Participants
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
| This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer. | ||
| Please stand by for further details. | ||
| We return to you now to your regularly scheduled program. | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, it is Tuesday, March 19th. | ||
| Can you believe that? March 19th. | ||
| That shocked me the other day. | ||
| I was scheduling some things and it said March 19th on my account. | ||
| March 19th what holy smokes so time is flying here in 2024 | ||
| This is the InfoWars War Room, your election headquarters, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| And we are some, I've lost my counter on the screen here, I believe 235 days, I think it is, 235 days till the presidential election. | ||
| We'll get that number updated for you once we get it updated on my screen. | ||
| But time is flying. | ||
| Now, I've got huge political news today. | ||
| 231. 231 days till the presidential election. | ||
| So we went from, oh, there is no deep state, to now... | ||
| The American left, specifically the New York Times, is bragging about the deep state and how great it is. | ||
| Now, why might they be doing that today? | ||
| Probably because you have multiple new political prisoners of the Biden administration. | ||
| Specifically, one of the top Trump advisors, Peter Navarro, being hauled away to prison for a four-month sentence for contempt of Congress. | ||
| Hunter Biden didn't get that treatment. | ||
| Peter Navarro did. And then you have others being charged, like a popular conservative social media influencer, Isabella DeLuca. | ||
| So now... | ||
| Oh, and also a Michigan lawyer, Stephanie Lambert, arrested, talking about election theft. | ||
| So you've got blatant political persecution of American conservatives, Trump supporters, Republicans. | ||
| And the deep state and the political persecution couldn't be more obvious. | ||
| So now the New York Times just says, you know what? | ||
| The deep state's here and it's awesome. | ||
| Because it's us. | ||
| And we're going after our political opposition. | ||
| And we got a judge on the Supreme Court that thinks the First Amendment is in her way. | ||
| So that means we got to get rid of it. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The deep state is awesome. | |
| Stunning stuff. Now we're going to revisit that massive free speech issue. | ||
| And we're going to play now the audio from the oral arguments from Katenji Brown-Jackson, Samuel Alito, and give a live response to it here. | ||
| We've also got some news from the Trump campaign. | ||
| They are trying to steal his assets. | ||
| Yes, steal. It's blatant theft, what they're trying to do to him. | ||
| So we got all of that and more. | ||
| We got big news dealing with the southern border, the back and forth between Texas and the Supreme Court. | ||
| And honestly, the whole thing is so confusing. | ||
| It's hard to even keep track of it. | ||
| But they say that, oh my gosh, it's controversial that Texas might be able to secure the border. | ||
| This is what they're saying. | ||
| They say it's controversial that Texas might be able to stop illegal immigrants from coming into the country and, God forbid, arrest criminals. | ||
| They say that's controversial. | ||
| And, my God, the Supreme Court might allow it. | ||
| You can't have that. | ||
| We'll talk more about this diversity issue. | ||
| What do you think is more important? | ||
| Diversity or efficiency? | ||
| Equity or safety? | ||
| Inclusion or success? | ||
| Hmm. Oh, and the American left doesn't believe that you have a Second Amendment right, but somehow they believe an illegal immigrant does in a latest judge ruling. | ||
| I actually don't disagree. | ||
| We hold these things to be self-evident. | ||
| I do believe illegal immigrants have the right to self-defense, just like I do. | ||
| Now, that doesn't mean they have the right to be in my country illegally. | ||
| We have laws, but part of our laws are the Bill of Rights. | ||
| So we got all that and more. But coming up, what would you do during a financial collapse? | ||
| What would bank runs look like in the United States of America? | ||
|
unidentified
|
There is a man who is whatever America needs him to be. | |
| The hero we deserve. | ||
| But the hero we need. | ||
| Nothing less than a knight. | ||
| Shining. They'll hunt him. | ||
| They'll set the dogs on him. | ||
| Because the truth is the greatest threat they face. | ||
| It's the war room. | ||
| with Owen Schreier. | ||
| ♪♪ ♪♪ | ||
| You know, one thing is certain. | ||
| When we see the state of things in our country, if you have any survival instincts, | ||
| you're looking at yourself, you're looking at your family, your friends, your neighbors, | ||
| and you're just thinking about, well, what would I do in the worst-case scenario? | ||
| And one of the things you obviously need to think about is what you're going to do about your financial assets, what you're going to do to protect them, and to make sure if there is a giant collapse or, God forbid, bank runs, that you don't get destroyed in a situation like that. | ||
| And so, Kirk Elliott is a financial expert, specifically in all things precious metals. | ||
| He's been in this game for decades, and he really wants to talk about this today. | ||
| I also want to hone in on the FDIC because I think that these two things are obviously | ||
| two parts of this larger picture. | ||
| But let's first just get into the issue of bank runs and then we'll kind of lead into | ||
| the FDIC. | ||
| Now for people that don't understand, because I mean Kirk, a lot of people might just assume | ||
| that the bank has all their money. | ||
| They might just make that false assumption that, oh, the bank always has my money. | ||
| I can go get my money. Well, you'll learn the hard way. | ||
| That's not exactly the case. | ||
| But what happens is when people realize that's not the case and a major financial crash happens, people run to the bank, they try to get all their money out, and then they find out the hard way the bank doesn't have the money. | ||
| Kirk Elliott, what happens next? | ||
| Well, it's just human nature. | ||
| If your bank fails and then people are seeing it on the news, everyone's going to think, oh, my bank's next. | ||
| And so this is how a run starts, right? | ||
| But we go back to January of 2023. | ||
| I was talking about FDIC having only 1.7% of all deposits insured. | ||
| And I was sounding this warning bell. | ||
| Say that again. That's a shocking number. | ||
| Yeah. 1.7% of all deposits, that's all the assets that they have to cover. | ||
| Now, if you reverse that as a consumer and say you wanted to get a loan for a house or even a car or something like that, and you only had 1.7% of what it is you're looking for a loan for, do you think you'd get that loan? | ||
| No, you wouldn't get the loan. | ||
| You wouldn't get the loan? No, I mean, well, no. | ||
| So I guess the bank's smart in that. | ||
| Yeah, so warning bells, I mean, just flashing right in front of my eyes, it's like, okay, this is a problem. | ||
| So we started talking about it, and then what happened? | ||
| Then March and April came around, Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, Silvergate Bank, Credit Suisse, First Republic, they all went into FDIC receivership. | ||
| Okay. Okay. | ||
| What did that do to FDIC? If they only had 1.7% of all deposits available, what do you think is going to happen to FDIC? Their available assets that they have to fund these bank failures starts to diminish. | ||
| So this weekend, this last weekend, I'm looking at the numbers. | ||
| It's like, oh my word, FDIC only has now 0.74% of all deposits insured. | ||
| So it's like half now. | ||
| It's half. So with five banks, so let's start doing some connecting of the dots here. | ||
| Five regional banks failed. | ||
| Their asset base comes down by more than half. | ||
| So now, where are we right now? | ||
| In the meantime, we've had so many things happen. | ||
| Basel III Accord, which meant banks now, instead of having 0% reserve requirement, zero on hand, they say, now you have to have 20%. | ||
| Of all deposits. So if you're a billion-dollar bank, now you have to go from nothing on hand to having $200 million in reserves, where are you going to come up with that? | ||
| You're not. So now they've got this problem, but it's amplified in the sense of after Silicon Valley Bank went under, there was an emergency funding program called the Bank Temp Funding Program, the BTFP, which was just stimulus money. | ||
| It was funding to stop the bank runs. | ||
| And everyone was applauding and saying, sweet, The Fed, they did their job, they did an amazing job, and they stopped the bank runs from happening. | ||
| Well, they didn't stop really anything other than they put a Band-Aid on it. | ||
| They didn't fix the problem. | ||
| So now this problem is amplified because on March 11th, a week ago, That BTFP program, the funding, it sunset. | ||
| It expired. No more emergency funding from the Fed for failed banks. | ||
| This is where the story gets convoluted and interesting. | ||
| Well, it sounds like they're just trying to kind of put out a fire momentarily, even though there's still embers and it could still catch flame at any moment. | ||
| They're kind of like, okay, let's just avoid the panic now and then deal with the issue later. | ||
| Yeah, so my brain goes into two different scenarios here. | ||
| And you alluded to the first one in your opening comments here. | ||
| It's like, okay, what is in a bank? | ||
| It's not this big, huge bank vault door with hundreds stacked in there to the rim. | ||
| There's no money in there. | ||
| There's not money in the bank. | ||
| They're using it to buy stocks, bonds, mutual funds, real estate, companies, everything you and I would invest in. | ||
| Banks are doing it just with a larger scale because they're using our money to do it. | ||
| So that's a fallacy that there's actually money in the bank. | ||
| But I'm trying to put these things together. | ||
| So, okay, the FDIC even recently was just at 1.4, 1.7, whatever. | ||
| It's a very low number that they have. | ||
| The banks don't have your money. | ||
| Where is the money? Where is all the money? | ||
| Does it even exist? | ||
| It exists in the form of debt. | ||
| In investments that they've made, they've leveraged their debt. | ||
| And so a derivative's debt is the biggest problem. | ||
| So a derivative is leveraged debt, where they've done the same thing over and over and over again, just hoping that not everybody's going to pull their money out at the same time. | ||
| But if... | ||
| See, when Lehman Brothers and Bear Stearns went down in 2009, they had massive amounts of derivatives debt, which is leverage debt of about 20 to 1. | ||
| So that means if the markets go 5% in the wrong direction of what you thought it was going to go, you lose 100% of your capital. | ||
| 5% times 20, which is the leverage, you lose 100% on a 5% move. | ||
| So it's like, how in the world? | ||
| We can't afford this, but how are we going to get out of this? | ||
| They don't have enough assets. | ||
| So what did they do? They changed the rules of the game after 2009 and And we all become participants in this game because we gave away our ownership of our checking and savings accounts to the bank. | ||
| We just didn't realize that that happened. | ||
| So now, why did they need to do that? | ||
| Because they needed to have as collateral checking and savings accounts so they could pledge that collateral against their debt that they had to pay. | ||
| Well, you can't pledge something as collateral unless you own it. | ||
| Like, I couldn't say, oh, I need collateral for this loan I'm going to take. | ||
| I'm going to use Owen's bike and car and whatever else. | ||
| It's like, I can't do that. I don't own it. | ||
| So, now, we gave up our ownership of our checking and savings accounts to them in 2009, and so we became beneficial owners of our own deposits. | ||
| Meaning, as a beneficiary, if they decide that we can have it back, then they can give it to us. | ||
| So, it's a bank's play by different rules than the citizens, basically, or the consumers, basically, where if I only had 1% We're good to go. | ||
| And then spend a trillion dollars annually. | ||
| Correct. But they changed it to the point of every single deposit that they now have is their ownership. | ||
| That's their collateral. | ||
| So here's the problem. | ||
| And Janet Yellen spoke to this in different terms. | ||
| And we have to understand what all these things mean. | ||
| After Silicon Valley Bank went down, the whole concept of too big to fail. | ||
| They said, no, the government's not going to bail these big institutions out. | ||
| But who is? | ||
| We are. As the depositors, that's what a bail-in is. | ||
| So they changed the terms from a bailout, the government bailing out a failed institution. | ||
| Well, let me just pause you right there. | ||
| Okay, so if you're listening to this and you don't want to bail out your bank when it fails because that's what you're being set up for right now, how do you avoid that? | ||
| You avoid that by pulling money out of the bank. | ||
| Don't have too much money in the bank. | ||
| See, as a business owner, I've got this problem because we're in the precious metals world. | ||
| We've got millions of dollars of wires coming in every single day, people buying gold and silver. | ||
| I don't want to have all of my money in one bank. | ||
| So we have the problems like, okay, we have to set up another bank account, another bank account, another bank account, because we don't want that one to fail. | ||
| So too much money in the bank is a problem. | ||
| Too little in the bank is a problem because you can't. | ||
| Make ends meet, and you've got monthly expenses. | ||
| So for me, if I'm looking at it, it's like, all right, three to six months of expenses in the bank is all you should use, have, and then I would invest the rest into silver to take advantage of something that's tangible, something that's real, something that you pull out of this system, because here's what's coming next. | ||
| FDIC goes from 1.7 to 0.74% assets covered with five banks that failed. | ||
| Now, big, massive CEO of a national realty company, you know, they're like a commercial real estate company. | ||
| They're buying subdivisions. | ||
| They're buying commercial real estate property. | ||
| He went on Yahoo Finance and said, I expect over 500 banks to fail this year. | ||
| Why would he say that? Because he's in the business of getting money from banks for these big projects. | ||
| He knows that banks are undercapitalized. | ||
| By the way, I experienced that personally here in Austin. | ||
| And this was in 2019. | ||
| There was a development company, and they had loans that they thought they had secured from the banks. | ||
| But then once everybody shut down from the pandemic, and then they revisited the development afterwards in 2021, the banks were like, oh, I'm sorry, we can't insure those loans anymore. | ||
| And the whole project went... Done. | ||
| Yeah, done. So, I don't want to take people to take my word for it. | ||
| I don't want to take this real estate CEO's word for it that 500 banks should fail. | ||
| Let's go to the best banker in the country, supposedly, Jerome Powell. | ||
| So Jerome Powell, what did he say? | ||
| I mean, this is his thing. | ||
| This is his baby. This whole banking system is chairman of the Fed. | ||
| This is all his. He said, you know what? | ||
| We're going to have a bunch of banks fail this year because of commercial real estate losses. | ||
| It's like, this is your system. | ||
| This is your thing. | ||
| And you just said that you can't actually handle it. | ||
| You've broken it. By the way, that's not even mentioning, I had these stories in my news all week. | ||
| This is happening in Austin. They build these massive business complexes, 30, 40 places where you can rent a complex for your business. | ||
| They're completely vacant. | ||
| And so they're already in debt just to build these things. | ||
| They can't even fill up the space to pay their debts. | ||
| Downtown Denver, where I live and work, almost every third building, every third space on ground level is vacant. | ||
| This is downtown Denver? Downtown Denver. | ||
| In Manhattan, upwards of 50% is vacant. | ||
| It's like, what? I thought this was a growing economy. | ||
| I thought Biden just said he created 275,000 jobs. | ||
| But yet, at the same point, same numbers, same day, 275,000 jobs created, but unemployment went up to 3.9%. | ||
| Well, now, hold on, Kirk. | ||
| Do the math here, okay? Two genders equals 275 genders, all right? | ||
| So, this is liberal math that we're doing here. | ||
| It is liberal math, but here's the weird liberal math. | ||
| How do you increase jobs by 275,000, but yet unemployment goes up? | ||
| Hmm. Something's not right. | ||
| They're cooking the books. But here's where it's easy to cook the books because if you were an unemployed owner and you're looking for a job and you're hitting the streets, you know, knocking on every single door for six months, like, please hire me. | ||
| I need a job. And you get so discouraged that you stop looking. | ||
| They would say, oh, you're no longer unemployed because you voluntarily stopped looking. | ||
| Are you still jobless? Yes, you're still jobless. | ||
| But they take you out of the numbers, which is how unemployment can increase. | ||
| That tells me that there's more people looking for work that are just being taken out of the number. | ||
| See, this is Biden's economic plan for America. | ||
| This is why I think bank failures are coming. | ||
| FDIC is underinsured, even if that real estate guy is the dumbest guy on the planet. | ||
| And only 10 banks fail instead of 500. | ||
| That's still twice as many that failed that caused FDIC to lose half of their assets. | ||
| I think FDIC runs out of money. | ||
| Well, if you look at the patterns, the patterns are already going there. | ||
| From 1.7 to 1.4 to 0.7. | ||
| I mean, obviously you see where this goes next. | ||
| And so really, I mean, the best advice, the simplest advice is, in an economy like this, in a debt economy, a bubble economy... | ||
| You have to make the smartest decisions possible. | ||
| You can't live in... | ||
| I mean, some people might say, well, getting the most dead is possible. | ||
| You might as well. It's all going to explode. | ||
| So it's like, well, no, I would say, no, you need to be smarter. | ||
| You need to not be a part of that. | ||
| That's only going to make things worse. | ||
| Kirk Elliott is my guest. KEPM.com slash gold, which is where you can secure your financial assets in precious metals. | ||
| KEPM.com slash gold. | ||
| So, okay, the trend at the FDIC, what comes next? | ||
| What comes next is one bank going under creates a contagion because people are going to say, wait a second, if that bank's going under, what about mine? | ||
| I'm going to start pulling money out. | ||
| Fear starts to creep in to people and they don't want their money to run out. | ||
| Banks should be the safest asset that people have, right? | ||
| In their mind, this is the safest thing. | ||
| Like if you were to say, I don't trust the stock market, I don't trust the bond market, I'm pulling out and I'm just going to sit in cash for a bit. | ||
| Five years ago, that would have been a reasonable thing to do. | ||
| Now with banks failing, I can't even say that that's safe. | ||
| So now people start pulling back. | ||
| They're saving for a rainy day. | ||
| They don't know what comes next. | ||
| That impacts the stock market. | ||
| That impacts everything in a negative way. | ||
| So here's where these people at the Fed, I don't think that they're stupid. | ||
| Why would you stop emergency funding in an election year when banks, if they lose confidence in the banks, the people... | ||
| The whole economy is toast. | ||
| So then why would you stop the funding of banks? | ||
| Here's where either one, they truly have no money and they know that they can't keep printing it because the BRICS nations have risen up, taken away the petrodollar. | ||
| There's no demand. They have to keep printing money to fund all these things and that'll cause more inflation or... | ||
| They want to break the system because they want to usher in central bank digital currency and given the fact that people lose confidence in the banks, they have no money, they can't feed their kids, they can't pay their rent, they can't pay their mortgage, people will give up their freedoms for what comes next, which is central bank digital currency. | ||
| This is their plan, I believe. | ||
| See, the BRICS nations are 70% of the world's population. | ||
| With India and China, there's big countries in there. | ||
| So if they no longer use the US dollar to purchase oil, and who else joined the BRICS nations? | ||
| Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirates, Argentina, Egypt, Ethiopia. | ||
| Six of the nine largest oil producers in the world are now part of BRICS Plus. | ||
| So what happens when they don't use the U.S. dollar? | ||
| They build up their own currencies, they destroy the U.S. dollar, and Putin's playing a masterful game of economic warfare against the West. | ||
| Yeah, they were writing these stories, it was all last week. | ||
| There were the news reports. The sanctions, the West sanctions on Russia have no impact. | ||
| A year ago, they were saying Russia's economy is tanking. | ||
| Putin has destroyed the economy. | ||
| It's all over for Russia. | ||
| And this is all just propaganda because of the war. | ||
| Now, a year later, they're all saying the same thing. | ||
| The West sanctions haven't worked at all on Russia. | ||
| Interest is down. Inflation is down. | ||
| Russian economy booming. Well, that was the truth a year ago. | ||
| They just lied about it. | ||
| They lied about it, just like they lied about those unemployment numbers, just like they lied about the jobless claims, just like Jerome Powell has been lying for six months, saying, we're going to lower interest rates because we've won the war against inflation. | ||
| They haven't lowered the interest rates in six months, even though they promised it, because they can't. | ||
| It's like a doctor telling, it's like if you have a cancerous tumor, and a doctor's like, well, I don't want to tell him that, maybe it'll just go away, and I'll just tell him he's fine. | ||
| It's not going to go away. | ||
| And it's not fine. | ||
| But what happens next is you realize, oh my word, it's too late. | ||
| You can't get out in time. | ||
| Because once the bank runs start, this is where I would rather be three months, six months, nine months early than one day late. | ||
| Because imagine if you saw the warning signs when Silicon Valley was going down. | ||
| You said, but they're undercapitalized. | ||
| I've got my money in there. | ||
| And you pulled it out three or six months before it happened. | ||
| You're glad. | ||
| But if you waited a day late, you lose everything. | ||
| This is the warning sign that I'm trying to tell people. | ||
| It's like there's problems with the economy. | ||
| Get out of Dodge. Start protecting and preserving your assets, which is why something like silver is so good. | ||
| Well, I do want to ask you why you prefer silver, but let's just put this really simply for laypeople that might not be the most financially informed. | ||
| Basically, it comes down to this. | ||
| The money you have in the bank is not guaranteed. | ||
| Period. End of story. | ||
| The money you have in the bank is not guaranteed. | ||
| But when you have it in precious metals, something you can put in a safe at home or bury underground, you know, that's guaranteed. | ||
| That's something you have in hand. | ||
| You don't have to worry about whether the bank has it or not. | ||
| Correct. It's a thing. | ||
| Things never go to zero. | ||
| I don't care if it's a bike. | ||
| I don't care if it's a car. I don't care if it's groceries. | ||
| I don't care if it's house. I don't care if it's gold or silver. | ||
| I don't care if it's oil or gas. | ||
| They never go to zero. | ||
| I mean, they can fluctuate up and down, but they never go to zero. | ||
| A company can go out of business overnight and can go to zero. | ||
| See, true wealth, I would encourage people to start looking at wealth as in terms of ounces of gold or silver that they own, ounces of a tangible thing, real estate that they own, rather than something that's paper, a company that can evaporate overnight. | ||
| Because that's true wealth. | ||
| I'm looking at your website there, KEPM.com slash gold. | ||
| It looks like both gold and silver are up, but gold seems to be up a little bit more, at least trending right now. | ||
| But why do I constantly hear people like yourself who've been in the precious metal industry for decades? | ||
| Why is it silver? | ||
| Why do you like silver so much more? | ||
| Well, gold's near an all-time high. | ||
| The high on silver was pushing $50 an ounce, so there's a lot of headspace still left. | ||
| So in other words, silver's trading low, gold is trading high, get in while silver's low? | ||
| Is that the theory? Pretty much. | ||
| Well, silver's actually outperforming. | ||
| In the last 30 days, silver's up 10%, gold's up 6.3%. | ||
| So it's like, okay, which one's better? | ||
| I mean, 6.3% in 30 days is not a bad return. | ||
| 10% is better. | ||
| So over time, I look at the ratio between gold and silver. | ||
| How many ounces of silver does it take to buy one ounce of gold? | ||
| That historical number is 20. | ||
| Right now, it's 85. | ||
| So what does that tell us? | ||
| Either gold is overvalued or silver is undervalued. | ||
| I don't think gold is overvalued. | ||
| Fundamental forces that cause gold to move are unsustainable debt, inflationary pressures, political chaos, geopolitical conflict. | ||
| We've got all of that. | ||
| Gold's going to continue to go up, but silver then needs to outperform. | ||
| The latter is true. | ||
| It's going to outperform. | ||
| It's going to grow faster. | ||
| So that ratio comes down to the historical average. | ||
| That's why we're in silver. | ||
| But then you look at... The more technicals behind it, the price action on silver, it just surpassed a 15-year moving average. | ||
| I'm not a technical guy. | ||
| I couldn't care less. | ||
| A chartist says, okay, this is a good time to buy or a good time to sell. | ||
| Fundamentals say why it is a good time to be in there, right? | ||
| So the fundamentals are there. | ||
| My chartist, my technical clients are foaming at the mouth saying, Kirk, this is the best time to buy silver because when we pushed over $25, We went above that threshold, which means that former ceiling that was holding it down is now the floor. | ||
| And then there's not much resistance moving forward. | ||
| So that's why silver makes so much sense to me. | ||
| But even the aggregate global demand, 1.2 billion ounces of silver is needed this year for manufacturing. | ||
| 1 billion ounces is coming out of the ground. | ||
| That's a 200 million ounce shortfall. | ||
| When you have low supply, high demand, prices go up. | ||
| I'm just looking at it as pragmatically as possible, and it is a fantastic way to minimize risk and maximize return. | ||
| So if you would rather have your financial assets secured instead of risked in the bank, KEPM.com slash gold, and Kirk can give you the best plan to do that. | ||
| You've heard his reasoning here. It's unarguable, and the numbers don't lie either. | ||
| So Kirk, obviously your website, one great resource. | ||
| What's another great resource here? | ||
| So go to the website, give us a call, and my consultant team will listen to your fears, listen to your concerns, listen to your goals, and plan out a strategy for success moving forward. | ||
| That's one way to do it. | ||
| Another thing you should do, get excess capital out of the banks before they start to go under. | ||
| Completely agree. Kirk Elliott, thank you so much. | ||
| We'll be right back with more. Well, we just did 30 minutes of financial economic talk with Kirk Elliott. | ||
| How do you think this does? | ||
| Sacramento, to give low-income families $725 a month, no strings attached. | ||
| Yeah. We can get a little more specific here. | ||
| How about this? The Sacramento Board of Supervisors approved the Basic Income Pilot Program last week. | ||
| It's set to offer $725 a month to low-income black and Native American families. | ||
| So if you are white, you need not apply. | ||
| But it doesn't really matter what your skin color is. | ||
| This shouldn't be going on no matter what. | ||
| But now we live in a welfare state. | ||
| A little taste of socialism or communism for you, coming to you from the Democrats. | ||
| It's just awful. | ||
| And, you know, this hurts the economy, all things considered. | ||
| There you go. And it's not just happening in Sacramento or California. | ||
| It's happening in many Democrat-run cities across the nation. | ||
| Across the nation, they're giving out free money, which of course isn't a real thing, is it? | ||
| Somebody's paying for that. | ||
| Reaching into the taxpayers' pockets and giving it to low-income black or Native American families. | ||
| Mm-hmm. Very nice. | ||
| Excellent. All right, ladies and gentlemen, I want to remind you about a great product we have at InfoWareStore.com, and that's Brain Force Plus and Brain Force Ultra. | ||
| Brain Force Plus, of course, the capsule for maximum mental energy and focus, or the liquid tincture Brain Force Ultra. | ||
| And I don't go on air without one of these two. | ||
| Brain Force Ultra liquid tincture under the tongue for maximum mental focus, clarity, energy, or Brain Force Plus. | ||
| The capsule, same story. | ||
| And I'm telling you, for a three-hour transmission, I'm always taking Brain Force Plus or Brain Force Ultra before I go on air. | ||
| But for you, maybe you've got a big business presentation or... | ||
| Maybe you've got a big exam for school, Brain Force Plus, Brain Force Ultra, a good way to help you get focused and prepared. | ||
| And of course, when you shop at Infowarsstore.com, it's your support there that keeps us on the air. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All right. All right. | |
| What do we have? | ||
| What do we have here? | ||
| Let's go to Kevin O'Leary. | ||
| He went on Fox News and he went on CNN, basically speaking the same thing. | ||
| And we'll get into the political persecution of Trump following this. | ||
| But first, let's go. | ||
| Here's Kevin O'Leary on CNN and on Fox News. | ||
| And it's funny, the retort or the reception he gets from CNN and then from Fox is totally different, as you can imagine, when he tells the truth about Letitia James, first here in clip 10. | ||
| But more importantly, the message about the American brand. | ||
| You think about America, the reason this is the number one economy on earth is that we have laws, and we have due process, and we have property rights. | ||
| It attracts foreign capital from all around the world. | ||
| All of that is being shaken to the core here. | ||
| The concept of seizing assets in 30 days on a bond number that's never been issued. | ||
| No insurance bond companies ever issued anything near this. | ||
| There was no chance it was going to happen. | ||
| And only giving 30 days notice and time, that's a really bad message. | ||
| And I think New Yorkers should think, well past Trump, whether he's president or not, or whether this attorney general is gone in four years or not, it's irrelevant. | ||
| This is case setting against the American brand. | ||
| The most stable country on earth anywhere to put capital to work over a long period of time, particularly in real estate, is the United States of America. | ||
| This is an assault on what we believe to be core. | ||
| And I find it extraordinary. | ||
| I think it's very troubling. | ||
| It has absolutely nothing to do with Donald Trump at this point, in my view. | ||
| And it is completely bipartisan. | ||
| This is an attack On America. | ||
| And I don't know how you can look at it any other way. | ||
| And as an investor, and I know plenty of investors are completely disturbed by this. | ||
| But, I mean, no one is going to put any money to work in New York in these amounts until this thing settles down. | ||
| The whole world is watching. | ||
| And everybody's waiting for one thing we haven't got yet. | ||
| Adult supervision. | ||
| Where is it? | ||
| Where are the adults in this crazy narrative? | ||
| The clowns are running the show. Certainly there's got to be adult supervision at some point. | ||
| They're clowns. They're authoritarian. They're liars. | ||
| You know, the war going on here and all the political yadda yadda woof woof woof. | ||
| But we need an adult in the room now. | ||
| This is the United States of America under siege. | ||
| Yeah, what do you have? | ||
| Or maybe, what are you lacking when there's only liberal Democrats in the room? | ||
| What are you lacking? You're lacking an adult. | ||
| You're lacking a serious person. | ||
| And that's what we're lacking right now in the White House and all of the tentacles now that it's controlling. | ||
| Now here he is on CNN. Now notice on Fox they let him speak there. | ||
| Let's see if it goes the same when he says this on CNN in clip 11. | ||
| I don't think this case is about Trump anymore. | ||
| I think this case is about New York. | ||
| It's about the American brand. | ||
| It's about what we promise the world in terms of fairness and justice and investing capital in a country that's built the largest economy on earth. | ||
| Forfeiture? Seizing of assets? | ||
| Is that in our nomenclature in America? | ||
| Is that what we tell people that want to bring their money here and protect property rights? | ||
| Forget about Trump. Nothing to do with Trump. | ||
| You think this is good for business in New York? | ||
| You think this is good for business in America? | ||
| To take a law that we use to protect people against buying refrigerators at an overpriced value decades ago and apply it against an individual and then talk about seizing assets like he was in Venezuela or in Cuba? | ||
| This is a very, very, very bad look for New York. | ||
| And everybody around the world is watching this. | ||
| This may be great for the attorney general, but this is not good for America. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But in terms of the valuation, can you be clear as to why? | |
| Why would the properties not be sufficient collateral? | ||
| What a great message to send out all around the world. | ||
| Take a claim where there was no monies lost, There was no fraud here in the context of actually people losing money. | ||
| Deutsche Bank, who made the loan, was made whole. | ||
| And let's make a penalty of half a billion dollars against a crime, apparently, where no monies were lost. | ||
| Great message for New York. | ||
| Great message for America. | ||
| Bring your capital because we'll protect your property. | ||
| I think that was a statement that would be much better made Some time in Venezuela. | ||
| I'm not kidding. That's a scary, scary message. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And by the way, there are no such thing as half a billion dollar bonds. | |
| Again, the laws exist to protect the marketplace. | ||
| There are no half a billion dollar bonds. | ||
| There were no victims. No money's lost. | ||
| Never. You liberal liar. This law has never been applied. | ||
| Forget about Trump. Nothing to do with Trump. | ||
| Everything to do about America and the New York brand. | ||
| I love this state. | ||
| My children live here. | ||
| A horrible message to everybody around the world watching this. | ||
| Absolutely horrific. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Wait, Kevin. Hold on a second. | |
| This attorney will be gone one day. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I have a wonderful voice and it won't be talked over. | |
| Kevin O'Leary, I would like to hear you say. | ||
| This is not America. What are you doing? | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not America. | |
| Ladies and gentlemen, what we have to understand is the liberal psychology. | ||
| They really don't get it. | ||
| They really don't. They pick out an enemy politically. | ||
| They fill themselves with hate. | ||
| They fill their heart and their souls with hate. | ||
| And then they just move forward With wherever the hate steers them. | ||
| And the damage that's done and the precedence that gets set, they really are completely blind to it. | ||
| And this psychology needs to be understood for the danger that it is. | ||
| It is truly dangerous. | ||
| Okay, we are dealing with political corruption and persecution coming from the Democrat Party. | ||
| Probably the worst of which has ever been witnessed in the history of the United States of America. | ||
| I would... | ||
| At least modern history. | ||
| Definitely post-19th century. | ||
| You have probably never seen political persecution or corruption... | ||
| The likes of which we are witnessing today from the American left and the Democrat Party. | ||
| And they love it. They love it. | ||
| That's why they publish stories like this with the headline from the New York Times. | ||
| It turns out the deep state is actually kind of awesome. | ||
| New York Times. | ||
| This morning. Now, of course, they used to deny there even was a deep state. | ||
| You were a conspiracy theorist if you believed in the deep state. | ||
| But now it's so obvious there's a deep state. | ||
| Now it's so obvious that it's the American left committing this political genocide of the American political science way of life, trying to Politically persecute their opposition, incarcerate, censor. | ||
| We're witnessing all of it. So it's impossible to deny the deep state. | ||
| So now they just say, well, it's actually great. | ||
| Yeah, it's real and it's awesome because we run it and we're using it to destroy our political opposition. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we're so much better than you. | |
| That's why we get to do it. | ||
| But let's take a look at the state of this political persecution. | ||
| Now, here's a White House reporter for the Huffington Post. | ||
| A White House reporter. | ||
| A liberal White House reporter. | ||
| A leftist White House reporter. | ||
| Do you want to see how truly ignorant? | ||
| Do you want to see the true state of the left-wing media in this country? | ||
| Perhaps there is no better example than this from sv.date.com. | ||
| Who reports this to his followers. | ||
| He says, This is the state of the American liberal journalist. | ||
| They make an assumption, they do no research, they are completely wrong, and then they affirm their wrong opinion. | ||
| Now, I am just one example. | ||
| I am just one example, maybe the most egregious. | ||
| I'm not here to have some sort of a measuring contest of who's being politically persecuted the most or why. | ||
| But there's no doubt my case was a precedent-setting case, especially since what we've seen follow. | ||
| There's no doubt that my case is maybe the most egregious because I never went into the Capitol. | ||
| I never touched a police officer and I'm on video trying to stop people | ||
| from going into the building. | ||
| But SV. or Date, SV Date, the White House reporter from the Huffington Post claims no non-violent | ||
| Trump supporters have been sent to prison and nobody's been sent to prison | ||
| didn't touch a police officer. | ||
| And my, how incredibly wrong he is. | ||
| Just egregiously wrong. | ||
| Just outright wrong. | ||
| But he's not going to correct his statement. | ||
| He's not going to change his opinion on the matter. | ||
| He's not going to change his stance because he's a liar. | ||
| Because he's a liberal journalist. | ||
| And that's what they do. | ||
| So he says Trump supporters are lying. | ||
| No nonviolent criminals have been sent to prison. | ||
| That's a lie. But he says you're lying when he's the one lying. | ||
| Does he do any research? | ||
| No. Does he correct the record when he's been corrected? | ||
| No. He just reaffirms his completely ignorant and erroneous stance on the issue. | ||
| But it continues. | ||
| You know... I let one slip through the cracks and we'll see if the crew can save my hide today or I can go and find it. | ||
| But when I went on Tim Pool after my sentencing, I went on Tim Pool's show after my sentencing and then I went on again after my incarceration and I said the same thing both times. | ||
| So you could pull either clip. | ||
| But I said, my case is going to be precedent setting. | ||
| And now that the Democrats, the Biden administration, the Department of Justice, the FBI, the U.S. attorneys, now that they know they can politically persecute and charge and incarcerate a nonviolent, peaceful protester, a journalist who committed no crimes, now that they know they can persecute and incarcerate a completely innocent American, For his First Amendment rights, now they're going to come with a second wave of charges. | ||
| And since they've charged two journalists, sentenced at least two more journalists to prison time, and now they're coming after more. | ||
| Social media influencer charged in Capitol riot. | ||
| That is Isabella Maria DeLuca. | ||
| Young lady... | ||
| I guess she was like 21 years old when she was at the Capitol on January 6th. | ||
| But what's her big crime? What are they using against her? | ||
| Her speech! Because at 2.55pm on January 6th, she tweets out, Fight back or let politicians steal an election? | ||
| Fight back. And so that's her crime. | ||
| She also... | ||
| Put out an Instagram post saying, according to the Constitution, it's our house. | ||
| And so that's her crime. | ||
| Now, they've had hundreds of these charges in waiting. | ||
| My guess is they still have hundreds more in waiting. | ||
| My guess is we're still going to see hundreds of charges, just like I predicted on the Tim Pool show, just like I predicted on this show after my political sentencing and incarceration. | ||
| I knew my case would be precedent setting. | ||
| That's why we had to fight it. That's why we're taking it to the Supreme Court. | ||
| By the way, we've got a big update on that. | ||
| My attorney, Norm Pattis, is going to be coming on the show Thursday with a big update. | ||
| And quite frankly, it's not good. | ||
| I mean, I'll just be honest with you. | ||
| And... If my case wasn't so important for free speech, and if my case wasn't the precedent-setting case that they're using to arrest now hundreds if not thousands of other Americans, quite frankly, I would just lay down and give up and just finish my probation and do the rest of it and just try to wipe my hands of the deal. | ||
| Because it's become quite a significant mess, let me just tell you. | ||
| But I'll have the updates on that Thursday. | ||
| So Isabella never touches a police officer, never does anything violent. | ||
| But because she was there, and because she says, fight back, and this is our house, she gets incarcerated. | ||
| And what the U.S. attorneys are arguing is that she touched a table. | ||
| I'm not even kidding you. | ||
| She touched a table. | ||
| Doesn't end there. Michigan lawyer Stephanie Lambert arrested by U.S. Marshals in D.C. following court appearance after submitting evidence of numerous crimes, including internal emails from Dominion Voting Systems to law enforcement. | ||
| So she gets the records. | ||
| She submits them in a courtroom. | ||
| She tries to have a very professional and serious argument about election integrity and theft in this country, and she gets arrested for it. | ||
| Michigan Attorney Stephanie Lambert was arrested in Washington, D.C. on Monday following a court hearing after she gave the evidence of numerous crimes to law enforcement containing internal emails from Dominion Voting Systems, AP reported. | ||
| Lambert attended a court hearing in Washington, D.C. for a defamation case involving Patrick Byrne, whom she represents. | ||
| Byrne, the former CEO of Overstock, is being sued by Dominion Voting Systems over his claims of election fraud. | ||
| So now they just arrest your lawyer. | ||
| So now if the Democrats come after you with political charges and persecution and you get a lawyer that's good and wants to defend you, now they just come after your lawyer. | ||
| And by the way, this is what they've done to my lawyer too. | ||
| And we're going to have a bit of an update and an announcement on that on Thursday. | ||
| Folks, I'm telling you, it's just shocking stuff. | ||
| And look, I had a conversation with my attorney, Norm Pattis, today. | ||
| And it's like, look, Norm, I mean... | ||
| Because he's going through it now. | ||
| I'm like, Norm, I mean, look man, if we, you know, do we have to give this up? | ||
| Do we just use our voices now to fight this? | ||
| Or do we just want to continue this fight as they're trying to destroy him now? | ||
| Yeah. So now they go after your lawyers. | ||
| You don't even have the right to a lawyer anymore. | ||
| They'll just arrest your lawyer. | ||
| We'll hear from top Trump advisor Peter Navarro, who just got incarcerated today. | ||
| For the same thing Hunter Biden did. | ||
| But is Hunter Biden going to jail? | ||
| Nope. Of course not. | ||
| Today, you guys will certainly focus on that little story, but what I suggest to you as journalists is that there's two really bigger stories that you might want to report on and even do some research on, because these are big issues. | ||
| This is not about me. | ||
| One of the big stories It's about what is really an unprecedented assault on the constitutional separation of powers and the doctrine of executive privilege as a critical tool dating back to George Washington's effective presidential decision making. | ||
| When I walk in that prison today, The justice system, such as it is, will have done a crippling blow to the constitutional separation of powers and executive privilege. | ||
| The second and related story has to do with the emergence of lawfare and the partisan weaponization of our justice system. | ||
| Which we have seen come to this country with a vengeance since the coming of Donald John Trump as president. | ||
| And that keeps getting worse. | ||
| So let me walk you through those two stories. | ||
| And again, I'm hoping as journalists... | ||
| You will do some background, some research. | ||
| I'm asking you to fact check everything I say today and write the bigger stories here, which I think are the important ones. | ||
| So let's talk about some facts here. | ||
| I am the first senior White House advisor in the history of our republic that has ever been charged with this alleged crime. | ||
| And I say alleged because for hundreds of years, this has not been a crime. | ||
| And for 50 years, the Department of Justice has maintained the principle of absolute testimony of immunity. | ||
| And it was only with my case that somehow that has changed. | ||
| Here's where the homework is, because the big constitutional separation of powers are these. | ||
| Can Congress compel a senior White House advisor, what they call the alter ego of a president, to testify before Congress? | ||
| And executive privilege goes back to George Washington and his remarks. | ||
| To the Congress regarding the Jay Treaty. | ||
| And he said very simply and clearly, succinctly, elegantly, that to write to the Congress, he said, I cannot command you as members of Congress to come to me. | ||
| You cannot Command me to come to you. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And the reason is... All right, and he will be reporting to that prison 2 p.m. | |
| Eastern time there in Miami. | ||
| And then Fox News cuts him off. | ||
| But... I... This is truly a dark time. | ||
| Now, as it goes, it's always darkest before the dawn. | ||
| But... Truly, the Democrat Party, ladies and gentlemen, is just completely unhinged. | ||
| Completely crazed. And they're now weaponizing the government against their political opposition. | ||
| they're just persecuting whoever the hell they want. And I don't think it ends here. | ||
| here. | ||
| . | ||
| But again, why is Peter Navarro going to prison? | ||
| Because contempt of Congress? | ||
| Well, Hunter Biden committed contempt of Congress. | ||
| Why isn't he going to prison? Because there's two sets of laws in this country. | ||
| One for Democrats, one for Republicans. | ||
| And if you're a Democrat, you're above the law. | ||
| If you're a Republican, the law will be twisted, contorted, manipulated, confused. | ||
| And then aimed and weaponized against you. | ||
| These are dangerous, dark times. | ||
| And the only way to cure us of this cancer is to eradicate the Democrat Party politically. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I don't have to tell you things are bad. | |
| Everybody knows things are bad. | ||
| It's a depression. Everybody's out of work or scared of losing their job. | ||
| The dollar buys a nickel's worth. | ||
| Banks are going bust. | ||
| Shopkeepers keep a gun under the counter. | ||
| Punks are running wild in the street. | ||
| There's nobody anywhere who seems to know what to do, and there's no end to it. | ||
| We know the air is unfit to breathe, and our food is unfit to eat. | ||
| We sit watching our TVs while some local newscaster tells us that today we had 15 homicides and 63 violent crimes, as if that's the way it's supposed to be. | ||
| We know things are bad, worse than bad. | ||
| They're crazy. It's like everything everywhere is going crazy, so we don't go out anymore. | ||
| We sit in the house, and slowly the world we're living in is getting smaller, and all we say is, please, at least leave us alone in our living rooms. | ||
| Let me have my toaster and my TV and my steel-belted radios, and I won't say anything. | ||
| Just leave us alone. Well, I'm not going to leave you alone. | ||
| I want you to get mad! | ||
| The War Room with Owen Troyer. | ||
| the internet will never be the same. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I'm not a fan of the internet. | |
| We're going to find this clip because it's bothering me now. | ||
| The problem is, the first time after my sentencing, I didn't have a Twitter account. | ||
| I was still banned on Twitter. | ||
| So there was no posting for me at that time. | ||
| And then after I went on the Tim Pool show and predicted this exact thing, the second time... | ||
| We just were sharing other people's clips from it, and then so we're having to source those out. | ||
| But we're going to find it. And why am I obsessed with this? | ||
| Because I'm telling you now here today, just like I said in August of 2023, just like I said in December of 2023, I'm saying now in March of 2024, this is not the end. | ||
| More people will be charged and sentenced and incarcerated by the Biden regime. | ||
| There will be more political persecution in the coming months. | ||
| Guarantee. This is all about censoring or getting conservatives to self-censor. | ||
| This is all about putting the fear of the government in the hearts and minds of American patriots. | ||
| This is intimidation, and this is a chilling effect on free speech, if not an outright abuse and weaponization of the government against free speech, which Katenji Brown Jackson all but admits she's for in her oral arguments yesterday. | ||
| Justice Katenji Brown-Jackson backs government censorship, First Amendment hamstringing government in significant ways. | ||
| So I guess get rid of the First Amendment would be her logic. | ||
| So let's go now to these stunning clips From her oral argument a woman who belongs nowhere near the | ||
| Supreme Court What she admits and what she | ||
| Bye. | ||
| . | ||
| Puts on record in our oral arguments should be stunning to the American people and should be the cause for an immediate removal from the Supreme Court. | ||
| Let's start with clip five. | ||
| Again, this is the oral argument from Katanji Brown Jackson against the First Amendment from yesterday's free speech case. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Whether or not the government can do this, this is something I took up with Mr. | |
| Fletcher, depends on the application of our First Amendment jurisprudence, and there may be circumstances in which the government could prohibit certain speech on the internet or otherwise. | ||
| Now pause right there. Did you hear what she just said? | ||
| Ladies and gentlemen, let's make no mistake about this. | ||
| The Declaration of Independence We hold these things self-evident. | ||
| The Bill of Rights, unalienable. | ||
| It doesn't say in certain circumstances. | ||
| It doesn't say in special situations or for different considerations. | ||
| It says self-evident, unalienable, shall not be infringed. | ||
| What part of that does Justice Ketanji Brown-Jackson not understand? | ||
| Has she ever read the Declaration of Independence? | ||
| Has she ever read the Constitution or the Bill of Rights? | ||
| She's now arguing against the founding documents and the law of the land from the Supreme Court. | ||
| Saying, well, I don't know. | ||
| It really depends on how you apply the First Amendment. | ||
| Since when is there some sort of a legal philosophy or debate about how the First Amendment is applied? | ||
| Oh, that's right, today. Because the Democrats are against it. | ||
| So now there's a new philosophy about how or when or why the First Amendment should even be applied or exist, according to Katenji Brown Jackson on the Supreme Court. | ||
| That is shocking stuff and should be the cause for an immediate removal from the bench. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. Do you disagree that we would have to apply strict scrutiny and determine whether or not there is a compelling interest in how the government has tailored its regulation? | |
| Certainly, Your Honor. I think at the end of every First Amendment analysis, you'll have the strict scrutiny framework in which, you know, in some national security hypos, for example, the government may well be able to demonstrate a compelling interest, may well be able to demonstrate All right, so not every situation in which the government engages in conduct that ultimately has some effect on speech necessarily becomes a First Amendment violation, correct? Now pause it right here, because this is basically Kamala Harris speak. | ||
| Katenji Brown-Jackson is an embarrassment. | ||
| She's such a pseudo-intellectual. | ||
| It's just a joke. | ||
| She just says a bunch of crap, but means nothing. | ||
| Let me translate the Kamala Harris language, the Kamala Harris speak there, from Katanji Brown Jackson. | ||
| She's saying that it's one thing for the government to put forth an oral argument against certain speech. | ||
| So, in other words, if a major media outlet comes out and says vaccines are not safe, And then the government comes out and says, yes, vaccines are safe. | ||
| Well, nobody's arguing that that is illegal or unconstitutional or against the First Amendment. | ||
| But what Katanji Brown-Jackson is arguing in her Kamala Harris speak is that the government should have the right not to rebut in an oral argument against a claim, but should have the outright ability to censor a claim. | ||
| That's what her Kamala Harris speak. | ||
| She's trying to pretend like she's a pseudo-intellectual, some sort of a legal genius there when really she just engages in Kamala Harris speak. | ||
| That's what she's saying. | ||
| That it shouldn't just be that the government can put forth an oral argument Or a public statement to rebut something that they view as false, but that the government should be able to move in and completely erase or censor a message that they view as false. | ||
| Now she gets more into a practical application or example of this after her Kamala Harris speak later on. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. Your Honor, I guess the top-line question I would ask is, has the government set out to abridge the freedom of speech? | |
| And in this case, you see that time and time again, because if you control... | ||
| That's not the test for First Amendment violations. | ||
| Your Honor, this flows from the plain text of the First Amendment, right? | ||
| No, I understand, but we have a test for a determination of whether or not the First Amendment is actually violated. | ||
| So, in certain situations, you know, the government can actually... | ||
| Require that speech be suppressed if there's a compelling interest, right? | ||
| What circumstances? It can, Your Honor. And I guess what I would say is that the courts below never got to strict scrutiny because the government never raised this. | ||
| This has never been litigated. | ||
| The question in this case is whether at the front end the government itself has undertaken action. | ||
| Is the coercion, is the state action, right? | ||
| That's the question in this case. | ||
| And I would urge the court to address the state action issue just like you addressed it in Bantam Books. | ||
| Use that term four times in Bantam Books. | ||
| I couldn't understand because it seems like an extremely expansive argument, I must say. | ||
| So, obviously, Ketanji Brown-Jackson is completely lost. | ||
| She does not belong anywhere near this bench. | ||
| She's completely lost. She doesn't understand her role. | ||
| She probably couldn't even pass a constitution test if she was given it tomorrow. | ||
| She doesn't understand the arguments being presented Are so key and fundamental to the First Amendment, and it's reached the Supreme Court because they have to make a decision about this. | ||
| This is not about some other case or some other situation. | ||
| They can bring those up, but this is a new circumstance. | ||
| This is a newfound issue where the United States government is engaging in direct action when it comes to censoring Americans' First Amendment right. | ||
| And so she can sit here and pontificate and do this pseudo-intellectualism with legal theory. | ||
| She's not addressing the issue. | ||
| The US government was working hand-in-glove with social media companies to censor information. | ||
| Most importantly, and this is why it should be so serious, but nobody on the Supreme Court except Clarence Thomas will probably even have the guts to say it. | ||
| The reason why this is so dangerous is because it was the US government censoring truth. | ||
| Censoring truth. | ||
| Now, this will come up later with Samuel Alito. | ||
| But that's what this is about. | ||
| The U.S. government was coercing and manipulating information and censoring the truth. | ||
| So again, oh, legal philosophy, legal theory, pseudo-intellectualism from Katenji Brown Jackson. | ||
| You're missing the entire case. | ||
| You are out of your element. | ||
| You are lost at sea without a map. | ||
| But this is where she really shows you how she feels about the First Amendment. | ||
| She doesn't understand. Well, the First Amendment is a blockade to us censoring speech. | ||
| And I don't get it. | ||
| That shouldn't be the case. Stunning stuff here. | ||
| She should be removed from the bench. | ||
| She should lose her law license. | ||
| She should become a case. | ||
| She should be an example of, oh my gosh, we can never have anybody like this again, not only on the Supreme Court, but any bench. | ||
| Katangy Brown Jackson should now be the poster child for why you get removed from the bench. | ||
| She should be the poster child that goes in the history books of, my God, look at how far we went. | ||
| My God, look at how bad things got. | ||
| Katangy Brown Jackson, removed from the bench, doesn't even understand the basics of the First Amendment, and she proves it right here in clip six. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Justice Jackson? So am I. Biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways. | |
| We're going to play that again. It's your view. | ||
| It's not her view. It's your view that the First Amendment hamstrings the government from censoring speech. | ||
| That's not somebody's view. | ||
| That's the law of the land. | ||
| That's the Bill of Rights. That's the U.S. Constitution. | ||
| That's the First Amendment. | ||
| In your view, a hammer is supposed to be used on a nail. | ||
| In your view, a boat is supposed to float on water. | ||
| In your view, a lawnmower cuts grass. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What do you mean, in your view? | |
| So in other words, in Katenji Brown Jackson's view, the First Amendment is not there to curtail government action against our rights. | ||
| That's her view. | ||
| Again, this woman can't even swim and she's just been thrown into the middle of the ocean. | ||
| She's drowning on the Supreme Court. | ||
| This is an embarrassment. How does she not understand the very basics of the U.S. Constitution? | ||
| The Declaration of Independence, the U.S. Constitution, the Bill of Rights, the law of the land. | ||
| Our rights are endowed by the Creator, by God. | ||
| Meaning, they don't come from government. | ||
| They come from God. | ||
| And by the way, we hold these things self-evident, meaning this is common sense. | ||
| We all agree it's common sense we have these basic rights. | ||
| It's not up for the government to decide whether we have them or not. | ||
| It's self-evident. It's common sense. | ||
| We all get it. Not Katenji Brown-Jackson. | ||
| She doesn't get it. | ||
| She's confused. Well, gee, why is the First Amendment blocking the government from censoring speech? | ||
| Boy, that pesky First Amendment's stopping us. | ||
| From censoring speech and blocking American speech. | ||
| It's hamstringing us. | ||
| At least that's how you view it. | ||
| I don't understand. That's not how I view it. | ||
| I'm Katenji Brown Jackson. | ||
| I don't think anything should stop us from censoring speech. | ||
| I'm just a Supreme Court justice. | ||
| I'm against free speech. This is incredible. | ||
| This is an incredible admission that should shock and horrify America. | ||
| And there should be massive... | ||
| See, and this is how propaganda works. | ||
| There should be massive protests and marches in the streets to have Katenji Brown Jackson removed from the Supreme Court. | ||
| But there's no activism. They make some bullcrap up about Donald Trump. | ||
| They get a million dumbasses in the streets marching. | ||
| Here's Katenji Brown Jackson actually taking a big fat dump. | ||
| On common sense and the First Amendment, and it's like, oh, barely anybody even cares. | ||
| They barely even talked about it on the news last night. | ||
| All was bloodbath over here, bloodbath over there. | ||
| The liberals say it's a bloodbath. | ||
| The Republicans say the liberals are lying about a bloodbath. | ||
| Here's a Supreme Court justice saying, well, gee, this First Amendment is hamstringing the government from censoring speech. | ||
| That's how you view it. But she doesn't view it that way? | ||
| This is just... You could rant for hours. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. Justice Jackson? | |
| So, Mike... Biggest concern is that your view has the First Amendment hamstringing the government in significant ways in the most important time periods. | ||
| I mean, what would you have the government do? | ||
| I've heard you say a couple times that the government can post its own speech, but in my hypothetical, you know, kids, this is not safe, don't do it, is not going to get it done. | ||
| Oh, that's great. Pause it. | ||
| I love that. I love that right there. | ||
| And this is the liberal mindset. | ||
| You know, I guess in a way we should be thanking Katanji Brown Jackson for fully exposing the liberal psychology and the liberal mindset for all to see. | ||
| She says, just telling kids not to do that is not always successful. | ||
| It doesn't always work. Well, okay. | ||
| You're not my mommy. | ||
| The government is not my mommy. | ||
| The government is not my daddy. | ||
| The government is not my big brother. | ||
| The government does not decide what's safe for me or what's not. | ||
| They can give me advice. | ||
| But they don't decide. | ||
| I decide. This is self-government. | ||
| But what does Katenji Brown's actions show you? | ||
| Liberals believe they're your mommy. | ||
| Liberals believe they're your daddy. | ||
| And they know what's best for you, and they should have the power to decide for you. | ||
| And that's what she just admitted. | ||
| Oh, well, sometimes telling the kids not to do something just doesn't work. | ||
| So you have to force them to do it. | ||
| Well, if that's how a parent wants to engage in discipline, you're not my mommy! | ||
| You are not the mommy of America. | ||
| The government is not Big Brother. | ||
| The government is not our authoritarian figure. | ||
| You are supposed to be protecting our rights. | ||
| That's your job. You don't seem to get that. | ||
| You have it all reversed, don't you, Judge Jackson? | ||
| You think that you're my parents. | ||
| You think you're my mommy. | ||
| You think you're my daddy. | ||
| And you think that, well sometimes when I tell you not to do something, you might not do it. | ||
| Well, that's none of your business. | ||
| But she just let the cat out of the bag. | ||
| The American left wants to be your mommy, wants to be your daddy, wants to be your authority figure. | ||
| They're authoritarians, folks. | ||
| And they think the First Amendment is in their way. | ||
| Duh! That's the entire purpose of the Constitution. | ||
| Duh! That's the entire purpose of the Bill of Rights, to stop the government from getting in our lives. | ||
| We have rights given to us by God, not the government. | ||
| You can't take them away. | ||
| And a Supreme Court justice doesn't understand this. | ||
| How did she get on that bench, you might ask? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. I guess some might say that the government actually has a duty to take steps to protect the citizens of this country. | |
| And you seem to be suggesting that... | ||
| Um, actually, no. | ||
| No. It's not the government's duty to protect us. | ||
| Now, they can have some rules in providing public safety, generally speaking. | ||
| When there's a consensus from we the people, but actually it's not your duty to protect us. | ||
| It's your duty to protect our rights. | ||
| And here you are attacking them. | ||
| Incredible stuff from the Supreme Court. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. Duty cannot manifest itself in the government encouraging or even pressuring platforms to take down harmful information. | |
| So can you help me? | ||
| Because I'm really worried about that. | ||
| Because you've got the First Amendment operating in an environment of threatening circumstances from the government's perspective. | ||
| And you're saying that the government can't interact with the source of those problems. | ||
| And Your Honor, I understand that incident. | ||
| I guess what I tell you is... | ||
| All right. Let's try to put aside Justice Jackson's complete Misunderstanding of the First Amendment. | ||
| Misappropriation of her role as a Supreme Court justice. | ||
| Let's just try to put that all aside from this absolute ignoramus that has made her way to the Supreme Court bench by affirmative action. | ||
| An embarrassment. An absolute embarrassment. | ||
| Let's just put that aside and let's just speak practically and rationally here. | ||
| Something Katanji Brown Jackson probably doesn't understand. | ||
| Let's look at the facts of the situation since she's so obsessed with COVID-19 and misinformation. | ||
| Or rather, the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
| Because these are the two main issues that got brought up. | ||
| They lied about COVID-19. | ||
| The government lied about COVID-19. | ||
| The government lied about the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
| So when she says, well, you know, the government... | ||
| Wants to be the source of truth. | ||
| Well, what happens when the government lies? | ||
| What about that circumstance? | ||
| And this is why it's so dangerous. | ||
| And this is why the Supreme Court justices are supposed to be the smartest legal minds in the country. | ||
| And that's why Katanji Brown Jackson has just lowered the standard to such a degree, a dangerous degree now. | ||
| They're supposed to hear arguments and then weigh the potentials and then make a decision that best protects the American people's rights. | ||
| That best protects the American people's rights. | ||
| Not our safety from a virus. | ||
| Not our safety from misinformation. | ||
| But our rights. | ||
| And the fact that Ketanji Brown Jackson's mind is so closed, the fact that Ketanji Brown Jackson's IQ is so low, the fact that Ketanji Brown Jackson's intelligence quota is about the equivalent of a ham sandwich, she can't even possibly understand what we're talking about. | ||
| She can't even comprehend this notion that the government might lie. | ||
| Or let's just assume the government wouldn't be so evil. | ||
| Maybe the government gets something wrong. | ||
| Maybe the government gets something wrong. | ||
| And then they want to censor free speech. | ||
| They want to censor discussion and discourse over information that they might have wrong, which they do all the time or blatantly lie to us all the time. | ||
| And Katenji Brown Jackson is so ignorant and so low IQ that she can't even comprehend this, ladies and gentlemen. | ||
| She's so blinded that she can't even see this. | ||
| This is dangerous. | ||
| Katanji Brown-Jackson is a direct threat to your rights, and she doesn't even hide it. | ||
| So according to Katanji Brown-Jackson, the government should be able to censor you, lie to you, and then censor you for calling out the lie. | ||
| All right, we're going to continue to cover this case. | ||
| This was the headline. | ||
| When I went live with Alex Jones, and we unfortunately, but as usual, accurately predicted everything that was going to follow. | ||
| First Amendment martyr Owen Schroer sentenced to 60 days in January 6th case. | ||
| That was the Alex Jones headline. | ||
| And my attorney at the time said, the country is at risk right now. | ||
| The government has declared war on the First Amendment. | ||
| I have not been as disheartened about my country's prospects to live under the rule of law as I am today. | ||
| And now here we are. Multiple, more charges. | ||
| Journalists getting incarcerated, arrested. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And we're going to have more on that. | |
| And how we warned about this was coming. | ||
| Coming up in the third hour. | ||
| But I want to go back to the oral arguments. | ||
| And something Judge Alito says here. | ||
| He's... Now this is more of a fair... | ||
| Response to everything that's going on here. | ||
| But there's something very important that he says here, and he makes a pretty strong admission about something as well. | ||
| So here's Alito, an oral argument from Alito in the First Amendment case yesterday where Supreme Court Justice Katenji Brown-Jackson embarrassed herself in the nation. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I've exchanged between the White House and other federal officials, and Facebook in particular, but also some of the other platforms. | |
| And I see that the White House and federal officials are repeatedly saying that Facebook and the federal government should be partners. | ||
| We're on the same team. | ||
| Officials are demanding answers. | ||
| I want an answer. I want it right away. | ||
| When they're unhappy, they curse them out. | ||
| There are regular meetings. | ||
| There is constant pestering of Facebook and some of the other platforms, and they want to have regular meetings, and they suggest rules that should be applied, and why don't you tell us everything that you're going to do so we can help you, and we can look it over. | ||
| And I thought, wow, I cannot imagine Federal officials taking that approach to the print media, our representatives over there, if you did that to them, what do you think the reaction would be? | ||
| And so I thought, you know, the only reason why this is taking place is because the federal government has got Section 230 and antitrust So, there's a lot packed in there. | ||
| I want to give you one very specific answer first, and then Step back out to the broader context. | ||
| So specifically, you mentioned demanding an answer right away and cursing them out. | ||
| The only time that happens is in an email that's about the president's own Instagram account. | ||
| It's not about moderating other people. | ||
| Okay, we'll put that aside. | ||
| There's all the rest. Constant meetings, constant emails. | ||
| We want answers. We're partners. | ||
| We're on the same team. | ||
| Do you think that the print media regards themselves as being on the same team as the federal government, partners with the federal government? | ||
| So potentially... | ||
| Now pause that and rewind it real quick. | ||
| And Justice Alito will eventually say something that's so important coming up momentarily. | ||
| But see, here's the realization. | ||
| Now Katenji Brown-Jackson, again, you almost can't even blame her. | ||
| She's really just not smart enough to be in the position. | ||
| It's like... I mean, it'd be like asking me to design a SpaceX rocket. | ||
| It's like if Elon Musk called me and said, hey, or sit down at this desk and design a SpaceX rocket, I'd be like, uh, well, I don't really know anything about astrophysics, so good luck. | ||
| So, you know, or maybe I might even have a better chance at that than Katenji Brown-Jackson does of understanding basic constitutional law. | ||
| It'd be like... Going into a kindergarten classroom and asking a kindergartner to give you a thesis on human anthropology or something. | ||
| I mean, it's just, that's like Katenji Brown-Jackson on the Supreme Court. | ||
| Or maybe it's like going and asking a dog to walk on its hind legs and then do two, ten straight backflips. | ||
| You know, it's just impossible. Katenji Brown-Jackson, she doesn't have a chance. | ||
| So, I mean, I guess in her defense, she's just, she's way out of her element. | ||
| She's way out of her league. But you can see Samuel Alito, this is a guy that's, you know, he gets it. | ||
| He gets it somewhat, and he's not a complete moron. | ||
| But okay, I want to replay that clip because listen to what he's saying and the realization is starting to sit in. | ||
| He's like, huh, why is it that the Democrats, why is it that members of government think that they're on the same team as the media here? | ||
| Why is it they're saying they're on the same team? | ||
| Why is it that they think they're going to act in cahoots to censor speech they don't like or to oppress opinions that they disagree with? | ||
| This is the realization. | ||
| This is somebody that actually has an IQ and understands the position they're in on the Supreme Court. | ||
| Analyzing these things and responding to the conditions. | ||
| Not like a Tenji Brown Jackson who has no clue what's going on. | ||
| Alito actually gets it. | ||
| And so he starts to make this realization and push back. | ||
| And then what he says later is even more revealing. | ||
| But so play that clip again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
That aside, there's all the rest. | |
| Constant meetings, constant emails. | ||
| We want answers. We're partners. | ||
| We're on the same team. | ||
| Do you think that the print media regards themselves as being on the same team as the federal government, partners with the federal government? | ||
| So potentially in the context of an effort to get Americans vaccinated during a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic. | ||
| And I really think that piece of context, it doesn't change the First Amendment principles. | ||
| Now again, this is why it's so dangerous. | ||
| The First Amendment doesn't say this is paused during a once-in-a-lifetime pandemic. | ||
| But then again, these are all the potentials that need to be weighed. | ||
| So now the government can just say once-in-a-lifetime pandemic, once-in-a-lifetime storm, once-in-a-lifetime this, once-in-a-lifetime that, once-in-a-lifetime the other thing. | ||
| And so the Bill of Rights and the Constitution is all suspended because it's once-in-a-lifetime. | ||
| No! That's not the precedent. | ||
| And that's not how the law is written. | ||
| But that's an incredible admission. It's just, oh we just say it's once in a lifetime, or we just say this is an | ||
| emergency, or we just say this so so so we can suspend the First Amendment in these instances. | ||
| No! | ||
| Continue. | ||
|
unidentified
|
But it's relevant to how they apply here. | |
| And I think it's important to understand that at this time, this was a time when thousands of Americans were still dying every week, and there was a hope that getting everyone vaccinated could stop the pandemic. | ||
| And there was a concern that Americans were getting their news about the vaccine from these platforms, and the platforms were promoting, not just posting, but promoting bad information. | ||
| I understand all that, and I know the objectives were good. | ||
| Were they, though? | ||
| They were also getting their news from the print media and the broadcast media and cable media. | ||
| And I just can't imagine the federal government doing that to them. | ||
| But maybe I'm naive. Maybe that goes on behind the scenes. | ||
| I want to play that clip again. | ||
| I'm going to play that clip in its entirety again. | ||
| Again, Alito gets it. | ||
| He's saying, well, wait a second. Since when does the government and the media view themselves as partners in censoring the American people? | ||
| You know, technically that you might consider that fascism, authoritarianism. | ||
| You say, well, since when do we have that? | ||
| I mean, we don't have that in print media. | ||
| We don't have that in cable media. | ||
| But you know what? Maybe I'm naive. | ||
| Maybe that does go on in these other medias, too. | ||
| And yeah, Americans can decide where they get their information. | ||
| And the government is likely to post a public statement. | ||
| But that doesn't mean they censor another one. | ||
| So, I mean, Alito's like getting it. | ||
| He's leaning into the right questions. | ||
| And he admits, you know what? Now that we see this in digital media, maybe this does go on in other media. | ||
| Maybe this is going on in other media outlets. | ||
| Maybe I'm naive. Maybe this has been going on. | ||
| So let's play that. This is probably the most important part. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Play it again. I understand all that, and I know the objectives were good, but once again, they were also getting their news from the print media and the broadcast media and cable media, and I just can't imagine the federal government doing that to them. | |
| But maybe I'm naive. Maybe that goes on behind the scenes. | ||
| It struck me as, wow, this is not what I understand the relationship to be. | ||
| That's all. But I do. | ||
| I think this is important because I have the same reaction that you do, that these emails look unusual. | ||
| I think the idea that there'd be back and forth between the government and the media isn't unusual at all. | ||
| When the White House press secretary on July 16th is asked about this by the press at the time, what she says is... | ||
| So here's the realization as we go to break, folks. | ||
| This is not just happening in digital media. | ||
| The U.S. government, and in particular it's the Democrats mostly right now, 90% Democrats, liberals, They're colluding with media to censor things they don't want you to see. | ||
| That's it. We're back here live on the Infowars War Room. | ||
| Brought to you by Infowarsstore.com. | ||
| I want to tell you about our friends over at Dr. | ||
| Jones Naturals. My favorite toothpaste is over there at Dr. | ||
| Jones Naturals. And it's such a great way, such an easy way to support us. | ||
| If you like this show, to shop at Dr. | ||
| Jones Naturals. | ||
| And everybody in the audience, I hope, brushes their teeth. | ||
| I hope you use toothpaste. | ||
| And so why not get your toothpaste from our friends at Dr. | ||
| Jones Naturals. Multiple options there, but that's my favorite right there on the screen. | ||
| Super silver whitening toothpaste with coral calcium carbonate. | ||
| This stuff is incredible and always leaves your breath feeling fresh, always leaves your teeth sparkly white, none of that fluoride, and it's got the good stuff, the calcium, carbonate, and so much more. | ||
| And so if you really want to take care of your oral hygiene and health, My go-to is super silver whitening toothpaste with coral calcium carbonate from drjonesnaturals.com. | ||
| It's on sale right now, 30% off. | ||
| There's other options for toothpaste there as well, but that's my favorite. | ||
| That's my go-to. That's my favorite, so that's the one I'm going to tell you about. | ||
| But there's other options. But why not get your toothpaste from our friends at Dr. | ||
| Jones Naturals? A great way to support us. | ||
| They also have great supplements as well, great sleep aids. | ||
| Like Rocket Rest. A great sleep aid like Rocket Rest. | ||
| But there's lozenges, toothpaste, immune gargle, supplements like Rocket Rest. | ||
| So our friends at Dr. Jones Naturals really have it going on. | ||
| And when you shop there, you help keep this show on the air. | ||
| DrJonesNaturals.com Alright. | ||
| Still a lot to get to here. | ||
| Still a lot of illegal immigrant news. | ||
| Man, I don't even know if I want to touch that stuff yet. | ||
| So let's look at what this diversity, equity, and inclusion is doing. | ||
| Now, let's start off by going into this. | ||
| Now, if you need a police officer to save your life or to stop a crime, you want a police officer that's able-bodied and can accomplish the mission. | ||
| Well, now in Nashville, that might not be your case because they're lowering the standards because, you know, diversity, they explain here in clip two. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's a male-dominated profession, so women are scared to take that step, maybe thinking that they're not able to do it, but you can do it if you have that right mindset. | |
| It's a mindset the Metro Police Department hopes more women will have. | ||
| Their goal? Not really. | ||
| A 30% female police force. | ||
| They're just lowering the bar. Last year, it was 11%. | ||
| This year, it's 13%. | ||
| And is it even attainable? | ||
| I think we're definitely growing, so if we can just keep that momentum going, I believe that it is definitely attainable. | ||
| Commander Tiffany Gibson is Metro's first female director of training. | ||
| I can't even believe it. Can you believe the madness of this? | ||
| What is going on here? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Why are we so stupid? | |
| I want to make sure the police force is 30% women. | ||
| Well, what if you don't have enough women that want to be police? | ||
| Well, then we'll lower the standards. | ||
| We'll give them bonuses. We'll give them incentives. | ||
| Well, now you've destroyed law enforcement. | ||
| It's insanity. It's like, well, you have a protocol. | ||
| You have to give out 100 speeding tickets a month. | ||
| Well, what if 100 people don't speed? | ||
| Well, then you just force it. Well, that's not good for anybody. | ||
| This is just insanity at its very base. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Continue. Changes they've made to help attract recruits, especially women. | |
| No more physical ability tests. | ||
| Oh! No more physical ability tests so a woman can join. | ||
| They've also added lactation rooms for nursing moms to all eight precincts. | ||
| More flexible schedules. | ||
| That's in addition to their already paid maternity leave and sick time. | ||
| What's something the Metro Police Department does not currently offer to female recruits that you think could really be a game changer? | ||
| We're trying to get going, possibly help sponsor our own child care facility, and I think that would be really helpful for females. | ||
| New officers like Emma Long hope it all leads to more women joining her on patrols and beyond. | ||
| More qualified and strong women to be in this police department and be leaders in this police department. | ||
| I mean, I think it would be a great thing to see. | ||
| Yes, hi, this is the Nashville Police Department. | ||
| Would you like to commit a crime? Yeah, my car has just been burgled and I'm being held up at gunpoint. | ||
| Can you send someone to my location? | ||
| I'm sorry, all current officers are lactating right now. | ||
| They will be lactating. So this is the new trend, is you lower the bar so that the right-identitied people can become police officers. | ||
| Yeah, you're now in Reno 911. | ||
| You might as well be. Underrated show, by the way. | ||
| And then you have this. To be honest with you, this bar graph is a little confusing to me, but I can tell you what it means. | ||
| Medical school acceptance rates by MCAT score, GPA, and race slash ethnicity. | ||
| And so what it proves is that it is basically 10 times harder for an Asian person or a white person to get into medical school than it is a black person. | ||
| Specifically, but in some instances a Hispanic person, but it's mostly just for a black person. | ||
| So in other words, if your grades are highly superior if you're an Asian, but if the other person you're competing for a spot against is black, but their grades are much lower, they're going to get the entry because of their skin color. | ||
| And then what do you think that does to the medical industry? | ||
| What do you think that does to the medical field? | ||
| What do you think that does to the doctor's office, the surgeon's table? | ||
| When you're about to have surgery to save your life or you're about to have a penetrating surgery, are you going in there thinking, man, oh man, I hope this surgeon is black? | ||
| Or are you going in there thinking, man, oh man, I hope this surgeon is good and qualified? | ||
| Well, now you don't have to be qualified. | ||
| You just have to be the right skin color. | ||
| And by the way, Don Lemon brings this up on his show with Elon Musk that lasts one episode. | ||
| But Elon Musk gets it right. Why would you want to force things like this when the consequence is quite literally potentially life or death in clip nine? | ||
| I believe that if we lower the standards for what it takes to become a doctor... | ||
| You're saying if we lower the standards, but do you believe people are dying because the standards are being lowered? | ||
| I don't think that is, yes, an issue, but it could become an issue. | ||
| Okay. But the actual evidence and history shows the exact opposite if you look at how minorities are treated by the medical system. | ||
| This is how dumb Don Lemon is. | ||
| He doesn't have the foresight to understand what Elon Musk is talking about, but then he says that there's some sort of recorded history about a phenomenon that has never existed before. | ||
| You have never had a phenomenon where you select people for a job based on their skin color, and he says, well, history proves that that's not the case, even though he admits this is the first time it's ever happened, and he doesn't have the foresight to see how dangerous this could be. | ||
| I mean, just look, this guy is... | ||
| My God. | ||
| My God, liberals are retarded. | ||
| All right, just continue. Most doctors now are white. | ||
| And there are lots of mistakes in medicine. | ||
| So you're saying that my doctors are... | ||
| have bad medical care? | ||
| No, he's saying it can get worse. | ||
| I'm trying to understand your logic here when it comes to DEI, because there's no actual evidence of what you're saying. | ||
| No, I said... So again, pause it. | ||
| So again, now he says there's no evidence. | ||
| I mean, this guy's unreal. | ||
| First he says all the evidence says what you're saying is wrong. | ||
| Now he says there's no evidence. | ||
| Don Levin, ladies and gentlemen, he was a main anchor at CNN. Continue. | ||
| If the standards, like let's say, I think that particular thing was referring to surgeons. | ||
| Let's say a surgeon is asked to... | ||
| A surgeon in training is asked to do a series of operations under the supervision of a senior surgeon, and they get a bunch of those operations wrong. | ||
| If that happens, and yet they are still approved to be a surgeon, the probability that someone will die, I think, at some point is high. | ||
| Okay. I understand that. | ||
| But that's a hypothetical. That doesn't mean it's happening. | ||
| I didn't say it's happening. | ||
| You didn't say it was happening? | ||
| I said it will. I said, if we lower standards, people will die. | ||
| Look, we lowered the standards for media. | ||
| Why respond to something or put something out there that has not happened? | ||
| Because I could say... But you just said that it had happened. | ||
| I think we don't want to lower the standards. | ||
| Okay, if you look at the history of the medical industry, especially when it comes to black Americans, it shows the exact opposite. | ||
| If you look at the Tuskegee experiment and on and on, only 5% of doctors are in America are black. | ||
| That has nothing to do with the medical institutions. | ||
|
unidentified
|
All of them are white. That was black Americans getting tested on by Big Pharma. | |
| And there are still these inequities, right? | ||
| And people still, there are still mistakes. | ||
| Are you blaming DEI for that? | ||
| No, I'm just... Wow, all right. | ||
| We got more examples of this. | ||
| My goodness. Elon Musk made the right decision to cancel that show after one episode. | ||
| Why doesn't this diversity, equity, and inclusion phenomenon apply to... | ||
| Every job. Like, for example, the National Basketball Association. | ||
| Probably like 80-90% black athletes. | ||
| Why don't people complain about more diversity in the NBA? Need more Asians. | ||
| Why don't we see that? | ||
| Well, because it's very important that you have the best team so that you can win the championship. | ||
| Oh. So really, it's non-consequential if you put more Asians or white people or Hispanics... | ||
| On an NBA team, really it's completely inconsequential. | ||
| You just might not win a championship, is what you're saying. | ||
| So you need the best players? That's interesting. | ||
| So no diversity when it comes to that. | ||
| You can't fill your roster and say, we need 30% white players. | ||
| But then for the airline industry, when it's life or death, or for law enforcement, police officers, when it's life or death, Or for the medical field, doctors, surgeons, when it's life or death. | ||
| That's where we need the diversity, equity, and inclusion. | ||
| Okay, got you. Got you. | ||
| But for a game, we can't have it there. | ||
| Because that's more important. | ||
| I see. Make it make sense. | ||
| Well, you can't. You're dealing with liberals. | ||
| They're quite literally retarded, unfortunately. | ||
| More of this. The Association of American Medical Colleges, which partners with the American Medical Association, is responsible for medical school admissions and granting medical licenses in the U.S. In order to embrace diversity, equity, and inclusion, they don't rely on test scores and grades alone. | ||
| No. They consider each applicant individually to determine how they might contribute to the learning environment and the workforce instead of relying on test scores and grades alone. | ||
| In other words, skin color. | ||
| That's nice. The Supreme Court in the state of Washington, the bar exam will no longer be required to become an attorney in the state of Washington. | ||
| And other states will follow because that's how we get people like Katanji Brown Jackson on the court. | ||
| You see? That's how that works. | ||
| But of course Elon Musk is right. | ||
| This is going to get people killed. | ||
| It'll happen in the airline industry. | ||
| It'll happen in the surgeon's room, the doctor's office, law enforcement. | ||
| Because see, that's what the modern day left represents. | ||
| That's what the Democrat Party represents. | ||
| Death. Death. | ||
| Death to your culture. | ||
| Death to your civilization. | ||
| Death to justice. | ||
| Death to free speech. | ||
| Death to the right to defend yourself. | ||
| It's just death. | ||
| These people literally like killing babies. | ||
| It's the party of death. | ||
| It's the Democrat party. It's the party of death. | ||
| So, I mean, I mentioned this yesterday. | ||
| I sent the crew a clip today. | ||
| In clip 14. | ||
| So if you don't want to see a first trimester baby, it's a little gruesome. | ||
| But... First trimester baby. | ||
| And Democrats say that you can kill this. | ||
| Democrats say that you should be able to kill this. | ||
| You should be able to kill this thing right here. | ||
| This baby. Look at that. | ||
| Moving its arms, moving its legs. | ||
| I mean, what kind of a soulless freak would want to kill that? | ||
| What type of a soulless freak would argue that you should have the right to kill that? | ||
| Or would want to kill that? | ||
| That is so heartbreaking. | ||
| It just drains your soul. | ||
| You just can't even imagine. | ||
| But the answer is a Democrat. | ||
| A Democrat would like to kill that baby. | ||
| A Democrat would argue that you have the right to kill that child. | ||
| These are sick, demented freaks, folks. | ||
| The Democrat Party is the party of death. | ||
| Do not get it twisted. That's all you need to know. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I want him found. | |
| Not tomorrow, not after breakfast. | ||
| Now! | ||
| Yes, sir! | ||
| Well... | ||
| Well what? | ||
| Man up and vanish like a fart in the wind! | ||
| Peace. | ||
| Nothing left but... | ||
| Damn rocks on the windowsill. | ||
| And that cupcake on the wall. | ||
| What say there, Fuzzy Bridges? | ||
| This is conspiracy. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
| One big damn conspiracy! | ||
| And everyone's in on it! | ||
| Oh Oh | ||
| Unveiling the truth behind the globalist curtain Welcome to the War Room. | ||
| ♪♪ ♪♪ | ||
| All right, let's get into this illegal immigration news. | ||
| It's stunning here. | ||
| But first, here, in less than two minutes, Are the Democrat plans with the open borders in clip number seven. | ||
|
unidentified
|
The Democrat open borders plan to entrench single party rule explained in under two minutes. | |
| One, flood the country with untold millions of illegals by land, sea and air from all over the world. | ||
| Enough to eclipse the populations of 36 individual US states so far. | ||
| Two, prioritize the needs of these millions of non-citizens over the needs of the American citizen with free flights, buses, hotels, meals, and phones, ensuring their loyalty to the political party that imported them. | ||
| Three, keep them in the country at all costs, even when they commit violent crime like murder and rape. | ||
| Attack the language used to describe the criminals as opposed to the criminals themselves. | ||
| Slander critics as racist. | ||
| Four, ensure their privileges are made irrevocable with Five, count the noncitizens in the census that will determine congressional apportionment in the House of Representatives. | ||
| As of now, that would equal 13 extra congressional districts, a tremendous amount of electoral Six, wage a massive, heavily funded lawfare campaign to change state voting laws that legalize mass mail-in ballots. | ||
| No signature verification and no proof of citizenship requirements, making it nearly impossible to prove voter fraud. | ||
| Seven, lock in the permanent voting majority with campaign promises of lavish benefits and permanent privileges, enshrining generational fealty to the Democrat Party. | ||
| Eight, win elections. | ||
| Nine, entrenched single party rule has been achieved. | ||
| The best part? Your tax dollars are paying for it. | ||
| I'd like to see that running on national news channels ahead of the 2024 election, local news channels. | ||
| That's what needs to be happening. | ||
| And by the way, you used to have to pay big firms to put out quality ads like that, political ads like that, and that's why you'd always see at the end of it, this is paid for by the yada yada campaign. | ||
| Well, people make this stuff on... | ||
| Their social media accounts, they do it for free because they care about the country. | ||
| And I guarantee them to you they'd happily let these get run as ads during an election cycle because we're trying to save the country here. | ||
| And people need to know. | ||
| I mean, that lays it out. Less than two minutes. | ||
| That's the Democrat Party plan to become totalitarians and conquer this country in their death party. | ||
| Now, an interesting decision came from an Obama-appointed judge. | ||
| Judge rules illegal immigrants have gun rights protected by the Second Amendment. | ||
| A decision on gun rights for illegal immigrants has divided the Second Amendment community. | ||
| Now, obviously, the irony here is rich, and we'll get deeper into it. | ||
| But before we do, I actually agree. | ||
| I do believe that illegal immigrants have a Second Amendment right. | ||
| I actually do believe that. | ||
| Now, I'm not saying that they're Americans. | ||
| I'm not saying that their right is given to them by the government. | ||
| Their right to self-defense is given to them by God, the Creator, just like it is to us. | ||
| Now, that doesn't mean they're not criminals for crossing the border illegally. | ||
| That doesn't mean they have a right to stay here and get free stuff. | ||
| They can be deported. They can be put in jail. | ||
| But, again, we hold these things self-evident. | ||
| If somebody is attacking you, do you have the right to defend yourself? | ||
| If somebody is attacking you with their fists, do you have a right to punch back? | ||
| If somebody is attacking you trying to stab you with a knife, do you have a right to stab back? | ||
| If somebody is coming after you trying to shoot you or kill you with a gun, do you have the right to shoot back and defend yourself? | ||
| Yes, you do. Yes, you do. | ||
| If an illegal immigrant is standing on the street, minding his own business, and somebody starts attacking him, he has the right to defend himself. | ||
| We hold these things self-evident, endowed by the Creator. | ||
| So I actually agree. | ||
| Illegal immigrants do have a Second Amendment right. | ||
| An illegal immigrant has the same right to self-defense that you or I have. | ||
| Now, they're not American citizens. | ||
| They don't have a right to stay here. | ||
| And because they're not citizens, they don't have these rights enshrined. | ||
| And when they go to their other country, who knows what? | ||
| They might have a different law there. | ||
| They might not have rights given to them by God, like we have in America, that we hold self-evident. | ||
| But I believe all humans have the right to self-defense. | ||
| We should all hold that self-evident. | ||
| And see, that's what it's really about. | ||
| And that's the distraction. They want to make it about guns. | ||
| They want to make it about guns or magazines or types of weapons or attachments or modifications. | ||
| It's really just about the right to self-defense. | ||
| And you have the right to choose how you want to defend yourself. | ||
| But the Democrats want to make it illegal to defend yourselves because they want to rape you and kill you. | ||
| And if you have the right to defend yourself, well then the Democrats are going to have a problem raping and killing you, aren't they? | ||
| But this was a liberal judge. | ||
| A federal judge in Illinois has found that the Constitution protects the gun rights of noncitizens who enter the United States illegally. | ||
| U.S. District Judge Sharon Johnson Coleman on Friday ruled that a federal probation on illegal immigrants owning firearms is unconstitutional. | ||
| That's amazing. | ||
| Do they make the same argument about Americans having guns? | ||
| In Illinois? No! | ||
| They do for illegal immigrants, though. | ||
| Isn't that amazing? A liberal judge believes that an illegal immigrant has more access to the Second Amendment rights and self-defense than Americans do. | ||
| That's the real story here. | ||
| That's the real story here. | ||
| Isn't that amazing? So a liberal judge appointed by Obama would have a more liberal view and application of the Second Amendment when it applies to non-citizens than he does for American citizens. | ||
| That is incredible. | ||
| But it all gets back to what we just played. | ||
| The Democrats are importing a voting block and they want to show loyalty to the illegal immigrants. | ||
| So they get free stuff and they get more access and they get more rights than you! | ||
| Than you. Now, there's some back and forth with this situation at the Supreme Court and Texas being able to enforce the southern border. | ||
| And, I mean, you can read multiple stories and they have different... | ||
| Some say that Texas lost. | ||
| Some say that Texas won. | ||
| But let's just put the political football down and just address the game. | ||
| Supreme Court allows Texas to begin enforcing controversial immigration law. | ||
| Controversial. Supreme Court lets Texas enforce new law allowing police to arrest illegal immigrants. | ||
| Supreme Court clears way for Texas to enforce illegal immigration law for now. | ||
| So it's controversial to have a southern border. | ||
| And it's a new law to arrest criminals? | ||
| What? What? | ||
| What? It's controversial to have a southern border and protect the southern border. | ||
| It's controversial or somehow a new president to arrest criminals is what they're arguing. | ||
| So all Texas is saying to the Supreme Court is we believe it's within our state's duties to protect our southern border, to protect the border of Texas. | ||
| The federal government is trying to open the border We believe it's our duty as the state of Texas to protect the border. | ||
| We also have a bill that says Texas can arrest illegal immigrants. | ||
| The federal government says we can't arrest illegal immigrants. | ||
| Well, we in Texas say we can. | ||
| And then the liberal media says that's controversial and that's a new law that you would arrest criminals. | ||
| So having a southern border and arresting criminals is new and controversial, according to CNN, Politico, and the Washington Post. | ||
| Now what the hell is going on in Fort Worth where I guess they don't want to | ||
| arrest criminals and they want to have an open southern border as they are | ||
| pushing back against this in clip 16. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It is the mission of the Fort Worth Police Department to serve every member | |
| of our community. | ||
| And our day-to-day commitment to that mission will not change with the passage of Senate Bill 4. | ||
| Although we will always follow the law, the primary responsibility for immigration enforcement and border protection should be left to our federal and state partners. | ||
| In the light of the vibrant growth of our city and the diversity of our communities, Our department remains unwavering in its commitment to community policing and making Fort Worth the safest city in the country for all who call this community home. | ||
| Oh, there it is. | ||
| Yes, we're here for the illegal immigrants. | ||
| So, yeah, the rest is in Spanish here. | ||
| Now look, again, I'm fair-minded. | ||
| In many ways, I'm liberal-minded. | ||
| I'm a classical liberal. If there's an illegal immigrant... | ||
| Who is a victim of a violent crime and calls the police, then yeah, okay, the police should stop the criminal from assaulting or robbing or whatever the illegal immigrant. | ||
| That's fine. I'm okay with that. | ||
| I don't want a police officer to show up at the scene of the crime. | ||
| Let's say there's an illegal immigrant woman and she's getting raped. | ||
| I don't want a police officer to show up and say, oh, wait, you're an illegal immigrant? | ||
| I'm sorry. I have to let this person rape you. | ||
| Of course not. That's not at all what we're arguing here. | ||
| But once everything is processed, it comes out you're an illegal immigrant, well, you know, maybe you get a court date, maybe you get a citation, maybe you get arrested, maybe you get deported. | ||
| Sorry, you broke the law. | ||
| But again, it's the same thing with the Second Amendment. | ||
| If an illegal immigrant is standing on the street corner and somebody comes up and tries to mug them and stab them with a knife and they fight back and they defend themselves, they have the right to do that too. | ||
| Now again, law enforcement gets involved, you're here illegally, well now you might have to deal with the consequences of that. | ||
| But it's this blatant pushback against common sense law enforcement. | ||
| How is that even controversial to say we're going to protect the southern border? | ||
| How is that even controversial to say we're going to arrest criminals? | ||
| Because the left has diluted the argument. | ||
| The left has bastardized the discourse. | ||
| So they're not going to give up. | ||
| The liberals are not going to give up. | ||
| They don't want Texas to defend the southern border. | ||
| And they don't want Texas law enforcement to arrest illegal immigrants. | ||
| That's what they're doing. This is happening. | ||
| Democrats. Open policy. | ||
| It's criminal policy. | ||
| There's no other way to put it. | ||
| Here's some of the results. | ||
| Listen to what the Los Angeles Police Department is reporting now. | ||
| Again, we warned you, these are gangs coming in here now. | ||
| Hear it from the Los Angeles Police Department, clip 13. | ||
|
unidentified
|
We have a significant increase in burglaries from organized groups that are outside this country, that are coming into the country, and they are targeting high-end residents. | |
| And we are addressing that specifically in a task force fashion through multi-agencies. | ||
| Lots of these break-ins have been recorded by security cameras in recent years. | ||
| Detectives tell me many tourist burglars who've been arrested often entered the U.S. through a visa waiver program. | ||
| Many were visiting from Chile and other South American countries. | ||
| The LAPD says there have been more than 900 residential burglaries across the city since January. | ||
| Some of those committed by the tourist burglars who often target luxury homes in the foothills. | ||
| And some of them may be using New technology to interfere with home security. | ||
| Just last week, the LAPD's Wilshire station sent out this alert that Wi-Fi jammers had been used to block camera and alarm signals during some recent break-ins. | ||
| Some sort of device by burglars that actually deaden, kill or stop Wi-Fi from operating. | ||
| The immediate fix for these home alarm systems is to hardwire them. | ||
| Where you plug those systems directly into your Ethernet in the wall and not use your Wi-Fi internally. | ||
| Choi says he's not sure if the tourist burglars have been using these devices, but the i-team has learned jammers and drones have been found by officers in Beverly Hills and other nearby cities. | ||
| Last year, burglars were caught staking out homes in Orange County while wearing a camouflage suit like this, similar to ghillie suits worn by military snipers. | ||
| And it's not just a California story. | ||
| Police in Scottsdale, Arizona, announced today the arrests of a trio of suspected residential burglars, all in the U.S. on the visa waiver program and suspected of being part of a wide-ranging criminal organization. | ||
| These are Chilean burglary crews that are coming to the United States on the visa waiver program. | ||
| Now, if Republicans were good at narrative and messaging, then you could dominate this. | ||
| These are Biden border gangs. | ||
| These are Biden burglaries. | ||
| I mean, identify every single thing that happens with illegal immigrants with a Democrat name or the Democrat Party attached to it because they're directly responsible for this. | ||
| Here's another example. O'Fallon, Missouri. | ||
| Illegal immigrant stabs two people at a laundromat. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Clip 15. Homeland Security told police Barrera Amaya entered the states in 2021 through Eagle Pass, Texas. | |
| No matter who's committing the crime, whether they be illegal or here legally, the O'Fall Missouri Police Department is going to take it seriously. | ||
| According to court documents, Barrera Amaya was in the Highlander laundromat with a neighbor who was also the victim. | ||
| Eventually, he hit the victim inside the business and chased them into a parking lot where he stabbed them in the back. | ||
| Another person came to their aid. | ||
| They were stabbed too. Then police say they quickly picked him up in his car. | ||
| Our detective bureau took over the investigation and obtained a confession. | ||
| Har says Homeland Security told them Barrera Maya had a detainer from ICE. It's just so frustrating. | ||
| This is all caused by policy. | ||
| It's like, gee. | ||
| Why did I gain 50 pounds and now I'm fat and unhealthy? | ||
| Well, because you sat around all day eating bonbons and never exercised. | ||
| You made a decision that led to bad health. | ||
| Gee, why are illegal immigrants committing mass burglaries and organized crime and killing and stabbing and raping Americans? | ||
| Well, because you have bad policy decisions that led to this. | ||
| So it's just like you make better decisions, you learn from mistakes, you make good decisions, and none of this happens. | ||
| But there's an agenda afoot. | ||
| And that's the Democrat Party's agenda. | ||
| To destroy the United States of America and have one party rule, no more United States. | ||
| That's their agenda. | ||
| And they'll lie to accomplish it. | ||
| Oh yes. They will lie. | ||
| Like Christine Blasey Ford, remember her? | ||
| She gets called out on The View. | ||
| I don't know if called out is the right word, but they say, hey, you know, people still don't buy your story. | ||
| Well, yeah, she made it all up. She has no witnesses. | ||
| They all spoke against her. | ||
| And so here she is on The View. | ||
| Remember this person who tried to lie to make sure that Brett Kavanaugh couldn't get on the Supreme Court? | ||
| Here's a little reminder of her in clip 12. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, you've been called a highly credible witness, and you have a PhD in psychology. | |
| You're a professor. | ||
| You teach at Palo Alto and Stanford Universities. | ||
| But even today, some people remain skeptical of your story. | ||
| And you write that during the hearing, Senator Lindsey Graham wouldn't even make eye contact with you. | ||
| Were you prepared for that kind of response? | ||
| I was prepared ahead of time that none of the Republicans were going to speak with me, and they were going to use an outside interviewer. | ||
| And so I was actually surprised at how kind some of the other Republican senators were who broke that protocol and said hello. | ||
| Who was that? Can you name a good one? | ||
| Senator Flake and Senator Sasse both came over and said hello. | ||
| Neither one was in Congress anymore, right? | ||
| But still, with credit. Yeah, it's good for them. | ||
| That says a lot. So this is what they do. | ||
| They bring forward these women who have no integrity and really it's women like, women that make up sexual abuse allegations or rape allegations and accusations, they are the enemy of actual victims. | ||
| They are the biggest enemy of actual victims because when they lie for political purposes, now people tend to doubt real victims. | ||
| Unfortunately, this is what they've done. | ||
| This is what the liberals have done. | ||
| But, you know, this image, guys, just B-roll clip eight. | ||
| This image says it all. | ||
| So E. Jean Carroll lies about Trump raping her, and she still wins the case. | ||
| And they all exit the courtroom smiling, glad-handing, because this is them. | ||
| This is their body language. They believe they've conquered the truth. | ||
| They believe they've conquered reality. | ||
| The message is now clear. | ||
| Make things up. | ||
| Lie, twist, deceive, and manipulate. | ||
| Against the political opposition and then steal their money. | ||
| And then we walk out of the courtroom as heroes when we're the real villains. | ||
| When we're the real criminals. | ||
| And they do it right in front of your face. | ||
| I mean, it's the gangster mafia mindset. | ||
| It's the crooked criminal psychology to torture you. | ||
| To torture you. | ||
| And that's what they do. And then she goes on TV saying how rape is sexy. | ||
| And she goes on TV bragging about how she takes all Trump's money and she's going to spend it on lavish vacations and apartments. | ||
| And it's all a big joke. | ||
| It's all a big joke. | ||
| Rubbing your face in it. | ||
| Yeah, we can lie. | ||
| We can deceive. And we can get away with it. | ||
| And then we can destroy you in the process. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's disgusting. That's liberals. | |
| That's what they do. And people are waking up to it, though. | ||
| If there's good news, people are waking up to it. | ||
| Like this black couple talking about who they're going to be voting for or who they had voted for in the past and who they're going to vote for in the future in clip 19. | ||
|
unidentified
|
In 2008 and 2012, you voted for? | |
| Barack Obama. Barack Obama. | ||
| 2016. I voted for Donald Trump. | ||
| Hillary Clinton. 2020? | ||
| Donald Trump. Biden. | ||
| And who will you vote for in 2024? | ||
| Donald Trump. Donald Trump. | ||
| You may vote for the former president. | ||
| I may. Why do you say that? | ||
| My views on certain things have changed. | ||
| I am very much so riding the fence. | ||
| What are you struggling with? | ||
| Now see how the host there tries to bully her and they want to make you ashamed. | ||
| Oh my gosh, you voted for Trump. | ||
| Oh my gosh, you're somehow a bad person. | ||
| But people are getting it. Wait a second. | ||
| It's not about the person. It's not about the propaganda. | ||
| It's about the policy. | ||
| It's about a leader of the country. | ||
| It's about a chief executive. | ||
| It's about a commander in chief. | ||
| But that's what they try to do. They try to bully you and henpeck you. | ||
| Like, oh, you're bad if you vote for Donald Trump. | ||
| It's time to get over that liberal bullying. | ||
| It's time to get over those Democrat deceptions. | ||
| Alright. We've still got a lot of news to cover here. | ||
| I mean, boy, I got so much. | ||
| Crazy stuff from a Candace Owens interview. | ||
| More news out of the Gaza Strip. | ||
| I also want to play these clips talking about free speech. | ||
| We may have to put that on hold for tomorrow. | ||
| So much in my docket left with just 30 minutes. | ||
| Folks, please continue to shop at InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| It's your support there to make everything we do here possible. | ||
| I mean, these days, there's so much news to cover on a three-hour show. | ||
| I have to take two scoops of TurboForce Plus to try to turn into Motor Mouth here. | ||
| 40% off TurboForce, InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| 10 hours, clean energy, one scoop, TurboForce. | ||
| Put down the toxic energy drinks, pick up a scoop of TurboForce Plus. | ||
| 40% off InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
| It's your support there that keep us on the air. | ||
| All right. I've been warning about what we saw today with Peter Navarro, what we saw with Alex Shepard, what we saw with Steve Baker, what we saw now with Isabella DeLuca. | ||
| I've been warning about this, and... | ||
| It's not to say I've been proven right. | ||
| I knew this was going to happen. | ||
| So we've got a couple clips today. | ||
| We're still digging through the archives to find more of them because I've been warning about them at nauseam. | ||
| After my sentencing, I did about 50 shows warning that this was going to happen. | ||
| After my incarceration, I did another 50 shows warning this was going to happen. | ||
| After I got released from prison, I did another 50 shows warning that this was going to happen. | ||
| So... You know, digging through the internet trying to find all these clips now. | ||
| It's like trying to find a needle in a haystack. | ||
| But we got a great crew here and we're going to find more. | ||
| But here's just a couple of me addressing what we're now witnessing, the political persecution continuing. | ||
| When you watch these, these are from months ago. | ||
| These are from last year. So as you watch these from me from last year, listen to me now. | ||
| This is not over. | ||
| There will be more arrests, more charges, more incarcerations of Trump supporters by the Biden regime before the presidential election. | ||
| All right? Here I am telling you so much last year. | ||
| We have to sit here and ask ourselves, what type of jurisdiction does the government have now to criminalize free speech? | ||
| And so, I mean, quite frankly, I didn't get in media to talk about me. | ||
| I didn't even expect I was going to become a free speech icon or martyr. | ||
| But now this is the fight I'm in now, Alex. | ||
| I am now selected by the government to be one of the biggest free speech activists on the planet, of course, alongside yourself. | ||
| And so this is where we're at now. | ||
| But we always warned people, whatever they do to us first, they're gonna do to everybody else. | ||
| Look at what they've done to you. | ||
| And now they do the judgment cases against Rudy Giuliani. | ||
| Look at what they did to you with the censorship. | ||
| Now they censor everybody else, myself included. | ||
| So folks, understand. | ||
| If they can get away with criminalizing Owen Schroer's free speech, they're coming for you next. | ||
| Well, sure. You know, I'm one of the most politically persecuted journalists in America. | ||
| I don't think it's a stretch to say that. | ||
| and I got out of prison last week for a speech crime. | ||
| And the last time I was here on Timcast, we were discussing this before we went live, | ||
| how basically my case was going to be used as a precedent-setting case | ||
| to go after other journalists, and now they are going after other journalists. | ||
| There's another one that's going to be turning himself in on Tuesday, | ||
| and I suspect there's going to be a lot more in 2024. | ||
| So my case is eventually likely to get to the Supreme Court, and hopefully we can have success there to stop this | ||
| political persecution of journalists in Biden's America. | ||
| And I'm sure we'll get into some of the details about my case and everything else. | ||
| We'll get into that later. But I would just say that I'll lead with this. | ||
| There's something that I can't get over now. | ||
| It's like an itch that can't be scratched. | ||
| I'm not somebody that censors myself. | ||
| I don't censor myself. I'm not afraid to speak my heart. | ||
| I'm not afraid to speak my mind. But just coming on this show, just doing the interviews I've done this week, just hosting my show over at Infowars, now every time I go on air and every time I speak, there's something in the back of my head. | ||
| Am I going to go to jail for this? | ||
| Am I going to get arrested for this? | ||
| Am I going to be incarcerated and tortured and thrown into solitary for this? | ||
| And that's what it's like to grow up in... | ||
| A communist country. That's what it's like to grow up in an oppressive regime. | ||
| And this is what it's like in America now. | ||
| And it breaks my heart that this is the country that future Americans might grow up in. | ||
| That's the thought that has to linger in the back of their mind, like they're living in North Korea, that if they say something wrong, they have bad speak or a thought crime, they're going to be locked up. | ||
| So hopefully we can stop this before it just gets totally out of control. | ||
| We've been warning that this is going to happen. | ||
| And I guess you in the audience understand this, but it's like, when are members of Congress going to get this? | ||
| I mean, how bad does it have to get with Katenji Brown-Jackson arguing that the First Amendment might not apply anymore, and that it's in the government's way to censor you, and so we need to get rid of it? | ||
| How bad does it have to get where top Trump advisors are getting arrested for contempt of Congress, but Hunter Biden doesn't? | ||
| How bad does it have to get where journalists now, since my incarceration, which was the precedent set in case, Steve Baker, Alex Shepard, how many journalists have to get persecuted and arrested and incarcerated by the Biden regime now? | ||
| How many other individuals like Isabella DeLuca are going to be charged and sentenced by the Biden regime now because they got away with it? | ||
| How much longer does this go on? | ||
| How many more innocent Americans have to suffer? | ||
|
unidentified
|
That's the question. That's the question. | |
| All right, quickly, let's see if we can get to this here. | ||
| Over 13,000 children killed in Gaza. | ||
| Others severely malnourished. | ||
| Starving children fill hospital wards as famine looms. | ||
| But if you think that's bad, you're an anti-Semite, according to a rabbi that Candace had on her show. | ||
| Truly incredible stuff here. | ||
| But there's some interesting points here. | ||
| Play clip 17. I didn't. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I said it's sad when an innocent... | |
| It's not condemnation. | ||
| I'll just ask you the question. | ||
| Is it sad? I don't want to cut each other off, okay? | ||
| Because clearly what we are having here is just a disagreement. | ||
| There's no reason to get angry. Do you think it is sad when an innocent Palestinian child dies? | ||
| Candace? I cry every day. | ||
| He won't answer the question. And it's not just for Israel. | ||
| And he's mad because people won't buy his narrative. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And this is one of the things you clearly do not understand. | |
| The same way most don't. | ||
| No, I think we actually do understand now. | ||
|
unidentified
|
And that's your problem. I cry for what's going on in Israel. | |
| I cry just as much for what we are forced to do. | ||
| So why don't you go to Israel then? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Golda Meir had a great quote. | |
| She said that one day we may be able to forgive them for killing Israeli children. | ||
| We will never be able to forgive them for making us kill their children. | ||
| Wow. | ||
| Wow. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What about my statement of saying that I also... | |
| Now let's be clear. That's enough. | ||
| So look, this is an all-out war. | ||
| These people have been warring for years. | ||
| And again, you just source the Jewish religious text. | ||
| They believe that they're God's chosen people sent from the land of Ur to conquer the Canaanites and so on and so forth. | ||
| God said that they could kill and conquer these lands. | ||
| That's the religious text. | ||
| That's what they believe. Some others might believe that. | ||
| Some Christians believe that. But imagine, imagine they're sitting here. | ||
| He says, oh, I'm so sorry that you forced us to kill your kids. | ||
| Here's another incredible part of that interview in clip 18. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How dare you go into the misogynistic, excuse me. | |
| Misogynistic. This hag daughter, something you... | ||
| Here, start it over. Start it over. | ||
| See how he accidentally says the wrong insult. | ||
| He accidentally says the wrong virtue signal. | ||
| He didn't mean to say misogynistic. | ||
| He accidentally, oops, sorry. | ||
| I meant a different insult. Play it again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How dare you go into the misogynistic, excuse me, the anti-Semitic trope of his hag daughter, something used throughout the late 18th and early 20th century. | |
| Sorry, sorry. Hag is now anti-Semitic? | ||
| That is a term of his hag daughter that goes back into the witches of Eastern Europe. | ||
| Why did you have to call her a hag daughter? | ||
| Just to be clear, because she's a witch. | ||
| I think she's a witch. | ||
| That's not because she's Jewish. | ||
| I would call her a hag of any color. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I think she's a witch, what they have done over the last two years. | |
| I believe his daughter is a hag. | ||
| I said that because that's what I believe. | ||
| You may disagree with me on that, but to say that that's anti-Semitic is ridiculous. | ||
| I would call any person a hag. | ||
| Candace, Candace. I'm going to be very clear with that point. | ||
| He goes into an unbelievable thing here about how Hag, everything is anti-Semitic. | ||
| And so this guy wants the authority to tell you everything and be your thought leader. | ||
| And he's not. Maybe for his Jewish congregation he is, but not Christians. | ||
| Here's the problem. When I see the Patriot Front going around behaving like they do, I see that that's bad against my political movement. | ||
| I see that's bad against Christian conservatives. | ||
| I see that's bad against Trump supporters, and I call it out and I say, hey, don't do that. | ||
| I'm not affiliated with that. | ||
| So I would suggest Jewish people who don't want to be a part of this madness, like these rabbis, Shmully and this other guy going after Candace Owens, you need to denounce these people because they're making you look bad. | ||
| So like the Patriot Front makes Christians and conservatives look bad, these rabbis make Jews look bad. | ||
| Ah, yes, another confused moment for Joe Biden at a secret campaign event. | ||
| They can't let these things be known to the public or otherwise he'd be protested and a Trump rally would break out. | ||
| He abruptly stops speaking out of nowhere because he sees a kid in the audience and then is like, oh, a child, and then just gives the microphone over to this lady out of nowhere and then approaches the young child for a sniff and a grope. | ||
| That's Joe Biden politics, baby. | ||
| Groping children from sea to shining sea. | ||
| Joe Biden. Oh, yeah. | ||
| Yeah, he's moving in. Look at the kid. | ||
| The kid is already in defense mode knowing that that's a predator. | ||
| Kids somehow know, don't they? | ||
| Yeah, they do. There's a new documentary out and it shows what's going on. | ||
| You know, it's kind of sad. | ||
| It's kind of painful stuff. Disturbing footage of Nickelodeon's abuser Dan Schneider filming in a hot tub with a 16-year-old bikini-clad Amanda Bynes resurfaces online as shocking new documentary raises grave concerns about adult TV writers' close relationship with teen star. | ||
| Yeah, and then there was also the producer or editor, whatever it was, for the Marvel movies. | ||
| That had sick, disturbing, pedophilia-like posts on the internet. | ||
| And then he got rehired. | ||
| So it's all over in Hollywood, unfortunately. | ||
| But you look at Amanda Bynes as an example, and I guess that that poor girl was abused so badly as a childhood TV star that she's now reached a point where she has to completely desecrate herself To make herself so ugly that nobody would want to touch her. | ||
| And I'm not trying to be rude to her, and maybe she still has a beautiful soul. | ||
| So this is not some sort of a negative commentary on Amanda Bynes. | ||
| It's more just like, that's what you do after years of abuse. | ||
| And unfortunately, it's all too common in Hollywood and entertainment when they get access to these kids. | ||
| All right, ladies and gentlemen, we're going to finish with a bit of a light note today. | ||
| The crew put together a special and really did a great job. | ||
| Really did a great job from Infowars skits on band.video. | ||
| This is what happens. | ||
| This is a leftist intervention of a conservative. | ||
| We shot this last week, myself and the crew. | ||
| Big ups to the crew and our great editors here that did a great job with this. | ||
| I think you'll have a laugh as we close the broadcast. | ||
|
unidentified
|
a leftist intervention. Oh, what's going on here guys? I just want you to take a seat, John. All right, sure. Well, | |
| everyone here really cares about you and I'm John. Do you know what an intervention is? Intervention? | ||
| Yeah. Yeah. | ||
| We're all worried that, well, frankly, you're becoming a right-wing MAGA extremist. | ||
| What? We've all noticed signs of radicalization. | ||
| You can actually read about him here in these articles from NPR and PBS. Wait, wait, wait. | ||
| What is this? I've never seen this before. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Frankly, we're worried about you, and we want to get you the help that you need, even if you don't know that you need it, okay? | |
| So we've all prepared some statements. | ||
| They're called personal impact statements. | ||
| If you could just let us read them and, you know, maybe afterwards clarify some things. | ||
| If you want to start. Yeah. | ||
| John, I've been worried about your descent into white supremacist ideology ever since you got a squat rack last month and bragged that you were now a part of the, quote, home gym master race. | ||
| One week later, I witnessed you chug an entire pitcher of raw eggs in one sitting. | ||
| God! It's called slonking. | ||
| Your beard was soaked in the raw egg juice. | ||
| I mean, it's a little messy. Disgusting. | ||
| When I asked, you said raw eggs are anabolic. | ||
| I couldn't find anabolic on the ADL hate slogan database, but I'm sure it means something awful. | ||
| It's just about muscle growth. | ||
|
unidentified
|
As your friends, please help us understand. | |
| We can't stand idly by as you destroy yourself with racism, bigotry, and probably salmonella. | ||
| No, I haven't gotten sick once, actually. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's perfectly fine. | |
| John, it used to be so much fun. | ||
| We would go out, get Blasted on alcohol. | ||
| Party all night. | ||
| Eat a bunch of fast food. | ||
| Like, who even are you anymore? | ||
| I mean, I've made some health decisions. | ||
| I cut out alcohol. | ||
| I don't consume seed oils anymore. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Listen, sweetie. You are a cult member, okay? | |
| You believe everything Trump says and you want to build a big wall on the border. | ||
| Look, man, I'm just against illegal immigration. | ||
| It's common sense policy. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Your lifestyle is committing genocide, okay, to my people. | |
| By the way, I don't know even if you're on threads yet, but... | ||
| I saw you reposted DeSantis. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He wants to ban all the gay and trans books for kids. | |
| No, no, no, no. They're just grooming kids sexually, man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's not grooming. It's liberal. | |
| Hello? Yeah, look, have you even looked into these books? | ||
| Well, yeah, I did my own research. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Well, there you go, man. | |
| Check the articles. Doing your own research, a classic sign you're descending into right-wing madness. | ||
| Hold on, John. Do you even have a Ukraine flag in your bio? | ||
| Well, actually, I got rid of all my social media last week. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you boosted? Boosted? | |
| Like a booster scene? | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, you're vaccine boosters. | |
| Oh, no, I didn't get vaccinated. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Oh, my God, are you serious? | |
| Wow. We should have brought our masks. | ||
| Guys, it's fine. It's fine. | ||
| I got my ivermectin right here. | ||
|
unidentified
|
What is that? | |
| There's a horse on the box, John. | ||
| You don't get your vaccines, you don't wear a mask, not even off the side of your ear, so you can prove to people you trust the science. | ||
| The masks don't do anything, man. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Dude, no, no. Last week, I went to go reparate some toilet paper, and you had two rolls. | |
| You weren't even stocked up. | ||
| Wait, no. Dude, I hadn't been to the grocery store. | ||
| Excuse me, a black voice is speaking right now. | ||
| Thank you. Continue. | ||
| You talk about China virus and it coming out of, like, eco-science lab? | ||
| Like, dude, you sound crazy. | ||
| But it did come out of a lab in Wuhan, China. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Do you even stand for the Black National Anthem? | |
| The Black National Anthem. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Thank you, guys. I don't even know what this is. | |
| Are you kidding me? Come on, John. | ||
| You come in here wearing that American flag right in our face. | ||
| Like, don't you understand that that is capitalist patriarchy? | ||
| This was a gift from my grandfather. | ||
| He was a veteran. Oh, my gosh. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Are you kidding me? It feels like just the other day we were planning my next abortion, and now you come in here talking about starting a family? | |
| I mean, I just think I might want to have kids someday. | ||
|
unidentified
|
White kids, John? What? | |
| Kids? You're going to national parks for hours, days at a time. | ||
| Yeah, I mean, I asked you to come. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Camping? A black guy in the woods? | |
| Dude, I saw the noose in your bag. | ||
| That was fishing wire. | ||
| You were gonna lynch me. Guys, that was fishing wire. | ||
|
unidentified
|
A noose. Come on. Frankly, John, there's no point in denying this because we found these in your room. | |
| Lord of the Rings DVDs? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Yeah, extended edition Lord of the Rings DVDs. | |
| Can you guys please stop saying the name of that movie title in front of me? | ||
| That's a popular movie. We have no black people. | ||
| I didn't want to violate your privacy. | ||
| But sometimes when you care about somebody, you gotta do extreme things. | ||
| I looked in your gym bag, and I found a couple things, John. | ||
| George Orwell. 1984. | ||
| Ron, Paul, John, what is this? | ||
| The Great Awakening by Alex Jones? | ||
| Where'd you get this? At bullwurststore.com? | ||
| What are you talking about? Why are you going through my gym bag? | ||
|
unidentified
|
John, we can help you. | |
| Look, John, we know you've been reading the Bible. | ||
| You finished it or whatever. | ||
| Congratulations. That's great. But actually, yeah, I finished it. | ||
| My question is, why do you have this, huh? | ||
| What's this about? It's a hunting knife. | ||
| For hunting what? Black people? | ||
| What? Oh, whatever it is, it's irresponsible. | ||
| Anybody here could have picked this up. | ||
| Whoa! Okay? You can't just have things like this lying around. | ||
| I even heard you went to a shooting range. | ||
| Like, for what? You know I'm a Second Amendment activist. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I mean, I used to go hunting with my dad when I was a kid. | |
| My guns! You're scaring us, Joe. | ||
| So, it's you who's been groomed? | ||
| No. What? Please, please. | ||
| Why do you need an AR-15 that shoots 15 magazines a second, last I checked? | ||
| Is it not a weapon okay? | ||
| What are you using? Lasers on your guns, John? | ||
| Assault weapons? The only thing they're good for is what? | ||
| Killing children? Alright, alright, alright. | ||
| Look, we're mad. | ||
| I know that. We have good reason. | ||
| But let's just give John a chance to respond, okay? | ||
| Guys, I'm a little confused. | ||
| I mean, I think I'm actually bettering myself as a person. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Alright, we're clearly not getting through to him. | |
| And frankly, I say we go to plan B. Hoods up, everybody. | ||
| Everybody, we're doing the ritual. Let's do this. | ||
| I'm out of here. | ||
| You guys want to do some fentanyl? | ||
| Yeah! Survival Shield X3, now back and better than ever with a whopping 40% discount. | ||
| It's your ticket to a healthier you, powered by the might of activated tri-iodine. | ||
| Picture this, a product derived from ancient sea salt buried deep beneath the earth, harnessing a cutting-edge process that stabilizes iodine in a groundbreaking tri-iodine formula. | ||
| Imagine waking up feeling rejuvenated, your body's processes humming smoothly like a well-oiled machine, all thanks to Survival Shield X3. This isn't just a step up from the old nascent iodine system, it's a quantum leap in health supplementation designed with you, the patriot, in mind. | ||
| Survival Shield X3 has got your back, providing peace of mind and body in these uncertain times. | ||
| Head over to InfowarsStored.com and witness the transformation for yourself. | ||
| This is more than just a supplement. | ||
| It's your shield, your protector, your Survival Shield X3. Don't wait. | ||
| Take control of your health today and step into a brighter, healthier future. |
Export Selection