Nov. 10, 2023 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
01:45:47
| 
| Speaker | Time | Text |
|---|---|---|
|
unidentified
|
Thank you. | |
| Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. | ||
| It's It's going to be only America first. | ||
|
unidentified
|
America first. | |
| The American people will come first once again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
With respect, the respect that we deserve. | |
| From this day forward, it's going to be only America. | ||
| America first. America first. America first. America first. | ||
| America first. | ||
| Good evening, everybody. | ||
| You're watching America First. | ||
| My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes. | ||
| We have a great show for you tonight. | ||
| Very excited to be back here with you tonight on Thursday. | ||
| We have a lot to talk about tonight. | ||
| Lots to get into. | ||
| Big show. | ||
| Big show. | ||
| We're talking about the war in Gaza. | ||
| I'll be giving some updates, small updates, about what's going on over there. | ||
| Nothing too big, but there was a big political win for Biden. | ||
| He was able finally to secure humanitarian pauses. | ||
| Not a ceasefire. | ||
| They don't want anyone to call it that and that's not what it is. | ||
| They secured humanitarian pauses in the fighting. | ||
| So we'll talk about the distinction of what that means. | ||
| We'll also be talking tonight and picking up on what we talked about on Tuesday. | ||
| Which is the situation in Germany, which I find pretty interesting. | ||
| You know, in Germany they're preparing for what they say will be mass deportations of Muslims. | ||
| And this is after they've banned Palestinian protesters. | ||
| And all sorts of other things, and I see that some people are getting excited about this. | ||
| They say, and this goes with what people have been saying about the Gaza War, is that this will be an opportunity, if you're pragmatic, to use the Zionists' anger and wrath towards Muslims right now to get them removed from Western society, or crack down on them on universities. | ||
| And so a lot of people have been saying this is a great deal, that under the pretext of this Zionist war, we're going to be able to remove Muslims from Western society, specifically Europe, but the big problem is they're going to keep bringing people in. | ||
| They're literally just removing the critics of Israel. | ||
| That's the basis for it and that's politically what they say that they're going to do. | ||
| They're going to keep letting in economic migrants and in fact they're going to send them all over Europe. | ||
| They're going to disperse them across all the other European countries. | ||
| It seems that they're only going to get rid of the ones that are criticizing Israel. | ||
| So it's not exactly beneficial in any way. | ||
| Not really a good deal. | ||
| Because after all, If they're coming, if they're coming anyway, there's gonna be refugees, there's gonna be economic migrants, the least they could do is hate Israel, you know? | ||
| If there's a bare minimum... I'm joking, of course. | ||
| That's a joke by the way, but it's like we have people pouring into the West from the third world and maybe the one thing they have going for them is they are not totally a subject of the Zionist lobby. | ||
| That's maybe the one beneficial thing about them. | ||
| And now all these Western governments are going to Filter them according to that and they're only gonna let in the non-white, low IQ, whatever, refugees and migrants that don't have a problem with Israel. | ||
| Or that, even worse, swear allegiance to Israel as opposed to the nation they're coming into. | ||
| So, we'll talk about what's going on there because there's this bigger conversation that's been happening since the war broke out about what position a true nationalist should have. | ||
| That a true white nationalist or a true American nationalist, German, French, European nationalist, people have said, what is the position if you're not a bleeding heart liberal with the Palestinians, if you're not a neocon with the Zionists, what position is it sensible for the nationalists to take? | ||
| And so I want to talk about the situation in Germany because I think it sheds some light on what that answer ought to be. | ||
| So it's gonna be a good show. | ||
| A lot of ground to cover. | ||
| Before we get into it, I want to remind you to smash the follow button on Cozy and on Rumble. | ||
| I'm live every night on Cozy and Rumble simultaneously. | ||
| So make sure to follow me on both to get notified whenever I go live. | ||
| And make sure to follow me on Rumble because all the replays are on Rumble. | ||
| Follow me on both though because I don't know if If they'll let me stay on Rumble. | ||
| There's been a lot of pressure lately to get me kicked off Rumble, which is just outrageous. | ||
| It just never ends, man. | ||
| I mean, and I don't know why I'm the one that gets singled out. | ||
| I'm like, and I don't want to get anybody else in trouble. | ||
| But it's like, hey man, can't you go and focus on, like, Keith Woods for a minute? | ||
| Can't you go and attack Angelo Gage for a sec? | ||
| I don't want anyone to be attacked, but it's like, how come I'm the only one that's getting attacked by everyone all the time? | ||
| What the heck? | ||
| It's like, I finally get on Rumble and the show is blowing up there and everyone's loving it, And then there's like 10 hit pieces this week about my channel on Rumble. | ||
| There was a hit piece from Media Matters. | ||
| There was another hit piece by Wired Magazine. | ||
| So, what's the deal? | ||
| Everyone else can blow up. | ||
| Everyone else can have a channel. | ||
| Why are they still attacking me? | ||
| I thought it was good now. | ||
| I thought we were okay. | ||
| Apparently not. | ||
| I don't know why that is. | ||
| Some people get to say this stuff and it's not really a problem. | ||
| But for whatever reason, I got this like hair. | ||
| I can't. | ||
|
unidentified
|
It's in my line of vision. | |
| For whatever reason, I'm the banned man. | ||
| I'm the only one that gets banned from stuff anymore. | ||
| Everybody keeps telling me cancel culture's over. | ||
| Censorship is over. | ||
| Really? | ||
| Because I'm still not on Twitter and I'm on like one platform and they're trying to chase me off that one too. | ||
| Whatever. | ||
| Anyway, so you have to follow me on Cozy in case I get banned on Rumble. | ||
| So if you're a Rumble exclusive viewer, That's fine. | ||
| Watch me on Rumble. | ||
| But make sure to follow me on Cozy in case I get banned because then you'll never hear from me again. | ||
| Cozy.tv slash Nick and follow me on both. | ||
| With that, we're gonna move on. | ||
| We'll dive into the show. | ||
| Before we get into the news, just a quick follow-up. | ||
| Yesterday I did a couple of streams. | ||
| I did a long, casual stream in the afternoon, and then I streamed the Republican debate, the third GOP primary debate. | ||
| And it's interesting because I watched the debate and, of course, I loved Vivek. | ||
| I thought he was great last night. | ||
| And I've been critical of him, but from the point of view of somebody that wants him to succeed. | ||
| I want him to do well, because I actually like what he has to say. | ||
| I don't know that we align 100%, but he is by far the closest, or the most closely aligned with America First, I would say, than any candidate, maybe even including Trump. | ||
| Vivek is clearly more articulate than Trump and it seems like obviously more energetic and maybe more innovative, more ideas. | ||
| We've been talking for a long time on the show about the all-important question which is who will succeed Trump? | ||
| And we've been looking and searching for who that person or the donor or the whatever that will fill that role and take that baton and see to it that the Trump reforms have been institutionalized in the GOP and actually that we build upon them. | ||
| We don't just cement what Trump changed about the GOP, but we also deepen and intensify and expand it. | ||
| We've been looking for who that's going to be, but we haven't really found that person. | ||
| And I would say that out of everybody, over the past seven years since it all started, Vivek has maybe been the closest to that. | ||
| And I don't necessarily love his look and there's things about him that I'm not a huge fan of, but his message is very good. | ||
| And at the minimum, it's better than everybody other than Trump. | ||
| Maybe even better than Trump himself. | ||
| And so I've been critical of his performances in these debates. | ||
| Really, I'm nitpicking. | ||
| I think that he doesn't really have the temperament to be that leader because He's very young and he's new to politics. | ||
| He's from the tech Startup world and that's really a different energy and you see the contrast when you look at Vivek versus Chris Christie Chris Christie in my opinion is dumb as a bag of rocks But being from New Jersey and having been in politics for decades in like a mobbed up state You could see that he has that kind of EQ that that intelligence that a politician has Like a mobster. | ||
| It's a different type of person. | ||
| Versus in a startup, in a tech startup, in Silicon Valley, in that universe, it's very peppy and it's upbeat and it's a different energy. | ||
| And so my biggest criticism is that when he goes to these debates he's not tough enough. | ||
| He's just not very strong. | ||
| Like, he doesn't know how to handle these confrontations. | ||
| And you could tell because he's not a politician. | ||
| He's just not trained in that type of engagement. | ||
| And I thought he did very well with that last night. | ||
| He came out very strong, very tough. | ||
| And I thought that he delivered some of the best answers so far. | ||
| He got a lot of airtime. | ||
| But what was surprising, and this is what I want to talk about, what I saw today is that Everyone is up in arms from the establishment. | ||
| It seems like the people loved him, but he got such a sour reaction. | ||
| Ronna McDaniel, who's the chair of the RNC, she came out and said, I'm not gonna put a dime in for him. | ||
| We are not gonna help him at all, which is totally unprecedented. | ||
| The RNC chair is not supposed to intervene like that, not supposed to comment on the race. | ||
| And I saw guys like Dave Rubin and many others, all these like neocon Jewish Zionist types were furious with him. | ||
| New York Times ranked him very badly. | ||
| Some of the polling that they did said that he was the least favorable out of the group. | ||
| Just goes to show, they hate to hear that. | ||
| That's the war party. | ||
| Because I think maybe the thing that distinguished him, and it's the same thing that distinguished Trump in 2015, When the 2016 GOP primary started, the thing that distinguished him the most is that he's anti-war. | ||
| That's maybe where he diverges most sharply. | ||
| And he diverges on other things, but that's maybe the sharpest and the most significant departure is that everyone on that stage is a total neocon. | ||
| They want to go to war with Russia, China, and Iran all at the same time. | ||
| And Vivek is the only one Saying enough. | ||
| We're not going to fund our allies. | ||
| We're not going to pour money in to go to war with our adversaries. | ||
| And it's notable that that was the very same thing that differentiated Trump in 2015. | ||
| People forget that. | ||
| And honestly, this is the last thing I'll say, then we'll move on. | ||
| We'll talk about Israel-Palestine. | ||
| Lately, people have criticized me. | ||
| And it's sort of amusing. | ||
| People have tried every vector of attack against me. | ||
| In the early days, they called me a racist, a white nationalist. | ||
| Then they called me a Holocaust denier. | ||
| Then they called me a neo-Nazi. | ||
| Then they started paying people within my inner circle and peeling them off. | ||
| And calling me corrupt, or calling me unethical as a leader, as a business person, or mean, a bad boss, that sort of thing. | ||
| And lately, and none of that has worked, but that's gone on since I started. | ||
| And if you pay attention, it's always a different flavor. | ||
| And lately, what people have been saying, like Pedro Gonzalez and others, They have called me a hypocrite because I support Donald Trump, but yet I'm, of course, very outspoken against the Israel lobby and Jewish power. | ||
| And they say that there's this blatant contradiction because, of course, Donald Trump is intimately connected to the Jewish lobby and the Israel lobby through his son-in-law, Jared Kushner, and that he was the most pro-Israel president and so on. | ||
| And so people have talked up this contradiction and said, oh you're a hypocrite or maybe you're a shill or something like that. | ||
| But I feel the same way about Trump as I do about Vivek on this issue. | ||
| Now, putting aside the fact that I obviously disagree with Trump's support for Israel. | ||
| That's not what I would do, and I'm America first, so I actually lean more towards the Democrats on this. | ||
| And I can do that because I'm not a Republican. | ||
| I'm America first. | ||
| I'm really politically independent. | ||
| And so I actually don't align with most Republican orthodoxy. | ||
| I'm not a Republican. | ||
| I probably align more with Republicans than Democrats because I have conservative views and I am right-wing. | ||
| But I am able to say that I support Biden's position on Israel and Netanyahu. | ||
| I do support that. | ||
| And I'm very much against the Adelson family, which has given patronage to the GOP for 10 plus years, and specifically to Trump. | ||
| I don't like Jared Kushner's relationship with Netanyahu and Mohammed bin Salman. | ||
| And I don't like that he was given so much, or delegated so much responsibility over issues in the first term. | ||
| So, but putting all of that aside, because that's really neither here nor there, here's the important thing. | ||
| The biggest issue that we have with Israel is not that the United States moved the embassy. | ||
| It's not that we have recognized Israel's sovereignty over the Golan, which is what Trump recognized. | ||
| Of course, the worst The biggest consequence of Israel's capture of our foreign policy establishment is the war machine. | ||
| That's the $7 trillion, like Vivek said last night, that's the $7 trillion liability that Israel represents. | ||
| And it's even greater than that. | ||
| If you understand anything about America's foreign policy in the Middle East, it has been very, very costly to secure Israel. | ||
| through peace agreements with Egypt and Jordan that we pay for through foreign aid, and through the wars. | ||
| The wars in Iraq, our intervention in Libya, the wars that we have sponsored in Syria, in other places, countering Iran's influence in the region. | ||
| That's the biggest price tag. | ||
| And so all these conversations about America being the world's policemen and America's military overextension and how we're prioritizing foreign interests over domestic interests, it all comes to a head with the Israel lobby capture over the government and these it all comes to a head with the Israel lobby capture And so this is where you resolve the contradiction. | ||
| People say, well, how do you support Vivek or Trump? | ||
| And they say nice things about Israel, or they've pledged to do diplomatic things with Israel. | ||
| It's because the biggest problem is that we have been dragged to war. | ||
| And Trump, the first thing he did, even before he talked about the wall, is he said that the war in Iraq was a mistake. | ||
| He's been saying that since it started. | ||
| So he was saying that he was against the war in Iraq since 2003. | ||
| Right up through to the Republican primary in 2015, he made it a big issue in all the debates. | ||
| And Tucker Carlson did a show this summer and he said that is the original sin that Trump committed as he went against the wars. | ||
| And that's correct. | ||
| And he was staunchly and consistently and steadfastly against the wars and he shamed the entire field into reversing that position because we were poised in 16 to have another cycle where Republicans were apologists for Bush and for the Iraq War. | ||
| Like Republicans in 16 were still owning the Iraq War. | ||
| Like it wasn't a mistake. | ||
| And I remember because if you looked at all the propaganda back then, it was all apologism for the war in Iraq. | ||
| and how it was actually a good thing and Obama's withdrawal was premature and a mistake and we went in and we have to stay in because otherwise it creates a vacuum and Iran fills a vacuum and God forbid and all this other stuff it was actually a success and actually there were WMDs it just wasn't nuclear it was chemical on and on and on and Trump came in and maybe the | ||
| The biggest sea change, it wasn't just on immigration, it was on war. | ||
| He said, we are now against wars. | ||
| And this is completely against GOP orthodoxy. | ||
| The voters are still more pro-war than Trump was seven years ago. | ||
| And I found that out, I sort of realized that throughout the first term. | ||
| Whenever Tucker Carlson would deliver an anti-war monologue when he was at Fox News, all the Facebook comments on his shows would be negative. | ||
| Like, the core Fox News viewer base were more pro-war than Tucker or Trump. | ||
| And so that's where, even though I don't love how deep Trump's ties are to the kingdom and to Israel, by the same token, he didn't expand or initiate any wars in the Middle East, which is more than can be said about Obama and Bush. | ||
| And Bush Senior, and anybody in a really long time. | ||
| That's why they all hated him. | ||
| And the same is true with Vivek. | ||
| I recognize that Vivek lately has been paying more lip service to Israel, and that's because he really fell out of favor. | ||
| If you pay close attention to this stuff, people are sort of interested in him as a novelty, and then he really fell out of favor when he indicated that he might suspend aid to Israel. | ||
| And that was a big media cycle several weeks back. | ||
| And now they hate him. | ||
| And when he went out there last night, it was the same deal. | ||
| He said, you guys are neocons. | ||
| You're Dick Cheney. | ||
| You want to go to war with everybody? | ||
| We can't do that. | ||
| So that's why I liked Trump back then. | ||
| That's why I support him, even though there's some cringe stuff in there. | ||
| It's why I like Vivek even though he's paying the obligatory lip service to the Zionists. | ||
| Because they are a fixture. | ||
| That's what it is. | ||
| That's a political reality when you're running in the GOP primary. | ||
| So, you gotta keep your eye on the prize and realize what really matters. | ||
| It's not just about, does somebody say they support Israel? | ||
| What's our problem? | ||
| Our problem is not the $3.8 billion or the $6.6 billion in annual foreign aid. | ||
| That's actually not good. | ||
| I don't like that. | ||
| But the much bigger concern is the endless and unconditional security guarantee We guarantee every action by a expansionist, maximalist, provocative, antagonistic state in the Middle East which is drawing us further and further into a regional and maybe a world war. | ||
| That's been the subject of the show for the last month. | ||
| That's the problem. | ||
| Don't look at the $3.8 billion. | ||
| That's not...it's an issue, but that's not really the main issue. | ||
| The issue is what you've seen over the past month. | ||
| And in that sense, it's sort of invisible. | ||
| You can't put a price tag on an unconditional security guarantee. | ||
| But when Israel says that they're going to send 400,000 soldiers into Gaza and kill everybody, and we're expected to go and cover for them, and we're going to be dragged along into a conflict with every country in the Middle East, Iran is in virtually every country, then you see that that's the real problem. | ||
| 3.8 billion a year? | ||
| That is a lot of money. | ||
| But it's nothing compared to the risk that we will be engaging Russia, China, and Iran in every other country in the whole region, which would be just a catastrophe. | ||
| So, we need to support politicians that That want to have independence. | ||
| That's why we say America first. | ||
| We want to have a strategic independence from the State of Israel. | ||
| We can call them an ally. | ||
| We can even give them foreign aid. | ||
| We can move the embassy. | ||
| We can attack their enemies. | ||
| We could say the IRGC are terrorists. | ||
| All of that, honestly, is not really the problem. | ||
| The problem is the commitment that we will cosign everything they do up to and including a nuclear World War III. | ||
| So, as long as Vivek and Trump are against that, I support them over DeSantis and Nikki Haley, who are owned by Israel, and they are looking forward to a war with China. | ||
| And even, this last thing I'll say, I promise, even the language on China is totally different. | ||
| If you remember about Trump, Trump as a businessman, but a different kind of businessman. | ||
| That's another interesting thing. | ||
| Trump is a New York real estate developer. | ||
| Vivek is a tech startup guy. | ||
| So even within the business world, there's a distinction. | ||
| But when Trump came in, In 16 or 15, when he entered the race, he said, China rips us off, they win, we don't beat China anymore. | ||
| At the same time though, he would say, but that's okay, their leaders are smart. | ||
| He said, I don't blame them. | ||
| They're only doing what they're supposed to do. | ||
| And implicit in that is all kinds of assumptions. | ||
| About how world affairs actually work and it shows an actually mature understanding of the world. | ||
| Which is to say, when Trump says that China's leaders are smart for ripping us off, he's saying that China is an independent country and they have a self-interest and in the world, All of these countries have a self-interest and they're coming into conflict with each other. | ||
| That doesn't make China evil, because they're pursuing their self-interest at the expense of our country, which is to them a foreign nation. | ||
| They're being competitive. | ||
| And so that's a completely different frame than the Cold Warrior, you know, the Reaganite New Cold Warrior who says, China's evil, Putin's a thug, we have to kill them, the world belongs to us, not them, they're evil, they kill Uyghurs, they're tyrants and dictators and their regime is illegitimate and we're gonna kill them all and we're gonna go to war with them and they're evil. | ||
| It's a totally different framing. | ||
| And so Trump came in and saw China as an adversary and a competitor, but also a potential partner, but also a fixture in the world that has legitimate self-interest, that has legitimate autonomy and independence, and that we would have to compete and cooperate with them in the world. | ||
| But a foundation is that we both, it's against both of our interests to engage in war. | ||
| Trade war, world war, anything like that. | ||
| That's very different from DeSantis who comes in and says, it's a new Cold War, we have to ban TikTok, we have to go to war culturally, economically, militarily, we have to build a million subs and All that. | ||
| So, anyway. | ||
| So that's that. | ||
| But I want to move on. | ||
| I want to get into our news here. | ||
| And so we'll start, I want to talk a little bit about the latest in the Gaza War. | ||
| And, like I said last week, there are not going to be any major developments until we see what happens in North Gaza. | ||
| Because we still don't know Israel's endgame. | ||
| They refuse to say what it is. | ||
| The war has gone on now for over a month, and all that we have heard from Jerusalem, they've said that their intention is to destroy Hamas. | ||
| But they have not said specifically what that means. | ||
| So we don't know what the goal is of this Israeli war in Gaza. | ||
| Are they going to occupy the entire Gaza Strip? | ||
| Are they going to annex the Gaza Strip? | ||
| Are they going to stop in North Gaza? | ||
| We don't know, on the ground, tactically speaking, what their objectives are. | ||
| And they said that that's deliberate. | ||
| They're maintaining a deliberate ambiguity about their objectives. | ||
| In order to maintain a strategic advantage over Hamas and to some extent Iran and its proxies. | ||
| So when we learned last week, almost a week to the day, when we learned last Friday from the Hezbollah chief, when he declined to declare an all-out war against Israel and him speaking on behalf of the Islamic resistance in Iraq and Yemen and Syria, That basically told us that the war is going to continue as is. | ||
| Israel will continue its operation in North Gaza. | ||
| There will not be an escalation or a widening in other countries or between Iran's proxies in Israel or Iran's proxies in the United States. | ||
| And so the next major thing to look for in the conflict is when Israel finishes in North Gaza. | ||
| They have been encircling Gaza City for the past two weeks, which is in the northern half of Gaza. | ||
| They are beginning to penetrate into the core of Gaza City now. | ||
| That's been happening the last couple days. | ||
| And when they finish in Gaza City, whatever that looks like, that is going to be another inflection point. | ||
| And either the Israelis will declare mission accomplished, or they will continue to move south. | ||
| They'll either declare a mission accomplished and a discussion will begin about who is going to administer control over Gaza after the war. | ||
| Or the war will continue and expand and they'll move south. | ||
| And then we'll have to look again to Hezbollah and see what their response to that will be. | ||
| But that's where we are in the war. | ||
| So nothing major has changed. | ||
| And in fact, on Sunday, there will be another speech from the chief of Hezbollah, Nasrallah. | ||
| He'll be giving another speech this weekend. | ||
| So we'll watch that and see if there's any developments. | ||
| But nothing has really changed since we last talked about it. | ||
| A minor development that happened today, though, is important with the relationship between Israel and the United States. | ||
| The Biden administration has been pressuring Israel to limit the civilian casualties because the primary strategic objective of the United States here is that we don't want the conflict to widen into a war with Iran. | ||
| Or Iranian proxies in Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, and Yemen. | ||
| So the United States recognizes that there is an intimate relationship between the duration of the war and the severity of civilian casualties and the likelihood that the war will widen. | ||
| In other words, the more that Israel kills Palestinians and the longer they kill Palestinians, the more likely it will be that Iran will go to war with Israel. | ||
| That Iran's proxies will escalate their attacks on Israel, that Israel might retaliate, and then it's a full-blown regional war. | ||
| So because of this dynamic, since the beginning, the Biden administration has urged Israel to delay its invasion. | ||
| Initially, the invasion was supposed to happen a week after the Al-Aqsa flood on October 7th, and it was going to be an all-out, full-on invasion. | ||
| But the Biden administration sent Blinken out and they successfully pressured the Israelis to delay the invasion, although maybe it was because the Israelis were simply unprepared. | ||
| We don't exactly know, but the Biden administration got what they wanted, which is that Israel delayed the invasion and they made it more, they made it slower, they made it more surgical and gradual to limit the amount of casualties. | ||
| And then since then, the Biden administration has urged Israel to pause the fighting in parts of the Gaza Strip to allow for humanitarian aid to come through and for there to be areas or periods of time where the Biden administration has urged Israel to pause the fighting in parts of the Gaza Strip to allow for humanitarian aid to come through and for there to be areas or | ||
| So the minor development today is that finally that diplomacy triumphed and Israel has agreed to these humanitarian pauses. | ||
| And this is from the New York Times. | ||
| It says, quote, Israel has agreed to put in place daily four-hour pauses in its relentless assault on Hamas in selected areas of northern Gaza to allow civilians to flee or go outside without fear of danger. | ||
|
unidentified
|
her. | |
| The agreement formalizes and expands on what Israel has been doing already in recent days, as it suspended attacks along a single corridor for several hours at a time to allow people to leave northern Gaza. | ||
| In addition to opening a second such evacuation corridor along a coastal road, Israel will designate a specific area or neighborhood each day that will be free of fighting for four hours. | ||
| Israeli authorities seem most intent on making clear that the pauses were limited in time and area, rather than a sustained halt in their military operations. | ||
| The IDF wrote on Twitter, quote, there is no ceasefire. | ||
| There are tactical local pauses for humanitarian aid for Gazan civilians. | ||
| Our war is with Hamas and not with the people of Gaza. | ||
| Mr. Biden said on Thursday, quote, I've asked for a pause longer than three days, asked if he was frustrated that Mr. Netanyahu took so long to agree. | ||
| The president hinted at impatience. | ||
| He said, quote, it's taken a little longer than I hoped. | ||
| But Mr. Biden has not joined the calls by some in his party and around the world for a full ceasefire, reasoning that Israel has a legitimate interest in destroying Hamas after the October 7th attack. | ||
| Asked about the prospect of a ceasefire again today, Biden said, none, no possibility. | ||
| And that's the thing. | ||
| They want to draw a distinction between a ceasefire and a humanitarian pause. | ||
| And these things do matter. | ||
| People laugh because it seems like semantics. | ||
| And it is, by definition, semantics. | ||
| But semantics matter. | ||
| And there was a funny clip this week where Justin Trudeau almost slipped and said ceasefire and then he said a ceasing of hostilities in some places. | ||
| So they don't even want to use the word ceasefire. | ||
| Ceasefires become a loaded word, where there was a UN General Assembly resolution about a ceasefire, and Democrats are calling for a ceasefire, and Palestinians, Arabs are calling for a ceasefire, the whole world is calling for a ceasefire. | ||
| And they want a ceasefire because they're saying that the people of Palestine need time to leave, and the humanitarian relief has to come in. | ||
| But Israel is saying that if there is a ceasefire, that's going to allow Hamas to adjust. | ||
| So, because Israel has to destroy Hamas because of the attack on October 7th, there can be no ceasefire, because that would be a display of weakness and it would allow Hamas to adjust. | ||
| And the United States and Canada and other Western European countries and Eastern European countries, they say that Israel has to do whatever it needs to do. | ||
| Do what you gotta do to kill every last Hamas operative. | ||
| No ceasefire. | ||
| And it's interesting, of course, Biden, even though there are progressive Democrats that call for a ceasefire, Biden says, no, we want a humanitarian pause. | ||
| So never cease bombing. | ||
| Bomb every day forever. | ||
| But just maybe stop bombing, pause the bombing. | ||
| Don't cease bombing, pause the bombing in some places to allow for aid to come through. | ||
| But you know what? | ||
| Ultimately, The humanitarian pauses is, it's almost worse, in a certain sense. | ||
| Because you might say, well, it's better than nothing. | ||
| But do you know what this does? | ||
| It creates this sense of complacency, where the bombing never stops, the civilian casualties rise every day, and Israel is killing United Nations relief workers, they're killing journalists, Which is illegal, but it's not the worst thing ever. | ||
| You know, when I hear UN workers and journalists are being killed, I'm like... No! | ||
|
unidentified
|
No! | |
| Not the UN and journalists! | ||
| Those are my two favorite kinds of people! | ||
| Are people that work for the supranational global government and journalists? | ||
| No. | ||
| Kidding, of course. | ||
| That is a war crime and it is illegal. | ||
| And remember, Israel is a bad guy here. | ||
| That's bad when they do that. | ||
| I hate when they do that. | ||
| It is bad though because in this case the journalists are actually good. | ||
| Because they're documenting a genocide and they're undermining Israeli and Jewish power in the world. | ||
| So, regardless of my little joke in the middle there, which no one should take seriously, but Israel is killing journalists, UN relief workers, they're killing children, they're killing civilians, and they're doing it every day and the death toll continues to rise. | ||
| It's illegal, it's a genocide, it's indiscriminate, it's not humanitarian or humane, I should say, and The good thing is that the silver lining in this horrible situation is that finally the world is waking up and paying attention to the Palestinian cause. | ||
| And in that sense, Hamas has succeeded because the whole world was ready to forget about Palestine. | ||
| The whole world was ready to forget about the Gaza Strip, specifically Saudi Arabia and the United States. | ||
| We're paving the way to normalize ties with Israel without resolving the Palestinian issue. | ||
| And so what Hamas did with the Al-Aqsa flood is they put Palestine literally and figuratively on the map. | ||
| And now the whole world is paying attention. | ||
| The whole world sees the barbarity or the barbarism of Israel and how evil they are. | ||
| And when the Biden administration comes in and they let the bombing continue but they just stop the bombing in certain areas, it does provide relief and I'm sure the people of Gaza are grateful to have that. | ||
| But all it does is create this perception that Israel is being humane when they're not. | ||
| It creates this perception that Israel is taking steps to mitigate civilian casualties when they're not. | ||
| They're not letting enough relief in. | ||
| They're not stopping the bombing. | ||
| They're still killing whoever they want. | ||
| The United States still justifies that and it still guarantees that with its Navy and its Air Force. | ||
| So... | ||
| So to me, the humanitarian pause, this is just like a paltry consolation and all this does is create, more than anything, I think it creates political maneuverability for the Arab states, for Saudi Arabia and for Egypt and for Jordan and the Gulf states. | ||
| It allows them to quell popular discontent about their government's relationship with Israel while Israel is murdering people. | ||
| So it's really just a cheap tactic to to buy some political capital for people that are in full support of this. | ||
| The Democrats fully support this. | ||
| America fully supports this. | ||
| The Arabs fully support this on some level. | ||
| And when they say, well, we're fighting for humanitarian pauses, it's creating the appearance that they're fighting for the Palestinians when they're not really doing that. | ||
| It's creating the appearance that they're trying to reign in Israel, but they're really not doing that at all. | ||
| So that's why I don't love that. | ||
| So that's that. | ||
| The other development is that the United States is being dragged further and further into the conflict because the United States keeps being attacked in the Middle East. | ||
| And it seems like nobody's talking about that. | ||
| That the United States is being bombed every day in the Middle East because of our support for Israel. | ||
| So we are being directly attacked And we're being directly attacked because of Israel. | ||
| Israel is killing civilians. | ||
| We're making sure that they are allowed to do that. | ||
| And as a consequence, people are bombing us. | ||
| And I feel like if more people knew that, they would say that we should stop letting Israel kill Palestinians. | ||
| If we're getting bombed because of our support for something that we don't even support, because of our military making sure that Israel can do something abhorrent that no one in America supports, Maybe the situation might change. | ||
| I feel like Americans would say that we need to either restrain Israel or we need to stop supporting them. | ||
| So this is a story from AntiWar.com. | ||
| It says, quote, The Pentagon said on Wednesday night that the U.S. | ||
| launched more airstrikes in eastern Syria that targeted a facility used by Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and affiliated groups. | ||
| This is a big deal because if we kill anyone from the IRGC, That means that the United States is at war with Iran. | ||
| So this is a very dangerous game we're playing. | ||
| This is why we're talking about World War III. | ||
| And this is different, by the way, from Hezbollah. | ||
| Hezbollah is affiliated with Iran, but it isn't Iran. | ||
| When we go and conduct airstrikes in Syria, first of all, we're bombing Syria. | ||
| So we're attacking one country, which is an ally of Russia, China, and Iran. | ||
| And we're bombing Iran's paramilitary in Syria. | ||
| So we're attacking Syria, and we're attacking Iran. | ||
| Which is different than if we were bombing Hezbollah, or if we were bombing a Shiite militia in Iraq, or the Houthis, It says the U.S. | ||
| launched similar airstrikes on October 27th in an attempt to deter further attacks on U.S. | ||
| forces in the region. | ||
| But the rocket and drone fire on U.S. | ||
| bases has not stopped. | ||
| At least 41 attacks have been reported since October 17th, injuring at least 45 troops. | ||
| An umbrella group of Shia militias that calls itself the Islamic Resistance of Iraq has taken credit for many of the attacks. | ||
| The militias received support from Iran, but it's unclear if Tehran is directing the attacks. | ||
| The Pentagon previously acknowledged that it had no evidence of direct Iranian involvement. | ||
| For their part, Iran has denied any role in the attacks on U.S. | ||
| troops. | ||
| Responding to U.S. | ||
| allegations, Iran's representative to the United Nations said Tuesday that Tehran has never been involved in any actions or attacks directed at the United States military in Syria or Iraq. | ||
| There are no reports of casualties yet in the U.S. | ||
| strikes. | ||
| If IRGC personnel were hit, it would risk a huge escalation with Iran. | ||
| And that's the problem. | ||
| You see, and it goes back to this arrangement which we've been discussing. | ||
| Israel can't do what it's doing without America. | ||
| It can't. | ||
| And Iran has been saying this, and it's true. | ||
| That if the United States did not have subs, marines, aircraft carriers, fighter jets, right off the coast of Israel, ready to attack Hezbollah and Iran, Israel could not conduct this war. | ||
| They are 33 days into a war that they should not even be able to engage in. | ||
| And they wouldn't be able to engage in it because regional players would check them. | ||
| Iran would check them. | ||
| Hezbollah would check them. | ||
| Syria would check them. | ||
| Even the Arabs would be able to check them. | ||
| But the United States has been deploying all of its diplomatic and military and economic resources to keep the Arabs in line and to keep the Iranian coalition in check. | ||
| As a consequence of that, we are fundamentally responsible. | ||
| Because of that dynamic, that makes us responsible. | ||
| We own Israel's actions. | ||
| We don't even agree with them. | ||
| The Biden administration doesn't agree with it. | ||
| Most Americans don't agree with that. | ||
| And the American regime has been against Israel's actions for a long time, going back to really the beginning. | ||
| And yet here we are owning the most heinous actions that the entire world opposes. | ||
| The whole world Is against Israel. | ||
| The states of virtually every country, the governments of virtually every country, have condemned Israel. | ||
| And the people of every country in the world are against what Israel is doing. | ||
| So yes, the United States supports Israel, the government supports Israel, even the American people don't support Israel. | ||
| And yet we're owning what they're doing. | ||
| We're owning the worst thing in the world that everyone hates, Because we're making sure that Israel can do it. | ||
| Because we're threatening to go to war with anybody that tries to stop them from doing it. | ||
| As a consequence, we're being bombed every day. | ||
| As a consequence, we're being bombed every day in Iraq and Syria by these Shiite militias. | ||
| And we have to respond. | ||
| So, and we have been escalating these responses. | ||
| First, we were just shooting down their missiles. | ||
| The Houthi rebels in Yemen, which are backed by Iran, were launching missiles to southern Israel and the United States was shooting them down. | ||
| And then we would retaliate against some of these militias in Iraq and Syria. | ||
| Now it's escalated to the point where we're carrying out airstrikes in Syria, which is a sovereign nation. | ||
| And by the way, Syria is an ally of Russia and China and Iran, and we're conducting airstrikes in their sovereign territory, where we have bases, and we're bombing Iran! | ||
| In this case, we bombed the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, which is different than the Iranian Armed Forces. | ||
| The Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps is a paramilitary wing that serves the Ayatollah directly, that serves the Supreme Leader directly. | ||
| But they are Iranian military personnel, and we're bombing their facilities. | ||
| So if the United States accidentally hits and kills somebody in these facilities, that means that the United States military has attacked the Iranian military, has killed someone in the Iranian military. | ||
| So do you understand now the risk that initially it's Israel versus Hamas in Gaza? | ||
| Now it's the United States attacking Iran in Syria, where Russia has a military base. | ||
| That's why this war cannot go on any longer. | ||
| The longer that this war goes on, the longer that Israel is in Gaza, and therefore these Shiite militias are attacking us for supporting it, The longer it goes on, the likelihood increases every day that the conflict escalates and widens. | ||
| That Iran gets dragged in, that Hezbollah gets dragged in, that we get dragged in. | ||
| Because Muslim anger, anger in the Muslim world increases with every dead Palestinian. | ||
| The longer it goes on, the more Palestinians die, the more videos of children being blown to smithereens by Israel, the more the people in these countries are going to rise up. | ||
| And they're going to demand on the Shiite Iranian side that Hezbollah and the Axis of Resistance escalate their attacks. | ||
| And in the Arab countries, in the Sunni Arab countries that are against Iran, they're going to start to join Iran. | ||
| There's a big problem in the Arabian Peninsula. | ||
| What happens when Iran is the only Muslim country that's standing up to the United States and Israel? | ||
| You're going to have a problem in Bahrain. | ||
| You're going to have a problem in Saudi Arabia's eastern province, because you've got Shiites living there. | ||
| You're going to have a problem, I would say, even among the rest of the population. | ||
| Hamas is Muslim Brotherhood, but Iran is the only country that supports them. | ||
| Similarly, even though these other countries have had normalized ties with Israel, their people don't like that. | ||
| And pretty soon they're going to look to Iran and it's going to create instability within these countries. | ||
| And that is going to create pressure on Saudi Arabia or the Gulf countries or other Arab countries. | ||
| To take other diplomatic steps against Israel. | ||
| This is what's pushing Iran and Saudi Arabia together. | ||
| It's pushing Iran, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia together. | ||
| Seems like a wild proposition, but yet it's happening before our eyes. | ||
| The Iranian President and the Crown Prince had a call two weeks ago. | ||
| The Saudi Finance Minister said that they will begin investment into Iran. | ||
| The Iranian President will visit Riyadh for the first time. | ||
| For a meeting of the Organization of the Islamic Community? | ||
| So... It's not good. | ||
| Not a good situation. | ||
| So, anyway, those are the latest developments on the war. | ||
| I want to get into a little bit, uh, what's happening in Germany. | ||
| And we were going to cover this on Tuesday, but I ran out of time. | ||
| Tuesday talking about, I think it was, what, the Transgender Manifesto or whatever, that Colorado shooter. | ||
| But I wanted to talk about the situation in Germany because there's been this conversation happening on the right about who nationalists should support in the Gaza war. | ||
| Because it's Israelis versus Palestinians, and more broadly it's the Zionists versus a Muslim world. | ||
| And then on a global scale, in our countries at home, it's the Zionists that wield influence in the elite, Versus these Muslim immigrants and refugees that have come in. | ||
| So there's layers to the conflict. | ||
| Where the form that the conflict has taken in the United States, for example, is that you have militant left-wingers who are non-white and they're either immigrants or they're foreign students or they're refugees or they're liberal, they're black or black and white American liberals and they're taken to the streets of the major cities and on the university campuses And in opposition to them are all the Jews in media. | ||
| It's all the Zionist Jews at CNN and Fox, and the Zionist Jews on Wall Street, and the Zionist Jews on Wall Street that give tens or hundreds of millions of dollars to the universities. | ||
| And so that is how the battle has occurred here in the West. | ||
| And of course, the battle here in the West is very much part of the battle over there. | ||
| It's not separate. | ||
| People say, well, this doesn't concern us. | ||
| It's happening thousands of miles away. | ||
| What does that have to do with the United States? | ||
| It has everything to do with the United States. | ||
| Because as we just talked about, the war over there can't happen unless American subs and carriers and Marines and planes are there. | ||
| So, it matters very much what popular opinion in the United States is. | ||
| It matters very much what the media ecosystem is in the United States. | ||
| Because if the United States slips in its support for Israel, if Israel doesn't have complete confidence in an American security guarantee, if the Muslim world Doesn't have confidence that the United States unconditionally supports Israel. | ||
| It completely changes the dynamic. | ||
| That's why Joe Biden took a trip there. | ||
| And that's why they refused to say ceasefire. | ||
| Because in a conflict like this, everybody is watching everybody else very closely. | ||
| And so when you have a very delicate system, like we talked about of these checks in the region, Where Israel's on Hamas, Hezbollah's on Israel, the United States is on Hezbollah. | ||
| It's a game of confidence. | ||
| It's a Mexican standoff. | ||
| It's a game of chicken. | ||
| And so if the United States, if there's even a question, As to whether or not the United States political establishment can or does completely support Israel in a sustained way, that changes the calculus of Hezbollah. | ||
| If Hezbollah has even the inkling that maybe the United States would back off, it increases the likelihood that they will attack Israel, that they will open up a second front in the war on Israel's northern border. | ||
| This completely changes the war. | ||
| If Israel only has to worry about Hamas in Gaza, and although they have troops deployed and they've evacuated the border in the north, but if they have confidence that there won't be fighting in the north and they could just focus on the south, this is doable. | ||
| This is something that they can handle. | ||
| But again, if a front opens up in the north, if Hezbollah attacks, if missiles are raining down from Yemen, and they're raining down from Iraq, and maybe there's attacks from the West Bank, this is a war that Israel cannot handle. | ||
| This rapidly spirals out of their control into a nightmare scenario, maybe worse than they've ever faced in the history of the country. | ||
| And again, Whether or not that happens, it all goes down, it's the linchpin, it's the crux. | ||
| Does Iran and does Hezbollah, do they have absolute confidence that the United States will intervene against them if they attack Israel? | ||
| Are they sure? | ||
| Are they absolutely certain that the United States will come in with overwhelming deterrent force to deny any incursion into Israel or any missile strikes on Israel? | ||
| Will they come to Israel's aid like they have with Ukraine? | ||
| That's why for Israel, the American regime's support has to be rock solid. | ||
| It has to be unconditional, unquestioning, and sustained. | ||
| That's why Biden won't say ceasefire. | ||
| That's why we veto the Security Council Resolution. | ||
| That's why Blinken has been making the trip and Biden made the trip. | ||
| And that's why, is it overkill to have two carrier strike groups and a nuclear submarine and thousands of Marines out there? | ||
| Yes. | ||
| Yes and no. | ||
| All those assets need to be there to create a credible deterrent threat. | ||
| And it's not just about having the military assets there. | ||
| There needs to be the credible political deterrent threat as well. | ||
| That there is a political will to execute on that threat. | ||
| So when... | ||
| There are massive protests in the streets of the United States. | ||
| And when there is a narrative war on social media, and when there are these battles on America's most prestigious university campuses, it's very much part of the war in Gaza. | ||
| Because if public opinion goes against Israel, and it undermines political support for this administration because it's an election year, 2024 is around the corner. | ||
| Biden needs progressives. | ||
| Biden needs independents. | ||
| If public support waivers for Israel, and it moves the needle for Biden, it changes the score for this entire conflict. | ||
| Because if America's resolve goes down, then it emboldens Iran and Hezbollah. | ||
| If Iran and Hezbollah are emboldened, and Israel has reasonable suspicion that Iran and Hezbollah might attack, It changes the war completely. | ||
| It's a totally different conflict. | ||
| It's not just a war in Gaza, now it's a war on every front against the entire Middle East. | ||
| Against Iranian proxies in Iraq, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and the Palestinians in West Bank and the Gaza Strip. | ||
| Totally different situation. | ||
| So, I've seen a lot of nationalists say, well, it doesn't matter. | ||
| What's going on over there doesn't matter. | ||
| I say screw them both. | ||
| I say fuck them both. | ||
| Whatever. | ||
| And it's like that's the wrong position to have because, of course, the Israelis and the Palestinians care very much about what's happening in America because what America decides is going to change. | ||
| We're the ones that are the determining factor in the conflict. | ||
| So what we say and what we think here in America, they both care deeply. | ||
| Specifically the Zionists care deeply. | ||
| And obviously the Zionists are winning. | ||
| And as I just laid out before, this is intimately connected with American interest. | ||
| Now I've seen a lot of nationalists say, we should just stay out of it. | ||
| We should just be neutral. | ||
| If the Zionists and the Palestinians are fighting in the streets, let them fight it out. | ||
| Let Israel and Palestine kill each other. | ||
| And they're saying that we should have a neutral stance. | ||
| But if we're neutral right now, it doesn't mean that America is neutral. | ||
| If you and I are neutral, it doesn't mean that the American state is neutral. | ||
| The American state is on the side of Israel. | ||
| Unconditionally, completely on the side of Israel, and it has consequences for America. | ||
| America is being attacked. | ||
| The world blames America. | ||
| It is increasing multi-polarity in the region and changing our relationship with our Arab neighbors. | ||
| This proxy war with Saudi Arabia and Iran is cooling off because of this. | ||
| It's changing everything. | ||
| So when people say that we should be neutral, There is no neutrality. | ||
| We are on the side of Israel. | ||
| And we are on the side of Israel because the Zionists control the media, and the Zionists control the State Department, and the Zionists control the lobbying in Congress. | ||
| That's why all the congressmen vote for these resolutions. | ||
| That's why AIPAC wins all their elections. | ||
| That's why the State Department is run by a Jew. | ||
| And the Biden cabinet is full of them. | ||
| And it goes on and on like this. | ||
| There's been another aspect of it as well. | ||
| It's not just that some nationalists say that we should be neutral. | ||
| Some nationalists say, and this is an interesting way of looking at it, some nationalists have said, and by the way a lot of them are Jewish, they say that Zionists are in power. | ||
| And because Zionists are in power, and Israel is currently under attack, the Zionists in America are using their power to go after the Palestinian cause in America. | ||
| Because it matters so much, That America completely supports Israel. | ||
| The Zionists here are rabid. | ||
| It's like whack-a-mole. | ||
| Anywhere they see support or solidarity for the Palestinian cause, they're going to use everything at their disposal to go after it. | ||
| That's why Florida bans the Boycott, Divest, and Sanction movement. | ||
| That's why Turning Point USA has these trips to Israel. | ||
| That's why, since the conflict started, A lot of these major Zionist Jewish donors to Ivy League universities are pulling their donations until the universities stand up for Israel. | ||
| That's why Wall Street hedge fund owners are saying they won't hire any students that are pro-Palestine. | ||
| That's why MSNBC and CNN are firing or not putting on television their pro-Palestine presenters. | ||
| And so there are some nationalists that are saying that when you look at the Palestinian cause in America, it's dominated by the left wing. | ||
| BLM supports Palestine. | ||
| A lot of the cultural Marxist left-wing professors support Palestine. | ||
| A lot of the most progressive Democrats support Palestine. | ||
| So a lot of nationalists are saying that if Zionists are attacking Palestinians, And all the Palestinians happen to be left-wing, then we should support this. | ||
| Because even though the Zionists are attacking the Palestinians for the wrong reasons, they're attacking them because they want Israel to win this war. | ||
| We should support them anyway because it achieves the right result, which is that many of the Palestinians, while they're not white, and they're refugees, or they're immigrants, or they're left-wing, or they supported BLM three years ago, so we should let, we should sort of exploit The Zionist influence in America, and we should weaponize it against the left. | ||
| We should direct it against the left, or even in Europe. | ||
| They should direct the Zionist influence to deport Muslims from European countries. | ||
| They should use the Zionist zeal, even though it's, again, motivated by the wrong thing. | ||
| They want to get rid of the Palestinians because they want the West to support Israel forever. | ||
| We should support it anyway because, well, they're removing people that are our political adversaries anyway. | ||
| And they think this is, like, smart. | ||
| But I want to talk about the situation in Germany because it sheds light on this idea. | ||
| So Germany's a good example because a lot of what I'm talking about is happening here. | ||
| There have been major pro-Palestine protests in Germany. | ||
| And in response, the German government is now getting tough. | ||
| And they have banned pro-Palestine protests. | ||
| And the Chancellor of Germany, Scholz, has said it's time for mass deportations. | ||
| And so a lot of nationalists look at this and they say, this is great! | ||
| The Chancellor of Germany finally Is getting around to deporting these Muslims, even though it took Israel being attacked for it to happen. | ||
| This is great. | ||
| This is awesome. | ||
| But let's read a little deeper into what these deportations are going to look like. | ||
| I took these from various sources. | ||
| This is what it says about Olaf Scholz and what they've been saying, other ministers in the government have been saying. | ||
| It says, quote, Germany must, quote, finally deport on a large scale those who have no right to stay in the country, says Olaf Scholz, the chancellor, in the wake of massive pro-Palestinian protests and incidents of anti-Semitism. | ||
| Mr. Scholz outlined the tougher approach to migrants in an interview with Der Spiegel on Friday following a trip to Israel where he met with family members of German citizens taken hostage by Hamas. | ||
| He slammed recent anti-semitic protests in Berlin and said Germany stood by its Jewish citizens against those who unashamedly celebrate the death of those killed in the Hamas attack. | ||
| So keep in mind, and this is important, there is not a consciousness waking up that mass migration is a problem. | ||
| That's not what's happening here. | ||
| That's not what's happening in Germany. | ||
| That is not what is happening in the United Kingdom. | ||
| That is not what is happening in the United States. | ||
| Nobody is saying that we need to deport immigrants because they are changing the demographic character of our country. | ||
| That's not what they're saying. | ||
| That's not what they're doing. | ||
| They're saying, and what Olaf Scholz specifically said, because this is important, he said we must deport those who have no right to stay. | ||
| Those who have no right to stay. | ||
| Well, what does that mean? | ||
| Who has a right to stay and who doesn't? | ||
| Well, the article explains that. | ||
| He says the reasoning though, the reason for the crackdown on this, which again, we'll get in detail on what precisely that means, because it means something. | ||
| He says the reason is because they're anti-semitic. | ||
| So it's not because multiracialism is a failure. | ||
| It's not because they all became white nationalists. | ||
| It's not because they all woke up to the racial reality of this demographic transition. | ||
| It's because they have opposed Israel and these countries are controlled by Israel. | ||
| But it goes on, and this will explain what I mean by, or what he means by, we must support those who have no right to be here. | ||
| The interview asked, among those in Germany who harbor hatred for Israel are many people with Arab roots. | ||
| Did German policymakers ignore for too long the deep hatred entrenched in those groups? | ||
| Mr. Scholz denied that the issue had been ignored but said, going forward, we will be differentiating even more precisely who is coming to the country and who is allowed to stay. | ||
| He said, on the one hand, there is the immigration of workers that we need. | ||
| Nice. | ||
| And there are those seeking asylum because they are the targets of political oppression. | ||
| On the other hand, though, that means that all those who don't belong to one of those groups cannot stay. | ||
| That is why we are limiting irregular migration to Germany. | ||
| Too many people are coming. | ||
| So he says, if you're an economic migrant that we need, or you're a refugee fleeing political persecution, you can stay. | ||
| And you can keep coming. | ||
| If you're an economic migrant, well hey, we still need those. | ||
| And by the way, that's white genocide. | ||
| The fertility rates are going down, so they are replacing what would have been the German population, the ethnic German population. | ||
| They're making up the difference and growing the population by bringing in foreigners. | ||
| He says that is going to continue. | ||
| Well, newsflash, that's why genocide. | ||
| We need to keep bringing in workers. | ||
| Yeah, they're all workers. | ||
| They're all workers. | ||
| They're all economic migrants. | ||
| They are poor. | ||
| They are from poor countries. | ||
| They are low IQ. | ||
| They are low education. | ||
| They have no capital. | ||
| They will be imported into these countries to shore up the workforce of disappearing European populations. | ||
| And that is replacement. | ||
| They have called it refreshment, replacement. | ||
| It's white genocide. | ||
| So he says, if you're a legit political refugee, if you're a legit economic migrant, you can stay and keep coming. | ||
| We'll keep bringing them in. | ||
| But if you're irregular, and if you have the wrong political views, we'll filter you out. | ||
| So when he says there'll be mass deportations, That's not happening. | ||
| There will be no mass deportations. | ||
| They're not going to deport a significant number of people, and they're not going to stop new people from coming in. | ||
| All they're going to do is persecute a very small number of the most vocal and active organizers of anti-Israel protests. | ||
| He outlined a package of measures to reduce the number of people coming to Germany, including working with the European Union to ensure migrants are fairly distributed. | ||
| Okay, so he's going to send them to other European countries. | ||
| They're going to receive Europeans, or rather, immigrants. | ||
| And immigrants come to Germany from coastal European countries in the South, because Germany has a generous benefits program. | ||
| So Germany is saying, uh-uh, you can't come just because we have the best benefits. | ||
| We're going to send you all over Europe. | ||
| We're going to make sure that every country gets genocided in Europe, not just ours. | ||
| Great! | ||
| Here are some other ministers from the German government. | ||
| Germany's Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck criticized Muslim groups while expressing concern over rising anti-Semitism in Germany and calling for tough consequences for people committing anti-Semitic acts. | ||
| He said anti-Semitism cannot be tolerated in any form. | ||
| The extent of the Islamist demonstrations in Berlin and other cities in Germany is unacceptable and requires a tough political response. | ||
| Anti-Semitic acts are a crime, he said, and those committing them will face the consequences. | ||
| He said anyone who is German will answer for this. | ||
| If you're not German, you risk your residency status. | ||
| Anyone who doesn't have a residence permit provides a reason to be deported. | ||
| That is what Olaf Scholz means by people that have no right to be here. | ||
| He doesn't mean Muslims. | ||
| He doesn't mean Arabs. | ||
| He means people that are anti-Semitic and don't have residency. | ||
| He's not saying if you're a refugee, if you're an economic migrant. | ||
| He's not even saying if you're Muslim. | ||
| He's saying if you're an Islamist. | ||
| If you're a brown liberal, if you're a brown liberal from a Muslim country, if you're a brown refugee, you're fine. | ||
| He's saying if you are an Islamist, which is someone who believes that Islam should be the law of the land and therefore a death to Israel, if you believe that, if you believe in opposing Israel, if you believe in a Muslim government, and you don't have lawful residence, then we may revoke your visa. | ||
| Okay? | ||
| That's not a mass deportation. | ||
| That's not a white awakening. | ||
| That's not even... | ||
| Rectifying the white genocide and demographic transition that's occurring. | ||
| All this is doing is removing the political enemies of the State of Israel. | ||
| That's what this is. | ||
| It goes on. | ||
| It says Germany's Interior Minister. | ||
| So that was the Vice Chancellor. | ||
| Chancellor and Vice Chancellor. | ||
| This is the Interior Minister, Nancy Faeser. | ||
| She said those backing Hamas must be deported. | ||
| She said if we are able to deport Hamas supporters, we must do this. | ||
| Our security authorities have currently placed an even stronger focus on the Islamist scene. | ||
| Not Muslim, Islamist. | ||
| If you're a brown liberal, you're fine. | ||
| Brown liberals are fine. | ||
| Multiracialism is still... that is still it. | ||
| Just if you don't like Israel, you gotta go. | ||
| This is the leader of the opposition. | ||
| This is the CDU leader, Frederick Merz. | ||
| Has demanded that only those who declare their support for Israel's security can become German citizens. | ||
| Leader of one of the major German parties, the CDU, he says, quote, anyone that does not agree to this, anyone that does not declare their support for Israel's security has no business being German. | ||
| He proposes adding a special commitment in the agreement undertaken by all new German citizens to recognize the security of the state of Israel. | ||
| He says, quote, anyone who does not sign this has no place in Germany, adding that he believes the security of Israel was the founding principle of the German state. | ||
| This is what nationalists should support? | ||
| And this goes back to a principle that I've talked about a lot. | ||
| People that support the system, they think that they're using the system. | ||
| In reality, the system is using them. | ||
| They think that they will use the system as their instrument, but the system is using you as an instrument. | ||
| In this case, nationalists think that they are using the Zionists that run the government to deport non-whites and stop white genocide. | ||
| They think that they can instrumentalize the Zionist-captured government to achieve the white nationalist agenda. | ||
| But it's the opposite. | ||
| It's the complete opposite. | ||
| The white nationalists are being instrumentalized by the Zionist regime To help the Zionist regime remove from Western society the organized critics of Zionist influence. | ||
| There are no mass deportations. | ||
| They are not against Islam dominating Europe. | ||
| They are not against Muslims. | ||
| They are not against non-white replacement. | ||
| They are against Islamism and the supporters of Hamas. | ||
| And so, it is under the guise, it's under the aegis, Of the prospect of a mass deportation that white nationalists are really supporting a very targeted political persecution of specific people in Western society that are organizing opposition to Zionist influence. | ||
| That's what's going on here. | ||
| And by the way, nationalists then are supporting people that say you have to pledge support for Israel to become German. | ||
| In fact, the founding principle of the German state is Israel's security? | ||
| Seriously? | ||
| You can't imagine any way in which this could backfire? | ||
| They're saying if you don't support Israel, we'll deport you. | ||
| If you don't support Israel, you can't become a citizen. | ||
| You don't see how this could backfire to support this? | ||
| This is letting, oh, I'm actually clever. | ||
| I don't support either side. | ||
| I'm neutral. | ||
| I say just let them fight each other because I don't like either side. | ||
| That's not what's happening. | ||
| The Zionists control these governments. | ||
| The Zionists are using our governments to go and kill children and alienate the entire world. | ||
| And the Zionists are rewriting the constitutions of Western countries to make it so that the reason our countries exist is to be slaves to Israel. | ||
| You're not supporting both sides fighting each other, both sides losing. | ||
| Israel is kicking everybody's ass, and you're supporting that. | ||
| And they're our most formidable adversary, if you want your country to be sovereign. | ||
| Case in point, simultaneously, At the same time that all this is going on, where the Chancellor, Vice Chancellor, Interior Minister, and the leader of the CDU party say, deport Hamas supporters, deport Islamists, deprive anyone who doesn't support Israel of citizenship, guess what's happening at the same time? | ||
| A 22-year-old member of the German legislature has been arrested Because the police executed a search warrant on his house because his neighbors heard Sieg Heil coming from his apartment, coming from his dorm. | ||
| And he's now been put in jail and deprived of his immunity as a member of the German legislature. | ||
| This is that story. | ||
| It says a German far-right politician has been arrested for allegedly displaying Nazi symbols after C. Kyle was heard coming from the headquarters of a fraternity to which he belongs. | ||
| Daniel Halemba was later released when a judge ruled he was not a flight risk. | ||
| He was elected to the Bavarian parliament earlier this month. | ||
| He was detained hours before he was due to gain immunity as an alternative for Germany MP when the parliament was sworn in on Monday afternoon. | ||
| Police issued an arrest warrant for him on Friday and he was tracked down near Stuttgart in the state of something on Monday morning. | ||
| Police in Würzburg last month raided the premises of the Teutonia Prague student fraternity after neighbors complained of hearing shouts of Sieg Heil from inside. | ||
| The phrase was a key Nazi slogan and is banned in Germany. | ||
| Officers said they had confiscated banned material and that the raid confirmed the allegations made by neighbors. | ||
| Mr. Halemba is under investigation on suspicion of sedition and possessing banned symbols. | ||
| Nazi iconography is also outlawed in Germany. | ||
| So let's look at what's happening in Germany. | ||
| In the last several months, the AfD party, the Alternative for Deutschland party, which is a far-right, Euro-skeptic, anti-immigration party, has been exploding in the polls. | ||
| They have become one of the most popular parties in Germany and they are becoming a national party and won a huge upset election recently, of which this member was a part of that. | ||
| And they have become popular on a platform against the mass migration into Europe, which is reaching ahead. | ||
| Now, the AFD opposes this because they say that Angela Merkel's project of multiracialism has failed. | ||
| They're against mass migration. | ||
| And it's that message which is why they're successful. | ||
| They are leading the rising consciousness. | ||
| In order to take the wind out of their sails, all the other parties, including the Chancellor Olaf Scholz, are now saying, well hey, we're against immigration too. | ||
| But as we just noted, they're not really. | ||
| They have completely pivoted and it's gone from AFD being against the migrants. | ||
| Now all the parties are against the migrants, but they're not all against the migrants in the same way. | ||
| They're against the migrants that are the most critical of Israel. | ||
| Nobody else. | ||
| The economic migrants can come in, the refugees can come in, and everyone can stay. | ||
| But the ones that are against Israel, well they gotta go. | ||
| And they can't come in anymore. | ||
| And we're gonna change what it means to be a German citizen. | ||
| Do you see the problem? | ||
| Germany was trending towards anti-migrant. | ||
| So the Zionist-influenced politicians picked up that issue and used it for their benefit. | ||
| It didn't happen the other way around. | ||
| It's not like the nationalists picked up the Zionist-controlled government and weaponized it against mass migration. | ||
| Quite the opposite. | ||
| The Zionists saw that the anti-migration cause was gaining steam, and they are now using the latent white nativism in these countries to target their political opponents, the opponents of Israel inside Germany, And the United Kingdom and France and the United States. | ||
| That's what's going on here. | ||
| I don't see any benefit to that. | ||
| I don't see any benefit in removing the most anti-Israel migrants and nobody else. | ||
| Do you? | ||
| In the United States, 12,000 illegals are apprehended at the border every day. | ||
| It's been 6 million since Biden took office. | ||
| Do you see the benefit in the Biden administration or a future administration revoking the visas of a few hundred people that are the most critical of Israel? | ||
| Or that are leading the organization of protests against Israel? | ||
| Do you see the benefit of that? | ||
| I don't. | ||
| That doesn't meaningfully change the situation in America. | ||
| There's 12,000 apprehended every day and they're being funneled into every state in the country. | ||
| And you think removing a few hundred changes the score? | ||
| It doesn't change the score on immigration. | ||
| Not in the United States, not in Germany, not in the United Kingdom. | ||
| But you know what it does change the score for? | ||
| If you take out the most influential critics of Israel, it does change the score for Israel's influence in our countries. | ||
| So it's about a relative advantage. | ||
| Some might say that in the simplest, simplest terms, removing one immigrant is beneficial to a nativist. | ||
| But of course, who is that immigrant? | ||
| If you remove a hundred immigrants, yeah, like in absolute terms, is that beneficial for nativists, nationalists? | ||
| Sure. | ||
| But if they're the hundred most anti-Israel critics and nobody else is affected, who is that more beneficial for? | ||
| And also, add to this the dimension that Zionists are, by far and away, the more formidable threat. | ||
| Because they are the ones with high agency, they are the ones to wield influence in our governments, they are the ones depriving us of our sovereignty. | ||
| When you add to the layer, not just that migrants are pouring in, but that our government's captured by foreign lobbyists, well then you realize, this is not a good deal at all. | ||
| To remove a paltry tiny percentage, a drop in the bucket of immigrants, but also remove the critics of the number one foreign influence operation in the West? | ||
| How is that a good deal for nationalists, Americans, or Europeans? | ||
| It isn't. | ||
| So you have to wake up and see what's going on. | ||
| No, sorry. | ||
| The Zionist Jews did not realize that they should stop killing white nations. | ||
| No, they didn't become white nationalists. | ||
| No, they didn't stop being mostly left-wing. | ||
| No, they didn't start caring even a little bit about... | ||
| The viability of Western countries, that didn't happen. | ||
| They are using white nativist sentiment and saying, oh look, brown people! | ||
| Okay, you can attack Muslims now, because this is urgent for Israel's national security interest. | ||
| For no other reason, and to no other end, and nothing more than that will happen. | ||
| We're going to shut down Palestinian protests and nothing else. | ||
| And let me ask you a very simple question. | ||
| People have said that the pro-Palestinians are the same as BLM. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Do you think that all the Jews, left and right wing in the United States, who have been pulling their money from University of Pennsylvania and Harvard, who have blacklisted pro-Palestine students from Wall Street jobs, who have pulled pro-Palestine presenters from MSNBC, Do you think that these left and right wing Jews are going to be saying the same things in a few years when there's another major BLM riot? | ||
| Do you think for one second they're going to reciprocate? | ||
| Do you think that they're going to pay it forward? | ||
| You think they learned their lesson and they joined our team? | ||
| You think that in three years, Ben Shapiro, Mark Levin, and Jake Tapper, and Wolf Blitzer, and Bill Ackman, and Larry Fink? | ||
| Do you think that in three years, if there's another BLM explosion in the cities, you think they're going to be saying, if you support BLM, you can't work at BlackRock. | ||
| If you support BLM, we're going to defund Harvard. | ||
| You think they'll all be against it? | ||
| They were all for it in 2020. | ||
| BlackRock and MSNBC and the universities and the donors, they were all for it. | ||
| Back then, you think in three years they're going to totally flip and say, well you know what? | ||
| We realized we were wrong. | ||
| Yeah, I don't think so. | ||
| I don't think so. | ||
| I don't think anybody's getting deported the next time an anti-white thing is said at a rally. | ||
| I don't think any Ivy League university will be defunded because an anti-white protest or an anti-white statement occurs on the campus. | ||
| I don't think any liberal is going to lose a job in Wall Street for saying something anti-white. | ||
| So, no. | ||
| This is not the beginning of, we're clever! | ||
| We're gonna help the Zionists destroy their enemies! | ||
| No, you're not using them. | ||
| They are using you, idiot. | ||
| Goy. | ||
| Like, that's what it always is. | ||
| And by the way, these nationalists that are saying that we're doing this are all Jews. | ||
| Like Koston Olamaryu is saying, oh, Hamas is in Bronze Age, and we should use the Zionist regime to go after the left. | ||
| It's like that guy is a Jewish Zionist! | ||
| And all his goyim followers, all his stupid goyim followers go, huh, we're smart! | ||
| Koston Olamaryu, the Jewish Zionist, told us that we're using the Zionists to fight for white nationalism, to fight for American nationalism. | ||
| No, no, you're being tricked. | ||
| You're being tricked, knowingly or unknowingly, to take a side on behalf of the government that has captured your sovereign government. | ||
| You're being tricked, knowingly or unknowingly, into supporting your captors. | ||
| It's like the Vichy France regime. | ||
| You're being unknowingly tricked into doing the dirty work. | ||
| That's literally what it is. | ||
| Tommy Robinson got freed on Twitter so he can go and lead all the hooligans, all the soccer guys, to fight the Muslims. | ||
| Finally, we get to fight the Muslims. | ||
| No, you idiot. | ||
| You are being unleashed as a stupid goyim hordes to suppress the Palestinian protests. | ||
| And once this is over, they're going to throw you in jail for doing it ever again. | ||
| So, and case in point, look at what's happening in Germany. | ||
| Spontaneously, or rather simultaneously, at the same time that the ministers and the party leaders are saying that you're going to be deported because you don't support Israel and we're going to make it a requirement for citizenship that you swear fealty to Israel, they're locking up the youngest member of the AFD for Nazi forbidden symbols. | ||
| Wake up! | ||
| No, Germany didn't just get based at all. | ||
| And nobody seems to see the problem there. | ||
| Oh, great! | ||
| They're deporting Muslims! | ||
| Read the fine print for being anti-Semitic. | ||
| And simultaneously they're going to lock up a young far-right nationalist leader. | ||
| You don't see the problem there? | ||
| This is supposed to be... We're being pragmatic? | ||
| Deporting one Muslim is a victory, even if he's leading the resistance against Israel? | ||
| And he's gonna be handcuffed to a far-right white guy at the same time? | ||
| I mean, that's what it's gonna be. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So... | |
| So, no. | ||
| The position that nationalists must take is against... You don't need to love the Palestinians, but you need to be against the influence of Israel and the idea that Western nations exist to serve Israel. | ||
| Yeah, you have to be against that, because they're the ones in charge. | ||
| Muslims are not in charge. | ||
| Zionists are. | ||
| Jews are. | ||
| You're not going to get thrown in jail for criticizing Islam. | ||
| You are going to get literally your citizenship revoked or your visa revoked for criticizing Israel. | ||
| That's a problem. | ||
| That's THE problem. | ||
| So, anyway, so that's that. | ||
| I want to move on. | ||
| I want to get on into our Super Chats and we'll see what you guys have to say about all this. | ||
| And I've been saying that for a long time I feel like slowly but surely people are people are getting it But let's take a look. | ||
| We'll see what all of you have to say. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Let me get set up. | |
| And I'll read our super chats here. | ||
| Let's see. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Okay. | ||
| Cato, the censor sent $3. | ||
| In the same way Trump was the first Internet president, Pope Francis is the first Internet pope, but the church is not meant to be filtered through the smears and opinions of anyone with a Twitter. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No, but that's not really true, is it? | |
| Trump is not the first Internet president, and Pope Francis is not the first internet pope. | ||
| Internets existed for 30 years. | ||
| What are you talking about? | ||
| It's not the same. | ||
| I do agree with you though about the church not being filtered by anyone with a Twitter account. | ||
| But I don't agree with the rest of that analysis. | ||
| Not gonna do it. | ||
| So, I mean, people can post one all they want. | ||
| I'm not, I'm probably not gonna do it anytime soon. | ||
| I may do it in the future. | ||
| I'm not, I'm not gonna say never, but I have no plans to stream Skyrim. | ||
| And the more that you push me to do it, the more I'm not gonna want to do it. | ||
| Max Tittman sent $100. | ||
| Nick, my wife is going into labor right now to our firstborn. | ||
| Bringing another America first Catholic groper into the world. | ||
| God bless you and keep fighting the good fight. | ||
| Thank you for everything. | ||
| Why are you watching my show while your child is being born? | ||
| Thank you for the big super chat, but shouldn't you be watching your child be born? | ||
|
unidentified
|
Go be with your wife, dude. | |
| Hey, thank you for the huge super chat I appreciate it but like Feel like something more important is happening actually like something more important is going on right now that you should probably be Should probably be involved with that I'm not gonna say like don't watch my show but like brah Your kid's being born? | ||
| You're watching the show? | ||
| But hey, congratulations, man. | ||
| God bless you. | ||
| God bless your family. | ||
| Hope it's a good one. | ||
| Hope it's a good baby. | ||
| But hey, thanks for the big super chat, man. | ||
| Go be with your wife, okay? | ||
| But congratulations. | ||
| Demetri Burke sent $5. | ||
| Almost all other content on the internet is unwatchable. | ||
| I'm grateful for the insight and the consistently correct takes. | ||
| Ridiculous how niggas like Destiny and Doyle have followings. | ||
| Real niggas stand with NJF. | ||
| Much love. | ||
| Trump 2024. | ||
| Well, I don't think Doyle does have a following. | ||
| But as far as Destiny, I mean, his following is literally all trannies and porn stars and idiots. | ||
| Hey, thanks a lot buddy. | ||
| I percent $5 the mustache is awesome love you less than three hey thanks a lot buddy love you too angel amos aguilera sent three dollars great show as always sir are there any materials or sources you recommend for protestants considering a conversion to catholicism thanks my favorite question Do you have any books you could recommend? | ||
| Just go online, dude. | ||
| Go on Catholic Answers. | ||
| Okay. | ||
| Read... That's honestly what did it for me. | ||
| Not that I converted, but when I started to get back into Catholicism, because I was never really into it. | ||
| You know, I was born Catholic, but I was never really super religious. | ||
| Catholic Answers. | ||
| They have a video for everything. | ||
| Answers your questions. | ||
| I know a lot of people might go, eh, that's not a trad based answer. | ||
| That's what did it for me. | ||
| So that's what I'd recommend. | ||
| Growiperman200 sent $3. | ||
| Hey, what is up my nikka? | ||
| Can you hook a groiper out with giving me an unban? | ||
| Not quite sure to what I did, but I will make sure that I live up to the name of groiper. | ||
| Thanks for second chance king. | ||
| No, I'm not doing it. | ||
| Hey, thank you for the super chat, but no, I think that's very presumptuous. | ||
| Russia is not a godly country. | ||
| Russia is just as liberal as the United States. | ||
| global order? | ||
| It is the most godly country in this fallen world, in my opinion. | ||
| Love Russia. | ||
| Hey, thank you for the super chat, but no, no, I think that's very presumptuous. | ||
| Russia is not a godly country. | ||
| Russia is just as liberal as the United States. | ||
| I mean, yeah, they don't have the same acceptance for homosexuality and things like that, but there's a lot of pornography there, a lot of abortion, and most of the people are atheists. | ||
|
unidentified
|
So. | |
| So... You know, I don't support Russia because they're a beast, trad country! | ||
| They're not really that beast or trad, the people at least. | ||
| They're more conservative than we are, but they're not very religious. | ||
| They're not very religious. | ||
| So... | ||
| And this like, they're fighting on behalf of Jesus. | ||
| Like, I think they're fighting on behalf of Russia. | ||
| I don't think they're necessarily a crusade. | ||
| They're not a crusader state. | ||
| No, I don't think so. | ||
| So... I think that's a meme. | ||
| That whole idea is a meme. | ||
|
unidentified
|
I wouldn't get too caught up in that. | |
| Corn Maze sent $3. | ||
| Um, can we ban this Joe Boomer guy? | ||
| He won't stop harassing band. | ||
| The guy's crazy. | ||
| He should go. | ||
| I'm not gonna do that because you sound gay. | ||
| Um, why would you, why would you type um? | ||
| Are you gay? | ||
| Why would you type um? | ||
| You think you're cute? | ||
| Um is verbal filler. | ||
| Why would you type verbal filler? | ||
| Because you want to sound cute? | ||
| You don't sound cute. | ||
| You sound like a faggot. | ||
| So, no. | ||
| Hail Joe the Boomer. | ||
| Yeah, I know dude. | ||
| I wish I was back on Twitter. | ||
| Hey, thank you. | ||
| My TL is full of boomers who have tranny porn and they're like posting about gender neutral bathrooms while Palestinians are being genocided, that autumne groiper guy is okay but we need you back on twitter okay love you. | ||
| Pretty fly white guy sent $3,265, thanks for all the content friend. | ||
| Suffocation sent $5, the public is cucked to death here in Germany, the biggest cities aren't majority German anymore. | ||
| Once the boomers die, the demographics will completely shift. | ||
| Half of all kids are already non-German. | ||
| Plus 40k new refugees come every month. | ||
| I know man, that's how it is. | ||
| That's what it is everywhere. | ||
| Wealthy edits sent $5, when Nick debates someone always bet on Nick. | ||
| Thanks for reading God bless you and chat. | ||
| Thank you. | ||
| CGRR sent $10, new fan here, ever heard of Warhammer 40k? | ||
| It's a tabletop game with a base medieval catholic and fascist aesthetic. | ||
| I haven't played it but the lore goes hard and the vids on YouTube are cool. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Okay. | |
| Vugly Wugly sent $12, RFK Jr is polling at 22%, which is apparently better than Ross Piero polled at and now Jill Stein declared. | ||
| How will they throw a wrench in things? | ||
| I love when people ask a stupid-ass question like this. | ||
|
unidentified
|
How will they throw a wrench in it this time? | |
| Just shut up, dude. | ||
| As far as Ted Kennedy goes, I don't know, but it is a problem for Trump. | ||
| It might be a problem for him. | ||
| We need to get a spoiler to run on the Democrats' side. | ||
| People have said they want Cornel West to run on the Democrats' side to be a spoiler for the Dems because probably Robert Kennedy is going to hurt Trump more than he hurts Biden. | ||
| Or at least it could go that way. | ||
| Some of the polls have shown that. | ||
| So, that is their wrench. | ||
| That's their wrench for Trump, I think. | ||
| Robert Kennedy's not gonna win. | ||
| What do you mean? | ||
| They gotta stop the rise of Robert Kennedy! | ||
| Robert Kennedy's not gonna win. | ||
| So what the fuck does that even mean? | ||
| I mean look, that pastoral reform, it's not what people are saying. | ||
| being attacked for something very basic about allowing trans to be baptized under specific circumstances. | ||
| Then Kath starts stating they are leaving because Pratt has zero issues. | ||
| I mean, look, that pastoral reform, it's not what people are saying. | ||
| No, they're not. | ||
| They're not letting legit transsexuals that are like totally trans to be godparents or whatever. | ||
| It says it can't cause scandal and it's basically common sense. | ||
| And people that are talking about it haven't even read it. | ||
| People that are sounding off on the headline where it says Pope says trannies are okay. | ||
| It doesn't say trannies are okay. | ||
| So most people that are giving their opinion don't, you know, they don't understand it. | ||
| They haven't read it and I don't love it. | ||
| I think they'll probably clarify it in the future, but, um, um, But it's not it doesn't say what people think it says It's just another excuse for people to attack the church and like you said to pretend like the Protestants don't have their own issues. | ||
| It's like Protestants Protestants don't some of them don't believe Jesus is the Son of God and they're like, oh but but a headline about the Pope So it's all just about attacking the church They never want to defend Protestantism it's always attacking Catholicism and And the Orthodox are always there to say, oh we're based, we're more based than Catholics. | ||
| Okay, you were about to reunite until the Muslims came in. | ||
|
unidentified
|
He's a Catholic. | |
| Doge shit poster 69 cent $3. | ||
| Trent Horn from Catholic Answers is a half Jew. | ||
| You literally just recommended a Zionist organization. | ||
| He's a Catholic. | ||
| Epic America first fail. | ||
| He's a Catholic, a pop. | ||
| Fucking really. | ||
| He's a Catholic apologist. | ||
| I'm not recommending Trent Horn for Israel history. | ||
| I'm recommending Catholic Answers, which has actually many people on there for Catholic apologists. | ||
| I mean, he's a good debater on that. | ||
| But this is bait anyway. | ||
| Grow up or man 200 cent $3. | ||
| Hey Nick, sorry for trying to be too friendly with the NikaTalk was just trying to be funny. | ||
| So please can I get the unban though? | ||
| He'll buy my unban with a joke. | ||
| Grow up or man 200 cent $3. | ||
| Jerry Seinfeld music plays so what's the deal with black people? | ||
| I mean they're not really black and they're not even people. | ||
| Haha JK Jake. | ||
| Okay, I'm done. | ||
| I'm done. | ||
| Okay, alright, you know what? | ||
| That, I can't do anymore after that. | ||
| That's the last Super... I'm not... No, I'm done. | ||
| I don't wanna... I'm just... I'm over it, okay? | ||
| That's the last Super Chat. | ||
|
unidentified
|
You know what? | |
| That's the last Super Chat. | ||
|
unidentified
|
No thank you after that. | |
| Okay. | ||
| That's gonna do it for me. | ||
| But hey, as always, thanks for watching. | ||
| Remember to follow me on Rumble and on Cozy. | ||
| Make sure to follow me on both. | ||
| I'm on the air Monday through Friday around 10 o'clock Central, as always. | ||
| Thanks for watching. | ||
| Thanks to our Super Chatters, in particular Blackpill and Max Titman. | ||
| Nice. | ||
| But thanks to everybody that superchats, everybody that watches the show. | ||
| We love you, and I'll see you tomorrow. | ||
| Until then, have a great rest of your evening. | ||
|
unidentified
|
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo! | |
| It's going to be only America first! | ||
| America first! | ||
| The American people will come first once again. | ||
|
unidentified
|
With respect, the respect that we deserve. | |
| From this day forward, it's going to be only America first. | ||
| First! |
Export Selection