Speaker | Time | Text |
---|---|---|
unidentified
|
The silent majority is no longer silent. | |
This is The War Room with Owen Schroer. | ||
Please stand by for further details. | ||
unidentified
|
We return you now to your regularly scheduled program. | |
I want war. | ||
Give me your attacks. | ||
Everything. Now you understand the shape of things. | ||
That's true. God wants me to wage war! | ||
Yes, sir, Jesus! | ||
I will do it! | ||
No more games! | ||
War! Ah! | ||
The real thing! | ||
unidentified
|
War! War! | |
War! You want war against our children? | ||
You want war against God? | ||
You will get war! | ||
War! His blood will fill buckets. | ||
Politically, not violently. | ||
And so I told you, I'm going to destroy you. | ||
I understand it now. | ||
I'm gonna get you. | ||
I'm coming for you. | ||
Do you understand that? What do you think I am? | ||
What do you think I do? You're very foolish. | ||
I don't hate you, Joe. I'm revolted by you. | ||
See the difference? You revolt me. | ||
You've been acting like a tough guy for a long time. | ||
unidentified
|
Destroy me. Give me your power. | |
Show me what you can do. Here I am. | ||
See how it works now? | ||
Oh, I'm so scared, Joe. | ||
Here I am, Joe. You can't do anything because you're a devil. | ||
unidentified
|
And you can't stand against Chris. | |
Yeah. | ||
You've chosen the wrong side and you're going to be destroyed. | ||
No matter what happens to me, Joe, you're done. | ||
Shining on with the big boys, Joe. | ||
Circling the black hole of hell, Joe. | ||
I can't wait to bang heads with you. | ||
They just don't understand how it works. | ||
They don't understand how the teeth bite. | ||
They don't understand the shape of doom. | ||
They just don't understand it. | ||
And I will detonate thanks to God's blessing. | ||
Not the defeat of Hillary, but the next great mission before I'm done. | ||
I will detonate the war that leads to your destruction. | ||
And Joe is only a baby in this, but he's an example of these fools who must first be destroyed before they're cleansed. | ||
Because we've taken down Hillary, and we've taken down the globalists, and we're gonna take down Soros, and we're gonna take you down. | ||
Once we stop fearing the devil and start taking the devil on is the day we start living. | ||
unidentified
|
And then you see the horizon. | |
You realize God's in control. | ||
And the bluff's gotta be called. | ||
The enemy's gotta be engaged. | ||
Bone's gotta meet bone. | ||
The sword's gotta meet shield. | ||
The axe has gotta come down on that skull. | ||
unidentified
|
And in the end, we'll see heaven. | |
Wind is filling my shales and I'm on a journey where I'm supposed to go. | ||
I'm on the path of my ancestors. | ||
A path beyond the stars. | ||
unidentified
|
A path to Valhalla. | |
And that's why I do this. | ||
Because to not do it is to lose the soul. | ||
And you've all chosen your lot with the devil. | ||
And I've chosen that I must take you on. | ||
It'll be this contest that defines us. | ||
unidentified
|
It'll be these wars, these fights that make us who we are. | |
See, Joe, you're in the pretend Hollywood world. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm in the big boy world. | |
Big squid. Ten times bigger than you. | ||
No whale. No sperm whale's ever fought that. | ||
unidentified
|
There's a little sperm whale. There's a squid this long. | |
That's me. One of my tentacles hit me. | ||
Your entire head. And don't worry, I'll show you. | ||
I'm just squeezing slowly, slowly, slowly. | ||
Slowly, the big tough Hollywood guy. | ||
Just very slowly. | ||
Just squeeze. Because vengeance is God. | ||
That's where this all comes from. | ||
And so now you get the full, the full heat loads. | ||
See, this is, oh, it's only started. | ||
Dude, the big giant burning plungers aren't even there. | ||
Winning the information war one mind at a time. | ||
Infowars.com. | ||
unidentified
|
Tomorrow's news today. | |
No globalists were hurt in the filming of this project. | ||
I want him found. Not tomorrow, not after breakfast. | ||
Now! Yes, sir! | ||
Well... Well, what? | ||
Man up and vanished like a fart in the wind. | ||
Nothing left but... | ||
Damn rocks on the windowsill. | ||
And that cupcake on the wall. | ||
What say there, Fuzzy Bridges? | ||
This is conspiracy. | ||
That's what this is. | ||
One big damn conspiracy! | ||
And everyone's in on it! | ||
This is the best route we can make the world... | ||
Unveiling the truth behind the globalist curtain. | ||
Welcome to the war room. | ||
Yeah! Welcome to The War Room. | ||
I am Chase Geiser, your host this afternoon into the evening. | ||
Thank you so much for tuning in on this Ides of March, this historic day in history. | ||
And I'm just catching up with the news the last hour or so as I've been preparing for the show. | ||
I'm printing off the articles from Infowars.com. | ||
And there was so much good news yesterday around the Fannie Willis issue and this pressure for her to recuse herself or just not be associated with this case in Georgia. | ||
Now I'm seeing this headline from Calvin McBreen. | ||
Apparently came out at 9 a.m. | ||
Breaking judge rules corrupt Georgia DA Fannie Willis to remain on the Trump case. | ||
So Judge Scott McAfee ruled today that Georgia's Fulton County District Attorney Fannie Willis will be able to remain working on her election interference case against presidential frontrunner Donald Trump. | ||
The judge's order addressed a motion to dismiss the case by the Trump team filed after Willis perjured herself about her sexual relationship with the lead state prosecutor she hired to go after Trump, Nathan Wade. | ||
Judge McAfee denied the Trump legal team's grounds for disqualification while admitting the established record now highlights a significant appearance of impropriety that infects the current structure of the prosecution team, an appearance that must be removed through the state's selection of one of two options. | ||
The judge ruled either Willis and her entire staff have to step aside or special prosecutor Wade must withdraw himself from the case. | ||
Okay, so this is consistent with yesterday. | ||
Just the headline confused me. I thought the great news from yesterday was being reversed. | ||
Let's hear what Dersh had to say about this just recently. | ||
Let's go ahead and run clip number eight and then analyze. | ||
Clip number eight, please. | ||
unidentified
|
Fonny Willis, you told me last week there should be a special prosecutor to investigate her. | |
What do you think of this recent twist here where she's saying the appearance isn't enough to disqualify her? | ||
Do you think she has any weight in this argument? | ||
She's trying to put pressure on the judge to find only that there was an appearance and then say that wasn't enough. | ||
But even if you need an actual conflict, it's there. | ||
The evidence is overwhelming. | ||
The evidence is overwhelming that they had an affair before the She hired him. | ||
The evidence is overwhelming that she benefited financially from it. | ||
The evidence is overwhelming that he was not qualified to do the job and earn $700,000. | ||
This ought to be a criminal investigation of Funny Willis and the two witnesses. | ||
I think we're well beyond disqualification, but I don't know whether the judge will have the courage to actually look And said, I believe you committed perjury. | ||
I believe you committed obstruction of justice. | ||
I believe you tampered with witnesses. | ||
I believe you conspired to commit perjury. | ||
That would be the right result. | ||
But if the judge doesn't have the courage to do that and falls back on an appearance of conflict, then she's making a legal argument. | ||
That's not enough. Now, we've seen that this lawfare is incessant. | ||
We've, of course, faced it here at Infowars. | ||
The great Owen Schroer spent some time in prison. | ||
We've seen the lawfare against Trump. | ||
And it seems to be effective in fortifying the left's conviction that Trump is Satan himself, Satan incarnate. | ||
I mean, I watched... The other day I was scrolling through my Twitter feed and I saw one of the Krasenstein brothers. | ||
I always mix up the clones. | ||
I like them, though. They're actually very polite, even though everything they say irritates me. | ||
But I saw one of the Krasenstein brothers say something to the effect of 92 charges or indictments for felonies. | ||
They're literally just tallying the numbers as if that itself is evidence of criminal | ||
activity. | ||
Now, traditionally speaking, at least when I grew up, if there was an indictment like | ||
that, it was pretty bad news. | ||
We had a system that had a lot more trust than it has today. | ||
But things have changed, and it's abundantly obvious that there is an incessant effort | ||
to shut down Donald Trump by any means necessary. | ||
Frankly speaking, ever since the Russian collusion hoax, I have doubted every single accusation | ||
made by any establishment organization or individual against Donald Trump. | ||
I mean that was such a glaring miscarriage of justice that it has undermined anything that the establishment could possibly say against Trump in terms of criminal accusations or allegations of that nature. | ||
And it is astonishing to me the extent to which the left totally disregards the fact that I mean, we have a sitting president who's a Democrat. | ||
disproportionately helping Hillary Clinton and her campaign by leveraging taxpayer resources, i.e. | ||
the intelligence community, to unlawfully spy on this campaign and then just make up this hoax that Russia was colluding with the Trump campaign in order to overturn the election or impact the election in 2016. | ||
Ever since then, every single allegation that's been made against the Trump administration is in that shadow. | ||
And if you don't acknowledge the fact that this establishment, this regime, this political class in the United States of America has already made a conspiratorial effort to shut down Donald Trump, then you're lost. | ||
You're totally lost. I mean, if they broke the law to conspire against Trump again... | ||
And no one was held accountable whatsoever. | ||
I mean, it did come out that it was a hoax, officially in the documents, admittedly a hoax, but nobody went to prison, nobody served any time, nobody paid any fines, nobody got fired, at least not that I'm aware of. | ||
And if it came out that it was a hoax and there was no accountability, then what's to say that this establishment wouldn't do this over and over again dozens of times, as many times as there are indictments against Donald Trump? | ||
In every single instance that there's some sort of prosecution against Donald Trump, we see that there is an inherent conflict of interest. | ||
Whether it's Judge Angeron and his wife's social media posts saying that Trump was screwed before the trial even began. | ||
Whether it's the fact that These plaintiffs, not these plaintiffs, these defendants like Trump are being found guilty without a jury, and a jury is merely used to determine the extent of the sentencing, a tactic used to bewitch the perception of the public because they hear about a jury, a jury, a jury all the time, and they don't realize that there was no jury involved in the actual conviction part of the crime alleged or the civil suit brought, only in the determination of what the payment is going to be. | ||
And I don't understand why it is that the left believes that these indictments are indicative of any sort of reliable evidence against Trump. | ||
And the question comes to mind, well, do they believe it? | ||
Or is it just... | ||
A convenient lie. And I always try to say on the show and others and anywhere on the network where I am, that it's really important to distinguish those who tell the lies from those who believe the lies. | ||
Now, repeating a lie is one thing. | ||
If you believe that it's true, you're less culpable. | ||
Obviously, it's irresponsible to believe foolish lies. | ||
It's irresponsible not to think critically, not to look into things, to be in cognitive dissonance or denial as to the nature of this political climate that we're in, the state of our country, the state of the world for that matter. | ||
But to tell the lie intentionally is Clinton-level behavior. | ||
Actually manufacturing this Russian collusion hoax, lying to Congress, intentionally deleting emails, that is one level of culpable not reached by the other puppets that retweet or repost or share or spread the lies because they themselves have fallen for the con. | ||
Right? I saw that post from Krasenstein. | ||
I don't know if you guys can find it or not. | ||
It's just baffling to me how they make the decision to interpret 92 indictments as indicative of Trump's criminality instead of indicative of the establishment's corruption itself. | ||
And we've seen this hypocrisy time and time again in multiple ways. | ||
It comes from the right and the left, but it seems to be particularly egregious among those on the left. | ||
I don't know why it is that that's the case. | ||
But something psychologically, genetically, theologically, spiritually, culturally about the left does give them a predisposition to cognitive dissonance. | ||
You know, they say some genders or races are predisposed to different illnesses. | ||
So, for example, if you're Of African descent, you're more likely to get sickle cell. | ||
Or, you know, if you're a man, you're more likely to have Alzheimer's than if you're a woman. | ||
We see this with the president, of course. | ||
There's all sorts of different medical conditions, illnesses, sicknesses that are associated with different genders, races, immutable characteristics, just because that's the way that nature works. | ||
We come from different parts of the world, different backgrounds, different histories, different environments, and our bodies have adapted differently to those different environments. | ||
And so, for some reason, if you're a leftist in this country, in the world for that matter, you are disproportionately predisposed to cognitive dissonance. | ||
And just for the sake of the audience, for those who may not know what cognitive dissonance is, it's when you simultaneously allow yourself to believe two different, completely conflicting things at the same time instead of choosing the thing that's more rational. | ||
So it would be like believing that the Russian collusion hoax was a hoax, but simultaneously believing that Hillary Clinton did nothing wrong. | ||
That's cognitive dissonance right there when you can't handle that. | ||
Yeah, here's the tweet. The people who attack the judges like Judge McAfee in the Fannie Willis ordeal and not the person being charged with 85 felony indictments are the ones who history will judge as having Trump derangement syndrome. | ||
So their word for cognitive dissonance is Trump derangement syndrome because they like to throw Trump in there any chance they can. | ||
It says not the people who say let the judge and jury decide. | ||
Again, implying that there's actually a jury in all these cases. | ||
If you think that attacking the courts because they ruled in a way you don't like is patriotic, perhaps you need a civics lesson. | ||
So it's because you're not an expert in civics. | ||
It's because you haven't listened to your professor or your civics teacher. | ||
This is why you're so stupid. | ||
You're just not as educated as me in my ilk, in my class of people who view our indoctrination not as indoctrination, but in education. | ||
And so they disproportionately have this cognitive dissonance where they just can't accept the obvious truth in the face of what they emotionally want to believe. | ||
And it's bizarre to me because they come out and they talk about things like how there's this inequity among different races, different peoples in our nation, in our system. | ||
There's systemic racism. | ||
For example, there's this bizarre woke Advil ad. | ||
It claims that black people experience pain inequity. | ||
Maybe they're referring to the sickle cell that I mentioned. | ||
I don't understand. But we're going to run the clip here in a second. | ||
I'm assuming you guys have it ready. Just let me know in my ears if you don't. | ||
Yeah, so I want to run this ad and then we'll talk about it. | ||
unidentified
|
I should not have to beg my doctor to run tests or ask them to take another look. | |
Welcome to Believe My Pain, a discussion about systemic pain bias in healthcare. | ||
I want to thank all of you and all of you for joining me today as we talk about this very important issue. | ||
I also want to thank the Pain Equity Project developed by Advil in partnership with the Morehouse School of Medicine and Black Health for inviting us to be a part of their commitment to addressing pain bias in black communities. | ||
That's just bizarre. | ||
Bizarre, bizarre behavior. | ||
And of course the pharmaceutical company would create the terminology systemic pain inequity. | ||
These are the type of terms made up by pharmaceutical companies, other companies, for the purpose of marketing, for the purpose of advertising. | ||
A famous example is halitosis. | ||
Have you ever heard of halitosis? | ||
I'm sure that you have. Halitosis is the clinical term for bad breath. | ||
Typically caused by drainage from the back of your nose into your throat while you sleep, which creates this terrible odor. | ||
Halitosis. Doesn't really exist. | ||
At least it didn't when the term came out. | ||
I believe it was invented, made up by Listerine, in order to sell mouthwash. | ||
And get some doctor testimonials. | ||
Some of the old black and white ads about Listerine talk about halitosis is this bad breath condition. | ||
And if you've ever had bad breath, maybe you have halitosis. | ||
I believe it's totally made up. | ||
Yeah, how halitosis became a medical condition with a cure. | ||
Bad breath wasn't perceived as a medical condition until one company realized that it could help them sell mouthwash. | ||
See if you guys can find a YouTube clip of the original Listerine halitosis ad. | ||
I know that I'm throwing curveballs at you, but I'd love for the audience to see this. | ||
So they're making up, Advil is making up systemic pain inequity, not out of the kindness of their hearts, but because they want to sell more Pain pills. | ||
Right? And you gotta keep in mind, Advil is an over-the-counter drug. | ||
So when you're talking about systemic pain inequity and doctors having to be begged for pain medication, you don't have to beg your doctor for Advil. | ||
It's only the heavy-duty narcotics stuff you have to beg your doctor for. | ||
Right? So what does Advil have to do with systemic pain and equity anyway? | ||
Because everybody can go to a CVS and purchase Advil. | ||
And if you're going to a CVS in San Francisco, you can just go in there and steal it. | ||
Nobody's going to arrest you because it's not expensive enough. | ||
Advil is literally free in many major leftist cities for anyone who wants to just go in there and steal it. | ||
So they make this stuff up so they can sell it. | ||
And the irony is they're not even trying to sell it to the black market. | ||
They're trying to sell it to those who have fallen ill to the psychological condition known as white guilt. | ||
So we as white people watch that commercial, that ad. | ||
We see this campaign and we think somehow we're contributing to racial reparations by purchasing Advil because they stand for this leftist, woke, social justice warrior ideology. | ||
And then you see examples like Don Lemon. | ||
We're going to run clip seven here in a second. | ||
Don Lemon bites the hand that feeds him. | ||
So after being on CNN for years, he's canceled. | ||
And before his show was supposed to launch exclusively on X on March 18th, he's canceled by X because of his incredibly rude interview with Elon Musk. | ||
I don't know if it was a bad interview or not. | ||
I haven't seen the whole thing. I've only seen clips of it. | ||
But it was very obviously rude, narrow-minded, myopic, all the things that you would expect from a leftist pundit. | ||
But what's bizarre to me about this, this cognitive dissonance thing that we've been talking about, I'll run the clip in a second, is I can deal with stupid. | ||
I can deal with somebody who just doesn't have... | ||
The processing capacity to deal with complicated issues, critical thinking, or issues. | ||
I have no problem with someone who's just plain old dumb, like Vinny Frum of Mice and Men. | ||
Nothing they could do about it. It was an immutable characteristic. | ||
Maybe they were in the birth canal for too long, and so they didn't get enough oxygen, and they're just stupid now. | ||
Maybe genetically, they just don't have all the genes that are associated with being correlated to intelligence. | ||
If you're dumb, I get it. | ||
I understand. I will forgive you. | ||
I will be gracious to you. | ||
No problem whatsoever. | ||
Obviously, sometimes it's inconvenient and unfortunate, but frankly, half the population is going to be below average. | ||
Half the population is going to be above average. | ||
That's just the way it is. | ||
But with cognitive dissonance, it has little to do with your IQ at all. | ||
That is the decision, despite your overwhelming capacity or your normal capacity for critical thinking and intelligence, despite your ability to think, you have decided not to. | ||
unidentified
|
It is an illness of character. | |
And we see clips of how Don Lemon responded to ex, formerly Twitter, censoring Donald Trump. | ||
It's a private company. You can do whatever it wants. | ||
And then when Elon Musk says, you know what? | ||
We're not going to pay you some minimum amount to publish your content exclusively on our platform. | ||
He acts like it's not a public square and it's not free speech. | ||
There's a difference between letting someone use a platform and paying them to do so. | ||
You're not entitled to being paid thousands of dollars to post your stupid content on this platform just because you're Don Lemon and you used to be a pundit at CNN. You're literally trying to transcribe The business model of legacy media, which is dead, into this new social media medium, and it's not going to translate. | ||
It doesn't work like that anymore, Don. | ||
Sorry that you launched a YouTube channel and only had 2,500 subscribers in 10 hours. | ||
Sorry that nobody cares what you have to say, and the only reason they listen to you is because they wanted to turn on CNN because they were CNN junkies, and not because they wanted to turn on Don Lemon. | ||
Nobody ever watched Don Lemon because he was Don Lemon. | ||
They watched Don Lemon because they were watching CNN and he happened to be on. | ||
Nobody watches Chase Geyser because he's Chase Geyser. | ||
They watch Chase Geyser because they want to watch InfoWars and he happens to be filling in for somebody today. | ||
That's a fact I'm willing to admit because I'm not a moron like Don Lemon. | ||
Let's run this clip and see what he has to say. | ||
unidentified
|
And it was tense at moments, but you've been involved in tense interviews. | |
I said to him, I think it's good that people see folks like you and I, who have different worldviews, come together and talk, as he says, have free speech. | ||
Free speech is only important when someone you don't like, or I would say someone who doesn't have your sane point of view, if they're allowed to speak freely and to say their point of view. | ||
Apparently that doesn't matter to Elon Musk. | ||
It's just for maybe talking points for him or rhetoric because it doesn't seem to matter when it's about him, questions about him from people like me. | ||
All right. So when you said that, I wanted to play some of the clips because some of them are illuminating. | ||
These are clips that you shared with us. | ||
This is a part of the conversation with Musk where you ask him about heat speech. | ||
Here it is. Hate speech on the platform is up. | ||
Do you believe that X and you have some responsibility to moderate hate speech on the platform? | ||
That you wouldn't have to answer these questions from reporters about the great replacement theory as it relates to... | ||
I don't have to answer these questions....the great replacement theory as it relates to Jewish people. | ||
Do you think that... I don't have to answer questions from reporters. | ||
Don, the only reason I'm doing this interview is because you're on the X platform and you | ||
asked for it. Otherwise, I would not do interview with this interview. | ||
So you don't think, do you think that you wouldn't get in trouble or you wouldn't be | ||
criticized for these things? I'm criticized constantly, I could care less. | ||
Yeah. What do you think was gonna happen there? | ||
I have two things I wanna What did he expect? I mean, he's asking obtuse questions. | ||
After he's been offered a contract, apparently there were negotiations. | ||
There was some sort of contract that existed between X and Don Lemon for an exclusive. | ||
And X was probably thinking, all right, well, we gave Tucker this deal, so we're going to counterbalance it and show that we're bipartisan, that we're not partisan, and give Don Lemon one. | ||
It'll balance each other out, and then we'll call it a day. | ||
And then he blows it just by being so rude and... | ||
Obtuse? Apparently, my understanding is, and you'd have to talk to Don, but my understanding is that after some of these clips came out, he just got a text from Elon Musk that said contract is canceled. | ||
It's funny how cold and short that was, but if I know anything about successful people, there's one thing that almost all of them have in common. | ||
They can make major decisions, whether good decisions or bad decisions, they can make major decisions almost instantly. | ||
One way to tell if somebody is financially successful is just look how long it takes for them to make a decision at a restaurant. | ||
There's a correlation between the most successful people, the most assertive people. | ||
They look at a menu for two seconds. | ||
They know what they want right away. Boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, boom. | ||
Same with buying a house. They walk into a house. | ||
I'll buy it. Instant decisions. | ||
You see it from incredibly admirable successful people. | ||
You see it from atrocious successful people. | ||
Whether you watch The Wolf of Wall Street. | ||
Or anything else, you're going to see that these people come in, they know exactly what they want right away, boom, they make a decision. | ||
And as soon as Don Lemon gave him any reason to second guess something he was probably already having reservations about because of Don Lemon's leftist push and Elon Musk's antagonism for illegal immigration and all these things associated with leftism right now, that was just enough for him to say, you know what, it's over, I'm just going to text him, no more lawyers, done. | ||
unidentified
|
More on the other side. Welcome back to The War Room, folks. | |
I'm Chase Geyser, your host this afternoon. | ||
unidentified
|
Diving in to Don Lemon. | |
Really being a lemon. | ||
He's that thing that looks good on paper. | ||
You buy it. Maybe you like it for a couple of days and then it just keeps breaking down. | ||
Musk did respond to some of these clips of Don Lemon. | ||
Basically just whining. | ||
Musk says on Twitter, All this said, Lem and Zucker are, of course, welcome to build their viewership on this platform along with everyone else. | ||
It's not censorship. Censorship is when you can't even talk at all. | ||
It's not when someone refuses to pay you to say a bunch of lies that they don't like that doesn't make them any money back. | ||
No return back. So, now that we've got that out of the way, I want to run this clip number 15 here in a second. | ||
I don't have an article with it, but the reason I wanted to mention this is because Dan Lyman and I had a conversation last week on this show. | ||
Many of you were likely tuning in. | ||
And I thought it was a really cool conversation with Dan. | ||
He does amazing work with Borderhawk. | ||
And since all people really know about Dan is the work that he does regarding... | ||
Foreign policy, borders, things of that nature. | ||
And so I wanted to take the opportunity while speaking to him, since he'd been on some of the other shows that day, to not talk to him about the border specifically, but just general macro, 30,000-foot views on philosophy, politics, culture, the nature of this New World Order globalist takeover. | ||
We sort of had a mini Joe Rogan podcast for about an hour, InfoWars style. | ||
And one of the things that came up It was a conversation about the way that architecture has changed since the nuclear bomb was used in war. | ||
Before 1945, all over the world, you see these amazing government public buildings built by kings and queens and governments and municipalities for the people, regardless of whether or not they actually respected the people. | ||
They had enough self-respect or narcissism to build buildings Classic, amazing, beautiful public buildings. | ||
Train stations, courthouses, whatever. | ||
Some of the most famous architecture. | ||
All before 1945. | ||
And then we see the bomb go off and everything is made by drywall and plastic and styrofoam now. | ||
They just don't build it like that anymore. | ||
And there are different theories about this, but I wanted to show this clip that came across my feed today of Tucker Carlson speaking with Cuomo about the degradation or entropy of architecture. | ||
This is clip 15. Go ahead and run it. | ||
The public spaces are beautiful. | ||
The architecture has not been degraded by postmodern, the oppression of postmodern architecture, which is designed to demoralize and hurt you and destroy your spirit. | ||
I believe that because it's true. | ||
unidentified
|
Do you believe that postmodern architecture is designed to kill your spirit? | |
Of course. Why? | ||
That's the message of it. | ||
Well, look, anything that we make with our hands, it's the purest expression of our creativity. | ||
So there's a purpose behind everything that we make. | ||
There's a message behind all of it, as there is in all art. | ||
You don't paint a painting with no vision behind it. | ||
You paint a painting because you're saying something. | ||
And so buildings that are warm and human and that elevate the human spirit are pro-human. | ||
And brutalism, for example, or the IMPE glass boxes that crowd every city in the United States, those are not elevating. | ||
What's the message of working in a cube in a room with a synthetic drop ceiling and drywall on the walls and fluorescent lighting ahead of you and no privacy at all? | ||
What's the message? The message is really clear. | ||
You mean nothing. | ||
You are replaceable. | ||
You are a widget in a bin awaiting assembly. | ||
You're just a cog in a machine. | ||
You have no value. | ||
And everyone kind of ignores this, like, oh, well, that's the way buildings have always been. | ||
No, that's not true. And architecture and anything made by human hands is the purest expression of the society that produced it. | ||
So we were like, oh, they're handicrafts. | ||
No, they're not handicrafts. | ||
They're a visible and tangible sign of who you are, not just as a person, but corporately as a society. | ||
And if you live in a place that creates nothing beautiful and doesn't provide people uplifting buildings | ||
to live and work in, that's a very sick and dark society. | ||
And it wasn't always that way. | ||
So not only are they trying to erase architecture and anything that implies the divine creation | ||
of humanity itself. | ||
Keep in mind, the Renaissance or the Enlightenment that happened hundreds of years ago now was deeply associated with the notion that human beings were created by God in God's image. | ||
And I know that a lot of these famous artists were... | ||
Morally inept, some of them not people of faith, despite the fact that their commissions were often for the Catholic Church. | ||
But the art still reflected this divine message. | ||
And it ties directly into what happened in our revolution here in the United States, because John Locke came out with Locke's famous Second Treaties of Government. | ||
You can download a PDF of it anywhere. | ||
It's in the public domain. It's free. | ||
It's about 80 pages or so, if I recall. | ||
And the whole premise of that book is that if we are created by God then our lives and our bodies are our private property. | ||
And if our lives and our bodies are our private property, and we have these rights that we're born with because we're created by God, then everything that we produce therefore with our lives, our time, and our bodies is also, by extension, our private property. | ||
This is the philosophical, theological, political premise for capitalism and freedom. | ||
It may be very well the foundation of capitalism and freedom, this idea from John Locke, which is implicit in Judeo-Christian values. | ||
It goes all the way back to Plato with the physical versus the metaphysical, the real versus the real that is not perceptible. | ||
That's what the metaphysical is. | ||
A truth that you cannot see, that's not actually physically material or part of this universe, but it's a truth, like an equation. | ||
This idea goes into Christianity and Into our politics. | ||
And we saw in the Renaissance beautiful art that reflected this. | ||
I mean, look at the Sistine Chapel. | ||
Look at the perfection of the way that these sculptures were made. | ||
And they almost gave a God-like, divine characteristic to human beings. | ||
Because we are made in the image of God. | ||
We have God reaching out and creating Adam. | ||
And the perhaps most famous painting of all time on that ceiling. | ||
And our architecture reflected this as well. | ||
If we're going to make a building, then we should do it according to the golden ratio, this mathematic principle that inherently believes that there is an underpinned physical law of beauty and that all beauty reflects this ratio. | ||
We see the famous man with his hands in the different directions. | ||
I think that was Da Vinci as well. | ||
Maybe it was Michelangelo. I mix them up sometimes. | ||
Forgive me for my ignorance. But it was this idea that if you wanted to make anything beautiful, it had to follow certain physical laws or mathematical laws because God made the universe according to these laws in its divine perfection. | ||
And in order to make something worthy of God or divine, you have to obey the laws of beauty, mathematically, literally the golden ratio. | ||
And so in the Renaissance, everything was absolutely beautiful. | ||
You can find memes of the Mona Lisa and how it adheres to the golden ratio, other Renaissance paintings and how they perfectly line up with the golden ratio. | ||
This is why this art was so famous. | ||
This is why this architecture from these times in the past were so beautiful because they inherently believed in the divine creation of the universe and of mankind. | ||
And they followed the laws that they tried to discover mathematically that would exist. | ||
Render beauty. And it worked! | ||
That's what's so amazing about it. | ||
In practice, the hypothesis was proven correct. | ||
And then after we discover as a people that we can annihilate our entire existence from the face of the earth, that we can make ourselves extinct, that we don't need God's judgment in order for an apocalypse to happen, we could just elect to have one immediately, literally within hours or days, with nuclear genocide everywhere. | ||
Suddenly we stopped obeying the laws of God because we perceived ourselves to be gods. | ||
And we're seeing the same thing with artificial intelligence. | ||
I'll get more into that in some of these breaking stories about that in the next segment. | ||
But that's just some food for thought for the audience here. | ||
Their agenda is always projected ahead of time on the world. | ||
And we just have to have... | ||
the critical thinking and will to see right through it. | ||
unidentified
|
Welcome back to the war room, folks. | |
I am Chase Geyser, your host this afternoon, getting into the evening. | ||
We're going to cover news for the next hour. | ||
And then after we get through some of these articles and it's overwhelming to just look at them, we're going to dive in and take some calls as well for the last hour. | ||
So keep your phones close by. So talking about this erasure of culture and ideas, as we see this effort to eliminate Western culture from the world itself, and there's a multitude of ways that the globalists are trying to do this, we see it manifest in different ways. | ||
So one of the major ones is this open border policy that the Biden administration is not only allowing but sponsoring with NGOs as well. | ||
That's contributing to the elimination of the West, the replacement migration. | ||
We've seen it happen with the undermining of Christian values, the pushing of this gender dysphoria agenda for lack of a better expression. | ||
We see it in the way our education system has been totally revamped to emphasize critical theory, which is Marxism, instead of traditional educational methods. | ||
We see it in our architecture, which we just went over with Tucker after the nuke went off. | ||
We, as a species, put God on the back burner since we perceived ourselves to be gods. | ||
And now we treat humanity like it's cheap because we now, for some reason, believe that it's cheap. | ||
This is all part of the erosion of the West and it has nothing to do with what race you are, what gender you are, | ||
what sexual orientation or religion you are so much. | ||
These things are related in indirect ways. | ||
But it has everything to do with just simply eliminating Western values, namely the existence and justification for | ||
individualism altogether. | ||
So in order to eradicate the individual, what they have to do is first erode national sovereignty. | ||
So you have these globalist entities that are trying to work their way from the top on a global level down to you. | ||
Specifically, you as an individual. | ||
And first, what they have to do is undermine the argument that nations have a right to national sovereignty. | ||
This is why they hated Donald Trump so much, because he was a populist and believed in America first and American sovereignty. | ||
And not only that, but advocated that other nations do the same for their people and their constituents and their culture. | ||
He was someone who advocated national sovereignty on all levels. | ||
Not American superiority, but American independence. | ||
Which, of course, he knew would manifest in American superiority because where there is freedom, there is prosperity. | ||
And where there is prosperity, there is superiority. | ||
In all facets. And so the globalists are trying to undermine national sovereignty. | ||
They're trying to get everybody in groups like NATO or the UN or the World Economic Forum. | ||
They're trying to penetrate the cabinets. | ||
And once they have eradicated national sovereignty from the face of the earth as an idea or a real political system, the next thing they're going to do is say, well, hey, if nations have no right to be sovereign from one another and we're all part of this globalist community, then what's to say that individuals have a right to be sovereign and independent from one another? | ||
What's to say that individuals should have their own isolated thoughts? | ||
They should all be wired into the matrix and we should have the collective consciousness. | ||
They're working their way down to you. | ||
When Donald Trump said, they're not after me, they're after you, I'm just in the way. | ||
It's true about Donald Trump. | ||
It's true about Alex Jones and countless other heroes trying to raise awareness for this | ||
great awakening. | ||
And the most recent manifestation of this agenda, this effort that they're making is | ||
what we've seen from Gemini, this artificial intelligence, what we've seen from chat GPT, | ||
and now what we're seeing from Adobe AI Firefly, which is erasing white people just like Google | ||
They're trying to erase white people from the internet, and it's not about race. | ||
You have to keep in mind it's not about race. | ||
They're not trying to eradicate Donald Trump because he's Donald Trump. | ||
They're trying to eradicate Donald Trump because of what he is associated with, because of the connotations of Donald Trump, because of the America First movement, because of the rise of populism in America. | ||
And they're not trying to eradicate white people because we're white. | ||
They're trying to eradicate white people because we are associated with Western culture, Western philosophy. | ||
All the way back to Plato, through Christianity, to today, Western civilization is a threat to globalism. | ||
They are incompatible philosophies, political theories, altogether. | ||
And we're seeing that every one of these tools made by these major corporations is an eradication of the West. | ||
And not only... Are they eradicating our culture, our way of life, our people, our ideas from the face of the earth? | ||
But they're telling us that they're doing it, that they're going to do it, and they have been telling us for years. | ||
People always ask Alex Jones how it is that he was able to make all these crazy predictions that were hyper-specific predictions that came abundantly true, whether it was his predictions of 9-11, which happened that very year, or his predictions of eating your neighbor, which is happening in Haiti right now. | ||
And it's because he actually read the documents. | ||
And for years I was so perplexed as to why these documents even existed in the first place. | ||
I mean, if you have this major conspiracy, if you have this major plan, why is it that you would document it and publish it on every major headline? | ||
In every major news story. | ||
In every album that comes out. | ||
In every single that comes out. | ||
In every video that gets sponsored. | ||
In every movie that comes out. | ||
This message, this agenda is constantly being told to us. | ||
This is what we're doing. | ||
This is why we're doing it. | ||
And you will be happy. You will own nothing and you will be happy. | ||
They always tell us what their evil plan is. | ||
And for some reason people just, okay, you know, whatever. | ||
Thinking about getting a dog. | ||
On to the next thing. And it wasn't until I saw this clip a couple of days ago from Andrew Tate, which I'm going to run in a second, I want you to watch this, that it occurred to me this might be why they're telling us what they're doing. | ||
And this might be the best argument in favor of the perspective that this is literally a satanic movement, that globalism is satanism. | ||
Go ahead and run it. If you understand how Satanists work and think, Satanists believe in karmic retribution. | ||
They don't believe they're allowed to trick you. | ||
If you believe in Satan, if you worship Satan, if you're a Satanist, you believe it's important, you tell people what you're going to do because then you will not pay the price, there will be no karmic retribution for your actions. | ||
So let me give you an example. If I sell poison apples and I put up a sign saying apples and you buy one and you die, then you were poisoned. | ||
If I sell poison apples and I put up a sign saying poison apples and then you buy one and you die, you committed suicide. | ||
The fact that I told you what it was means I'm not guilty. | ||
I didn't murder you. You committed suicide. | ||
So when you do bad things, when you do evil things, the Satanist handbook, you can look this up yourself, the satanic religion says, you have to make it clear to them what you're doing. | ||
And if they don't resist, if they don't stand up against it, then they are complicit. | ||
unidentified
|
They're agreeing that what's happening is okay. | |
So, sounds kind of familiar, doesn't it? | ||
Sounds a little bit like maybe the reason they're telling us that they're going to take over the world and eliminate individual sovereignty and national sovereignty and white culture altogether is because they're Satanists and they believe that if they warned us, if they told us what was really going on and we still buy it, then the culpability has shifted and they are not karmically accountable. | ||
It's bizarre how right on the money that clip from Tate was. | ||
I never would have thought of that on my own. | ||
I really don't think I would have come up with that. | ||
That is a brilliant insight. So I want to show you this Adobe Firefly story here on the camera. | ||
Because if you take into context what Tate just said, and you look at these images from Firefly, where Infowars has prompted the generator to create an image of the American Founding Fathers, and it's Showing minorities the whole time. | ||
Again, I don't have any problems with minorities. | ||
Viking rowing a boat? | ||
It looks like Ukrainian soldiers, but of color. | ||
Oh, here we go. This is a Viking rowing a boat. | ||
Look at these. They're telling you right here, satanically, they're telling you right here what they're going to do. | ||
They're going to eliminate whiteness from the face of the earth. | ||
And first they're going to do it in all media. | ||
It's going to be this AI program to do it. | ||
Then we're going to see it. We've already seen it in every commercial except for the Suicide Pods commercials. | ||
Then they're going to do it in every music album, on every social media platform. | ||
Then they're gonna do it in every movie, which they've pretty much already done when they changed the rules of how a movie can win an Oscar to require a minimum amount of minorities involved in either the production or the cast. | ||
This is Satanists practicing their religion. | ||
Okay, if we're gonna do this evil thing, it would come back to bite us karmically if we didn't incessantly tell the world for years at conferences and in hearings on all entertainment platforms that we were going to do it and by constantly pushing it for decades in every way that human beings consume information they believe that they are no longer accountable for the evil they are going to perpetuate I saw that clip by Tate, and I was just absolutely blown away. | ||
We're going to get into more news in the next segment. | ||
Wow, that hour just blew by. | ||
That was a lot of fun. In the meantime, I want you guys to go to Infowarsstore.com and check out Survival Shield X3. This is an amazing product, and I didn't know anything about iodine other than seeing it briefly in the HBO series Chernobyl. | ||
They would take the iodine after the radiation was reaching them in order to protect their lymph nodes or thyroid from radiation poisoning. | ||
But I looked up some research that I printed out for Harrison, and the benefits of iodine are absolutely astounding. | ||
So many different benefits. | ||
This is something that I'm going to start taking regularly. | ||
I recommend you do the same thing and be the reason that we are still on the air at InfoWarStore.com | ||
unidentified
|
What the f*** is that? | |
Some are saying that directed energy weapons are being deployed to spark the largest fire in Texas history. | ||
And we know that these weapons exist. | ||
unidentified
|
This newly released footage shows the Dragonfire Laser Directed Energy Weapon System in action. | |
And it could be in the hands of military personnel in five years' time. | ||
It destroys targets with an intense beam of light and has pinpoint accuracy. | ||
It's able to hit something the size of a one-pound coin from a kilometer away. | ||
The fires we have seen in recent years, including the fires in Texas, are very different from what we have seen in the past. | ||
They often selectively spare the trees while burning the infrastructure into a powdery ash footprint. | ||
unidentified
|
Witnessed and observed some extraordinary damage in our state. | |
Could be caused by hurricanes or tornadoes. | ||
And frequently when you see the aftermath of that damage, there's some semblance of a structure that is still there. | ||
When you look at the damages that have occurred here, it's just gone. | ||
Completely gone. | ||
Nothing left but ashes on the ground. | ||
After the Maui fires, many people believed that a blue roof was able to deflect these directed energy weapons and spare the home from destruction. | ||
And Joe Biden recently alluded to this twice. | ||
If you fly over these areas that are burned to the ground, you'll see in the midst of 20 homes that are just totally destroyed, one home sitting there because it had the right roof on it. | ||
unidentified
|
And anyway... You notice you fly over in a helicopter. | |
Those places were good roofs. | ||
They didn't go. You need the right materials? | ||
Yeah. So we gotta change the Joe Biden is clearly not a reliable source of accurate information. | ||
But why would a roof save a house from burning? | ||
And while there is plenty of circumstantial evidence that suggests directed energy weapons are being used to start these recent fires, arsonists have been arrested starting them the old-fashioned way. | ||
And there is a clear motive. | ||
The United Nations, who have been orchestrating the open border policy of America and several other countries, have openly announced plans to clear the lands of people and move them into smart cities. | ||
Starting with Agenda 21, a map which shows designated off-limits to human areas lined up with the 2008 California fires. | ||
Nine years ago, planning was announced for smart cities to be built on Maui. | ||
But the most coveted property was owned by natives whose families have lived there for generations prior to Hawaii being annexed by the U.S. In August of 2023, Maui was devastated by highly suspicious fires. | ||
Roads were blocked off to keep residents from escaping. | ||
And the U.S. government gave survivors a mere $700 per household. | ||
A conference in April of 2023 met in Viña del Mar, Chile, to provide the municipality with support in the transfer of knowledge about the theory and solutions of smart cities. | ||
A year later, Viña del Mar was ravaged by fires. | ||
It was blamed on climate change, but local officials claimed arson. | ||
And in 2022, Amarillo, Texas was reported to be the number one area under the radar for the Texas housing market under the United Nations Vision 2045. | ||
On February 26th of this year, the biggest fire of Texas broke out in this same area. | ||
Vision 2045 is the latest iteration of the United Nations plan to seize control of 90% of the land and limit people to 15-minute cities. | ||
unidentified
|
I'd like to think that change happens in manageable ways. | |
It doesn't happen like that. | ||
It happens in punctuated equilibria, where we have periods of stability and then periods of massive, radical, disruptive and transformative change. | ||
And that is where we are right now. | ||
This is the decisive decade in the history of humanity. | ||
We who are here now have a responsibility that no future generations will have. | ||
Reporting for InfoWars, this is Greg Reese. | ||
unidentified
|
Never give up the fight. | |
Stay safe. | ||
Infowars.com I don't have to tell you things are bad. | ||
Everybody knows things are bad. | ||
It's a depression. Everybody's out of work or scared of losing their job. | ||
The dollar buys a nickel's worth. | ||
Banks are going bust. | ||
Shopkeepers keep a gun under the counter. | ||
Punks are running wild in the street and there's nobody anywhere who seems to know what to do and there's no end to it. | ||
We know the air is unfit to breathe and our food is unfit to eat. | ||
We sit watching our TVs while some local newscaster tells us that today we had 15 homicides and 63 violent crimes as if that's the way it's supposed to be. | ||
We know things are bad, worse than bad. | ||
They're crazy. It's like everything everywhere is going crazy, so we don't go out anymore. | ||
We sit in the house, and slowly the world we're living in is getting smaller, and all we say is, please, at least leave us alone in our living rooms. | ||
Let me have my toaster and my TV and my steel-belted radios, and I won't say anything. | ||
Just leave us alone. Well, I'm not going to leave you alone. | ||
I want you to get mad! | ||
The War Room with Owen Troyer. | ||
The Internet will never be the same. | ||
Welcome back to the War Room. | ||
I'm your host today, Chase Geiser, filling in for the great Owen Schroer because Owen was kind enough to step in and host the Alex Jones Show today. | ||
While Alex is out, I believe Alex will be back on Monday. | ||
Make sure you stay tuned this weekend, though, because I will be hosting the Alex Jones Show on Sunday evening, and there's going to be some amazing broadcasts that we release on Sunday as well, including the new 30 Minutes podcast episode on Sunday night. | ||
I believe there's going to be a new one every Sunday night, and I haven't talked to Owen about it yet, but I think he did one this week. | ||
I'm not sure, but we'll see there. | ||
Obviously, this TikTok conversation has been a major conversation over the course of the last couple of days. | ||
And you're hearing conflicting things from different people on both sides of the aisle as to where they stand. | ||
Frankly, I don't know of any Democrats who really support this ban in terms of consumers, actual Democrat voters. | ||
But the political class has every incentive to support this, to believe in it. | ||
I know that Steve Bannon is against TikTok and he has every right to be. | ||
It's rational to be against TikTok because of its deep integration with the CCP. It's controlled by the CCP. It is spying on you. | ||
It is Chinese espionage. | ||
Now, the difference is this is voluntary. | ||
So as a user, you can decide whether to make an account or not, whether or not to risk your data being in the hands of the CCP. It's not this involuntary situation like Edward Stone revealed where I'm being spied on whether you like it or not and all your data is being mined whether you like it or not. | ||
That's what the deep state has been doing ever since the enactment of the Patriot Act after the 9-11 attacks. | ||
And so I made a tweet something like this. | ||
I said something like, look, when China... | ||
When the United States acquires your data through literally your phone microphone, your phone camera, your TV, your car, all of your communications, all of your texts, that's treason. | ||
So why is it that we would ban TikTok for committing espionage, something that China needs to do in the interest of its own national security? | ||
I think we should fight against espionage. | ||
But why would we ban China for looking at voluntarily provided user data on TikTok before we solve the problem of espionage of our own people by our own government? | ||
I mean, Edward Snowden came out 10, 15 years ago now. | ||
I think it was about 10 years ago, 12 years ago, revealed to the public | ||
that all of our Fourth Amendment rights were being violated incessantly by our own government, | ||
that the government could watch you undress if your laptop was open, | ||
that it could turn on your phone even if you removed the battery from it or turned it off, | ||
that it could listen to every conversation that you have, watch everything that any camera could ever see | ||
everywhere all the time. | ||
And not only that it had those capabilities, but that it actually was doing this | ||
using some of the technology that he developed. | ||
He comes out in a major scandal, admits this, has to flee and seek asylum in Moscow | ||
of all places. | ||
Nobody gets fired, no laws changed. | ||
I think they had some hearings, maybe they changed some laws, they said they did, | ||
but you know that the government's doing everything and more than it was doing before | ||
this revelation to the public. | ||
But we're mad that TikTok is spying on user data? | ||
. | ||
That's voluntarily given over. | ||
I mean, we know when we sign up for these apps that all of our behavior is being tracked. | ||
We know that the algorithms create profiles for us that serve us different information based off of our history. | ||
We know that TikTok is controlling what information you see in your feed differently than the way that it controls the information in China, for example. | ||
That the CCP is poisoning the minds of our youth through the algorithms in a way that it will not allow to happen to its own people. | ||
We know this. But you want to empower the government to ban this platform in the interests of national security when you violate all of our same rights constantly with every media headline that comes out from a legacy outlet, with the lies that you perpetuate on behalf of the deep state, with all of the control and integration that you had in Twitter with the Twitter files or Facebook as Mark Zuckerberg admitted on the Joe Rogan podcast getting phone calls from the CIA about the Hunter Biden laptop. | ||
You want to do all this stuff, but you want to ban China from doing it. | ||
It's only okay if you abuse the rights of our people, but it's not okay if China does. | ||
And it seems to me that this has very little to do with data privacy or issues like that, and it has more to do with narrative control. | ||
And the fact is, our government and our so-called allies cannot control the way information is dispersed on TikTok, so they're trying to ban it. | ||
And not only that, but this legislation seems to me To be something that will not stop simply at TikTok. | ||
And sorry, crew, I've been throwing a lot of curveballs at you. | ||
But can you go on Rahim Kassam's Twitter page and find the video that he posted yesterday where he goes through this legislation? | ||
Because I want to give him a fair shake. | ||
I trust him and I like him. | ||
But I think I disagree with him and Bannon on this specific piece of legislation here. | ||
And I've taken the liberty, crew help me out here, of printing and going through and highlighting the legislation itself. | ||
It's only about a dozen pages or so, because I want to read the actual legislation and not just show clips about the legislation or headlines about the legislation. | ||
I'm going to go through some of the details that I noticed here with you. | ||
And I know that legislation is a little boring, but this is important. | ||
Yeah, if we can rip that clip, I do want to show that three-minute clip before we end the segment today. | ||
So, Prohibition of foreign adversary controlled applications. | ||
So this law is supposed to empower the government to prohibit applications that exist which are controlled by a foreign policy. | ||
Providing services to distribute, maintain, or update such foreign adversary-controlled applications. | ||
Providing internet hosting services to enable the distribution, maintenance, or updating of such foreign adversary. | ||
So they go through and they label everything, but the whole purpose is to remove any application or platform That is controlled by an adversary. | ||
Now, they can define an adversary, as I understand it, on a whim. | ||
And there are a couple of alarming details here, which we'll get to. | ||
Data and information portability. | ||
This was particularly interested to me. | ||
So we've got data and information portability to alternative... | ||
Right? So, in short... | ||
If one of these applications is going to get shut down because it's foreign adversary controlled and a user wants all of their data, this part of the legislation mandates that that data be provided to the user. | ||
And it's very interesting to me that this little stipulation is put in here because I recently went through our banned Google accounts here at Infowars, our banned YouTube accounts. | ||
You can still log in to those accounts even though they don't exist on the public-facing part of the platform. | ||
And I did a data request to see if I could get access to our video library. | ||
Of everything that we uploaded to our channel, with I believe 1.9 million subscribers on YouTube back when YouTube subscribers mattered, I wanted those videos and thumbnails and headlines so I could create an archive of historically what we've done here at InfoWars. | ||
I thought that would be an interesting thing to have access to. | ||
Maybe we could re-upload everything with the same exact details on Rumble so people could have a historical clone or representation of what Infowars was posting on YouTube before it was removed from the face of the platform. | ||
So I put in a data request and I get back this zip file from Google within a couple hours and it's got all sorts of crazy data. | ||
I can open up documents that show every single search for a video that was done while logged into our account. | ||
So the crew will be logged into the account in the back. | ||
Jones will ask for a clip to be pulled up. | ||
I can see every search query. | ||
All sorts of amazing data. | ||
But the one thing they won't provide are the actual videos or thumbnails themselves. | ||
So you can have access to all your data, but you can't have access to any of the content which was considered to be a violation, published from a channel that violated the guide, the rules and policies. | ||
They won't even give you your own videos back. | ||
They give you this useless data, but not your own videos. | ||
And I'm thinking to myself reading this like, okay, would this law require Google to provide me with those video files? | ||
I mean, think about it. If any company is foreign adversary controlled, is it not Google? | ||
How many headlines or reports have we seen over the years of Google working closely with the CCP? | ||
How many times have we seen leadership or representation from Google come out and say, | ||
look, we don't want to be working with the CCP on AI technology or on search engine clones, | ||
but we know that if we don't work with them on it, they're just going to steal our intellectual property and | ||
do it without us. | ||
So we're going to play ball with them. | ||
So Google has been working closely with the CCP for years because they want to be available to the market there. | ||
They don't want the CCP to steal their intellectual property. | ||
Does that mean that their foreign adversary can control? | ||
I mean, it seems to me that the CCP has a lot of leverage over what appears on these platforms. | ||
They certainly have a lot of leverage as to whether or not these platforms | ||
can be used by their constituents, their people, and their own nations. | ||
I mean, why else have we seen Hollywood cater to communism so much, so insistently? | ||
Famously, the movie Gravity has the International Space Station be a partnership | ||
between China and the United States, when I believe that partnership in reality has primarily | ||
been between Russia and the United States. | ||
I could be mistaken about that, but that's an example of the type of catering that happens to China. | ||
The Chinese market by Hollywood because they want to make sure that they can release their movie in China as well and make the revenue off of that. | ||
So does that mean that all of Hollywood is foreign adversary controlled? | ||
And they list some exemptions in here, but they're very vanilla. | ||
But there's two or three more things I want to go into about this. | ||
So What does it mean to be controlled by a foreign adversary according to this piece of legislation? | ||
So it's a platform that is controlled by either a foreign person that is domiciled or headquartered or has primary residence in a nation of a foreign adversary. | ||
So if Edward Snowden made a social media platform, it would count as a foreign adversary controlled platform and would be banned under this legislation just because he's in Moscow and Russia is a foreign adversary. | ||
Not saying that he's going to do that, not saying he should do that, whatever, I don't care. | ||
But hypothetically speaking, the application of this would make that platform illegal. | ||
Some of the journalists makes a platform and they happen to live in Moscow. | ||
That's problematic enough. | ||
The other thing that's very interesting about this is that they define the entity as being foreign-controlled if it is directly or indirectly Owned by this foreign adversary or representatives of this foreign adversary by 20% or more. | ||
So if 20% or more of the shares are owned or controlled by a foreign adversary, either through an organization or through an individual, then that makes this platform illegal, banned. | ||
So let's say, for example, that For some reason, China decides it doesn't want Facebook to exist in the United States anymore, or Instagram. | ||
Because it's controlled by our intelligence community and the information that they're seeing our people exposed to on those platforms is not conducive to the success of the CCP's international agenda. | ||
Let's just say, hypothetically, China doesn't like Instagram or Facebook and they want it to be gone. | ||
As I understand this legislation, and I'm not a lawyer, but I'm reading through it here, I'm actually reading boring legislation, they could just buy 20% of all of the public shares We're good to go. | ||
If any foreign adversary doesn't want the platform to exist in the United States, they simply have to buy 20% of it, and then it's somehow foreign adversary controlled because they own one-fifth of it. | ||
Now, I would think that it would have to be at least half, first of all. | ||
Second of all, isn't this a major vulnerability to every other platform? | ||
I mean, what if there's a liquidation of Infowars... | ||
Or Infowars goes public, hypothetically, which is not going to happen. | ||
Way too complicated. Let's say Infowars went public and China decided to buy 20% of it just to get us off the internet in the United States. | ||
They could literally just buy 20% of anything, shut it down. | ||
Absolutely crazy. And this applies to platforms... | ||
That allow users to create profiles that have a million or more monthly active users and enable users to generate or distribute content. | ||
And they specifically named ByteDance and TikTok in this legislation, but it's not exclusive to just this platform. | ||
And then they go in to talk about how a foreign adversary country is defined and Qualified divestitures, the president determines through an interagency process would result in the relevant foreign adversary-controlled application no longer being controlled by a foreign adversary. | ||
Is the president in control of this? | ||
The president determines through an interagency process precludes the establishment or maintenance of any operational relationship between the United States operations and the relevant foreign adversary-controlled application. | ||
So, basically, the president could just reverse some of these decisions, maybe. | ||
So is that somehow supposed to be the protection from this 20% acquisition strategy? | ||
And it seems like This could just go so far beyond TikTok that it's alarming to you. | ||
Now, I may be wrong, and this is why I want to show you this clip from Raheem Krasami yesterday, because regardless of whether you agree with Raheem, this is somebody who I admire and somebody who I trust. | ||
I think he's wrong about this, but please, I implore you not to interpret what you're going to see in this clip as malicious. | ||
But I want to give him the opportunity here in this clip, and I want to give the audience the opportunity in this clip to hear the other side of the coin, the other argument from everything that I just said, and maybe we'll get some clarification here. | ||
Please go ahead and run it. We're good to go. | ||
Figures that come along and people that will rear their ugly heads that we might not necessarily love, we might not necessarily like. | ||
But in order to win a general election, unfortunately, you know, you have to bring coalitions of people together. | ||
And look, you know President Trump. | ||
He is, at the end of the day, he's probably one of the most generous and kind people I've ever met in my life. | ||
He's also one of the most gracious people I've ever met in my life. | ||
He's always willing to listen to people and he's always willing to hear out the arguments. | ||
So, you know, he's been hearing some arguments. | ||
He's certainly been hearing some Club for Growth arguments, certainly been hearing some arguments from Jeffrey Yass. | ||
And I think the position that he took last week has now already been moderated. | ||
He came out today and said, look, You know, we're talking about TikTok, we're talking about Facebook. | ||
He said, why not do both? | ||
So the thing I think people need to realize, and I did a video on this, it's up on YouTube and GoshX and Getter and Truth, is I went through The bill, page by page, it's only 12 pages long, marked it up, decided to look for myself and see, you know, is this a bad bill? | ||
Does this actually give the President of the United States the power to ban websites? | ||
Does it give the President of the United States the power to requisition things? | ||
Now, listen, I run a website, a pretty dissident website, if you ask me, and I would be the first one to be blowing the whistle. | ||
I'd be the first, one of the first, you'd probably be before me, To be banned and requisitioned by the President of the United States if the legislation, if this legislation allowed it. | ||
It doesn't allow it. | ||
Which is why my colleague Will Upton was happy to write the piece. | ||
He worked in the U.S. Treasury Department in the Trump administration. | ||
And he says this is exactly the legislation that we crafted that we wanted. | ||
It's America first legislation. | ||
And it sounds like... Just to finalize that point, Laura, real quick, before I lose my train of thought entirely, is we had a situation where CCP bad and economic nationalism good. | ||
And we've ended up with a bill that says CCP bad, Chinese Communist Party bad, and let's have TikTok, you know, the divestiture, the sale, whatever, bring it into the United States. | ||
That's economic nationalism. Yet somehow, the libertarian neoliberal lobbyist class in Washington DC has managed to pretend to people that this bill would somehow empower the government to ban X or to ban Rumble. | ||
It's simply not Possible within the terminology of this legislation. | ||
Now, we can talk about overreach in a minute and all the corollaries from that. | ||
But if you take this as it is, it is almost a perfect bill to stop the Chinese Communist Party influence in American social media. | ||
So maybe he's right. I don't know. | ||
But as a layman reading through this, and maybe those presidential stipulations prevent the abuse of this, it seems to me... | ||
that as long as the president was a Marxist or a leftist or agreed with the CCP, that China could | ||
buy 20% stake in any platform, meeting the requirements of the platforms here, and that | ||
would result in its removal from the United States. It seems to me a major, major red flag. | ||
And so I disagree with him. I respect him and I like him and I understand his antagonism toward | ||
the CCP. They're obviously using and abusing TikTok, but parents should ban TikTok in their | ||
homes. The United States government should not ban TikTok in our nation. We have a First Amendment, | ||
and if the CCP wants to push communist talking points and communist videos to our population, | ||
we're stupid enough to fall for it. | ||
Well, that's an inconvenience of freedom of speech. | ||
And I would rather afford the inconveniences of too great a degree of freedom than those of too small a degree of it. | ||
So let's see some of these other clips that pertain to this. | ||
First one I want to show you is Crenshaw. | ||
More like Cringeshaw, this is clip 19, griping about TikTok, being rude as he always is, being myopic as he literally always is. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's run it. Access to everything TikTok has, which means data on all Americans. | |
And with data and with access to your app that you're addicted to, you can vastly manipulate an entire population, which the Chinese have done. | ||
Are you worried that our intelligence agencies are doing the same thing domestically? | ||
Am I worried that- Well, I know that they're not. | ||
They're not manipulating Americans. | ||
unidentified
|
They're not controlling a flow of information. | |
Yeah, did you have some evidence otherwise that you'd like to share? | ||
I mean- Okay. Are you serious? | ||
Say something and then just immediately dismissed by Crenshaw. | ||
That guy is a jerk. Do you remember when he- What was it, National File? | ||
He tried to trip that journalist. | ||
Somebody very friendly to the Infowars network. | ||
I can't remember the gentleman's name, but do you remember a couple of months ago? | ||
Yeah, he tried to trip that journalist that was asking him questions, and he did that thing where he was bashing some kid for questioning him about his faith. | ||
I mean, this guy is a lunatic. | ||
He's unhinged. I mean, I got no problem with people with a short fuse. | ||
I have a short fuse. I lose my temper sometimes. | ||
Ask my wife. Jones has a short fuse, as I'm sure you can tell by his famous clips on this network over the course of the last 30 years. | ||
30 years in April. There's nothing wrong with having a short fuse, but there's a difference between having a short fuse and being a real ass. | ||
And Crenshaw is the latter. | ||
This guy makes so much money off of the market because of his insider trading. | ||
And he celebrates the war in Ukraine... | ||
With Russia as an opportunity to kill Russians without the loss of a single American life, regardless of the fact that it takes millions of thousands, hundreds of years worth of taxpayer dollars, lifetimes worth, to fund such a conflict. | ||
And so many innocent people die. | ||
The guy's a lunatic. I think he's a sociopath. | ||
I think he might be the Antichrist. | ||
More on the other side. The executive director of the Anti-Defamation League, Jonathan Greenblatt, who long before October 7th has been a crusader for censorship of things he doesn't like, he was urging Fox News to fire Tucker Carlson for years, went on to Morning Joe and essentially made clear that the concern of the pro-Israel lobby in the United States is that there are too many social media platforms In particular, the ones catering to a younger generation that are allowing too much anti-Israel content in the United States. | ||
Here's what he told Morning Joe. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's be frank about it. | |
We've been on this show. We've talked about Instagram. | ||
We've talked about Twitter or X. And you've seen my back and forth with Elon Musk. | ||
But we need to talk about TikTok. | ||
TikTok, if you will, It is the 24-7 news channel of so many of our young people, and it's like Al Jazeera on steroids, amplifying and intensifying the anti-Semitism and the anti-Zion with no repercussions. | ||
I've got to ask, Joe. | ||
Is it a coincidence that the Anti-Defamation League went on to MSNBC? And announced that their main concern was TikTok and the fact that TikTok is allowing too much Israel, anti-Israel speech in December of 2023. | ||
And less than two months later, this has become the number one priority of the American Congress. | ||
unidentified
|
Let's listen to the rest of what he said. | |
Like, there's been a lot of lamentations about the fact that TikTok's ownership is Chinese. | ||
But you know what? Oracle owns 10% of the company. | ||
General Atlantic owns a piece of the company. | ||
Our friends at Sequoia Capital own a piece of the company. | ||
So does Sequoia and General Atlantic, does Oracle want to be responsible for spreading anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism? | ||
It's time to talk about TikTok. | ||
And I think we need members of Congress to be asking them, why are they doing enough? | ||
And let me be clear, I've met with Sho Chu, the CEO, I've talked to their leadership, but it is long past time for TikTok and its owners and its investors to step up and say, enough, we're going to take action. | ||
Frank, the executive director of BDO goes onto television in December and says, it is time to put our foot down. | ||
About not allowing TikTok to allow so much anti-Israel content and two months later the American Congress is ready to ban it for the first time in years as this proposal has been circulating as media outlets make clear that that inside Congress is in fact the impetus for why this is happening. | ||
Where are all my conservative friends who are so deeply concerned About how the internet is being controlled in order to suppress dissent that Washington dislikes. | ||
So it's amazing to me. | ||
They didn't seem to care so much about TikTok the whole time for the last five or six years that it was pushing transgenderism on our population, on our children specifically. | ||
I was talking to my wife earlier, and I think she actually had the number wrong. | ||
I think it's higher than this, but she was reading some report that 20% of Gen Z identifies as something other than heterosexual or their gender at birth. | ||
I think it's higher than that. | ||
I think it's higher than that for people who don't identify as their gender at birth or as exclusively heterosexual. | ||
And I believe that there's some portion of the population that is born with some sort of different sexual orientation than heterosexual. | ||
I believe that there are people that are born gay. | ||
I think something may happen in utero. | ||
I don't even know that it's genetic. | ||
I think that would explain why they haven't found a gene for it. | ||
Something may happen in utero that causes a disposition, at least to this. | ||
And I don't have a problem with that from a theological perspective because, all right, you think of it as a sin. | ||
Why would God give somebody that sin? | ||
Well, God, we're all born with sins. | ||
So just because you're born with it doesn't make it right or wrong morally. | ||
That's not a point I'm trying to make. | ||
I believe that there is some portion of the population born that way. | ||
But it's small. | ||
And before all of this broke out, the studies that I saw said something like 4% or less. | ||
Or anything other than their gender at birth identifying a heterosexual. | ||
And the way they did these studies 10 years ago is they would look at porn viewership across the states. | ||
And almost universally 4% of viewership was homosexual. | ||
So that was kind of how they came up with the number. | ||
Alright, about 1 in 25 people might be born with a disposition or an interest in homosexuality. | ||
And to see this number just... | ||
Drastically explode in basically months. | ||
I mean, I know it's been four or five years in the works. | ||
That's 48 to 60 months. | ||
Is a result of these algorithms on TikTok. | ||
Children are very impressionable. | ||
The algorithms serve videos that people are more likely to watch multiple times. | ||
When you see something different or bizarre in your feed, you're more likely to watch the entire thing because at first it's shocking. | ||
And then the algorithm interprets that as you being interested in that thing, so it serves you more information like that. | ||
And then suddenly as a kid, all you're seeing is transgender content. | ||
And so this algorithm, I believe, has psychologically impacted our population to cause massive amounts of gender dysphoria. | ||
Now, I don't believe it should be shut down or silenced by the government. | ||
I think parents should be like, hey, I'm not going to let my kid on this app. | ||
This is a major problem. | ||
Or if they let their kid use the app, make sure it's got all the protections and controls in place if they're sophisticated enough, which they may not be. | ||
But We have seen this from TikTok for years. | ||
No one's really saying anything. | ||
Now, all of a sudden, TikTok videos are going viral of the genocide happening in Gaza. | ||
And the ADL is coming out up in arms. | ||
And the ADL doesn't typically come out against these publicly traded platforms like Google or Facebook or Instagram. | ||
It seems to only come after TikTok, A, and B, after X now. | ||
And they didn't come after X before it was owned by Elon Musk. | ||
But as soon as our intelligence community, as soon as our deep state lost control over X, the ADL came out against X. And now that TikTok is one of the only platforms of a handful... | ||
That is out of the deep state's control because the algorithms are controlled by the foreign adversary. | ||
You see the ADL coming out against it, and it's pretty obvious to me that this legislation is not about protecting the privacy or the data of our population. | ||
That's just what they say that it's about. | ||
What it's really about is maintaining or establishing our government's monopoly on the information and content that is consumed by our people. | ||
This is an effort to control the narrative. | ||
And it doesn't make TikTok good. | ||
Just like the genocide in Gaza doesn't make the Palestinians good. | ||
Just like the invasion of Ukraine doesn't make the Ukrainians good. | ||
I'm not saying TikTok is good. | ||
I'm just saying our government's just as evil, if not worse. | ||
And to give them this kind of control... | ||
It's always going to have unprecedented, unintended, at least by the people that vote for it or support it, consequences. | ||
I mean, look at what happened with the Patriot Act. | ||
The Patriot Act comes out, Edward Snowden reveals 10 years later, boom, we're all being spied on. | ||
I thought we were supposed to use it to catch and monitor terrorists, to prevent terrorist attacks. | ||
And all over the world, we're seeing terrorist attacks more than ever. | ||
And our own people are being spied on now. | ||
And our own border is wide open to people from all over the world coming into the United States, some of them terrorists, over 75,000 of them from terrorist-run countries, from places of interest. | ||
So obviously they don't care about protecting the safety of our people or the sovereignty of our nation. | ||
They only care about controlling the narrative. | ||
We're gonna get more into it in the next segment. | ||
Talk a little bit about the freedom of speech. | ||
some of these viral TikTok clips that have been going out, this psychological operation on our | ||
people. In the meantime, make sure you visit InfoWarsStore.com. | ||
I highly recommend that you get a bottle of Survival Shield X3. This product is one | ||
that I'm going to begin taking next. I'm going to add it to my regimen. I take Brain Force Plus, I | ||
take Turbo Force Plus, and I take the B12 because Harrison gave me a bottle of it, and that's been | ||
amazing, kept me from getting sick. | ||
But I highly recommend that you check out Survival Shield X3 because after I did all the research to | ||
do some ads for the network for this product, since we just got it back in stock at 40% off, | ||
I'm going to start taking it as well. | ||
It helps with everything from your thyroid to cognitive ability to your ability to remove toxins from your body. | ||
We know that they're putting chemicals in the water to turn the frogs gay. | ||
And I'm no doctor, but it seems like anything that can help with your body's natural process of detoxification is a good thing. | ||
Check it out now. Welcome back to the War Room, folks. | ||
I am Chase Geiser, your host this afternoon. | ||
So we've been diving into this TikTok conversation, tried to analyze the legislation, and showed you a counter clip. | ||
You can make up your own mind. I highly recommend you read it. | ||
I'd love to hear a lawyer read it. | ||
Maybe Ron Coleman would be a good person to reach out to since he's a free speech attorney, a famous one at that. | ||
My thinking on this is that it's inappropriate for our government to have the power to do such things. | ||
And even if it doesn't expand or extend beyond TikTok, it just seems like bad form. | ||
And I know that TikTok is evil. | ||
And I know that it has brainwashed an entire generation of our people into Marxist critical theory, anti-racist, anti-fascist, disgusting illness, basically. | ||
But it's up to parents to raise their kids and not the government to have total control over the narrative. | ||
Total control over the narrative is how we've gotten into every war since 1945, if not even back as far as World War I. And we can't allow our government to increase its control over the narrative. | ||
We've seen all of the censorship over the last several years. | ||
How terrible it is, how it's impacted Hollywood, how it's basically ruined art. | ||
In this country and to give our government even more power and influence over what people in our country can consume seems to me altogether absolutely disgusting. | ||
Gross. And I do believe that this legislation would be used to expand those powers or would be exploited by our enemies and our government alike. | ||
Could be wrong about that, but even so, It's just not worth it. | ||
And I want to show you this hilarious clip from Alex Stein a couple of days ago. | ||
This is the one I had, the crew poll, 2 minutes and 11 seconds. | ||
Alex Stein is an absolute genius. | ||
He's one of the funniest people I've ever seen in my entire life. | ||
He's been a friend of the network for some time. | ||
And everything that he does, while being hilarious, also highlights a terrible truth. | ||
The ridiculousness of... | ||
Our civilization at every level from city councils to school boards all the way up to the top of the federal government. | ||
And if you think for a minute that any of these leftists in power at any capacity are tolerant of freedom of speech, just watch as they usher him out of this hearing because of his freedom of speech being exercised in a hilarious way. | ||
Go ahead and run it. Hey, guys. | ||
unidentified
|
It's me, Alex Stein. I just want to say this has been a terrible meeting. | |
I mean, it's been so boring. | ||
I just listen to all these people drone on. | ||
And let me tell you something, Jennifer. | ||
I love big booty Latinas. | ||
So I sit here and I see you. | ||
Yes, I love- You are out of line. | ||
Well, I can't say I love big booty Latinas? | ||
How do you figure that? That- Wait, how is that a- First response- So my first- my first amendment right, I'm allowed to say I like big booty Latinas. | ||
How is that a crime? Is that because you're a big booty Latina? | ||
That is the second time. | ||
Wait, how is that? No, I do have a comment about technology, but you're yelling at me because I'm talking about big booty Latina. | ||
Listen, AOC is my favorite big booty Latina. | ||
You're my second favorite big booty Latina. | ||
So don't get all, you know, butthurt about that. | ||
I still think you're a beautiful lady. | ||
Little thick, but I like him thick. | ||
I don't want some skinny mini girl. | ||
I want somebody that has some cushion for the pushing. | ||
You know what I mean, Jennifer? So this is the problem. | ||
The tech here in New York City, it's absolutely ridiculous. | ||
Now my wife has got her OnlyFans on MyCity.com. | ||
She's on MyCity showing her vagina for like $5.99 a month. | ||
And I know that you could probably make some money. | ||
Yeah, that's MyCity, Jennifer. | ||
What? What's wrong? | ||
Keep it clean? Well, do you know the First Amendment? | ||
Hey, no. Do you not understand the First Amendment? | ||
I'm allowed to say whatever I want. | ||
No, you don't understand the First Amendment. | ||
Then I'm allowed to say Big Booty Latina. | ||
Big Booty Latina is not a crime to say that, officer. | ||
But this guy is such a dummy. | ||
He doesn't understand. It's not a crime. | ||
I can go to a media. I can call him a dummy. | ||
I can call you Big Booty Latina. | ||
I can call you an idiot. | ||
I can call you a mask wearer, probably five times vaccinated. | ||
And I know you're probably going to get my... | ||
I can say all that. | ||
unidentified
|
I'm a pimp on a blimp. Y'all don't understand this. | |
I've sued y'all and I've won. | ||
So I can call you a big booty Latina. | ||
I can say whatever I want. Thank you. | ||
Prime time 99. | ||
Prime time 99. | ||
I'm going to pimp on a blimp. | ||
unidentified
|
You're not going to win the law. | |
I'm going to pimp on a blimp. | ||
It's so good. | ||
Obviously they're not friendly to freedom of speech. | ||
They want total narrative control, and they don't care at all about the health of our people. | ||
They only care about the health of their political agenda. | ||
So this clip is five minutes long. | ||
I'm not going to show you the whole five minutes because I can hardly stand, read Between the Lies. | ||
But I want you to see clip number 14. | ||
Now, do you remember the story of the transgender student who was in an altercation in a bathroom, I believe, basically beaten up by some school bullies? | ||
I went to the doctor. | ||
The text revealed that the injuries were minor. | ||
But then the next day, I believe, this transgender student Was found dead, and the media immediately took it and ran with it, saying that somehow the death was a result of the beating from the day before. | ||
The bully's beaten her up, even though the text proved that she wasn't injured severely. | ||
So let's run, read between the lies here, clip number 14, for a little bit so you can see an example of how they lied, and then I'm going to show you a clip of the real story, what really happened. | ||
Nex deserved the chance to grow up. | ||
But tragically, that is not going to happen. | ||
Instead, Nex died a day after a fight in a school bathroom at Owasso High School in Owasso, a suburb of Tulsa. | ||
You know, while we don't have a definitive cause of death in this case, the idea of a fight in a bathroom probably sparks fear in the hearts of most parents of LGBT or non-conforming kids, I assume. | ||
unidentified
|
We are losing our kids. | |
And we're losing it because of so many politically motivated attacks that are putting laws in place and creating a culture of violence. | ||
You've got one of the founders of lives of TikTok, who was appointed to an advisory board in the state. | ||
She doesn't even live in the state and was appointed to an advisory board. | ||
Let's be clear. But implicitly with the headlines and with the messaging, they push the line. | ||
Every person watching should be fearful of. | ||
although we don't know for sure the cause of death. | ||
This whole segment is about violence against trans kids. | ||
And it's not acknowledging the over 100,000 overdoses we have every single year in this nation, | ||
but only acknowledging so-called hate crime against the trans community. | ||
And the reason they're so antagonistic toward this hate speech is because they want the ability | ||
to control all speech to control the narrative altogether, not because they actually care about trans people, by God. | ||
If they cared about trans people, then their policy wouldn't be the mass sterilization | ||
of any person as soon as they begin to show symptoms of gender dysphoria, which is the leftist policy here. | ||
Let's see this clip that I saw Libs of TikTok herself post. | ||
I don't know if she posted it directly or quote posted it. | ||
Of what really happened here. | ||
This is clip number five. | ||
unidentified
|
Right now. Assuming we can trust a medical examiner in Oklahoma with the case of Nex Benedict, unfortunately the cause of death has been released and it is a self-inflicted event with antidepressants and Betadryl. | |
My heart absolutely sank when I saw this headline a few minutes ago because Republicans are going to have a field day with this. | ||
Chaya Raichik is going to just add this into a pile of memes about trans people self-inflicting certain things, let's say. | ||
I feel like especially straight and cis people are going to have a very easy time losing sight of what caused Nex's passing. | ||
Because now people are going to just blame Nex instead of blaming the systems and the bullying and everything that actually directly led to this happening. | ||
This is not something that a teenager does unless- So now if you commit suicide, it's not your own fault. | ||
This is not a- The suicide was as a result of the trans hate. | ||
It was a result of Libs of TikTok. | ||
Libs of TikTok killed this person, apparently, because of trans hate. | ||
Keep in mind, the great irony here is that the reason Libs of TikTok is famous and huge is because Libs of TikTok simply publishes, reposts TikTok content to a different audience. | ||
So the TikTok algorithm is designed in such a way That generally speaking, content produced, created by members of the transgender community will be shown in droves to people who are either neutral or friendly to the condition, ideology, whatever you want to call it. | ||
unidentified
|
The community? Better term? | |
But when you take that same content and you show it exclusively to an audience that's antagonistic to this Mental illness and its spread, that is suddenly the perpetuation of hate crime. | ||
It's hate. It's hate speech. | ||
It's causing the death and the suicides of these people. | ||
And you can go back and you can read studies from decades ago, years ago, way before any of these social media algorithms came out, and they show that People who are transgender and have undergone some sort of transition, either hormonal or surgical, are 19 times more likely to commit suicide than members of the general population. | ||
This has been true for years. | ||
Different studies have different numbers, but the point is there is a much greater likelihood. | ||
And you can say it's because of hate speech all day long, but frankly, transgenderism or gender dysphoria is seldom the only thing wrong with these people mentally. | ||
Mentally, they have other conditions as well, and you can't blame it on free speech, folks. | ||
unidentified
|
We're in a house of God. | |
First, simmer down. | ||
I want to thank Commissioner Kavanaugh and Chief Hodgins for that recognition. | ||
And Chief Hodgins for that recognition. | ||
There was a lot of drama around the lieutenant's exam. | ||
This was the main reason for the booths. | ||
Because of COVID, the list for the exam got extended and moved out. | ||
In essence, you have a group of people who are eligible to promote to lieutenant. | ||
They had already taken the test and people had gotten their scores, but then they retracted them and they gave the scores back and it looks like they gave women and black firemen a higher score. | ||
So this is a DEI move that she made. | ||
New York Fire Department Commissioner Laura Kavanaugh and Ivy League plant with zero previous firefighting experience responded to the incident by sending an email vowing to hunt down all those involved. | ||
Announcing that the Bureau of Investigation and Trials will investigate the matter, adding that she realized members might not come forward, but they should know that there is clear video of the entire incident and they will be contacted if they don't. | ||
As the New York Post reported, the internal communications from firefighter unions, including the Uniformed Fire Officers Association, Circulated memos condemning the stunt. | ||
The memo went on to say that the guilty parties will be, quote, educated over their behavior, stating, we want the members to come forward. | ||
They will come to HQ to be educated why their behavior is unacceptable. | ||
unidentified
|
Brass should have addressed the behavior in the moment. | |
And it's what came after the ceremony, he says, has many firefighters now feeling uneasy. | ||
Members were told that they would be hunted down. | ||
It would be better if they came forward and identified themselves. | ||
It would be better for them. | ||
unidentified
|
I don't think anyone wants that to happen. | |
I think if the chiefs want to come forward and admit they failed to supervise, they can start the line. | ||
Yesterday, an FDNY spokesperson telling us, quote, nobody is hunting anyone down. | ||
We're looking into those who clearly broke department regulations. | ||
It has nothing to do with politics. | ||
It's about professionalism at an official event held in a house of worship. | ||
But this internal memo says otherwise. | ||
This note sources familiar say was sent to chiefs. | ||
One bullet reads, quote, members have a right to political beliefs, but you don't have a right to make a job-related ceremony political in nature, end quote. | ||
A pair of Staten Island lawyers have offered to represent any of the firefighters for free if the commissioner ignores the First Amendment. | ||
Internally, morale is crumbling. | ||
According to the New York Post, the FDNY is refusing to move anyone who took the civil service exam for lieutenant in December 2022 up the career ladder, thanks to a screw-up by the Department of Citywide Administrative Services. | ||
unidentified
|
Three demoted FDNY fire chiefs recently filed suit against Fire Commissioner Laura Kavanaugh. | |
They allege that she targeted them based on their age. | ||
Once she got depositioned permanently in October, shortly after I was removed from a high profile position to the court of master uniformed equipment section, Without any explanation. | ||
And then apparently when I didn't retire three months later, I was demoted to deputy, which is the first time in the history of the fire department that staff chiefs were demoted. | ||
I had a similar experience, although I was removed from my position as chief of fire prevention in August, preceding the demotion that took place earlier this year. | ||
And I suspect it was in part due to politics and some concerns over Positions I had taken on issues that perhaps City Hall wasn't happy about and politically. | ||
When she became the permanent fire commissioner, shortly thereafter, within a few weeks, I was called up to her office and basically told that I was being removed as the chief of uniformed personnel with the explanation of that we're just going in a different direction, but that I could clean out my office and I was being removed and I was being replaced by my executive officer, a much younger chief with no experience in the role that I do. | ||
The entire crackdown is unconstitutional on its face, but it is a stark reminder of the level of fascism rising amongst city offices emboldened by the madness of the creeping Marxism of the totalitarian left. | ||
John Bowne reporting for InfoWars. | ||
unidentified
|
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | |
That's tomorrow, and that is it for us today. | ||
Okay, I don't know. Whatever it is, it's not right on the teleprompter. | ||
I don't know what that is. I've never seen that. | ||
unidentified
|
We are going to do InfoWars. | |
Yeah. Okay, but... | ||
Now, I can't read it. | ||
unidentified
|
There's no words on it. | |
Okay. Ready? | ||
There's no words there to play us out. | ||
What does that mean, to play us out? | ||
Owen Schroer is going to do a new broadcast. | ||
All right, go, go. | ||
That's tomorrow. And that is it for us today. | ||
And we will leave you with a... | ||
I can't do it. | ||
We'll do it live. | ||
unidentified
|
We'll do it live! | |
F*** it! Do it live! | ||
While other networks lie to you about what's happening now, InfoWars tells you the truth about what's happening next. | ||
Visit InfoWars.com forward slash show and share the link today. | ||
The program that strikes fear into the heart of the elite. | ||
It's the War Room. | ||
To the War Room, folks, I am Chase Geiser, your host this evening. | ||
We're going to go ahead and open up the phone lines. | ||
It's the last hour of the show already. | ||
It's been flying by. | ||
Make sure you call in 877-789-2539. | ||
Again, that's 877-789-2539. | ||
Open lines. Talk about whatever you want. | ||
Obviously, I love to talk about some of the breaking news of the day, as well as some of the things we've been talking about for the last couple hours. | ||
But the lines are always open, 877-789-2539. | ||
While the crew screens the calls coming in, I do want to go over a couple more stories here. | ||
Famously, we've been seeing that this whistleblower died, this Boeing whistleblower. | ||
And there's a number of reasons that this is interesting to me. | ||
So... Before all of these catastrophes started happening with airplanes in the last few months, I tweeted. | ||
It was either last year, maybe even a whole year before. | ||
You'll have to look it up. | ||
You could go to my Twitter account, crew, and you could type in... | ||
I don't know, flights or airplanes or something like that in my tweet history, you'll see. | ||
And I said that this was going to happen. | ||
And the reason I knew this was going to happen is because during the pandemic, travel plummeted, all the airlines suffered abundantly, and they laid off a massive number of people. | ||
And then when the pandemic was over, all of the demand for flights returned fairly rapidly, and And these institutions, these airlines, couldn't hire people back fast enough to service the demand. | ||
So it was hard to find pilots and get the pilots back. | ||
They fired so many of them because they weren't vaccinated. | ||
It was hard to find flight attendants that would come back because the ones they let go or laid off, found other jobs and didn't want to come back. | ||
And one of the things nobody talked about was... | ||
The maintenance crews and the people responsible for maintenance, did they have a hard time hiring them back? | ||
And I knew that this massive layoff coupled with diversity, equity, and inclusion policies was going to amount to major malfunctions and issues with airplanes. | ||
Predicted it, and we're seeing it happen. | ||
There's always a latency between bad policy and bad outcomes, and we're seeing the outcome now of bad policy. | ||
And we have this whistleblower This Boeing whistleblower who dies, close family friend of dead Boeing whistleblower, says he told her, if anything happens to me, it's not suicide. | ||
And I don't doubt that Boeing was already screwing things up. | ||
We know what happened with the Max 8s just plummeting to the earth because of their bad software updates. | ||
We know that they take shortcuts. | ||
We know that it is a military-industrial complex business that takes shortcuts and always wants war, and that Nikki Haley and her ilk and this political class have just been exploiting Boeing for years. | ||
And they take shortcuts whenever they can. | ||
What they don't tell you is how old these planes actually are. | ||
They used to tell you when you walked into an airplane, above the door you could see the year that the airplane was manufactured. | ||
They took that away. | ||
They took that off the airplanes because it was freaking people out when they were getting on planes that were built in 1963. | ||
These planes are retrofitted. | ||
They put new seats in them, but it's an old plane most of the time. | ||
And I know they build new ones, and there's issues with new ones, and there's upgrades, but there's a reason that half the time when you get on an airplane, it doesn't have an outlet. | ||
Well, it's because it's from the 60s to the 70s. | ||
And so the old planes, coupled with the fact that they don't have enough technicians to service the planes correctly, means they're taking shortcuts behind the scenes. | ||
That's why we see doors flying off. | ||
That's why we see wheels busting, emergency landings. | ||
Jets bursting into flame. | ||
And it's only a matter of time before something really catastrophic happens that results in the death of everybody on board. | ||
Unfortunately. And it was predictable. | ||
And so let's look at this clip. | ||
This is clip number 16 of Poso going over the Biden whistleblower suicide. | ||
I want to run this clip and then back to back with that crew. | ||
Just go into her audio on the line earlier today. | ||
Final thoughts on this topic, Jack. | ||
I think that's a huge part of it. | ||
And by the way, we really should be asking questions as to Nikki Haley's role or whatever role she played into this, the move from the Seattle area to South Carolina. | ||
Obviously, Nikki Haley played a huge part in that. | ||
That's what won her the board seat on Boeing. | ||
And so why is it that we have this politician who was running for president and yet there was no question about it whatsoever? | ||
The media didn't bring it up. | ||
I don't even really remember I don't remember Trump bringing it up that much. | ||
And frankly, I think it's something that when we do have politicians that are this clearly bought off by one of these failing companies like this, we should be asking those questions. | ||
And especially with Boeing, in many ways, similar to Aeroflot and similar to what we were saying about TikTok, Boeing is by and large a state-owned or at least state-related enterprise in the United States. | ||
And it's kind of silly that we don't talk about it like that. | ||
unidentified
|
Don't believe it. Ann? | |
Tessa, Barnett's family friend Jennifer said they had talked about this exact scenario playing out, but his words seemed like a premonition. | ||
He told her, don't ever believe it. | ||
I knew John because his mom and my mom are best friends. | ||
And so over the years, get-togethers, birthdays, celebrations and You know, what not. | ||
We've all got together and talked and, you know, That's how we really know each other. | ||
And when Jennifer needed help one day, Barnett came by to see her. | ||
They talked about his upcoming depositions in Charleston. | ||
Jennifer knew he filed an extremely damaging complaint against Boeing. | ||
He says the aerospace giant retaliated against him when he blew the whistle on unsafe practices. | ||
For more than 30 years, Barnett was a quality manager. | ||
He'd recently retired and moved back to look after his mom in Louisiana. | ||
He wasn't concerned about safety because I asked him, I said, aren't you scared? | ||
And his voice and the way he would talk, no, I ain't scared. | ||
He said, but if anything happens to me, it's not suicide. | ||
You know, I know that he did not commit suicide. | ||
There's no way. | ||
He loved life too much. | ||
He loved his family too much. | ||
He loved his brothers too much to put them through what they're going through right now. | ||
And he basically told you not to believe it? | ||
Yeah. Basically, yeah. | ||
Not true. He's got too much to do. | ||
Likes breathing. And he did. | ||
He had a lot of plans and things that he wanted to do. | ||
What do you think happened? | ||
I think somebody got in there and made, you know, money can buy anything nowadays, it seems like, and there's a lot of evil in this world. | ||
I think somebody didn't like what he had to say and wanted to shut him up and didn't want it to come back on anyone, so that's why they made it look like a suicide. | ||
The last time she saw Barnett, it was at her father's funeral in late February. | ||
He was one of the pallbearers. | ||
Sometimes family and friends referred to him by his middle name, Mitch. | ||
I think everybody is in disbelief and can't believe it. | ||
And I told everybody that I don't care what they say, I know that Mitch didn't do that. | ||
And just because John Mitch Barnett is dead doesn't mean this case won't move forward. | ||
His attorneys say they're still prepared to go to trial in June. | ||
Working for you, Ann Emerson. | ||
We've got this crazy story, this whistleblower dying in the context of all these things going wrong with Boeing. | ||
And the thing to keep in mind, folks, is just what Poso said in the first part of that clip. | ||
Boeing is technically a private company, but it's publicly traded. | ||
Is with the government, the military-industrial complex. | ||
So it is an extension of the state. | ||
And the other thing to keep in mind, too, is that its business is to make weapons of war. | ||
Its business is to make high-tech, classified technology, aerial technology, that can result in the most efficient Death of as many people as possible in any combat environment. | ||
And so this is not a business that necessarily is run by its conscience because the nature of the business that it's in, the nature of the industry that it serves, the fact that it makes weapons that inevitably result in the death of people, some guilty, some innocent. | ||
This is not a business predisposed to have a conscience. | ||
So, it seems to me very possible that they know the planes are faulty and they're flying them anyway because they want to make the money and it doesn't bother them. | ||
It seems to me very possible that this whistleblower was the victim of some sort of unjust recourse, for lack of a more explicit claim. | ||
And that this is only going to continue to happen and continue to get worse until we neuter the military-industrial complex, the political-industrial complex, and the diversity, equity, and inclusion policies that prioritize immutable characteristics over competence. | ||
I've got no problem with anybody of any race, gender, sexual orientation, religion, having any job, as long as they don't have that job because of their race, gender, sexual orientation, or religious disposition. | ||
And I know religion is sort of a gray area as far as whether or not it's an immutable characteristic, but the vast majority of people maintain the religion they were born into. | ||
So I consider it one. | ||
It's certainly a right. | ||
So, this is what we're seeing play out right before our eyes. | ||
And all this in the context of incessant cognitive dissonance. | ||
Very first hour of the show today, I talked about how the left was disproportionately predisposed to derangement, to delusion, to cognitive dissonance, to not seeing the truth for what it really is if it counters the narrative that they have playing in their head. | ||
If it's against the dogma of the cult that they have decided to join, the cult of leftism, the cult of globalism. | ||
And now we're seeing Fox News reporting that COVID-19 shots contain toxic DNA and cancer viruses. | ||
Something that Alex Jones and others have been saying for years, warning about for years, in addition to the symptoms, the other symptoms of these vaccines, like myocarditis and others. | ||
And let me put it to you like this. | ||
How many people do you know who have died of COVID-19? | ||
And measure that up against how many people you know who have had a fairly serious, at least a fairly serious adverse reaction to these vaccines specifically. | ||
I'm not talking about all vaccines generally, but these mRNA vaccines specifically, because I know at least half a dozen people, some relatives, some friends, who have had serious adverse reactions to these vaccines, whether it was heart attacks, Paralyzed limbs for a couple of weeks. | ||
Bizarre side effects that are atypical of basically any drug that you would consume, even the illegal ones that you buy on the market. | ||
And I know absolutely no one. | ||
This is now four years after the pandemic. | ||
I know no one who died of COVID-19. | ||
I know a ton of people. | ||
I hardly know anybody who didn't get it, who didn't hate it. | ||
I know Rob Dew got really sick when he had it. | ||
I believe it was serious. | ||
Don't get me wrong. I'm not saying that COVID-19 wasn't serious. | ||
I'm just saying that these vaccines are more dangerous than the illness itself. | ||
And even the CDC is coming out and saying that you can totally disregard former protocols of staying home for 14 days or 5 days when you get diagnosed with COVID. Just go back to work. | ||
It's not that big of a deal. I mean, they're coming out and saying that now. | ||
But let's look at this clip in conjunction with all that's being revealed about these vaccines, all that we know because we think rationally and we prefer the truth to these dogmas that would make us more comfortable. | ||
We're willing to sacrifice our comfort in order to pursue and believe the truth because it's a value that we have. | ||
It's an ideal that we have. | ||
It's something that we're devoted to morally, ethically, philosophically in all ways. | ||
Despite all of these symptoms coming out, these side effects coming out, the truth coming out about how terrible these vaccines are for everyone, look at Destiny shake his head as Dave Smith spits the truth at him here in clip number 12. | ||
You guys can go ahead and run it. | ||
Okay, but you're arguing with something I didn't say. | ||
I'm saying the official narrative was that it didn't come from the lab. | ||
If you get the vaccine, you cannot get it and you cannot transmit it. | ||
These were huge stories that were flatly wrong. | ||
No, you're shaking your head. That's not wrong. | ||
unidentified
|
The official position of the NIH or the government was not that if you get vaccinated, you will never transmit it and you will never get sick. | |
I know that there is one quote that people – yes, I'm aware that there is one quote. | ||
Anybody that honestly followed any of that or saw all of the statements, nobody actually thought that. | ||
It is unfathomable to me that people that will make so many excuses for every single Trump gaffe will come out and take like seven words quoted by the president. | ||
What excuse have I made for Trump? Oh my God, they said the vaccine was 100% effective. | ||
That's unbelievable. | ||
Nobody really thought that. That's unbelievable. | ||
We should be able to manufacture a lot of vaccines and that vaccine, key goal is to stop the transmission, to get the immunity levels up so that you get almost no infection going on whatsoever. | ||
Everyone who takes the vaccine is not just protecting themselves, but reducing their transmission to other people and allowing society to get back to normal. | ||
unidentified
|
We can kind of almost see the end. | |
We're vaccinating so very fast. | ||
Our data from the CDC today suggests, you know, that vaccinated people do not carry the virus, don't get sick. | ||
I think you need more than one sentence of a thing to see if they genuinely thought that the vaccine would be 100% prevent. | ||
Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus stops with every vaccinated person. | ||
A vaccinated person gets exposed to the virus. | ||
The virus does not infect them. | ||
The virus cannot then use that person to go anywhere else. | ||
It cannot use a vaccinated person as a host to go get more people. | ||
That means the vaccines will get us to the end of this. | ||
unidentified
|
Essentially, vaccines block you from getting and giving the virus. | |
Fully vaccinated people are at a very, very low risk of getting COVID-19. | ||
Therefore, if you've been fully vaccinated, you no longer need to wear a mask. | ||
When people are vaccinated, they can feel safe that they are not going to get infected. | ||
We have all the vaccines we need. | ||
unidentified
|
We just need our people to take it. | |
A, for their own protection, for the protection of their family, but also to break the chain of transmission. | ||
You want to be a dead end to the virus. | ||
unidentified
|
So when the virus gets to you, you stop it. | |
You don't allow it to use you as the stepping stone to the next person. | ||
I think given the country as a whole, The fact that we have now about 50% of adults fully vaccinated and about 62% of adults having received at least one dose as a nation, I feel fairly certain you're not going to see the kind of surges we've seen in the past. | ||
If you're vaccinated, you're not going to be hospitalized, you're not going to be in an ICU unit, and you're not going to die. | ||
You're okay. You're not going to get COVID if you have these vaccinations. | ||
unidentified
|
None of our vaccines are 100% effective or prevent the transmission of 100% of a disease. | |
There's no vaccine like that. | ||
Unbelievable. The cognitive dissonance is insane. | ||
And it's one thing to believe the lie and to be wrong with But it's another thing to be a real jerk about it. | ||
And he's a jerk. He really is. | ||
Destiny is a jerk. And I'm not saying I'm right about anything. | ||
It's my job to get up here, spew my opinions, and be self-righteous about them. | ||
That's what my job is. | ||
I'm never told what to say. | ||
I'm told to try to tell the truth as often as possible. | ||
As often as I can know what the truth is. | ||
So I understand that I'm a self-righteous person, but I disagree with people. | ||
I'm willing to work it out and talk it out. | ||
I think it's fascinating. | ||
I've tried to have so many people on my podcast, on the show as a guest, who might not necessarily agree with any of The values or ideals or political positions of Infowars or myself, but just to have a real conversation in a friendly way, a respectable way. And I can't tell you how many friends and family members that have fallen out of my life because of this cult, this lack of tolerance. | ||
A perfect example is the difference between the Krasensteins and Destiny. | ||
Destiny's a jerk about being totally ignorant. | ||
He's a smart guy. | ||
Cognitive dissonance has nothing to do with intelligence. | ||
Krasensteins, they're really nice about it. | ||
Had a beer with them after the debate. | ||
Had a great time with them. | ||
Very friendly people. | ||
Not bad people. This is different. | ||
This is like another level of just malice. | ||
When you're in such denial that you're forced to To push lies. | ||
Despite all of the evidence to the contrary, it becomes malicious and irresponsible. | ||
And you should have a right to lie. | ||
I believe in the freedom of speech. | ||
Don't get me wrong, I'm not calling for the censorship of this person or the silencing of this person. | ||
I'm just pointing out, I'm just criticizing this mentality, this philosophy, this approach to the truth which results in The censorship of all truth and freedom of speech. | ||
The death of our republic itself when they can't recognize that the Biden administration is the administration, is the philosophy, is the policy. | ||
Behind the death of our republic, not Trump. | ||
These are the same people who would come out and say that Trump deserves to be in jail because he tried to overthrow a democratic election, but who totally disregard the fact that the Supreme Court had to rule on a leftist push to remove Donald Trump from several ballots in several states. | ||
The most anti-democratic thing one could do. | ||
We want to talk about our democratic institution, and I know that it's a constitutional republic. | ||
But it has democratic processes. | ||
So in that sense, I'm using the term democratic, not democracy as a whole. | ||
And it's abundantly dangerous because where in the past a lie would die so quickly in the face of the truth? | ||
We live in a half-physical, half-metaverse civilization today with technology. | ||
Where the lies don't die instantly in the face of the truth. | ||
They will, I believe, eventually die in the face of the truth. | ||
But the algorithms are such that people get siloed into these different loops of content and perspectives. | ||
And that loop perpetuates these lies. | ||
We know it's been famously said that if you tell a lie loud enough and often enough, people will begin to believe it. | ||
And that's what we're seeing with these algorithms. | ||
We're seeing these silos putting people in their own bubble. | ||
And despite how ridiculous or atrocious or obnoxious or obvious these conflicts are, these logical conflicts are, people still don't see how obvious it is. | ||
They don't wake up. | ||
It's like when you're having a dream and you can hear an alarm blaring at you from the sky in the dream. | ||
And you think for some reason... | ||
That there's an air raid going on or something catastrophic is about to happen in your dream only to find when you wake up that you were hearing your alarm penetrate into the dream. | ||
That's like what this cognitive dissonance is. | ||
They can hear the truth Coming at them from the sky. | ||
They know it in a weird, distorted way, an accurate way. | ||
They know it's there. They're aware of it. | ||
But they're in this dream state. | ||
So they can't acknowledge that it's actually their alarm going off to wake them up. | ||
It's actually the truth happening. | ||
And instead they think it's this fantasy that they live in. | ||
More on the other side. And your calls. | ||
We are going to be going to your calls as promised. | ||
Sorry for the delay. I just wanted to cover a few more things that last segment. | ||
Make sure you call on 877-789-2539. | ||
Again, that's 877-789-2539. | ||
First up, I'm just going to go down the list here because everybody looks like a great caller. | ||
Let's start with Wild in Wisconsin. | ||
unidentified
|
Wild, what's up? Hey, Chase. | |
I wanted to talk about a thermonuclear war with Russia. | ||
Let's do it. And I thought it was crazy, first of all, in the I haven't mentioned that much with the Putin-Tucker interview, how Putin said there's been zero communication between him and Biden since the start of the Ukraine war. | ||
You know, that's not a very good sign. | ||
Yeah, I absolutely agree with you. | ||
Oh, go ahead. I didn't mean to cut you off. | ||
I just sensed a pause, so I took over, but go ahead. | ||
Oh, no, I was asking if you saw that. | ||
Did you? Yeah, so we've got this article here. | ||
Maybe the crew can throw it up on the dot cam. | ||
This is from RT that we posted on Infowars.com today. | ||
Kremlin slams US distortion of Putin's words on nuclear weapons. | ||
And I did hear exactly what you're talking about in the Tucker interview as well. | ||
It was alarming to me that Putin said he couldn't remember the last time that he spoke with President Biden. | ||
And also that he hadn't spoken with them at all since the onset of this war. | ||
So we're funding billions of dollars for this conflict. | ||
We're getting the whole international community involved. | ||
We're adding people to the roles at NATO. And I mean, there are countless, countless headlines here. | ||
Countless headlines here. Russia claims it's killed 6,000 foreign fighters in Ukraine, including 491 Americans. | ||
France mold boots on the ground in Ukraine for months. | ||
Kiev-backed terrorists still try to poison soldiers. | ||
Germany prepares to bring back the draft. | ||
I mean, the whole world is preparing for war with Russia. | ||
And Joe Biden didn't think to have a phone call with Vladimir Putin. | ||
And Putin hasn't, as I understand it, particularly reached out to Biden. | ||
The real reason is not that Biden is impossible to get a hold of, not that a conversation | ||
from the President of the United States and the leader of Russia wouldn't be conducive | ||
to some sort of success. | ||
The reason is because Putin and the White House understand that Joe Biden is suffering | ||
from some form of dementia and that he doesn't actually run things. | ||
So a phone call with him is absolutely pointless. | ||
That's why Putin and our White House are relying on their staffs to communicate with one another because this guy is not running the country. | ||
What do you think, Wilde? I mean, that was my interpretation from it. | ||
Totally, totally. And like, you know, obviously they would have, you know, Biden just communicate with like a script from his staff if he did communicate with Putin. | ||
And there was also, I'm concerned that, you know, that Russia might use tactical nukes or Larger nukes because their sea fleet has been struck so many times, and it's their doctrine that if they lose a third of their navy, they automatically fire, according to leaked documents. | ||
Plus, I'm concerned that the biolabs in Ukraine might be responsible for, as we saw with corona, bioengineered, sexually transmitted diseases that have been running rampant in Russia. | ||
I suffer from so many of those. | ||
I pretty much got them all. | ||
And lastly, I was thinking of the possibility of they're going to go Russia into war with a false flag by claiming that Russia took down the Bitcoin market and crashed Bitcoin and everyone would flip out. | ||
Or if they crash the power grid and blame it on Russia. | ||
I was in Europe. | ||
Well, they tried to blame them already for the space nukes, and then that just disappeared after that cyber attack that resulted in the outage of AT&T for several hours. | ||
Yeah, and obviously there's more than just space nukes up there. | ||
I don't know if you ever saw how the Russians just abandoned all their space shuttle programs right when You know, they were saying they were going to switch to using, like, arrow blades. | ||
They call it NASA spaceship stuff, you know. | ||
And ultimately, I wanted to hear your opinion. | ||
Do you think this war with Russia is more Rusophobia, Slavophobia, or more against Christianity? | ||
because it seems like they're more of the current pillars holding up | ||
Christianity right now. That's a great question. | ||
So, obviously, this is very complicated, so take anything that I say with a grain of salt. | ||
This is just my opinion as a layman paying attention, okay? | ||
Celtic salt or Himalayan? | ||
And make sure you get iodized with Survival Shield X3. So... | ||
It's complicated and there's multiple reasons. | ||
And typically for conflicts like this, it's not any one reason that starts it. | ||
Sometimes historians depict things as being over one issue. | ||
And it rarely is that massive death and war and resources are allocated to anything because one thing happened or because of one issue. | ||
Sometimes I guess it's possible that that's the case, but usually it's complicated. | ||
So there's several things going on here with Russia that... | ||
Explain this war with Ukraine. | ||
The first thing is, NATO has been infringing upon Russian sovereignty for decades. | ||
And I'm talking about since the collapse of the USSR. So NATO was originally created as a stalwart against a nuclear war with the Soviet Union. | ||
Soviet Union collapsed, but as all government programs, NATO did not cease to exist even though its original mission was accomplished. | ||
And so NATO has been infringing upon Russia for an extended period of time for several reasons. | ||
One of them being the desire to control Russia. | ||
The way that energy is exported from Russia to the rest of Europe so they can control the supply chain, make a little money off the top of the exports, and keep their thumb on Russia economically. | ||
So Russia's economy, I believe, is 71% reliant on exporting energy via natural gas to Europe | ||
and the rest of the world. | ||
And that pipeline goes straight through Ukraine, which is why it was important to Russia that | ||
Ukraine never be a member of NATO because that would mean that their exports were subject | ||
to the consent of NATO and not just a sovereign nation in Ukraine. | ||
So if NATO, if Ukraine joins NATO, that means that Russia will have to negotiate with the | ||
international globalist community as a whole for things like pricing, the ability to export | ||
that through that pipeline there. | ||
And it could be shut off at any time by the international community and cripple the Russian economy altogether. | ||
And so from the standpoint of national sovereignty, they know that if Ukraine joins NATO, it's over for Russia as a sovereign nation. | ||
It will have to be the subject of and obey NATO and its international partners if that happens. | ||
That's the first thing. Second thing is, okay, well, why does NATO want to do that? | ||
Why does NATO want to control these exports? | ||
Skimming makes sense, but it doesn't seem like enough for a major war. | ||
And the reason is because Russia has a gigantic arsenal of nuclear weapons, and it's not perceived, probably accurately so, it's not perceived as a republic or a democracy or a free country. | ||
It's perceived as a dictatorship. | ||
And it's fairly unpredictable who's going to come to power, who's going to fall out of grace. | ||
There's bizarre assassinations that occur, right? | ||
So, from a national security standpoint, the United States and our NATO partners, for lack | ||
of a better expression, I'm no fan of NATO, are terrified at the notion when they consider | ||
who is going to be the leader of Russia next. | ||
So we know that Vladimir Putin, regardless of whether he's evil or not, we know that | ||
he's not somebody who impulsively nukes the world. | ||
He's not insane. | ||
He's not rash or impulsive about that tremendous power that he has. | ||
But what's to say that the next person, after Putin dies in 10 or 20 years or whenever, | ||
isn't going to be absolutely insane? | ||
And that poses a tremendous national security threat for the world. | ||
So NATO conspired together to try to control Russian exports. | ||
So in the event that a madman arrives at the captain chair, the helm of Russia with all | ||
these nukes, they would be able to control that person by cutting off exports and things | ||
of that nature. | ||
That's my opinion on why this conflict exists. | ||
It's all about control over Russia because they feel that leadership there is unpredictable | ||
into the 21st century. | ||
And there's other reasons as well, but that's the main one. | ||
Wild, I'm sorry to cut you off, but we are coming up on a break. | ||
So I'm going to move on to more calls on the other side, but thank you so much for your | ||
call and for the great question. | ||
Not sure if I'm right, but it stands to reason that my points are correct, at least in some | ||
More on the other side, folks. Stick with us. | ||
All right, folks. I'm Chase Geiser hosting the War Room this afternoon until Alex Jones is back in studio next week. | ||
I'm sure I did a great job hosting the Alex Jones show today. | ||
So if you were tuning in, hoping to find him, I highly recommend that you go back and watch the Alex Jones show from today. | ||
As always, he did a fabulous job. | ||
And I'm going to get right into the calls because we only have 10 minutes of the show left and I want to get to as many people as possible. | ||
I apologize to everyone here on the board if I'm not able to get to you. | ||
Let's start with Tony in Texas. | ||
Tony, what is on your mind? | ||
unidentified
|
Hey, I'm going to tell you how I got out of a ticket the other day. | |
Okay. Look, this really happened. | ||
I'm an old man, and I never wear my seatbelt, so I got pulled over for not wearing my seatbelt, right? | ||
So this cop comes up to my window, and I tell him, look, I'm going to tell you straight up, identify as transparent. | ||
So if you give him a... So if you give me a ticket, that means you're profiling me because you're saying you can see me. | ||
And this poor young guy, he just started shaking his head and he tells me, get out of here, old man, and wear your damn seat, boy. | ||
That's a great story. | ||
Thank you for that call, Tony. That's so funny that you mentioned it. | ||
You know, I got pulled over coming out of the studio a couple of months ago. | ||
There were a couple of weeks there. | ||
It was before Owen went to prison that I got pulled over a couple times a week. | ||
It was bizarre. And Scott pulls me over, does the same deal. | ||
He says, where are you coming from? You know how they usually say it. | ||
And I said, I'm coming from work. He goes, where do you work? | ||
And I just took a gamble. | ||
I gave him one look, sized him up. | ||
I said, InfoWars. | ||
He goes, InfoWars? | ||
All right! Get out of here! | ||
Same kind of deal. I lucked out on that one. | ||
There are perks, folks. | ||
There are perks. There's no snacks around here. | ||
And... Pickens are slim as far as turbo force around here because we sell it all. | ||
But other than that, there are certain perks to working here. | ||
I really appreciate your call. | ||
Let's hear next from Clayton in Indiana. | ||
unidentified
|
Clayton, what's on your mind? Yeah, so the other day I was just hearing some discussions on AI being artificial intelligence. | |
Yeah. And it kind of dawned on me how... | ||
Ambiguous it is. | ||
You can't really pinpoint the start of it, the beginning nature of it. | ||
And so instead of artificial, it makes more sense, especially in dealing with computing, as an active intelligence, being more like a program or an active directory, things of which systematically have activation cues. | ||
So if AI is not artificial intelligence, But it's active intelligence. | ||
You can point out activators. | ||
Yeah. And activators dealing with permissions and profiles and the like. | ||
Yeah, absolutely. That's a great point. | ||
You know, I was talking about this just the other day, too, because everything is called AI now. | ||
AI has become such a hot topic that people are calling their applications AI. They're calling different software solutions AI, even when they're not really AI. Artificial intelligence is an intelligence-created platform. | ||
Artificially by human beings. | ||
That's what artificial intelligence is. So if you have some piece of software that can change somebody's voice to someone else's voice, that's not really AI. That's just a sophisticated software that knows how to change the audio file waveform to sound more like a different voice than one. | ||
AI, we need to hold on to what that means. | ||
Artificial general intelligence is different. | ||
Now the closest thing we have as of now to actual AI is ChatGPT because it can respond in a way that feels very human, seems like it was written by a human to a human being. | ||
That's the definition traditionally of artificial intelligence is anything that when interacted with By a human being, that human being cannot tell whether or not they are interacting with a program or with a real human being. | ||
So you can put people in chat rooms with ChatGPT and you can prompt it correctly and set it up correctly and tweak the settings correctly to the point where it will Be undetectable to somebody using it that they're not speaking with an actual person on the other end. | ||
That's the closest thing that we have to artificial intelligence. | ||
But these other apps that just make fake images and fake videos, that's just sophisticated software. | ||
So I'm totally with you on that, Clayton. | ||
I want to go to another call here. | ||
Let's hop over to... | ||
unidentified
|
One of the calls dropped. | |
I want to hear from George in California. | ||
George, this is the one that I wanted to take. | ||
unidentified
|
Go ahead. So far, so good. | |
How are you doing? Brother, God bless you. | ||
God bless the crew. As always, never forget you guys. | ||
I felt this was a calling from God to call into you, my brother, because Greg Reese's recent video about parasites and how disease affects the body is something that's been affecting my family for quite a while, and I'm holding the tears back from this miracle we've been experiencing. | ||
I take care of my mom. | ||
I'm also a graduate student here in my local town of Fresno and driving Uber right now, believe it or not. | ||
You got anybody in the backseat? | ||
unidentified
|
No, I just dropped them off, man. | |
We had a couple of enthusiastic people. | ||
What were you going to do if I called on you while the person was in the car? | ||
unidentified
|
Just make him deal with it? I was going to tell him, hey, I was going to say, hey, brother, we're on the line. | |
Shout out to the war room Alex Jones. | ||
That's awesome. Yeah, my brother, but here's what's going on. | ||
My mom's been diagnosed with MS for the past 20-plus years. | ||
Sorry to hear that. And it's degraded to the point... | ||
Yeah, thank you, brother. | ||
She's degraded to the point where she has trigeminal neuralgia, which, if you're familiar with, is the three worst types of pains that mankind can face is childbirth, back pain, and the third is trigeminal neuralgia. | ||
And this poor thing... | ||
She would have this pain and it would break anybody's heart because she's screaming uncontrollably, cannot eat, cannot drink, and she's bed bound and when she would get a cold she would get pneumonia. | ||
We started giving her ivermectin when she would get pneumonia and her pain went away in her jaw. | ||
Really? Which is where the trigeminal neuralgia affects exactly. | ||
Wow. Well, have you seen any of those clips of Joe Rogan talking about that parasite that lives in cats and how bad it is for you? | ||
Maybe the crew could pull it up. If the clip is short enough, guys, I do want to run. | ||
I know we only have a few minutes left, but are you familiar with that parasite that lives in cats that can control your brain? | ||
unidentified
|
Oh, wow. No, I haven't seen that one. | |
You got to look that up just in case the crew can't get to it fast enough. | ||
They're whizzes, so I bet you they will. | ||
But there's a parasite that lives, I believe, in the kitty litter of cats. | ||
And when it infects insects, it can totally hijack their minds and their brains and control them 100%. | ||
Make them do whatever they want, sort of like the curse from Harry Potter, where you can just control what somebody does. | ||
And there's some people that believe that it can impact people negatively as well and control their actions, mess with their behavior. | ||
I don't know what studies have been done, but thank you so much for your call. | ||
I do appreciate it, and maybe the crew will find that. | ||
If they find it in time, I'll run it. | ||
In the meantime, George, I'm going to take another call, and God bless you and your mother and your family. | ||
I'm sorry that you're going through that. | ||
Bad things always end up being good things in one way or the other. | ||
So stay strong and drive safe, brother. | ||
So let's hear next from... | ||
I'm going to take one more call while the crew looks for that clip. | ||
I want to hear from Tony on New Jersey. | ||
unidentified
|
Tony, what's up? Hey, I got some information for you. | |
Okay. I called in the other day to Owen. | ||
Okay. And this is going on to kind of like a 5G thing. | ||
I found Charlie Ward. | ||
And he says that Russia has been taking the cell towers down since last year, and they're executing people that, I think he said promoted, you know, like, you know, people that promoted the 5G. They've been executing those people and taking the cell towers down since last year because it has nothing to do with our phone. | ||
It's a total weapon. | ||
And where are these executions taking place? | ||
Where? Again? Forgive me. | ||
unidentified
|
In Russia. In Moscow. | |
Yeah, I don't know about that, man. I don't know about that. | ||
But I do want to show you, I do want to show the audience a little bit of this clip because the crew did find it and we've only got a minute and a half left. | ||
So, sorry for cutting you off a little prematurely. | ||
But can we run this just for a few minutes and then I'll interrupt because I know it goes over. | ||
Talking about the percentage of human beings. | ||
Half of Brazil has the brain worm that makes you basically psychotic. | ||
Well, it doesn't make you psychotic. | ||
It makes you risk-taking, crazy. | ||
It affects your judgment. It programs you to want to have more cats, smell piss. | ||
Yes. Well, it definitely does that to rats. | ||
It actually reprograms rats' brains, makes them sexually attractive. | ||
And there's a bunch of parasites. | ||
Yes, there's a bunch of them. | ||
And there's some that probably haven't even been identified. | ||
And that's where the whole crazy cat lady thing comes from. | ||
Yes, that's exactly what it is. | ||
It's one of the reasons why they tell women when they're pregnant to stay the fuck away from cat litter. | ||
Don't touch cat litter. Don't kill anyone in your cats. | ||
Yes. I mean, it can be actually fatal for babies. | ||
But what I'm trying to get at... | ||
Goes back to the Middle Ages when they said kill the damn cats. | ||
Well, I'm sure there's a lot of factors there, right? | ||
See, old wives' tales were like, you get demon-possessed by that cat, and really it's a damn brain worm. | ||
Well, that's probably also why they told you not to eat pork. | ||
And that's science fiction. That's a real brain worm programming. | ||
Like you were saying earlier, I looked at it's true. | ||
I didn't even know that. That the top soccer teams have the highest level of brain worm infestation. | ||
Well, there's a disproportionate amount of people that live in countries with a high toxoplasmosis infection with successful soccer teams. | ||
There was some study that was done on that. | ||
So, you guys see it? That's what I was talking about. | ||
unidentified
|
I forgot it was on Joe Rogan. I think I remembered it was on Joe Rogan. | |
I forgot it was the episode with Alex Jones, so that's cool. | ||
We are coming up on the end of the show. | ||
We've got about 18 seconds left of this segment, folks. | ||
Before I let you go for the weekend until the Sunday show, I want to remind you to discover the power of activated triiodine. | ||
Survival Shield X3 is back in stock at 40% off. | ||
You can do the research yourself, folks. | ||
The effects of this product are absolutely amazing. | ||
So much research has been done. | ||
Check it out at infowarestore.com. | ||
unidentified
|
Survival Shield X3, now back and better than ever with a whopping 40% discount. | |
It's your ticket to a healthier you, powered by the might of activated tri-iodine. | ||
Picture this, a product that derives from ancient sea salts buried deep beneath the earth, harnessing a cutting-edge process that stabilizes iodine in a groundbreaking tri-iodine formula. | ||
Imagine waking up feeling rejuvenated, your body's processes humming smoothly like a well-oiled machine, all thanks to Survival Shield X3. This isn't just a step up from the old nascent iodine system, it's a quantum leap in health supplementation designed with you, the patriot, in mind. | ||
Survival Shield X3 has got your back, providing peace of mind and body in these uncertain times. | ||
Head over to InfowarsStored.com and witness the transformation for yourself. | ||
This is more than just a supplement. | ||
It's your shield, your protector, your Survival Shield X3. Don't wait. | ||
Take control of your health today and step into a brighter, healthier future. |