Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Oct. 25, 2022 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:02:24

DEATH CON 3: THE JEWS CONTINUE THEIR WAR AGAINST YE | America First Ep. 1085DEATH CON 3: THE JEWS CONTINUE THEIR WAR AGAINST YE | America First Ep. 1085

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

56:52

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Thank you.
unidentified		- Good evening, everybody.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas Chaif-Wentz.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Monday.
		We have a lot to talk about tonight.
		Lots to get into.
		Big featured story.
		Tonight we're talking about the continued war against Yeh by the Jews.
		Specifically the Jewish media.
		And last week we covered The company WME, or William Morris Endeavor, which is run by the Jew Ari Emanuel, which called for Ye to be cancelled in all of business.
		All of his business ties, all of his connections must be cancelled, says Ari Emanuel, the Jewish owner of Endeavor.
		Which is the conglomerate that owns William Morris Endeavor, which is the oldest and largest talent agency in Hollywood.
		One of the big three.
		Well, today we're talking about the other two.
		As I said, Endeavor, William Morris Endeavor, is one of three.
		One of the three talent giants that run Hollywood.
		The three of which constitute most of the market share Well, since we last spoke about that, the other two companies, which are also run by Jews, have now also done exactly the same thing.
		calling for EA to be completely canceled by business.
		Well, since we last spoke about that, the other two companies, which are also run by Jews, have now also done exactly the same thing.
		And so CAA, which is the creative artists agency, I think, So...
		CAA and UTA, United Talent Agency.
		I don't know what they stand for.
		I'm not a Hollywood guy.
		But CAA and UTA have joined William Morris Endeavor and now you've got three for three of the Jewish-owned major Hollywood talent agencies that are calling for Ye to be canceled.
		In particular, CAA represented Ye, so they've shut down their contract with him.
		And this is in addition to Balenciaga, which has cut business ties with Ye, and another Hollywood company, a production company called MGS, which produced a documentary about Kanye West for $2 million.
		They plan to sell the distribution rights for $10 million.
		They've now said they are cutting ties with Kanye.
		And they will not be distributing the documentary.
		They're going to scrap it.
		Even though they already made it.
		Even though they paid millions to make it.
		And wouldn't you know, that company too is run by Jews.
		Ye was also admonished by several Hollywood celebrities including David Schwimmer, Amy Schumer, Katie Couric, Gwyneth Paltrow, among others.
		They are all Jewish.
		And he was also condemned by his family.
		His ex-wife's family, Kim Kardashian and all of them.
		And they are not Jewish.
		But they all have Jewish managers.
		So we'll talk about that.
		That'll be our featured story.
		Go figure.
		You know, the Jew strikes back.
		We'll talk about that.
		We'll also be talking tonight about the war in Ukraine, major development.
		The Russian Defense Minister had a meeting today with the U.S.
		Secretary of Defense and the British Minister of Defense.
		Because the Russian government believes that the government in Kiev will be planting a dirty bomb in Ukraine and create a false flag attack which they will attribute to Russia in the hopes of creating a showdown between NATO and Moscow, which is very alarming.
		In other words, they think Kiev is going to detonate a dirty bomb, a nuclear bomb, Like a briefcase, suitcase nuclear bomb on their own territory and blame it on Russia and then get the United States to go to war with Russia or attack their Navy in the Black Sea or other strategic targets.
		Very, very concerning.
		If there's any likelihood or there's any plausibility that that could occur, that's a very big problem.
		So, we'll talk about that tonight as well.
		Should be a pretty good show.
		Sorry it's so late.
		Jeez, it's 1230.
		The time just gets away from me.
		I'm trying.
		You know what it is?
		I'm just totally...
		I don't know what it is.
		I just, I can't be on time.
		Every day I'm like, you know, I'm gonna try and be on time and it's like midnight.
unidentified		I'm like, oh I gotta do that show.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I gotta start that show.
		I'm just getting terrible now.
		I used to be, used to be like an hour.
		Now it's midnight.
		It's 1230.
unidentified		Geez.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So I'm gonna try.
		I'm gonna try and get down to 10 o'clock tomorrow.
		Once again, tomorrow's a new day.
		We're gonna set out, try and do 10 o'clock.
		You know, it's gonna be a good show tonight for the people that tuned in and for the replay gang, but I'm really gonna try and shoot for 10 Central Time tomorrow.
		You know what it is?
		It's like 9 o'clock and then I think I have time.
		I'm like, well, It's... The show starts at 10.
		I got time.
		And then 10 rolls around.
		I'm like, oh, it's only 10.
		Well, you know, I guess, you know, it takes me a half hour to get ready.
		You know, and then it's 11.
		I'm like, oh, I gotta... Okay, well, if I start at 11, it's not that bad.
		And then it's midnight.
		I'm like, oh, shit.
		It's midnight.
		I gotta get this show started.
		So... It's an illness.
		It's an illness.
		It's not my fault.
unidentified		It's an illness.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm, uh...
		It's a disability.
		It's an illness.
		I'm sick.
		I'm mentally ill.
		Me being late is a mental illness.
		You can't blame me for this.
		Maybe I gotta do some medication or something.
		Gotta up the chromium.
		Gotta go to my doctor.
		Hey, can I get an increase in the chromium prescription please?
		I need a stronger dosage of the chromium to get this show started.
		I also got a new one.
		I got GABA.
		GABA it's a neurotransmitter I got GABA apparently helps with sleep so I added that to the stack and I think I am gonna put magnesium in as well my my buddy a friend of mine Capri he I asked him what his stack was and he said magnesium and he had one other one and then he had GABA so I started taking the GABA
		I thought I was gonna die last night because I took it and I was like neurotransmitters It's gonna like go into my brain.
		Is it gonna destroy my brain?
		I don't think so.
		It should be fine So I either way I need more supplements to get this show on the road.
		All right Anyway, so I'm gonna try it.
		So I'm gonna try ten.
		So listen, I'm gonna try ten o'clock tomorrow I'm gonna shoot for ten central.
		The problem is I get on Twitter and Twitter I'm just on there for hours and hours of fun And, you know, on a telegram, having a great time, you know, and then... But all right, okay, so that's that.
		Gonna try 10 o'clock Central, all right?
		Hold me accountable.
		If I'm not here on time at 10 o'clock Central, bully me, okay?
		Bully me, call me names, just pick, you know, pick on me.
		I deserve it, all right?
		10 o'clock Central, that's the goal, okay?
		Alright, before we get into the news, I want to remind you to follow me here on Cozy.
		Smash the follow button to get a push notification whenever I go live on Telegram.
		Smash the follow button.
		We at 211, 21,100, so we're just gaining subs constantly all the time.
		Make sure you're following me.
		Also, follow me on Gab, Telegram, Parler, and TruSocial.
		Links are down below.
		Get me on Parler.
		I'm gonna post some stuff this week on Parler about Jewish power.
		Now's the time!
		Gotta strike while the iron's hot!
		It's a conversation starter.
		It's a conversation starter, and now it seems less crazy.
		You know, Ye is out there talking about the Jews, and it's a conversation starter.
		Hey, you know, what do you think about JM?
		What do you think about the Jewish media?
		Today he did an interview with Lex Friedman, who's a Jew, And Lex Friedman's beating him over the head with the Holocaust stuff.
		And Kanye goes, uh, he's talking about Jewish media.
		And the interviewer, Lex, says, well, when you say Jewish media, that's so harmful because it reminds us of the Holocaust.
		It sounds like the 1930s.
		And Kanye goes, what if we call it JM instead?
unidentified		Jewish media.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And in the beginning, Lex goes, you know, I don't like that you call it the Jewish media.
		You can't say that.
		And Ye goes, why?
		Because it's redundant?
unidentified		Because it's redundant?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Just the media then, because it's redundant to call it the Jewish media.
		He goes, no, not because it's redundant.
		So awesome.
		Shame on anybody that said he was going to apologize, you know, what a bad take.
		I remember when all this started, when the DEFCON 3 thing happened, everybody's like, oh, wow, she's gonna apologize.
		Here we are, two, three weeks into it, and he's talking about the Holocaust and JM.
unidentified		Oh, why?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Because it's redundant?
		So good.
		So good.
		Better?
		And it's so funny how Ye He says it even better than Wignats.
		You know, like, he made being obsessed with Jewish power cool again.
		It was cool, and then people like Mike Enoch made it not cool.
		They just made it seem cringe and weird.
		And now Ye is making it cool again.
		Now, just like he made Christianity cool.
		Not that Christianity wasn't cool, but it kind of got usurped by uncool people.
		It got usurped by televangelists and like Mormons and all kinds of other people that are just sort of not with the vibe, you know?
		And then Ye came on the scene with Jesus King and washed us in the blood and Donda and it's like, alright, this is fun.
		And now he's making it cool to talk about Jewish power and the Jewish media.
		He's kind of like... He said it on the interview today.
		He's like the prophet.
		Not a prophet like a real prophet, obviously, but a prophet like in the archetypal idea, you know.
		The truth teller.
		The prophetic truth teller.
		So... So I think he definitely fits that mold with these kinds of things, but...
		And even with Trump, you know, Trump I think in 2018 was definitely less cool than he was in 2016 and then Ye put the hat on and he called it a Superman cape and made it cool.
		Okay, but we're going to get into the news.
		Our first story, I don't want to spend too much time on because I really want to get into the Ye story because I think that's more interesting, but our first story is about the war in Ukraine and this is a little bit worrisome.
		And there was a lot of talk about this at the beginning of the year when the war in Ukraine started in February.
		During those initial months there was this specter of a chemical attack.
		If you remember, that's what the NATO media was constantly fear-mongering about.
		And this was coming from the Western media, which is a little bit different than our story tonight.
		But just to set up the background, if you remember, when this war started, that was the fear.
		Was that Russia, and this was an idea that didn't come from Russia, it didn't come from the Russian president, who never mentioned chemical weapons, or the Foreign Ministry or the Defense Ministry of the Russian Federation.
		This idea was promulgated by the Western media, by the New York Times, by the Council on Foreign Relations, the think tanks on social media, and the idea was that Russia Because the Kiev government did not collapse immediately with the initial incursion, Russia, out of desperation, would begin using chemical weapons.
		And I said at the time that that was in itself a setup for a false flag.
		They were pushing that out there to seed the idea, just like they did in Syria.
		They did the same thing during the Syrian Civil War in 2014 or 2013, and then again in 2017, and again in 2018.
		or 2013 and then again in 2017 and again in 2018.
		So this is something, and even in Iraq, they did this all the way back in Iraq 20 years ago.
		It's what the Western media loves to do.
		Chemical weapons are technically a restricted class of weapons.
		They're technically considered a weapon of mass destruction.
		Chemical, biological, and nuclear.
		But chemical is probably the least severe of the WMDs, with nuclear probably being the most extreme.
		And so chemical weapons have been a convenient tool of NATO and Washington and the military-industrial complex This is a way for them to create a pretext to escalate a conflict, but not too much.
		So, for example, when they say that Saddam Hussein is in possession of and is using illicit, banned chemical weapons of mass destruction, it creates a pretext which is sort of like the Goldilocks condition for whatever kind of intervention they want.
		It is more severe than conventional munitions, Because you could say that if a nation is in a civil war or if they have a certain peacetime security policy, their use of conventional military weapons would not justify a foreign intervention.
		You can't say that we're going to invade a sovereign state and topple their government with a ground force or airstrikes because they're fighting off rebels or because they're putting down an insurgency or an insurrection.
		So chemical weapons are more than a conventional weapon.
		They're considered inhumane, they're banned by international law, so it justifies a foreign country intervening.
		It justifies Washington intervening in Iraq with a ground invasion, or Syria with airstrikes, or at one point they wanted for a long time a full-on ground war in Syria, 200,000 troops just like Iraq.
		But it's not on the level of a nuclear or a biological weapon where it would call for a total war.
		With nuclear retaliation or, you know, something else more extreme.
		So it's sort of, they're perfect, chemical weapons are the perfect, boy who cried wolf, it's the perfect setup, it's the perfect frame job, and it always has been for Saddam Hussein, for Bashar al-Assad and the Syrian Civil War, and then again in Ukraine.
		Like I said, in March, in April, and in May, and they never retracted this, They never went out there and said this was incorrect, or they never said they were wrong.
		But for the first three months of the war, when they were calling Putin a war criminal, and saying that he was killing pregnant women and children, they were also saying that he was going to use a chemical weapon out of desperation.
		And that then, of course, the implication is that would create the pretext for a major escalation.
		If Putin used chemical weapons, that would be The Goldilocks scenario, the perfect scenario, which would justify whatever direct intervention that NATO wants, whatever they prefer.
		It's more than a regular ground war.
		It's not as severe as nuclear, so they could go in and they could blow up the Black Sea Fleet.
		They could go in and directly attack Russian positions in Ukraine.
		They could attack Russian critical infrastructure.
		And the Russians said, no, no, we have no intention of using chemical weapons.
		We're not going to do that.
		Like, it wouldn't even make sense for us to do that.
		In fact, they said that we're restraining ourselves, calling it a foreign military, or a special military operation as opposed to a war, or an anti-terror effort, or a full mobilization.
		And Russia actually said that Washington was only pushing that narrative because they were trying to set them up.
		They were talking about chemical weapons, they would deploy their own chemical weapons and then blame it on Russia, and then they could retaliate in whatever way that they want.
	And then that just went away.
	They just stopped saying that.
	And now there's something happening that is similar but not quite the same.
	Now the Russian Defense Ministry, this is the news today, has gone to the NATO governments of the United Kingdom and the United States and said that Moscow believes that Kiev, the Zelensky government, is going to use a nuclear dirty bomb in Ukraine and blame it on Russia.
	And they're going to the United States and the United Kingdom to say, look, You know, we have no intention of using nuclear weapons and we don't want a nuclear war.
	We don't want a dirty bomb to go off and then there's a nuclear war.
	So this is a story from Russia Today.
	It says, quote, Moscow has discussed the threat of Kiev potentially using a dirty bomb with London and Washington at the level of the Chiefs of the General Staff.
	The Russian Chief of Defense, General Valery Gerasimov, raised his country's concerns in a phone call with U.S.
	Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, General Mark Milley, after having a similar conversation with his British counterpart, Admiral Sir Tony Radekin.
	The Pentagon only mentioned that the two generals discussed several security-related issues of concern without providing any further details.
	It was the first such conversation since May.
	The British Defense Ministry said the phone call took place at the request of the Russian Ministry of Defense, adding that the United Kingdom rejected Russia's allegations that Ukraine is planning actions to escalate the conflict, and also that the British Admiral restated the UK's enduring support for Ukraine.
	London also agreed it was important to keep communication channels with Moscow open to manage the risk of miscalculation and to facilitate de-escalation.
	The developments came a day after the Russian defense minister raised similar concerns in phone calls with the defense chiefs of the US, UK, and France.
	Moscow has been warning Western nations about Kiev's alleged plans to use a dirty bomb to frame Russia for quite some time.
	The West, however, has been dismissive of such warnings.
	Earlier on Monday, the Russian Defense Ministry claimed that Kiev wanted to frame Moscow as a nuclear terrorist by accusing it of using weapons of mass destruction and thus potentially launching a powerful anti-Russia campaign.
	Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov also stated that the West's disbelief in this scenario does not make the threat any less pressing.
	So this is actually a real threat.
	This is actually somewhat worrisome because certainly Kiev has access to nuclear material.
	And you don't need a lot of nuclear material to create a dirty bomb.
	We're not talking about a real atomic bomb.
	We're not talking about a nuclear warhead.
	We're talking about an explosive device with nuclear material.
	Which would create a conventional explosion and then would launch nuclear radioactive material into the air and into the atmosphere.
	That's why they call it a dirty bomb.
	It's a bomb, but it's dirty.
	And the dirty part is the radioactive particles that would be launched into the air and then would make everybody sick, even if they didn't get hit with the conventional explosion.
	They would get hit with radioactive particles and then die of radiation poisoning.
	So that's the idea and Ukraine can do that.
	Ukraine can acquire that themselves.
	They have nuclear material.
	They can acquire it from other countries like Israel or whoever.
	So it's certainly a capability they have and Honestly, it tracks.
	Here's the thing.
	When you look at these potential actions or events that have happened in a war, You have to understand that you analyze it on the level of motive.
	Motive and ability.
	Because there's a public relations component to the war.
	So obviously the capitals and the defense ministries and the militaries of the various governments involved are not going to be totally transparent because it's a war.
	They're not going to telegraph their moves.
	And if they do something clandestine, if they do something illegal, They're not going to go and do a press release and say, um, we want a dirty bomb, or it would be great if a dirty bomb would go off because then X... You know, Washington, as an example, is not going to come out and say, we blew up Nord Stream 1 and 2.
	And if you're looking for evidence that that happened, well, if that's your theory, if your theory, using that as an example, Something like the sabotage of Nord Stream 1 and 2.
	If your theory is that that was done by Washington, well the evidence will not come in the form of a study from Washington's think tanks.
	Who are the military and defense specialists?
	They're all people that worked for defense contractors or worked in Think tanks funded by the defense contractors or they're all former government people that again are on the boards of the defense contractors or intimately involved in the industry of war and what's more if your theory is that the Washington Security apparatus took out the pipelines.
	They're very good at what they do.
	They know it's illegal They know that that would cause a rift between them and Germany or them and NATO with them in continental Europe So they're of course going to be very good.
	They're gonna be very capable of covering up their tracks and doing it discreetly and That goes without saying that they wouldn't make it official or public and they wouldn't state it openly so when you look at these kinds of things that have happened or things that could happen and You can't determine the plausibility of this by looking at the press releases and say, well Washington's Joint Chiefs said that they don't think it's realistic.
	Think about the motivations of the actors involved.
	Zelensky and the Kiev government have been demanding for months Then NATO go to war with Russia.
	They've been calling for a no-fly zone to be established over Ukraine, which NATO has repeatedly rejected.
	They have called for way more aid than the United States can even provide.
	They're asking for so much military equipment that for the United States to provide it, we would have to give them the things that we need for our own defense readiness, for our own wars.
	So Washington has rejected their most Excessive demands for military aid.
	They've also called for them to just straight up attack Russian targets.
	And they've pleaded with NATO to go to war with Russia on their behalf.
	And they've repeatedly been shut down.
	Not just by Washington, but also by London, and also by Germany, and by France.
	Even to the point where, I think at one point, Joe Biden recently said that Zelensky is appearing ungrateful.
	And that's actually going to hurt his chances of getting more aid greenlit by Congress in the future if he appears ungrateful.
	So the point is to say there's this rift which exists.
	Biden and the other NATO countries are trying to prevent signs of that from being made public, and they're trying to prevent it from widening, but there is a rift.
	Kiev and Washington, which is the leader of NATO, are not on the same page, clearly.
	And all those are good examples of this.
	Kiev wanted the no-fly zone established, Washington wouldn't allow it.
	Kiev created this huge wish list for military aid, Washington was not able and refused to deliver.
	Kiev is demanding more for Ukraine, always, and Washington said, Stop.
	You look like you're being ungrateful.
	We're already giving you a lot.
	Even just a month ago, when Russia annexed those two breakaway provinces in Ukraine and Luhansk and Donetsk, Ukraine created this expedited application into NATO and NATO the NATO General Secretary Stoltenberg and Biden and Washington said no you're not joining NATO and no we're not going to war with you.
	So all of this represents a clear rift and a clear difference in policy between Kiev and NATO broadly but specifically Washington which leads NATO.
	So then that brings us to the development today.
	Moscow is saying that Kiev wants to detonate a dirty bomb in Ukraine.
	And Washington and Paris and London say, oh, that's not going to happen.
	That's not a real concern.
	But think about it.
	Ukraine is capable of creating a dirty bomb.
	Russia's not saying that Ukraine is going to do anything that they can't do.
	They're not saying they're going to do a nuclear bomb or a nuclear missile, a dirty bomb, which doesn't take much.
	Almost any one of these countries, if they really wanted to, could create a dirty bomb.
	All you need is a radioactive material and a bomb, and a high-yield bomb, which they are capable of acquiring or producing.
	And think about motive.
	If there is this rift between Kiev and Washington, and Zelensky realizes that he's on the ropes here and it's about to be winter, which means that There's going to be a real energy shortage in Europe.
	All of these pro-Ukrainian politicians are going to suffer electorally.
	Even Washington is about to lose its pro-Ukrainian majority in the Appropriations Chamber, in the House.
	The Republicans are set to take over the House.
	House has the power of the purse.
	House has the ability to initiate the defense spending bills and the foreign aid bills.
	When, if and more likely when, the Democrats lose the House in the winter, Ukraine is going to lose its patronage of the United States.
	And when those energy bills get more expensive in Germany, and when that destroys German manufacturing, which destroys the German economy, and when the German economy is destroyed, it destroys the Eurozone economy, And when the high heating and electric and energy bills hurt individual consumers in all these countries, they're going to literally ride in the streets and they're going to force their respective governments either to capitulate to their demands and pull their support for Ukraine and
	Ukraine knows this.
	Zelensky knows this.
	And they also know that the war logistically is about to get a lot more difficult because in the winter the terrain gets more difficult for offensives.
	If you're the offensive party in the war and you've got to trudge through sleet and slush and snow, it's a lot more difficult in the winter to be on the offense than it is in the summer.
	So all this taken together, Zelensky realizes it's the end of the road here.
	And we're about to enter a very long, difficult winter if you're on the Ukrainian side.
	And Washington is already unwilling to provide more, or maybe what's necessary, for Zelensky to be confident that he can win this war.
	They'll not provide the no-fly zone, or the military equipment he's asking for, or NATO membership, or these other things.
	What's something that Zelensky can do?
	Which would bring, which would force, you could say a better way, force Washington to escalate the conflict on their behalf.
	Dirty bomb.
	The United States and the New York Times and the Washington apparatus, security apparatus, have been saying that Russia's going to use a nuclear weapon.
	We take those threats seriously.
	Russia's going to nuke Ukraine.
	They've been saying that for months and so they're almost like making their bed.
	And now if a dirty bomb goes off in Ukraine, what are they going to do?
	Say, oh, Zelensky did that?
	They can't do that.
	If a dirty bomb went off in Ukraine, that would bring Washington into the war.
	That would obligate the United States and NATO to respond.
	Maybe not by going to war with Russia, but performing acts of war against Russia, like, again, targeting their fleet in the Black Sea.
	And you also wonder if there's some kind of Collusion going on between Kiev and Washington.
	Is this their way of plausible deniability?
	I think that's probably why Moscow called Washington and London to get the story out there so that if a dirty bomb goes off they can't say, oh we didn't know about it.
	They can't say, oh that was Russia.
	So it's almost like Russia is combating this Potential false flag which maybe NATO is participating in.
	It's just like we covered the story a few weeks ago where the New York Times spilled the beans on Kiev and said that it was the Ukrainian armed forces that killed Alexander Dugin's daughter and said that they, which was an assassination, which was a terrorist attack against a civilian, New York Times published that, threw them under the bus.
	Was that Washington saying that we don't own those actions and Ukraine is on their own or was that their way of creating a healthy distance so that Ukraine could do the dirty work and Washington wouldn't be blamed for it before they then blew up the bridge in Crimea and allowed and let Ukraine off the leash?
	So that's the relevant question is how much To what extent is Washington complicit?
	To what extent does Kiev have the consent of Washington to escalate the conflict?
	Is Kiev going rogue with the dirty bomb?
	Or is this NATO's idea?
	Is this NATO's pretext?
	Is this their way into the conflict?
	To get their nuclear war criminal terrorist Russian state that they want?
	So that once and for all, they're able to intervene in the conflict decisively ended for the Russians and win this thing once and for all.
	Because just like Zelensky sees the writing on the wall with the winter, so does the West.
	And what is that going to look like if the West is defeated by cold weather?
	Literally.
	That they talk tough and they rally the international community, which is really just NATO's pawns.
	And then it got cold.
	And then it got cold, and they didn't have gas, and then all their governments collapsed, and their economies collapsed, and then Russia won the war.
	Is this Washington's way of staying in the game, and not just Kiev?
	I think that's an open-ended question.
	I don't know.
	I don't know if there's complicity there.
	And that is why Moscow is making the call to say, listen assholes, you're not going to do this false flag.
	We're telling you that we think this is what's going on.
	Now you can't deny it.
	So, it's just a question of how desperate And how psychotic do you think the foreign policy establishment really is?
	Do you think that there's any restraint and any reason there?
	Or do you think that these people have fully gone crazy and they're gonna create a nuclear...
	Nuclear frame job to bring in Washington into a shooting war with Russia potentially That's the question.
	So we'll keep an eye on that.
	But it's you know, I'm not gonna lie It's kind of scary because it could like it could happen Ukraine could totally detonate a dirty bomb either unilaterally or with the support of America and honestly Once they do that, if they do that, it would obligate us to respond either way.
	There's no scenario where that's gonna go well for us.
	But we'll keep an eye on that.
	We'll see what happens.
	And hopefully it's just more tactics.
	Hopefully this is more just PR.
	Because that's what it is.
	Just like the chemical stuff.
	Washington said for months they were gonna do a chemical attack, and Moscow said that was a false flag, and then it just never happened.
	So is this just a bluff?
	Is this just another thing like that?
	Or is this going to get real?
	But it's not good.
	So that's that.
	But I want to move on.
	I want to get into our featured story about Ye and his continued war with the Jewish media.
	And this story is pretty incredible.
	So like I said earlier in the show, we covered on Thursday, and I did a Twitter space about this I think last night, we talked about Ari Emanuel.
	And Ari Emanuel is the owner of Endeavor.
	Endeavor is a parent company which owns William Morris Endeavor.
	And William Morris Endeavor is the number one talent agency in Hollywood.
	And Ari Emanuel, who runs this outfit, he's the number one, one of the most influential, powerful agents in Hollywood, runs a six billion dollar company.
	He wrote an open letter in the Financial Times demanding that all these businesses cut ties with Ye.
	Every business that Ye has a hand in, Ari Emanuel named them and called for them to cut ties with him.
	And he took credit for canceling Mel Gibson in 2006 as well.
	And so we did a little bit of a deep dive into Ari Emanuel who runs the company.
	And it's pretty amazing because one, the guy is Jewish.
	So why is Ye being canceled?
	Why is Ari Emanuel writing this letter as one of the most powerful media entertainment moguls in Hollywood to cancel Kanye West?
	Well, it's because Kanye said that Jews run Hollywood.
	Well, this is a Jew that runs Hollywood.
	And not only that, but he's got a pretty interesting lineage.
	Ari Emanuel runs William Morris Endeavor.
	So he's a big deal in Hollywood.
	You could say that he's one of the guys that runs Hollywood.
	There are three big talent agencies in the American media industry.
	There are William Morris, UTA, and CAA.
	There's three big ones.
	William Morris is the oldest and the largest, and Ari Emanuel runs it, and he's Jewish.
	And he not only said that he wants Yeh to be canceled, but also he said that he was a factor in Mel Gibson being canceled in 2006 because of Mel Gibson's comments about Jews running the media and causing war.
	And he said that it wasn't until Mel Gibson apologized, slavishly, that he then began giving Mel Gibson work again in Hollywood.
	So Mel Gibson said, Jews run Hollywood, and then a Jewish Hollywood agent canceled him, and then when Mel Gibson apologized for saying the Jews run Hollywood, the Jewish Hollywood agent let him work again.
	Okay?
	Well, we looked into his family, and Ari Emanuel is Jewish.
	He comes from a Jewish family.
	His brother is Rahm Emanuel.
	His older brother, Rahm Emanuel.
	Rahm Emanuel, as you may know, was Barack Obama's chief of staff and campaign manager.
	He was the chief of staff in the Obama White House, and then he was the mayor of the city of Chicago.
	Ari Emanuel's other Jewish older brother is Zeke Ezekiel Emanuel, who was the architect of Obamacare in the Obama White House.
	Zeke Emanuel served in the National Institute of Health for 20 years.
	Starting in 1997.
	I'm sorry, I think it was 13 years.
	Starting in 1997.
	And then he was promoted to a health advisor for the Office of Management and Budget in the Obama administration where he became the architect of the Affordable Care Act.
	And this is not me saying that there's interviews with him as the architect of the ACA.
	And then in the Joe Biden administration was put on the COVID advisory board.
	So these are three Jews, all brothers,
	Zeke Emanuel, the oldest, the eldest, served in the NIH starting in the Clinton administration, and through the Bush administration into the Obama administration, created the ACA, and then recently served on the advisory board for COVID, and now he's also on the board of the Center for American Progress, which is a Democrat think tank associated with George Soros' Jewish Open Society Foundation.
	That's Zeke Emanuel.
	His younger brother Rahm Emanuel also got a political appointment from Bill Clinton in the late 90s, worked with Barack Obama as a senator, and worked on his campaign, and then became the chief of staff in the Obama administration, and then used his connections through Obama and through Chicago And Springfield to become the mayor of Chicago.
	And then the youngest brother, Ari Emanuel, runs one of the big three talent agencies and a conglomerate worth $6 billion including Miss Universe, the UFC, they've got Matt Damon, they've got Dwayne Johnson, they've got Adam Sandler.
	Okay?
	Their father, Benjamin Emanuel, is an immigrant from Jerusalem.
	He moved to Jerusalem from Eastern Europe at the turn of the last century, Benjamin Emanuel.
	And Benjamin Emanuel moved to Jerusalem to fight Arabs.
	His brother was killed by Arabs and his name was Emanuel and he adopted Emanuel as his surname.
	That's not the real surname of the family and he became Benjamin Emanuel.
	And he tried to fight in the Israeli Defense Force, but they wouldn't let him, so he joined the Irgun.
	And the Irgun was an Israeli terrorist paramilitary group in Israel.
	He fought in the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and then emigrated to the United States in the 1950s.
	Rahm Emanuel also fought with the IDF in the 1990s, in the early 1990s.
	I think 1990 and 1991.
	Okay?
	So these are the Jews that cancelled Kanye West.
	Kanye said Jews run Hollywood, and Ari Emanuel, a Jew who definitely doesn't run anything, and his fucking family definitely doesn't run anything, called for all these businesses to cut ties with Kanye.
	That was last week.
	We covered that last week.
	Today, two of the other... two out of the other... what is it?
	Two out of the other two big talent agencies also called for Kanye to be canceled and this is the article and we'll go through these people as well.
	It says the fallout facing the rapper formerly known as Kanye West has continued to grow as one of Hollywood's biggest agencies has stopped representing him.
	CAA ended its relationship with Ye this month following his recent anti-semitic outburst in various interviews according to a person with knowledge of the situation.
	CAA is the latest business to scrap or suspend its relationship with the rapper over his remarks.
	Other leading entertainment industry figures, including Endeavor CEO Ari Emanuel, called on all companies that work with the musician to cut ties with him.
	Emmanuel noted in his opinion piece that his clients LeBron James and Maverick Carter cancelled an episode of The Shop because Ye continued to repeat dangerous stereotypes during filming.
	So you remember a week ago when there was an interview on LeBron James podcast?
	With Yay that was supposed to come out and then it got canceled?
	Well, LeBron James owns that podcast and LeBron James is a client of William Morris Endeavor, which is run by Ari Emanuel.
	It's funny how that works, isn't it?
	Isn't that interesting how that works?
	Ari Emanuel, the Jew brother of Rahm Emanuel, Chief of Staff Obama, Mayor of Chicago, brother of Zeke Emanuel, architect of Obamacare, on the board of Center for American Progress, son of an Israeli terrorist from Israel, part of a terrorist group, Ergun.
	He owns the contract for LeBron James.
	LeBron James owns the podcast.
	That did an interview with Kanye and then wouldn't air it because Kanye kept talking about how the Jews run Hollywood.
	Go figure.
	That's in addition to CAA now.
	It says, Emanuel noted, or I'm sorry, Emanuel's position drew support from colleagues.
	On Sunday, United Talent Agency Chief Executive Jeremy Zimmer sent a note to staff asking them to support the boycott of Kanye West.
	The letter says, quote, as a company we stand for a wide diversity of voices and ideas but we can't support hate speech bigotry or anti-semitism.
	These are the big three talent agencies in Hollywood.
	The big three.
	These are THE three agencies.
	Almost all of the biggest Hollywood actors and musicians are signed with these talent agents at UTA, CAA, and WME.
	Well, this is who runs all of them.
	CAA, which is the most powerful, was founded by Michael Ovitz.
	The founder is Michael Ovitz, who is Jewish.
	The president, the current acting president of CAA, is Richard Lovett, who is Jewish.
	CAA is owned by a conglomerate called Texas Pacific Group.
	The CEO of that company's name is John Winklereid, who is Jewish.
	So the CAA represented Kanye for his career, entire career, and they just cut ties with him and are joining the boycott.
	And CAA, the founder is Jewish, the president is Jewish, and the CEO of the parent company that owns the company is Jewish.
	That is one of the big three talent agencies, and in particular the most powerful one in Hollywood.
	UTA is the third most powerful one, United Talent Agency.
	The CEO of that company is Jeremy Zimmer, who is Jewish.
	The president of that company is David Kramer, who is Jewish.
	The chairman of that company is Jim Berkus, who is Jewish.
	And of course, the person who initiated the boycott is Ari Emanuel, the CEO of the third and the second most influential of the big three talent agencies Ari Emanuel of William Morris Endeavor, who is Jewish.
	Okay?
	So, I return to my initial question from weeks ago.
	What did Kanye say that was incorrect?
	What did he say that was wrong?
	Is he wrong that the media is run by Jews?
	Because the media is comprised of who?
	The talent.
	The actors.
	The musicians.
	Who represents them?
	Who gets them contracts?
	Who negotiates their contracts?
	Who gets them work?
	Who is the intermediary between the talent and the producers and the directors and the big production companies?
	It's the agents.
	And the agents are, in some sense, where the power is.
	They're the power brokers of Hollywood.
	Because they know both sides of the business.
	There's three big ones.
	They are all run by Jews.
	It's not anti-semitic to say that, even though it sounds that way.
	It sounds anti-semitic to say that the big three talent agencies in Hollywood are run by Jews.
	The biggest, most influential, most powerful talent companies in Hollywood are run by Jews.
	But they all are.
	Every single one of them.
	CAA has a Jewish founder, president, and the CEO of the parent company, all Jewish.
	WME, CEO of the company and of the parent company, Jewish.
	And the CEO, president, and chairman of UTA are all Jewish.
	Three for three.
	And they all canceled Kanye.
	Every single one of them.
	It gets better.
	The article goes on and talks about another company that canceled Kanye.
	On Monday, film and TV producer MRC said it is not proceeding with distribution of its documentary about Ye.
	In a statement they said, quote, we cannot support any content that amplifies this platform.
	The silence from leaders and corporations when it comes to Kanye or antisemitism is dismaying but not surprising.
	What silence?
	What is new and sad is the fear Jews have about speaking out in their own defense.
	They're afraid of speaking out in their defense?
	They don't seem afraid.
	What does Ari Emanuel have to be afraid of?
	His company's worth $6 billion.
	His brother is in the frickin' administration.
	He's on the board of one of the most influential NGOs tied with the Open Society Foundation and gets government money.
	They're afraid to speak out against who?
	The people they're canceling?
	The people that they're killing their career?
	Who's Ari and Zeke and Rahm Emanuel afraid of?
	CAA and UTA?
	Who are they afraid of?
	Who is Jim Berkus afraid of?
	They're the ones that are afraid, not Ye!
	And anyway, the company is MRC.
	They produced a documentary about Kanye costing them $2,000,000 planned to sell it for $10,000,000.
	They're scrapping it because of the remarks.
	Who runs MRC?
	Well, it's two people.
	One of them is Muslim.
	A Muslim, I believe he's gay or something.
	And the other one is predictably Jewish.
	The co-founder and co-CEO of MRC is Modi Weizsik or Weizsik who is Jewish.
	Okay, so we're what, four for four then?
	It gets better.
	There were a number of celebrities that condemned Kanye on social media today, including Amy Schumer, David Schwimmer, Gwyneth Paltrow, Katie Couric.
	Do you think you know where I'm going with this one?
	Guess what they all have in common?
	Guess what all of those actresses and actors have in common?
	They're all Jewish.
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And it gets even better than that.
		His own family disavowed him.
		This is according to The Guardian.
		It says, quote, The rapper's ex-wife, Kim Kardashian, also responded to West's anti-Semitic comments.
		In a story posted to her Instagram, she wrote that hate speech is never okay or excusable.
		She said, I stand together with the Jewish community and call on the terrible violence and hateful rhetoric towards them to come to an immediate end.
		Hate?
		Violence?
		What the fuck are you talking about?
		Earlier in the day, several of her family members, including her mom, Kris Jenner, sisters Khloe Kardashian, Kendall Jenner, Kylie Jenner, posted their own matching statements in support of Jewish people.
		I support my Jewish friends and the Jewish people read the statement posted to their individual Instagram stories.
		So, Ye has been on this media circuit talking about what exactly?
		Is he saying that we should kill Jews?
		No.
		Is he saying that he hates Jews?
		No.
		What's he saying?
		What has he said in every interview?
		He said that Jewish people run Hollywood and Jewish businessmen in the media industry have created unfair contracts for black people.
		And screwed over him and people he knows in the entertainment industry.
		And that on every contract there's a Jewish person.
		And that Jewish people have visited harm upon the black community by creating these unfair dealings with them.
		He said, I'm Jewish.
		He said, I'm Jewish.
		He said, and I want this situation to be rectified.
		I want to open up the contracts and look at the language and look at how black people are being screwed over.
		So he's not going out there saying violence, killing, hate.
		He's just saying descriptively.
		And they keep asking him, well what does it have to do with the fact that they're Jewish?
		And he says, well they just are.
		They're screwing me over and they do happen to be Jewish.
		And they're a people, not a race.
		And this is what's going on.
		Everybody knows it and so on.
		But he's not saying anything that's really even hostile or antagonistic or calling for... In fact, he said the opposite.
		I'm not calling for violence or hatred.
		But all the statements of hatred, violence, all the Jewish people that run these media companies and all of their pawns, you know, you think Kim Kardashian and Chris and all the rest of them did this of their own volition?
		They got calls.
		And this was after the ADL, which is a Jewish group, Jonathan Greenblatt, demanded Adidas and all the others condemn Ye, and other groups like Stop Antisemitism and the SPLC called for the same.
		What are we to make of all of this?
		Was Yeh factually wrong?
		Is he incorrect in saying that Jews run these things?
		Obviously they do.
		Case in point.
		He is now, since he said that Jews run the media, been debanked by JPMorgan Chase.
		He has been banned on Twitter and Instagram.
		Balenciaga and Vogue have cut ties with him.
		His talent agency, CAA, has fired him.
		The other two big talent agencies have called for a boycott of him, UTA and WME.
		The ADL has called for Adidas to stop doing business with him and gone on a media circuit condemning him.
		Jewish celebrities have attacked him.
		His ex-wife and his ex-wife family have attacked him.
		And in addition to that, he has been banned from Fox News, his documentary has been scrapped, and according to his new interview today, he said that according to Candace Owens, he's not allowed on Daily Wire, which is what?
		Run by a Jew.
		Daily Wire.
		That's the other one today.
		Ye went on an interview with Lex Friedman, who's Jewish, and said that Candace Owens told him that Daily Wire would not allow him to be on their platform.
		Daily Wire makes a hundred million dollars a year.
		It's a billion dollar media company.
		And who runs that outfit?
		Ben Shapiro.
		Who is Jewish?
		Which reminds me of the other conservative outlets, like Breitbart, which is run by Jews, or Prager University, which is run by Jews.
		Name some other ones.
unidentified		So, he's not wrong.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And the question is, if this is the dynamic, then...
		Why is it ethically wrong to talk about it?
		If it is the truth and it's not incorrect, why is it ethically wrong to talk about this?
		They say, well, it sounds like the 1930s.
		What does that even mean?
		Is it true or is it not true?
		What do you mean it sounds like Hitler and the Nazis?
		Well, it's true!
		So what does that mean?
		You're saying that the truth sounds like the things the Nazis were saying?
		What do you mean by that?
		Kanye says the Jews run the media, which we have just established is true.
		And then the Jewish interviewer said, that sounds like the Nazis, that sounds like Hitler.
		So the truth reminds you of Hitler?
		The truth reminds you of what the Nazis said?
		Does that mean that the truth must be actually wrong because the Nazis said it, or does it mean something else?
		It's their words, not mine.
		They said it.
		I'm not saying that.
		They say that when you say Jewish media, that sounds like gerbils in the 30s.
		Okay, granted.
		But is it wrong?
		Is it incorrect?
		Is it an incorrect statement that the Jews run the media?
		They would say yes.
unidentified		Really?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, they're all Jewish.
		Well, they're not really Jewish.
		They're individuals.
		Well, yeah, that happen to be Jewish and they all fucking know each other.
		Well, that sounds like the 30s.
		Okay, so?
		Is it true or not?
		Who are the people cancelling him?
		ADL, Jewish group.
		WME, run by Jews.
		CAA, run by Jews.
		UTA, run by Jews.
		The other one.
		Um, what is it?
		MRC, run by Jews.
unidentified		Hello?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So if it's not factually incorrect, it's morally wrong because it sounds like the 30s, it hurts people's feelings, it's like the Holocaust, it's... They're individuals.
		They're not individuals.
		How are Ari Emanuel, Rahm Emanuel, Zeke Emanuel, and Benjamin Emanuel individuals?
		They're a team!
		They're a team!
		You can't tell me they're individuals when they all work in the White House!
		That's not no individuals.
		Like they all just met at a bus stop.
		They're brothers!
		They took ballet together and they all went to a Jewish school.
		And then two of them worked in the Clinton and Obama White House.
unidentified		And one of them runs Hollywood.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And they talk on the phone about politics and business and you're telling me these people are not really Jewish?
		They're individuals?
		They're individuals that all happen to be brothers?
		And all fought for the IDF?
unidentified		And they all went to a Jewish school?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		And it's just a big coincidence?
unidentified		They pick up the phone!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		They go to Shabbat!
		They go to Shabbat on Saturday and that's when the decision was probably made!
		Give me a break.
		They're individuals.
		They're not really Jewish.
		I'm sure they would say they're Jewish.
		And it's really interesting.
		When they're working together and it's something positive, they're a people and they're a community.
		When they're screwing over black people, they're individuals, right?
		When we're talking about their suffering, and we're talking about their achievements, and we're talking about them in a positive way, they're a community.
		The Jewish community stands together.
		And they're a vibrant and strong people, and they're a family.
		But when they're fucking over Kanye and all his friends in the music industry, or they're leading us to war in Iraq, or they build Obamacare, or they kill the Russian Tsar, Are they genocide the Palestinians?
		Well then it's just those particular... They're just individuals.
		They're not Jews.
		They're individuals.
		They're just bad guys.
		They're human beings.
		We're all human beings.
		We're all pink on the inside.
		Those are just individuals.
		They're not really even Jewish.
		They're just individuals.
		Okay, seriously?
		So there's nothing factually or morally wrong about talking about this.
		The only reason that it seems morally wrong is because they hold authority and they use that authority to create this moralization for that authority.
		Why can we not talk about all the Jews exercising authority?
		Because to talk about them exercising their authority in an abusive way is wrong, is morally wrong.
		The people in power are telling us it is wrong to question the people in power.
		It is morally wrong to question those in power.
		That is what they're saying.
		You strip away the particular language and that is the premise.
		We Jews are in power.
		If you talk about Jews in power, that's an age-old anti-Semitic trope.
		It is hateful.
		It is evil.
		It is evil to talk about who is in power.
		It is evil to question those in power.
		And people are like, yup!
		Good enough for me!
		No, it's not evil.
		That is the power structure.
		That is part of the character of the power structure.
		And if we want to understand why things are the way they are, Have to talk about it.
		Have to talk about it.
		You know, what does their Jewish identity mean for us?
		What does it mean for those of us that are not Jewish?
		Who may be black, or may be white, or whatever.
		What does it mean for us non-Jewish people that they rule over in Hollywood, or in Washington, or in New York, or in Southern Florida?

▲