All Episodes
April 8, 2024 - War Room - Owen Shroyer
02:25:02
TOTAL ECLIPSE OF THE NEWS: Humanity Comes Together to Appreciate Inspiring Once-in-a-Lifetime Celestial Spectacle
Participants
Main voices
g
greg reese
07:00
h
harrison smith
01:45:10
Appearances
a
alex jones
01:57
c
chase geiser
01:30
d
donald j trump
02:49
Callers
william in arkansas
01:52
| Copy link to current segment Download episode

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
The silent majority is no longer silent.
This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer.
Please stand by for further details.
We return you now to your regularly scheduled program.
greg reese
In 2021, the commander of Israeli intelligence published a book on designing a special machine
that would resolve what he described as a human bottleneck for locating and approving
targets in war.
A recent investigation by Plus 972 Magazine and Local Call reveals that the Israeli army has developed an artificial intelligence-based program known as Lavender, which does exactly that.
According to six Israeli intelligence officers with first-hand experience, the Lavender AI machine determined who to kill and was obeyed with military discipline.
During the first weeks of the war, the Lavender system designated about 37,000 Palestinians as targets and directed airstrikes on their homes.
Despite knowing that the system makes errors about 10% of the time, there was no requirement to check the machine's data.
The Israeli army systematically attacked the targeted individuals at night in their homes while their whole family was present.
An automated system known as Where's Daddy was used to track the targeted individuals and carry out bombings when they entered their family's residences.
The obvious result was that thousands of women and children were wiped out by Israeli airstrikes.
According to these Israeli intelligence officers, the IDF bombed them in homes as a first option.
And on several occasions, entire families were murdered when the actual target was not inside.
In one instance, four buildings were destroyed along with everyone inside because a single target was in one of them.
When it came to targets marked as low level by the AI Lavender system, cheaper bombs were used, which destroyed entire buildings, killing mostly civilians and entire families.
This was done because the IDF did not want to waste expensive bombs on who they deemed as unimportant people.
It was decided that for every low-level Hamas operative that Lavender marked, it was permissible to kill up to 15 or 20 civilians.
And if the target was a senior Hamas official, more than 100 civilians was acceptable.
Most of these AI targets were never tracked before the war.
The Lavender software analyzed information collected on the 2.3 million residents of the Gaza Strip through a system of mass surveillance, assessed the likelihood of each person being a militant, and gave a rating from 1 to 100.
If the rating was high enough, then they were killed along with their entire family.
Lavender flagged individuals who had patterns similar to Hamas, including police, civil defense, relatives, and residents who had similar names and nicknames.
This sort of tracking system has existed in the U.S. for years.
unidentified
What I will be providing you and the fine gentleman of the Secret Service is a list Of every threat made about the president since February 3rd.
And a profile of every threat maker.
And these are, like, existing targets?
Exhibit A. Oakland resident Justin Pinsky posted on a message board, Romania has a storied history of executing their leaders, couldn't they do us a solid, and take out Bush?
How is this all possible?
Um, keyword selectors.
Attack, take out, Bush.
So think of it as a Google search, except instead of searching only what people make public, we're also looking at everything they don't.
So emails, chats, SMS, whatever.
Yeah, but which people?
The whole kingdom's not white.
greg reese
And while many people claim that Israel controls the US, Joe Biden said that Israel serves US interests.
unidentified
There's no apology to be made.
None. It is the best $3 billion investment we make.
Were there not an Israel, the United States of America would have to invent an Israel to protect her interests in the region.
The United States would have to go out and invent an Israel.
greg reese
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese.
harrison smith
That is the latest incredible Greg Reese report about the AI genocide taking place in Gaza.
AI deciding who to kill for Israel.
Remember, it's not proof.
It's a threat matrix. We've been over that extensively.
More Israel news coming up.
We'll be talking about the eclipse.
We'll be talking about all sorts of wonderful things on today's episode of The War Room.
Stay with us, folks. Infowars.com forward slash show.
Share that link now.
Good afternoon, ladies and gentlemen.
Welcome to The War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, coming to you live from the Infowars headquarters here in Austin, Texas.
Thanks so much for being here with us on this moon day.
It's moon day. It was the solar eclipse today.
And I'm telling you, I hope you got to see it.
I hope if you were in the path of totality, you got to see it.
And I hope if you weren't in the path of totality, you made your way there to see this thing.
It was, well, it was something else.
It was really incredible.
I don't know how else to describe it.
I mean, either you saw it and you understand my loss of words, or you didn't, and you don't.
It was something else.
Transformative event, I might say.
But that also means that I was looking up at the sky instead of doing my news gathering as I normally do.
So... We're scrambling.
We're scrambling to get things together, but of course there is just absolutely a ton of news.
We are going to talk a little bit about Israel as the fallout of their unprecedented attack against the Iranian consulate in Damascus is still making waves.
But we're also going to be talking about the introduction of anti-racism policies, destroying not just education, but health care as well.
We also have a big story out of Brazil today, which if you are A regular viewer, you'll know that Brazil very much went through the same thing that America went through.
By which I mean exactly the same thing.
By which I mean the same people doing exactly the same thing to get the same outcome.
A puppet president controlled by the international intelligence agency Deep State.
And used to destroy any and all dissent against that Deep State.
And now they're going after Elon Musk as the deep state here is.
So we'll visit a little bit of what's going on in Brazil with Elon Musk and this judge, this out-of-control judge they have down there who's attempting to claim that...
Let's just go ahead and get into that now.
Because we'll get into this and we'll get into how this has come about because of the interference in Brazil by the American deep state.
Here's the story. This is posted on X by Paolo Figueredo Filho.
I don't even know how to...
Just take a look at the screen, folks.
Just if you want to find this guy, look at the screen because I can't pronounce this.
Figueredo. That sounded Italian.
Justice Alexandra de Moraes published a decision of the Brazil Supreme Court stating that Elon Musk is part of an international criminal network, including the billionaire in an unconstitutional criminal probe, in which I'm under investigation as well, by the way, according to what the author says.
And even imposes fines and threats to X if they lift the censorship.
Understand we're dealing with an abject despot.
Here's the final page of Des Moores' decision.
Quote, the flagrant conduct of obstruction of Brazilian justice, incitement to crime,
public threat of disobedience to court orders, and future lack of cooperation by the platform
are facts that disrespect Brazil's sovereignty and reinforce the connection of the international
criminal instrumentalization of the activities of the former Twitter current X with the illegal
practices investigated by the various investigations previously mentioned and should be the object
of investigation by the federal police.
Given the above, I determine the inclusion of Elon Musk, owner and CEO of the social
network provider X in view of the position held as formally investigated for in theory
intentional criminal instrument instrumentalization of the social network provider X, formerly
Twitter in connection with the facts investigated.
Yeah, they're trying to...
I mean, they're claiming that Elon Musk is part of a criminal conspiracy to use Twitter to undermine the sovereignty of Brazil.
Obviously, this is...
Well, it would be a giant joke if it wasn't real.
If it wasn't real, it would be a huge, hilarious...
Ironic joke that X is now engaged in manipulation of democracy.
When in reality, that's what they're mad at.
They're mad that it used to be able to be used by those in power to maintain the status quo.
And now Elon Musk has actually opened it up to a more free speech platform.
And they're not happy about that.
They're really not. And so I want to touch now on this article that we covered not too long ago from Financial Times, which is one of the mouthpieces of The Globalist where they tell each other what's actually going on.
This article is called The Discreet U.S. Campaign to Defend Brazil's Election.
It says, as Brazil prepared to hold a presidential election last October, many governments around the world viewed the vote with a mounting sense of foreboding.
The far-right incumbent, Jair Bolsonaro, was openly flirting with subverting the country's democracy, just like Trump.
What did he actually do to subvert the democracy?
Absolutely nothing. He just holds positions that are contrary to the globalist plan.
So that's a crime in these people's minds.
Opposing them is a crime.
See, they're gods.
They see themselves as gods and opposing them is heresy.
And once you understand that that's the worldview of these people, everything becomes perfectly understandable.
That's why when they implement things, they act like you can't oppose it because it's It's like opposing God's will.
It's like opposing nature itself.
It's like when you see...
We've literally had conversations on the show where we had a caller call in and talk about Israel being aggressive in the surrounding areas.
And we were like, well, you know, this is eventually leading to Israel nuking Lebanon or Syria.
And the caller responds, God works in mysterious ways.
It's like, well, okay, but that's not God.
These are human beings making these decisions.
So human beings make the decisions, but they have the import of God.
They have the power of God.
So when they make decisions and when they make policy, if you oppose it, it's like you're opposing God.
So how dare you? That's how they think of themselves.
So again, back to this article.
They say that Jair Bolsonaro attacked the electoral process, claiming that the electronic voting machines used by Brazilian authorities were unreliable and calling for a paper ballot instead.
So, saying that the electronic voting machines used by Brazilian authorities were unreliable and calling for a paper ballot instead, in these people's fevered, psychotic minds is him attacking the electoral process.
Attacking the electoral process, right?
It's like if I say, hey, you know, the bank that I deposit my money in, you know, keeps the money in a back room with the window open.
That doesn't seem safe to me.
They're like, wow, you're attacking the banking system?
You're attacking money?
It's like, no, I want it more secure.
That's not attacking it.
It's actually the opposite of attacking it.
But again, everything is inverted.
Everything is a lie with these people, so it shouldn't be surprising.
He constantly hinted at the risk of election being stolen, echoing claims made by Donald Trump in the U.S. In other words, he saw the election being stolen in the U.S. and said, hey, that could happen here if we're not careful.
And in response, the CIA and the State Department and a variety of other deep state That's actually what happened and they admit it in this article.
In the end, Luiz Ignacio Lula de Silva's win in October was accepted without serious challenge by Bolsonaro, and the veteran left-wing politician was inaugurated on January 1st.
The fact that the election was not seriously challenged is a testament to the strength of Brazil's institutions.
But it's also a part of the result of a quiet, year-long pressure campaign by the U.S. government to urge the country's political and military leaders to respect and safeguard democracy, which has not been widely reported.
Right? Because it was secret.
secret because it was a coup that America pulled off in Brazil.
That's exactly what happened.
And again, we don't need to go through this article.
This is just setting the groundwork for the article you just saw on screen that the Brazilian
court is now claiming that Elon Musk is part of a criminal cabal, a criminal international
conspiracy to undermine democracy by giving people free speech.
This is the insane insanity that we're dealing with.
But it is real.
It is very real.
Again, we've been over this, so you can go back.
I think I was on the War Room last time we covered this.
Check the War Room archives, and you can see where we go through this article with a fine-tooth comb.
But suffice it to say, it was a directive by the Biden administration, go down and make sure Bolsonaro does not win.
And so that's what they did.
The State Department and the CIA sent people down to cooperate with their Brazilian equivalents to rig the election.
And once they did, they pulled off exactly the same thing that they did on January 6th, where they had a giant protest that broke into the municipal or the government building in Brazil.
And now they're arresting little old ladies who were just walking along with the crowd.
Grandmothers who never committed a crime in their lives are now facing decades in prison because they are insurrectionists.
Just literally exactly the same thing they did in America they are doing in Brazil.
They saw how well it worked here.
So they're doing it in Brazil because you can't have another leader, a Trumpian outsider like Jair Bolsonaro, in power in one of the most powerful countries in the entire southern hemisphere.
And so now we're seeing the fruits of that labor as you have this absolutely out of control.
And I saw somebody on X pointed out this judge, this Alexandra...
Alexandre whatever. Morez?
De Morez. He looks exactly like Alejandro Mayorkas.
It's like we got these creepy bald clones running the world from behind the scenes and destroying every western country.
I mean the dude looks like a straight up super villain.
It's Like Central Casting 101.
It's pretty wild, actually.
We can pull up a picture of this guy and show people what I'm talking about.
He looks like a straight-up supervillain.
And that's a nice way to put it.
Here's the article from Economic Times.
There he is. Isn't that a guy you trust with your democracy?
I mean, he looks like a specific supervillain.
I can't think of who it is.
He looks like a specific supervillain.
Is it Lex Luthor? Does he look like Lex Luthor?
He looks like somebody Superman would have beef with.
Let's just say that. Elon Musk slams Brazilian judge Alexandre de Moraes, calls for his resignation.
In a direct rebuke, Musk stated, coming shortly, X will publish everything demanded by Alexandre and how those requests violate Brazilian law.
This judge has brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the Constitution and the people of Brazil.
He should resign or be impeached.
Shame, shame, shame. Tesla chief and tech magnate Elon Musk on Sunday publicly criticized Brazilian judge Alexandre de Moraes.
And of course we saw his direct rebuke there.
That's not the only one.
I've got a couple more stories of this.
This one from Al Jazeera.
A Brazilian judge orders probe of Elon Musk amid ex-disinformation row.
A Brazilian judge has opened an investigation of Elon Musk for obstruction of justice after a tech mogul said he would defy a court order to remove ex-accounts accused of spreading, quote, disinformation.
In a decision on Sunday, Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Mores said the probe will examine whether Musk, who owns X, engaged in obstruction, criminal organization, and incitement.
Moraes said that X would face fines of $100,000 per day for each account reinstated in defiance of the court orders.
Social networks are not lands without laws, de Moraes wrote.
De Moraes' order came after Musk attacked the judge on X following an announcement by the platform that it had been ordered to block certain accounts.
So that's an important timeline note right there.
De Moraes' order, his order that they'll face fines and You know, to potentially be shut down in Brazil at least, came only after Musk attacked the judge on X. Following announcement by the platform that had been ordered to block certain accounts.
So Brazil, I'm telling you, who is that?
Is that Lex Luthor? I mean, the dude looks like Lex Luthor.
Only Lex Luthor, you know, achieved things in his life.
He wasn't just a government functionary.
It's not clear what accounts were blocked or when the court order was issued.
The judge has brazenly and repeatedly betrayed the constitution of the people of Brazil, Musk said.
So again, Brazil demands that X take down accounts.
X says, actually, all we do is comply with the laws of the land.
And if someone posts illegal material, then we'll remove it.
And possibly, you know, remove their accounts as well.
So they can't continue to release things like child material, child sex material, or, you know, revenge porn type stuff.
Like stuff that's actually illegal.
That would be illegal for you to distribute stuff.
In physical form, it's illegal to distribute.
In technical form, and Elon Musk has been very clear on his stance on that, where free speech abides by the laws of the country that they're in.
And when Brazil just arbitrarily demands that accounts be taken down, as used to just be
the regular function, like this used to just be the way things went, is if the government
reached out to Twitter or Facebook or Google and said, hey, take these accounts down, take
this information down, delete this article, then they just would.
And X just won't now.
They're saying, well, give us the official law that was broken.
Tell us what actual crime was committed and we'll comply.
If this is just an arbitrary demand in an unconstitutional fashion, where you just want
us to take things down because you think they're disinformation because they disagree with
you, then we're not going to do that.
And so in response to that, now the judge is putting tons of fines and trying to basically forcibly shut down X in Brazil.
So this is just outright tyranny, outright authoritarianism.
Musk said X would probably lose all revenue and have to shut down in Brazil, but that principles matter more than profit.
Musk also said that he would publish everything demanded and show how those requests violate Brazilian law, just like the requests in America broke American law, only before you had a complicit big tech industry that would go along with it even though it was breaking the law.
Because it was easier, and because they got money, and because they agree with the agenda being set forward by the deep state in the United States and the Brazilian government, because it's the same deep state.
Brazil's Solicitor General Jorge Messias, a member of President de Silva's leftist government, expressed support for the judge, saying in a post on X that, quote, we cannot live in a society in which billionaires domiciled abroad have control of social networks and put themselves in positions to violate the rule of law.
But of course, they're trying to violate the rule of law.
So translation, what he's saying is we cannot allow billionaires who live abroad to give our people free speech when we want to silence them.
Demores, one of 11 judges on Brazil's high court, is known as a polarizing figure in Latin America's largest country.
The judge has spearheaded efforts to combat, quote, disinformation and, quote, hate speech online, causing him to be viewed as a savior of democracy by many on the left and a menace to it by many on the right.
So in other words, he is a censorious, authoritarian criminal who the people that he works with and are on the same side of, they love that he's a criminal.
It's pretty simple.
It's not actually that complicated.
These people do not have what we would typically consider principles like free speech.
No, they have power.
That's all they believe in.
He has the power, so he's going to use it to help his side and silence his opposition.
So the opposition doesn't like that, and his side does.
Not that complicated. Since last year, he's overseen an investigation into former President Yair Bolsonaro over the allegations he had been planning a military coup before his defeat in the 2020 presidential election.
Again, as a 2022 presidential election, rather.
So as Yair Bolsonaro was the president of the country, he was apparently planning a coup on himself, planning on not winning the election.
So, of course, what that means is that this judge was working hand-in-hand with the American government in order to stop Yair Bolsonaro from becoming president.
Repeat president from maintaining his position as president of Brazil.
That's what that means. So when you combine this story with the story that we just covered from the Financial Times about the discreet campaign to save democracy in Brazil, in which you had representatives of the CIA and the American State Department go down and cooperate with people in Brazil, well, this was one of the guys they were cooperating with.
Musk met Bolsonaro in 2022 during a visit to Brazil to announce a plan to install his Starlink satellites over the Amazon rainforest to provide internet to schools and health facilities in remote areas.
During their meeting, Bolsonaro praised Musk as a legend of liberty and described his presence as something spiritual.
So again, this is not about saving democracy.
This is not about even free speech necessarily.
This is a information war taking place.
Over the entire world in various different countries in which those who are in the system and a part of the establishment and working to degrade and demolish national sovereignty in favor of a one-world government that's unelected and unopposed by the free speech of its constituents are at war with the people who actually believe in the things that made the Western world great.
Christianity, free speech, and all of the wonderful things enumerated in our Bill of Rights and Constitution.
So again, it's not really that complicated.
It is that evil.
It is that authoritarian.
It is that blatant, what they're trying to do.
In the exact same way, and we don't need to go through it every time, but you should just know by now what happened when Elon Musk brought free speech back to X here in America.
They went after Tesla in a variety of different ways.
They went after just everything.
They went after Starlink in a variety of different ways.
They stole billions of dollars from him, that judge in Delaware.
They are trying to destroy Elon Musk in whatever method they can find going through everything he's ever done, looking for something that they can claim is illegal in order to defeat his attempt to bring about and retain free speech in this country.
It's very simple. It is international.
It is blatant, corrupt, obvious.
And the actual death of democracy.
But they're going to do it under the claim that they're preserving democracy because most people are dumb enough to believe it.
Dumb enough to go along with it.
And dumb enough to actually comply with it.
And we've got some other stories that we can get into here.
Like this one. This was posted by Amuse on Twitter.
And it just goes along with the rest of what we're talking about.
The way that the Great Reset is the great collaboration.
And you've got industries and corporations working directly with the US government to break American law and violate the rights of the American people.
Thanks to investigative work done by Patrick Webb of the leading report, it has been revealed that the federal government has indirectly engaged in unlawful surveillance of American citizens through their employers.
This activity is facilitated by the Domestic Security Alliance Council, a collaborative initiative between the FBI's Office of Private Sector and the Department of Homeland Security's Office of Intelligence and Analysis.
The DSAC, Domestic Security Alliance Council, aims to foster effective communication and exchange of security and intelligence information between the federal government and private sector.
Participating companies are encouraged to monitor their employees and report those who oppose firearm restrictions, lockdowns, vaccine mandates, or support border security, branding them as potential domestic extremists.
These companies have access to a secretive portal where they can create profiles of such
employees given employers ability to freely review employee emails and web activities,
actions that would be unconstitutional if directly undertaken by the government.
This practice raises significant privacy and legal concerns and if not illegal, it should
be.
And of course it is. Of course it's illegal.
Of course you're not supposed to find ways to technically adhere to the law while violating its purpose and function and why it's even in place in the first place.
This is outsourcing of tyranny, outsourcing of corruption, where the federal government can't spy on your personal emails without and certainly can't use it to actually prosecute you in court without a court order.
And so, they're just asking that your employer do it for you.
Just like they asked the big tech companies to do it for them.
It's just violating the First Amendment.
It's just tyranny.
It's not complicated.
It's happening and it has to be stopped.
Alright, welcome back.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is The War Room.
And we're talking about the various ways.
By which the American government is gathering data that they're not allowed to gather for plans that they're not allowed to have to carry out tyrannical measures that are explicitly forbidden by the Constitution.
We live in a hijacked, thoroughly tyrannical system that is not just the government, but the government instead serves as almost an organizing body, Medium through which all of these other various organizations carry out their nefarious activities.
Said it a million times.
The Great Reset is the great collaboration.
A form of neo-fascism in which your rights are violated continuously by the government, but it's done through private organizations, institutions, and corporations.
So that they can say they're technically not violating the law.
Which again, I don't understand. And this doesn't make any sense.
This is as blatant as it can possibly get.
This censorship. And so the story from the Daily Mail was from March 7th of this year.
A little over a month ago, federal government created profiles on Americans, kept in a secret portal shared with 650 companies to track extremists who search MAGA, guns and Biden, say Republicans.
Federal officials investigating January 6th asked banks to filter through customer transactions.
An interface shared with over 650 companies and federal officials holds a secret portal containing sensitive data on American citizens.
Some of the indicators include the general search terms MAGA, gun, kill, shoot, capital, Kamala, and Biden.
And of course, this was the same hearing during the weaponization committee in which we heard that they had tagged people who'd done things like purchased Bibles or shopped at Bass Pro Shop.
And this apparently is enough to flag you as a domestic terrorist.
At the same time, they say we don't have enough resources to keep out 10 million Americans, non-Americans, 10 million illegal immigrants crossing over the border into America.
This is where they're spending their time investigating the American people for language that is completely undeniably legal.
It is absolutely within the bounds of the First Amendment to do any of the things that they're tracking.
Question the lockdowns, question the vaccines, question Israel.
Question the U.S. government.
Question Biden and Kamala.
Do you understand how blatant this is?
How this is the exact thing that the first man was written to stop from happening?
From having an American government with the incredible power that the American government has turning its eye towards the average American person and silencing them because they want to continue to do what they were doing.
I mean, this is As blatant as you can possibly get.
The surveillance was intended to track consumer purchases following January 6th.
As Jim Jordan says, if you've got the wrong political beliefs, while you're potentially a domestic violent extremist, Jordan added.
There's an entity we discovered called the Domestic Security Alliance, DSAC. And this is an entity where the FBI and Department of Homeland Security works with the 650 largest companies in the world.
And they work through this control access portal where they're sharing this secret.
What are they sharing in the secret portal?
Well, we're not really sure.
Well, now we have a better idea of it.
But transactions at sporting and recreational supply stores like Cabela's, Dick's Sporting Goods, and Bass Pro Shops were reviewed in order to detect customers who might be, quote, extremists.
You know, people that buy...
Bibles or believe in the Second Amendment as well as the first.
These are the threats to democracy that they are gearing up to take on in a very real way.
As of now, they're just laying the groundwork.
I think Lara Logan puts this really well when she says they're building a human terrain map of the people they do not want, just like Rommel did in North Africa.
A human terrain map.
I think that might be a good way of putting it.
They're trying to get as much information as they possibly can.
Feed into an AI supercomputer type of thing.
And what they'll get out of this information is a terrain map.
In other words, a preliminary survey of a battlefield.
And America is that battlefield.
And we are their enemies.
And so, just like you would send spy planes in World War II to identify where bunkers were, where guns were stationed, well, that's what they're doing here.
Only in this case, the dangerous things are you and me having rights.
So from Patrick Webb, the federal government has been illegally surveilling and building profiles for Americans in a secret portal called DSAC for those who oppose firearm restrictions, lockdown, and vaccine mandates, or support border security, and they're labeling them domestic extremists.
If you care about border security, you're a domestic extremist, apparently.
Meanwhile, the border is wide open, and God only knows how many foreign spies are making their way across with the full cooperation and participation of the American government.
And he actually has screenshots of this portal.
You can see the login to the DSAC portal on Patrick Webb's account.
The potential for shifts in various policies many DVEs may perceive to oppose or threaten their ideological goals and agendas or feed into existing narratives.
Many DVEs, I'm guessing that's domestic violent extremists, subscribe to and record the U.S. government's exercise of power, influence, and initiatives, possibly including firearm legislation, the easing of immigration restrictions, and new limits on the use of public land.
Again, it's your right as an American to oppose anything this government does.
This government is in a very real way, not in a flippant way, not in a way where they're just saying things off the cuff and using labels that sound extreme to express a point.
No, when they say DVEs, when they say domestic violent extremists, that's a legal appellate.
That's a legal claim.
That they can act on by labeling you that.
Again, it's not just a, you know, sometimes when leftists say, you know, these MAGA extremists or whatever, they're just saying it in a whatever, insulting way.
This is a legal application of this term.
This is an actual actionable function of the government when they label you this.
Some domestic violent extremists discontent with renewed measures to mitigate the spread of COVID-19, the ordered dissemination of COVID-19 vaccinations, and efficacy and or safety of COVID-19 vaccinations.
So again, folks, even though...
The science is out now, and it's not even remotely close to what they said it would be.
Not only did the vaccine do nothing to stop the spread, it definitely killed a bunch of people.
It definitely had massive extreme side effects that we are only now just coming to understand how extreme they were.
And the more you get the vaccine, the more likely you are to get the virus.
It's like a one-to-one relation between these things.
But if you question it, you are literally being labeled a violent domestic extremist.
Okay? We have to get a handle on this, folks.
Other things they note, as can be indicators of a lone actor, homegrown violent extremist, can include things like the purchase of books, including religious texts.
So purchasing certain religious texts will have you denoted as a domestic violent extremist, which would be violating another important aspect of the First Amendment, the freedom of religion.
So they now have the biggest companies in the world who both have initiatives that they're in, like the tent partnership, where they're Benefiting from and turning into slaves the massive influx of illegal immigrants while simultaneously working with the government to say your opposition to these types of programs makes you a violent domestic extremist, which means they have the right and indeed obligation to destroy you in whichever way possible.
So this is the neo-fascist corporate global order telling you their plans.
All right, welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith.
Reminding you to go to Infowarsstore.com.
Infowarsstore.com is the only way that we are able to be here on the air and bringing you this very important news that's going largely unreported by most.
And certainly the ultimate outcome of this is never fully reported on.
I mean, it really doesn't matter What organization that you get your news from, if they're not telling you where it eventually leads, they're just giving you the play-by-play of your own destruction.
We're trying to highlight for you where this is going, what all of these things are pointing towards, And how so many of the seemingly inexplicable actions of the people in charge are extremely explicable.
They're extremely explainable when you understand where they're attempting to take us.
And that is a one world government controlled by corporations, unaccountable, unquestionable,
and ruling forever.
It's really not that complicated.
It is that important.
And I hope that you can support us by going to InfoWarsStore.com today.
Get your Survival Shield X3.
It is back in stock and it's a massive 40% off.
Turbo Force Plus, also 40% off.
BOD Ease is 40% off.
And DNA Force Plus is 50% off.
Do your part today in fighting for free speech in this country and around the world.
And contribute to the most powerful media outlet in existence right now, I have to say.
As more and more people are waking up to the reality of our situation, looking for answers, and finding that it's really only Infowars that seems to be able to connect all the dots in an effective and Compelling way.
Infowarsstore.com Man, we have so many different stories to get to that all contributes to this concept.
Because you do, you have to wonder how it got to this point.
How, like just how, how are any of these things even remotely acceptable?
This being one of them that of course has been going on for years.
Minority contracting comes to medicine.
Hospitals are giving minority contractors a big leg up on everything from medical equipment to cancer screening.
When public hospitals purchase medical equipment or rely on outside doctors, they typically consider the price and quality of each vendor.
But in Tarrant County, Texas, they consider something else too, the race and gender of the vendor's owner.
Now just knowing nothing else about this should still give you a Like pit in your stomach.
The fact that healthcare has now been infiltrated by the DEI agenda, which it has for a long time, don't get me wrong, but we're reaching like critical mass of this stuff.
That when it comes to your, literally your life, a life and death issue, of sicknesses and cancer and healthcare in general, that those decisions are not being made strictly on the basis of merit.
They're not being made strictly on the basis of capability, but are actually taking Equity, racial equity into account.
And it should really terrify anybody.
And the more you get into it, the more terrifying it is.
Because one thing that you know these people do is conceal and obscure anything that contradicts their completely vapid and incorrect ideology.
So in other words, if they find out that after having implemented DEI policies and programs in the healthcare industry, they discover that in fact you get significantly worse outcomes, that the rate of death goes up, or the rate of obesity goes up, or whatever it is. If you find that having implemented racial equity in your healthcare system...
You get negative consequences.
Do you think they're gonna come out and say that?
Think they're gonna come out and say, gee, it looks like the more black doctors we have, the more people die, we better have less black doctors?
Or do you think that they're going to continue with this push no matter what and find some other way to blame the outcome of their own policies on white supremacy?
Yeah, I think we all know where this goes.
So Tarrant County's public hospital system, JPS Health, evaluates bids for contracts on a 100-point scale that gives more weight to, quote, diversity and inclusion, 15 points, than to the reputation of a vendor's goods and services, 10 points.
Remember, this is the same point system that they talked to me about when I went in to get monoclonal antibodies and they told me I couldn't get it because I was white.
I didn't have enough points.
I would have had more points if I was black or Hispanic.
But being white, you don't get points for being white.
You're a bad guy. So I didn't have enough points to qualify for medicine.
I didn't have enough points to qualify for potentially life-saving medicine because I wasn't the right race.
Really think about that.
These weights that they're using, it uses similar weights to select outside providers of cancer screening.
Price and quality receive 20 points each, according to the procurement request reviewed by the Washington Free Beacon, while diversity receives 15, enough to make up for major deficits in other areas.
Minority-owned firms earn the 15 points automatically, the criteria state.
Other firms are scored on their use of minority subcontractors, measured as a percentage of the total contract value they receive.
So again, in other words, you could have...
You could have a company, you could have one company that was completely solid, never had a bad review, never had a bad outcome with their treatments, and they would get, you know, 20 points.
Or maybe say, like, you know, they've got a couple problems.
They, you know, they get 15 out of the 20 points for quality of work.
You have another group that's never had success, have massive amounts of complaint.
They get zero points. Well, those two companies would be considered equal, equivalent to And, you know, have the same number of points as each other in this system that they're creating.
This is madness. This is utter and complete madness.
Think about what I just said. You would have a firm of white people who succeed in everything they're doing, are extremely successful, they're cheap, they're everything perfect.
You could have another group that...
Fails completely in any meritocratic reading who are not capable of providing the thing that they say they're providing.
And yet these two things will be scored equally because that second firm is run by a black woman.
That's how they're actually evaluating providers and vendors for medical treatment right now.
It's already happening. JPS is just the latest health provider to integrate race into its procurement policies, balancing the cost of life-saving services against the demographics of a firm providing them.
I mean, what is there to say?
I mean, this is madness. This is insane.
This is retarded. I guess I would ask people of minority background, would you rather have a white doctor that's good or a black doctor that'll kill you?
Which would you rather have?
We'll sort of flip the transgender thing on its head.
They say you can either have a living son or a dead daughter in order to compel people to seek transgender treatment for their kids.
What would you rather have?
Would you rather have a black doctor and be dead or a white doctor and live?
That's the question that we're having to ask.
Not that white doctors are inherently better than black doctors.
It's that their race probably shouldn't be a part of the grading rubric that you use to determine where to get healthcare.
And understand this is happening literally everywhere.
The legal system, the healthcare system, the education system, corporations in general, the financial systems where they choose to send investment.
It's all been not just infiltrated, but completely subverted and essentially overthrown by DEI. And once again, what they're setting up through this paradigm is if you have A negative episode with one of these companies.
They're gonna scream racism and say, oh, well, it's just because we're black-owned.
That's the only reason you're pointing out that we kill everybody that we interact with.
This isn't something that they will just undo when it is revealed what abysmal outcomes you receive with this type of justification for your actions.
They'll just continue to do it, and people will literally die as a consequence.
And it'll never stop.
It'll never stop. Like, it's bad enough when you have DEI and you've got your retirement money that you're going to rely on to live for the last 20 years of your life being gambled with a rubric of how diverse the company is rather than how much money it actually makes.
That's already beyond the pale.
But now they're applying it to, obviously, the air travel industry.
Which has made things extremely concerning.
More videos out this weekend of planes literally falling apart in midair.
And they're applying it to things like healthcare or the legal system where you've got incredibly unqualified people now serving as judges and prosecutors who only got their positions because of their race or ethnicity.
And it'll never end because they'll never admit that they were wrong.
greg reese
The National Guard is being deployed and the people are being advised to have two weeks of food and to fill their fuel tanks.
This could all be explained due to the fact that tens of thousands of visitors are expected along the path of totality.
But many people believe that they could be preparing for possible earthquakes Due to the Devil Comet aligning with the April 8th eclipse and due to the fact that in 1811, a comet also appeared in the skies during a solar eclipse on the same path and was followed by the biggest earthquakes in American history.
Known as the New Madrid Earthquakes, around 10,000 earthquakes occurred in just three months' time, the biggest being measured at 8.8 magnitude.
They were the most devastating series of earthquakes in recorded history.
But it was a different comet, and while some claim that a solar eclipse can trigger earthquakes, this scenario seems unlikely.
This eclipse season is, however, a very rare event.
The recent eclipses in August of 2017 and October of 2023, along with the upcoming one on April 8th, forms an Aleph and a Tav over the United States.
The Aleph and Tav are the first and last letters of the Hebrew alphabet, the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end.
These eclipses mark the end of the great year, a 26,000-year period that starts anew with the dawning of Aquarius and a new golden age.
Manly P. Hall wrote that high-level Masons designed America for a peculiar and particular purpose, a secret destiny to bring about a new Atlantis or a new world order, wherein a king descended of a divine race will rule over all.
In rituals, this king is symbolized as Apollo, Horus, or Nimrod, the father of Freemasonry, and is thought to be a descendant of the biblical Nephilim, or the Sumerian Anunnaki.
According to Thomas Horne, this will happen in 2025, which corresponds to several documents published by intelligence agencies, such as Global Governance 2025, Global Trends 2025.
And the 2025 Deagle forecast on world population.
NASA is notorious for performing Masonic rituals based on the Egyptian mystery schools.
Apollo being the same character as Horus, Sirius representing Isis, and Atlantis being the new golden age they hope to restore.
And during the eclipse on April 8th, NASA will fire three rockets named after Apep, the Egyptian serpent god, whose goal was to devour Ra, the sun.
And when the sun re-emerges after three minutes of darkness, it will be likened to the rebirth of Horus, their new king of the Golden Age.
CERN, known for practicing occult rituals at a statue of Shiva, the Hindu god who symbolizes death, destruction, and the end of an age, will be firing up their large Hadron Collider to full power during the solar eclipse.
And Israel, who is in the midst of committing genocide, is preparing to sacrifice a red heifer, a ritual sacrifice to prepare them for taking back the Temple Mount.
unidentified
Red heifers, to be precise.
Some Jews and Christians believe they're the key to rebuilding the historic Jewish temple in Jerusalem and to beckoning the Messiah.
To understand, you have to go back nearly 2,000 years when the ancient Romans destroyed the last temple in the city.
To rebuild it, these believers point to the Bible's Book of Numbers.
It commands the Israelites to sacrifice a red heifer without defect or blemish, and that has never been under a yoke.
Only then can the temple rise again.
Those sacred cows were showcased in Washington at a recent prayer gathering.
Many evangelicals believe these red heifers will usher Christ's second coming.
We need the Messiah to come, right?
So for me, the red heifer is red for the blood of Jesus Christ.
A massive altar already awaits.
harrison smith
Yeah, I just made up a thing, but that makes sense, right?
Completely, complete madness.
But that's what they're pursuing, folks, with everything they've got.
That video available on Infowars.com.
We'll be right back, folks. Don't go anywhere. All right.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
Bye.
This is The War Room.
I'm your host, Harrison Smith, sitting in for Owen Schroer today.
I'll be here behind the War Room desk until Thursday.
Big thanks to Kriston T. Harris for hosting American Journal this morning.
And Chase Geiser will be taking over until Thursday.
We have just a huge amount of news here still to get into.
In fact, before we move on to some other stories, just continue with what we were covering in the last hour, the news.
I don't even know how to describe it.
Just the complete destruction of the healthcare system in the name of racial equity.
Madness, but here we are.
Mass General Brigham puts anti-racism ahead of their patients' health.
Last Tuesday, Mass General Brigham announced it will stop reporting to child welfare officials suspected incidents of abuse or neglect solely because a fetus or newborn is exposed to drugs.
The Boston Health Network's new policy also requires written consent for any testing of any expectant woman or infant outside of emergency situations.
It also limits testing to circumstances where results will change the medical management of the pregnant person or infant.
So, just to reframe this or actually put this in context, you've got babies that are born having been introduced to drugs, having been exposed to drugs as a fetus.
In other words, the mother is doing hard drugs while pregnant.
And the baby is born with sort of telltale signs that that's the case.
And typically that would then necessitate a test.
You've got fetal alcohol syndrome, the term crack baby.
That's often used.
They'll be malformed.
They'll have problems.
And what they're saying is, yeah, from now on, we're not going to test babies that seem to show evidence of fetal exposure to hard drugs.
That might make you wonder why.
Not knowing how insane everything has become in this world, it would cause serious questions.
Why would you not test for that?
I mean, what's the harm in testing it?
You test it if it shows that The child was exposed to hard drugs.
Well, you know, you might have a case of abuse on your hands.
You might have a case of an incapable parent who perhaps can't be trusted to provide adequate care for their child.
And if it comes up that there was no exposure, then great.
Nothing happens. Why would you get rid of this?
Well, because of course, The racial percentage of babies exposed to hard drugs is racist.
It's racist.
I guess. I guess it's racist.
And this is the way that they justify everything that they're doing.
Got other stories.
They're getting rid of gifted and talented programs.
They're no longer publishing books.
Images of criminals on the news.
Why? Because, well, they're more likely to be non-white.
Now, while that would give you a more accurate perception of reality, it would fly in the face of the ideology that these people adhere to, which itself is in blatant contradiction to reality.
So they want to uphold their imaginary equality society, which doesn't exist.
But they're willing to actually let newborn babies come to harm to achieve this goal.
Doctors want and need to help without frightening patients away.
Generally, they should involve state child welfare authorities only as a last resort.
But grappling with this tension was not the motive behind the new health policy.
Instead, the changes were made in the name of social justice or, quote, health equity.
Health equity. Sarah Wakeman, MD, Mass General Brigham's Senior Medical Director for Substance Use Disorder, described the policy as the latest step in our efforts to address longstanding inequities in substance use disorder care.
A press release justifying the change noted that, quote, black pregnant people are more likely to be drug tested and to be reported to child welfare systems than white pregnant people.
A press release justifying the change noted black pregnant people are more likely to be drug tested and to be reported to child welfare systems than white pregnant people.
Now, if you were an alien, if you were untainted by bias of any human type, and you are presented with the fact that black women Are more likely to be drug tested and to be reported to child welfare systems than white people, the obvious conclusion you would come to is that black people do more drugs while pregnant and are doing things that have more reasons to report them to a child welfare system.
If instead you are so completely biased that you think that such a result is literally impossible, And that clearly this is the outcome of racism and you have to undo or fix this problem.
Well, you might be the head of this hospital because that's exactly what they're saying.
They say drug testing shouldn't be equally applied across groups.
It should be driven by the circumstances of each individual patient, which of course it is.
It absolutely is.
Nobody is, which is funny because literally, I mean, if you want to actually work off of the science, What you would see is that you should be testing more black people because more black people expose their children to hard drugs.
I mean, that makes sense to me, right?
You got 100 mothers, 50 white and 50 black, 20 of them in the black cohort.
Show signs of exposure to hard drugs and only 10 of the white people expose their children to drugs.
Then you would come out of that saying, okay, black people seem to be more likely to expose their children to hard drugs.
So any method that we're employing to stop children being exposed to hard drugs should probably focus more on the black community than the white community, since that's where the bigger problem is.
They're going with the exact opposite of that, even more than the opposite.
They're saying that that outcome has to be racism.
So therefore we will allow more black babies to be deformed and made handicapped by exposure to hard drugs as infants or even as fetuses.
Is this a positive move for the black community?
Is this going to have a positive outcome?
For the black community to have it more likely that your children are introduced to hard drugs and that that exposure goes unnoticed, untested, and untreated by the hospital.
This is insane.
If black babies are indeed exposed to drugs and health professionals detected, personnel can fast track
their mothers to treatment via vital and vital social support.
Should a woman refuse help and her unborn baby or newborn's health appears compromised, even if not
emergently, as the policy stipulates it must be, it may be time to report.
Mass General Brigham policy revision comes at a time when social justice is infecting medicine and public health.
During COVID-19, national experts argued for giving priority to minority patients in distributing the new vaccine, a plan that would have likely resulted in more deaths overall.
Brigham and Women's Hospital, as part of the Mass General Brigham System, is undertaking
a pilot in which admissions of patients with heart failure to specialty cardiac units is
partly based on race.
These clinical considerations flow from the politics of group identity, not from the best
interests of individual patients, which is the North Star of medical ethics.
Mass General Brigham has decided to conceal potentially valuable health information from
medical professionals in the name of social justice.
In doing so, it may end up disproportionately compromising the well-being of black women
and babies.
The success of the new policy should be judged on whether it improves health outcomes for
all, not because doctors drug-tested fewer black patients.
That's what you're going to get.
Essentially what you're going to get is, again, just the total inversion of reality.
You're going to have less black people tested, therefore less data, less, you know, the statistics are going to show that less black people's babies are introduced to hard drugs, when in reality, because they're not testing as many, and because they're, you know, not implementing any treatment methods, Programs or anything, you're actually going to have more.
So you're going to have more black babies affected by hard drugs when the stats are going to say that you actually have less.
And when all this gets implemented and when the inevitable outcome is bad health outcomes specifically for black people, well, they're just going to use that as an excuse to implement more policies of exactly the same variety.
So this is the feedback loop that they're in right now.
They assume racism where it doesn't exist.
They put policy forward to deal with the imaginary racism.
The imaginary racism is going to have bad outcomes for specifically the people it's supposed to help, which statistically is going to look like more racism.
And they're going to implement more bad policies to fight more imaginary racism.
You know, repeat ad nauseum until...
Nobody is even capable of understanding this because everybody in charge is a DEI hire who isn't qualified for the position that they're in in the first place.
As I've been particularly about race, there's this story just about the general health outcomes of public policy.
Addiction activists say they're, quote, reducing harm in Philly.
Locals say they're causing it.
Addicts have turned a minority neighborhood into an open-air drug market.
Residents blame the mostly white advocates for destroying their community.
You see what I'm saying? You see how this is exactly the process I just talked about?
That they go, hey, gee, it looks like more black people get arrested for drugs.
Let's stop arresting people from drugs.
Oh, oopsies, your entire black community is now an open-air drug den community.
Just living in complete misery and despondency and abject filth.
Whoopsies. For three years, Sonia Bingham, a 55-year-old mother of three, started every day the same way with a broom.
At dawn, she would come out to sweep away the damage from the previous night.
The syringes, the fentanyl baggies, the cigarette butts, and the half-eaten sandwiches.
And sometimes as she swept, she couldn't help but think that the city of Philadelphia would
have never let this fly during the crack epidemic.
They threw our black asses in jail, says Bingham, who's speaking to me in her living room where
there's a TV streaming the live feed of four security cameras placed throughout her property.
Now that the color of the addicts has changed, they're going to meet them where they are
in our community and allow them to destroy it.
So now you have the children, grandchildren, great-grandchildren watching how once again
our lives don't matter.
See, it's racism.
We had to stop arresting people because arresting people is racist.
And now that the people that we haven't arrested are destroying the neighborhoods that we don't
arrest them in, it's racism again.
I mean, it just works.
It's brilliant, honestly.
It's this deconstructionism that is really a win-win situation.
It is a win-win situation for the people that want this country utterly destroyed.
Her problem is not just with the hundreds of drug users camped out in Kensington, her neighborhood in Northeast Philly that's been dubbed Ground Zero for the city's opioid crisis.
It's with an ecosystem of activists that call themselves harm reductionists.
Those who advocate for harm reduction, a Biden-endorsed policy that prioritizes users' safety over their sobriety or abstinence, says they're helping to fix the problem.
But when I visited Kensington last month, Bingham and almost a dozen other residents told me that the activists are usually the ones causing the problems.
Yeah, duh. Yeah, duh.
No, they always are, though.
But that's the case everywhere, and they always are.
This is always the case, every single time.
Every single time. And yet, she says, you can't buy, use, and recover in the same neighborhood, Bingham says, echoing a line she first heard from one of her neighbors.
It's not a thing. And yet, she says, anyone who complains about the nonprofit workers and volunteers who hand out millions of free syringes a year in Kensington using public dollars is vilified.
We're being made to look like we don't care about people or we're racist, said Bingham, adding that she's been called a lot of names by local drug users including The N-Word and Uncle Tom.
Locals noted that many of the activists handing out sandwiches and needles in Kensington, which is a mostly minority neighborhood, are white.
A spokesman for the Prevention Point, the largest harm reduction nonprofit in Philadelphia, told the Free Press that 50% of their 12-person leadership team are BIPOC, by black, indigenous, or person of color, non-whites.
50% is non-whites.
And their 8-strong board has three members identifying as BIPOC. You know, whatever that means.
I mean... I don't know what it's going to take exactly to break through the programming, the racism programming that for decades has told black people nothing is their fault, everything is white people's fault, and told white people everything is your fault, you have to kill your own bloodline and hate your own people and dedicate your life to...
Harm reduction and pursuing policies that only make everything worse.
I don't know what it's going to take or how much it's going to take, but it's so obscenely obvious at this point what's going on and what's behind this and how this is being perpetuated that it's embarrassing that we even have to talk about it.
I mean, the black people in Chicago that are furious that immigrants are being moved in and taking over.
It's sort of a similar thing with that, right?
They'll go, well, these are the white people that are bringing in Mexicans to hurt black people.
It's like, how about everything liberals claim is a lie?
How about every policy they pursue has negative impacts for the very people that they claim they're helping?
This is not complicated.
We have other stories today of just getting rid of the gifted and talented program because there's too many white and Asian people in it.
I just wonder if the average black person in America, if you ask, hey, do you want your kid to be able to achieve scores to get into a gifted and talented program?
You think they'd be okay?
You think they'd want that? You think they'd want something to elevate the educational level of their children?
I would think so.
I would think they would like that sort of thing.
But no, you can't have that anymore.
Why? Because too many white people were in it.
I mean, there are black people in it too, obviously, right?
If black people qualify, then they qualify and they go into the program.
But if they don't, they don't.
And that's racist, apparently.
So now nobody gets it.
Now nobody can have it. And now the black people that did qualify no longer have anything to qualify for.
Seattle Public Schools shuts down gifted and talented program for being oversaturated with white and Asian students.
Even then, what does oversaturated even mean?
This is all nonsense.
It's all ridiculous. But it goes on, and it goes on, and it goes on, and it just doesn't stop.
In early March, Oregon became the first state in the nation to both decriminalize and then recriminalize hard drugs after voters realized the level of chaos they unleashed by making possession of small amounts of heroin and methamphetamine and cocaine a civil matter in November of 2020.
So Portland, as far as I can tell, is the only place so far that has rolled back some of the changes that it made.
I can't help but applaud them for noticing the Basic reality of cause and effect.
Congratulations, you guys. You have now exceeded your liberal compatriots around the world.
By simply undoing the law that made everything worse, you have now achieved something that is apparently impossible for most other people of your political bent to achieve.
basic recognition of cause and effect.
In San Francisco, which got behind harm reduction in full force,
briefly opening a city run triage center in 2022, the critics called an official safe injection site.
There's been a major reversal.
Democratic Mayor London Breed has come out swinging against the philosophy,
calling it a key driver of the city's skyrocketing overdose rate.
you Harm reduction, from my perspective, is not reducing harm.
Breed told the crowd before city hall in February, it's making things worse.
Yeah.
The real question is, how did you not know that was the case?
How did you not know? What did you think was going to happen?
Honestly, what did you think was going to happen?
What do they think is going to happen here?
What do they think is going to happen when you're making medical decisions off the basis of the people, of the race of the people providing it or receiving it?
Do you think you're going to get better health care?
What's going to happen when you're no longer punishing black kids for misbehaving?
Because more black kids get punished than white kids.
What do you think is going to happen when you tell the drug addicts that it's not illegal to do drugs in open air and they can just hang out on the elementary school steps shooting up heroin?
What did you think was going to happen?
Honestly. I want to know.
You never explained it when you implemented these things.
There was never a coherent plan as to how so-called harm reduction policies actually reduced harms.
They just used that phrase to justify policies which clearly and by any measure of basic logic would have negative impact on the thing they're trying to deal with.
So I don't even feel bad for this lady in wherever, Philadelphia.
Because she's fallen for everything just like everybody else is.
She's literally living through the reality and she can't identify it.
She thinks it's racism.
It's those racist white people who now, I mean, us white people, we're just so desperate to live in cities of filth and chaos.
Well, we love it, obviously, right?
All we want is to just not be able to go outside at night.
And it's not even about us.
It's about black people. We just love when black people live in filth and chaos, obviously.
And so first we tried to do it through the legal system by arresting all the black people for committing crimes.
And now we've changed up our nefarious tactics where we're not arresting people.
And that's actually the super secret white person situation.
Strategy to destroy the black community.
You figured it out, lady.
Well done. Do you get how absurd this is?
It's legitimately depressing because, again, you've got, whether it's immigration, drug, whatever, it's like for a moment you have this hope.
You have this flare-up of hope.
Where you go, look, look at all the black people in Chicago railing against illegal immigration.
Maybe this is it.
Maybe this is, you know, the big switcheroo.
Maybe this is when black people realize, as a community, that they've been fed lies for decades.
And that the leftists, maybe they do care about them.
But they're certainly not able to do anything positive for them.
And they're also literally replacing them just like they're replacing everybody in America with illegal immigrants who don't hold our values.
Get this flare-up of hope, only to have it dashed when it's like, no, they just are mad that reparations aren't the number one thing that they're concerned about.
And they still think it's racist to shut the border.
It's like, okay. So I don't know what it's going to take to break through this programming, to break through this racist paradigm where they just have to see everything as a consequence of white racism.
But until we get over with that, until we realize that white people are not just not bad, but really good, we'll just be stuck in this cycle.
Welcome back, ladies and gentlemen.
This is The War Room. I'm going to go ahead and open up the phone lines for your calls for the rest of this hour and the next.
If you want to call about the eclipse, we are going to continue covering some of that.
If you saw it, let us know.
And we'll show you the video of our viewing here.
We've got a lot of other videos to get to as well.
And I want to get to this story now because it's a doozy.
Let's not bring it up quite yet, because instead, let's first lay the groundwork here.
For a while now, there's been a game that's played by inner-city black youth called the Knockout Game, where they go up and randomly punch people in the face and try to knock them out.
Sometimes this kills people.
Sometimes it's just a simple assault.
But regardless, sometimes it's filmed for clout.
Sometimes it's just something to do on an afternoon.
And more and more people are being affected by this.
And more and more people are coming to understand what's even happening.
Because it's happening to such a degree that now social media influencers are getting punched in the face.
And they've arrested a few of the guys that are doing it.
And we'll get to where Salon is taking this story in just a second.
Here's a story from the New York Post.
Fringe political candidate who ran for New York City mayor accused of sucker-punching TikToker.
Man who allegedly sucker-punched a TikTok influencer in New York City is a perennial down-ballot political candidate who ran for mayor, governor, and city council in the last three years.
Skiboki Stora, 40 of East New York, was charged with assault Wednesday in connection with a random Monday attack on Haley Cate, the NYPD said, after the influencer told her 1.1 million followers about being punched in the face by a stranger as she walked the streets of Chelsea Monday.
The suspect was set to appear in a Manhattan court Wednesday morning for a previous arrest, court docket showed.
He's a frequent candidate for elected office and performing artists who performs rap music
under the name designer attitude. In a music video posted to his Facebook page,
Storra is seen punching the air while boasting of his wealth and status as comic book style
POW graphics jump onto the screen. Kate, the TikToker's viral video attracted,
garnered more than 41 million views as several other women took to the platform to share that
they too had been recently sucker punched in Manhattan.
Police did not say if Storra was a suspect in any of the other incidents. Kate posted a clip
on Tuesday in which she praised New York for giving me everything I'm grateful
for.
She said she believed the attack was an isolated incident.
Of course it wasn't. It is a trend.
It's a rash of incidents like this.
And you can see the images of the white women that are punched.
Now, one of the interesting things about this is Stora, the alleged attacker, who is in court for a different crime that he committed at a different period, as he is a repeat criminal.
He was actually running for city council in District 9 last year.
The person he lost to was Yousef Salam, one of the members of the Central Park Five, who along with four other black teens raped and beat a white woman almost to death.
So this is New York City, and they've had their convictions vacated or something, but in my opinion, and from my research, He is absolutely guilty, as are the other members of the Central Park Five.
There's really been no evidence showing that they weren't guilty of what they're guilty of and no evidence to show that their interrogations were forced or coerced or anything of the sort.
You can watch them all, and we've covered that extensively here.
But this is the state of American politics.
In New York City, In District 9, you can either vote for the guy who raped and nearly killed a white woman or the guy who walks around randomly punching white women in the face.
Leadership. Who do you want to be your city council member?
Pretty incredible. Second man arrested for randomly punching a New York City woman.
This happens a lot.
There's a lot of different people doing it. A second man was arrested and charged for allegedly punching one of several young NYC women who shared stories of random assaults in viral TikTok videos.
Malik Maya of Brooklyn is accused of approaching the 27-year-old Mikaela Toninato in Union
Square and punching her in the right eye Monday.
The 30-year-old was arrested in West Village Friday and charged with the assault.
His arrest comes two days after police arrested 40-year-old Skiboki Stora in connection with
a randomly assaulting young woman who was walking in New York City.
Several videos went viral on social media showing the woman describing being suddenly
hit by strangers on Manhattan sidewalk in recent weeks.
That includes Tony Anato's video, which has nearly 13 million views.
Out of nowhere, this man came up and hit me in the face.
I'm actually in shock right now, she recounted in the video with the black eye there.
Black eye. Black eye.
Given to her by a black guy.
Tony Anato said she was admitted to the emergency room and suffered a concussion, a black eye, and a chipped tooth.
How do you think an outlet like Salon is going to cover this?
Punching Nazis is a good thing and all white people are Nazis.
So we've already laid the groundwork for this and now we're just dealing with the inevitable consequence of our stochastic terrorism against white people.
That would be one honest way of discussing this.
But no, instead, here's the headline from Salon.
Brace yourself. Men punching random women in New York City.
A desperate last gasp of male rage fueling MAGA. That's right, folks.
It's MAGA. Yeah.
Downtown Manhattan. Obviously MAGA country, just like the Chicago streets at 2 a.m.
Men? Men are punching random women on the streets of New York City.
As usual, with these kinds of diffuse and chaotic stories, there's much that's unknown, including how often this is happening.
Yeah, most people don't even report it, so it is impossible to know how much this is happening.
And when they report it, they refuse to identify who it was.
That did this to them. We don't know how it's happening, how many people are involved, or whether it's all coordinated.
But what we do know is already alarming.
CNN reports that dozens of women have discussed being victims on social media and formally interviewed six of them.
NBC News reports there have been at least three arrests.
CBS News reports that NYPD released images last week of a fourth man wanted for allegedly punching a woman in Union Square.
Women report being assaulted by men of different races and ages.
Do they, though? But do they?
Are the women different races?
unidentified
Oh, they're all white.
harrison smith
Are any of the punchers white?
I wonder. Probably not.
If I had to guess.
Still across different stories, a couple of similarities pop out.
The alleged victims are mostly young and pretty, and most of them say they're minding their own business when they were attacked.
Some were on their phones or reading on tablets.
Others were speaking to friends or daydreaming.
Whatever they were doing, they were just living their lives.
And that, it seems, is what enraged their assailants.
Yeah, I know.
They were living their lives as pretty white women.
And that is an unconscionable thing to the extremists that you've radicalized through this type of article.
Yeah, I mean, mostly it's like, I don't know, jealousy, just hatred, envy, all the terrible things that these people suffer from and are being deliberately inculcated into their mindset.
52-year-old woman in Chicago is randomly punched in the face while walking down the street.
Police say this happened last Friday around 6 p.m.
This other woman posted a video saying she saw the attack.
She warns that what's happening in NYC is spreading.
It's happening all over the place.
Now again, they have no problem...
And again, it's just, I mean, this is so...
It's so bizarre, man.
I mean, this whole article, folks.
We'll have to get back into it.
We'll have to get back into this article.
They literally talk about Jordan Peterson here, as if Jordan Peterson...
Telling young men to clean their rooms are responsible for these random 40-year-old black guys punching young white women in the face for fun.
Now, they know they're going to get away with it.
They know they probably won't even be charged with it.
And they're doing it because this is what the media has told them is good and right to do.
Because white people are all racist, evil Nazis who are keeping them down.
and they can vent their frustrations on us at any moment.
I'm gonna give out the phone number on the other side and where you get back into this salon article
because yes, they really are blaming white MAGA supporters for punching women in the face.
unidentified
Thank you.
harrison smith
Alright, welcome back folks.
I don't know, I'm simultaneously massively entertained by this salon article.
And also just utterly infuriated.
Let me go ahead and give out the number now so we can gather phone calls to take.
And if we get enough of this segment, we'll go to them now or we'll go to them for the whole next hour here.
Give us a call. 1-877-789-2539.
1-877-789-2539.
Give us a call here on today's episode of The War Room.
So again, I don't know who this article is written for.
Who's falling for it?
What they're trying to achieve here?
And it's like, even by writing this article, they in a way undercut their own argument.
Because you'll see as we read through this, they're very capable of following the trajectory from the underlying sort of Bad ideas that fuel a movement and then the consequences of that.
But in their mind, this only exists in MAGA. I think you'll see what I mean.
Let's just read a couple excerpts from here.
Just pure, unadulterated absurdity.
So again, this story, in reality, is about the fact that black guys punch white women in the face in New York.
As a fun game to play and most of the time they completely get away with it.
And occasionally the women make a video about it where they refuse to identify by any description the person that did this to them.
Salon has taken this phenomenon and has said it is the last grasp of MAGA masculinity.
They say, whatever the excuse the angry man concocts, the impetus is always the same.
The eyes of a woman are directed at someone or something that is not him, and he is indignant over it.
Their theory here is that men see women looking at a phone, and they're so outraged that the woman isn't looking at them that they punch her.
Now, this is stupid.
This is nonsense. But that's what they're going with.
They say, This is another one of those...
Another one of those things where they have to assume some just absolutely, totally nonsensical reason for Republicans to say what we're saying.
Completely ignoring what is obviously true.
We've got Charlie Kirk or other people talking about the hormonal impacts of birth control.
And saying, hey, do women know about this?
Young women shouldn't be on this.
It completely changes your entire hormonal balance and has major negative effects that they don't tell you about.
Now, they can't actually contradict that.
They can't actually say anything that's wrong about that statement.
So instead, they come up with this idea that for some reason, Charlie Kirk and I, we have some Some completely insane desire.
We want to see women have babies before they're ready.
You know what we love is miserable women.
You know what we love is broken families.
That's what we really want. And we strategize how to get it.
This is retarded.
unidentified
You get that, right? You understand how stupid this is?
harrison smith
Tricking women into having babies before they're ready.
Yeah, that's our ultimate plan.
You got it. You nailed us.
I never even saw this.
Why is he burning Barbies?
Part of his movie review?
Great. Okay, so they go on.
The late 90s and early 2000s was another backlash period as the rise of Limp Bizkit, George W. Bush, and trucker caps eclipsed the relatively feminist mid-90s.
That's probably what, you know, if I had to guess what...
The guys punching women in the face in New York City, what they were listening to is probably Limp Bizkit.
The rise of MAGA, they say, is fueled by misogyny.
The rash of men punching women in New York City captures this moment in a dark way.
It's true that women aren't just suffering in silence, but telling their stories without shame or self-blame.
So, they're not afraid of Taking the actions of a few insane people and applying them to entire swaths of the human race.
Even when the people doing the thing are not even a part of the group that they're using the thing to blame on, right?
Okay, this is crazy.
Just on the face of it, this is utterly ridiculous.
Now, if you had a bunch of...
White frat dudes in MAGA hats punching women in the face.
Maybe you have a point.
Maybe. Instead, you have a bunch of black men punching young white women in the face.
Do you want to apply that paradigm to your critical reading of this situation, Salon?
Do you want to perhaps replace the word MAGA with Black Lives Matter?
And understand, because you clearly are capable of understanding how sort of stochastic terrorism, the underlying mindset compelling these movements can lead to outcomes like this.
You understand that. You just are desperate to, yeah, here they are.
I'm sure these are the guys punching women in the face, right?
It's just infuriating. Yeah, it's Limp Bizkit.
It's Jordan Peterson talking about lobsters.
That's why men are punching women in the face in New York City.
I mean, I get it.
I get their whole thing is to find whatever angle they can to demonize White people and men and Trump supporters and the people not doing the crazy crimes that they're actually writing about.
I get why they're doing this.
I don't get how anybody falls for it.
And it must be relieving, I think.
It must be relieving for these people to have something else to blame this on.
Because you see the rash of these stories and you think, geez, a bunch of old black guys punching young white women in the face.
This looks bad.
This looks good. This contradicts everything I've been led to believe and everything I've been saying and everything that our government has been saying about white men being the most dangerous people in the world and et cetera, et cetera.
It must be very upsetting and uncomfortable to have reality so blatantly contradict your belief system.
And it must be relieving to have Salon or somebody come out and say, don't worry, we'll just demonize men about this.
Don't worry, if you're looking for a way to twist this and manipulate and distort it to fit our incredibly off-kilter, off-center, and totally wrong belief system, don't worry, Salon's there to provide you the ammo to do so.
I think maybe we'll end this hour before we go out to phone calls.
I'll have to play that in the next one.
It's a little bit too long. It's a little bit too long.
I have a good video I want to show you, though.
We'll go out to a phone call or two here while we can.
Bart and George, I want to talk about women getting punched in the face.
Bart, you're on the air. We have about a little over a minute left in this segment.
unidentified
The floor is yours. Well, first of all, I don't condone violence against women, but I believe militant feminism is causing anger between men and women because look how men get treated in the child support system.
A man gets to see his kids twice a month.
harrison smith
Well, I mean, this is it, right?
I mean, it doesn't matter if it's race or gender.
All of it's coming from the left, and it is seeking to divide us by any means necessary or by whatever immutable aspect they can use as a lever to cause division.
unidentified
Yeah, and the final thing I have to say, I got a plug for X3 and X2. That stuff is dynamized by it now.
harrison smith
100%. I've been saying for a while, I started taking X3 again, and it's literally like I got an hour or two every single day that I didn't have before.
I just have to sleep less.
I'm just not as tired.
It's not like it wakes you up like a caffeine shot.
It just makes me not tired in the afternoon.
It's incredible. It's like life-changing stuff.
So yes, thank you very much for that call, Bart.
We'll go to some other calls on the other side.
Go to Infowarsstore.com to support us.
Get Survival Shield X3. See what it can do for you.
Buy a bottle of X3. It's like buying an extra hour in your day.
That's the effect it's had on me personally.
See what it can do for you.
And give us a call. Lines still open on today's episode of The War Room.
1-877-789-2539.
1-877-789-2539.
Lines open for your call.
We're going to show a quick video of...
Chase Geiser took interviewing people about the eclipse on the other side.
So stay tuned for that. And we'll be back very shortly.
We'll probably come in with a Limp Bizkit song.
That's a good idea. I think the crew should jump right on that.
unidentified
Stay with us. How are y'all doing?
chase geiser
We're documenting the event today.
Do you mind if we just ask you a couple questions?
What's up? Cool. What's your name?
unidentified
Where are you from? My name is Steve, and I'm from Fred, Texas, but I live in Austin.
chase geiser
Awesome. I'm Chase. I'm from Austin, Texas.
Is this your first eclipse that you've ever seen?
unidentified
Were you born here? No, no.
Can you tell? This is not my first eclipse.
chase geiser
How many eclipses have you seen?
I don't know, like maybe five.
What is it about on that is so interesting to you?
unidentified
They're not really that interesting to me.
chase geiser
So why'd you come out for this one?
unidentified
To take pictures of people taking pictures of the eclipse.
chase geiser
Well, if you ever want to take my picture, just let me know.
unidentified
Alright.
So, part of the reason why we raised our hand is that we love being interviewed.
So, I'm a Cancer Sun, Leo rising, and I'm a Capricorn Moon.
He's a- go ahead. I don't know what- I'm a Leo.
You're a Leo? Yeah, he's a Leo Sun.
I'm a Leo Moon. I'm a Leo Moon and an Aquarius.
Wow, okay. Rising.
Yeah. No, you're Aquarius Sun.
Oh, Aquarius Sun. Yeah.
Awesome. Yeah. Awesome.
chase geiser
How are y'all doing? We're here.
We're just documenting the event.
Do you mind if we say hey? Of course.
unidentified
We're the best people to talk to.
chase geiser
We're fun. So I'm Chase.
unidentified
Where are you from? What's your name? I'm from Seattle, Washington.
This is my sister, Tracy.
She's from, where are you from?
I live in Vancouver, Washington.
Oregon, Portland.
chase geiser
So you guys flew all the way here just to see this?
unidentified
I flew all the way here this morning, took Spirit Airlines, left Seattle at 9 o'clock last night, spent four hours in Las Vegas this morning, and then on to Texas.
chase geiser
So what do you think of all these clouds?
unidentified
Ah, you know what? Looks just like home.
Well, the thing is, so I'm a teacher, so I've been on, like, a solo road trip.
So I flew to El Paso and I drove all the way here.
This is like my end point of my trip.
But the reason why we spent all this money and time to come here is because we saw the eclipse in 2017.
I got my 2017 glasses here.
So we know what a good eclipse looks like.
So we're just going to be imagining what we saw in 2017 in the sky, okay?
Yeah, and we would be really disappointed right now, but we just kind of think it's funny and comical.
Yeah. Because, you know, we've seen it before.
So if it doesn't happen today, we can go to Spain in 2027 and watch it.
chase geiser
So what do you think about all the conspiracy theories about end times, things like that?
unidentified
Oh, that's just hogwash.
Hogwash? Yeah. I mean, is that what people are saying?
Yeah, I've never heard of it. I thought that was happening in 2012.
No, I mean, there's a total solar...
If it's the end, Austin, great place to be, right?
Let's go down together!
chase geiser
Thank you, guys. Appreciate you.
unidentified
Band.video. Yeah, B-A-N-N-E-D. Awesome.
chase geiser
They're going to be in for a pleasant surprise.
Is this your first eclipse?
It is. Are you excited about it?
Yeah. What made you decide to come check it out?
unidentified
Just that I've never seen it before.
chase geiser
Do you believe any of the conspiracy theories or that it's a sign of the end of the world or anything like that?
Nope. So, are you disappointed that it's cloudy or do you think that the clouds are going to part ways and we're going to be able to see it?
unidentified
I am disappointed that it's cloudy, but it wasn't cloudy like a minute ago, so hopefully it will be less cloudy in a
bit.
I'm William. I'm from Florida, Gainesville, Florida.
chase geiser
Did you fly all the way here from Gainesville to see it?
I did. Is this your first eclipse experience?
unidentified
No, I saw the 2017 eclipse in Charleston.
chase geiser
Are you an astronomy enthusiast?
Moderately. Do you have a telescope at home or anything like that that you use?
unidentified
I have a telescope at home and I have my solar binoculars with me.
chase geiser
Wow, solar binoculars.
That's going to be awesome. Do you believe any conspiracy theories about the end of the world or anything like that?
Not really. Everything's going to be okay?
I think so. Do you think the clouds are going to part in time for us to be able to see it?
unidentified
It would be nice if they did.
chase geiser
Absolutely. You made a long trip, so hopefully they do for you.
unidentified
I appreciate it. Well, I've already seen part of it through the binoculars, so even if I don't see any more, I've at least seen some of it.
chase geiser
When's the next one supposed to happen like this?
unidentified
In the continental U.S., I think in 20 years, 2044, 2045, something like that.
chase geiser
So you're going to go to the next one? If I'm around.
Thank you so much. Appreciate it.
william in arkansas
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now.
harrison smith
It really was a magical experience.
We'll come in with video of my family watching it on the other side.
Hopefully you all got to watch it as well.
Your phone calls coming up next.
Don't go anywhere. So that was the experience of my family seeing it.
I got great footage here, you can see.
Just stunning visuals of the ring.
It was hard to capture on a phone.
Very hard to capture on a phone, but it was incredible.
It was something else. Man, I hope you got to experience it like I did.
We're going to go out to your phone calls here in this third hour of The War Room.
Infowars.com, band.video.
And I'm glad because some of our callers have called in about the story we were just covering, but others have called in about the story I wanted to cover next.
So we'll go to Laura in Tennessee in just a moment.
But first, let's go to the people who want to talk about women getting punched in the face.
This latest expression of male dominance in this MAGA culture war.
Okay, let's go to Daniel in Indiana.
I'm sorry. Let's go to Justin in Kentucky.
Sorry, Daniel. We'll go to you in just a second.
Justin, go ahead. Yeah, hi.
unidentified
So I want to start this conversation off with this quick verse.
It says here in Psalms 28, it says, a lawless nation will have many bad leaders.
I'm going to go ahead and jump to this screenshot I took.
In the year 2023, America had 1,026,700 abortions.
And what we're seeing in our streets with the lawlessness is, you know, we as a people, We have sinned.
We have fallen away from God as a nation.
And that might not be true for you as an individual.
That might not be true for me as an individual.
But as a nation, we have all fallen.
And we're getting the due punishment.
You know, we have bad leaders, just like God said here.
We have bad leaders and our bad leaders are allowing crime to take place.
And I believe we're just getting what, you know, like I said, maybe not you and me as a people, but like as a nation, we're getting what, you know, our actions deserve as a nation.
harrison smith
Yeah. I don't, definitely don't disagree with you.
And I'm actually going to, it's funny you brought up abortions.
That is the topic I'm going to go to next.
But yeah, no, I totally agree.
There is very little true leadership in this country and those that achieve the status of Leader are often put in that position specifically because they are not leading people in a good direction.
I mean, it's pretty obvious, but that's the way that it goes.
That's the way that this world is right now.
Thank you for that call, Justin. Let's go to Scott in California now on Line 9.
Go ahead, Scott. You're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, how you doing, man? You guys are all doing a great job.
I want to plug the Great Awakening book.
I got a signed copy, and I also bought a copy for my leftist, soon-to-be father-in-law.
Hopefully, he'll read it. X2. It's awesome, and I also got a bottle of the bodies, which has helped my shoulders.
I want to bring something up, though.
I was married, and about 25 years ago, I got put through the family court system, and when I obtained my divorce from my My wife, the attorney that I retained did some work for me for my divorce, and he also handled my child support and visitation.
Well, lo and behold, a few years later, that same attorney represented my ex-wife for child support.
Clearly a conflict. I wrote letters to the bar, everything, and they did absolutely nothing about it.
So I got jacked around.
I was labeled a deadbeat dad in the whole nine yards.
And I was just kind of wondering why that was happening, because it just didn't make sense to me.
It didn't make any sense.
But now taking, you know, 20 years down the road and seeing what's going on with the depopulation and all that, it actually makes sense.
Because in the process of that, you know, I got a vasectomy.
I'm not having kids anymore.
And I think that's pretty much a regular thing if you ask a lot of guys.
And I've actually been asking a lot of guys that have been through divorces and stuff, going through child support and all that.
I ask them straight up, are you going to have another kid?
They're like, hell no. Pardon my language.
Right. So... Then you multiply it and you look into the agenda that they're putting on for child support and the trans pushing and all that stuff in the schools, it's clearly a depopulation scheme.
So I just wanted to let everybody know that that kind of thing is going on and I truly understand it.
And then also, as far as women getting punched in the face, I don't condone any violence towards women, but You know, for them to label like, oh, mega extremists, it's clearly not that.
And it's unfortunate.
It's really unfortunate. And probably some of these influencers probably deserve it.
I'm just saying. I don't know about that.
harrison smith
I don't think anybody deserves to get punched in the face when they're not bothering anybody.
So I disavow that.
I disavow it. But, yeah, you know, obviously it's, I mean...
It's inevitable. It's obvious.
It's what we talk about here all the time.
It is literally the people that are...
I don't even know how to explain it.
But it's like the world's just being surrendered over to evil.
That's just what's happening right now.
And... It's just going to be division, however they can cause it, however they can destroy anybody, right?
If you talk about the two genders, male and female, which...
You know, side stands up against oppression and which side is genetically disposed to not stand up to oppression.
Well, men are the ones who stand up to oppression and men are the gender being destroyed.
Women are being destroyed too, don't get me wrong, obviously, but they're being destroyed in a different way and for different ends.
It's their life-giving abilities that are being demonized and destroyed.
But when you look at these various groups that are all being demonized, it's the complete inversion of reality every single time.
Thank you for that call, Scott.
Let's go to Laura in Tennessee, because Laura, you want to talk about the abortion issue.
And I'll go ahead and start off with this story from Politico.
Trump says abortion is up to the states, declines to endorse national limit.
Former President Donald Trump on Monday said abortion should be left to the states in the former post-Roe era, declining to endorse any national limit on the procedure.
This has caused a lot of outrage on the right who feel like abortion should be something that we have a very firm and in many ways extreme stance on.
I'm sort of torn on this.
Laura in Tennessee, what's your input?
unidentified
Well, I had an abortion in 72.
And I actually saw the baby I aborted.
I was 20 weeks long.
And my thought was, I murdered this child.
And it affected me because I was one of the first, probably, you know, coming out of feminism, you know, out of the 60s and stuff.
But I changed my stance on that.
Now, I understand him leaving it to the States.
Because you might have an issue of a woman's life.
And if you have just one strong view on abortion, that there should be none at all, you know, to me it should be the woman's life.
Now, I'm pro-choice, but I believe you make your choice before you hop in that bed.
And Betty, if you don't want to pay child support, then you better abstain.
Same with the girl. You don't want a baby?
Abstain. You know, the only way, the only way that you're not going to have a baby is keep your legs closed.
harrison smith
It really is that simple, isn't it, Laura?
You've solved the problem.
unidentified
If they would only obey, you know.
I've got children and great-grandchildren, so somebody didn't listen to me.
harrison smith
No, that's...
Yeah, and look, so what you...
I mean... What do you think about Trump's sort of soft stance on abortion?
Because I've seen posts from people like Mike Pence saying this is a disgrace.
We should have a hard line on this.
This should be a main pillar of our platform.
And what do you think about that?
Because I... I tend to agree with Trump on this, and really I see it like I deplore abortion, but I also see how when you look at what the left champions, abortion is one of the only topics that they even have a leg to stand on because they can sit there and go, look, the Republicans are trying to take your rights away.
You have rights. They're trying to take them away, and we won't let them.
And it's a very compelling argument for women.
I get it. For a lot of women, obviously not all, but that's a very compelling argument.
And I see the political roadblocks to, like, getting rid of abortion as being really difficult to overcome.
So, I mean, what's your take?
Is this something that Republicans should, you know, make a pillar of their platform?
Or is this something that, by supporting it, is politically, you know, stops us from getting the power that we could then use to get rid of abortion?
Just what's your take on Trump's sort of softening of the stance on abortion?
unidentified
Well, I'm kind of with him on it.
You know, God gave us all a choice.
We have to make the choices.
I would prefer to have a firm stand, but then what happens when, I mean, if you've been raped and it's been such a violent rape, some women might have a hard time going through with that.
You know, be carrying something that you would consider so vile in your body.
You know, you wouldn't look on it as a baby.
You'd just look on it as a, you know, like poison in your system.
Yeah. You know, nobody knows the mindset but God.
Yeah. And I just think...
Yeah, I would go with him.
Leave it to the states. Then you could have, you know, doctors.
Now, I would say no late-term abortion.
I would only say abortion like possibly traumatic rapes, maybe life in the balance, you know, someone's life in the balance.
Those would be the only two things.
harrison smith
Plus, those are such small percentages of what, you know, the vast number.
I mean, it's like, I don't even know what the percentage is.
It's definitely less than 1% of abortions are because of rape.
So it's like, okay, if we could get rid of 99 plus percent of abortions by just allowing them for rape and only rape, is that not a deal you'd be willing to make?
Because right now, You're never going to get the deal if you have a hardline stance.
So if you want to actually stop abortion, then maybe we got to make some deals with the other side, as abhorrent as that is.
But I really appreciate your call, Laura, and I want to go to another caller here who's called in about this.
But just to clarify what I'm saying here, I just understand the political reality
of the world that we're in and how the Democrats use abortion as, again,
one of the only things that they actually have a leg to stand on.
I mean, they can't stand on the economy, obviously.
They can't stand on crime.
They can't stand on trade or just anything, really.
I mean, everything gets worse under them, except you could get more abortion.
So that's what they run with.
And to me, I almost see it like, like, you know, obviously,
like if you want to get rid of abortion, you gotta get elected.
If you wanna get elected, saying that, you know, you have to carry a rapist's baby
is not gonna get you elected.
So you're never going to get elected in order to stop abortion by being the anti-abortion candidate.
I almost see it like... If you're commanding an army, and your country's being invaded, and there's a shrine, a really important, religiously significant shrine, and a lot of people who adhere to your religion are like, we have to protect this shrine.
But you're looking at the strategic map in front of you, and you go, okay, if I dedicate troops to the shrine,
then we're gonna lose the whole country and the shrine with it.
But if we can let the people sort of mess with the shrine a little bit,
but dedicate all of our forces to the actual invasion, then we can stop the invasion, we can win the war,
and in doing that, we'll save the shrine.
But if you focus all of your, do you see what I'm saying?
Like if you dedicate all of your troops to the shrine, then the rest of your country is gonna get overrun
and you're gonna lose the shrine in the end of the day.
So if we wanna protect abortion, we can't dedicate all of our troops to abortion
because that's how you lose the overall war.
And when you lose the war, you lose the debate over abortion.
I don't know. I don't know if that makes any sense that way that I'm putting it.
But it's like, if my goal is to stop abortion, sort of ironically, I think that making that a pillar of the Republican Party is counterproductive to the overall reducing of abortions.
As much as that might sound counterintuitive, I do think it's true.
And I want to hear y'all's input on this.
Ben in Ohio called in about abortion as well.
And we'll show you the video that Trump put out as well, or I can give you more comments from that video.
But go ahead, Ben in Ohio.
unidentified
You're on the air. Harrison, how's it going?
Good, thanks. Well, look, I ran into a totally different point of view that I hadn't even thought of with an abolitionist point of view.
And I know you were just talking about how that...
Putting that up in front is probably not the right thing to do because it's not going to get anybody in place.
But it's an interesting point of view.
Abolitionists Rising is where I found it on YouTube.
And it's very interesting.
People that stand out on the street with big signs of, you know, drawn, aborted fetuses that are, like, scientifically drawn.
You know, it's not just an arty-farky thing, but...
They have conversations with people about how abortion is murder and the only forgiveness is found is through Jesus Christ.
Right. I don't know.
It's a very difficult topic.
Because you have all these people who have already done it.
A lot of them really feel like it's not a problem.
Hell, I live with one. But nonetheless, I don't know.
It truly is in my heart.
I've always known it to be absolutely wrong.
And murder truly fits the bill.
You know, we have to stand up for those who cannot speak for themselves, the richest among us.
And they are all truly our neighbors.
So it's a, you know, it's...
It's a hard topic, brother.
harrison smith
Yeah. Yeah, and I think, you know, as our last caller was pointing out, I mean, the way it is now is late-term abortion is one way to describe it, but I mean, they're talking about abortion up to the moment of birth or even after the birth, so it's like they're so far down the line.
It's like, I would be willing to compromise.
I'd be going, look, Can we both come to the table and say it's not okay that babies that are being born are aborted?
Can we come together on that?
Can we agree on that as a first step?
And then maybe cut the abortions back by half?
Would that not be a positive development in all of this?
And again, I point to things where bills will be presented.
by Republicans that are like, explicitly, like the whole point of the bill is like,
we want to get rid of any exceptions for rape and incest.
And it's like, okay, first of all, this is never gonna pass.
So all of this is doing, the only thing this is doing is giving the left ammunition.
If I was a leftist, I would want the Republicans to put forward bills,
specifically whose entire point of the bill is, if you get raped, you have to have the rapist baby.
Or if you're 11 and get raped, you have to have the baby.
And it's like, you're not, it's never gonna pass.
You're not actually stopping any abortions with this bill because it's never going to pass.
So you're not actually achieving anything positive in the development of the abortion topic, but you are giving massive ammo to the pro-abortion people who are pushing so far now they want post-birth abortions, a.k.a.
just literally murdering a baby.
It really is...
Sick how far it's gone.
And I think if you take that as a position, there's not a lot of reasonable people who will disagree with you that by the time a baby is literally viable, they could be born, but instead they get aborted.
No reasonable person will be like, yes, you should be able to carry a baby for eight and a half months and then abort it.
That's sick. That's sickening.
That's disgusting. That's horrific and wrong.
And I don't know anybody except for the most extreme abortionists who, pro-abortion person, Who takes that position.
But they're getting it.
They're getting what they want.
So again, I think if you could just...
If we could find some way to actually decrease abortions by having some sort of compromise, I'd be happier with that than taking a hardline stance that precludes you from making any positive developments against abortion at all.
That's my... Very firmly pro-life stance.
I want to actually see legislation that actually has a tangible difference in the number and type of abortions that are carried out.
And I think that by taking a hard-lined, unreasonable stance, like even if you are raped by a family member, you have to have the baby.
I just don't think that's viable at all politically.
And that's just me.
And I know it's like sick because it is murder.
And I can see how people would be outraged where it's like, so you're going to let some babies be murdered?
And it's like, no, I want to decrease the overall number.
And I'm trying to find the best way to do that because that is my ultimate goal.
And again, I think the extremism is not helpful in achieving that.
We'll go to the first few minutes of Trump's statement on this, and we'll take phone calls on the other side.
But here is Trump's statement on abortion that he released very recently.
donald j trump
Under my leadership, the Republican Party will always support the creation of strong, thriving and healthy American families.
We want to make it easier for mothers and families to have babies, not harder.
That includes supporting the availability of fertility treatments like IVF in every
state in America.
Like the overwhelming majority of Americans, including the vast majority of Republicans,
conservatives, Christians, and pro-life Americans, I strongly support the availability of IVF
for couples who are trying to have a precious baby.
What could be more beautiful or better than that?
Today, I'm pleased that the Alabama legislature has acted very quickly and passed legislation
that preserves the availability of IVF in Alabama.
They really did a great and fast job.
The Republican Party should always be on the side of the miracle of life and the side of mothers, fathers, their beautiful babies, and that's what we are.
IVF is an important part of that, and our great Republican Party will always be with you in your quest for the ultimate joy in life.
Many people have asked me what my position is on abortion and abortion rights, especially since I was proudly the person responsible for the ending of something that all legal scholars both sides wanted and, in fact, demanded be ended.
Roe v. Wade.
They wanted it ended.
It must be remembered that the Democrats are the radical ones on this position because they support abortion up to and even beyond the ninth month.
The concept of having an abortion in the later months and even execution after birth, and that's exactly what it is.
The baby is born.
The baby is executed after birth.
is unacceptable and almost everyone agrees with that.
My view is now that we have abortion where everybody wanted it from a legal standpoint, the states will determine by vote or legislation or perhaps both and whatever they decide must be the law of the land.
In this case, The law of the state.
Many states will be different.
Many will have a different number of weeks or some will have more conservative than others and that's what they will be.
At the end of the day, this is all about the will of the people.
You must follow your heart or in many cases your religion or your faith.
Do what's right for your family and do what's right for yourself.
Do what's right for your children.
Do what's right for our country and vote.
So important to vote.
At the end of the day, it's all about will of the people.
That's where we are right now and that's what we want.
harrison smith
So that's Trump's statement on abortion that's causing all this uproar.
We'll be right back with more of your calls.
Alright, welcome back folks. We go directly out to your phone calls once again.
Got a lot of people calling in about the eclipse.
We'll go to Daniel first.
Daniel in Indiana, thanks for calling in.
You say the eclipse? Pretty incredible.
It really was.
Harrison! Yeah, what's up Daniel?
I didn't expect to have the sort of emotional reaction I did.
It really is something...
How was your experience, Daniel?
unidentified
It really was. It really was incredible.
To be honest, it was the first one I'd ever seen.
And I got to enjoy it with my fiancé at home, so that was pretty awesome.
But yeah, it was something spectacular, that's for sure.
harrison smith
Yeah. I mean, when that ring appears, it's pretty mind-blowing.
Mind-blowing stuff.
Anything else, Daniel?
Any other observations?
Nothing's happened. So far, there's been no cyber attack.
There's been no earthquakes. Did we avoid a catastrophe?
unidentified
Yeah, I think we might have.
I'm calling from central Indiana, Muncie, Indiana.
And other than everyone just kind of getting excited for it, it kind of was, you know, a come and pass type of event.
But hey, real quick, before I go, I just wanted to give a shout out to some of your products.
The X2 Shield is incredible.
The hair and beard formula is awesome.
And TurboForce, incredible.
And one last thing.
You guys do an incredible job, man.
You're an inspiration, and seriously, I listen every day.
So please just keep it up.
harrison smith
Well, thank you very much, and thank you for the call.
And I'm glad you got to see this once-in-a-generation event.
Really, it was something special, man.
Let's go to Father Larry in Colorado.
He's made the very astute observation.
The world has not, in fact, ended.
Thanks for letting us know, Father Larry.
unidentified
You're on the air. Yes, I want to acknowledge and let people know that the fear of porn was for nothing.
There you go. As it always is.
And I do have a couple other comments I'd like to make, if that's at all possible.
Please. The first one is about the fighting.
Rather, I should say, the black men punching white women in the face.
I'd like to start a...
But a comment, maybe it would be seen as a conspiracy, I don't know.
I just simply would not doubt at all if our wonderful, wonderful government isn't just simply paying them some amount per punch.
You know, we see all sorts of things going on, and I just want to introduce that possible theory.
Yes, it might be a conspiracy theory, but I want to introduce it.
harrison smith
Well, it's not out of the realm of possibility, considering the fact that Governments have paid tens of millions of dollars.
Governments of cities have paid tens of millions of dollars to Black Lives Matter protesters who burned the country down.
So, you know, it's not a crazy thought that you punch a white woman in the face, you get arrested, you sue the city for roughing you up during the arrest, and you're given a check for a million dollars from the city.
I mean, that's not out of the realm of possibility.
That's how far we've fallen, Larry.
unidentified
Well, the other thing I'd like to bring up, and it's about the abortion issue.
As you introduced me, I'm Father Larry.
I call myself a conservative Anglican priest.
And this is something that's very important to me, given my understanding of when life starts, as well as when you receive your soul.
And that is at conception, folks.
So, yes, I personally will call it murder.
In any event, I feel bad for a woman if she's raped.
But what has that child done to deserve to be murdered?
In any event, in the case of rape, I would advocate the individual receive Extreme counseling, no matter if they're going to keep the child or abort it.
But again, what has that child done to deserve being murdered?
harrison smith
I agree. No, I completely agree.
And I don't want people to get the wrong impression because we were talking about rape victims getting abortions earlier.
And I totally agree with you, to be clear.
I do think it's murder. I don't think that the baby did anything to deserve being murdered just because their father was a criminal or something like that.
So I totally agree with you.
My stance on it is, right now, abortion is so out of control.
And I can just imagine, if I somehow got a meeting with the man behind the curtain, And he offered me a deal that said, alright, we can either have things continue as they are now, or we can get rid of 99% of abortions as long as you let us keep the incest and rape abortions.
I would make that deal.
That's what I'm going to...
Not that that's right, but that...
It's a much better option than what we have now, which is more or less abortion on demand at any point up to and even after birth.
So again, I do think that just because if you're born from the product of rape, that doesn't mean you're not a human and don't have a soul and deserve to be murdered.
I think that's horrific and wrong.
But at the same time, I think it's such a vanishingly small portion of abortions that if I were to be able to make that deal, I would make that deal.
What do you think about that, Father Larry?
unidentified
Well, I... You know, there's a part of me that, you know, that the individual, if they're raped, that there should be considerations made.
But again, in any event, that individual, if it is a severe situation of rape, that they are going to need...
Counseling, a psychologist, a psychiatrist, whatever one would want to call it, they're going to need that kind of help.
And offer the option of complete mental health care during the whole process and give that human being the opportunity to live.
I've talked to way too many individuals, myself personally, that were the product of a botched abortion and they were absolutely happy that their mother was not I'm able to abort them and had the opportunity to live.
harrison smith
Let's put it that way. I think you would find that would be the case with anybody.
I don't think anybody is going to go, oh, I'm the product of rape.
I should have been killed.
Nobody believes that.
Nobody wants to be killed.
The babies don't want to be killed.
It doesn't matter how they were created or under what conditions.
I do think everybody has a right to life.
I just see a difference between what I... Personally and morally and ethically think is right and wrong and what I think is feasible politically in this country.
And those things are sometimes at odds.
But at the same time, I would rather do something that makes a positive difference than lose it all by sticking to...
Too close to the ideal rather than the reality.
But I thank you very much for the call.
That was a very good call.
Thank you, Father Larry. I hope you call in again.
I do want to get to one more caller. Lucifer's Bain in California.
We have about a minute, and you say you have the solution for the abortion issue.
Go ahead, Lucifer's Bain.
unidentified
You're on the air. Hey, hey, thanks.
Yeah, I just wanted to...
harrison smith
Can you hear me okay? I can hear you all right.
We've got one minute left. All right.
unidentified
I just wanted to point out that You know, the main issue, I think, is when everybody is forced to pay for somebody else's abortion.
So people, you know, I think if someone wants to get an abortion, perhaps they should have to pay for it themselves.
harrison smith
That would be another very good start, is just not having Planned Parenthood, not having government-provided abortions for all and sundry.
unidentified
And maybe people would be willing to pay for other people who don't want to go through a birth because they were raped.
I'm sure maybe that could be something that people would be willing to have taken out of their taxes for.
But I think if people were forced to pay themselves, they might reconsider, consider it more...
And the consequences of them putting money to have an abortion.
harrison smith
That'd be a good start. I do think, I think there's a lot of, we could make positive developments.
I don't think it's healthy that both sides are so extreme.
All right, welcome back, folks.
Final segment of The War Room for today's broadcast.
I'll be back here tomorrow at 3 p.m.
uh... chase guys there will be sitting in for me on american journal let's go back out to
your phone calls over before we do
this article i think is extremely well done and and
sort of reflects my view perfectly it's from
frank pavone Thank you for watching!
Pavone, I'm not sure how to pronounce his name, but Frank Pavone, he is the National Director of Priests for Life.
He's a pro-life leader in this country.
He says President Trump's statement on abortion policy paves the way for a culture of life in a divided nation.
And as I was using the sort of metaphor illustration of where to dedicate troops in a war, He reflects on the founding of this country and the Constitution.
So what he says is this, President Trump's announcement today on Truth Social calls to
mind the drafting of the US Constitution at a time when slavery was still legal.
The founders understood they could not get the Constitution ratified if it contained
an absolute anti-slavery position.
They needed it to get the nation started.
But with the Constitution they did adopt, they put in place the very mechanism by which
slavery was in fact ultimately abolished.
We're at that same moment now.
President Trump is taking a similar stance to the one taken by the founders.
They had to start a nation, and we have to save a nation by winning the election.
Right now we have a nation divided on abortion, but by saving the nation itself from destruction by the Democrats, by saving the Constitution, free and fair elections, freedom of speech and religion, and by stopping the extremism of the Democrats on abortion, we will in fact preserve the very mechanism by which we can continue to build a culture of life.
He says, I thank the president for his statement, but I don't expect him to do my job.
I expect him to do his.
My job and the job of pro-life movement is to lay out the moral absolute of the right of life, which does not admit of compromise.
No abortion can ever be justified.
So I think that's the exact right way to put it.
We do have a moral absolutism when it comes to abortion.
But in the political realm, such an absolutism is in many ways a guarantee that you'll never have the authority or power to preserve the system by which you can achieve the demands of your moral stance.
So I completely agree with that, and I think that was a very well-done article that's on the Gateway Pundit by Frank Pavone.
With that, we go out to your phone calls once again.
Let's go straight down the line here.
Keep your comments as quickly as possible, if you will.
William in Arkansas has called in about a squatter in the White House.
Go ahead, William. You're on the air. Yeah, what's your problem with squatters?
william in arkansas
They've been there for 200-plus years.
Windsor Castle, man.
How long have they been squatting there?
We've got a gentleman running for the pity-pat party with Mr.
Kennedy. You know, he wants reparations for some and preparation aids for others.
You know, so what do we say?
Abortion issue? As a nurse and a technician in surgery, I've literally held a zygote in my hand.
And on the way to the Petri dish, it broke.
And I realized, right, that life begins at conception.
I've done almost 100 organ procurements, organ harvest.
I've held a nine-month-old heart in my hands.
That's the youngest. We don't talk about the sanctity of life.
We talk about my rights, my rights, my rights, not my responsibility.
The first woman called said, close your legs, or...
Put on a condom, use birth control.
We're using abortion clinics as birth control.
It's a sick situation, right?
They were never meant to be birth control institutions, especially for the public to pay for.
We're pretty morally lost as far as I'm concerned.
I still believe in compulsory service.
Nobody's ever given me a strong argument of why one man's going to protect another man's family or way of life.
There's millions of people in this country I never would have agreed with.
I've never met them. I wouldn't like them.
But I've served them one way or the other.
But they won't serve back.
That understanding of e pluribus unum from many form one, it's down the toilet, right?
Who's to blame? I don't know.
You know, we're looking at, you know, Orange man, bad.
White man, bad. I want to know the difference between Archibonics, Okibonics, and Ebonics, and I'll give you an example.
We've got Uncle Tom.
All right, well, I guess we're going to have to go for the white man, Uncle Maga.
unidentified
Yes, sir, boss man.
william in arkansas
Well, wait a minute, that's the other side.
unidentified
But for Uncle Maga, Mr.
Chappelle, I just want to tell you, sir, what can I call you, Dave?
Oh, put down the whip, sir.
Put down the whip. I didn't mean it.
But I want to tell you that them's the prettiest, smartest babies I ever did see, and they got the most natural blue eyes, just like their mama.
harrison smith
I think you lost me somewhere, William.
But I like it.
I don't know what it is, but I like it.
Thanks for that call, William.
I mean, it's so crazy things people believe.
It's madness.
I mean, it's like, if you've ever had a baby, how you can possibly support abortion is beyond me.
I mean, when the baby is in the belly, it still has a personality.
It's the same personality it has.
Once it's born.
It's the same personality. It's the same baby.
I don't understand how you can think that because it's in a belly, it's not a person.
It is, obviously. I think this is Bizarre that we even have to have this argument.
But they have people believing that boys or girls and men can get pregnant.
So I guess we have to change our tactics a little bit.
Thanks for that call. Let's go to Nathaniel in Rhode Island.
He says, today is a biblical new year.
What does that mean? Thanks for calling in.
Nathaniel, you're on the air. Yes.
unidentified
Thank you so much, Harrison.
And I really appreciate the InfoWars network.
So basically, I want the InfoWarriors to check this out because...
This is the beginning of the new year.
If you look in the Bible, in the book of Exodus, and it's connected to Passover, right?
Because Passover will be on, what, April 22nd this year?
Okay. Okay, so if you guys just do a study, this is the beginning right now of the new year.
So happy new year to everybody.
harrison smith
Happy New Year. So it's the New Year in the term of like the Jewish calendar, or what does that mean?
unidentified
Well, God told, I think Moses, if you look in the book of Exodus, he said something about basically the first new moon.
So basically, it's connected to Passover.
It's a lunar calendar. Yeah, the lunar calendar.
So if we go backwards from Passover, so Passover will be April 22nd, and it's connected to the new year, the first month of the new year.
harrison smith
Interesting. Interesting. Passover is the 22nd.
Well, that comports with the timeline that they're planning on sacrificing the red heifer at the end of April, in the last week of April.
So that would make sense in a lot of ways.
Thank you for that call, Nathaniel.
Let's go to Max in Wisconsin now.
He's next on the list here. No NASA feed of the eclipse.
Interesting. Go ahead, Max. You're on the air.
unidentified
Hey, Harrison. Can you hear me okay?
Yes, sir. Yeah, there was like a NASA sheet, like, facing the moon and the sun.
And I always think it's interesting when I see these eclipses happen, that there's never the other way around of it facing Earth, seeing the shadow of the moon going across.
You'd think with all the money, you know, we'd be able to see that.
And, you know, the Chinese, they don't have a man in the moon.
It's a rabbit on the moon surface.
It looks like a rabbit kind of to them.
And it's like a rabbit hole symbol of the rabbit going into the hole of the sun, the tunnel of light.
harrison smith
Interesting. There was, you know, Owen Schroer just posted this, posted a video of an eclipse captured from a plane.
That's pretty...
Pretty amazing, and you can really see the shadow passing across the Earth.
So I don't know why NASA can't get their act together to capture this, but it certainly can be captured, and we'll go ahead and play this video here on my show.
On my computer, if we can go to it.
But you can actually see, so this is from a plane, you can very well see the shadow passing over as the moon eclipses the sun and then is revealed once again.
So I imagine that's a time lapse, but that video, pretty famous, but yeah, Owen posted that.
A little bit earlier. Pretty amazing stuff.
Thank you for the call. Quickly, we'll go to Kevin in Minnesota.
We have a minute left in the program, Kevin.
30 seconds. You're on the air.
unidentified
Hi, Harrison. Love you.
Long time listener. I love all you guys.
Thanks, Rob. Screen. I just wanted to say, I haven't heard the words blue collar, white collar.
I'm kind of pitching this.
As an avenue to talk about, because, you know, I'm pretty sure seeing how the world's so concerned about what our colors are, our ethnicity, whether you're white or blue, I'm pretty sure I've seen most of the colors.
In white collar and blue collar.
What do you think, Eric?
harrison smith
You know, that's interesting because it's kind of a way of turning the typical communist paradigm on its head because right now the blue collar workers are being crushed by the sort of communistic leadership of the elite.
And I think it's interesting because, you know, part of me wants to reject it because it's like, well, that's what communists do, the whole, like, you know, class warfare thing.
But at the same time, maybe, you know, our class should be unified against the elite.
alex jones
You shouldn't purchase the products at Infowarsstore.com just because it keeps us on the air.
You should get these products because they are game-changing.
Everybody knows our information is some of the most hardcore, accurate intel on the planet.
Our products are absolutely no different.
They are amazing.
They are the missing links people need.
And of all the deficiencies that are out there, one of the biggest problems on the planet is iodine deficiency.
Just look up iodine deficiency on Wikipedia.
More than two billion people the UN estimates have major cognitive disabilities because they haven't had iodine.
It is essential in all electrochemical activity in the body, but most iodine in plants or in meat is bound to other compounds or other elements.
So you don't get the full absorption.
Not with X3. It has all three of the healthy types of iodine in it.
The good halogens, the deep earth crystal, pure nascent iodine, and then two other types the scientists tell us help with absorption.
X3 has been sold out for six months.
It's now back in stock for 40% off at infowarsstore.com and it funds the broadcast and everything else we do.
So I want to encourage you all to get your X3 for 40% off now at infowarsstore.com.
Takes about two weeks to kick in, but almost everybody has incredible results.
Separately, we have another great product, 10-Hour Clean Energy Turbo Force, available discounted at InfowarStore.com as well.
It's discounted as well, despite the fact we're about to sell out.
So whether it's X3, Next Level Iodine, or whether it's Turbo Force, 10-Hour Clean Energy, they're both available, discounted right now at InfowarStore.com.
It funds the broadcast, and it's game-changing.
Export Selection