Alex Jones and guests Brandon Gray, Sean Fitzgerald, Royce Lopez, and Mike Schiele expose globalist overreach—WHO/EU ignored 2019 transmission warnings, delayed responses, and pushed lockdowns while China’s $40M funding contrasted with Trump’s $400–$500M cut. Gray’s bullhorn protests demand business reopenings, term limits, and repealing the Smith-Mundt Act, mocking Bill Gates and Fauci’s alleged tyranny. Fitzgerald debunks leftist polling claims on Medicare for All, citing black voter demographics, while Harrison contrasts 1950s South Philly’s thriving black community with today’s collapse due to government interference. A Daily Mail report links COVID-19 to U.S.-funded Wuhan lab research, exposing potential deep-state cover-ups. Fines, checkpoints, and surveillance—like the Patriot Act—threaten lasting control, with Schiele warning of incremental "boiling the frog" restrictions. Jones warns rugged individualism is key to survival; submission risks dystopia. [Automatically generated summary]
This is Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroer today.
We have a show packed full of guests, great video clips, of course, all the news you can possibly handle, and more.
Very exciting day. I have actual Justice Warrior joining me in the next hour, Brandon Gray later this hour, and then to finish off the show, Revenge of the Sis will be joining me.
I just got a last-minute update that Savannah Hernandez, We'll not be able to make it on.
Very unfortunate, but I got plenty to fill it up in the meantime.
Don't worry about that. But first, here's a video by the one and only John Bowne, United We Stand.
So-called media has been foaming at the mouth to get me further deplatformed so I can't respond to the lies.
Think about this in America.
Think about this in America, that I have been unable...
This is the 11th hearing that they've had in the last year and a half where I'm one of the main focuses and I have not ever been called to testify when they say outrageous, slanderous, defamatory things when they've had in the House Intelligence Committee, Senate Intelligence Committee and others.
They'll have people point blank From the CIA, you name it, who are leftists, say Alex Jones works for the Russians.
That is an outrageous lie beyond Joseph McCarthy and anything he ever did.
But when McCarthy did it, the people got to come in and got to confront the committee and say, you have no decency.
How dare you act like this?
This is a hundred times worse than anything Joseph McCarthy ever did, and it's a shame.
All I want to do is stay in this fight, and I see so many good men and women of every race, color, and creed who bleed You have to plant that seed,
you have to water that seed, you have to commit to that, and you have to not care what slaves of the system say to you when they Trying to make you feel like you're failing.
That is the corrupt system dying.
unidentified
Non-cooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good.
Should it ever appear that the inter-American doctrine of non-interference merely conceals or excuses a policy of non-action, if the nations of this hemisphere Should fail to meet their commitments against outside communist penetration, then I want it clearly understood that this government will not hesitate in meeting its primary obligations.
Those attempts to oppress you and control you and lie to you is the system failing.
It knows we love each other.
It knows we're coming together.
It knows we have a fabulous world and things we can do that are so amazing.
We've just begun to discover our power.
And it doesn't want you to have that.
It wants to steal that and capture your soul and use it because it's not creative.
unidentified
The very word secrecy is repugnant in a free and open society.
And we are, as a people, inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths, and to secret proceedings.
We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify us, the facts they deserve to know.
It needs to capture you and make you beg it and plead so that you can even be on its platform and show your creativity and then it sits in judgment like a satanic American idol and tells you how good you are because you've served it and you bow to it.
Thought in the universe.
Innovation and courage and the exercise of will and learning to be attacked and learning to not submit to that is what makes us grow.
Of course, you can find that video on band.video, infowars.com.
Good video to play.
Hopefully that's setting the tone for the rest of today's show.
Great show. Lots of guests.
Don't go anywhere. This is The War Room.
I'm Harrison Smith, infowars.com.
The Ides of April.
It is the 15th of April. Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroer on today's episode of The War Room.
Later in this hour, we will be joined by Brandon Gray of Just Another Channel on YouTube.
Talk about his bullhorning efforts.
So we'll wait until the second half of this first hour to get into some of the reactions that we're seeing across the country right now.
Some of the protests that we're seeing as people stand up and say, let us go back to work.
Now I want to start the show with some good news and some bad news.
The bad news is that like nature reclaiming a city devoid of humans, my hair...
I'm devoid of professional barber shops is retaking my scalp.
That's the bad news. The good news is it's making me look more and more like an anime protagonist as the days go on.
So I do apologize for the scruffy look.
This is not by choice. This is how God made me and we all have to deal with it.
But yes, we'll spend a lot of time today talking about the coronavirus, and of course, as that is the number one topic.
But I have other stuff as well, and we're going to go back in time.
We're going to look at some of our forefathers, how they dealt with the increasing, the encroachment of government on their society.
We'll talk about... There's so much to talk about with coronavirus because this is the big one.
Obviously, we all know that this is the big final move of the globalists.
If we just look back at the last couple years, starting in 2016, when the globalists really thought they had everything in the bag right after a couple decades of Bushes and Obamas really lining, paving the road for the totalitarian control.
They really thought they'd bring the hammer down in 2016.
They had their fake news label that they were ready to roll out and use Governmentally to shut down places like Infowars. They had it all, it was all ready It was all there in their hands until it was ripped away from them by Donald Trump and the Patriots who supported him so the last four years since then have been a sort of a one-upmanship as they tried to regain the control that they feel slipping through their fingers and
And, of course, in 2019, we saw the big blow-up where you just had countries all over the world exploding into social unrest.
And they couldn't let that go on much longer.
They needed to really play their final card, right?
This is the big one.
They're going to play this. If it works, it works.
They have total control. If it doesn't, God only knows what's going to happen, but it means complete failure for them.
So that's what we're seeing now.
So, I mean, just insanity.
As I was going through the headlines of what I want to talk about today, the death toll soaring past 10,000 as they just start counting deaths that weren't coronavirus, weren't tested, but say, yeah, that's what we're doing.
You have all these articles saying the growth in surveillance may be hard to scale back after this pandemic.
Oh, you think so?
Do you think that maybe once they get all these control mechanisms into place, they're not going to want to let them go?
Yeah, thanks. Thanks for that.
Just all this insanity. But we're going to start with, of course, the top story of today.
As Fox News puts it, the global battle that has erupted as Trump pulls WHO funding over coronavirus response.
I have to consciously say W-H-O. That's the World Health Organization.
I always want to say who, who, who, who.
Of course, every time I say that, I just picture the big owl sculpture from Bohemian Grove.
But that's purely a coincidence, I'm sure.
The president announced Tuesday that the United States would immediately halt funding for the World Health Organization, saying it put political correctness over life-saving measures, noting that the U.S. would undertake a 60- to 90-day investigation into why the, quote, China-centric WHO... Great idea.
Absolutely perfect. This is exactly what should be happening.
And I just have to ask everybody who's defending this, all the people who are erupting in anger over Trump pulling Trump.
What has the WHO done?
What has the WHO done?
It's a weird sentence. What has the WHO done, honestly, with this pandemic, with this epidemic?
Because as far as I'm concerned, just every once in a while you get a headline that's like, the WHO now considers this officially a pandemic.
As you're looking around, it's like, we've been on lockdown for two weeks and now you're calling this a pandemic?
I mean, they were behind the times on everything.
As far as I can tell, they've done absolutely nothing to help with this.
Kind of like the EU. If you look at what's going on with Europe and the way European countries are struggling, especially places like Italy, struggling to just keep up with the sick and dead.
What has the EU done?
So you have all of these globalist organizations that have all of these multinational organizations working within it.
And yet, when it comes down to it, when there is a crisis, when they're actually, you know, what they're there for is happening, and they're nowhere to be found.
They do nothing to help. They do nothing but take money, pad their own pockets, expand their own ideology and their own...
Agendas forward. And oh boy, do I have a lot to say about that.
We're going to get to a document later in the show that really is going to blow your mind.
And really it's just going to be a teaser because I plan on doing a live stream tomorrow where I fully go through the entire document.
But we'll get into exactly how places like the WHO take advantage of these situations to destroy freedom, gain power, etc., etc., etc.
I continue with this article from Fox News.
While we may agree that the WHO has shortcomings that must be corrected, your attack on the global health organization can easily be seen as a deliberate but transparent attempt to deflect responsibility for your own failures onto others, Maloney and Lynch wrote.
So these are two Democrats from the House Oversight Committee and the House Subcommittee on National Security saying, no, it's Trump's fault that all of this happened.
It's Trump's fault that China lied about infection.
It's Trump's fault that the WHO lied about human-to-human transmission.
It's Trump's fault.
Well it kind of is because he was listening to the professionals.
He was listening to the people who have appointed themselves in charge of the situation.
People like Dr. Fauci and Bill Gates who have never had a vote cast for them in their lives and yet have assumed the role of governmental caretakers.
Of course, he has detractors from the Democrats, but he also has supporters from the Republicans.
Donald Trump does in his defunding of the WHO. Senator Rick Scott from Florida said, quote, glad to see real Donald Trump halt funding to the WHO. We need to review their role in helping communist China lie about the coronavirus before any more taxpayer money is spent.
He says this was the right move, and I look forward to a full congressional investigation into the WHO. As do I. And that's going to be very interesting.
And this sort of gets into the mud.
It gets into the, you know, basic foundational issues that one has when dealing with international organizations.
Because who...
Whose jurisdiction are they under?
Where are they headquartered?
I mean, how much leeway does America have to go in and investigate their files or subpoena their phone records or any of these sorts of things?
Are their offices located in America?
Are their offices located elsewhere?
Are they able to hide information from us so we can't actually make a full investigation?
Now, if we had a health organization that was the American Health Organization, then it would be under the purview of Congress and, you know, by extension, under the purview of the American people.
So we'd be able to go in, have full transparency, be able to see exactly what they're doing.
Of course, that doesn't work out in reality, but at least we would have more control when it's just this international conglomeration where all these different countries are giving money for different reasons and wanting to pull the WHO in one direction or the other.
Of course, it's led by a violent communist from Ethiopia.
Of course, not a big surprise he would have sympathy for the Communist Chinese, but there we are.
Of course, the EU Foreign Policy Chief, Joseph, Joseph, that's Joseph without an H, just weird.
Joseph Borrell said the 27-nation bloc, quote, deeply regrets the suspension of funds and added that the UN Health Agency is now needed more than ever to combat the pandemic.
No, you were needed more than ever.
about three months ago when you actually could have helped this situation. Now essentially what you're seeing on screen is what is happening. The WHO is just blindly being guided by Communist China as they basically allowed this pandemic to spread uncontrollably. Borrell added that quote only by joining forces can we overcome this crisis that knows no borders. Of course he has to throw in the no borders thing. We're all in this together. Of course the virus does
have distinct borders. You can tell very clearly where some countries succeed and other countries fail. Some countries enact draconian quarantine measures while others do not do so and you can see the differences there. The borders, the importance of borders has been made absurdly obvious by this entire pandemic but of course they're using this to continue to try to destroy the very borders that would have prevented this pandemic from going as far as it truly has.
Of course, the U.S. is the WHO's largest single donor.
We contribute roughly $400 to $500 million per year to the WHO, while China offers only about $40 million.
The money saved will go to areas that, quote, most need it, Trump asserted.
A.K.A. America!
Stop giving our money.
Stop stealing our money, I should say.
Stop stealing my money to give to foreign organizations that hate me and want me destroyed.
Thank you, Donald Trump.
Thank you, by God.
More on the other side when we get back.
And at 3.30, that interview with Brandon Gray.
You won't want to miss it. More with the WHO on the other side.
unidentified
Have you heard 5G causes coronavirus?
Well, here's where the claim first came from.
It's from this Facebook post from March 19th.
The poster claims to have done some research and made a map overlaying the new 5G towers with the COVID-19 cases, then claims how it's weird the towers are right by the hot spots.
Well, first, the poster only used AT&T's tower data, no other company.
We Messed Up Here00:08:37
unidentified
Two, where those towers are, they're based on population density.
So where there are more people, there are going to be more cases of COVID-19.
And three, there is just no evidence to support the poster's claim.
So this is false. 5G towers are not causing coronavirus.
Absolutely absurd. Let me finish off here real quick with this withdrawing of money from the WHO. That has, of course, the globalists in the media, the government and elsewhere absolutely furious.
And you notice that this is the continual pattern, right?
What was the impeachment about?
Oh, yeah. Remember earlier this year?
Remember earlier this year, this year that we are just over a quarter through, there was a huge impeachment battle and that was the most important thing in the entire world.
Yeah, that was this year, ladies and gentlemen.
It's just, time is crazy these days.
But remember, that was all about...
Money going to the Ukraine.
You know, Donald Trump wanted to stop sending or at least pause the money and say, hey, why are we sending money?
What are they doing with this money?
And that, oh, you can't do that.
You can't stop giving Americans money away to people who may or may not hate them.
That's what really makes the globalists angry, and that's what we're seeing here again.
So the United States contributes half a billion dollars per year to the WHO. China offers only about $40 million.
Trump goes on to say, quote, He said on Tuesday, accusing the WHO of failing to adequately keep the international community apprised of the threat of coronavirus.
The WHO failed in this duty, he says, and must be held accountable.
He added that the WHO had ignored credible information in December 2019 that the virus could be transmitted from human to human.
Last week, Representative Mike McCaul, Republican of Texas, said the WHO and the Chinese Communist Party were, quote, co-conspirators in allegedly hiding information about the novel coronavirus in its early stages and called it, quote, the worst cover-up in human history while calling for the leadership of the WHO to step down.
And of course, again, I'm reminded of We're good to go.
We did everything right.
We did everything we possibly could.
The FBI, the police, we showed up right after everything had happened.
We cleaned up.
We were there within 25 minutes.
And we're great and we're awesome and we did everything right.
And no, we didn't prevent this or stop anyone from doing it.
The shooter was at home playing video games when we picked him up.
But we are awesome.
We are great. And do not question us.
Give us more power.
That's essentially what's happening.
where Donald Trump is having the right response, which is okay, you're the WHO, you're the World Health Organization.
The whole point of your existence is to be ready for something like a pandemic to help prevent the spread of some incredible new disease that threatens to wipe out the human race.
They've utterly failed.
They have completely failed, utterly.
The response should not be to give them more money.
The response should not be to just more, you know, greater empower them.
No, no, it should be to say, what are they doing?
Why are we paying for this?
We don't need this if they don't help.
So you take the money back.
You take the money back until they straighten up and fly right.
The senators, many senators have pinned a letter announcing the investigation of the WHO and have delivered it to the World Health Organization.
A number of GOP senators delivered a letter to the WHO on Tuesday announcing they are investigating the organization's involvement with China's cover-up on the true scale of the coronavirus outbreak.
The letter outlines six key questions and requests for information.
Number one, what protocols and procedures did the WHO have in place for epidemics, suspected pandemics, and pandemics prior to December 2019?
I'll go ahead and answer these.
While I'm going through them, I'll go ahead and answer them for the WHO. The plan they had was take control of the media, put laws in place to stop people from spreading, quote, disinformation, open the borders, and obey China.
Okay, so that's question number one.
done. Question number two, please outline what steps were taken by the WHO in accordance with protocols and procedures suspected pandemics as a result of the coronavirus.
Yeah, nothing. Yeah, nothing. Really, what they did was a lot of nothing. They really helped in nothing. And the most important thing they did was nothing. What did the W.
When did the WHO first know China had cases of a potential SARS like virus? You know, December 2019, a full month before it actually spread to the United States. I'll go ahead and answer that. When did the WHO team first arrive in China and start investigating the coronavirus? It's a very good question. I don't know the answer to that.
If I had to guess, I would say they basically just showed up and China told them what the deal was and they did no investigation.
That's a guess. Who at the WHO was in charge of coordinating coronavirus response with the Chinese Communist Party?
Maybe the communist in charge.
I don't know. And six, do any members of the WHO leadership receive financial compensation outside their WHO salaries?
If so, please describe.
And again, I'll just point out that this is the problem with international organizations like this that have no governmental oversight.
We don't know what they're doing.
We don't know what the point of their existence is.
We don't know whether they actually are trying to help people or they're going for their own country or their own ideology.
We don't know. It's totally just this opaque, blind organization that is under no government at all, can do whatever it wants, has incredible power, and we just pay money to it and don't ask anything about it.
Of course, the AP News reports China didn't warn the public of the likely pandemic for six years.
Key days, nearly a week in which that virus was allowed to spread.
And China, like the good communists they are, saved face, right?
And this is the problem with communism in general.
If you have, I don't know, say a bioweapon leak from a lab, is it more important to protect your people and warn about this and say, guys, we messed up, we need to put a lid on this and do things to prevent this tragedy from expanding?
Or Or do you save face?
I mean, you don't want to make the Chinese government look bad.
You're a part of the Communist Party, and if you messed up, it means we all messed up.
So it's better just to bury this, try to make this look better.
Look at things like Chernobyl, right?
Everybody watched that show and loved it and recognized how caring more about upholding the appearance of a solid political state has disastrous consequences when it interferes with the honesty that is needed to deal with certain massive travesties.
That's the problem with communism in general, and that's what we saw take place in China, which is why now we are all locked in our homes.
Of course, this is from TheInfoWars.com.
The WHO blocked doctors from ordering border controls to stop the spread of coronavirus.
Paul Judge Watson reports the WHO blocked doctors from urging countries to impose border patrols to stop the spread of coronavirus.
While the organization was demanding countries impose zero border controls, it was also campaigning against the profiling of international travelers in order to prevent the, quote, stigmatization of Chinese people.
You don't want hurt feelings.
No, no. We can't have Chinese people getting their feelings hurt.
Instead, we just have to destroy the universe.
We have to destroy the economy.
We have to just let thousands of people die because we have to save face with the Chinese.
Now, the Department of Defense is getting into it, saying it's taking a hard look at evidence that the coronavirus came from the Wuhan lab.
You know, we used to be We still are, but we say Infowars tomorrow's news today.
It's taking people so long to get to the truth now.
It's really like next year's news today.
By 2021, maybe they'll get around to reporting what Infowars knew three months ago, which is this came from a Wuhan lab.
This was a bioengineered weapon that either escaped or was purposefully put out.
That's Infowars tomorrow's. This is Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroer today.
Actually, he was my guest a little while ago when he stood up and shouted down Joe Biden here in Austin.
He is a local troublemaker, you might say.
A local activist, not afraid to go up and stand up against the globalist machinations that we see go on in our fair city.
His name is Brandon Gray.
You can find him on YouTube at Just Another Channel.
But first, I want to go to this video of him bullhorning the state capitol yesterday, and then we'll come in and talk to him about exactly what's going on with the coronavirus, the orders, and the protests, and all that.
So first, here's Brandon Gray from Just Another Channel yesterday bullhorning the Austin state capitol.
unidentified
The world's got the blues, and baby, I'm your troubadour.
Okay? We're out here talking to people, and we're bullhorning as well.
It's time to open up these businesses.
Thanks for tuning in. Smash that like and subscribe.
unidentified
You know, everybody might be scared, but the biggest thing to remember is It's a something unpredictable, but you can get by it You have who you have, let's tell you, of your life Can't forget about love in the middle of the night, we forgot Let's forget about that Bill Gates says you will stay locked down for 18 months Unless there's a vaccine I'm going to go get a drink.
18 months, Austin, Texas.
18 months without a vaccine?
Hashtag, who elected Bill Gates?
Quizno, we want our subs toasted, not our American liberties.
The people that we did run into seemed to agree with us.
There's a strange phenomenon going on, Harrison, where the only people who don't agree that we need to open up and get commerce going are the insane, never-Trumper, leftist hipsters in Austin.
Yeah, yeah, and it's it's very weird how they've totally co-opted these people to be the snitches to just you know Call out their neighbors and to be the enforcers of the the political will in this very like hypnotic sort of way where these people just don't question it all and they're they're actually willing to go out and spread the message even If they don't understand it or whatever So you got a lot of support while you're out there at least of the people that you know There weren't a lot of people out there But are the people that were were generally supportive and
we see today this headline from WWJ news radio Furious crowd gathers at Michigan Capitol to protest the stay-at-home order I'll show some clips in the next segment of people doing their in-car protest To me, it seems like people are finally getting sick of this.
They're finally saying enough is enough.
Let us back to work. Do you think we've reached a tipping point here?
If you have these catastrophes that forces everybody to close, the people that can weather it are the people with the trillion dollar, you know, a year backing, or Apple or Google just became a trillion dollar company earlier this year.
Amazon, of course, is just skyrocketing in popularity and profitability, as are places like Walmart, It's outrageous.
It's time. You know, I'm right there with you, and I feel like that's what's been frustrating me the most about what's going on with coronavirus is sort of the feeling of just like helplessness as everybody just sort of sits around and waits to be told what to do.
It's pretty infuriating, honestly, and I've been waiting for somebody to do something like this, so I'm very supportive of that.
Now, some people are going out and holding protests.
You have this It's an anti-Governor Whitmer, Operation Gridlock.
The traffic there extends from miles and miles.
Here's a short little clip, a little snippet of people talking about why they are protesting there at Michigan's Capitol.
unidentified
So very conscious of social distancing and the rest of it.
I hope Whitmer understands that she's not just going to be able to rule Michigan like other politicians rule China or something like that.
We're going to take our liberties and we're going to keep them and we're going to fight for them.
As was the goal of the demonstration, cars are creating gridlock.
An organizer acknowledges it's artificial gridlock when most people are staying home, but the goal was to create the big visual.
Governor Whitmer said she respects the right to protest, but she had asked people to do so in a manner that doesn't jeopardize anyone's health.
And the Conservative Coalition posted guidelines about remaining in vehicles, but as you can see through the video, that was not followed across the board and people are gathering up in such a way that is not respecting the social distancing guidelines entirely.
Some 5,000 people, or nearly 5,000 people, I should say, posted on Facebook that they intended to attend this particular protest.
So that's actually better than where we're seeing other places where people are trying to hold church services and are actually being shut down by the government.
But this is good, and hopefully we'll see this grow.
The story, of course, furious crowd gathers at Michigan Capitol to protest stay-at-home order.
But I just want to read some of these headlines and get your reaction, Brandon.
From ABC7 in Chicago, social distancing measures may be necessary up until 2022 to contain the coronavirus pandemic.
From the Guardian, they say growth and surveillance may be hard to scale back after pandemic, experts say.
Then of course you have from MSN.com, COVID-19 checkpoints are now targeting out-of-state residents.
They draw complaints and legal scrutiny, where basically they're setting up checkpoints in between states now.
You also have this, judge forces McHenry County, Illinois Health Department to provide names of all the COVID-19 patients to the police.
DC extends their stay-at-home order through May 15th.
Doesn't sound like they're slowing down anytime soon.
And you know what I'll say is, what really, one of my main motivations for coming out and doing what we did on Monday, I'm boiling down Bill Gates footage, right?
I got four hours of Bill Gates that I've condensed down into about 20 minutes.
And it is soul-shattering.
To hear this guy speak.
He's the one talking about 18 months.
And hopefully, if our great leaders up in the vaccine sky can save us, then we can all be let free by 2022.
They're almost predicating our freedom on a vaccine.
I mean, they're making people essentially clamor for a vaccine because they've been told this is the key to let you out of your house.
It's truly sickening.
And to me, the shutdown clearly has had more negative impacts than the virus itself, just from people losing their jobs and having to go on welfare.
I mean, we don't know down river how bad, how many deaths this will cause, how many suicides or just lack of nutrition or just everything that's gonna come down from spending $6 trillion in three months and shutting off the economy.
What it is, Harrison, is it's like throughout history we've had these red pills, right?
JFK was a huge red pill.
9-11, huge red pill.
You move forward to recent times.
Russian collusion, huge red pill.
Kavanaugh hearings, Jussie Smollett, the Ukraine gate, huge red pills.
Now here comes coronavirus and if you're not woke Yet, if coronavirus doesn't wake you up to the corrupt media, look at the president's hearings right now.
He is calling them out.
Listen to your president, people.
Listen to your president.
Swallow the red pill.
This is the biggest red pill you're ever going to find.
And unfortunately, this red pill is costing American lives.
Thank you, China. Yeah, seriously, and hopefully people can recognize this and actually are brave enough to take the red pill and say, everything I believed maybe was not so true.
Now, this headline just appeared on Fortune.
The IRS has just launched their Get My Payment portal for tracking your stimulus check status.
So, Brandon, I'm sure you're eagerly awaiting your Trump bucks, your bribe to stay at home.
I think the pertinent question is, What are you going to buy from the InfoWars store when you receive your stimulus check?
By extension, you have my wife to thank because I never thought to get these glasses, but then she made me and now I wear them all the time and I like them and people like you are bringing them back in style.
It's good stuff, man. It's strong.
So, folks, of course, people like Brandon here are why I'm able to have a job, why any of us here are able to keep the information flowing because he goes to Infowarsstore.com and makes so many great purchases.
So, Vaso Beats, that's what you're running low on.
What's your favorite product from the Infowarsstore?
Absolutely. And I just gotta, first I gotta say, the first thing that attracted me to your channel, I guess you could say, is the name, Actual Justice Warrior.
I think that's simple but brilliant.
And I, you know, I always make the joke that, you know, all these different types of justice, social justice, economic justice, all this, it's not justice.
It's like, it's like turkey bacon.
It's not bacon. It's just pretending to be, right?
Well, I have an educational background in criminal justice, and it's pretty much for the exact reasons that you laid out, is that social, environmental, racial justice, those are all forms of group justice and are, in fact, forms of injustice.
So I made it actual justice in order to compensate for that.
What happened was I started opening with an unrelated intro about different things, so the theme song didn't really fit in there, but it will come back in random videos here and throughout.
But I know it used to be in every video, and it was weird, and a lot of people in my comments are missing it.
Oh, yeah. Yeah, I didn't think I would because when I first started watching, it was always like, you're like, you're very happy and you're, you know, very normal presentation.
And then like your intro were these rabbit masks and this kind of, you know, disorienting like noise.
And it was so weird that I that I grew to love it.
What is the rabbit mask? Why is what is what is this symbol about?
The rabbit mask is just something I had from earlier on and I needed something in my background to add a little texture because if you watch my videos from way back it was basically blank except for the rabbit mask and I kind of built everything around it.
So I decided to keep it because you know you don't want to lose everything and how you start as you progress through you know your channel.
But there's no, like, secret behind the rabbit mask.
I have an educational background in criminal justice.
I used to do courses in terrorism, like video courses at a college in terrorism, criminal justice, and other things for criminal justice college.
And after I left that, I decided I didn't want to work for anybody again, so I started making videos.
And one of the things I had a big issue with in the media is the way that they covered crime-related stories because they were just not—it's a lot of journalism when you're talking about crime-related stories, like media outlets copying other media outlets rather than going to original court documents.
The absolute best betrayal narrative that is going on right now under our very noses is the betrayal narrative that is brewing between the Bernie Sanders progressives and the Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez progressives, which is weird because that is typically the same group of people.
But it turns out that according to the Bernie Sanders progressive wing, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez might not be progressive enough.
I kid you not.
The woman who paused the COVID stimulus bill to give this weird arm-waving speech on the House floor We have to go into this vote eyes wide open.
Apparently not progressive enough for the Bernie Sanders wing of the Democratic Party anymore.
The woman that is so race-obsessed, so obsessed with identity politics that she believes that the current crisis that we're all dealing with is a racist crisis that requires reparations as a solution, despite the fact that the crisis is caused by a virus, which by its very nature cannot tell the difference between the races, is too far to the right, Not the left, too far to the right for some people in the Sanders wing of the Democratic Party.
Now, the reason Ocasio-Cortez is seen as too far right by the Bernie Sanders base and a betrayer of Bernie Sanders is due in large part to the pettiest thing that you're ever going to hear.
But I'm going to hold off on that and start with stuff a little bit more of substance so that you can understand what has basically been laying the groundwork for this betrayal narrative.
And that is Ocasio-Cortez's break with the Justice Democrats.
Now, whispers of an Ocasio-Cortez betrayal narrative began to start among progressive circles.
Last year, in August of 2019, when she fired Stafford, made famous by Mr. Reagan.
Obviously, the Democratic National Committee does not want Bernie Sanders to be the nominee.
That was true in 2016, and that is true in 2020.
And they did work against Sanders in 2016.
And we can basically infer, based on past actions, that they probably, behind the scenes, worked against Sanders in 2020.
But the problem that I have with this narrative is that it assumes that had the DNC not done that, Sanders would have won.
And I just don't see that when I'm looking into the numbers.
Like, one of the reasons why I said Joe Biden would be the candidate all the way back in January of 2019, and every step of the way through this primary process, even when he dropped in the national polling to like 8%, Was because in the Democratic primary, demographics matter more than anything.
And the way the primaries are structured, you have to get black voters in order to build momentum and win.
And Joe Biden never fell above 39% in the polling among black voters.
And Hillary Clinton beat Bernie by 3.5 million votes, largely on the back of black Southern Democratic voters.
So if you don't learn the mistakes from the past, you're doomed to repeat them in the future.
And I think that's what's happening to Bernie Sanders.
Yeah, it's really interesting because it's like you're actually kind of giving great advice to the Bernie Sanders campaign if they would have listened to you last year.
And I remember you saying that.
And I actually thought you were wrong.
I thought Biden would never have made it this far.
But then we saw, you know, Super Tuesday and everything.
He really pulled it out. So, you know, bravo to you.
You saw this coming a long way away.
Of course, I don't think... I mean, do you think Biden actually has a chance?
What's your, just casting forward even farther, what's your prediction for the election?
You think he's just gonna get blown out of the water, or is it gonna be a close run thing?
Honestly, the COVID-19 is such a black swan event that anything could happen from this point on.
I thought that he would have had a better chance in 2016 than he'll have in 2020 before all of this.
But now that the virus is out there, it's going to depend a lot on people's perception of how Trump is handling it.
Because regardless of whether or not you believe, and I'm pretty sure you understand federalism, that the president isn't in charge of this virus, not really.
Regardless of that fact, most people look to the president for guidance.
So however good of a job he does on this is going to determine his electoral success.
And obviously, if we fall into a Great Depression, that's not going to help him.
Yeah, yeah. We're getting thrown all sorts of curveballs, and I think Trump would agree with you.
The headline today, Trump wants his name on the coronavirus stimulus checks, even if it delays them, because I think he understands people need to see I'm the one sending them money because that's the way that everything is perceived.
He's the one in charge, and he's taking advantage of that, which is interesting.
Now, another one of the things that you bring up fairly often in your videos that I think is super interesting is the way that often the Bernie bros or the progressive left will distort polls, you know, position polls, where they say, do you like Medicare for All?
And people say, oh, free healthcare?
Yeah, I love that. And then they explain the details and get into the dirt, and they say, oh, maybe I don't like that quite as much.
Right. Right. So a lot of people take the Kaiser Family Foundation, like the headline poll, to say that the majority of Americans support Medicare for All.
But in reality, even though you and I know what Medicare for All is, we know what a national health care plan, what people are actually saying when they're answering that question is that there should be a health care plan in the nation, not necessarily that they want nationalized health care.
And when you delve into the actual numbers where they pull the individual tenants of Medicare for All, We're good to go.
The numbers tank to like 30%.
So it goes from 55% approval rating nationally to 30%.
To say that if everything is told to somebody about Medicare for All, they don't support it, but somehow because they support the name Medicare for All, that that means they're in favor of it and they're aligned with Bernie is just disingenuous.
Right, it's almost like, do you want free ice cream?
Yes. Okay, I'm going to kick you in the shins when I give it to you.
Well, maybe I don't want it so much, right?
You actually have to balance the risk versus reward, I guess you could say.
And, you know, to me it's one of these things that it's almost idiomatic or...
It feels like cheesy to say, but it's like they rely on low information voters.
The lower information that you have, the less you understand the machinations of government, the more likely you are to trust them, the more likely you are to go with their programs.
Do you think this is a conscious thing?
Do you think this is just a natural occurrence that people aren't doing it on purpose?
But what is it about keeping low information voters in order to maintain their power as the Democrats?
I mean, I think that they don't want to talk about the tenets of Medicare for all.
We saw that early in the debates when Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, all these candidates, anytime they got any reasonable pushback, they'd say that's a Republican talking point and try to move on from the topic.
So there is there is a move in the Democratic Party to push their agenda without telling you what they're actually pushing for.
So I guess that is trying to you're you're Trying to obscure information from the voters.
I don't know if you're necessarily creating low information voters.
I haven't seen that headline, but I'm not surprised by it.
This is basically the monkey's paw of Bill Maher's wish for a recession to get rid of Trump that we're dealing with right now.
You asked for it, and you ended up getting a pandemic-induced recession.
So if that's what you wanted to change the person...
in the White House, then I guess I hope you're happy with it.
Like, I don't know.
Like, for me, even if I had, you know, Obama in office, Biden in office, God forbid Bernie Sanders in office, I wouldn't want the country to go into a depression.
I wouldn't want my neighbors to be losing their jobs, people to get sick and, you know.
Well, I think that means you're a decent person with basic humanity, unlike some of our opponents Can you stay for one more segment?
Are you on for one more segment? Sure. Okay, awesome.
All right. More with the actual Justice Warrior on the other side.
You can find him on YouTube, actual Justice Warrior.
His Twitter is AJWSean, Sean Fitzgerald, the actual Justice Warrior.
More on YouTube. I'm a libertarian.
I think you call yourself a libertarian as well, as are a lot of people, guests here on the show.
But it seems to me, and I don't know if you've noticed this, there has been a distinct anti-libertarian bent amongst people that maybe used to be more on our side.
And to me, that's upsetting because libertarianism has gotten this bad reputation, really, of being ineffective or being nonsensical.
And now people are saying, no, we need to be authoritarian, just authoritarian on our side.
To me, that's Annoying, because I'm still a libertarian, because to me, that just defines liberty as my highest goal, and, you know, that's that.
I basically, anything, any position I try to hold, I try to maximize the liberty of the people involved, and usually that means cutting down on governmental power.
But just, can you talk about that?
Have you noticed this, and just, what's your opinion on modern libertarianism?
Yeah, well, I do consider myself a libertarian, and there's been a recent pushback that's just related to the virus, like the idea that there are no libertarians in the middle of a pandemic or anything like that, which is a little bit ridiculous.
Everyone knows all the hardcore libertarians are living in their bunkers with three-year supply of food right now, and they're totally fine.
But there is an attack, and it's the same attack just amplified on libertarians that we're somehow more cruel because we don't want to use the force of government in order to take care of the needs of people.
But I would argue that that level of compulsion, like what's required to achieve an agenda put forward by many in the Democratic Party and some people who are in right-leaning circles, is far more cruel than letting people Come together voluntarily and figure out their own problems.
There's a lot that can be done through charity that doesn't need to be compelled by government.
And we've seen when government kind of takes up the room, like when they become the 800-pound gorilla in the room, a lot of charities die off.
And I think charities are far more effective and that their ideology is actually far crueler than the one you or I would put forward.
And I think just, you know, a lot of people just sort of, they either take liberty for granted or they just don't factor it into their, you know, the calculus that they're doing.
And it's worrying for me because I think there is a distinct attractiveness to the sort of authoritarian right that is not necessarily helpful for our side, and yet we're seeing it grow.
What's your reaction to it?
Do you try to fight back against it or are you trying to just sort of express yourself in the way you feel and who cares what other people think?
Yeah, I find it sort of a tightrope you have to walk where I go, well, I like 90% of what this guy says, but then he goes too far with it, so do I associate with him and say I'm for him, but I'm not for that?
Anyway, it's all kind of messy, and I just appreciate you out there as a just sort of diehard libertarian, and I know that whatever topic is coming up, you are going to have a principled stance that's not necessarily predicated on power politics or anything like that, but rather just getting down to the actual justice like your name denotes.
But sort of moving back to where we were just a minute ago, what do you think the likelihood is that Biden will be replaced coming up?
And like you said, we're in a sort of black swan event and who knows what's going to happen.
But again, I just want your prediction as to the health of Joe Biden and the actual feasibility of him being elected president or the DNC sort of pulling a switcheroo there at the end.
So my thing with Joe Biden being replaced is obviously health is the wild card that nobody can predict.
If something happens to Joe Biden, they'll have to replace him.
And that picture of him is hilarious for that Babylon Bee article.
But yeah, obviously that's the wild card and all that.
But absent Joe Biden dying, and I'm not rooting for that in any way, shape or form, he's going to be the candidate because they put all this effort into Joe Biden.
And right now, I think the Bernie Sanders supporters are as much as the Hillary Clinton election.
They're basically going to fall in line and vote for Joe Biden, probably more so because Biden isn't as toxic a figure as Hillary Clinton.
But if you go and replace with an Andrew Cuomo, then they're walking away because they're going to say, you prop this guy up and then you didn't even pick him when he got the most votes.
That's crazy.
And Andrew Cuomo, I'm a New Yorker.
I've known Andrew Cuomo was running for president since his first term as governor.
There is no way he's going to take this opportunity to replace Biden because it's almost a guaranteed He may be the flavor of the month right now, but that's right now.
Yeah, yeah. And it's almost like from Cuomo, it's like he wants to be captain of the ship, but the ship is sinking.
So maybe he'll wait for the next ship to come around and try to captain that.
But isn't this sort of an inherent flaw?
And this is what I saw in 2016, is when you have a top-down ideology, of course you fall into line.
So people, when they were disappointed at Bernie Sanders, it's like, don't you understand this is his ideology is going along with the power structure?
And so, you know, I was sort of Knew that was coming in 2016.
Even more so now, it's like people who are surprised that Bernie would drop out and support Biden.
What have they been watching?
Isn't this an inherent problem with the top-down ideology?
Yeah, and it's also—it is a problem with the top-down ideology.
And Bernie Sanders, as much of an independent senator as he's been in his career and congressman, he's always endorsed a Democratic nominee.
Anybody surprised by this hasn't been paying attention to his career.
But in terms of strategy, it's a terrible strategy because he's been saying he'll endorse the nominee no matter what since the beginning.
If you remember Donald Trump, when he was asked if he would endorse the nominee in the Republican primaries, he said, yeah, if it's me, if not, we'll see.
And that scared people.
They're like, oh, if he runs a third-party race, then maybe my candidate will lose no matter what, so I have to support him now.
Bernie Sanders does not understand the basics of leverage in politics, and that's another reason why he lost this race.
Go there and subscribe. His Twitter, AJWSean, is how you follow him there.
More on the other side. Don't go anywhere, folks.
Well, we're halfway through the show, ladies and gentlemen, and I think it's gone swimmingly.
Look at that crew working hard back there, setting up the enormous amount of guests that I threw at them at the last minute, as well as videos and others.
And they're still bringing me stories.
Up to the minute, but we're going to steer away from coronavirus for just the next couple of minutes here.
We're going to talk about some other stuff, but we'll get back to it in a little bit.
Where was I going to go? Okay, I'm going to show these videos.
So yeah, we're going way away from coronavirus.
We're going way away from modernity itself.
We are staying away from the headline news and going back to our past to hopefully find some inspiration there that can free us here in the future.
We're going to go to clip 13.
There's an old YouTube channel.
Not an old channel, but the the guy who runs it is a cameraman and a documentary filmmaker Who has worked for PBS and all sorts of places for decades and so he uploads all his old footage from the 1970s up to?
the 1990s of raw interviews that were then edited into PBS Documentaries, but he just uploads the raw footage And it's really great and I'll forget the I'll forget the name of it here in a second to tell people to go there but he was doing a video about race and social justice and the the movement in the 1960s to bring about Civil rights and he had this interview with a man about growing up in Philadelphia in the 1950s in a black neighborhood And I thought it was so
incredible the way that this guy talked about the 1950s as a black man in South Philly and I just want you as you watch this as He's describing growing up in South Philadelphia in 1950 think about what it would be like for someone to describe Growing up in that very same neighborhood today Would you hear the same description?
If not, how would it be different?
We'll show three clips from this gentleman.
1950s black Philadelphia neighborhood.
unidentified
Take it away. I grew up in South Philadelphia.
We didn't realize it was segregated.
All we knew is that our neighborhood was all black, and we weren't even that conscious of color because the people who owned the store down the street were black, the tailor, the restaurant owners, the undertaker, everybody in the neighborhood.
And it was a very small street, working.
Everybody worked, blue collar, essentially.
Very close-knit neighborhood.
Everyone had over four children.
We played in the streets together.
On Saturday morning, our parents came out and the hucksters came around and our parents purchased things.
We had to go buy ice because there were no refrigerators then.
We had a coal stove, so the younger kids were responsible for putting wood and coal into the stove and keeping it going.
And the level of interest in education was just profound.
I mean, even to this day, I don't think I've ever had such a positive educational experience than I did in my first six years because school was an integral part of the community.
And you can hear as he describes it, he has a nostalgic, loving, warm feeling for growing up in South Philadelphia in the 1950s.
A sense of community, a sense of safeness, a sense of family that is absent now.
And to me, this is a tragedy on...
Really unimaginable levels that through government intervention, essentially solely government intervention, you go from this cohesive, safe, really beautiful sounding society, community that he has there, and look at South Philadelphia today.
Is there any interest in education or is it all crime?
Are there any families?
Is it kids playing in the street together?
Or is it crack dens and single motherhood?
It's disturbing what has happened to the black community.
And I think just juxtaposing what it's like now to what this guy talked about in the 1950s is really eye-opening to me.
And of course, I found the... The YouTube channel is David Hoffman.
David Hoffman is the guy who uploaded this.
So let's go to the second clip here of this man talking about growing up in the 1950s in South Philadelphia.
unidentified
The children of the late 40s, 50s, who grew up in the 60s and were active in the movement came from good, solid families.
Up until 1959, 78% of all black families had a man and a woman in them.
That's a fact. Teen pregnancy was looked down upon.
Sexual activity among kids, everyone bragged about it.
No one did it. But if someone became pregnant, if there was an aunt in the South, they would go there.
So that the moral standards and ethical standards for people living in those communities was extremely high.
It had little to do with your income.
Many of us were poor without realizing that we were poor.
I think this interview is so important because it so shatters so much of the discussion about race here in America today.
It wasn't an outside force that came in and, you know, fixed the black community or helped the black community get somewhere good.
You can tell in the 1950s, they had families, right?
Those numbers, I think, are inverse now.
He was saying 78% had a mother and a father in the home.
I think it's reversed now that something like 78% are actually single mothers now in the black community not even to mention the number of abortions That are taking place, but you can see there It shatters the narrative because what was what what what made it a powerful good community?
It was the families. It was the community it was it was the people of the community themselves you know upkeeping this level of you know, comfort and livelihood and lawfulness and all this sort of stuff.
And it's the outside force, the government coming in with their big, you know, bag of money and their big, their gifts, their wonderful gifts to the black community that has utterly destroyed that community, utterly destroyed the ability for these people to maintain their own level of comfort and, you know, order and all these sorts of things that you can see this guy express existed in 1950s Philadelphia and yet is...
Utterly absent in that same neighborhood today.
It really is stark and it really lays out very clearly just what is necessary for a good life and how that has been taken away, right?
He talks about the family, the parents, the involvement, the education.
You know, money doesn't have to do with it.
That's another one, right? It's, well, it's just crime is more prevalent amongst poor people.
Well, that's not true if you have A decent community that looks after each other and themselves and is not reliant on some, you know, pie in the sky, you know, Uncle Sam for support and food and all that.
It's, again, actually tragic what has occurred when you juxtapose what this guy is talking about to where that same neighborhood has come today.
So here's the last clip of this man from the YouTube channel, David Hoffman.
unidentified
I mean, the discipline was in the community.
I mean, you didn't speak back to an adult.
The thought of an elderly person being disrespected was just unheard of.
And teachers were never disrespected.
And if you misbehaved, you would be spanked by a neighbor.
When your mother got home or father got home, you were spanked there.
And God forbid a teacher should ever have to send for your parents.
And they had to take off work.
That was it. And so it imposed a kind of discipline.
And again, it was a discipline that had little to do with how much money you...
There was a sense of comfort, a sense of well-being, a sense of oneness between the school and the community.
He's describing something that needs no top-down control, that needs no outside force coming in to correct it.
They were doing fine.
They were doing well. He talks later in that video, and I suggest you look it up.
The YouTube video name is He Loved Growing Up in 1950s Black Philadelphia.
The channel is David Hoffman.
You should go and listen to it because he was a big mover in the civil rights movement.
of the 1960s but his whole thing was he was like there are laws that discriminated against me and you know when I went up to a counter they would serve all the white people first and I'd miss my bus and he's like that's what I was fighting against but I wasn't fighting for government control I wasn't fighting for you know forced integration into white neighborhoods he's like I just wanted the government to leave us alone well you know What they got was the opposite.
What they got was a lot more government, and in the ensuing 50 years, we've seen the utter collapse of the black community.
It's embarrassing. I'm going to do a little tease here because tomorrow I will be doing a live stream.
It'll probably be around 6 p.m.
I want to get done with it before the kill stream starts with my guest in the next hour, Revenge of the Cis.
I don't want to compete with them, of course, so I'll try to finish it before that.
But I was going to do a report on this document here.
I'll tell you so you can do document cam.
It's called Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.
This was put out by the Rockefeller Foundation in coordination with the GBN, that's the Global Business Network.
I was going to do a report on this, but as I opened it, as I began reading, as I began doing research about the authors and funders of this and the many connections they have in the neocon world, I realized that this was a larger topic than a mere report can handle, so I will be going through this entire topic.
Document this dossier with a fine-toothed comb.
Be revealing all of the occult research I have done in determining who funded this and why.
And I'll be giving all of that to you tomorrow, live streaming on my YouTube channel and my Twitter.
That's Off Limits News.
You can follow me on Twitter at Off Limits News.
I'll be going live there to break this down fully.
But just to give you a little tease here, this document was published in 2010.
And basically it is what they call a scenario planning workshop.
They come up with scenarios that they pose and they try to look into the future and they try to plan what they're going to do when these certain scenarios occur.
And this is the...
This is like the organization controller of all of the other world organizations, right?
You have thousands, tens of thousands of these non-governmental organizations and governmental organizations that are all working towards the same goal, which is globalism, which is greater control of humanity as a species.
And in order to all get on the same page, in order to all coordinate all of their various machinations, they require sort of a central planning group.
And that's what things like the Rockefeller Foundation serve as, as a central planning organ of the new world order.
And this is how they proliferate their ideas, their strategies to the rest of their minions Rockefeller Foundation is one.
Of course, you have in life meetups like Bilderberg and Davos where they all get together and get on the same page so for the next year they can all be working towards their nefarious goals.
But this particular document came out in 2010, and it was projecting into the future to about 2030.
So we're about halfway through the future that this document attempted to envision.
So I'm going to read this scenario narrative.
So this document contains four scenario narratives that they try to lay out in order to predict what's going to happen in the future.
Remind you, 2010, this came out as a prediction.
Looking into the future, about 20 years, we're about halfway through that time period.
This first scenario is called Lockstep.
In 2012, the pandemic that the world had been anticipating for years finally hit.
Unlike 2009's H1N1, the new influenza strange, originating from wild geese, was extremely virulent and deadly.
Even the most pandemic-prepared nations were quickly overwhelmed when the virus streaked around the world, infecting nearly 20% of the global population and killing 8 million in just seven months, the majority of them young, healthy adults.
The pandemic also had a deadly effect on economies.
International mobility of both people and goods screeched to a halt, debilitating industries like tourism and breaking global supply chains.
Even locally, normally bustling shops and office buildings sat empty for months, devoid of both employees and customers.
The pandemic blanketed the planet, though disproportionate numbers died in Africa, Southeast Asia, and Central America where the virus spread like wildfire in the absence of official containment protocols.
But even in developed countries, containment was a challenge.
The United States' initial policy of, quote, strongly discouraging citizens from flying proved deadly in its leniency, accelerating the spread of the virus not just within the U.S., but across borders.
However, a few countries did fare better.
China in particular.
The Chinese government's quick imposition and enforcement of mandatory quarantine for all citizens, as well as its instant and near hermetic sealing off of its borders, saved millions of lives, stopping the spread of the virus far earlier than in other countries and enabling a swifter post-pandemic recovery.
It's a plan, folks.
It's all a plan. This is all according to plan.
China's government was not the only one.
This document continues.
From 2010, I remind you.
China's government was not the only one that took extreme measures to protect citizens from risk and exposure.
During the pandemic, national leaders around the world flexed their authority and imposed airtight rules and restrictions.
From the mandatory wearing of face masks, literally came out today.
Peabody's mandatory face mask order went into effect at midnight.
midnight, those who don't obey can be fined up to $1,000.
Mandatory wearing a face mask to body temperature checks at entries to communal spaces like train stations and supermarkets.
Even after the pandemic faded, this more authoritarian control and oversight of citizens and their activities stuck and even intensified in order to protect themselves from the spread of increasingly global problems.
From pandemics to transnational terrorism to environmental crises and rising poverty, leaders around the world took a firmer grip.
Folks...
Come on! I mean, these are the white papers.
We have the documents.
This was published by the Rockefeller Foundation.
And tune in tomorrow to Off Limits as I break down exactly who funded this, who wrote it, what their plans are, what they've been involved in in the past, how this all relates to the decades-long control sought by these people in power.
And this is what you have to realize.
We... Tend to experience things, you know, in real time.
As the virus accelerates, most people out there, of course, we've studied this.
We know about a lot of this stuff, so we can sort of forecast and see this sort of stuff coming and hopefully prepare against it.
But for most people who are just looking to the mainstream media, they're reacting, you know, oh my gosh, it's a virus.
What are we going to do? Oh, now they're, you know, the WHO is warning that it's all...
But it's all been planned.
These things that are happening right now are the fulfillment of plans that have been in place for decades at least.
And so when you have people like Alex Jones talking about the Bohemian Grove, about Bilderberg, about Davos, about the Rockefeller Foundation and all of their various incarnations, the Open Society Foundation, all of these different globalist outlets...
Have been working on this, planning towards this.
Their plans work very far into the future.
You know, it's something that Donald Trump has learned to sort of absorb through his work in building buildings, building massive skyscrapers, right?
When you're building a massive skyscraper, you don't just plan a week ahead.
You're planning 10 years, 20 years, 30 years ahead, and then you're having these plans come to fruition, which is why he's such a capable leader anywhere.
But that's what these people have been involved in So while it may seem novel to us, while it may seem like it's happening in real time to us, this is the fulfillment of preordained situations that have been in place in the activation of networks and of plans that have been in place for decades at least.
This document from a decade ago lays out almost perfectly what has occurred and what their desired plans The desired outcome that they would want to see would come from it.
Now, when I first saw this, when I first was sent this document, I just opened it to a random page to see what was going on.
I didn't realize that this was a projection.
I didn't understand what this was at first.
I just started reading right in the middle of it.
And it has all of these things like it says, in 2014, when Manhattan flooded and the images of boats going down Fifth Avenue shocked the world.
And it's like... Wait, did that happen?
I don't remember that happening.
Oh no, wait, they just thought climate change would have destroyed us by now.
Another little teaser, a teaser on top of the teaser.
The person who wrote this, if you go to his Wikipedia page here, I'll tell the guys to search it right now.
It was written by Peter Schwartz.
Just search Peter Schwartz into Wikipedia and we'll see...
We'll see who wrote this document.
The esteemed gentleman who wrote this document for the Rockefeller Foundation.
Guys, do you have that Wikipedia?
Peter Schwartz of Global Business Network.
Anything about that? Because I'll just say it from memory if we can't pull it up.
But essentially it starts with, there he is.
He's the American futurist, innovator, and co-founder of the Global Business Network, a corporate strategy firm.
What's this down here?
In 2010, Schwartz, is this, yeah, is this, oh my god, did they remove it?
Did they take it out?
Oh my god, yesterday I went to the Wikipedia and it said he's best known for, they took it out, they literally changed it.
That is amazing. Yesterday, yesterday the Wikipedia said he's the disgraced author of the Pentagon report that said London would be underwater by 2020.
This guy's a climate alarmist.
He wrote this paper for the Rockefeller Foundation.
More on the other side. In the intelligence community, a limited hangout is the deliberate revelation of some information about malfeasance to try to confuse and or prevent discovery of other information.
In a recent Daily Mail article, the Communist Chinese admit, after four months of denial, that the COVID-19 virus resulted from work being done in the Wuhan Institute of Virology and was paid for by the U.S. National Institute of Health, run by none other than Anthony Fauci during the Obama administration.
In the article, the CCP admits to harvesting their bats from a single cave in Yunnan, China, thereby vindicating the work of Indian researchers who scanned its genome and found evidence that COVID-19 is a man-made hybrid, also known as a chimera virus.
Controversy sparked in 2015 over the creation of a chimeric SARS-like virus at the University of North Carolina, and a moratorium was enacted to end gain-of-function research in the United States.
Gain-of-function research involves genetically increasing the transmissibility of deadly pathogens.
Immediately following this moratorium, the Obama administration and the National Institute of Health under Dr.
Anthony Fauci outsourced the work to the Wuhan Virology Lab in China.
The NIH awarded $3.7 million in research grants to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for gain-of-function coronavirus experimentation on bats.
The Wuhan Institute lists the NIH as a partner, as well as the University of Alabama, the University of North Texas, Harvard University, and the National Wildlife Federation.
The CCP still claims that it was an accident, suggesting that the innocent bat experiments may have gotten out of control.
But the admission is that COVID-19 came from the Wuhan laboratory and it was paid for and directed by Anthony Fauci and the NIH. The very same Fauci who is now suggesting extended lockdowns and mandatory vaccinations in the United States.
As the world increasingly blames China for the COVID-19 virus, the CCP has fired a not-so-subtle warning shot across the bow of their American deep state accomplices.
A massive war with China could potentially make all talk of deep state corruption vanish.
Takes advantage of some of the amazing sales that we have.
DNA Force is 50% off.
That's one of our best sellers.
It's also on the slightly more expensive side in terms of our supplements.
It's worth it, believe me, well worth it at full price at 50% off.
It's practically a steal.
I don't even understand how that's possible.
But that's what I'm told, 50% off.
So, hey, take advantage of it while you can.
That's a DNA force at the M4WarsStore.com.
And, of course, the storable food is now available.
And as we see headlines...
Saying things like we're going to have to be under some form of lockdown or some form of control until 2022.
Folks, it's not too late.
It's not too late. Buy your storable food now.
As I've said before, you need to buy it now, even if you don't need it now, because when you do need it, it's going to be too late.
I know a lot of people are...
Perhaps realizing that was sound advice as they tried to order storable food and found reserves were deplenished.
But here at InfoWars, the reserves have been refilled, replenished, and are available now at InfoWarsStore.com.
Help keep us on the air.
Later in this hour, I will be joined by Revenge of the Cis, Royce, and Merch.
We'll be on to talk about some of the headlines we see today.
And in the next segment, I'll sort of...
Burn through these headlines and get the most important stuff out of the way so we can have a heck of a fun time the second half of this hour.
Don't go anywhere, folks. It's The War Room.
I'm Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Troyer.
Third hour of The War Room has begun.
This is Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Troyer today.
The Ides of April, April 15th, 2020.
Let me read you some of these headlines before I welcome my guests in the next segment.
Nancy Pelosi vows to stop Trump's quote illegal decision to halt WHO funding.
What sort of mental gymnastics do you have to do when giving money No longer giving it is illegal?
This is the mindset of these insane people.
Pelosi said in a statement that she will swiftly challenge the move, calling it, quote, senseless, dangerous, and illegal.
Well, I would argue it's not senseless.
I'd argue it's not dangerous, but I could see how you'd make the argument on the other side.
We could have that. Debate, but illegal.
It's illegal to not give our money to this organization.
This is the mindset of these people.
It's like, okay, if an NGO exists and the United States gives money to it, they just have to forever.
If they ever stop giving money to this organization, even though the organization's corrupt, even though it's a failure, none of that matters.
You have to keep giving them money forever.
It's an easy...
It's an easy pledge to make when you're just stealing other people's money, right?
And Nancy Pelosi does a video about this where she's standing in front of her refrigerator talking about how she's very proud of having put a stop to small business loans.
Out of the stimulus. And people did a little bit of research and found out that the refrigerator that Nancy Pelosi is standing in front of costs $34,000.
$34,000 refrigerator.
I don't own anything that's $34,000.
Except the house, I guess.
But my God, it's like these people, these out-of-touch rich jerks.
I'm just done with them.
I'm sick of them. Can we just get rid of them already once and for all?
Please, my God.
Can we just jail these people?
Some interesting headlines here.
NYC death toll soars past 10,000 in revised virus count.
Which is very interesting, as the subtitle is, the city has added more than 3,700 additional people who were presumed to have died of coronavirus, but never tested positive.
This is what we call a hate crime math.
This is the math you do when evaluating hate crimes.
No, it's not. No, no. Doing math is not a hate crime.
Well, some people think it is, but no.
Certain math is a hate crime, but other math is fine.
But, you know, it's like the hate crime.
It's like, well, this guy littered Nobody littered in front of a synagogue.
Hate crime, we're going to count that as a hate crime.
It doesn't matter if it really is or not.
It doesn't matter if they really died from a coronavirus or not.
We need those numbers up.
We've got to get those numbers up to get that juicy funding because of all the high numbers that we have.
It's fudging the numbers like they always do.
Now they're just open about it.
They're like 3,700 more people with coronavirus.
Isn't that incredible? Oh, so you tested them?
No, I mean, but they're dead.
So, like, might as well, right?
Might as well say that they're coronavirus victims.
It's just absurd. Here's another hilarious headline.
Bill Gates refuses to say why he was on Pedo Epstein's Lolita Express jet.
Hmm. Hmm.
Why would one go on the Lolita Express?
How many reasons are there to go on the Lolita Express?
Maybe, maybe it's because you're a billionaire pedophile who's friends with other billionaire pedophiles.
I don't know. I mean, that might be one reason.
One reason may be that he just, you know, wanted to get away.
Maybe he just wanted to go have a nice day in the sun on Pedo Island.
Maybe that's why. There's from the Daily Mail.
Bill Gates refuses to reveal why he flew on Lolita Express with Jeffrey Epstein four years after his release from prison while the billionaire was still chairman of Microsoft.
Because he's got to keep the network strong.
You know, you got to have all these rich, corrupt people in the elite rungs of society.
They got to get the blackmail.
They got to be in debt to each other.
They got to all be on the same team.
That's why you fly on the Lolita Express.
Why? Why? Why would one fly on Lolita Express?
It's like, it's like a wayward husband won't say why he went to a strip club.
I mean, we don't know.
We don't know why he went to the strip club.
We don't know. Maybe he just likes chicken wings.
Vietnam introduces fake news fines for coronavirus misinformation.
It was actually hilarious. I found this article on Reddit.
It's from Reuters. Vietnam introduces fake news fines for coronavirus information.
And the Reddit thread on this article was very interesting because it started with everybody celebrating this, going, finally, finally, some country is brave enough To criminally prosecute fake news spreaders.
And then, like, as time went on, suddenly you started seeing these other comments percolating up saying, uh, guys, maybe this isn't so great.
Like, maybe they're just gonna use this to call other things fake news and, you know, stop people from talking about stuff that the government doesn't want them to talk about.
So by being like, well, maybe, but, like, we gotta stop the fake news.
Anyway, it's just, Reddit comments are always a frickin' cesspool, but, I mean, you know, we knew this was coming.
This has been... I mean, the big tech companies have already been doing this, calling things fake news if they're not from the authoritative sources, even though they're proved to be correct.
Week or two later, right?
Zero Hedge got their Twitter account deleted.
Still not up. Still not up, right?
Washington Post, Washington Examiner, the Daily Mail, the Sun, they're all coming out with the same story, essentially, that Zero Hedge did.
But Zero Hedge was kicked off of Twitter for it.
And even now that it's revealed that it was true, they're still not going to be let back on.
Not a big surprise. Another interesting story from Zero Hedge.
Ventilators by cloak and dagger.
Israel's Mossad boasts of stealing medical gear from other countries.
An Israeli broadcast interview featuring a high-level Mossad operative is making waves in the region after an intelligence official admitted using a little bit of theft.
Little bit of theft to obtain medical protective equipment in the fight against coronavirus, which has been in short supply globally.
Can you imagine if it was someone like Donald Trump saying, you know, a little bit of theft.
We used a little bit of theft to steal masks from other countries for ourselves.
I mean, my God, it's like...
He can't even put a stop to spending half a billion dollars on the WHO, an organization that seems to do nothing and probably, you know, hates us.
You gotta keep sending them half a billion dollars, but, you know, other countries, they're looking out for themselves, let's just say that, right?
Here's a story again as we venture across the pond.
German lawyer who criticized lockdown arrested, taken to psych ward, claims she was violently abused by authorities for calling for protest against the quarantine.
German medical lawyer who criticized the coronavirus lockdown law was arrested and taken to a psychiatric ward where she says she was violently abused by authorities.
That story by Paul Joseph Watson can be found at Infowars.com.
Also from Infowars UK, hospital beds four times emptier than usual.
That's kind of weird during a pandemic, wouldn't you think?
Wouldn't you think during a pandemic that absolutely shuts down the entire world economy, wouldn't you think there'd be more sick people than normal?
Nope. Four times less people in the hospitals at the NHS. We just live in an insane world.
The U.S. has thrown more than $6 trillion at the corona crisis.
That number could grow $6 trillion.
Three times the amount of the Iraq war in just three months because of this absurd crisis.
When you're talking about the Iraq War, that's an average of $8,000 apiece for everyone in America paying $2 trillion.
So, what's that?
$24,000 a person?
Every single person in America, $24,000?
That's how much has been spent on coronavirus?
So you can expect your Trump bucks in the mail, but there'll be about one-twelfth of that, one-twelfth of the amount of money that we've spent from the New York Post.
Wall Street feasts on federal coronavirus aid while Main Street starves.
We were talking about this earlier with Brandon, that you just have regular mom-and-pop shops absolutely shutting down, where all of the globalist organizations are still raking it in and seem to be under no...
Closure or scaling back whatsoever.
The IMF, that's the International Monetary Fund, cautions renewed social unrest possible amid panic.
Obviously, Binge Nation average American streams eight hours of content per day during the coronavirus outbreak.
I knew that as the break was coming on, I thought, should I just come out apologizing for my hair right out of the gate because they're going to say something about it.
Well, I mean, most days we still don't because we just never like going out.
But as soon as they told us we can't do things, I just want to do all of the things.
Exactly. It's always been in my DNA. It's always been ingrained in me.
If you tell me not to say something, I'm going to find a way to say it.
If you tell me not to do something, it could be something I hate.
I hate playing sports.
It's exhausting. You get sweaty.
Sometimes you get hurt. It's annoying.
It's a whole thing. So I don't like playing sports, but right now I will play a game of half court because I'm not allowed to play a game of half court.
Yeah, and it really is disturbing how, like, they just flip this switch and everybody just starts patrolling everybody else.
Everybody starts snitching on everyone else and they feel good and, you know, like they're the ones doing the right thing.
Now, before I let you go off about snitches and how you feel about them, I have to remind you we're on terrestrial radio and I had to work hard to get you on here.
If you keep cursing, you're going to make all my sacrifice for, you know, in vain.
Curse slip while I'm sitting up here, but I guess when you're behind the desk and the lights and everything, because I usually curse like a sailor, folks, off camera.
Well, no. Well, that's not true because I know tomorrow you're going on the very popular Ralph Retort in the Kill Stream, which I was lucky enough to go on about a month ago.
Am I right, guys? Folks, we'll answer that question more on the other side with Revenge of the Cis.
You can find them on YouTube, Revenge of the Cis.
Their Twitter, at ROTC Radio, is where you can follow them there.
The bad boys of the internet.
We'll get into why they're such pariahs on the other side.
Slipping that insult at the end there.
Harrison Smith sitting in for Owen Schroer today.
My guests, Revenge of the Sis, run a wonderful show on the YouTube.
I got a text from my dad during that commercial break.
It reads simply, ROTC equals funny.
High praise there.
High praise for the Revenge of the Sis, fellas.
I have to agree. ROTC does equal funny.
But I realized we didn't even introduce you to the Fine Info Wars audience.
You guys, you run a show called Revenge of the Sis.
It runs every day, 3 to 5 Central Standard Time on YouTube.
And you really just cover current events.
You cover politics a little bit.
But you guys are funny.
It's a comedy show.
It's a lighthearted sort of show.
That gets you all into trouble a little bit every once in a while.
But we've talked about it before that...
People have too thin of skin.
And, you know, through y'all, I've sort of discovered a lot of interest that I now really appreciate, things like the Opie and Anthony show, things like wrestling.
I was never into pro wrestling, but you guys reference it so much.
I was like, I better learn something about this because I'm missing everything you guys talk about.
But it does seem like y'all sort of harken back to sort of the opiate Anthony and the heyday jibing at each other, sniping at each other.
You know, I want to live in a world where people can joke with each other.
They can insult each other.
And we know that it's not to take it personally.
It's like, that's fine.
My hair looks dumb.
I'm perfectly aware of that.
You guys can joke about it.
We can both appreciate it.
But I suppose you guys find you run into a little bit of trouble with this.
To me, it's just basically, you know, a lot of the stuff now that gets you labeled as like, you know, whatever, racist or alt-right or misogynistic or homophobic.
It's all basically job site humor.
It's a blue-collar thing.
It's been around forever. It very much was ingrained where I grew up.
And it's just you had guys mostly working on an assembly line.
And, you know, there were black guys and Polish guys and Italian guys and Jewish guys.
Well, the Jewish guys were usually in the office.
But, you know, all these other guys.
And they would – you break each other's chops.
Like it's not – Meant to be malicious.
There's no anger. It's a long day.
You have to get through it. To me, I've always called it job site humor.
It's We're good to go.
You know, it's just easier to cheat in the war of ideas by getting people kicked off of a platform rather than just being funnier.
I mean, between the two of us, we do six hours a day.
I do my morning show at Day Wave together.
That's at 10 a.m. And then in the afternoon, we do Revenge of the Sis.
And then at nighttime, Mike does Night Wave.
And yeah, you know, it's putting together six hours of prep every day.
You know, first off, thanks to our fans because our fans really help us out and they send us a bunch of stuff and they really help us filter through stuff.
Your fans are some of the best, like one of the best fandoms in all of the internet.
I know I'm going to have a ton of response just from having y'all on the show.
Every time I go on y'all's show, people making memes out of it and cartoons out of it and remixing it into songs.
It's amazing. That's one of the things that attracted me to y'all's show is y'all have really cultivated this very loyal and creative fan base that is really incredible.
They're not, though. They're really not if you are not mean to them.
And it is nice because I know if I'm talking to y'all on Twitter, if we're interacting on Twitter or something, I can say jokes and know, all right, this audience is going to get that I'm joking here.
You don't always know that with people, but I recognize people from your audience, just from y'all's interaction, or they always comment whenever I talk to y'all or whatever, and it's always like, Yeah, I can just joke here.
I don't have to be serious.
I can say a joke. They're not going to take it personally.
So, what are y'all doing about, I mean, I'm struggling between like just continuing to talk BS and nonsense or whether we should actually address some of the insane headlines that I have in front of me.
No, but see, that's actually a great point because, you know, he and I would sort of snipe at each other and be at each other's throat for, you know, years, basically.
He'd be trash talking, blah, blah, blah.
And then we have a debate on the kill stream, which you guys are going on tomorrow, which we'd like to plug again.
But... It's like ever since then, he and I are cool.
It's like, you know, it's when you can't communicate.
It's when you are just sort of like sniping at each other that it's uncomfortable.
But then you can actually talk and be like, look, I think you're wrong about this.
I think you're wrong about this. But at the end of the day, you know, who cares?
We're going to get along. We've gotten along better ever since then.
He did it. I hope the crew has their hand on the dump button.
We'll be right back, maybe.
Here's a little peek behind...
Behind the scenes, backstage here at InfoWars, when we do these, I'll do a segment, and then if we want to put it out on its own thing, you know, I've got to come up with a title, so the crew comes on my ear and says, you know, what do you want to title this Revenge of the Cis segment when we put it out on band.video and InfoWars.com?
I said, well, that's easy. It's an easy title.
It's Revenge of the Cis's last appearance on InfoWars.
And I mean, I know this is not something that it's a new take, but this this cure or whatever is going to be way worse.
It's going to kill way more people.
Than this virus is.
I mean, you know what they're not going to count?
They're not going to count with this whole economy thing because now if you stub your toe and you had COVID and you get an infection and you die, it was the COVID that killed you.
They're not going to count all the people that are going to be killing themselves.
And that really is an issue to me.
Joking aside, people are going to kill themselves because if you're Robert Downey Jr., you could sing Imagine in a Mansion and that's fine.
But there's people in studio apartments that have no human contact.
Like in Michigan, they're not allowed to go outside.
And those people are just going to, they're going to not have it anymore and this is going to be worse.
I'll tell you what they're going to do. They're going to blame the suicides on COVID. Yep, you're right.
And they're going to attribute that to COVID. That's what's going to happen.
Yep. So, you know, that virus came and everybody started killing themselves and it'll be like, no, no, no, this virus came and it killed a few people and then you fired everyone and gave Jeff Bezos all the money and we just called it a day and then a bunch of people killed themselves.
Like it wasn't, you know, you're missing some steps here when you tell the story.
All I know is that China is open right now, and they're open and they're up for business.
So the longer we stay closed, that whole tariff and all the stuff we want to do, we're not going to be behind them.
Every day that goes by, we're going to be more behind them.
Know what I think is going to happen? It's going to be state by state.
I think some states are going to open up.
I think Texas is like, we'll open yesterday.
But you're going to have places like Michigan because she wants to be the vice president, or you're going to have places like New York because Cuomo's brother's on the news that are going to keep it locked down forever.
I mean, I think that they're already saying, scientists are recommending that we should continue social distancing until 2021.
I think there's a limit. I think even fat, lazy Americans who just do nothing and sit around and keep talking about how tough they are, even those people, there's only so far you could push those people before they just go, all right, look, I was comfortable.
That was pretty much the only thing stopping me from shooting up things and going crazy and starting to do crazy stuff.
Now you've taken the one thing from me, which is what I had every day.
I had my coffee mug, I had my job, I had my family come home, put food on their table.
I had a whole deal. And now you can only take that from somebody for so long before they're gonna start getting crazy ideas.
And of course, now we have the headline, you know, $1,000 punishment if you don't wear your mask outside.
I mean, it's just, it's insane.
It can't go on much longer, you know, as far as I can tell.
You have other things. Judge forces McHenry County to provide names of all COVID-19 patients.
DC extends stay at home order through May 15th.
COVID-19 checkpoints at state boundaries for out of state people.
And then this headline from the Guardian, the growth in surveillance may be hard to scale back after the pandemic, experts say.
It's like, well, no duh.
Obviously, you put these things in place, they don't just get scaled back.
Wasn't a income tax was a temporary measure for the second World War.
We're still paying income tax 70 years later.
So yeah, I think it's obvious that this is happening.
Do you guys think this is a big danger?
Do you think it's just going to fade away and we're going to be back to where we are before with, you know, Amazon much more powerful and everybody else a little bit more poor?
Do you think this is going to really, you know, push to be a big cataclysmic event?
That's the consensus, at least when I look at my normie Facebook timeline of featuring all the people I went to high school with and girls I dated and people that represent the normie.
They're all...
Everybody is erring on the side now of safety, and they just go, whatever's best.
I mean, look, we've caught a lot of terrorists with the Patriot Act, and we sure have done good with the social distancing.
A lot of people out there are like, how long?
Okay, three months off of work, and then I can go back and make $12 an hour?
Yes, sirs and ma'ams.
And you're like, whoa, what is going on?
I've misbehaved over far less historically in my lifetime.
and people that think for themselves build free societies, innovate, do amazing things.
But those that love to grovel, those that love to be subservient, those that love to comply and think that it's a virtue, they create stagnation, corruption, tyranny, and then finally collapse.
And the world is now being tested.
And we're seeing lots of dutiful individuals who've complied and submitted their whole lives believing if they just submit now in a bigger way, somehow they'll create a heavenly future.
But the technocrats running the global system are oppressive and anti-human.
And are psychotic and are building an anti-human future.