Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 29, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:27:58

The Truth About Alt Right Leader Ben Shapiro | America First Ep. 356

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:24:03

Appearances

Clips

alex jones

00:15

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Nationalism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
alex jones ▲ ● ▼		America first. . . . . . . .
unidentified		Thank you.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		We're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be with you this evening.
		Wow, Thursday already.
		Time really flies, huh?
		It's those weeks when you get to take a three-day weekend.
		I feel like that's when it really shortens it up.
		Does a nice job of shortening it up, right?
		We've got a packed show for you tonight.
		I'm very... I am actually excited.
		I know I say that every night.
		I always say, oh I'm excited to be with you tonight.
		And usually I'm making that up, alright?
		Usually I'm not so excited.
		But tonight I'm authentically, I'm genuinely excited.
		Because we're going to talk about a few things which to me are some of my favorite subjects.
		Benjamin Shapiro, alt-right leader Benjamin Shapiro, finally his reign of white nationalist terror He's being brought to an end.
		He was called out by The Economist and so we'll be discussing this little interaction.
		I don't know if you saw this or not, but this was on Twitter and this was actually trending on Twitter all day.
		The Economist did some... I guess I didn't read the article.
		The point of the article is not really the substance, it was the headline.
		But the headline basically said something that Ben Shapiro is this alt-right leader.
		And Ben Shapiro goes on Twitter and he lambasts them with this very nasally, typically Shapiro-esque rant about why that wasn't exactly factual and blah, blah, blah.
		And the economist is forced to issue a retraction.
		And they say, okay, yes, Mr. Shapiro.
		We will retract the headline.
		We will put up a new headline.
		And so I think it's very interesting.
		We're going to talk about that little interaction, what that means.
		Maybe some similar stories, which don't get as nice of an outcome, as much of a happy ending.
		Maybe people that might be on this show right now, speaking to you at this moment, you know, might have the same thing happening to them.
		So we'll discuss that.
		We'll also be talking about immigration.
		Again, one of our favorites.
		Fan favorite.
		Finally, we have a little something from the President.
		Little something about what's going on with the border.
		We have tweets!
		Okay, that's a start.
		We've got tweets, you know, so basically we don't have a border.
		More people are coming in than at any time since George W. Bush and people that are even being apprehended are being released into the country, but hey, don't worry about it, folks.
		Hey, relax!
		Trump's tweeting about it, okay?
		What more do you want him to do?
		He wakes up, bing bing bong, send...
		I don't know what more you want him to do, alright?
		What do you think he is?
		The President of the United States?
		So we'll talk about the tweet.
		We'll talk about what he's planning on doing.
		And we also have a new figure here.
		This is my favorite figure.
		We've had a lot of figures lately from the border, from ICE, from Customs and Border Protection, figures about people being detained, figures about people being released into the country, about border crossings.
		But this figure is actually a lot better, I think, than all of them, because this just kind of gives you an idea of the scope of what we're talking about, or rather the scale of what we're talking about, which is that there is projected to be, in this year, 1.5 million new illegal immigrants 1.5 million new illegal immigrants coming into the country.
		And this, according to Breitbart News, Uh is projected to surpass every year of illegal immigration levels that the Obama administration oversaw.
		One and a half million illegal immigrants brought into the country in 2019.
		That's what's projected.
		So we'll discuss all that.
		We'll discuss the immigration thing and it should be an exciting show.
		That's that's the name of the game here.
		Big energy.
		Big excitement.
	I gotta get a haircut.
	I gotta tell you because every night you know it feels like the show starts later and later and My hair's growing longer and longer.
	And typically this is because, you know, I'm in the mirror just trying to keep this thing together.
	I don't put gel in this at all.
	People are always asking me, what product do you use in your hair?
	I don't use product in my hair.
	I'm Italian.
	We don't need product in our hair.
	It stands up because of our superior genetics.
	But I'll be, you know, I'll be in there trying to sculpt this thing.
	It's getting too long on the sides and the top.
unidentified		So...
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I know you're really interested in that, but I'm probably going to have to get a haircut tomorrow or this weekend or something.
		He's just out of control.
		And the other thing we have to discuss, never mind that, never mind there's important news to discuss, who cares?
		But there is a big article that we have to talk about, and this is just so perfect to me.
		Before we get into alt-right leader Benjamin Shapiro, who I disavow, friend of Charlie Kirk and Candace Owens, who I disavow as well.
		Too extreme for me.
		You know me.
		You know me.
		I'm a centrist.
		I'm just a campus conservative.
		I'm just a... I'm just an Afro-Latino campus conservative.
		Alright?
		Right-wing extremism.
		White nationalism.
unidentified		Who?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Who's that?
unidentified		Me?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm just a centrist campus conservative.
		I just want lower taxes.
		And that's not... Nick, that joke's getting old.
		Joke?
		What are you talking about?
		What joke?
		But before we get into all that, we do have to discuss this article here from Bloomberg.
		Normally I wouldn't go in-depth into this, but to me, I see this headline and I just have to talk about it because it's almost... it's exactly, like verbatim, what I said yesterday.
		You know, towards the end of the show yesterday, I made this joke.
		I said something to the effect of, you know, look, I know China's doing gene editing on their children, and they've got this ethnic core that's totally coherent, and their country is strong and powerful, and they have a direction, they're committed to common goals, but we have a secret weapon.
		It's called immigration.
		It's called diversity.
		And actually, I stole that joke from a friend of mine.
		QAnon, perhaps?
		Maybe?
		Maybe that's Q. Maybe it's not Q. But that's a joke that was shared to me by a high-level individual, the funniest man in Washington, D.C.
		And so I make that joke yesterday.
		Oh, that's great.
		That's funny.
		I mean, it's funny because it's true.
		We should be laughing.
		Otherwise, we'd be crying.
		Okay.
		But then we get this article from Bloomberg today.
		And it's so funny because of the synchronicity, how these things line up.
		So this is the headline.
		From Bloomberg.
		It says, America's greatest asset is its demographics.
		Oh, really?
		The sub-headline says, a healthy birth rate and high immigration are the US's secret weapons against China and Russia.
		The other sub-headline, but the US needs to keep birth rates up and immigration rising.
		So, it's just beyond parody at this point.
		These people really do believe... I mean, that's why I said it's a joke.
		These people really believe this stuff.
		They really believe China rising in the East and understand the significance of China rising in the East.
		What this effectively does is it invalidates like 30 years of American ideological mythology, is what it is basically, which says that the only way for a country to do well is for it to be liberal and democratic and have a constitution and respect natural rights and have free markets.
		That's the only answer, right?
		That the Soviet Union fell and we won the Cold War and in doing so we proved that the only way to be a modern country, in fact the only civilized way of living, is to be like us.
		Libertine, free markets, hyper-individualism, atomization, all the rest, corporatism essentially operating at the top.
		Oligarchical corporatism, that's the only way to be.
		And here you have China coming along, and they're none of these things.
		For a long time, the argument used to go that we're going to let China come into the World Trade Organization, and we're going to have huge trade deficits, and we're basically going to finance their rise.
		I mean, understand, China was nothing 50 years ago.
		It's only by the grace of American foreign investment that they're where they are today.
		We allowed it to happen.
		And the reason we allowed it to happen is because, again, the ideology, this ideological mythology, because there's this illusory sort of idealistic component to it, naive component to it.
		The idea was that if China became rich, if China developed a middle class, eventually they would have to democratize.
		These things go hand in hand, you see.
		You can't have a middle class and be an authoritarian state because, A, people get a little money in their pocket, they have a little bit of economic choice, a little bit of economic freedom, and what follows down the line is they're going to demand political autonomy, political enfranchisement.
		And you're going to get democracy.
		So the mythology was always, don't worry about China.
		Oh, don't worry about it.
		Hey, it's fine.
		They're going to become capitalists and then democratic.
		And hey, democracies don't declare war on each other.
		We're all just going to get along.
		It's the end of history.
		But obviously that didn't happen.
		And this is happening all across the world.
		China's doing fine.
		They're probably one of the most authoritarian countries in the world.
		Definitely out of the major economies of the world, the most authoritarian.
		And they're pretty substantially Authoritarian.
		You've got countries like Russia, countries like Turkey, countries like Brazil, the Philippines, where they've got leaders which could not be described as liberal, as respecting human rights, or the Atlantic Charter, or anything like that, and yet they're solving problems.
	Sure, Russia isn't doing great.
	Sure, Philippines is still suffering from a lot of challenges.
	Bolsonaro in Brazil hasn't achieved anything so great yet.
	He only got into office several months ago.
	But in spite of that, they are starting to clean the country up.
	You look at Russia prior to Putin, prior to the year 2000, they were doing a lot worse.
	They're not doing great today, but they were doing a lot worse.
	You know, you look at a lot of these countries.
	You look at Turkey with Erdogan, bringing the country back together around their shared ethnic and religious heritage.
	So, what China does, I guess more than any of these countries, but alongside them, is it invalidates all this mythology, all this ideology that we've been operating under these assumptions for years.
	That the only way for us to be competitive is through free markets, this and that, all the rest.
	And so you got to understand when it comes to this question, I mean this is deadly serious.
	How are we going to compete with these other countries?
	Naive ideology is not going to make us competitive.
	This sort of nation of immigrants We're gonna thrive because freedom, man!
	Because we have bacon, alright?
	Because we have guns and bacon and we have freedom and we kick ass!
	That does not sustain a political order which is competitive.
	In China, do you know what they're doing?
	They're studying.
	They're investing in their own people.
	They're kicking out foreigners.
	They're quashing any kind of foreign influence.
	They're taking currency and goods and they're hoarding it in such a way that they can nurture their own industries.
	They're investing in artificial intelligence, in robotics.
	These are all things which are not really ideological.
	They're just simply pragmatic.
	These are things that work.
	These are things that sustain political order.
	And in America, we're saying, well, let's just bring them all in here.
	Maybe it'll work.
	Either way, it makes us feel good.
	Either way, this is the right thing to do.
	Isn't it better when we have a little bit of color, okay?
	Isn't it okay we have a little bit of women in the boardroom, alright?
	Or we have some queers hanging out in the lobby or whatever?
	And so, we really have to get serious about this stuff, but we're going to read a little bit of the article, just a few excerpts here, because this is really fundamental.
	We're going to talk about immigration at the end of the show, but every time we see an article like this, it's very important to sort of read between the lines.
	if you can't even call it that anymore, it's really just reading what they're saying, like explicitly to you now, before you had to read between the lines, now you just have to listen to what they're saying, so this is the first paragraph, it says, quote, will America or its authoritarian rivals dominate the 21st century?
	The answer may have as much to do with demography as with policy, oh, okay, I agree with that, Although we often fixate on military spending and GDP as markers of America's position vis-a-vis China and Russia, a country's demographic profile critically impacts its ability to generate that wealth and power.
	I'm in agreement!
	I'm surprised at how much I'm agreeing with this Bloomberg article about demographic change.
	You mean to tell me that the demographic profile of a country is as if not more important than the GDP or the size of the military?
	Couldn't agree more!
	Couldn't agree more!
	But then they go on and they kind of ruin our agreement here.
	They kind of ruin our...
	Our little moment where we can find common ground.
	And they say, and if demography is indeed destiny, America's geopolitical future looks pretty promising.
	So long as the country can navigate the dangers the world's demographic future also holds.
	And they go on to talk about what this really means, which is bringing in more immigrants.
	We just have to bring in more immigrants.
	They say, quote, a country's people are taproot of its power in many respects.
	A large working-age population serves as a source of military manpower.
	Far more important, a relatively young, growing, well-educated population is a wellspring of the economic productivity that underlies all other forms of international influence.
	All things equal, countries with healthy demographic profiles can create wealth more easily than their competitors.
	They can also direct a larger share of that wealth to geopolitical projects as opposed to, excuse me, pensions and healthcare.
	And it's interesting because in this article they are stressing the importance of demographics.
	They're just not looking at it in any other way other than age and size.
	And that's it.
	They're just talking about volume.
	So it's sort of curious because they say, well, military and GDP isn't the most important thing.
	What's really important is you have a lot of immigrants that can support a big military and a high GDP.
	You know, they're not talking about the quality of the immigrants.
	They're not talking about the actual profile, you know, the profile of the immigrants.
	They're simply talking about the quantity.
	And they're talking about the value, you know, the value of any given individual unit of economic productivity.
	And that's the only way we look at it.
	And even if you look at the qualifications that they use for this kind of stuff, well, it's young, growing, and well-educated.
	Well, we've got young and growing down.
	We've certainly got young and growing down.
	Well educated.
	If you look at Hispanic immigrants, this is according to Jason Richwine, if you look at Hispanic immigrants in particular, and this is the largest group, was previously the largest group I think up until a couple of years ago, since about 1965 or thereabouts after the Hart-Celler Act.
	If you look at Hispanic immigrants after the second generation, you don't see any substantial improvement in education.
	So the second generation is more educated than the first generation, but after that, not a single generation, third, fourth, or beyond, they don't come close to the education rates of white people, any other group of people.
	It doesn't improve after the second generation.
	The same is true with IQ.
	They come in here, average 85 IQ, three generations on, IQ doesn't improve.
	So again, if we're looking at, again, the quality of immigrants and not just the volume, yeah, the quality of immigrants kind of matters just as much.
	We're not really looking at that.
	We're looking at how can we bring in as many people as humanly possible So that we can inflate the GDP and so that we can increase the size of the military.
	Bring in more grunts to work in the military.
	More people that you could put a uniform on and put them at some faraway outpost and they can perform their patrols and their work and everything else.
	But of course this doesn't work because we see that there are a lot of countries in the world who have a big population and they don't do so well.
	You know, is Brazil really capturing all of its economic potential?
	Is India really capturing all of its economic potential?
	Here's a country with a billion people.
	India has a billion people.
	And their GDP, their military doesn't come close to ours.
	You want to know why?
	It has to do with the people.
	Because the people are of, well, perhaps, if you're looking at, oh, all kinds of different factors, you could say that economically and otherwise, they're of a lower quality.
	People know this.
	And there are economic reasons.
	There are some other reasons which are a little more controversial.
	You know, among the reasons are that, well, Americans are simply more educated.
	They have access to capital.
	You know, there are certain cultural traditions that go on in America.
	There's also some racial factors which people don't like to talk about so much, like average IQ, which is kind of a big one.
	And that's why a country like India can have a billion people and their GDP doesn't come close to ours.
	They don't invent anything at the same rate as us.
	They don't produce art or culture, which is compelling, at the rate that we do, or anything like that.
	But this article is principally concerned with age, manpower, that's all there is.
	And this is the last excerpt I'll read before we move on here.
	But this is really fundamental stuff.
	It says, America's demographic future is more fragile than the numbers indicate.
	Projected increases in population are heavily dependent on one of the country's hidden underrated advantages, high levels of immigration.
	But if current trends are any indication, the U.S.
	could easily squander its demographic advantages by enacting draconian immigration restrictions, or simply destroying its image as a country that welcomes ambitious newcomers.
	Ambitious newcomers.
	That's who's coming over.
	Conversely, if the proportion of immigrants continues to rise while the white population shrinks, xenophobia and race-based politics could become more common and more toxic.
	If the U.S.
	is to keep its demographic edge, which is importing 3 million immigrants a year, it will have to find ways of reconciling two competing imperatives.
	Refreshing the population through immigration while preserving social and political stability.
	That's the agenda.
	That's the objective.
	What it comes down to is this.
	America, with 330 million people, even with less people.
	You know, think of America in 1990.
	Just to give you an idea, this is a very important statistic that people need to know.
	In 1990, 50% of America's population descended from the founding stock of the country.
	50%.
	As recently as 1990.
	I guess that's not so recent anymore, but maybe people are surprised that that figure As recently as 1990, half the population was natural population growth descended from the original stock.
	Could trace their stock back to the founding of the country, 1776, the settlements in New England, all of that.
	Okay?
	Half the country.
	And in 1990, the population of white people was a much larger majority.
	Then they are now.
	So you figure in 1990, America was indisputably the most powerful country in the world.
	I don't think we had the same edge of GDP over the next highest country or anything like that.
	I'm not sure the exact figures, but you know that with a smaller amount of people, but simply with the right people, we were still able to be the most powerful country in the world uncontested without a doubt.
	And everybody knows that.
	Now they're telling us that, no, no, no, actually we need to refresh the population.
	Even though if the white population were to diminish, and therefore the population at large would diminish, GDP, you know, this larger number may go down, maybe it would stagnate, maybe it would stay the same.
	Well, that would be unacceptable.
	That would make us uncompetitive.
	What we need to do is refresh the population.
	All these people who seem to be doing just fine, Just fine on their own.
	From 76 all the way up to 1990, right?
	From 1776 all the way to 1990.
	Seemed to be doing just fine on their own.
	Without growth for the sake of growth.
	Without pursuing GDP for the sake of itself.
	You know, economic productivity in itself.
	We were doing just fine.
	Actually, we were doing better than anybody in the world.
	In Europe, in America, we were doing just fine.
	And they said, that's not good enough.
	That's actually not good enough.
	Profits aren't high enough.
	GDP isn't high enough.
	Not enough widgets are being sold.
	Not enough taxes being collected.
	Not enough goods are being purchased.
	So, we just have to refresh the population.
	We just have to bring in all these people and, oh sure, they're going to cause things like social and political instability.
	That's just something we'll have to manage.
	That's just something we'll have to figure out because of course we need more people in the military to expand our hegemony in financial markets, to make the world safer banking, and we need more people buying products and working these menial jobs.
	And that's ultimately what this is about.
	You know, why do we complain about immigration?
	Why do we hit that all day long?
	It's because this is the agenda.
	And I said this yesterday.
	I said this yesterday about Facebook banning white nationalists.
	Why do you think Facebook is banning anybody who, you know, speaks ill of immigration?
	And that's effectively what they're doing.
	Anybody who says that we should maintain any kind of racial or ethnic homogeneity or coherence in a country, it's because they're all in on it.
	The agenda on the part of Silicon Valley, Wall Street, D.C., all these other power centers, is we just want to transform this country into a country of Of laborers and consumers.
	We want a country that, you know, there is no solidarity among people.
	There's no... And this is all things that I said yesterday, but you read this article and it really just drives home the point that I'm not like making that up.
	You know, you might have heard years ago that this was conspiracy talk to talk about Population replacement is some kind of conspiracy theory, that the people that push that are Nazis, they're white nationalists, something like that.
	It's really not an extreme position to have.
	It's just simply factual.
	They're not hiding it.
	They're telling you, yeah, the agenda, the play for the next 100 years, for us to do better, is we have to refresh, replace the population with people who are going to work, who are going to increase the GDP, they're going to increase our bottom line, and they're going to serve in the military.
	And in having a big military, we're going to be able to protect our financial interests.
	That's all there is to it.
	That's all there is to it.
	You know, it's not complicated.
	You think they're bringing them in here because they're going to make your life better?
	You think they thought, you know, you look at my suburb in Chicago, you think they came down here where we have no problems and they said, how can we make it better?
	There needs to be more minorities here.
	We have to have more people from Brazil and Nicaragua and Guatemala.
	You know, I was driving around and There hasn't been a murder here in, like, decades.
	There hasn't been a burglary in, like, years.
	The only crime is, like, teenagers being too loud at night.
	But it's safe.
	It's clean.
	The schools are good.
	The restaurants are nice.
	Everything is great.
	You know, and they were driving around and they said, this is pretty good.
	But you know what could make it better?
	Hey, I'll tell you.
	You know how I could make your life better?
	You have no problems.
	But you know how I could, except for high property taxes, you know, that's a certain tax for something, right?
	That's a certain expense you pay for a certain neighborhood, right?
	You know how we could make your life better?
	We just need to bring in Africans.
	We just need to bring in Africans from Africa.
	And that's, you know, all this was going great.
	We need to bring in those kinds of people and it'll actually make it better.
	Nobody said that.
	Nobody believes that because it's not true.
	That's gonna hurt you, but it's gonna help the elites in the country who benefit off GDP, military, all the rest.
	So if you didn't believe me yesterday, there it is from Bloomberg, and there's many articles like that.
	So I know I spent a little bit more time on that than I intended to.
	It's already like 740, but...
	We're gonna move on here.
	We gotta get on to the other issues.
	This Ben Shapiro episode.
	So like I said at the top of the show, the episode in question here, I didn't read the article.
	The substance of the article is kind of irrelevant.
	But The Economist, they put out this headline where they call Ben Shapiro alt-right.
	Okay?
	You know, that's what they say.
	And Ben Shapiro, I'll read to you this autistic rant that he goes on.
	He writes, quote, The Economist, this is a vile lie.
	Not only am I not alt-right, I am probably their leading critic on the right.
	I was the number one target of their hate in 2016 online according to ADL data.
	I demand a retraction!
	Oy vey!
	I demand a retraction!
	He goes on, quote, you should be ashamed of yourselves for that garbage headline and description.
	To call yourselves a journalistic outlet and then botch this one so badly is astonishing.
	Here is me in 2016 in Washington Post ripping Trump for flirting with the alt-right.
	Here was my podcast the day after Charlottesville in which I analyzed and savaged the disgusting alt-right.
	My book itself contains several pages devoted to the evil of the alt-right and white supremacy.
	Retract this pathetically inaccurate and defamatory nonsense now!
	And what does The Economist do?
	Dutifully.
	What do they do, of course?
	We have deleted an earlier tweet for an article that mischaracterized Ben Shapiro, who has been strongly critical of the alt-right movement.
	We apologize.
	Here's the article.
	Now, first and foremost, isn't that kind of cool how that works?
	Isn't that kind of neat how that works?
	Imagine that.
	A conservative right-wing commentator can put an outlet like this on Blast.
	All they have to do is just demand a retraction.
	And it happens and the outlet apologizes.
	I'm so sorry Mr. Shapiro.
	We were wrong.
	You are critical of the alt-right.
	Isn't that kind of cool how that works?
	I don't know what it is about Ben Shapiro.
	You know, maybe it's facts and logic.
	It must be just the strength of his arguments.
	I guess it was that.
	It was like we were saying yesterday, you know, the economists, they saw these facts being delivered, just blow after blow, and they're like, we're being humiliated.
	These facts and logic are overwhelming.
	We're being, we're being embarrassed.
	We're getting owned online.
	This is going to end up in a cringe compilation.
	We have to act now.
	I'm sure it was that and nothing else.
	I'm sure it was that and nothing else.
	That a guy like Ben Shapiro could go out there and, I demand that you stop this now!
	Issue a retraction now!
	And, you know, a media outlet like this, a totally legacy media outlet like this, would just say, oh yes, I'm sorry, we'll issue a retraction, we'll do the right thing.
	That must be a nice little perk.
	I wish I had a perk like that because, you know, this is on a similar note, I've been called the white nationalist for like months.
	And every time an article like that comes out about me, I say, I'm not a white nationalist.
	Of course.
	I've been saying it for like years now.
	I think Jared Holt did an article saying, you're a white nationalist.
	And I went on a stream and I said, well, you know, I'm white and I'm a nationalist.
	So I guess if you want to get technical, it's like, yeah, well, I'm white, comma, a nationalist.
	And he's like, oh, he's a self-described white nationalist.
	Now he's a self-described white nationalist.
	Now he's a self-proclaimed white nationalist.
	Well, that's not really what was said, right?
	And then I go to Iowa, and they writ me in their Iowa State Daily for the campus speech as white nationalist, Nick Fuentes comes to campus, and they detail this exact event.
	They said, well, he says he's white and a nationalist, so he's a self-proclaimed...
	And I go to the speech.
	I said, I don't identify as that.
	And here's the difference.
	A white nationalist is somebody who wants X, Y, and Z. And I'm a nationalist who wants America to kind of have some coherent national identity.
	And you know, there's a number of ways we could go about that and yada yada.
	Next day, the person who's reporting about the speech says, oh yeah, white nationalistic.
	And every time I say, you know, look, what you're doing is liable.
	What you're doing is basically...
unidentified		All right.
unidentified		points.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Well, okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, it looks like we're back here.
unidentified		Sheesh.
unidentified		All right.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Okay, are we back?
		It looks like we're back.
		That's awesome.
		Wow, that's great.
		That's great.
		We love that.
		I love a little 10 minute interruption.
		You love to see it, right?
		You love to see it.
		Man, isn't that weird?
		We talk about a few different issues and you have problems.
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I'm sure it's a coincidence, but what were we talking about before we left?
		Talking about Mr. Ben Shapiro.
		Look, I don't know.
		I'm just going to wrap it up on this point because it's kind of hard to get cut off like that and just sort of dive right back into the old rant.
		I mean, I don't even know where I left off before I got cut, but...
		Uh, you know, look, this guy Ben Shapiro, in summation, to conclude, this guy Ben Shapiro is causing a lot of problems, alright, and I think the point that I left off on with this Economist article is basically that, you know, he likes censorship.
		He likes this stuff.
		When my show goes down, he likes that.
		When I get called the white nationalist, he likes that.
		He upholds the framework of the left.
		It's a sort of pick up right where I left off there.
		And I think that was a point I was about to make, which is that when he uses this kind of stuff alt-right, I go after the alt-right, too.
		I go after white nationalists, too.
		I go after these people.
		He goes on Dave Rubin, for example, and he says, I believe the real racists should have their lives destroyed.
		Well, he's participating in censorship, of course.
		He's the number one beneficiary of censorship, as a gatekeeper.
		Ben Shapiro's task is not to protect free speech, it's not to keep people on the internet, it's not to foster some marketplace of ideas.
		Ben Shapiro's task is to make it such that conservatism means exactly what he wanted to and what his donors wanted to, which is all of what we just talked about with the Bloomberg article.
		Mass immigration, foreign wars, free trade, diversity, all this other stuff.
		That's the job.
		So, you know, I see a lot of people tell me all the time, like, oh, a lot of, like, blue-pilled normie types.
		Oh, you're conservative.
		What do you like, Ben Shapiro?
		You know, I think you'd really like this Ben Shapiro guy.
		You ever heard of him?
		Or, you know, you guys agree on a lot of issues.
		Well, of course, all that overlap is really a non-starter because people like him want to make sure that people like me, because we have fundamentally different ideas about how the nation should govern itself and how we should identify as Americans, should simply go away.
		We should be banned.
		And that's why he uses their framework just as easily as any left-wing person.
		That's why, for all the economists might say that he's alt-right or a radical conservative or...
		Remember it was the New York Times that wrote a glowing article about how Ben Shapiro is the prophet of conservatism.
		He's leading the intellectual dark web.
		These people are just as much a part of the establishment as anybody else.
		And that was the point I was trying to make there before I got...
		Cut off, but I don't want to spend too much time on that.
		There's really not much left to say there.
		I'm still kind of miffed that we got cut off like that.
		You know, I thought we were going to... I thought we weren't going to have that issue anymore.
		I got the Windows key and typically what'll happen since I got the Windows key is I just fix the issue very quickly, but the computer actually froze while I was trying to fix it.
		So that's just...
		Totally different issue.
		You know, if it's, okay, well we're fixing this issue and the computer freezes, well not much you can do about that, right?
		So that's always, always a great time, but we're gonna go into our last topic here for the evening and then we'll open it up for super chats or stream labs.
		You know, it wouldn't even be that big of a deal if I could just pick up the stream where I left off, but the problem is then it creates two separate streams if you're offline for too long.
		Then it's just like I got one video and then another video and It's just kind of sloppy, so maybe I'll re-upload it as one video.
		Maybe that'll be cleaner.
		So, it'll take a little bit more work, but maybe I'll have to do it, because that's the only way I can stand it.
		But anyway, enough about that.
		Our last topic here is this immigration thing.
		As you know, we've been talking about this for weeks now.
		We've been talking about this since the funding bill was passed, because that's when this problem really kicked into overdrive.
		And that's, you know, what everybody's saying at the border, which is this immigration thing.
		And finally today we got a response from the president on this issue.
		He's basically been silent about immigration since the end of the government shutdown and the ensuing funding bill, which completed the whole process three weeks later.
		You know, we had a lot about North Korea, some stuff about health care, and just sort of this meandering, unfocused administration, until finally it seems like we're revisiting this issue about a month or so later.
		And the president has a tweet for us.
		He says, Mexico is doing nothing to help stop the flow of illegal immigrants to our country.
		They are all talk and no action.
		That's really interesting.
		Interesting concept there.
		Likewise, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador have taken our money for years and do nothing.
		The Dems don't care.
		Such bad laws may close the southern border.
	Now there's really a lot to pick apart here.
	I mean, sentence by sentence, Mexico is doing nothing to stop the flow of illegal immigrants.
	Well, maybe you should do something to stop the flow of illegal immigrants.
	Why is it Mexico's responsibility to do that?
	Why would Mexico do that anyway?
	There's no incentive for them to do that.
	Mexico just dumps their bad people into our country.
	America's a dumping ground for Mexico.
	And the best part about it is, not only do they send their worst, poorest, their biggest criminals over to America, But moreover, the people that they do send here who are somewhat decent, the people come here, they work, and then they send remittances back to Mexico.
	So they send over some workers, some laborers, and all throughout their stay in America, they'll be sending money back to Mexico.
	And that money will be spent in Mexico.
	And that money will go into the Mexican economy.
	And then when they're done working, in a lot of cases, then they come back to Mexico.
	A lot of times they'll just come over, they'll work for 10 or so many years, or they'll come for a needed medical treatment, or they'll come to bring their school, or rather their children to school in the American public school system, and then they go back.
	So why would Mexico want to stop that?
	Why would Mexico want to, in any way, stem the tide of immigrants pouring into America now?
	There's no reason for them to do it.
	And we tried to package that up with the USMCA.
	We tried to package that up with a couple of other different things.
	But ultimately, the task of protecting America's borders is the job of the American president, not the Mexican president.
	Mexico is going to protect their interests, their people.
	So sure, even if we work something out, even if there was some kind of understanding or agreement, Where does the buck stop?
	Is it with Mexico?
	I don't know if that excuse will really fly in 2020.
	Well, Mexico wouldn't stop their immigrants from coming.
	That's kind of why we elected you to build the wall, isn't it?
	So that's number one.
	And it's so clean, you know, all these different... it's just excuse after excuse and...
	What does he say next?
	They're all talking no action.
	Yeah, again, very interesting there, right?
	Where's the action on our part?
	He says, likewise, Honduras, Guatemala, and El Salvador have taken our money for years and do nothing.
	We give them the money.
	Do you remember in the last government shutdown?
	I think it was around September or something.
	It was right around the midterm election.
	We actually greenlit more foreign aid for these Central American countries.
	So it's not like, you know, because a lot of people come to me when I criticize Trump and they say, oh, well, he couldn't do anything about that.
	Like that was put in place by his predecessors.
	Well, this was money that was greenlit under a Republican House and Senate and Republican president.
	that there was hundreds of millions of dollars given to all these countries when they were doing the same exact thing, when we have like three caravans coming through in September, October, and November.
	And I don't know if anybody remembers that, but it's not really fair.
	I don't think that's really...
	Does he think he can just kind of get one over on us by blaming these countries and saying, well, they're not stopping, but they get money anyway?
	Maybe stop giving them the money then.
	I mean, you're kind of like the president, right?
	And up until recently, we did control both chambers of Congress.
	So remember, I mean, that was passed under a Republican House of Representatives.
	The excuse that is used now is, oh, well, the Democrats control the House.
	Well, that wasn't the case when the money was allocated back during the fall when the migrant caravans were coming in.
	So that's pretty absurd.
	He says, the Dems don't care.
	Bad laws.
	I may close the southern border.
	Yeah, you think?
	Maybe it's time to, you know, actually close the southern border by any means necessary?
	Doesn't seem to be happening.
	NBC News reports then this afternoon that the Trump administration is asking Congress for sweeping authority to deport unaccompanied migrant children.
	Well, finally.
	Finally, he is asking about doing something about this.
	It's about time.
	Am I right?
	Am I right?
	Immigrants pouring into the country.
	They're being detained.
	It's worse ever since George W. Bush.
	But finally, we have a president who's going to ask permission if he can stand up and do something about it.
	I don't know how people can defend this administration anymore.
	You know and I used to be one of the most gung-ho people about it and people like to paint this picture like I jumped on the bandwagon of the Black Pillars or something like that or I have to tell people that they were right all along.
	The funding bill came down and it was made clear that this administration is not serious.
	Everything before that I think could have been rationalized to an extent.
	But there was an ulterior motive, that there was still some effort being made to stop immigration, that there was somebody serious still in the White House trying to get this done.
	But after the funding bill, I mean, he created this crisis.
	You know, previous crises we could say that, well, Congress wouldn't pass something.
	But this present crisis is a direct result of the funding bill that the President signed.
	The president could have vetoed that.
	He didn't have to sign it.
	And that was the watershed moment.
	That was the crossing of the Rubicon when he said, I'm willing to be personally complicit in what's happening.
	Before you could say, well, he's fighting and he's holding back, you know, these adverse forces on immigration.
	But then he just gave up with the funding bill.
	And then he just gave up with the State of the Union.
	He gave up with all this other stuff.
	And I don't know how people defend it anymore.
	They say, well, he's our only guy.
	He's our only hope.
	You know, he's doing a lot of great things like tax cuts and all the rest.
	That's just not good enough.
	Sorry.
	You're the President of the United States.
	This may be our last opportunity to achieve meaningful reform before we really have to go underground.
	Literally forced underground here when the next administration comes in and they decide to pursue all anti-immigration people on RICO charges or something else like that.
	I mean, that's what we're up against.
	We're up against people who want 5 million immigrants a year, basically.
	And so I don't understand how anybody can still stick around and defend this guy when that's all that is being done here.
	Send in the military.
	Send in the National Guard.
	I don't know what can be done, but people say, well, he's not declaring himself a dictator and that's why you're mad.
	He's up against a lot of...
	He's up against a lot of obstruction and a lot of opposition within his own party, and you're mad that, you know, things take time and you have to be patient.
	No, I was saying that maybe months ago.
	I was saying that maybe three or four months ago, but then your patience runs out.
	Then the reality of timing sets in.
	You know, I was willing to be patient for two years, and then after two and a half years we signed the funding bill, right?
	And nobody was tying his hands on that one.
	He could have vetoed that.
	So...
	You know, at that point I said, look, until this administration gets serious about this, you just, you can't support it in good faith.
	The number one issue that he ran on was building the wall, stopping illegal immigration, deporting illegals, maybe cutting legal immigration.
	Now, this is according to Breitbart, they're projecting that the Trump administration is going to bring in 1.5 million illegal immigrants in 2019.
	Which happens to be more than every year of Barack Obama's presidency.
	So not one single year did Barack Obama have 1.5 million illegals.
	Trump is bringing them in in year two of the administration.
	I mean that is just that I don't know what other figure you need.
	I don't know what else you need to say that this has been an abject failure.
	The promise was we were going to deport 20 million illegals.
	I mean, I understood that maybe that wasn't practical.
	That probably wasn't going to happen.
	But remember, that was the promise.
	He said we're going to deport 20 million illegals.
	So you would expect at the very least that we would have less illegals in the country.
	And when we got started, you would imagine that if you're promising we're gonna get them all out, at the very least there wouldn't be more than when we began.
	Like, okay, nobody's gonna push you to deport all of them.
	That's a lot of people.
	You only have so much time.
	But we're gonna have more than ever before?
	Like, what's going on?
	And again, and it all goes back to this is entirely self-inflicted.
	This is going to be the worst year for illegal immigration since George W. Bush because Trump signed the funding bill that gave amnesty and immunity to unaccompanied minors and their sponsors.
	Who constitutes all the new illegal immigration?
	Like we said yesterday, it's unaccompanied minors and their sponsors from Central America.
	So all these people, this was the problem back in November because we talked about childhood separation in July.
	And so Trump, looking at that emergency, said, well, this is pretty terrible.
	We've got to do something about that.
	And then what?
	Four months later, he's giving immunity to all these people that are the problem?
	What do you think you're going to get more of?
	The problem!
	So I'm off.
	I'm off the Trump train.
	I just I can't do it anymore.
	I can't defend it.
	I'll probably vote for President Trump in 2020.
	I'll probably do it just because you know there really aren't any other good options.
	You know I like Yang and we've been doing the Yang gang thing because I think it's very important that he breaks the law jam on the socialism-capitalism question.
	I think it's important to play the other side because this is an incumbent election, so you'd be stupid to not play the other side.
	You know, I live in Illinois, so this is a very blue state.
	There's a little bit of clout there and room for organizing, so I'll probably vote for Trump.
	You know, in spite of the fact that Yang is something that's strategically important to do now, people still don't really understand this, but, you know, I don't know.
	I don't even know.
	Maybe I'll just sit this one out, honestly.
	Maybe I won't even vote.
	Maybe that's the answer.
	If it's between Trump and somebody else, and they're both, I mean, really, what difference does it make, then?
	If it's 1.5 million illegals and more legal immigrants than ever before, How's that any different than any other administration?
	Is any other thing getting better?
	Trade?
	Foreign policy?
	Censorship?
	Is any of that getting better?
	Doesn't really look like it, right?
	So, at the very least, if you went with an independent or a democrat or somebody like that, you get a little options.
	You get a little flair here.
	You know, a little destabilizing action.
	A little chaos.
	But, I mean, this is just more of the same.
	This is George W. Bush 3.
	I always hesitated to say that.
	And the reason being was because people would say that when he would strike Syria.
	And that was a ridiculous comparison because, you know, striking Syria with 50 missiles is not the same as 250,000 ground troops in Iraq.
	Okay, obviously.
	But when you look at the policies being pursued, in principle, they're basically the same.
	Not in the same scope and not on the same scale, but in principle, you know, what did George W. Bush give us?
	You know, mass immigration, cheap tax cuts that weren't really all that helpful, foreign wars, trade deficits...
	What are we getting with this administration?
	Anything really all that different?
	On a different scale, maybe it's less.
	And maybe not.
	Maybe by the end of it, there'll be more immigration.
	That's what the president promised.
	More immigration than ever before.
	We're gonna get that Hispanic vote.
	Just gotta keep trying.
	Just gotta bring in more immigrants.
	You know, that was George W. Bush's strategy.
	If I bring in 8 million immigrants in 5 years, I'll win the Hispanic vote.
	We just gotta keep trying.
	It's just not enough.
	10 million more, 20 million more, 30 million more.
	Who cares?
	One day we're gonna get more than half of the Hispanic vote and it'll all be worth it.
	And those Democrats, they're gonna regret the day they ever let us bring in all those immigrants because they're gonna start voting Republican.
unidentified		Uh-huh.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Any day now.
		Cassie Dillon, Ben Shapiro, Aaron Bandler.
		They're gonna drive down to El Paso, Texas with a trailer hitched to the back of their truck full of copies of Milton Friedman's Capitalism and Freedom, Free to Choose, and they're gonna go.
		It's gonna be like when Trump visited that Hurricane Disaster Center.
		He was throwing paper towels.
		It's gonna be like that.
		There's just gonna, they're gonna be mobbing them.
		Spanish translations of Free to Choose, Spanish translations of John Galt, right, of what's the Ayn Rand book?
		All those different books.
		It's going to be Henry Hazlitt's Economics in One Lesson, Ludwig von Mises.
		I imagine Guatemalan immigrants are going to come across the border and they're going to read a Spanish translation of On Money and Credit by Ludwig von Mises.
		And they will vote Republican.
unidentified		Uh-huh.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Any day.
		And that's how these people think.
		That's really what they believe is going to happen.
		So I'm over it.
		I'm over it.
		You know, we'll take it day by day, right?
		We'll play it by ear, I guess.
		Maybe a month before the election we're going to get another, you know, 20 promises, right?
		What was it before the midterms?
		No, no, I'll do something about immigration after the midterms.
		I've got a birthright citizenship executive order.
		It's coming right up.
		You know, it's in the oven.
		You know, it's going to be out in five minutes and I've got another executive order coming down the line and This one is going to completely end this amnesty fraud happening at our ports of entry.
		Coming right up.
		Just got to vote for me in the midterms.
		After the midterms, you know, nothing, right?
		So that's that.
		We're going to take a look at our Super Chats.
		We'll see what you guys are saying here.
		We'll have to go into this other panel here to pull up our old Super Chats from the previous stream.
		And we'll see.
		Okay, so let's take a look.
		Not a good year, right?
		2019 has not been off to a great start.
		Censorship, tech problems, drumpf.
		It's just all the way around.
		It's really a year of trial.
		That's what it is.
		A year of trial.
		You know, being tested.
		I hope that's what it is.
		I really hope that's what it is sometimes.
		Because it's like, you know, I'm trying to do my part over here.
		I'm trying to spread the good word, alright?
		I'm trying to do what I'm supposed to do.
		And it just seems like the bottom is always falling out from under me.
		It's like, what's going on?
		What's the deal with that?
		Right?
		But I guess that's how it goes, right?
		The road less traveled, huh?
		Let's see.
		Dominic Liberatore says, I know this is small picture, but if radical Democrats control UBI, wouldn't they try and withhold the bag from white nationalists?
		P.S.
		I miss America only.
		The Juan Williams of America first.
		I just, I can't do it anymore.
		The questions about Yang, the questions about Yang really belie who is an NPC and who is not an NPC.
		I'm so sorry to say that.
		But it's like, if you understand Yang, you get it.
		Like, you're high IQ, you understand political strategy, you understand politics, and if you don't, you just don't get it, man.
		I mean, people saying, well, when he gets elected and he passes UBI, isn't he gonna use that against white nationalists?
		Bet you didn't think about that.
unidentified		Oh, God.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Spare me!
unidentified		Please!
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Please!
		The point is not to elect him president.
		We probably, even if he got elected, and understand he was hot for like a minute and now his chances, even in the betting markets, are down to like 4%.
		Okay?
		4% of winning the nomination.
		So he's polling at 0% in every state and nationally.
		He's at 4% in the betting markets, all right?
		We're like two years out from the actual election.
		About a year and a half out from the actual election.
		So it's a long shot that even gets the primary nomination.
		Now they wouldn't give it to Bernie Sanders.
		They're going to give it to Andrew Yang, okay?
		And that's like even if everything goes right, it would be a long shot, longer than a long shot.
		Then he's going to win the general election.
		Then he's going to get UBI passed.
		Then we're going to be concerned about, well, is he going to not allow it for political extremists?
		I think you're kind of putting the car before the horse.
		Will he pass UBI if he got elected?
		Probably not.
		Would he get elected to the general?
		Probably not.
		Is he going to win the Democratic primary?
		No!
		So, people coming in, you know, you really shouldn't show for Yang because, you know, let's say he gets the nomination, gets elected, UBI gets passed, he's probably going to take it away.
		You know, under this, like, crazy hypothetical, he says it's for everybody over the age of 18.
		So, probably not going to happen anyway, right?
		If it's for everybody over the age of 18, regardless of income and anything else, they're not going to take it away based on ideology.
		But, like, that's so not the point.
		That is so not the point.
		Holy smokes, man!
		How many times do we have to say it?
		It's not about that.
		It's about changing the conversation.
		It's about human-centered capitalism.
		Ugh.
		I don't know.
		Is it me?
		Is it me?
		But I just feel like it's... I feel like... What's that movie?
		It's like Vertigo or something.
		I feel like I'm the bad guy.
		I feel like I'm just wiling out or something.
		But I feel like we answer the same question every night at 12.
		But Yang has a bad policy.
		Yang's policy couldn't be implemented.
		I'll just say this very simply in plain English so everybody can understand once and for all.
		It doesn't matter if Yang has bad policies.
		It doesn't matter if Yang's policies can't be implemented.
		It doesn't matter if Yang's policies can't be implemented the way we want them to be implemented.
		None of that matters.
		What matters is he is talking about human-centered capitalism.
		He is talking about an alternative to capitalism and socialism.
		He's talking about tech.
		He's talking about automation.
		He's talking about social media.
		He's talking about children and smartphone abuse.
		That's what matters.
		Okay?
		Okay?
		Are we good?
		Do we understand now?
		Because it's just like... I mean, we could do this every night.
		All right, all right.
		Pump the brakes.
	Relax.
	Things are all right.
	Things are going great.
	You're alive.
	You're, you know, relatively healthy.
	Everybody just calm down, okay?
	We're going to do some deep breathing exercises and we're going to be all right.
	Cassie, Queen of Spades Dillon says, go ahead and re-upload all your videos to a new platform with the intros edited out.
	And while you're at it, make me a sandwich.
	Yeah, right?
	That's how it goes, basically.
	Punish Dano says if you had to give up McDonald's or Vidya for an entire year?
	Vidya.
	That's still great.
	For an entire year, which are you giving up?
	Any guess when the new premium show might be up?
	Yeah, probably tomorrow.
	And McDonald's or video games?
	I don't know, man.
	It's a really pressing question.
	I don't know, probably video games.
	I'm not really addicted to video games, but I am addicted to fast food.
	So, and I am shamelessly addicted to fast food.
	It's just, you know, you just crave it after a while.
	And I catch myself.
	I crave processed sugars.
	I crave this kind of stuff.
	And I'm a disciplined person, so I really can, if I, if I really don't want it.
	I can stop anytime I want.
	But it's true.
	You know, I'll pull back and I'll not have it for a little while if I feel like it's getting excessive, but it is, you know, there is a chemical addiction happening there.
	YangPilled says, Nick, I love your boomer jokes.
	They're my favorite.
	Glad you enjoy, because I know the boomers get very upset about this.
	Samuel Tudor says fake conservatives don't understand economics.
	Free markets equals free people.
	That is real conservative.
	That's why I call him Ben Is Real Shapiro.
	That's good.
	I never thought of it that way.
	You know, Ben is a real conservative.
	He is real.
	You know, Ben Shapiro is real.
unidentified		Ben Shapiro is real.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Ben Shapiro is real!
		You know, something like that.
		Ben Shapiro is real.
		I often think that to myself.
		You know, I think to myself, I sit down at my desk and I go crazy thinking about Ben Shapiro is real.
		Dave Rubin is real.
		Jeffrey Zucker is real.
		Jeff Bezos is real.
		George Soros is real.
		All these people are just so real.
		Jake Tapper is real.
		Anderson Cooper is real.
		You know, they're just very real people.
		Real conservatives.
		That's what I'm about in my life is real campus conservatism.
		NotNathan says, Riddle me this Nick, what is 13% and also 52%?
		I think it's 50.
		I think it's 50, but yeah.
		Riddle me that one, huh?
		I don't know.
		I don't know what you mean by that.
		It's a pretty tough riddle there.
		Overseer says my enthusiasm for the Trump administration started to weaken back when he announced the bump stock ban and then it died at CPAC 2019.
		Oh well, keep up the good work, Nick, and don't interview E. Michael Jones.
		Well, now I have to.
		Well, now I have to.
		Right.
		But yeah, the bump stock ban was pretty rough.
		I don't know if that was the end of the world for me, but You know, it just goes to show that it wasn't moving in the right direction from the beginning.
		Tom Allen says, I've been scared to come out, but I was viciously attacked by alt-right leader Ben Shapiro and his goons.
		They tried to put a noose around my neck whilst shouting, this is Yehudi, Clowny Goy.
		Yeah, that's, uh, that's a fear that I often have, you know, when traveling to Skokie, Illinois and other places.
		I'm always afraid that somebody's gonna put a noose to a reverse Holocaust on me or something you know we have to be afraid as a black man myself I look at who are the slave traders and you know you got to really get woke about that right Carson Gordon says Nick don't let Ben distract you focus on the bag I'm always focused on the bag but guy Glass half-empty says, all hail Ben, whose sister is a 10 Shapiro, the leader of the new Nazi alt-right.
		Oh, I disavow, I disavow neo-nazi leader Ben Shapiro.
		Can't do it, I'm a campus conservative, okay?
		Distracted libertarian says, hello fellow zoomers, I hate boomers and also have an abnormal attraction to TikTok girls.
		Become orthodox, join AIM.
		Okay, I don't know who this is supposed to parody.
		Oh, is that?
		Well, it's not.
		That can't be Patrick Casey, because Patrick Casey's not Orthodox.
		So I don't know who you're trying to parody there.
		Not really sure what you're getting at, big guy.
		God's Plan says, have you talked to Zoomer Chick Lieutenant Corbis?
		No, I don't know who that is.
		Cassie, Queen of Spades Dillons' globalist Bertrand Russell said that in the future, China would have to take control of the West due to a lack of whites.
		He wrote this in the 1930s.
		Yeah, there you go.
		And it's gonna happen, baby!
		Yang gang, wresting control of the country away from the other people.
		And that's gonna be a little marginally better, I guess.
		John G says, thank you, Nick.
		Hey, thank you, man.
		I appreciate the just gratitude posts.
		Thank you, my friend.
		Thank you.
		Uh, Tantz Davel says, love your show.
		Thanks, man.
		Glad you like it.
		Uh, The Deep Dark Net says, you see the Crow House, the Crow House, Blackstone Intel, and more exposed themselves as anti-speech, anti-gun shills the past couple of days.
		So many shills insulting their audience.
		No, I haven't seen any of that.
		He says, it's truly insane.
		They all blew it at once.
	I haven't seen, uh, I don't know who those people are, so.
	Amor Fadi says your show is getting me through the late shift.
	Thanks big guy.
	Hey man, you're welcome.
	Glad you're glad you're liking it.
	The wagees out there.
	Glad the wagees can cope with a little America first.
	You know, they go into their jobs, put on the earbuds, and they can kind of escape a little bit from the day to day.
	I get it.
	I was there once.
	I was a wagee like you once, getting up for the morning commute and you know, driving all the way over and working eight hours.
	Been there, done that.
	I remember, because I used to work a job in a warehouse where it was eight hours, and you literally just had to, it was this mindless activity of just packaging and unpackaging.
	You would dump out the contents of the box.
	You would repackage.
	Oh, I think that's how, no, no, I'm sorry.
	It was different.
	There was a problem with the boxes they were stored in.
	So you would dump them out, get rid of the box, put them all in the other box, tape up the box, put it down.
	Get another box, unpackage, move them into the other, and you would do that for eight hours.
	the same thing, you'd probably do like a thousand or, you know, that's probably a lot, but, you know, you do a lot of boxes in a day, and so you just have to, I remember I would listen to Kanye West discography, like, every day, all the way through, I listened from College Dropout to, at the time, Life of Pablo, and just listened to every album, and then you'd come Life of Pablo, and just listened to every album, and then you'd come close to being done with the day, to give you an idea, you know, so I'd listen to Alex Jones, and then Crowder, and Levin, so, so, in short, I appreciate, you know, when people say, you know, your show gets me through my wagey shift, or whatever, it's
	your show gets me through my wagey shift or whatever.
	It's like, yeah, I hear you.
	I'm doing it for all those, all the nibbas and the struggle, right?
unidentified		Okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know what I'm saying.
		Bofa Blanket says you should outsource a tech support team, perhaps from India, to prevent these rampant Zoomer tech issues in the future.
		Yeah, I'll get right on that.
		Basketball says, I wait all day to watch you, Brother Nick.
		Can we please donate to Nick?
		Tens and 20s, guys!
		Also, check out ER's latest video.
		The last line is very funny.
		Yeah, listen to basketball.
		Let's see some fives and tens going there for my sacrifice, alright?
		Respect my sacrifice!
		All right, I'm a brave, uh, you know, content soldier, basically, and you have to clean my boots.
		Samon says, the land wheel you're arguing with on Twitter eight hours ago was the same one Warski harpooned in January.
		I told you to behold the whale wars.
		Yeah, I saw somebody say that.
		Pretty rough situation going on there.
		I look at a person like that and I just think, you know, it almost makes me, it's like, could God be possibly real?
		You know, some people look at war and they're like, how could this happen?
		How could God allow this?
		And it shakes their faith.
		Yeah, war happens.
		These other things happen.
		But then I look at this bloated, two-ton tunic, okay, 300-pound woman, and she's got tattoos up and down her arms and on her fingers.
		She's got the piercings, dyed hair.
		I mean, she'd be ugly to begin with, this bloated, puffy, fat face, fat little sausage fingers.
		And she's low IQ, got her beanie, dirty clothes, dirty face, dirty room.
		And I think, God, why have you forsaken us, you know?
		No, I don't actually think that.
		I would never actually, you know, have my face shaken like that.
		That's a joke, by the way.
		I know a lot of Catholics really like to get on my case lately.
		You know, it's very interesting.
		A lot of Catholics out there, they really like to go after their own.
		You know, never mind satanic pedophiles controlling the world, but they're going to come after me.
		No, that's a little bit of a detour, but, you know, a little action going on in that way.
		But it is true, you know.
		You see people like that and you're like, how can there be justice?
		Can there really be?
		Is there moral right and wrong when this kind of inequality exists in the world?
		I don't know.
		I don't know.
		It's tough.
		Pope John XII says, who's your favorite pope of all time and why?
		I don't know.
		Does St. Peter count?
		I guess the original is probably the best.
		I guess if he technically counts, then probably him.
		If not him, I don't know.
		I'd have to think about it.
		There's like 260-some, so a lot to choose from.
		Based Once is when I first got into conservatism and...
		It was by listening to Ben Shapiro.
		But I soon found out how hypocritical for him to tell minority groups to see themselves as individuals while he is an open Zionist.
		Well, yeah, and that's really, that's when it all begins to unravel.
		You see that the whole ideology is just a lie, a deception.
		Glenn Cunnington says, Can you do that voice you did yesterday about the racist book?
		No.
		No, I don't do those things on command.
		It's just, you know, when I'm doing a bit, when I'm doing a little improv.
		Okay?
		Nick, do the bit.
		Will you do the bit?
		I feel like Tony Soprano when he's golfing with the WASP-y type guys.
		Nick, do the bit.
	Do the bit.
	We can't expect God to do all the work, can we?
	Is that how the saying goes?
	Yeah, basically.
	Can I have some shekels, please?
	The camel's back is broken.
	up yeah basically can i have some shekels please james russell says hey nick you think trump would go to war against venezuela or iran if he's going to lose if so that would be the straw that breaks the camel's back with the camel's back is broken the camel's back is in a million pieces so i don't know what you're talking about there i don't know war is not going to happen anytime soon in my mind maybe against venezuela but i don't think against iran people who say that kind of stuff don't understand the gravity of what that conflict would look like uh
	so definitely not iran venezuela is probably more likely but i don't know um uh i tend to be skeptical of people who one.
	Predict that, you know, they'll use that so cynically to get out of an election or whatever.
	I know it's happened in the past, but I don't know.
	I'm a little skeptical about that.
	So, you know, people are like, he's failed on everything, but if he went to war, would that really be the last straw?
	I think we're kind of already there.
	I think we're kind of... Let's imagine the worst case scenario.
	We're kind of like there, right?
	Let's see.
	Holistic Solutions says, why praise Yang?
	Here we go.
	Here we go.
	Why praise Yang?
	Well, I did a whole show about it, you know.
	I guess we could just stop right there.
	Why praise Yang?
	Well, if you want to know, I did a whole show about it.
	I did a show about it on Tuesday, too.
	So, but let's go on.
	It's a big Super Chat, so I'll bite.
	Okay, I'll bite.
	Haven't we learned campaign promises are emptier than a drunk liquor's cabinet?
	Or a drunk's liquor cabinet?
	Good one, man.
	Kosher politics is a non-starter.
	You can't defeat the enemy using the enemy system.
	Oh, fuck off!
	Another Austrian painter.
	1776 is the only fix.
	Yeah, you first, buddy.
	You first.
	Yeah, just dox yourself, please.
	Go on Twitter with your name and your face, and why don't you talk about it then?
	And, you know, send it to Jared Holt and all the rest.
	Jesus!
	We're gonna get all the nuts on the show tonight, right?
	We're gonna get all the, you know, every little thing.
	You know, the guy comes on the show.
	Yeah, I don't know why you're even bothering peddling Yang Gang.
	Okay.
	What we really need is Hitler or another revolution!
	Yeah, okay, Fed.
	Okay, Fed.
	Can I see your badge, please?
	I believe it's illegal for you to say that you're not a Fed, right?
	That would be entrapment, am I correct?
	Great timing, too, right?
	After the New Zealand shooting.
	Great timing, coming on the show.
	Yeah, what we really need is another Hitler.
	Oh, okay.
	Okay, agent.
	Uh, how's the wife and kids, right?
unidentified		Shhh.
unidentified		Ugh.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Madone, we're gonna have this tonight, right?
		Perfect.
		Perfect night.
		We're all- we're gonna have everything tonight.
		We're gonna have everything!
		2019 is gonna continue getting more epic, man.
		And people wonder, gee, why isn't anybody bothering to save our people?
		You know?
		Where are all these people that are trying to save our country?
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Great question.
		Maybe because anybody who tries, you know, they're subject to, you know, not just the task in front of us, but also the people behind, right?
		You know?
		Yeah, yeah.
		Coming on to America first.
		You know, what we really need to do is, we just need another Hitler.
		Yeah, good idea, dude.
		Good luck with that.
		Good luck.
		Why don't you talk to your friends and co-workers about that one?
		Get back to me.
		Tell me how that one works out.
		Disavow, disavow, disavow all, you know.
		We're not going to solve it through the ballot box.
		We really need... And by the way, do you want to buy an unregistered firearm in this parking lot of Walmart?
		Yeah, okay, man.
		Okay.
		Sean Spence says, do you go to traditional Latin mass?
unidentified		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		It's like 30 minutes away.
		Basketball American says, Flonase is go-off juice straight to the dome.
		Yeah, that's the only way to do it.
		You know, I might as well just swap out.
		I'm gonna dump all the liquid in the Flonase and just put Monster Zero Ultra in it, and I'll just spray that onto the surface of the brain.
		You know, if you think I'm going off on the... I think it's actually like... What is it?
		I don't think it's Flonase.
		I think it's actually something else, but...
		You know, if you thought that was go off juice, just wait until it's Pepsi or something like that.
		Medieval Dad says, okay, I'm not even reading that one.
		Kappa says $13.50.
		Yes, HH Brother.
		Level Best says, do you consider Portillo's fast food?
		I consider Portillo's like fast casual.
		Finally a good question.
		I consider Portillo's more like fast casual.
		There's kind of like tiers, you know, it's pricing, it's also quality.
		It's like you go to McDonald's and you could spend like five bucks and get a meal and that's probably the lower tier is McDonald's Taco Bell Wendy's KFC Popeye's You know places like that White Castle and then I think a step above that is fast casual where you've got five guys Portillo's Shake Shack You know places like that where you're probably gonna spend like $10 a little bit more than $10 and the quality's a step above the weights a little bit step above so
		I'd probably say it's fast casual.
		And I'm a big proponent of fast casual.
		Fast food I love, but the fast casual is the master race.
		You know, that's really the final red pill is why go to a sit-down restaurant when you can get a Portillo's Big Beef, right?
		For $10, you can't beat it.
		Well, I guess you could beat it, but with some options.
		Some options, I guess, are, you know, a little bit more economical.
		But the Big Beef, it's good.
		They've got locations everywhere.
		It's consistent.
		It's bang for your buck.
		You know, so that's why Chicago's the best city in the world.
		You know, people are always telling me... I had some guests come over the other day.
		They're telling me, oh, New York, New York is so great.
		Oh, yeah.
		New York is great.
		No, no, no.
		Chicago's got Portillo.
		Chicago's got it all.
		All right?
		Greatest city in the world.
		Based once is Free Bobby Schmurda.
		Schmood.
		Schmoodster over here.
		Big agree on that one.
		Yeah, five years.
		Been five years since Hot, you know, well, since the song came out.
		You know the song.
		So yeah, I'm in agreement with that one.
		Get the petition going.
		Ryan Struckman says, Nick, there's no turning back for you, but do you think engaging in pro-white and paleoconservative activism is even worth it in our times?
		Are Zoomers wasting their youth only to be ostracized?
unidentified		No.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Just be a pussy, dude.
		Just be a pussy.
		Don't do anything.
		Horrible evil is being committed.
		Just don't bother doing anything at all.
		Just make sure you're okay.
		That mentality will produce good outcomes in the long run for our ancestors.
		We just need more people thinking like, how can I take care of just myself and be as comfortable as possible?
		That is a mentality we need.
		We look around the world that has been created and we think, Well, things are pretty bad.
		You know what I have to do?
		I just have to be completely and totally concerned with my own comfort and nothing else.
		Yeah, good idea dude.
		Are Zoomers just wasting their time being ostracized?
		Look, I'm fully aware of You know, the realities of activism and what we're trying to do.
		But I've never said that the only way to do it is to get yourself ostracized.
		The only way to do it is, you know, do something that brings out a big cost to you personally.
		People should.
		It's your obligation and your duty to participate in the movement in whatever way you can.
		And that's whatever way you can.
		I'm not saying you gotta go join up and fight Antifa on the streets.
		Of course not, you know.
		But it does mean that if that's starting a family, it means starting a family, okay?
		You know, you don't have to do anything even political.
		Have a couple of kids, right?
		And vote red, right?
		Or support your content creator, whatever it is, whatever it is.
		But it is your obligation to start participating in some kind of civilization, regenerating movement in some capacity because, you know, I kind of get that un- A lot of people say to me, oh, people are being dumb if they're like the Columbia Kid, for example, where they're at Columbia University, they've got a great future ahead of them, and they're going to go out and say, I love white people!
		We're the greatest!
		Whatever!
		Yeah, obviously that's dumb, and you shouldn't start a podcast.
		Not everybody should start a podcast.
		Somebody like that should just be quiet, keep to themselves.
		But, you know, they become a professional and then you have to contribute in some capacity.
		And that can be however it is, whatever level of risk you're willing to take on.
		But, you know, this kind of thinking of, because I get it, you know, you do have to take care of yourself.
		But this idea that I'm not going to stick my neck out at any point, in any capacity, for any reason, that's kind of how we got here in the first place.
		So I would caution against that mentality.
		Don't ruin your life.
		Don't do things that will come close to ruining your life.
		Don't take a chance at ruining your life.
		Never do that.
		You know, never do that.
		We are much better off having people who have never spoken a word about these ideologies, but are, you know, just doing their own thing, having a family, in politics or in a profession.
		But I do think that people, if they are aware of these issues, there is some degree of obligation that they're doing something to move the ball down the field.
		And that could be as simple as, again, just having kids, just to give you an idea.
		So, So it's a good question.
		It's a question I get a lot, but...
		But it's kind of delicate, because I don't want to tell people, because people always get, and that's why I have to clarify, because people always get it wrong, and they say, oh, oh, so what you're saying is, I have to, like, run for office, or, oh, I have to do activism, or I have to be out on the streets with an arm patch and a flag or something.
		Like, no, nobody's saying that, right?
		Oh, I have to give you shekels.
		Like, no, nobody's even saying that.
		But we are saying that it's like, you know, look, if you know what's going on, how do you not feel some sense of obligation, right?
		How do you not see cause and effect?
		And maybe all you have to do is just survive.
		That's my word of advice to the Zoomers.
		It's definitely worth it.
		It's definitely worth it.
		If you can, if you have the aptitude, if you have that opportunity to get into politics, and that's your calling, you really want to do that or whatever it is, Just don't reveal your power levels, all right?
		Just stick to the talking points.
		I know a lot of people like this in D.C.
		I know a lot of people like this in D.C.
		You'd be surprised who are like this.
		And they're the ones who are going in day in, day out.
	They're working in the belly of the beast, trying to save you on things you'll never hear about.
	And so I don't think that's a waste of time, but I think everybody should be contributing in some capacity.
	Basketball says, Black, African-American?
	No.
	Call me a person of Africa.
	I like that.
	I like that.
	Call me that from now on.
	Ryazaki says, do you know the Distributist?
	He's Catholic and sympathetic to Identitarianism.
	Would be a good guest.
	Hope this doesn't make you go off.
	Well, it's not gonna make me go off, but Distributist has been kind of nasty to me in the past.
	He's one of these people, like I said earlier, a lot of Catholics out there, a lot of trad cats, are really kind of nasty, bad people.
	That's just simply a fact.
	You know, it's not everybody, and I don't mean that as an indictment of the religion, but you see people like this person, Distributist, you see who's the other one, Mauritania's Finest, or Mauritius Struggle is the name.
	Mauritius Struggle.
	He's another Catholic YouTuber, and you see people like, there's one other whose name I forget at the moment.
unidentified		It's, oh yeah, P.T. Carpenter.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Carlo is another great example.
unidentified		P.T.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Carlo is this tradcath guy in Washington, D.C.
		who doxed Scott Greer.
		So you know why Scott Greer was in that big Atlantic hit piece with all those emails and everything?
		That was P.T.
		Carlo.
unidentified		P.T.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Carlo is this tradcath who saw Scott Greer and said, you know, Scott Greer isn't sufficiently Catholic enough, or he's not sufficiently traditionalist enough.
		He's too much of a racialist, so we're gonna dox him and destroy his career.
		Really?
		You know, Scott Greer ostensibly is fighting on the same side.
		Is he Catholic?
		I don't know.
		He was raised Catholic.
		I don't know if he's the most explicit and overt Catholic poster.
		But anyway, that's nobody's business.
		He's ostensibly on our side.
		The people that run the country are satanic pedophiles, basically.
unidentified		Right?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		we're up against secularization, schism, Protestantism, heresy.
		There's like so much going on, so many bigger priorities, so many bigger evils.
		And you've got trad Catholics who are behind us shooting at the people in front, doxing, doing all this other stuff.
		And I see people like distributists and Mauritius struggling others, and they got nothing but negative things to say about me.
		Oh, I'm too mean to whores, right?
		I'm too mean to sluts.
		I should be really more forgiving towards them and, uh, and things of that nature.
		Oh, no, Nick is really uh he's too abrasive okay yeah he's really kind of a nasty guy so we're gonna counter signal him and we're gonna attack him on our streams and we're gonna do all this kind of stuff and it's just like what kind of person are you you know it's like maybe it's time to take a look in the mirror right what what agenda are you really advancing are you advancing an agenda that supports the church are you advancing an agenda that supports
		Traditionalism and Catholicism and the message of Christ in this time of darkness, or are you doing something that's based on your ego?
		Are you doing something that, oh well, you know, Nick is this YouTuber that I have a problem with, for whatever reason, and so we're gonna go after him.
		And so that really, that really has to be a lesson there, because I see that all too often.
		So no, I'm not gonna have Distributist on the channel.
		I'm not going to have a lot of these guys on the channel because, you know, I'm out there and look, those are anonymous people also, for what it's worth.
		So I'm out there with my face saying, don't have premarital sex and a lot of other things that aren't exactly cool and sexy, right?
		And I'm advancing a reactionary political cause and I'm sacrificing for it.
		And I got people from behind, oh, you're too mean, you're too mean.
		Okay, coward.
		Uh, so, yeah, you said I shouldn't go off, but I, uh, have to go off sometimes.
		Castizo says, I play America First at work with speakers at 100%.
		Okay, so this guy's based in Red Pill.
		This guy knows the score here.
		Kyle says, b-b-but Nick, Yang is gonna ruin the country.
		Socialism, bad.
		Capitalism, good.
		MAGA, I heart Israel.
		Hey, dumb-dumbs, it's not about Yang.
		Exactly.
		Exactly, exactly right.
		I don't know how anybody could show up for Trump.
		Okay, maybe you don't like Yang, but really, we're on the Trump train still?
		Like, what are you, dumb?
		What are you, a dumbo?
		Nobody says, rough year!
		God bless and thank you for your service.
		Thanks man, I appreciate that.
		Anna Mises, hope you saw my reply tweet.
		If you need help with DDoS protection slash diagnosis, just DM me.
		Also, I tweeted, proof I'm still banned here, but we're all good.
		Look, you figured it out.
		It's fine.
		Just drop it.
		All right, relax.
		Yeah, I'll be sure to reach out to you for tech support.
		Cassie says, good.
		I can, he says, good.
		I can feel your anger, Nick.
		It gives you focus, makes you stronger.
		Uh, so another Star Wars nerd in the chat.
		I almost regret that I know what that is, but yeah, it was a Star Wars stand for a long time.
		Okay, I know, I know the quotes.
		I know the movies.
		Yeah, it's true.
		It's not the way of the Jedi.
		I'll never join you.
		I'll never join you.
		Brandon Hanson says, Hey Nick, I got some pretty cool sawed-off shotguns if you're looking to start the revolution.
		I swear I'm not afraid.
		Brandon Hanson, love the show.
		Thanks for everything you do.
		Keep it going.
		Thanks, man.
		Yeah.
		Well, it's just so obvious at this point, you know, and it's always the same talking points.
		It's always the same kind of person.
	Hey, Nick, man, look, we're not going to solve these things through the ballot box.
	We're not going to solve it by winning elections.
	Why don't you meet me in this under... Let's go organize IRL.
	Give me your name and address and your phone number.
	Give me your social.
	Try and buy this firearm off me.
	Okay, man.
	Yeah, sure.
	It sounds legit.
	Sounds legit.
	Let's do the beer hall push again in New York City.
	Just give me your address and your, uh, you know, and your license and everything else.
	Okay, dude.
	That sounds legitimate.
	You know, if you want to do that, fine.
	Just don't watch my show.
	My show is not for people like this.
	My show is not for people that want violence or change from outside the system.
	This show is dedicated to the cause of peaceful, peaceful reform in government towards accommodating these radical technological and demographic changes.
	That's the object of the show.
	Not a revolution, not a white ethnostate, you know.
	So if that's your jazz, watch another show.
	Watch Spencer or one of the others, Heimback, whatever.
	But that's on our mission.
	Ed Lundgren says, Nick, your show continues to improve.
	I will say this though, hard to not OD on Blackpills.
	You must strive on regardless.
	God bless.
	Thanks, man.
	It's true, it's a struggle.
	It's tough, but you're right.
	We do have to just soldier on.
	I don't really get Blackpill.
	Things just get bad and, you know, you just kind of have to change your own internal state and just roll with the punches, basically.
	So...
	It's true, but we gotta stay in the fight.
	Glenn Cunnington says, it takes a certain level of IQ to understand the Yang Gang.
	Can't blame him too much.
unidentified		True, true.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Can't blame him for being low IQ, I guess, right?
		Ian Matthews says, hail Nicktory.
		Yeah, careful with that one, right?
		Andrew says, I'm a premium member, but wanted to send you $2.
		Well, thanks, man.
		Much appreciated.
		Denal says, the simple act of prayer is an advancement of good.
		Yeah, that's true.
		But, you know, we could also use some more tangible things.
		Not that prayer isn't good.
		Not that prayer doesn't help.
		It does.
unidentified		But we'd also like to see some things tangible in the real world.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Am I a consequentialist for saying that?
		You know, some people might say, oh, you're, uh, you must not believe in the power of prayer.
		I do, but it's like, it's sort of the, the old story.
		What is that old, uh, What is the expression?
		But the old story where they say somebody's drowning and somebody throws them a life preserver and they send it away.
		No, no, God's gonna help me.
		And they get a lifeboat.
		No, no, God's gonna help me.
		And a dolphin comes out of the ocean and rescues them.
		No, no, God's gonna help me.
		And they drown and they go to heaven and they're like, what gives, man?
		I thought you were trying to help me.
		I thought you said, you know, you were gonna save my life.
		Well, I did, but you didn't take the life preserver, the boat.
		It's like, well, you know, maybe...
		Pray, but also we are going to need people to actualize some of these changes.
		So, yes.
		Yes, pray, but we also got to do some other things also.
		Ryazuki says, understandable, didn't know he has a nasty streak.
		Yeah, a lot of them do.
		True colors, huh?
		True colors!
		Hyman says, praise Kak, shade away.
		Yeah, yes, brother.
		I agree.
		Praise Keck, my friend.
		Look, I found that this is just kinda true in any group.
		You're just gonna have a certain degree of that.
		I guess that's how group dynamics basically work.
		You know, it's whatever, it's whatever.
		You'd think Catholics would rise above that, but whatever.
		I guess that's every group.
		So, yeah, look, and I don't mean that to hit everybody.
		There's, obviously, it's just the vocal minority that is very outspoken.
		The vast majority, and I've heard this from a lot, a lot of people, so don't think I don't appreciate, you know, or don't think I'm attacking Catholics in general, as a Catholic myself.
		Um, the vast majority of people reach out and say, oh, your show brought me to the faith or brought me back or you're doing a great thing, you know, you're advancing the cause of the church and things like this.
		It's the vast majority.
		I can't tell you how many emails, super chats, direct messages, whatever I get with that kind of message.
		And so it's by far and away, there's a lot more positivity.
		So I guess that's sort of, I do tend to dwell on the negative a little bit, but it is something that's so frustrating because I do put my life on the line here.
		That's not an exaggeration to say that.
		I really do sacrifice in a lot of ways to have a Catholic life and to have a show that advances Catholic values.
		And so to have people that supposedly share the faith, you know, should be on the same team, sort of nipping at your heels all the time, is something that really rubs me the wrong way.
		But I do tend to dwell on that.
		Obviously, there's a lot more good than bad, but we're just a little bit more vocal.
		So let's see, David Sperner says, great show, King.
		Sorry about the late chat.
		Have a tuna sandwich on Lent for me.
		Or for Lent on me.
		Thank you, my man.
		I'll be sure to do that.
		Aw, dammit!
		Tomorrow's Friday.
		I gotta get in a little bit more meat.
		I gotta get in a little bit more meat before Friday.
		You know, last week it was such a, or two weeks ago, it was such a scandal.
		Everybody gave me, aw, Nick ate meat on Friday.
unidentified		You're going to hell, you're... Okay, yeah, okay, man.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I know, I know, I know, I know.
		Don't eat meat on Friday, alright?
		I had a big beef at Portillo's.
		Give me a break.
		I'll go to Confession next week, alright?
		Madone, okay?
		So I'll get the meat in tonight and then tomorrow I'll eat the egg salad sandwich, okay?
		Alright, is everybody happy?
		God's happy, everybody's happy, alright?
		Sheesh.
		Uh, but yeah, thanks.
		Ruggle says, Presbyterian gang, embrace the Lord's true faith.
		Uh, yeah, I don't know about all that, but okay.
		Well, brothers in Christ, okay.
		Videogamesnake says, Nick, what's your opinion on Trudeau having a lower approval rating than my evil Drumpf?
		Canada's going to shit, just funny, Drumpf is more loved.
		Yeah, well, Trump understands that if you...
		have this populist base, you're going to have half the country hate you, but half the country's going to love you.
		And with these like technocrat neoliberals, everyone just hates you, you know, in Canada, in France, in Germany, well, to a lesser extent, Germany, but Theresa May, you know, look at Miracle and, or like I said, to a lesser extent, Miracle, but look at Macron, look at Theresa May, look at Trudeau, all their approval ratings look at Theresa May, look at Trudeau, all their approval ratings are in the gutter, you know, and they have no support in their They have no support among the people.
		There's really no popular base of support for that besides like cosmopolitan urban liberals, which is, and like ideological liberals, which is a very small percentage of the population.
		So the liberal base is probably around like 20 to 30% in any of these countries who would support a neoliberal technocrat, no matter what.
		And the base of support for like a populist who even has the image of being a fighter, being a nationalist, whatever, it's probably going to be like 40% or a little bit higher than that, you know, 35 at the minimum.
		So I, I think it just comes down to something like that where people who are tired and resent the system, there's always going to be more of them than people who like are, uh, Loving the system.
		Also, that's a little bit more polite than what I was going to say that really like love the system So it's not surprising to me.
		That's my opinion on that.
		It's not surprising that you know Neoliberalism corrupt technocracy like all that doesn't work.
		It's kind of common sense We've got one more here.
		Ian Matthews says anabaptist gang sent from my stone oven Yeah, okay, man Yeah, we welcome all Protestant brothers.
		Okay, we're all brothers in Christ.
		We have to focus on the enemy and Which is the devil, right?
		That's the enemy, is evil.
		Not, not our Christian brothers.
		But, that's our show.
		It looks like that's all our Super Chats.
		Remember to check us out, nicholasjfuentes.com slash membership.
		Five bucks a month to get your premium membership.
		Help support the show.
		Be sure to check that out.
		The link is down below.
		Remember to subscribe to the channel.
		Give me a big thumbs up.
		Leave a comment down below.
		Click the notification button to get notified every time I go live.
		Remember, we're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
		Central, 8 p.m.
		Eastern Standard Time.
		I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		As always, thank you guys for watching.
		Thanks to our Streamlabbers, Superchatters, Premium Members, everybody who watches the show.
		Did I say Streamlabs?
		Old habits, right?
		You can't get out of it.
		But thanks to everybody who watches the show.
		We love you folks and we will see you tomorrow.
		Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America First!

▲