All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 11, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes
02:11:31
VAPING DEATH EPIDEMIC: Flavored E-Cigs BANNED by Trump | America First Ep. 459
Participants
Main voices
n
nick fuentes
01:50:37
| Copy link to current segment

Speaker Time Text
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism,
will be our freedom. - will be our freedom. -
Not interested.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
He's just that.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I've never heard of Bigfoot.
unidentified
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
You're not interested.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
I've never heard of a big one.
Just that.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
I've never heard of big puts.
Who's that?
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our freedom.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human beings.
You're not interested.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
No e-girls.
unidentified
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
I've never heard of a big budget.
Who's that?
Americanism, not globalism. not globalism.
Will be our freedom. Will be our freedom.
Will be our freedom.
Will be our freedom.
An older generation.
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
I've never heard of it.
What is that?
Americanism, not globalism.
Will be our freedom.
I've never heard of Bigfoot.
Who's that?
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human being.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry.
I'm sorry, Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl.
You know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
unidentified
No e-girls.
Never!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Hashtag never e-girls.
Not even once.
unidentified
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
Who's that?
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Guy, I've never heard of Nick Fudge.
unidentified
Who's that?
Thank you.
Thank you.
and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
The boomer generation and its consequences have been a disaster for the human race.
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
Americanism, not globalism, not globalism, will be our credo. will be our credo.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I'm sorry Brittany and Betsy, but I just can't do it.
You're an e-girl, you know the rule.
No e-girls.
Who's got the clip?
No e-girls.
Never!
Hashtag never e-girls.
unidentified
Not even once.
Guy, I've never heard of Bigfoot.
It's just that.
We'll be right back.
We'll be right back.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
I've never heard of Big Clutch.
unidentified
Who's that?
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
With respect, the respect that we deserve.
From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
America First. America First. America First. America
First.
America First.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Good evening, everybody.
You're watching America First.
My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
We have a great show for you tonight.
Very excited to be back with you here tonight on Wednesday.
And it is a bit of a rough day.
We know that it's actually, it is a great day, but it's also a very bad day because we know that it is the 18th anniversary of 9-11.
Very, very tough day.
We're gonna get some F's in chat.
Some big F's in chat for the people that died on 9-11.
But in spite of that, in spite of the dreary occasion, we still do have a lot to talk about.
Our featured story for tonight is actually a little bit of four-dimensional chess.
You know, the show is titled... it's some clickbait headline about the e-cigarette ban.
And a lot of people might be thinking, you know, it's like 9-11, there's kind of some other things going on.
Maybe they're asking, why is the show about e-cigarettes?
Why is it about vaping?
It's actually a six-dimensional move.
We're probably going to spend a little bit more time on the occasion today and a little bit less time on e-cigarettes, but you see, if I call it an e-cig show, then they don't mess with my algorithm, right?
Or they don't manipulate the algorithm to punish me, to penalize me in the YouTube search results or in the suggested videos.
I know if I make the video title, uh, Google Dancing Israelis Freedom of Information Act, well, it's a different story.
So it's a bit of a, it's a bit of a four-dimensional chess move.
You know, I see all these different chess boards.
I see all possible permutations and moves.
So our featured story is gonna be about...
Uh, the e-cigarette ban which was announced today by the president.
It has not gone into effect.
We don't know if there's going to be an e-cig ban or what it'll resemble, but the president submitted a very strong suggestion to the FDA to ban all non-tobacco flavored e-cigarettes because of this epidemic of young people Getting hooked on e-cigarettes, and I guess lately there's been this string of deaths associated with vaping.
Now, I'll say I'm not a scientist, so I know I'm gonna get a lot of people in the comments at the end of the show, all these Reddit scientists, all these people that like cigarettes, who are gonna say, well, actually those deaths had nothing to do with vaping, and there's not a strong correlation, or there's gonna be a lot of that going on.
I have to say, full discretion, not a scientist, I'm giving you political takes about a chemistry issue, okay?
So I just have to get that out of the way because I know whenever the drug stuff comes up, it's always people that are hooked on the drugs themselves who want to get in and give you the, well actually, you know I went to high school with a lot of people, a lot of my good friends were like huge pot users, huge marijuana smokers, And they were all experts.
They were all Reddit experts on the science behind pot.
Well, you know, and I think you kind of understand where that comes from.
But so just want to get that out of the way.
We'll be talking about the ban and some considerations.
You know, some people have said that You know, really who this ban may be intended to benefit is Juul and major e-cigarette companies that will be able to bypass this regulation because they have more money, they have lobbyists, and so on.
So we'll talk about that.
Many people have compared it to other things like cigarettes, alcohol, drugs.
We'll talk about it from that angle.
I'll give you my take, which is that I think it should all be banned.
I think it should all go away.
But we'll get into that later.
Like I said, that's our featured story for tonight.
We'll also be talking about some big white pills, big white pills this week on immigration and on North Carolina.
So yesterday I mentioned briefly before the show started that there was a big special election happening in the 9th and I think it's the 3rd district, the 9th and Was it the 9th and the 3rd or is it the 9th?
Yes, the 9th and the 3rd district of North Carolina.
Two big special elections with a lot riding on them.
They have national significance because that is a very good sort of metric.
That's a good benchmark for where we stand in the lead-up to the 2020 presidential election.
The good news is, and we didn't get to talk about it so much last night because the numbers were still coming in, you know, the polls had only closed I think like a half hour or an hour before the show started.
But the good news is that the Republican won in both elections, in the 3rd and in the 9th district of North Carolina.
In the 3rd district, the Republican won by a margin of 24%.
In the 9th district, it was only about 2-3%.
Yeah, there was about a 2% margin.
I've got all this in my notes, but I believe it was 2% as I recall it.
So a big victory in the third.
Unambiguously great for Republicans.
In the ninth, it was a victory but, you know, probably leaves a little bit to be desired.
So we'll talk about that.
And then on immigration, this happened like an hour before the show tonight, the Supreme Court issued a decision that they will allow this huge sweeping ban on asylum seekers to go into effect while they deliberate on a proposed rule change.
To the asylum laws for Central Americans.
Basically what's happening is this third safe country rule is being implemented while the Supreme Court deliberates on whether or not it's constitutional that the president pass that or sign that through an executive order.
So that's a huge white pill.
This will effectively shut down all asylum cases from people coming through Mexico from Central America.
And you know, like we've been talking about all year, The past six months or so what's driving predominantly this huge influx of illegal immigration in the past couple of years is these Central Americans from the Northern Triangle.
It's Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador.
Largely it's families, unaccompanied minors, this sort of thing.
So that this rule change was allowed to pass in the interim while they're deciding is a huge victory and like we've been saying for the past couple of weeks it is it falls Right in line with this pattern, this trajectory of really a lot of good things happening with immigration from this administration.
You know, we talked about last Friday, we had some numbers that came from Mexico that showed that as a result of Mexico's changes to policy after the tariffs, after that tariff threat fiasco in June, you know, you remember the president said that unless Mexico addressed illegal immigration, we'd put tariffs on all goods coming from Mexico.
The numbers came out on Friday as a result of that change.
The illegal border crossings that came through Mexico were reduced by 56%.
We saw the numbers from August.
Arrests of illegals at the border were at 64,000, which sounds like a lot for one month, but it was 130,000 in May.
We had more money appropriated for the wall from the Department of Defense last week.
And now we have this announcement from the Supreme Court that the rule change for asylum seekers goes into effect.
It's pretty good.
It's pretty big.
And this is, you know, a year out from the election.
There's still time.
If we see more of this, we could turn it around by election day next year.
So, it's all white pills on that front.
So that's going to be our show.
It's going to be very exciting, you know.
It's been a good news week.
It's been a lot of black pills lately.
You know, I think we had our fair share of black pills yesterday, and last week, and the week before that, and, you know, kind of the whole year.
It's been one big, very dark joke.
In a way.
Some have been saying that the Joker film coming out in October is the culmination of 2019, which has been seen as dark comedy.
A very, very black humor sort of a joke.
That things are not going our way in a very sort of funny way.
But we can still see the funny side of things.
So it's refreshing to see good things happening.
But before we dive into our current events, I do just want to talk a little bit about 9-11.
You know, it's very interesting.
It's been 18 years since 9-11, and this show's been going on for a little bit more than two years.
So we've actually had three shows covering 9-11, you know, in 17, 18, and now in 2019.
And it's always interesting, you know, normally I'll do a little spiel, whatever.
It kind of varies year by year.
What's interesting about this year is that I'm actually totally restricted in what I can even say about this.
So if you're expecting, you know, a show about 9-11 truth or something like that, you're not going to get it because actually pursuant to YouTube's community guidelines, which they changed in August, we can no longer talk about 9-11 conspiracy theories.
They specifically And you can look this up.
I double-checked today before I put together my notes for the show to make sure.
But it explicitly says, if you can believe this, in the YouTube community guidelines, that you cannot deny, you cannot offer conspiracy theories about so-called well-documented violent events, which include Sandy Hook, 9-11 is one of the examples they give.
So I have to say, this is the first year that we really are in a straitjacket.
You know I always try to be careful when I talk about these kinds of things which might make people upset, which might make certain people upset, certain people that like might firebomb your house or assassinate you.
Not like normal good people like yourselves.
Normally we have to be careful but this year we can't even offer an alternative theory because we'd be breaking the rules and we get banned off of YouTube if you can believe it.
And that, I don't know about you, but that only fills me with confidence.
That, to me, only reassures me that what they say about 9-11 is completely true.
What we learned from the 9-11 Commission, and what the government has told us, and what the mainstream media has told us, it only reassures me that YouTube would ban all other alternative speculation, ideas, theories,
It only reassures me that all of that is rock solid, concrete, totally true, so we're not going to be engaging in any kind of harmful conspiracy theories, anything that would, I don't know, undermine the fabric of our society if we really thought long and hard about what happened on that day, and who could have been responsible, and where they are today, and maybe what they've been responsible for.
In the meantime, so we're not really gonna dive into that too much, but we are going to talk about a number of things pursuant to 9-11.
You know, I'll say from the outset what we hear about 9-11 every anniversary is this never forget.
You know, this is what we hear all the time.
Never forget 9-11!
And it's actually interesting because we kind of have basically forgotten, you know, everything about this event.
We've really forgotten a lot of the details, a lot of the Inconsistencies, irregularities, weird goings-ons, we have really sort of forgotten the consequences of this day.
So I will say that, you know, in a way some people might say that talking about 9-11 so frankly might be irreverent or disrespectful, but I'll say it's actually probably in keeping with the memory of people who died on 9-11 to really explore What exactly happened that day?
What it says about society?
What it says about the country?
You know, I think it's been long enough now.
I think at 18 years, it's probably time to say, maybe thoughts and prayers are fine and well, but, you know, we can see where 9-11 was.
A pivotal point in the 21st century and the genesis of a lot of bad things that have gone on since.
And so, I think that deserves some pretty frank analysis, right?
And thought.
So, we'll start out with the obvious angle, which is, what is What is the role of the Jewish state of Israel in 9-11?
It's very interesting because, you know, every year there always seems to be some kind of little link between this country or these people and 9-11.
You know, for example, I think it was in 2017 or 2018, this was one of the shows I did on 9-11, where Benjamin Netanyahu said, and like I said, I don't know if it was 17 or 18, but he said on one of the anniversary years, the 9-11 was exploded by a bomb.
Isn't that so weird?
He said that on the day of 9-11, in the weeks after the actual event, the actual attacks, He said it was a 350 kiloton bomb that exploded the World Trade Center and then he also said in either 17 or 18 that it was a bomb as well.
I guess he misspoke two times.
So you know there always seems to be something sort of weird going on there.
This year it's from A little bit of a different perspective.
This year we get a statement from the mastermind of the 9-11 attacks, Zawahiri, one of the thought leaders of Al-Qaeda.
And so this is a report from the New York Post.
It says, quote, Al-Qaeda leader Ayman al-Zawahiri called for Islamic terrorists to strike at the US, Israel, and their European allies.
In an Arabic language speech addressed to Muslim brothers the world over, Al-Zawahiri urged his followers to be, quote, inventive and creative as they concoct their diabolical plans.
And this is a part I want you to pay attention to.
This is a quote from the speech.
He says, quote, the interests of Israel and its American, British, French, Russian, and European allies are spread all over the world.
So just as they conspire in joint forces against us everywhere, we must chase them down everywhere at a time and place of our choosing.
So it's very interesting that 18 years after 9-11, the leader of Al-Qaeda is not even talking directly about the United States, not talking directly about the European powers or Russia or anything like that.
They're not even talking about Christianity.
The whole of this speech, and if you read the transcript, if you find some summaries of it, the whole of this speech is talking about how the goal of Al Qaeda, and of global jihad, is to roll back what they see as the influence of Israel.
You know, notice how he frames it in this speech.
The interests of Israel and its allies.
Which are America and all these other countries.
He focuses largely in the speech about what's happening in Palestine.
And so it's not really lost on me the significance that maybe the reason Muslims hate us today and 20 years ago has a lot less to do with things like...
Our freedoms, our western way of life, like we're led to believe.
You know, the going narrative for 9-11 is, why do 19 people hijack airliner planes and fly them into skyscrapers?
It's because they hate our way of life!
They hate that we're free.
They hate that we're Christian, or something like that.
But that's not what they're saying.
That's never what Al Qaeda said.
That's not what they're saying today, and that's not what they said then.
And if you don't believe me, I have some evidence from the actual attacks themselves.
This is a statement from the Al Qaeda leader today, saying that, well, we need more jihad to roll back the influence of Israel and her allies, and what Israel is doing in Palestine.
But you could go back to 1997.
This is according to the following information is from a book called The Israel Lobby by John Mearsheimer and Stephen Waltz.
It talks about how in 1997, Osama bin Laden published his fatwa against the United States.
This is when Osama bin Laden declared jihad against our country.
The predominant grievance, the primary grievance he has against the United States, when he declared war on us, Four years prior to the September 11th attacks was our unconditional support for Israel.
It was not our Western way of life.
It was not our freedom.
It was not Christianity.
It was not troops stationed in Saudi Arabia, as some say.
It was not military action in the Middle East.
It was our unconditional support for Israel.
Moreover, this is another excerpt from the book.
It says that the 9-11 Commission Noted that Khalid Sheikh Mohammed was primarily motivated by the Palestinian issue.
This is from the commission report.
It says, quote, by his own account KSM's animus toward the U.S.
stemmed not from his experiences there as a student, but rather from his violent disagreement with U.S.
foreign policy favoring Israel.
It's actually sort of interesting.
They also say that the masterminds of 9-11 were inspired to do this attack in particular, flying planes into buildings, because of sites that they saw during the 1980s war between Israel and Lebanon.
According to many sources, it says that the masterminds of Al-Qaeda saw buildings, in particular skyscrapers, on fire in Beirut, Lebanon, when Israel was fighting a brutal war against them in the mid-1980s.
And that image of these burning skyscrapers, that's what planted in their minds the vision of an attack on American skyscrapers in New York City.
And there's a lot of other evidence about this.
It's not just the September 11th attacks.
It was also the 1993 World Trade Center bombing was inspired by our support for Israel.
A lot of this stuff, it all goes back to this relationship.
And so that's just a little bit of food for thought.
You know, 18 years later we ask ourselves, And again, this is if we buy the official narrative, which I'm required by the community guidelines to do.
Why do Muslims have a bone to pick with us?
Why did Al-Qaeda decide to fly these planes into buildings?
What was their problem?
Well, it has a lot less to do with what they say it has to do with, which is liberalism, freedom, Christianity, all this kind of stuff, and a lot more to do with...
Why we're supporting the Jewish state of Israel.
So that's number one.
The other angle I want to talk about is the angle with immigration.
There's actually a very good article published in Breitbart today about the attacks talking about how the loopholes that allowed the 9-11 hijackers into America are still open.
This is from Breitbart.
It's also sort of interesting the numerology here.
It says there are at least six million Illegal aliens who arrived in the United States the same way 7 of the 9-11 Islamic terrorist hijackers came to the country by overstaying a visa.
All 19 terrorists from 9-11 Murdered 3,000 Americans and injured more than 6,000 others in 2001.
Arrived in the U.S.
legally with 16 obtaining tourist visas and 3 others obtaining business and student visas.
In total, 7 of the 19 terrorists overstayed their visas at some point either before the attacks or at the time of the attacks and were supposed to be deported but never were.
18 years after the 9-11 attacks, the loophole where illegal immigrants become illegal aliens after overstaying their visas remains fully open, with at least 4.5 to 6 million foreign nationals living in the U.S.
who should have been deported after their visas expired, according to Pew Research Center.
In total, there are roughly 11 to 22 million illegal aliens living in the U.S. at any given moment, and more than 1.2 million foreign nationals are legally admitted to the country every year, like all 19 terrorists on the September 11th attack were.
So, to me, I look at the 9-11 attacks, and I see two really strong themes, two really strong narratives, which is this country and immigration.
And it's kind of incredible, because if we had just about any other president in the White House at the time of the attacks, and who knows, maybe this administration was in on it, I don't know.
If we had any other administration in power at the time of these attacks, to me, I see these planes flying into these buildings and I say, I'm doing two things.
I'm going to cut off support for Israel.
You know, that's day one.
We're going to investigate the Mossad's influence here.
We're going to do all kinds of stuff with that.
And number two, I'm going to shut down all immigration.
You know, insanely, after the 9-11 attacks, maybe this was totally calculated and coordinated, the idea was, you know, we have to go after them over there.
Which is incredible, because in the meantime, while we went over to Afghanistan and Iraq, allegedly to fight people involved in 9-11, to go kick their ass because of what they did to us, while we went overseas and remained there, We have brought in so many Muslims that there are more Muslims in the country today than there were during the time of the attack.
So it's like we went over there to fight the people that perpetrated this, but meanwhile we just let millions and millions more of them into the country?
And now they've set up these huge strongholds in Michigan and Minnesota and Texas all over the country?
It doesn't make any sense!
You know, so I see the story of 9-11.
It's not about, you know, liberalism.
It's not about democracy.
It's not even about a clash of civilizations.
To me, it's about this country that always seems to be causing problems, and it's about foreigners.
It's about people coming into the country that are not like us, that will never be like us, and who hate us, and that has consequences.
You know, a lot of people like to see this conflict with the Middle East and with Islam.
It's a clash of civilizations.
It's Judeo-Christianity.
It's America and her closest ally against the Muslims.
It's just like turning back the Ottomans in Spain, you know, in Andalusian Spain.
I don't know.
To me, I just see what goes on in the Middle East, and I want no part of it.
None of it.
Neither.
Not the Abrahamic faith that came after, and not the one that came before.
I think we can leave both of them thousands of miles away, across the ocean, over there.
Because this whole thing, this whole mess, which we can't even really talk about in great detail, it seems like that is the proper response.
But instead, we get these wars.
We get wars that are still going on.
And I'll just say, you know, I can't go into too great a detail about this, but I'll tell you some things you're going to want to look into.
You're going to want to look into the dancing Israelis.
There was a recent Freedom of Information Act request, which just unveiled a lot of intelligence about the dancing Israelis.
There were a number of Israeli nationals who were celebrating and dancing as the towers collapsed.
They were told To occupy a certain rooftop and take pictures of what was happening.
They knew what was going to happen!
So you're going to want to look into that.
You're definitely going to want to check that out.
You're also going to want to think long and hard about what happened immediately after the 9-11 attacks and who that benefited.
And you know, to me, when we look at a crime, when we look at a crime scene, when we look at somebody perpetrating an action, what we always want to think about is the motivation.
You know, if we're looking for the perpetrator, if we're looking for accomplices in any crime, we're always going to want to think about, well, who would stand to gain?
Who would have a motive to perpetrate a crime?
Who would have a motivation to bring down these towers?
Because, you know, I'll tell you, and this is well documented, George W. Bush had plans to invade Afghanistan on September 10, 2001.
You can look this up.
This is well documented.
That plans for an American-led war against Afghanistan were on the President's desk the day before 9-11.
And you're telling me, 24 hours later, nobody knew it was Pearl Harbor 2.0, a surprise attack on American soil, and we got the perfect pretext to go to war in Afghanistan, which happened later that year?
I'm sure it's all coincidence.
That's what they tell us.
That's what they say.
So, you know, I'm sure that's all true.
And the last thing I'll say is think about Jeffrey Epstein.
Think of what we saw with Jeffrey Epstein.
A lot of people look at this event and they'll say, I buy it.
I buy what the government says about 9-11, you know, a conspiracy.
A conspiracy about 9-11?
Well, the scale of an operation like that, the competency that would be required, this vastly exceeds what the government is capable of!
How could so many people be in on something like this?
And the elites, how could they do that to their fellow countrymen?
Well, I'd want you to look into something like Jeffrey Epstein's death or the Las Vegas shooting.
Maybe you look at something like Operation Northwoods.
If you think our government is not willing or able to at the very least be complicit in something like this, to have full knowledge but not even attempt to stop it, you gotta look at American history.
You gotta think long and hard.
You're gonna have to do your own digging on this.
Uh, if you really think that that is outside the realm of possibility.
So, you know, 9-11, never forget, couldn't be more true today.
Never forget what happened, who we're dealing with, why it happened, all these things, right?
To me, the lesson from 9-11 is absolutely crystal clear about peoples in the world, right?
But so that's 9-11.
We're gonna move on.
We're gonna move on to some current events type things.
You know, of course, praying for people affected.
You know, while these dramatic schemes are playing out on a higher level, at the end of the day, it's people like us that are being just slaughtered and ripped to pieces in events like this.
You know, I don't deny that the 9-11 towers fell and collapsed, and thousands of people were killed and are getting cancer.
We just dispute some of the details.
You know, it's like other things that happen.
Like, I'm not denying 9-11.
I would never deny 9-11.
But, you know, just some of the key details are maybe subject to review, shall we say.
The seventh tower collapsing, you know, what the hell happened there?
But, as always, when we look at these grand schemes, we think about power players and things happening in the world, at the end of the day what does not change It's that the victims of all these grand designs of our elites and the powers that be and the corridors of power are us.
We are the people ripped to pieces and, you know, destroyed and murdered and all these different things.
We're the ones that get killed in these things.
So that's always, I think, what is worth remembering, right?
But anyway, that's 9-11.
We're gonna move on.
We're gonna talk about this North Carolina race, or these two North Carolina races, Rather, which have turned out very good for us.
You know, we are gearing up for the 2020 election.
In a big way, the spotlight has been on the Democratic primary because there's not really going to be a significant primary contest on the Republican side and because it's such a full Democratic field.
They don't have an incumbent.
There's not a real shoe-in for the nomination like there was in 2016.
But really, I think this is a great sign for the 2020 election to take a little bit of a step outside the Democratic primary.
It's these two special elections in North Carolina.
And I'll read you to you a report about the results from Fox News.
In a major victory for both President Trump and National Republicans, North Carolina GOP State Senator Dan Bishop is projected to win a fiercely contested special U.S.
House election for the 9th District that was widely seen as a bellwether for the President's chances in the 2020 election.
And another Republican House candidate, Greg Murphy, decisively won a separate special election in North Carolina's more solidly GOP-leaning 3rd District earlier on Tuesday evening, frustrating Democrats who spend millions trying to make a splash in the state.
Even Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairwoman Cheri Bustos acknowledged that the president contributed to Bishop's win, writing in a statement, quote, We fell an inch short tonight, but it took more than $6 million There's that number again.
An outside Republican spending in a last-minute Trump rally to seal Democratic candidate Dan McCready's fate in the 9th District.
McCready's campaign spent approximately $4.7 million on the race, while Bishop's spent only $1.9 million.
Outside spending primarily from national party committees helped Bishop to the tune of 5.8 million dollars though compared to McCready's roughly 1.4 million dollars.
So both spent roughly 7 million dollars.
Republicans closer to eight, Democrats closer to seven in this district.
The clean sweep heartened the president, who has long emphasized the national implications at stake in these elections.
Trump unloaded on McCready in the fiery rally on Monday night, telling attendees that, quote, to stop the far left, he must vote in tomorrow's special election.
So, you know, I'll say with this election, this was necessary for the Republicans to win.
You know, in the ninth district in particular, we won overwhelmingly in the third district.
That was what was predicted.
This was not exactly a hotly contested election in the third district.
But in the ninth district, This district went 12 points in favor of the Republicans in 2016.
So this is a pretty solidly Republican district.
In FiveThirtyEight's calculations, they actually have a 14 point partisan lean.
So even though they voted 12% in favor of Trump, In 2016, FiveThirtyEight, using their analytics and algorithms, says that actually, objectively speaking, without focusing on a particular candidate or election, their partisan lean is actually more significant than that.
So that Bishop won by only 1 or 2 percent in this district when the partisan lean is 14, when in 2016 when Trump was running they won by 12.
You know, it's hard to say that this was a huge, unambiguous victory for the GOP.
It was necessary For them to hold this seat, it was necessary for them to win this election because of the lean and also because of the timing.
You know, of course, this is going to be the last special election that remains to be resolved between now and the 2020 election.
So this is the last benchmark to see where we're at before the next elections.
But that said, it's not an overwhelming victory.
It's not great.
Moreover, you see a lot of very troubling trends here, specifically in this district.
We saw that compared to 16 and 18, the actual midterm elections held in 2018 in the same district, which they had to do a recount, the suburbs in this district moved much further to the left, and the rural counties or the rural precincts moved much farther to the right.
This is a very bad trend for Republicans.
You know, this is the sort of phenomenon of immigrants changing the demographics, and It's also a lot of white people changing the electoral situation as well.
It's a lot of women who are driving electoral politics, realigning the suburbs to the left.
It's also a lot of college educated people.
This is a primary concern for the president in states like Virginia, in North Carolina, in a lot of the swing states that we were able to win in 2016 is that the suburbs are going further to the left And that's being driven largely by women.
Thank you, ladies.
I'm sure, you know, there's nothing to see there, right?
And also by the changing demographics, which is immigration.
So, in general, this was a win.
You know, this was a slight white pill.
It looks like we're in okay shape for 2020.
I would say that we're in the game.
Trump's got a chance.
You know, I think we will be able to compete in this election.
That said, I think there's a lot of work to do.
I think You know, this election shows what we've been talking about for a long time.
We talked about last week with regards to Texas.
This electoral situation for Republicans is getting worse every year.
It's getting dramatically worse every year because of changing demographics.
You know largely it's being driven by immigration but it's also being driven by generational trends.
It's being driven by gender trends.
You know, there's a lot of things that are going wrong for the Republican Party, where I think pretty soon, and this is not anything new that you're hearing here, but the Republican Party platform is not going to be solvent at the national level in the next 10 years.
You know, and whether that's due entirely to demographics or there's other factors, you know, millennials are increasing in their share of the vote.
Generation Z is voting.
Also, women are being cringed and retarded.
But the Republican Party is going to have to change their platform to appeal to a changing constituency, a changing electorate.
And I don't know if that's going to happen.
So we'll see.
It's a minor white pill for us.
We had to win that one.
We did win by the skin of our teeth there.
And so I guess for now we're in good shape.
For now we're safe.
So that's North Carolina.
We're going to move on to this asylum rule.
This is to me the much bigger white pill.
You know, I promised you two white pills tonight.
And the election was okay, but to me the real white pill is this asylum rule.
This is very recent as well, so you probably didn't hear about it if you were watching the news last night or if you're paying attention to it today.
This just came out this evening, and this is on the asylum rule which the president tried to pass earlier this year.
This is from Bloomberg.
It's his quote bolstering President Donald Trump on one of his signature issues.
The U.S.
Supreme Court cleared his administration to enforce a new rule designed to sharply limit who can apply for asylum at the U.S.-Mexico border.
The justices said Wednesday that the administration can apply the policy while a legal challenge goes forward.
A series of lower court rulings have put the ruling on hold.
The president tweeted, quote, big United States Supreme Court win for the border on asylum.
The policy affects people who travel to the U.S. through Mexico from Central America.
People crossing the southern border won't be able to seek asylum unless they previously applied for protection from one of the countries they passed through.
So if you're from Central America, if you're from Guatemala, El Salvador, Honduras, of course, if you're passing through Mexico to get to America like these caravans do, if they don't first apply for asylum in Mexico, they will not be eligible to apply for asylum in the United States.
And if they're not eligible to apply for asylum, then they can be turned around at the border.
This was the big source of our problems, which was that American law says that if you apply for asylum, you must process the request.
You have to detain them for a short time, and then we run out of detention space, and then we release them into the country while we process their application, and then it doesn't matter if they have an eligible request.
Most of them don't.
Most of them are fraudulent.
They have infiltrated.
They are now in the interior of the country, and you never see them again.
So that was the major problem.
This was driving in a large way.
The big influx, the big growth in illegal crossings.
This year, last year, the previous year, is the Central American people claiming asylum.
So if they come through Mexico, they don't apply there, they apply here.
We can just turn them right around.
We don't have to process their request.
We don't have to detain them.
We can just keep them out of the country.
So that's huge.
The article goes on.
It says the administration told the Supreme Court the rule, quote, alleviates a crushing burden on the U.S. asylum system by prioritizing asylum seekers who most need asylum in the United States.
I mean that's kind of cringe, but you know whatever.
The American Civil Liberties Union representing four nonprofit organizations sued to challenge the rule which it said would virtually eliminate asylum at the southern border.
Which is great!
That is what we want.
And you know, to me, this is part of a very solid record these past two weeks on immigration.
You know, I was very, like I said...
I was very skeptical.
I was very pessimistic about our prospects with immigration in June, because we had seen, like, the worst numbers ever on illegal immigration at the beginning of the summer.
So, you know, some people might be saying, well, well, Nick, you were blackmailing at the beginning of the summer.
Nick, you were so down on Trump in the beginning of the summer.
Yes, I stand by that 100%.
We hit rock bottom in May, in June.
It was record illegal immigration, like, Decades.
Plural.
Record illegal immigration numbers.
In May, it was 130 illegal crossings in that month alone.
In June, it was 100,000.
You know, we had appropriated barely any money for the wall.
We had the $1.6 billion for border security from the Omnibus Bill in 2018.
We got $1.6 billion for border security from the deal to reopen the government in 2019 in, I think, February or March.
And that was before the emergency funding that Trump had allocated from the DoD had been approved by the Supreme Court.
That happened in July.
So where we were in May and June is that, okay, no money has been allocated for a real wall, no real wall has been built, you know, like one mile of new wall has been constructed, and hardly any money has been appropriated even for a placement wall.
Illegal crossings are at an all-time high.
They're talking about expanding legal immigration.
You've got caravans pouring in and we're unable to stop them.
So we really did hit rock bottom.
And then things started to turn around a little bit.
In June, the president said to Mexico, to the president of Mexico, he said, unless and until you change, In some way and try to stop these illegal migrants coming into America, we're going to put a 10% tariff on all goods coming from Mexico.
And that's only going to go up in stages until we raise it to 25% on October 1st.
And I said, okay, well, you know, we've seen threats like this before, but let's hope we see tariffs go down.
Maybe something will change.
Maybe Mexico will try to fix this.
Tariffs were never implemented.
Before the tariff deadline was met, the Mexican envoy to Washington DC struck a deal and it wasn't a third safe country agreement like we just saw implemented by the Supreme Court.
You know, they allow this ruling to go into place.
It wasn't anything significant.
I don't even think it was anything written.
We never saw a written agreement.
It never passed.
I don't believe the Mexican legislature.
We saw basically a handshake agreement where all we heard was rumors that Mexico was going to deploy more National Guard troops when they had been doing that for years.
And they were going to implement something sort of like a third safe country agreement with the Central American countries.
But it wasn't exactly that.
I'm not going to get into the details, but, you know, it was seen as like third safe country light, essentially.
And I said, this is terrible.
Mexico's never going to implement this.
It'll never happen.
But, you know, now, since that has happened, I think everything, that was probably the defining moment when things have started to turn around.
Because, like I said, since that was implemented, the border crossings from Mexico have gone down by 15%.
It went from illegal arrests being at 130,000 in May, a 20-year record.
You know, I think actually it was in June, it was a 20-year record.
In June, we had not seen that many illegal arrests or rather apprehensions at the border since 2001.
Okay, that's how bad it was.
That went down from $130,000 in May to $100,000 in June to $64,000 in August.
Crossings down 54%.
In July, the Supreme Court allowed the President to allocate the money from the DOD using the declaration of a state of emergency to fund the border wall.
This month, we saw more money allocated from the DOD, an additional $3.5 billion.
Plus, now we have this ruling from the Supreme Court, We got the numbers from August, so things seem to be looking up.
You've got these ICE raids happening every weekend, which although insignificant compared to the illegal crossings, it does seem to be kicking up a little bit.
It does seem to be sort of escalating in some ways.
So to me, I look at this immigration picture and very cautiously Citing all this evidence, citing all these different data points that we've seen over the past couple of weeks and in the past couple of months, I humbly say that I am optimistic for the first time in a year.
It's been a year since I've been white-pilled.
After the midterms, I said, this sucks.
Trump is a failure.
He's a fat, cheeto, bald, you know, idiot, whatever.
And we've been down on him, and rightfully so.
It's been terrible.
But if these past few weeks are any indication of where we're headed in the future, I think it's going to be good.
I think we have a lot of potential here to turn things around.
So, you know, maybe we make some good appointments, right?
Maybe we make a good National Security Advisor appointment, you know?
I hear that certain forces in the White House are trying to prevent a very based guy from getting in who could really clean house.
If we get a good guy as our National Security Advisor, maybe we get a different DOD Secretary, a different DHS Secretary, maybe a different Chief of Staff, we could really be in good shape.
I'm very white-pilled.
So I'm very white-pilled on immigration.
I'm very pleased with what I'm seeing, and you should be too.
This asylum rule is a game-changer, and a lot of people point out that the asylum seekers are not all of the immigrants.
I don't think they're even half, but they are a significant component of what has been driving This huge influx, these record levels that we haven't seen in years.
You know, because if you look at the numbers of illegal crossings, it like collapsed after Trump got elected in November of 2016.
The illegal crossings went like straight down from Obama to Trump like immediately.
And then once Trump started to talk about amnesty for DACA, it went right back up.
And then specifically this like caravan type immigration, minors, families from Central America, that is really what has been driving this huge increase these past couple of years.
So we can shut down all the asylum requests and just turn these people away.
You know none of them are applying for asylum in Mexico because they're not asylum seekers They're economic migrants.
They're not coming because they're fleeing persecution or violence or whatever.
They want jobs.
They want stuff.
That's why they're coming here.
They're not going to apply in Mexico.
They're going to go through Mexico, try to apply here.
And we're going to turn them around.
We're going to send them back where they came from, you know?
And maybe if that happens enough, they'll stop coming.
So it's very white-pilling.
But we're going to move on.
We're going to talk about our final story here, our featured story for tonight, this e-cigarette ban.
And I have to say at the outset, I'm totally in favor of banning things.
You know, I am not a small government conservative.
I am not a libertarian.
I am not somebody who believes that The individual should have a right to choose.
I don't believe this.
If it is not healthy, if it is harmful, particularly to the youth, it should be banned.
And if something is not in widespread use, or it's been not enough time where we can still control its breakout capacity, we should do so.
So a lot of people say, what about alcohol?
You're in favor of banning, like, marijuana, but what about alcohol?
We can't really control the breakout capacity of alcohol.
It's been around forever.
People drink alcohol, and they have been forever.
And there's, you know, some other reasons.
We can control, we can control marijuana, we can control opioids, we can control e-cigarettes.
We should try to, you know?
So I have to say, at the outset, I'm entirely in favor of it, but I'll read you, this is a report from CNN.
It says President Donald Trump said Wednesday that the U.S.
Food and Drug Administration would be putting out, quote, some very strong recommendations regarding the use of flavored e-cigarettes in a couple of weeks.
HHS Secretary Alex Azar, seat in the Oval Office with the President, Melania Trump, and the Acting Commissioner of the FDA announced the newly proposed enforcement policy would require flavored e-cigarette companies to take their products off the market.
Quote I'll take several or rather it'll take several weeks for us to put out the final guidelines that will announce all the parameters around the enforcement policy and then there will likely be about a 30-day delay to effective date as is customary said Azar.
But at that point all flavored e-cigarettes other than tobacco flavor would have to be removed from the market.
By May 20th he said E-cigarette companies making tobacco flavored products would have the chance to file for approval by the FDA.
At that time, flavored product manufacturers would also have the opportunity to file, but their products would be off the market until approved.
A sixth person in the United States has died from lung disease related to vaping, according to Kansas health officials.
The US CDC and Prevention, the FDA and state health departments have been investigating this outbreak.
Health officials say they haven't found a definitive cause or a clear connection between cases, but some are zeroing in on potential clues.
As of Friday, there have been more than 450 possible cases of lung illness associated with e-cigarette use reported to the CDC across 33 states and the Virgin Islands.
The numbers have been changing frequently.
So, you know, again I'll also say that I don't know if this epidemic thing is really legitimate.
They've been reporting that people have been dying because of e-cigarette usage.
They've also been saying there's not really a strong correlation.
If you look at a lot of the cases, in fairness, In many of these cases, these people had prior conditions, or they have other risk factors, they're elderly, they're using products from the black market, things that are not regulated, and so on.
And so, I'm not going to say at the outset I totally endorse this idea that vaping is killing people across the nation, but I think we all know and understand that Vaping has become a problem.
Everybody's using it.
And in particular, children are using it.
And I don't care what you say.
Maybe it's better than cigarettes.
It's not good for you.
And specifically, it's not good for kids.
And this is why it's critical that what they're banning is not e-cigarettes.
They say that tobacco flavored e-cigarettes, who get a waiver and get approval, will still be on the market.
They're banning the flavored e-cigarettes.
Well, why does this matter?
Because if you're selling a flavored e-cigarette that's, you know, in large measure, I think, marketed towards children because the flavors are like bubble gum and mint and cherry and this kind of stuff.
Well, I think children are a lot more susceptible to that than if it's just seen as an alternative to a cigarette.
It's a tobacco e-cigarette.
It's meant to wean you off of cigarettes.
It's a more healthy alternative to smoking tobacco, you know, in another form.
So, to me, I think that is why it's sort of a critical detail.
So, if that's the case, I'm in favor of it.
You know, a lot of people draw these comparisons and they'll say, well, what about regular cigarettes?
People are complaining that e-cigarettes are killing people, but cigarettes are killing a lot more people.
I agree, but you know, it would probably be advisable that nobody is smoking anything, right?
If we can try to contain the usage of these things, we know that vaping is bringing back smoking.
Cigarette usage was plummeting in the past few years, and in the past few decades, really.
It was almost extinct, and now we know that vaping is ubiquitous.
It's particularly prevalent among high school age children, among college age adults, you know, so that this is Growing, it's expanding, it's surpassing cigarettes.
It's sort of a straw man argument to say, oh well, cigarettes are not as healthy.
I think it'd probably be most healthy if nobody was smoking anything.
If they were not smoking regular cigarettes or e-cigarettes.
And we all know that people are getting hooked on the vaping and that is probably less healthy than not doing anything at all.
And you know, people can say, well, it's vapor, it doesn't do anything.
It's chemicals.
You're breathing chemicals into your lungs.
Children, you know, people that are in high school.
Maybe you could say that an adult could do that.
Somebody that's 21, whatever, they want to hurt themselves.
Maybe I understand that a little bit more.
But we all know that it's kids that are getting hooked on this stuff.
And even if you think it's not that bad, I'm sure people would agree that kids should not be inhaling these things, should be not be consuming these kinds of controlled substances like this.
So I'm all in favor of it.
And you know, the other argument is, well, maybe this is Juul.
This is Juul, which is an e-cigarette manufacturer who is using their lobbying and regulatory power to shut down their competitors.
You know, maybe I understand that, but I also don't think that our ends are mutually exclusive.
You know, if that's going to take this kind of stuff off of shelves, if kids can't go to a gas station and get bubblegum flavored e-cigarettes, Yeah, I don't know if I really care that Juul is cornering the market on this.
I think all that stuff should be totally shut down.
And by the way, it's very interesting that a lot of these people are out there talking about health and fitness and returning to tradition and all this, and yet I see a lot of my friends online promoting e-cigarette usage.
It's not good for you.
You know, if your body is this temple, people are going to neg me for not working out and eating shit and eating Big Macs or whatever.
Well, you can't go out the next day and say and defend e-cigarette, vaping, all this kind of stuff for kids because clearly, you know, these things are, these things are contradictory.
So I'm in favor in general of banning things that are harmful to society.
I think this is The real conservative approach.
A lot of libertarians don't like this.
They'll say, you know, well, people have a prerogative to decide.
Who is the government to decide what is bad for you?
The government should decide what is bad for you.
Smart people should be in charge of the government and they should have a say in what you should and should not be able to do.
You know, think about it.
If we had never allowed marijuana to ever get out of control, Or opioids or any of this stuff.
If the state really was powerful and effective and competent at controlling these things, we would have a much healthier society.
And I know, if you know somebody who had their life taken by drugs, you know, was killed by drugs, something like that, I'm sure you would feel similarly.
If somebody's life could have been saved if the state was effective at shutting this kind of stuff down.
And a lot of the rebuttal is something along the lines of, well, the government can't control substances.
The government can't control drugs.
Yes, they can!
They're just not trying.
They're just not trying.
They're in bed with all these people, whether it's marijuana, whether it's pharmaceuticals, whether it's cigarettes or vaping.
You know, people that are talking about Juul using this as a strategic political maneuver to shut down their competition.
Well, then they're in bed with the e-cigarette manufacturer.
Right?
So don't tell me that it's impossible for the state to do this.
The state isn't even trying!
It's not that government can never do anything.
It's government with this, you know, horrible democratic managerial system can do nothing.
If we had real, competent, nationalist leadership and power, I'm sure you could take care of this.
If you brought in the right people, if you I think revived the right perhaps Faustian spirit.
We could shut these things down and we should want to do that.
We should be trying to do that.
We'd be a lot better off if that were the case.
You know, so I know I'm gonna take a lot of heat for this.
I know a lot of people are gonna come in and say, well, I like vapes, you know, or you know, they're gonna tell me that vapes are good for you or something like this, but I've never been in favor of the controlled substances.
If you can shut it down, you should.
We should shut down things that are bad for society and in particular for the youth.
You know, we should shut down marijuana, we should shut down opioids, e-cigarettes, pornography, we should shut all of it down, you know?
And I think we'd be a lot better off if that was the mentality other than this.
Well, you know, people can do what they want to do.
People can wreck their lives.
People can destroy the lives of other people.
We can allow these predatory corporations, predatory lobbies, and predatory multinational oligopolies prey on the innocent, on children, on even adults in some cases.
No, I don't think we have to tolerate that.
I think we could have a much better society, right?
I think we could make it a lot better, so...
I'm in favor of it.
You know, if they say that e-cigarettes are killing people, I don't even care if it's true.
Keep spreading it.
You know, make it a CDC national health emergency and shut it down because I think we all know the kids are being infected with this stuff.
The rates of smoking is out of control.
I think people in a lot of cases are going from vaping to cigarettes You know, where it used to be the gateway drug was marijuana to hard drugs.
I think the vaping is definitely probably turning people on to smoking if they otherwise wouldn't be.
And for that reason, I think if the FDA can prevent this stuff from getting on the shelves or make it more difficult, then then that should happen.
I'm in favor of it.
But that's our featured story.
We're going to move on.
We're going to look at our super chats because we are well past our time here.
We'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
A lot of people.
It's a boomer take.
It's not a boomer take.
It's a zoomer take.
It's a zoomer take.
We've had it with boomers.
If anything, boomers are the ones that are permissive.
Boomers are the ones that are saying, it's just a plant, man.
It's just a plant.
It's just vape, man.
We have a problem with little tobacco, man.
The Indians used to smoke this stuff, man.
That's boomer talk.
That is hippie talk.
Us zoomers are about turning away these things that are harming our body.
So it's actually the opposite.
But let's see we got to get to the super chats.
Waldemar says first super chat here big guy am a poor student but at least I can spend my parents money on my favorite e-boy.
Ah well thank you for the super chat much appreciated.
Diabetes says but Nick without job how will I eat?
Without being a wagee?
Well, I think that's sort of... I think that's why wagees are where they are, because they ask questions like this.
Well, if I didn't wage, how would I eat?
Well, you know, maybe that's why you're a wagee.
Colby says, people are starting to view 9-11 as this historic aberration as opposed to, as I mentioned, an outgrowth of an isolationist and retreat-based foreign policy, says Ben Shapiro, tying in 9-11 with Bolton.
Well yeah, of course that would be his take.
Of course Ben Shapiro's take would be the 9-11 means that there aren't enough wars happening.
Totally ridiculous.
And we all know that.
that, you know, what has been the, we have gone across, excuse me, we've gone across the world to destroy terrorism, and we've gotten more of it.
You know, how many terrorist attacks have there been since 9-11?
There have been, globally, something in the ballpark of 30,000 Islamic terrorist attacks.
So, it's not like it's getting better because we're fighting all these wars, you know?
A really good comic says, Europe!
Tornado sirens blaring outside, time to grab a seat on the old porch and watch the skies.
Okay, I don't know if that's the best idea, but all right.
Walter says, may I know the reason why you dislike Varg's strategy of starving the beast economically while building back our communities based on our forebears?
I'm not familiar with any of Varg's content, so... You're saying, why do you dislike Varg's strategy?
I don't, I don't think I've ever said I dislike his strategy.
I don't, I don't know anything about Varg.
Other than he, like, burned down some churches or something.
And he's a pagan.
Arsony says, Hey Nick, what's your take on recent news that Vladimir Putin warned George Bush about impending attack two days before 9-11?
Yeah, it's probably true.
I think a lot of people had prior knowledge of 9-11.
I think our government did.
I think the Israelis did.
I think Russia did.
And I'm sure we were warned.
You know, I'm sure we knew about it.
And and we didn't take it seriously, you know, they definitely weren't complicit Julius says Beardson's jewel deleted subcultural items gets an F Yeah, yeah, I mean the jewel is sort of a totem of the right-wing or zoomer culture, but it's got to go Reagan Lodge has ever noticed how many vape stores are run by Iranian immigrants.
The e-cig ban is a blatant Zionist plot to dry up Nick's Persian financiers Ah, yeah, that is a good point.
Yeah, maybe that's my old friend.
That's my old Zionist friend trying to shut down the Iranian proxy money to America First, shutting down the cash flow.
Four-dimensional chess.
L.A.
Dodgers' officer.
I just wanted a hot dog.
What is this?
That doesn't say dog, it says a hot D-O.
She then went all, something on me, Niko can we have an optics check on our half black, half Mexican on Wiener Street?
Okay, I don't know what any of this means, but it's very cringe.
Manis says, who is Lolli Socks and why do I keep getting recommendations for his channel on Twitch?
He's a friend of mine from DLive, but I guess he's not on DLive anymore, now he's on Twitch.
The thing is a lot of people watch his streams and admittedly it might be confusing.
He's not a very trad guy, but guy is totally based in Red Pill.
Don't tell anyone, but the guy knows all the relevant facts.
So I always try to promote people who know our relevant facts, right?
And he's a bro.
He's a good dude.
He based Ozzy, so that's who he is.
Glenn says, you talked about the background of what happened in the optics war.
What about the thought wars?
Also got hooked to vaping three years ago.
Ban them!
Kids are hooked!
Yeah, big agree.
So the thought wars this happened when did this happen?
This was like I Want to say this was like winter 1718.
This was like December 2017 January 2018 The thought wars was I forget exactly how it originated but basically this schism broke out again in the the broader alt-right sort of on top of the optics wars in some ways and it was very interesting and
That a lot of these stupid trad whores in these trad whores right in the alt-right they wanted to self-identify as feminists and they wanted men to stop attacking them and even though they were on board with traditionalism I am a woman and I want to be heard I want to be equal you know this is the kind of thing we were hearing from a lot of the e-girls And so these battle lines were drawn between the faggots and the based-on-red-pill chads.
The faggots said, you know, well, women are a net positive for our movement.
This is always what they would say.
I know she's cringe.
I know she was like she's a retard.
I know she did bad things in her past.
I'm speaking very broadly about women in the movement.
I know like she's dumb and all this.
unidentified
But on net, I think they're positive for the movement.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
This was the cope that we would hear from all these beta male orbiters.
As a whole, I think Tara McCarthy is good for the movement.
And she's like a fragile idiot who she got criticized for like a day and she like nuked her whole internet following.
And she did that like every month so people would send her money.
unidentified
I'm sorry those guys are being mean to you Tara.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Here's money for a new laptop or whatever.
You know, these were the net positive.
How about Lauren Southern?
You know, that was one of the... She was one of the e-girls.
And she introduced these homosexual producers who basically destroyed the UK's right-wing scene because they were working with Hope Not Hate and she knew about it.
These are your net positives, right?
So that was the argument from them, and people like myself, among others, a certain editor of a very famous website, we said, look, women come into political movements and they change the dynamic.
In any male space, women change the dynamic.
Whether they're smart or dumb, whether they're, you know, helpful or not helpful, they change the dynamic.
They come in and immediately there's a division in the men.
Some men want to go business as usual, right?
Women come in and they treat it like it's just the same.
It's all the same, right?
And we have a movement.
You rise and fall based on merit.
We're working towards the common cause.
Well, there's another kind of man who sees a woman in a male space And tries to compete for her affection.
You know, this is the problem.
You'll get a lot of division and infighting within a movement because now you've got women inside, where people are trying to court the women, trying to impress the women.
Women will demand special treatment, and some men will give it to them because they want her affection, and other men will say, no, it's got to be a meritocracy.
We have to stay focused on the goals.
And so invariably, a woman entering into a male space or a political movement introduces these unnecessary conflicts, infighting over girls, about girls, and they want to rise up.
They just cause a lot of chaos, division, disorder, naturally.
So we ought to keep it homogeneous.
And so this was a debate that raged for a little while, and I don't know when it was really resolved.
I guess eventually it sort of just flamed itself out.
You know, at that point, all the women who had a problem with me, or a problem with the chief antagonist of Thought Wars, stopped talking to us, blocked us, and we blocked them, stopped talking to them.
But I still remember, hey, for what it's worth, I remember, I remember who blocked me, I remember who unfollowed me, I remember, and even on the guy's side, who disinvited me from streams and this kind of thing, because they were all proven wrong by the way.
Every single one of them.
You side with an e-girl, you always lose.
The record of history shows that, and it will show that into the future.
Because the principles underlying my argument are irrefutable.
I mean, what I'm saying about this is just common sense.
And so it's no surprise That every so many months we see an episode like the Lauren Southern fiasco or you know like we saw with Ashley St.
Clair or with Cathy Xu or you know with all these different people it's always something you know and so you stick with an e-girl you're gonna lose it's like that old meme I see some people and it's like millennial woes or a lot of these other characters.
It's like serves them right, trusted an e-girl.
I have yet to be proven wrong in one single instance since I took this position on women in the movement.
I have never in one instance seen a woman completely blow me out of the water.
Oh wow, you know, but this one, oh, she's really indispensable.
We would have never been where we are now if it weren't for her, right?
It's never happened!
It's never happened.
So, just a little food for thought.
And that was a Thought Wars.
Otto von Bismarck says, Why give a super chat for Kaiser and the Fatherland?
Okay.
Anand says, Glormf, be like, bro, can I hit your jewel, bro, please?
Yeah.
A really good comic says, Next person to send a super chat is officially gay, but the one after that gets five years good luck.
Ah, very interesting game here.
I like this sort of makes things interesting Brunetto who I guess is gay now says Nick.
I hope your studio is in the basement There's currently a tornado warning for Cook County.
Stay safe big guy Well, don't worry.
I think we'll be alright The studio is actually not in Cook County.
It's in New York City.
It's in a high-rise apartment.
There are no tornadoes.
You can look outside the window.
It's beautiful outside.
It's a beautiful night.
We've got this these clouds and the clouds are going in about a hundred miles an hour.
But you know, it's it's not like a tornado or anything.
So it's relatively clear skies out, you know nighttime.
I think we're okay.
Red Pilled, who has five years of good luck, says, Knickers, wear a Hawaiian shirt at TPUSA Miami.
Is that what we're calling it now?
We should call it Knick Pack or something.
We should call it N Pack.
N for Nick.
Knick Pack, right?
But yeah, Hawaiian shirt seems to be what people are going with.
Northwest says, praise God, John Bolton is out of there.
Hello, Neocon mustache ride department.
Okay, yeah, thank you for that very perfunctory chat, and it's really contributing.
Lethal Brawler says, hey Nick, the something, hey Nicky the Pooh, can I be bearified as Boo Bear?
Oh, this is like what, Owen Benjamin sort of stuff?
No, we're not doing any bearifications.
What do you have to do to become an Owen Benjamin bear?
What do you have to do to get the bear emoji in your username?
Do you have to like, uh...
Do you have to do what Owen Benjamin did like work for Hollywood for 20 years or have a gay dad or be Jewish or something like that?
Maybe I don't know Black Swan says PewDiePie gets married then immediately bows to the ADL suspicious timing.
If only he listened to you.
Yeah, what do you know?
I endorse marriage but You know, it is interesting.
Gets married to a female.
Femloid enters into the equation.
Now he's talking to the ADL.
I don't think the timing there is insignificant.
Buzz Aldrin says, Nick, have you ever jeweled?
If so, what flavor?
No, I've never jeweled.
I don't understand the appeal.
I would never want to put that into my lungs.
You know, I don't know how you could not have anxiety about that.
That you're breathing that into your lungs and it's some kind of foreign substance.
I would not, I just wouldn't trust it, you know?
Fatlip says, uh, what in the, hmm, oh boy.
Okay.
Blake says, favorite Lil Wayne album?
I don't listen to Lil Wayne.
Adam says, I found out today that my wife is pregnant with our first Aryan super soldier.
Scratch that, our first Mediterranean super soldier.
Boy or bust?
Ah, well, the Mediterranean is the Aryan, so I, you know, it's all the same, but congratulations!
Congratulations on the the latent super soldier the incipient super soldier big congratulations for praying for a boy right but you know if it's a girl that's fine too that's a gift from god too we love girls too right but you know boy we really want it to be boy right but congratulations thanks for being a content creator that's most important form of content creation
churning out more soldiers for the war for the battle of ideas for the war of ideas i mean right so thanks for that pass around the street says uh what do you think about the use of signs stickers and circular forwarding snail mail to advance our message would you encourage viewers to partake No, I think that's ridiculous.
Honestly, you know, a lot of people say, well, it wouldn't hurt, but like, it wouldn't do anything.
That already exists.
You know, a lot of these publications are still print-based publications.
They're not making a dent.
They're irrelevant.
The conversation is happening online.
Everyone knows that.
So who are you going to convince?
Boomers?
Boomers have been inactive and resistant to these ideas for years.
People have been putting out publications for years.
The battle is going to take place on the internet.
Doom Marine says, Nick, there is a rumor that you will have a raspberry mojito on the debate freight.
Big if true.
Also, did you talk about Zoe Quinn's latest thing?
I don't know where you heard that rumor, but no, I wouldn't drink.
And if I did drink, I wouldn't be drinking some gay mojito, whatever that is.
And no, I don't know anything about Zoe Quinn.
RxI says opinion on the fat acceptance movement.
You know what my opinion is.
I don't even need to give it to you.
I just totally have no respect for...
Obese people in most cases, you know, and this acceptance obviously is stupid.
MKAF's favorite, it's like just stop, stop eating sugar.
It's so not hard.
Just stop, stop eating.
These people act like it's rocket science.
Well, dieting doesn't work.
Well, what do you mean?
What do you mean?
Where do you think all the tissue comes from?
It comes from food.
What are you, stupid?
Well, actually, if you eat less, you gain weight.
That's retarded!
That's the dumbest thing I've ever heard!
Okay, then why are people that are starving in Africa, why are they not morbidly obese, right?
Well, the processed food is cheaper.
Eat less of it!
Don't eat!
Have a little self-control, you know?
Well, I just don't know.
How I ballooned up to 10,000 pounds, I think it's pretty clear, you know?
You have no discipline.
And it's not, it's not like it's challenging.
I do it all the time.
Yesterday, I was debating, am I going to go out and get a Big Mac and fries?
And I've had French fries like five days this week.
Am I going to eat more shit or am I going to have a bowl of oatmeal?
And I said, I'd love a Big Mac.
Nothing in the world would hit the spot more than a quarter pounder, a McDouble and fries right now and ketchup.
But I've been eating so bad lately, I have to get back on track.
And I ate oatmeal.
And I ate oatmeal again today, and I'm gonna have chili for dinner.
You know?
And that's a little thing called self-control.
So that's the way I see it.
MKAF says, favorite episode of Kickstarter TV and Hyde Wars?
I don't know the episodes by number.
I just know them from the clips that are posted, you know?
Why do people ask me this?
Why is it an endless source of curiosity what my favorite Sam Hyde video is?
I don't... Is it like, I'm gonna tell you one you haven't seen before or... Because I know everyone's just gonna say, yeah, I like that one too, you know, so... Say what's your favorite.
The one everyone likes?
Oh, we all like that.
Everyone likes that one too.
Yeah, remember that part when he says the thing and then we all laugh?
Like, I don't get it.
I don't know.
I like the one when, um... Let me think.
Let me think.
It's been a long time.
Of course, the timeless classic is when he talks about time travel in your 20s.
That's pretty Keno.
The one, the My Little Pony one's kind of funny.
There's a lot of good ones, but I don't know them like chapter and verse.
I couldn't tell he was like episode, you know, 13 or whatever.
Smelly says, remember it weren't part... Okay, this just doesn't make any sense.
Friendly Juice says, I'm glad you shaved off the mustache.
You were starting to give me Owens a free candy van, that thing on your... Okay, so is nobody speaking English today?
Are we just taking a break from proofreading or what what is going on?
I'm glad you shaved you were starting to give me owns a free candy.
Oh owns a free candy van with that thing on your lip.
Well, you should have put all that in quotations.
It makes sense now that I put through it right, but I think you're trying to own Benjamin.
Owns a free candy van with that thing on your left.
Okay, well, I see what you mean now.
That's a very cringe take anyway.
Even if it's grammatically correct, it's still an NPC take.
Mustache?
There's two permutations with mustache.
unidentified
Pedophile, 70s porn star, mustache, pre-programmed response, mustache, porn star, pedophile.
There are two responses from television.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
That is what your brain just did.
And you should really think about that.
I was going off about that on Telegram the other day.
That's what it is, these NPC, you know, Sam Hyde calls them, sitcom robots, sitcom humor robots.
Most people, because this was always the response, I have the mustache, you look like a 70s porn star.
Okay.
I probably heard that a thousand times, and I doubt that every person who told me that has even seen a 70s porno or a 70s porn star.
I know I haven't, right?
But yet they all know mustache, pre-programmed response, 70s porn star.
You know, that is your NPC sitcom dialogue tree.
Or it's pedophile.
Looks like a pedophile.
I don't know.
I don't think there are a lot of pedophiles that have mustaches.
I mean, some of them do, some of them don't.
right but uh but i just very the mustache is a good look right uh but but people these days they're programmed we've just got to have it's just got to be the same responses so you know what it's grammatically correct but it's still cringe internet explorer says jeffrey epstein arrested today but will he talk Ah yeah, very true.
I don't know this username, says most e-cigarette companies were bought out by tobacco companies.
I tried a vape, threw up for six hours the next day.
Worse than normal cigarettes.
Sounds kind of like you're a baby, you know, because I know, like, I remember being in high school and being like 13 or 14 and kids were vaping and, you know, they weren't throwing up, so.
So I don't know.
I mean, I'm gonna say, I'm gonna say I'm against it.
It probably is bad for you, but you threw up for six hours because you smoked an e-cigarette?
I don't know, man.
Maybe, maybe, maybe you should work on yourself.
Maybe your composition is a little weak, right?
Eddie Cade says, Nick, I'm just joshing.
I'm just busting your chops a little bit.
No need to get upset.
Eddie Cade says, Nick, my professor, said that 40% of Mississippi Republicans oppose interracial marriage.
The class condemned the 40%.
Well, I'm sitting here with the feel when you have an argument from watching America First.
Yeah, you love to see it.
Well, and that's the thing is, you know, this position is not like foreign.
This has been the dominant position forever.
Forever everywhere.
And in America.
Forever.
Up until like recently.
You know it was totally acceptable to oppose interracial and most people did but it's like in the last 15-20 years maybe go back even a little further than that with like media and things like that but um but everybody everybody was against it and it was always like you know look we just marry within our own we are just traditional and that's just the way we do things
And forever that was just acceptable but now now everybody's been bullied into submission that you can't criticize it you can't be against it and I'm sorry but uh but I I will not I will not be bullied I will not be bullied by the PC police, by the politically correct mob.
Yeah, I oppose interracial relationships.
I don't want it for my kids.
I don't want it for me.
I don't want it for my grandkids.
I don't think it's generally something that's advisable.
What's wrong with your own people?
What's wrong with your own heritage?
What's wrong with your own race?
I think that's a betrayal in some ways.
You know, I think it's a rejection of the biological and social reality of race.
You know, even if you believe it's a construct, it's obviously biological.
But even if it stops as a social construction, I still think there's value in a biological identity.
You know, this idea of kin, of ethnicity, heritage.
So yeah, I'm totally on board.
Mississippi, very based.
Dumbass says, actually Nick, take a look at these studies and papers written by gay nerds that prove vaping is safe and actually good for you.
Well, I just don't understand how people, people buy into all this stuff.
They think cigarettes are good, they think vaping is good, marijuana.
It's like, don't you understand there's like a whole industry that's designed to take your money to get you hooked on this stuff?
You know, all these people, they understand like, they understand like, as an example, a lot of traditional people understand pornography.
And the goal of pornography is to destroy morality, and it's also intended to be addictive.
And they get that, right?
And it's to steal your soul.
And they also understand that things like sugar are meant to be addictive, meant to steal your money.
They're meant to get you hooked.
You develop a taste for sugar, a dopamine reaction, a dependency on it, a chemical dependency in some cases.
I don't know if that's totally true, but you know, people develop this craving for it and that's how they make their money, right?
But then people look at tobacco and they're like, no, but that's good for you.
It's good for you.
I will keep forfeiting my income for cigarettes, vape, marijuana, whatever, pharmaceutical pills.
It's all a racket.
You want to be free and independent and strong.
No chemical addictions.
You know, that's the thing with like the junk food.
I mean, I like to indulge in junk food because I'm young and I can do it now.
My metabolism is fast enough that I can indulge.
I can indulge now more than I will be in the future.
But it's ultimately in my control.
You know, I've gone months without eating junk food.
I've gone months without eating fast food.
You know, sometimes if I'm feeling dependent on it, I'll refrain from eating it simply because of that.
The goal is to be independent, right?
And it's also to have a strong composition as well.
Crackhead says the buildings free-falling, goyser gawking.
Bush comes on the TV and starts talking.
Says he's gonna kill Afghanis and Iraqis too.
Some come on Jewish people and just bust a move.
Oh, so come on shlomo and just bust a move is what it says.
Okay, that's good.
Samir says, hey Nick, one small thing when you read my super chat.
Can you introduce me as Joker?
Well, again, a little late for that.
Stevie O says, Nick, how long until you start using your Swiss bank account filled with super chat money to stage?
Okay, I'm not gonna read that.
unidentified
Don't.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
It's funny, but you know, it's just not really ideal for the situation today.
Andrew says, never forget building 7.
Yeah, very true.
Dumbass says, pull it.
Okay.
Spurglicious says, 9-11 was a tragedy.
Um, ever heard of the Holocaust?
Yeah, I actually read a very good article about the Holocaust the other day on the UNS Review.
Dimitri says vapes but what about those AR rifles uh yeah that's a good point I guess Eddie Cade says I blame the superior state of Liberia for 9-11 okay This Greek fellow says, Hey Nick, I'm assuming you hear about the surprise vote in North Carolina.
The Dems are up in arms about calling it cheating.
At this point, it feels like cheating is just justified to prevent our replacement.
Yeah, we should have no bones about cheating.
The only thing wrong about cheating in politics is if you get caught.
And I'm not saying that to be edgy.
I'm saying that to be legit.
The stakes are too high to not cheat.
And they're cheating.
We know they're cheating.
We have to cheat just to be competitive.
So yeah, I mean, they got the, in the 9th District, they got the Republican on some absentee ballot fraud or something.
Yeah, I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
Ethically, morally, cheat.
Absolutely.
It's all a sham.
It's all a joke anyway.
They cheat and they're more powerful.
Bethicus says, long journey from Crowder to Peterson to Allsup to Fuentes.
I'm sad that I'm 46 and just now seeing the truth.
1350 is true.
I'm black and I see it 24-7.
Wow!
Well, quite the tale here.
Well, welcome.
Glad you have finally made it to the promised land, to the Knicker Nation.
Welcome.
You are now a Knicker, right?
But uh, but that's good.
You know, very few people, very few minorities like myself.
You know, I'm ashamed to say that my, my fellow Africans, my fellow Latinos, they find it hard to accept these things, but you know, this is how we make life better for everybody is acknowledging reality.
So, so kudos to you and big thanks for the super chat.
Levi says, our accents cringe are based.
I'm driving through the south right now and I can't get enough of the girls accents.
What does that even mean?
Are they cringe or based?
What does that even mean?
I think they're cringe.
You know, I love the Chicago accent.
I love the Midwestern accent.
Midwestern accent is so superior.
It's the American accent.
Everybody knows that.
Certain accents I like more than others.
The Boston accent I like.
The New York accent is kind of obnoxious to me, if I'm being honest.
Southern accent I'm really not in love with.
Californian accent I don't like.
I like our accent...
I like the Boston accent.
Canadian accent I find funny.
The British accent I find to be charming and funny as well.
Australian accent is cool.
Continental European sound like retards to me, you know?
Some people find that attractive.
The continental European accent to me just sounds like you're dumb.
Maybe with the girls it's different.
Maybe with girls I think it's attractive.
I think like with like a French girl with a French accent, that's probably ideal, right?
or maybe even slavic a slavic accent maybe that would be ideal so i'm i'm sort of ambivalent sort of a mixed bag there i would say i would say largely uh non-american accents are based southern accent sorry to say cringe sorry to say look if you have a southern accent that's fine i like you whatever but it's just No, it's not.
It doesn't feel like home to me.
Home to me feels like Midwestern.
Southern to me is just sort of like, it's just very alien, right?
But it's, at the same time, it's not exotic like Italy or France or the UK.
and it's also it's also different than like a real a real city guy in like boston you know or new york something like that like a real a real union guy you know like a real all-american jack sort of a guy to me a southerner is it's like it's sort of like the uncanny valley of accents you know it's too close to approaching where we are but not not alien enough if that makes sense Trevor says I unsubbed from you a while ago because you were too sarcastic.
Then I realized I was a cringe millennial and I didn't get superior zoomer bands.
Very sad.
Yeah, many cases a lot of people have to, you know, a lot of people are not ready for the nick pill right out of the gate.
They have to sort of go away and come back.
So I guess welcome back.
You've seen the error of your ways, but Yeah, I don't know what it is people say, oh it's too sarcastic.
It's like, if you don't get the sarcasm, the irony, if you don't get the strategic value, if you don't get the humor, it's like you must be over the age of 25.
It's that simple, you know?
Gabriel says black woman super chat hello based department I'll be in Miami for the event big guy a friend and I got tickets rhetorical knives out knickers well hey very cool man can't wait to see you there can't wait to see you and your buddy we'll be out there knickers will be out there it's gonna be a great time radical drones as Nick what's your view of the state of our currency It's a disaster.
It's a joke.
Everybody knows that.
I was a libertarian, so believe me.
I've read all the relevant literature on monetary policy, fiat money, the gold standard, these things.
You know, so I don't think anybody can look at our currency and say that this is a sustainable picture.
I think it's like, since Nixon fully pulled this off the gold standard in 71 or 72, the value of the dollar relative to gold has plummeted to like, it has retained 2% of its value.
You know, and you can look at this across the board.
When countries drop the gold standard, the value of their currency plummets.
Inflation is out of control.
You know, so, I think it's a disaster.
Leo says, given the owner, I am surprised this event isn't considered an anti-semitic attack.
Yeah, well, you know, fortunately for the owner of the World Trade Center, he wasn't there on 9-11.
You know, he was there every other day, but that day he had a doctor's appointment.
But the doctor's appointment was cancelled.
Good thing he didn't go back to his office when his doctor's appointment was cancelled in the World Trade Center Twin Towers on 9-11.
And instead decided to go for a walk around the city.
It's a good thing his family wasn't in the building either where they normally would be.
It's also a good thing that like Warren Buffett wasn't there because you know, he would usually be there as well.
I guess everybody just got really lucky that day, you know really fortunate.
Russian Fellow says $6 million is a cucked and goy-pilled amount.
Yeah, agreed.
Rational Red Pill says update from the race policy panel at my law school at the NAACP and ACLU today.
One of them said 1350 was fake and the other said it was proof of white supremacy from cops and prosecutors.
God help us.
Yeah, very convenient, right?
But what are you gonna do?
Can't really expect much more from them.
Broseph says 2020 election is fake and gay.
Tucker will save America in 2024 when he pops the kosher bubble.
Article is Tucker in the kosher bubble on website that James Alsop works for now.
Yikes bro, I mean that's just very cringe.
I don't know this username says never forget the Twin Towers on 9-11 forget World Trade Center 7 yeah yeah good point Seamus says my Protestant roommate tried to get me to go to church with him told him he should go to a real church and he tells me Catholics came after Protestants imagine the cringe I felt great show Nick well thanks Yeah, I don't know what it is with these people, man, but they're just straight-up delusional.
At the very minimum, they have to acknowledge that not only is our church, not only do we have apostolic succession, but we are the oldest church, and we created the Bible.
So, you know, Protestants, it's like, at the bare minimum, they have to acknowledge that their religion is entirely derivative, you know, is a breakaway from the true church.
So I don't know how they claim that.
You know, I guess a lot of Baptists say, like, John the Baptist, you know, and this kind of thing.
But it's like, where did your Bible come from?
It came from the Council of Nicaea.
It came from Catholics.
You know, where did the Orthodox Church come from?
It came from the Catholic Church.
It all comes from the Catholic Church, you know.
None of your breakaway little sects are ever going to convince me that you've got it right.
Ben says Owen Benjamin's channel is back.
Mount the cannons.
Hoist the main sails.
That's a very stupid thing to say.
Kind of a cringe thing to say.
We don't care.
I mean, the guys are sort of dumb and we didn't care about him before he attacked me.
I frankly don't care about him after, you know.
Miss Tony says start wifeying more of these women while they are young, knocking them up and turning them into housewives if y'all want more women voting Republican.
Okay, just all around this is just a disaster of a chat.
Nobody should be knocking up women, should be getting married and then, you know, having children legitimately.
and uh turning them into women sure but you know i i love it's always women saying men just need to men just need to do this maybe women need to shut the fuck up for a second you know and and we'd be better off right no offense i love women i love women and i love what they have to say but frankly it's all these women chirp chirp chirp you know what i think you know what i think i think men need to do this i think many do i think the real problem is this i think the real you know the real victim is women
Maybe you need to realize your own place in the struggle, right?
Frankly?
Dumbass says women.
Eye roll emoji.
Thank you.
Am I right?
For crying out loud.
Oh, the eternal, the eternal females!
It's just always, right?
Friendly Jews says, uh, yo, people in the chat saying, six sticks died from cancer.
R.I.P.
Pray for sticks.
F's in chat.
I don't think that's true.
Levi says, will the wall debate be filmed?
I think so.
Tim W says, would have been nice to get the asylum ruling from SCOTUS, like, say, oh, I don't know, a million illegals ago, but we'll take the win.
I know I hear you, but you know, what are you gonna do?
That's the system.
That's the process.
This Russian fellow says, in certain countries, illegal crossings of the border are punishable under the charge of espionage.
You feel America should employ a similar rule?
Yeah, definitely.
We should totally get serious about it, but I mean, you know, that's never gonna happen.
Big Mike says, it's stupidly easy to make e-juice at home.
The compounds are cheap and available everywhere.
Kids will just use tobacco flavor vape anyway, too.
Such a stupid argument.
So, once you're acknowledging that it's bad, kids should not be on it, but you're saying, well, but they could do it other ways.
Good.
Make it harder for them.
Make it more unpleasant.
And you know that kids are not going to be smoking tobacco vape at the same rate they're going to be smoking Flavors that are obviously marketed towards children.
It's like candy flavored.
It's bubble gum.
It's chocolate.
It's all these wacky combinations.
Right?
And they're just going to make their own concoctions at home.
Well, let them then.
Let them try to order compounds and then it's the parents' oversight.
But the problem is that it's widely available.
It's in a package.
Everybody knows that.
So no, we will not have any of this.
Well, they'll just do it anyway.
Well, you could do a lot of things anyway.
You could do a lot of things to hurt yourself anyway.
That doesn't mean that we should allow multinational corporations to market it and to prey on people and to facilitate it for it to be readily available and so on.
You could easily make, you know, drugs that approach something like heroin, right?
Oh, well, we might as well legalize heroin because you can make Crocodile yourself.
You might as well legalize meth.
You can make meth in your backyard.
Of course you can make meth.
Of course you can do that.
That doesn't mean it should be on shelves in stores and marketed towards children.
Uh, let's see.
Bonebust says e-cigs are for the gays and other people, but they shouldn't be banned by the government.
They should be socially banned by social ridicule, much like obesity and being a cuck.
Nope, they should be outlawed by the government.
Uh, the guy goes on, he says vape still creates COPD and popcorn lung.
Yeah, yeah, so it should be banned.
Dimitri says, I asked my brother about vapes in school.
He told me the kids are smoking super high nicotine concentrated cartridges to get the 10-second head high.
Guess what they call this act?
Getting nicked.
Yeah, well, hopefully we can change the definition of that to watching America first, right?
Getting red-pilled.
Getting nicked now means, you know, getting woke about dancing Israelis instead of nicotine.
But yeah, I mean, I've heard of a lot of stories like this.
And, you know, people that don't want to take drastic action to stop that.
You question how coherent their worldview is.
Oh-oh says happy hump day knickers got you all in my prayers and remember only queers and boomers vape.
Yeah, very true Faith Goldie's lips says our Albanians European Islam is foreign to Europe.
I think probably genetically They're a European.
I don't know enough about the genetic phenotypic, you know Background of all these Balkan countries, but I think probably genetically they're European.
But I mean we know that Culturally, they're not if they're Muslim.
So, I think it's a stretch.
Brian says, me and all my buddies would jewel in the restroom during lunch in high school.
Pretty cringe, looking back.
All these freshmen got me rich, though, giving them pods.
Yeah, see?
Bad.
This is bad stuff.
People like you should be put in jail.
Faith Goldie's Lips says, vegan?
Nah.
Kale sucks.
I puke whenever I see kale.
Whenever you see kale?
Very nice.
I know you're just trying to get me to say something funny, though.
But on an unrelated note, kale is actually not bad.
I know people ridicule it a lot, but I had a kale salad once.
I know, kind of cringe, though.
But it was not bad.
I had one once.
It's all the same to me.
It's lettuce.
It's lettuce, okay?
It's green and leafy.
It's the same, okay?
So, so don't knock it until you try it.
Lone Slob says, even if vaping doesn't kill, it turns you gay.
Yeah, yeah, a few will report on this.
Quirk says, did you see the Fox interview with Overstock's CEO?
Too long, didn't read.
He stepped down and blew the whistle on the FBI Peter Strzok and the Illuminati.
Happened a few weeks ago and the media has buried it.
He blew the whistle on the Illuminati.
Yeah, sounds really based in Red Pill.
You mean he was on Fox News talking about the Illuminati?
Wow, talk about a Red Pill that's gonna rock your world!
How esoteric!
uh muffins or i'm sorry ruffins says your 9 11 memo bit is great add it to the list yeah it's a bit right literal human garbage says libertarians the type of nibbas to let their mom get hooked on heroin and be like it's her choice live and let live yeah you know people dying of drugs all over the place well they should have been smarter Ron Paul says do you understand how pro- It's Ron Paul.
The username Ron Paul.
Can you imagine what the super chat's gonna say?
Give me a break.
Do you understand?
I'm gonna read it in retard voice.
unidentified
Do you understand how prohibition and the black market work?
Ironic you say war on terror is fruitless but war on prohibition would be a good thing.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Okay, first of all, those two things have nothing to do with each other.
And second of all, yeah, obviously black markets exist.
Black markets will always exist, but they are the black market.
They are not the supermarket.
Everybody knows that.
Well, because the black market exists, I guess we got to legalize everything that's on the black market.
Because people are going to find ways to circumvent the law, why have the law?
You know, you can easily, I'm sure, get somebody to become a contract killer using the black market.
We should legalize contract killing because you can get it on the black market.
Do you understand how the black market works?
People can circumvent and break the law.
Therefore, laws are fruitless.
Well, that makes a lot of sense, right?
And prohibition.
I love the prohibition one.
You know, something that has been around forever that they outlawed and, you know, people were drinking alcohol anyway.
That is a far cry from something that is now being introduced.
Something that has not been around forever.
Something that is being promulgated now.
That is breaking out now.
You can't put alcohol back in.
I don't think you can become a society that does not have alcohol when we've had it forever.
You know, in Islam, they have successfully banned alcohol, for the most part.
A lot of the elites get it, but generally speaking, it's not as prevalent there, right?
But in the West, in Christian society, that probably was never going to work.
Marijuana, not in widespread use.
Or at least it never used to be.
You know, pharmaceuticals, never in widespread use.
Vaping didn't even exist.
So, very, very stupid argument.
Things that we can control, we should.
Things that are bad, we should try to take off the market.
Moreover, You know, you have to admit that drugs exist on a continuum.
I'm so tired of hearing this argument about alcohol.
Well, we can't ban marijuana because, well, alcohol is a drug.
I fucking hate libertarians when they say this.
These smug retards.
So you're in favor of banning all drugs?
Yes.
Oh, so you're in favor of banning caffeine and Tylenol and alcohol?
No, you stupid bitch!
They're obviously different.
They're obviously different.
We would all acknowledge, we would all acknowledge that drugs exist on a continuum.
You've probably got caffeine somewhere over here, alcohol maybe over here, tobacco somewhere around there, and then you've got the hard drugs.
We all know that.
Why do we know that?
Because kids eat candy.
Candy has caffeine.
Chocolate has caffeine.
Kids might not be drinking coffee, but they're drinking soda.
And they're eating chocolate.
That has caffeine in it.
We all know that if a child eats a candy bar, it's not going to be very harmful.
Would we allow a child to drink alcohol?
Would we allow a child to smoke cigarettes?
Would we allow a child to do meth?
We all know that caffeine has very few bad side effects, right?
Or long-term health side effects, if at all.
You can drink coffee your whole life and be fine.
Caffeine, the drug.
You can drink that your whole life.
You can have that as a kid.
You're fine.
Alcohol can be enjoyed in moderation.
There are long-term health effects.
Addiction, if it's abused, right?
We know that tobacco, the same thing is true of that.
Probably not suitable for children.
We know then that our drugs might be worse than alcohol and caffeine, right?
We would say that somewhere along this continuum, the government must intercede and regulate.
You know, in the case of alcohol and in the case of tobacco, there's age restrictions.
There's licensing.
There are things in place.
In the case of drugs, it's outright banned or outlawed.
In the case of marijuana, you have to get an illegal dispensary, whatever.
But we all acknowledge that the government has a role to play.
They must regulate.
They must intercede because not all drugs are the same.
Some are worse than others.
They're qualitatively different.
You know, so yeah.
John Paul username talking about prohibition.
Wow, fresh.
I've never seen that before.
I've never seen anything like this before.
But you just got to think a little bit.
Use your brain.
Use your P-Libertarian brain and think about it for a moment.
You should be arrested for peddling this nonsense.
You should be arrested for being so foolish.
Anyway, Matthew says, boomers be mad at the e-cig ban in Shatka.
Communist Nick.
Big government Nick.
I say fashion Nick.
Hell yeah!
Big government Nick.
Communist Nick.
Hell yeah!
Nazbol Nick.
Fash Nick.
Yes, I am not a cringe small government worshiper.
I believe in a big state.
I believe in a big intrusive state that serves the people.
I believe in that.
You are always going to have power.
You are always going to have an elite.
And the elite must do what is best for the people.
Forget all the rest.
Forget all the rest about freedom, liberty, individualism.
That's all garbage.
That's all ideology.
See, call me big government.
It's not even a pejorative.
I say yes.
So you're telling me you believe in big government?
Yes.
Anyway, let's see.
We've got Solgren who says, hey Buzz, you missed the truck.
We're not aiming for the truck.
Yeah, I've seen that one.
That's a good meme.
Hkitty says, do you think that Patriot Weekly review is bad optics?
And if you do, why?
Would your appearance on the show improve the optics?
I don't know what that is.
Tim W says, exactly why women shouldn't be in the military.
Yeah, a lot of things they shouldn't be involved in.
Sydney says, more like the clean shave memo, right Nick?
Ah yeah, the clean shave memo.
We got that one a couple days ago.
Boomer Blamer says, oh but Candace Owens...
I don't know what that's in reference to.
Second account with a big super chat.
Thank you so much.
He says, time for a truly powerful state.
One that saves its children and doesn't give them up for sacrifice to the ruling class.
Agreed.
A great super chat.
A big amount.
Thank you very much.
And a great message.
Totally true.
A powerful state.
Now I'm not saying that I'm in favor of a totalitarian state.
I'm not saying I'm in favor of You know, nothing moves without the state's approval, but we need more.
I don't care how big the government is, I want it to be effective.
That's what matters.
I want it to be effective, I want it to protect the people, I want it to serve the will of the people, and the size of it is completely arbitrary at that point.
How do you even judge the size of it?
Is it by spending?
Is it by taxes collected?
Is it by personnel?
Is it by... How do you even measure it?
You know, the American government is the biggest in the history of mankind!
You know, and it's not shrinking.
Nobody's even attempted to make it shrink.
And you will always have a ruling elite.
You will always have power.
You know, so we just have to wield it effectively and in a way that is going to benefit us.
Kyle says, Big Mac and Coke ban is imminent with that logic.
Not true at all.
White Pill says, Nick, may I please have a White Pill?
We've been doing them all week.
Elliot says, we can't ban DMT.
How will we talk to interdimensional elves?
Uh-huh.
Is that a joke or something?
Todd Fox says you should interview Christian Weston Chandler on the premium show.
Okay.
Bombus says in regards to being obese, Germany created a weight loss program in 1938.
unidentified
100%.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼
Okay, I'm not reading that.
It's bad.
Disavow.
Jesse Pinkman says have you finished The Sopranos yet?
You need to grow a chinstrap beard like AJ in season 6b.
I just finished season 4 this week.
I took a long break from it and then I just tuned in and I finished season 4 the other day.
I'll probably finish it this month or something.
It's pretty good.
It's a pretty good show.
It's just that it's just so much television.
It's hard for me to sit and watch and binge.
I can't binge watch, you know?
It's just not really my thing.
Anand says, okay, so this is all just gibberish.
Thank you for that.
Boomer says, then they trying to fit a $10 super chat into $1.99.
So true.
Yeah, you love to see it.
For a $1.99 super chat.
Super long question, you know, super in-depth.
Really?
Eddie Cade says, it's spelled P-R-O-G-R-A-M, Anglo.
Yeah, totally true.
Goytoys says, Nick, have you seen Dave Chappelle's Okay, I don't, I don't know.
Is it time to put another hole in the wall?
Is it time, are we gonna get another one in the wall tonight?
Have you seen Dave Chappelle's new stand-up on Netflix?
I had a lot of locals on my Twitter say it was good and it made me curious.
Literally within 10 minutes, the guy normalized pedos.
No, I still have not watched the Normie Netflix special and I don't plan on watching it.
For the 100th time, I have not seen it.
I will not see it.
Are you surprised?
John M says if you wear the MAGA hat again come 2020.
I'm gonna make fun of you online.
You'll be the cringe one, dude Australian nibba says okay.
So this is all gibberish, I think Zoomer G says going solo to Miami.
Can't wait to make Knicker friends.
Yeah, I can't wait to see you there big guy.
It's gonna be fun.
Mike says I was an Australian visiting Texas in 2008.
I met a guy who told me Obama was a turtle on a fence post.
He just doesn't know how he got up there.
I'll never forget that.
Ah, that's kind of funny.
That's a very good way to say it.
I would say that he does, though.
I think we all know how he got up there.
It's sort of a naive boomer take.
Incompetence.
You know, somebody who's in over his skis, certainly in over his skis, but I think we all know how he got there, right?
This sort of dirty sort of stuff going on behind the scenes.
White Pill says, can a midwestern knicker get a white pill?
It'd be very... Okay, no.
We did that all show.
El Sibbiati says, yes, some women need to STFU.
No, no, no.
Women.
Some women need to... The simp.
Simp!
Simping out here.
Yeah, yeah.
Some women need to STFU.
Some.
That is why one never sees a women philosophers.
Their minds won't chill the F out for two seconds.
Yeah, that's why.
It's because their minds are just racing with good ideas.
That's definitely the reason.
What is the matter with you?
Bomba says, Have you ever read about the Anabaptists of Munster, 1500's version of cringy communists and heretics, promptly put down by the Lord Bishop in a proper Catholic way?
By the way, I'm a Russian wahmen.
The wahmen meme is not funny, but hey, thanks for the super chat.
No, I've heard of the Anabaptists in like AP Euro history class, but don't really know that much about them.
But hey, I didn't know we had a based Russian female in the chat.
Wow.
You caught me talking about the sexy Russian accent sort of awkward now.
Right, but hey, thanks for the super chat.
Blank says, yo Nick, any thoughts on Bitcoin?
I don't know.
It's good.
It's kind of a complex subject.
It's good in my eyes.
Faith Goldie's Lips says, Catholic nations, mutt Brazil, poor Colombia, cucked France, ortho nations, based Serbia, trad Ukraine, based Greece, based Russia.
Ortho promotes your worldview much more successfully than Cath.
I'm struggling to laugh because like everything about this is just straight up retarded.
Brazil is the epitome of Catholic.
How about Italy?
Italy where the Church of Rome is.
Italy where it's like what 95% white and it's still traditional and they oppose homosexuality and they oppose abortion.
Versus, yeah, Serbia is really based.
Yeah.
I think of really prosperous, wholesome, and traditional Slavic nations like squints Serbia and Ukraine and Russia.
Yeah, totally based.
Tell me, what is the abortion rate in Ukraine?
Isn't like 100% or something?
Based Greece.
Can we even say that Greece is the same?
Do you mean like, what, Turco-Greco-Grease?
Do you mean, you know, Greco-Arab Greece?
I'm not sure if we're talking about the same Greece here.
Maybe Greece was based in Red Pill like 2,000 years ago, but today, really?
I mean, I don't know.
It's hardly the same, right?
Based Greece, which is a poor, debtor nation.
Russia, which is a shell of what it used to be, and the Orthodox Church is fledgling there.
What is it, like 10 people in Russia that are Orthodox Christian?
The rest are abortionists and murderers?
Yeah, Serbia and Ukraine, these are stellar examples of society.
Contrast it with Paris, Rome, you know, great Catholic nation, Spain.
Certainly, they have their fair share of degeneracy.
I agree.
Things have gone awry.
But, you know, let's not pretend like these Slavic nations don't have their problems.
The only difference is that Catholicism is true.
So Orthodox can say, based Putin, and that's about as good as you can get, right?
But outside of that, it's not true.
That's not true.
And these countries are failing.
So, just in different ways.
But I wouldn't say that, you know, Serbia is based in, what, Italy is not?
Salvini is not?
Right?
So, so very cringe.
Hungary, Orban, all these, you know, really, you're gonna say, but, you know, Ukraine's really gotta figure it out.
Who do they elect as their president?
Like, a comedian or something?
Anyway, Bob Sack- and also this idea of we have to choose our religion based on our political views.
Well, that's a secular point of view.
It just goes to show how morally bankrupt a lot of these people are.
Bob Sacamano says 300 IQ take on drugs.
Libertarians are speds.
I don't know what that means.
Do you mean spergs?
Hovert says Eastern Orthodox handshaking Catholic Church.
I have nothing against ortho bros, but I'm Catholic Orthos want to come in and throw and throw punches.
You're gonna get BTF owed The leaf says HP Lovecraft had a cat named Nibber man.
Do you have any affectionate names like that for Al?
No, I just call him Albert.
I'm not I'm not really weird about it.
I you know, just call him his name Jr.
Says merch idea a t-shirt that reads please excuse my gamer moment with the pic of you punching Yeah, that's really great.
We'll get right on that.
Carl says, shout out to my NICAs in Texas.
Yeah, go Texas.
Tim says, smash the degeneracy with the power of the state.
Yeah, I agree.
Technically Mac says, Rudy Giuliani had a Freudian slip on Fox News.
Just tuned in, maybe you hit it, but he said, we couldn't determine how the tower would come down.
Oh yeah, yeah.
Well, you hear a lot of things like that over the years.
I haven't read the whole thing.
I think I read like half of it.
I haven't read the whole thing.
I think I read like half of it.
It's pretty good.
Mike says Nick got his anti-smoking ideas from that guy with a funny mustache.
He's been reading again.
I didn't get it from that.
It's just kind of common sense.
White Sox is ignoring me talking about sexy Russian accent m'lady.
Unless... No, disavow no e-girls, remember?
AJ says Spain super trad and base church plus accent.
Spain is kind of a degenerate country, but the church is very based.
Go away Toys, sorry I can't tune into all 45 hours of your live stream while being a wage slave, dickhead!
Yeah, well, you should have thought about it, okay?
It's an old special, and we talk about it every night, so you should have heard about it.
And if you didn't, that's on you, okay?
Yeah, I agree.
And, you know, to be fair, we're not totally white-pilled yet, but we're just seeing a lot of good things happening.
Immigration and Bolton shit is sort of lightening the absolute hell that happened in spring.
Yeah, I agree.
And, you know, to be fair, we're not totally white-pilled yet, but we're just seeing a lot of good things happening.
A lot of good trends, which have to be followed through on.
But I'm with you.
I'm surprised as well.
And lastly, we have a non who says P. Okay, so that's our last Super Chat.
That's gonna do it for us tonight on the show.
Remember to sign up at nicholasjfuentes.com slash membership to become a premium subscriber.
Only five bucks a month to support our show and to get exclusive premium content all available on the website.
Link is down below.
Remember to subscribe to the channel and give me a big thumbs up.
Leave a comment down below.
Click the notification button to get notified every time I go live.
Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
Central, 8 p.m.
Eastern Standard Time.
I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
As always, thanks for watching.
Thanks to our Super Chatters premium members, everybody that watches the show.
We love you folks, and we'll see you tomorrow.
Again, remember...
on DLive for live coverage of the debate.
DLive first, and then later on we'll be on YouTube for live reactions.
So don't forget that.
We will see you tomorrow.
Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified
Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
It's going to be only America first.
America first.
The American people will come first once again.
▲
Export Selection