Pastor NXR Livestream addresses the perceived Jewish influence on pornography, citing Al Goldstein and Leonard Radvinsky's $30M OnlyFans acquisition as evidence of a Talmudic agenda to defile Christian culture. The discussion contrasts 17th-century Massachusetts moral codes with modern liberal standards, arguing that the Comstock Act reflected true righteousness while current laws prioritize individual liberty over virtue. Ultimately, the speakers advocate rejecting the "Judeo-Christian" moniker, urging Christians to enforce biblical morality through marriage, software filters, and ambition to save Western society from perceived spiritual decay. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
The Greater Woe of Tempting00:15:01
This is from my sermon just yesterday, the Lord's Day on Sunday.
I typically don't share my sermons.
We used to share them publicly.
I stopped in part, large part, because we got so much opposition from people who hate Christ, who hate historic Christianity, whose highest commitment is to 20th century liberalism, that it became more of a liability.
And so my first obligation as a local pastor is to my local church and the parishioners there.
I wanted to protect them.
We had protesters who were showing up and trying to dox members.
All these kinds of things.
So, for certain protective practical measures, we stopped publicly posting the sermons, but there's just something that's simply too important that has to be covered in today's episode.
And I'm actually going to be using a little bit of my manuscript that is my sermon notes from yesterday's homily.
So, stick with me.
I think that this episode is going to be really, really helpful for many of you.
We are talking about Jews, pornography, and And the need, the necessity to save young men.
Jews, their influence on pornography, amongst other things, and we're going to be bringing receipts in today's episode.
And yet, still, despite all the odds being stacked against us, the necessity of saving young men.
This is from the gospel according to Matthew 18, verses 7, 8, and 9.
The Bible says this Woe to the world for temptations to sin, for it is necessary that temptations come.
But woe to the one by whom the temptation comes.
And if your hand or your foot causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away.
It is better for you to enter life crippled or lame than with two hands and two feet to be thrown into the eternal fire.
And if your eye causes you to sin, tear it out and throw it away.
It is better for you to enter life with one eye than with two eyes to be thrown into the hell of fire.
This is the word of the Lord.
Again, that's Matthew chapter 18, verses 7, 8, and 9.
This is what you need to understand.
Biblically speaking, theologically, what Jesus is saying to his disciples in this particular text is that there is both a danger but also necessity for temptations to come to the people of God.
That the people of God, Christ followers, disciples of the Lord Jesus, will be confronted.
They will engage and be confronted, meet up against temptations.
These temptations are dangerous, eternally so.
The stakes are heaven and hell, and yet also according to Christ, not my opinion, but Christ and his own word, these temptations, although dangerous, are necessary.
I've written this in my manuscript that I used just yesterday morning.
Christ declares that it must needs be that temptations come.
That's from the King James.
It must needs be, that is, it is necessary that temptations come.
This necessity does not arise from any defect in God.
The book of James says that God cannot be tempted by sin.
Neither does he tempt us with sin.
So, this is not because of some fault that lies with God that temptations are necessary, but rather from the corruption of man.
Since our nature is wholly inclined to evil, it cannot but produce stumbling blocks.
That doesn't mean that the Christian is a slave to sin.
We're new creatures in Christ Jesus.
Ezekiel speaks of the heart of stone being removed and replaced with a heart of flesh that's softened, malleable, and receptive to the things of God.
If any man be in Christ, he is now a Therefore, a new creation.
So the Christian is no longer bound to sin, a slave to sin.
Both the penalty of sin has been paid at Calvary by the atonement of Jesus Christ, his bloodshed, his life forfeited under the white hot wrath of God, which we deserve, right?
Romans says the wages of sin is death.
So we worked hard in our vocation of sin and merited for ourselves the just wages, the punishment for sin, which is death.
Jesus died that death on the cross, not just the physical torment, but on the cross and leading up to the cross, even in the Garden of Gethsemane, as he's sweating drops of blood, saying, Father, if there's any other way, let This cup, the cup of God's wrath towards sin, part from me, pass over me, but not my will, my human will, is what Jesus is addressing there, be done, but the divine will, your will and mine and the Spirit's,
in the sense of Jesus' divine nature that we share in the Godhead, that the divine will be done, not my human will, even though his human will was sinless, it was not sinful for him to ask for the cup of God's wrath to pass from him, but he knew that even though his human nature desired that, Jesus was the perfect man, and so his human nature was subjugated, submitted perfectly to the divine will shared from the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit, which was that Jesus, who was innocent,
that he who knew no sin, the scripture says, would become a curse, become sin on our behalf, and that he would merit for himself, take upon himself the wrath of God for sin.
So, our nature as Christians, if we're Christians, we have a new nature.
We have a new heart.
We are new creatures in Christ Jesus, and yet still, because of the flesh, St. Paul says this under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit in Romans chapter 7.
He says, Within the members of my being, sin still resides.
An inclination, a propensity towards sin still remains within the members of my being.
Paul, as a Christian, this is after his conversion, his soul has been justified, right?
So he has been saved in terms of justification, declared righteous by God, the salvation of his soul.
He is being saved.
Ephesians speaks in the present ongoing tense.
He's being saved in terms of his sanctification, the renewing of his mind.
It's happening day by day, conformed further in his thoughts, in his desires into the image of Christ.
So he has been saved, past tense, justification, salvation of the soul.
He is being saved, present tense, sanctification, the renewing of his mind.
But he is still awaiting, as Paul writes, Romans chapter 7, a future.
Element of salvation, namely glorification, the salvation of his body.
So he says, I find this law at work within the members of my being because he's still in the flesh.
He's a new creature, but in the physical sense, his flesh is still there in that life until the resurrection.
He's still battling with the certain natural, fallen, natural propensities of the human flesh that are inclined towards those things which are contrary to the law of God.
So he says, I find this law at work within the members of my being.
When I want to do good, evil is right there present with me.
So the good that I want to do, this I cannot carry out.
And the evil that I do not want to do, this I keep on doing.
Oh, what a wretched man I am.
Who will, present or future tense, who will save me from this body of death?
Who will save my soul?
No, that's already been saved.
Past justification.
Who is saving my mind, renewing my mind?
No, that's already taking place in the present tense.
Sanctification.
No, he's saying, who in a future, Time in a future sense will save me, that is my body glorification.
And so, the Christian, even if you are converted and you are following Jesus, there is still a future element of our salvation that we are awaiting, namely the salvation of our body, which is corrupt.
Not always, the resurrected body will be done away with sin.
Not only the penalty of sin paid, the power of sin broken, but the presence, the mere presence of sin gone forevermore.
But that does not happen so long as we are in this flesh, in this temporal earth, this gospel age, the church age, in this life.
In the life to come, With the resurrection, our bodies will be resurrected, glorified, a glorified body in which not only is the penalty paid of sin, power of sin broken, but also even the mere presence of sin no more.
So, all that said, for the Christian, our nature, even as Christians in the flesh, is still inclined to evil, certain tendencies, temptations, propensities.
It cannot produce, it cannot but produce certain stumbling blocks, temptations.
As a polluted fountain sends forth bitter waters, so does the human heart bring forth.
Sin, idolatry, and unbelief.
This is important.
A doctrine that you need to know the impeccability of Christ.
We just finished Palm Sunday.
We are now in Holy Week, heading towards Easter.
The doctrine of the impeccability of Christ.
Christ was tempted.
We know this.
Hebrews says that he's a merciful high priest because he too was tempted and therefore knows how to bear with and associate with, have sympathies towards, compassion towards those of us.
Who also are tempted.
So, if anyone says Christ was never tempted, that's a lie.
The Bible plainly says he was.
But the question is tempted in what manner?
What kind of temptation?
What category of temptation?
When Christ was led by the Spirit after his baptism into the wilderness to fast from water and food for 40 days and 40 nights to pray, at his weakest point in his human nature, when his flesh was weakened and vulnerable, when he was hungry, The scripture says, then Satan took that opportune time to come and tempt him.
And this was a real temptation, three temptations that Satan comes and brings to Christ.
Now, Satan is tempting Jesus, and he really is tempted.
Here's the difference the temptation that Christ experienced in his earthly ministry, in his incarnation, all throughout his life, but especially heightened in this wilderness temptation by Satan directly, that temptation was a temptation that came from outside of Christ.
It was an outward temptation.
Christ was never tempted inwardly.
And what I mean by that, the impeccability of Christ, although Jesus, the second person of the Trinity, took upon himself in the incarnation by the conception of the Holy Spirit with the Virgin Mary, he took upon himself a second nature.
He did not substitute, he did not replace.
The divine nature always remained fully intact.
But in addition, not subtraction, but in addition to the divine nature of Christ, second person of the Trinity, He added unto himself the second nature, the human nature, flesh, in the incarnation.
Now, Christ's flesh, because there was no human father, and because of the divinity, Christ's flesh was not corrupted.
And therefore, Christ, when he was tempted by outward temptations, like Satan in the wilderness, he did not have added to these outward temptations the inward temptations of the flesh.
There was no sin or corruption in the members of his being.
Even in terms of his human nature, his human nature was not fallen, his human nature was not corrupt.
This is the doctrine of the impeccability of Christ, meaning that he really was tempted outwardly, and yet he could not sin.
Not just that he did not, but he could not sin because inwardly there was no temptation.
You and I experienced inward temptation because of the corruption of the flesh, even as converted born again Christians.
Christ did not have that weakness.
His flesh was not corrupted.
He had no human father, conceived by the Holy Spirit through the Virgin Mary.
Jesus, not only did he have the divine nature, but even the human nature was an unfallen, uncorrupted human nature.
He experienced temptations that were outward, coming from outside of himself, but not inward.
The three great enemies, get this, the three great enemies of the Christian throughout all times and all places have always been Satan, the world, and the flesh.
Satan, the world, and the flesh.
Jesus had two of those temptations, outward temptations, the world and Satan.
He did not have the inward temptation of the flesh that you and I do have.
So, our battle against temptation is different than Jesus.
But that's not to say that he was not tempted at all.
He was tempted.
And so, Hebrews is true when the book of Hebrews, the letter to the Hebrews in Holy Scripture, says that he is able to associate and have sympathies towards those who are tempted because he is a merciful high priest in the order of Melchizedek, also being tempted himself, although the nature and the manner of that temptation is distinct.
Okay, next in my manuscript, I wrote this The guilt of sinners.
And those who tempt others to sin.
Here's the big idea, all right?
A little bit of Christian myth busters for a moment here.
All sin is equal.
No, no.
The Bible doesn't teach that.
The Bible has never taught that.
Christian tradition and history does not teach that.
That is an evangelical, Protestant element of modernity, right?
That's an egalitarian, liberal notion that is not historically Christian.
It's not true Christian doctrine.
This idea that all sin is equal.
It's not true.
Not all sin is equal.
This raw equality for everything, right?
That every person, men and women, are equal.
Every single nationality or ethnicity is equal.
Every generation is equal.
And every sin, for that matter, is equal.
That's a liberal notion.
It's a hangover of modernity.
We have to dispel that myth.
That is not what the Bible teaches.
I've written this in my manuscript.
Though temptations must come, Christ pronounces woe unto the world, and again, woe to that man by whom the temptations cometh.
Again, that's from the King James.
So he's pronouncing a woe unto the world in a collective sense because sin has entered the world because of the fall, the curse.
And so the whole world is now groaning and experiencing some level of corruption.
Sin has now entered.
There's a temptation that the world experiences collectively, both Christians and non Christians alike, and yet a greater woe.
It's not equal.
A greater woe that's then pronounced to that man by whom the temptations cometh.
Violence Against Sin and Sodom00:15:28
So it is a sin to succumb to temptation.
It is a greater sin, and I would argue exponentially so, to bring temptation.
It is one sin to be the temptee, it is a greater sin to be the tempter.
The one who causes people to sin is of bearing an exponentially greater moral culpability than the one who falls.
For temptation.
One of the other teachings of Christ that bears this point up is where Jesus says, If anyone causes any of these little ones to stumble, it would be better for him to tie a millstone around his neck and cast himself, be cast unto the sea, than to cause one of these little ones to stumble.
Jesus also, when he's pronouncing woes on certain Jewish cities in Israel, Tyre and Sidon specifically, he says, Woe unto you, Tyre and Sidon, for if the miracles I performed in you, He had walked their streets.
He had preached sermons in their midst.
He had performed mighty signs and wonders and miracles before their very eyes.
They were witness of these things.
He says, If I had performed the miracles I performed in you in Sodom and Gomorrah, Gentile towns, cities from long ago that were known for immense perversity, these were cities that's not that they were innocent, they were sinful.
And corrupt and of a very perverse nature.
The types of sins being committed by Sodom and Gomorrah, right?
We know what types of sins they were committing.
Sodom, the inhabitants there, were homosexuals.
They were Sodomites.
And not only did they want to sleep with other men, but even when they were visited by angels, they wanted to sleep and try, if they could, attempt to rape angels.
That's the kind of inhabitants of.
Sodom.
And, you know, spoil alert, if you haven't read that particular passage in the Bible, God destroyed them.
These inhabitants went to hell, eternally destroyed, but also temporally.
God rained down fire and brimstone from heaven and burnt up their entire city and destroyed these people.
And yet, Jesus says to Jewish towns during the time of his earthly ministry that he ministered in and preached in and performed signs and wonders, miracles in, he says, Woe to you, Jewish towns, Tyre and Sidon, for if The miracles I performed in you had been performed in Sodom and Gomorrah, they would have repented.
But you are a particularly stiff necked, rebellious people.
I have given to you an added measure of grace.
When God gives to mankind revelation of himself, it is grace.
God revealing himself to us is grace.
It is a form of grace, it is arguably the highest gift and highest.
Measure of grace that a person can receive, the revelation of God Himself, who He is and what He has done.
When God reveals Himself to us, He is giving us grace.
And therefore, Tyre and Sidon, those particular Jewish towns, had been given by God an added measure, a greatly added measure of God's grace.
And so, therefore, their sin of unbelief and stiff neckedness and rebellion in the midst of such heightened grace.
Was a greater evil in God's purview than the evil of wanting to rape angels committed by Sodom and Gomorrah.
That was particularly Sodom, but Gomorrah being a city that was similar.
Those cities destroyed, and so even a greater judgment that was pronounced on Tyre and Sidon.
Now, that's just one example.
Jesus goes on and says, To one will be given a light beating, to another, a severe beating.
Egalitarianism.
Which is the engine and the heart of liberalism, especially 20th century expressions of liberalism, is a lie.
Egalitarianism is a lie.
God has created a world of hierarchy.
There's hierarchy in the world.
There's hierarchy in heaven.
There's also even a form of hierarchy in hell.
Dante's Inferno.
I don't agree or subscribe to everything that's outlined in the book, but the basic concept, I believe, is correct that there are degrees of judgment.
Some judgment, some torment, some punishment in hell eternally is greater than others.
And we know that this is true, not because of Dante, but because of Christ.
Jesus says there are severe beatings, there are light beatings.
Or, woe unto you.
You have done something worse than someone else.
Or, this little one who stumbles bears some moral culpability.
But the one who causes him to stumble, it would be better for him to tie a millstone around his neck and be cast into the sea.
It'd be better for him if he had never been born.
So, all sin is equal.
That's a lie.
That is a myth.
So, though temptations must come, Christ pronounces a woe unto the world in a collective, general sense.
But then again, the implication here is a greater woe, a greater judgment.
To the man by whom the temptations come.
It is one thing to be the temptee, it is another to be the tempter.
Here we learn that necessity does not remove guilt.
The fact that Jesus says in Matthew chapter 18, verse 7, that it is necessary that temptation comes into the world, it does not mean that because God has planned for this, that it is necessary because of the corruption of the flesh and the fall of creation.
It does not mean because of God's ordinance, because of creation's fall.
And because of the corruption of the flesh, aka temptations coming to the world being necessary, that does not mean that because by virtue of that necessity, that moral culpability for those who fall under temptation, and especially those who cause and bring temptation, that that moral culpability is somehow absolved.
It's not.
It is necessary, Christ says, that temptations come into the world, and yet the one who falls for temptation is guilty, and the one who causes temptation is much more guilty.
Here we learn necessity does not remove.
Moral guilt.
Both the one who brings temptations and the one who falls into temptations are guilty before God, but not equally so.
So, what's the solution?
What's the remedy?
And again, we're going to be bringing receipts of Jewish influence in pornography and how to save young men, right?
I'm laying out the theological foundation.
Then we're going to get to the cultural, political, historical elements of Jewish influence in pornography and the plight of young men and how to save them.
I'm almost done with the theological part.
The severity of Christ's remedy.
If temptation is necessarily in the world and the world is corrupted, there is a class of individuals, not all, but some who are tempters and they are corrupt and they are nefarious and they are wicked.
And in our generation, in our time, there is a heightened efficiency of temptation due to technological innovation and all these kinds of practical things.
The fact that you have temptation right now sitting in your pocket with your smartphone.
You have temptation.
You could stop watching this video and watch pornography within three seconds with a click of a button.
The fact that temptation is greater makes the words of Christ in verse 8 and 9 of Matthew 18 all the more pertinent.
The severity of Christ's remedy.
I've written in my manuscript the following When Christ commands, if thy hand or thy foot offend thee, that is, cause thee to stumble, to fall into temptation, the remedy is.
Cut them off.
He speaks not of bodily mutilation.
This is figurative, but also profound, potent speech.
He speaks not of bodily mutilation, our Lord, but of spiritual mortification, to mortify the flesh in terms of spiritual discipline and sanctification.
Christ requires that we remove whatever leads us into sin, no matter how dear it may be.
Our Lord compares sinful attachments to our own members.
That is, that sin is so dear to us because of the corruption of the flesh that it is as though temptations to sin are members of our own body.
Hands, feet, eyes, to show how precious our sin often seems to us.
Yet Christ teaches that nothing must be spared if it draws us away from God.
Christ does not say, Manage or restrain sin, but rather, Cut it off and cast from thee.
This signifies a resolute and unyielding break with sin.
Half measures are insufficient in the pursuit of holiness.
Lastly, what is at stake?
The stakes are, in fact, eternal.
I've written this.
Christ sets before us two ends to enter into life on the one hand, or to be cast into everlasting fire on the other.
There is no middle path.
Every sin, if cherished, leads toward destruction.
We often cling to fleeting comforts and neglect eternal realities.
Christ calls us to a sober estimation that no earthly loss compares with the loss of.
Of the soul, as the scripture testifies elsewhere, for what does it profit a man if he gain the whole world but forfeit his soul?
Left to ourselves, continuing, we cannot perform this cutting off.
Our hearts are enslaved to sin, and we are prone to excuse rather than destroy it.
Yet what Christ commands, he also, in his mercy, enables.
By the Spirit of God, for those who are in Christ, we are renewed and strengthened by the Spirit, by grace, to mortify.
The flesh that leads us into temptation.
This work, though difficult, becomes the daily exercise of every believer.
Let us not be discouraged by the struggle, the very conflict, the fact that you, Christian, listen to me, young man, if you have any grief over your sin, if you have any hatred for your sin, I still sin, I still struggle, I still fall, but I hate it.
I wish that it were not so.
If you can say that, you can only say that.
By the grace of God, the righteous man falleth seven times, yet rises again.
The sign of your salvation is not the absence of sin in this life, the sign of your salvation is the hatred of sin in this life.
It is the wrestling with sin, the struggle with sin.
If you sin, but you wish that you did not, that is a great sign of assurance.
What Christ commands to mortify the flesh, to put up safe walls between you and temptation.
Even to the point of severing and divorcing and cutting off that which is dear to you, metaphorically, your hand, your foot, gouging out your eye, that which Christ commands, that serious war that must be waged against sin and the temptations of sin, Christ also mercifully enables us to do.
By the Spirit of God, we are renewed and strengthened to mortify the flesh.
This work, although difficult, becomes the daily exercise of every believer.
Let us not be discouraged by this struggle.
The very conflict against sin is a sign of God's grace at work within us.
All right, we're going to go to a brief commercial break, then we're going to come back, bring some receipts, and show you the war of Jewish influence in corrupting the Christian West through pornography and breaking down the family and corrupting fathers and husbands.
We're going to show you that, and then we're going to give some points of practical application for young men to fight against it.
The individual.
Whether he's Jewish or not, statistically speaking, he usually is.
But whether he's Jewish or not, the individual who brings temptation, corrupt sexual perversion as temptation to take down young men, he is of much greater moral responsibility.
He is far more guilty.
And yet, notice that this text, Matthew chapter 18, verse 7, 8, and 9, the second half of verse 7, half of one verse, it implies, and elsewhere, a whole biblical theology.
Tells us that we can make this point explicitly.
But it implies and communicates that there is a greater judgment for the tempter.
Yet the next two whole verses, verse 8 and 9, tell us that even though the tempter is bearing greater guilt than the one who succumbs and is led astray by temptation, the one who is attempting to restrain himself from temptation, the tempter is much more guilty.
But the one who is trying to avoid temptation is still going to bear guilt.
If he falls, therefore, he should take upon himself extreme measures.
Cutting off a hand, cutting off a foot, gouging out an eye, metaphorically speaking.
One more verse that makes us point is this Since the beginning, the kingdom of God has suffered violence, and the violent shall take it by force.
Brother, you will not waltz into the kingdom of heaven.
You will not go on a Sunday afternoon walk in the park and enter into the pearly gates.
You will enter heaven by the grace of God, but it will be through striving.
A Holy Spirit wrought, empowered, grace empowered striving and warring.
Wage war against sin.
Wage war against those tempters.
Call them out.
They must be called out and done away with.
But also, wage war not just against the two outward sources of temptation, the devil and the world, the sons of the devil who have been sown into the field of the world in order to corrupt.
The sons of righteousness, wage war against them.
But that third source of temptation, the inward source, Satan, the world, but also the flesh, mortify the flesh.
I would rather enter into heaven with no hands and no feet and no eyes.
I would rather enter heaven as a man who is a beggar and lame and blind than to be whole and cast into the fire of hell for eternity.
Wage War on the Enemy00:06:44
I hope and pray that that is your desire as well.
We'll come right back bringing receipts and bringing a game plan after a quick word from our sponsors.
Warning this product contains nicotine.
Nicotine is an addictive chemical.
All right, I'm going to keep this simple.
Look, I know that you know that I know that you know you're using nicotine.
Half of the people listening to this show, you're using some kind of nicotine product.
I know this.
I'm in group chats with you.
You have told me to my face.
I know you're using it.
So I'm not asking you to start a new habit.
I'm not asking you to add something to your budget.
I'm not asking you to spend money that you're not already spending.
I'm simply asking for you to transition to a based Christian America First company.
Right there on the cover, you have a foot crushing the head of the serpent.
It's not subtle.
These guys are based, they're Christian, they're America First.
They make their product in America.
Go to nicknack.com.
Use their product, and you will be supporting NXR Studios.
You'll be supporting a Christian company.
You will be saving 20% on your nicotine purchases.
Use my promo code.
It's all caps, J O E L. That's Joel.
20!
Joel 20!
Save 20% go to knickknack.com.
All right, well, welcome back to NXR Studios Live.
We're talking today about Jewish influence in pornography.
And if you've been on the internet for any length of time, it's a trope that pretty much goes around.
There was a time when Rabbi Solomon Friedman was the owner of Pornhub, of course, the late deceased owner of OnlyFans.
People have always connected the dots between who owns this here and what's their ethnicity and How, what percentage of America do they make up, and yet they're overrepresented in this domain?
We wanted to come in and really connect the dots explicitly with the quotes, with what they've said.
I've also got new details on the life of Leonard Radvinsky.
He was the owner of OnlyFans.
He purchased it in 2018 to make it into an adult subscription service.
We're seeing new details from his life.
He's a Ukrainian born Jew that are absolutely insane.
And you're saying that it's tolerated, insane that it's legal.
Just for the record, Wes Hussain was because he just recently passed away.
Yes.
They said that he passed away from cancer.
I personally think it probably was.
AIDS, but cancer is.
AIDS resulting in cancer.
How about that?
That sounds right.
Okay.
Let's start with this.
Let's start with a man by the name of Al Goldstein.
Leading up to 1973, in the United States Supreme Court decision, Miller versus California, we had obscenity laws on the books.
And those obscenity laws, although they were somewhat vague, explicitly barred the promulgation, the use, the mailing of pornography.
And so this was an industry that was pretty much completely underground.
But as that changed in 73, Al Goldstein starts a magazine called.
Screw magazine.
Now, I don't need to explicate to you Al Goldstein what his background is.
And interestingly enough, and this is something you have to remember, and this link you have to make, Al Goldstein himself was not an observant Orthodox Jew.
He himself was asked in an interview, What religion are you?
He said, I am an atheist.
And someone actually went even further and they said, What does it mean to be a Jew?
He said, It means nothing at all.
It means I get called.
And you could just insert the slur there that people typically use for Jews.
So he himself was not religious, he himself was an atheist.
And yet, listen to this man.
This is a man who was arrested over a hundred times in connection with still existing obscenity laws, considered one of the grossest, most perverse men in American history.
He said this in a 2004 conversation with a man by the name of Luke Ford The only reason that Jews are in pornography is that we think that Christ sucks.
Catholicism sucks.
We don't believe in authoritarianism.
Pornography thus becomes a way of defiling Christian culture.
And as it penetrates to the very heart of the American mainstream and is no doubt consumed, By those very same wasps, its subversive nature becomes more charged.
And so you have to keep this right in the forefront of your mind.
Here's a man who dedicated his entire life to making hardcore pornography accessible, legal, and a viable entertainment industry.
And he explicitly grounds that effort explicitly in We are doing this because we hate Christianity and it subverts the Christian culture of America.
Let me point something out just real quick.
I know that this isn't the main point of the episode today, but.
Sometimes it's helpful to see the perspective of our enemy.
This was a man who hated Christ, hated Christianity, and yet notice that even in the quote that Wesley just read, he named two subgroups of Christianity.
He said that he hated Christ and Catholicism, so he names the Catholics, and then in that parenthetical statement, he talks about his goal at corrupting the wasp, white Anglo Saxon Protestants.
He saw both as an affront to everything that he loved, which, if you want it, what is it that he loved?
Satanism.
So, this is a person who loves Satan.
This is a person doing Satan's will.
This is a son of the devil.
And he sees Christ as the ultimate enemy, but he sees two agents standing in his way on the side of Christ Catholics and WASS, white Anglo Saxon Protestants.
He hated them both, wanted to corrupt them both.
I understand that we have sincere, significant theological differences as Protestants with Catholics.
And yet, when the enemy is surrounding us, The gate.
When your own enemy, he's not differentiating between the two.
He's a Protestant, Catholic, both representative of Christ, and I hate them both.
If your enemy is fighting you in such a manner, it behooves us, at least for a while, to perhaps have a ceasefire with each other in our internal civil war and to say, we're going to link arms and stand against the orcs that have infiltrated the camp and beat them back into submission by the grace of God.
And then we can have our intramural fight over theology as a luxury of victory.
Right now, we don't have that luxury because our backs are on the ropes.
Just wanted to make that point briefly.
Well, new details from the Daily Mail on the owner of OnlyFans, Leonard Rudvinsky, are absolutely scandalous.
This is a man who's a Ukrainian born Jew.
He immigrated to the United States, and his private life was very private.
He very much so didn't like having his picture taken.
OnlyFans Owner Scandal Revealed00:04:12
On the internet itself, only a few pictures of him exist.
But from sources like his father in law, they recount that he himself was.
A deeply religious Jewish man.
And I want you to listen to the avenue he took in order to be able to purchase OnlyFans when he did, I believe for $30 million.
Listen to his track record from the age of 17.
This is from the Daily Mail.
Some businessmen stumble into the online porn industry by chance, discovering they can mint money, but Radvinsky jumped into it when he was still in high school.
Born in the Soviet Union in Odessa and Ukraine, he was a child when he immigrated to the U.S. with his parents and lived outside of Chicago.
Leo, as he was known, played competitive chess from the age of 10.
And he was a smart, sometimes abrasive teenager who defied his school's preppy school dress code by wearing a leather jacket.
He was a talented computer hacker who, after cutting his tech teeth working on a video game, saw the online potential of porn early on.
In 1999, age 17 and still at high school, he set up Cybertania using his mother's name on the incorporation papers as he was so young.
There's no indication she was otherwise involved in the business.
And what he did with that, I'm not going to recount the sordid details of what that site actually offered and everything that he did, but Forensic News put it this way it was undeniable that he was.
Quote, catering to pedophiles to make a buck.
It was basically a password sharing site for all sorts of illegal activities.
Forbes said it was a scummy business, but it was a profitable one, citing figures given in a court case that revealed it was earning $1.8 million a year in 2002.
After branching out.
OnlyFans?
That was his very first porn site, Cybertania, 2002.
After branching out into sites linking to celebrity sex tapes in 2004, two years after he graduated college, Redvinsky set up his most lucrative business to date, MyFreeCams, a live webcamming site where sex workers stripped.
et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Later, they started advertising its services on chat forums for boys, girls, and teens, where the minimum user age, which could hardly be enforced anyway, was 13 years old.
The independent investigative journalist who looked into these forums labeled the free kids' chat rooms as, quote, a pedophile's playground.
They were part of a larger porn pipeline, sending children directly into the arms of predators.
MyFreeCams turned Redvinsky into a multi millionaire.
And so he becomes a multi millionaire in the early 2000s.
And then, with profits from MyFreeCams dwindling, this is now 2018.
He spotted the potential of OnlyFans in 2018, emailing its British chief executive, Tim Stokely.
He offered to buy it outright and reportedly paid about $30 million that same year.
OnlyFans was, now listen to this, at the time, an obscure fan subscription service that allowed users to pay for exclusive content from creators and avoided explicit imagery.
So he didn't come into a site and a service that existed and already it was explicit.
And he said, I think there's a way to squeeze more money out of it.
That's actually what a rabbi named Solomon Friedman did with Pornhub.
They founded a Canadian based company called Ethical Capital.
Partners.
So, this wasn't something that existed and was already perverse and like, all right, I think it's good.
We could run some more ads.
We can transform this.
This was a site where people uploaded their piano pieces, their music, their art, and shared all that.
Helped considerably by the COVID 19 pandemic, which made it difficult for sex workers to meet clients in person, Radvinsky transformed the site into the hugely popular adult only porn business it is today by encouraging sex workers to move there with a financial deal that was far more generous than those offered by rival websites.
OnlyFans has been credited with transforming the porn business by allowing.
Not only sex workers or adult content creators, but anyone willing to reveal explicit footage or photos of themselves to make money from it.
The company takes a 20% pay cut of the revenue from subscribers, a deal which made Red Vinsky a record $700 million last year alone.
Wow.
The two, Al Goldstein, this guy, Leonard Red Vinsky, two of the most influential men in subverting and perverting, not just the individuals involved, not even just the people watching, but pornifying America's culture.
To where now, whether it be HBO at late night, whether it be your Netflix shows, whether it be Hollywood, taking cues on Instagram, even sites where you don't allow pornography, it's been described many places as they're pornified.
Liberty vs Moral Consent00:14:55
It's suggestive, it's perverse.
It does all of these things attempting to get even children, it's not enough that it's adults, children, young teens, into this ecosystem where they can make money on them.
Yeah, well said.
And I would just go even further to say okay, so you have these two Jewish men heavily influential in the emergence, promulgation of pornography.
And someone might ask the question, okay, so Why do you make it broader than that?
And I think it comes back down to arguments we've made in the past with respect to how laws have changed to allow these things, obscene materials, publications, those sorts of things, to even be allowed to be legal.
And this comes back to a concept of pluralism, I think largely pluralism, but also this neutral, and it really is a lie, but neutral constitutional order.
These things are fundamentally Talmudic.
So if you look in the early period, early American, Period, you look at the laws that were established, for example, in the Massachusetts Bay legal codes.
You can go back over to England, you look at obscenity laws that existed there, even preceding the colonial period in America.
All of these laws, Christian laws, have one end it's to enforce righteousness.
At root, it's to enforce righteousness.
In a liberal, constitutional order, enforcing righteousness isn't the point.
And this, it's more of reaching some kind of moral consent.
Among the people.
It's what does a reasonable person expect in their society with respect to obscenity?
And so all of these things, this modern liberalism, it's unmoored.
And it's all been promulgated via this Talmudic Judaism worldview.
And this is why you even see quote unquote conservative Jews making arguments, for example, that, well, free speech, well, First Amendment.
Finding ways to skirt the law because the law actually isn't there because God has set it there.
The law isn't there for righteousness in a civilization, it's just for general acceptability.
And so, just to go through that clip, yeah, let's do that.
Conservative Jews pushing for degeneracy in the name of free speech or liberty.
Here's the problem at some point, that we always cherished liberty in America's founding, that's undeniable.
The founders cherished liberty.
They fought and died for liberty.
But the question is, what kind of liberty?
What kind of American liberty?
The liberty that we have now is a liberty, it's an idolatry of liberty.
We've gotten to the point where we love and worship and serve individualism, individual liberty, at the cost of virtue, at the cost of righteousness.
That's not what our founding fathers bled and died for.
They wanted liberty, liberty of conscience.
But they did not want liberty at the cost of virtue.
And that happened later.
That crept in later.
And Jewish influence was a very big part of it.
And it's not just the radical leftist Jews, but your based conservative Prager U Jews.
Yes, we're going there.
Prager U Jewish influence, conservative Jews have pushed for the corruption of America using channels and loopholes like freedom of speech.
Prioritizing, idolizing liberty, even sexual perverse liberty, at the cost of true virtue.
And we're going to see a clip now.
Suppose a man says, I view animated child porn.
So there's no real victim in that sense of child pornography, which we both agree is horrendous.
And by viewing animated child porn, it prevents me from acting out sexually on a child.
Now, I deny that.
I think that pornography.
Inflames us to then want to act those fantasies out.
And I think there's good studies that back that up.
But surely you wouldn't say to the man who views animated child pornography, that's not bad so long as you don't act it out.
Wouldn't you want to help this poor sick dude?
Yes, I would, but I'm thrilled that he's not acting it out.
I mean, agreed.
Okay.
Of course.
Well, that's big.
Yeah.
We're both thrilled that he might have a poor substitute, but it is a substitute if that were the case.
No child is being used, it's all animated.
Yeah.
And he is.
Would you use the word evil of animated child pornography?
No, I would use evil only with behavior.
That's where we might differ, forgetting the sex issue.
You can't be evil.
You didn't do evil if you thought evil.
You did evil if you thought evil.
If I'm masturbating to animated pictures of pornography, I'm not doing something evil.
That's correct.
Yeah, I think that's despicable.
Really?
Yes, of course.
Who is being hurt?
You have to have a victim.
Oh, I'll tell you, there's at least two people being hurt.
There's the person who's poisoning himself by encouraging him to think I don't want children.
And there's also the animator.
Okay, wait a minute.
We both are aching for him not to have those fantasies.
I agree with you, but I.
But you won't call it evil.
I won't call a fantasy evil.
Thank you so much for watching that clip.
If you want to watch the entire thing, go over to mattfrad.locals.com.
Matt Frad, in that clip, I'll be honest, I'm not always a huge fan of Matt Frad.
He, right there, is having a realization that conservative Jewish influence is perverse.
And then he's currently now working for the Daily Wire.
I'm just going to say it.
So that doesn't make a lot of sense to me.
All right, there's my disclaimer.
That said, in that clip, Matt Frad, He did well.
He did well.
And he pretty much, I mean, that clip right there one shotted Dennis Prager.
Any current fan of Dennis Prager that claims to be a Christian should be ashamed.
Go ahead.
Yeah, I was saying as we were watching it, I've seen that clip about five times.
It came out about two years ago or so.
And I still can't believe you said that.
I mean, no, like, Prager U, this conservative organization, the leader of that, well respected, I think, in conservative intelligentsia, to say something like, animated child pornography is not evil.
But it does point to exactly what we were talking about right before we went to the clip, which is it is fundamentally Talmudic.
And this is why we have to be specific about it, because you're like, oh, it's anti Semitism.
It's fundamentally Talmudic to view laws not as a means of enforcing righteousness.
And so, in that particular instance, what Matt Fred is pointing out is that the man himself, in watching something and engaging in the fantasy, is doing something that is unrighteous.
And that's why it's evil.
And of course, Dennis Prager disagrees.
Because he doesn't have that fundamental, what we would say is a Christian worldview.
He doesn't.
And this is why we oppose the Judeo Christian moniker, because they aren't the same thing.
This is why it's so helpful to talk about this thing, particularly in light of its influence from Talmudic Judaism.
But I want to go even further.
I just want to quickly lay out how American laws with respect to obscene publications, obscene materials have changed.
Obviously, I already alluded to the fact that in the Massachusetts Bay Colony, no surprise, you have your Puritans and they had strict moral codes with respect to licentiousness, lascivious behavior.
For the reason they called them the Puritans, let's say it that way.
Right, exactly.
So if you look at the, in 1641, Massachusetts Bay Colony, you look at the legal codes, Massachusetts Body of Liberties, what you see is strict penalties for fornication and what they call, quote, lascivious behavior, of course, which this could be immodest dress, this could be a particular type of dancing, this could be public displays of affection for your spouse or not your spouse.
And the punishments here were pretty severe.
What would the Puritans say?
The danger of having sex is that it could lead to dancing.
You know what I mean?
Right, right.
But I mean, so here's the typical punishments that were often included in the Massachusetts Bay Colony fines, lowest level, but more often, public whipping, actually.
And so both the man and the woman engaging in the lascivious behavior slash fornication are both being whipped.
Like that, again, enforcing righteousness.
But then one other, which we've actually talked about over on Right Response, but The other quote unquote punishment was being compelled to marry.
So if it was a fornication.
So the Puritans would have done that too.
So, like both parties, the man and the woman, if it was adultery, that would be a much stricter penalty.
But if they were two single individuals and they were caught having sex, they would not have been imprisoned at the cost of the taxpayer, right?
So these two people, they sin and everybody else is punished by having to feed them three times a day and put a roof over their head.
No, they would have been punished.
It would have been whipping.
And the Bible talks about this the rod for the backs of fools.
One of the reasons why we have so many degenerate fools in our society today is because there are no consequences.
And a fool doesn't respond to being reeducated and rehabilitated.
A fool doesn't need to be sat down and have a talk.
A fool understands one language, and it's a primitive physical language.
The fool needs to be whipped.
And so, in the case of the Puritans, the man and the woman, if they weren't married, they were single, but they were fornicating, they would have been whipped and then compelled into marriage.
Right.
Yeah.
And then, so we have this.
This is 17th century into the 18th century, the colonial period.
This is.
Basically, how America, the American colonies, are governing sexual licentiousness.
Then, as you become a constitutional republic, even, so we talk about the First Amendment, and I love to bring this up about we're conservatives, we're originalists.
Well, when the First Amendment was ratified in the Constitution, there were state statutes, again, that, for example, if we look at Pennsylvania in 1815, this is what they called the early obscene publications law.
It made it a crime to quote, print, publish, sell, or expose.
To sell any obscene or indecent book, pamphlet, paper, or print.
So it's a state law in light of the Constitution.
The Constitution is superseding these state laws, and no one batted an eye.
That's right.
Remember the First Amendment of the Bill of Rights, freedom of speech.
And so it protected, and they have freedom.
Nope.
And there was not a thing to do with it.
And so you see Pennsylvania have this law, but virtually every state was adopting a law.
Just a helpful disclaimer, right?
Because we want to win.
It's like, I wonder if these three guys are aware that there were books that were burned in Weimar, Germany.
We are very aware.
But I like that.
And that's not to say that the book burnings were wrong.
I think there were certain things that were wrong.
That's not one of them.
I fully support what was done in Weimar, Germany, in terms of burning pornographic books.
But we're Americans.
We're Christian Americans.
We want a Protestant Christian prince in the likeness of a Jackson or a Washington.
And the beauty is.
It's not that, like, ooh, icky, I don't want to be guilty by association with.
It's more of, I believe that our American fathers, our Christian American fathers, have provided for us such a rich heritage that we can live and breathe that air and that we have been given the tools that we need as Americans for the reformation and revival that we need.
The only thing better than shutting down child brothels, which they did, is never having them in the first place.
There were not mass book burnings in the early Americas, although there were towards the Civil War, which we'll talk about.
Because the materials were never produced in the first place, because we had, wait for it, laws.
Yep, yep, yep, as a deterrent.
That's right.
And so, okay, so state laws, just giving the lay of the land.
So we have Massachusetts Bay Colony, then we get these state laws post Constitution that are banning obscene materials, print, publication, sell, possession, all of these things.
But we even see it go further if we go to the next step, which is what's called the Comstock Act of 1873.
So, whereas all of these other laws, Pennsylvania state law, for example, was state, At the state level, the Comstock Act actually is a federal law, a federal statute that comes in and says, It is prohibited to mail any obscene, lewd, or lascivious book, pamphlet, picture, paper, print, and other publication of an indecent character.
What about two consenting adults?
They don't have the freedom to do that.
It doesn't matter if you consent.
They consented, darn it.
It doesn't matter.
There was no concept of that.
Signed to law by Abraham Lincoln, correct?
This was 1873, so it was a little bit after that.
Yeah.
There were earlier laws, I think, that Lincoln did sign because this was happening during the Civil War.
And then you're right, they liked it so much.
It was like, all right, we've got a new president, run it back, codify it into federal law.
Yeah, but and again, you have a Christian, a fundamentally Christian moral order.
So, what we're seeing in these laws and the way that they're written is this flat, it really is just a flat ban on indecent material or obscene material.
They're not being specific.
We'll see later as we go to Miller v. California in 1973 how that changed.
But what's great about this law is, again, this is federal enforcement.
And what they did was they leveraged the United States Postal Service.
And so they literally had the ability to go and search mail.
Talk about book burning.
They could literally say, This was sent from a person that we believe is distributing these materials.
We're going to open this mail and we're going to prosecute that person if we find this obscene material there.
And so, this is all those three examples state laws, federal law, colonial law all of these are good examples of what we would say is the Christian moral order.
But as we move into the 20th century, we see this flood of judicial liberalism, this constitutional neutrality.
The courts have completely thrown out the idea that laws are rooted in some theological basis or biblical standard.
And this is like Oliver Wendell Helms, for example, a very famous justice at the beginning of the 20th century said that the truth is that which is whatever is prudent.
And I'm paraphrasing there, but that's effectively what he says.
And that becomes the philosophy of the courts through the 20th century.
And this is how we wind up with something like Miller v. California.
So Miller v. California comes in and it says Comstock Act, it says all of these state statutes.
This is the law of the land.
This is how we'll legislate.
And it basically had three components, which are called the Miller test.
Artistic Value Meets Garbage00:03:24
This is how we determine is this pornographic film, is OnlyFans illegal?
Is the publication of magazines that have explicit photos in them, are these things illegal?
So, number one, the material is obscene.
So now they're not doing the flat band, they're getting specific.
What do we mean by obscene?
The average person applying contemporary community standards would find the work.
Appeals to a purient interest or a seen explicit interest.
Which purient means erotic.
I helped work on a bill to try to get pornography banned in Texas, and that specifically means it has a design to eroticize, stimulate, et cetera.
Right.
So then we see this.
To tempt.
Yep.
Yep.
Exactly.
Precisely.
So appeal to the average person.
That's the first one.
Number two, it depicts sexual conduct in a patently offensive way.
So not that it depicts the conduct, but in a patently offensive way.
And then number three, the work taken as a whole lacks serious literary, this is the loosest one, serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value.
And so this basically, you can see we've thrown out the biblical standard.
We're simply going to apply a pluralism.
What's the average person think?
And Goldstein leveraged that artistic claim to try to say, like, hey, these smut movies that I've made, they have artistic value.
It's the same example of getting Talmudic with it.
Well, actually, technically, there's like an artistic, and that's leveraged, exploited, because the Miller test, in and of itself, with a righteous community, They would say, Yeah, this is patently offensive.
It appeals to pre-interest.
It lacks any artistic value.
I mean, that's all pornography.
It all falls in that category.
But what is done is saying, Hey, you're chilling my free speech.
There's actually a quote that the court said: There is an inherent danger of regulating every form of expression.
So the court is saying, There's some problems with this.
However, we risk, we run the risk of infringing on the freedom of expression, exploited by bad actors to say, You have to let this be available.
You have to let this be sold because.
It technically has artistic value.
Yeah, and this is an aside, but this is why it's so important.
Christians, don't be constitutionalists.
It's not enough.
This is how you get into the world of pluralism being okay and rights without duties and obligations or rights that are not rooted in a biblical basis.
This is how we've gotten to this point.
Christians started failing to view the Constitution as something that is upstream from a more rudimentary standard.
The Constitution became the standard.
First Amendment, Second Amendment, all of these things are the standard of what's good and true.
And by the way, they can change.
They're a changing standard.
This is the living constitution argument.
And so it's just important that we reject that because otherwise, this is where the Talmudic Judaism and just weaving the law, making things vague enough so we can apply for some exemption or we can skirt our way through, for example, an artistic claim.
And so we're publishing pornography and it's artistic and it has serious political or whatever otherwise value.
And it's all garbage.
It's all garbage.
Christians, we need to be able to say, That's wrong.
It's wrong.
And I don't care what the First Amendment says.
I care what Scripture says.
And by the way, the people who wrote the First Amendment cared what Scripture says.
Right.
Marriage as a Safeguard00:09:37
Well said.
All right, here at the end, we want to provide, as promised, some practical applications for fighting the war against temptation for the salvation of your soul, because that's what's at stake.
And so we talked about at the very outset three of the primary enemies of the Christian throughout the ages that is, the world, the flesh, and the devil.
And we want to provide, and the risk of being overly simplistic, but three very simple, practical, helpful methods of avoiding these enemies of the world, the flesh, and the devil.
Three enemies, three tempters, and here we have three applications for solutions marriage, accountability, and ambition.
Marriage, accountability, and ambition.
We'll start with marriage, we're going to hit these briefly.
We are perfectly aware.
Counseling and discipling young men who reach out to us all the time.
And I do that also in the local setting as a minister.
Marriage is easier said than done these days.
We're perfectly aware of that.
I don't want to spend a lot of time here because we just, in the sovereignty of God, his timing is perfect, finished, I think, like an hour and a half long episode on marriage in the year of our Lord 2026 in Western societies and how difficult it is.
That it is not just possible, but it has become, in sadly, all too many cases, somewhat common that a woman will marry a man and then absolutely destroy his life.
Take the house, take the kids, take everything that he has.
And so there are certain measures, added measures, that in a better time, a better society, would not necessarily have to be considered.
But today, they do.
The young man who is seeking marriage because he wants to please the Lord, right?
The Bible says if you burn with passion, Let him marry.
If any man burns with passion, let him marry.
So there's no negating this.
I understand that marriage is hard, but we still have to address it because it's what the Bible says.
One of the safeguards against lust is marriage.
If any man burns with passion, let him marry.
Okay?
So, all right, marriage, I get it.
That's what the Bible says.
But marriage has become its own pitfall, potentially.
It has become its own trap.
And so we're aware of that.
And so I guess what I want to say here for the sake of time is see our published work.
We just did an episode and I posted it on my ex account, my personal ex account.
That's at Joel Webbin, is the handle at Joel Webbin.
If you're not following me already, then make sure to go over and follow and click the bell.
And if you go to my profile and simply click on videos and scroll down, you'll see a video that I posted on my personal ex at Joel Webbin, but actually from Right Response Ministries, which is a ministry that all three of us are involved in.
It's a nonprofit Christian ministry called Right Response Ministries.
But that video, that episode from Right Response, is posted again on my personal Twitter.
And it's on the necessity, we're not mandating it, saying it must be done in every single circumstance.
But that it is actually permissible and in some cases necessary, given the lay of the land and how corrupt things are today, that the entire judicial system and the courts are all weighted against men.
And because of that context, it brings us no joy, but seeking to be innocent as doves and wise as serpents, we make a biblical case for prenups.
A man and woman getting a prenup going into marriage, binding themselves to biblical standards, so that if the woman Betrays her husband and becomes an adulteress, or tries to leave the marriage apart from biblical cause, such as adultery or abandonment, that she is not able to rob him of everything that he has.
Using that, so you're planning for failure.
No, you're setting safeguards to ensure success.
And there is a difference.
It's like, oh, well, you're just planning for failure.
Well, what about all the biblical laws about divorce and remarriage and adultery?
And all these are laws given to us in the Old Testament from God Himself.
So, was God planning for failure?
God was just planning for failure.
No, God was ensuring success.
And we, seeking to emulate the example that God Himself has set for us, we can use legal documents to ensure a greater likelihood of success.
The court system already has its own measures put in place, but those measures are corrupt and they are idolatrous towards women and at the expense of men.
And so, a young man seeking to enter into marriage with a Christian young woman, but knowing that he could be deceived, She could be deceived.
They can mutually agree and say, We know what the courts will do in the year of our Lord 2026 if things come to the worst, but we are going to abide and ensure legally put it into legal agreement that we're going to abide by God's standards and not our secular courts.
And what that does is it adds an extra measure of inhibition, of hesitation for both parties, not just the man, but also.
The woman, so that they would seek to abide by God's standards.
So, you want to avoid falling into temptation.
You want to cut off a hand, cut off a foot, as Jesus says in Matthew chapter 18, verse 8 and 9, gouge out an eye, take extreme measures.
Well, one of those measures is marriage.
And I understand how difficult it is.
But this, the word of God doesn't change.
Marriage is still one of the premier God given solutions to a young man falling into hell's fire.
Because he's not able to resist the temptation of lust.
One of the premier solutions that God prescribes is marriage.
And the fact that women are hussies today, and the fact that the court system seems to constantly side with the hussy and ruin men's life, doesn't mean that God's solution of marriage is no longer applicable.
It is.
And so, seeking to be innocent as doves but wise as serpents, there are certain ways to shore up.
The sanctity of marriage, the institution of marriage, even in a fallen and corrupt society.
Again, see our published works.
Go to on X at Joel Webben.
Click on my profile, click on videos, scroll down.
You'll see a video of us in leather chairs in front of a bookshelf from Right Response.
And in the title, I believe also in the thumbnail, it'll say the biblical case for prenups.
Go and check that out.
So that's the first one.
Let me just add to Christianity as a command to men and women says, do not, and the King James uses the word, defraud one another.
So it literally says, all right, the tool is marriage.
And to prevent against a sexless marriage, because there are many modern men and women stuck in them, the Bible also says, Do not rob from your spouse what they are owed.
So, not only get married as an aid against sexual immorality, but also continually, regularly have sex with each other as a command.
Yep.
Do not deprive each other except by mutual consent and even then only for a time, for there is much temptation in the world.
Mutual agreement.
Yep.
So that you might devote yourself to prayer and then be joined back one to another.
This is what scripture teaches.
A woman who is licentious outside of marriage is.
Is in sin.
And a woman who is depriving her husband in marriage is also in sin.
Sex outside of marriage is sin.
The absence of sex within marriage is sin.
So that's important for us to understand.
Women, the men are, we're literally dying out here in the year of our Lord 2026 in America.
Please, please, Christian women, do your brothers in Christ a favor.
Don't be whores.
Get married, love your husbands, don't be feminist.
The men are dying.
And if we ultimately fall, and we are falling, if we ultimately fall, the women and children will follow suit.
The whole society will crumble.
One of the best things that you can do if you want to save the West, if you are a Western woman, particularly even an Anglo Saxon, a white woman, become a Christian, repent of your sin, believe in the Lord Jesus Christ, marry a good, God fearing man.
Have lots of sex with him, have lots of babies, white babies that you're going to raise in the fear and admonition of the Lord, teach to be Christian.
You want to be a hero?
That's a hero.
The woman who's speaking at CPAC is not a hero.
Erica Kirk, boss babe with the sprinkly lights at TPUSA, not a hero.
The woman that we've never heard her name, but she fears the Lord, that she is marked by a quiet and gentle spirit with imperishable beauty that is.
Precious in the sight of God, as 1 Peter 3 says, who is giving to her husband intimacy and love in the bedroom and producing for him many God fearing children.
That woman, you are saving the world.
Build Dominion to Avoid Lust00:06:00
That hand that rocks the cradle rules the world.
You are a woman who is to be feared and praised, as the Psalms even say in the Proverbs, your children will rise up and call you blessed.
You are a mighty woman of God.
Tell you otherwise.
We thank God for women like that.
And if you're a young Christian woman, become a woman like that.
So that's marriage.
That's the first application, the first solution against temptation that will drive you to hell, the world, the flesh, and the devil.
Three enemies, three solutions marriage, then accountability, and ambition.
Let's talk about accountability now.
What can men do in terms of accountability to spare their soul?
Any thoughts?
The biggest one is software.
It's like, oh my goodness, I fell into this again.
How could this be?
I live alone.
I have a laptop and a phone with no filters, with no accountability on them.
I don't understand how this keeps happening.
Paul instructs Timothy to flee youthful lust.
You would never live in an apartment.
You're downtown.
Hey, happens this door actually is just a direct line right down a hallway to a gentleman's club.
Paul does not say, okay, yeah, you could live there.
Just have good self control.
He would say, flee, run away, don't live there.
So for the modern man, hey, I have a phone with no filter.
I have a phone with no accountability.
I have a laptop with no accountability.
You are to flee, if you struggle in this way, the temptation of that.
I knew a man, he wrote a book, and he said that he would literally take his laptop and lock it in the car at night.
That's how serious it was.
Filters weren't working.
Accountability wouldn't work.
I will take this device, I will lock it away from me.
I will not be alone with the phone.
And then, even accountability, not to the ultimate end oh, I failed.
Hey, accountability, I was alone last night.
I didn't even do anything.
I had my phone with me.
I'd committed to turning it off, I'd committed to locking it in my car.
So, accountability just for even setting up the context in which you can sin.
And so, if you need these measures, you have to take them.
This would be the modern equivalent of cutting off your hand.
So, Jesus is not literally saying, go out, grab the old chainsaw, rev it up.
And hack that thing off.
He's saying, if you can't have a phone, don't have one.
If you can't have a laptop, don't have one.
Whatever means, whatever things you need to cut out of your life, cut them out.
And accountability and then confession to others when you do sin, those are the two tools that you have at your disposal.
Internet pornography is terrible in that it's persuasive, pervasive, it's everywhere, it's accessible, but also it's on the internet.
It lives in the cloud.
You can take your devices, you can put them away from you, and you can sit there in an empty room with books and your Bible and actually not have that same level of temptation.
Right.
Okay.
Second one is, or that was the second one accountability.
So marriage accountability.
And third, lastly, ambition.
Idle hands are indeed the devil's workshop.
Antonio, do you want to talk about ambition for a while?
Because I have a feeling, maybe I'm wrong, but there are men who are not even Christians.
And I'm not saying they're perfect men, not even close.
I'm sure that they've had their fair share of sexual temptation and given in on multiple occasions.
But there are some non Christian, top tier, high caliber men.
That we all know, they're famous, they work 16 hour days, they're constantly innovating, conquering, doing these kinds of things.
I would bet my house that these men are looking at pornography at least less than the average man without even a zeal and love for Christ, without even a God fearing, healthy marriage, without even having other Christian brothers around them that actually hold this standard and would hold them accountable, but strictly by virtue of being ambitious men.
They're just, they think of pornography and they don't even think of it necessarily as morally evil, but they think of pornography as something for the plebes.
Yeah, something that holds them back, right?
It's like, say what you will, but the red pill movement filled with degeneracy.
And obviously, I think fornication and those sorts of things are promoted.
But one other, I guess, underlying element of it is that I'd say you generally see a rejection of pornography.
It's considered, to your point, like for the plebes, it's considered low class or whatever the case is.
It's goy.
It's for losers.
Losers sit in the corner and watch another man take a girl.
Yeah, but there is a truth to the point of like ambition being.
You use the example of a man who's alone.
You know, you work a job, you get off at three, you're at home by four, and you're home alone from 4 p.m. at the gym.
Yeah, exactly.
There's no gym.
There's, I think, friendships a big one.
Friendships, obviously, a big one for accountability, but it's also a big one for ambition.
Do you have men that you are around consistently regularly, particularly if you're a single man, that you're spending a lot of time with?
You're going, you have hobbies, you guys are trying to build something together, you're building a business.
But I mean, it's.
I would say it's pretty logically consistent that if you're spending all of your time doing something, building something, one, you get the internal reward for saying, I'm building, I'm being useful, I'm being productive.
You get that internal satisfaction.
But obviously, the consequence of that is you don't have a lot of free time.
You don't have a lot of free time to slip and fall into sin and to error, into poor pathways in your life.
And that, I mean, it extends even beyond pornography to alcohol, right?
Men who are more lonely are far more likely to be addicted to alcohol, are far more likely to be addicted.
Be addicted to drugs, et cetera.
And so, this is the idea that the idle hands are the devil's playthings, they're the devil's workshop.
That the less that you're doing in terms of being in alignment with your masculinity, your desire to build, to leverage your productive capacity to have your dominion, to establish dominion in the world, you're going to feel less masculine.
You're going to have far more time.
You're going to feel more pathetic, more shame, even inherent in that.
You're just not doing anything.
And then all of these are the natural bridges to pornography and other forms of addiction.
Be Busy to Kill Sin00:02:27
So, very, very simple.
It becomes a vicious cycle, like you sin and then you feel down, you feel less motivated, less drive.
It keeps you inside from starting that thing.
You're inside, you're down, you're depressed, you indulge in it more, kills even more of your drive.
It can be a vicious cycle to have to do that.
Exactly.
So, it's pretty simple in terms of what the application is.
The application is men, be busy, be busy.
You have a nine to five job, try to build a business on the side.
You have one or two friends, hang out with them more.
Guys, way more summer is right around the corner.
You need to be outside on your jet.
Learn to play chess.
Learn to play chess so much that when you lay down at night, you're just literally seeing chess pieces as you go to bed.
Find something to be hyper specialized at, near obsess over, and continue to build your skills and build confidence in your ability, in your restraint, in your discipline.
All of these things are building a callus to say, I'm going to do something and I do it, or I'm not going to do something and I don't do it because I've trained myself.
I've built up a confidence in myself that when I say I'm going to do something, I do it.
And when I say I'm not going to do something, I don't do it.
Amen.
Smash the subscribe button right away, immediately.
Subscribe.
Don't even have to click the bell.
NXR Studios on YouTube and NXR Studios on Rumble.
We are broadcasting live simultaneously on YouTube and Rumble and over on my personal X account.
Follow me at Joel Webbin on X. Subscribe and click the bell on YouTube and Rumble in XR Studios.
We have one super chat from Dakota Davis.
He said, GM, good morning.
If you're watching corn, is the way that he spelled it, I understand that.
Made by Jewish men, doesn't that make you a gay Zionist?
Hating world Jewry can help free you from sin.
Christ is king.
So true.
Well said.
If you're ever tempted, just imagine fat, sloppy Al Goldstein sitting in the room with you, not getting richer.
And approving.
Yeah, you do that, you good little boy.
Yep.
Kill him.
Kill him.
Yeah, you're looking at animated child porn and you have Dennis Prager's approval.
If that doesn't motivate a man to put his sin to death, I don't know what will.
All right.
Thank you guys for tuning in.
God bless you.
And we will see you, Lord willing.
It's Monday.
We broadcast three times a week Monday, Wednesday, Friday at 12 p.m. Eastern Time.
So we'll see you again, Lord willing, on Wednesday at 12 p.m. Eastern Time.