes, he wrote it in a book.
This book, Government Gangsters, I urge all of you to read before you cast a vote for this gentleman. - Nice. - Mr. Patel has published at the back of this book a list of 60 people whom he calls, quote, "members of the deep state." 60. This list includes many distinguished public servants who have dedicated their lives to our nation.
Among them are Democrats and Republicans, including former Trump administration officials like the former Secretary of Defense Esper.
Then there is Mr. Patel's plan to quote, and I quote him, Shut down the FBI Hoover building on day one.
Reopen it the next day as a museum of the deep state.
And he has said, quote, we're going to come after people in the media.
We're going to come after you.
Whether it's criminally or civilly, we're putting you all on notice.
Does this sound like the kind of nonpartisan law enforcement professional who should lead the FBI? Yes.
Here, Senator Kennedy gives him an opportunity to address the conspiracy theory attacks waged against him in Clip 10. If you're not taking off some people, you're not doing your job right.
I think they should just have people who care about questioning them neutrally.
Again, not a Republican or Democrat thing.
Like if someone goes out there and specifically lies about Russiagate, about impeachment, about insurrection, about the 51-inch letter, call them out on it.
But they keep having them on over and over and over and over again.
He knows about the fake intel leaks and then how it gets promoted by the mainstream media.
He knows how their whole propaganda campaign works, folks.
That's why they're scared of him.
Now, whether he can or will dismantle it or not is in their story.
But exposing it for the American people and understanding that, grasping that as the FBI director is already a huge advancement of the issues we've had with FBI leadership.
Now, I got a couple other clips from the Patel hearing.
I want to jump to some of these Gabbard clips.
Her entire opening statement, about 10 minutes, was in...
Incredibly powerful.
But for the sake of time, let's just go to some of these clips, some of these highlights first.
Here she is with Senator Michael Bennett from Colorado, who turns out to be a real freak show himself.
unidentified
Listen to him here in clip 20. Do you believe, as the chairman of this committee believes, as the vast majority of members of our intelligence agencies believe, that Edward Snowden was a traitor to the United States of America?
The American people elected Donald Trump as their president not once but twice.
And yet the FBI and intelligence agencies were politicized by his opponents to undermine his presidency and falsely portray him as a puppet of Putin.
Title I of FISA was used illegally to obtain a warrant to spy on Trump campaign advisor Carter Page using a Clinton campaign-funded false dossier as their so-called evidence.
Biden campaign advisor Tony Blinken was the impetus for the 51 former senior intelligence officials' letter dismissing Hunter Biden's laptop as disinformation specifically to help Biden win the election.
Former DNI James Clapper lied to this committee in 2013, denying the existence of programs that facilitated the mass collection of millions of Americans' phone and Internet records, yet was never held accountable.
Under John Brennan's leadership, the CIA abused its power to spy on Congress, to dodge oversight, lied about doing it until he was caught, and yet has never been held responsible.
Under Biden, the FBI abused its power for political reasons to try to surveil Catholics who attend traditional Latin Mass, labeling them as quote-unquote radical traditionalist Catholics.
Personally, just 24 hours after I criticized Kamala Harris and her nomination, I was placed on a secret domestic terror watch list called Quiet Skies.
Let me get one more quick clip before we hit the end of the first hour here, getting into it with Mark Kelly in clip 24. The tendency to repeat Russian and Syrian, and even in some cases, I think we'll get into in a closed session, Iranian information, and to discount what comes from our intelligence community.
She might have the toughest road ahead because there's a couple of other Republicans outside of the rats that are not committing to voting yes for her.
But see, she gets the general issue here, which is just because the U.S. intel agencies say something is true doesn't mean it is.
And they can sit here and try to propagandize the Congress and propagandize the media and the American people.
She doesn't stand for that.
She doesn't think that those are good practices for the director of national intelligence.
And that angers corrupt politicians like Mark Kelly and the like.
They want to be able to use the intelligence agencies against us.
Not for us.
Against us.
And she gets that.
I pray to God she gets confirmed.
She's always been consistently anti-war and pro-transparency.
And because of that, they say she is spreading false propaganda, spreading foreign propaganda, when that's exactly what's been done to us by our intelligence agencies for years.
So, I mean, we're talking total 180 change at leadership if we can get Gabbard in, if we can get Patel in.
All right.
I got a couple more clips.
I got guests coming up.
Folks, remember to support us.
Become a VIP member.
TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP. Best way to support us.
Monthly membership, huge benefits come along with it, and that secures these broadcasts and the Alex Jones Show into the future.
TheAlexJonesStore.com slash VIP. Become a member today.
Clip 18. And by the way, Bernie, the problem of corruption is not just in the federal agencies.
It's in Congress, too.
Almost all the members of this panel are accepting, including yourself, are accepting millions of dollars from the pharmaceutical industry and protecting their interests.
Bernie Sanders got caught lying about his big pharma contributions.
What a coward Bernie Sanders is, by the way.
I got millions of votes.
Yeah, you got more votes than Hillary Clinton.
And then you got down on your knees like a dog and let him steal it from you twice.
Like a little bitch.
They took it from you twice.
And you took big pharma money.
You're a coward.
You're a fraud.
All right, Dick Durbin brought up the Epstein list during the Kash Patel hearing, clip 17. I want to talk to you about the Epstein case.
unidentified
I have worked on this for years, trying to get those records of who flew on Epstein's plane and who helped him build this international human trafficking, sex trafficking ring.
Now, earlier, I urged then-chairman Durbin...
To subpoena those records.
And I ended up being blocked by Senator Durbin and Christopher Wray.
They stonewalled on this.
And I know that breaking up these trafficking rings is important to President Trump.
So will you work with me on this issue so we know who worked with Jeffrey Epstein in building these sex trafficking rings?
Child sex trafficking has no place in the United States of America, and I will do everything, if confirmed as FBI director, to make sure the American public knows the full weight of what happened in the past and how we are going to counterman missing children and exploited children going fjord.
All right, we're about to be joined by Ryan Samso.
We're going to continue our J6 defendant profiles.
This interview is going to be a little different.
We're going to have a little more leaning questions as Ryan was really at the center of one of the most viewed videos from January 6th when Ray Epps whispered something into his ear before the barriers went down.
We're going to ask Ryan what?
It's going to be fun.
Don't go anywhere.
Joining me now is January 6th defendant Ryan Samzell and Ryan, I do want to give you the same opportunity I've given the other January 6th political prisoners to just tell their story.
And I guess I would like to start with your experience going through the justice system.
I would like to save some time, however, to talk about, I think more importantly, what happened that day from your perspective.
I'm not sure anybody's ever heard your story.
I'm not sure you've ever had the chance to correct any record as far as what you were involved in or not involved in that day.
So we will ask those questions of you, specifically in the one video that might be one of the most viewed and controversial videos from that day, when the barriers go down and Ray Epps famously whispers something into your ear.
There were even accusations made about you.
So you can address all of that stuff.
But why don't before we do that, why don't you just give us your experience dealing with the justice system and what your political punishment was like for your activities that day?
At this point, you're in jail in D.C.? I was in D.C. and Northern Neck when the assaults happened.
The worst assaults were actually in Northern Neck.
A lot of people got it confused and thought it was at D.C., but it was in the Northern Neck jail.
Both times, my hands were behind my back in handcuffs when assaults took place, and I'm looking to get a legal team to hopefully get that camera footage out so I can give it to the people.
The justice system, there's no justice in the system.
They, for the guy, I refused to plead guilty, me personally, because I wanted the truth to come out, and I thought the American people had the right to know.
The odd part is that when my trial came, they kept my trial date off the calendar so people wouldn't come in and watch.
Then when I looked at the calendar date, they had it off by a month, and so people thought that my trial was already over.
Because my trial took seven days, so when I was leaking it out to people, like, hey, I got a trial, come up.
They're like, oh, no, it was last month.
I'm like, no, I'm going to trial right now.
So they want it so badly for people not to come to see what was going on.
That being said, I don't remember if you remember me or not, but you're actually in my discovery quite often.
You.
We were next to each other a lot, and you actually stopped and spoke to me that day.
You were carrying a camera, and you were just there filming.
I remember, and you clearly asked me, you said, why are you here?
I don't think that would have been January 6th if I was wearing that shirt.
I don't know.
I'd have to be refreshed on that, because I just don't know.
I'm not denying that that's true.
I don't remember wearing that shirt.
But nonetheless, I was obviously filming that day.
I talked to a lot of people, so I wouldn't be surprised if we did have an interaction.
Now, before I actually get into the events of that day, is there anything else you want to talk about as far as your experience through the justice system?
Did you spend time in the BOP? Yeah, so I was in the BOP. I was pretrial.
I was in MDC Brooklyn.
The pictures, if you Google my name, you'll see pictures of me in what looks to be a broom closet.
The FBI had said that those pictures were fake.
Those pictures are not fake.
First of all, how would I take, they said they were selfie style.
They were not.
If you look at the pictures, you'll see me laying in a broom closet in my boxers.
The reason why they put me in that room is they held us in solitary confinement.
While in solitary confinement, The only way that you have to eat sometimes, the guards will put you on tray punishment, so they won't feed you.
So Zach Real, a proud boy, we came up with a system where I'd flush my sheet down the toilet, and he would flush his sheet, and they would tangle up, and he was feeding me food through the toilet.
They put me on visit restriction, and, you know, it made it all the way to the Congress members, and, you know, they looked into it, and they certified that this was a real picture taken by a guard, and it made it into a motion that my lawyer filed to ask the judge.
They give me a bond because these were the smaller conditions I was living in.
During this time, I was in need for a vascular surgery from the assault.
I ended up having a deep vein thrombosis leading to the heart.
To that day, I still haven't gotten it treated, but I'm scheduled to do so within the next eight weeks now.
President Trump is supposed to be meeting us here, and we want to go to that stage, and we want to hear what he has to say.
We have a right to be here, man.
And as I said that, the cop pushed the fence, and I grabbed it and pulled it towards me, and the cop lifted his hand up, and he says, I'll knock you the F out.
So I took my hat, I put it on backwards, and I put my hands on a fence, and I said, take your best shot.
Right there.
That's when I said, take your best shot, Tom.
Ray Epps came up and he spoke to me and he said, hey man, I got more people.
Wait until more people come and we got to push through that fence.
See, what I really want to do is, you can see his mouth.
We can get a professional.
I argued and the prosecutors denied it.
I argued and I said, look, I want a professional lip reader to come in and I want him to read Ray Epps' lips because...
Why can't he?
And if it was me, they would have.
And when I was arrested by the FBI, Mr. Schroeder, the FBI came to my house after they came in there like I was on the Taliban's most wanted list.
When they allowed me to get dressed, they said, hey, listen, when we interview you, there's going to be a guy that we're going to signal.
I want you to call him the voice of reason.
And I said, you know, in the very beginning, I didn't.
I didn't know how corrupt the FBI was.
I really didn't.
And I said, all right.
So when I put my shoes on, they took me to a police station and they asked me, I said, hey, what about this guy right here?
And I said, he didn't say much.
I don't really remember.
And I said, is it fine if I have a lawyer with me?
And he said, well, first, he says, wait.
So he's like a voice of reason, right?
And I kind of sat back and I said, well, he said, look, we don't have to answer our question now.
We'll get to that.
Well, when I was in the D.C. jail, they wanted to have an interview with me.
When I denied the interview, coincidentally, the next day I was savagely beaten where I suffered a broken eye socket, broken nose, dislocated jaw, and acute kidney damage and blood clots.
Well, I would say, let's say you're 90% recalling it accurately, and the gist of what you're saying is accurate, of what he said to you.
It would line up with, which is crazy enough, some other people that had him on tape, even the night before.
Saying something similar about going into the building.
So it wouldn't be really the first time he said something along those lines.
But that was the moment before kind of the final breach that I think really led to things popping off.
The police throwing the flashbangs, the smoke grenades, the rubber bullets, which then just incited the crowd.
I mean, everything kind of got out of hand after that moment.
And you just happened to be right there at the front lines, and that moment specifically was one of the most viewed videos because of the Ray Epps controversy, and then him being right there at the barricades with yourself.
Yeah, so immediately after we all pushed, there was a guy to my right, and he was more in front of the female officer.
When she...
When the barriers knocked her over, she tripped behind a step behind her and she had fell back.
I had immediately noticed that and I ran to her safety and I pulled her up to make sure that the crowd, as you see, that's not me pushing in front of her.
Now, the cop came to my trial and lied and said that I said that.
I did not say that.
And that was him.
So when we, and right here, I yelled at this cop, I saved your officer, because he said, you knocked her down.
I said, no, I saved your officer.
Ray Epps comes running up past the fallen officer.
We get up further to the building.
He later approaches me.
You know, everybody's just walking around over there waving our flag.
It wasn't violent at this second area right here.
People are just standing there.
And Ray Epps comes up to me and he says, hey, man, what's your handle?
And I didn't really understand that lingo at the time.
I said, my handle?
What are you talking about?
He says, you're a good patriot, man.
What's your number?
And I said, I don't know.
And I never gave him my phone number.
And I thought that was odd, man.
And, you know, so later on there today, I'm still standing there and there's a kid standing right next to me.
Joshua Black is his name.
And they start shooting off rubber bullets into the crowd.
Joshua Black gets shot in the face with a rubber bullet.
When I stop to assist him, a heavyset black girl comes over, and I'm helping patch up this kid who has a rubber bullet stuck in his face.
Ray Epps, again...
And I actually have to picture this, you know, I'll post it up on my X page at some point, when I can go through everything, and Ray Epps is standing behind, and he's screaming at the cops, you just shot an unarmed fucking man, blah, blah, blah.
That's when I stood up, the cop came over and tried to choke Joshua Black while he was on the ground, and I got between the cop, I didn't want to hit the cop, so I used my body to bump him back.
Yeah, this guy right here.
That's my work that I put around his face.
That was my patchwork.
So the cop tried to choke him.
I tell the cop to back off of him, and the one cop comes over to me, and he says, hey, man, I seen what you did.
It's a good job.
I shook his hand.
After that, I went over to the scaffolding.
That's when I seen you.
You were out there with your video camera, and you said, hey, man, what are you here for?
Let me ask you this question because, you know, I'm trying to get everybody's different experience because there were so many different parts of that day.
There were so many different moments and parts that kind of led to the overall story and really ultimately the false narrative.
At any point for you, Because you were right there at the front.
At any point for you, was it like, okay, this is about to get really out of hand, or wait a second, are we being set up here?
Or for you, was it just kind of adrenaline, massive crowd, they stole the election?
Well, I mean, We also have to consider the longer-term environment.
We just witnessed the left rioting, burning cities to the ground for months, literally months.
They were bailed out.
They were supported by their politicians, representatives.
We saw them taking over entire Capitol buildings, I mean, blocks.
They took over blocks in Seattle.
They were burning police buildings.
I mean, so we can go on and talk about the riots.
So it was kind of this...
And I'm not saying it was at the front of your mind, but, you know, there is the monkey see, monkey do phenomenon where it was like, you know, they just rioted for months and, you know, maybe you just figure, okay, this is acceptable in America now.
And I'm not saying you rioted, obviously, but overall the largesse of the crowd was kind of already in, you know, used to seeing those images, used to seeing the riots, used to seeing it being accepted.
And, you know, maybe that had a factor to play, especially once the cops, I think, really had a major part in instigating the crowd there as well.
And they were obviously set up and unprepared as well.
I mean, from the treatment in the prisons to what he witnessed that day.
Yet another incredible January 6th story from a January 6th defendant.
We're going to continue these pieces.
We're going to go to Border Patrol whistleblower Zachary Apotheker coming up next.
He's got some big stuff.
Joining me now is Border Patrol whistleblower Zach Apotheker.
This is the first time we've had him on since Trump has been inaugurated.
I'm curious to know what his current status is.
Being punished politically for some of the things he did blowing the whistle on what was going on at the border under the Biden administration.
So I'd like to get an update on that.
Before we get into that, though, Zach, I want to give you an opportunity to speak about a friend of yours who was just killed near the Canadian border.
Border Patrol agent and friend of yours.
It's my understanding you were actually about to spend some time with him.
Perhaps a little backyard barbecue and cold beverage.
Do you want to talk about your friend in the Border Patrol recently who was shot and killed up by the Canadian border?
I've seen some interesting reports, and I'm really not ready to commit to any of them, quite frankly, because I know the investigation is ongoing.
But we're talking about a friend of yours, U.S. Border Patrol agent David Malland, also an Air Force veteran.
And so I've seen conflicting reports on what led to the shooting that led to his death.
I'm not sure which direction the scent is taking me as far as what the real story is.
And I'm not even asking you necessarily to weigh into any of that either.
I just wanted to give you the opportunity to talk about what a great person he is and really, you know, humanize the sacrifices that a lot of these Border Patrol agents make because, you know, this is not a household name.
This Air Force veteran Border Patrol agent lost his life defending this country.
And, you know, he doesn't get he doesn't get the big ceremonies.
He doesn't get all the attention.
And so it's it's kind of one of these things that we just deal with in the media.
but it's true.
It's true.
He's, he's not a household name.
David Maland did not get big mainstream attention, and it's really unfortunate.
Yeah, what I can tell you about him is he's an absolute hero, and I wouldn't sit here and lie to you and tell you that he wasn't the best person I've probably ever met unless he really was.
I mean, he was just the type of guy you walk away from.
And when you put this uniform on, you're willing to die for this country in the line of duty.
You know, and make the ultimate sacrifice.
You are a hero.
And he took that in.
You know, there's nothing that I can add.
There's nothing I'm going to say that's ever going to make it okay or lessen the pain.
But just that he's in God.
You know, I know he's with our Lord and Savior, man.
And I think about him all the time, as many other people do.
And, you know, from my aspect of it, this is what I really wanted to add, Owen, is I worked...
You know, there's about 20,000 agents in the Border Patrol.
And I was on your show prior to getting my gun and badge taken away, right?
You had me on.
And I spoke out.
I said, there's a problem in this country.
There's been a problem going on.
We're letting too many people in.
There's criminal aliens.
The government's assisting these NGOs, giving them millions, hundreds of millions, if not billions of dollars.
And they're bringing people into the country.
There's a lot of criminals.
And I'm at a very small station.
And lo and behold, they punish me and take my gun and badge.
And the shift that he was working was a shift I was on.
And it was a very small shift.
So I wasn't able to assist.
And I'm not blaming anyone because this is going to be used against me.
But I just want you to understand how I feel if you're a viewer at home.
You speak out against a problem with violent alien criminals and you're punished for it, taken out of the line of duty.
The problem with these bureaucratic agencies, they hide the ball on you, right?
So we have something called OPR, Office of Professional Responsibility.
They're like CBP. Border Patrol is not its own agency.
We're under CBP. And there's a couple different agencies under CBP. You have the port.
You have the guys that patrol alongside the port.
That's us.
And between ports, you have AMO, which is Air Marine.
And we have our own internal investigations, which is OPR. They've been the ones investigating me.
They're saying that it's administrative because I didn't do anything criminal.
I didn't give away any operational security.
And the leader of OPR, because they fall under CBP, is Rodney Scott, who's an ex-Border Patrol agent who I've spoken to.
He reached out to me when I first came out before I got in trouble, and he said, you already fired the bullets downrange.
Keep going.
Just so happens that now Rodney Scott is in charge of all of CBP. So he's the guy that can call it off.
Will he?
I don't know.
No one really wants me to go and do these interviews, but what other way can I protect myself?
I didn't do it for money.
I didn't really do it to get a following.
I have 47,000 Twitter followers.
If they gave me my job back, I would delete my Twitter tomorrow and just go back to doing my job.
When they took my livelihood away and took a lot of my pay away, James O'Keefe donated $100,000.
And I'm more than great.
I can never thank him enough for that.
But at the same time...
You know, that's two years of pay after taxes.
I mean, it wasn't like a life-changing amount of money with all my bills adding up.
I have a lawyer that he assisted me with, but there's costs associated with that.
So I'm at a point where now it's like I spoke out and I did it on the principle of I'm not okay with this going on and I wanted it on the record that I wasn't okay with it.
And that's really all I've gotten out of it, Owen.
It was, you know, forgive me for being unprofessional.
It was cuckold behavior, cuckoldry.
I mean, it was like beyond sick and disgusting.
We were just getting as many people under this country as we could, regardless of if they had if we knew what their criminal background.
We're talking murderers and rapists.
And then they go and kill and rape women like Lincoln Riley.
And we're supposed to be OK with that.
So there was really no morale.
It was like sick, psychotic behavior.
So, yeah, it was a form of torture.
Yeah, but the thing is, whenever that's going on, there's obviously going to be guys that they don't want to leave the job, and they're going to say, well, this happened before, and we granted amnesty before.
It was never on this level, and I talked to a lot of old-timers that worked in the 70s, 80s, and they were like, thank you, someone finally did it.
Someone finally, quote-unquote, pulled the trigger and said, this isn't okay.
Yeah, it was psychotic paper, so I spoke out, because what if somebody said, like, you know...
What if somebody came in to run the country and said, why'd you do this?
And you just said, well, they were telling me too.
I was getting paid.
That wasn't a good excuse.
Me being told to do that wasn't a good enough excuse, regardless if anybody was also going to get me in trouble for it.
I gave my life over to Jesus Christ, right?
And that's a whole other conversation.
I'm not trying to preach that right now.
But what I'm saying is I had to meet my maker.
And ultimately, that was the leading cause of that, man.
Well, you're a man of your convictions, and I think that you had seen enough and you made your decision.
I mean, I can't say what I would do in your shoes, obviously, but I would say when I look at a situation where you're left with an opportunity to either shut up, sit down and shut up, or speak out, you know, I've obviously chosen the latter at every time down the line and paid the price as well.
So I think that we both have that in common.
I guess where I was trying to get, though, do Border Patrol agents feel better now?
I mean, is there a semblance of an increase of morale or, like, they can do their job again?
There's purpose again?
I mean, I have to imagine there's a culture shift within the Border Patrol agents since Trump got in.
Yeah, and I can make everyone at home feel great and say there is.
And there really is.
I mean, they're getting to do this.
It's kind of like a sport now.
They're going to catch people.
But when you have guys that worked for the last 20 years and everything, every single person they caught was wiped out in a week's worth of work.
Now when they're catching people and returning them, we just let in $30 million over the next four years.
How many are we going to remove?
I mean, the math still isn't going to add up, Owen.
They are happier.
They're not being forced to do psychotic behavior.
So in that sense, they're kind of let off the leash.
But the damage is kind of done, bro.
The victims have already been killed.
But at least they're trying to right the ship, right?
So I'll speak for myself.
If they were to give me my job back, I could go and do my job with a clear head.
Now, if we were still letting people in the country, I wouldn't even want my job back.
So the morale is definitely 180. You know, as great as this country is, it's going to be hard to undo what was happening.
And another reason I spoke out, too, is because both my brothers died of drug overdoses.
So I only had two siblings.
Both my brothers were lying in a grave, and I'm letting more drugs and people come into this country on a daily basis.
How would you feel?
Your brothers died of drug overdoses, and they were good dudes, and they're lying in a grave, and you're bringing in hundreds of people, and right down the road, there's...
There's just drugs coming every, you know, so often because we don't have enough agents to actually do the work because we're more busy bringing people into the country.
From a practical standpoint, do you think sending the military down to the southern border will help stop the flow, or do you think just the policy changes are more effective?
You know, they need to hire as many people as humanly possible.
And obviously the policies of returning people, but send the military, send the national, whoever you got to send, send as many people and return them.
I mean, it's a...
The thing that I like about Border Patrol, it's not like you're a police officer where you're trying to determine all these different crimes.
It's not like you don't have to be Sherlock Holmes.
You're down there, you see a guy cross, you catch him and you return him back into Mexico where he came from or put him back into Canada.
And it takes a lot of men to do that.
I think our apprehensions are down and that's good.
That means less people are coming.
You can safely assume because they're not being able just to give up and then given a free ride into the country.
Well, I think, again, you're a man of your convictions.
It doesn't sound like you have any regrets.
Everybody questions decisions they make that impact their lives, obviously, but you stood by your convictions.
I think you did the right thing.
I would say God is going to provide the opportunity for you, whatever that is, whether that's getting back to your job or something else, but that's kind of how I view your situation.
I would hope they invite you back.
I don't know why they wouldn't.
There's new leadership.
Your case should be brought to the very top.
I mean, you know, bless Christy Noem's heart.
She's getting all dolled up to go out on the streets.
But, you know, if we can get your name to her desk or whosever desk that needs to see your case and say, hey, we're reinstating this man.
Give him his gun.
Give him his badge.
Put him back on the border to do the work that he was meant to do.
I think that would be the best case scenario for everybody.
And it would deter what you're talking about to say, I can't in good faith give somebody bad career advice.
I can tell them my experience, but I can't give them bad career advice.
But if you can get reinstated, you know, that might make you rest a little more easier with other people talking to you about, you know, maybe other concerns they have.
And we got another great guest coming up in the next hour.
I'm going to get into some real important legal news, specifically Trump ending the federal income tax with Bob Barnes, who doesn't just do civil rights litigation, but also tax litigation.
So he's really an expert on a lot of these issues that are coming to the fore with the changing of the guard at the White House.
All right.
I've barely been able to plug today.
I've been so busy covering the highlights and getting both of the guests on that I've really neglected paying the bills.
So, let me urge you, please, to go to thealexjonesstore.com and do some shopping, whether it's the great hoodies or hats or t-shirts that are so popular.
I keep hearing all these stories about the t-shirts, the hoodies, the people who wear them out.
They meet their new girlfriend.
They meet their new best friend.
They have an excellent conversation with like-minded people.
Whatever it is, hell, maybe they just want to ruffle some feathers with a liberal that's hanging around town.
But those are the kind of stories that's always entertaining just from wearing the t-shirts.
The limited edition Trump inaugural t-shirt is still available at thealexjonesstore.com, but that is a limited edition.
The new beginning site-wide sale is live.
10% off t-shirts and hoodies.
15% off hats.
20% or more off all supplements like Alex Jones Atomic Defense Immune System Builder.
40% off a 90-day supply right now.
That'll get you through the winter months when you've got these flus, these coughs, these colds, everything else going around.
Alex Jones Atomic Defense, 40% off a 90-day supply.
That's three bottles.
Get it while it lasts at thealexjonesstore.com.
But the best way, aside from the supplements and everything at the store, The best way to support us is to go right to thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP and become a VIP member.
All kinds of benefits come along with this.
Monthly store credits, free shipping on orders over $99, advanced notice of other giveaways and specials, but only when you become a member of the VIP club, thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. And it's those sustained memberships that really are giving Alex an opportunity to stay on air into the future.
Legal battle's still ahead.
Future of Infowars, you know, maybe hanging in the balance.
But hey, it's Thursday, January 30th, 2025, and we're still on air.
But these legal fights are very expensive.
Unfortunately, that's the reality of the situation.
But the VIP members have been imperative in keeping this thing going.
And for me, the great crew behind me making this show look so great so that I can sit here and basically talk while they're running all the different cameras, running all the different...
The screenshots that you get, the clips, the sound, everything.
That's all the crew.
I just have to sit here at the desk and look good.
So become a member, thealexjonesstore.com slash VIP. Best way to support us.
Best way to take advantage of all the membership details that you can find there.
And that's what will keep Alex Jones on the air into the future, whatever the fate here in these famed studios may be.
All right.
I got a short five-minute segment.
I'll probably just do some headline coverage.
And then Bob Barnes is going to join me for the third hour to talk about all these EOs and this idea of abolishing the federal income tax.
Can we do it?
What does it look like if we do?
Is it even legal?
Bob Barnes coming up shortly.
All right.
I got a lot of important stuff to discuss with Bob Barnes coming up in about five minutes.
It's really not funny, but go ahead and put the headline back up there.
It's a breaking headline right now.
Co-pilot of Black Hawk helicopter involved in mid-air collision was a woman.
Doesn't mean she can't fly a helicopter or co-pilot, but it does make you wonder if it wasn't a diversity, equity, and inclusion role hire that landed her as that co-pilot.
And maybe potentially led to the deadly crash.
It truly is deadly stuff.
And I don't say this stuff to be...
Shock jockey or extreme.
It's a real phenomenon.
Leftist policies are death.
They are death.
Liberal policies, Democrat policies equal death.
That's not a turn of phrase.
That's not an exaggeration.
Literally.
They lead to death.
The open borders, the DEI, all of it.
It all is deadly.
It's not a joke.
That's why I'm so serious about ridding our body politic of this cancer.
These policies are deadly.
Give liberals, give Democrats a little plastics, a little plastic, little tykes, political kit, and they can go play around and not hurt anybody.
Liberal Democrat policies hurt people and get people killed.
It's completely unacceptable.
And yet, here we are again.
By the way, look at Michael Strahan on interviewing Caroline Levitt.
This is just ridiculous.
I mean, goodness gracious, Michael.
Do better.
Clip one.
unidentified
But is there any concern that we risk losing people with years of experience like doctors and, let's say, scientists?
Well, most doctors who work in actual hospitals and medical institutions have to show up to the office.
We know that employees are more productive and more efficient when they are working in an in-office environment, and that's what this administration expects, and I think that's what American taxpayers expect.
Don't forget, it's the American people who are funding this government, and they deserve people who are actually showing up to work on their...
Look at this clip in 25. Now, the individual reporting here is speaking in Spanish.
But this is Mexico.
Look, we've seen the Associated Press.
They say, it's catastrophic.
These countries can't handle the influx.
But, okay, it's not catastrophic for us.
We played the video yesterday of this leftist reporter.
Mexico can't handle all these people.
What is President Trump thinking?
Oh, but America's supposed to.
Do you understand what a reality wake-up call this is about to be?
Here's hundreds, if not thousands, of people that made the trek to get to the southern border.
Now they can't get in, and they're stranded in Mexico.
Oh.
Oh.
Mexico says we can't handle them.
Mexico says this is catastrophic.
Yeah, no kidding.
This is what we've been dealing with for four years.
And so now that it's happening in their countries, and now that they're expected to foot the bill and take care of these people, all of a sudden it's going to be an issue, and all of a sudden they're going to want to stop illegal immigration.
Isn't that amazing?
So these scenes in Mexico, oh my gosh, look at these lines, hundreds, thousands of illegal immigrants.
This is ridiculous.
We can't do this.
Yeah, no kidding.
Neither could we.
And you made us do it for four years.
All right, I am really excited to hear from Bob Barnes here on a multitude of stories that his expertise is going to be paramount.
And then...
I don't know if he knows this, but his own law center is up to something today.
And, you know, they have represented me, the 1776 Law Center.
1776lawcenter.com has represented me, and not only now in my defense, but also some cases where we're going on the offense.
So maybe we'll talk about that coming up here with Attorney Bob Barnes.
But this is where I really want to hear your take, because I'm sure...
I mean, I get a little anxious.
My heart rate goes up a little bit every time I hear Trump talking about abolishing the federal income tax.
So, when you hear this, and he even lays out the historical perspective of it, going back over a century, you've done a lot of tax cases, you've handled my tax cases, so you're very well aware of these laws.
What is the answer here?
Abolishing the federal income tax?
Abolishing the IRS? When you hear Trump talk like this, what goes through your mind?
I mean, what he's talking about is that our country was founded on taxing foreign enterprise, not American enterprise, and that that had a wide range of benefits for building up American industry, for building up American manufacturing, for building up American farming.
And his point is that there's no reason for us to not want to return to that better way of life for the American economy.
Most prosperous American economy was pre-income tax when we relied on tariffs, particularly because they served a dual purpose.
One purpose was a source of revenue for the government, but the other was a mechanism to build up American industry and manufacturing by giving domestic industry a competitive edge that they didn't have to pay that tax.
Like he's talking about more broadly.
And if you locate in the U.S., he wants that tax to be as low as possible if you build and make things here in America.
He wants every incentive on the planet to exist to restore American manufacturing and the independence of our supply chain, which as people figured out during COVID, we're actually dependent on China for essential items of everyday living.
And that's not a position you want to be in.
That's real leverage that China is developing against the rest of the world.
If you want to be able to get energy, if you want to be able to feed your family, if you want to be able to get basic essential items for the modern economy, you depend on China's goodwill.
And we don't want that to be the case either.
So for national security, for economic security, for economic prosperity, for a government that will stay within its limits, the most beneficial thing you could do is shift from a domestic tax system to a foreign tariff system.
So he's absolutely on to something.
Whether he can get enough support for it to get it through is yet to be determined.
But at least he's on the right path.
The other aspect is, as long as the IRS exists, the IRS is not just a tax collection agency.
It is a mass surveillance and control agency.
It is intended that you, in order to get those little tax deductions, you confess everything about your life.
You tell the IRS every year.
Here's who I am.
Here's where I live.
Here's my birthday.
Here's who I live with.
Here's what churches I give to.
Here's what political people I give to.
Here's what charities I give to.
Here's what people I have in my everyday life economically.
You basically do a confession that's more detailed than what you would give a priest.
And so if we could take that away, power from the federal government, that too would be an extraordinary benefit.
So I think at every level, he's on the right path.
Yeah, he would need Congress, but yeah, absolutely.
With ease, they could say no more income tax.
It'll be over tomorrow.
And the IRS agents have to go get a new job.
It's my argument to Trump's people about what they should be doing with the federal government in terms of, and I think he's on the right path there, like saying, hey, please resign.
If you resign, we'll give you some extra benefits.
That helps get rid of 10, 20% of federal employees.
And now we just need 80% more.
And so I've been recommending defund them.
The easiest way to get rid of them is to defund them.
If you try to demote them, they sue you.
If you try to fire them, they sue you.
If you try to change their benefits, they sue you.
If you try to move them to an undesirable location, they sue you.
So the best way to avoid that is just if there's no money for them, too bad.
They're out of luck.
So that's the one area where they can't extort the courts into extorting the Trump administration into continuing in their position in power.
But as your video pointed out, not only are these people not positive and productive, these people are negative forces on the American economy and society.
And we got in their arrogance and condescension.
I mean, almost all of grant programs are basically ways to line the pockets of the Democratic elites.
So the first thing is that civil service reform is one of the worst things that could ever happen because it allowed the bureaucracy to be permanently in power without being responsive to the American people through elections.
Elections have no impact on them.
The second problem is the size and scale of the government has become so subsuming that all kinds of people are economically dependent on it now, which is its own problem and developed into its own animal.
And then the third problem is the judiciary is very pro-bureaucracy.
And so on average, particularly in the district of corruption, which we just need to get rid of that court system altogether, restore home rule and take away all the D.C. court system.
They have been a persistent problem, and they've proven how political they are in the last eight, nine years where they would routinely intervene in Trump's administration, routinely reaffirm the Biden administration, all of the insanity that took place, the January 6th cases.
So that anytime he tries to do anything towards these federal employees, they run to court.
The one area where the courts can't force something is they can't force you to spend money you don't got.
And that's where it is.
The reason why he went with the resignation remedy is that's a remedy they can't sue over because they're volunteering for it and it's consistent to congressional legislation.
It still hasn't stopped senators and congressmen from complaining about it.
That gives you how extreme it is.
Basically, we have a D.C., a parasitic class in Washington.
That is parasitic to the rest of the world and the rest of America.
And what they've done is they've built up this permanent bureaucracy that is their main protection.
And they enrich and reward.
They built a new democratic political machine.
It's just called federal government.
And whether it's grants to NGOs, whether it's independent contractors or secretly deep state allies, or whether it's federal employees getting fact-checked for staying at home and not even working.
All of it has become this massive democratic political machine that is sapping real economy and energy from the rest of the people.
And we're just seeing it on display at scale in how they go crazy if Trump simply says, no, we're not going to fund DEI scholarships in Burma.
No, we're not going to try to teach the Palestinians how to use birth control.
They go insane.
What do you mean there's not $35 million for that?
I mean, this is how out of touch with the real world they are.
And for the most part, this war has not even touched them.
And so that's why they don't mind it, because they're living in their bubble while the rest of Ukraine pays it.
But let's look at some of these Trump executive orders and policies.
And now...
You know, the diversity, equity, and inclusion phenomenon is kind of reaching ahead again after the tragic plane crash yesterday.
And of course people immediately start to think about that stuff.
I mean, how could we not?
They shoved it down our throats, they made it policy, and then you bring it up and they pretend like it's illegitimate to even act like it exists, even though they brag about it.
Here's some of the things, you know, he mentioned getting rid of the DEI programs in the federal government.
I also happen to know, same case with any federal contractor as well, because they have the same standards.
So that impacted a lot of different industries.
He also signed this executive order yesterday, ending radical indoctrination in K-12 schooling.
That's your critical race theory.
That's your gender ideology.
How is it, from somebody that really understands civil rights decisions in the court, how did they get away with this?
How were they able to get away with hiring based off of race, but using this blanket of protection called diversity, equity, and inclusion?
I mean, I brought suit, for example, against IBM and Red Hat with America First Legal, Stephen Miller's group.
Now he's in the White House.
And it was extraordinary.
He brought suits by American Press Legal all across the country and was constantly winning.
This wasn't winning enough to set it aside.
And there were enough corrupt courts, partisan courts, that weren't intervening and that were letting them get away with it.
Because this was always illegal to discriminate to say, okay, because of the color of your skin, because of your ancestry, because of who your parents or grandparents happen to be.
Because of what gender we decide you are, suddenly you're going to get special benefits above others.
Now, of course, what they're discovering is Trump's going to have to be doubly diligent because when he's getting rid of the DEI programs, they're just rebranding.
They're just calling themselves other things.
And one of the things that's fascinating about these programs is it's coming out that there was hierarchies within them so that the person who got paid the most was like the diversity manager.
And it reminded me of Orwell's Animal Farm.
It turns out some pigs are more equal than others.
The other thing this all was, it wasn't just social experimentation.
It was a way to get money to the Democratic Party.
That's what 90% of it was.
That's how Joe Biden processed foreign aid.
How much money is my family going to get out of this?
You dig in, you see people like data nerds and other people that are online that are helping out Doge and documenting.
You dig into the grants.
All the grants are just giving money to their political pals.
That's what it is.
It was sapping from the productive American people to line the pockets of the Democratic Party's pals.
That's what 90% of DEI was.
It was making sure the right person got that contract, the right person got that job, and the right person had their pockets lined.
And it was to keep them dependent, just like their welfare programs are intended to keep people dependent.
They don't want people independent.
If they actually created welfare programs that gave microcapital to black America and black America used it to be economically successful and become economically independent as it once was before a lot of these programs were instituted, then all of a sudden they lose the votes.
They need them to be dependent in order to get the votes.
It's all one big scam to bribe votes and keep votes on their team in the name of helping some disadvantaged constituents.
But it's like Bernie Sanders has been exposed.
In these RFK hearings.
Here's Bernie.
I fight the man.
I fight big pharma.
I'm taking on the big corporations.
No, you're Bernie.
You're Bend Over Bernie for a reason.
That's why they know you as Bend Over Bernie.
Today, he was arguing with Robert Kennedy.
Always a bad idea for people to do.
He's much more likely to be well-armed with the facts than you.
Bernie was like, oh, no.
I didn't take millions of dollars from pharmaceuticals.
It was just regular employees.
Never the executives.
Yeah, right.
It was the janitor sending you $1.5 million, Bernie.
But what happened is he started to see the grapes.
Like, I could see the grapes in the White House.
Oh, and from that point forward, he did whatever they told him.
Bend over Bernie became who he was from 2016 forward.
He's no longer little commie Bernie with some good Second Amendment ideas from rural Vermont.
He's true commie Bernie on behalf of the corporate elites and their fascistic crowd who want to continue to control government policy to line their pockets at our expense.
I mean, what has been a crash course, I don't think Democrats realize their response to Robert Kennedy.
As well as Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel, is doing severe damage to the Democratic Party brand.
There's a lot of normies out there that believed Bernie Sanders was fighting the man, that believed Elizabeth Warren wanted to take on corrupt corporate power on behalf of the ordinary consumer, not realizing that these are the top two recipients of big pharma money just laundered through their executives and other people rather than through a corporate PAC. That they are bought and paid for, but now they're seeing it on full display.
I mean, imagine all these Democrats.
I mean, Kennedy is Democratic royalty.
There's people that have been his lifelong friend for 50 years that are willing to betray that to serve their donors and the deep state.
And all it is, it's a crash course for all those Kennedy voters, many of whom, by the way, voted for Trump at the top of the ticket, but a good number of them voted Democrat down ballot.
And now they're discovering why voting Democrat down ballot is not an option.
There's a reason why the Quinnipiac poll just had the Democratic Party have a lower approval rating than any time in the history of the Democratic Party.
It is at that level of nadir.
It is worse than when it was under George McGovern.
Because even then, your local person thought of their local Democrat as much as part of the party as McGovern did.
Now they're seeing they don't have any allies.
People they thought were their allies?
Bernie Sanders, stand up to the man.
I'm going to bring a revolution.
Elizabeth Warren, consumer protection.
Let's take on the big corporations.
And then they see they be the lead Democrats attacking the only real Democrat that has attacked big corporations for his lifetime and his career, and that's Robert Francis Kennedy Jr. And they're like, holy cow, these guys are all frauds.
They're all fakes.
They're all phonies.
I think that's half the reason.
I was curious, why did Trump nominate?
Kennedy and Gabbard, knowing that going through the nomination process was going to be the most tough path to get them into official positions of power when he could put them in other positions.
And the talk throughout the summer and the fall was that Kennedy himself told Tucker Carlson, it'll be tough for me to get through Congress.
But then I watched the hearings and I'm like, of course, this is why he did it this way.
He did it this way to give a crash course to his own base.
And give a crash course to the independent voters who are the big swing voters in the future, working class voters, disproportionately African-American, Hispanic, Asian, but who become, after COVID, deeply skeptical of the Democratic Party brand because of the economic impact.
They tend not to like illegal immigration because it impacts them more than anybody else.
They lose jobs.
They lose school standing.
They lose housing access.
They're the ones who suffer the economic detriment.
But then I see the hearings and I see exactly why.
He wanted these voters to understand how the Democratic Party is lost, that it's dead, that it's DOA. The party of Andrew Jackson is no longer the party of Andrew Jackson.
It's the party of the central banks that Andrew Jackson spent so much time fighting.
And these hearings are highlighting that.
They're broadcasting that.
They're showing how much the Democratic Party literally worships vaccines like they're God.
That if you say anything against them, you are a heretic who must be burned at the stake.
How corrupt these people are.
How Kash Patel trying to restore credibility to the FBI, and he's the one that they're attacking.
That Tulsi Gabbard trying to give us honest intelligence for the first time in the history of American intelligence agencies.
And for that very reason, they're going ballistic on her.
But all those normies out there who believe the nonsense about the Democratic Party brand, and normie conservatives.
Who still thought Mitch McConnell was one of us.
Who still thought that some of these conservatives were conservative at all.
So far, these hearings have been very revelatory.
They're going to be politically consequential, no matter whether these people get confirmed or not.
The Democratic Party is destroying itself in live time.
So I would say, too, because I put principle over party, and obviously the Republican Party is much more aligned with my principles than the Democrats, especially now it's not even close.
But Gabbard, RFK Jr., these are former Democrats.
I mean, these used to be the most popular Democrats.
And so I do wonder what the final damage is going to look like here when it's the Democrats coming after their own, really, more so than even the Republicans who are now cooperating and trying to get these nominees confirmed.
I do wonder what the final damage is going to look like.
I guess we won't really know until the midterms.
But man, some of these Democrats, they've really embarrassed themselves, I would say.
Well, and I think they're living in a fantasy land.
Like, they're living, like, five years ago, you could get away with preaching about the wonders of vaccines.
And you could attack Robert Kennedy, and the normie would have been like, oh, yeah, vaccines are wonderful, etc.
Post-COVID, that's not the case anymore.
Like, we did a big, massive survey that we provided to Trump's people last spring.
Richard Barris, People's Pundit Daily, put it together.
And what we found was one in three Americans were considering voting for Robert Kennedy for president.
And what was animating them?
Food freedom and medical freedom were the top two issues that were driving them.
These were one out of three Americans know somebody that has either been discriminated against because of the vaccine or has been injured from the vaccine.
I mean, that's extraordinary.
And they're up there pretending vaccines are still sacrosanct.
Vaccines are, it's like they're the Catholic Church in the middle of the Protestant Reformation who don't realize the Reformation is here.
And the Gabbard is another indicator of how corrupt our system has become.
And credit to Trump, using their confirmation hearings to educate the world at just how corrupt Washington is.
They're also defending me in a very big case right now.
I don't like to talk about it, but it's a very important legal defense of me going on right now as well.
And you can support that by going to owendefense.com in that legal defense.
But we're also, I will tell you, going on the offense now as well.
And without going into the details, we've also now...
So now we're also going on the offense over there at the 1776lawcenter.com.
Now, this one I might be scooping you on, actually, Bob.
I don't know if you've heard about this one yet.
Soon we will be – actually, it may have already been done.
But I talked with some of your legal team, specifically Lexi, who's representing me in some other cases.
I said, hey, why don't we file a FOIA request on all of these states – I don't know if you saw this, but Tuesday night, Jesse Waters was able to get transcripts of the COVID snitch line in Minnesota.
And these quotes are some of the funniest things that I've ever seen in my life.
I have them clipped out here.
And so I said, hey, why don't we file a FOIA request to Minnesota?
And any other states that had a COVID snitch line, and let's actually get the audio files and play them on the air.
If not for the insanity that was those years under Democrat rule, but for the sheer comedy of it.
So if it hasn't been officially filed, it's in the process.
We're now filing a FOIA request to get all audio from the COVID snitch lines.
So you're going to hear about people calling, my neighbor was outside without a mask.
My neighbor was mowing the lawn.
He didn't wear a mask.
Oh, they took their children out playing outside during COVID. So it's great stuff you're doing over there at the 1776 Law Center.
And I can't think of any reason why they would not give us this audio.
And I've encouraged people to really deepen and broaden their use of the Freedom of Information Act at a federal level and all the state-level equivalents of that.
Whether it's called the Open Records Act or sometimes there'll be a sunshine law.
It might have different verbiage, but you're entitled to know what your local government is doing, your state government is doing, and your federal government is doing, including when they receive information from third-party sources that is not private because it's disclosed directly to the government in a public matter.
And so I'm all in favor of more people learning how to do that.
I mean, the only reason why we know about Hillary Clinton's emails is because Tom Fitton at Judicial Watch did a big FOIA request and stumbled on the fact that she had hidden and destroyed and deleted a bunch of emails and was operating a secret email server outside of government control or knowledge while she was secretary of state.
So if there's so much, it's like great credit to President Trump declassifying the JFK files, the RFK files, the MLK files that are in process.
I would like the Malcolm X files to also be declassified.
I would like Russiagate files to be declassified, COVID-19 files to be declassified.
There's more work to be done in that regard, but it's on the right path.
But if more ordinary everyday people, like people can use the Freedom of Information Act and the Privacy Act.
What does the IRS have on you?
What does the FBI have on you?
Is the government monitoring you?
You're entitled to know that about yourself.
And you can request all these agencies provide information about you.
We were going to do it for Alex, but then I realized that we would probably need like three gigabytes of material because every government agency known to man has been spying on Alex.
So it turned out to be a long list.
But I think it's really useful.
We're going to be developing it.
We're going to use your case and other cases to teach people at 1776 Law Center how they can use in their state, whatever the laws are, will help draft the template so that people can plug and play.
It's sort of like the vaccine mandate cases.
When that first happened, I put out a letter that I said, here's the kind of thing courts generally look for as being an approved religious exemption.
And people were able to borrow from that, learn from that, use that.
It was all free.
And protect their livelihood.
I mean, literally millions of Americans that protect it.
I hear from them every day, somebody saying, you know, this helped save my job.
So I think we all need to be active as citizen journalists, as citizens participating in our government to check our government by doing this.
I mean, think about like all the crowdsourcing that went into exposing each of these Democratic senators in live time.
During the RFK hearings about how they took all this money from Big Pharma.
That's crowdsourcing, grassroots, investigative, independent citizen journalism for which the Freedom of Information Act and its equivalent is a great tool.
Look at Georgia.
It was them asking for the ballots where they found out they had never looked at the ballots.
And then when they did look at the ballots, they found there were discrepancy with the ballots and exposed systemic flaws in the Georgia's election system thanks to people using the Freedom of Information Act.
It's like watching the Milgram experiments in live time, where you see these people sit there and shock somebody they don't even know just because somebody in a white lab coat tells them to.
I mean, my favorite one was people who were riding alone in their car with a mask on.
And there's still discrimination against the unvaccinated.
Now, I mean, you get a sense for how religious this is for people with the way Bernie Sanders went nuts over it yesterday over a onesie.
A onesie for your toddler that says unvaxed, unafraid drove him crazy.
It was like you were watching an Inquisition official seeing the Protestant Reformation in live time.
Their disconnect is extraordinary.
Their delusion is nuts.
I mean, I represented people who could not wear a mask, went into a grocery store, and they had people running, screaming at them about how now they were going to die because this person without a mask walked in, not even realizing they were getting closer to them and not even properly working the mask with the way they were screaming at them.
It was just insanity.
It shows you, I thought at some point Fauci was going to see how far he could go and say, okay, if you really want to avoid COVID, you can't drive anymore.
You have to walk everywhere, but you can't walk with both feet.
You have to hop.
And if you hop on one foot everywhere you go, then you'll avoid COVID. And you know what?
And what Warren admitted, when she was begging, and she was saying, if he gets in...
They're all going to go bankrupt.
It's like, how are they going to go bankrupt?
They're only going to go bankrupt from being sued, big drug companies, if their product is alive.
If it's not safe and it's not effective and they've engaged in negligence.
So she's admitting that she knows their products kill people.
Their products disable people.
And I mean, they've guaranteed profit with no risk.
This has always been insane.
This is always a bad idea.
And in any other context, both Bernie and Warren, Would be the lead critics of such a proposal.
But yet they're the lead advocates because they're bought and paid for by Big Pharma.
That's who the new Democratic Party is.
I've been trying to explain to people, think like fascists and communists from the 1930s.
Because fascists were just a form of communists.
They're all statists.
Fascists believed in socialism for the nation.
The Nazis believed in socialism for the race.
Commies believed in socialism for everybody.
But they were all commies at heart, all socialists at heart.
And that's what they are.
And that's what the Democratic Party's become.
It's become a party of the professional class, by the professional class, for the professional class, which means weaponizing government to empower them at the expense of the rest of us.
And in the process of doing so, they basically become fascist ideologues.
And they forfeited all of their populist roots.
Or any populist ideas that ever got them into power in the first place.
That's how Warren got to the Senate, promising to take on big corporations and protect the consumer.
And that's who Bernie Sanders has been.
But as soon as he could smell the White House, he's become bent over Bernie for corporate America, for the big defense industry, for big government, for all of those people.
No longer anything vaguely resembling the guy who was a big Second Amendment guy 10 years ago in northern Vermont.
When he makes that a priority, it probably isn't going to be his top priority quite yet, but I would imagine he's going to move on that relatively soon.
The president of Panama, Jose Raul Molino, has made a statement.
Panama says there will be no negotiations with the U.S. over the canal.
They have been removing all of the...
Chinese signs that were strewn about the canal.
So, you know, that's what Trump was talking about.
What is the approach to this?
Can Trump make the legal claim that they broke the treaty and move in?
First of all, under the treaty, U.S. is the guarantor of the operational security of the canal.
So on that basis, they can always intervene.
They can always intervene concerning the canal.
It's solely to make sure its operational security is maintained.
And Panama was playing footsie with China, and that's what Trump was really aimed at.
He was like, better quit playing footsie with China, or that will be our canal, and we'll kick out the Chinese for good.
The second grounds they can do so is if they are not consistently providing equal access to the U.S., and Trump alleges that is now happening, and that part of what China— I mean, it's clear what China is trying to do with its whole Belt and Road initiative.
It wants to control essential items of the economy so that nobody can try to change their government at all, externally.
Because they'll say, look, if you want your airplanes to work, the airstrip we built for you in some country, wherever it is in the world, then you better keep your mouth shut and play ball with what we need in terms of the court of public opinion or if we decide to go into Taiwan.
And China has huge internal economic problems.
They have a massive, massive real estate bubble that they basically inflated after the global financial crisis to keep everybody employed and to manipulate their growth rate to look like they were still growing at the same rate they were before when they weren't.
So they've got a massive bubble that's imploding that could completely take down their entire economy and society and government.
And they probably want as a backup strategy being able to manipulate global foreign policy for global foreign market access, but also So if they get into real trouble, what do they do?
Distract their public by going into Taiwan.
Create a military conflict.
Hey, you know, Chinese pride is back.
We're going to take on those Chinese nationalists and conquer the last Western, whatever language they want to use, in order to keep people invested in China's governance structure rather than overthrow them, which would be the normal instinct given how China has so badly mismanaged its housing economy and the economy the last decade within the country.
And it's just a ticking time bomb waiting to go off.
But President Trump's instincts are correct.
He's legally entitled to it.
Same with Greenland.
Same with Canada.
He's looking at shipping routes.
He wants to make sure U.S. has operational security over those shipping routes.
China's been trying to co-opt those shipping routes so that it could shut down U.S. traffic whenever they wanted next time.
They plan on engaging in economic warfare, not military warfare, not kinetic warfare.
That's what China's been building up for, to protect the fact they become the world's factory because they employ slave labor.
And have undermined manufacturing across Western Europe and the United States and the rest of the world.
So in order to take that out, Trump is right to be able to focus on protecting the security of our shipping routes.
And he is legally entitled to go into Panama if he needs to.
So we've been looking at it with you potentially being the standard bearer for the suit.
You might have a more robust, easier access to claims than a lot of other defendants.
Plus, we could bring those claims in the Western District of Texas, which is not as problematic a jurisdiction as the District of Corruption is in the District of Columbia.
So as a whole, they make it almost impossible to sue the government.
It's one area where I disagree with Trump.
Like, Trump has been saying he wants to expand qualified immunity for cops.
And I get why he's worried about that, all the lefty jurisdictions harassing police officers, etc.
But qualified immunity is a bad doctrine.
Nobody should be immune for violating somebody's rights.
If what they did was lawful, that's their defense.
That was their defense at the time of the founding of the country.
But basically, it's getting around all these ridiculous immunity doctrines.
And if we can find a court that will entertain the challenge to these doctrines, then I believe we're exploring at least.
Some way to get some legal relief or remedy, at a minimum discovery, into what actually took place at the scale and scope of corruption on January 6th cases involving judges, involving juries, involving grand juries, involving the DA's office, involving the U.S. Attorney's office, because they were all involved and complicit at different levels, in my opinion.
I think we would document and demonstrate.
Now, one other option we're looking at is not just suing politicians.
Not just showing people that may have governmental immunity, but maybe looking at some people who don't have governmental immunity who are complicit.
Some of the undercover federal agents and sources who were actually there, who were giving false intel and information, who may not be protected by immunity, who helped provoke and instigate any problems or troubles that happened that day, who then gave false testimony against others later on.
So we were looking at what is there available to get some civil remedy and relief.
For what happened on January 6th, not only for the people who are victimized by it, but to deter the government from doing it again and other bad actors from doing it again.
But it's going to be tricky.
The short answer is it's very, very hard.
But I take those kind of cases on all the time.
So we're trying to find a way to do it because I think it needs to happen.
At a minimum, the worst case scenario, let's say the court shut us down, it highlights the need for legislative reform.
It highlights the need for that.
We need legislative remedy long term so that corrupt actors don't get away with it.
Well, and I guess that's really the second word there is reform, because when I'm talking to a lot of these other defendants, you know, first priority is, hey, what are our legal options here?
And then it's we need criminal justice reform.
We need Bureau of Prison reform.
And, you know, these are these are people that are activists.
And so I don't think they're going to be, you know, laying down, let's say, Just because the years have passed and they've had their pardons.
I think people are very serious about these issues and these reform issues, and so we'll see where it goes from here.
Bob Barnes, at Bob, or excuse me, actually, at Barnes underscore Law on X, vivabarneslaw.locals.com, and of course, 1776lawcenter.com, and really looking forward to you showing people how to take advantage of that FOIA. Absolutely.
We're going to be sending you some merch, Owen, so that you get, but we got some cool people doing cool designs for us.
1776 Law Center supports food freedom, financial freedom, medical freedom, political freedom, and it supports cases and causes and clients that don't necessarily have the financial means to do it themselves.
So we crowdsource it.
It mostly just covers some of the costs.
You know, some of the past people that 1776 Law Center has helped cover the cost of, Kyle Rittenhouse, Covington, Brooke Jackson, Robert Kennedy.
So they're Owen Schroyer.
So there's some great names on that list.
So I appreciate everybody who helps, but we're also going to be providing information.
So let's say you don't have resources, you know, go to 1776 Law Center.
We're going to keep updating it.
You're going to get free intel, free information on these other cases.
You're going to get free intel on how you can use FOIA, how you can use Open Records Act requests, what your legal rights and remedies are, you know, what some of the language that needs to be used if your kid or somebody else has to deal with a vaccine mandate.
We're going to be providing all that information for free there at 1776 Law Center.
And I thank everybody who has helped make that a possibility, because otherwise some of these cases wouldn't get the representation they need.
I mean, maybe you chalk this one up to social media desperation.
A Georgia...
Healthcare worker arrested for twerking over disabled man's head, and I believe there were actually multiple instances of this.
It's really sick.
We have it on the screen.
We blurt out the victims, but it's actually extremely sad seeing this.
TikToker arrested after going viral for dancing over a disabled person's head.
Did you really just do it for the social media attention?
Or is there something else going on here?
These are not things you see or hear about in a healthy society.
Some unintentional comedy from the Associated Press talking about the California wildfires.
Study says climate change made conditions that fed California wildfires more likely and more intense.
Right.
The climate change.
What about the arson?
You know how many times arson was mentioned in this story?
Care to take a guess?
Zero.
Not once.
Wonder how the arson played into that.
Literally the people lighting the fires.
And the policies, the water policies, the debris policies, the forest policies.
No mention of that.
So the actual things that caused it, the actual things, the policies and the arsonists, no mention.
Just climate change.
Of course!
Of course.
Two men in custody after an elderly man was found tied up and killed in his basement in his Chicago home.
His sister had to come over and see this for herself, and ultimately he was deceased, George Levin, 63 years old.
Now, two men have been taken into custody.
I've heard reports that they were illegals, making me think it was gang activity, but they seem to be Either not committing to that or maybe afraid to say it.
So I'm not really sure what's going on.
But that is just a horror story that we will continue to monitor.
Now, Edward Snowden was brought up quite a bit during the Gabbard hearing today.
He actually offered a comment when the hearing was over.
I'm not even looking for posts and articles about it, and I've seen it trend on X, but really getting intense in the last four or five days.
And people are just freaking out all over the place and saying, is that Alex Jones?
Is that a clone?
Is that a guy in a rubber mask?
How has he lost so much weight?
And look so much younger.
Well, for five months, I've been eating better, working out a lot more intensely.
But also, I have been religiously taking the highest quality supplements out there.
I believe in supplements.
They're well documented.
We have some of the best.
But I just forget to religiously take them.
Now I have in my office and at home.
My people take medications, but I put it in the same type of bottles where you have every day what you're taking.
And I religiously take a lot of high-quality supplements.
And I drink a lot more water.
I've done some intermittent fasting where I don't eat till 1 or 2 o'clock every day, and then I don't eat past about 6 or 7. And I've lost 55 pounds now in five months.
My blood sugar is, you know, like a super healthy 15-year-old.
My blood pressure's low because my tests were not really bad, but they were starting to get in the zone of bad.
I was like pre-pre-diabetic, not pre-diabetic, but getting close to pre.
And now it's just, I just had my blood test done three weeks ago again.
So you're like a 20-year-old athlete, they said.
And I've got great genetics.
People have seen photos of me when I was younger and I was in great shape and ran like six, seven miles every few days.
I could bench press 400 pounds, I weighed 180 pounds, squat 600. I mean, I was quite a beast.
I wasn't even trying to be big.
I was just very strong for the muscle I had.
And so I intend to get an even better shape.
But I could not have done it without Ultimate CMOS, the Ultimate Superfood.
And it has the very best iodine in it.
It has the very best vitamin minerals, the way it's naturally produced, just right in your cells.
It is the ultimate superfood.
And she must have been popular for a long time.
I don't know why I wasn't promoting it, but this is a really strong private label of one of the top certified brands out there.
When we do this, we just go out and find out what's already super popular, what's already pop rated, and we can see if they'll let us private label it.
In this case, they did.
And the gummies are back in stock.
It's up to 50% off if you get three bottles, 40% off if you get less.
But these are great deals at thealexjonesstore.com.
Also, Ultimate turmeric formula.
Super concentrated, the strongest you'll find, with super concentrated ginger, black pepper extract, and more for your whole body, for your inflammation, for your brain, your cardiovascular.
I gobble this.
That has helped me get super healthy.
And, you know, quite frankly, this wasn't out yet, so I was just taking the InfoWars brand out of it that's excellent as well.
But the point is, is that I was on turmeric every day.
I mean, I'm just doing it.
And so it really, really works.
I see these fools out there saying, Ozempic Jones.
Well, I would never take that.
It's obviously super bad for your heart, super bad for your guts.
Are you kidding?
I'm not taking any big pharma garbage.
I am eating healthier, working out, drinking a lot of water, and it's been incredible.
Now, I'm on hard work and high-quality compounds that God gave us.