Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Sept. 13, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:38:27

Live Democratic Debate Reaction and Analysis | America First Ep. 460

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:18:30

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		That's a clip!
		No e-girls!
		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not even once.
unidentified		I've never heard of it.
		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
		He's just that.
		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
unidentified		Who's that?
		Thank you.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the generation.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		Americanism, not globalism, will not globalism, will be our freedom. will be our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		I've never heard of it.
		I've never heard of Nick Pudge.
		Who's that?
		Americanism, not populism. not populism.
		We'll be our freedom.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not even once.
unidentified		Guy, I've never heard of Nick Pudge.
unidentified		Who's that?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Guy, I've never heard of Nick Pudge.
unidentified		Who's that?
		We'll be right back.
		...and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom!
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, not globalism, not globalism, not globalism,
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
		He's just that.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll be right back.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I've never heard of Bigfoot.
unidentified		Who's that?
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human.
		I'm not interested.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified		Not even once.
		Guy, I've never heard of a big one.
		Just use that.
		Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
		We'll be our freedom.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Guy, I've never heard of big one.
unidentified		Who's that?
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
		Not interested.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an e-girl.
		You know the rule.
		No e-girls.
		Who's got the clip?
		No e-girls.
unidentified		Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Hashtag never e-girls.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Not even once.
unidentified		Guy, I've never heard of Nick Budge.
		Who's that?
		I've never heard of Nick Budge.
		I've never heard of Nick Budge.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I've never heard of Nick Budge.
unidentified		Who's that?
		Thank you.
		Thank you.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
		The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sorry.
		I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
		You're an E-girl.
		You know the rules.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day home, it's going to be only Americans.
		America first. America first.
		America first.
		America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening everybody.
		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be with you here tonight on Thursday at a bit of a later hour.
		A little bit after 10 o'clock here.
		We just finished watching live the third Democratic presidential primary debate.
		And it was long.
		That was a long debate.
		We started watching that if you are just tuning in now or you're coming here from DLive.
		We started watching the debate at 7 o'clock central.
		It is now 10 o'clock.
		So the debate ran nearly three hours and featured the top 10 candidates.
		Fortunately this time around it's only one night of debating.
		For the first two democratic debates they split it up.
		So if you missed out on this one, not to worry.
		We'll be right back.
		We'll all get our fair share of debating.
		So, we'll be talking about that tonight.
		That is the main thing we'll be talking about tonight, but if we run out of things to say about that, we could also talk about other things.
		You know, this PewDiePie situation.
		Uh, has taken a very interesting turn today, of course.
		We talked, I think it was on Tuesday, about PewDiePie giving a $50,000 donation to the ADL.
		He has rescinded the donation as of today, so we might get into that.
		And we also may talk a little bit about Charlottesville and the fate of the Robert E. Lee statue, the Robert E. Lee monument there in Lee Park, which According to The Hill, a circuit judge has now ordered that that monument is protected by the law.
		So if we run out of things to say about the debate, because it was a boring one, we could get on to some other topics.
		But honestly, it's late.
		We're going to try and keep it short tonight.
		I know the Super Chatters are not going to be helpful in that regard.
		We've been at it for three hours already.
		I imagine there will be another two.
		That's okay.
		That's okay.
		I'll still get complaints anyway that there's not enough content, right?
		I'll still get premium people saying, there's not enough.
		This is no substitute for premium content.
		But anyway, we're gonna dive right in here.
		I guess we'll just dive right into the debate or into analysis and reaction about the debate.
		So like I said, just some details.
		This was the third such debate.
		We had one in June.
		We had one in July.
		Did not have a debate in August, so this is the third one.
		Like I said, in the first two primary debates it was two nights.
		And the qualifying standards, right, the qualifications for the first two debates were relatively easy to meet.
		You know the reason we had 20 candidates in the first two debates is because the threshold was so low.
		I think for the first two it was you either had to have 65,000 individual donors or you had to hit 1% in I think three approved polls from the DNC.
		It was either or.
		Either you meet a fundraising threshold or you meet a polling threshold.
		And that's how, in a race of 23 or 24 candidates, we had fully 20 on the mainstream debate stage.
		And actually, for those debates, they were doing all these sort of convoluted mathematical algorithms and things where they were dividing it based on how high you polled, and we'll have a few of the top polling people with several of the bottom polling people.
		And they changed the rules to make it so that you wouldn't have a primetime debate and an undercard debate.
		Fortunately, we don't have to mess around with that anymore.
		This time around there was a significant culling.
		We went from 20 candidates to 10.
		The qualifications were raised, whereas in the previous debate you needed 65,000.
		Now you need 130,000 individual donors and you need to hit at least 2% in four approved polls by the DNC.
		So last time it was either fundraising or polling.
		Whoops!
		That was almost a big mess.
		This time around it was you had to hit the fundraising threshold and you had to hit the polling threshold.
		So obviously a lot less people qualified.
		Some notable people that have dropped out or were barred from the debates, I think Hickenlooper dropped out, Inslee dropped out, we saw a number of other smaller candidates.
		Tulsi Gabbard is still in the race but she did not qualify.
	Marianne Williamson, still in the race, did not qualify, so there were some notable exceptions tonight.
	But the people we did see debate were Joe Biden, Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, Pete Buttigieg, Cory Booker, Kamala Harris, Beto O'Rourke, Andrew Yang, Julian Castro, and Amy Klobuchar.
	The debate was on ABC and Univision and it was three hours.
	I cannot stress that enough that it was three hours.
	And I'll say at the outset, you know, here's what you have to keep in mind.
	Maybe in the 2016 Republican primary you could see it having made sense that it was 17 candidates And given so much air time over such a long primary, because in the Republican primary in 2016, it was very similar in the sense that it was a very crowded field, you didn't have an incumbent, and so they were just sort of picking at who's going to be the next leader of the GOP.
	You could realistically see a lot of those candidates having stood a chance in the general, you know.
	Would it have been Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Marco Rubio, Kasich, you know, all these different candidates, Ben Carson, even Jeb Bush I might say.
	All those candidates at different times had had a moment, you know, or they had their day in the sun where they were polling high, the polling was dynamic.
	You know, I remember there was one point in December 2015 when Ben Carson was polling at number one.
	At the beginning of the race, Jeb Bush was polling at number one.
	At different points, different people are winning caucuses and primaries.
	Ted Cruz won the Iowa caucus.
	And so it was a very dynamic race.
	There wasn't really a set or one individual candidate who was clearly running away with it.
	I'll say that these debates are basically pointless because that is not the case with this primary.
	I looked at every single poll tonight from the month of September on 538.
	You can look at all the national polls for the month of September.
	And in only one single poll did another candidate tie Joe Biden.
	There is not one poll for this whole month where any candidate surpasses Biden in the polling.
	There is one single poll where a candidate tied him.
	That was Elizabeth Warren in a YouGov poll.
	Looks like in the YouGov polling Elizabeth Warren does a lot better.
	There are maybe two or three polls where another candidate is even within striking range of Joe Biden the entire month.
	Every other poll shows that Joe Biden is the frontrunner and in most cases by double digits.
	All the polls have the same pattern.
	It's Joe Biden number one, it's Biden or Warren at number two, and these three candidates are all double digits, and everybody else is in single digits.
	This is not a competitive primary.
	You've got three serious candidates and everybody else is wasting our time.
	You know, so we went from 20 to 10, and that's good, I guess, because Michael Bennett was obviously not gonna win, right?
	And Hickenlooper and Inslee and all these ridiculous characters, Gillibrand, they stood no chance.
	He had 10 clearly, obviously superfluous candidates, so I guess it's good that it got halved, but we still have 7 too many.
	You know, at the very, at the very minimum, we have like 5 too many.
	You know, Klobuchar, Castro, Beto, Yang, I would say even Cory Booker.
	I would say these guys are just not competitive.
	I would say the top five, and it's even a stretch to say it's a top five, are the ones that could potentially win contests.
	And that is Biden, Sanders, Warren, Harris, and Buttigieg.
	All the rest is extra.
	So to me, it's just such a headache to see this kind of stuff because there's really only like three major players.
	And about this debate in particular, and about the debates that have been happening so far, none of the debates are actually changing the picture.
	It'd be one thing if, like, after the first debate there was a big shakeup in the polling, or after the second debate, oh, you know, somebody had a moment, and they were the breakout star.
	Nobody is breaking out.
	Nobody is gaining.
	Nobody's really collapsing either.
	It looks like everybody is just kind of stagnating.
	You know, the biggest moment so far in any of the debates was the first debate when Kamala Harris attacked Joe Biden.
	We remember that was probably the biggest, most newsworthy exchange, clash so far of the whole election.
	And the polling change after that is that Kamala Harris gained marginally, Joe Biden fell marginally, and within four weeks, they both reverted to where they were before.
	That was the biggest thing that happened so far.
	There was no breakout, no shakeup, nobody got launched ahead.
	It was like Kamala gained a little bit, Joe Biden fell a little bit, and then they just, by the next debate, four weeks later, they were back where they were before.
	You know, so there aren't really any game changers, and that's How I judge the debates.
	You know, a lot of idiots watch these debates...
	They're really engaged on the... I don't know who this is, but they're, you know, they're really on the edge of their seats and, oh well, I don't know, Cory Booker's got an interesting strategy.
	He should position himself as moderate on this issue.
	Oh, I don't know, you know, Klobuchar is giving the establishment a good backup plan in case... It's like, the way that you judge a debate is not actually by what people are saying.
	It's by those moments.
	It's by a moment.
	They're defined by The soundbites are defined by what's going to be the headline tomorrow.
	Most people can't, like, stay engaged to a movie for three hours, or a television show, or read a book, let alone watch the same debate about public policy, the same inane, banal debate about public policy with minor differences for three hours.
	It's not really going to matter that, like, oh, Klobuchar, like, they really liked her position on health care.
	None of that matters.
	It's like, did somebody land a blow?
	Did somebody attack somebody and really knock them down?
	That's all that matters.
	And so, that's how I'm looking at these debates.
	With that in mind, this debate didn't change anything at all.
	Nobody did particularly well.
	No moment really stood out to me as really noteworthy or newsworthy.
	There were hardly any big exchanges, with a few exceptions.
	You know, Castro attacked Joe Biden a couple times and it was kind of funny.
	Castro attacked Buttigieg.
	This is the funniest moment of the night, I'll just say.
	You know, I think Castro said something to the effect towards Biden.
	He said, you know, are you already forgetting what you said, old man?
	You know, you might as well have said that.
	Really, Boomer?
	Did you really just forget what you said five minutes ago?
	And Buttigieg interjected in the middle, And he said, you know, this is what people don't like about politics, all this one-upsmanship and this kind of thing.
	And I'll say, whenever people say this kind of stuff, and it's not just because it's Buttigieg, it's so gay because it's a debate!
	It's a contest!
	You know, and it's always this, and particularly with the Democrats, they're like, should we attack each other, should we not attack each other, rise above, we go low, we go high, you know, whatever it is.
	But at the end of the day, you're fighting for the nomination.
	Yeah, you all agree on a lot of things.
	Yeah, you're all trying to beat Donald Trump.
	But you're also competing for one spot to be the one nominee.
	So you have to fight about your differences, right?
	To select the best candidate.
	And Castro said basically that.
	He cut Buttigieg off.
	He said, that's what an election is, retard.
	Hey retard, we're trying.
	That's what the nominating contest is.
	And you know, he got a huge applause line.
	Buttigieg shut down.
	That was the most amusing moment of the night, and that was because of my own personal feelings about it.
	That was for my own personal satisfaction.
	It wasn't a game changer for the election.
	It didn't matter.
	Castro's not a competitive candidate.
	Frankly, neither is Buttigieg.
	It was just funny to me.
	But outside of that, nothing really happened.
	And so as a result, nothing will change.
	The polling won't change.
	No candidate is going to really rise or fall.
	I think you'll see the same thing happen in October.
	It'll be the same debate.
	And for what it's worth, if we are going to break it down and give a substantive analysis, which I guess we're going to have to, of the issues and the policies, it was virtually the same debate we saw in July and June.
	It was the same topics in the same order.
	You know, I counted a few topics They talked about health care.
	They talked about racism.
	That was a little bit surprising that it was explicitly, what do you think about racism?
	You know, even in the past debates, they tried to couch it and they said, well, what do you think about criminal justice reform?
	What do you think about the racial wealth gap?
	In this one, they were just like, well, what do you think about white supremacy?
	So that was a little bit interesting.
	It was criminal justice reform, immigration, gun control, climate change, education, foreign policy, trade.
	All of these topics were discussed in the last two debates, and they all got the same treatment.
	You know, on healthcare, I'll keep talking about healthcare, we're not, I don't know if we'll go into every issue tonight, but on healthcare it's a perfect example.
	It's literally everybody says the same thing, and even when they disagree with each other, it's the same disagreements, it's the same talking points.
	We get it.
	The debate is between public option and medicare-for-all.
	Do you want there to be private insurance alongside a public medicare option or do you want to outlaw private insurance and just have single-payer, have medicare coverage for everybody?
	That's a debate.
	Well, medicare-for-all, you can't pay for it.
	Well, public option, not everyone's going to be covered.
	Okay, that's the gist of it.
	We've done this four times already, and we did it a fifth time tonight, you know, and it's all the same.
	Well, I want Medicare for all who want it.
	Well, it's time for Medicare for all.
	Time for Medicare for choice, says Joe Biden.
	No, it's time for Medicare for America, says Beto O'Rourke.
	Like, okay, we get it, you know?
	And yeah, this is like manifesting the deeper divide in the party, truly, between progressives and moderates and outsiders and establishment.
	How many fucking times can we say that, right?
	You know, sorry for the language, but it is what it is.
	We get it already, you know?
	But it's all gonna be the same!
	But it's all gonna be the same.
	At the end of the day, they're all for universal healthcare.
	It's all going to be contrasted against Donald Trump.
	These differences really, in the grand scheme of things, are not important.
	I don't believe that if Warren gets into office, they're going to get Medicare for all.
	I think they're going to get public option.
	If Bernie Sanders gets into office, I don't think they're going to get universal health care.
	I think they're going to get public option, or some variation.
	So, for a host of reasons, the differences don't really matter.
	But that was the whole debate.
	It was, what do you think about climate change?
	Well, I think it should be You know, a foreign policy based climate change thing.
	Implementing it in trade and foreign policy.
	Well I think it should be like a Marshall Plan, but for climate change it's like all the same.
	The one area that I did think was interesting, like I said, is the racism part.
	Where I think it was Jorge Ramos or one of the moderators asked Beto O'Rourke straight up, why are you the best candidate to tackle racism?
	And they never said it explicitly.
	Actually, I think they have a few times.
	But in this debate, it was very implicit.
	It was basically like, look, clearly this Democratic Party is woke now.
	You know, this audience for this debate is all Hispanics and Blacks, and the party is now dominated by Hispanics, Blacks, Asians, and Jews.
	So, hey, Robert Francis O'Rourke.
	Hey, you, handsome, white, privileged male.
	Why the hell should we vote for you, bitch?
	That was basically what the question was.
	You know, they were like, well, everyone says racism's a problem and systemic racism continues to be a problem.
	Why are you the best candidate to address this?
	They might as well have said, hey, hey, listen, white idiot.
	Why should we vote for another white man?
	They've said that point blank a few times.
	This time was a little bit implicit.
	And Beta O'Rourke said, well, it's time for reparations.
	And, uh, who was it?
	Booker?
	Said that he was going to put in the White House an office of white supremacy.
	White supremacy is dangerous for the country.
	Pete Buttigieg said he wanted a Douglas Plan.
	Sort of like the Marshall Plan, but named after a black guy.
	And I guess this is reparations.
	The Douglas Plan is... It's sort of like when we rebuilt Europe with billions and billions of dollars, but instead we're just giving billions and billions of dollars to black people for no reason at all.
	And every single candidate was trying to like outdo the previous one on how extreme they're gonna take things with race.
	And you know I'll say like this is the future of politics.
	A lot of people, and this is the most important thing I'm gonna say tonight...
	A lot of people watch my show and if they're normal, if they're mainstream people like Normie, I'm not saying that in a nice way, I'm saying it like you're brainwashed.
	A lot of mainstream type people might sort of wander onto my show and they look at me like I have three heads when I talk about the white man, white racial consciousness, you know, racial differences in IQ, these kinds of things.
	A lot of people are not prepared for that on our side.
	Like conservatives, republicans, And it's across the age spectrum.
	It's Turning Point college kids, it's Millennials, Gen X, Libertarians, it's Boomers.
	A lot of people are so not ready for race on our side.
	But you watch the debate on the Democrat side tonight, they are speaking 100% in racial terms.
	They do not view the country, they do not view policy, extremism, through the lens of ideology.
	They didn't even say like fascism, Nazi, that kind of thing.
	They said white supremacy.
	They said systemic racism.
	They are fundamentally, I think in this day and age, unconcerned with ideology or systems, political systems, even really policy.
	The major difference is what it's coming down to is all cultural.
	Sam Francis wrote a lot about this in the 80s and 90s.
	He called them middle American radicals, who are not exactly people that are swayed by, you know, they're not strong feelings ideologically one way or the other on economy or, you know, how the government should run or foreign policy.
	They're not very ideologically driven.
	What distinguishes them from everybody else is this attitude, this feeling of alienation of, in a lot of ways, demographic change or cultural change.
	The distinction, the cleavage between Republicans and Democrats is starkly cultural and increasingly racial.
	And so if you think that, "Oh, I'm out of step with the Republican Party because I talk about race," take a look at the Democratic stage.
	That's our future, whether we like it or not.
	Electorally, that's our future.
	And in every other way, that's our future.
	It's people that are motivated and viewing the world through the lens of race, racial self-interest.
	You know, Jorge Ramos said, and the guy speaking Spanish, we all know Jorge Ramos, the guy's like a Mexican national.
	And a nationalist certainly for Latinos.
	And the guy asked point blank, like, hey, what are you going to do for Latinos?
	They're asking during the debate, what are you going to do for black people?
	This is the future of America.
	Completely racialized politics.
	It's going to be tribalist and tribe is based on race.
	It's not based on ideology.
	It's not based on economic self-interest.
	You know, I hear Tucker Carlson, frankly, Steve Bannon, Donald Trump, they try to reframe it as, well, You know, what if the Republican Party was the party of working class people?
	Sorry, you're stuck with white people.
	Whether you think, whether that's a strong hand or that's a weak hand, whether you like it, whether you don't, that's the way it is.
	You know, and we have to get with the times.
	You might not be comfortable with it, but that's the only way we're going to be able to operate in the 21st century is to meet them where they are on race.
	And that's how they're talking.
	So I will say Democratic Party is way ahead of us in that regard.
	You know, they're speaking explicitly.
	We have to target white supremacy.
	White supremacy is a threat.
	They're racializing a threat.
	You know, even when we talk about crime, we don't racialize it.
	We say in very abstract, conceptual, general terms, we have to go after crime.
	We have to go after, you know, poverty.
	We have to go after these things.
	They're saying no, our problem is white supremacy.
	The threat to our country is white supremacy.
	Which is fascinating because we could just as easily say, hey, who's committing half the murders?
	Who are all the drug dealers?
	Where are the drugs coming from?
	It's clearly there are racial disparities here, but we don't want to play that way.
	They're obviously playing that way.
	They're vilifying a whole race, half the country, and we are not playing on the same battlefield.
	There is nothing wrong with identity politics.
	You know, a lot of Republicans say, oh well, Democrats are the real racists because of this.
	Democrats are hyper obsessed with race.
	You must be a Democrat.
	No, I'm a realist.
	I'm a racial realist, I'm a political realist, I'm a tribal realist.
	Tribalism is real, it's intrinsic to our nature, and it is the future of politics.
	We can either get on board and win, or we are going to continue to say, No, they're the real bad guys, they're the real whatever, you know, and keep on with this charade that we're all on the same page and we'll get murdered.
	We will get straight up rhetorically and symbolically murdered at the ballot box and then we'll literally get murdered when the country is like South Africa or Rhodesia or whatever else.
	So that's the most important takeaway to me.
	You know, health care, climate change, criminal justice reform, what have we not heard before from the Democratic side?
	We are gonna take your AR-15s.
	Okay, what else is new?
	What stood out to me is this party is starkly racialized and is weaponizing it against white people.
	The only way to beat them is to beat them at their own game.
	So, that was my major takeaway on the issues.
	Aside from that, I would say maybe the biggest disappointment of the night was Andrew Yang.
	You know, because Andrew Yang, I was a little bit excited about this one because the rumor was, I don't know if you saw this on social media, but he promised.
	I think he called up a journalist or something.
	Somebody reported this and they said, oh, you know, an Andrew Yang campaign spokesperson just called me and said, Andrew is going to do something unprecedented tomorrow night.
	He's going to do something never before seen in a presidential primary debate.
	And I was like, oh, what's he going to do?
	Is he going to smoke pot?
	Is he going to do a vape?
	Is he going to bring Williamson on the stage?
	Is he going to be naked?
	What is going to happen?
	Is it going to be like this huge game changer?
	Is it going to be like WWE?
	You know, like a limousine is gonna pull up sort of on the side and he's gonna get out with a title belt.
	I don't know.
	I can't imagine possibly what's gonna happen.
	Is he gonna kill somebody like in Joker?
	Is he gonna say, you know, what do you do when you take an Asian entrepreneur who loves math and you put him in a society?
	That treats him like trash!
	You get what you deserve!
unidentified		Bah!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, is that gonna happen?
		I don't know.
		But instead, he comes up on the stage today, and in the opening statement, he's like, I'm gonna do something unprecedented.
unidentified		If you go to my campaign website, I'm doing a giveaway.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's like, that's really a giveaway?
		That was your big surprise?
		That was the unprecedented, never before seen, September surprise?
		You're doing a glorified giveaway?
		If you apply on my website, I will select 10 lucky winners and give you a freedom dividend.
		Well, you know, we're not going to get any of that.
		They're going to google your name.
		Everybody who watches this show, it's probably on a watch list, they're going to give it to blacks, hispanics, asians, jews, muslims.
		Maybe they'll give it to some token white guy, you know, but it's somebody who watches Rachel Maddow.
		So it's like, yeah, the big thing I'm doing is if you go to andreayang.com, apply to win the sweepstakes.
		Oh, Great.
		So it's it's another debate and Andrew Yang's got a giveaway.
		Amazing.
		You know, so that was really disappointing.
		On another note, it's actually really important, I think, to explore Yang because I've been having a lot of conversations with friends of mine in DC, people that are like, I don't want to get too specific, but all kinds of different people that are in the political world.
		And we were all very fascinated by the Yang phenomenon.
		I know, I know he's cringed.
		I know he's gay.
		You know, I understand that.
		I agree with that.
		But when he really had this sort of breakout moment in the spring, like in March, April, May, we were all sort of fascinated by this energy from young people, from online, you know, that he was sort of a different candidate talking about human-centered capitalism, freedom dividend.
		He really was introducing something radical, and we were trying to think about You know, how is he going to contrast with Donald Trump?
		The obvious foil is who else was an outsider, total outsider, from the private sector with a sort of working class appeal, you know, internet savvy, with a very specific niche and devoted following, and who's speaking a totally different language?
		Not Chinese, but you know, talking about things, not Mandarin, but you know, talking about things like technology and technological automation, technological unemployment, human-centered capitalism, things like this.
		You know, a real realignment, a real shifting, a paradigm shift in the way we think about politics.
		The obvious foil was Yang.
		Just like Trump did that in 16, Yang some speculated was poised to do that in 2020?
		Well, I see that increasingly all of this appeal is just being squandered.
		I think a lot of people observed this happen a long time ago, but I think it was just on full display tonight.
		We got a little bit of that last time around, but now Yang has fully assimilated into the rest of the field and become just like any other Democratic candidate, except there's this novelty thing of the freedom dividend.
		For him to really, and this would have been such a huge opportunity, For him in particular, but for all of us, and for me as a commentator, if he were a real revolutionary and went onto the stage and just set it on fire, you know, and said, you know what, I'm going to make everything about the freedom dividend.
		I'm going to make everything different.
		Everything's got to be rethinking it.
		And I'm gonna speak in plain terms, and it's not gonna be partisan.
		He should have really attempted, even if it wasn't in his heart, to be dramatically different from all the rest, you know, but sort of adhering to this human-centered capitalism idea.
		I think he did a much better job of that in the July debate.
		You know, even like when they asked him about climate change, he was like, it's too late about climate change.
		We need to move to higher ground.
		How are you gonna move to higher ground?
		How are you gonna afford a house that's on a higher elevation?
		We're gonna give you $1,000 a month, you know?
		Or they asked him about... I forget.
		There was one other totally convoluted one where he found some workaround to make it all about the freedom dividend again.
		But he kept doing that and some people thought it was funny.
		I thought it was very effective.
		That's probably how he qualified for this debate.
		But in this one, every answer was just like cookie cutter, indistinguishable from all the other Democrats.
		Public schools are good.
		Public schools are great.
		I believe in public schools.
		And, you know, we need to release nonviolent offenders, and we need sensible gun control, and on health care we need something that works for... I mean, it was just all the same.
		So that's probably the biggest disappointment of this whole field, is that Yang Is officially cancelled.
		He's been cancelled for a long time but you know he's promoting like this stop eating meat thing.
		He promotes mass immigration.
		He was talking about the Russia stuff in the first one.
		And just at this point all the energy is gone.
		He does not understand politics.
		The way that you win politics in this day and age, which I think I understand even better than him at this point, is you gotta be different.
		You need attention.
		You need to stand out, not be like the rest, not be respectable.
		You need to be talked about, especially in a crowded field.
		And he's just like...
		Disaster so he's as far as I'm concerned.
		He's done.
	He's done for us, and he's done in the election the other two notable things I would say is Biden Biden to me increasingly does not seem like a viable candidate You know I've been saying all night that he's number one in the polls and and most of them by a double-digit margin that could easily change because you could see that this guy just He can't keep it together.
	He's forgetting things.
	He's making all these gaffes.
	I mean, he's looking terrible.
	I mean, he looks old.
	I guess in the last one, he just must have the makeup caked on and hair sprayed on.
	Because in the last one, he looked somewhat presentable.
	In this debate, he looked like a mess.
	And he started out kind of strong.
	He went out right on the attack against Warren and Sanders.
	A surprise attack.
	An ambush.
	One against two.
	I thought it was pretty effective.
	But towards the end of the night, I mean, this guy was just all over the place.
	Rambling.
	He was clearly forgetting where he was.
	Making all these misstatements, gaffes.
	It's like, you know, I do a show Monday through Friday.
	And it's off the cuff, it's extemporaneous.
	When you say like 10,000 words, I don't know how many, but when you say so many words in a short amount of time, you're gonna have times where you mess up.
	You know, you flub a word, whatever.
	It happens when you're speaking off the cuff like that.
	But, you know, not for nothing, but it's a three hour debate and it's like every single response.
	It's multiple gaffes.
	You're just messing up all over the place.
	He calls himself, or he called one of the other candidates like, Congressman, Senator, I'm sorry, no, Councilman, whatever.
	I think he was talking about himself.
	He just kept doing these weird things, you know, and he just looked gross towards the end of it.
	I honestly don't think he's going to make it.
	I think if you were just looking at the numbers you would say this guy's strong, everybody thinks he's electable, everybody thinks he can beat Trump, he's running away with the polling, the fundraising is decent, you know it's passable, but you watch these debates This, to me, does not look like a guy who has longevity.
	He does not look like physically viable to make it another year in this election.
	It's only going to ramp up from here.
	We haven't even begun the actual election yet for the nomination or the general, obviously.
	You know, the Iowa caucus is in the beginning of February, so we're still five months out from that, and he's falling apart.
	It's September, okay?
	The year before the election.
	And I think Elizabeth Warren, every performance I've seen from her is solid.
	It's strong.
	In the first and second debate, and even this one, there wasn't a clear moment where I would say, oh, like, she really stole the show with this line.
	She really, like, gripped the hearts of the nation with this one.
	But every performance, it doesn't really matter.
	She shows up.
	She's strong.
	She gives a good performance.
	Her answers are, on average, high quality.
	You know, and so just by being there, just by being there, being likable, being presentable, having these good moments, having solid performances, she is slowly and steadily rising the polls.
	And like I said, she's the only one out of all the polls in September who ties Biden or even comes close to striking distance with him.
	I could see.
	Right now, she's the only candidate that I can see surpassing him.
	And I don't know if that's gonna happen.
	You know, if nothing changes, I think Biden will probably be okay.
	But she's the only candidate that I can see surpassing him.
	I think everybody else is not serious.
	Everybody else is not competitive.
	She's with it.
	She's together.
	She's plucky.
	She's got this likable sort of energy.
	I don't really get it, but I could see how other people could.
	You know, and I think she's the only one in terms of polling numbers, everything like that, to really beat him.
	I think she's one to watch.
	The other thing is Bernie Sanders.
	You know, Bernie Sanders, whereas Warren has been steadily rising, and is likable and all that.
	With Sanders, it's the opposite.
	He started out in second place, clearly.
	A lot of people believed it was his race to lose, because, you know, many people thought he got cheated out of the nomination in 16.
	I don't think that's totally true, but, you know, they did kind of rig it.
	So a lot of people said, well, Bernie's really going to be a competitor this time around.
	He just has not been able to capitalize.
	He gets into the race and basically since he started he just keeps steadily going downwards.
	Warren entered and is going up.
	This guy just can't hold on.
	You know, every performance to me comes across as unlikable, in some ways bitter.
	He comes across as repetitive, a little bit stale.
	He's really not with it.
	You know, in 2016 he was even pushing it because he sounded like Occupy Wall Street, which was 2012.
	So even in 16 I would say A lot of this was a little bit dated.
	Now it's 2020 and this guy is clearly not woke.
	This guy's ancient in terms of age, in terms of politics.
	What he says about millionaires and billionaires, we've heard that before.
	We heard that in 16.
	We've heard that since 16.
	You know, so to have somebody like Warren who has maybe a fresh take and a fresh face, I think the distinction is very obvious and visible.
	And then the voice thing, you know, he just wasn't there.
	These older guys, it's bad enough that they're ancient and they're white and they're men and it's in this woke party of young people and people of color and women and all that.
	You gotta be presentable if you wanna be competitive as an old ostensibly white guy.
	I know he's Jewish and all that, right?
	But that you sound physically ill during the speech, like, that does not bode well for you if those are your weaknesses as a candidate.
	So the voice thing, he just didn't do very good tonight.
	But that said, nobody really won.
	Nobody, to me, really did amazing.
	Nobody really did all that bad.
	The polling, to me, will stay exactly the same.
	The two long-term trends I see are that Warren is going to continue to rise, Bernie's going to stagnate, everybody else stays the same.
	What we need to see is one of these, the only thing that's going to change, As if one of these smaller candidates really takes the reins and shows some initiative and starts attacking people or something, you know, really we need to see some boldness.
	But, you know, like Buttigieg, Harris, Beto, excuse me, Beto O'Rourke, these are all like second shelf, second tier candidates.
	And, you know, their performances, there's just nothing really exceptional about them.
	They're very unremarkable.
	Uh nothing really to take away from that.
	So I think if that's the case, if that's every debate from now until the end, this is the race.
	This is the race.
	It's between Warren and Biden and everybody else is running to see who's going to be the running mate.
	That's how I see it.
	So that's the debate.
	It looks like we got about 10 more minutes.
	So I do want to cover I don't know.
	Do we want to cover PewDiePie?
	Do we want to cover Charlottesville?
	Maybe we could spend a little bit more time on the election.
	I think it's probably best if we save a little bit of this stuff for tomorrow.
	This will be our show for tomorrow.
	This will be The Leftovers.
	It's PewDiePie and Charlottesville.
	And we'll also talk about Israel tomorrow, I guess.
	You know, I guess we don't want to cram it all in tonight and cram it in the last 10 minutes.
	I guess we'll just save it for tomorrow so we could really spend a nice amount of time on all that and also in case nothing happens.
	But yeah, so like I said, you know, these debates are not going to change anything.
	You'll see a lot of this.
	Maybe you won't, but the news will be preoccupied for the next few days and the next few weeks showing clips and talking about policy and people be interviewed, but To me, you know, again, the way that I view these debates is it's about moments.
	It's about these memorable times, memorable exchanges.
	It's somebody striking out something outrageous.
	And this is where all the conventional wisdom goes out the window.
	You know, a normal person, I think, would approach a political debate and say, well, you've got to be professional.
	You've got to be presidential.
	You've got to be buttoned up.
	You've got to sound eloquent.
	You've got to energize people.
	Well, it's not the 1990s anymore.
	You know, it's not the 2000s anymore.
	And moreover, the field is crowded.
	The way that you win a debate like this, or even an election like this, is how Trump did in 2016.
	Trump entirely rewrote the playbook because, of course, it was about the economy of the media.
	It was about the attention economy.
	A lot of the things he did confused and frustrated people to no end.
	You know, talking about banning Muslims and talking about illegal immigrants being, you know, they're bringing drugs, crime, rapists.
	A lot of the conventional people said, oh, this is a disaster, he's gonna crash and burn, his campaign is imploding, he's racist, like, he's finished.
	But what people didn't understand is that people were talking about him.
	People were talking about him, and it wasn't just that, because anybody could be outrageous, but there was substance to match.
	You know, while he was being outrageous, he was also speaking our language.
	Notice during this debate, and I think it's very stark, we've gotten used to Donald Trump because he's been in our lives for four years now.
	He announced in, I think, June or July 2015.
	So he's been in our life for four years.
	We've gotten used to his style.
	But you watch the Democratic debate, and then you remember, oh yeah, this is how politicians talk.
	You know, if you watch those opening statements, it was like, it completely lacks substance.
	These people are talking about, well, we're stronger united than we are divided, and we just have to rise above the hatred and the bitterness, and I want to be a president for all Americans.
	And what we need to bring back is civic friendliness.
	And it's all just empty.
	It's all empty.
	It doesn't mean anything.
	It's all just this bullshit posturing.
	It's people saying, well, what we really need to talk about is Donald Trump and stop fighting each other.
	We have more in common than we have not in common in our field.
	And, well, I think we should be attacking each other because, you know, blah, blah, blah.
	It's all nonsense.
	You know, so, so it was critical about Trump that he was getting attention, but he also was speaking straight substance.
	He was going up there and people laughed.
	But he was saying, you have to knock out ISIS.
	You have to knock them out real strong.
	You can't fight two wars at once.
	You know, we're in Syria, you've got Assad, you've got ISIS, and you've got Iran.
	You can't fight two wars at a time.
	You gotta knock out ISIS, you gotta knock them out strong, and then you worry about what happens after.
	And a lot of people would laugh at that and say, He does not sound like a politician.
	He does not sound, and I know this sounds familiar because this is what he heard during 2016, he doesn't talk like, but you really, it really gets driven home when you see a normal debate with normal people.
	And even Yang, who bills himself as an outsider, he is being assimilated into this made-up, totally artificial way of talking.
	It just doesn't make any sense.
	And honestly, This is my long-term prediction.
	This is my big brain prediction.
	Republicans can still be solvent.
	You know, the message of the show is broadly, Republicans are going down the tubes because of demographic change.
	But I see Trump, and the more I see politics just sort of evolve and correct itself and sort of go back to the status quo, the more I see Trump as showing us what is possible in more ways than one.
	To me, I think the next person who understands how to operate in this media ecosystem the way Trump did, but also has competence, that person has the potential to become a dictator.
	And I'm not making that up.
	I'm not trying to say this to be like based in red pill, but you see that there is such a stark gap in what the people want, what there is an appetite for, and what is being offered by literally everybody in politics.
	And And it is such a big gap that you just need somebody to get in there and take advantage of that, you know?
	That sounds kind of wrong, right?
	But somebody needs to take advantage of this idea of the next time you get somebody like Trump who understands what he did but does not have the weaknesses, or maybe Trump is impulsive, maybe he doesn't have the expertise, he doesn't have the legislative experience, doesn't have the connections, he does have some character flaws.
	We're finding out the egotism does seem to be a bit of an issue.
	The over-reliance on family who are not on his side.
	You know, there are a lot of problems.
	Maybe he takes it too far.
	The minute you get a candidate who is able to sort of create a fusion of what works in the past with what Trump figured out, that person has the potential to change politics I'm talking complete realignment.
	I'm talking like FDR level, hanging pictures on the walls.
	You know, people thought that Trump had that potential.
	Maybe he still does.
	The jury's still out on that.
	He's not really able to fulfill a lot of the things that he initiated, I think.
	But if somebody comes along and takes advantage, they will be able to do that.
	Nobody in this field is a serious contender.
	And this is why on a metapolitical level I have to tell you, demographics, fundraising, battleground states, at the end of the day none of this stuff really matters.
	I look at all these candidates and I really look at them, you know, I look at them as people, I look at them in terms of what they're willing to do, they're sort of like, I don't know if it's emotional IQ or charisma, but none of these people can match Donald Trump.
	You have to understand that Donald Trump in 16 was a phenomenon.
	He, for what it's worth, maybe Clinton was a bad candidate, maybe he got by by the skin of his teeth in a few battleground states by a few thousand votes, but he chewed up and he spit out 16 other Republican candidates, the top politicians in the country.
	The guy is a genius.
	The guy's a force of nature.
	And I know he hasn't been an effective governor, he hasn't been effective as a president, But in terms of campaigning, nobody's been able to match him.
	And so coming up in 2020, I hear a lot of the pessimism because we look at like North Carolina and the result from this recent special election where it was a district that went 12 points for Republicans and 16 and went 2 points this week in the special election.
	Or people look at like Virginia.
	Or North Carolina, the suburbs in particular that are trending left.
	To me none of that stuff really matters because to me it's really more a battle of wills.
	I know maybe this sounds a little bit too hokey, maybe it's a little bit too pie-in-the-sky, but to me I see Trump as just so much stronger, his aura, his charisma, he is so much larger than life.
	I don't see one person on that stage who can beat him at this point in time.
	You know, I see people that maybe they poll better than him right now or whatever, but I don't see anybody up there who really is bringing something new to the table like Trump is.
	Even as much as we have criticized him and been skeptical and half the country hates him, it's just not going to happen.
	The politics, and I don't think people have fully grasped it yet, a lot of people talked about it after 16, but I don't think people have really Mark my words.
	A lot of people said that.
	of the world, politics will never be the same after 2016.
	We are going to see in 2020 just how substantive and significant the changes are.
	Mark my words.
	A lot of people said that.
	I don't think a lot of people grasp that yet.
	You know, a lot of people get, oh, it's different.
	Trump came along and now, you know, he was obviously very different.
	Now he's the president.
	And I think people like, in theory, we're saying that, but they're going to see in 2020 just, you know, what it's going to look like for the rest of our lives since this guy has come around.
	You know, and that's all that is to say, I'm very heartened by the Democratic debate, in a way.
	You know, in one sense, it's blackpilling.
	Like I said after the first two debates, that this is what the field is going to look like, and it's going to get worse on the Democratic side.
	And every election cycle, they will get closer to never being able to lose an election again at the national level, if everything stays the same.
	If we have all these controls in place, you know, there's no like radical events.
	Like a huge economic catastrophe or a war or, you know, a third party or something like that.
	Barring some kind of radical, like, inflection point in American history, every election cycle the Democrats will get more radical and they will be more airtight.
	More anti-fragile in elections at the national level, you know, because of what's happening in Texas, Georgia, Florida, Arizona, all those other states.
	And so on the one hand, it's blackmailing to see that, like this is our future looking at the stage.
	But on the other hand, I look at that and it makes me feel a lot better about voting for Trump, right?
	You know, a lot of people have been down on this guy.
	I've been down on Trump for this whole year.
	And, you know, it's funny.
	I talk to boomers and they're like, well, I was talking to a boomer the other week.
	It's like, what do you think of Trump?
	I love him.
	And I'm like, well, I don't love him, but not for the reason you might think.
	Not because I'm a libtard.
	It's because he's not like a fascist, you know, because he's not a reactionary.
	No, I'm not fascist.
	Because he's not a reactionary.
	Because he's not a traditionalist conservative, right?
	So I know a lot of people are skeptical.
	I've been skeptical.
	But watching what happens on the Democratic side makes you realize how good we have it.
	Yeah, Trump is not perfect.
	Yeah, he's like blowing Israel every day and, you know, this criminal justice reform stuff.
	We've been talking about this for a year.
	We could go through the laundry list of things that have been disappointing or disillusioning about this administration, but you know, I'll take Trump any day of the week over these guys.
	This is the guy that says, you know, oh, they're accusing me of rape?
	They're not even pretty enough for me to rape them.
	I mean, he literally said that during the election in 2016.
	You know, people were saying, oh, he sexually assaulted me.
	And Trump would say, I sexually assaulted her?
	Well, she's not even hot enough for me to rape her.
	That's our president, you know?
	So when people say, oh, he's neocon Don.
	He's George Bush number three.
	Well, not exactly.
	Not exactly.
	They're praising John McCain on the Democratic stage, you know, for what it's worth if you compare Trump to a traditional Republican.
	Clearly things have changed so drastically.
	You look over there and they're talking about reparations and an office of white supremacy and transgender abortions.
	And then Trump is not so bad.
	You know, Trump talking about, well, I could win the war in Afghanistan, but I have to, I would have to wipe Afghanistan off the map.
	I don't have to kill everyone in Afghanistan to win that war, and I don't want to do that.
	She's not pretty enough for me to rape her.
	Things like this.
	Ilhan Omar has to go back to her country.
	She's got to go back.
	Doesn't love America enough.
	You know, things like that, they really do become more fulfilling when you see this.
	It's sort of like, you know, the old adage, hunger is the best, what is it, hunger is the best condiment or whatever.
	I feel like that when I watch these debates, when you're starving for a red pill.
	Starving for a based take, a based joke.
	Suddenly Trump is not so bad.
	Suddenly he becomes, you know, the god-emperor of mankind again.
	But it looks like we're running out of time here, so I do want to get on to our Super Chats.
	We'll see what you guys have to say.
	In conclusion, it's all the same.
	We're boned.
	But feel better about voting for Trump, right?
	But another gay debate.
	But let's take a look at our Super Chats.
	Lord knows we'll be here for another hour before I can have a meal.
	Dumbass.
	I'm sorry.
	I scrolled down too far.
	Initially.
	Anand says, did you see Giuliani's fashy tweet?
	Dare I say based in red pill?
	Yeah, I did see it.
	Very, very epic.
	And that really blew me away.
	I'm surprised somebody like him would tweet something like that.
	It was like a riot police officer, riot control police officer, who's facing off with Antifa, and he sees a sign that says, like, F the police, F the military, and he has a flashback to when he was at the football game, and he's saluting the flag, and when he was a child, and he sees 9-11, and sort of like tracing, how did he become a police officer?
	Well, he's an American patriot who loves order, And then, you know, so he flashes back all the way, his path from becoming a cop, all the way to when he was a child, and then it flashes forward to him, he's back at the protest in New York City against these Antifa people, and he whips out the, what is it, the billy club, the baton, and he's ready to beat the shit out of some protesters.
	And I was like, I'm like dumbfounded.
	I can't believe Rudy Giuliani tweeted out something so epic.
	Let's see Prince of Conquest says tape be like rip.
	Yeah, I don't know what was going on with the ABC debate, but a Lot of ambient noise tape being peeled paper being ripped I don't know what that sound was, but we kept hearing a lot of that during the debates and Stan Lee says, are you not happy you get to talk about it for two more hours?
	Hello, Looney Bin Department.
	I think I'm going crazy.
	Yeah, welcome to my world.
	nwordenthusiast says, here's some pocket change for sitting through that.
	Oh, thanks for the pocket change.
	Whitehotep says we finally figured out the mystery of why blacks can't swim.
	All that lead in their system is weighing them down.
	Yeah, I guess that's why, right?
	That's environmental injustice that Cory Booker talks about.
	You know that blacks are being poisoned with lead, I guess, or something in the ghetto?
	I don't know.
	I don't think getting shot counts as environmental injustice.
	I don't think getting shot by other black people counts as like, oh, there's lead in the ecosystem.
	Right?
	Let's see.
	Ranch Pilled says, Mommy Tulsi would have wiped the floor with these losers.
	The globalists fear her.
	That's just so not true.
	Tulsi was terrible.
	She was terrible in the last two debates.
	She's just not a good candidate.
	She doesn't know how to focus.
	She doesn't know how to stick to her issues.
	And she's not a good public speaker.
	She was a disaster.
	She had that one good attack on Kamala Harris, and all that did was hurt Kamala Harris.
	It didn't elevate her.
	Her issue is foreign policy.
	She can never focus on that.
	And when she does, it's not compelling.
	So no, they don't fear her.
	They don't fear her at all.
	Not a good candidate.
	Okay, I don't understand.
	Oh, I get it because he drinks the beer.
	And because he's a skeleton, it just leaks out from his jaw, presumably, so he has to wipe it up.
	Okay.
	That's a good Halloween joke, I guess.
	Dumbass says Buttigieg was dating women in the 2000s.
	He joined the Navy in 2009 and he came out as gay in 2015.
	Yeah, it really makes you think, doesn't it?
	It's sort of like when Ben Carson talked about prison.
	What does that tell you, right?
	It really makes you think.
	I've heard many such cases like this.
	You know, somebody starts out, they go in the military, suddenly they like to kiss men.
	I don't know.
	Q17 says that debate made Nick reverse his stance on drugs and drinking.
	Yeah, I could certainly understand the appeal of self-medicating.
	Feeling numb after that one.
	Rob says that debate was big gay.
	Yeah, agree.
	Terrible boating accident says Civil War 2 2024.
	Be there or be square.
	Civil War is not coming.
	I've never been a believer in this.
	PJ says, hey man, I'm pretty much done with America.
	Moving in with my fiancee in Poland and eventually raising a family there.
	America's finished.
	Poland strong.
	That's some pretty bold talk.
	You know, Poland didn't exist until what, like 25 years ago or something?
	Guy talking about Poland is strong.
	Weren't you guys like erased from the map for like a thousand years or something not too long ago?
	America is finished.
	America is stronger than Poland.
	Let me tell you that much.
	And don't get me wrong, Poland is based in Red Pill.
	That's great and all.
	But I'm an American.
	I'm not going to be fleeing anytime soon to cringe in Blue Pill Europe.
	Least of all Eastern Europe, frankly.
	So, Poland is strong.
	Oh, so you have your nuclear arsenal?
	Oh, Poland doesn't have a nuclear arsenal?
	Oh, well, surely you have a robust space program that's landed on the moon.
	Oh, you don't have that?
	Oh, well, that's okay.
	It's still cool, I guess.
	Jonathan says roses are red, violets are blue.
	BB has been caught spying on me and you.
	Very true.
	We'll be covering that tomorrow.
	Crimson Capsule says hail sardonic.
	Sardonic.
	Our facetious fascist king.
	Sucks the debates were extra paused.
	Way to persevere.
	Bottom text.
	Well thanks buddy.
	Yeah yeah it took a lot of perseverance but uh you know we're gonna have to do it like five more times so.
	Therapist says, after I belligerently scarf down hors d'oeuvres and slug down cocktails, I'm going to take a deep dive into the Miami Harbor, butt naked as I tumultuously scream, I'm Nick's biggest fan.
	Please don't make a scene in Miami.
	We're going to try and be respectable.
	We're going to try and be nice.
	All right, sophisticated, civilized Nickers.
	Don't be acting.
	Don't be acting up.
	Don't be acting a fool.
	Don't embarrass me, alright?
	But yeah, I'm looking forward to it.
	It's gonna be what?
	Two weeks?
	Yeah, it's two weeks out.
	We're gonna have a great time.
	You know, we're gonna debate Jacob Wall.
	We're gonna t-pose on some people.
	Will Witt is gonna be there.
	I hear Kathy Zhu is gonna be there.
	Don't tell anybody, but I hear Kathy Zhu is gonna be in Miami doing a debate, so maybe we'll be doing some t-posing, but it's gonna be a great time.
	Boopers says, I'm not racist, but I bet minorities are just... Okay, I can't read that.
	lowbrow says so wish i could have been on that stage saying outrageous things owning the libs naming them and chimping out on everyone great stream nick well thanks uh skiz says televised debates should quote more philosophers joe biden based yeah the kirkegaard thing was sort of caught me off guard i was not expecting that
	I'm not voting Democrat because none of the candidates stated their preferred pronouns.
	It's hashtag LARPing faggots.
	Yeah, that's a funny joke about, you know, pronouns, I guess.
	That's a really great premise.
	Yeah, Democrats are so crazy that...
	They didn't even declare their pronouns.
	Oh, I'm not voting for them because I care about, like, I don't know, dude.
	What are you even trying to do?
	You trying to sound like Benny Johnson or something?
	Mike H says they trying to be cray.
	They trying to be cray.
	Yeah, yeah, that's very based.
	Uh, Sugg says, would you prefer your viewers date a cutie atheist e-girl or a Luddite catholic brap hog?
	Uh, probably a cutie catholic.
	Samurai Spirits says Elizabeth Warren kind of plucky though.
	Yeah, she's plucky.
	She's got that plucky student council vibe.
	Studio IKN says no bad Lederhosen jokes tonight, just the money.
	Ah, well, thanks for that.
	I couldn't tell if you were joking or not or what was going on with that one, but hey, thanks.
	And thanks for the edit last night.
	Very Kino edits.
	This fellow made a cartoon of me with a Nerf gun keeping Destiny and Hassan outside of the border wall.
	Very based, very based artwork, so I appreciate that.
	Uh, let's see, this Greek fella says, anyone on the right who still defends Yang is dumb.
	Dude is a total cringe nerd and his free money stance is lame.
	The free money thing is cool, actually, but, uh, yeah, he is cringe and gay.
	And you are dumb if you defend him and you're on the right, so I agree with the rest.
	Buff says, how in God's name was Beto allowed on that stage?
	If it wasn't for your commentary, I would have watched 30 seconds of that cringe fest.
	Might see you in Miami.
	Oops, I mean Miami.
	He says may I mean, I mean Miami.
	Jorge made me forget my native tongue.
	No, that's funny.
	Yeah, well, it'd be good to see you in Miami.
	Certainly buy a ticket, meet me, meet the fans, party with us.
	And yeah I know it's pretty brutal.
	Well Beto I mean for what it's worth he hasn't been able to you know get really far on the polls but I mean he's still up there he's still like three or four or five percent depending on which poll you look at.
	So it's not surprising but yeah he does suck.
	Nibba says Booker got that vacant wall-eyed Simpson stare.
	How can we see eye to eye on the issues when he ain't even see eye to eye with himself though?
	I'm Canadian.
	We know he's got problems with that.
	It's like a lazy eye, right?
	Or is it a glass eye?
	I don't know what's going on with it, but the eyes are like, it's like literal bug eyes, like a fly, you know, or a spider or something.
	Devin says, I'm Canadian, kill me.
	Well, I'm not going to kill you, but I am going to cringe.
	Bandit says, I can't stand this Beto guy when he said 1690, I almost screamed, I I can't imagine being such a loser.
	I just hate this fool.
	Guy belongs in Weedy Hut Jr.
	Get me off this sick planet now!
	Yeah, I know.
	That was so horrible and it vindicates everything I've been saying on the show.
	He said, and this is not fringe anymore.
	It was in the New York Times and now it's on a mainstream presidential debate stage.
	He said our history doesn't start on the 4th of July.
	It starts with slave ships in 1619.
	And that cultural revolution, it is coming.
	It is basically complete.
	Vindicates we've been saying for years.
	Machiavelli says fractional reserve lending is counterfeiting.
	Okay, so I see we have some kind of monetarist, some kind of gold standard Austrian in chat.
	Yeah, very based.
	Bandit says, also super chat suck.
	I so heavily had to edit my original statement.
	It lost all meaning.
	YouTube sucks.
	Agree.
	Eggcraft Carrier says, Arian Super Soldier Nick Fuentes goes full tilt and embraces accelerationism.
	Also, congrats on the 30k viewers.
	The Groipers are rising.
	30k?
	We didn't have 30k viewers.
	I don't know what you're talking about.
	But thanks.
	I have not embraced accelerationism, but thanks anyway.
	Jimbo says my visceral reaction to Kamala Harris's awful takes got me banned from the DLive chat, but it was worth it.
	The game reward has power.
	Yeah, it's not worth it.
	Please don't do that.
	They threatened to ban me.
	I got an email after one of the streams and they said, if your chat is not moderated, we will take you off the site.
	There will be consequences.
	So please, you're only hurting me when you do that.
	So please don't go off.
	Try to control yourself.
	PewDiePie is a secret knicker.
	I talked to him in private.
	He has a plan and it's only just started.
	Mass Zoomer Awakening is coming.
	Well, you know what they say.
	What is it?
	It will happen when the weather cools.
	That is when their plan... What is the expression?
	What is the pole prophecy?
	When the weather cools, though, the plan that they've laid, something like that.
	Forest Shade says they never even debated, it's just an echo chamber.
	Yeah, agreed.
	Logan says, how's Al doing?
	Did you rub his belly today, Nick?
	I did, actually.
	He's doing well.
	He was not doing well yesterday.
	He threw up and shit all over the floor.
	I was not happy about that.
	I woke up, I go into the living room, and I'm like, oh hey, like good morning, whatever.
	You know, I go to greet the dog, to pet him, I turn around and I notice huge vomit stain, huge vomit stain, shit, flies, everywhere.
	I'm like, bro, what are you doing?
	What are you doing?
	So, and it was funny, I texted my mom, I'm like, ma, this guy, like, is out of control.
	There's shit all over the floor.
	And she's like, oh my gosh, that's terrible.
	Well, thanks for cleaning it up.
	I'm like, Yeah.
	LOL.
	LMFAO.
	ROFL.
	I'm rolling on the floor laughing right now if you think I'm cleaning that shit up.
	I'm not cleaning that up.
	Not my dog.
	These people, they bring the dog into the home.
	I'm allergic.
	I didn't want the dog.
	I had like every complaint.
	I have been adamant that I did not want a dog for decades.
	For decades now.
	And they got a dog anyway.
	And I'm allergic.
	I'm chronically allergic to the dog.
	And so now I have to take allergy medication every day.
	I have to have a A thing in my room, a filter, an air filter to keep the dander out of the air.
	You know, I'm like constantly sniffling and it's like now I'm gonna, now I gotta clean up the shit.
	Didn't want the dog, the dog hurts my life.
	Now I'm, no way am I cleaning up dried vomit off the floor.
	No chance.
	You can do that when you come home, you know?
	Anyway, Heinrich says, come to Hyde Park.
	Trads will cook you dinner.
	Hyde Park.
	I don't know.
	Hyde Park's kind of far and I don't meet people from offline.
	So yeah, I'm gonna pass.
	Bullin Talkies says I was hoping Steve Austin, but I do have some friends in Hyde Park.
	Maybe I'll come see them again.
	Bullin says I was hoping Steve Austin to make a surprise entrance out of the stage and hit O'Rourke with a stone-cold stunner and shoot a promo on Yang going corporate.
	Sad.
	Oh, you thought that was gonna happen?
	Let's see Manus says looks like this is the last super chat.
	Good night.
	All right.
	Well, good night, buddy Against degeneracy says I'm sure you agree that these people should be in jail due to how dangerous they are to society But how do we suppress these views using the state without also having them apply to us and views?
	Okay, this is just a very stupid super chat.
	We are in favor of free speech I'm just gonna put it that we are in favor of free speech and
	at this moment okay but if you can't understand the answer to this question if you're legitimately answering you are actually low IQ and I'm not I'm not joking I'm not trying to get funny points but he's so mean to the super chatters if you're asking this question uh you're not very smart hardcore monster says I have to do a yearbook quote today should I meme it up and include words like zoomer and red pill or is that cringe should I keep it serious keep it serious I would say Matthew says all I heard was white genocide, Shiite, and DAS riot.
	Trump looks like a god after tonight.
	Groyper's rising.
	Yeah, relating to that.
	CIA defector says Nick was clearly upset Eggman wasn't in the debate.
	Yeah, that's true.
	Grand Theft Auto says PewDiePie donates to ADL.
	Also PewDiePie.
	Psych!
	Yeah, that's what happened.
	Yeah, funny, funny, funny.
	I agree.
	I would know.
	As soon as I thought this, I hear you mumble.
	He's just too ugly to be president.
	Maybe chuckle.
	Thank you.
	Well, hey, glad I could provide some laughs.
	I don't think it's that.
	shapping, weed habits, I would know.
	As soon as I thought this, I hear you mumble.
	He's just too ugly to be president.
	Made me chuckle.
	Only your content makes me laugh these days.
	Thank you.
	Well, hey, glad I could provide some laughs.
	I don't think it's that.
	I think it's just an ethnic look.
	I think Mexicans just have that look, right?
	I think it's just like an indigenous, like, native look.
	One of these, like, you know, Indian, American Indian types.
	I don't know if it's necessarily a lifestyle thing.
	I think that's just an ethnic thing.
	But who knows?
	Maybe he could be right.
	Yeah, that's true.
	Oh, yeah, I think nobody disputes this.
	The guy does not look like the people that are coming across the border.
	literally has blue eyes shaking my head i'm a white hispanic 95 plus white please accept these reparations from a fellow conquistador yeah that's true oh yeah i think nobody disputes this the guy does not look like the people that are coming across the border the guy i think has like light hair light eyes lightish skin you know and that's what people forget is in mexico uh people forget that number one mexican is not mexico is not homogeneous
	they've got the obviously the colonial past and they have a caste system they had a the uh what the hacienda system uh And obviously explicit and legal caste system, but it still remains.
	It's still effectively there that the higher up people in the society are the light-skinned descendants of Europeans and the people lower are the American Indians, right?
	Everybody knows that.
	Lil' Jesus says, it's Miami time.
	Are you going?
	Very exciting.
	Alex says, Nikki boy, my guy.
	I was visiting my parents when my ma said she was an Israel supporting gal.
	Thanks for giving me the fuel I need to flex on mommy.
	She had never even heard of the Liberty.
	Ah, very good.
	Well, congratulations on red-pilling your mom.
	Yeah, that's how a lot of people are, but you know, they're just not aware of what happens.
	Default username says, PewDiePie did an oopsie.
	Uh-huh.
	Yeah.
	Nodge says as a fortune 500 hiring manager.
	I've nice nice flex if I see a resume with no college degree I'll still interview them as long as they have a MacBook and iPhone is pretty much equivalent Ashley Sinclair defies all egirl stereotypes Yeah, she's a dummy But I don't know what you want me to do with this one good.
	I guess I don't know what that means MacBook and college degree are you saying college degree is worthless and Justin says, how cringe has Richard Spencer become?
	Very cringe.
	What's what is the matter with these people?
	I don't understand.
	What what would it compel somebody to write this in a super chat for $3?
	Hmm.
	What am I gonna say to Nick for my $3 super chat?
	How cringe is Richard Spencer?
	I think Richard Spencer's cringe.
	How cringey?
	What the what do you want me to say to that?
	I don't know very a lot many PuppetPal says Kamala is still blumpf posting hello 2016 department.
	I don't think she's blumpf.
	She didn't say anything about drumpf or anything like that.
	Dennis Prager says Yang literally couldn't sell free money.
	R.I.P.
	Never trust anyone with a receding chin.
	Accurate.
	Yeah, that is pretty funny.
	I don't really listen to it.
	A couple of songs are good.
	I don't really listen to it.
	A couple of songs are good.
	L says, Yeah, I don't know if it's like, who will it be?
	But I just think whoever can capture that will wield a lot of power.
	Christian says, G'day, Nick.
	Ever been dominated via a handshake?
	Due to my work, just squeezed my four fingers hard, made me feel small.
	I'll get him next time.
	On ya, mate.
	Not really.
	To me, I think that's just the most cringe thing in the world.
	You know, I know Trump does that a lot.
	He does, you know, the Chad yank, the Chad grasp, you know?
	But to me, whenever people do that, it just strikes me as like you're a tryhard, you know?
	I think people that are truly Competent people that are truly Powerful people influential people they don't need to exert in these very obnoxious displays I don't think these very belligerent ways because I know a lot of people who do that and they're all like They're all people that are total tryhards.
	People that, for example, read The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene.
	People that listen to self-help podcasts and they do fancy tie knots.
	They do something other than a half-windsor or a four-in-hand or they know the names of knots.
	I only had to know because I had to look it up when I was a kid.
	But people that are doing these really fancy combinations, right?
	Or people that wear pocket square.
	Well, not all pocket squares are bad, but you know the type.
	You know the type I'm talking about.
	Somebody that wears a three-piece suit, you know?
	It's- it's these types that can shake your hand really hard.
	I'm- I'm the man.
	I'm really cool, you know?
	Somebody who's really got it going on can just sort of sit back.
	The wise man chuckles to himself, you know?
	So I- I've always thought that stuff was pretty gay.
	It's like, oh yeah, you give me a really hard handshake, like you're a faggot, right?
	But let's see Josh.
	So but that doesn't really happen to me I've had that one or two times but the people that do that are honestly so pathetic.
	It doesn't really even come across Josh Sears says great job today Nick good content.
	Thanks, buddy Thanks.
	Yeah, it's been a long night, right?
	What four and four and a half hours?
	Cowboy says haha.
	Imagine if you said the n-word that would rule.
	Hey, well, maybe meet me Miami, right?
	Don't record me No, I'm kidding.
	Sounds good.
	I don't know, dude.
unidentified		Sure.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Yeah, I'll watch that.
		Berserk with me.
		Tragic worldview.
		Warrior reflects and struggles with those who are masters by nature.
		Sounds good.
		I don't know, dude.
		Sure.
		Yeah, I'll watch that.
		Boopers says that Giuliani tweet is a grunt-style advertisement.
		Yeah, I mean, like, the message about being a slave for the managerial state is kind of cringe, but, you know, the idea of the state beating the shit out of anarchists.
		Kind of based in Red Pill.
		You know, some guy, I love America.
		I love order.
		I love the police.
		And now I'm going to beat the hell out of left-wing people.
		I mean, the message is, the subtext, I think, is kind of based.
		Anand says, Poland strong.
		The Eurocuck screeches while getting railed by Germany and Russia.
		Yeah, pretty funny.
		Pretty funny, kind of funny though.
		All these countries are so based in Redfield until a country with a bigger military rapes them, you know?
		Really Good Comics says, might just be me, but not a big fan of these candidates.
		They got the official RGC thumbs down.
		538 is going to be reporting on that one tomorrow.
		You know, they'll be looking at the exit polling, they'll be looking at the Google Trends online polling, and they'll say, oh, and by the way, the really good comics, two thumbs down.
		That's devastating for the field, right?
		But hey, thanks for the super chat.
		Thanks for all the Ninjaginis, too.
		This guy must be rich.
		What does this guy do for a living?
		Does he sell these comics?
		Who's paying for these comics?
		It's like Bill Gates bankrolling the really good comics because it's like the guy makes these comics that I enjoy but you know they're kind of out there and he's dropping Ninjagini's super chats left and right.
		It's like what does this guy do for a living?
		Is he like a gold salesman?
		Is he a diamond salesman?
		Is he like getting support?
		Is he getting patronage from Steve Jobs?
		Steve Jobs is dead.
		I don't know.
		Warren Buffett?
		Jeff Bezos?
		Because I don't get it but thanks buddy.
		918 says Half expected Bernie's jaw to fall off or eyeball to pop out if the camera banned him one more time.
		Well yeah, Biden's dentures popping out.
		Bernie's like sweating profusely.
		His hair's messed up.
		Stop aborting babies, says Cavedin.
		Skull IQ level reps finna hand these Dems gun concessions for nothing.
		How about offering a compromise of background checks for voter ID laws?
		Yeah, if they were smart they'd do that for sure.
		George says Poland out here since 966 nibbles be talking Polska rising.
		I don't know what you're talking about big guy.
		Are you talking about?
		Eastern Germany, right?
		Are you talking about Western Russia?
		I don't know what you mean Are you sure are you sure about that?
		You know John Cena?
		Since 966 uninterrupted.
		Are you sure about that?
		I don't know You know, I played that game diplomacy ever played the game diplomacy and It's about the balance of powers in Europe at the turn of the century.
		I don't recall Poland being on that map.
		I recall Germany, Austria, Hungary, Russia, Poland?
		Warsaw in that game I'm pretty sure is in Russia, right?
	So that's just, you know, a little way that I can relate to it.
	NovaCorp says feds and chat spamming cringe and fed posting.
	Oh, that's cringe.
	Let's see, America First says with Arian Egghead gone, Joe Biden is our only hope now.
	He will speak when he wants, even if it doesn't make sense.
	Yeah, that was epic.
	I'm going to double my time because everyone else is doing it, and I'm a white man.
	Yeah, he's Aryan.
	I don't think he's the nominee.
	No, I don't think he came back and I don't think he's going to come back.
	It's going to be competitive and I don't think he's going to make it, frankly.
	Riley says, fan from iFunny, give us some knicker love.
	No, I hate iFunny, but hey, welcome.
	Cookie Kitchen says, what's for dinner tonight?
	Chicken.
	No, I'm gonna go to the diner.
	I'm gonna have, I don't know, maybe I'll get some hash browns or something afterwards.
	Some scrambled eggs, some bacon, some ham.
	James says, Big Mac money, you earned it tonight.
	Well, thank you so much, buddy.
	I did.
	I worked hard tonight.
	uh okay this guy's just we can't have that in chat he says hi did you see there was a democratic debate tonight yeah but the username we just can't have it luke says how can provincialism be used to manage racial demographics or should we try central authority this kind of stuff is just like totally cringe Provincialism.
	They must be talking about isms.
	Isms do not matter.
	Isms do not matter.
	I do not... I am a believer in realpolitik.
	I believe in pragmatism and power.
	I don't believe in isms and, you know, hypotheticals, ideals.
	I think we are living in a government that is not a federal representative democracy anymore.
	We're living in a managerial, basically a managerial technocratic plutocracy, bureaucratic state, something like this.
	I don't know the exact modifiers to describe it, but we know that we're living in something resembling this anarcho-tyrannical empire.
	And we have got to make it work with the federal government.
	We've got to make it work with the halls of power in these major world cities, population centers, commercial centers.
	So no, provincialism I think is a dead end.
	I think we've got to get in control of power centers in media, obviously, you know, obviously in the physical space in real world, commerce centers, political centers, financial centers.
	We have to get influential people.
	And also we have to appeal to outside countries.
	It's a global struggle, is how we have to look at it.
	Very good friend of mine, QAnon, right before he departed us, and he's not, he's still alive, but he departed the scene, QAnon theorized that we're gonna have to increasingly rely perhaps on even outside countries, nationalist movements, to support us.
	So I think it's, if anything, it's more of a global perspective than a provincial perspective.
	Sir Evil Pudding says only Nick can roll on the floor laughing about not cleaning poo from the floor.
	This from the guy who complains about Poo Poo Super Chats.
	Well, I'm not literally rolling on the poo floor.
	Josh Sayre says, you were so right about the two Americas with different heroes and founders.
	Also, you think Kathy Xu will get degenerate with me in Miami?
	Well, I would hope not because I know you're not married to her.
	But who knows?
	I don't know.
	Like I said, would.
	Would.
	But I don't know.
	Maybe you're not Catholic, right?
	But yeah, I was pretty on the money on that.
	And you know, look, she strikes me as a bit of a whore, frankly.
	Just like Ashley St.
	Clair, so I wouldn't be surprised.
	But you shouldn't be into that, alright?
	Shouldn't be into it.
	James Russell says, these debates always keep reminding me why I voted for Trump despite all of my problems with him.
	Exactly right!
	That's what I keep telling people.
	Nobody wants to listen.
	Everybody wants to complain.
	But that's been my thinking all along.
	Lit says five hour uptime tonight great stream.
	Well, thanks.
	Yeah, it's been a long night Mustache says hey Nick watching this debate made me think of coming out of retirement to raise my pro gamer KD What do you think big guy in Call of Duty?
	I think that's a fine idea Nova Corp says I'm eating food just to spite you right now.
	Yeah, you are spiting me because I haven't eaten a full meal at all today.
	I had tamales for breakfast and that was it.
	I had some homemade tamales, not made by me actually, made by some co-workers that my father worked with.
	But I had a few tamales, they were really spicy.
	And then before the show I had a few pieces of bread.
	I had a few measly pieces of bread, some goldfish crackers, a kind bar, a cut up peach, and a yogurt drink, and a bottle of Coke.
	So I gotta eat.
	Dan D says, thanks Nixie in Miami.
	Yeah, see ya bro.
	Cookie Kitchen says, if Bernie wants the Democratic vote, he should change his name to Colonel.
	Yeah, we did that joke I think already, but thanks.
	Bob Sacavanna says, you would, Kathy Zhu?
	Bruh, she looks like an eel.
	You know, look, don't criticize me.
	You like what you like.
	You have your preferences.
	So I think she looks okay.
	I think she looks fine.
	People say she's ugly.
	I think she's passable.
	The Leaf says, W in chat for winged hussars.
	Battle of Vienna took place on September 12th, 1683.
	Yeah, the winged hussars were based.
	Yeah, I'm not gonna deny Poland had their moments.
	I'm not gonna deny they're not a based country right now, but Nibba talking about America's dead, Poland is rising.
	It's like, you want to like, look at the scoreboard, you know?
	So I don't deny they're based, but it's like, scoreboard department?
	Okay, but it looks like that's our last Super Chat.
	So that's gonna do it for us tonight.
	I gotta go eat, all right?
	I haven't eaten all day.
	I've been on here for like my whole life.
	So that's gonna do it for us this evening.
	Remember to check us out, nicholasjfwentes.com slash membership to become a premium subscriber.
	Only five bucks a month.
	Best way to support our show and to get a lot of premium content.
	I'm getting ready.
	I'm preparing for a flurry of premium content.
	So, you know, who knows?
	But I'm not gonna make any promises until the content's made, right?
	So be sure to check it out.
	Link is down below.
	Remember to subscribe to the channel.
	Give us a big thumbs up.
	Leave a comment down below.
	Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
	Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday at 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	As always, thanks for watching.
	Thanks to our Super Chatters premium members, everybody that watches, everybody that joined us on DLive and YouTube tonight.
	Thank you so much, and we'll see you tomorrow.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America First!

▲