Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| On January 10th of 1963, 45 current communist goals were submitted to the congressional | ||
| record. | ||
| Number 13 was, do away with loyalty oaths. | ||
| Sixty years later, on the very same day, Biden, Obrador, and Trudeau met in Mexico City for the Declaration of North America, which states a plan to unify North America under the ideas of diversity, climate change, migration, health, and regional security. | ||
| The beginnings of a North American Union, which is a step towards a one-world government. | ||
| According to law, elected officials must swear an oath that they will support, defend, and bear true faith and allegiance to the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. | ||
| And through the Freedom of Information Act, U.S. Attorney Todd Callender, along with his team at Project Proper Oath, found that not a single member of the existing Cabinet has a valid oath of office. | ||
| U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Janet Yellen has no oath of office. | ||
| U.S. Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin has no oath of office and has also failed to register as a foreign agent, which is required due to serving on the boards and conducting international business with Raytheon, Nucor, and Tenet Healthcare. | ||
| U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland has no oath of office. | ||
| U.S. Secretary of State Anthony Blinken has no oath of office. | ||
| U.S. Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro Mayorkas has no oath of office. | ||
| U.S. Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg has no oath of office. | ||
| U.S. Secretary of Health and Human Services Xavier Becerra, responsible for declaring a national emergency during COVID, has no oath of office. | ||
| Former Director of the Centers for Disease Control, Rochelle Walensky, had no oath of office. | ||
| U.S. Special Counsel Jack Smith, responsible for investigating the January 6th U.S. Capitol attack, has no oath of office. | ||
| U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, Matthew Graves, Chief Prosecutor of Jan Sixers, has no oath of office. | ||
| Vice President of the United States, Kamala Harris, has no oath of office. | ||
| Within 30 days of appointment to public office, all public officials are legally required to have a signed and notarized copy of their oath of office. | ||
| And it appears as if no elected officials in the federal government have one. | ||
| They are either non-existent, incomplete, or fraudulent. | ||
| The fraudulent ones are missing signatures, are not notarized, and in most of them, the words, so help me God, are in all caps. | ||
| In the US Constitution, so help me God, is not in all caps. | ||
| And this matters, as many have been telling us for decades, including the great Jordan Maxwell. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Today, the entire world of mankind operates under a world law Which is referred to as the Law of the High Seas or International Maritime Admiralty. | |
| When you were born, you came out of your mother's water. | ||
| Since you came out of your mother's water, you are a maritime product. | ||
| This is why when you were born, the doc has to sign your birth certificate. | ||
| It's a maritime admiralty manifest showing that your mother brought you into the world and you are going to make money. | ||
| Anything in this country, if it's a lawful, legal document of any kind, your name must be, according to maritime law, be in all capital letters. | ||
| Why? Because you do not own your body. | ||
| You do not own yourself. | ||
| All capital letters name implies that you are a maritime admiralty product. | ||
| You are not a human. | ||
| You're not a living entity. | ||
| You are a product. Your living entity person, the actual you, is represented under law by upper and lower case name. | ||
| So you are a corporation whether you know it or not. | ||
| But you are merely a subsidiary of a larger corporation called United States. | ||
| This is the way the law works. | ||
| Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reis. | ||
| Alright folks, find and share that Reis report at InfoWars.com and Band.Video. | ||
| Stay with us. The war room begins on the other side. | ||
| Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Welcome to the War Room. I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live on this Tuesday afternoon from the Infowars headquarters here in Austin, Texas. | ||
| We have just a jam-packed show for you today. | ||
| More videos than I could possibly ever play in a single sitting, but we'll get to as many of those as possible. | ||
| We are, of course, going to cover the undercover video from this intelligence agent, sound investigations capturing On tape, some admissions that the deep state would probably rather not have aired in public. | ||
| We'll go through that, of course, with a fine-tooth comb. | ||
| We're also going to talk about I mean, all of these are deeply interconnected. | ||
| All these stories have these threads of connectivity through them that we'll try to highlight, illustrate for you. | ||
| Because this video alone covers free speech and the way it's being attacked on all sides. | ||
| It also leads us into some other big stories where it's not just Infowars, but a number of Large right-wing dissident outlets that are being targeted for destruction through lawfare. | ||
| But of course, that has to do with January 6th. | ||
| That has to do with the persecution of Trump supporters in general and the way that because we actually love our country, we have been deemed a threat to our country. | ||
| It's nonsensical, but that just makes it perfectly in line with everything going on in the American government right now. | ||
| We have some more updates to the Brazil versus Elon Musk conflict going on. | ||
| And we're going to get very into that. | ||
| We're going to get into the abortion discussion going on right now. | ||
| We're going to get into how we... | ||
| And again, all these things are sort of intertwined. | ||
| Just as an example, we're going to get into abortion. | ||
| And the thing I want to talk about when it comes to abortion is how we as conservatives | ||
| need to be acting when the things that we're trying to conserve are already gone. | ||
| In other words, we're not conserving anything. | ||
| It's time to change the approach. | ||
| And it has to do with waking up to this reality and approaching the world in the correct way, | ||
| understanding that we are an insurgency. | ||
| We are not the ones in power anymore, which means we can't act like we're the ones in power anymore. | ||
| And so when we cover that, we're going to get into how Britain is dealing with not being an empire anymore. | ||
| And we'll watch a video of a Chinese spokesman saying what he thinks about the British now. | ||
| And sort of throwing cold water on the Brits' still rather elevated self-image. | ||
| Which is perhaps at odds with its current predicament of being basically incredibly weak and nothing compared to what it was before. | ||
| So lots of things intertwining here from free speech to understanding where we are as a movement and how we have to approach the political sphere. | ||
| We just have a lot to discuss today. | ||
| And we'll begin with this video. | ||
| And I'm just going to let the whole thing play. | ||
| I'm just going to let this whole dang thing play and then we'll come back and talk about it because there's a lot to get into here. | ||
| A lot of nuance to delve into. | ||
| Not that this is anything particularly new. | ||
| We've known this the entire time. | ||
| The story at Infowars, investigative report, FBI CIA officer confirms FBI agents | ||
| were in the crowd on January 6th, confesses agencies targeted Alex Jones. | ||
| We're gonna go to this video. | ||
| It is from a outlet called Sound Investigation, sort of a Project Veritas style sting operation. | ||
| And we'll get into what we can learn about this, what we can glean from it, | ||
| how it has less to do with the attack on Alex Jones and Infowars, | ||
| and more to do with, in general, understanding the tactics that the deep state | ||
| is employing here in this transition time. | ||
| Because that's where we're in. We're in a transition from a previously well-governed republic to a fully despotic, tyrannical deep state run. | ||
| Nation, group of people, economic zone, whatever they picture us as. | ||
| Right now we're sort of in the in-between zone where the tyrants, being as despotic as they like, still have to at least pay lip service to the idea that we actually operate under a rule of law. | ||
| So what we're seeing here is the transition from a republic to an empire and the way that the deep state is helping to facilitate that while maintaining decorum. | ||
| In the old framework. | ||
| So let's go to it now. | ||
| Here he is, this FBI-CIA officer. | ||
| Watch the full video and comment on it on the other side. | ||
| Let's watch. You can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How? Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? | |
| We get really close. | ||
| We call it a nun. A nun. | ||
| A nun. Sometimes you just gotta get a quick look. | ||
| Just to see what happens. Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow. | ||
| Nothing like putting out a fake social media thing to like really get people mad. | ||
| Alex Jones? Yeah, so we were after him. | ||
| You are? He did what we wanted. | ||
| Which was what? He took his money away. | ||
| Gavin O'Blennis is a contracting officer at the CIA. O'Blennis worked for the FBI in 2021 and 2022 in the San Diego office, moved on to Homeland Security where he conducted asylum interviews at the southern border, and now works for the CIA managing multi-million dollar contracts across government agencies and private sector vendors. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I work for, um, I work like this without, I'm not supposed to tell people kind of job. | |
| I say intelligence, what do you think? | ||
| The CIA? Yep. You work for the CIA? I do. | ||
| That's incredible. I'm the contracting officer. | ||
| That's amazing. So I deal a lot with different agencies. | ||
| We're contracting with Director of National Intelligence to do stuff. | ||
| We do Navy, Army. | ||
| Any of them, really. I just, FBI. I used to work for the FBI, so they threw the FBI at me. | ||
| They're like, here, you used to work there. | ||
| Oh, I'm permanent. Good. | ||
| Why do they call a contractor? Because I do the contracting firm. | ||
| I do all the legal contracts. | ||
| I fly out to vendors and evaluate them. | ||
| I love the agency. Good for you. | ||
| I like the Bureau, too. The Bureau was a lot of fun. | ||
| I got to do a lot of cool stuff at the Bureau. | ||
| I was the guy in the back of the truck, in the van. | ||
| Oblenis spoke to an undercover sound investigations reporter about his work experience involving near entrapment and his employers' involvement with political commentator Alex Jones' legal battles. | ||
|
unidentified
|
As long as the bureau is able to progress far enough to be able to put pro-lifers in jail whenever they want. | |
| Yeah. You think that's on the agenda? | ||
| We can, we can, you can kind of put anyone in jail if you know what to do. | ||
| How? Just let them know. | ||
| You create the situation to where they have no choice but to act on their impulse. | ||
| And once they act on that impulse, then we call that entrapment. | ||
| It's a fine line. | ||
| Does the bureau practice entrapment a lot? | ||
| We get really close. | ||
| Not officially? No. We get as close as we can. | ||
| We get as close as we can to it without doing it. | ||
| So they can entrap some of these pro-lifers into doing things that they don't... | ||
| We call it a nut. | ||
| A nut. A nut. | ||
| Mmm. Sometimes you just gotta get a quick look just to see what happens, right? | ||
| And how does that happen? You put a post out there or you have some fake profile say something that triggers, that we know is going to trigger them, right? | ||
| Like we already know your history. | ||
| If we're to that point, we already know everything about it. | ||
| So we're like, oh, this will piss them off. | ||
| Sometimes you like to fuse and just wait for it to follow, right? | ||
| Like a rally. Like a, oh. | ||
| So when a rally happens, sometimes the bureau behind it? | ||
| Yeah, sometimes. Nothing like putting out a fake social media thing that, like, really get people mad. | ||
| Mm-hmm. Well, it's fake news. | ||
| Sometimes it's fake. | ||
| It's not fake. It's embellished a little bit. | ||
| Who would be, like, a big influence that you're, influencer that you're after? | ||
| You. Like, uh, I don't know, like, um, I don't even know these names, like a Fox News person or like a Tucker Carlson or like... | ||
| Oh, I'm sure he's in there. | ||
| Right. You always want the biggest and loudest. | ||
| Like that, what was his name? | ||
| The one that said the Sandy Hook didn't happen. | ||
| Alex Jones. Yeah, so we were after him. | ||
| You are? Are you still after him? | ||
| Why? Because he's broke. | ||
| He got found guilty and had to pay like a hundred million dollars. | ||
| So why were you after him? | ||
| We're not anymore. Just to get the money from him? | ||
| Yeah. Was that court case used? | ||
| Was that the CIA case? Sure it was. | ||
| That was the agency thing? Well, actually it was a defamation case. | ||
| So it's a civil government. | ||
| But we were looking at all of the scholars, commenting, following, like, who's that the latest? | ||
| Right? So, even though it's technically not our, well, not the agency definitely, but the Bureau, for instance, eh, it's not our purview, it's a civil matter. | ||
| But since they got all this access to this stuff, and it's there, what can we go find? | ||
| And did you finally? I can't. | ||
| We did. So, you know, it's just kind of like, you know, realize the opportunity that you have. | ||
| So with Alex Jones, you were watching him long before anything ended up happening? | ||
| Probably. It wasn't my office, but I mean, we would have been well aware of what he was doing. | ||
| And the goal with him was what? | ||
| Just to bankrupt him? Oh, pretty much. | ||
| And we let the families do it. | ||
| What? We let the families do it. | ||
| Were they encouraged to do that by the Bureau? | ||
| Like nudged? We don't encourage people. | ||
| We just say there's no federal statute being broken. | ||
| But you do have the option for a civil case. | ||
| And it's a pretty good case. | ||
| Nice. In our opinion. | ||
| Oh, that makes so much sense. | ||
| I have a cousin who's a lawyer. | ||
| So that's a lot of these cases, they're kind of encouraged by the FBI? Yeah, like, there's nothing federal law we can do, but civilly, we still had them that way. | ||
| And they did? | ||
| Yeah. So the FBI was happy? | ||
| We didn't care. We were like, oh. | ||
| Basically, the citizens did your job. | ||
| Yeah. Wow, so you can encourage a civil lawsuit. | ||
| Very encouraged. I bet you can. | ||
| What can you do with people like Alex Jones now? | ||
| Is he still out there? Yeah. | ||
| He's still chirping. He can chirp. | ||
| Are you still watching him? Yeah. | ||
| Why? He did what we wanted. | ||
| Which was what? He took his money away. | ||
| Oh. We shut him up for a while. | ||
| You're never going to shut him up for a while. | ||
| Unless you put him in prison. But again, he didn't do anything to go to prison. | ||
| Being ignorant is not a crime, though it's shit. | ||
| I mean, you could bring a nudge. | ||
| He did inside a riot, like Cheeto. | ||
| He didn't encourage people to go shoot. | ||
| He didn't. So he didn't do anything. | ||
| Additionally, Oblenis states that he knows and works with FBI agents who were undercover in the January 6th Capitol riot, estimating about 20 field agents were there undercover. | ||
| While O'Blennis notes that they were not involved in violence, this appears to be the first submission of undercover FBI agents in attendance. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I thought you said that there were FBI agents in the crowd at J6. There always are when there's a big protest in D.C., just in case it gets out of hand. | |
| But there wasn't enough to turn that tight. | ||
| I mean, I'm talking maybe half of 20. | ||
| You needed a thousand to get rid of that crowd. | ||
| So they had like, oh, that was just 20? | ||
| Yeah, just go through it and see what they could hear, you know, that kind of thing. | ||
| Wow. Yeah, definitely. | ||
| They needed a thousand at least. | ||
| Well, I see that's also Capitol Police jurisdiction. | ||
| They're in charge. Why they didn't have more on hand, I don't know. | ||
| The Bureau didn't really want people knowing that they were in the crowd. | ||
| Mm-hmm. That would be overstepping their bounds. | ||
| A little bit. Do people know that? | ||
| Why? Do people know that the hero was in the crowd? | ||
| Nope. They probably never will. | ||
| Do you know agents that were there? | ||
| Mm-hmm. Really? Mm-hmm. | ||
| They work for the agency now. They work for the agency now. | ||
| They got promotions, perhaps, for their good work. | ||
| You know... Maybe we use the word bombshell a little bit too much. | ||
| But how can you not? | ||
| This is bombshell after bombshell. | ||
| This is an entire fuselade. | ||
| Of bombshells. Where to even go with this? | ||
| I think the big takeaway for me is this gives you very, very good insight into the MO of the FBI, the modus operandi. | ||
| And we've covered this extensively. | ||
| I know I've talked about it extensively because of the personal experience I had working on some film sets with FBI agents, where I was just the script supervisor, so I just got to sit and talk to the FBI agents all day. | ||
| And they're not shy about it. | ||
| I mean, if I'd been wearing a hidden camera at the time, I would have gotten stuff like this. | ||
| Because they're not exactly shy about it. | ||
| And again, as we move in this transitory period, this transition period, from a republic to an all-out open despotism, they're still having to couch everything they do under the color of law, under the shade of legality. | ||
| And again, this is very important to them. | ||
| The vast majority of FBI agents do not start as beat cops. | ||
| They don't start as FBI agents. | ||
| They almost all start in prosecutor's offices or district attorney offices. | ||
| They're almost all lawyers. | ||
| Sticking minutely to the letter of the law is extremely important to the FBI. And you can hear... | ||
| From this conversation, the way that they fudge things. | ||
| Now, one of the things we always talk about is parallel construction, a well-known legal tactic that the FBI and a number of law enforcement agencies do. | ||
| Parallel construction would be something like you have a guy that you want to get on something. | ||
| You think he might be involved in a crime, but you have no proof of it. | ||
| You have nothing to take to the judge to get a warrant to spy on him, and so you find some other reason to go after him. | ||
| Well, you know that he posts on social media about smoking weed, so do a drug bust on him, or use that as probable cause to get the search warrant, knowing that you're not even looking for the thing about drugs. | ||
| You're looking for whatever else you're looking for. | ||
| You've got to create that parallel construction in order to justify the So, in a way, this is sort of parallel construction. | ||
| Now he says, he actually says, and he doesn't use the word discovery, but one of the tactics | ||
| that might be used would be to use a lawsuit to open up the books of an organization. | ||
| And again, they're doing this to Donald Trump. | ||
| They're doing this to VDARE. | ||
| They're doing this to a number of right wing dissident organizations who are not breaking | ||
| the law as he admitted. | ||
| Nobody broke the law. | ||
| He says he's done nothing to put him in jail for because he's committed no crime and yet | ||
| he's being investigated and yet he's being punished. | ||
| Again, we still have a semblance of a remaining remnant of a true legal system in this country where our law enforcement can't just arbitrarily spy on you and then use that information in court. | ||
| And that's an important caveat there. | ||
| The goal for the FBI, just like the goal for all law enforcement, is to get scalps, is to get victories, is to get convictions. | ||
| They can gather all the information they want through whatever means they want. | ||
| They just can't then use that information in court without being able to show how they got it, the chain of custody, how they got the warrants to do the searches to find the evidence. | ||
| So they can spy on you however much they want. | ||
| I'm not saying they're not spying on you. | ||
| I'm saying if they're actually pursuing you in a real way in order to charge you with a crime or go after you in some other way through the power of the They have to have legitimate evidence collected legitimately. | ||
| They can't just go up and say, yeah, you know, we don't like this guy, so we spied on him, and we found this thing, and so we're going to present this to court under our legal system as fallen and destroyed as it is at this point. | ||
| You can't use that evidence in court. | ||
| So the FBI is extremely... | ||
| Hyper-focused and aware of this. | ||
| And so everything they do is very intricately designed to stay within the technical legal bounds of the law while violating the purpose and spirit of the law at every possible pass. | ||
| And when they talk about a nudging, it's not entrapment. | ||
| He's very careful to say, well, it's not entrapment. | ||
| It's definitely not entrapment. | ||
| But it does flirt awfully close with entrapment. | ||
| And of course, in certain circumstances, it absolutely is entrapment like with the Whitmer | ||
| kidnapping case, where it's pretty much proven that it was completely fabricated by the FBI | ||
| in the first place. | ||
| And yet they used it to establish the narrative that right wing domestic terrorists are dangerous | ||
| and we have to fight them with everything we've got. | ||
| And that's the other part about this. | ||
| What he's talking about there, putting aside the specifics and looking at it in a general | ||
| holistic sort of way, this is just what's happening across the board at this point. | ||
| It is a full spectrum push to destroy free speech in this country, whether it's by going after Donald Trump as a presidential candidate, media outlets like Infowars or V-Dare, or parents at school boards. | ||
| From the FBI to the school boards themselves, to the hospitals, to the media companies, and everybody in between understands that this is the move, this is the push, one by one. | ||
| Very systematically destroying outlets that go against the designed narrative. | ||
| And this all just fits right into the disinformation paradigm that they're using as an excuse to silence speech worldwide. | ||
| And again, we'll get into how this is happening in Brazil. | ||
| It's happening in the UK. It's happening everywhere. | ||
| In America, we're supposed to have safeguards against this, which is why it is a little bit more difficult for our deep state to do it. | ||
| But they are very good at doing it. | ||
| He also says we create situations where they have no choice but to act on impulse. | ||
| Well, that to me sounds an awful lot like January 6th. | ||
| Create a situation where they have no choice but to act on impulse. | ||
| In other words, create a situation where you've got fired up MAGA supporters at the Capitol, and then you shoot... | ||
| Flashbangs at them and flash grenades and you hit them with tear gas and you put an incredibly thin line of cops in front and you shoot the tear gas and the flashbangs over the heads of the people at the front, which forces them forward, forces them into contact with the police. | ||
| Suddenly you've got a riot on your hands. | ||
| He's really giving the game away here and it's not even that complicated. | ||
| None of this, again, is new. | ||
| This is all just them saying it and that in and of itself is a bit of evidence, isn't it, as to the I assume, as most of the time, the Project Veritas style stings, like carried out here by Sound Investigations, usually play on the sexual aspect of these people that they're entrapping. | ||
| In other words, you get a hot chick to flirt with a nerd, suddenly that nerd is ready and willing to give up all sorts of secrets thinking he has a chance with the hot chick. | ||
| Or if you're gay, get a hot gay guy to go out with this creepy old blubber man and tease him along. | ||
| And you can see it's not even hard. | ||
| It's not even difficult. Now, this might be one of the reasons why most intelligence agencies had a very strict anti-gay sentiment up until now, because obviously, back in the day, it was something that you could blackmail people with. | ||
| And so if you were gay and somebody found out you were gay, they could hold that over your head and force you to do things that you wouldn't rather do. | ||
| I guess it's a little bit different now. | ||
| But this guy clearly is... | ||
| I mean, it's so... | ||
| It's so off-putting. | ||
| Like, just the way he says things is so... | ||
| Well, I can't tell you who it is, but it's a certain agency. | ||
| It's a certain... What do you think of when I say intelligence? | ||
| Yeah, I work for the CIA. No big deal. | ||
| And it's like, are you a D, though? | ||
| I mean, who are you, really? Because, I mean, this guy, he could be nobody. | ||
| He could be the lowest level, whatever, and have no actual personal... | ||
| You know, knowledge of the things that he's talking about. | ||
| And he's just trying to talk himself up because he is on a date. | ||
| That's obviously a possibility. | ||
| But what he's saying fits perfectly in line with what we know the FBI's modus operandi to be. | ||
| And he, according to his LinkedIn, I mean, he's either committing a federal crime by impersonating a federal officer or he's the real deal. | ||
| I tend to think he's the real deal, especially When he says that he oversees the legal coordination between various agencies, well, that's a pretty high-level thing to do. | ||
| And again, you've got to be hyper-focused on the legality of what you're engaged in so that you can actually use the evidence that you get. | ||
| Because otherwise, if you get it in an illegal way, they can't use it. | ||
| They can't get the scalp. They can't get their gold star for being a tyrant. | ||
| He talks about using civil cases. | ||
| Same thing that's happening with Trump as they're going after him in a million different ways. | ||
| Same thing that's happening with V-Dare. | ||
| And we'll get into that in just a little bit. | ||
| Again, he says, you know, well, Alex Jones didn't do anything that you could throw him in jail for. | ||
| Well, he didn't commit any crimes. | ||
| I mean, you really have to wonder how these people got to such powerful positions. | ||
| And obviously it's because people like them are in the powerful positions and birds of a feather fly together. | ||
| But at the same time, I guess it's no wonder why our country is in the state that it's in when we have a deep state that is gleefully willing to destroy a man who is not committed a crime and doing it in a way that is outside of the legal system so as to keep their hands clean and avoid any backlash to their obviously unconstitutional activities. | ||
| More on the other side. We'll cover this and all sorts of threats to free speech. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. Yeah, I remember we were on a set filming a little instructional video for the FBI when I was working in D.C. for a film production company. | ||
| And a lot of the video, sort of a training video for the FBI, but it had high production value and it had a narrative behind it. | ||
| And the purpose of the video was to show And one of the examples that they used was they had suspicions of a guy who they thought was going to do something violent against a local district attorney. | ||
| And so they went to his Facebook to try to find probable cause for a search warrant. | ||
| And one of the little intricacies that was highlighted in this video was if his Facebook page is public, anything on it is fair game. | ||
| If, however, the Facebook page is private, or if you have to be a friend of his to get | ||
| access to his Facebook information, then you cannot use that to get a search warrant. | ||
| You can't use that as probable cause to get a search warrant. | ||
| Just little things, just little intricacies, almost like a magic trick that they're doing, | ||
| like some sort of ceremony. | ||
| You have to fulfill certain obligations, you have to dot certain I's and cross certain | ||
| T's, and then your actions are legal where they wouldn't be otherwise. | ||
| So that's just one of the little ways that our system is still clinging on to the foundational concepts that America was built on. | ||
| The idea that the government can't just arbitrarily search your documents, the Fourth Amendment, arbitrarily investigate you and search you and seize your information. | ||
| They're not allowed to do that. | ||
| They have to have probable cause. | ||
| How they get that probable cause can be a little bit And if they can't get the probable cause through the legitimate way, then they'll do it through an illegitimate way. | ||
| They'll find some other crime that they can frame you for or make it look like you're engaged in in order to get the warrant to do the search, looking for information that has nothing to do with the stuff on the warrant. | ||
| And again, the way you can think about this is... | ||
| If you think somebody murdered somebody and you want to get him but you have no probable cause to go into their house, then you say, well, I know he smokes weed. | ||
| We're going to go in and search him for drugs. | ||
| And once you're in there, you find a dead body. | ||
| And the cops that are there are going, well, we didn't come here for this. | ||
| But now that we're here and we see this, this takes precedent. | ||
| This is now a crime that we're going to charge you with. | ||
| And it would make sense if it happened naturally like that. | ||
| That's obviously how it would take place. | ||
| They go into some guy's house looking for weed and they find a dead body. | ||
| Yeah, murder is going to be the charge they're going to charge him with at the end of the day. | ||
| And it's not illegal to do that because you found the search warrant was legal even if it wasn't a search warrant for a dead body. | ||
| So that's the way that they do it. | ||
| That's the way that they intricately circumvent the laws of our country. | ||
| And of course they do. This is exactly what they've been doing with big tech the entire time. | ||
| They don't have a right to go in and read your private messages or even read your posts if your account is not public. | ||
| So how do they do it? | ||
| Well, they circumvent that restriction. | ||
| They say, well, we don't have to have a search warrant if we just go to the provider. | ||
| Go to the big tech company, go to the social media company, and say, hey, would you mind passing us that information? | ||
| And if we lived in a country where our corporations were run by people who actually were patriots and understood the value of America and the Constitution, then they would force the government's hand. | ||
| They would say, look, if you want this information, you need a warrant. | ||
| And to get a warrant, you need probable cause. | ||
| So you go through that rigmarole, come to us with the warrant, and then we'll give you the information. | ||
| But that's not what they do. Instead, what they do is they say... | ||
| We could use a couple million dollars. | ||
| We could really use a sizable investment from the U.S. government. | ||
| So why don't you work with us and we'll work with you and we'll give you the information that we have. | ||
| Again, the whole world is being set up to be like this. | ||
| This is, I think, one of the primary reasons why private ownership is being destroyed in this country. | ||
| Because, again, if you... | ||
| Own your house, and that's your private property, and you have rights because that's your private property. | ||
| Well, those go away if you're renting from a landlord, and the landlord can give permission to the government. | ||
| Again, if they want to go into your house, they have to go through the whole process of getting a search warrant. | ||
| But if they can just call up BlackRock, who is your landlord, and say, hey, we want to get into this house, and BlackRock can say, sure, go ahead. | ||
| No warrant needed. Because obviously you don't need a warrant if the person agrees to a search. | ||
| And if you don't own your house, your landlord can agree to a search of your domicile, even without your permission. | ||
| Same thing can happen with your car. | ||
| If your car is a rental or you don't really own it, I think the same thing could happen with your phone. | ||
| Because now, last time I went to get a new phone, they really wanted me to rent a phone. | ||
| I'm like, no, I want to give you money, get the phone, and you're out of my life forever. | ||
| That's not how it works anymore, though. | ||
| They want you renting your phone, I think, again, because then they can search your phone without your permission because you aren't even technically the owner of your phone. | ||
| So you're not the owner of the information on your phone. | ||
| So all of these ways are ways of circumventing the spirit of the law as enumerated in the Constitution. | ||
| They're sticking very carefully within the letter of the law, but violating its basic tenets as understood by anybody else. | ||
| Reasonable. So this is the transition period. | ||
| This is what they have to do for now, just to bear minimum cover to save their own butts and technically comply with the law while obviously violating the reason the law is in place at all. | ||
| That you're not supposed to be able to just investigate people without probable cause. | ||
| They do anyway. | ||
| They just do it in a circuitous sort of way. | ||
| And, of course, that is very evident in the Sound Investigations video when the guy says, well, we're going after his followers. | ||
| We're looking into his followers, looking into everybody around him. | ||
| And then, of course, he brags. | ||
| About Alex Jones being gone and being silenced. | ||
| He acts like they achieve victory. | ||
| I hate to tell him, but yeah, I'm still here. | ||
| Yeah, we're still here, actually. | ||
| I'm not sure if you noticed. We are still here. | ||
| And that's good news. That's a little bit of good news to come out of all of this. | ||
| Again, the story's at Infowars. | ||
| There's another story here. Investigative report. | ||
| FBI CIA officer confirms FBI agents were in the crowd on January 6th, confesses that agencies targeted Alex Jones. | ||
| And that's another bombshell from this. | ||
| Like I said, bombshell after bombshell. | ||
| As far as I know, the FBI officially has never admitted to a single undercover operative on January 6th. | ||
| They have never admitted it. | ||
| Every time they're questioned in Congress, they give some noncommittal answer. | ||
| Or they say it's classified. | ||
| They say they can't address that. | ||
| So I don't think there's ever been an official admission that there were FBI agents undercover in the crowd on January 6th until today. | ||
| So that was a very big deal. | ||
| And I know Owen said this on the Alex Jones show, but I completely agree. | ||
| Where are the Republicans? | ||
| How is it that not a single person exposed by Project Veritas has been brought up on charges? | ||
| How is it that Civilians, citizens, the average person can go out and get this bombshell undercover coverage showing very, very blatant and almost gleeful, technically not violation, but very much clearly violations of the law. | ||
| How is it that regular citizens can go through this process, take the risks, get this bombshell | ||
| information, and then the people who we have vested, we voted on to protect our rights | ||
| and serve us in Congress and the Senate, do they not even see it? | ||
| They don't even know this is going on. | ||
| Elon Musk knows it's going on. | ||
| Everybody else seems to know what's going on. | ||
| They just don't know. | ||
| They're just acting blind to this. | ||
| And of course, the danger, the problem with all of this is that the deep state is so far | ||
| entrenched at this point, the people that are in Congress are probably being blackmailed | ||
| by the FBI and the CIA anyway. | ||
| So they're not going to stand up against them because they've been allowed to be gathering | ||
| information on our elected representatives for years, ever since the Snowden leaks at | ||
| the very earliest, or the very latest. | ||
| I mean, we had earlier hints that this was the case before that. | ||
| But the NSA and the entire deep state apparatus has been spying on our elected representatives. | ||
| Spying. And again, if they're not going to charge them with anything, then they can spy on whatever they want. | ||
| This is another thing you have to understand about the deep state. | ||
| There are different levels of power that they're willing and able to exercise. | ||
| They have extraordinary backdoor capabilities. | ||
| You spy on the electronic communications of absolutely anybody at any time, constantly. | ||
| So if they want to spy on Lindsey Graham, they can get his emails, they can get his phone calls, they can listen to him live time, they can watch his screen while he's doing stuff, they can go into his recycling bin on his computer and see stuff he's deleted. | ||
| They can see absolutely everything. | ||
| There are no restrictions to what they can do in terms of spying on you as long as they don't take it to court. | ||
| As soon as they take it to court and it's discovered that they didn't have a warrant to gather that information, the information gets thrown out in the case the information is based on This is my big takeaway from all this. | ||
| On the other side, we're going to talk about how this plays into the myriad of other massive number of Things just like this going on against VDR, against Trump, against anybody that questions the current ruling regime. | ||
| As again, we move into a mode of tyranny and despotism where this type of behavior is no longer concealed. | ||
| They're doing it already. | ||
| As of now, they still have to pretend they're not. | ||
| But they're laying the groundwork to where they can openly spy on us like this. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is The War Room. I'm your host, Harrison Smith. | ||
| We're going to get into the variety of attacks against our free speech happening right now in a wide swath of offensive maneuvers against the average American who has committed no crime other than simply expressing dissent, expressing that they'd rather not commit civilizational suicide. | ||
| In pursuit of nonsense climate change goals or whatever it may be. | ||
| Not a crime, obviously, but it's being treated like one by the people with the guns and the badges in the big headquarters in D.C. So I guess it's a crime. | ||
| I guess for all intents and purposes, it's a crime now to speak out against the federal government. | ||
| That's what we're learning. So we'll learn how to deal with this. | ||
| Just one minor thing, part of the story that I always like to tell is that in this movie I was working on where the FBI agent was trying to find probable cause by looking at a guy's Facebook page, the probable cause they found on that page was We're memes that I had also shared on my page. | ||
| So they go to the in the in the movie, they go to the guy's page and they're scrolling down. | ||
| There's like a live free or die thing. | ||
| There's a Gadsden flag like come tread on me. | ||
| There's a you know, the Second Amendment is to be used against tyrants. | ||
| It's all just very American. | ||
| And they're like scrolling it like, oh, yeah, this is plenty probable cause. | ||
| This guy's dangerous. Literally on the day, like talking to the FBI agent going, you know, looks an awful lot like my profile. | ||
| You know, I think it's kind of weird. | ||
| You're going after people. You're saying it's probable cause that they might be a domestic terrorist because they quote the founders of this country like Thomas Jefferson. | ||
| That was what they were doing. | ||
| And this was years ago, by the way. | ||
| This was like at least eight years ago. | ||
| So just know that the things that are rolling out now of white supremacy is the number one threat. | ||
| Domestic terror has now overtaken Islamic terror as the number one threat. | ||
| And we now have to... Assign massive manpower to hunting down and destroying the militia movement or whatever it is. | ||
| These things have been in place for years. | ||
| We're talking at least a decade of preparation to get us to this point. | ||
| Indoctrination of FBI agents who come in and are instructed and taught that this is your enemy. | ||
| These are the bad guys. | ||
| White American Christians. | ||
| They are the most dangerous people in the world. | ||
| They are the bad guys. You're the good guys. | ||
| We're the good guys. Everything we do is in pursuit of good, and if we have to cheat and lie and manipulate and engage in parallel construction to get there, well, that's because we're the good guys, and actually it's just because we're so smart and we're tricking these people. | ||
| That's how they feel, and they take that sense of superiority, and it really shields them against any maybe guilt or self-reflection as to the blatant violation of their oath that they're undertaking. | ||
| Well, let's talk about other ways that this exact or very similar style or tactic is being used across the country to destroy the political movement against the deep state. | ||
| From Kyle Becker, Letitia James poised to begin seizing Trump's properties. | ||
| Again, Trump's done nothing wrong. | ||
| He did nothing illegal. He did not commit any crimes. | ||
| He didn't murder anybody. He didn't rape anybody. | ||
| He didn't do anything really wrong at all by any stretch of the imagination. | ||
| But they'll come up with something. | ||
| But they can come up with something to give them an excuse. | ||
| And remember, the whole lie of Russian collusion was for this purpose. | ||
| Remember, they knew he wasn't colluding with Russia. | ||
| But they thought he was up to something. | ||
| They thought he could get him on something. | ||
| They thought he maybe, you know, missed a decimal point here or there in his filings | ||
| and they could get him on that. | ||
| And so they just needed a window into his information. | ||
| They needed access to his communications as a fishing expedition. | ||
| They can't just say, hey, judge, we're going to go spy on this political candidate because he's running against Hillary Clinton. | ||
| The judge won't authorize that. | ||
| It's against the law. So they have to say, well, actually, we have evidence that he's a Russian agent because he's meeting with these Russian people. | ||
| Now, what they don't tell the judge is that they sent the Russian people and that the information they're relying on comes from the Hillary Clinton campaign. | ||
| It doesn't matter though. All they need is the excuse. | ||
| All they need is the permission to do the thing that they want to do anyway, which was investigate all of his communications, looking for something they can get him on. | ||
| That didn't even work. That failed. | ||
| So they... Went to their next plan. | ||
| Charging with a million different things, about a million different non-crimes, and just see what you can do to distract and destroy him. | ||
| And just like they brag about with Alex Jones in that video, they basically think they have victory. | ||
| Because look around. | ||
| What has Trump been doing for the last year? | ||
| Defending himself, fighting off the attacks, not focusing on what he should be focusing on, which is the presidential campaign that the sake of America demands he win. | ||
| So, Tisha James is poised to begin seizing Donald Trump's properties as an insurance company will not be permitted to post a $175 million bond for Trump while he appeals a fraud judgment. | ||
| Knight Specialty Insurance is currently unable to post the bond on Trump's behalf, Attorney Dave Kingman noted. | ||
| According to Kingman, as a consequence, New York Attorney General Letitia James will be empowered to initiate enforcement procedures against Donald Trump's properties. | ||
| So, even though he's appealing this, even though the ball has not dropped, Letitia James has not yet sung. | ||
| It is not over, but she's still working on capturing his properties because this isn't about getting justice for a crime. | ||
| It's about using the justice system to punish a political dissident. | ||
| This is tyranny, cut and dry, black and white. | ||
| There is no other way to describe this. | ||
| Weird. People have this idea that if you don't have a... | ||
| If you don't have a Hitler-like strongman at the top of your governmental structure, then it can't be tyranny. | ||
| No, what we have now is a widely distributed tyranny. | ||
| We have tyranny infecting every institution in our country in a sort of diffused way, not organized way. | ||
| From the top down necessarily, although Letitia James very much in cooperation with the Biden White House, so that's not even really true. | ||
| But whether it's Letitia James or Fannie Willis or any of the judges in these cases, they all know exactly what they're doing. | ||
| They're using their power to destroy their enemy because that's what Democrats do. | ||
| They see politics as a game of power and in a way they're right. | ||
| So Trump must post the $175 million bond to prevent James from initiating enforcement procedures after a court fined the president $454 million in February for illegally inflating the worth of his assets, a total non-crime that didn't hurt anybody. | ||
| So obviously this is selective and vindictive prosecution, and they know full well it is. | ||
| They don't care. They're in favor of it. | ||
| In fact, maybe we'll go to that video now. | ||
| We have clip number 10 here. Here's Whoopi Goldberg sort of expressing what I think a lot of left-wingers hold in their hearts. | ||
| Now, last week, as this video noted when it was posted, Whoopi was warning. | ||
| She was very scared. | ||
| She was terrified, actually, that Trump, if he got into office again, would put his political opponents in jail. | ||
| She's shocked and appalled at this imaginary circumstance that she has made up. | ||
| But here's what she says about Biden. | ||
| Let's watch. Well, the Supreme Court won't hear oral arguments until the end of April. | ||
| Now, let's look at a scenario where the Supreme Court says, yes, he has all those rights. | ||
| He is immune from everything. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know what Joe Biden could do since he is presently president? | |
| What? He could throw every Republican in jail. | ||
| I mean, he could. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay, we'll be cool. | |
| He can throw every Republican in jail because he's president. | ||
| That's your understanding of the way our government works, is it? | ||
| It sounds crazy, but you get that this is where we're headed, right? | ||
| You get that we are very rapidly heading down a path in which government is going to start doing this. | ||
| Well, you're free to vote for whoever you want, but if you vote Republican, well, then you're dangerous. | ||
| You're a domestic terrorist. Step out of line, you'll be arrested. | ||
| And slowly but surely, they're putting in all the pieces for this. | ||
| We have to stop them. | ||
| It is imperative that we stop them. | ||
| This country and our people will not survive without massive, concerted efforts by not just the populace, as we are screaming our heads off, but the people in power in the halls of Congress have to do something to stop this bleeding. | ||
| America is bleeding out. | ||
| It's time for triage. | ||
| It's time to actually approach this with the seriousness and We cannot allow this to continue. | ||
| This is not something you can brush aside. | ||
| This is not something that is Whoopi Goldberg being out of her mind. | ||
| No, this is the understanding, the belief, this is the spirit of the Democratic Party. | ||
| And Republicans, even if it's just in their own self-interest, even if it's just because they selfishly don't want to be thrown into a gulag, act now before it's too late. | ||
| Do something to rein in the out of control, despotic, tyrannical madness that is currently ruling our country. | ||
| Imprison the people in the FBI. Don't just impeach. | ||
| Imprison Alejandro Mayorkas. | ||
| You've got to act severely. | ||
| This is a severe issue. | ||
| You've got to act rapidly. | ||
| We are running out of time to save this country. | ||
| In any form that is recognizable as a Republican. | ||
| Once that's gone, the gloves are completely off. | ||
| Once they get what they want, and all the people who spoke up against them are gone, and all the people that can run against them for office are gone, and all of the limits dictated by the Constitution have been overridden and destroyed, it's hell on earth. | ||
| Because this beautiful image of... | ||
| America. Border Patrol watching the eclipse with the illegal aliens. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Isn't that beautiful? Isn't that amazing? | |
| Just off screen is a tied up little girl, but ignore that. | ||
| Ignore the fact these are literal criminals swarming across our border. | ||
| We're going to get into immigration here in just a second. | ||
| On the other side of this segment, I'm going to get into... | ||
| Again, just the variety of attacks against free speech that are going on not just here but around the world and how they're being coordinated in an organized fashion by the international intelligence community. | ||
| And we're going to get into what some J6 families are doing to fight back against the entrapment that has imprisoned their family for decades. | ||
| Before we do that, I want to go to this quick video, because this is very well done, from an Irish farmer destroying the lie of cows being responsible for CO2 emissions. | ||
| So, just, and we'll get into climate change a little bit more later, but here's just a little breakdown as to why the making illegal of cows, like, why this whole thing is just utter and complete balderdash. | ||
| Let's watch. The biggest lie in the world right now is that cows are killing the planet. | ||
| At the core of that lie is how methane is calculated and in the next few minutes I am going to take you through the full carbon cycle for my dairy cows from the air and back to the air. | ||
| All the carbon that enters my dairy cows starts in the air and I have organised this fog as a nice visual representation of that carbon. | ||
| Let's take 10 carbon atoms from the air And follow their journey through one of my dairy cows. | ||
| The grass in my field uses photosynthesis. | ||
| That's a hard word to say. | ||
| Photosynthesis. Grass uses photosynthesis to pull carbon out of the air and store it as energy in the form of carbohydrates and proteins. | ||
| So when my cows come in here in a few weeks to graze this field, they will eat the grass and they will take up the carbon. | ||
| Sorry if I'm explaining this like you're stupid, but none of the public question any of this stuff. | ||
| One of the ten carbon atoms will leave as meat and milk, which is then consumed as food by us humans, and we emit the carbon as respiration. | ||
| Another two of the carbon atoms are emitted as respiration by the cow. | ||
| Also not counted as an emission. | ||
| The remaining seven carbon atoms are digested in the rumen of the cow by bacteria. | ||
| The bacteria inside the cow's rumen takes the remaining seven carbon atoms and converts them to methane through the bacteria's version of respiration. | ||
| So respiration from the human, not counted as an emission. | ||
| Respiration from the cow, not counted as an emission. | ||
| Respiration from the rumen, counted as an emission. | ||
| But here's the thing, no matter how the carbon leaves the cow, It has all started in the same place, which is the air. | ||
| This next bit is where climate scientists like to gaslight us farmers and say that methane is not the same as CO2. So let's continue to track our seven carbon atoms which have left our cow as methane. | ||
| They have entered the atmosphere again, and them seven methane atoms have 96 times the global warming potential of seven carbon atoms. | ||
| However, over the next 12 years, them seven methane molecules that entered the atmosphere will break down into CO2 and water, completing our cycle. | ||
| What this means is if you have a stable number of animals, like this farm has for the last 12 years, as you emit the seven methane molecules, seven more that you emitted a decade earlier have just broken down back to carbon to be reabsorbed by the grass. | ||
| So the net effect of Of the methane molecules emitted by my cows on global warming is zero. | ||
| Factually, zero. | ||
| And yet, in all the carbon calculations, them methane molecules are accounting for over 70% of my farm's emissions. | ||
| Yeah, so it's all based off of lies is what they're telling you. | ||
| But that's okay because they don't actually care about the climate. | ||
| They want you to starve. That's the point. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We're going to continue to talk about free speech here and the threats that it's under. | ||
| I should take a moment to not just brag about the fact that Infowars is still here and stronger than ever. | ||
| But actually, thank you for putting us in this position. | ||
| Thank you for helping us to weather the storms. | ||
| Thank you for going to Infowarsstore.com and supporting us monetarily. | ||
| As that is the best way to contribute to this righteous mission we are engaged in. | ||
| To expand the consciousness of humanity and wake people up to the very real and thinly disguised threats that they're under. | ||
| Thank you for doing everything that you've done to keep us on the air. | ||
| Without you, we are nothing. | ||
| But because of you, we are a massive existential threat to the global prison planet system they're trying to bring in. | ||
| And the evidence of that is how hard they fight us. | ||
| So going to InfoWarsStore.com is pretty much the best thing you can possibly do to fight back against the New World Order, global government, tyrannical system overall. | ||
| It is a direct slap in the face. | ||
| Every time you go to InfoWarsStore.com, you are slapping the tyrants in the face. | ||
| So slap them in the face with some X3 or some Turbo Force. | ||
| Really slap them in the face with some bodies or DNA Force Plus. | ||
| However... You prefer to slap him in the face. | ||
| Make sure Infowars store is a part of that attack. | ||
| Metaphorically, obviously. | ||
| Obviously. We don't want these people really slapped in the face. | ||
| We want them put in jail after a legal trial. | ||
| Something that they won't... | ||
| A courtesy they won't grant us. | ||
| But we have to stick to our principles. | ||
| Otherwise, we'll just be them. | ||
| We aren't them. So let's get into how they are... | ||
| Essentially eliminating free speech across the board in a variety of different ways. | ||
| Yeah, we'll do that now because there's other news that has to do. | ||
| Again, all these things are so deeply interconnected. | ||
| You've got this video from sound investigations that's largely about, you know, entrapment | ||
| in the way of the FBI circumvents constitutional restrictions in order to do things that would | ||
| otherwise be illegal. | ||
| But another big part of that was January 6th. | ||
| And there are some developments in the January 6th sphere that are positive. | ||
| But on the free speech side of things, VDARE published a video called, quote, it is finished. | ||
| Peter and Lydia Brimelow's update on VDARE's crucifixion by New York, New York Attorney | ||
| General Letitia James saying, here's what happens next. | ||
| We've, of course, covered this story, you know, continuously since it broke. | ||
| And it's sad, but it's almost an inevitable conclusion. | ||
| I mean, what's happening is that you've got this moderate-sized dissident magazine, incredibly good, incredibly powerful, incredibly effective at getting the message across as they do it in a professional and well-informed way. | ||
| And then they have to go up against the juggernaut that is New York State, essentially. | ||
| Now, we have a video of this we can go to now. | ||
| Here is Peter Brimlow and his wife talking about the fact that the lawfare has worked just like how they're going after Trump, just like how they went after Infowars. | ||
| It's not that they did anything illegal. | ||
| But by merely trying to fend off the legal attacks, they have driven Vidar to bankruptcy and are essentially shutting down this very powerful dissident media organization. | ||
| So let's go now to clip number nine. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Hello, everyone. I'm Peter Brimlow. | |
| I'm the editor of vdare.com. | ||
| And this is my wife, Lydia, who is the publisher and general put her out of fires. | ||
| And one of the fires we have to deal with right now is that last Wednesday, Sabrina Krause, the New York State Judge, held us in contempt for not complying with the massive and intrusive subpoenas, even though we're fighting them. | ||
| And even though she herself has modified the subpoena to protect, up to a point, our pseudonymous rioters, who she was previously trying to get us to docks. | ||
| So Nikola is paying $250 a day for this, and we're just basically running out of money here. | ||
| We can't afford to fight on the state front and the... | ||
| The Federal Front very much longer. | ||
| So I wrote on Good Friday that D.C. James has crucified VDR.com. | ||
| The superior demands that we've been hit with, even though we've been charged with nothing, are simply Destroying the organisation, consuming all of its activity, all of its energies and, crucially, all of its money. | ||
| We've slowed down publication very dramatically. | ||
| VDA is sort of on life support at the moment, editorially. | ||
| But it is going to end. | ||
| We can't go on like this very much longer. | ||
| Since we first got the original subpoenas... | ||
| So this whole video is a little over 18 minutes and you can find it on VDARE or on their X account. | ||
| I think it's at VDARE. Just search VDARE on X. You can find this video of Peter Brimlow and his wife, who is the publisher of VDARE news outlet. | ||
| I mean, he says it right there, right? | ||
| Even though we've been charged with nothing, they are simply destroying the organization. | ||
| They're consuming all of its activity, all of its energies, and crucially, all of its money. | ||
| So it's been effective. So not committed of a crime, certainly not convicted of a crime, and yet the organization has been destroyed. | ||
| And yet they cannot do what they need to to survive. | ||
| They cannot produce the product that people pay for. | ||
| So they're going away. | ||
| They've been bankrupted. This is lawfare manifest against a smaller media outlet than Infowars, but certainly not a less important one. | ||
| Well, I do like to pat ourselves on the back. | ||
| But this is the thing. It doesn't matter if you're Fox News or some guy in his basement. | ||
| Every step of the spectrum, you are an enemy and you will be destroyed. | ||
| And thankfully, Infowars got to such a level that when the attack came, we'd been prepared for it and we've been able to survive. | ||
| That's not going to be the case for other outlets. | ||
| And once they're done with Infowars and V-Dare, they're moving on to Postmillennial and Gateway Pundit. | ||
| Once they're done with them, they're moving on to Daily Wire and The Blaze, right? | ||
| This is the, not even slow rolling, but this is the steamrolling of American media. | ||
| They're systematically destroying independent outlets through lawfare without ever convicting the people of a crime. | ||
| In these lawfare maneuvers. | ||
| And of course one of the things he said was that. | ||
| They were attempting really to get the names of his pseudonymous writers. | ||
| The writers that used a pen name. | ||
| They really wanted to get who those people were. | ||
| They really wanted to know who those people were. | ||
| Attempting to unmask anonymous writers. | ||
| Which obviously America has a storied history. | ||
| And the effectiveness of anonymous literature. | ||
| Most of the founding fathers had a pen name that they wrote under. | ||
| Thomas Jefferson's was Focion the Good, for example. | ||
| But they all, I mean, all the, you know, Federalist letters and things, those were all published under pen names because that's what you have to do when you live under tyranny. | ||
| And obviously the tyrants are trying to get rid of that so they can implement their tyranny. | ||
| It's not all that complicated. | ||
| V-Dare is hosting a big event at the end of this month. | ||
| If you do want to support them, I think you still can by subscribing to this conference. | ||
| It's April 26th to 27th, and there's a lot of really good people going. | ||
| Keith Woods coming from Ireland, Steve Salier, John Derbyshire, Jared Taylor, John Lott, | ||
| but also Owen Schroyer will be doing a live show from the castle, and Dan Lyman will be | ||
| there as well from BorderHawk and InfoWars. So, Big InfoWars VDARE crossover event later this month, | ||
| and I encourage you to support them as I encourage you to support us as we are all in this fight | ||
| together and working towards human liberty against a mechanized, corrupt machine of death | ||
| known as globalism. As I said, one of the things that Mr. | ||
| Brimlow was talking about there was the fact that, and again, I shouldn't even need to spend time to relay to you the fact that they're using discovery and they're using claims of withholding information to punish these organizations just like they have done with other media outlets in the past or with Donald Trump. | ||
| And the strategy is, well, let's avoid a jury trial altogether by demanding discovery of outrageous things and then punishing them when they don't give it to us. | ||
| Do a whatever it's called. | ||
| Just declare them guilty outright without ever having them able to defend themselves. | ||
| And then bring the jury in to give it the veneer of a trial when really they're just deciding how guilty the guilty party is. | ||
| So this is the death of... | ||
| It's the death of independent media. | ||
| It's the death of the First Amendment, but it's also the death of the Fourth Amendment. | ||
| It's the death of just the legal system in general. | ||
| If it can be manipulated and hijacked and distorted in this way, it's over for everybody, okay? | ||
| And again, these things are not happening in a vacuum. | ||
| They're not happening independent from these other things. | ||
| All of this is happening in a coordinated fashion because it's all part of the same plan. | ||
| From AP News, anonymous accounts use right-wing channels to spread misinformation. | ||
| It's not a coincidence that they're going after V-Dare for having anonymous writers and trying to force them through the legal system, finding them $250 a day for not revealing the legal names of their writers. | ||
| At the same time, the government is Trying to insinuate they're trying to make laws to stop people from anonymously posting online in general. | ||
| The repost and expressions of shock from public figures quickly followed after a user on the social platform X who uses a pseudonym claimed that a government website had revealed skyrocketing rates of votes registering without a photo ID in three states this year, two of them crucial to the presidential contest. | ||
| Extremely concerning, X owner Elon Musk replied twice to the post this past week. | ||
| Marjorie Taylor Greene responded to it. | ||
| Even Trump said something about this. | ||
| And they basically say this is bad because Well, they say it's totally inaccurate, but I mean, nobody trusts you people anyway, so I'm just going to assume that it is in fact accurate, but they're very mad that this anonymous account was able to break a major news story and bring a lot of attention to a very troubling reality in this country that we're bringing in tens of millions of people and our voting system is completely insecure and they could, if they wanted, be voting at any time and there'd be no way to tell or not. | ||
| So they're, again, using this. | ||
| They're calling this election disinformation or election rigging. | ||
| I mean, whatever word they want to use to describe this, the point is obvious. | ||
| They're trying to destroy free speech in this country. | ||
| Wholesale, full stop. | ||
| That's what they're trying to do, and they're going to get away with it if the people that we empower through our votes to represent us in the halls of Congress or even in the state houses... | ||
| The various different states, if they don't step in to stop this from happening, nothing's going to stop it. | ||
| You get to these people. I mean, you heard Whoopi Goldberg say he's just arrest all Republicans. | ||
| That's where these people's mindsets are. | ||
| She got cheers for that, right? | ||
| These people are psychotic. They're psychopathic. | ||
| They're tyrannical beyond belief. | ||
| They're so short-sighted. | ||
| They're implementing the exact policies that will destroy them in the end. | ||
| We have to fight them to save them. | ||
| It's so unbelievably frustrating, but you've got to understand this is where it's going. | ||
| There is no limiting factor in their own ideology. | ||
| There is no principle they're standing on where they say, well, we have to do this, and once we get these people, it'll be over and we'll be satisfied and we'll go back to not prosecuting our enemies and destroying free speech. | ||
| No, they're just going to keep doing it. | ||
| And the next scalp they get will just empower them to go further down the slippery slope towards total and absolute despotism. | ||
| So it's up to us to stand up against them and to use the legal power that we still retain in this country to stop this illegal process. | ||
| So, I mean, I think if you want one piece of homework from today's program, call your congressman, call your senators, call your... | ||
| Your local representatives as well. | ||
| Make them aware of this video put out by Sound Investigations. | ||
| Demand they subpoena this guy or investigate in some way how this type of video was even made and whether these accusations were true. | ||
| They, I think, just want to pretend they don't even see this stuff. | ||
| They want to pretend that they don't even know this is going on, which is retarded. | ||
| It's just absolutely suicidal. | ||
| The stupidity of pretending like you don't notice... | ||
| The shackles being put around your limbs. | ||
| They're going on regardless. | ||
| They're going on whether you pretend to notice them or not. | ||
| So I cannot believe that Ted Cruz and John Cornyn are not aware of this video, but they're not going to mention it because mentioning it would mean that they sort of have an obligation to do something about it, so they're going to pretend they don't even know what you're talking about. | ||
| So don't let them have that excuse. | ||
| Call them. Call up your representatives. | ||
| I mean, if everybody listening to my voice took two minutes out of their day to call the publicly available number to just simply ask or register a complaint or a... | ||
| Statement to your representative, national, local, state level, whatever it is, make them aware of this and demand that they do something about it. | ||
| They have to see what a serious threat to our actual democracy all of this is. | ||
| They have to be aware of this. | ||
| Don't let them pretend that they're not. | ||
| Another story from Infowars here, published today. | ||
| Arbiter of truth and disinformation guru tells public, quote, don't do your own research. | ||
| Pennsylvania Secretary of the Commonwealth Al Schmidt and Executive Director of the Pitt Disinformation Lab Beth Schwenk She also discussed January 6th in the 2020 election as a failure to control the minds of citizens. | ||
| Quote, one thing everybody can do to make sure they're seeing accurate information is to use trusted sources. | ||
| So in elections, that means using the Department of State. | ||
| That means using your county election office. | ||
| It means using media organizations that follow and adhere to professional journalism standards like, quote, your local NPR affiliate. | ||
| Now we'll get into that in just a little bit because we actually have a story from today posted at the Free Press titled I've been at NPR for 25 years. | ||
| Here's how we lost America's trust. | ||
| Where a longtime contributor to NPR notes how it completely went off the rails and became a deeply partisan, highly immoral and unethical organization ever since they came down with Trump madness. | ||
| So keep that in mind. | ||
| So what these people are telling, they're like, don't do your own research. | ||
| Don't look at evidence that contradicts what we're saying. | ||
| You should trust in two things. | ||
| You should trust in... | ||
| Deep state governmental organizations that are clearly run by psychotics that despise you and lie continuously with no punishment or recompense whatsoever. | ||
| Or the media establishments who simply repeat and transcribe what those corrupt government agencies tell them. | ||
| Or you can just do your own research and come to the truth. | ||
| These people are dangerous. They have real power. | ||
| They're in positions of authority. | ||
| They are using those positions of authority to silence their opponents and And it's time that we stepped up and stopped them from doing that. | ||
| Biden admin statement, issues statement, supporting Digital Services Act. | ||
| This from BrusselsSignal.eu. | ||
| Joe Biden's United States has been accused of issuing a statement supporting the European Union's Digital Services Act, DSA, one of the policies that we've been covering since its announcement, especially in Ireland, despite repeated concerns from civil society organizations that the regulation could hamper freedom of speech online. | ||
| Oh, could it? Oh, could the bill to hamper freedom of speech online actually hamper freedom of speech online? | ||
| This is the thing. You've got to not even remotely give credence to the lie that these things are unintentional. | ||
| Obviously, they're intentional. | ||
| You don't write the Digital Services Act with the intent of doing anything other than restricting free speech online. | ||
| That is the point of it. | ||
| It's when he said, like, where... | ||
| We're sort of worried. | ||
| We're worried that something might happen. | ||
| Like, yeah, the thing that they're trying to make happen, you should be worried because | ||
| they're doing it full well, in full knowledge of what they're doing. | ||
| But US President Joe Biden's administration has been accused of issuing a statement supporting | ||
| the DSA, despite repeated warnings of what the intended purpose of the DSA is. | ||
| One such group's Free Speech Ireland expressed concern regarding a joint statement published | ||
| by the European Commission and the Biden administration in the wake of April meeting of the US EU | ||
| Trade and Technology Council. | ||
| The meeting was spearheaded on the US side by Anthony Blinken and Gina Raimondo, while | ||
| the EU was represented by European Commission officials Margaret Vestager and Valdis Dombrovski | ||
| and Dier Breton, who's another guy you should know about, in the document jointly penned | ||
| by both sets of lawmakers detailing the conclusions of the two-day meeting. | ||
| Explicit reference is made to the DSA. | ||
| The regulation is described as forcing big tech firms to mitigate societal risks emanating | ||
| from their services, including negative effects on civil discourse and electoral processes. | ||
| So make no mistake, translation here, not that complicated. | ||
| The regulation describes forcing big tech firms to silence speech that goes against their desired policy. | ||
| That's it. That's all. It's speech. | ||
| They're not talking about child pornography. | ||
| They're not talking about violent information. | ||
| They're not talking about using social media to organize violent attacks or domestic terrorism. | ||
| They're talking about speech that has a quote, negative effect on civil discourse. | ||
| They're writing speech laws. | ||
| The American government, the presidential administration of Joe Biden is collaborating | ||
| with the EU to establish laws to limit your speech online under the dubious, thinly veiled | ||
| lie of civil discourse and protecting the electoral process. | ||
| These people are criminals. | ||
| They are tyrannical scumbags. | ||
| They know exactly what they're doing and they're going to do it if we don't stop them. | ||
| This is a red alert, end of the line, last chance, you know, goal line defense. | ||
| We have to pull off here because they're already writing the laws. | ||
| They're already implementing the laws in the EU and they're bringing them to America as | ||
| these laws are being established and written and cosigned by the United States and our | ||
| so-called representatives like Anthony Blinken. | ||
| When he's not busy bidding over for Israel, he's taking away our free speech activity. | ||
| Incredible stuff. He should be in prison. | ||
| A companion document also jointly pinned by both parties detail how researchers in the US can use the DSA to extract data from designated American companies. | ||
| The status report summarizes a subset of mechanisms that are available to European and or United States researchers today so they can get in and, you know, get your information without a warrant. | ||
| Look, another way that they are circumventing the restrictions placed on the government by the Constitution in order to violate our basic human rights. | ||
| The report aims at showcasing existing access modalities and encouraging the use of these mechanisms to study the impact of online platforms' designs and decisions on society. | ||
| Free Speech Ireland expressed concern that these new documents appear to show the U.S. government is now supporting the DSA, despite it including several elements explicitly designed to control public discourse online. | ||
| It's bad enough that Europe is under this, as Europe is the birthplace of the concept of free speech and the concept of human rights, but it's even worse in America where we have a constitution that is written in stone and established with no amount of wiggle room, no amount of obscurity, very blatantly. | ||
| Stops the government from being able to do what they are actively doing right now. | ||
| If they do it and they get away with it, then that's it. | ||
| That's the law. The Constitution means nothing. | ||
| If we cannot use the Constitution to rein in this tyrannical activity, then it's not worth the paper it was printed on, written on. | ||
| So there you go. President Joe Biden cooperating with the EU to establish free speech controls in complete violation of our First Amendment and our seemingly what used to be our firmly held belief about the importance and value of a free society where conversation unrestricted is allowed and not just allowed but imperative to our ability to operate functionally as a republic. | ||
| But it's not just America. It's not just Europe. | ||
| No, it's all around the world, and it's happening in, again, a coordinated fashion. | ||
| From NotTheBee, let's talk about the report that exposed Brazil's aggressive censorship, Elon Musk's refusal to comply, and what that means for the world. | ||
| We'll get into this on the other side. | ||
| Michael Schellenberger has broken down what the Brazilian government is doing and why | ||
| it's doing it to Elon Musk and X, and how this may be a testing phase for other acts | ||
| to take place in America later. | ||
| But of course, as we detailed yesterday and many times in the show before yesterday, this | ||
| is an outgrowth of and a consequence of the coup that was carried out in Brazil with the | ||
| US State Department and the CIA collaborating with Lula to rig the election by claiming | ||
| that Yair Bolsonaro was an insurrectionist and was going to overthrow democracy, just | ||
| like they're doing with Trump. | ||
| They did run exactly the same playbook in Brazil. | ||
| It's been even more successful there than it was here. | ||
| And we'll show you some videos that highlight and expose that. | ||
| Some very powerful and good videos on the other side as we get into the battle of Elon Musk versus Brazil. | ||
| Welcome back, folks. As you know, if you've been watching this program for a while, Brazil was overthrown in 2022. | ||
| Under Silva de Lula, he's been installed as the president with the cooperation of the State Department and the CIA. Just the latest. | ||
| And you've got to admit, they've really defined, refined rather, their ability to overthrow governments in South America. | ||
| I mean, they pulled this one off with hardly a socialist thrown out of a helicopter. | ||
| I mean, you barely had bloodshed whatsoever. | ||
| I mean, there was a little bit, and people's lives have been destroyed from this as they carried out exactly the same January 6th entrapment mechanism that they used to imprison dozens of innocent people. | ||
| Financial Times details it in a glowing article celebrating this. | ||
| The Discreet US Campaign to Defend Brazil's Election. | ||
| Because of course that's the way they're going to phrase it. | ||
| But it's similar to the Times Magazine article that said, you know, the way that all of these | ||
| billionaires and important people came together to fortify the election. | ||
| Well, that's what they did in Brazil. | ||
| In this case, it was a foreign power going in and completely rigging Brazil's election. | ||
| And now that they've done that, they're making the most out of it by using Brazil to go after | ||
| free speech itself. | ||
| Not the B.com has a very extensive article about this, where they detail Michael Schellenberger's | ||
| latest Twitter file releases that say this on February 14th, 2020, Twitter's legal counsel | ||
| in Brazil emailed his colleagues to describe a hearing in Congress on disinformation and | ||
| fake news. | ||
| Batista revealed that members of Brazil's Congress had asked Twitter for the content of messages explained by some users via DM, as well as login records, among other info. | ||
| Batista said, we are pushing back against the request, which were illegal because they do not meet Brazilian Internet law, Marco Silva's legal requirement for disclosure of users' records. | ||
| But, of course, that was when Bolsonaro was president, and things have changed since then. | ||
| But instead of me talking about it, I want to go to this video of Congressman Nicolas Ferreira. | ||
| He is a congressman from Brazil speaking out in the U.N. Clip number six. | ||
| Here's him breaking down the way the socialist left has taken over his country and are in the process of destroying it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I was born in a poor neighborhood in my city, Belo Horizonte, Brazil. | |
| I'm married. I'm a Christian. | ||
| And we are expecting a daughter, Aurora, who will be born in three months. | ||
| I became the most voted federal congressman in Brazil, and I'm here to warn you about what's happening in my country. | ||
| I apologize if I make any mistakes in my speech. | ||
| I'm still learning English. | ||
| The left returned to power in the presidencies of Brazil this year, but it has had the power of universities, media, and culture for decades. | ||
| America is like a body, and its health is a tripod. | ||
| Patriotism, morality, and spirituality. | ||
| If someone undermines these three areas, America will collapse from within. | ||
| Stalin said this. | ||
| They have known the secret for a long time and used all possible means to achieve their goal, the destruction of the family. | ||
| But you may wonder, wouldn't that be too radical of an idea? | ||
| Does anyone really want to do this? | ||
| And after all, how would they do that? | ||
| First, they destroy the sense of reality. | ||
| There is no wrong, there is no longer right and wrong, good or bad, everything is relative. | ||
| When they say that, why then say that men exist? | ||
| Women, aren't they concrete concepts? | ||
| Therefore, they must be abolished. | ||
| Then they move on stage number two, the destruction of identity. | ||
| If you are nothing, then everything can be everything. | ||
| Therefore, they will destroy your identity as a person. | ||
| Young people no longer know what or who they are. | ||
| They are carried away by any wind of doctrine and cling to what is fashionable. | ||
| They tell you dress like this, use this type of language, and finally, live like this. | ||
| It is the generation most lacking in good references that has ever existed. | ||
| After all, the left replaced Jesus with a Black Lives Matter activist and exchanged | ||
| the cross, which represents injustice, against an innocent person for symbols that represent | ||
| nothing other than selfishness of activists itself. | ||
| By the way, the rainbow is not yours, but ours. | ||
| Read the Bible and you'll find out. | ||
| Applause Also, beauty no longer exists. | ||
| The focus is on shocking, whether in fashion, music, films, and TV series. | ||
| The important thing is to sell a culture that delivers everything you want, except meaning of life. | ||
| Slaves to their own will. | ||
| A generation that cannot handle pain, confrontation, much less being told what is wrong. | ||
| Who exchange their parents' advices for teachers who never carry them in their arms? | ||
| Who commit the strength of the youth to actions that only serve those who are dominating them? | ||
| They are too foolish to know. | ||
| That they are being used and who uses them. | ||
| Like those who campaign for abortion, but ignore that 75 years ago the Universal Declaration of Human Rights was published, which in its third article states, everyone has the right to life. | ||
| This is a 12 week old baby. | ||
| His or her heart is already beating. | ||
| It has a fingerprint. | ||
| There is no one in the world like this baby. | ||
| When they find a bacteria on Mars, they call it life. | ||
| But this child is just a clamp of cells to them. | ||
| To those who propagate death and help the largest silent genocidal movement, we will respond with a culture that recognizes the sacredness of life and encourages its acceptance. | ||
| I renew my commitment of protecting the lives of children, both before and after birth. | ||
| This is the first and most fundamental of rights. | ||
| Without it, nothing else is possible. | ||
| But this is not only the tool they use to change our culture. | ||
| Men who use it to lie about their ages, to go to war and fight for their country, But now lie about their biological sex to compete with women. | ||
| How did we get to this point? | ||
| Who is responsible for creating this generation? | ||
| Where are the men and women with the courage to say they will not bound to tyranny? | ||
| Are we watching the world collapse in front of our eyes and we are just going to watch it? | ||
| No. We ain't nobody slaves. | ||
| Our freedom was achieved with a lot of sweat and blood, and it would be very naive to believe that it would be not with sweat and blood that we would maintain it. | ||
| I come here to give a message to all those who still have hope in changing the world. | ||
| The world will be a better place if there weren't so many people promising to improve it. | ||
| It's a quote from a philosopher, Olavo de Carvalho, and that fits perfectly with Greta and Leonardo DiCaprio, for example, that supported our socialist president called Lula, a chief that should be in jail, and now we have Amazonia with the worst fire in 15 years, and they are just in silence and disappeared. | ||
| Let... | ||
| Let us first be the change. | ||
| I know that the situation looks terrible and the Conservatives tend towards private life, his work and his family. | ||
| But if we don't rise up for public life, our private life will be and is in danger. | ||
| To do this, we need to raise educators who will dictate new directions for UNESCO, for example. | ||
| Education that teaches and not doctrinate. | ||
| New judges who will honor the Magisterium and deliver justice. | ||
| And not like some of Brazil's Supreme Court who have betrayed the Brazilian people and persecuted their political opponents. | ||
| It's a very powerful speech from this young congressman, Nicolas Ferreira, from Brazil. | ||
| Really just laying down everything. | ||
| Just absolutely amazing. And just to let you know what they've done with this socialist takeover of Brazil, they actually talked about and tried charging A Twitter support person for a crime, for not giving over the private information of their people. | ||
| And as he notes there, they go after their political opponents. | ||
| They're using the power they've been vested with to establish tyranny and despotism and to silence their opponents. | ||
| It's happening around the world. | ||
| We need a global pushback now or never. | ||
| Now or never. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| This is The War Room. | ||
| I'm your host, Harrison Smith. Thank you so much for being here with us. | ||
| We still have a lot to cover in today's program. | ||
| My lord, do we have a lot to cover, and a lot of videos to show you as well. | ||
| I guess we'll finish up with the free speech corner of our coverage today. | ||
| With clip number eight here, as this is the ultimate end goal of the policies that are destroying free speech piecemeal, Slowly but surely, they are undermining the foundation of this country and the entire Western world. | ||
| And as we've said many, many, many, many, many times in the past, you want to understand where the world is going, what the role of the globalists is, how all these various countries play into it. | ||
| Really ain't that complicated. | ||
| China has the system they want everywhere. | ||
| The social credit score totalitarian technocratic control grid is in place in China where they are refining and exporting it. | ||
| The other countries in the world, especially in the West, are already operating under a de facto norm. | ||
| Global government under organizations like the World Economic Forum who gather together in Congress, who set policy, and then the individual members of that organization go back to their home countries and implement the policy at the national or state or city level, as well as in cooperation with a number of other NGO organizations, activist groups, Which they fund with the money that they steal from the people that they govern. | ||
| It's a very incestuous, self-fulfilling role that they play. | ||
| But importantly, they're doing this in cooperation and coordination and very intricate cooperation with corporations, international corporate cabals that are really composed of the same people. | ||
| But are using their financial power to bring this about rather than political or media power. | ||
| Although those things are involved as well. | ||
| But let's go now to clip number eight. | ||
| This is from Epoch TV, Epoch Times, exposing the fact that there is a social credit system in place in this country. | ||
| It's just not fully legal yet. | ||
| But the framework is there. | ||
| The scaffolding has been erected. | ||
| And they are building the facade. | ||
| They are building... The structure that they intend to enslave us all just like they do the communist Chinese. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's go to clip number eight. We now have a social credit system right here in the United States that has been installed quietly, interestingly, not by the government, but instead by private businesses and banks. | |
| It's in similar ways, really, to the way the Chinese Communist Party's social credit system works. | ||
| Rather than use a CCP standard of adherence to the ruling regime, it's instead based on the social justice standards under ESG, or Environmental and Social Governance. | ||
| As ESG criteria assesses businesses' sustainability and ethics, a personal ESG score, just like the big corporate ones, offers insight into a person's commitment to sustainable practices. | ||
| And apparently we're all committed to this, whether we like it or not. | ||
| Your personal ESG score is calculated based on three main factors, environmental, social, and governance, which includes, for example, your purchase history. | ||
| What products are you choosing to buy? | ||
| Already, apparently, purchasing a gun, buying alcohol, or other items can affect your personal ESG score. | ||
| Your sales history, your public records, including your credit reports. | ||
| All of these are considered to gauge your impact on the environment and society. | ||
| But because people don't want these things, they've found that they have to try to force people to want these things. | ||
| Watch now on Epoch TV. That's Epoch TV Crossroads program. | ||
| So just like with the DSA, they say, what's the exact term that they used? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's, we'll pull it up here. | |
| Just so we can be sure to get their doublespeak exactly right. | ||
| They want to have regulations that Have negative effects on civic discourse and electoral processes. | ||
| Yeah, you might have a low social credit score because you are not responsible ESG members or because your language is having negative effects on civil discourse and the electoral process. | ||
| They're like, all this civil discourse is getting too negative. | ||
| We're just going to get rid of all of it. | ||
| Yeah, we're just going to abolish civic discourse itself, and you can all just do as we say whenever we say it, and argumentation will be considered treason. | ||
| That's their solution to this. | ||
| So whatever language they need to use to justify their tyrannical activity, they'll use. | ||
| And it's all just very, very thinly veiled tyranny. | ||
| Not complicated. | ||
| Where does this go? | ||
| Well, there's a couple options, and strangely, it seems like there's sort of three realms here. | ||
| Now, remember, when we say third world, that's actually a phrase from the Cold War. | ||
| It doesn't just mean a poor country. | ||
| It means a country not yet aligned with the first world, which was capitalism, or the second world, which was communism. | ||
| The third world was a phrase coined to represent just the countries that hadn't picked a side yet, basically the battlegrounds of the Cold War. | ||
| We use it differently here. | ||
| But I see again sort of a triple division structure where you've got places like China that are in the system. | ||
| They're in for good or ill. | ||
| There's no breaking out of the Chinese system right now without some sort of massive upheaval in terms of like literally an earthquake kills all of the government in Beijing. | ||
| And then maybe the Chinese people would be free. | ||
| But you know, Without that, Chinese people aren't going to be staging a revolution anytime soon to overthrow their government. | ||
| So they're fully in. And then you've got places like America that are as far away from that as is possible to get in this world today, but are rapidly moving in that direction. | ||
| And then in the middle, you've got places that are extremely socialist. | ||
| And the strange thing is, it's from this middle group that we're seeing the loudest pushback and possibly the most effective or at least the most aggressive defense from all this. | ||
| Taiwanese earthquake videos I haven't seen yet. | ||
| So, Brazil, very much in the full socialist camp, but as you saw from that congressman from Brazil, a powerful voice for a populist youth uprising against that. | ||
| Likewise in Spain. | ||
| Spain has been Very much in the claws of the socialists for a very long time, and yet we're seeing a Spanish nationalism rise. | ||
| And perhaps an unexpected way. | ||
| Same thing's happening in Ireland as more and more migrants flood that island nation. | ||
| We're seeing a rise in right-wing nationalist pushback. | ||
| So I want to go down to this video. Clip number 14. | ||
| The Spanish Christian patriots rise up, saying you have transformed our land into a dunghill. | ||
| Time has come to take back what is ours. | ||
| Clip number 14. He says violence, insecurity, drugs, immortality, family destruction, plundering of our jobs, degenerate indoctrination of the youngest, and sexual crimes against our women, sisters and daughters. All the things that our ancestors gave us with sacrifice and blood are being demolished and we are doing nothing to stop it. | ||
| Is this really what you want for your homeland? | ||
| Is this land not worth the sacrifice? | ||
| We know who our enemies are, just as you know what they want to do to us. | ||
| Enough of being afraid. Existence is not life, nor is it death. | ||
| Existence is struggle, and if we're not willing to struggle, then we do not deserve to live either. | ||
| Nucleo National, he says we don't want to give a life that degrades men, but recover the forms of life that once dignified him. | ||
| The 14th of April, from 1130 to 1500, come to Madrid to meet us in this area and join the call of the blood and your people. | ||
| Now, I know what you're thinking. | ||
| I know what you're thinking. | ||
| That, Harrison, is a scary symbol. | ||
| I don't know. That looks kind of fascist to me. | ||
| Yeah, I get it. I understand. | ||
| Do you disagree with the message, though? | ||
| Does it not resonate with you, the reality that socialists and communists are turning once glorious Christian powerful countries into literal dunghills? | ||
| Is that not true? | ||
| And since it is true, the question is, who's doing anything about it? | ||
| Who's doing absolutely anything about it? | ||
| If you don't want to see the rise of You know, neo-fascist groups. | ||
| If you don't want to see violent outbreaks and uprisings against this, maybe it's time that the establishment does something to stop the wholesale destruction. | ||
| Because you can't expect people to just sit by. | ||
| While the sacrifices of their ancestors are stolen from them, when their lives are ruined, when their countries and cities and neighborhoods are demolished around them, people are going to fight back. | ||
| I think it's better they fight back, even if they have scary-looking symbols, than to be so scared of the symbols that you're going to sacrifice your entire culture to a couple of Moronic, bloodthirsty communists. | ||
| So you don't want to see the rise of that. | ||
| Maybe we need to get back to some semblance of morality and normalcy, okay? | ||
| Because that's the option. Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Third hour of The War Room is on, and boy, oh boy, do we have a lot to talk about. | ||
| I'm going to go to a couple videos here. | ||
| We'll just get to them quickly. | ||
| First of all, let's talk about socialism, shall we? | ||
| I can tell you all about the dangers of socialism. | ||
| I can try to impart upon you the lessons that we have learned through the suffering of others who have been through this and describe what it's like to live under a socialist regime. | ||
| I could talk about the importance of private property in the way that it underpins freedom itself. | ||
| I could talk intellectually about the concepts of socialism versus capitalism and freedom, etc., etc. | ||
| I don't think any argument I could make would be better than a socialist simply describing his dream utopia. | ||
| Here's a socialist of some sort. | ||
| He's a professor, I understand. | ||
| A professor, a socialist professor, answering a simple question. | ||
| Under socialism, how do I get a PS3? How do I get a PlayStation 3 under a socialist model? | ||
| Clip number 12, let's find out. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Question to you, Professor Wolf. | |
| Under your system of worker cooperatives, would I still get my PlayStation 5? | ||
| Absolutely. You'd have to struggle a little bit for it. | ||
| You'd have to talk to your fellow workers. | ||
| You'd have to talk about the distribution of income. | ||
| You'd have to compare your desire for PlayStation against all the other interests of all the other people. | ||
| It wouldn't be something you worked out on your own with your particular boss. | ||
| In any way would have to be a democratic decision. | ||
| You'd have to come to terms with that the way you do with democratic decisions now in our society to the extent that we have them. | ||
| Yeah, that sucks. | ||
| Yeah, that sounds like it sucks real bad. | ||
| And he's arguing for socialism. | ||
| You know under capitalism how you get a PS5? You go buy it. | ||
| You don't have to ask permission to anybody. | ||
| You don't have to negotiate with anybody to make sure they're on board with you having a game system. | ||
| Can you imagine? And that is what it'd be like. | ||
| That's what it'd be like. You get your gay communist utopia. | ||
| This is so cool. Can I get a PS5? Well, why do you deserve a PS5? When there's people out there that are starving, you'll be browbeaten. | ||
| It'll turn into some sort of struggle session where your desire for a PS5 is evidence of your capitalistic ideology. | ||
| And you may have to be sent to a gulag for re-education until you no longer desire the PS5, the evil outgrowth of capitalism. | ||
| I mean, my God. | ||
| You'd have to actually debate whether or not you can have a PS3 with a bunch of blue-haired morons who are in charge of you. | ||
| And again, obviously, your desire for a PS5 will be used as evidence against you. | ||
| I mean, it's just retarded. | ||
| That's just a terrible system. | ||
| That's a terrible system, and that argument was counterproductive, sir. | ||
| I'm once again asking for a PS5. Yep, that's... | ||
| Good luck, Bernie. | ||
| Good luck is all I have to say. | ||
| Let's learn a little bit more about... | ||
| We have so many good videos. | ||
| Let's just go to clip number 13. I'm not even going to set it up. | ||
| Let's just go to clip number 13. | ||
| We've got a solar eclipse. We've got the earthquake. | ||
| She ran down the hallway. The rapture is here. | ||
| The rapture is here. And then also I learned that the cicadas are coming. | ||
| Cicadas. Cicadas. | ||
|
unidentified
|
For the first time in like 100 years. | |
| No, no, no. Well, this is what I read. | ||
| There's two different kinds of cicadas coming. | ||
| Yes, two different times are coming. | ||
| The good cicadas and the bad cicadas. | ||
| But for the first time in many, many years. | ||
| No. Every 17 years this happens. | ||
| Well, that's not what I read, but maybe, you know, maybe you know better. | ||
| But in a way... | ||
| I will say all those things together, what maybe lead one to believe that, you know, either climate change exists... | ||
| That's more the point....or something is... | ||
| Yeah, maybe. | ||
| ...at the mercy of climate change. | ||
| It's underground. It happens, and the eclipse, they've known about the eclipse coming because eclipses happen. | ||
| Yeah, I think, um... | ||
| Maybe we need to restrict voting rights. | ||
| I'm just gonna say that. Well, ladies and gentlemen, if you thought we had more than enough news already, it's still rolling in. | ||
| The news don't stop. | ||
| Alex Jones has had his name invoked in the Canadian Parliament, of all places, by Justin Trudeau. | ||
| So we'll get to that in just a second. | ||
| People on our side, ostensibly most people in the establishment right are woefully unprepared to deal with the situation we find ourselves in. | ||
| And even people on the dissonant right seem incapable of concocting a strategy that's effective against the powers that we're facing. | ||
| And I'll explain how this, I think, relates to abortion. | ||
| But obviously abortion is a big topic ever since the Roe vs. | ||
| Wade rollback. | ||
| It's been sort of a continual topic, reignited once again by President Trump's statement, which was met with outrage in certain corners of the Republican Party. | ||
| And Donald Trump has responded to those responses. | ||
| And I'll read his truth post here. | ||
| He says, Terminating Roe v. | ||
| Wade was, according to all legal scholars, a great event. | ||
| But sometimes with great events come difficulties. | ||
| Many good Republicans lost elections because of this issue. | ||
| And people like Lindsey Graham, that are unrelenting, are handing Democrats the dream of the House, Senate, perhaps even the presidency. | ||
| Reflecting what we've said on this show over and over again. | ||
| By allowing the states to make their decision and hoping that most Republicans running for office will have the sense, although they must follow their heart, to require the exceptions for rape, incest, and life of the mother, we have taken the abortion issue largely out of play. | ||
| When the Supreme Court had the courage to do the right thing legally and terminate Roe v. | ||
| Wade, all those people, including Lindsey Graham and Marjorie... | ||
| Denon Felser of Susan B. Anthony that were hardliners one day after the victory were gone and of absolutely no help as the Democrats staged rallies and won elections they should have never won. | ||
| Lindsey Marjorie and others fought for years unsuccessfully until I came along and got the job done. | ||
| Then they were gone, never to be heard from again until now. | ||
| We can't let our country suffer any further damage by losing elections on an issue that should always have been decided by the states and now will be. | ||
| Again, I think he's right. I think, you know, it's funny. | ||
| I was listening to Owen host the Alex Jones show today. | ||
| And of course, just like always, I mean, it's pretty much uncanny. | ||
| You know, we don't strategize about what we're going to say. | ||
| You know, he and I aren't calling before the show. | ||
| How should I cover this? How are you going to? | ||
| Okay, you're going to cover it that way. Okay, great. | ||
| But we end up on the same page. | ||
| We end up on the same page because most of our conclusions are fairly obvious when approached with a principled stance. | ||
| And I think Owen expressed exactly what I believe, that while I'm staunchly pro-life and I do think it's murder, I also understand the political reality of the situation that we're in. | ||
| And I understand that abortion is probably the number one single issue that single issue voters talk about. | ||
| Because, and it's perfectly understandable, in the same way that we are outraged any time gun control comes up from the Democrats, they get outraged any time abortion is brought up by Republicans. | ||
| Because, and again, I'm not endorsing the view, I'm letting you know that you inspire pushback when you project your desire to take a right away from somebody. | ||
| We have a right of guns. When they want to take that away, it fires us up because we have a right and we don't want it destroyed. | ||
| People in certain states have the right of abortion at this point, and they don't want that taken away. | ||
| So it really does an incredible job of getting people to go vote. | ||
| I mean, it's just it's an effective political tool that the Democrats use. | ||
| And Lindsey Graham does not serve anybody by putting forward some of the policies he's proposed. | ||
| And you can search. | ||
| I mean, just go look. Just go look on Google it. | ||
| Just search like Lindsey Graham abortion, no restriction, something like that. | ||
| And you'll actually see that it was like immediately after the Roe versus Wade decision came down from the Supreme Court that Lindsey Graham was Putting forward bills that were never gonna pass. | ||
| They were never going to actually make a positive difference. | ||
| The only purpose they served was to give ammunition to the Democrats. | ||
| And you can find articles from 2022 and 2023 where every other Republican is saying, what are you doing, Lindsey Graham? | ||
| Are you trying to give us bad press? | ||
| Because that's the only thing that's coming from this bill. | ||
| I get it, you're virtue signaling about how much you are pro-life, but politically, it's empowering the pro-abortion people. | ||
| So stop it. Just stop it, Lindsey Graham. | ||
| Do what you do best and start wars overseas. | ||
| You're so pro-life. And I think this goes down to that classic turn of phrase, the, at this point, cliche, and yet very true statement, Where it's sort of an exchange, right? I'm conservative, and then the question is, what are you conserving? | ||
| What is it exactly you're conserving here? | ||
| Because as far as I can tell, everything that we wanted to conserve has been ripped away from us and is never coming back. | ||
| So what are you conserving? | ||
| Now, there's a lot of truth in that statement. | ||
| Because we do not live in a conservative society. | ||
| We do not live in a society that is rooted in Christian, Western, American ideals anymore. | ||
| From the media, to the government, to our schools, just everywhere in between. | ||
| We are not the dominant culture in America anymore. | ||
| Now that sucks. | ||
| I don't like it. But it's the reality. | ||
| And it seems like conservatives in this country are slow in understanding that that's the reality. | ||
| They're slow to adopt a strategy that works in these circumstances. | ||
| So let's flip it on its head. | ||
| If it was the 1940s and abortion was absolutely illegal everywhere, how far do you think pro-abortion activists would have gotten if they came out again in America in the 1940s and said, we demand abortion on demand, paid by the government, up to and including the ninth month of pregnancy? | ||
| Do you think they ever would have gotten anywhere? | ||
| Do you think that ever would have just remotely been approached, like those people would have been forcibly given lobotomies? | ||
| It was a better time back then. | ||
| They knew how to deal with people like that. | ||
| But obviously they didn't start with that. | ||
| Obviously you start with, you just get your foot in the door. | ||
| Hey, you know, sometimes in certain circumstances, maybe it's better that we have abortion. | ||
| Maybe it's better that, look, if a child is raped by her father, I mean, these are extreme circumstances, but we've got to have abortion available as a medical procedure in these extreme circumstances. | ||
| And of course, people go, yeah, all right, you know, we hate abortion, but okay, there are certain times. | ||
| And then, incrementally, we get to where we are now, which is that you have nine-month or even post-birth abortions literally executing a baby. | ||
| So how effective do you think it's going to be in a country where, for all intents and purposes, abortion is absolutely illegal without restrictions? | ||
| Because even if you live in a state that abortion is illegal, well, you know, your company will probably pay for you to go to another state to get the abortion that you want. | ||
| So for all intents and purposes, it's totally legal here, and it is, of course, a primary celebrated topic of the left. | ||
| Do you think you're going to succeed by suggesting the most hard-line You know, opposite of what exists right now? | ||
| Or can we try to roll back a little bit and get the ball rolling and get our foot in the door and make the arguments that at least give us some restrictions on the abortion? | ||
| If we can at least roll it back to some reasonable time frame, if we can maybe allow an exception here or there and base our argument off of the reality that we are not in charge anymore and that we have to start acting like that, Then we can actually make incremental changes in a positive direction that get us back to some semblance of normalcy. | ||
| These people think we're still in charge. | ||
| Lindsey Graham thinks that, you know, it's just a brief aberration. | ||
| And with the right legislation, it'll be the 1950s again next week. | ||
| That ain't happening, folks. | ||
| That's not happening. So we have to change the tactics that we take. | ||
| And I see this with people who see what's going on with the destruction of white people, with the attacks, the anti-white attacks that are constantly going on. | ||
| You've got to understand that we are an occupied nation. | ||
| We are under the control of people who despise us. | ||
| There's really not... | ||
| You know, there's a effective, strategic way to approach some of this stuff. | ||
| And then there is the, I don't know, spiritually fulfilling way to approach things that achieves nothing. | ||
| Right? If you want to just come out and just start screaming about this stuff and demand That the laws that exist now be completely inverted and go exactly the opposite direction. | ||
| You're just wasting time. | ||
| You're not achieving anything. | ||
| And you're not helping anybody. | ||
| So just understand where we are in this country. | ||
| Understand that we are not the majority sentiment that just has to enforce what we believe. | ||
| We are the insurgency. | ||
| Conservatives at this point, it's the wrong appellation. | ||
| It's the wrong thing to call us. | ||
| Because we have not conserved anything. | ||
| Because all of what we believe in is gone at this point. | ||
| That doesn't mean we give it up. | ||
| That doesn't mean we no longer adhere to the basic morality, the fundamental tenets that we sincerely believe in. | ||
| It means we have to change our strategy to reclaim some of these Governmental powers. | ||
| And then change the way that we use those governmental powers, knowing that what we're facing is a full-spectrum, orchestrated, coordinated cabal of psychopaths that are trying to destroy the earth. | ||
| And treating it with the seriousness and intensity it demands. | ||
| And we see this, if you're on right-wing Twitter, you see it all the time. | ||
| Everybody gets this, except for the people in power, who are essentially paid not to get this. | ||
| Where you've got people saying, Everything I'm saying right now basically is like Republicans act like politics is a debate club and liberals act like it's war. | ||
| We have to understand it is war and we're losing the war. | ||
| Tell me, if your army is outnumbered, if you're outgunned, if you're backed into a corner with no Possibility of retreat. | ||
| If you are in a losing position in a war, are you just going to send all of your soldiers out to attack in a full frontal assault? | ||
| If you're retarded, if you're suicidal, yeah, go ahead and do that. | ||
| But it's like we can't understand that that's the situation. | ||
| It's like conservatives just have this illusion that if we just Pass some legislation. | ||
| If we just win a Congress seat or two, then we'll be back in the 1950s and everything will be good again. | ||
| That ain't happening anytime soon. | ||
| So we need to take the numbers that we do have. | ||
| I also don't want to be blackpilled here and say, well, we've lost it all and it's never coming back. | ||
| It will come back if we have the right strategy, if we have the right tactics, if we have the right goal in mind. | ||
| And if we use the powers that we still retain to bring these things about, it is absolutely possible that we can turn this thing around. | ||
| It has to be done in an incremental fashion. | ||
| It has to be done in a strategic fashion. | ||
| But it can't just be flippantly and sort of like, it can't just be built on senseless outrage. | ||
| Yes, everybody in the pro-life sector is outraged that babies are being killed. | ||
| But if you go only without that outrage and just say, if any one baby is killed, I refuse to support this policy. | ||
| It's like, then you're just going to lose entirely. | ||
| Then you're just going to not have any power to make any positive change at all. | ||
| And we'll continue down the path of post-birth abortions and abortions on demand paid by the taxpayer at nine months. | ||
| So it's up to you as to whether or not we approach this Strategically, or whether we operate under the delusional understanding that somehow if we just yell loud enough and make extreme enough demands, people submit to us. | ||
| This is nonsense. This is nonsense. | ||
| I've said it before. I posted it on Twitter, and then I was like, this could be interpreted the wrong way. | ||
| In October, when the conflict between Israel and Gaza broke out, and it blew my mind that you've got these dudes in Gaza who have been under occupation for 75 years. | ||
| 75 years! | ||
| These people have been under surveillance and just crushed in every possible way and | ||
| had their, any rights they do retain severely curtailed by an occupying force. | ||
| And yet 75 years on, these are Jamaican like gyrocopters in their backyard or underground | ||
| somewhere to launch these attacks. | ||
| And then of course you have Israel, which is the Jewish nation, which is the outcome | ||
| of literally millennia of Jews eventually getting out of a position where they were | ||
| a minority in various nations in Europe. | ||
| And what I realized in this strange dichotomy is you sort of have examples of the two effective ways of resisting Israel. | ||
| Tyranny and oppression. One is just to be so hard-headed and stubborn and just willing to do whatever it takes, right? | ||
| The Palestinian side is just like, it doesn't matter if you oppress us for nine generations, we're still going to be just as fervently and insanely anti-Israel as ever before. | ||
| And that's one way to do it. | ||
| The other way to do it is the opposite of that. | ||
| And it's more the historically Jewish method, which is like, don't cause any trouble. | ||
| Look, we're the minorities in this country. | ||
| Let's not draw any attention to ourselves. | ||
| Let's not... Make these people hate us by any means. | ||
| Let's cooperate. Let's live in concert with our host country. | ||
| And let's work quietly and softly behind the scenes to improve our condition overall. | ||
| And eventually that pays dividends and you get your own nation after millennia of doing that. | ||
| But I just realized this is kind of the two. | ||
| If you're going to oppose oppression, these are the only two viable options. | ||
| You either... Quietly, sort of work behind the scenes to improve things for yourself and defend yourself within the system that you're in, or you just hard-headedly and stubbornly resist with everything you've got without ever letting up for a single moment. | ||
| Americans, and white people in general, maybe just aren't used to being the victims of oppression. | ||
| We haven't quite figured out how to deal with that yet. | ||
| I guess in Eastern Europe, there are more examples of it under communistic oppression. | ||
| But it's like in America, in the Western European countries, it's not either resist with all you've got or resist quietly and work behind the scenes to improve things. | ||
| It's like either just submit entirely and start working for your enemy or just lash out pointlessly and draw the ire of your oppressor and get destroyed in the process. | ||
| And it's like these are... We've got to choose one of these two options. | ||
| And it seems like the Palestinian option is sort of out the window because Americans are too comfortable and fat and lazy and ill-informed to actually stage real hardcore resistance against the oppression of the globalists. | ||
| But when it comes to conserving the Western world, that's not an option anymore. | ||
| It has been lost. So now we have to understand that we, the people who believe in human rights and Christianity and the promise of America and the value of freedom and liberty itself, we are the insurgency. | ||
| We are the underdogs. | ||
| We are not in charge anymore. | ||
| That doesn't mean our fight is lost. | ||
| It means we can't act like we're in charge anymore. | ||
| Just like when half your army gets destroyed, you can't just march out to meet the other army acting like you still have equal numbers. | ||
| You gotta start going with a guerrilla tactic. | ||
| You gotta start working behind the scenes. | ||
| You gotta start operating in a way that comports with the reality, not in a way that comports with the fantasy or the | ||
| previously held position of your people. | ||
| So we gotta learn to be oppressed. | ||
| We gotta learn to be oppressed and not give up in that oppression. | ||
| We have to learn to deal with the oppression, deal with being in a country that is run by our enemies who are actively trying to destroy us and understanding that we cannot rely on the systems of our government to protect us. | ||
| We cannot... We should. | ||
| We have to be using the First Amendment. | ||
| We have to be speaking out against it. | ||
| But with a strategic goal in mind of turning that free speech into legitimate political action through the electoral process to make the changes at the governmental level that we want to see come about. | ||
| You can't just lash out pointlessly against this incredibly powerful apparatus that's arrayed against us. | ||
| And then be surprised when the apparatus crushes you. | ||
| You have to be smart. | ||
| You have to be like a centipede. | ||
| Like Donald Trump. | ||
| You have to work smart. | ||
| This just came out minutes ago. | ||
| It was a question time in the Canadian Parliament. | ||
| Pierre Polivier, I always forget how to pronounce his name, asked a question to Justin Trudeau. | ||
| Justin Trudeau invokes Alex Jones' name in a response. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let's watch. Speaker, he met the premiers in 2016. | |
| Since that time, he's broken the promise he made them. | ||
| He said the tax would only go up to 11 cents a liter. | ||
| Now, he admits it will go up to 61 cents a litre. | ||
| He said the tax would make people better off. | ||
| Now we have the Parliamentary Budget Officer's report which confirms 60% of Canadians pay | ||
| more than they get back. | ||
| The Prime Minister said, and I quote, in 2015, Canadians need a PM who will meet with the | ||
| premiers. | ||
| What happened? | ||
| The Right Honourable Prime Minister. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| While the Conservative leader continues with his misinformation and disinformation, the reality is the Parliamentary Budget Officer said that 8 out of 10 Canadians do better with our price on pollution and the Canada carbon rebate. | ||
| But speaking of misinformation and disinformation, any responsible leader that receives an endorsement | ||
| and support from proven conspiracy theorist and liar Alex Jones would have immediately denounced | ||
| that. But that's not what the leader of the opposition did. | ||
| He did absolutely nothing because those kinds of endorsements fit within his | ||
| political strategy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Order. | |
| The Honourable Member for Belle-Euchamblie. | ||
| Mr. Speaker. Does this go on? | ||
| Do they keep talking about it? | ||
| Yeah, that was all I saw. So there you go. | ||
| Alex Jones invoked in Canadian Parliament. | ||
| You'll notice that Justin Trudeau did not answer the question at all that was posed to him. | ||
| But that's being a liberal for you, right? | ||
| Here's a reasonable question about a policy. | ||
| Oh yeah? Well, you got endorsed by Alex Jones. | ||
| Yeah! Raucous applause. | ||
| Just didn't address anything. | ||
| We'll get into this a little bit on the other side because I think there might be something deeper at play here. | ||
| And I'll explain that in just a second. | ||
| Alex Cargill at Trans Splendor has an interesting take on Pierre Polivier, and I'll tell you how that plays into it on the other side. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| We just saw Alex Jones be invoked by Justin Trudeau. | ||
| A question from Pierre Polivier. | ||
| Alex Cargill, at TransSplendor on Twitter, was on with us on American Journal last week. | ||
| He told me how to pronounce that name, and I don't remember it. | ||
| Polivier, whatever. | ||
| I'm going to call him Pierre. And I post him the question that I think a lot of people would understand. | ||
| If you follow Alex Cargill, he's very against Pierre. | ||
| And I didn't understand why, because I said, look, I see interviews with this guy. | ||
| He seems right on the money. | ||
| He seems very good. He seems like a populist. | ||
| He seems Trumpian in character. | ||
| He seems like a DeSantis kind of style dude that could be effective and get votes, but also stand for Canadian sovereignty. | ||
| What am I getting wrong? | ||
| And Alex Cargill explained it to me, so you can go find that video on American Journal. | ||
| But suffice it to say, A lot of people in Canada that are on the right wing, that are the Infowars style, like really addicted and good at getting down to the bottom of things and finding out what people's real intentions are, basically have determined that Pierre is a plant, basically. And in the paradigm he explained to me, you basically have Trudeau being just the worst, almost on purpose, almost purposefully being as far left as you can possibly be To put right-wingers in Canada in this state of desperation where they just are so desperate to be out from under the thumb of Trudeau that they're willing to vote for the person that then is offered up to them as the alternative. | ||
| Pierre. Oh, look. | ||
| An alternative on a platter. | ||
| But it turns out he's connected to the World Economic Forum. | ||
| He is very much a globalist, apparently. | ||
| And... You know, it's basically a bad cop, good cop kind of style. | ||
| Vote for Trudeau. You get all these terrible things. | ||
| It's so bad that you're desperate for anybody else. | ||
| So they offer you Pierre, who is just Trudeau with training wheels on. | ||
| Just a little bit slower, but still, you know, approving of all the same things. | ||
| So I thought that was a very interesting take on it. | ||
| And this came back up because a few days after that appearance, Alex put out a tweet saying, I followed Pierre and he's the real deal. | ||
| And it's a big debate online. | ||
| People saying, well, Pierre got rid of all the World Economic Forum people in his council, so that's not the case anymore. | ||
| Other people saying, that's fake, that's the maneuver, he's tricking everybody. | ||
| Not sure where to fall on this, but Alex basically put out a tweet about Pierre saying, I follow this guy, he's the real deal. | ||
| And that's what Justin Trudeau was bringing up in that question time parliamentary meeting that we just saw. | ||
| And so I wonder if this isn't a slightly deeper play, because it would fit in perfectly with the paradigm that Alex Cargill described to me, the theorizing that Pierre is a false option, that it's actually in line with the uniparty practice to have it look like Pierre is this crazy far-right person because that's what they want. | ||
| They want all of the far-right people to vote for him because he's a red herring. | ||
| He's a wolf in sheep's clothing. | ||
| It sort of fits in either way, but I would like to see Pierre respond to this claim by pointing out all the things Alex Jones has been right about in the recent past. | ||
| And say, look, he understood COVID more than Justin Trudeau. | ||
| He warned about all these things better than Justin Trudeau. | ||
| Justin Trudeau's government was found in violation of the Charter of Human Rights because of the way they treated the trucker protest, which InfoWars was very much a backer of. | ||
| So, I mean, he's been right about more things he's been wrong about. | ||
| I would love to see, and we'll see how this goes. | ||
| And this may be a turning point, or it may be This is a problem when you're run by lying psychopaths that are incredibly capable at manipulating public sentiment. | ||
| You can never be sure which way it's going, but it seems to me like by invoking Alex Jones, he puts pressure on Pierre. | ||
| Now Pierre either has to You know, respond to it in the way that he wants and say, I reject Alex Jones and I'm nothing like that and I'm a reasonable Canadian. | ||
| I just want normal change. | ||
| In which case, you know, maybe people, I don't know how people respond to that or Pierre can actually respond In a forceful way and say, you're trying to smear me with Alex Jones. | ||
| Well, let's talk about COVID. Let's talk about the lockdowns. | ||
| Let's talk about all of these, you know, free speech and all of these various things that Alex Jones has been dead on about and that Justin Trudeau has even been rebuked by his own courts for his violations. | ||
| Of human rights in pursuit of these goals. | ||
| So, you know, Alex Jones might, you might not like him, but he was right about this and he's right about Justin Trudeau and he's right about me being the real deal. | ||
| I would love to see him go that route. | ||
| Again, just thinking about this, playing it out in my head here in real time, it's like, well, wouldn't that be exactly what you would do if you were trying to set up a fake puppet who pretends to be anti-World Economic Forum? | ||
| If you have a fake populist, wouldn't you set him up with something like this to say, hey, all these people think you're a fake populist. | ||
| You should go out and forcefully endorse Alex Jones. | ||
| That'll disprove their claims because how can he endorse Alex Jones if he's not the real deal? | ||
| That's a very real deal move to actually stand up for Alex Jones. | ||
| So I don't know. I think that would be the smart move. | ||
| I think the time is over for us to back down on things like this and allow them to manipulate and control the conversation by making these outrageous claims. | ||
| I think it's time to embrace the associations they want to tag us with and say, you know what? | ||
| You want to associate me with that person that you're saying is bad? | ||
| Well, here's why that person is right about a bunch of stuff. | ||
| Here's how that person has been dead on. | ||
| Here's how if that person had been... | ||
| You know, a premier of Canada. | ||
| We wouldn't have massive inflation. | ||
| We wouldn't have immigration that is beyond description. | ||
| You want to see a chart? Let's find this. | ||
| Where's that chart I had? | ||
| Here you go. This is the Canadian population change year over year. | ||
| From 1965 to 2023, you'll notice... | ||
| A bit of a change here in 2021. | ||
| This is immigration. | ||
| So none of this is a consequence of births and deaths. | ||
| This is a chart of immigration, essentially. | ||
| And you can see the Canadian population change year over year, goes up and down, hills and valleys, more or less sticking between 1% and 2% in value until 2021, in which case the immigration skyrockets. | ||
| I mean, it is literally straight up, like a straight vertical cliff face with a population change upwards of 3.5%, blowing the next highest peak out of the water. | ||
| By at least a percent and a half, meaning that the Canadian people are suffering under this massive influx. | ||
| The housing crisis is getting worse. | ||
| The job crisis and the fact – there are stories where some bar will open up a position for a bartender and get 6,000 – You know, requests for an interview, and most of them are Indian. | ||
| So Canada is being flooded. | ||
| Economically, they're being destroyed. | ||
| The population itself is being replaced, and demographically, there is a war going on against them. | ||
| Now is not the time to be soft about this. | ||
| There's the tweet from Alex Jones. | ||
| Been following this guy for years, and he's the real deal. | ||
| Canada desperately needs a lot more leaders like him, and so does the rest of the world. | ||
| I think Pierre should do an interview with Alex Jones. | ||
| I think the best possible thing to do would be for Pierre Polivier, or however you pronounce his French name, to do a live interview with Alex Jones, maybe even in studio, and discuss the problems that Canada is facing right now, and how Justin Trudeau has contributed to all of them, And how the World Economic Forum has bragged particularly | ||
| about Justin Trudeau's cabinet and the people they've put in. | ||
| The people, who I remind you, Canadian courts themselves have rebuked and have said violated | ||
| the basic human rights and violated the charter, which is the Canadian version of the Bill | ||
| of Rights. | ||
| They have been rebuked by their own court in violation of these in pursuit of a globalist | ||
| policy of total domination and human extermination. | ||
| I think Pierre should disarm Justin Trudeau's criticism by embracing Alex Jones's endorsement | ||
| and using Alex Jones as a spotlight, as an intention getter to tell the truth about what | ||
| Trudeau is doing. | ||
| All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| Final segment of the war room for today's broadcast. | ||
| I will be back here tomorrow and Thursday as well. | ||
| These guys are filling in for me on American Journal as Owen hosts the Alex Jones Show. | ||
| Of course, we're playing a little musical chairs, but we do what we got to do to keep | ||
| the information flowing. | ||
| The information must flow. | ||
| And I hope that you can support us in this mission by going to Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com is the engine that powers this machine. | ||
| You can be a part of this movement, this massively dangerous movement to the plans of the globalist. | ||
| It's probably the most effective thing you can do individually is support InfoWars, contribute to this fight, | ||
| war bonds, betting on the fate of humanity. | ||
| Infowarsstore.com is the best place to do it. | ||
| And supplements are incredible. They really are amazing. | ||
| Whether it's something like TurboForce that'll really wake you up and has a slow come down. | ||
| It's not like caffeine where you get all jittery and then you crash. | ||
| It's much smoother, much longer lasting, tastes delicious. | ||
| Can we put it in a smoothie or a cup of water? | ||
| Some people even put it in their coffee. | ||
| That's crazy, but you do you. | ||
| Do what you got to do. | ||
| It is powerful though, so be careful. | ||
| Turbo Force Plus is on sale at 40% off. | ||
| Or get Survival Shield X3, which ever since I've been taking it, I've basically slept an hour or two less a day. | ||
| It's literally given me an hour a day in my life, which is something you really can't pay for. | ||
| You can't buy time unless you go to Infowarsstore.com to get Survival Shield X3 and see what it can do for you. | ||
| Nascent Iodine, incredibly powerful, 40% off, and best of all, keeps us on the air and in the fight. | ||
| We have some more videos to go to here, but I want to talk about immigration in Ireland because two very interesting stories have come out of this whole thing. | ||
| Secret memo released the advice government tried to hide about deporting migrants. | ||
| A secret Department of Justice briefing paper in Ireland warned that the state urgently needed to resume deportations because most international asylum applicants were economic migrants. | ||
| Exactly the same thing as here in America and it's what we've been saying since the beginning. | ||
| These people are not asylum seekers. | ||
| They are not refugees. | ||
| They are scam artists. | ||
| They are con artists. They are lying to us. | ||
| They're taking advantage of what should be a beneficent | ||
| charitable act by the United States were being taken advantage of just like Ireland is being | ||
| Taken advantage of and of course, I don't I shouldn't have to tell you this | ||
| I certainly don't have to tell the people in charge of this. | ||
| They are perfectly aware of this. They're in cooperation with the criminals | ||
| okay, and the Illustration I always use the image | ||
| I always conjure is if you run a charity where you help to pay for cancer treatments for cancer patients | ||
| Would you keep giving out treatments when 90% of the people that were receiving or that would you keep giving out | ||
| payments if 90% of? | ||
| The people receiving payments didn't actually have cancer and we're just using you as a slush fund to pay for sports | ||
| cars Would you say, oh, by telling me to stop, you hate cancer patients? | ||
| If they're not cancer patients, they don't deserve your charity. | ||
| If they're not asylum seekers, they can't acclaim asylum. | ||
| If they're not refugees, you don't owe them crap. | ||
| Even if they are, you don't owe them crap. | ||
| But we like being charitable in the West. | ||
| It's one of our many vulnerabilities that get taken advantage of by unscrupulous scumbags. | ||
| But in this case, this is... | ||
| Beyond just people scamming the cancer charity, this is the cancer charity themselves working in concert with the scammers to defraud you of your money and send it to people who don't have cancer. | ||
| That's what's happening here. | ||
| So if you have a cancer charity, if you're running a charity like Ronald McDonald House, which provides housing for people whose children have chronic sicknesses and have to stay in hospitals, And these people can't afford to rent a hospital for four months while their child goes through chemo or whatever it is. | ||
| So if you're doing something like that, if you're giving somebody charity because they're extremely ill, and in fact, 90% of the people that your charitable money is going to don't actually have illness and aren't actually sick and aren't actually receiving treatment, then that's a fraud. | ||
| But if the cancer charity itself is collecting money from people saying, donate to us, we support... | ||
| You know, cancer patients, and then they're giving that money to people who don't have cancer by winking a nod and saying, hey, look, I know you don't have cancer. | ||
| Say that you do, though. | ||
| Just say the magic word. | ||
| Say, I have cancer and I need help, and then I can give you the money, even though we both know that you don't have cancer and don't deserve crap. | ||
| But I'll take a piece off the top. | ||
| You get the money. We sucker the people who think they're supporting a good cause, but really it's all going to scumbag con artist criminals. | ||
| That's what's happening here. The government of Ireland knows full well that the so-called asylum seekers that they are flooding their country with are not asylum seekers, do not deserve refugee status, and are economic migrants that are taking advantage of the goodwill of the Western cultures. | ||
| They know this. They're in cooperation with the scumbags. | ||
| They are complicit with the criminals and they are doing it on purpose. | ||
| Obviously, if you need to just get rid of the whole concept of asylum, just like if you found out this was happening, you just shut down the cancer charity. | ||
| You know what? It's being too much abused. | ||
| If it's being taken advantage of, it's got to go away now. | ||
| It has to go away now. So asylum was nice when we were a culture run by respectable people with morals. | ||
| We could do that sort of thing. But now we can't have nice things anymore because any vulnerability that we allow ourselves as an open, free, conscientious, and charitable society will be taken advantage of by bad actors. | ||
| So we can't have nice things. | ||
| We can't do nice things for one another. | ||
| That's you ruining it, not us. | ||
| But it has to end. It all has to end. | ||
| Absolutely, it has to end. | ||
| So it's been revealed now, and this was a secret memo that they didn't want people knowing about because it proves that they know that they are defrauding the Irish people, not just defrauding them out of money, defrauding them out of their own nation, depriving them of a homeland, committing an act of literal genocide by the definition of genocide in the Genocide Convention of the UN. They're doing it on purpose. | ||
| This is just another piece of evidence to contribute to this. | ||
| Oh, but we got more. Oh, but there's a little bit more, folks. | ||
| Oh, this story you will be interested in. | ||
| Antifa battered in Kulak. | ||
| This is a city in Ireland. | ||
| Where you had a protest against a refugee center in Dublin because that's the western world now is you've got the government importing in foreign military-aged men into your very neighborhood, placing them in a colony inside your neighborhood or municipality. | ||
| And it doesn't matter if people don't want them there. | ||
| It's not a democracy. This isn't a choice. | ||
| It's an attack. It's like appealing to the people that are bringing the battering ram to knock down your gate. | ||
| But I don't want you in here. | ||
| They know. They're perfectly aware. | ||
| They're doing it anyway. It's an attack against you. | ||
| So this is the way it works. | ||
| They know full well that the people they're bringing in are not asylum seekers. | ||
| They are invaders. They are military-aged economic migrants whose entire purpose is to destroy your country and replace your people. | ||
| They're being brought in. | ||
| And the people that live there have to, in many ways, many times, fruitlessly protest against their neighborhood being sold out from under them. | ||
| They're protesting, as it's our only option at this point. | ||
| They were confronted by leftist journalists and other Antifa types. | ||
| And one of the, or at least one of the Antifa figures, got a little bit roughed up and had his phone taken from him by the patriots in Ireland. | ||
| They were able to open the phone, and what they found was that The protesters reviewed the content of the phone to delete any invasive content that had been recorded. | ||
| On one phone, which seemed to belong to a mainstream journalist, it would appear to show concerning levels of cooperation between various media sources, NGO workers, and prominent Antifa operatives in both Ireland and the UK. One source explained... | ||
| And this appears to be corroborated by messages on the phone that the Antifa group had planned to oppose an anti-immigration protest in the city center. | ||
| They ultimately went to Kulak as they thought there would only be women and children there. | ||
| The videos of the phone content widely circulating on social media seem possibly to hold vast | ||
| quantity of insider info on the far left in Ireland. | ||
| The contents are certain to be studied in detail by nationalists already. | ||
| It seems the phone numbers of maybe a majority of prominent pro-plantation activists have | ||
| been revealed. | ||
| This embarrassing physical humiliation of the left, along with the trove of info revealed, | ||
| is the final nail in the coffin of street-level leftist organizing in the 26 counties. | ||
| The time of no passeran has passed. | ||
| So again, just to sum up what happened here. | ||
| You've got... I'd like to really picture this and take the last story that we just covered into account. | ||
| You've got the government of Ireland in total opposition to the will of the people, bringing in mass amounts of foreigners that are invading, that they know are not refugee seekers, refugees or asylum seekers, that are economic migrants, military-age men. | ||
| They're being put into communities. | ||
| When those communities protest, they are attacked and confronted by Antifa, black flag... | ||
| Communist agitators who are coordinating and corroborating with the mainstream media and political activists and politicians to shut down any legitimate protest against the destruction of the Irish people. | ||
| So there's more information about this at justicereport.news. | ||
| Phone dropped by battered Irish Antifa reveals journalist collusion. | ||
| If we had a country that cared about self-preservation, this country and Ireland would be rooting out these criminal networks with everything they've got and sending these people to jail. | ||
| You shouldn't purchase the products at infowarstore.com just because it keeps us on the air. | ||
| You should get these products because they are game changing. | ||
| Everybody knows our information is some of the most hardcore, accurate intel on the planet. | ||
| Our products are absolutely no different. | ||
| They are amazing. | ||
| They are the missing links people need. | ||
| And of all the deficiencies that are out there, one of the biggest problems on the planet is iodine deficiency. | ||
| Just look up iodine deficiency on Wikipedia. | ||
| More than 2 billion people the UN estimates have major cognitive disabilities because they haven't had iodine. | ||
| It is essential in all electrochemical activity in the body, but most iodine in plants or in meat is bound to other compounds or other elements. | ||
| So you don't get the full absorption. | ||
| Not with X3. It has all three of the healthy types of iodine in it. | ||
| The good halogens, the deep-earth crystal, pure nascent iodine, and then two other types the scientists tell us help with absorption. | ||
| X3 has been sold out for six months. | ||
| It's now back in stock for 40% off at infowarsstore.com and it funds the broadcast and everything else we do. | ||
| So I want to encourage you all to get your X3 for 40% off now at infowarsstore.com. | ||
| Takes about two weeks to kick in, but almost everybody has incredible results. | ||
| Separately, we have another great product, 10-Hour Clean Energy, TurboForce, available discounted at InfowarStore.com as well. | ||
| It's discounted as well, despite the fact we're about to sell out. | ||
| So whether it's X3, Next Level Iodine, or whether it's TurboForce, 10-Hour Clean Energy, they're both available discounted right now at InfowarStore.com. | ||
| It funds the broadcast and it's game changing. |
Export Selection