Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 28, 2019 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:18:30

Facebook BANS "White Nationalism" | America First Ep. 355

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:07:24

Appearances

Clips

donald j trump

00:04

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Thank you.
unidentified		Thank you.
donald j trump ▲ ● ▼		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
unidentified		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America First.
		America First.
		America first.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Good evening, everybody.
		We're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very excited to be with you here this evening.
		There is a lot to discuss, a lot to get into.
		Another day where it feels like the noose is tightening here.
		Our days are numbered.
		That's why you have to do Super Chats, all right?
		That's why you have to do the Premium Membership, because I fear we're not long for this world on this show, unfortunately.
		You know, for a long time people would always tell me, it's only a matter of time before you get kicked off, only a matter of time before you get banned from Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and, you know, typically I agree, but in the back of my head I always thought, you know, maybe we'll be able to hang on, maybe we'll be able to stick around for longer than most, if not, you know, for a long time, right?
		But we see this announcement today, and that's the title of the show, that Facebook is moving to ban So called white nationalist, white separatist content on both Facebook and Instagram.
		And they say they'll be implementing that policy in the next week.
		And this is why you see some of the accusations are so damaging.
		I don't know if I'll have to actually look into doing some kind of lawsuit after this takes place because you know, as well as anybody, people who watch this show, that I don't identify as a white nationalist.
		I never have.
		But in spite of that you have all kinds of journalists, local, national, left-wing, center, even right-wing.
		I saw some some pinhead in the Washington Examiner named like John Gage or something.
		Some bozo pinhead from Washington Examiner saying alt-right pundit and white nationalist podcaster Nick Fuentes.
		This is when you see how damaging these lies can be.
		Now, in the next week, and I'm sure this is coming down the pike for a lot of other platforms, you're going to see people like myself or even peripheral associated with any kind of basically white advocacy.
		I wouldn't even call it, it's barely even that.
		It's just saying, stop trying to attack white people, stop coming after white people.
		I'm pretty sure it's coming down the line that everybody on all the platforms is probably going to catch some kind of heat, will be censored in some form.
		So we'll be talking about that.
		We'll be talking about the new policy.
		We'll read the blog update there, and we'll discuss some of the implications for that.
		We'll also be discussing this immigration crisis on the border, which continues.
		We had a statement, I think it was last week or maybe the week before, from ICE, from Immigration and Customs Enforcement, saying this is outrageous.
		It's out of control what's happening at the border.
		I believe the, what was the term that they used last week?
		It was some kind of surge or something, but they were seeing apprehensions, arrests like they'd never seen before, people being released into the interior at a rate that's never been seen before.
		And now we have a statement from the Customs and Border Protection Commissioner, Kevin McAleenan?
		McAleenan?
		I don't know.
		That doesn't sound Irish.
		It has Mick in there, but it's...
		I don't know.
		That's a difficult one to pronounce.
		So he announced today that basically you're seeing immigration at an unprecedented scale.
		And surprise, surprise!
		Who accounts for all the new immigration to the border?
		Who's causing all the problems?
		Take a wild guess.
		After the funding bill, after what was discussed in the government shutdown, Central American families, minors, people accompanying minors.
		That's who constitutes all the new immigration.
		So we'll be going into that.
		We'll be discussing the statement.
		The current situation in El Paso, for example, which is the worst anywhere in the country and all the implications for that.
		So it should be a good show.
		I feel like I'm a little bit darker than usual.
		I don't know.
		Is that just me?
		I look at my camera before the show starts and it's the same settings, but it feels... Here, let me see if I could do this.
		If I could give it a little boost.
		Okay, that feels a little bit better.
unidentified		I don't know.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I started up the show today.
		I feel like... I feel pale.
		Am I pale?
		I don't look pale.
		I have a mirror right over here.
		I don't look that pale.
		So I don't know if it's the camera.
		I don't know if it's the lights.
		I don't know if I'm just pale.
		I don't know what it is, but I feel like the visual just doesn't look so much the same, but that's alright.
		I don't really have an extended anecdote to talk to you about today, other than that it's just getting rough out there.
		Just getting very difficult, you know, with the censorship that goes on.
		And you wonder how it could be this way.
		I feel like people read about this kind of stuff in the dystopian novels.
		They read about it in 1984, or Fahrenheit 451, or Brave New World, and they don't realize that that's kind of exactly what's happening right now.
		You know, I had somebody who came over a year ago.
		Over a year ago now to shoot a documentary which was never released by the way.
		Journalists have this awesome habit of coming around my house and doing these long extended interviews and camera work and then they just never publish it.
		All right there was this one example which I can't talk about because of an NDA but this went on for a week.
		Filming here for a week never got released.
		This was a year ago.
		I had a New York Times reporter come over She was here the whole day.
		She stayed and watched the show.
		She stayed until 9 o'clock from the New York Times.
		And she's following me.
		I had to take her to lunch.
		She paid for lunch.
		That was okay.
		But I had to take her to lunch.
		Never did an article.
		And she's texting me.
		She's emailing me afterwards.
		Never released the article.
		I had some, a couple of guys come over from Vice.
		Doing a documentary from Vice Canada.
		And they are here for the whole day.
		We go outside.
		We do interviews by my old high school, by the train station.
		Never released.
		So anyway, that's a little rant.
		And you know why that is?
		It's because they come here expecting me to say, I'm not racist, I just don't like them, you know, or something like that.
		You know, they expect to come around and film me saying some really incriminating things, really hateful.
		But they come around and they say, oh yeah, this is just a normal, really, this is just a really smart, handsome guy who knows the score about what's happening in the country, has a reasonable opinion.
		This will make us look bad, this will make him and his allies look good, so we can't publish it.
		But Anyway, what was the point of the conversation anyway?
		I completely lost my train of thought talking about the documentary last year.
		Damn, what was even the point?
		Where was I even going with this?
		Totally forgot.
		I don't have it in my notes so I can't even refer back to it.
		What was the story even about?
		It was about the documentary last year, February.
		About censorship?
		Oh yeah, okay!
		That was almost bad, if I just completely had to move on.
		That's right.
		So, 1984, Brave New World, Fahrenheit 451, and we're driving somewhere, I forget where, we're shooting this documentary, and what had been happening at the time was Somebody's book was removed from Amazon, just like we saw with Culture of Critique a few weeks ago.
		I forget whose book it was, but it was taken offline, or maybe it was a website, or some kind of censorship happened.
		And I said, you know, the more that I think about it, the more I realize that we really are living in a totalitarian state if they control the press, if they control what's printed, and they can simply decide what is allowed to be published and what isn't.
		You know, if they could simply decide that, for example, the Daily Stormer You know, you can't have a website.
		Or they can decide that Kevin Macdonald, this was a little anachronistic because this happened recently, but you know, this is sort of what I was getting at.
		If they could just say Kevin Macdonald can't publish his book on Amazon, then really, in principle, what's happening is that you're allowing this small collection of oligarchs to decide what you can and can't listen to.
		You know, facts or opinion.
	And that is the definition of a totalitarian state.
	And this guy was shooting the documentary, this smug, effeminate coastal liberal.
	He's like, so you're saying that we're living in a police state because you can't have a racist book?
	And it's like, you fucking idiot!
unidentified		Obviously that's not the point, in principle.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Excuse me, pardon the language.
		I'm a little hot, all right?
		Heated gamer moment.
		But you understand the smug liberal is smug effete liberal.
		You don't understand the principle at work here.
		It's not about, oh, is it racist?
		Is it politically incorrect?
		It's if one guy, Jeff Bezos, And he controls more than 50% of market share for printed books, and Barnes & Noble's going out of business, and he can decide by himself or with a collection of trusted flaggers, you know, the SPLC and the ADL, what you can and can't listen to.
		You're living in a police state.
		That's the definition of it.
		You know, I'm sure in North Korea they're probably saying the same thing.
		You know, maybe they're interviewing some dissident for a propaganda film, and he's saying, You know, basically, if you can't publish any books that criticize Kim Jong-un, we're kind of living in a totalitarian country.
		And maybe you get somebody from Pyongyang, some cosmopolitan city guy, some party apparatchik, says, oh really?
		So you're saying that, what, if you can't criticize the government, you know, who's basically God and everything, that we're living in a police state?
		Hmm, okay.
		So, it just really grinds my gears when people don't really see what's going on.
		And I'll read you the statement.
		We're just gonna dive right in here.
		We have to discuss this in greater depth here to really bring the point home.
		So this was in a blog post Facebook said that any quote praise support and representation of white nationalism and separatism would be banned when their new policy goes into effect next week.
		This is from the blog quote it's clear that these concepts are deeply linked to organized hate groups and have no place on our services.
		This is a little excerpt from The Verge.
		It says, Facebook has prohibited white supremacist content for a while now, but hasn't included white nationalism or separatism until today.
		Racist and hateful content based on race, ethnicity, and religion have been banned under the former policy, but under Facebook's new rules, phrases like, check this out, phrases like, quote, immigration is tearing this country apart, white separatism is the only answer, will also be prohibited.
		Statements, oh you know, like immigration is tearing the country apart and the only solution is white separatism, whites separating from other racial groups.
		Hate, that's hate speech.
		Organized with hate groups can't say it anymore.
		Facebook is the number one social media company on the planet.
		They have, what, 1.6 billion users?
		Instagram, also owned by Facebook, next biggest, 800 million monthly active users?
		So you go on a platform like that, you know, you're a normal guy, nice enough guy, and you say, hey, you know, wait a second.
		I'm living in the United States, or I'm living in Great Britain, I'm living in France, Germany.
		I don't know.
		I don't know, folks.
		This Senegalese migrant sets a bus of 50 children, school children, on fire and says that this is a statement to the Salvini government about the migrant crisis in the Mediterranean Sea.
		I don't really like that.
		That kind of action is tearing this country apart.
		The only solution is maybe we just have to get away from these people.
		You know, you're not saying white separatism, but maybe we have to get away from these people.
		Banned!
		Can't say it!
		And actually now in the future this is part of the new policy.
		Anybody who looks up highlighted phrases which are white nationalist or neo-nazi or white separatist, they will now be redirected to a charity like Life After Hate where they'll get educational information about how they can unlearn these things, how they can unthink these problematic thoughts.
		I don't understand how people can look at that and not understand exactly what's going on here.
		How can people look at this and not see the writing on the walls?
		That Facebook is banning this kind of stuff?
		This isn't even racism anymore, right?
		We've talked about what racism is and isn't, how this is a partisan rhetorical tool, but in a word, this isn't discrimination.
		This isn't bigotry.
		You know, I think a lot of people might be on board with saying, okay, maybe you can't have the KKK.
		Facebook.
		Now, I'm a free speech person.
		I think everybody should be on Facebook so long as it's not inciting violence.
		But let's say you're a moderate, centrist kind of a person, not really partisan, don't really have a stake in this.
		And you say, well, perhaps it's reasonable that Facebook would have the KKK not on the website, or they would have people who are openly discriminating against people of another race.
		You know, for example, he couldn't say something like, I hate black people.
		You know, he couldn't have something like that on the platform.
		I could see how a reasonable person could come to that conclusion.
		I think things like that are wrong.
		I think things like that are distasteful.
		I happen to think that social media should just simply be for everybody, But I could see where a reasonable person could understand that.
		But this is not what we're talking about here.
		We're not even talking about so-called hate speech.
		We're not even talking about, and this is basically how it operated before anyway on all the platforms, but now we're talking about explicitly Targeting one specific political ideology.
	That's what it comes down to.
	They said that the reason we're changing it is because basically groups like the SPLC and the ADL and the Southern Poverty, or that is the SPLC, you know, these kinds of groups, they got into our ear and they said, you know what, before maybe you thought that this was innocuous, before maybe you thought that this was just, you know, just a regular political ideology, actually it's associated with violence.
	And you know why this happened?
	It's because of the New Zealand massacre.
	They said, look, This guy who shot up that mosque in New Zealand, he was a white nationalist, and now you see how this kind of political ideology, it is not neutral.
	It has, by its very definition, sort of this implicit violence about it.
	Implicit in the ideology is a prescription Is white nationalist violence the only kind of targeted political or ideological violence that happens in the world?
	Of course not!
	is therefore by itself an incitement to violence.
	In itself is an incitement to violence.
	So that's why you have to get rid of it from the platform.
	But you've got to understand that no other ideology works this way, right?
	Is white nationalist violence the only kind of targeted political or ideological violence that happens in the world?
	Of course not.
	It's actually one of the smallest groups by killings and attacks.
	It's not organized on a supranational level.
	It's not organized on a national level.
	You know, take a look at the top five terrorist organizations in the world.
	Top four are Muslim.
	You've got ISIS, you've got Al-Qaeda, you've got Al-Shabaab, Boko Haram, and number five is the Lord's Resistance Army in Uganda.
	So the top five, well, the top four are Muslim.
	The top five aren't even in Western countries.
	Now tell me, when Muslims go into the Bataclan Theater in Paris and they kill 130 people, and then they go into Nice, France, and they do a bus attack and they kill like 40 people, And they go into Stockholm, Sweden and they do a bus attack and they kill 7 people.
	And they do terrorist attacks basically like every week.
	30,000 terror attacks by radical Muslims since 9-11.
	And 9-11 where they killed 3,000 people flying planes into buildings.
	And you would never, you would never in 1 million years see anything coming close to that.
	to the same standard being applied to that political ideology, to Islamism, to Salafism, which are different, by the way, to Wahhabism, or to Islam in itself.
	Now, you could just as easily take a look at the Koran, like somebody might look at the shooter in New Zealand's manifesto and say, hey, look, this in itself is a call to violence.
	You know, maybe you could read it peacefully, and maybe a lot of people do.
	But I look at this, and ISIS looks at this, and they read into that a message of violence.
	They read in that a call to arms, a call to action to commit violence.
	And because of that, we have to move to censor that.
	You would never in a million years see that on Facebook.
	That they would censor the Quran, that they would censor anything like that.
	And in fact, you had ISIS propaganda all over social media for years!
	Before they decided to do anything about it.
	Ironically, until they decided to start killing journalists.
	Those are the only lies that seem to matter, right?
	But with white nationalism, never mind the fact that in itself cannot be described as a violent ideology.
	And again, I'm not a white nationalist.
	I don't want to act as an apologist for white nationalism.
	But it's hard not to see how this can become a problematic standard to be applied to far-right or right-wing politics, right?
	Is this where it stops?
	Of course not!
	This is where it begins.
	So if they start to say that, well, this ideology, because of the actions of one person, one person, I don't think we've ever seen anything on the scope or scale like this ever before with this ideology.
	But because of this one person, now the whole thing, anybody who suggests anything that comes close to this, White people should have their own nation.
	White people should separate from other races.
	This is an intrinsic call to violence.
	It has to be banned.
	That standard is not applied anywhere else.
	And beyond that, I think, and I hinted at this a moment ago, the problem is not simply that this is a double standard.
	That obviously white nationalism is not the problem of violent extremism.
	That there's other ideologies that people just simply ignore when it's convenient.
	But beyond that, what is the definition of these things?
	Is there a precise definition that was offered on this blog when they say that you cannot access the number one social media platform in the world and the number two social media platform in the world?
	Was there a precise, concise, clean definition, clear demarcation of what constitutes so-called white nationalism and white separatism?
	No!
	No!
	Just that in itself.
	And understand, they call me a white nationalist.
	They call everybody a white nationalist.
	They call Dinesh D'Souza a white nationalist.
	They call Ali Akbar a white nationalist.
	They call Lucian Winchurch a white nationalist.
	They called the President of the United States a white nationalist.
	So who exactly is coming up with the definition of this stuff?
	You understand when it's that elastic, when the definition is not sound, when it's not precise, this opens you up to a lot of problems.
	Because then it comes down to if some unnamed, nameless employee working for some contractor in Arizona that Facebook employs to enforce their arbitrary terms of services, if they decide one day that simply criticizing immigration or criticizing diversity, if they define that as if they decide one day that simply criticizing immigration or criticizing diversity, if they You're off the platform forever.
	And you could see how that will become a problem in the future.
	And you know that this is only the beginning.
	That's, I guess, the other problem with it.
	It's not simply that the definition is not precise, and therefore people that are adjacent to that ideology could be banned, or people that know the same problems but don't have the same prescriptions might be banned, which might be myself, but you could see where this might expand even further to the right.
	Maybe it's white nationalists today, and maybe tomorrow it's people like Charlie Kirk.
	Probably not people like Charlie Kirk, because they benefit Google.
	But it might be even people that are further along, further away on the periphery, who could get banned.
	And anyway, this brings home the fundamental question, which is, you know, we're not living in a free society anymore.
	This kind of stuff is technically illegal.
	You look at the Communication Decency Act of 1996, and what this does is basically says that social media companies are not liable for the content that's posted on the platforms.
	It says that so long as these companies do not act as a publisher, they're not held liable for what's posted.
	So that means that, for example, when the New Zealand shooter live streams a shooting, Facebook and Mark Zuckerberg are not held legally accountable.
	Because according to Section 230 of the Communication Decency Act in 1996, it says that insofar as Facebook is not actually acting as a publisher, they're just unbiased, indifferent, non-partisan, third-party platform for content.
	You know, they have no culpability for this.
	It's only the actions of the user.
	But we see that, obviously, they're no longer meeting that definition.
	Maybe you could argue that banning hate speech... I think that was a stretch in itself, to say that banning hate speech Um, would constitute not being biased, being indifferent, still being not a publisher.
	But at this point, when they're saying it's not even hate speech, it's not even violence, it's simply promoting this particular ideology that we don't like, aren't you then in that sense acting as a publisher, and therefore not indifferent, not third party, and culpable therefore in anything that's published on the platform?
	I would think that this is basically illegal now.
	You know imagine if for example they took up a number of ideologies that were offensive or violent or whatever and they said you can't post that on the platform.
	Are they not then in a de facto way giving a green light to everything that's posted?
	Are they then not acting as a partisan actor and saying, you know, something that's democratic or something that's liberal or something that's Islamic or whatever?
	That's okay.
	That gets our stamp of approval.
	You're acting as a publisher.
	And then you gotta ask, where's the administration on this?
	Where's the Congress on this?
	This has been going on for years.
	It's in direct violation of the law.
	The only reason, and people say this all the time, well, Nick, they're a private company.
	They can do what they want.
	You might think it's a bad thing.
	You might think it's having a chilling effect on free speech.
	It's altering political discourse in an adverse way.
	But they're a private company.
	They can do whatever they want.
	No they can't, actually.
	No they can't.
	It's only by the grace of this particular legislation that they're even allowed to operate.
	Could you imagine the lawsuits?
	How many?
	The number value, right?
	The dollar value of the lawsuits that would be waged against Facebook and Instagram if you didn't have the statute, if you didn't have the government cooperating with them with this particular law.
	Of course they're not a private company.
	They're working with the government on this.
	So it's time for the government to step up.
	And this is probably the biggest disappointment of this administration.
	Because you know, and we've talked about this before, Once we get shut down on social media, and it's looking inevitable at this point, and I got kicked off Discord the other week, I get kicked off Streamlabs, I'm kicked off Stripe, I'm kicked off like everything at this point, except for a few different services.
	Patreon, I mean, you name it, basically all the payment processors.
	I'm kicked off everything.
	Soon to probably be kicked off some of these others, based on, you know, lies, essentially.
	At what point can you say that we're able to move the ball down the field anymore, from any kind of right-wing perspective?
	If liberals in Silicon Valley dictate what goes on social media, they dictate what goes, period.
	The only refuge that any right-wing person has left where they're safe is Fox News and talk radio.
	That's it.
	So unless you're gonna get on talk radio, unless you're gonna get on Fox News, you don't have a platform.
	Try and get on Facebook.
	Oh, you can't anymore.
	You can't.
	And I saw even people saying, learn to code.
	Even people that were celebrating the Jussie Smollett thing, they were banned.
	So it's not even... Don't even pretend.
	I saw a lot of people saying, oh, conservatives are going to pretend this is a free speech issue.
	You know, it technically is about white nationalism, but it is more broadly a free speech thing.
	So, try getting on Facebook.
	Try getting on Instagram.
	Try getting on Twitter.
	Try getting on YouTube.
	In two to three years, I'm sure after the 2020 election, they'll have it all buttoned up.
	You won't stand a chance.
	And so at that point, you've got Fox News, you've got talk radio.
	There is no place for us to express our opinions.
	There's no place for us to get our ideas out.
	They understand this.
	They know it's working.
	I'm sure that after Trump got elected, all these Silicon Valley people got together.
	And we basically know this because that's what the Google execs were saying.
	If you remember, there was a meeting leaked directly after the election where they said, we have to make sure this can't happen again.
	You know, they did say that on a leaked tape, but I imagine that they all got together, not just Google, but all of them.
	They got together and they said, we can't let this happen again.
	You know, Hillary Clinton should have been president.
	We're supposed to make her president.
	And so I imagine that they set out, I don't know if this is a real memo or anything, but I'm sure they set out and they said that by 2020, we want to make it such that on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, you cannot promote content that will lead to this kind of thing happening ever again.
	And they know it works.
	And they've seen that it works, and they're going to keep doing it because it works.
	And we see that this administration, in spite of using all these tools to get elected, could you imagine Trump without Twitter in the 2016 election?
	In spite of this being directly connected, their destiny and fate being tied with ours, they refuse to do anything to help us.
	They refuse to assist us.
	And you know, this isn't going to make anything better.
	Right.
	The administration's failing.
	Social media thinks they're winning.
	This isn't going to make anything better by kicking white nationalists, white supremacists off the platform.
	I'm not a white nationalist.
	I would counter a lot of those ideas with facts and logic.
	I'll write with arguments.
	But beyond that, why do you think the New Zealand shooter did what he did?
	Why do you think mosque shooters, you know, when white nationalist terrorism does happen, why do you think it happens?
	It happens because they look at the system, and the system is the government, the system is media, the system is Wall Street and the private sector, and they see that there is simply no peaceful or legitimate way for them to express their grievances.
	You look at government policy, it's government policy to bring in a million and some immigrants per year.
	We brought in like 10 million immigrants From 2000 to 2010.
	That's a government policy.
	They see that.
	They oppose that for politically incorrect reasons.
	There is no legitimate means for them, again, within the system and all the institutions that the system represents, for them to get those ideas out there, for them to change policy, for them to have some stake in this so-called democracy, liberal democracy that we have.
	So what's the only alternative?
	Let's see.
	I can't get elected to office.
	I can't hold a job.
	I can't tweet about it online.
	I can't watch my favorite podcast or watch my favorite video anymore.
	You know, I'm basically cut off at the legs.
	The only thing I can do is sit here and stew about it.
	All alone.
	Can't talk to anybody.
	Can't go to government.
	Can't go online.
	What's the only alternative?
	You see these horrible things happening to the country in the eyes of You know, said white nationalist or said white separatist.
	You have an idea for how to fix it.
	You have an idea what the problem is.
	I've got nowhere to go.
	I've got nowhere to go.
	The only solution is to go to Christian Piccolini and become some paused up homosexual, basically.
	So, I guess there's only one alternative.
	That's how that kind of thing happens.
	And the shooter was not really, you know, It's not like that was a secret with this shooter.
	If you looked at the manifesto, he said, the only reason I'm doing this is because any other form of change is futile.
	This is the only way that we can reject these kinds of things.
	Now could you imagine if people were allowed a voice?
	If people were allowed a platform?
	If people were allowed a spot in government?
	Maybe then there could be some kind of compromise, some kind of middle ground.
	At the very least, the most extreme and fringe elements of this ideology could be tamed, could possibly be socialized, you know, brought back into the system, brought back into the light where they're not doing damage.
	You know, and I'll say even at CPAC, I saw somebody like, I forget her name, but I saw some girl who's affiliated with Jared Holt, some woman, and she said something to the effect, I think it was her, it might have been Christopher Mathias or somebody else, but she said, basically, I'm more comfortable talking to you directly. but she said, basically, I'm more comfortable talking to you I I'm more comfortable when you're online because we can see what you guys are up to.
	And I think that's, you know, I'm not somebody who's out there planning anything bad, but I think that's basically the right idea.
	Isn't it better to have people with ideas you don't agree with online, where they're on the same playing field as you, when they can share the same ideas as you, instead of doing these kinds of violent attacks?
	I would think that if you were interested in actually stopping violence, if you were interested in making multiracialism work, then you would be.
	And that's really what it comes down to.
	I think that's the fundamental premise here.
	Of course.
	Of course that makes sense.
	But Facebook and Silicon Valley, Wall Street, Washington D.C., and people might be in the live chat saying, but they don't want that.
	Well, that's exactly right.
	They don't want to stop these attacks.
	They don't want to have this multiracialism thing work.
	Every time a white nationalist pops off and does an attack, Silicon Valley loves that stuff.
	Washington DC, Wall Street, they love that stuff.
	That gives them a pretext to shut down all legitimate dissent.
	That gives them an excuse to go after anybody who opposes immigration.
	And great, the more people that are pushed outside, The more anybody who looks like they oppose immigration is on the side of radicals and mosque shooters and everybody else.
	So basically they force this division where you're either on the side of the New Zealand shooter and people like that or you're on our side.
	And when you're on our side, There's no room for anything opposed to immigration.
	There's no room for anything opposed to diversity.
	They don't want you to have a seat at the table.
	They don't want you to have political enfranchisement.
	They don't, I don't think, want you to vote.
	They don't want you to speak.
	They don't want you to have a platform.
	Because they don't want any opposition to what's going on.
	They don't want to have a liberal democracy.
	They don't want to have a multiracial country where everybody feels like they're being heard and they're valid and everything else.
	They want a country where white people are simply going to go away.
	And this vindicates everything that anybody on the right wing has been saying for many years.
	Not even just the white nationalists or the white separatists, but everybody.
	Which is that what's happening in these countries is deliberate.
	If you're looking at this from the framework, from the narrative.
	You know, if you're trying to tie all this together using this theory that Mark Zuckerberg, Jeff Bezos, George Soros, the SPLC, the ADL, they just don't like racism.
	You know?
	They just really want to see poor people in all these other countries come here so they can have a better life.
	And they want us to all get along.
	They want racism, which is discrimination, prejudice, against any race for the reason of their race.
	They want that to go away.
	They want to see less of that.
	If you're looking at it from that perspective, if that's your working theory, none of this makes any sense.
	None of this makes any sense.
	If you wanted a free, liberal, multiracial democracy, this is the wrong way to do it.
	This is the wrong way to get peace, which is what we're trying to.
	We're trying to kind of keep a lid on things.
	We're trying to stabilize radical demographic technological changes.
	That's what I'm trying to do, right?
	But that's not what they're trying to do.
	If they were trying to do that, they wouldn't be forcing this divide.
	They would be trying to probably empower people like me.
	Trying to empower people who have a voice that is sensible, that is not extreme, that is trying to preach compromise, that is trying to preach some kind of peaceful settlement, trying to voice some of the problems we see down the pike without preaching reactionary or alarmist prescriptions.
	They would be trying to empower voices like that, or at least maybe sort of create a release valve for that kind of tension, but that's not what's happening.
	Instead, what they're doing, it kind of conforms to the other theory, which is that Zuckerberg and Bezos and Soros and the SPLC and the ADL, what they really want is for white people to just simply go away, for them to shut up and just kind of disappear so that we can have just kind of this mixed, deracinated for them to shut up and just kind of disappear so that we can have just kind of this And they can be satiated with liquor and sex and drugs, and they'll just kind of be the unthinking masses.
	And they can be satiated with liquor and sex and drugs.
	And they'll just kind of be the unthinking masses.
	And if you wanted to do that, well, you would try to force this demographic change as quickly as possible.
	And if you wanted to do that, well, you would try to force this demographic change as quickly as possible.
	And you would silence anybody who brings up any kind of objection from the left or the right to what's happening so that you could achieve your ultimate goals.
	If that were happening, you would try to alienate everybody, legitimate and illegitimate, people within the system and outside the system, people violent and nonviolent, from expressing any kind of dissent against this program.
	You would shut them down or you'd associate them with the most radical.
	And you would make normal people feel afraid to express those kinds of sentiments.
	That's basically what you would do if it were deliberate.
	And so it's getting harder and harder to justify the former worldview where these people, these technocrats in charge of these policies legitimately want these things to happen.
	Because I'll tell you, I know a lot of people in Washington DC who are not sympathetic to my views at all.
	They think I'm far too extreme.
	They think I'm prejudiced.
	They think I'm bigoted.
	You know, maybe they're right-wing adjacent, or maybe they're not even right-wing at all.
	They don't agree with me at all.
	In short, they think that my views are maybe atrocious or hateful.
	But they do acknowledge, they do acknowledge that I'm basically right about my prescriptions, about what's happening with diversity, about mass immigration, about ethnic conflict.
	They acknowledge that I've got the problems right.
	And moreover, they acknowledge that people like myself do need to be heard.
	People like myself do need to have a platform.
	Even though they might share the political ideology of Mark Zuckerberg, and they might fit with his ideology more than mine, they're more sympathetic to my view of what's happening with tech censorship because they know, because they want all of this to basically work out in the end, that these kinds of policies do nothing but hurt everybody involved.
	But Bezos, Zuckerberg, they're not on board with even the people in the middle.
	They're radical.
	They want this agenda, this multiracial, deracinated slave class.
	They want that to happen.
	And so, in short...
	In short, I'm not a white nationalist, everybody, alright?
	I'm not a crook.
	I'm not thinking... I have all the right opinions, okay?
	I have all the right opinions!
	I think this is a good thing!
	I think multiracialism is the best thing ever!
	Having all kinds of people with different opinions and different histories and cultures which are mutually exclusive, living in the same country, living in close proximity, enough rehab friction, I think that's a good thing!
	I think out of that, Through shared ethnic and racial conflict, we will have shared strife.
	And through shared strife, you know, that'll make us stronger.
	I think becoming more like Brazil, becoming more like the rich, multiracial democracy that is Iraq, that is the Democratic Republic of the Congo, I think that will make America better.
	America's best days are ahead of us.
	You know, you look at China, China.
	What are they doing?
	They're building hyper fast trains and they're building infrastructure and they've got this brutal authoritarian government which is regulating behavior making sure everyone's behaving and they've got one ethnic core the Han Chinese in the middle and you know they're using genetic modification to make their children smarter and faster and taller and better.
	But, you know, we've got one trick up our sleeves that they just don't know about.
	We've got immigration, alright?
	We're bringing in millions of people from the third world every year.
	We've got a little thing called diversity.
	So you might be thinking to yourself, well, you look at all the figures and everything's basically going down, alright?
	Substance abuse is going up.
	Suicide's going up.
	Life expectancy going down.
	Happiness going down.
	Trust in government and institutions is going down.
	All the indicators are going down, but that's just temporary.
	You see, once we get rid of Donald Trump, the best days are ahead of us.
	We just need more diversity.
	So, I just want to reiterate for Jared Holt, anybody who might be watching, Zuckerberg, Facebook, Instagram, Google, trust me, I am not any of those bad things.
	I hold all the right opinions.
	At worst, you could describe me as a campus conservative, alright?
	I'm just a Latino with African heritage.
	I'm a campus conservative.
	As long as I got my Starbucks, my Netflix, alright, my Amazon delivery, I'm good, okay?
	Ethnic heritage, ancestral culture, anything like that, you know, forget that.
	Forget that!
	Is that a Netflix series?
	If it's not, I don't want to hear about it.
	So, we just have to put in that little asterisk.
	Not a white nationalist, just a free speech advocate.
	Okay?
	You could just call me that.
	You know, people say, if you're not a white nationalist, what are you?
	Free speech advocate.
	Okay, so that's Facebook.
	We just got to clear the air about that, you know, just in case anybody gets the wrong idea.
	The last thing we have to talk about here, we're running out of time.
	I didn't think I'd spend so much time on that, but, you know, really, it's kind of problematic.
	Kind of problematic, Zuckerberg.
	The last story of the night is about immigration.
	It's another black pill.
	Look, things are just not going well at the border.
	Sorry.
	It's just not working out here.
	We had the statement from ICE last week that we've never seen immigration like we have this year.
	And now I've got a statement from Customs and Border Protection Commissioner McAleenan who calls on Congress for help.
	He says he's reassigning 750 federal agents who are currently stationed at the country's busiest international bridges and trade zones to help U.S.
	Border Patrol agents.
	He says we're at a breaking point.
	So this is according to the Texas Daily Tribune, quote, Border Patrol is on pace to apprehend about 100,000 migrants this month alone.
	100,000 this month alone.
	Do a little math.
	Okay, 100,000, that doesn't really, that doesn't sound like a lot.
	100,000 that doesn't really mean it doesn't sound like a lot 100,000 so over the course of 30 days so what is that 10,000 10,000 every three days?
	About 3,000 every day?
	I think I've done the math right there.
	About 3,000 migrants a day, basically, on the southwest border.
	So we're not even talking about the whole stretch of the border, but the southwest corridor there.
	Most of them families and unaccompanied children from Central America.
	Gee!
	Who could have predicted that?
	What a surprise!
	You mean to tell me that Donald Trump signs a funding bill that says that people who are the sponsors or potential sponsors of unaccompanied migrant children from across the border get total legal immunity, total immunity, total protection from deportation or even the initiation of deportation proceedings.
	You're telling me that after you sign that bill you're gonna get a hundred thousand migrants a year and all of them are Central American families and minors?
	I'm shocked!
	Who could have predicted this?
	Who could have seen this coming?
	I'm so surprised!
	You know?
	What are we going to find out next?
	That if you make murder legal, you're going to get a lot more murder?
	This is so surprising to me!
	And it just goes to show, this administration is off the rails.
	And it just goes to vindicate everything I've been saying since Friday.
	People are out there celebrating.
	Trump, we're winning again.
	We're on the Trump train.
	We defeated Robert Mueller and creepy porn lawyers going to jail.
	That's pretty based in a red field, am I right?
	And Israel got the goal in.
	Take that, Palestinians, you know?
	But it's just not happening at the border, and that's the whole reason we elected the president.
	I don't really care about Michael Avenatti.
	I don't even really care about Robert Mueller.
	Trump-Russia collusion?
	I thought maybe they colluded.
	I didn't even really care about that.
	It's not like they could impeach him anyway.
	What matters is what's happening at the border.
	$100,000 a month, and this is a direct result of the President's own hand.
	He signed the bill.
	There is no longer an excuse.
	Now, I could have said last year, and I did, that the Omnibus Spending Bill wasn't the end of the world.
	Because you remember the Omnibus Spending Bill?
	It didn't allocate any substantial money for a while.
	It was basically the same deal with a little bit more money as the funding bill.
	It said 1.6 billion dollars for a fence.
	All the same restrictions as the last funding bill.
	But there was nothing in there about immunity.
	There was nothing in there about catch and release.
	Nothing about unaccompanied migrant children.
	Nothing about this program to release people into the interior.
	There was none of that.
	So after the omnibus spending bill last year, I said, you know, it doesn't allocate any money for the wall, any meaningful money for the wall, but that's okay.
	They'll have another opportunity to do that in September or in December or I guess in January, you know, and we saw every Continuing resolution being passed every successive CR that was passed.
	But with this bill, this was totally different.
	This wasn't just not money for the wall.
	This was immunity for unaccompanied migrants and their sponsors, which is wholly different.
	This was catch and release.
	And the president signed it when he could have vetoed it.
	He signed it!
	He could have vetoed it.
	And that's really why it caused this break.
	People ask me a lot, what made you say, I'm off the Trump train?
	What made it different from what happened before?
	And that's really what made the difference.
	And I said this, if you go back and watch the episode, I think I might have it privated because of the clampdown on social media.
	But if you go back, there might have been a clip floating around on Twitter of it.
	I said, when this funding bill was signed, This is exactly what's going to happen.
	You sign a bill saying unaccompanied minors and their sponsors are going to have complete immunity.
	What are you going to get more of?
	Unaccompanied minors and sponsors and potential sponsors.
	It's no surprise that we have 100,000 migrants coming across the border this month.
	This is further from the El Paso Tribune.
	It gets better.
	The El Paso sector has seen a particularly large surge in undocumented immigrants and now has more than 13,400 migrants in custody.
	For context, he says that 6,000 is a crisis.
	surge in undocumented immigrants, he said, and now has more than 13,400 migrants in custody.
	For context, he says that 6,000 is a crisis.
	There are 13,400 in custody.
	Shortly after the press conference, the Border Patrol's Del Rio sector announced that it has begun releasing migrants on their own recognizance because it has, quote, experienced a significant rise in the number of family units arrested through the sector.
	He said the agency needs the ability to detain families together for four to eight weeks, enough time for a judge to evaluate their asylum claims and decide whether to deport them or let them stay in the U.S.
	So basically, and this is, again, what we said from the beginning, the real problem here is not even necessarily the wall.
	The real problem is the laws here.
	That's the real, that was the real betrayal.
	Don't build the wall?
	Okay.
	You know, that sucks, but we understand what you're up against.
	But not only did we not change the law in the right direction, we made the law worse.
	The problem with the law is that anybody shows up at the border, they say I'm an asylum seeker, they get detained, and then they get released because it's overflowing.
	You understand it's like a mob rush.
	It's like the flash mobs that you used to see.
	You remember this happened a lot in Chicago, where a gang of young individuals, of young thugs, they go into a store on Mag Mile or whatever, they go into a luxury store, CVS I think in some cases, and there would be just so many coming in, just a bum rush, that you just couldn't stop them all!
	There's just not enough!
	Not enough personnel, you can't get the police fast enough, so you'd run in, get all the stuff, run out.
	They're not really running out at the border, but it's basically the same premise.
	If some people come across the border, well, you can detain them, and maybe some get away.
	But if 100,000 come across the border, even if you apprehend all of them, even if they're approaching the point of entry, you just simply can't hold all these people.
	We don't have the facilities, we don't have the resources, the infrastructure.
	So what they do is they try their best to accommodate, but at a certain point they have to say, look, Under U.S.
	law, we have to process your request.
	This is something that takes, like, nine weeks.
	We can't detain 100,000 people for nine weeks, so we're just gonna gradually start releasing people in.
	And you could take an ankle bracelet, you know, or you just go out and you're allowed to stay in the interior and just come back when your application is finished being processed.
	Well, they never come back, and that's how you get more illegal immigration than you get under Barack Obama.
	So, look, the administration is failing.
	That's all there is to it.
	This administration is failing.
	I'm not gonna say fail, because there's still an opportunity for course correction.
	There's still time.
	I'm not saying I'm optimistic.
	People, whenever I say that, people say, oh look, yeah, just keep hoping that he's gonna crack course.
	I'm not saying that's what's going to happen.
	I'm saying there's a window of time where, if there's a political will, it still could turn around.
	I don't see it happening.
	The administration is failing on every substantive issue.
	And look, maybe immigration is a lost cause.
	Maybe the foreign wars is a lost cause.
	But at the very least you gotta take care of the internet censorship.
	It's so easy.
	He had an executive order on his desk.
	The week after his inauguration to address the internet censorship just didn't sign it.
	So, honestly, the administration will have been better.
	It will have been, I guess, a good thing.
	But it will have been an abject failure if we come out in 2020 and we're actually worse off than when he came in on every front.
	The trade deficits are worse.
unidentified		The wars are four years older now.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		Immigration is higher than it was at any time during Barack Obama's reign.
		The social media censorship is worse.
		Oh, but unemployment's better for blacks and Latinos.
		Aren't we glad about that, right?
		Isn't that really cause for celebration?
		Oh, and non-violent drug offenders, drug dealers, by the way, are getting out of prison sooner.
		Thank you so much, man.
		We're really doing a lot of winning.
		I'm so sick of it.
		So that's the show.
		All right, that's a little... ending it on kind of a dark note there, but that's okay.
		We've got some Super Chats.
		I know that'll cheer me up.
		I know that'll cheer me right up.
		So we'll take a look at our Super Chats.
		We'll see what people are saying about all this.
		Let's see.
		Nick Corbin says, Trump's stance on tech censorship is currently.
		Just save up your good boy points.
		Ahead.
		Yeah, yeah.
		Real helpful.
		Boomer.
		Yeah.
		Yeah, that's really going to be doing a lot for us.
		His position is, uh, what is it?
		Just be really good.
		Just be really good.
		We'll take care of it.
		Oh, thanks.
		That means a lot, man.
		Livelihood is totally dependent on you just signing an executive order.
		Okay, Trump.
		I'll just try and be better.
		Steve Z says, so no word on why Faith Goldie has been replaced by James Alsop and Amron?
		Her channel is demonized so I can't ask and awaiting through two hour.
		Oh, demonetized.
		Uh, so I can't ask, and waiting through two hours of Canadian politics for a clue?
		Hello, Yikes Department.
		Uh, yeah, I don't really know a whole lot about that.
		I've talked to Faith, haven't really talked to James so much about that in particular.
		You'll have to ask her, you'll have to ask James.
		I don't think she was replaced by James.
		I think she dropped out, and then I think James just was brought on board.
		Cause if you remember, when they announced the initial lineup, Jared Taylor said that the list was subject to change, so I don't think it was like, We're gonna take out Faith, and we're gonna put in James.
		If you're still one of those wackadoos who are on the Nealon campaign like last year, you probably believe that I was behind it all, right?
		Remember last year when Paul Nealon got kicked out of AmRen, and everyone said it was because I control AmRen secretly behind closed doors?
		So maybe it was my doing.
		Maybe I said, uh, James Aust is my best friend again.
		No, but I don't really know a whole lot about that.
		Probably a scheduling thing if I imagine, or if I could speculate.
		Faith's a pretty busy person, so it could be that.
		Dotard Blormpf says, great show big guy.
		Important question, am I considered a zoomer if I was born in 97?
		I think 96 is the cutoff.
		But I'm not really sure.
		I think Pew Research says the cutoff is 96.
		So I'm not totally sure.
		It's probably 96 or 97.
		So you're probably right on the edge there.
		Cassie, Queen of Spades Dillons, has ever watched YouTube prank videos and seen how blacks are much more likely to react aggressively and or violently?
		No wonder 13 do 50.
		I don't know what you mean by that.
		I've never noticed that.
	Blacks acting more aggressively than whites?
	I don't know what you're talking about.
	That sounds pretty racist to me actually.
	And 13 doing 50?
	What are these numbers that you speak of?
unidentified		13 and 50?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		13 and 50 doesn't ring a bell doesn't ring a bell.
		Sorry.
		I don't I don't know what you're talking about Are you talking about like a 13 for 50 deal and one of my favorite corporations like Starbucks remember?
		I'm a Latino campus conservative So is that like the 13 for 50 deal at Amazon or the 13 for 50 deal at Goldman Sachs or something?
		It's like I don't know Maybe that's the interest rate?
		I couldn't... I don't know what you're talking about there.
		Anomie and Blacks reacting more aggressively.
		We're all just pink on the inside, dude.
		I don't know what you mean by that.
		Anomie says, I had to donate on my alt account because I'm still bad from your chat.
		Thanks for supporting your paypiggies.
		Oink oink.
		Daddy, is this good?
		Oink oink.
		Also, I know you never ignore me.
		You're just busy.
		Yeah, Anomie eternally salty.
		You want me to... Well, you figured it out.
		You started an alt account, so, you know, maybe I encouraged you to take a little initiative there.
		You're not banned on my live chat, I don't believe.
		I recall specifically going in and unbanning you.
		And, you know, maybe it's on your end, okay?
		This guy's always busting my balls in the live chat of... Sometimes I'm in the live chat of the Weekly Sweat and he's like, oh Nick, you gotta unban me, you're being a real jerk, blah blah blah.
		Well, you figured it out, so I think we're all good.
		All right.
		Cassie, Queen of Spades Dillons says, uh, boot one ethnic group from the white race, which, um, excuse me, as a Afro-Latino campus conservative, I have to tell you, there's no such thing as white, okay?
		White nationalist, white separatist, I don't even consider myself white.
		I consider myself, uh, Hispanic and African, okay?
		You add up my Hispanic and African DNA, it's like 99%.
		So, You know, the white nationalists don't even accept me as white.
		So, as an Afro-Latino, okay, I have to tell you, I don't even think there is such a thing as white.
		Italian, French, English, it's all so different!
		It's all so different to me!
		I can't really place it.
		It's all different.
		No such thing.
		You know, this is a popular myth.
		This is a conspiracy theory.
		Where'd you hear that?
		On Alex Jones?
		The white race?
		Never heard of her.
		I'm an Afro-Latino.
		Why don't you ask somebody else about that?
		Ruggle Migdal says, Whatever, I don't know how it's pronounced.
		I'm not French.
		I'm an American.
		I pronounce it how I want to.
		Alex Davidson says, Pretty basic.
		A lot of real political go-getters always citing rules for radicals.
		Kind of basic, I have to tell you.
		There's some good stuff in there, but it's a little bit overhyped.
		The real red pill in terms of strategy to me is Sam Francis.
		You know, forget rules for radicals.
		That's a good one.
		Fox says, fitness, illegitimate state in the Middle East.
		That's a good one.
		Physical fitness, fitness, illegitimate state in the Middle East.
		Yeah, I like that.
		Alex says, technology is ultimate power beyond money or politics.
		Manipulate how people think.
		You manipulate how people vote and what they consume.
		You control what they become.
		We live in crazy times.
	Exactly right.
	That's what we mean by breaking the conditioning.
	People are being influenced in terms of their own thoughts.
	You know, it's like Patrick Starr says, at least I'm safe inside my mind.
	Or Spongebob says that, and then Patrick says that in his mind.
	That's what it's like.
	That's what it's like.
	That's where we are now.
	America First says, Nick Monroe was locked out of his account just for reporting on the mosque shooting.
	1984 level of censorship now.
	Yep, and people will do nothing.
	It'll get worse, and people will do nothing.
	And they'll get what's coming.
	You know, that's just how it goes.
	Alex says, soon FBI, or FBI, Facebook bans you for wrong thing.
	Not having FB is seen by polite society as extremist.
	Our problems are bigger than demographics.
	So true.
	Spencer Skirt Skirts has opinions on CJ Pearson.
	uh cj pearson he's he's young i don't want to attack him you know i don't want to attack him because he's a young kid basically what is he like 16 So I'm not going to attack him too viciously, but I don't know.
	I just look at him and I think, how can people look at that as anything more than a novelty at that point?
	You know, look, I was doing a show when I was 17 and I wasn't black, all right?
	I was only Hispanic.
	So, you know, people didn't really fawn over my message like they do.
	Oh, 10-year-old, base, black, conservative.
	But, you know, I just can't imagine being a grown adult and like, oh, here's a 16-year-old.
	You have to listen to a 20-year-old.
	That's really when you figure everything out, right?
	Yeah, I guess I'm a little hypocritical for saying that, but it's not a lot of substance there.
	I said I wasn't going to attack him.
	I guess I'll leave it at that.
	Just kind of a novelty thing and not a whole lot of substance going on, but that's what's to be expected.
	Maybe he'll mature a little bit and maybe when he's older he'll come around to the right way of seeing things.
	Dara 107 says, going to the Renaissance Festival is the last implicit stand of white identity.
	Have you ever been to the Renaissance Fair?
	No, I've never been to a Renaissance Fair.
	Maybe you should ask a Volkish folklorist or one of these other goofy European LARPers.
	I've never been to a Renaissance Fest, sorry.
	I'm actually cool, so... Homer Barlow says, Nick, China's a communist country.
	No good, no praise.
	China's not communist.
	And China's actually great.
	They're better than our country at this point, I would say.
	At least they have a coherent sense of self.
	They know what they're doing economically in terms of promoting political order.
	I'd prefer that kind of authoritarian country over just, you know, freewheeling, libertine, police state liberalism, which is what we have.
	You know, look, if it was between those two bad options, I don't know.
	I mean, do I do I pick a country that embraces and affirms their cultural and ethnic heritage or one that rejects it and wants to see it destroyed?
	It's kind of a boomer, you know, boomer framework there.
	Cloud Ninja says, I just don't care anymore.
	I just want the bag.
	Sarcastic.
	Off topic, but what else do we have to look forward to?
	Honestly, 1.2 million illegals per year.
	Geez.
	The bag.
	Just focus on the money.
	No distractions.
	Just focus on the bag.
	I'm a Democrat now.
	Look, I'm Yang Gang.
	I'm Afro-Latino.
	I'm Democratic.
	I'm an anti-racist activist, alright?
	I'm a civil rights activist.
	My pronouns are he and him.
	I'm basically left-wing, alright?
	Don't ban me.
	I guess I'm a campus conservative, but I'm basically inoffensive.
	I'm totally fine.
	Just don't ban me.
	I will just promote consumption.
	Just keep buying your gas, alright?
	Just keep buying consumer products.
	Just keep spending money.
	They love it when you spend money.
	Just keep spending money.
	So, I can't really... More good things to look forward to?
	I don't know what you're talking about.
	Our best days are ahead of us.
	More taco stands and, you know, things like that.
	Matt 606 says, when driving to Papa Gino's, I like to accelerate.
	Yeah, nothing beats Papa Gino's.
	Nothing compares to Papa Gino's.
	Nothing.
	Nothing at all.
	Nothing compares.
	I can't think of a single thing that compares to Papa Gino's.
	One of my favorites.
	My mom says, do you feel better after you are off the Trump train?
	I do feel a little bit better.
	I do feel a little bit of relief.
	Unforgivable says, uh, why does no one mention that Bap is a flagrant homosexual, which we would, uh, celebrate.
	I just never see it mentioned.
	Yeah, yeah, it's like, it's a good thing.
	It's fine.
	Yeah, it's great.
	Everyone's equal.
	Everyone is equal.
	It's equal.
	All right, get over it.
	Okay, it's equal.
	Um, Bronze Age pervert.
	I don't even, I don't know if he's homosexual so much as he is a pagan.
	That's the thing.
	It, it's tough because I understand people that say, well, the male form, the physical form, but it, you know, people can definitely say at some point it maybe crosses a line into the erotic, into the sexual, so I don't know.
	You know, that's the thing with Bronze Age pervert, I don't really like to see that kind of thing on the timeline, but he's not an idiot, you know, he does, there's a lot of good content on there also.
	about the classics, about history, you know, so he's not a dummy, clearly, there's some good content besides that, but yeah, I'm not the biggest fan of that kind of posting, you know, not a fan of lewd posting, I've always been for just a blanket ban on the lewd posting, you know, a lot of people, they do the physique posting, or there's hoe posting by women, just no, no lewd posting, If you're gonna post, just have clothes on.
	It's not difficult, you know?
	There's already enough of that in the world.
	You want to see lewd posts?
	There's no shortage of that.
	I don't need to see it on my timeline, too.
	Homer Barlow says, Nick, Q is forcing Trump's hand to drain the swamp.
	Yeah.
	Well, let's just say Q might be a friend of mine, may or may not be a friend of mine.
	I know Q is a big fan of Minecraft, among other things.
	We play that sometimes, play a little Fortnite, play a little Minecraft.
	We're down there in the mines.
	So I have to tell you that as a personal friend of Q, I do know Q. I have met Q in person in Washington, D.C.
	And I can tell you, he's basically in agreement with me on a lot of things.
	I, you know, you may wonder, Nick, a lot of things you're predicting, a lot of the things you're predicting, they seem to bear out.
	It almost seems too good to be true.
	How could you be that right?
	Well, you know, let's just say I have a little source.
	Maybe I know QAnon.
	I shouldn't, I actually, I shouldn't say, I shouldn't say.
	James Russell says, when does the course correction opportunity close?
	Oh, probably, I don't know.
	probably the election I would say probably the election maybe six months before the election I would say so May next year I would say is about if it doesn't really start to happen by then it's probably not gonna happen so douchebag says you see Ollie's tweet he gets it quote every or rather either every group should advocate for itself and their shared values or none of us can exactly and I think that's all anybody's saying you know to be to be not ironic for a moment here
	I legitimately am not, you know, white nationalism, white separatism.
	I've never really been advocating for those things.
	People that advocate for that are talking about creating by force or through political policy this kind of all one race polity in America, which I think is just simply impractical.
	Or Whether or not America would be better off as a homogeneous country or a heterogeneous country is sort of irrelevant at this point.
	You know, we've made our bed.
	We're gonna have to lay in it.
	And at this point, the question simply becomes, how are we going to hold this country together of 330 million people?
	How are you going to govern a country with all these different groups that have all these competing interests?
	And the only way to do it, and I think that's a good observation about Ali being on the money here, is that either everybody gets to play that game or nobody does because it's not fair that one group just kind of has to sit it out and they have to play this, you know, it's for everybody and everybody's a participant and we're all one race, the human race, but other people seem to have no problem advocating for ethnic self-interest.
	So I think that's really kind of the issue we're trying to force here is a little bit of fairness, a little bit of An appropriate accommodation for these competing tribal interests that are inevitable, you know?
	KCM says, my parents let me buy prizes with my good boy points.
	How many points will it take for them to save the white race?
	I don't know what you're talking about, my friend.
	Don't know what you're talking about?
	Saving the white race?
	Who's she?
	I'm trying to save a future where we can sell products on the market, okay?
	As long as the GDP goes up, I'm happy.
	That's what I always say.
	When I wake up, I look at the GDP, I say, is that number going up?
	Okay, that's good.
	I get to go back to sleep now.
	Cassie says, dethroned, conquered, and forgotten.
	I don't know who you're talking about there.
	No, no, I will not stop doing that.
	If you don't play Minecraft, you're not really a Zoomer, honestly.
	Simon Skolas says the left going against free speech is truly tragic.
	As a free speech activist, it's very hard for me to watch.
	Douchebag says, I know the anniversary of 1999 Yugoslavia bombings passed.
	I just want to say FNATO.
	Thanks, Nick.
	Keep up the good work.
	Thank you, man.
	I agree.
	FNATO.
	Retweet.
	Garrett Dalton says, legalize weed.
	It literally cures cancer.
	No, I'm not addicted.
	What do you mean?
	I spend 80% of my paycheck on weed.
	No, STFU.
	It calms me.
	Yeah, I am in favor of banning weed still.
	A lot of dumbo libertarian people still use that argument.
	It's always... The argument always starts with, what about medical marijuana though?
	There's no medical use for marijuana.
	And beyond that, then people say, well it's just a plant or it's not harming anybody.
	The war on drugs is more harm than good.
	We haven't really been serious about the war on drugs.
	I'm for a serious war on drugs.
	So...
	Very true.
	Very true.
	If you smoke weed, don't talk to me.
	Homer Barlow says Mao Zedong killed 100 million.
	What are you saying?
	Mao Zedong stopped being in control of the country 50 years ago.
	Big guy.
	50 years ago.
	He was forced to abdicate in favor of a more figurehead type role.
	That was 50 years ago before they started to turn around.
	Dareton says, I don't know what Ren Fair you know of, but here it's 1.
	Pre-Industrial Revolution, 2.
	Christian imagery everywhere, 3.
	95% white attendance.
	Cool!
	I'm sure the Dungeons & Dragons meetup is the same too.
	95% white, no girls, Christian imagery, Pre-Industrial Revolution, magic?
	Yeah, okay, dude.
	Let's go play Magic the Gathering together.
	Yeah, alright.
	Yeah, I'll catch you at the Renaissance Fair after our Magic the Gathering game.
	I'm not that kind of nerd, all right?
	I'm not that kind of guy.
	I don't know.
	I know a lot about politics.
	I'm not really a Chad or whatever, not really a jock, but I don't know if we're there, okay?
	I don't know if we're there, though, all right?
	Cassie, Queen of Spades Dylan says, solve D over DX.
	I'm not doing calculus on the show.
	I did get a five on my calculus AP test in high school, though, when I was a junior.
	But I'm not doing it on the show, because I forgot all of it.
	A Hyman Protector, and he's posting the finger dance meme there.
	K-Max McDonald says, Nick, do you think Facebook will now ban Numbers USA group?
	They don't mention race, just that immigration numbers are too high and need to be lowered.
	Is that too extreme now, according to Facebook?
	Why are you asking me?
	I don't know.
	I don't know.
	That's just the question.
	There's no precise definition.
	They can ban anybody they want.
	So yeah, probably.
	They'll probably start banning people like that.
	Wouldn't be surprised.
	But we'll have to see next week who remains, who doesn't remain.
	D Sharp says, disavow.
	Yeah, I disavow.
	Penelope with a big super chat, much appreciated.
	Thank you so much.
	Says, from a Catholic fan from the past Upper East Side of Manhattan, enjoy a few happy meals.
	God bless.
	Well, thank you so much.
	God bless.
	I will enjoy plenty of happy meals.
	Well, you know, I shouldn't say that on the show.
	All my health nut friends are gonna get on me.
	I'll spend all that at Trader Joe's on groceries.
	Alright, are you happy?
	Are you happy?
	I got somebody sending me this picture the other day.
	Look, it's carrots and it's carrots, broccoli, chicken.
	Super cheap, super fun, little bit of spices.
	Yeah, okay, man.
	Or I can get a Big Mac and another Big Mac for 25 cents using my coupon on the McDonald's app and medium fries and a chocolate shake.
	And I'll go to sleep forever.
	And that's the way to do it, baby.
	That's our surviving clown world.
	Nick Corbin says my daughter's been murdered, but damn, these tacos are good.
	I'm still upset, TBH.
	Of course, referring to the Molly Tibbetts killing.
	Yeah, pretty upsetting to see the level of brainwashing.
	You know, this family, their own daughter, their own teenage daughter murdered by an illegal immigrant.
	And what is their statement?
	Hispanics are the same as us except with better food.
	That's, that's really great.
	That's a normal country.
	That's fine.
	That's perfect.
	So true.
	Reban everything.
	Not far enough, Nick.
	We need to re-ban alcohol.
	So true.
	Re-ban everything.
	Dinal says, Oh, my don't.
	Chrissy, did you hear that?
	Drum fucked up again.
	I heard one of Hesh's associates has ties to his office.
	Yeah, you're going to make me try to sound like my mom on the air.
	You're gonna try and make me sound like Tony Soprano over here?
	Look, we're trying to assimilate, alright?
	My mom, bless her heart, she does her best.
	She tries to assimilate.
	Every time I have guests over at the house, I try and... I like when she drinks, I like to, you know, piss her off a little bit, try and bring that old Taylor Street Dago out of her is that I can say that cuz I'm Italian.
	We just say that in the house.
	This is parlance I don't say that to offend I am Italian myself But I try to bring out that American Italian spirit because she tries to assimilate, you know She grew up in an all Italian neighborhood She comes over to a whiter neighborhood and I think she tries to sort of fit in tries to you know bake cookies do the usual Anglo kind of thing But every once in a while I try to get under her skin and then you see the real, you know, the real mad spirit present and that's what we like.
	That's what we're trying to recapture here.
	David Sperner says, Nick I'm sorry but on behalf of all the low IQ super chatters officially provoke trial by combat by way of Minecraft hunger games.
	For real big guy keep up the great work and stop calling me a retard.
	Well look, okay, you're not a retard you just post retarded things sometimes.
	Is that better?
	No, I joke.
	But yeah, let's do it.
	Let's do it.
	Minecraft Hunger Games.
	Meet me in my Minecraft Faction Server.
	And we'll settle this the old-fashioned way.
	Alright, how's that?
	Much appreciated.
	Matt Levine says, back from AIPAC policy conference.
	Got some thoughts?
	I'd love to hear them.
	Name Jeff says, Israel, and he's doing the finger meme, is not Israel.
	Yeah, that's very good.
	It's kind of hard to, you know, verbalize that, to vocalize that, but very good.
	Okay, it looks like that's all our Super Chats.
	We're gonna call it, I'm hungry!
	I haven't eaten anything all day!
	So we're gonna have to call it.
	But remember to check us out on nicholasjfuences.com slash membership to get your premium membership only five bucks a month and you get one additional show every week on Sunday.
	Remember to subscribe to the channel, give us a big thumbs up, leave a comment below, click the notification bell to get notified every time I go live.
	Remember we're on the air Monday through Friday at 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes.
	This is America First.
	I'm an Afro-Latino campus conservative.
	I mean no harm to anybody.
	I disavow everybody living and dead, you know, who is banned by Facebook's Terms of Services.
	Thanks to our Super Chatters, Premium Members, everybody who watches.
	We love you folks.
	And we will see you tomorrow.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo!
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America First!

▲