Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

May 18, 2023 - War Room - Owen Shroyer

02:12:19

FBI Whistleblowers Testify To Congress On Corruption And Weaponization At Federal Government And In Democrat Party

Source

Participants

Main voices

charles cornish-dale

12:13

garret oboyle

06:50

michael yon

13:46

owen shroyer

55:18

steve friend

08:32

Appearances

jim jordan

01:00

marjorie taylor greene

04:16

matt gaetz

01:50

mike johnson

01:14

thomas massie

04:13

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		The silent majority is no longer silent.
		This is The War Room with Owen Schroyer.
		Please stand by for further details.
		We return you now to your regularly scheduled program.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yesterday, Marjorie Taylor Greene teased On the Alex Jones Show that she would be filing articles of impeachment against Joe Biden.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		She then made this official announcement this morning.
marjorie taylor greene ▲ ● ▼		It is with the highest amount of solemnity that I announce my intention to introduce articles of impeachment today on the head of this America at Last executive branch that has been working since January 20th, 2021, to systematically destroy this country.
		The President of the United States, Joseph Robinette Biden.
		Joe Biden has deliberately compromised our national security by refusing to enforce immigration laws and secure our border, allowed approximately 6 million illegals from over 170 countries to invade our country.
		Deprive Border Patrol of the necessary resources and policies sufficient to protect our country.
		And his administration has willfully refused to maintain operational control as required by the law.
		He has allowed fentanyl, the number one killer of Americans between the age of 18 and 45, to overwhelmingly flood into our country and kill around 300 Americans every single day.
		These aren't just Americans.
		These are people's family members.
		These are their sons, their daughters, their brothers, their sisters, their mothers, their fathers, their cousins, aunts and uncles.
		These are American families.
		His administration has lost complete contact with approximately 85,000 unaccompanied illegal alien children.
		And his policies have forced tens of thousands of illegal children into slave labor.
		Where are these kids?
		No one even knows.
		It's horrible.
		Joe Biden has reinstated catastrophic and disastrous catch-and-release policies which have allowed illegals to flood our country and our communities.
		He ended Remain in Mexico and reinstated catch-and-release.
		Under Biden's command, the Secretary of Homeland Security has illegally granted mass parole to aliens
		when US federal law only permits parole to be granted on a specific case-by-case basis.
		He endangered the lives of Americans by allowing illegal aliens who had tested positive for
		COVID-19 to enter our country and infect American citizens,
		yet while enforcing strict COVID policies on American citizens.
		His policies, directives, and statements surrounding the southern border have violated our laws
		and destroyed our country.
		Biden has blatantly...
		Thank you. Where American taxpayers live.
		Employees are fired when they are corrupt or aren't adequately serving their employer or purposely destroying a company.
		In this case, the employer is the American people because they pay the salaries They pay the salaries of everyone in the federal government.
		The Constitution outlines a very simple process to fire the corrupt officials serving in the federal government — impeachment.
		Matthew Graves, Christopher Wray, Merrick Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, and Joe Biden are all corrupt and unfit to hold office, and they all must be impeached.
		This concludes impeachment week.
		And now I can...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, ladies and gentlemen, there's more news on this, what Marjorie Taylor Greene calls impeachment week.
		And this is going to be a heavy, clip-laden show because I want you to see as much of this FBI whistleblower testimony as possible today.
		Here's what is...
		Sad about this situation.
		because of all the crying wolf that the Democrats have done for the last five years, six years about
		Donald Trump, I don't know if the American people will actually understand and respect the
		significance of the Biden corruption that Marjorie Taylor Greene is filing the articles of impeachment for.
unidentified		It's my life and my body, stand in front of me.
		I'm taking joy in my arms, it's the soul of me.
		You won't stop, ask to see me lay face down.
		Head for the door, and do it hard!
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Here we are ladies and gentlemen on this Thursday, May 18th, 2023 edition of the InfoWars War Room.
		Brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com And let me just tell you what we have coming up today.
		We do have two guests, Michael Jan, joining us in the second hour.
		He's got breaking news out of the Darien Gap.
		And it's more of what we already know is going on, but we just get more details as the days go by.
		More are now crossing the Darien Gap than ever before.
		So this lie from Mayorkas, this lie from the Biden administration that they're shutting down the Darien Gap
		and securing the border is just that.
		A lie.
		And so it's not just the numbers that are coming in, it's now the confirmed diseases that we have coming in as well.
		But hey, wear that mask, take that vaccine, unless you're an illegal immigrant, then come on into the country.
		Whatever you want, whatever you need, we'll throw you on a plane, we'll throw you on a train, we'll throw you on a bus, and you can cough and spit and hack and pee, and you get the point.
		We have the raw egg nationalist who has made a very dangerous connection to lab-grown meat and the Chinese military.
		Oh, yes.
		Why is it always the Chinese military involved in our gain-of-function research with Anthony Fauci and now the lab-grown meat with Bill Gates?
		Yes, they want you to eat and to drink their poison.
		And it's very important you understand their mindset.
		It's very important you understand where they're coming from so that you can understand why they're doing this and why they think you need to be eliminated and you need to be domesticated and enslaved.
		Because in their eyes, they're living already in the year 50,000.
		Forget about the year 3,000.
		Their plans are built according to what they see in the year 50,000.
		So they're building a whole system now expecting in the year 50,000, if we have these gigantic smart cities, all the infrastructure, all the rules, all the regulations will all be permanently in place in the digital corporate world government.
		And they're setting it in place now.
		So they have to convince you you're the problem on the planet, convince you you're causing climate change, whatever other propaganda, and so you have to be enslaved.
		And so you have to eat the lab-grown meat from Bill Gates, and you have to eat the bio-milk from Bill Gates, and you have to drink the poop water from Bill Gates.
		And yes, and yes, Bilderberg is kicking off talking about the AI, but that's what it is.
		Because even these demons have an element of humanity in them enough to see the same thing.
		Look at the movie Judge Dredd and the megacities.
		Look at the movie The Fifth Element and the megacities.
		That's where they see humanity inevitably going into their megacities, into their population-dense megacities, where they will control the ebbs and flows of humanity for the rest of time.
		And they have to have the right AI in place, and they have to bring it out as soon as possible, weaponized, without you getting access to it and understanding it.
		But that's a whole discussion we'll have in the third hour.
		Most of today's show is actually going to be clips.
		I've got over 30 clips here from the FBI whistleblower testimony in front of Congress today, which was just epic.
		Just epic. I could not even turn my eyes away this morning.
		And what's amazing is you're watching this and you realize how disingenuous the Democrats are.
		You realize that they're willing to lie right to your face and they don't even care.
		They don't care that you know they're lying.
		They don't care that everybody watching knows they're lying.
		They're going to sit there and they're going to lie and they're going to play their games.
		And you watch this in real time and then they complain that And they say, why are the whistleblowers only going to Republicans?
		Why aren't the whistleblowers coming to us?
		And they make it perfectly clear.
		Nobody trusts you, Democrat, dirtbags.
		Everybody knows that a Democrat in Congress is probably just a total scumbag criminal at this point.
		Whether you are or not, doesn't matter.
		That's the Democrat flavor.
		That's the Democrat energy.
		Total scum baggery.
		So they complain.
		Why didn't we get access to the whistleblowers?
		Why didn't the whistleblowers come to the Democrats?
		Because they're the ones behind the scenes watching your corruption.
		Why would they whistleblow to you?
		You're the bad guy.
		You're the criminal.
		You're who they're blowing the whistle on.
		That'd be like, if you catch your boss laundering money, and you go tell your boss, hey, I caught you laundering money, he'd say, oh, okay.
		So yeah, why would you, hey, I caught you Democrats weaponizing the FBI. Oh, okay.
		No, you go to the Republicans.
		So, I mean, these clips are going to be absolutely unbelievable, and I hope we can get to all of them today.
		When we come back in the next segment, we're just going to start rolling all of these out.
		I mean, there is so much.
		You have a leftist protester activist type that I support what he did.
	And Clay Higgins, who's a formal sheriff, dealt with him like a sheriff and law enforcement should, since I guess there weren't police there or something to deal with this guy.
	Because, you see, when I disrupt an event, the police put me in cuffs and dragged me out.
	When a liberal disrupts an event, they just let him go.
	So this leftist was there disrupting a Republican press conference for speaker after speaker after speaker when finally Clay Higgins tried to step in and do something.
	Now, they do their same tactics here, and we're going to expose it all.
	And the video that you've seen of this, the one that's gone viral from this today, is an edited video that makes Clay Higgins look bad and makes the leftist protester look like the hero.
	Now again, the individual that did this, I fully support.
	100% support.
	I don't care what side of the aisle you're on.
	You did your First Amendment activities the right way.
	I may disagree with it. You did it the right way.
	But just because law enforcement comes and removes you from the scene doesn't make you the victim.
	If police come and remove me from the scene when I'm disrupting an event, that's their job.
	You notice I didn't start flopping and flailing like, oh, the police, oh my gosh, assault!
	Well, now that's what they're trying to do to Clay Higgins, and they give you deceptively editing video.
	So we'll show you the full story.
	We've got that.
	We've got all kinds of news.
	We're going to be monitoring the Bilderberg situation.
	We do... Not like racism in this country, right?
	Well, I've got three examples now, today, all in the news, three examples today of blatant hate crimes committed against an individual because of their skin color, but you're not hearing anything about them, and I bet you know why.
	And I bet you know why.
	So, we've got all of that and more coming up today, but because I really want to commit to these clips, ladies and gentlemen, Let's take care of business before we get too far into the show here.
	Infowarsstore.com.
	I'm already revved up and ready to go.
	I took my brain force.
	Ultra. Bing.
	I've got a little bit left of my turbo force here in the cup.
	Bang. And this is what I go to before I do a three-hour show for maximum mental clarity, mental energy, physical energy.
	That's my go-to.
	And you can find out why there are so many five-star reviews at InfoWarsStore.com.
	And you can find out why I use TurboForce Ultra and...
	BrainForce Ultra, rather, and TurboForce Plus before I go on air for three hours.
	Find out why when you shop at InfoWarsStore.com.
	And I'm telling you, if you're like me, I've accepted at this point in my life, I've just accepted, I've embraced...
	Caffeine. Big, big caffeine guy right here.
	I've just embraced it. But I don't like the energy drinks.
	There's like an acid flavor.
	There's too much processed sugar.
	The high fructose corn syrup.
	Cut it all out of your life.
	Try a canister of Turbo Force Plus from Infowarsstore.com.
	10 hours of clean energy without all the bad ingredients.
	All right, we get into the clips from the FBI whistleblower testimony on the other side.
	All right, we have tons, tons, over 30 clips to get to.
	I'm gonna be as diligent as possible and try to shut my yapper today because the testimony from FBI whistleblowers is way too important.
	Let's start. No real rhyme or reason to the order of this.
	I'm just gonna try to get it all out.
	Let's start with Garrett O'Boyle.
	FBI whistleblower who gets into the weaponization of government against the people.
	He gets into what happens when you call it out internally.
	And he talks about his commitment to the oath he took.
	Here is FBI whistleblower testifying in front of Congress today, Garrett O'Boyle.
garret oboyle ▲ ● ▼		Chairman Jordan, members of the committee, thank you for addressing FBI malfeasance and allowing me to speak today.
		Aside from that point of gratitude, I'm sad, I'm disappointed, and I'm angry that I have to be here to testify about the weaponization of the FBI and DOJ. Weaponization against not only its own employees, but against those institutions and individuals that are supposed to protect the American people.
		I am here today because even though I am wrongfully suspended from the FBI, I remain duty-bound to the American people to play my small role in rectifying these issues.
		After all, I never swore an oath to the FBI. I swore an oath to the Constitution.
		I've served my nation and community my entire adult life, first in the United States Army, then as a police officer, and lastly as an FBI Special Agent.
		Shortly after high school, I joined the United States Army where I served in the infantry and was quickly promoted through the ranks.
		I deployed to both Iraq and Afghanistan in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom.
		I served in the historic 101st Airborne Division.
		I received the Combat Infantrymen's Badge, which is awarded to those infantrymen who engage in ground combat with our nation's enemies.
		The Army's official motto is, this we'll defend.
		Along with numerous others, I volunteered to serve this nation, risking my life in combat to protect America and her values.
		I know some of the best men and women this country has to offer.
		They come from all backgrounds, races, and creeds.
		They helped mold me into the person I am today.
		Each was willing to sacrifice, and many did, to protect this great nation.
		It is our duty to honor their sacrifices by standing up for what is right, regardless of the difficulty.
		After serving in the Army, I became a police officer.
		Police officers, like me, are imperfect beings, but we strive to uphold the law and the Constitution.
		People who go to work every day trying to make their communities better, yet who nonetheless are faced with budget cuts and calls for defunding as we continue spiraling away from law and order as a nation.
		While serving as a police officer, I finished my bachelor's degree graduating with honors in criminology and law studies.
		Shortly thereafter, I began the long road to becoming an FBI special agent.
		A position I once understood to be the pinnacle of law enforcement and a way to continue to serve this nation and protect and defend the Constitution.
		During my four years as a Special Agent, I received the highest annual review an employee can receive.
		I volunteered for, tried out for, and was selected for an FBI SWAT team.
		I also volunteered for, tried out for, and was selected for a new unit the FBI created.
		I also received an award for my work on an anti-abortion extremism case.
		I've been smeared as a malcontent and subpar FBI employee.
		This smear stands in stark contrast to my life in public service.
		This smear campaign, disgusting as it is, is unsurprising.
		Despite our oath to uphold the Constitution, too many in the FBI aren't willing to sacrifice for the hard right over the easy wrong.
		They see what becomes of whistleblowers, how the FBI destroys their careers, suspends them under false pretenses, takes their security clearances and pay with no true options for real recourse or remedy.
		This is by design. It creates an Orwellian atmosphere that silences opposition and discussion.
		We know what is right to do, yet we too often refuse to do what is right because of the difficulty and suffering it incurs.
		I couldn't knowingly continue on this path silently without speaking out against the weaponization I witnessed, even if it meant losing my job, my career, my livelihood, my family's home, and now my anonymity.
		It's up to members of this committee As James Madison prudently opined, in framing a government which is to be administered by men over men, the great difficulty lies in this.
		You must first enable the government to control the governed, and the next place, oblige it to control itself.
		The safeguards currently in place at the FBI are clearly inadequate and must be reworked to protect whistleblowers and others who are inappropriately targeted.
		The FBI can extract whatever they want from me.
		I'm willing to bear that burden.
		I've sworn to defend this country from enemies, both foreign and domestic, even if that means sacrificing my life.
		I've lived that oath out since first enlisting in the Army, consistently saying, here am I, send me.
		My oath, however, did not include sacrificing the hopes, dreams, and livelihood of my family, my strong, beautiful, and courageous wife, and our four sweet and beautiful daughters who have endured this process along with me.
		In weaponized fashion, the FBI allowed me to accept orders to a new position halfway across the country.
		They allowed us to sell my family's home.
		They ordered me to report to the new unit when our youngest daughter was two weeks old.
		Then, on my first day on the new assignment, they suspended me, rendering my family homeless.
		They refused to release our goods, including our clothes, for weeks.
		All I wanted to do was serve my country by stopping bad guys and protecting the innocent.
		To my chagrin, bad guys have begun running parts of the government, making it difficult to continue to serve this nation and protect the innocent.
		But I, for one, will never stop trying.
		And I'll never forget my oath.
		Thank you. The cards currently in place at the FBI are clearly inadequate and must be reworked to protect whistleblowers and others who are inappropriately targeted.
		The FBI can extract whatever they want from me.
		I'm willing to bear that burden.
		I've sworn to defend this country from enemies, both foreign and domestic, even if that means sacrificing my life.
		I've lived that oath out since first enlisting in the Army, consistently saying, here am I, send me.
		My oath, however, did not include sacrificing the hopes, dreams, and livelihood of my family, my strong, beautiful, and courageous wife, and our four sweet and beautiful daughters who have endured this process along with me.
		In weaponized fashion, the FBI allowed me to accept orders to a new position halfway across the country.
		They allowed us to sell my family's home.
		They ordered me to report to the new unit when our youngest daughter was two weeks old.
		Then, on my first day on the new assignment, they suspended me, rendering my family homeless.
		They refused to release our goods, including our clothes, for weeks.
		All I wanted to do was serve my country by stopping bad guys and protecting the innocent.
		To my chagrin, bad guys have begun running parts of the government, making it difficult to continue to serve this nation and protect the innocent.
	But I, for one, will never stop trying.
	And I'll never forget my oath.
unidentified		Thank you. Thank you, Mr.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Boyle. God bless you. Mr.
unidentified		O'Boyle, we just heard from your interaction with Mr.
		Gates and how all of this occurred and all of the hardships you've gone through.
		If one of your really good friends, your former colleagues, came to you and said, I have this thing that is being covered up and I think the American people need to know about it, what advice would you give them?
garret oboyle ▲ ● ▼		I would tell them first to pray about it, long and hard.
garret oboyle ▲ ● ▼		And I would tell them I could take it to Congress for them, or I could put them in touch with Congress, but I would advise them not to do it.
unidentified		So you would legitimately try to protect one of your colleagues from doing what you have done?
unidentified		Absolutely. And how do you think that solves being able to shine light on corruption, weaponization, any kind of misconduct that exists with the American people?
garret oboyle ▲ ● ▼		It doesn't solve it. But the FBI will crush you.
		This government will crush you and your family if you try to expose the truth about things that they are doing that are wrong.
		And we are all examples of that.
unidentified		I can't think of a more sobering way to end a hearing.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I yield back. That says it all right there.
		We know it all too well.
		Garrett O'Boyle is an American hero.
		Garrett O'Boyle should be a household name.
		Garrett O'Boyle should have statues built in his name and his honor all around the country, but he doesn't.
		Instead, we do that for scumbags.
unidentified		Ladies and gentlemen, the truth.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let's now go to Congresswoman Kat Kamek, first speaking on the Congress floor about the FBI whistleblower testimony, then speaking at a Republican press conference about what was discussed in the hearing.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Here is Florida Representative Kat Kamek.
unidentified		You're nodding your head that you agree with that sentiment.
		It is inaccurate and wrong to make that assumption that Republicans want to defund police.
		It is false. Because forcing a political agenda down the throats of our hard-working men and women of the FBI with the threat and then subsequent follow-through...
		Of retaliation because they are whistleblowers, because they didn't want to break the law, because they knew that it was wrong to target Americans without cause, and they swore an oath to the United States Constitution, not to a political party.
		That makes them whistleblowers.
		That makes them courageous for coming forward and telling the truth.
		Gentlemen, I'm going to ask you all to please turn on your microphones, because we're going to go really fast, okay?
		Mr. Friend, during your service with the FBI, you served on the FBI SWAT team, correct?
		Yes. As you heard, my husband is a SWAT medic and has been part of joint operations with the FBI. So I would like to know, what is the threshold for these call-outs?
		And can you briefly detail the type of crimes warranted for an FBI SWAT team call-out?
steve friend ▲ ● ▼		There's a threat matrix, the SWAT matrix, in order to utilize the tactical team, but it could be as easy as somebody being in possession of a firearm or a request from a local agency just to use the FBI SWAT team.
unidentified		Okay, so Mr. Friend, your security clearance was suspended by the FBI after raising concerns for the use of excessive force with regard to the use of FBI SWAT teams to your direct supervisor, correct?
		Yes. Would you consider this retaliation?
		Yes. Thank you.
		Mr. O'Boyle, you were suspended without pay from the FBI on September 23rd, correct?
garret oboyle ▲ ● ▼		I was initially suspended on the 26th.
garret oboyle ▲ ● ▼		The suspension of pay came a little bit later.
unidentified		Thank you for that clarification.
		You had raised concerns to your chain of command when no action was taken that you reported these concerns then to Congress, correct?
		Correct. Once you contacted Congress, you were then suspended.
		Your top-secret security clearance was then suspended for those protected disclosures to Congress, correct?
		Correct. That seems like retaliation, no?
		It does to me. Okay.
		Mr. Allen, you were suspended from the FBI without pay on January 10th, correct?
		That is correct. You were suspended because you sent links to your squad to provide situational awareness about the FBI investigation on January 6th, correct?
		Yes. Yes or no, wasn't open source searches and sharing of information part of the duties of your job?
		Yes. And subsequently, after doing your job and your supervisors not liking the tone of the open source articles you provided because it didn't fit the FBI's narrative, your security clearance was revoked, correct?
		To all our whistleblowers, yes or no, do you believe that the retaliation pattern has a cooling effect on other agents from coming forward or speaking up?
		Yes or no? Mr.
garret oboyle ▲ ● ▼		O'Boyle? Absolutely. Yes.
unidentified		Yes. Do you believe that the FBI is purposefully hostile to you for that reason, to keep agents from speaking up?
steve friend ▲ ● ▼		Yes. Yes, without question.
unidentified		Yes. So I think it's clear we have a pattern here.
		If you speak up about the abuses you are seeing as an agent or are sharing information that may not fall in line with the FBI's political narrative, you will be suspended without pay, have your security clearance revoked, and your life will be turned upside down.
		It's pretty clear that the MO is if you don't comply, they will retaliate.
		If you don't agree with the political agenda, you get suspended.
		And they do it in such a way to deter others from speaking up and speaking out.
		That, ladies and gentlemen, is the weaponization of government.
		That is the weaponization of government.
		And that is why we are here today.
		Not because we have a political agenda.
		Not because we are here to go over events of the past.
		We want to fix it.
		We have to expose it, stop it, and prevent it from happening Again.
		That is why we are here.
		These men are whistleblowers.
		The gentlemen who came before us in previous hearings, they were journalists.
		And just because you don't address them as such does not mean that they are not who they say they are.
		They have been retaliated against.
		And regardless of your party affiliation, this behavior is unacceptable, and we need to stop it.
		Republicans, Democrats, independents alike, this is a concern we should— Good morning.
		I really can't say that this today, what you are hearing, what you will be hearing more of in this hearing in the coming hours, it couldn't be overstated how important this is.
		I think, Representative Gates, you just laid out very succinctly why this is so critical.
		I know a lot of people back home are wondering, you know, we hear about this weaponization, you guys get up here, you investigate, but nothing ever seems to happen.
		Think about this for a minute, though.
		Why this is so critical that we are investigating the weaponization of the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice.
		As was pointed out, if you are a parent and you attend a school board meeting, There could be an FBI agent in the parking lot scribbling down your license plate number.
		This is not a conspiracy theory.
		This is actually testimony that these brave whistleblowers have given us.
		That is not America that I know.
		If you are a Catholic and you want to attend Catholic mass, perhaps there is an informant inside reporting on what you are doing inside.
		This is the thing that novels are written about.
		This is spy movies.
		If you think about the FBI whistleblowers who have come forward bravely, This, today, will demonstrate the pattern that the FBI has used in retaliating against them and their families, because their families have served just as honorably alongside them.
		These men have served our country, both in law enforcement and in the United States military.
		Furthermore, as we have seen, these are decorated individuals who were led down a path only to find themselves left out in the cold, iced out, And this was by design.
		When the FBI was questioned about this, the word that kept coming back was, it's a coincidence.
		It's a coincidence that they leave these people in a position where they cannot seek outside employment, they cannot access their personal belongings, despite the fact that these men have served their country.
		But even worse, the loyalty to the nation has been questioned.
		This is truly the weaponization of government.
		Whether you are the president of the United States, as we have seen in the Durham report, whether or not you are a parent concerned about your child's education, whether you are just someone who wants to go to Mass, you could find yourself a target of the FBI. This FBI certainly knows no bounds, and we are seeing that in every single interview, in every single piece of evidence that we uncover.
		And this is really just the tip of the iceberg.
		But I would like to reiterate what Representative Matt Gaetz said earlier.
		This is not about the good men and women of the FBI, the rank-and-file agents who do their job honorably.
		No, this is about the political corruption at the very top that has seeped down into every field office across this nation.
		If you don't tow the company line, you might find yourself a target of the FBI, whether you are an outsider or an insider.
		And that is what we seek to uncover.
		One of my colleagues here today will outline some of the key retaliation points, so I don't want to belabor that point.
		But I do want to say to those that are concerned that we investigate and there is no subsequent action, everyone standing behind me agrees.
		We have to present the evidence, we have to deliver that evidence, and then we have to take action to make sure that there are consequences, but also that this never happens again.
		That is why in this particular case, I am so glad that the treatment of these whistleblowers is being referred to by the U.S. Office of Special Counsel and the Inspector General for further investigation.
		And I would encourage you all today, in today's hearing, to witness the treatment that these whistleblowers will receive from our colleagues on the other side of the aisle, who will seek to discredit them at every turn.
		I would like you to keep in mind the contrast during the January 6th testimony of how their whistleblowers were treated.
		With that, I'd like to turn it over to my colleague from the great state of Wyoming, Representative Harriet Hageman.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, now, ladies and gentlemen, as I said, we still have plenty of more to come on this, including in the next segment, we're going to be playing the entire whistleblower testimony of Agent Steve Friend, a distinguished FBI agent, and also a little bit of a commentary from Greg Stubbe as well.
		But, folks, the reason why I'm taking up the majority of the show today with these clips, with this content, is because this is everything.
		This is everything. Our government is corrupt.
		It's now been presented in testimony in front of Congress.
		We have to keep this momentum going.
		We have to highlight this.
		We have to make a big deal of this so that action follows like Representative Kamek just said.
		All right, still more to come from the whistleblower testimony today.
		I want to go to the full opening testimony, opening statement here from Agent Steve Friend, a distinguished FBI agent turned whistleblower.
		Here is his opening testimony on what he experienced.
steve friend ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, Chairman Jorman and members of the committee.
		My name is Stephen Friend.
		I'm a senior fellow for the Center for Renewing America.
		Prior to assuming my current position, I was a special agent for the Federal Bureau of Investigation for eight and a half years.
		During that time, I investigated approximately 200 violent crimes such as aggravated assaults, murder, child abuse, rape, robbery, child molestation, child pornography, and human trafficking.
		I also served five years on an FBI SWAT team and spent five years as a local law enforcement officer in the state of Georgia.
		In August 2022, I made protective whistleblower disclosures to my immediate supervisor, assistant special agents in charge, and special agent in charge about my concerns regarding January 6 investigations assigned to my office.
		I believed our departures from case management rules established in the FBI's Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide could have undermined potentially righteous prosecutions and may have been part of an effort to inflate the FBI's statistics on domestic extremism.
		I also voiced concerns that the FBI's use of SWAT and large-scale arrest operations to apprehend suspects who were accused of nonviolent crimes and misdemeanors represented by counsel and who pledged to cooperate with the federal authorities in the event of criminal charges created an unnecessary risk to FBI personnel and public safety.
		At each level of my chain of command, leadership cautioned that despite my exemplary work performance, whistleblowing placed my otherwise bright future with the FBI at risk.
		Special agents take an oath to protect the U.S. Constitution.
		The dangers of federal law enforcement overreach were hammered home to me when I was required to attend trainings at the Holocaust Memorial Museum and MLK Memorial.
		I cited my oath and training in my conversations with my FBI supervisors.
		Nevertheless, the FBI weaponized the security clearance processes to facilitate my removal from active duty within one month of my disclosures.
		In addition to an indefinite unpaid suspension, the FBI initiated a campaign of humiliation and intimidation to punish and pressure me to resign.
		In violation of HIPAA, individuals at the FBI leaked my private medical information to a reporter at the New York Times.
		In violation of the Privacy Act, the FBI refused to furnish my training records for several months.
		To date, they only provided a portion of the records, which are essential to obtaining private investigator and firearms licenses in the state of Florida.
		Even after releasing some of the records, the FBI refuses to confirm their legitimacy to the Florida Department of Agriculture, rendering the few documents they have provided practically useless.
		The FBI denied my request to seek outside employment in an obvious attempt to deprive me of the ability to support my family.
		Finally, the FBI Inspection Division imposed an illegal gag order in an attempt to prevent me from communicating with my family and attorneys.
		Working as an FBI Special Agent was my dream job.
		My whistleblowing was apolitical and in the spirit of upholding my oath.
		Nonetheless, the FBI cynically elected to close ranks and attack the messenger.
		The FBI is incentivized to work against the American people and in dire need of drastic reform, particularly in these areas.
		The integrated program management system incentivizes the use of inappropriate investigatory processes and tools to achieve arbitrary statistical accomplishments.
		Mission creep within the national security branch has refocused counterterrorism from legitimate foreign actors to political opponents within our borders.
		The FBI weaponizes process crimes and reinterprets laws to initiate pretextual prosecutions and persecute its political enemies.
		Bureau intelligence analysis capability increasingly dictates operations, turning the FBI into an intelligence agency with a law enforcement capability.
		FBI collusion with big tech to gather intelligence on Americans, censor political speech, and target citizens for malicious prosecution.
		A dysfunctional promotion process fosters a revolving door of inexperienced, ambitious FBI supervisors ascending the management ladder within the agency.
		FBI informant protocols that are broken and abusive.
		The FBI skirts the Whistleblower Protection Act and exploits a security clearance revocation process to expel employees who make legally protected disclosures.
		I am pleased to see the Weaponization Committee is taking testimony from FBI whistleblowers.
		I would also like to take this opportunity to address correspondence recently received by the subcommittee.
		Yesterday, May 17, 2023, FBI Acting Assistant Director Christopher Dunham submitted a letter to this subcommittee.
		Portions of his letter concern the suspension and revocation of my security clearance.
		Parenthetically, I also received a letter from the FBI Executive Assistant Director Jennifer Moore yesterday notifying me that my security clearance was revoked.
		I find the timing of these letters dubious, but leave that up to the subcommittee's determination.
		Instead, I would like to address and add vital context to the portion of Mr.
		Dunham's letter pertaining to my alleged violation of adjudicative guideline J. Mr.
		Dunham is referring to an audio recording I created of my August 23, 2022 meeting with Jacksonville Assistant Special Agents in Charge Colt Markovsky and Sean Ryan.
		After making protective whistleblower disclosures to my immediate supervisor in August 19, 2022, ASAC Markovsky summoned me to a meeting at the FBI Jacksonville office.
		ASAC Markoski told me the meeting was intended to be an opportunity to discuss my concerns.
		I anticipated the meeting might ultimately lead to my executive managers attempting to compel me to participate in an activity which placed public safety at risk.
		I was concerned ASAC Markoski and ASAC Ryan may threaten adverse actions toward my career as a result of my whistleblower disclosure.
		Prior to the meeting, I consulted Florida law to confirm that a law enforcement exemption exists for state two-party consent restriction.
		I decided to record the meeting to memorialize our discussion and my concerns about the FBI's misconduct.
		When I entered the FBI Jacksonville office building, ASAC Markovsky and ASAC Ryan were having a private meeting.
		I waited for them in a conference room.
		When they entered, all of us placed our cellular phones on the conference table.
		As an experienced investigator who has conducted hundreds of recorded interviews, I noted how both ASAC Markovsky and ASAC Ryan repeated themselves throughout our discussion and continually insisted I agree to their premise that I was insubordinate and refusing to perform my job.
		I rebuffed each allegation and repeated that I believed I was fulfilling my oath of office by making my disclosure about the FBI's rule of departures and the inappropriate risk to public safety via aggressive arrest tactics for January 6 subjects.
		It was my sincere belief that my ASACs were also recording our conversations.
		In January 2023, I participated in an interview with the FBI Security Division.
		During that interview, I was asked if I recorded my August 23, 2022 meeting with Asak Markovsky and Asak Ryan.
		I answered honestly that I had.
		Although it would seem to be an obvious and natural follow-up, the FBI Security Division interviewers did not request a copy of the recording.
		The FBI Security Division should be gravely concerned if executive managers threaten subordinate whistleblowers with adverse action.
		I submitted that this omission by the FBI Security Division solidifies my contention that Asaks, Markovsky, and Ryan created their own recording of our meeting.
		The FBI was not concerned about potential whistleblower retaliation.
		The Bureau was only interested in learning if these actions were at risk of exposure.
		I pray that all members consider the information I and my fellow whistleblowers present.
		You may think I'm a political partisan.
	You may think I'm a grifter.
	You may think I'm a conspiracy theorist.
	It does not matter.
	Simply put, this committee should avoid the temptation to impugn the character and the motivations of the messengers seated before you.
	I sacrifice my dream job to share this information with the American people.
	I humbly ask all the members to do your jobs and consider the merit of what I have presented.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Thank you. And, of course, he's speaking to Democrats because they are the ones that will ignore and try to cover this up.
		The Republicans, on the other hand, are taking it seriously, like Representative Greg Stubbe.
		Here's some commentary from him after hearing whistleblower testimony.
unidentified		Of corruption...
		Weaponization, politicization that has occurred at the highest levels of the FBI and the DOJ. And both Director Wray and Merrick Garland have sat there and testified that there's no retribution for whistleblowers.
		No, we don't retaliate against whistleblowers, but we have testimony, and I'm a lawyer too, and testimony is a fact and evidence that that exactly is what is going on in the FBI and the DOJ. Just quickly talk about how the inflation, Mr.
		Friend, of the domestic violence or the Statistics as it relates to January 6th, how they were inflating those statistics to make it look like there was a bunch more cases than there really was.
steve friend ▲ ● ▼		Typically, you would investigate January 6th as one case with lots of subjects, but instead, the decision was made to open up a separate case for every single individual there, and instead of, on paper, investigating them from the Washington field office, spreading and disseminating those to the field offices around the country if the individual lived in that area.
unidentified		So it, in effect, made it look like there was domestic terrorism, Thank you, guys. And A.G. Garland have both sat in desks just like that, under oath, and testified that they would not retaliate against whistleblowers.
		And it's my understanding, Mr.
		Friend, that you went through all of the required regulations at the FBI in order to raise your concerns to your supervisors.
		Is that correct? Yes. So you followed inside protocol for the FBI, utilizing whistleblower statute protection information regulations through the FBI. All right, folks, so look, the mainstream media, the Democrat Party, can try to act like, oh, there's no corruption unless it's Donald Trump.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Don't worry, there's no deep state.
		Nobody's out to get to you. Donald Trump is the only bad guy ever.
		No. That just shows they're weak and exposed.
		Here is Congressman Matt Gaetz speaking to the press after hearing from FBI whistleblowers.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Thank you, Chairman Jordan, for your leadership.
		The FBI has been victimized by political capture, and that politicization has manifested in the targeting of Americans who never deserve to have this government weaponized against them.
		Whistleblowers saw those bad acts.
		They stepped forward, and they were retaliated against and crushed as a consequence.
		And our work today will build on the work of Special Counsel Durham, An over-willingness to rely on information from individuals connected to political opponents and action without appropriate objectivity.
		One of the whistleblowers we'll hear from today served in the United States Marine Corps, served as a local cop, Garrett O'Boyle, and this is his testimony regarding that political capture.
unidentified		Do you believe that the FBI has become political?
unidentified		I do. I think most people out in the field try to avoid that politicization of the agency, which is good, but it's gotten to a point, it seems to me, that it's like a cancerous point where the FBI has let itself become I don't know how to begin to fix it.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		One group that saw that weaponization work against them were Catholics.
		The FBI field office in Richmond put out a memo saying that violent extremists would find the Catholic ideology attractive and would attempt to connect with Catholic adherents.
		That extremists would show an interest in Catholic congregations over the next 12 to 24 months.
		Leading up to the presidential election.
		Isn't that an interesting coincidence?
		And the memo calls for the FBI to develop sources within Catholic congregations to try to obtain information about those folks.
		Another group that saw weaponization turn against them, parents who attended school board meetings.
		You'll hear today from Steve Friend, who worked for the FBI and actually found himself ridiculed at his own FBI office because he too was a parent who attended a school board meeting.
unidentified		This is Steve Friend. During your law enforcement background, does knowing that you could be investigated by the FBI for speaking up at your child's school board meeting kill parents from exercising their First Amendment rights?
		Yes. And you said you had attended a school board meeting and you were nervous that you could be under federal investigation.
		Is that correct? Yes.
		My colleagues teased me about it.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Americans who are in Washington, D.C. on January 6th who committed no crimes, who simply...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, now there's another big clip from this.
		I'm going to pause and interrupt this right now because I want to play this clip separately in what's about to be exposed here.
		More evidence that there were indeed human confidential sources on the ground, in other words, federal agents on the ground during January 6th.
		But we have to understand something.
		When you solve problems, what is one of the first things you do?
		You locate the source.
		So imagine, America's under all kinds of attacks, all kinds of complex attacks, just like Infowars.
		Well, what did the globalists decide?
		What did the Democrat Party decide?
		How did Trump get in office that wasn't supposed to be?
		Well, they looked for the source of the resistance.
		They looked for the source of the alternative media.
		They looked for the source of the pushback against the false narratives.
		And it was Alex Jones and Infowars.
		So they targeted us for destruction.
		They tried to stop the source.
		So folks, again, there's all kinds of complex attacks this country is under from all kinds of different elements.
		But what is the internal source in which all of it flows through?
		It's the Democrat Party.
		It is the Democrat Party.
		And I've got clips coming up in the next hour that will show you How the Democrats are trying to run all kinds of shenanigans and distractions and obstacles to scuttle these whistleblowers and to destroy their testimony.
		Well, it's not going to work.
		So I hope we Americans, and importantly the Republicans up there, I hope they identify the source and say, you want to know where the source of all this corruption is?
		I'm not saying it's the only source, but it all flows through the Democrat Party.
		Michael Yan has been all over this illegal immigration pipeline, Biden border invasion from the Darien Gap right to the southern border.
		Not many people understand, in fact, that better than he does, not just with his sources, the other people he talks to, but being there on the ground.
		And he's been sending me major updates on the situation with the Darien Gap and the situation when it comes to disease coming into the country.
		But Michael, let's start with the Darien Gap and let's start with the fact that we have Mayorkas, specifically Mayorkas, but the Biden administration at large telling us the Darien Gap has been shut down and the border is secure.
		Well, we obviously know that's a lie, but get into the details, what you're learning about the actual details at the Darien Gap as we speak.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, Owen, thanks for having me on.
		And you were just on the border, so you don't need the briefing about whether or not the border is closed.
		You know it's not.
		You saw it with your own eyes.
		Everybody was very happy to see you down there.
		On the Darien Gap, as you know, I spent a lot of time down there.
		Mexico and Arizona. I was down in the Darien Gap about two weeks ago, right? I'm down there
		for months at a time. And I was there when Mayorkas came this year in April. I was there
		when Mayorkas came last April in 2022. I was physically present when he landed right in
		front of me in 2022 in Blackhawks. So here's what's going on in Darien.
		About 48 hours ago, I've got that place stitched up, by the way.
		I have people in all the key places and the key villages.
		It's taken a long time, but nothing happens down there without me knowing about it.
		Nothing on any significant scale.
		So we got word, reliable word, that about 5,000 people have now set off in one day from Colombia to the United States, which would be two to three times more in a single day than has ever happened.
		I mean, this is completely, the flash to bang with this Title 42 will be measured in weeks and months, but we strongly thought that this would happen.
		I've told this to Alex.
		I've been saying this publicly for quite a while.
		I think that the influx that we're seeing on the border now, the invasion, is actually nothing compared to what's coming.
		We see, by the way, Owen, as you know, Not all the inputs are coming through Darien Gap, which at this rate's got to be at least 500,000 a year coming through Darien Gap.
		But many of the inputs, for instance, the people that we're meeting crossing here in Arizona are going, actually flying, they're bypassing Panama on the Darien Gap.
		They're flying straight to Mexico City.
		They're telling us all the time.
		Or they fly actually to El Salvador, some of them.
		Others fly to...
		Menagua, Nicaragua.
		And so they fly to different places.
		For instance, Cancun.
		Some of the Chinese will fly to Cancun, which obviously bypasses Darien Gap.
		And then they will come to, you know, meet their snakeheads, as they call them.
		Chinese call them snakeheads.
		We call those coyotes, right?
		But the Chinese call them snakeheads.
		They'll meet their snakeheads in Cancun or in Mexico City or Tapachula down in the southern part of Mexico.
		But we have people from all over here.
		People from Uzbekistan, Georgia, many people from Georgia—or they say they're from Georgia.
		They may be from Russia.
		It's unknown to me. There's people from—oh, good Lord, so many.
		They say—that part of the wall that you're showing right now, Owen, is—they say people from about 160 countries of I've turned that corner around that edge of the wall.
		That would be most of the world.
		That seems over the top.
		I do know, confirm that people from about 140 countries do pass through the dairy and got those women right there, the women holding the bag.
		She's from Peru. And I believe the man on the end is from, was he from Colombia?
		I don't recall. I'm sorry.
		And some more Peruvians on the right.
		And there was a guy from Brazil in that line.
		And that line up there, that was a collage of people from different areas of the world.
		I didn't get to talk with all of them as they come around the corner.
		If they line up against that wall, it's harder for me to talk with them because Border Patrol is going through their documents.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, but this is the secure border, though.
		This is our secure border.
		You sit right there at the open gap in the wall, and they just pour in.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		That's right. These are Chinese right here.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And by the way, the Chinese, look how they're dressed.
		I was going to say, you just brought it up too.
		We're both synced up here. Because I've seen this just like you've seen this.
		I mean, it's pretty obvious, folks.
		You can tell when people are coming into the country and are extremely downtrodden.
		Let's say extremely downtrodden.
		You can tell when people are coming into the country and are extremely, let's say, deranged even.
		You've probably seen some of that.
		But there's also this, which we just saw as well, and I've seen usually at the airports, is people come in...
		They look well off.
		I don't know how else to say it. They look well off.
		They've got brand new designer bags.
		They've got smartphones. Their clothes are new.
		I mean, these aren't people who are coming here to seek asylum status.
unidentified		What is this? Yeah, exactly right.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		Look how they're dressed. They're not carrying any bags.
		There's a Chinese guy at the end of the line, and I'm the one that just put his bag on.
		There's quite a few, and he actually does have a bag.
		Some will come in with small bags, but look, again, how they're dressed.
		Many of the Chinese we know are actually, they come in different classes of people as well.
		There are other people that seem very, you know, sophisticated, that sort of thing, some of the Chinese coming through, and others seem like they might be farmhands.
		We do know that many Chinese are going to Oklahoma and Oregon, especially Oklahoma, to work on illegal marijuana farms.
		Many have been caught doing this.
		The Chinese are buying up remote farmland in places like Oklahoma and also Oregon, and they're growing marijuana, both legally and illegally.
		But they're bringing in workers from China.
		They trust them more. They can control them more, right?
		And most of the Chinese claim not to speak any English.
		Oh, and something that's very important.
		The Chinese are coming through with no documentation, typically.
		I think you already know this.
		I'm not telling you anything new, but we'll say it for the benefit of others.
		But the Chinese are coming through with no documentation.
		So they can just throw any birthday out.
		You know how this goes. Any name, right?
		Any name, any birthday, and now you're a new person, right?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Oh, yeah. You got a 12-year-old coming in with a beard bigger than mine.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		Exactly. And many of these children, we have no idea who they are.
		I just met some people from Bangladesh at that same area.
		They had just walked around that corner.
		They actually seem like gypsies to me.
		I've been to Bangladesh. You know, I've spent so many years in Asia, I don't know, 18 or 19 years just running around just in Asia.
		I've actually been to their countries and often, say, with Nepalese or Indians and others, I've actually been specifically to where they're from.
		Same with Afghans, right?
		I spent two years in Afghanistan running around everywhere.
		So a lot of these people that are coming through, I spent a year running around China, up in Tibet, Hong Kong.
		We don't see any Hong Kongers coming in, to my knowledge, but what I'm saying is I've spent so much time downrange in many of these countries that sometimes I can I don't know necessarily where he's from, but he's not necessarily from Nepal.
		But I met some people the other night that you just briefly showed on the video who said they were from Bangladesh.
		And they said they spoke Bangla, which is a language there.
		But they actually appeared to be gypsies to me.
		I've been to gypsy villages in Bangladesh.
		You know, they have the snake handlers and the cobras and all that stuff that they go around and beg for money with.
		And so instantly when they saw me, they actually did the normal thing that I see gypsies do in India and Bangladesh and Romania.
		Immediately came up and started begging and showing me the child.
		They always cry and show you the child.
		It's just like, and often they have a very specific look on their face.
		I know you've seen it before. It's a practiced look where they look like, oh, you know, I'm dying.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		There was a story.
		I was much younger at the time.
		It actually came to the city I was living in.
		But there was gypsies that would go house to house, and they'd go to your front door.
		This is really before the cell phone age.
		But they'd go to your front door and they'd say, oh, I need money.
		They'd tell you the big story. They'd put on this big act.
		And then somebody would sneak in the back and rob anything they could out of your house while they were sitting there distracting you at the front.
		So this is just more of the criminal element that's getting across the border.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		That's a normal technique, actually.
		Interestingly, I just got a report from a missionary down in Darien Gap.
		I know a lot of missionaries down there.
		And he said that for the first time, some Albanians showed up.
		This was like within this last week, actually.
		And they came to a missionary's home in the Darien Gap in Panama.
		And no migrants had ever come to their home before.
		And he said they were from Albania.
		And they were acting very sad and crying and doing all that sort of stuff.
		That's gypsies, actually.
		That's typically... Because I see that...
		You know, I spent so much time in Europe and Asia.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let's hold that thought. We're up against the break.
		Michael Yon is my guest. Don't go anywhere.
		Michael, Jan is our guest.
		We're talking about Biden's border invasion and the criminal element that is pouring over.
		And I wanted him to finish up his thoughts on that and then get into the disease element.
		So, Michael, finish up the criminal element that's coming across, how it's identified, but yet still is able to get over.
		And then let's get into the disease element as well, because I mean, we know about criminal violent activity in this country is on the rise, but, you know, we're supposed to be panicked over diseases, right?
		Wear the mask, take the vaccine. Well, there's diseases pouring over the open border.
		No sense of urgency about that.
		So conclude on the criminal element, and then let's talk about the disease element as well.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		Wow. Those are two huge topics.
		You know, a lot of the people coming through, you know, have gang tattoos, like the teardrop on their face and the spider web and their elbow and so many other gang tattoos and act gangster totally, right?
		They're coming in in groups often and totally act like they own the joint already.
		And we saw that both on the streets in El Paso, talking with people down there.
		Literally, people were fighting in the street.
		We got some of that on video.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, some people got really aggressive, territorial even.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		Oh, yeah. I mean, you've seen it.
		And so, you know, it can actually, believe it or not, when I go to Darien Gap, people say, oh, be careful.
		It's so dangerous down there, which, you know, it's a little bit.
		But it's more dangerous here.
		It's more dangerous on the stuff that you've been doing.
		Oh, and out on the streets, it's quite dangerous, actually.
		And so, you know, we're just lucky that God has shined on us so far.
		But on the gangsters, they're clearly here.
		And by the way, speaking of diseases, a huge amount of people are coming through Darien Gap.
		There's malaria has been a terrible outbreak of malaria among the Indians and the local
		Panamanians out there and dengue fever. CCP, Chinese Communist Party, has been weaponizing
		dengue fever and and even drones to dispense them. There's one that's on the streets of um
		yeah that was just a few days ago in El Paso. Lots of guys like that out there.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well they literally, people can't even believe this but you know it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		They literally emptied the Venezuelan prisons and just sent them to the southern border.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		That's right, they did.
		And we would talk with Venezuelans, and many of the people coming in are Venezuelans, especially in that area of El Paso.
		They've just come in, by the way, in about In Panama, the Panamanian government told me maybe six weeks ago that about 11 percent of the people in Panama now are New Venezuelans.
		11 percent. And it's destabilizing the country.
		Yeah, it's amazing.
		Now, when it comes time to talk about this—one other thing about Darien.
		About 160 people are reported to have died in the last, I think, five or six days now, maybe five days.
		It's because the rainy seasons have started again.
		And flash floods.
		People are washing down the rivers, again, with tents.
		And so about three days ago, U.S. helicopters were flying into Darien, and we wondered why they were doing that.
		I have people in Darien right now.
		They give me daily sit reps down there.
		And there was at least one CH-47 flying, and also Blackhawk helicopters.
		Panama does not own any CH-47s or any Blackhawks.
		They own Eurocopters and just a very few, a handful of helicopters, actually.
		UH-1H, that sort of thing.
		And so I asked Southcom, Southern Command, actually the commanding general, what's going on?
		Are we removing bodies?
		Are we moving migrants or what?
		And she said, no, we're actually moving building materials into the Darien Gap.
		For INL, she said, which is actually State Department.
		What does INL stand for?
		Something to do with narcotics.
		But, you know, that's quite interesting for moving building material into Darien Gap.
		So there it is right there.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So that just means they're getting ready to set up a permanent infrastructure there for this illegal immigrant pipeline.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, which we have already.
		You know, there's a significant infrastructure that continues to grow.
		Keep in mind, Owen, you mentioned before when we were talking how Mayorkas said that he was closing Darien Gap, but he's not.
		I mean, he's clearly opening up In 2022, he was down there.
		I saw him land right in front of me in four Blackhawks.
		And since that time, the camps have doubled or tripled in size.
		And they're still adding on to them, right?
		It's not just adding to the size of the camps.
		That's one of the camps right there.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Wow, this is a massive facility.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		By the way, folks, if you're just an audio listener, this is a massive facility.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		This is huge.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I mean, this is bigger... These facilities that they build, they intend them to be what they call soft camps, meaning they're supposed to be temporary, and then they end up becoming permanent infrastructure for illegal immigration.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		That's how it goes. And the camps are still being built in Texas.
		I don't know where all the camps are in the United States, and this is something I'm going to start looking into.
		That camp right there, that was actually the other night.
		That was in northeast El Paso, right?
		And they were adding on to it, and it's a huge camp, right?
		And that's just one of many across the border, and they are building more camps, right, in the United States.
		Now, down in Darien Gat, there's Mayorkas.
		Down in Darien Gap, a lot of the Indians are getting—and Panamanians are getting diseases now due to the migration.
		You know, circling back to the diseases, a lot of diseases going around, a lot of malaria.
		One of the Indians down there, he's a friend of mine named Francisco Agape.
		He's the mayor of 29 Imbaran, Wundan Indian villages.
		He said before the migration, we had maybe one or two cases of malaria a year, and all the Indians would Talk about it.
		You know, so-and-so got malaria, and it would be the talk of the villages, right?
		But not now. Now, there's so many people who get malaria, and it's a very serious form.
		There's different forms of malaria.
		It's quite a serious form.
		He said, now that the migration is coming through, we're getting many fevers.
		We're getting malaria. We're getting waterborne illnesses.
		Children are getting very sick.
		Also, Kuna Indians have told me the same thing.
		In Darien Gap, Kuna Indians have said children are getting sick.
		Children have died.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I heard you mention the dengue fever as well.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		Dengue is called break bone fever.
		In fact, when you call me on the phone that we're talking on, Owen, the ringer, my ringer is Aedes aegypti mosquito.
		And Aedes aegypti mosquito is the one that spreads dengue.
		I'm so cognizant of these mosquitoes that whenever you call me, I'm reminded to watch out for Aedes aegypti.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Most folks probably either have never heard of dengue fever or don't really know what it's about because we've pretty much eradicated it.
		I mean, if you do go to some South American countries, they will suggest you get a dengue fever shot or even make you get one.
		It's been mostly eradicated from the United States.
		Most people don't know how bad that is.
		It's like, I mean, you think COVID is bad.
		Dengue fever is like a thousand times COVID. Oh, dengue fever, they call it break bone fever.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		And because it feels like every bone in your body is broken.
		Let me tell you this. Web search, dengue vaccine Philippines prison.
		Now, they tried out a dengue vaccine, quote-unquote, vaccine in Philippines, and it killed and it injured a lot of people, right?
		And so the vaccine did, you know, whatever it was they were injecting, calling a vaccine.
		Just look up dengue vaccine.
		I read so much on these sorts of things because I am a war correspondent and I spend so much time in the jungles.
		So I'm constantly out with, you know, studying diseases and food issues and obviously other issues like crime, because this is all part of the war ecosystem, right?
		And so dengue, quite serious.
		Now, other diseases, very serious.
		Tuberculosis. Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.
		Somebody sent me an article in the New York Post talking about tuberculosis, and they kind of, I don't think it was intentional based on my reading of the article.
		I think that they kind of downplayed tuberculosis, like it's easily basically treatable.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, sure, it's easy to downplay until it's here and it spreads again.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Michael, tell people where they can follow your work.
michael yon ▲ ● ▼		We're out of time. Yeah, michael.yan.com.
		I'm also on locals.com, locals.com.
		And also, you can find me daily on Twitter.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, we are going to get back to some of this congressional testimony, whistleblower testimony, and reaction from our congressmen and women here in just a moment, as well as some other activity that was going down at the Capitol today, very lively.
		I'm, quite frankly, encouraged by all of it, actually.
		So we're going to have that coming up for you here in just a minute.
		But, ladies and gentlemen, let me first tell you about my favorite orange drink mix, Fizzy Magnesium, at InfoWareStore.com.
		Now, I can tell you I like this because the flavor, and I do, but it's also healthy.
		Many people are deficient in magnesium.
		This is a key element for enzyme function in the body, being deficient.
		In magnesium, not so good.
		So the solution, we have it at InfoWarsStore.com.
		Fizzy magnesium drink mix.
		By the way, it's the best orange drink mix as far as the flavor is concerned, too.
		And if you really want to boost the flavor, try two scoops.
		If one scoop is not enough and you're saying, you know, maybe I could do a little more flavor, try two scoops and you'll see what I'm talking about.
		So Fizzy Magnesium, InfoWarsStore.com.
		Healthy for you. Tastes great.
		If you've got kids in the house, I would just whip up a pitcher of this, just have a chilled pitcher of this in your fridge at all times, and now your kids will have something healthy that they like to drink.
		Fizzy Magnesium, Infowarsstore.com.
		Find out what it's all about and why it's my favorite orange drink mix right now.
		And you support free speech in the process.
		All right. Let's get back to our...
		Oh, and it's 25% off.
		How dare I not tell you?
		It's 25% off.
		Fizzy Magnesium at InfoWareStore.com.
		My goodness. Okay.
		Let's get back to what was going on today in Washington, D.C. Let's go now to Thomas Massey talking about...
		What happens when somebody inside the FBI tries to become a whistleblower and how the deep state, which is what this really is, is it not?
		This is the deep state. And by the way, there's a clip we'll show you earlier.
		They act like there is no such thing as a deep state.
		This whole thing is revealing the deep state.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		Here's Thomas Massey. Americans are upset and they are angry that the government's been weaponized against them.
		But I think they're better served if we remain dispassionate in reviewing this evidence.
		But I have to admit, I came here today trying to be dispassionate, but I'm feeling emotion.
		I'm feeling disgust.
		Before us, Among these witnesses has represented decades of exemplary service in the military, in the FBI, service to our country for which your families have sacrificed, for which you have sacrificed to give this service, and now the other side of the aisle just wants to disparage you.
		For bringing forth facts that the American people need to know, that we need to know, if we're going to change these whistleblower laws, so that you're not punished for bringing us the truth.
		This is our fourth, or we've had four hearings.
		And I'm noticing a disturbing trend here.
		Big business is working with the government to weaponize against the American people.
		And, you know, the government says, well, this is okay because we're not violating the Constitution.
		The big business is doing this voluntarily, and we saw this with the social media companies.
		But I want to play a testimony from a whistleblower who's not here with us today.
		If you could cue that up about how we've seen, in this instance, one of the biggest corporations in America working with the FBI to violate civil liberties.
unidentified		I believe it was either on January 7th or...
		The Bank of America, with no director for the FBI, can data mined its customers.
		And data mined a date range of five to seven years of any VOA customer who use a VOA product.
		And by VOA product, a debit card, They compiled that list and then on top of that list, they put anyone who had purchased a firearm during any day.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		I find that testimony chilling.
		That was the retired FBI Supervisory Intelligence Analyst, George Hill, who gave us that testimony.
		And what he said there is the Bank of America compiled a list of everybody who used a credit card or a debit card between January 5th and January 7th inside of Washington, D.C., and gave that to the FBI. But before they did, They looked at anybody who had ever purchased a firearm, according to their records, and elevated those people to the top of the list.
		And they didn't geofence it to Washington, D.C. You could have, as Mr.
		Hill testified, you could have bought a gun in 1999 in Iowa with a Bank of America card, and then you got heightened attention, and then it was given to the FBI. Now, whether the FBI asked for this Or whether they did this voluntarily is very chilling because Bank of America, you know, they've got a lot of issues in front of the government.
		And this is where you get into this unhealthy feedback loop.
		Bank of America spent a quarter million dollars lobbying us on the American Rescue Plan, issues related to Paycheck Protection Program, general issues related to data security, and general issues related to interchange, and general issues related to privacy.
		The irony of it.
		Bank of America is violating your privacy, working hand in glove with the FBI. Now, the FBI will say, we didn't ask for this, they just gave it to us.
		It doesn't matter. It's a violation when you get to this level of cooperation.
		Now, I want to turn to something else that's troubling me very much.
		The whistleblowers here before us today have described incentive-based payments related to increasing the number of criminal investigations.
		Mr. Friend and Mr. Allen, you've talked about this.
		Mr. Friend, can you tell us what that's about and why that might be unhealthy?
steve friend ▲ ● ▼		It's extremely unhealthy.
		It's called integrated program management.
		It's a process that the FBI uses annually to essentially establish arbitrary metrics for itself to achieve as far as opening up a certain number of cases and using certain tools and getting certain accomplishments.
thomas massie ▲ ● ▼		In football terms, this sounds eerily similar to the Saints' bounty, Kate.
		Folks remember that.
		In that scandal, coaches would pay players cash bonuses for hits that would result in injuries to other players.
		Players would receive additional pay if their tackle resulted in an opposing player being taken out of the game.
		These non-contract bonuses were part of an underground culture that incentivized dirty behavior.
		When the activity was exposed, the Saints organization was widely condemned.
		The defensive coach was initially suspended indefinitely, and the head coach was suspended for an entire season.
		Somebody at the FBI needs to be suspended for the dirty tactics that they've used.
		If we recognize it in sports, it's not hard to recognize it here in government.
		And I yield back to balance my time.
unidentified		All right, ladies and gentlemen, quickly...
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Another clip here. We'll almost have played all of our clips in the next segment.
		But again, this is a massive problem.
		And one side of the political aisle is trying to do something about corruption in the federal government.
		The other is not.
		Here that is in clip 10.
mike johnson ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, talk about a chilling effect, right?
		Not only have we chilled the rights of parents to go and express their views, any other whistleblower better take note, right?
		They better take note. You may not be able to feed your family.
		It's disgusting. Your security clearance was wrongfully suspended.
		You have no recourse, right?
		Because here's the thing. If you wrongfully strip clearances, the FBI is the one that you appeal to, right?
		The FBI is supposed to investigate itself.
		Is that right? That's correct.
		I just want everybody to understand.
		We only got 40 seconds left.
		The FBI investigated itself.
		This is why we're here, folks.
		This committee, we have jurisdiction over the Department of Justice, over the FBI. We are the checks and balances in the system.
		We have to draw attention to this because it's our oversight duty.
		We're all trying to fulfill our responsibilities and our patriotic duties here.
		I am grateful to you men for your willingness to stand forward and take the arrows as you have, even from members of Congress over here who are trying to disparage you.
		It's disgusting. I thank you for your patriotic responsibility.
		Look, the free speech of parents is chilled.
		The speech and the duty of whistleblowers is chilled.
		We got a problem, folks, and we're trying to fix it.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I'm out of time. I yield back to you. Rev Johnson from Louisiana, and we're going to show you We're going to show you the Democrat madness on the other side of this break.
		They did not like the way this hearing was going.
		They don't like it when their criminal activity gets exposed.
		That's coming up next on the InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com.
		Well, the Democrats did not like how the hearings went today.
		And that's because the truth is, you scratch this corruption at the FBI. Behind it, you find the Democrat Party.
		Same deal with the Durham report.
		Same deal with the internet censorship.
		And now with the weaponization of government.
		I want to show you now some of the Democrats breaking down, trying to scuttle this event today.
		Let's start. The Democrats are mad because the FBI whistleblowers don't trust them.
		The FBI whistleblowers do not trust Democrats.
		Geez, can you blame them? They must be smart.
		Yeah, folks, let me give you a little bit of a word of advice.
		Don't trust Democrats.
unidentified		Ever. With anything.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		FBI whistleblowers get it.
		That angered the Democrat members of Congress.
		And here are some examples of that.
unidentified		Let's start with clip 27....innocent and did nothing wrong.
matt gaetz ▲ ● ▼		Thank you for blowing the whistle on that.
unidentified		I yield back. Mr. Chairman, I have a sincere point of inquiry.
unidentified		Rule 11, clause 2.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		The gentleman is not recognized.
unidentified		I have a question about the rules.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		I have a question about the rules. Point of order.
unidentified		A question about the rules.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Point of order. State your point of order.
unidentified		The point of order is why does Rule 11, clause 2, subsection E1A not apply to this subcommittee?
		I can read for you. Each committee shall keep a complete record of all committee action which shall include, in the case of a meeting or hearing transcript, a substantially verbatim account of remarks actually made during the proceedings, subject only to some technical things.
		Such records shall be the property of the House and each member, delegate, and the resident commissioner shall have access thereto.
		Why does that not apply?
		Where is the whistleblower exception in the rules of Congress It's the prerogative of the committee to decide.
		No, it's not. It's the rules of the House.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		We have the whistleblower testimony.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		The whistleblower does not wish that to be made available to the Democrats at this time.
unidentified		The whistleblower doesn't make committee rules, sir.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Mr. Lynch is recognized for five minutes of questioning.
unidentified		Mr. Chairman, is the ruling of the chair always unquestioned, or do we have a vote on how some of these issues are decided?
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		If you state a proper point of order...
unidentified		I just did state a proper point of order.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		The gentleman from Massachusetts is recognized for five minutes of question.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, the Democrats are pissed because they have no access to these whistleblowers.
		And since they have no access to the whistleblowers, they can't control them.
		And there it is.
		That's what it's all about.
		Democrats love control.
		They are obsessed with control.
		They are authoritarian control freaks.
		Hopefully you've figured that out by now.
		So that's why they're all in a tizzy over here, because they don't control these whistleblowers.
		But notice, when it's a Democrat whistleblower, they get all the protection in the world.
		Who... Or should I say leaker?
		When it's a Democrat leaker or whistleblower, they get all the protection in the world.
		They get praise. Nobody gets to know their name.
		Supreme Court leaker, military leaker, doesn't matter.
		You're a liberal leftist leaker.
		You get protected. Democrats will protect you.
		And that's how it goes.
		You're the good guy. But oh, when they don't trust the Democrats and when the Democrats can't control the narrative, when the Democrats can't control their whistleblower operatives, That's what they really are as operatives.
		Well, you see the behavior.
		They get pissed and they start to show it.
		Here's more. Here's more.
		Again, Jim Jordan having to take control as the Democrat trying to disrupt the hearing in clip 14.
unidentified		Documents that the majority is entitled to.
unidentified		So, I mean, I'm not aware that you're able to withhold information from the minority that we would need to use to prepare for...
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		When it comes to whistleblowers, you're not.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		And I would just remind the committee, remind everyone, look, when it comes to whistleblowers, you're not.
unidentified		That's not right. It's shocking that the gentleman...
unidentified		That is not right. In fact, you talk so much about the whistleblower and the impeachment.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		It's shocking that the gentleman from New York would say that when you were part of an investigation with an anonymous whistleblower.
unidentified		Yes, we gave you all of the information you had. We had.
		Mr. Chairman, I can't hear five people at once, because we have regular orders.
		Mr. Chairman, I'm inquiring, and I was not going to be inquiring.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		That when it comes to whistleblowers, you are not entitled to it.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		That's at the discretion of Mr.
unidentified		Allen. Mr. Chairman, these individuals have been determined not to be whistleblowers.
		These are not whistleblowers.
		They've been determined by the agency not to be whistleblowers.
		Are you deciding that they're whistleblowers?
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Yes, the law decides.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Did you not listen to Mr. Levitt's testimony?
unidentified		Did you not read the law? The law decides that they are whistleblowers.
		The chair recognizes the gentlelady from New York has been recognized.
		The law has not determined they are whistleblowers.
		His attorney is just asserting that.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		That lady from New York.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, these are obviously whistleblowers.
		That's exactly what they are.
		And look at the little games the Democrats play.
		No, they're not whistleblowers.
		Well, why aren't they whistleblowers? Because the FBI says they're not whistleblowers.
		Well, who are they blowing the whistle on?
unidentified		The FBI. Oh!
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Gee! Well, the FBI that's getting exposed by these whistleblowers says they're not whistleblowers, so therefore they're not whistleblowers, and therefore we must control them, and we must have complete access.
		Control freaks, liars, frauds.
		Do you see, though, folks, this is all great news.
		I'm not telling you there's going to be any justice at the end of this.
		I'm telling you the fact that this is happening is good news.
		The fact that this is happening is momentum in the right direction.
		And the fact that you can see all these Democrats up there in a tizzy, freaked out, because they're not in control, just shows that this is a good thing going on.
		Let's see it again. Again.
		Here the Democrats are.
		The hearing not going their way.
		They try to derail it again.
unidentified		Clip 15. Without objection, the chair now recognizes Mr.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Garamendi for his five minutes.
unidentified		Mr. Chairman, I have a parliamentary inquiry.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Mr. Garamendi is recognized.
unidentified		Mr. Chairman, I have a parliamentary inquiry.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Mr. Garamendi is recognized.
unidentified		Mr. Chairman, I have a parliamentary inquiry.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		We can do this all day. Mr.
unidentified		Garamendi is recognized. Okay, let's do it all day.
unidentified		Mr. Chairman, I have a parliamentary inquiry.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		And you're not recognized. Mr.
unidentified		Chairman, there's a member in the side of the dais who has not been waved in on committee, would like to No.
unidentified		Is he asking to be waved in, or is he going to send the audience, or has he joined somebody's staff since he's against the wall?
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Mr. Garamendi is recognized.
unidentified		Mr. Chairman, can I have an answer to my question, please?
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		He's a colleague. He's not been waved in.
unidentified		Mr. Garamendi is recognized. Well, we'd be happy to wave him in if he wants to sit in, but he's up in the daze area, but he's not in the audience.
unidentified		He's actually sitting where most times staff stands.
mike johnson ▲ ● ▼		As is customary in the Congress.
		Yeah, yeah. Anything to obscure the facts.
		Anything to stall the committee hearing.
unidentified		Unbelievable. I'm not stalling.
		Mr. Garamendi is recognized for his five minutes.
		Mr. Chairman, I ask that Mr.
		Garamendi's time be restored since it was taken by inappropriate behavior.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		The gentleman is recognized.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, what did I say?
		I think it was yesterday or maybe the day before.
		It just so happened. It was synchronicitous that the I don't care anymore Phil Collins song came on for our break music.
		Because I said, that's the attitude Republicans have to have dealing with these petulant children, dealing with these immature adults we call Democrats.
		It's time to stop caring.
		They're children. They're children.
		If you're having a big debate, let's say you're having a big debate at your house...
		Let's say you and your wife, you and your spouse, whatever, you're having a big debate about a serious financial issue or a serious family issue or something like that, and your five-year-old decides to chime in And then when your five-year-old's not getting the right attention, do you go, oh, we're going to stop our whole serious conversation because the five-year-old has something to say now.
		No, that's like these Democrats.
		They're the children. They're the petulant, immature children.
		It's time to stop listening to them, stop taking them seriously, stop caring what they say, and just say, hey, the adults are talking, move aside.
		One more example in clip 26.
		So when the derailment doesn't work, they just go to outright lying.
unidentified		More than two months ago, former President Trump, facing mounting investigations into his many alleged crimes, declared that, quote, Republicans in Congress should defund the DOJ and the FBI until they can come to their senses.
		And we all know that when Trump says jump, the Republicans in the House say, how high?
		So here we are, on Police Week, watching House Republicans jump to lay the foundation to defund law enforcement.
		My colleagues on the far right are on a mission to attack and ultimately dismantle the FBI. This is defund the police on steroids.
		You would like it then. As part of their mission, my colleagues have brought in these former agents, men who lost their security classes because they were a threat.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Because they were a threat to your false power.
unidentified		And of course it's the exact opposite.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So now the Democrats are pro-police, guys.
		Did you hear that? Democrats are now pro-police and pro-FBI. Own it.
		Own it, Democrat voters.
		You love law enforcement now.
		You love the FBI. You love the CIA. You love war.
		That's you now. So the Democrats that cried defund the police and did it for five years are now mad at Republicans, and they don't even call for defunding the police.
		Some of them call for defunding the FBI. We should all agree with that after what we've seen.
		Alright, so you saw Democrats try to derail, then you saw Democrats outright lie, and now, at this point, they're flopping, they're flailing, and then a massive fail in clip 13.
unidentified		Thank you. Mr. Allen, have you ever used Twitter, yes or no?
		I have utilized Twitter, yes.
		Okay, and is your account at MarcusA97050645?
		That is absolutely not my account.
		Okay, that's not your account.
		Well, on December 5th, 2022, an account under the name Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said...
		That is not my account, ma'am.
		You haven't let me finish the question, sir.
		He might have been the football player. You haven't let me finish the question.
		And the time is mine.
		On December 5, 2022, an account under the name of Marcus Allen retweeted a tweet that said, quote, Nancy Pelosi staged January 6th.
		Retweet if you agree, end quote.
		Do you agree with that statement?
		Yes or no? That is...
		I don't... No, ma'am.
		That's not my account at all.
		I have no idea. I'm asking whether you agree with that statement, yes or no.
		Can you please rephrase the statement?
		Yeah. Do you think that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6th?
		I just want him to answer his last question.
jim jordan ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, he'll answer. I'm just telling you your time's up.
unidentified		Do you believe that Nancy Pelosi...
		Do you agree with the statement that this person tweeted that Nancy Pelosi staged January 6th?
		Yes or no? No.
		Thank you. I yield back.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So the purple-haired liberal pulls a tweet, thinks she's a genius, thinks she's caught this whistleblower in a tweet that's not even his.
		And then when he says, hey, by the way, that's not mine, she just goes on as if it is.
		So, I mean, okay, let's just pull any tweet up from ever and just say, do you agree with this?
		Will you disavow this statement?
		But see, there's another danger here because I'm affected by this personally.
		This is what people do is they start fake accounts, they steal your digital identity, and then morons think that that's actually you, and then they can harm your person, your identity.
		There's a reason why we do have defamation laws.
		I mean, hell, I've been defamed as much as anybody.
		Think I'll ever get any justice in a courtroom?
		Twitter lets all kinds of fake Owen Troyers get verified.
		I can't even get my account back.
		People think it's me. So it's like some member of Congress calls me to testify.
		They find some tweet that a fake Owen Troyer puts out and they say, look at what you did.
		Do you condone this?
		That's not me.
		Well, it's verified. It says right here.
		It's not me. So it's like, oh, here's your Marcus Allen.
		Look at what you retweeted.
		That's not me. Oh, I don't care.
		I'm going to make you disavow anyway.
		Okay, it's not mine. Now, interesting clip here inside the testimony of one of the agents.
		Why were they not sharing January 6th footage with defendants?
		Why were they not making January 6th footage available to the public?
		A little idea into that here in clip 16.
unidentified		Happy to do it.
		Show us where they were inside the Capitol and we'll look into it.
		To which WFO said we can't show you those videos unless you can tell us the exact time and place those individuals were inside the Capitol.
		To which the SSA responded back and I was privy to these conversations firsthand.
		Why can't you show us Why can't you just give us access to the 11,000 hours of video that's available?
		Because there may be UCs, undercover officers, or CHSs, confidential human sources, on those videos whose identity we need to protect.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		So, in other words, there were feds in the videos, and that's why they were, quote-unquote, protecting their identity by not releasing the footage.
		And by the way, Kevin McCarthy promised he would release all of it to the American public, and yet has not fulfilled that promise.
		Are these the feds they're trying to protect?
		I think they already protected their identity.
		They put black clothes on and covered their faces.
		They knew what they were doing.
		Those aren't Trump supporters.
		We are now joined by, once again, the raw egg nationalist, and he has some serious health news for you today.
		As you know, that's one of the things we like to promote here is health.
		Making you in optimal health.
		That's why we sell supplements and promote a healthy lifestyle.
		And Raw Egg Nationalist is all about it.
		Now, there's actually two major stories that I saw you do a deep dive into.
		One was the microplastics.
		Two, though, this is the one you're more concerned about and you want to address today.
		And that is the real...
		Risk and truth about the fake bio lab meat, the fake meat they want us to eat.
		So, you did a deep dive into this.
		What did you learn?
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		Thanks for having me, Owen.
		It's great to be back. So, I looked into the FDA filings for a company called Good Meat, which is the second company to receive FDA approval to sell lab-grown meat to the American public.
		And what I discovered looking through this incredibly boring series of documents is that the cultured meat, that's what they call it, the cultured meat that good meat is going to start serving to the American public very soon is made by a company called Join Biologics and the name seemed familiar to me so I looked on the internet and lo and behold it was Very familiar to me.
		A year ago, Join Biologics bought 1400 acres of land in Florida and they wanted to turn it into a primate breeding facility.
		And this caused quite a big fuss because it turned out that Join Biologics has deep ties to the Chinese military's biowarfare program.
		And there was a big uproar.
		It was discussed in Congress.
		Governor DeSantis talked about it.
		Anyway, this same company is the company that is producing good meats, lab-grown chicken.
		And this is a novel foodstuff that Americans have never eaten.
		And it's pretty worrying to think that a company with deep ties to China's bio-warfare program could actually be introducing or helping to introduce a novel foodstuff for which we have no safety data to the American public.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Now, these ties to the Chinese military, what exactly is the tie there?
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		So the founder of Join Biologics' parent company, Join Laboratories, which was founded in 1995, is headquartered in Beijing, is a graduate and member of a particular academy of sciences that is in China that is part of the biowarfare program, is recognized as part of the biowarfare program.
		And then other key personnel within Join Biologics are Also affiliated with this particular scientific institute that is providing biowarfare technology to the Chinese military.
		So it's shared personnel.
		And what you have to remember, I think, with every Chinese company really is that Ultimately, they are all organs of the Chinese state and some more than others and some more intimately than others.
		And this is definitely a case where there is significant overlap with China's offensive military capability.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Well, we know part of the anti-human, anti-man agenda is the diet.
		And I don't want to go into a whole diet talk with you now, but folks, trust me, it's well studied now.
		The carnivore diet is better than a vegan diet, and that's just to make it black and white.
		But they don't want you eating real meat.
		They want you eating their fake meat, which is basically just going to be soy globs or who knows what else.
		We'll get into more of that right now with the raw egg nationalist.
		But This is what's so amazing and that people need to understand.
		Whenever they try to cancel meat, it'll be just like everything else.
		Just like when they want to cancel your combustion engine.
		The elites will be eating steak dinners.
		The elites will be flying around the planet.
		Just not you.
		You won't be allowed to eat beef.
		You won't be allowed to travel.
		That's just for the elites.
		They're not going to eat this lab-grown crap.
		And when you've learned more about it, you'll figure out why.
		So now we're at the point where you were talking about they tried to start this primate facility.
		So what was that all about?
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		Well, so Join Biologics and its parent company, Join Laboratories, are one of the key global players in the breeding of lab primates for testing.
		So they've gobbled up companies on the East Coast and companies of America and companies in China that are involved in breeding lab animals.
		And what they wanted to do was to turn this 1,400-acre plot of land in Florida into a quarantine and breeding facility where they would ship in monkeys, breed them, and then they would sell them off to research companies and other corporations for laboratory testing.
		And, of course, this was going on in the middle of a pandemic that had been created as a result of Chinese bioweapon research.
		I mean, a lot of especially Republican members of Congress and the House were up in arms about this.
		And DeSantis, too, clearly recognized the serious, serious security considerations.
		And so their attempt to do that, in the end, didn't amount to anything.
		And I think that the land is just vacant at the moment.
		But, yeah, I mean, there are...
		They're a big player in the production of lab animals and lab research.
		And really, do we want people selling land in the US to Chinese companies so that they can do research and produce lab animals that will ultimately maybe benefit China's capability to beat the US in an unconventionally waged war?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Generally speaking, if you want to talk about this lab meat company or just lab-grown meat in general, what is it?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Why would you never eat it?
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		Well, I would never eat lab-grown meat because lab-grown meat is made with a type of cell that human beings have never eaten in our 200,000-year history as modern Homo sapiens.
		When you harvest normal animal cells and put them in a bioreactor and culture them and try to grow them, you can only grow them for a finite period of time.
		They'll only replicate so many times.
		Lab-grown meat is made with a class of cell known as immortalized cell lines.
		The first immortalized cell line was extracted from an African-American woman called Henrietta Lacks at Johns Hopkins Hospital in Baltimore in 1956, I think it was.
		It was taken Directly from, she had a uterine tumour, I believe, which she died of, and they took a sample of the tumour cells, and they've been replicating ever since, and they've been used for all sorts of medical breakthroughs, for vaccine development in particular, I think. But we have absolutely no history of consuming this kind of immortally replicating cell as food.
		But that's precisely what these companies like Good Meat and other manufacturers of lab-grown meat want us to do.
		And there's no safety data.
		Serious scientists have raised the question of whether or not actually eating cells that are functionally indistinguishable from tumors might actually give you cancer.
		And this is serious scientists.
		This isn't just people on the internet like me saying it.
		It's actually serious scientists.
		It's a question that these companies just don't want to answer.
		They don't want people to know that they're using cells that are functionally indistinguishable from cancer, and they don't want anybody to be aware of the fact that there's no safety data for their consumption.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And, of course, the whole cover here is, oh, we have to do this to stop climate change, when the truth is actually lab-grown meat causes more climate change than regular meat.
		In fact, beef cows don't cause climate change at all, so that's just an entire lie.
		But that's the whole cover is, oh, we don't have to think about what this is going to do to you or the average diet, because we just have to do this forever.
		Humans to stop climate change, a gigantic lie.
		And people don't believe me.
		And you just laid it out.
		We'll continue this on the other side of the break.
		People don't believe me. I say, no, you understand the lab-grown meat is literally bladder tumor meat.
		They are literally replicating bladder tumors and telling you it's meat.
		As the raw egg nationalists just explained, we'll be right back.
		Don't go anywhere. And don't eat the meat.
		Don't eat the fake The Raw Egg Nationalist is with us.
		Find out more from his magazine, mansworldmag.online.
		And you can follow him on Twitter at babygravy9.
		And I want to ask you again, people just can't even believe what goes into making this fake meat.
		The elements of, literally, bladder tumors, cancerous tumors, in many cases, are what's used to make this lab-grown meat.
		And so, I want you to just get into this one more time, because I do want to also ask you about the microplastics in everything.
		You know, when people start to see this lab-grown meat, fake meat trend, it's on the grocery stores, nobody really buys it.
		They try to bring it into the fast food market.
		Not that fast food is good for you, but obviously the fake meat, even worse.
		So if you're trying to explain to someone, hey, you don't want to eat this fake meat, what is your approach to that?
		And what do you think is really the driving force behind making people eat this?
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		Well, I would say to people, this is a type of food that we have never eaten in our history as human beings.
		It's a type of food, therefore, that we have no understanding of its effects in the short term or in the long term.
		And although lab-grown meat isn't precisely a tumour, it shares many functional characteristics with a tumour.
		And you wouldn't particularly want to eat a tumour.
		I wouldn't want to eat a tumour.
		Ask yourself what benefit there would be to eating this meat.
		In what way is it superior to normal meat?
		I mean, it's advertised as being ethically superior to normal meat because it doesn't require slaughter.
		But, I mean, that's an issue in itself because actually one of the essential ingredients for the growth medium is a thing called fetal bovine serum, which is Directly extracted from the hearts of cow foetuses while they're still alive on the slaughterhouse floor.
		So it's not true that this stuff is produced without slaughter.
		So the ethical case doesn't exist.
		And then you've got the climate change case.
		And that's, you know, so that's what it comes down to.
		Do you believe that this stuff is better for the planet than ordinary meat?
		And again, it isn't, as we're starting to see as studies come out that show that actually maybe Even this stuff produces 25 times more carbon dioxide than traditional farming.
		So the case for consuming this stuff, there's no health case, there's no ethical case, and there's no environmental case either.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		And what do you think is really behind this push?
		Because this isn't a coincidence that all of a sudden every grocery store or even fast food chains are now trying to introduce this to the market.
		What do you think is really behind this?
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		Well, the argument of my latest book, The Eggs Benedict Option, is that the push for all of these different kinds of alternative proteins is basically a form of corporate consolidation of the food supply.
		So, I mean, the story of the last hundred years in the food supply, and certainly the American food supply, has been one of corporate consolidation, the replacement of traditional locally sourced diets with corporate produced foodstuffs, And that's made these corporations huge amounts of money and afforded them huge power because they control the diets and the health of ordinary people.
		And I think that this move towards alternative proteins, lab-grown meat, plant-based meat, insects, all this kind of stuff is just another way for corporations to To gain yet further control of the food supply.
		I mean, what you have to understand about things like lab-grown meat is that the process for manufacturing it is patentable.
		The process that good meat uses to make its cultured chicken is a proprietary process.
		They own the process.
		They're the only people who can use it.
		These new products, and plant-based meat is no different, they offer a degree of control that you just can't get even with traditional animal products.
		So if you're Tyson or some big corporation, yes, you can own the farms and you can own the meat processing facilities and the packaging facilities and the slaughterhouses, but You can't patent a cow, but you can patent lab-grown meat.
		And so it offers total control from production to the plate, basically, of these products.
		And I think that really they're betting on total global control of the food supply by corporations.
		I think it's that simple.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		I agree, and I think that you get it down to the basis of, yeah, you right now, you can have a cow, you can raise cattle, and essentially you can learn how to be self-sustainable, independent as a farmer, let's say.
		But they want to make that entire process illegal.
		They want to make that illegal and say, oh, it's climate change, or oh, it's inhumane, so that you literally can't even feed yourself.
		You literally can't even feed your children without the centralized corporate food supply, which essentially will just turn us all into slaves, of course.
		And isn't that the ultimate agenda?
		Isn't that where all of this seems to flow?
		Now, another big deep dive you did, and we've got about two and a half minutes, is into the microplastics that are found in all the food.
		Talk about this shocking news.
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		Yes, yeah. Scarcely a week passes without some new terrible, terrible study revealing where microplastics are.
		And they're basically everywhere.
		I mean, we've had studies that show that they're in the deepest ocean trenches.
		They're in Arctic and Antarctic ice.
		They circulate in the air.
		They're on the top of mountains.
		They're in mother's placentas.
		They cross the blood-brain barrier.
		So that was a worrying study that I wrote about the other day.
		There's a new mouse study that shows that Within two hours of consumption of microplastics by mice, then the microplastics are in the mouse's brain.
		And so it's probably likely to be exactly the same or very similar for humans as well.
		I mean, microplastics are, sadly, are everywhere.
		They're in the food supply, they're in the water, and it's still not a problem that's being taken as seriously as it should be because we know that That there are all sorts of terrible, terrible effects that these things are having, even though we don't understand them that well yet.
		But we do know that they are linked, for instance, to the catastrophic decline in fertility that we've witnessed that was the subject of the Tucker Carlson documentary, The End of Men.
		You know, sperm counts and testosterone are declining at such a rate that by 2045, we may not be able to reproduce by natural means because men won't be producing any sperm.
		It really is an existential crisis I think that we're facing with plastics.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Can you even avoid it?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		What steps, what measures can you take to try to avoid consuming it?
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		You can't fully avoid exposure to plastics.
		I think that's unavoidable.
		You're going to be exposed to them somehow.
		But yes, you can mitigate your exposure.
		Avoid eating processed food.
		That's one thing that you should do.
		Reduce your reliance on plastics in general.
		So try not to use plastic Tupperware.
		Try not to use plastic bags.
		Try not to wear clothes made from plastic fibers like polyester and things because they get shed in the home and when you use the washing machine and things like that.
		Filter your water. Mm-hmm.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All great advice.
		Where can people learn more?
		Raw Egg Nationalists, what's the best location?
charles cornish-dale ▲ ● ▼		So go to my website, raweggnationalist.com.
		I do a lot of reporting these days for The National Pulse.
		That's thenationalpulse.com.
		And just follow me on Twitter, and I regularly post about these things.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		All right, I'm going to be slonking 12 raw eggs tonight.
		I'm going to double it tonight. All right, we're about to get into the rest of the news for today.
		We do still have some video clips remaining, but...
		As you heard from the last guest, the microplastics are in the water.
		And, of course, it's not just the microplastics.
		It's the glyphosates that leak in.
		It's the fluoride they put in it intentionally.
		It's even in cities like Flint where they have all kinds of poisons like lead in the water.
		Yeah, so you're going to want to filter your water, and I also recommend drinking out of a glass.
		But you can get a water filter at Infowarsstore.com.
		So that's part of the solution.
		You don't want to ingest the microplastics.
		You don't want to ingest the neurotoxin.
		Get a water filter from Infowarsstore.com.
		We did the research.
		Best quality at the best price.
		We did the work for you on that.
		Trust us. Get your water filter from InfoWarsStore.com.
		And of course, you support the broadcast in that process.
		But you're going to start hearing and seeing probably more about this.
		Oh, the fluoride is poisonous.
		Oh, the glyphosate's in the water.
		The microplastic's in the water.
		So now you know your solution lies at InfoWarsStore.com with one of our great water filters.
		And there's other water filtration options there as well.
unidentified		All right. Alright.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Let's just start doing a bit of a news blitz here.
		Representative Anna Paulina Luna introduces resolution to expel Adam Schiff from Congress.
		That's nice. Impeachment Week continues.
		Sam Brinton, you remember him.
		The White House wants this story to be buried.
		They don't want you to know about this.
		Sam Brinton arrested.
		Police records show the serial kleptocrat The kleptomaniac, Sam Brenton, has been arrested.
		Of course he's a Democrat.
		He's a thief.
		And the Biden administration hired him because he had a gay, pumpy kink.
		Well, he also apparently had a kink of stealing other people's clothes and wearing them.
unidentified		Hmm. Hmm.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		That doesn't sound too good, does it?
		That sounds extremely dangerous.
		Sounds very mental.
		So, uh, I guess he's in jail now, or he's been arrested.
		I don't know, but... Police records show he's been arrested, and of course the Democrat media wants to bury that story.
		Nancy Pelosi's daughter is taking care of Dianne Feinstein, and apparently it's a lot worse than they were originally reporting.
		And there's a lot of back and forth here about Nancy Pelosi's daughter taking care of Dianne Feinstein because the left is claiming there's a power play happening here between Pelosi and Gavin Newsom.
		Pelosi apparently wants Schiff to get the new Senate seat.
		From Feinstein. And Newsom has his own plan for that seat.
		So apparently this is Pelosi sending her daughter over there to coax Feinstein to endorse Pelosi's guy, Adam Schiff, the known liar, the known crook.
		Or is it just Nancy Pelosi's daughter being nice?
		I don't know. But apparently Feinstein's health, folks, is not good.
		Not good. Not good at all.
		And they don't want you to know the truth about Feinstein's health.
		She shouldn't even be in Congress anymore, is how bad it really is.
		Yeah, we claim in this country...
		We make a big deal in this country out of racism and hate crimes, don't we?
		That's a big thing, right?
		Right. Well, my guess is you haven't heard about these stories, and my guess is you probably know why.
		Suspect in stabbing of Phoenix Jogger told police he wanted to look like her uses they-them pronouns on LinkedIn.
		So the gentleman that stalked this girl, stabbed her to death in a Phoenix Park, was a obviously deranged leftist they-them pronoun individual.
		So they don't want you to know about that.
		And was the I wanted to look like her a racial thing?
		I don't know. Teens beat man, call him cracker during attack.
		According to the police record, a man was beaten and called a cracker by a group of teenage suspects in New York City last month.
		Teenage suspects.
		Teenagers beating up a white man, calling him a cracker.
		I wonder what could have led to that.
		Detective and killing of Kenner Handyman.
		Suspects said they wanted to kill a white person.
		The two men arrested for the fatal shooting of Lawrence Herr and Kenner may have been motivated because he was white.
		A detective working for the homicide said during the court hearing on Tuesday.
		So, open and shut hate crime cases, racism against white people, and the mainstream media won't even tell you about it.
		But they'll lie to you.
		They'll lie to you about an account that happened.
		Where you may have seen or heard this story.
		In New York City, there was a nurse who also happens to be pregnant.
		nurse pregnant just gets off a 12-hour shift at the hospital and she goes to
		rent a bike to ride home. And a group of teenagers that are also black decide
		they're gonna try to cut her off and steal her bike. Now my guess is this is
		motivated by again they know that hey you treat white people like second-class
		citizens now that's the propaganda and you do this on on video and now you're
		So there's multiple issues here.
		Well, immediately all the anti-white bigots out there like Ben Crump, Tariq Nasheed and many others shared this video and claimed that this woman, this nurse, stole a bike.
		And so again, it's a group of black teenagers harassing this woman and they claim that she stole the bike from them.
		Well, it turns out that was a lie.
		Ben Crump, a Democrat, lied.
		Tariq Nasheed, an anti-white bigot, lied.
		Tariq Nasheed says fake crying, screaming for help, mayo babbling.
		Is Tariq Nasheed going to apologize?
		Now, Community Notes on Twitter has posted in response to their lies, Ben Crump's lies, that a white woman was trying to steal from a black man, is what they claimed, a total lie.
		It was the exact opposite.
		The black man, as they say, was trying to steal the bike from the white woman.
		So imagine that. Folks, I've been on the receiving end of fake news media.
		I've been on the receiving end of leftist Democrat liars.
		The victim in this case was the white woman, a pregnant nurse off a 12-hour shift.
		She was the victim.
		And what did the left tell you?
		That she was the assaulter and she was the thief.
		And, you know, I want to be careful here because I don't want to delve into the fringe on all of this.
		Folks, 99% of people don't give a damn what your skin color is, okay?
		And it's sad that I have to cover the story in this manner because it's just the truth.
		Ben Crump, Tariq Nasheed, and all these other people were quick to label this woman...
		A thief and a racist because that's the world they want to live in.
	They hate white people.
	Even though the truth was this woman was the one who got the bike stolen from her and guess what folks?
	Her lawyer shows the receipts.
	They have the receipts. Every time you rent one of these bikes it shows a receipt.
	So you can't deny it. No apologies from any of the leftists.
	No apologies from any of the anti-white bigots that were a part of this.
	I hope Ben Crump gets sued for every dime he has.
	I hope everybody who lied about this woman gets sued for every dime they have.
	Because there is your real racism.
	So again, I don't want to sit here and do this whole thing, America's a racist country.
	There's going to be racism everywhere.
	People are going to be rude.
	People are going to be jerks, whatever.
	It shouldn't impact your life. You don't want to let it impact your life.
	That's the trick here. But see, to deny the vast amount of anti-white bigotry that goes on in this country is just to deny reality.
	That's all. And this is another perfect example.
	So, three instances where people get killed because they're white.
	Media covers it up. And then they have an instance where they think a white woman steals a bite from a black person, ends up being the exact opposite, the black person stealing from the white person.
	And they just completely lie to you and tell you the black person is the victim.
	He's the thief. Boy, that sounds familiar.
	George Floyd, Jordan Neely, the black person is the one breaking the law, and then they somehow become the victim?
	Yeah. That's what liberals do.
	That's what racists do. All right.
	I don't know if we'll be able to cover all this news in the final segment of today's InfoWars War Room, brought to you by InfoWarsStore.com, but I'm going to try my best.
	Let me do this because I think it's important.
	And I want to be clear here because I am fair.
	I am equal when it comes to my conclusions, my logic, my reporting.
	So you have an individual here, Jake Burdett, and this is a Democrat activist, a Bernie Sanders supporter.
	Who I support his First Amendment right and I think his activity in the Capitol or at the Capitol in D.C. today is...
	A fine execution of the First Amendment.
	So I do not think he's a bad person.
	I don't even think he should be punished for this.
	But when you disrupt a political event, when you disrupt a congressional government event, you are going to deal with law enforcement or you're going to be removed from the scene, just like I was.
	Now the difference between me and Jake is I'm not a liberal Democrat, so I have to go to court every month for my disruption from four years ago now.
	He won't probably have to go to court at all unless he tries to sue Representative Clay Higgins.
	Now, let me explain what happens here.
	I may need a little bit of help with my crew because we have so many of these videos.
	But this is the video.
	This is the video. Which is the one, though, that they shared that went viral that's not the full context?
	It's the one here from Christy Fogle when it starts with his Bernie Sanders shirt.
	It's basically just the one where it shows Clay Higgins removing him from the area.
	Do we have that one?
	So here's the video that goes viral.
	This is the video that goes viral that everybody sees.
	It's not even that one, I don't think.
	Okay, it's this one right here, guys.
	It's this one that I sent. I want to make sure we do this right.
	Because there's the one video that goes viral and that everybody sees that is not accurate as far as its context.
	So the one video that goes viral of this guy getting removed by Clay Higgins, you would see that and you might think, okay, well, Clay Higgins is the aggressor here.
	Clay Higgins is in the wrong here.
	The problem is that video does not give you accurate context.
	And so I want to do this right here and show that video.
	If we can't pull it up, I'm almost out of time.
	Do we have it? No, no, no.
	I don't care about the audio. Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Just show me the video on the screen.
	That'll be fine enough. So this is the video that goes viral.
	Alright? This is the third time he's disrupted.
	This is the third time he's disrupted.
	Clay Higgins is a former sheriff.
	Removes him from the scene.
	There it is. And by the way, at the end of this video, you'll notice Clay Higgins, he handles this so perfectly.
	At the end of this video, he goes... Now just calm down.
	Just calm down.
	Everybody just calm down.
	Because then all the leftists come over and start getting all hyped up.
	And he's like, everybody just calm down.
	Everybody just calm down.
	So that's the video you see.
	It's a 50-second video of Higgins removing this guy who disrupted the event for the third time.
	For whatever reason, law enforcement isn't getting rid of him.
	So Higgins has to do it, former law enforcement himself.
	So that's the video that goes viral, and then just like the lies they told about that woman stealing the bike, no, she got the bike stolen from her, everybody says, oh, look, Higgins is out of control.
	Well, let's show you the full video in context.
	Let's show you the full video in context.
	Which one is the video where it's actually his point of view?
	Yeah, so let's go to this is the full context.
	This is what happens before they show you that clip taken out of context here in clip 28.
unidentified		Representative Gosar, can you talk about when you did that rally with the neo-Nazi Nick Fuentes?
		Can you talk about when your family did an ad all endorsing your opponent?
		Why did that happen?
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Why did that happen?
unidentified		Hey, please don't touch me.
		Please don't touch me. Please don't touch me.
		Can you tell this guy?
		Can you tell this guy?
		But you can't ask.
		You can't answer the questions that he has.
		No, I can answer the questions.
		Okay. Listen, I respect your person.
		I'm Clay Higgins. I represent South Louisiana.
		Clay Higgins, okay. All I'm asking you to do is just peacefully stand by with your camera.
		And I promise you, look at me.
		I'll come talk to you straight up.
		I'll answer all your questions.
		Fair enough? Do you know about his family and his endorsement?
		Yeah, I'll answer that when we talk.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		Okay. So, they don't show you that video.
		Now, to the individual's credit, Jake Burdett, he did publish that video.
		He published all his videos.
		That was his video. Again, I'm not against Jake Burdett here.
		His First Amendment is good, but what they're doing is they're taking it out of context and they're saying Clay Higgins needs to be removed.
		Clay Higgins needs to be arrested.
		Clay Higgins is guilty of assault.
		As you can see in the full context, after the guy disrupted this press conference for the third time, For the third time.
		Hey, again, I'm not saying don't do that.
		I do that. First Amendment activity.
		Guess what? When I get removed, I'm like, okay, you got me.
		I'm getting removed. It's happened to me a dozen times.
		That's how the game is played.
		But, oh, you don't ever see people saying, I got assaulted.
		You don't ever see the Internet claiming I'm being assaulted when these lefties come and remove me from their events and toss me for their events, which happens all the time.
		Oh, no, no, that's not assault, even though it is literally assault.
		I mean, how many times have you witnessed this?
		So I'm not going to belabor the point.
		They take a video out of context.
		They make Clay Higgins look bad.
		And now they're going to try to charge him with assault and remove him from Congress for it.
		Even though you can see how polite he was being.
		And he said, hey, man, you do your thing.
		We're going to have our press conference.
		But if you just wait right there, I'll come answer your questions.
		Let's just wait. So they're trying to make this something it's not, obviously.
		Just like they did with the woman and the bike.
		It's the exact same thing.
		They take the reality and they invert it.
		But I gotta give credit to Jake.
		I support that activity, whether you're a liberal or a conservative or anything else.
		Fully support that.
		We need more of that. On both sides of the aisle.
		But when it happens, let's tell the fair story here.
		You see, let's tell the fair story here.
		I mean, again, I don't want to make myself the point of reference here every time, but it's a good point of reference.
		Remember when Al Green tried to stir up a riot mob against me in the D.C. airport?
		Remember that? I wasn't even disrupting anything.
		I was just having a casual conversation with him at the airport like we've had a couple times before, both flying in and out of D.C. to Texas.
		And I was just like, hey, you know, Alan Green, we're having a conversation.
		And in the terminal, he tries to rally up a riot mob against me.
		And he gets in front of a whole group of people in the airport.
		He says, this man is a racist.
		He's calling me as a black man, a racial name.
		He's a racist. He's a racist right in front of all these people trying to drum up a riot against me.
		Now, Clay Higgins didn't do that.
		Clay said, hey man, relax right there.
		We'll do some questions. Hey man, wait right there.
		Let us have our event. I'll do questions with you afterwards.
		And he kept disrupting.
		And so eventually Clay Higgins removed him from the press conference and said, hey, everybody relax.
		Everybody calm down.
		Calm down. So you see the reality needs to be told here.
		He has every right to go do his First Amendment activity.
		The people running the event have every right to remove him from the scene.
		That is a private press conference.
		And he can continue to disrupt, but eventually he's going to be removed.
		But they want to make Clay Higgins out to be the bad guy here, and they want to try to probably remove Clay Higgins from Congress because of it.
		But what about when Al Green tries to start up an entire riot mob against an individual at the airport?
		So see, these full stories need to be told.
		The full truth needs to be revealed.
		Okay, how do Republicans deal with their events getting disrupted?
		How do Democrats deal with somebody asking them a question peacefully at the airport?
		Yeah, that's one of my many times talking to Congressman Al Green.
	He was pretending he was on a phone call in this one.
	That's one of the tactics they like to do.
	Total BS. Let me play this one also.
	I like this. I like this.
	Jamal Bowman and Marjorie Taylor Greene had a little tiff outside of the Capitol today.
	Here that is in clip 21. It's small here.
	Save the party.
unidentified		The party's hanging by a thread.
marjorie taylor greene ▲ ● ▼		We gotta get rid of Biden. Save the country.
unidentified		The party's hanging by a thread.
		You gotta save the party.
		Listen, no more QAnon.
		No more that now.
marjorie taylor greene ▲ ● ▼		No more debt ceiling nonsense.
		Come on now. Save the party.
		Save America.
unidentified		Save the children. Do something about guns.
marjorie taylor greene ▲ ● ▼		Right, so close the border.
unidentified		Close the border.
unidentified		Save the children. Hey, where are the kids?
marjorie taylor greene ▲ ● ▼		Where are the migrant children?
marjorie taylor greene ▲ ● ▼		What kids? You guys have lost them.
unidentified		We're accepting them. We love them.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		No, you've lost them. We love the migrant children.
marjorie taylor greene ▲ ● ▼		There's tens of thousands missing.
		You can't find them. Wait, what are you talking about?
		That's your administration. What are you talking about?
		Yeah, migrant children are missing.
unidentified		You don't know the news. No, no, we don't know the news.
unidentified		Oh, you have sadly missed them before.
marjorie taylor greene ▲ ● ▼		Hey, let me tell you something, Jamal.
unidentified		I'm very smart, but we should pay attention.
owen shroyer ▲ ● ▼		More of this. This is good, folks.
		We need more discourse, more debate.
		It's healthy. Even if we can't agree, it's healthy.
		Alright, I am out of time, unfortunately.
		A lot of big stories I couldn't cover.
		Fetterman trying to talk today couldn't.
		Big Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
		interview. A story about an NBA player being demonized for flashing a gun that I want to talk about because it's really ironic.
		We're out of time for today.
		Thank you for everybody that tuned in.
		A loaded broadcast. We'll be back and do it again tomorrow.
		For almost a year now.
		It's been so long. I thought it was years.
		I was told, no, it's actually been about nine months.
		Since TurboForce has been in stock at InfoWarsStore.com.
		But ladies and gentlemen, we're going to do this together because I know there's a lot of people out there that love TurboForce just like I do.
		I'm shamelessly addicted to caffeine.
		I'm not going to lie. About 500 milligrams a day.
		I've just accepted this in my 30s.
		That's how it's going to go.
		So there it is. So Turbo Force is my go-to.
		I don't like the toxic energy drinks.
		I don't like the processed sugar.
		I don't like the high fructose corn syrup.
		I don't like the acidic taste.
		I don't like any of it.
		But man, oh man, that caffeine, that energy, it's really necessary at times, isn't it?
		So we just found a solution.
		Turbo Force Plus, your same favorite ingredients, your same favorite flavor, but now it's in the canister.
		No longer in the packets, now in the canister.
		So a better bang for your buck and more control over how much you want to put into your drink mix.
		Some people like a lot of caffeine.
		Some people might say, hey, that's too much for me.
		I only want to do a half scoop. Now, I did take the plastic covering off of this, but this is brand new.
		If you have ordered Turbo Force Plus from InfoWarsStore.com, it should be arriving at your house very soon.
		But I wanted to do this all together on the air.
		I wanted to do this as an InfoWars family on the air.
		I know that you out there and my crew, we all love Turbo Force.
		We've been jonesing, you might say, for Turbo Force.
		So this is brand new, folks.
		Brand new packet. I did take the plastic wrap off the front just to save time.
		I'm not blubbing. I'm going in, folks.
		I'm going in for the first time here.
		To the new Turbo Force, you can already smell that flavor lofting into the air.
		So here it is. It's been too long.
		I've even been waiting today for this moment.
		It's been too long. I'll do one scoop.
		We'll do one scoop here.
		And we'll stir that around there.
		So there it is. This is my first time.
		We had a couple leftover packets that we were clinging on to.
		Here we go.
		The moment of truth has arrived.
		The brand new TurboForce Plus from InfoWarsStore.com.
		And you can get it at InfoWarsStore.com.
		25% off the reintroductory rate.
		Probably about maybe 14 ounces of water here.
		There's the flavor! Hard to put that down, but I'm going to have to cover some other news.
		TurboForce Plus, in stock, Infowarsstore.com.
		10 hours, clean energy.
		Trust me, from a guy that has fully embraced the caffeine addiction, let's say.
		I shouldn't call it that. But, no, I embrace caffeine fully nowadays.
		And I'm telling you, folks, if you're somebody that likes to get caffeine to help you get through the day, whether you work long hours or you just like the energy boost, whatever it is, Give Turbo Force Plus a try.
		Trust me. Put the energy drinks down.
	Don't even go back to them.
	Don't even go back to the energy drinks.
	It's back, baby.
	The wait is finally over.

▲