Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 6, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

02:00:10

Kirstjen Nielsen OUT At DHS | America First Ep. 362

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:41:08

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		music
		music music
		music music music music music music music
		music music music music music music music music music music music music
		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall.
		Wall.
		Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. I'm out.
		I'm out.
		Thank you.
		Wall.
		Thank you.
		Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall. Wall.
		Thank you.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first. America first. America first. America first.
		America first.
		America first. America first.
		America first.
		America first.
		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		We're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be back with you this week.
		Hopefully a little bit more of a normal week, because last week was a little bit chaotic, a little bit hectic.
		We're excited to be back.
		We've got a great show for you tonight.
		Lots to get into, lots to talk about, and actually a few white pills, a few things which are making us more optimistic as opposed to less, which is a change.
		Title of the show, obviously, is about Kirstjen Nielsen, the DHS secretary who resigned this weekend, and so we'll see what happens.
		We'll be discussing that.
		We'll be discussing a new ruling by this Ninth Circuit judge regarding asylum seekers from Mexico.
		We'll be looking at some new initiatives by Stephen Miller.
		But overall the picture on immigration, at least at the start of this week, is better than it was last week.
		So that's a good start.
		So we'll be talking about that.
		That should be a little bit more white-pilling, more exciting than what we've been talking about for the past few weeks, which is just...
		Unmitigated disaster on this issue.
		Unmitigated failure.
		So we'll see.
		We'll see.
		We'll discuss and we'll see what happens.
		We'll be discussing Faith Goldie, my friend, who was kicked off of Facebook and Instagram today as part of a larger policy that has been implemented by Facebook targeting so-called white nationalism.
		So we'll get into that and everything that comes with that.
		We actually discussed this policy when it was announced, I think a little bit over a week ago.
		But it looks like it's now being fully implemented and they're really coming for everybody.
		So we'll get into that.
		That's always a great time, by the way.
		Whenever you see something like that, You know, just like we saw with the Twitch ban last week, you realize the walls are coming in.
		I noticed a lot of people commented on my last show, the only real wall that's being built is the one that's closing in around America First.
		Which is true, that's how I feel sometimes.
		No border wall, but the wall around America First, the noose coming in, choking us to death, that is very real.
		That's the only one I think that's getting 10 feet taller, right?
		So we'll get into Faith Goldie.
		There were some other groups and individuals banned, but I'm not really familiar with them.
		And it's kind of funny because in this BuzzFeed article they talk about who was kicked off, who has been purged from the service, and it's like they've got Faith Goldie, who's, in my opinion, a totally normal, basically moderate conservative by the standards of maybe 10-15 years ago.
		So you've got Faith Goldie, again, normal, well-adjusted person.
		Basically, again, ideas that were in the Overton window 10 years ago.
		And then you've got, like, soldiers of Odin, Aryan army, like you've got literally the KKK on the other hand who are getting kicked off.
		So it's like, obviously something's not right here.
		So we'll talk about that.
		And then lastly, if we have time, we will get to Senator Cory Booker.
		Who today in the Senate introduced a bill that would study the possibility of reparations for the descendants of slaves.
		And that's really great.
		So we'll have to discuss that if we have time towards the end.
		Now again, he's not introducing a bill that will create reparations or, you know, I don't think he's explicitly in favor of reparations because it's a very unpopular policy for obvious reasons.
		But he is introducing a bill that would study the effects of reparations, study the effects of slavery and Jim Crow and redlining on the prospects of the economic prospects of the black man in America.
		And maybe what we can do to fix that.
		You know what?
		What additionally we could do on top of everything we've done already to to rectify that situation.
		So if we have time, we'll get into that.
		But it should be a pretty good show.
		You know, I'm feeling... I'm basically feeling okay.
		We shot a great premium show the other day.
		I think I actually just uploaded a few hours ago.
		So if you're wondering where the premium show is, it's out.
		It's up.
		It's a little bit longer than usual actually.
		We covered the Sunday special between Ben Shapiro and Andrew Yang.
		I know a lot of people just kind of forgot about that.
		Because the Yang Gang thing, it's kind of going down, right?
		I mean, the buzz, all the energy from Yang Gang appears to be ebbing a little bit.
		But that's okay.
		I mean, there's still time, you know, there'll be the debates and everything and it's going to be a long 2020 election.
	But it seems like because of that, people just kind of forgot about the Yang Shapiro interview that everybody...
	Apparently was so excited about a couple of weeks ago.
	So I took that it was about an hour long interview I watched about 40 minutes of it and reviewed it on stream and answered some questions and everything else So if you're a premium member, be sure to check that out.
	If you're not become a premium member Other than that, I don't think there's a whole lot of other housekeeping things I got to tell you the weather is changing my mood a little bit.
	I think America first is about to enter sunshine mode or about to hit the sunshine pill Because people have been saying for a long time, Nick, you're really bumming me out.
	Nick, the show's gotten blackpilled!
	It's, uh, you've changed!
	You've changed!
	Tell me something, anything, that will make me excited to get out of bed and be a wagy today.
	And, you know, normally I just say, I can't do it.
	Can't do it.
	Can't do it.
	It's a bummer.
	You know, we're in a rut here.
	But I'm wondering how much of that is seasonal.
	I'm wondering how much of that is seasonal affective disorder.
	You know, whatever it is.
	Because I gotta tell you, it's a little bit of a different attitude when you walk outside and like your face hurts.
	Because it's 10 degrees or 0 degrees.
	And on top of that, you've got everything going on in the news.
	Versus...
	Well, things are, like, not great, but they're not terrible.
	Like, things are kind of turning around.
	But it's 70 degrees, and the sun is shining, and there's a breeze.
	So, I wonder.
	I wonder if that will have an effect.
	Now that we enter the season of the solar.
	The season of the celestial, as opposed to the lunar.
	You understand the problem with the lunar.
	The cold energy.
	Hyperborean though, so I guess that's kind of the rub.
	But we'll see if summer produces a more white-pilled show, a more clown-pilled kind of a show.
	We'll have to wait and see, right?
	But it's a beautiful day today.
	Yesterday we got some 60-degree days coming up this week, which For some reason, as a kid, I never appreciated that.
	But now, basically as an adult, I just can't do another winter here.
	I just can't do it.
	Right?
	So, glad to see that.
	But, anyway.
	Outside of that, I think that's everything.
	I did just want to say one other thing before we launch into the news.
	I'm getting a lot of emails from Premium members, and I said this on the Premium show as well.
	Very briefly the discord server is down.
	Okay, we got kicked off our server got shut down I got banned from discord.
	So a lot of people are emailing me like Nick I can't get into the America first discord Nick Can I get a link to the America first discord?
	It doesn't exist anymore.
	You can't get a link.
	You're not getting through because it was banned.
	It was shut down It's not coming back.
	So so just just a heads up if you're one of those people But, with that out of the way, I think we can kind of jive right in here into the big announcement that was made the other day, which is that Kirstjen Nielsen is out at Homeland Security, which, like her name to me, every time I have to write her name in the notes, I'm thinking like, white people, really, the caucasity.
	Kirstjen, K-I-R-S-T-J-E-N, Kirstjen Nielsen, like, what a goofy name, right?
	But, This is great news.
	This is a great development.
	Christian Nielsen, I believe, has been the DHS Secretary from the beginning of the administration.
	And so the announcement was that she abruptly resigned on Sunday as DHS Secretary.
	And now the Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Kevin McAleenan will serve as acting DHS Secretary, and that was announced shortly afterward.
	And a lot of people are very excited about this.
	I'm excited about it, but I just want to be extra cautious.
	Because this is a great thing.
	Kirstjen Nielsen, along with General John Kelly, among others, are the ones who are chiefly responsible with the situation at the border.
	Nielsen, Kelly, a few others in the administration have been the ones actively working against the President's immigration agenda.
	And of course, because DHS, the Department of Homeland Security, has a great degree of purview over the border.
	I mean, that's almost entirely their wheelhouse.
	You know, you look at securing the border, asylum, refugees catch and release, this is all under the jurisdiction of DHS.
	When we announced the increase in H-2B visas last week, that's DHS.
	When we're looking at 100,000 migrants coming across the border in March and 65,000 are released into the interior, That's DHS.
	So this is a pretty big deal that she's stepping down because, as I said, she has been the one who has been sort of hiding the reality of the border from Trump, saying she will carry out his agenda but not actually doing it, pushing back against some of the more extreme elements of the anti-immigration or pro-restriction agenda.
	So it's a very good thing that she's out.
	Now that said, You have to ask the question, is it too little too late?
	She's the tip of the iceberg.
	She is one person in DHS, but of course you have many problematic people across the whole department and across other departments as well.
	People like Mick Mulvaney, for example.
	You know, they kicked out John Kelly as Chief of Staff, and who'd they bring in?
	Mick Mulvaney, who's just as bad, if not worse, on immigration.
	So, it's a start, and that's how it has to be viewed.
	I see a lot of people are getting a little ahead of themselves, but you gotta remember, this is a good start.
	Here we are, it's April 2019, two years in, and the border is in crisis.
	It's probably much worse than a crisis, it's an understatement to say it's a crisis.
	And so that we're getting rid of the DHS secretary now, when she's been proven to be a disaster for years, You have to wonder.
	I mean, that should have happened six months ago.
	That should have happened after the midterms in November.
	Or it should have happened a year ago.
	That should have happened maybe months after the inauguration.
	But we don't want to be Debbie Downers, okay?
	We don't want to say... we don't want to be ungrateful.
	It is obviously a step in the right direction, but that's all it is at this point.
	It's a step.
	And who do they pick to fill her shoes?
	Temporarily, is this McAleenan guy from Customs and Border Protection.
	He's just as bad, if not worse.
	And he probably won't be the permanent replacement.
	That's what I'm hearing.
	From a lot of sources in the administration, that he probably won't be the permanent replacement there.
	But nevertheless, that he fulfilled the role of Nielsen just demonstrates the greater problem.
	You can kick out John Kelly, but it doesn't matter if you get Mick Mulvaney.
	You can kick out Kirstjen Nielsen, but it doesn't matter if you get somebody like Mick Alinen, who is the architect of catch and release for Barack Obama.
	So we have to really be careful about what comes next.
	It could be worse or the same, in which case it doesn't really matter.
	All right, but there are some other developments here, kind of explaining the story, how this came about.
	This is from a journalist and somebody named Julia Ainsley, an exclusive from them.
	This was posted on Twitter.
	They say, quote, President Trump has for months now urged his administration to reinstate large-scale separation of migrant families crossing the border, according to three U.S.
	officials with knowledge of meetings at the White House.
	Kirstjen Nielsen resisted, setting her at odds with the President.
	According to two of the sources, Nielsen told Trump that federal court orders prohibited DHS from reinstating the policy and that he would be reversing his own executive order from June that ended family separation.
	So apparently, the President, since about January, has been pushing the old family separation policy.
	Which, if you remember, said that they were going to separate out the children from their sponsors.
	Not parents' sponsors, because in the vast majority of cases it wasn't the parents.
	But separating the sponsors from the unaccompanied minors who arrive at the border.
	Because, and if you look at the data, this is actually a very, very effective policy.
	One of the most effective policies against this particular type of immigration which we're seeing.
	The only time you saw these immigration numbers, if you're looking at the Central American families, which constitutes, you know, the largest percentage, they account for the big majority of the new immigration, illegal immigration that's coming in, it was only during July and June and August of last year, when this family separation policy was in effect, that you saw those numbers decline in any real way.
	So, according to this insider information, Trump has been pushing to reinstate this policy since January.
	Because, of course, what happens when you have this funding bill and some of these other measures that have been put into place, his own executive order, which ended this policy, is the parents and the children are not separated, and therefore they're released into the interior together.
	And that, of course, gives a big incentive for more people to come in and to bring children, because then they know if I have a child alongside me, if I just have a child on my shoulders or whatever, if I just have some kitty with me, that's my ticket into America.
	And I have no problems.
	So Trump is rightly looking at the data and looking at, you know, obviously through experience, what is happening at the border.
	And since January is saying we have to bring this policy back.
	And Nielsen since then has been saying no.
	And this is just one example of why she's so terrible, why it's a good thing that she's gone.
	Because this has been the story of the entire administration.
	Her pushing back on all these hardline immigration restrictions, you know, or lying to the president, deceiving, not enforcing faithfully.
	So it's very good that she's gone.
	Now on top of that, and this is why I'm a little bit more optimistic, earlier I think it was today at like 4 or 5 a.m.
	I was tweeting about how, you know, I'm really not that thrilled.
	I really don't think this is going anywhere because all you have is Nielsen out.
	And like I said at the top of the show, it really doesn't matter if you're not cleaning house all across the board and really getting serious about policy changes.
	To start, but unless there's more, I'm really not seeing how this is a really a big deal, right?
	But then again, we see that Stephen Miller is making some moves.
	I was a little bit cynical about this last week, but this is according to Fox News.
	It says, quote, Trump's top White House immigration aide Stephen Miller Who wants 10 cities to house migrants on the border and is pressing to extend the amount of time U.S.
	immigration officials can detain migrant children beyond the current 20-day limit imposed by a federal judge.
	Miller wants to force migrant parents arrested at the border to choose between splitting apart from their children or remaining together indefinitely in detention while awaiting court proceedings, according to five people familiar with the plans.
	So last week we talked about this, the fact that Miller and the President were pursuing everything within the jurisdiction of the White House, everything they could do unilaterally to button up the immigration laws, button up the border, and I was skeptical of this.
	I said, you know, shouldn't we have been doing this from the beginning?
	I mean, I guess it's good if they start to make these changes, but Shouldn't we have done this in January 2017?
	Or why didn't we do this as it was promised before the midterm elections?
	Or after the midterm elections?
	You know, nothing has really come to fruition yet.
	And that is still the case, by the way.
	None of this has come to fruition.
	We still don't have a good DHS secretary.
	So nothing has happened yet.
	But Nielsen's out.
	Miller's looking at some of these very good and clean policies to ramp up the child separation and extend the amount of time they can detain people at the border and so on.
	And if he gets his way, that will be another step in the right direction to buttoning up the border.
	So, again, we're rooting for them.
	And I don't want to give anybody the impression that I'm, like, white-pilled now per se or that I think the course correction is being implemented, you know, or that the administration is turning around on immigration You know, I don't think that's happening, and again, I'm still not optimistic that that's happening.
	But you see Nielsen out, you see Miller looking to implement some of these policies, and if all of this, again, if all of this comes to fruition, if this bears fruit, if there's some consequence from all of this, then I'll say okay, then maybe we've got something on our hands here.
	But again, as of right now, nothing has changed.
	Shake up in personnel that's six months overdue.
	We're looking at policies that we've been looking at for two years, I hope it's the start of something new, but we can't get carried away, right?
	And then lastly on immigration, this is a bit of a black pill, actually.
	The same problems.
	We're facing the same problems, as always.
	A judge, a federal judge from the 9th Circuit has made a new ruling, and they have temporarily blocked a plan to send certain non-Mexican asylum seekers back to Mexico while they await a resolution for their asylum case.
	So this is something that the president was trying to implement where, again we've talked about this a lot on the show, the chief problem is not so much the vast expanses of border which do not have a physical barrier, which do not have a wall or a fence.
	The problem with the current influx of illegal immigration is people coming to a port of entry and surrendering themselves to immigration authorities and saying that they are seeking asylum.
	So whereas maybe 10 years ago, the problem was people just walking across the border and just kind of coming in and setting up shop.
	Now instead what they do and trying not to get caught.
	Now instead what they do is they try to get caught because they know that they can use loopholes in the laws and they can come to a port of entry.
	They can surrender themselves to Customs and Border or Border Patrol.
	I'm seeking asylum.
	They'll be coached on what to say, how the procedure works.
	They're detained for a short period of time and then they're released into the country because we don't have the facilities to detain them.
	So Trump had temporarily implemented this policy of sending non-Mexican asylum seekers to Mexico while they await their case.
	So instead of them coming across the border saying, I'm seeking asylum and us saying, okay, while we review your asylum request, you'll just be in the country and come back on your court date and we never hear from them again.
	Instead, they're released into Mexico where they're put back from where they came.
	And then it's up to them whether they want to try their luck or they want to go back home.
	So a judge has put an injunction on that, which goes into effect on Friday, and it says that Trump can't do this.
	And it's fascinating because if you actually read the injunction itself, it doesn't have any problem with the president's authority to do this.
	It just says that the means by which he did it was perhaps improper.
	And so this is a real problem that we're having with the judiciary.
	This should have been tackled, I think, much earlier in the administration.
	Because this is no secret to us, this is no surprise to us, the federal judges have been doing this with everything since Trump got into office.
	The travel ban, anything with immigration, DACA, DAPA, healthcare, I mean everything that the president tries to implement, we get a challenge from a court, we get an injunction from a federal judge, and In the majority of cases, it ends up in the Supreme Court, and it either gets turned over, or it's most likely going to get turned over.
	Because in the case, for example, of this particular rule about asylum seekers, if you look at the Immigration and Naturalization Act, the most recent one, it gives the President, like, almost total jurisdiction to end immigration for whatever reason.
	Any kind of immigration, for any reason, for any duration of time, for any, like, It's so broad, the scope is so huge, and so the law is really not ambiguous as to what the President has the authority to do with immigration.
	But again, you get these judges who have a political agenda, and it's in the Ninth Circuit.
	You know, a lot of the judges, they're from Seattle, or they're from San Francisco, or they're from Hawaii.
	I mean, this is various circuits of the federal judiciary.
	They're from these liberal strongholds, they have their own agenda, and so they say, I don't like the policy, I'm going to put an injunction on it, and I'll just invent some reason for why I'm justified in doing that.
	And when the travel ban was cleared several months ago, Clarence Thomas actually put out in his statement on the case, he said, you know, the federal judges, he has said this explicitly, Exactly what I'm saying.
	They're abusing their power.
	What they're doing is not proper.
	It's not legal.
	It's not constitutional.
	And if this continues, we're going to have to put a stop to that.
	We're going to have to do some form of judicial review where we end the federal judge's unilateral ability to just veto executive orders, bills from the Congress, because this is out of control.
	And so, this battle has to be fought.
	If we're going to get some sort of permanent solution on immigration now, or if Trump gets re-elected, we have to tackle the judiciary.
	And I don't know, I don't know if that looks like a legal challenge.
	I don't know if the Supreme Court is going to do that.
	I think the President simply has to ignore them.
	For a long time, I said that would be a bad idea.
	For a long time, I thought that If the president just simply goes against one of these injunctions, it will only build a case for impeachment.
	But, you know, after he's exonerated from the Mueller probe and after this crisis at the border, how out of control not only the border but also the judiciary is, I would say that it would probably be less risky for the president to just try and go against or, you know, in some way challenge it on his own.
	Normally I would have said that would be a very risky proposition.
	He's already in hot water.
	But at this stage of the game, it's so ridiculous what they're doing.
	I think you'd probably be justified in challenging them.
	Because, you know, we have three co-equal branches of government.
	You have the legislature, you have the executive, and then you have the judiciary.
	And they're all supposed to be on the same playing field.
	And they're basically operating as though they are over and above the other branches.
	If they don't like what the President does, they can just veto it.
	If the Supreme Court doesn't like what the Congress or the President does, they can just veto it.
	It's not how it's supposed to work.
	And there's no process to overrule the courts.
	So, that's immigration.
	Some good things, some bad things.
	Nothing is changing.
	People are still pouring into the country from Central and South America.
	You still got a super caravan amassing in Honduras.
	Nothing has changed.
	So, you know, again, maybe a year ago I would have had this mentality of, oh look everybody, it's turning around.
	He's gonna do it.
	He wants to do it.
	But, you know, all of this aside, he's still quadrupling down on bringing in more legal immigrants than ever before.
	And Kushner is still holding court in the White House with the George W. Bush administration and the Heritage Foundation and all these other pro-immigration, pro-big business institutions and trying to cook up some grand immigration deal that expands the amount of visas and foreign workers that are coming into America.
	So, while we may be taking a harder line on immigration, harder than open borders, worse than George W. Bush, Like, I guess that's a marginal improvement, but even in spite of that, at the same time, if you're bringing in more legal immigrants than ever before, how are you really making a difference then?
	Is it even better then that you're having less illegals but more illegals?
	I would say it was actually probably worse, because at least for the legal immigrants, the majority of the population can wrap their heads around the fact that this is improper.
	This should not be the case.
	With legal immigrants, basically they have full legitimacy.
	If they come in, there's really no case for ending this policy.
	So...
	As always, it's not really that huge of a victory.
	We're not even so sure this is going to amount to anything.
	It's such a bad situation that if we were to get it a little bit under control, it's still like worse than Obama, right?
	And then you've got legal immigration.
	So, optimistic?
	No.
	But, you know, we will wait and see, I guess.
	We'll wait and see what comes of this.
	But, you know, I'm not really Gung-ho about all that's going on.
	So that's immigration.
	You know, look, we'd like to see it fixed, but at this stage in the game, it's too little too late.
	The president is not going to totally reform the immigration system.
	That's not going to happen with a democratic house.
	We're not going to build the border wall in two years.
	We're just not.
	We've barely allocated the money yet.
	We haven't even started construction.
	So the idea that we'll build anything substantial between now and the election I think is wishful thinking.
	So immigration to me, that ship has basically sailed.
	It sailed probably 10 years ago, frankly, and Trump could have done things to sort of slow it down, or to change the long-term outlook, or maybe adjust it so that another administration would have to come in and reverse it and try and bring immigrants back into the country, but it was always a lost cause.
	He could have done things to, again, mitigate it or temporarily stem the tide of massive illegal immigration, but at this point it's really too late.
	So the only thing the president can do now, in my opinion, that's really worthwhile, that would have an outsized effect on the future, is tech censorship, which is conveniently the next subject.
	Okay, immigration, you're really just not going to be able to do it.
	Legislatively, through executive order, and even if you did, Our bet is already made.
	Whites are going to be a minority of the population by 2040 no matter what you do at this point.
	Right?
	Unless you started to drastically increase the number of the natives and decrease the amount of the foreigners.
	There's nothing like that in the cards.
	We've made our bet in terms of the demographics.
	So even if we could fix it, and we can't with immigration, it would still be the reality regardless.
	So that's why, to me, immigration is now on the back burner, and the priority is tax censorship.
	This just came down today, that Faith Goldie and other groups were banned from Facebook and also Instagram.
	This is from BuzzFeed, quote, individuals, or rather, this is the statement from Facebook.
	It says, quote, individuals and organizations who spread hate, attack, or call for the exclusion of others on the basis of who they are have no place on Facebook.
	That's why we have a policy on dangerous individuals and organizations, which states that we do not allow those who are engaged in offline, quote, organized hate to have a presence on Facebook.
	And so that's part of their new policy announced last week in the aftermath of the Christchurch shooting for getting rid of white nationalists, white separatists, white identitarians.
	And so they kick off, again, all these radical groups, the Aryan people, the Odin's army, the pagan front, you know, whatever, all these various groups you've never heard of.
	And then Faith Goldie.
	And then you find out that actually, it wasn't like they just came up with his name, they pulled it out of a hat or something.
	They came up with Faith Goldie because you had these Canadian NGOs and left-wing organizations whose job it is to go after right-wing people like the equivalent of Right-Wing Watch in America or Hope Not Hate in Europe.
	And they petitioned Facebook for a long time and bothered them and said, when are you going to ban Faith Goldie?
	When are you going to ban Faith Goldie?
	Faith Goldie's spreading hate.
	Look at what she said.
	When are you going to ban her?
	And eventually Facebook caves to the pressure and they say, you know what?
	All right already.
	We're kicking Faith Goldie off the platform.
	And this is really the biggest threat.
	Forget the immigration stuff.
	Forget all that.
	That's going to happen no matter what.
	The real thing we have to focus on now is basically the endgame.
	We have to focus on, okay, if we're not going to change the equation in the foreseeable future, how do we secure our ability to be able to secure that in the long-term future?
	How do we secure our capacity to continue to spread our ideas and to organize and to create an infrastructure to resist what's going to come down the line?
	And the first step in doing that is to protect us from Facebook, the social media companies, and also the payment processors.
	Because again, I've talked about it a lot before.
	Like, okay, immigration may not work out, but if people like Faith Goldie and others can't talk about our ideas, authentic right-wing ideas, whether that's religious or demographics-related or whatever else, then the left has a total monopoly on information.
	All the next generation will hear, in terms of facts and opinions, is coming from the left.
	They're gonna learn left-wing opinions in their schools, from kindergarten and now, conceivably, from preschool and daycare, all the way up through college.
	And you have to get a college degree now, right?
	That's the direction things are moving in, or where they already are.
	So you've got education.
	We're the next generation they get their opinion and facts from the public school system or predominantly the public school system from the time they're maybe three or four years old until they're 22.
	So 20 years of public school indoctrination.
	You've got the news media which is NBC, CBS, ABC.
	The best you could do is Fox News and probably Five out of seven shows are sending the wrong message, whether it's Shepard Smith, or Hunter Wallace, or Bret Baier, or some of these other characters.
	So who's the only good one on there?
	Tucker Carlson?
	Maybe Laura Ingraham?
	Maybe Sean Hannity?
	So you've got all the news media, with the exception of three shows.
	We've got all the regular media, not just cable, but network television and media aside from news media.
	You've got all of Hollywood, all film, all television.
	You've got Netflix, Blockbuster, pictures.
	You know, you've got just basically everything and probably the majority of people's parents.
	Then you've got YouTube, things like the Young Turks.
	You've got all the political content that is allowed on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, etc., which is liberal, which is totally in favor of the establishment.
	And you wonder how we could ever put up any kind of resistance, how dissent or dissident politics could ever have a chance any time in the future if there's this blanket monopoly everywhere you look on facts and opinion.
	It would be impossible.
	So that's the real threat at this point.
	Demographics is going to happen no matter what.
	But what can still be done is that you protect right-wing voices online.
	You protect right-wing voices in the only place where we are able to go on there without a major radio company or a major television company or a major newspaper.
	That's the only place where a normal person without ties to a major corporation who's in favor of cheap labor can get out there and get a platform and talk about these issues.
	That's the only way we're going to ever turn things around.
	You know, if we're going to turn things around, it's going to be because these ideas spread and they spread by people online.
	And I'm not just saying that because I'm one of these people spreading certain ideas online.
	I'm saying that because that's the truth.
	Get everybody offline.
	Stefan Molyneux, Faith Goldie, me, even people like CRTV, Breitbart, you know, whoever it is.
	And they probably won't go, at least not anytime soon.
	But you get all these people who are based and red-pilled offline.
	And how do you find these things out?
	You're just going to have to get people who are really, really, really curious, and they really, really don't care about the social stigma of looking into, you know, the banned thoughts, you know, the thoughts that you're not allowed to have.
	There's not a lot of people who have the temperament to do that, and they're not going to find it and turn it around for us.
	So, I look at what happens with Facebook and I say, this is it.
	It's the beginning of the end.
	You know, you look at how these things happen, like with Alex Jones, for example.
	It started out, I think, with Facebook.
	Or maybe it started out with, I forget exactly who came down for them first, maybe it was Spotify.
	But it starts with one.
	You know, they make a ruling, and then a couple more will take them off, and then a couple more.
	And then the last holdouts, typically Twitter, among others, will shut them down for whatever arbitrary reason.
	The pressure increases, and then you're done.
	So they take you off Facebook, they take you off Instagram.
	Facebook has, what, 1.5 billion people on it, 1.6 billion people on it.
	Instagram has 800 million active monthly users.
	So already, you're barred personally and professionally, politically, from using these platforms, which are the biggest in the world.
	You know, 1.5 billion people, you just are shut out from that.
	You can't access social media in that capacity.
	The same is true with Instagram.
	You just can't be a part of it.
	And then they'll kick you off of YouTube, and then they'll kick you off of... And they've already done this to Faith Goldie, by the way.
	Demonetized her, you know, put all these content restrictions on her channel.
	Where else are you gonna go besides YouTube?
	Where else do you get video content on the Internet?
	You gonna go on Vimeo?
	You gonna go on Dailymotion, really?
	What a joke that is!
	So you're kicked off YouTube, you've got no options for video content, and then what are you left with?
	Snapchat?
	Twitter?
	Yeah, lots of luck, right?
	And then they kick you off Twitter one day.
	So you can see a future where if people like Faith Goldie are not allowed, or people like myself are not allowed, or people like Jake Lloyd are not allowed on the air, or on YouTube, or on Twitter, or anywhere else, you can see where this will have a chilling effect and all that will be left is Rant Nation I'm fine with demographic change so long as it's legal and all this other stuff and that's the future we have to worry about.
	Us becoming a minority, we're gonna have to get used to that.
	But the tech censorship, that is really going to close our last opportunity to save things.
	So, it's the beginning of the end, folks.
	If we don't get a law, if we don't get an executive order, if something doesn't change, we're not going to be around for much longer.
	Knock on wood, I've been alright so far, but we're not long for this world.
	I don't believe when you see things like that.
	So last but not least, it looks like we will have time to talk about this reparations bill here.
	And this is just fascinating to me.
	This is sort of in a similar vein to the Columbus Day removal that we saw last week, which I discussed.
	Cory Booker introducing this bill to study the effect of reparations.
	This is from Fox News.
	Excuse me, it says quote, Senator Cory Booker on Monday introduced a bill that would study the possibility of reparations for descendants of slaves embracing a push that recently has caught the interest of fellow 2020 Democratic presidential candidates.
	The measure is a Senate companion to a bill introduced in the House of Representatives in January by Sheila Jackson Lee, which if passed into law would set up a commission to study the impact of slavery and continued discrimination against black Americans and make recommendations on reparation proposals for the descendants of slaves.
	You gotta love it.
	You love to see it, folks, don't you?
	Reparations for slaves.
	Isn't that the most pressing issue that we face?
	Isn't that, you know, when I get out of bed and I watch the news and I see the problems in the country, you know, we see somebody with a rifle walking to a high school today and we see a hundred thousand people illegally crossing the border in March and we have a trillion dollar trade deficit and the debt surpasses 23 trillion dollars and You know, you got all this stuff going on in the world.
	Libya explodes today in Tripoli.
	Bus burnings, terrorist attacks.
	You know, I wake out of bed and I think to myself, you know what the problem is?
	We haven't given black people enough money.
	That's the number one problem.
	What's my priority if I'm a presidential candidate, if I'm a political polemicist?
	We simply have not repaid blacks what they're owed.
	We still have to give them more.
	More apologies, more money, more helping, whatever you want to call it, more assistance.
	We just haven't done enough.
	It's been 150 years, 160 years since the last black slave was freed.
	It's been almost 50 or 60 years since they gained full legal rights and we ended discrimination and Jim Crow and all that.
	Uh, but it's not enough.
	It's still not enough.
	We can do more here.
	And that involves just paying them money.
	Just taking money from white people and giving money to black people.
	Now, in the first place, I'll say that this is good, ultimately, for us.
	I think because if Democrats really try and Capitalize on reparations.
	It's a losing issue.
	You know, if you look at the polling, it's not popular.
	You might have some idea about liberals or something, but it's only 26% of the population which supports this.
	Even blacks only support this by like 60-some percent, which is high obviously, but you know, it's not even a super majority like on some of these other issues.
	So I will say it's wildly unpopular.
	Is it likely this will become a major campaign issue or it'll get implemented?
	You know, probably not.
	And it'll probably ultimately be a good thing if we get to talking about that.
	Maybe that'll start to bring some things to the surface, hopefully.
	But you just have to recognize the sheer ridiculousness of this, the sheer absurdness of this.
	How would such a policy even work?
	I mean, you really have to think about it.
	It's sort of interesting how, on the one hand, white people don't exist, right?
	White identity is a myth.
	Whiteness must be deconstructed.
	That is, until it's time to take their money for reparations, right?
	We're all about deconstructing white identity, and what is white, really?
	The definition of whiteness is always expanding.
	We have to destroy whiteness.
	Well, it's funny how quickly they scurry to build whiteness back up so they can take from their pockets, right?
	So they can take what they think they're owed.
	Suddenly we know very clearly what a white person is and who they are and where they live and how much money they make and just how much money we can pull from them.
	Right?
	Yesterday it was, whiteness is evil, whiteness must be torn down, and today it's, uh, I think whiteness is great, and they're gonna have to pay their fair share, right?
	They're gonna have to pay back.
	It's ridiculous policy.
	For obvious logistical reasons, what are you gonna do?
	You gonna pay every black person, every non-white person in the country money?
	How do you determine who gets the money?
	Are we going to trace it back?
	How many grandparents do you have to have that were descended from black slaves?
	How many parents?
	How do you know who was a slave and who wasn't?
	Somebody like Kamala Harris, for example, who talked about reparations, her parents didn't even come to America since the 1960s, so should she get reparations?
	She's black.
	She's lived her whole life as a very privileged person.
	Is she going to get benefits because of redlining?
	Or, you know, some of these other things that are going on because of, uh, will black people get loans at a lesser rate?
	Does she get the slavery reparations even though her mom was Jamaican?
	Her father, I think, was white or Indian or whatever it is.
	Tulsi Gabbard's another one.
	Non-white.
	Parents are Indian.
	I forget the other heritage.
	So, is it all non-white people?
	How many grandparents do you need?
	What if you have three grandparents who are not slaves, but one who was descended from slaves?
	Does that person get reparations?
	And then, who do you get the money from?
	You know, the money doesn't come from the government.
	The money comes from taxpayers.
	So, are you gonna have a reparations tax on white people?
	What about somebody like myself?
	My ancestors didn't come into the country until the turn of the last century.
	From all sides.
	From Italy, Mexico, Ireland...
	You know, they were not Anglos.
	They didn't live in the South.
	You know, they came to Ellis Island, then they came to Chicago.
	You know, or on the Mexican side, they came up through Texas and eventually up to Chicago.
	And this was 100 years ago, well after slavery was ended.
	So, am I paying reparations because I have three white grandparents?
	Or am I opted out because I have 2%?
	Do you see the logistical problems?
	So, that in itself is problematic.
	But then beyond that, and that's really beside the point, The fundamental point is, what kind of country are we going to live in?
	If this is going to be a multiracial country, are we going to govern it based on grievance?
	Is that how it's going to go?
	Because, you know, I don't really have a whole lot of faith in a multiracial country if this is how we kick it off.
	You know, if the idea is that white people have to go peacefully and quietly into the night because we're all going to forget about race and we're all going to embrace this American identity, is the best way to kick that off, holding a gun to their head and saying, pay me for what you did 200 years ago?
	Because that strikes me as petty, vindictive, vengeful, not really embracing of the whole multiracial ethos which is progressing, moving beyond all these things.
	You know, once they're telling us we have to transcend all the things that happened in our past, these tribalist primitive impulses, but at the same time they seem totally unwilling to forget what happened in the past or to, you know, Or to find some kind of acceptable settlement.
	Affirmative action, not enough.
	Staying in the country, not enough.
	Everything else, not enough.
	We have to have more.
	So, I don't really have a lot of faith if that's how we're kicking it off.
	Do you think that when white people are a minority, and the governing coalition in the government is racial, it's non-whites against whites, do you think they'll be benevolent if this is how we are in 2019?
	What's it going to look like in 2050?
	We went from 1965 to 2019.
	Now we're asking for reparations.
	What's it gonna look like 30 years from now when we're in the minority?
	And blacks, Hispanics, Asians are ascendant and they are the governing coalition.
	They're now the majority of the country.
	If this is how they are now, demanding reparations, we want money, we want you to pay us back for all these things you did to us before.
	What's it going to be like in 2050 when they run the show, when they run the Congress and the White House and everything else?
	Are they really going to be nice?
	Are they really going to be concerned about the rights of the minority, which will then be white people?
	Will they be concerned about the interests of white people and equality and all this other stuff?
	Not looking so good, is it?
	Not so much, right?
	So, that is the more fundamental point, is it says that these people really don't believe what they're peddling.
	Multiracial utopia, transcending race, all this other stuff.
	That was a lie.
	That was a lie.
	What they're really about is, again, this grievance, this vendetta against white people.
	And that's what it's going to come down to.
	Well, you know, who's going to ask for the reparations next?
	And that's how it already operates in an effective way, but it'll be that explicitly very soon.
	So that's Cory Booker, that's Reparations.
	We're running out of time here, so I do want to get into our Super Chats, and we'll see what you guys are saying about all this.
	I know you guys are eager to pay your reparations.
	I know I am.
	I am eager to atone for the sins of my ancestors.
	But let's see, we've got Justin who says, this Super Chat will self-destruct in five seconds.
	That's hilarious, dude.
	Really, really boomer humor to start out the night.
	We've got E. Michael Jones.
	He says, what are your thoughts on books from 1990 to 1995?
	Okay, you asked the same question last week.
	Don't know what that means.
	Thomas O'Malley says, will you keep your early videos private permanently or will you eventually un-private them?
	Okay, I think I'm just gonna hang myself after the show is over.
	I think I'm just gonna go in the bathroom and hang myself because I... Three Super Chats and we've got... we've got this Super Chat.
	We'll self-destruct in five seconds.
	Like, okay man.
	We've got the same cryptic question about books from 1990.
	From last week, which I had the same answer, and we've got another question which we've answered about five times on the show about keeping the videos private permanently.
	Yeah, they're private permanently.
	I just decided they are now because people are gonna keep asking me.
	Every time you ask me, they're privated for another five years.
	How's that?
	You know, I like how, like, people are getting banned, I get kicked off Twitch, they're reporting me, they're sifting through everything I've ever said, and people's concern is...
	But I want to watch the content, Nick.
	When am I going to get to watch the content again?
	I know you do the show every night and there's like 30 shows just since you privated all of them, but I want to watch content.
	Look, I know your livelihood's on the line and there's truty like never before, but am I going to get to watch that?
	But am I going to get to watch that content ever, Nick?
	Am I going to get to watch what I want to watch ever?
	I don't know.
	Is that me?
	It just seems very inconsiderate.
	It just seems like a very like can you can kind of see what's going on over here and you're worried about Am I gonna get to watch the old shows?
	There's 30 shows.
	All right, you know that are that are not private.
	We do the show every day, but but I know I need 300 shows that I can watch.
	Okay, man.
	Yeah, one day I'll un-private them.
	Ah, sheesh.
	Reddit says, is this Cheesehead69's main channel?
	Yeah, that's what I'm going by now.
	I am now Cheesehead69.
	Nick Fuentes, that guy that marched in Charlottesville?
	He's a racist.
	He's an alt-right, you know, maniac.
	I'm Cheesehead69.
	I'm a civil rights activist.
	Anti-racist activist.
	Baker says, at what point did you realize your life was a comedy, Nick?
	Love the show, big guy.
	I've gotten three friends to become premium members.
	Never change.
	Well, thanks, man.
	Thanks for doing your part.
	You know, some people are asking, how can I have more free content?
	When am I gonna get more free content?
	And other people are referring their friends to the premium program.
	This is what a model America First viewer looks like.
	I think people should be taking notes, right?
	At what point did I realize life was a comedy?
	Oh, at a very young age I realized life was not a tragedy.
	I realized it was truly a comedy, you know?
	So I've known that for a long time.
	I don't really even remember the moment when I realized this, but probably as a young boy I realized, you know, I became damaged.
	Something snapped inside and I said, uh, now I see the funny side.
	Now I'm always smiling, you know?
	So this is a very old, very ancient thing for me.
	I know people are just getting on board the Joker train, but this has been something inside me for a long time, right?
	But glad you like the show.
	Thanks for the referrals.
	We'll have to do some kind of referral program.
	Refer a friend, get a month free.
	We'll have to do something like that, you know, like all the others do, right?
	Konky says, please wear a red clown nose that honks on Fridays.
	Yeah, well, hey, we'll see what happens, right?
	I'm not gonna give any spoilers, but hey, we'll see.
	Sean Spence says, will you talk to others on the dissident right?
	Oh, here we go.
	Oh my gosh.
	Like Owen Benjamin, Eric Stryker, Vox Dei, Michael Enoch, Alex Green.
	Time to unite!
	No infighting.
unidentified		All right.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Relax.
		Deep breaths.
		Okay, we're okay.
		We're doing great.
		We're fine.
		All right.
unidentified		Okay.
unidentified		We're good.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I think I'm good now.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I was about to...
unidentified		Wow.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I was about to freak out there for a moment, but I think we're cool.
		Cool as a cucumber.
		No.
		Will I talk to others on the dissident right?
unidentified		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		No.
		I'm not going to talk to Michael Enoch.
		I'm not going to talk to Eric Stryker.
		I'm not going to talk to any of these people.
		Time to unite.
		No infighting.
		I have nothing in common with these people.
		These people are sick.
		You listen to Michael Enoch and Eric Stryker and everything is Jews, Jews, Jews.
		That's all it is with these people.
		Every show, everything that was ever done everywhere is Jews and nobody is our friend unless all they talk about is Jews I'm sorry, that's not my jam.
		Okay, that's not what I'm about.
		That's never what I've been about.
		You know, and I get a bad rap because I talk about that sometimes.
		And it's real.
		I'm not trying to minimize it.
		I'm not trying to say it doesn't exist.
		Yes, you have Jewish power in the country.
		Who did Trump just go to talk to last week?
		The Jewish Republican coalition?
		And he got Sheldon Adelson with a Trump yarmulke?
		I mean, of course that exists.
		And it's not just Zionism, by the way, either.
		There is a Jewish lobby.
		No doubt about that.
		So I don't, don't get me wrong, I'm not, I'm not a guy downplay that or I don't talk about it, but when that is the monocausal explanation for everything that happens in the world, everything that goes wrong, and the only thing you can talk about is that, there's something wrong there.
		And I don't know if it's personal failure, I don't know if that's like a psychological thing, I don't know if that's a federal agent, But wasn't Mike Enoch married to a Jewish person?
		So for all this stuff about Jews are controlling the world and they're the ones doing everything wrong and so on, and you're married to one, it's like, I don't know, it's a little conspicuous.
		And it's a little convenient that nobody can ever talk about that because, well, there's a thing.
		And look, I don't want to get into that.
		I don't want to get into infighting.
		You're the one that brought it up.
		But you want to know why I don't talk to these people.
		They're not moving the ball down the field.
		They're not helping us.
		They're not the same as us.
		Okay?
		So this, we need to unite.
		We need to stop the infighting.
		First of all, it's not we.
		Because you're not out there with your real name.
		You're not out there with anything on the line.
		So I don't know who you are, what your motivation is.
		That's number one.
		It's not we.
		It's I should interact with those people.
		I need to stop the infighting.
		And number two, it's not infighting because we're not in the same movement.
		I'm not alt-right.
		I'm not white nationalist.
		I'm not Uh, TRS, whatever.
		I don't think it's funny to go on a podcast and say N and K and all this other stuff, this vulgar stuff.
		That's not who I am.
		So, uh, please.
		We left that behind a long time ago.
		I'm already spending more time on it than it deserves.
		The short answer, no.
		They're not in the same movement.
		It's not in fighting.
		There is no need to unite.
		You remember the last time we were uniting the right?
		And tell me how that went.
		You know, somebody went to jail for a thousand years.
		So, no.
	We're not talking to those people.
	And Alex Green is a perfect one.
	Here's somebody.
	He's the one from No More News, right?
	Here's somebody who goes on Twitter and calls me a Zionist Chill.
	Again, because I'm not talking about it every day.
	It's not everything on my show 24-7.
	No, there's no place for that anymore.
	We have to get serious.
	JC says, have a couple of Big Macs on me.
	Goyim, thank you my friend.
	Yeah, I tried the Deluxe Quarter Pounder over the weekend at McDonald's and I wasn't impressed, have to tell ya.
	Hadn't been at McDonald's in a really long time actually.
	The last time I had fast food was Before the weekend was last Wednesday.
	So not, actually not last Wednesday, the Wednesday before last.
	And the last time I had McDonald's was probably a week before that.
	So it's been a long time since I had McDonald's.
	I had the Quarter Pounder Deluxe, which they have green leaf lettuce and tomato, which is how they spice it up, and mayo, I guess, also.
	Wasn't, wasn't great.
	You know, I really wasn't blown away, so.
	But yeah, I guess I'll just go back to the Big Mac with bacon.
	A Tree says, What can a sympathetic mestizo do to help other than self-deport?
	LMAO.
	White people are getting a raw deal.
	So, you know, again, if you're a, uh, Mestizo, I don't know if there's anything you could really, uh, do to help.
	I don't pitch self-deportation or deportation.
	Like I said, the demographic thing is a done deal.
	So, uh, people that are in the country now are in the country, and they're gonna be Americans.
	That's just how it's gonna go.
	Might not like it.
	Might think it's a bad thing.
	I think it's tremendously destabilizing.
	I don't think it's, um, you know, I think if we had an ideal country, the more homogeneous, the more stable, the more ordered, the more coherent, and therefore the better.
	Not because they're inferior or, you know, anything like that, but just because by virtue of having people who are similar, you have stability.
	So, ideally, what would the country look like?
	Not like it's going to look like, but we don't have the luxury of having an ideal country or even working towards one.
	This is the way it's gonna be.
	I've accepted it.
	It's time to accept it.
	That's the reality.
	It's not gonna change.
	At least not anytime soon.
	So as a Mestizo, look, just vote Republican.
	You know, as anybody else, I would say for everybody, the same thing.
	Just do your part.
	Go to church, vote Republican, you know, do all that kind of stuff.
	Donate to your favorite content creators.
	But what do people expect that they're gonna do?
	What do normal people think they're gonna do?
	We love our wages, don't we?
	We love our wages.
	You know, just got to, I guess, get involved in some capacity, but just keep fighting for the right side.
	At this point, the racial stuff is, you know, less important.
	I'm not going to say you can't help out, right?
	Fresh Moz says, what's worse, a Wignat or a Wajee?
	Definitely a Wignat.
	We love our Wajees, don't we?
	We love our Wajees.
	Look, it's not for me.
	Look, the Wajee life just isn't for me.
	Truly.
	It just isn't for me.
	You know, I decided it just wasn't for me.
	So, you know, I respect the Waiji culture.
	I respect Waijis.
	I like Waijis, but it's just not something that I would consider doing.
	Joking!
	I'm just flexing on the Waijis.
	I'm only kidding.
	No, the Waiji is our friend.
	How many Waijis do we have in the audience?
	Probably a lot.
	That's just how you gotta put bread on the table sometimes, right?
	So, so definitely the Wignatt is worse than the Wagee.
	Wignatt is a very low, low form of life.
	People holding us back and basically defeated.
	So, definitely the Wignatt.
	Trump Army of Kentucky says, Nick, looking forward to the Bernie Sanders study on reparations, especially for the Welsh.
	The Wagee's cream of the crop.
	I don't know what you mean about the Welsh.
	I don't know what that's all about, but yeah, that'll be, that'll be the day, right?
	Bernie Sanders reparations.
	Just when you thought it couldn't get any better.
	It's gonna get funnier.
	You know what they say, what doesn't kill you makes you stranger.
	That's how I look at it.
	Tony R says gold belongs to the people, not the bankers.
	The Italian government moves to seize reserves from the central bank.
	From Russia today.
	Dubious about the source, but very based in Red Pill, if true.
	Very big, if true.
	That's the first step, right?
	Taking back the wealth from the banks.
	Maybe we're gonna get our new Caesar.
	Salvini, our new Caesar?
	We'll have to see, right?
	PuppetPal says, Nick, I'm trying to sneak into APAC, but I'm dummy thick.
	Yeah, that'll do it.
	That'll cause some problems, I'm sure.
	Dummy Thick trying to sneak in anywhere.
	It's going to raise some eyebrows, arouse some suspicions when you're Dummy Thick.
	I can't relate, but certainly I've seen it happen before.
	Many such cases.
	Italian Pal says, in America there are black movies, churches, music, and sphere of Twitter called Black Twitter.
	Blacks have been in America since the beginning, yet still have a distinct culture, destiny, no connection between race and culture, lol.
	Well, and that's exactly the point.
	And this is where he was being so disingenuous, and I got him on this point.
	Where I said, don't you think that an Italian and a Spanish person are more similar than an Italian and a Chinese person?
	He said, of course!
	How could you think I wouldn't believe that?
	That's the most simple thing in the world.
	And it's like, well, obviously, that's what I'm getting at here.
	That's the whole point.
	If they're more similar, they're more compatible.
	And they're compatible because of race.
	Like, what in the world?
	What do you think European culture is?
unidentified		You think it's just totally arbitrary?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You don't even think Italian culture is totally distinct from the Italian ethnic group?
		The Italian people have ancestral Italian connections?
		Of course not!
		So that was just totally disingenuous of him to say, oh race and culture have no bearing and all this other stuff.
		What a joke!
		Why do you think there's higher rates of mental illness?
		Why do you think all these studies show that interracial relationships are worse off in domestic abuse, divorce rates, drug abuse, everything else?
		Why do you think that's the case?
		Why do you think it's because, and why do you think they are not compatible?
		It's because the races are distinct and different.
		Because there's something intrinsically valuable about coherent racial identity.
		It's not about purity.
		You know, Nick Fuentes is concerned about white purity.
		He wouldn't be led in the ethnostate.
		That's not the argument.
		It's not about purity.
		It's not about the Aryan man.
		It's not about any of that.
		It's very simple.
		It's very straightforward.
		But people choose to be blind to this.
		It's very simple.
		If you get married within your own race, more or less, you know, I'm not, we're not going to be like literally Hitler here and say you have to come from the same town, in the same city, from the same country, 100% phenotype, whatever, but within the same race basically.
		So that you have a coherent racial identity, some kind of coherent sense of identity, and then it's compatible, and then you're going to have all these numbers working in the right direction, as opposed to what's being promoted, which is the most distinct, which is the most diverse.
		You should marry somebody totally different from you, and by virtue of not having a coherent identity, it is less compatible.
		You do have all those side effects.
		So, Oh, it's so frustrating.
		It's just, people just cannot see what's going on, right?
		The idea that we're all the same, we're all pink on the inside and all that, it's just such a lie.
		And that's why they were interrupting so much in that debate, because they know that once you start making that point, like, there's no getting that back in the back, and they know what's going on intuitively.
		Somebody says something in Russian, which I can't read.
		I can't read the Cyrillic alphabet, but he says, hey big guy, here's some gas money so you can drive to a Latin mass.
		Really spiritually fulfilling while living in clown world.
		Thank you for the gas money.
		Yeah, that really will go a long way.
		Douchebag says, man, I know it's a pipe dream.
		Kobach getting DHS or immigration czar position would be badass.
		I don't know if he would get the vote though.
		He probably would, and they could force the nuclear option either way, so...
		Yeah, that would be the dream, but I don't know if it'll happen, and not even because of the nomination.
		I think that's basically a myth that he wouldn't be able to get confirmed, but because I think the Trump administration just might be too weak to put him in place, you know?
		Everybody thought this kind of shake-up would happen when John Kelly was out at Chief of Staff, and who'd they get next?
		Mick Mulvaney.
		So I'm not optimistic about who they'll replace Nielsen with, but Hey, we can hope.
		If it happens, that'll be a very good thing.
		But it's not a confirmation problem.
		It's a nomination problem.
		Ben Adams says, My brother's roommate passed away over the weekend.
		I ask that you keep his family in your prayers.
		This show is the boost I needed.
		MXC forever!
		Well, I'm sorry to hear that, my friend.
		Our prayers are with you.
		God bless.
		That's unfortunate.
		I'm really sorry to hear that, but glad the show's giving you a little bit of a boost and the Knicker Nation is praying for you.
		But that's rough.
		That's rough.
		Rough to hear, my friend.
		Talk about a Blackville.
		We talk about Blackvilles about politics.
		There's your real Blackville, right?
		But we're rooting for you, okay?
		Prima Jen says, the next time SJWs accuse you of being a Nazi, you can tell them your political views are in line with the American men that stormed the beaches of Normandy.
	I would love to see their response.
	Yeah, if we just came up with the right argument, if we just told them, uh, I'm a Nazi.
	I have all the same beliefs as the people who stormed the beaches of Normandy.
	Guess you didn't think about that.
	And their jaws will drop to the floor.
	They will have nothing.
	They'll have nothing to say.
	The argument will be won with facts and logic.
	The day is saved.
	Immigration is over.
	We have the Trump in Reich is rising and... Come on.
	The problem is not that we haven't made the right argument.
	You know, do you think this hasn't been argued before?
	Uh, no.
	This is, this is kind of part of it.
	They see the greatest generation, the boomers, as part of old white America.
	They could care less.
	You know, they think George Washington, who founded the country, they see him as a slave owner.
	So, that's why that point is moot.
	And anyway, it's not like, um, you know, all it's gonna take is a really cogent, uh, thinker, really cogent sort of gotcha point that you can make.
	Um, you know, it's, it's...
	They know what they're doing.
	They're pushing this ideology to hurt America, to harm and replace traditional America.
	So, yeah.
	Their response would be what you saw on Thursday.
	Obfuscation, diversions, misdirection.
	That's what it would be.
	Jugs says, Hey Nikki, nice haircut.
	Thanks, you're a little late, but thanks.
	Ivy says, Honestly, did we ever expect a woman to take immigration seriously?
	Just kidding.
	Some women get it, but not Kirstjen.
	Yeah, that's true.
	People like Ann Coulter get it, but...
	You do make a good point.
	If we had a man in charge, I think it'd be better regardless.
	Nickerless says... I'm not reading that one.
	Nathan says, currently doing construction work at a casino.
	The words, have you seen the people we're trying to save, are ringing in my ears.
	Have you seen the people we're trying to save?
	I'm not sure what you're referring to.
	Construction work.
	Oh, I think I understand what you're talking about.
	White people, I guess, in casinos.
	Degenerates that we're trying to save.
	Is that what you're getting at?
	That perhaps our country is not worth saving?
	I would heartily agree with you.
	You know, look, country's gonna get worse.
	People are gonna get what's coming to them.
	That's the way it goes.
	That's what I resigned myself to a long time ago is, look, people have been negligent for a long time, people have been irresponsible and ignorant, and they will get what's coming to them, you know, and there will be a correction.
	And you could argue whether this is deserved or not, whether this is the responsibility of the elites or the people, they haven't governed themselves, is this intrinsic to our nature that people are careless or Have a tendency to degenerate, but no matter what, there will be a correction and there will be suffering as a result of this.
	So, everything will work itself out.
	It always does, right?
	No problem, says fellow Catholic.
	Why support pro-abortion Yang?
	Why don't you watch my show on it or watch any show from last week where we talked about this at length?
	BC Spook Patrol says you nominate one little old black pizza CEO to the Federal Reserve and everybody loses their minds.
	Yeah.
	Not sure what you're talking about there.
	I vaguely know what you're talking about, but not totally sure.
	What's true?
	Chody Doinks says, you're one of the only commentators who tells it like it is.
	Respect!
	Became a member over the weekend and I highly recommend everyone else do the same.
	Well, thank you so much for becoming a member.
	It's true!
	I am the only commentator that tells it like it is.
	I'm one of the only ones.
	I don't do advertisements.
	I don't do ad reads.
	I don't do sponsorships.
	I don't do...
	I don't take any funding from anybody.
	You know, I really just have no... There's really no consideration where I come on the show and temper what I say.
	And I'm just telling you, I'm not telling you that to toot my own horn.
	I'm telling you that functionally, there is really nothing.
	Right now, with the exception of Terms of Services, which is exerting pressure on what I say.
	You know, even if you're not taking money, even if you're not getting sponsors or whatever, if you have friends in Washington D.C.
	that you care about keeping, or you know, you have certain connections, you might want to be careful about what you say on the show, because it might offend the wrong person, might cause a bridge to burn, or if you get an ad, well, you want to be careful what you say, because you don't want the advertiser to get heat from right-wing watch or somebody, so you temper what you say.
	But I think I'm one of the only people who is only viewer funded and therefore can and will say whatever needs to be said.
	So I appreciate that you appreciate that.
	I try to tell it like it is.
	That's the only way.
	Look, somebody's got to do it, right?
	Somebody like me, a lot of people say, you know, you've got a lot of talent, you have such a bright future, why aren't you in school?
	Why didn't you stay in and just become a lying shill in Washington DC?
	You could have had it all.
	It's going to take the best and the brightest, people who could have had a great future, to sacrifice that on the other side.
	Who else but those people are going to put the country in the right direction?
	We're in the situation we're in, because all the best and the right people sold out and are doing the wrong thing, and are hypocrites.
	You know, they wanted what was best for only themselves and their career, so we have to step up.
	We have to have the best people coming over to our side.
	You know, and a lot of people from DC tell me, you'll never have a future, it'll be very hard for you if you don't cuck, if you don't praise certain groups of people, if you don't bend the knee to certain groups.
	And you have to come over, you have to come over so I can retweet, you have to come over so I can publicly be friends with you.
	And I say no no no, it's the opposite.
	We have to get to a point where you are coming over on my side.
	It's not me coming over to your side, people that are Quietly talking to me behind closed doors have to come over to my side and they have to do things like come on my show or speak if they not you know have to come on my show but they have to speak about these things on their own platforms and they have to alienate their friends they have to do what I did you know maybe you don't come on my show but you have to you have to do what I did and that's how we're gonna turn things around.
	It's not the people on the outside cucking and shilling on the inside.
	It's people on the inside going outside and saying, we're not going to take this anymore.
	We're normal.
	We have to rise up.
	There has to be some degree of solidarity, a little bit of courage and integrity.
	So, important point.
	Let's see puppet pal says make America the 110th country.
	I don't know what you mean by that But it sounds I don't know.
	It sounds like a little bit Offensive so I might have to disavow that I'm not sure what exactly that means, but I disavow Video game snakes is what do you think of Herman Cain being elected the Federal Reserve?
	Okay, that's what you're referring to about the Pizza Man remember the Pokemon 2000 Herman Cain speech and Any opinions on Stephen Moore?
	I don't remember the Pokemon speech, but Herman Cain being elected to the Federal Reserve, I don't know.
	I don't know that much about Herman Cain, but doesn't strike me as somebody qualified to run the Federal Reserve, right?
	I mean, does he have experience in banking to the same extent that the others do?
	I don't know.
	It's a little, um, a little strange to me.
	No, not really.
	Not any strong opinions.
	Yeah, we talked about that, I think, on Friday.
	Well, yeah, I mean, there were so many inconsistencies.
	That was one among them.
	And I caught that.
	He said Kurds should have their own state and their terrorism is justified, which is fascinating because if you go back and you watch that clip, like, it said it all right there.
	We're talking about the Christchurch shooter.
	And why did the Christchurch shooter do what he did?
	Because he wanted a country of all white people in New Zealand.
	He wanted to intimidate Muslims, get Muslims out of the country.
	That's why he did what he did.
	And, uh, and Hassan Piker said, well, because he did that all right wing, um, you know, white identity kind of politics is dangerous, leads to violence.
	We have to ban it.
	I said, what about the Kurds?
	You know, you're a communist.
	The Kurds are communists.
	The Kurds are terrorists.
	You know, have you heard about what's been going on in Turkey?
	They blow up buses, they do bombings all the time in the capital, in Istanbul, all over the place in Turkey.
	So, what's your opinion about that?
	And he said, well, what Turkey's doing is actually fine because they are rebelling to create an independent Kurdistan, a Kurdistan for the Kurds.
	So, understand there's literally no difference.
	Kurds doing terrorist attacks to get their own sovereign, independent Kurdish state.
	In other words, for self-determination.
	The Christchurch shooter shooting people to intimidate them, to ultimately facilitate a white ethnic state or whatever.
	Isn't that basically the same thing?
	But Hasan Piker is in favor of one and against the other.
	I'm against both.
	But as Zahn Piker says, oh, well, the Kurds are fighting ISIS and their goals to create a Kurdish state are legitimate.
	Therefore, I support it.
	Okay, well, you're obviously a hypocrite.
	You, you know, it is clear what's going on there.
	So, yeah, obvious hypocrisy, obvious inconsistency.
	I don't think that's it.
	I think it's because I'm a based, civic, Latino, campus conservative.
	You know, that's what I'm all about.
	I'm an anti-racist activist.
	to doing business, I guess.
unidentified		True.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't think that's it.
		I think it's because I'm a based civic Latino campus conservative.
		That's what I'm all about.
		I'm an anti-racist activist.
		Default settings says, say it with me now, F. John Locke.
unidentified		True.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Agree.
		Twin Peaks reference says, Nick, are you taking GF slash wife applications?
		It's not If not, when do you think you'll settle down?
		Oh, I don't know in a few years.
		I want to get financially secure first and then then I'll probably be looking to settle down then I'll be taking applications.
		Oh, but that's not for a long time.
		You know, that's for that's some some years down the road.
		John Shepard Smith says, What are you expecting to hear in Candace Owen's committee hearing tomorrow regarding white nationalism?
		I don't know.
		Honestly, I have no idea.
		I'll be surprised by what she says because you know she said some weird things in the past like about Hitler and whatever else so she's kind of unpredictable.
		Somebody like Charlie Kirk you can kind of predict like their ideology but Candace Owens I think is just kind of such a wild card you don't really know what she's gonna say so I don't know I don't know what what I'm expecting there.
		James Russell says, if only Trump did something like declare gangs like MS-13 terrorists.
		Oh wait, he did that to the Iranian IRGC.
		Thank you based Bolton and Pompeo.
		Yeah, wrong priorities on that one.
		Slows says, every other song Nas does is we was Kangs.
		Yeah, that's true.
		I don't like... Well, that's not necessarily true.
		If you listen to Illmatic, there's nothing overtly political for the most part on there.
		I mean, outside of the, you know, 1990s, New York is sad and violent, and outside of that, there's not a lot of that.
		But in the new album that he just put out last June, I think it was, I couldn't listen to it.
		I listened to the first song and I'm like, this is just ridiculous, you know, how political it is.
		So Illmatic wasn't like that, but...
		Last album was.
		Your mother says, hey Nick, can you do my math homework for me?
		No.
		Minecraft gang says, pee-pee poo-poo.
		Thanks, man.
		Nick says, hey Nick, big fan of the show.
		I'm not a Wignatt by any stretch.
		But... But will Fed posting be necessary 20 years down the line?
		No Wignatts.
		No Fed.
		Are you like retarded?
		Like what's wrong with you?
		I don't understand Facebook cracking down on people, Twitch cracking down on people, and I know what my question will be.
		I know the question I'm going to ask.
		Nick, I know advocating for violence is wrong now, but do you think advocating for violence is going to be good in the future?
		Like what is wrong with you?
		Are you retarded?
		Seriously?
		I just don't understand.
		I just don't understand the motivation.
		Unless you're actively trying to hurt me, you have to be retarded.
		Unless your motivation is bad, there has to be something wrong with you that you would think this isn't appropriate and this is something that will be good for the show.
		This is something that that must be asked on the super chats.
		Yeah, look, the show's gonna go away, frankly, and it'll go away, okay?
		And I'll just leave it at that, right?
		We're gonna get banned and everyone's gonna wonder why.
		Oh no, America First got shut down.
		Knock on wood.
		Oh no, America First got shut down.
		But Nick, what are you gonna do?
		Are you gonna bring it back somewhere else?
		And I'm going to say, yeah, remember when you were asking about, um, when you were asking about how I should bring Chris Cantwell and Patrick Little on the show and how I need to embrace violence and everything else?
		And I'll say, yeah, maybe not, right?
		Sheesh.
		Spiteful says, maybe if they will do some DNA testing for the reparations, they will find the real slave owners and Ben Shapiro will be canceled.
		Ah, yes.
		Very based in Red Pill.
		Super Chat, my friend.
		Very good point there.
		Doop, just with a Super Chat, thanks.
	Swindling Boomers says, Pee Pee, Poo Poo, E. Michael Jones, Brap.
	Thank you.
	Ryan D says, Greenies, good sir.
	How do I red pill the normies?
	That joke is, really, it's still funny.
	Billy says, have you ever heard of Ben Shapiro?
	You should check him out sometime.
	Thanks for the tip.
	I'll be sure to look into it.
	Righteous sadism.
	Have you ever touched a girl's boobies?
	Honk honk.
	Disavow.
	Honk honk is gay, by the way.
	Jumbo Antonio says, any thoughts on Eminem's older music?
	Think you'd like the song Renegade?
	No, I don't like Eminem.
	Don't like his old stuff.
	Don't like his new stuff.
	I don't like white rappers.
	That's just the way I am.
	I just think it's sort of unnatural.
	I think rap is for, uh, you know, rap was created by blacks.
	Rap should be done by blacks.
	That's just my feelings on it.
	I've yet to listen to a white rapper who I'm really impressed with.
	You know, who are the white rappers?
	You know, oh, well, some of the white rappers are Jewish, right?
	Like, uh, Post Malone.
	Er, not Post Malone.
	Um, who was the one?
	Uh, who was the one who was dating Ariana Grande?
	Mac Miller, Jewish.
	Beastie Boys, Jewish.
	There's a lot of Jewish ones.
	Who is a white rapper?
	I can't think of his name right now.
	He sings Pray For Me.
	G-Eazy.
	Terrible.
	Sucks.
	Terrible.
	You suck.
	Logic.
	Sucks.
	All the white rappers are garbage.
	I can't think of one who's good.
	And Eminem is technically a good rapper.
	The technical aspect of the rapping and good lyrically, but there's no flow.
	There's no soul to it.
	It's not good.
	It's not well produced.
	You know, that's why I like Kanye West.
	The lyrics aren't great.
	He's not technically a great rapper, but the production is good.
	He's got a soulful sound.
	That's what matters to me.
	So... No, I don't like Eminem.
	I will not listen to Eminem.
	I'm done with Eminem.
	I listen to Kanye West.
	That's about it.
	Pragmatic Culture says, Nick, Logo is an egghead, but would you at least concede many leftists push an image of right-wingers as mentally ill to explain us away to their base?
	Yeah, Logo is an egghead.
	And no, no, I will not concede anything.
	You and Logo both misunderstand my points completely.
	And that was a small part of the tweet.
	So in the first hand, you're autistic if you take a little thing and, well, actually, Well actually, I found this one part of your tweet to be maybe half-true.
	But I'm gonna do a thread now and tell you why it definitely was half-retentive.
	Fuck off, faggot.
	So on the first hand, I object to that behavior.
	But secondarily, no, he completely misunderstands the point.
	Boy being, when I say they understand that what we're saying is true, I mean to say that conservative right-wing ideas are deeply ingrained in our nature.
	Why are they afraid of white identity?
	Why are they afraid?
	It's because they're afraid of white nativism.
	And they've all said this, by the way.
	Maybe not Destiny and Ahsan Piker, but all the higher-level people writing for The Atlantic, anyone else who knows the score, who knows what's going on on the board, they know.
	That the threat to the multiracial society is white nativism.
	People like Andrew Yang acknowledge this.
	Yang says, you know, the only thing that's gonna...
	I heard our country in the future is the rise of a dispossessed white majority that is going to be not happy.
	They're going to be bitter about their loss of power.
	So they understand this, and why do they acknowledge that white nativism is a threat?
	More than, for example, other conspiracy theories or whatever, like Logo is trying to compare it to.
	Because they know that race is a part of us.
	They're the ones out there saying racism is... everyone is a racist.
	It's deeply embedded in us.
	And it's regressive.
	It's primitive.
	It's tribalist.
	In doing so, they are implicitly acknowledging that race, tribalism, is a part of who we are.
	The reason they're afraid of it spreading is because even if they think it's irrational or ignorant, they know it spreads because it taps into something which is very much deeply embedded in our subconscious.
	It's very much a part of who we are and we can't really change it.
	So that's what I mean.
	You know, Democrats and left-wing people, they will never say this explicitly, but implicitly the message is that we always have to be protecting against the rise of racism again.
	We always have to be on guard In case we regress back to tribal impulses.
	That's why they fear white nativism.
	So, they may see it as irrational.
	They may disagree that we value race.
	But they are implicitly acknowledging when they flip out and they're very scared for promoting race realism or things like that because they know that race is a part of who we are deep down.
	They know, for example, that we need religiosity.
	They know deep down that a call for order and security, even if it's fear-mongering or irrational, They know it's deeply embedded in our flawed and unchanging nature, and they acknowledge that implicitly when they talk about this kind of stuff, and that's what I was getting at.
	But, you know, this guy wants to play word games and say, oh, what you say is irrational, innate nature is actually insanity according to this gay, esoteric book I read a hundred years ago.
	So, no, completely misunderstanding the point.
	Daniel Anderson says, how to become premium, lol, I've been on the website multiple times, my boomer eyesight hides the button from me.
	Go to the website, top right corner, premium content.
	Okay?
	Let me pull it up and make sure that's right.
	Yeah, but I'm pretty sure it's just at the top right corner there.
	Yeah, you go on the website, top right, it says premium content.
	Can't miss it, okay?
	Let's see.
	Goodbye Groip says Mike Enoch Pinovich Israel.
	Yeah, basically, right?
	Solid Voice says Big Kahuna at Arby's is greater than Big Mac every day.
	Join us, Nick.
	I've never eaten at Arby's.
	So, maybe I'll give it a shot.
	All right, maybe I'll give that one a shot.
	Zirconium says, if you're a Yank, you don't own the slaves.
	Mason Dixon.
	Yeah, but that's the thing.
	Are they gonna exempt everybody north of the Mason Dixon line?
	Probably not.
	So... Level Best says, did you get a chance to eat at Hot Dugs before it closed?
	If so, what was your go-to dog?
	No, I've never eaten at Hot Dugs.
	So I can't tell you.
	Victor says, keep it up, Nick.
	Thanks, I will.
	Brian W says, riddle me this, Slippery Nick.
	What is 13 but also 55?
	Azumaru cashes in social security.
	Oh, I like that.
	That's a good joke.
	Finally a clever joke.
	I appreciate that one.
	Hyman says, think I know exactly how you'll be dressed for Avalon.
	And he gives a clown emoji.
	Yeah, that'll be a good one.
	You know, look, I like Hunter Avalon.
	In spite of the fact that he's a little bit of a boomer and a little bit of a normie in some respects, I like him.
	I think he's a funny guy.
	And we talked on Saturday.
	We had a call to set up the debate, which I'll be debating him on April 20th, 7 p.m.
	Eastern time.
	We haven't announced the topics yet.
	But I don't want it to be really nasty or contentious.
	I think he's generally fine.
	I think he's a good guy.
	So I don't have any personal animus against him.
	And I actually appreciate that he didn't even debate me, because, you know, a lot of these people, you know how it goes.
	People don't acknowledge, they ignore, they don't engage, they don't debate, they don't have a conversation, let alone have something more, what would you call it, contentious.
	So, I appreciate that he's willing to talk, and so, I don't have anything bad to say about him.
	Nicholas Williams says, would you trade liberties for an ethnostate?
	I'm not in favor of an ethnostate.
	Ethnostate sounds terrible to me.
	Where are we gonna get tacos?
	You ever think of that?
	Where are we gonna get authentic street tacos?
	Where are we going to get Vietnamese takeout?
	Don't have an answer for that one, do you?
	No, I didn't think so.
	No, I'm not in favor of an ethnostate.
	I'm in favor of a food court country.
	I want the country basically to look like the food court at a mall, which means just kind of dirty, kind of shitty, and loud, and lots of commotion.
	We've got a lot of different food selections.
	Cheap, quick, sort of subpar, but there's lots of options.
	You know, that's basically what I want for the country.
	I want it to resemble the food court at a mall, and I think that's a fine vision for the country.
	I think that's better.
	Uh, Rilon Musk says, my knicker thoughts on starting local grassroots nationalist movements.
	Got some buddies interested looking for advice from the zoomer Roger Stone.
	Uh, no man, no.
	How many times do we have to say this?
	Why create a target?
	Why put a target on your back?
	Yeah, you know, we're all individuals and we're anonymous and we have these views.
	You know what would help?
	All getting together in the same place under a label and putting a big target on all of our backs.
	Yeah, I think that'll go well.
	No man, the activism to me is over.
	You look at what happened to Generation Identity.
	I think the same, frankly, I think American Identity Movement will face the same prospects in this country kind of stuff.
	In my opinion, that very structured organization, I don't know if that's going to pan out in the future.
	I'm not optimistic about it.
	I think the future is going to be very loose networking and associations.
	So instead of, hello, welcome, this is the Nationalist Club.
	My name is Federal Agent and would you like to buy an unregistered firearm in the parking lot?
	I don't know if I would go that far.
	I don't think that's the solution.
	I think the solution is more Find people of like mind.
	Subtly.
	Cautiously.
	Carefully.
	Start to build a social group.
	Maybe you guys hang out on the weekends.
	Maybe you have a very informal, casual social group.
	You go to bars.
	You go out on Friday, Saturday night.
	Maybe you have a book club.
	Something like that.
	But you don't call yourself anything.
	You don't have a Discord chat.
	You don't have a Facebook chat.
	You don't have a Slack chat.
	Very informal.
	Very loose.
	You know each other.
	You connect each other.
	And that's how the movement, in my eyes, takes shape.
	Like the Mafia, basically.
	You know, the Mafia doesn't come out and say, Hello, we are the Mafia.
	Welcome to the Mafia meeting.
	I am so-and-so.
	I am the leader of the Mafia.
	And for today's illegal activities, we'll be killing people.
	You know what I mean?
	That is not how a sort of clandestine organization operates.
	It operates Very loosely, very informally, casually, you know, and it has to be like that.
	So that's my advice to you.
	That is my advice.
	Shidcat says, can you say the daily brap a couple of times?
	No, actually, I can't.
	nwordfuentes says, whoops, scrolled too far down there.
	Okay, I'm not reading that one.
	Doc Daniels says, Hey Nick, did your heart break when Jared Holt insulted Boomers?
	It really did.
	It really did.
	When you see somebody like Jared Holt saying something like that, it's just like... Really, I don't know.
	I think it's funny, but more than anything, it's kind of sad.
	It just kind of proves we already knew about Jared Holt.
	He's the kitchen window kid.
	He's the kitchen window child looking out at all the other boys playing and he's left out.
	So he's tweeting all these memes.
	Shut the F up, boomer, broke, woke, bespoke meme.
	He does all our memes.
	You can look on his Twitter.
	He uses them incorrectly and he's not funny, but he uses all our memes.
	and so in a way you can see this he wants to belong there is this bitterness that he does want to sort of belong to this movement he does kind of want to be cool and hip and have excitement and energy he starts a podcast he envies what we have going on here so uh so yeah it was like kind of funny to see him say that but at the same time it's like dude like you're you're sad man you're pathetic so Look, Jared, I'm like the Christian Picciolini of the dissident right.
	Jared, if you ever want an off-ramp of your radical Antifa liberalism, you know, one day you wake up and you realize, I'm just a total soulless corporate slave for the establishment, and I'm basically doing the work of Satan, and all the rest, and you decide one day you want to turn your life around, Call me, okay?
	I will help you de-radicalize.
	I will help you leave your former life and embrace a life that is healthy and normal and coherent, the way things have always been.
	So, Jared, I'm telling you, if you ever want to DM me, you have any questions, okay?
	If you have any questions about changing your life, there is an out, okay?
	There is a way that you can get out of this, and I will help you, all right?
	That's my word to you, Jared.
	We will help you.
	No Problem says, you hurt my feelings, friend.
	Just wanted to know.
	Well, what was your super chat?
	I will hurt your feelings.
	I will hurt you in the end.
	Why support pro-abortion Yang?
	I say that because I've answered this a thousand times, and, um, and, uh, look, we're gonna, well, I have answered this a thousand times, so I'm not gonna relitigate that.
	I've said this on Twitter, I've said this on YouTube, so, um, so that's unfortunate.
	Just watch the Yang Gang episode.
	It's irrelevant what he's doing.
	We're gonna get all of that and more anyway, you know?
	So, 816 says, do you think FOS legislation on social media will last?
	Freedom of speech?
	Once whites lose the majority, that's an auto repeal.
	Nothing more important than immigration.
	That's just not true.
	Freedom of speech legislation would be very important, even if temporarily.
	You know, even if it didn't last very long, it would be important.
	And there's no guarantee that it would be overridden, because if it did, it would get challenged in the Supreme Court.
	And the Supreme Court would probably rule in our favor.
	So you're wrong.
	You're just simply wrong about that.
	You know, talking about something that is less important than immigration.
	What is immigration going to change?
	Immigration doesn't matter anymore.
	The bed's already made with demographics.
	So...
	All the way wrong.
	All the way wrong on that one.
	Billy says we must lobby the tech companies to ban all... Like, what difference would it make if immigration were high or low if the country's majority minority?
	It's gonna get marginally worse, whereas free speech is getting drastically worse.
	And you're, well, we can't protect it in the interim because it might get... Everything's gonna go under that same way.
	Immigration would be the first thing to go.
	So, uh, Billy says we must lobby the tech companies to ban all Kurdish nationalist content immediately.
	Yeah, Kurdish nationalist, Zionist, Palestinian, everything, you know?
	Oh, but it's only white identity, white separatism.
	That's interesting how that works.
	Sammo says can you unblock me on Twitter?
	No.
	JC says Eminem is cucked.
	True.
	Brandon Hanson.
	Hey, Nick.
	First off, I'm not a fed.
	Have you ever thought about training with me and my buds in the woods for the revolution?
	Think about it.
	Yeah, that's always... Nick, I'm not a fed, but you want to give me your social security number?
	I've, you know, I'm gonna help you.
	I'm gonna give you a million dollars.
	You just gotta give me your social security number.
	Oh, yeah.
	Okay.
	Patria Victoria says, try Jelly Roll for a white rapper.
	He's from Illinois.
	I'll check that out.
	Amir says, Ben Shapiro claims the West was built on Judeo values.
	Would you please rebut this for neat bucks?
	Yeah, Shapiro and Charlie Kirk both say this.
	Not true.
	Of course this is not true.
	The West was built on Catholic views and ostensibly Christian views.
	Even if you disagree that it's Catholic, you know, you believe it's the Enlightenment.
	Okay, well the Enlightenment was built on Protestant values or Christian values.
	You know, even the scientists, even as derivative as the Enlightenment was, in terms of Western culture, people like Isaac Newton, among others, were Christians.
	All of them.
	The Founding Fathers, Christians.
	And a lot of people say, oh no, no, no, they were Deists.
	No, they were Christians.
	You might have had a few exceptions where there's a more difficult case to make that they were Christians, but they all believed the country should be informed by Christian values.
	So, the idea that it's Judeo-Christian or it's Judeo is preposterous.
	You know, Judeo-modifying Christian is, it's like black-white or, you know, things that are totally mutually exclusive.
	How could you be at once Jewish and Christian?
	How could you at once believe Christ is the Son of God, but at the same time believe that he was a usurper, that he was a false prophet, that he's in hell, as the Talmud states?
	So no, the concept of Judeo-Christian is wrong.
	And then beyond that, Jews and Christians have been fighting forever.
	People paint this picture of the Torah and the Jews have been informing Western civilization for millennia.
	Really?
	Because if you look at any history of the Middle Ages, Medieval times, it's a history of conflict between religions.
	Christians, Jews, Muslims.
	So, look at the Spanish Inquisition.
	Was that actually, like, a friendly thing between Christians and Jews?
	The Pale of Settlement, pogroms, things like that.
	Was that ever, uh, and was that a Judeo-Christian tradition?
	So, look, whatever you want to believe about what's going on now, to say that the West was built by Jewish values is just, you know, simply not true.
	Simply not true.
	Uh, BC Spook Patrol says, Wall Street is freaking out at the thought of a black man being in charge of their money.
	That's right, that's what it is.
	That's what it is.
	Racists.
	Always.
	Basketball says Britney Venti always has your back.
	Is she mad?
	Can she cook?
	Britney Venti.
	My Nubian Queen!
	Britney!
	Uh, yeah, she's always out there.
	She's always out there shillin' for the Nicker Nation.
	You know, she was out there, uh, talkin' about how she watched my show.
	Then she unfollowed me.
	That was rude.
	I took offense to that.
	Very insulting.
	But hey, she's been defending me very vigorously online, and I appreciate that.
	I do.
	She refollowed me.
	She's been tweeting attacks at Destiny, which I appreciate.
	So as far as I'm concerned, she is a-okay.
	A fellow knicker, a fellow African ancestral person, you know, my black sister, my fellow, my Nubian goddess.
	So yeah, she's not mad, but she is Nubian.
	I don't know if she can cook.
	I guess that's the trick.
	Her room's dirty, though.
	Her room is dirty, and there's some other things going on.
	She's self-conscious about, you know, something going on.
	So, um... I don't know.
	I don't know if it'll totally work out, but she's a good ally to have.
	She... If we're gonna have e-girl allies, she's a good one to have in our corner.
	We like Brittany Venti.
	Gooseman says, would you, uh... No, I'm not gonna answer that.
	Enkidu... Oh, a reference too!
	What is that a reference to?
	Gilgamesh.
	See, I went to college.
	I know Enkidu.
	Says, I want your take.
	I'm totally white, but was adopted at birth by a chosen family.
	I feel torn between my beliefs and my family.
	Do you have any thoughts?
	This isn't a meme.
	Also only a few weeks older than you.
	Zoomers unite.
	Yeah, I understand it's not a meme.
	Look, you have to... Look, identity is something that's complex and have different degrees of salience.
	You know, some identity has more salience than others.
	For example, I'm a quarter Mexican and I don't like downplay that because it doesn't fit with my ideology, you know, or I'm ashamed of it or anything.
	It's just because it didn't have a strong presence in my upbringing.
	You know, all of my grandparents, I had two Italian grandparents, a 100% Irish grandparent, and a grandparent was probably half native, half Spanish, and that grandparent died well before I was born.
	So, when you look at identity in that way, it's something that has different degrees of salience.
	Having a mother's Italian, a grandmother's 100% Italian, having that as a big impact on my life, that identity is more salient than the Mexican identity.
	the only grandfather who was a part of that passed away a long time ago so it's not ashamed or putting it down or you know whatever it's just different degrees of salience for obvious reasons and it's comprehensive you know i have this identity as an american or as an italian having this identity is irish and mexican also um and so if you're white but raised by you say a chosen family a jewish family um then obviously your ethnic identity is white but you're not a person who's a person who's a You have a blood connection to the European race.
	But raised by Jewish people, you have a connection to that too.
	And I don't think you should be ashamed of that.
	I think you should be proud of who you are.
	And I'm not, like, we're not against Jews.
	Don't get me wrong.
	We're not against Jews or like there's anything wrong with being Jewish.
	Unless, you know, we're talking about religiously there's something wrong with it.
	Uh, but you should be proud of who you are and there's some fine Jewish people in the movement.
	People like Paul Godfrey and Stephen Miller and there's many people like that.
	So, So I don't I don't know if it should be a source of conflict.
	I mean certainly you have these competing identities Whereas maybe a thousand years ago would be sort of tough but on this day and age I think you can affirm both, you know, you can love and appreciate your parents and understand your upbringing But at the same time understand who you are and where you come from But but that really is the question this nature and culture versus or rather nurture and culture versus nature and race and blood
	So, stuff, but that's an identity crisis which I guess you'll have to navigate and sort of figure out for yourself which one appeals more strongly to you.
	What you really believe in.
	Do you believe you are European?
	Do you believe you're like culturally Jewish or whatever?
	I mean, it's kind of up to you.
	Amir says JF has confirmed Destiny is a person like Ben Shapiro, Hollywood execs, intellectual elites, bankers, etc.
unidentified		Really?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So he's crafty?
		You mean he's a person like them, meaning he's crafty, high IQ, smart, you know, really works hard?
		That's interesting.
		I guess I sort of knew that about him from the beginning, but good to know.
		Good to be confirmed.
		Ryan says, opinion on humanism.
		Ari, Richard Dawkins tweet.
		I didn't see Richard Dawkins.
		I don't follow him on Twitter, but I'm against humanism.
		Anti-humanist gang.
		Rilon Musk says, extra shekels for a good answer.
		Thank you.
		Edward Fuentes says, bro, okay, I'm not reading that one either.
		Take cover says my face when the greasiest most dishonest streamer on twitch calls you slippery nick while you wear your heart on your sleeve So true such a clown world.
		I do wear my heart on my sleeve I hope I don't understand how I come off as disingenuous.
		Well, I guess I kind of get it And maybe people perceive me as having this put on Persona or sort of a contrived way of talking.
		This is just how I talk.
		I remember I talked to somebody one time and um And they were like, I think it was somebody who watched my show.
		And they were like, I'm surprised that you talk like this in real life.
		They're like, I'm surprised that, like, that's just who you are on the show, I assume.
		I'm like, what does that even mean?
		They're like, well, I just assumed, you know, you just kind of talked more like a bro or, like, kind of like a dumber, more immature sort of a person.
		So, so I think people have this perception.
		I'm like a used car salesman.
		People say that a lot.
		But it's, it's, it is a little bit of a persona.
		I tend to be steeped in irony and, you know, all that.
		But I hope people understand it is sincere.
		Like, I don't come on the show and, like, put on an act, like, I ham it up a little bit and we make jokes but uh but no it's it's all it's all totally sincere so you're right about that.
		It is an injustice that he's allowed to say this.
		Sorrows of a Young Zoomer says any tips for how to debate people like Destiny?
		Just not debate them.
		You can't win with somebody like that.
		Somebody's always trying to trap you, gotcha, oh oh you no no no you said this and That's not a good faith argument.
		That's not a good faith debate.
		You know, you watch Yang versus Shapiro, and it's, let me ask you a question, what do you think about this?
		And the response is thoughtful, and the other side is listening, and willing to be charitable, and restate the argument.
		In good faith, what you think it is, that's how a debate is supposed to be conducted.
		A good faith debate is not, um, I'm going to ask you, and then when I don't hear the answer I like, I'm going to interject and interrupt, and actually I assume the worst, and everything you're saying is a lie, and all this other stuff.
		It's just, no, it's not productive for any reason, so.
		And I remember I said to myself after the second debate with him, after I realized that, I said, I'm not going to debate him anymore.
		And I guess I forgot, like, just what a nasty guy he is.
		I mean, just absolute scum-sucking loser this guy is.
		And you look at him and that, of course, his history, what he looks like, I mean, that's everything about him.
		Right?
		I mean, look at his physiognomy, it says it all.
		But then you've got the fact that he is a pedophile.
		You've got the fact that he beats his wife, abandoned his child.
		I mean, this guy is just the epitome of evil in the society.
		So, somebody like that, you don't deal with.
		And the more you can get negative, nasty people like that out of your life, the better.
unidentified		What criticism?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I don't know what you're talking about.
		What criticism?
		I don't know what you're talking about.
		Jeffersonian Wright says, Nope.
		Never go into a rural area.
		Not going to happen.
		I don't know why, it's always cope with these people.
		It's always, we need you to become rural, we need you to become southern, whatever.
		All the lesser ways of the culture, they're always, always coping, always very aggressive about that.
		Kind of says it all.
		Matt Hands says, thoughts on baptism, do you think it's really necessary?
		Yeah, it is necessary.
		That's what the Catholic Church says, it's necessary.
		Samos says this country gets worse, the more Western values get rejected.
		Yeah, I guess it depends on what Western values are to you, but yeah, basically.
		Mead Music says, hello fellow Christian brother.
		Today is 40th birthday.
		Happy birthday, Boomer.
		Please wish me a happy birthday.
		Give us hope for the future.
		Thanks and God bless.
		Well, happy birthday.
		Hope it's a good one, my friend.
		You know, you're older than 20, so you're a Boomer, but that's okay.
		A Boomer ally.
		We appreciate you and hope it's a good birthday, my friend.
		Hope it's a good one.
		Many more, hopefully, right?
		David Sperner says, Sorry for the late chat, big guy.
		Just wanted to thank you for bringing these Moloch worshippers to the light of day.
		And Judeo-Christian values embrace Christendom, reject heresies.
		So true!
		And thanks.
		Glad you're enjoying the show.
		Spook Patrol says, hey Nick, Hassan Nephew's violent insurrectionist rhetoric has really inspired me.
		Honestly, does dictatorship of the proletariat sound that bad?
		Perhaps not.
		Perhaps not.
		After all.
		Umph says, boobie and queen.
		Disavow.
		Disavow.
		America First says, even though Rams Paul is kind of a boomer, he has good points on identity and nationalism that seem similar to yours.
		Seems like a good follow.
		Yeah, he's a great guy.
		I like Rams a lot.
		And there's a lot of overlap.
		He gets optics, he gets the rhetorical stuff, and he gets the content as well, the substance.
		So, he's one of my favorites, hands down.
		One of our closest allies.
		We love Rams.
		Ziphias says, why are your and EMJ's Wikipedia pages gone?
		I don't know why mine got removed.
		I didn't really follow that too closely, but somebody told me about that a long time ago, and honestly, it's a blessing, because it was all lies on my Wikipedia page anyway, but I know, for some reason they took it down.
		That's a slock, dude.
		Yeah, that's an understatement.
		True, true.
		I do belong in the arena.
		that's a slock dude Young Lung says bit late yeah bit late 852 it's a bit late yeah that's an understatement bit late but nice job on both debates with Destiny last week unlike many others you belong in the arena true true I do belong in the arena it's where I feel at home this is where I am at my best The Nick the Knife has to be in conflict, has to be in the fight.
		So yeah, I enjoy it.
		And that's the problem, you know, they're like, you talk too much, whatever.
		I don't think I did, number one.
		But number two, look, if you can't handle that, get out.
		You know, if you can't handle the sparring, if you can't handle the verbal cuts that are happening, got no place in the ring, right?
	Okay.
	That's our last Super Chat.
	What, did we just do the show for two hours now?
	Is that the new program?
	The show's two hours instead of one hour?
	Okay.
	But that's our last Super Chat.
	That's gonna do it for us on the show tonight.
	Remember to check us out on America First Premium.
	It's at nicholasjfuences.com slash membership.
	We just did a brand new episode this weekend.
	I think it's... Let me check.
	It might even be longer than an hour.
	I think it was like an hour and 20 minutes or something so lots of content there we've already got like 20 some hours of content plus the show this week and you get an exclusive show every week if you become a premium member plus it's a great thing to support the show we're 100% viewer funded so we rely on the premium memberships so do check that out if you want more content you want to support the show link is down below Remember to subscribe to the channel.
	Give us a big thumbs up.
	Leave a comment down below.
	Click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
	Remember, we're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	As always, thank you guys for watching.
	Thanks to our Super Chatters premium members.
	Everybody watches the show.
	We love you folks, and we'll see you tomorrow.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America first!

▲