Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 9, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:42:38

The White Nationalist Hoax | America First Ep. 363

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:26:49

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music
		music music music Wall. music music music music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music
		Thank you.
		outro music Wall. Wall.
		Wall. Wall.
		Thank you.
		American.
		Capitalism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you here on the show.
		And we've got a lot to talk about.
		We've got a great show for you tonight.
		There is a lot to get into, a lot of news to discuss.
		Some things that are making me a little bit nervous.
		The feature of the show tonight, of course, about these hearings they're holding in the Judiciary Committee of the House of Representatives.
		Always have to hold these hearings.
		It's always hearings, right?
		About white nationalism today.
		That's the subject.
		So we'll be getting into what was discussed, who was present, what was said.
		But it's not a good sign, folks.
		Whenever we see these people getting together in Washington, D.C., and who do they bring?
		They have the ADL, senior vice president, they have some civil rights activist, they have Facebook, Google, they've got Democratic Congress people.
		So whenever this collection gets together in Washington, D.C., it's like my life is going to get harder, right?
		We're going to get into that.
		We'll talk about this move by the Trump administration to label the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps in Iran a terrorist group.
		And there's some very interesting trickery that went on with this.
		This is something that I didn't get a chance to talk about when it happened yesterday.
		But in reading some of the stories about it, reading some of the reports, I noticed something very interesting about the way that it was presented by Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu.
		And I'll get into this in greater detail towards the end of the show, but this was announced yesterday.
		Yes, this was announced on Monday, and Bibi Netanyahu thanked the President for recognizing this paramilitary group as part of Iran's military as an official terror group, officially acknowledged by the U.S.
		government as an FTO, a Foreign Terrorist Organization.
		And so in the English tweet, Bibi Netanyahu says, Thank you, President Trump.
		This is really terrific.
		We love you, and so on.
		And then in the Hebrew tweet, Bibi Netanyahu says, President Trump acceded to my request to make this happen.
		So, a little interesting trickery, and we'll get into all of that.
		It'll be very fun to discuss.
		I think you know where I'm going with that one.
		But it should be fun to discuss.
		Then we'll discuss some immigration white pills, and overall it should be a pretty fun, packed show.
		I gotta tell you though, we do this show every night.
		We do this show Monday through Friday.
		We have these little events, I guess you could call them, the ISU speech, the CPAC thing, the Destiny debate on train wrecks last week, but To me it just feels like the days are blending together.
		Does it ever feel like that for you?
		I'm sure maybe for the wagees out there more so, they feel this way.
		And maybe I am in some sense being assimilated into a wagee type lifestyle.
		The same routine, the same show, every night, the same stuff.
		And so I don't know, it's getting a little bit surreal almost.
		It's getting a little bit...
		Strange, I guess you could say, right?
		I'm seriously hitting the Joker pill, because I, you know, I just kind of go through my morning routine, I go through the routine, I get to the show, and it's the same news, the same stuff, the same clown world, and here we are again, right?
		So I don't know, maybe I'm just losing it, maybe it's just trying to break out of this cabin fever from the winter, seasons are changing, so maybe it's just that.
		I don't know, I couldn't tell you, but it's just feeling a little bit...
		I don't know, feeling a little bit strange, a little bit alienating, right?
		But we do have a great show, it is going to be a fun time.
		Before we get into the news though, because we've got some great stories I really want to dive into, but before we get into any of that, I do just want to take a moment to acknowledge, you've probably seen it by now, it's been all over Twitter, and this was a clip posted by a friend of mine called Zoomer Loyalist on Twitter.
		Good friend, good follower, and now a mutual!
		I follow him.
		He posted a tiny little clip of our friend Tiny, Stephen Bonnell, otherwise known as Destiny or Tiny for short, as we like to call him, posted a short clip from an old stream that Destiny did a while back where he calls for violence against conservatives.
		He says, I want right-wingers excised out of my country.
		I want them to be killed, basically.
		And this is making the rounds.
		This is retweeted by Keemstar, retweeted by Stefan Molyneux, retweeted by some pretty big accounts, Count Dankula.
		Another clip surfaced, basically where he expresses the same sentiment.
		There was the clip from the Ralph Retort earlier this week where he said he wanted violence against Nick Fuentes and people like me.
		So I do just want to take the opportunity to acknowledge, not only did I win the debate on Thursday, you know, a poll was conducted, and Team Right, which was me and Sargon, won 56% to 44%, not only did we win the debate, and our arguments were obviously more persuasive and more true, but we did prove, in a way, to be basically prophetic.
		Because it would have been outrageous enough for these clips to surface about my debate opponent saying these things normally, and it would be egregious because of the double standard.
		Obviously, I get kicked off of Twitch.
		Why?
		Because I say that interracial relationships shouldn't be promoted ubiquitously in advertisements, sitcoms, Hollywood movies, and so on.
	That's a bannable offense.
	Destiny says conservatives should get killed on like 10 different occasions, openly explicitly advocating for political violence, openly explicitly advocating for so-called ethical child pornography.
	I don't know how that could be ethical, but he advocates for that too.
	No ban, no restrictions, no suspension, nothing like that from Twitch.
	So it's on that level it's inconsistent, it would be bad enough on that, but then even on the deeper level is what were we literally just arguing about on Thursday?
	What was literally the exact debate on Thursday?
	The debate was about, and this is relevant to what we're going to talk about today, about this so-called white nationalist hearing, is Destiny and Hassan Piker, who are, I think, pretty representative of the left today.
	You've got a neoliberal and a Marxist.
	They believe that right-wing content should be completely deplatformed from the Internet, and right-wing content creators should be completely deplatformed from Facebook, YouTube, all of social media, because their rhetoric, you see, is inherently violent.
	You can be left-wing, you can do it every one, you can be a communist, you could be a Kurdish nationalist, you could be a Zionist, you could be whatever you'd like, but there's something about right-wing rhetoric and right-wing opinion, which is inherently violent.
	And even if it isn't explicitly violent, even if it isn't openly violent, well, it could lead to violence, or it is implicitly violence, or we can basically presuppose that what they really mean is they want violence.
	So it's interesting that on Thursday, that's the argument.
	Oh, white nationalism's obviously the big threat.
	Right-wing content is obviously especially dangerous, because it is inherently violent.
	That's the argument on Thursday that we make on Twitch, alongside the argument about liberal media.
	You know, media not having a liberal bias.
	And then fast-forward five days later, and we find all these clips from, you know, six months ago, from a few months ago, from earlier this week, so it's frequent, it's consistent, where they're openly, explicitly calling for violence.
	Like, I don't know.
	I don't know what else there is to say at this point anymore.
	It just feels like the facts don't matter.
	It just feels like what's actually true and what's actually consistent doesn't really matter.
	Do you kind of understand what I'm saying here?
	Because, like, we can say whatever we want and we can point out all the logical fallacies, we can point out the inconsistencies and the hypocrisy, and it's like none of that was ever said at all.
	It's like it doesn't even matter that that's the case.
	You know, it's like no matter what we say, no matter what we do, this machine lurches forward with its agenda no matter what.
	And so that was the perfect example was the Twitch ban.
	I don't think there is any more of a perfect and clear demonstration of what's happening in the country than what happened to me this week.
	Because there you see the whole thing in effect.
	We have this debate.
	The debate is about is the media liberal or conservative?
	They say somehow it's about equal.
	We say no, the media is liberal.
	We win the debate.
	I get banned off of Twitch, right?
	Destiny goes to his friends on Twitch.
	Oh, by the way, don't tell your audience about this.
	I'm gonna get Nick banned.
	For what?
	For saying mixed marriages shouldn't be promoted?
	Destiny out there openly advocating political violence, pornography of children, and pedophilia.
	He's fine.
	So, okay, I guess that's normal, right?
	And then on top of that, then you get the double standard with the violence.
	We're going to hold literal congressional hearings talking about white nationalist violence and the only people out there talking about violence is the left.
	What are right-wing people saying?
	Even people like Richard Spencer, even like the most alt-right, Whig-nat, white nationalist types, even them, what are they saying?
	They're like running for weird elections.
	You've got like Paul Neal and Patrick Little They're talking about, sort of, separating off, going to their own area, retreating somewhere else.
	And that's on that end of the spectrum.
	Over here, in the campus conservative circle, we're saying, hey, please, like, leave us alone.
	And what's the left saying?
	Punch Nazis!
	We're gonna throw grenades through your window!
	We're gonna kill everyone!
	We are gonna outbreed you!
	It's just, like, the world's upside down, and inside out, and sideways, and back and forth, and everywhere around.
	And I don't know.
	I just feel like the world doesn't make any sense ever, right?
	Maybe it never did make any sense, but it certainly doesn't now.
	So, very interesting that that's the double standard that goes on.
	Will Twitch take action?
	I don't know.
	It remains to be seen.
	It's kind of funny.
	It took 12 hours for them to kick me off for saying, you know, maybe mixed relationships shouldn't be promoted, but you've got 400,000 views on a video of him saying, I want right-wingers killed and Nothing, nothing.
	No ban, no suspension, so it's very interesting the way that works.
	Very interesting.
	Take notes, you know, take notes because that's what the next 25-30 years is going to look like, you know, and it'll have the force of law.
	But anyway, that's my that's my old pal Stephen Tinybottle.
	We're gonna get into the news here though.
	I don't want to complain too much about that.
	I've been tweeting about it all day.
	It's just so frustrating to see that, you know, because I think on this show we do try to be honest.
	You know, there's irony, there's jokes, you know, when there are things that are crossing the line that I want to say but I can't really say, or I'm not sure about, we'll use a little bit of humor.
	But generally speaking, the show is pretty straightforward.
	I basically wear my heart on my sleeve.
	It's not like we're really being deceptive about what we're putting out there, right?
	And I think that's why even some people have decided to lay off of me, even people like Jared Holt.
	I don't know if this is true, but I imagine even people like him watch enough of the content to say, Here are people that are a threat, and here's somebody who's just trying to make sense of what's going on, right?
	Maybe not.
	Maybe I'm reading into that what I would be looking at it if I were in his position.
	But anyway, we're gonna get into this white nationalist hearing because it's directly relevant to the Destiny thing.
	The aftermath of the Christchurch shooting continues to unfold.
	You know, it started out with the gun ban in New Zealand, and then it was the Facebook ban.
	On white nationalist content, and then we saw that come into effect the other day.
	And of course the reason it came to Facebook first, by the way, is because it was live streamed on Facebook, the shooting was.
	I think people are kind of missing that key detail.
	But the reason Facebook and Instagram is a subsidiary of, or rather Instagram, yeah did I say that?
	Instagram is a subsidiary of Facebook, because those two companies are getting rid of white nationalists.
	They did that because The Christchurch shooting was live-streamed on Facebook.
	So that's why that was the only company that really has ratcheted their censorship up so far against so-called white separatists and white nationalists.
	So they did that last week.
	A congressional hearing was called today in the Judiciary Committee.
	And this is according to the Examiner.
	It says the hearing included representatives from Facebook and Google who were appearing on a panel with six other witnesses, including civil rights activists, the father of two victims of an Islamophobic attack, and also you had the senior vice president of the ADL and Candace Owens and also you had the senior vice president of the ADL and Candace Owens And it's interesting because I watched a good deal of the hearing.
	There's just a little note before I get into the actual substance of the hearing, I'm I watched basically the whole hearing, and everybody was talking about it on Twitter.
	It was trending on Twitter, things like white nationalism, Candace Owens, like the major subjects of the hearing were trending, and everybody was reporting on this.
	But then when I went in to do actual research on, you know, trying to find the facts of the hearing and some of the background information, I couldn't find a single article about the actual hearing itself.
	Do you want to know what every article was about instead?
	So if you Google, for example, white nationalist hearing, because the hearing today was about white nationalism, you know what it is.
	If you Google that, you won't find an article that says, you know, today a hearing was held in the Judiciary Committee discussing white nationalism or right-wing extremism.
	There's no article that says that.
	Every article from NBC, CNN, all the major sources, instead of reporting on the actual hearing, do you want to know what they report on instead?
	They report on the fact that during the hearing, they were streaming the hearing on YouTube, and on the YouTube stream, all the comments in the live chat for the stream were racist, and anti-semitic, and other hateful things, other bigoted things.
	So isn't that kind of interesting?
	It's interesting enough that they're holding this hearing, but then the way that they present it to the public is not that, like, obviously the white nationalists are not really winning.
	If Congress and the biggest social media companies in the world and the biggest political advocacy companies in the country are all getting together talking about it, but what's the article about instead?
	About how But people are being racist in the live chat.
	You've got the head of Google, the head of Facebook, the U.S.
	Congress, the head of the ADL.
	They're all sitting there in D.C.
	together talking about white nationalism and understand like white nationalism is not the threat here.
	We're talking about terrorism, extremism, violence.
	It's so not a problem and even if you take the FBI statistics at face value It's wildly disproportionate in the opposite direction.
	It's underrepresented, right?
	You know, you look at Islamic terror, which is 50% of the attacks, the majority, vast majority of the killings and attacks.
	That's obviously not the problem.
	So you've got all these powerful people together in Washington DC sitting around to discuss this non-issue.
	And that's a demonstration of force to say we're the power here.
	We're gonna make sure this doesn't happen.
	And instead of NBC reporting on, yeah, all these big people are here together to quash white nationalism, they're raising the alarm bell, right?
	They're setting off the alarm because people were being racist in the live chat!
	Yeah, you know, they've got the heads of Facebook and Google in a congressional hearing talking about how they're gonna solve this political problem, which is probably a hundred people strong.
	But on the other side, on the other hand of that equation, you know, you've got people saying things on the live chat of YouTube.
	So, it's pretty equal.
	I don't know who's gonna win this one.
	I don't know.
	I think the white nationalists are taking over.
	Sure, you've got Facebook and Google and the ADL, but, I mean, they've got that presence there on the live chat.
	I mean, any day now, that's going to spill out into the open.
	You're going to see laws.
	It's going to be crystal night all over again.
	I mean, like, give me a break.
	And that just tells you all the buys.
	I guess that tells you, really, all you need to know about it.
	But they come together in this hearing and it's just so ridiculous.
	And I'm trying to give it a shot, I'm trying to give it a chance.
	I always try to listen with an open mind.
	But right out of the gate, you get this black civil rights activist who says, and it's so fascinating, you get this black woman I don't want you to hear what I'm about to say as Republicans and Democrats.
	I don't want you to hear what I'm about to say as partisans.
	saying, I come in peace.
	I don't want you to hear what I'm about to say as Republicans and Democrats.
	I don't want you to hear what I'm about to say as partisans.
	I want you to hear this as Americans.
	And I'm like, okay, well, I'll give her a chance.
	Maybe I...
	Maybe I'm just prejudiced.
	Maybe I'm a cynical old, you know, joker type man and I have all these preconceptions of what she's about to say and then what does she lead with?
	Ah, Thomas Jefferson was a slave owner and you know what he said about black people?
	He said they were dumb and they have no love in their hearts and our founding fathers were slave owners and the whole history of the country is racist and anti-black and everyone hates black people and they call us monkeys and I'm like, really?
	So we start out with, don't listen to this.
	Don't listen to this as partisans.
	We're all Americans and the American founding fathers were racist and American history is racist and it's just all these different data points of racist this and racist that and woe is me and I'm a victim.
	And so that's basically how the hearing went on for the bulk of it.
	You got, of course, some Jewish lady from the ADL doing the usual song and dance.
	Even the guest of Candace Owens.
	Candace Owens brought some Zionist guy named, uh, what was his name?
	He had a very Jewish name.
	Mort.
	and he had Tourette's, which was a little bit comical.
	So even Candace Owens brought a special guest, as like Candace Owens representing the right, ostensibly she was invited by Republicans, she brought a guest, this Zionist Jew who was speaking out against Palestinians in the BDS movement.
	And so even the ostensibly right-wing person on the panel is a Jewish complainer talking about anti-Semitic attacks or...
	Oy vey!
	But it's the Palestinians this time.
	So I guess that's supposed to be like based in Red Pill, Ben?
	Because the real racists are the Muslims?
	So the whole panel is just dogging on Whitey, dogging on Whitey.
	You're a white nationalist.
	No, you're an anti-Semite.
	No, you're this, you're that.
	You know, all the names.
	Really unproductive.
	It was just sort of a partisan thing.
	But the takeaway from this White Nationalist hearing is this is the new strategy.
	This is what the Left does.
	They know they can't use racist anymore.
	They know they can't use Nazi anymore.
	They know they can't use White Supremacist anymore.
	White Nationalist is the latest one they've come up with.
	And actually White Nationalist, to me, is the most effective.
	Because white nationalist is a little bit descriptive of the kind of battle that's happening in the country.
	This pejorative, in terms of what the left wants it to do, is actually very effective.
	Because you think about what the left's goals are, which is transforming the country, revolutionizing it against the traditional Christian, white, so-called heteronormative state of the country that existed previously, and replacing it with this multiracial, queer, genderless, and replacing it with this multiracial, queer, genderless, deracinated, whatever kind of country you want to call it.
	And so to call somebody like Donald Trump a white nationalist, to call somebody like Stephen King a white nationalist, Somebody like Faith Goldie or myself, a white nationalist.
	It's factually not accurate.
	What a white nationalist is in the United States or in Canada, in the North American context, is somebody who wants an all-white country.
	Either they want to make the United States as it exists, an all-white country through deportations or some other kinds of policies, or they want to create an all-white country By carving it out of one of the states through secession or having some kind of breakaway separatist movement.
	But that's what a white nationalist means if you're talking about the strict definition.
	And nobody who is called a white nationalist, Tucker Carlson, Trump, Steve King, me, others like us, want that to happen.
	However, where it does become effective is what we're trying to protect is the heritage, the legacy we are trying to salvage, the culture of a white, European, characteristically European Christian traditional America.
	So in the sense of what an actual white nationalist is, we don't meet that definition, but we are nationalists.
	We are nationalists pining for the olden days, the traditional days of America that did have that European texture of life.
	So is it correct?
	No, No.
	But does it sort of sound correct?
	Does it have a connotation that might ring true for a lot of people?
	I think they blur the lines.
	I think they have this fuzzy definition that lacks precision and they can throw that around and in the framework, in the context of their political goals, it actually makes a lot of sense, right?
	If you're a left-wing person, And you're trying to make America multiracial, aka not white, and you're trying to make America not Christian, and make America not traditionalist, or whatever you want to call it, Christian I guess, then people who oppose what you're trying to do, I guess you could say would be white nationalists, even if that's not exactly what the definition is.
	And this is their playbook.
	This is their playbook for 2020.
	All they have to do is pick a word, make it stick, and they use that as the pretext to get rid of people offline.
	Well, the New Zealand shooter is a white nationalist, and he talked about similar things to Donald Trump.
	And he talked about similar things as Faith Goldie talked about, or Bake Alaska talked about, or whoever else.
	He was violent.
	He believes these things.
	They believe these things.
	You solve for X, they must be violent, and therefore we have a legitimate reason to ban them while not really doing anything that's improper, or borderline illegal, or whatever else, anything that would raise suspicions.
	And so that's really the strategy here.
	That's the strategy on the part of the left, is to paint everybody who is, again, opposed to this revolutionary agenda as white nationalists, and that fuzzy definition, those connotations, Again, in the context of their agenda for the country, it does sort of make sense.
	Who would be rebelling against the pausing of America?
	Well, of course, only white nationalists could do such a thing.
	And, you know, I tweeted about this.
	I said, look, if we're going to have such a big problem with white nationalists, as Facebook is, and Instagram, and they're trying to censor and shut down people targeting political ideologies, we should probably have a precise definition of what that is.
	If you're gonna start banning people and taking away their platform to talk to 1.6 billion people, the most popular social media platform, and they have Instagram too.
	So if you add the monthly average users together, it's 2.4 billion people.
	Instagram plus Facebook.
	So before you deprive people of the biggest social media conglomerate in the history of the planet, you know, maybe ever in human history something on that scale, Well, certainly something on that scale.
	Maybe we should have some kind of a precise definition before we go banning people for falling under that category.
	If we define white nationalist as it's always been defined, again, it is that all white homeland in America either by taking over the government, having some kind of revolution, a secession, some kind of separatist movement.
	If that's a definition that everybody agrees upon, very few people fall under that group.
	Not even the alt-right falls under that group.
	I don't even think they define themselves as that alt-right.
	I'm not sure.
	I'm not one to speak for them, but I'm pretty sure people that are in that camp have been countersignaling that stuff for a little while now, and I'm not trying to go out to bat for them.
	You know my feelings on them, but I'm talking about even them who are seen as, you know, the new neo-Nazis or whatever.
	Even they are not really in that camp.
	So if that's the case, then you see it for exactly what it is, which is a pretext just to kick people Offline.
	And people say, well, what's wrong with white nationalism?
	What's wrong with white identity?
	They call anybody who speaks out in favor of the white man a white nationalist.
	That may all be fine and well.
	Maybe it is normal and natural to say that perhaps white people should have a homeland somewhere.
	Perhaps that's in Europe.
	Perhaps that's a European country.
	Who knows?
	While it's fine and well to say maybe that's a rational thing to say and shouldn't be censored, you understand the kind of pressure that we're under now.
	Where if you're a white nationalist, they're going to kick you off Facebook and probably soon YouTube and probably soon Twitter.
	And Elizabeth Warren says she's going to start prosecuting white nationalists and all the rest.
	And so you see very quickly what is happening to the country.
	It's no longer really even about ideology.
	It's no longer really about even violence.
	What it's about is politics.
	It's about power.
	And Candace Owens, I disagreed with a lot of what she said in the hearing today, but she's very tough.
	I think she's a very sharp and tough cookie.
	But I think she hit the nail on the head in the beginning when she said, you know, this really isn't about racism or anything.
	What this is about is power and control.
	This is the Democrat playbook for 2020.
	And I think that's basically true.
	What this is about at this point is jailing and shutting down political dissents, your political enemies.
	That's all it is.
	It would be the equivalent of if the Republicans got control of the government, and they got control of the media, and they got control of the big social media companies in Silicon Valley, and they got control of Wall Street, and they said, um, we're now gonna ban communists from our platform.
	Everybody who wants universal healthcare is a communist.
	Everybody who wants universal education is a communist.
	Everybody who wants a social safety net is a communist.
	And communists kill people.
	Like in Russia, or like in Venezuela.
	And therefore, we're gonna ban communists.
	Do you understand?
	That would be the equivalent, that would be the analog on the right side.
	People on the left don't really understand that.
	I think the useful idiots, the shock troops on the ground don't really understand that.
	The message of this show, the message of I think a lot of people on the right at this point is this.
	Demographic change is here.
	It's already arrived.
	You know, whether we stop immigration, all of it tomorrow, or we stopped it yesterday, or a week ago, or even five years ago, all the same, our demographic destiny will arrive by 2040 just because of the fertility rates, and everybody knows that.
	We're going to have to accept that this is the way our country is now.
	And that's the way it's going to be for the foreseeable future in the short to medium term.
	And so coming to grips with that, people like myself are not out there saying, we have to drive them out!
	We have to do mass deportations!
	Nobody, I don't think I've ever said anything close to that on the show.
	I think I've mocked that sort of proposition before.
	All we say, and even people like Tucker Carlson, Donald Trump, people on Fox, people in the Republican Party, is we have these radical changes occurring.
	Demographic, technological, economic, social.
	Things are changing very quickly across the board on a tremendous scale.
	And how are we going to return to normalcy?
	How How are we going to get a grip on our society?
	How are we going to prevent things from spiraling out of control into violence, into some kind of horrible instability, some kind of cataclysmic event?
	How are we going to basically slow things down and Normalize things.
	I think that's the task of the show.
	That's all we've talked about is how do we accommodate these changes using laws to target technology, using laws to look at diversity, and is this a good thing?
	How can we mitigate the adverse effects?
	You know, and I don't understand how somebody could watch this show and interpret a message like that as crypto white nationalist.
	Well, he's saying that white nationalism is out of the cards and impractical and he's, you know, making cogent arguments against it.
	But secretly?
	No, he wants it, though.
	But secretly, I know he's saying that we have to live with this and we have to find political solutions and accommodate what's going on and try to negotiate a settlement.
	But what he really means is, I don't understand how that happens, so...
	In spite of all my pleas, in spite of all the arguments made against this, I have the feeling that our days here are numbered.
	I have a feeling that the clock is going to run out sooner rather than later.
	I thought for a long time we'd be able to stay alive and survive just so long as we kept the message clean and focused.
	Uh, sort of moderate to an extent or ironic if we're gonna, you know, try and push the envelope a little bit, but I fear now that there's really just no room for any kind of dissent.
	You're either on board with all of it, hardcore, you know, full-throated, or you're the enemy of the state.
	Either you not only want diversity, you want as much of it as possible.
	There are no downsides.
	And we have to have it as quickly as possible, as frequently, and so on.
	And not only are mixed marriages a good thing, but you have to be in one.
	And you have to be in favor of them being promoted.
	And actually they're better.
	I mean, do you understand?
	There's just no room for any kind of moderation or any kind of dissent in the other direction.
	And if that's the case, and it's looking to be that way, if they're all getting together and crafting new regulations and policies, talking about steps in the right direction, I have a feeling our days are numbered.
	So, it's not good to see congressional hearings happening about this stuff.
	And understand, like, we've got a lot going on, too.
	Understand that they even have a hearing like this kind of says it all.
	You know, and this is what they do.
	People who write for the biggest publications in the country, people who run the biggest social media platforms in the world, they get together and talk about how they're afraid of white nationalist violence spiraling out of control.
	Really?
	Don't you perceive a little bit of asymmetry there?
	I can't imagine how Jeff Bezos, Mark Zuckerberg, and the head of Apple, and the head of Google, and the head of all these companies get together, and the heads of NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN, all the major media companies, and all the Democratic politicians, and all the Wall Street people, I can't imagine how they all get together in a room, scratching their heads and wondering, you know, how are we going to stop a hundred people in Appalachia?
	How are we going to stop a thousand people dispersed all throughout the country Posting these memes online.
	I mean, yeah, I'm Mark Zuckerberg, I'm worth $50 billion, you're Jeff Bezos, you're worth $150 billion, you control the market share of 50% of the printed books in the country, and yeah, Google controls YouTube, which is the number one You know, video hosting on the web and the number one search website on the web.
	But, I mean, these guys are being really racist in the live chat.
	It seems like no matter what we do, we can't stop them from posting videos where they spell out the n-word.
	I just don't know what we're going to do.
	Our hands are tied.
	And all the hall monitors, all the enforcers, people like Jared Hull, Christopher Mathias, they really do feel like Like, they are the underdogs.
	They really do feel like they're the ones going up against Leviathan, going up against the Golem.
	Like, how does that happen?
	How does the... Again, it's the ADL, Google, and Facebook sitting down at the House of Representatives, and they're all really scratching their heads.
	How can we stop a thousand white nationals in the country?
	Gee, that's a tough one.
	Good luck, you're gonna need it out there with, you know, the number one platforms in the history of mankind for political speech.
	It just blows me away, and that's the kind of double-think that occurs.
	We're getting together, we're all really stressed out having this hearing, as if that's, you know, even remotely what people are concerned about on the day-to-day.
	Never mind automation.
	Never mind the debt.
	Never mind immigration.
	Never mind crime.
	The drug epidemic.
	We're gonna hold a hearing on a white nationalist terror attack that happened in New Zealand.
	One out of maybe ten notable ones that have occurred in the last 30 years.
	So, I think that says it all right there.
	So that's the white nationalist hearings.
	I'm not a white nationalist.
	I'm not.
	I'm not a white nationalist.
	I'm not.
	Do I really look like a guy with a plan?
	Do I really look like a guy with a plan, Jared Holt?
	I'm like a dog chasing a car.
	I wouldn't know what to do with it if I caught it, okay?
	That's how I feel sometimes.
	Jared, why don't you introduce a little anarchy?
	Will you DM me?
	Okay?
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So that's the white nationalist hearings.
		Our next topic is just as interesting, okay?
		Even better.
		Even better than the last.
		On a different note, here we have the same old song and dance here with our President Donald Trump.
		This was reported by Fox News on Monday.
		President Donald Trump formally designated Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a foreign terrorist organization.
		This designation will do nothing to limit the IRGC's malign activities, but it may criminalize the activities of millions of Iranians and foreign tourists.
		So basically, if you're not familiar, in Iran, they have two different and distinct branches of their military, or two different sections.
		You have the Iranian military, which answers to the government, which answers to the head of government, which is the president, Hassan Rouhani.
		And then you have the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
		which answers to the supreme leader, Ayatollah, what is it, Kamenei at this point.
		And so you have two distinct militaries with two distinct purposes.
		The normal military, which serves the head of government, is tasked with all the normal responsibilities of national security.
		The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps serves at the pleasure of the supreme leader to protect the Islamic Revolution and the ideas embodied within it.
		So you see them operating in Iraq, operating in Syria, operating abroad, also within and having a big vested interest in companies.
		Basically their job is to make sure that the whole reason for the Islamic Revolution, all these Islamic tenets that motivated the revolution, are carried out and sustained and protected and made sure to be pure.
		And so that's just a little distinction on the difference.
		And so the president declared that paramilitary group, which essentially functions as part of Iran's military, he says that they're a terrorist group.
		So that would be like if Iran said that the Secret Service was a terrorist group.
		And Iran did say the Central Command of the Department of Defense is a terrorist group.
		But I guess a more proper equivalent would be if Iran or a country like Russia said that the CIA is a terrorist group.
		I mean, so it's a pretty big step.
		Nothing like that has ever been done before.
		That a section of a nation's military has been called a terrorist group.
		But the President did that.
		Trump said his administration's unprecedented designation recognizes the reality that Iran is not only a state sponsor of terrorism, but that the IRGC actively participates in finances and promotes terrorism as a tool of statecraft.
		This is according to CNN.
		Labeling the guards as a terrorist organization will allow the U.S.
		to impose further sanctions, particularly affecting the business sector given the IRGC's involvement in Iran's economy.
		So, this stuff isn't really that important.
		You know, this could be perceived in one way as a continuation of the strategy of containment on Iran.
		The Trump doctrine says that we're going to contain countries like Iran and North Korea rather than doing nation building, rather than doing war, rather than this sort of de-escalation that Barack Obama did.
		They're using containment.
		So what containment says is that we're not going to go in and do regime change in Iran by going to war with you, by sending a quarter of a million troops and killing your soldiers and things like that.
		What we're going to do instead is we're going to bleed you economically so that things become so intolerable that you eventually come to the table and you surrender, or things will get so bad that the people in your country will overthrow your government.
		And that's what containment says.
		We're going to isolate you.
		We're going to cut off your economy.
		We're going to embargo you, and we're going to punish you to the point that you're going to surrender, or you'll be forced to surrender.
		Regime change will come from within.
		And we did that with North Korea, and they surrendered.
		They said, we're going to denuclearize.
		With Iran, they're still resisting us.
		So, on the one hand, you could say that this is the continuation of that policy.
		we're just escalating the traditional Trump doctrine, which he's been pursuing for two years, which is containment.
		He's already maxed out on sanctions, already maxed out on just about everything he can do to cut off their economy.
		And so you could say that sanctioning the IRGC or declaring them a terrorist organization is just the next logical step.
		That's one way to look at it.
		It doesn't really make a lot of sense when you consider the timing.
		When you consider the timing, another explanation is probably more accurate.
		Another way to look at it is just another concession to Israel.
		You could look at it as another part of the sanctions regime against Iran, which is part of our American interest to denuclearize Iran, or you could perceive it as a series of desperate Hail Mary attempts by the Trump administration to shore up Benjamin Netanyahu in his re-election bid in the Israeli elections, which were today.
		Now if you look at it that way, it makes sense because the election is today.
		So we have this action which is unprecedented, which is very provocative towards Iran at a time when the oil market is about to really hit the fan.
		I think they said the Brent crude went up to $70 a barrel because of things going on in Venezuela.
		Libyan production is down because of renewed instability.
		You have Iranian sanctions.
		So at a time when it's very inconvenient for us to do something like this, we're going to provoke Iran Conveniently, one day before Benjamin Netanyahu's election.
		Really makes me think it's almost like the recognition of the Golan Heights.
		It's almost like all the other things that we've rolled out for Israel in the past couple of weeks so that this guy can win his re-election as a criminal.
		And then, even better than that, is we see the response by our real president, our real commander-in-chief, Benjamin Netanyahu, who, according to the foreword, it says, Prime Minister Netanyahu on Monday thanked U.S. President Donald Trump for designating Iran's Revolutionary Guards, a terrorist organization, claiming the dramatic Prime Minister Netanyahu on Monday thanked U.S. President Donald Trump for designating Iran's Revolutionary Tehran came at his request.
		So I'll read you his tweet in English.
		After this policy is carried out, Netanyahu responds on Twitter with one English tweet, and then one Hebrew tweet, and see if he can spot the difference.
	It's very subtle, but see if you can spot the difference between Netanyahu's English tweet thanking the president for recognizing the IRGC as a terrorist organization And the Hebrew tweet thanking the president for recognizing the IRGC as a terrorist group.
	In English, he says, Thank you, Donald Trump, for your decision to designate the Islamic Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization.
	Once again, you are keeping the world safe from Iranian aggression and terrorism.
	Okay, fair enough.
	And now the Hebrew tweet translated into English.
	Thank you my dear friend the President Donald Trump for having decided to announce Iran's Revolutionary Guards as a terrorist organization.
	Thank you for the answer to another important request.
	That serves the interests of our country and the region.
	We will continue to act together in any way against the Iranian regime that threatens the state of Israel, the United States, and the peace of the world.
	So it's interesting.
	In English he says, uh, thanks for your decision, you're keeping the world safe.
	In the Hebrew tweet it says, thank you for your decision, thanks for answering my request.
	Very different message.
	Very different message, don't you think?
	One is obviously saying, sort of incidentally, this is a step in the right direction.
	Good on you, my man.
	We are working together as equals.
	The other statement says, good dog.
	Wow!
	Good boy!
	You did it!
unidentified		You did it!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You recognize them as a terrorist group.
		Thank you for following my commands.
		That was really great.
		One is a relationship of equals.
		The other is obviously, One of a subordinate and the boss.
		One is the big boss man, Benjamin Netanyahu calling the shots from Jerusalem.
		And the other is, you know, he's just a client of America, as many would like to believe.
		Look folks, it doesn't get more obvious than this.
		Why are we conducting our foreign policy in this manner?
		We have people overseas that are dying.
		We have a $700 billion defense budget so that we could shore up this military, and this is how the president treats it?
		Basically, as an extension, as an arm for a foreign country, for Israel?
		That's what's going on.
		What do you think?
		Recognizing the Golan Heights and Israel's sovereignty over it, what do you think that was part of?
		What do you think this move is a part of?
		What do you think everything that's been done in the past six months has been a part of?
		Moving the embassy, recognizing Jerusalem, all the rest, affirming the foreign aid, attacking Ilhan Omar, attending AIPAC, it's all part of the same thing.
		This president, just like every other president, but maybe more so than any other president, is using our State Department, is using our Defense Department, as an extension of Benjamin Netanyahu's administration.
		He's using it in order to get Benjamin Netanyahu elected.
		Why?
		Why does that matter to the American people?
		Is this something that helps Americans?
		Actually, it doesn't.
		Tearing up the Iranian nuclear deal, recognizing their paramilitary group as a terrorist organization, does not help.
		If you're trying to bring Iran to the table you're going to want to sanction them but you're also going to want to facilitate some kind of negotiation in the same way that we did with North Korea.
		But Israel doesn't want that and therefore our president doesn't want that.
		The same could be said of our policy in Syria.
		The proper America first response would be Assad should stay so long as he cooperates with America.
		It really doesn't matter so long as the country is stable and cooperative.
		But that just won't do for Israel.
		They have to have their little piece of land in the Golan Heights and they also have to have the country destabilized so that Iran can't build some kind of a foothold there and it has to be destabilized so they can't support Hezbollah and so on.
		And so we remain in northeastern Syria.
		So it's a continuation of what we've seen for the past year and it's just really disappointing because here again, and this is the insulting part, okay, help your ally win re-election.
		Maybe I could stomach that.
		If Salvini came to the President and said, could you do something for Italy, and the President obliged, I would maybe not mind so much, right?
		And not just because I'm Italian.
		You know, if Theresa May came to the President and said, hey, can you help us out here?
		Well, not Theresa May.
		I don't like Theresa May.
		If Orban or somebody like that came to the President and said, hey, can we have a little bit of help?
		And the President gave it to them, I would say okay.
		But here's where it's insulting.
		The President simply ignores The President simply ignores the promises he made to his own people.
		So we say, secure the border?
		He says, we'll wait a year.
		Close the border?
		Eh, we'll do it in a year.
		Can we have a trade deal?
		Yeah, we're working on it.
		Can we have some kind of withdrawal from the Middle East?
		In three months.
		Bibi Netanyahu calls him up, he's probably got him on speed dial.
		Hello, can we have IRGC recognized as a terrorist group?
		Done.
		Done!
		In 24 hours it will be completed.
		And that's the most insulting part to me.
		Because obviously there's a lot of elasticity here.
		Obviously the responsiveness is there when it comes to Israel, when it comes to AIPAC, when it comes to Jewish donors, when it comes to regular Jews.
		When it comes to the American people, then suddenly we don't really care so much.
		Suddenly, not really a priority for the President.
		If you were building the wall, if everything was going according to plan, it'd be a different story.
		You know?
	And even then, it'd be dicey what's going on in the Middle East.
	Not exactly in our interest.
	But you could understand where we would be willing to tolerate something like that if everything else was going according to plan.
	But that's just it.
	It isn't.
	So, it's disappointing.
	And we're going to talk about this a lot in the future, this realignment that's happening with Israel.
	I really do think something is happening domestically with American politics.
	The Democrats are positioning themselves as just straight-up anti-Likud.
	Israel and America's politics are now intertwined, where you have Beto O'Rourke now speaking out against Bibi Netanyahu.
	And understand, Beto O'Rourke would never speak out against Israel itself, but speaking out against Netanyahu's right-wing Likud party.
	So now you have a totally synced up politics between these two countries where it's no longer even about America as a single unit and Israel as a single unit.
	Now it's totally connected and interchanged.
	And so now the American right, we can actually exert, I think, some pressure on Israel.
	If the Democrats are going to be perceived because of Yohan Omar and Beto O'Rourke and others as anti-Israel, we can now turn the tables and say, look, we're the only ones that are going to give you play in Washington, D.C., We're the only ones that are going to give you everything you want, that are going to help you get re-election.
	I think now might be the time to turn the tables a little bit, but it's the same sort of slavish devotion to the same people that we always have been.
	That's all right.
	That's all right.
	We're making some country great again, right?
	Hey, if we can't make America great again, I will rest easy knowing that at the very least we made Israel great again.
	You know, can't make America great?
unidentified		Nah.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Tough luck, right?
		But at least we made one country great again.
		At least we made Israel great again.
		And they're chosen people, so we know we're going to cash in on that at some point.
		I'm sure blessing Israel is going to pay off one of these days.
		That's a funny thing.
		You talk to these, like, evangelicals.
		I remember I had this debate with a family friend.
		She's this hardcore Protestant, and I said, like, I brought up all the stuff.
		I brought up all the good arguments.
		And she's like, um, well, even if that's all true, the Bible says that those who give blessings to Israel will be blessed.
		And, you know, that quote from the Schofield Bible or whatever translation.
		And I'm just sitting around waiting for the blessings.
		I'm really just waiting for the blessings because, you know, it doesn't feel like we're being blessed.
		Like, how much money does it have to pass a certain threshold before the blessings come down?
		You know, because we've given them what, like a quarter of a trillion dollars since they were founded?
		Like, we've been helping them for a long time.
		They've been the number one recipient of foreign aid since 1978, and I'm like...
		Where's the blessings?
		I'm just waiting for the blessings.
		I was promised the blessings.
		Maybe once we get to 500 trillion or 500 billion dollars.
		Maybe once we get to a trillion dollars in foreign aid and military support and everything.
		I don't know what the threshold is at which point we'll start to see blessings but it seems like it's actually getting worse.
		It seems like our country is getting worse and their country is getting better and so it seems like they're getting all the blessings and we're kind of getting none.
		So I don't know.
		Maybe it was a mistranslation.
		Maybe we got to go back in and check and make sure we got that all correct.
		Make sure that we really are precise with the wording there because, you know, I'm looking at the prospects of this nation, the life expectancy, suicide rates, drug abuse.
		I'm looking at GDP, wealth, everything else.
		It's just it's really not working out so much.
		I really don't see a lot of blessings in our future.
		60 million immigrants in 60 years.
		I think they're gonna bring a little bit something other than blessings to the country.
		So, I guess we'll just have to wait and see though.
		I guess we'll just have to wait and see.
		If we believe hard enough, it's on the way.
		It's coming, okay?
		But that's the IRGC.
		We're running out of time, so I do want to get into our Super Chats here.
		We'll see what you guys are feeling about this.
		I know, I know my Super Chatters will deliver my blessings.
		I know the Knicker Army.
		These Knickers, these Super Chatters, they will go toe-to-toe with Mark Zuckerberg.
		You know, it's like in that Marvel movie.
		It's like in the Avengers.
		We have Facebook, Google, YouTube, and the U.S.
		government and the ADL and AIPAC and all of this.
		We have the Super Chats, and then the Hulk comes in, and it's the Super Chat superimposed over the Hulk's face.
		Take that, Jeff Bezos!
		You banned our book from 50% of printed book market share, but we've got live chats, bitch!
		We got the N Tower on Twitter, and you're gonna ban us, but we got Google Voice, too, so what are you gonna do?
		The country's under our control.
		We're pulling the puppet strings.
		Yeah, you've got 1.6 billion Facebook views, but we've got the live chat, baby.
		We've got Google Voice.
		We could just make an alt account.
		You can ban us at 5,000 followers, but we're gonna post things anyway.
		And, you know, so in short, the war rages on.
		It's a stalemate.
		It's a tough one.
		It's going back and forth.
		Who knows what the outcome will be of this battle?
		I couldn't tell you.
	I don't know who will win.
	I don't know.
	Who would win?
	All of Silicon Valley and the government or a couple of guys?
	A couple of racist guys.
	I don't know, man.
	It's a tough one.
	Okay, we have to read the superchats.
	Yeah guys, could you be a little bit more productive with your superchats?
	jokes to piss Nick off.
	Please consider using your donation to do something productive instead.
	Yeah, guys.
	Could you be a little bit more productive with your Super Chats?
	Okay.
	Thank you very much.
	I can't believe Super Chatter comes out to defend me.
	The See, this is why I'm doomed.
	This is why this is my purgatory.
	Somebody comes to my defense, somebody white knights for me, and I can't help but make fun of him too.
	You know, at that point you get everything that's coming to you.
	I make fun of the nice people, the not nice people, the people coming to my defense.
	It's like, at that point, at that point, you know, you get what's coming to you, right?
	Yeah, can we please, excuse me, can we please be a little bit more productive with our Super Chats, everybody?
	Uh, no, but thank you for sticking up for me, Derriton.
	Thank you!
	You're so right.
	Derriton says, my suggestion, donate with a Bible verse that you think is relevant to the topics in tonight's show.
	Yeah, yeah, that's a good idea.
	Talk about productive.
	These people trying to make steel jokes.
	You're so childish.
	Swag is for boys.
	Class is for men.
	Ever heard of it?
	Let's see.
	Dog Fredify says... For the Super Chatters who like to make Nick... I can't read this one.
	I can't even read that one.
	That one's just inappropriate, but it's a little bit of a twist on that one.
	N-word Fuentes, I can't read that one either.
	Look, I think this should go without saying, but if your super chat contains the word footjob, I'm probably not going to read it, okay?
	Just for future reference, you're going to want to avoid that in the super chats.
	We're gonna try and be a little bit... we're gonna have a little bit of expectation of productivity.
	So we're gonna try not to... it's a family show, all right?
	It's a family show.
	It's bad enough I'm teaching everybody the Italian swear words.
	It's bad enough I'm dropping regular swear words.
	We have to maintain some sense of decorum, all right?
	Collective Consciousness says, I may miss the show tonight since James Patrick somebody O'Shaughnessy is streaming.
	Here's a portion of my neat bucks.
	God bless.
	Well, thanks.
	That's okay.
	You don't want to hang out with some other streamer.
	I get it.
	I understand.
	For Posterity, I have so much heartburn.
	I don't know what that's all about.
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't agree with that point.
		because I'm spitting fire, that's what it is.
		For posterity says multiculturalism could be tried in a new land.
		I doubt it would work, but to make established nations multicultural dissolves the host ethnicity and culture.
		Well, to be fair, America is a new land, right?
		Relatively so.
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't agree with that point.
		I don't agree with that point for that reason because that's kind of what America is, right?
		I mean, established is kind of relative, isn't it?
		Devin Meng says, I got an English major.
		What do I do now?
		Not ironic.
		Thanks for the show.
		I started watching after the Destiny debate and it brightens my day.
		Get your money back if you're an English major.
		I got an English major.
		Well, what should I do next?
		Try and get a refund on college.
		Try and get those four years back.
		I don't know.
		What job can you get as an English major?
		Journalism?
		Teacher?
		English professor?
		I don't really know what hires that anymore.
		Dude, just get a job.
		My advice to the young knickers is always the same.
		Use nepotism to your advantage.
		Exploit your connections.
		this is always the same, but generally speaking, it's save your money.
		Don't waste time.
		Um, and if it's coming to the job market, like use nepotism to your advantage, exploit your connections.
		Don't choose your position based on what your passion is, man, following your dreams.
		Choose it based on where do you have resources?
		Do you have a connection in a certain industry?
		Does your father have a company?
		Does your uncle have a company?
		Does a friend know somebody?
		Do you understand what I'm saying?
		Work your connections.
		This is how jobs happen.
		Honestly, I saw some study on biz today.
		I was bored.
		I was in a situation where I couldn't leave.
		So I was on my laptop.
		was scrolling through biz and I saw some study from LinkedIn that said that something like 86% of young people are getting their jobs through like connections as opposed to applications I don't that doesn't sound right I don't know if that's true but I know a lot of people who they don't get jobs for years out of college if they don't have like a connection so as an English major I would say you know don't waste time save your money get some kind of a job in the meantime
		but if you're doing the job search just try and try and find an in somewhere save you a lot of time Right?
		But I don't know.
		It depends on what kind of life you want.
		Being a teacher's not a bad gig if you can get into a good district.
		You know, the teachers in my district make bank.
		They make like six figures.
		It's, uh, and for the job, it's like you could have a part-time job.
		There's a lot you could do being a teacher.
		What do you work?
		Like six hours a day and you get how many hours off?
		Cause you're like, it's a planning period or whatever.
		And you get the, you get the whole summer off.
		You get a quarter of the year off.
		Really?
		You paid six figures for a quarter of the year.
		What a joke.
		You know, you're really making, if you think about it that way, you're really making 100, if it's 100 grand, you're really making 133 grand if you work it out with the quarter of the time you have off.
		So I know that doesn't exactly follow, but you understand what I'm saying.
		It's really not fair to say it's a $100,000 a year job if you have three months of the year off, right?
		So I don't know, maybe be a teacher.
		I don't know.
		I'm not an English major.
		I didn't do that to you.
		You did that to you, okay?
	Devin, or I just read that one.
	Jax says, my normie African-American supervisor only talks about all the women he wants to sleep with and how marijuana isn't bad.
	He also loves the Avengers and can't wait for the new movie.
	Conversing with these types is impossible.
	Sounds like an upstanding guy.
	Sounds like a normal, fun guy.
	Really interesting, unique individual.
	I hear you, dude.
	I hear you.
	That's everybody these days.
	And that's what's so funny to me is people really do believe that in this free society, it really allows people to become like these individual, unique personalities.
	If we lived in a traditionalist country with oppressive social norms or possibly oppressive laws, you know, people couldn't be who they are.
	Hang on.
	I got a hair in my mouth.
	I don't know where that came from.
	But people basically say that if we didn't live in a free society, you couldn't be who you are.
	You couldn't go to a parade and have, like, glitter on your face, and if you're a man, wear a bra outside!
	What we're finding out in a free society is people are not actually very interesting, or unique, or exceptional, or remarkable.
	People are basically mediocre and basically lack agency and autonomy completely.
	That's what we found out.
	Everybody thought, like, once we get rid of all these laws, you know, I can really be who I am!
	Who are you?
	Like you're nothing.
	You're a follower.
	You're like livestock, basically.
	That's what we've cultivated instead.
	Whereas before, you had people who were disciplined and educated and smart.
	Now you have people who are vacuous, empty, hollow, totally filled with whatever propaganda they watched last.
	Who are these individual free spirits that we've created?
	People who watch the same television shows, people who watch the same movies, people who all have the same opinions.
	What does that tell you about liberalism?
	It's bullshit.
	It's totally wrong.
	Order is better than freedom every time.
	People are not making really interesting, cool choices, really diverse choices.
	No, everybody's just doing bad things that harm themselves and those around them.
	It's just group delusion, right?
	Yeah, so much individuality.
	My personality is I watch The Office and I like eat pizza sometimes.
	I'm like so crazy.
	Yeah, yeah, you're really, you're out of control.
	Good thing we don't have laws against adultery and things like that because we just couldn't keep you down, girlfriend.
	You're really, you're really powerful.
	Couldn't keep that one down.
	And also there's all this propaganda about you're all beautiful humans and just be yourself and express yourself.
	Like, no, you suck.
	You suck.
	You know, you're all so, everyone's doing their own special cool little thing.
	No you're not!
	Most people are totally unremarkable, totally mediocre.
	Most people do not excel in any area.
	If they specialized in it, would not be better than the best person doing that thing.
	You know, most people are good for specializing in a very particular task that would exist in a normal town, like ironsmithing or cooking or, you know, being a butcher or a baker or whatever, you know, being a construction worker, something like that.
	But, you know, everybody's an artist.
	Everybody's a good drawer.
	Everybody.
	No, no.
	I mean, people really are not.
	It's called exceptional for a reason.
	They're the exception.
	It's like the one percent.
	And like everybody in the middle, it's like 10 percent of unremarkables.
	70% of mediocres and 20% of exceptionals.
	This is generally the model that we follow.
	That's why you have to have a structured and an ordered and a hierarchical society.
	So yeah, you know, you point out these types.
	They definitely exist.
	They are everywhere and you can't talk to them.
	You can't talk to them because they're low IQ and they're just totally, you know, they're in the matrix basically.
	They've taken the blue pill.
	How do you talk to somebody like that, you know?
	And they're like, I just like to, I, well, you know, I just like to, like, browse Reddit and, like, read, like, cool science shit on Reddit.
	I like random shit, like, um, articles about galaxies and space.
unidentified		And, um, I like the Big Bang Theory and Rick and Morty.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I really like the show How I Met Your Mother and That 70s Show and I like to smoke pot sometimes.
		Yeah, you're, you're great.
		You're really interesting.
		I'm glad we tore down society to accommodate this.
		I agree.
		Jack says I forgot to mention he's 31.
		They always are.
		They always are.
		Isn't that how it always goes?
		People generally just have to be sort of, um, led.
		They have to be guided.
		This is how the world operates.
		The world is not, you know, just a flat plane, except you're talking about the globe, or the, you know, the Earth.
		The Earth is flat, but You know what I'm saying.
		Social structures are not flat.
		They're not egalitarian.
		They are hierarchical.
		It is a triangle, everybody.
		It is a triangle.
		You know, there are people that lead.
		There are people that follow.
		Everything is complementary and reciprocal.
		It's not just this, you know, Adams, you know, billboard balls on a...
		On the table.
		No, it's very different.
		Drew says, Riddle me this.
		What advocates for no borders yet has so many walls?
		Also, have you heard of our Senator Fraser Anning down under?
		He gives me hope.
		Yeah, I've heard of him.
		He's pretty based in Redpill.
		And I don't know what you mean by that riddle.
		I've never been very good at riddles, so I couldn't tell you.
		Zirconium says Nixon as a boomer.
		I asked a zoomer if there's any point contacting my representative with reasonable concerns about censoring he was at the talk Nah, I mean look people say this all the time call your representative Call your representative and tell them does it have like does is that gonna turn the country around?
		I just never really I mean I Look, I guess it's better than doing nothing.
		I guess if that's going to move the needle a little bit, it's worth doing.
		But are you going to convince me that if you call up your representative, it's really going to change anything?
		Like, I don't know.
		I'm very, I've always been kind of skeptical of that.
		Calling the White House during the shutdown is one thing, you know, or calling representatives when it's a contentious bill is one thing, but saying, you know, I'm really concerned about tech censorship, I imagine as a politician you hear phone calls like that and then you're like, F you, you know, give me $100,000 and maybe I'll take it more seriously.
		So, so yeah, I mean, go ahead.
		I guess it doesn't hurt, but I don't know if that'll, you know, I have no idea.
		any changing, any reforming, right?
		Blue first says, what made Trump betray us?
		Did he deceive us to get elected?
		Did he become compromised?
		What's your opinion on it?
		I have no idea.
		I frankly, I have no idea what caused the turn there.
		You know what it could have been from the beginning is that he was just never really serious about getting anything done.
		Just incompetent and basically unserious about fulfilling his campaign promises.
		I think that's probably what it is.
		I think deep down he probably wants to secure the board.
		He probably knows that this is unsustainable.
		But he just lacks the will.
		He lacks the competence to carry it out.
		But at this point it doesn't even matter.
		What difference does it make if he wants it deep down or if he doesn't?
		The result is the same if you're incompetent and unwilling.
		So I think that's what it portrayed all along, is that he was just never serious about changing anything, you know?
		Maybe it was just a big vanity project.
		Simon Scola says, Richard Spencer has a mustache again.
		Ah, good to know.
	Thank you for the update on that.
	I was curious about this.
	Ryan D says, whatever happened to Yusuf from Steven Crowder?
	Well, he probably, you know, Probably still going to school, you know, not much.
	I haven't spoken to him in a long time, so I don't know.
	American says, I missed the hearing.
	They condemned Jewish nationalism because of its similarity to white nationalism, right?
	They condemned all nationalism, right?
	You're gonna be surprised to hear that they didn't.
	It was just whites.
	The Dimmy says, Nick, you remind me of a younger Jonathan Bowden.
	If you haven't heard of him, I highly recommend listening to The Point of Great Civilization on YouTube, an excerpt from one of his longer talks.
	I will check it out.
	I am familiar with him as an author, but I haven't listened to this talk, so I'll check that out.
	I don't know, maybe this week.
	We're going to be streaming on a new service starting soon that just started up.
	It's based on blockchain technology and PewDiePie is endorsing it and he's going to be streaming there so we'll probably migrate over there and I'll let you know in No.
unidentified		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		There's no hope for people that find themselves on Reddit.
		Garretton says Psalm 37, one through six.
		You're going to have to up the super chat, buddy.
		If I'm going to go in and read it, uh, Salim Fortes has tried telling a friend how Reddit is a cesspool of mediocrity that aggregates its content from fringe Twitter accounts and ruins organic memes, but he didn't get it.
		Is there any hope for editors?
		No, no, there's no hope for people that find themselves on Reddit.
		It is a cesspool for normies.
		And everybody knows that.
		Jen Shaw says, Hey Nick, what's your opinion on the Jehovah's Witnesses?
		Would you dismiss them as wacky Protestants or what?
		Seems to me like slightly more extreme.
		Yeah, they are just kind of wacky Protestants to me.
		I mean, look, we're all followers of Christ and everything, but they're a little out there.
		I met a lot of Jehovah's Witnesses when I was up in Wisconsin campaigning for a certain politician.
		And they were all like, no, we can't vote.
		No, no, it was funny.
		We would come to the door and we'd be like, uh, do you know who you're gonna pick tomorrow?
		Or something like that.
		Something to that effect.
		We're like, do you know who you're gonna vote for?
		And he's like, oh, I've made my allegiances.
		And we're like, oh, great.
		Who are you gonna vote for?
		And he's like, my allegiance is to God.
		And we're like, us too.
		Like, that's great.
		But like, who are you gonna vote for in the election?
		And he's like, I'm a Jehovah's Witness.
		We don't believe in that.
		Thank you so much.
		That's really helpful for everyone when you don't vote.
		Brandon Hanson says, S894 Domestic Terrorism Prevention Act of 2019.
		The bill only points to domestic terrorism by whites and what an epidemic it is.
		Is there any chance this passes?
		Thanks.
		Love the show, big guy.
		I don't know.
		I haven't heard of this bill.
		Probably may pass the House.
		I think it would have a stronger chance of passing the House, but probably not the Senate.
		So, but I don't know.
		I mean, I have no idea what they're willing to do at this point if they have this hearing today.
		Dee Sharps is clown world first.
		Yeah, that's where we're living.
		No longer America.
		Dotar Blormpf says, hope you get invited to more debates soon.
		Gotta keep the knife sharp.
		Yeah, me too.
		We'll be doing a debate on Saturday, not this Saturday, but next Saturday the 20th with Hunter Avalon.
		So that'll be our next engagement.
		Watery says honk honk.
		Okay.
		Simon Scola says did you see the James Woods tweets?
		No, I didn't see it.
		Not sure which one you mean.
		American says if I am a neo-nazi, does that make... Did you see James Wood's tweet?
		Which one?
		American says if I'm a neo-nazi, does that make white people from the past proto-nazis?
		It seems like most white people throughout time have been proto-nazis.
		Disavow.
		This rhetoric is not helpful.
		I love when people do that.
		They're like, so if Nazi is like liking white people, then I'm a Nazi?
		Do you think that helps?
	Do you think that helps your case?
	Do you think everybody's like, oh, now I'm a Nazi too?
	I'm a Nazi with you also!
	I'm no longer fazed by this.
	Or do you think you just call yourself a Nazi?
	I love all these clever noticing goyim.
	I'm a clever goyim.
	I'm coming up with all these word tricks.
	I've got it figured out.
	I've got the latest word trick.
	I've got the latest rhetoric that's really going to turn these bastards on their heads, man.
	Once they hear this little wordplay, they're not going to recover from that.
	So if I'm a neo-Nazi, then are they pro- I guess everyone's a proto-Nazi, huh?
	They're shaking!
	They're shaking!
	You're making too much sense!
unidentified		Like, it's just not productive.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It doesn't work.
		It doesn't work that way.
		Douchebag says, are white majoritarians considered white nationalists?
		Yeah, probably.
		Dan Tastic with a 99 cent Super Chat thanks.
		Mr. Beast with a couple of Super Chats thanks.
		Cassie, Queen of Spades Dylan says Sheldon Adelson looks like a melted candle.
		True.
unidentified		Yeah, I agree.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I've never been one of these people who doesn't like ad hominems.
		I think generally they should be avoided in a debate.
		The way a person treats themselves in their own body reflects upon their morality.
		Yeah, I agree.
		I've never been one of these people who doesn't like ad hominems.
		I think generally they should be avoided in a debate.
		You know, it's like polite, but I don't mind them.
		You know, I don't mind them in a debate as long as it's not like with malicious intent.
		You know, as long as it's not just like nasty.
		So I think it can be fun.
		I think it'd be banter.
		You know, I'm okay with banter, I guess, in short.
		But ad hominem is not an ineffective argument tactic.
		Like you said, what a person is reflects their values, you know.
		So I don't think there's anything wrong with that.
		Like Destiny, for example.
		Somebody passing moral judgment and he's a pedophile.
		Like that's kind of a relevant detail.
		CS says, hey Nick, did you see Mike Mahl's back?
		Also, congrats on the big numbers recently.
		Real white pill TBH.
		Yeah, big white pill for the Nick.
		And no, I did not see Mike Mahl.
		I'll have to look him up.
		We missed that guy.
		You know, when you forget, when people leave, you just kind of forget about him, you know?
		So, that's a great surprise that he's back.
		Nick Poster says, would you ever go on a stream with Patrick Little?
		Also, everyone at Cow is jealous of you.
		Keep up the great work, my guy.
		Shadealay and Praise Kek.
		I don't know which one Cow is.
		No, no.
		Disavow Patrick Little.
		Nasty, insane guy.
		Lauren Rose says, what's your stance on... Okay, I'm not just... I'm just not gonna read that.
		Amir says, Jared Kushner... Okay, can't read that.
		CP Beast says, first off...
		First off, I love Israel.
		I know you do too.
		But I wonder, do you think they would still be our greatest ally with a different leader?
		Yep.
		I think it really doesn't matter, honestly.
		Dan Tastic says, if you don't consider securing and maintaining a white majority to be the end goal, what do you consider to be the end goal?
		What do you mean, end goal?
		There is no end.
		What do you see as the end, my friend?
		At what point does all of this end?
		At what point does all of this end?
		It ends for me, probably, you know, if I'm lucky.
		in uh 60 to 80 years it ends for us you know who knows when well all this talk about end game there is simply the game there is simply the game and you play for advantage you play for tactical posture and things like that tactical wins strategic wins but you know all this talk about grand design end games climactic victories and losses this eschatological sort of thinking it's it's all misguided
		If your goal is not a white majority or a white state, well, here's the thing that I know right now.
		They're basically on the fence about putting people in favor of that in jail, and that's all I need to know at that point, right?
		They're gonna kick you off everything, they're gonna make it so you can't make a living, and then people are now promising in elections they'll put you in jail for believing that.
		So, my end goal is to keep my show going, At this point, my endgame is to have a YouTube channel to do a show tomorrow, or the following week, or the next week.
		That's my endgame as I exist in this moment.
		Politically, the endgame is to negotiate this transition in a way that is peaceful, in a way that is stabilizing without some sort of catastrophe, and then we'll worry about the consequences after that has been achieved.
		No, I haven't noticed that.
		I have not noticed that.
		and sending super chats to look on Nick's face when he stays up all night.
		Reading them will be epic.
		Yeah, really fun.
		God's Plants says, Have you ever noticed that Normie's self-help content is no longer motivation to better yourself, but to prove that you can overcome racists and bigots?
		No, I haven't noticed that.
	I have not noticed that.
	I don't know what you're talking about.
	Tom Allen says, Please debate Destiny again on Ralph Retort.
	I think I speak for everyone by saying your rivalry is top tier entertainment.
	P.S.
	bring back Wacky Steve.
	Can't do it.
	I just dislike that guy on another level.
	I just can't.
	I can't have any more exposure to this person.
	It is going to ruin my soul.
	Domine says they are very afraid, must mean they think whites are more powerful than we realize.
	They know a lot we don't and I trust their judgment here.
	You know, again with this goofy stuff, this motivational, they know our power.
	No, I mean they're just crushing political dissent in my opinion.
	You know, I think it's just a matter of why would you allow even the threat of an insurgency or dissident movement if you could simply not allow it, you know?
	It's like having an aunt in your house.
	You don't like, you know, the aunt shouldn't say, this guy's really, I'm just a little bug in his house, but he's freaking out.
	He's smashing me with a shoe.
	People are screaming.
	I'm, I'm winning.
	They must know something that I don't.
	It's like, no, you just don't want an aunt in your house.
	You just don't want, why bother?
	Why have the nuisance?
	You know?
	And yeah, Trump won the election, and now they're gonna make sure nothing like that can ever happen again.
	So, I wouldn't go that far.
	I mean, it's... I don't know.
	That kind of thinking to me is just like... a little bit misguided.
	Okay, let's see.
	What else?
	We got a lot more.
	Excellent.
	Minecraft ganks has joined the PP gang.
	Yeah, okay.
	I'll do that.
	Douchebags has remembered the Europe is lost meme is 15 to 16.
	Well now it's the opposite.
	US has lost LMAO.
	The hard Euroskeptics may be able to take over or stop the EU with their coalition.
	Hail Salvini and Orban.
	Yeah, you're right.
	It has definitely flipped in a big way.
	Who could have seen that coming?
	Sorrows of a young Zoomer says, secure the bag.
	Never heard of her.
	Secure the blessings.
	Here's your blessings, Bucks bro.
	Thank you.
	I like that.
	That's a little bit better.
	John Torta says, one blessing for Nick in exchange for his lifetime commitment to Jewish sovereignty.
	Okay, I'm set.
	It's just like, uh, what do you call those when you buy it?
	It's, it's an indulgence.
	I give your superchats to Israel for the missiles and I've secured my blessings.
	Lazar says, Hi Nick!
	How open are you to do a video interview?
unidentified		How do I contact you?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Send me an email.
		We'll see, man.
		I don't know.
		I'm a curmudgeon.
		I'm an old recluse.
		I'm a hermit.
		I don't talk to people I should talk to.
		I want to talk to you.
		Like, why should anybody think that I want to talk to any one person?
		I'm a curmudgeon.
		I'm an old recluse, okay?
		I'm a hermit.
		I don't talk to people that I should talk to.
		I don't talk to people that are famous.
		People that want to talk to me who are, you know, could probably help my career.
		I just don't like to talk and people emailing me.
		I want to talk to you.
		I want to pick your braid about this, that, and the other.
		I'm a stranger to you!
		But, uh, yeah, send me an email.
		We'll see, man.
		I don't know.
		Am I just an antisocial person?
		I don't want this to come off as offensive or rude, but I'm just a little bit antisocial, you know, people.
		I want to... I want to converse.
		Like, you know, you know me, but I don't know you, you know.
		It's not... not to be rude or anything, but it's just the way it is.
		So, but, you know, send me an email.
		Shoot me an email.
		njfuentesblog at gmail.com.
		Not very open is my answer, but we'll see.
		West Motorstein says, good evening ladies and gentlemen.
		We are tonight's entertainment.
		She said 69.
		I was dying laughing.
		Destiny is no match for Joker Nick.
		I'm glad somebody appreciated that, because I was practicing that, you know, in the buildup.
		I was in the call-in lobby and I was, you know, like practicing.
		I was like, we are Tonight's entertainment.
		Had to get it just right.
		So I like the esoteric Joker quotes.
		The people aren't really, if they're not true gamers, they're not really gonna get it.
		Deplorable Mike says, 1517 was the beginning of the end of America.
		259 years later before our independence.
		JQ, old news, the Protestant question should be the most imperative.
		Yes, very true perhaps.
		Very important consideration.
		James Russell says Nick Fuentes goes on biz?
		Sometimes.
		All right.
		Occasionally.
		I check it out.
		I like to see what's good, you know?
		Homer Barlow says he's got some nasty foot fungus.
		Great show nonetheless.
		Thank you.
		Thank you, Baby Boomer.
		I like how even on this meme the Baby Boomer is a swing and a miss, but that's alright.
		We love you, Homer.
		You're a good sport.
		Tom Allen says, uh, did you know most of the early settlers in C and S America were expelled Moors and Sephardis?
		So most from those countries have their blood.
		Interesting.
		Interesting.
	David Sperner says history, teacher, nationalism, great connections, great pay, great hours, summer off, more practice for homeschooling and parenting, and you get to teach about the Holodomor.
	Yeah, very, very based in Redfield.
	The teacher is our closest ally, perhaps.
	Hyman says, about a month ago my teacher stopped class.
	We could all watch the new Avengers trailer.
	Another teacher told me you booked a spot in line already.
	So did I, to be fair.
	I got my ticket already.
	I got a couple of tickets already.
	So hey, it's the big one.
	It's the last one.
	I want to see it when it comes out.
	I don't want it to get spoiled.
	All right.
	But, uh, that's fine.
	It's the last one.
	Look, if they were showing, you know, Guardians of the Galaxy trailer, or Ant-Man trailer, I'd be like, oh brother.
	But it's the big one.
	As a movie fan, like, you gotta go see it.
	Nothing like this has ever been done before, where they do like 26 movies over 10 years and all part of the same universe and storyline and it culminates in like this ensemble thing.
	It's incredible, even if you think it's normie tier, you know?
	So, that's my take on The Avengers.
	I'm gonna be... I bought my ticket already too.
	So don't don't take a swing at me for that.
	Connor says, I'm getting a couple of my friends to sign up for your premium content.
	I'm going to sign up tonight after my wagee server job.
	Now's the time to do this, guys, before the clock runs out.
	Very true.
	Very true.
	It's urgent.
	The race against time.
	But thank you so much.
	Another model.
	Nicker.
	Another model.
	America First viewer.
	Who is not only subscribing himself, but referring friends.
	This is our closest ally.
	David Sperner says, the ever-relevant Bible verses are Revelations 2.9 and 3.9.
	Ah yes, very true.
	Spurger says, thoughts on Eastern Catholicism?
	Good, but not as good as Western Catholicism, obviously.
	N-Word says, why don't you debate anymore?
	I debate.
	I debated on Thursday.
	David says, great show, King.
	Please give me approval.
	I, as a Super Chatter of Stockholm Syndrome, please stop making fun of me.
	Oh God.
unidentified		Okay, I won't make fun of you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Level best.
		It's true.
		It's true.
		You have to have a high IQ to understand the banter, to understand the humor in this.
		That's the thing about America First.
		It's inaccessible, which is what I like about it.
		It's not an easy, it's not easy to digest.
		It's not easy to come along for the ride.
		It's a show that challenges you, all right?
		It's a show that bullies you sometimes.
		It's a show that makes fun of you and mocks you, ridicules you and laughs at you.
		It's a show that sometimes is not even technically proficient.
		It's a show that sometimes is interrupted in the middle for 15 minutes or is 25 minutes late or 15 minutes late.
		It's never been 25, 15 minutes late, you know?
		And I almost prefer it that way.
		I think it's better that way.
		You know, you can get content that's on time and has good production quality and is nice to you, and it's, here, let me spoon-feed you your pudding.
		But this show is hard, all right?
		There's merit to that.
		There's really something to be said for that, I think.
		In this age of instant gratification, yeah, have a show that's gonna punch you in the nuts.
		How about that?
		How about that, bitch?
		Can you handle that, snowflake bitch?
		2019!
		And America First is gonna punch you in the nose.
		And that's what the show should be.
		That's what politics should be like.
		We need more of that.
		We need more toughness.
		We need people who host political shows to bully their fans more.
		Time to toughen up, America.
		It's like Joe Biggs says, time to make America not a bunch of whiny A-B's anymore.
		Time to toughen up.
		Give me a super chat, you're gonna get the back of my hand.
		How do you like that?
		No, it's jokes.
		You have to be high IQ.
		You have to get it, okay?
		Look, you have to get it.
		High IQ club, I understand.
		Uh, so, so thanks.
		Thanks for pointing that out.
		Simon Scholes says, James Woods posted a Pepe Brenton Terence.
		Oh, yeah, I did see that.
		That was a little bit, um, interesting.
		Little surprising.
		Very, uh, very strange timeline we're in, isn't it?
		Bone Lord says, what do you have to say to those trad cats that say Faustianism ruined Christian civilization?
		I haven't heard the argument.
		I have not heard people say that before, but I would disagree.
		Yeah, it's disappointing.
		Everybody sacrificed.
		Everybody volunteered, campaigned, spoke out publicly, and Trump himself.
		Lost a lot of friends for supporting him in 16 and we got nothing.
		Nevertheless, great show.
		Lately, big guy.
		Keep up the great work.
		Well, thanks.
		Yeah, it's disappointing.
		Everybody sacrificed.
		Everybody volunteered, campaigned, spoke out publicly, and Trump himself.
		So it's just tremendously wasteful altogether that we went to this effort to get nothing, you know?
		Yeah, I'm with you on that.
	Yeah, I'd go on his show.
	I like him.
	He red-pilled me on the woman question years ago.
	You know, his Dr. Phil appearance.
	We've all been there.
	You know, he red-pilled me on the woman question.
	So, I like him.
	Some guy the Cyrillic again says did you try Oreos and peanut butter yet?
	No.
	No, I don't think I'm going to actually Technology bad says you mentioned in passing about major news organizations filming you for pieces that never get released.
	Can you spill the tea?
	Maybe one day Maybe one day.
	There was a New York Times article that was supposed to get published, there was a Vice article, or a Vice documentary that was supposed to come out, and then the people that made it got laid off so they couldn't... So that was kind of a cell phone, right?
	We all made fun of Vice for the layoffs, and the people that were supposed to make my documentary got laid off.
	You know, when I sent them an email, I'm like, hey, any update on the documentary?
	Spent all day in my house filming.
	And it came back.
	Failure to send notice.
	This email is no longer active.
	And I'm like, what's going on here?
	I emailed the other person.
	Same thing.
	I looked them up on LinkedIn.
	Vice 2016 to 2018.
	They got fired.
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		New York Times.
		She comes.
		She eats.
		She watches the show.
		She stays after until 9 o'clock.
		I never hear from her again.
		She doesn't write the article.
		They come for Vice.
		They take me out.
		They film me.
		They film me here.
		They film me while I'm eating.
		Never hear from them again.
		And then there's another big one.
		They're here for a week.
		Never heard about it again.
		So, Billy says, destiny is a little man with a little brain.
		Very true.
		All of that is true.
		Dareton, still not defamation.
		Dareton says, Nick, please end the show on a high note.
		Read the passage from Psalms.
		There's no greater white pill than eternity in heaven.
		Psalm 37.
		Okay, man.
		You're gonna really bust my balls about this.
unidentified		Jeez.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		All right.
		37-1, because you've asked for it.
		37-1 through what?
		There's no bigger white pill.
		You can take your white pills and you can, uh, you know you can do it with your white pills, all right?
		We're taking the black pill, clown pill.
		White pills are over.
		I'm, it is not a phase, mom.
		I am no longer white-pilled.
		I am flushing my white pills down the toilet and you can't make me take them.
		It says, Do not fret because of those who are evil, or be envious of those who do wrong.
		For like the grass they will soon wither, like green plants they will die away.
		Trust in the Lord and do good.
		Dwell in the land and enjoy the safe pasture.
		Take delight in the Lord and He will give you the desires of your heart.
		So true.
		So true!
		Thank you for the white pill.
		I'm really, I'm really feeling like that these days.
		You know, as literal pedophiles get me removed from Twitch, I'm really, that message is really resonating with me right now.
		Ace Venturis says, John Lott just had a debate with Destiny.
		He was hosted by Red Elephants at their channel.
		Love your thoughts!
		Thanks!
		I'll have to check it out.
		Another, I'll have to add that to the list.
		But John Locke's very smart, so I'll have to watch that one.
		EcoFash says, Thanos is based.
		EcoFash, Ari, Uncle Ted, hope he wins.
		Disavow, disavow.
		Don't be anti-human.
		Don't be one of these weird deep ecology people.
		That's not in anymore.
		Ian Matthews says, I, Nicholas, Juarez, Fuentes, disavow cape shit.
		Saying cape shit is cringe, dude, by the way.
		Saying cape shit is cringier than being into it at this point.
		Billy says I can remember the exact moment I was radicalized.
		It happened during a PragerU video with Steven Crowder.
		Many such cases.
		I think that's how Brenton Terrence was radicalized.
		Louder with Crowder.
		He was a Mug Club subscriber.
		Hyman says, called their audience soy boy libtard snowflakes.
		Marvel Studios is not happy with me.
		That's okay.
		I'll still keep watching that garbage.
		Very relatable.
		Very relatable.
		That's how I am.
		That's how I am at this point.
		Black billed, but you know, let's enjoy.
		Let's just enjoy the Avengers.
		Let's enjoy the antibiotic meat and everything else.
		Let's enjoy bacon, Big Mac and fries and Coke.
		Let's enjoy all of it, right?
		While we're here.
		That's what happened.
		I think that's what got to her.
		Look, I'll be smiling no matter what.
		I'm always smiling, okay?
		I see the funny side.
		guilty by association that's what happened I think that's what got to her Bonelord says Nick you handsome fella you really do look like traditional America don't let them take your smile king gotta always see the funny side I'll be smiling no matter what I'm always smiling I see the funny side I'll always be smiling even if I'm sardonically laughing you know the show's always all smiles even if it's a dark message
		But that's our last Super Chat.
		Okay, now we've got one more.
	Mazer says, can you please stop swearing and yelling so much?
	You said this was a family show, which was obviously a lie.
	My mom says I can't watch anymore.
	So sorry.
	I'll have to... I'll have to change that.
	I'll have to control myself in the next one.
	But it looks like that's gonna do it for us.
	That's all our Super Chats.
	That's it!
	All right, it's 8 30.
	Okay, we're calling it.
	That's all our Super Chats.
	Remember to sign up for the premium membership at nicholasjfuences.com slash membership.
	We're 100% viewer funded.
	We rely.
	We rely totally on the premium subscribers and the super chats.
	No sponsors, no Israeli money, no Qatari money, okay?
	No Adelson money, nothing like that.
	100% viewer funded.
	So we need you to step up, become a premium member.
	It's only five bucks a month.
	You can sign up in the link down below.
	You get one exclusive show every week just for premium members on Sunday, on the weekends.
	Another, another Super Chat from Catboy, and it just says, foot job.
	Thank you for that.
	Thank you, thank you to the viewers who fund the show.
	Thank you so much.
	America First powered by Super Chats like this one, right?
	But be sure to check out the link down below for that.
	Remember, not, not for the, not for that, for the premium membership.
	Remember to subscribe to the channel.
	What a show, right?
	Give us a big thumbs up, leave a comment down below, click the notification button to get notified every time I go live.
	Remember, we are on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	As always, thank you guys for watching.
	Thanks to our Super Chatters premium members.
	Everybody who watches the show, we love you folks.
	And we will see you tomorrow.
	Oh, until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America first!

▲