Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Nov. 6, 2018 - America First - Nicholas J. Fuentes

01:30:47

The Most Important Election of Our Lives | America First Ep. 276

Participants

Main voices

nick fuentes

01:15:10

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Show episode speakers

Speaker	Time	Text
unidentified		Thank you.
		Thank you.
		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		With respect, the respect that we deserve.
		From this day forward, it's going to be only America first.
		America first. America first. America first. America
		first. America
		first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first. America first.
		you you you you you you you you you
		you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
		you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you you
		you you you you you you you you you you you you you
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're watching America First.
		My name is Nicholas J. Fuentes.
		We have a great show for you tonight.
		Very important evening we're having, and we're happy to be back here for another powerful week of the hottest show on the web here.
		I gotta tell you, I'm anxious, fellas.
		I'm really anxious, because tomorrow's gonna be it!
		It's gonna be high stakes, and that's what we'll be talking about tonight, of course.
		And the title of the show is The Most Important Election of Our Lifetimes.
		You gotta understand, this is a little hyperbolic.
		This is what everybody's saying.
		It is a true...
		This is debatable.
		Probably 2016 was the most important, but you know everybody's saying that and it is a big deal though.
		So we'll be talking about the Senate, we'll be talking about the House, we'll be talking about some of the odds, some of the indicators we could look at, but to me the scariest thing about tomorrow is that really none of the numbers even matter.
		I mean what 2016 proved is that Things are so chaotic and there's so many variables that you simply cannot predict the outcome of elections at the national level anymore.
		I mean, we could look at case by case and try to make a prediction, but honestly, I'm looking at, for example, the betting markets.
		I'm looking at Predicted.
		I'm looking at John Stossel's betting fair.
		It's the exact same odds that it was for Donald Trump at 2016.
		And I know because I was watching them all year in 2016.
		It was like 33-67.
		That's what it was right before the election.
		And we know how that turned out.
		And it's the same this year.
		And I don't know.
		I mean, have the pollsters learned?
		Have the...
		Have the betting people learned?
		I don't know.
		So that's why I'm anxious.
		But we'll be talking about all that.
		We'll be talking and getting pretty in-depth.
		Yesterday I did an America First premium show and we went really in-depth.
		I made my predictions.
		We went through all the polling on all the Senate races.
		We went through all the numbers on the House of Representatives.
		All the toss-up Races uh for the dish for the different congressional races and if you want to check that out remember nicolasjfuentes.com membership and that's only for the premium people you guys are going to get kind of a softer version but we really went hardcore for the premium members and I know they enjoyed that but besides the election Okay.
		I don't know if anybody else has seen this.
		This has been kind of on the radar for, I think, about a year now.
		But they're saying there's this, uh... There's this...
		Unidentified flying object in outer space.
		Now normally, I don't know if it's goofy to do this anymore, but this kind of stuff freaks me out.
		To me, it's news.
		There's some kind of cigar-shaped asteroid that entered into the solar system.
		I don't know if anybody else saw this, but people are saying it could be an alien probe.
		People are saying it could be a light sail because of how it's moving and it doesn't...
		I don't know, all the math that they use to describe more common objects in space, it doesn't really apply to this thing.
		It's just kind of convenient that we're seeing satellite after satellite shut down, it goes out of power, it needs repairs, and yeah, the solar observatory a few months ago, and we're sending something to the sun, and we're doing the space force, and now you've got this asteroid that comes and goes on this very strange trajectory, so...
		On the one hand, we're worried about the midterms.
		On the other hand, is there something else coming?
		Is it gonna be... What do they call it?
		Uh...
		Operation Blue Beam, or it could be Contact.
		Who knows what's going to happen?
		So, if anybody has any, if there's any astronauts out there, if there's any aliens who know what's going on, let me know.
		Shoot me an email, because that kind of stuff freaks me out a little bit too.
		But, we're going to launch right into it here.
		This is the news.
		It's kind of weird how that works out, right?
		Like, last week was mass shooting, bombing, incel attack, all this other stuff.
		And then this week, this weekend, Eerily quiet.
		We had a few rallies.
		I don't know, is that by design?
		Because you look at the news cycle for the past couple of weeks and it feels like every day it's some big episode.
	And then this weekend, exactly nothing.
	And you had even last night, I think it was like midnight today, or I don't know, I was up all night.
	I kind of lost track of time.
	But very early this morning, they announced that America had put its sanctions on Iran.
	And this was the top story for like five minutes, and then it was back to the midterms.
	I don't know, is that by design that the media does that, or was there just legitimately nothing happening?
	Because to me normally that would be kind of a big story and Hassan Rouhani made a very aggressive statement and it's kind of a big deal.
	So are they pushing it under the rug to focus on the midterms to get people out to vote?
	And this is where, this is the last thing I'll say before I bring out the whiteboard here, this is where it's kind of strange where we have to look at what's going on and then we have to look at what the media is telling us about what's going on as two different entities
	Deserving of analysis in themselves because for example, we're going to talk about some of the polling here and a good example of this is this morning There was a poll that came out that said that the generic ballot lead held by the Democrats has shrunk to 3% So the generic ballot is they call up registered voters and they say, you know It's a generic ballot if you're gonna vote for the Republican or the Democrat in your congressional race because of course It's different for everybody
	In all the different districts, in all the different states, if you're talking about Senate-wide.
	And for months and months, the generic ballot, the Democrats have held the lead by 5, 7, 10.
	There was a poll by CNN this week that said they were up by 13, which is a lot higher than some of the others.
	But this morning, a poll came out and said Democrats are only leading by 3, which is within the margin of error.
	And with that kind of a poll, you have to take a step back and wonder.
	As with some of the other things going on in the news, Is this really gauging where the voters are?
	Or do the people that are making the polls have a vested interest in the outcome of the election?
	And they know that if they put out a poll that says, uh-oh, the race is tightening, Democrats are within the margin of error, Republicans are within striking distance, Then perhaps they know that this will, in a marginal way, increase voter turnout for the Democrats if it causes some kind of panic.
	To me, you can't rule that out.
	That's why you can't really trust any of the polls anymore.
	You can't trust any of the news.
	Because in every case, and we've seen this over the last two years or three years, the media, the people that do the polls, the people that do the data, they have a vested interest in the outcome of the elections.
	And if that's the case, they know that what they put out there is going to impact You know, it's not like there's this independence between these two variables here.
	The amount of people voting and the perception of how many people are going to go out to vote.
	So, of course, none of these are really reliable if we want to, you know, get a good metric.
	So, with that said, we're going to bring out our board here.
	And even within just 24 hours, this has changed.
	And like I said, we went into much greater depth on this on yesterday's show.
	And I have to tell you, The handwriting's not the best.
unidentified		I don't know if you're gonna be able to read it.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You know, I did the whole show yesterday, and then I, uh... Let me move my mic over.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		I did my whole show yesterday, and then I realized, like, wait a second.
unidentified		Like, none of this is legible.
		But let me go in.
		I'll change the settings here.
		Some Jewish guy on Twitter was like, some lefty was like, the lighting's really bad, and he's doing a whiteboard.
		Like, it's endearing, it's fun, who cares?
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		So this is our map here, and like I said, I've been paying attention to the House races so much, I've been looking at them on an individual basis, but I believe there are about nine changes in the House races, and the only change to the Senate map, and just to go over briefly, we've got for the Senate, there are six, well there's 45 races that are likely Democrat or safe Democrat, so I believe the only one That's likely.
		So everything is safe except for I think it's one or two likely, which is Minnesota and Pennsylvania.
		We've got Leans Democrat, which is like sort of a toss-up, but leaning Democrat.
		We've got our toss-ups, which it's anybody's game.
		We've got Leans GOP.
		And then there's 48 likely or safe GOP seats.
		And I believe there's like one or two likely.
		I don't really count those because in each case it was basically a given that GOP and Democrat were going to win their likely and of course their safe seats.
		The only change to the Senate map was West Virginia, which actually really surprised me.
		Because when I was looking at this yesterday and I was making my predictions for my premium people, I said West Virginia was going to be a really tough one.
		But that one actually moved from Leans Democrat and Manchin, who it's a red state.
		It's a state that Trump won by crazy margins.
		But Joe Manchin has been there for a while and they like him and he's kind of a blue dog Democrat if they even exist anymore.
		But in spite of all that, he's moved over to toss-up territory, which, you know, and I said this yesterday on my premium show, I said, look...
		If it comes down to Trump vs. Manchin, who are the people of West Virginia going to break for?
		Are they more loyal to their Senator, who's a Democrat, and he's one of two Democrats in West Virginia who hold statewide office, or are they more loyal to the President?
		The Governor came down to a rally the other year and converted.
		Will Joe Manchin have to do the same, or are they going to keep him around?
		I guess he's moved into toss-up territory now.
		And there are six seats, or rather five now, that are leaning Democrat.
		Seven now that are toss-up.
		Two now that lean GOP.
		And what you're going to notice right away about this map for tomorrow is that already you need 51 seats for a majority.
		Technically, strong technicality here.
		Technically, Republicans only really need 50.
		And that's like the bare minimum because of the way the vice president operates today.
		The vice president acts as a tiebreaker.
		So if it is 50-50 and a vote comes down on a bill 50-50, Mike Pence will act as tiebreaker, break the tie, it's plus one Republicans.
		I mean that doesn't make it a majority but I mean you see why functionally it could work that way.
		But you notice that it's 51 seats for a majority.
		Republicans are at 50 without even batting an eye with Tennessee and Texas.
		And, of course, those are going to go Republican.
		I imagine barring some, you know, crazy numbers.
		I think they're already, they already know Beto O'Rourke is toast and Tennessee.
		Marsha Blackburn, she was up by like 16.
		Taylor Swift endorsed her opponent.
		And now she's, you know, she has a more modest lead.
		But it still is pretty strong.
		These are probably going to go Republican.
		And we're at 50 before we even start looking at seats that could flip and other things.
		And out of the seven toss-ups, I mean, you know, a handful are going to go to Republicans.
		If not Arizona, it's going to be Indiana.
		If not Indiana, it's going to be Missouri.
		If not Missouri, it's going to be Montana, Nevada, West Virginia.
		And so, like I said, the other day I evaluated...
		I'm not going to do that all on this show.
		I go poll by poll here.
		But generally speaking, I would say that out of the Senate, we're probably going to see, and this is like my most conservative estimate, is anywhere between 53 and 55 seats for Republicans.
		I think anything below 53 is probably out of the question.
		If I were going to highball it, if we got really, really good turnout, I'd say we could get up to 60.
		If you want to know the truth.
		I know that sounds outlandish.
		I know that sounds kind of crazy.
		And again, that's if we had exceptional, remarkable, like 2016 surprises in terms of turnout, people that are hidden Trump, people that are unlikely Trump in the sense that, you know, they're voters that Aren't really counted in the polls normally, or if they are, then they don't say they're voting for Republican.
		Barring something like that, we're probably going to be in the range of 53 to 55.
		I'd say more comfortably 53 or 54 seats, which is good.
		We're picking up seats, and you gotta understand the math was very favorable for Republicans this time around.
		The way they have it with the Senate is that it's staggered.
		And so this time around, only a third of the Senate, and that's how it is in every two years, a third of the Senate is up for re-election, or their seats are up for election.
		And this time around, I believe it was only seven Republican seats that were even contested.
		And only two of them were really, Arizona and Nevada were the only ones that were really tough.
		Because you had Mississippi, you had some of these other races that were very winnable for Republicans.
		So it was very good math for us, and I think we'll have a very strong outcome here.
		If you look at the betting markets, if you look at predicted, if you look at Maxim Lott and John Stossel, they have the Senate, I think at like 85%, it's going to be us, 5%.
	538 has similar numbers.
	It's basically a shoe-in.
	I don't want to get too confident, but honestly, if it comes down to Tennessee, Texas, and one of these seven for even just a majority, we're gonna do well.
	And the impact of the Senate, I guess this show will be more about Sort of the consequences.
	Because honestly, to make predictions about these races is very tough for a variety of reasons.
	Some of which we've already gotten into, which is the polling being inaccurate and the pollsters having an agenda.
	But on top of that, even if we're looking at polls, even if we're counting on polls, there just aren't enough.
	And polls are not accurate.
	For example, in, I think it was Ohio, there was like two polls.
	And they determined on the basis of two polls that Baldwin was up by 10% and that's why they've got a 75% chance in the betting markets.
	That's based on two polls.
	And polls in...
	Smaller races are notoriously more difficult.
	Polls in midterms are notoriously more difficult.
	Or rather, they're less accurate than in presidential years.
	So, when we're looking at this kind of data, it's like, does this really mean anything?
	It didn't mean anything in 2016, ultimately.
	You know, Wisconsin, Michigan, Pennsylvania, nobody thought those were in play.
	And here, the same is true.
	Now, I recognize that Democrats weren't mobilizing very strongly in the Midwest, but that said, we have to take all the data with a grain of salt for like a million reasons.
	But to get into the consequences of the Senate, which to me is more important, you know, I can make my prediction.
	It's really not worth that much because it's going to depend on who votes.
	We don't know who that is.
	But the consequences one way or the other, what's good about the Senate is that the Senate is actually, I don't, you know, it strikes me as kind of surprising how much, how little people know about how the process works.
	So I'll kind of explain it from the ground up here.
	The Senate is the upper chamber of the American Congress.
	We have a bicameral system, which means the House is the lower chamber, the Senate is the upper chamber, in the same way that in Britain you have the House of Commons and the House of Lords, or in Russia you have this, in Mexico you have this.
	And so the House of Representatives is the House of the People.
	And for people that are politically in tune, you're going to know all this, but this is the chamber of the people.
	This was formed by a compromise when the Constitution was created that some people, and I forget which bills they were talking about or which charters, who wanted what, but one charter they had in mind said, well, our Congress should be determined, representatives should be determined by the amount of people.
	You'll have a representative apportioned to a certain amount of people.
	I think it was like 14,000 initially.
	And then on the other side they said, no, we need to have a chamber comprised of states, and every state will have the same amount of representatives and they'll be chosen by the state legislatures.
	They came together, they said, let's have two, we'll have a lower and an upper chamber.
	In the Senate, they have very different powers than they have in the House.
	So the Senate is...
	For example is responsible for all confirmations.
	This is why Trump has been able to jam through as many judge appointments not just in the Supreme Court but also in the federal judiciary as he has because we have control of the Senate right now and the the cloture procedural snag doesn't apply to the to the nominations because of a change that was made by Harry Reid a few years ago and And so if we keep the Senate, and if that sounds like crazy talk, it doesn't really matter.
	If we keep the Senate, we're going to be able to charge through and fill up the judiciary.
	We're going to fill up...
	There's any Supreme Court nominee in the future.
	It's going to be much easier this time around with Gorsuch and much more so with Kavanaugh.
	It was a real struggle because we had a majority of 51.
	So that means if we don't have, if we lose two Republicans, and that's very likely with all the cucks that are in there, we're kind of dead in the water.
	If we have a majority of 53, 54, it's much more comfortable.
	We can fill up the Supreme Court.
	We can fill up The other judicial positions.
	And the advantage of that, people might think, oh well, like, who cares about that?
	It's just the judiciary.
	If you think back to some of the key decisions that have been made in the past couple of years by the administration, it's come down to the judiciary.
	Look at the travel ban.
	The travel ban was an executive order.
	Trump said, you know, according to my authority, given to me by the Immigration and Nationality Act, I'm going to ban people for this temporary time from six or seven different countries.
	And it got shut down by a federal judge once.
	It got shut down by a federal judge twice.
	It got shut down by a federal judge a third time.
	And that time they challenged it and they worked their way all the way up to the Supreme Court.
	And because we had control of the court, it was allowed to remain as law.
	Now, if we look at immigration, for example, the president has said that he's going to put an executive order on immigration on the table this week.
	I don't know.
	Is that going to happen tomorrow?
	Is that going to happen today?
	The time's running out today, so who knows?
	Last week he said it would be pretty comprehensive, but we're not seeing it.
	Maybe it'll happen tomorrow.
	Let's say, as a hypothetical, an executive order comes down and it says, we're going to turn away all these caravanners because, you know, they're not really seeking asylum.
	If they wanted asylum, they would have applied for it in Mexico.
	And so, under the law, we have a reasonable, we can reasonably say, they're not going to be eligible for asylum and we shouldn't have to process them because they're trying to game the system.
	So he puts down an executive order.
	We're going to turn those people away.
	We're going to cancel birthright citizenship.
	And of course, the first thing that's going to happen is it's going to get challenged in the courts.
	Some immigrant is going to say, oh, well, I want my citizenship.
	I don't want my citizenship rights revoked.
	I'm going to challenge this in court.
	And ultimately, it'll work its way up to the Supreme Court.
	And it'll go through all the other federal judgeships in the meantime.
	And so that's just one example.
	That's kind of an extreme example, because that'll go all the way to the top.
	That's a little bit more dubious, particularly on immigration.
	But with all these other judgeships that are being appointed, you're going to see American law evolve over the next 30 years in favor of the right wing.
	And that's in favor of, I mean, just all kinds of different things, whether that's gun rights, free speech, voter ID, unions.
	I mean, there's all kinds of areas that are impacted by that.
	So don't turn your noses up.
	The House is admittedly much more tenuous, but if we don't lose it, or rather, if we lose the House, it's not the end of the world.
	The Senate is a good thing to have if we strengthen our majority there, we're going to get a lot of positions in the judiciary, we're going to shape federal law, and that's a very enduring legacy.
	People are not talking about that so much, but that's a huge thing.
	Now with the House, It's much more tough.
	There's a lot of things that have been mixed around in the past 24 hours.
	Obviously I don't have time in the next hour to go over like 75 races and all the different polling that's going on there.
	But this has been the struggle from the beginning.
	If you listen to My 2018 Election HQ podcast, you know that the House has always been a dogfight, basically.
	We owe that to the President.
	It wasn't going to be like this.
	You understand that Trump has conducted his strategy with campaigning, with policy, with all kinds of different things, optimally, such that we have remained competitive in the House in a way that I don't think would have been possible if we had a different president.
	In the sense that the House really shouldn't have been competitive.
	Like, it's an off year.
	We had the president in 2016.
	Traditionally, and he said this on the campaign trail a lot, more so in the summer, when you win the presidency in the next midterm election, you tend to do poorly in the congressional elections, both in the Senate and in the House, but particularly in the House.
	The polls have never been favorable, and generic ballot in, you know, state-by-state, or rather district-by-district polling, it's never been that good, but we've remained afloat, I think largely because Trump has been very strategic.
	He's been hitting the campaign trail very hard since 2017.
	He's been out there making the case, not just in key swing states for the Senate, but in key districts for the congressional races.
	He's been hitting everybody really hard with policy in terms of, you see, the new NAFTA deal which was made, you see...
	What's being done with immigration that that's been pushed in the spotlight with the Kavanaugh situation.
	So there's a lot going on here.
	Now that said, the polling is a little bit tricky.
	We see that the real clear politics average for the generic ballot is a little bit over 7%.
	It's about 7.5% that the Democrats have an advantage on average in the real clear politics average.
	Average.
	So they're up by about seven and a half, and that might be spooky to some people.
	It sounds like a big number, right?
	Democrats are up seven and a half percent, and that's not the best metric.
	I mean, you know, again, the polls don't really mean that much, but these are the numbers we have to work with.
	It's 7.5%.
	Some of the polls in the past week are not looking so hot, like I said earlier.
	There was a 3% poll that came out today, a poll that showed they were only up by 3%.
	There was a poll today from Rasmussen which said Republicans were up 1%.
	But, to me, the most important factoid that I heard throughout the election was from a place called the Brennan Center of Justice.
	I don't know how many people heard about this.
	This was kind of off the radar, but in March, the Brennan Center of Justice released their report, and they said that they analyzed all the data for the midterms in the past so many years, and they said that for Democrats to overcome the gerrymandering advantage that Republicans have, they would need 11% minimum in order to break that Republican wall.
	So in other words, in 2010, when the census was done, when Republicans swept the House for the first time, in 2008, Barack Obama won the presidency, the House, and the Senate.
	In 2010, Republicans won the House.
	In 2014, we won the Senate and the House.
	And in 2016, we won all three.
	But in 2010, you had the census happen.
	At the same time, you had Republicans sweep And they won the House, they won state legislatures, governorships all across the country because people didn't like Obama.
	It was the same effect that happened with this president.
	You know, he gets in, the next midterm he doesn't do so well.
	And because of what we did in 2010, we were able to gerrymander all the districts and give the GOP a very, very strong structural advantage, which, even if the Democrats do really, really well, If they get 5%, if they get 4%.
	You know, the polling today said 3 or Republicans have 1.
	But let's say they get the average, let's say they get 7.5.
	Some reports are saying that's still not going to cut it.
	They're going to need up to 11, and that's the minimum in order to be competitive, in order to flip 24 seats and gain control of the House.
	Some people have made similar predictions based on the gerrymandering and said it could be as low as 7, as high as 11.
	Some say it could be as low as 11, as high as 16.
	But in any case, we know that even if the Democrats have a strong polling advantage, Polling probably isn't totally accurate.
	If it is, it's giving Democrats a slight edge.
	And ultimately, even if it's high, it's not going to be that good.
	And I don't say all of this to puff people up.
	I don't say all of this to give people an unrealistic expectation that, oh, you know, Nothing matters.
	Don't don't be worried like the house is on lock.
	What I'm saying is it's just a toss-up.
	You look at the generic ballot.
	It's very good for Democrats.
	You look at some of these other signs.
	It appears to be going well.
	They're trying to psych themselves up, but it's anybody's game right now.
	It really is anybody's game, and there's no way to predict it because it is a hundred percent dependent on the turnout.
	If Democrats are able to turn out Blacks, Hispanics, and Millennials in really big numbers?
	Like, all this math is just wrong, you know?
	I mean, with the House, they're going to take tons of toss-ups, and the high end is going to be something like 40 seats are going to flip, and they're going to get a pretty modest majority in the House.
	And in the Senate, forget about everything Leans Democrat, forget about half of the toss-ups, and we have a slight majority, you know, modest gains in the Senate.
	By the same token, if they don't do so hot, and despite all their best efforts, the Millennials don't show up, and Blacks don't show up, and Hispanics don't show up, or, if they do show up, they vote about 50-50, you know, or they vote not as close to the Democrats as the Democrats would like, well then, we're still in play here.
	But it's 100% dependent on what the turnout's going to be.
	We have no idea what that's going to look like.
	The outcome that will happen if we lose the House, and I'm going by what's most likely.
	We're going to win the Senate.
	You know, it's kind of silly to entertain the idea that we'll lose it.
	Hopefully I don't regret those words, but we should be okay in the Senate.
	In the House, we win the House.
	It's like, if we win the House, we win the game, okay?
	I mean, this is like, on the scale of 2016, this is huge, okay?
	This is epic.
	We win the House and the Senate, Trump is able to jam through immigration, he's able to get through, probably, infrastructure, he's able to get through USMCA, I mean, we're unstoppable.
	And not only does it have a Not only does it have a public policy effect in the sense that we're going to get everything that we want, hopefully, you know, barring the Republican establishment impeding us too much, but I think we've done just about enough for the Koch brothers that we'll be able to get the things that we actually care about.
	We'll probably get a tax cut, we'll get border security, we'll get All these goodies we like.
	But on top of that, think about the effect that this will have on the left.
	This will crush them.
	They will be demoralized.
	They'll be completely delegitimized.
	Who could take the media seriously if they lose the House?
	Who could take the Democratic Party seriously if they lose the House?
	You'll have, in the first place, the Democratic Party will fall apart.
	Completely.
	The biggest problem they're having is a few different cleavages right now.
	The main one is between the progressive left and the more moderate establishment.
	This is a big problem and we saw this on display with the Red State Democrats.
	Heidi Heitkamp was the Senator from North Dakota.
	She's a Democrat.
	She used to be competitive in North Dakota.
	North Dakota used to be leaning Democrat.
	But because of what's going on with Kavanaugh, what's going on with the caravan, I mean, just in the last six months, what's going on?
	How far the perception of Democrats has shifted from, you know, well, they're not totally crazy to, okay, this is the party of Nancy Pelosi and Maxine Waters and so on.
	She went from Leans Democrat to likely Republican.
	And now she's underwater.
	I think it's like she's underwater by 16 points in the polls.
	She's getting killed.
	And you look at Joe Manchin.
	He could get spoiled by the Libertarian candidate.
	This guy was solid Democrat six months ago and the same is true with all these guys.
	So the main cleavage is this perception by the white working class, by unions, by the middle class, labor basically, that the Democrats now are this extreme party, they're radical, and they're trying to hold these two different factions together.
	Because you've got a guy like Beto O'Rourke, who people are saying he's young, he's the future.
	The establishment doesn't care for him so much because he's not like a moderate.
	He's not going to win Texas.
	He can't win in a purple state.
	He can't win in a red state.
	He can't win anywhere.
	He can win in California maybe.
	And that's because he's for Medicare for all.
	He flirted with abolish ICE.
	He wants Trump to be impeached with not even Nancy Pelosi wants that.
	But you have this progressive wing which says, no, he's the future, he's young, and that's where the youth is.
	That's a big problem for them.
	Where the old guard says, no, no, we've got to reel in those impulses, we have to be pragmatic.
	Clearly we still have to win elections in the Midwest and the Rust Belt.
	We can't afford to alienate all white people or the white working class or anything like that.
	And that cleavage will be so exacerbated if they lose the House, it's going to be open warfare.
	It's going to be the blame game.
	The establishment will blame the progressives, the progressives will blame the establishment.
	This is what happened to a small extent after 2016, after you saw in the DNC chairman election between Perez and who was the one in Minnesota.
	Who's the Muslim?
	Keith Ellison, right?
	So Keith Ellison was the progressive.
	Tom Perez was the establishment.
	That was to a smaller degree, but it'll be open warfare.
	That's within the Democratic Party.
	Within the media...
	I literally, we're going to be at the point where it could be martial law, honestly, because what I describe happening to Republicans every day with censorship is going to happen to Democrats.
	In the sense that, you know, when we get kicked off Twitter and Facebook and we're seemingly going against all odds, like Trump's our last hope and if he goes, who else is left?
	The fear is that eventually we'll get to a point where we don't believe we can make change within the system.
	That within the electoral system, within the legitimate American political system, we can't reform, we can't make change, and so we'll look outside the system.
	And what does that look like?
	Violence.
	Right?
	And so, what I've been talking about with Republicans all day long, and I think that's happening, and you see that happening, is happening with Democrats now.
	If they lose the House, they'll start to say, wow, like, we just can't win.
	They're going to get increasingly desperate, increasingly nervous.
	You know, they lost in 2016.
	They're losing across the world.
	They can't even win, like, football games.
	You know, it was like in the Super Bowl, if you remember, when it was, I think it was the Falcons versus the Patriots.
	Look at me, I only remember because of the political stuff.
	But they were like, oh, it's Atlanta, the blackest city in the country versus the whitest team in the country.
	And, you know, we lost the election.
	We lost all the special elections, but we could win the Super Bowl.
	And symbolically it would be blacks spanking whites.
	Can't wait for that, you know, and they couldn't even win that.
	So they get to a point where they're like, wow, like we're, we're just kind of screwed.
	And the media is telling them it's Russia.
	It's white supremacy.
	It's Hitler 2.0.
	Say goodbye to Western democracy, all this other stuff.
	They might take to the streets.
	So if we win the house It's like a miracle.
	Okay, this is the greatest thing.
	It's on par with 2016 if not better only because it's more unbelievable But I don't want to get your hopes up.
	That's kind of unlikely I mean if anybody's gonna win it's gonna be the Democrats gonna be close It's gonna be a fight a slog.
	It's anybody's race, but I think if anybody's favorite it's the Democrats if they win Like, we're kind of screwed, okay?
	It's not the end of the world.
	Like I said, we'll still have the Senate, and I've talked about this earlier in the month, or rather in October, that it might not be the end of the world for 2020.
	There's a way we could spin that, and we'll go into what we could do if the Democrats take the House.
	But what's going to happen immediately Nancy Pelosi becomes the speaker.
	The Democrats have been doing this goofy thing where they're, like, trying to distance themselves from themselves.
	For example, for Democrats to win, like, if you remember in the Pennsylvania special election, I think it was in District 18, it was Rick Saccone versus Conor Lamb.
	Was it Conor Lamb?
	I think it was Conor Lamb, yeah.
	Conor Lamb was a Democrat.
	He was this young, strapping, and he was a veteran, and white guy, and he was talking about opioids.
	And he had to distance himself.
	He had to say, you know, I don't even like Nancy Pelosi.
	I'm really not even a Democrat.
	So, there's been this weird thing where for Democrats to win in some of these competitive districts or states, they have to pretend like, I'm not really a Democrat.
	You know, I happen to be a Democrat.
	But I'm not really in the party of Nancy Pelosi or these other people.
	And they're giving this false impression that, like, if they win, Nancy Pelosi won't be the Speaker.
	That it'll be, oh, I don't know, it'll be some total moderate who's really gonna listen to Republicans on the issue.
	That's wrong.
	Nancy Pelosi will be the Speaker of the House.
	What will happen next...
	I will launch four investigations into Republicans, and they'll be very dangerous.
	They'll be looking at things like Russia.
	They might reopen an investigation into Kavanaugh.
	They'll be looking at the tax returns.
	They'll be looking at all kinds of things.
	They're going to open up investigations, and the trick with these is it's going to be dangerous, okay?
	Once you get control of the House, they're going to get control of the committees.
	They'll have the power to subpoena.
	They'll have the power to open up investigations and interrogate people, basically.
	Under oath and this is gonna pose a big problem for the administration because if they make wrong moves It's very precarious, you know Democrats are gonna do their due diligence and try to do everything to indict Republicans and in the administration the GOP is gonna have to work their tails off to make sure that that doesn't end in disaster So that means that with all these investigations are gonna be launched
	They're going to have to prepare papers are going to have to coach witnesses I mean they're gonna have to do crazy things in order to ensure they're gonna have to do a lot of work in order to ensure that all these investigations are benign and what that's gonna do is just slow down The White House, it's going to slow down all the departments.
	So all the great and vigorous action that you're seeing on immigration enforcement, on deregulation, all this other stuff, it's just going to grind to a halt.
	Because people will just be overburdened with the work of trying not to get indicted by these nutjobs in this witch hunt that's going to take place if they take over the House.
	Beyond that, we're not going to be able to pass anything.
	You need both chambers to pass bills.
	It's gonna suck.
	Hard to imagine we'll even be able to pass an appropriations bill.
	You know, you thought they were holding us hostage when we had a majority in both chambers, and we couldn't break the cloture rule in order to use our majority in the Senate.
	We had to win over...
	Nine Democrats to pass anything.
	You thought it was bad when we had to win nine Democrats over in the Senate?
	Imagine we have to win over a Democrat majority in the House of Representatives.
	It's going to suck.
	We're not going to be able to pass anything.
	We're not going to be able to pass border security.
	We're not going to be able to pass, I doubt, infrastructure or anything like that.
	And they're just going to just shut down the administration in the same way, perhaps it's karma, that the Republicans did to Barack Obama.
	Now, the thing is with Barack Obama, he didn't even try to make a deal.
	I will say that's the difference.
	With Trump, he came to Republicans with a legitimate bargain.
	Like with DACA, for example.
	He said, you know, look, I will, I so could destroy DACA and I just did, but we'd be willing to keep it.
	But you're going to have to make compromises because the voters gave us a mandate to change the immigration system.
	In spite of that, we're going to throw you a concession.
	We don't even have to, but we're going to because, you know, we don't want to do the nuclear option in the Senate.
	And they said, no, no, like we can't do that.
	Did that even happen with Barack Obama and the House of Representatives?
	No chance!
	They passed Obamacare without a single Republican vote, and then, when they had to go in and fix Obamacare because it was broken, what had happened in the meantime?
	My mom says that a lot to make fun of.
	Certain people, so I say that sometimes.
	What happened in the meantime was that Ted Kennedy died, and they had to fill his seat.
	I think a Republican ended up filling his seat, or they didn't fill it in time, so they didn't have a majority in the Senate.
	So instead they had to go back retroactively and pass a separate Reconciliation Act.
	Point being, they had to jump through all these hoops just to make sure that, like, they didn't have to make any compromises when they totally overhauled the entire healthcare system.
	And it's like so they they try and say oh well they did that to Barack Obama there's no equivalency there at all because Trump really has worked with the Democrats to an extent but there's not going to be any reciprocity there Democrats are going to shut down the administration now the silver lining here is that If we pack the judiciary, Trump's going to be able to run the government through executive orders.
	You know, the administration's going to be hampered, but I think we will, to an extent, be able to get things through with executive orders.
	We fill the judiciary, they're going to go all the way up, and they should be affirmed by the Supreme Court or whoever it ends up being.
	So, to me, I mean, that's the only silver lining.
	It's going to be pretty rough if they win the House, but I think with executive orders, we'll be able to do a little bit and the judiciary is going to help us a lot.
	Ultimately, though, with 2020, I think it could go.
	It's beneficial either way.
	Clearly, we'd like, we would really like to win the House.
	That'd be really nice for 2020.
	Because it'd be great to run on.
	I completed the wall, and we passed everything we wanted.
	And this is just like the FDR administration, but more epic.
	And we're just going to control the government for 100 years.
	And it's Trump imperium now.
	That would be great.
	But even if we lose the House, I think there's still a way to spin it.
	The Democrats will punish the country.
	All the economic prosperity you saw these last two years, it's going to come crashing down.
	I think inevitably.
	You know, I think if Democrats win, it's going to cause the market to crash a little bit.
	I think there's going to be a recession anyway in the next 30 months.
	If it's likely to happen when Democrats control the House, is that the worst thing in the world?
	Oh look, Democrats got control of the House, then the market crashed.
	Or then there was a recession.
	Or look, Democrats got control of the House, now we can't pass anything.
	Look at what they're doing.
	And so to me, it's sort of like, take Kavanaugh, and then that's every day.
	Take what happened to the Kavanaugh hearings, and that's every day if they control the House.
	You're able to galvanize the Republican base, you're able to push midterms to the right, or rather, midterms, independents, moderates to the right, because every day You can go and stump, as Trump's been doing since 2017, you can go on the campaign trail for 2020 and say, look at what these people are doing.
	They're shutting down the government.
	They crashed the market.
	You know, yada yada, it's a witch hunt.
	That's been very effective.
	Look at what happened with Russia.
	Have you heard about Russia anytime recently?
	And that's because Republicans were so effective at showing what a fraud that was.
	So to me, even if Democrats win the House, it's gonna, look, it's gonna be bad.
	I'm not trying to spit it and say, well, everything's fine.
	But I'm talking specifically for 2020.
	That's not the end of the world.
	2018 to 2020, it's gonna suck.
	It's really gonna suck and be very frustrating.
	But in 2020, there's a way to spin that so that we could use it in our favor.
	I mean, really the momentum that we ignited in 2016, that, it's still competitive.
	The day before?
	I think just goes to show we really have something here.
	We have a lot of momentum.
	So, anybody's game.
	We'll see what happens.
	And remember, tomorrow we're doing our live coverage.
	It'll be me, it'll be Vince from Red Elephants, it'll be Bryden, and we might get on somebody else, I don't know.
	But it'll be a pretty fun show.
	We'll be looking at it all night.
	It'll start at 7 o'clock, and it's kind of interesting.
	There's some competitor streams.
	That's okay.
	That's fine.
	Fine by me.
	Whatever.
	You know, I don't notice that.
	But it'll be a pretty fun stream, and we'll be looking at it.
	We have some of the finest political minds.
	Vince did on his channel what I think was the best deep dive out of them all.
	I think he ended up finding that Republicans would just eke it out with like 222 seats or something.
	I don't remember the exact numbers, but he really knows the data.
	Bryden, you know, we've had him on In previous streams, he's great too.
	So it should be a good time, and ultimately, we'll see.
	But you gotta go out and vote!
	Remember, you have to go out and vote, no matter where you are, what you're doing, if you like your guy, if you don't like your guy, you gotta vote Republican.
	Because if we win the House, it's a good thing.
	Now, some people are gonna criticize and say, oh, well, well, well.
	I saw some retard on the timeline who was like, oh, you think Republicans are just gonna, like, fix everything?
	Like, no!
	But clearly, like, just with this analysis, One is so much better than the other.
	It's not going to be ideal, and I'm being a little hyperbolic when I say it's going to be Trump Imperium, but one is clearly better than the other.
	If we win the House, we get a border wall.
	Potentially.
	We have a much better chance than if the Democrats win.
	If we win the House, we have a much better shot at infrastructure, all these other things.
	And so, you can't afford to be a baby about it.
	I'm going to suck it up.
	I'm going to vote for Bruce Rauner.
	I don't want to do it.
	I hate Bruce Rauner.
	I don't like him personally.
	I don't like his politics.
	I don't like him.
	But he's better than this billionaire Jew, J.B.
	Pritzker, who bought the race with $150 million.
	He's probably going to win.
	But I'm gonna do my duty, you know, and I met Bruce Rauner actually, and I didn't like him, and he made Illinois a sanctuary state, and he did some things with abortion that were not great, but I'm gonna suck it up, I'm gonna vote Republican, because that's what you do.
	And I'm gonna vote for Dan Lipinski, and I'm gonna vote for all these other people.
	Okay, well Dan Lipinski is a Democrat and maybe if you're in my district, you're not gonna vote for Art Jones That's what you're not gonna do.
	Okay, that's the one exception I'll make but for everybody else you got to go out and vote Republican, but that's our analysis here I'm gonna go in and fix the brightness here and we'll start looking at our stream labs and super chats.
	It's exciting It's an exciting week Um, I actually kind of like it.
	You know, if it was going to be a shoe in one way or the other, it wouldn't be nearly as exciting as it is now.
	You know, when we get to, uh... It really comes down to the wire here.
	It's a real nail-biter.
	But, uh, my prediction.
	I don't really want to make a prediction because...
	It's so there's so many variables here and it like the numbers are all bogus just like it was last year I will say though the betting markets it's the same and I know because I put 300 bucks on Trump in the 2016 election and it was 33 it was 33 throughout the whole thing and it went up like 36 down to like 29 but it was right in that range was about 31 32 33 percent or 33 cents a share whatever it was And then the same night that it happened, it just went the other direction.
	And we all saw the New York Times.
	I remember, I was at BU, I was in my friend's apartment, we didn't even have a TV, and we were watching just on somebody's laptop the New York Times.
	The needle started out, 95% Hillary, and over the course of the night it just went the other way.
	And that's not to say, you know, that's sort of a fallacious syllogism to say oh well because the odds changed radically one election the odds will change radically in another election all odds will change radically you know that's not what I'm saying but it is to say that that's possible clearly the polling is not accurate it's not the end-all be-all we'd like to think everybody's learned but probably not so but we'll take a look now at our stream labs and super chats we'll see what people are saying here
	I'm confident.
	I'm anxious, but I'm confident.
	I think we'll do alright.
	Black Swan says, Nick, a thought.
	God cannot be literally known through rationalism.
	However, we are created in God's image by learning of oneself, and the nature of man divinity can be better grasped.
	The kingdom of God is within man.
	Critiques?
	I don't know.
	I'm not really.
	My mind's kind of on the election.
	I'm not really in headspace to get into theology.
	You know, it's sort of like the Halloween episode where I did the call-in show, and I'm over here like carving up a pumpkin.
	I'm scooping out pumpkin seeds, and then somebody's like, uh, logic isn't real!
	And I'm like, come on, man.
	Really?
	So, uh, yeah, I don't know.
	That's true, basically.
	We can't know God through rationalism.
	believe that.
	And it's kind of something I struggle with in my experience because I've never been like touched by God.
	I've never had, I have never had a spiritual experience.
	I've never had a moment where I was like, oh, you know, cause some people say, well, I know God is real because you know, there was this one time where I was guided or it was impossible to know.
	Maybe I'm arrogant.
	And I just think that when God does something, it's like, oh, I'm just a genius or something.
	Maybe it's that, but I, I've never really had a spiritual experience.
	And so I sort of feel like that because my, my faith. - Yeah.
	It's 100% built on just the logic of it.
	I see the world.
	It just doesn't make sense to me.
	And I'm not, you know me, I'm not an academic.
	I'm not a philosopher.
	I'm not a logician.
	I don't know the three laws of logic, okay?
	But I just know common sense.
	And I look at the way things are.
	I look at the world.
	I look at who we are.
	And I just can't make sense out of, you know, what we're all just carbon.
	It's all just chemicals.
	I'm really what I'm opposed to is materialism.
	That's my big problem.
	I think that's just totally inadequate to explain away the universe.
	And then once you go from materialism, you say, well, there's gotta be God, and then if there's God, you gotta divine the nature of God, or divinate the nature of God, and then which world religion is representative of that, and that's how you get, I think, to Catholicism, is recognizing then the nature of man.
	If certain things are true about man, well then, of course, That's by design, right?
	I mean, if human, and I don't know if I'm explaining this well, but, you know, let's see if we can define a truth about humankind.
	Let's see if we can figure out what are some primordial characteristics of mankind.
	Well, you know, we need to have some form of religion, we need to have some form of authority, hierarchy, tradition, all these things.
	And I look at these things and I say, well, if religion were true, if we had a creator, well, if one of the religions were true, it would have all of these truths in mind.
	And I look at the Bible and I say, look at how much of that is true in there.
	I don't think it's a coincidence that everything in there basically holds water today, all that wisdom.
	And there's the Jordan Peterson way of looking at it, that the Bible is not, you know, talking about a real God in a philosophically realist sense, but that God is the transmitted wisdom over generations.
	It's what Jung might call the collective unconscious or whatever.
	You know, I kind of get that.
	But to me if you combine the two that well, you know It kind of has to be a God and then well We know some of these things to be true.
	Where do we find them in a religion?
	I think that's how you kind of arrive at Anyway, that's not really relevant.
	We're talking about the midterms people want to know about the Senate They want to know about the house.
	They don't want to know about they don't they don't care about my personal religious experiences, but But that's, that's just me.
	So when people come up to me, they think I'm like some religious zealot.
	I'm really not.
	You know, I'm not like one of these people who's like, I'm executing God's will.
	It's like, to me, it just makes sense.
	Just makes sense.
	Jose Antonio says, King, it's Jose Antonio, premium member.
	Appreciate your hard work and hope all is well.
	Personally, well, thank you.
	You can tell, I feel like I sound a little bit different.
	I don't know if that's allergies.
	I don't know if I'm sick.
	It's because I didn't sleep last night.
	There's a lot, you know, kind of going on here.
	The problem is I'm allergic to my dog, which is, you know, that's awesome.
	Isn't that great?
	I love when it's so frustrating because it was in like my, I think it was my senior year of high school or maybe freshman year of college.
	For Christmas, my parents got my sister a dog.
	And the program was this, when we graduate from high school, no it wasn't high school, but the program was this basically, like, after we train the dog, over the summer, then the dog will go with my sister to college and it'll live there.
	And it'll be her dog.
	Well, that really didn't work out that way.
	They got a dog, and the dog just lives here now.
	And so I have to deal with the dog.
	It didn't go with her, it sticks with me.
	And I'm the one who didn't want the dog.
	So I'm stuck with the dog.
	And throughout the whole process, this is a conversation that's gone on for years.
	I said, we can't get a dog, I don't like dogs, and I'm allergic to dogs.
	Everywhere I go where they have a dog, I have an allergic reaction.
	They said, oh, that's ridiculous.
	And if we get a dog, we'll just get one that's hypoallergenic.
	Well, we got a dog.
	Oh, he's not hypoallergenic, actually, you know.
	The breed was, but he's kind of not really the right breed because we got him from a weird, uh, you know, not a standard place.
	So now we have the dog.
	Doesn't go with her.
	It stays with me.
	Turns out I go to get tested.
	I pass out during the test.
	I'm allergic to the dog.
	And so now I just have allergies indefinitely.
	Isn't that great?
	So I had a really bad seasonal on top of the dog and now I just have allergies year-round.
	So I have post nasal drip.
	I have, you know, and that creates a sore throat.
	So it's just all these problems.
	I'm sniffling constantly.
	That's, I think, caused me a sinus infection.
	So, so to answer your question, Jose Antonio, thanks.
	Thanks for the compliment or thanks for appreciating my hard work.
	And yeah, I'm doing just great.
	I'm doing just great.
	You know, it's, it's great when you wake up and you think, am I just, is this just the indefinite sickness, which is my allergies or is this allergies plus?
	Something else.
	What are you gonna do?
	You just can't, you can't win.
	You can't win.
	Well, let's take a look.
	We've got some super chats here.
	Pragmatic Culture says, ah, this is gonna be a great episode, I can tell.
	Nicholas Juan Fuentes Pepe epic style, bottom text.
	Sensational says, Nick Fuentes Pepe style.
	Konky says, can the real Nick Fuentes Pepe style please stand up?
	I, yeah, I'm really, This meme is so astroturfed, but it's so persistent that it actually works.
	You know, normally I'd say, this meme is ridiculous, it came out of nowhere, it's fake, but what's funny is just, it's everywhere.
	You know, and I name search myself every day.
	I, you know, search on Twitter, Nick Fuentes, to see who's talking about me today, and you just clogged it all up.
	It's been like 500 Pepe-style tweets.
	So thanks for that, cheering me up.
	It's actually been a big boost, I've gotten like 200 followers in the last couple of days because of it, I believe.
	Sam Ellis says, what's the best place in Tel Aviv for a good falafel?
	I don't know, I'll have to talk to my producers and get back to you on that one.
	I'll have to talk to my Jewish producers and let you know.
	Steve Cummings says, what makes Reagan a non-conservative president?
	That's actually a really good question.
	You have to understand what conservative means, you know, in the American context, but also in a more universal context.
	If you're defining conservatism like the Republican Party.
	Reagan was Republican.
	He led the Republican Revolution in 1980.
	That was clear enough.
	He swept with a landslide in 80.
	In 84, he won every state.
	Some people might say, oh, no, he lost Minnesota to Walter Mondale.
	No, he didn't.
	There's a great story that Pat Buchanan tells where he comes into Reagan's office.
	He says, oh, congratulations, you won like every state but one.
	And Reagan said, no, we won Minnesota.
	So that's a fun little anecdote.
	Reagan led the Republican Revolution.
	At the time, the Republican coalition, and I've said this many times before, per Darren Beattie, among others, I believe also Sam Francis talked about this, or maybe it was somebody else who I was listening to recently, but the Republican coalition in the 80s was the foreign policy hawks, the cold warriors, it was the free market people, and it was the religious right, the social conservatives.
	When you look, these are not all equal conservative movements.
	Reagan was the leader of that coalition, but we have to really think about what conservative means, evaluate all of them separately.
	Neoconservatism, not conservatism.
	Free market stuff, not conservatism.
	The only conservatism is paleoconservatism, ultimately, which is the social conservatism.
	It's Russell Kirk.
	And paleoconservatism eventually, you know, really, really reached its high watermark in the 80s and 90s with Sam Francis, Pat Buchanan, Jared Taylor, these kinds of people.
	Peter Brimelow.
	And what paleoconservatism says is, what we value as right-wing people is religion, we value tradition, communities, hierarchy.
	These are the kinds of things that make up a conservative.
	The neoconservatives are not really conservative at all.
	They come from left-wing people, really left-wing Jews, who said, like, the 1967 war was almost a disaster.
	We need to really fight the Soviet Union now.
	So they were left-wing people who wanted to fight the Soviet Union.
	And so they're not conservative.
	That's George W. Bush.
	Was he really conservative?
	He brought in 8 million immigrants in 5 years.
	He wasn't even a small government guy or anything.
	Financially irresponsible.
	He sent us to war in Iraq, Afghanistan.
	That wasn't realist.
	That wasn't conservative.
	So the neocons are not conservative.
	The libertarians, or rather the free market people, are libertarians.
	Small government, this sort of deregulation stuff.
	This is not conservative.
	This is individualism.
	You could call it classical liberalism.
	You could call it right liberalism.
	But it's liberalism.
	There's nothing right about it.
	And they try to pass it off and say, oh well, we're actually conservative because we're conserving original liberalism.
	Well, you can't really have it that way, you know?
	So what's going to be a conservative in 100 years?
	Well, I'm for transsexuals and gay marriage and pot smoking and abortions.
	I'm a conservative.
	I'm conserving the progressivism of the 2000s.
	You can't really do it that way.
	So that's nonsense.
	That's right liberalism.
	It's right, but it's liberalism.
	And by right, I mean right-wing.
	The only conservatism is, you know, are you able to... do you believe in progress?
	That's what it comes down to to me.
	That's the fundamental question.
	Do you accept human limitations?
	Do you accept that man has a nature that has fallen and cannot be improved?
	That society can progress in technological ways and in material ways, but ultimately it's not infinite and it comes at a tremendous social cost?
	To me, Reagan didn't understand any of that.
	Reagan wanted free trade.
	Reagan wanted to deregulate the market, shrink the government.
	Reagan brought in all these immigrants.
	He gave amnesty to three million and he ruined California.
	He passed gun control laws in California.
	So, to me, this guy's not conservative.
	He gave us the Bush family.
	He gave us free trade.
	You know, he, I think, set up the foundation for NAFTA.
	And he gave us Three million immigrants.
	He didn't secure the border.
	So to me, there's nothing really conservative about him.
	And for all these people, we love Reagan.
	We wish there was another Reagan.
	No, screw Reagan.
	This is not the party of Reagan anymore.
	This is the party of Trump.
	And look, I'll admit, this has been my defense of Reagan.
	It was a different challenge.
	The 1980s were different than the 1990s.
	I'll say that much.
	In the sense that Reagan met the challenges of his time, which was the Cold War.
	He won the Cold War.
	And the paradigm did shift after 89, after 91.
	And it was a new world order.
	I mean, that's literally what George Bush said in 91.
	And so really it was the Bush family that saw the rise of China, the gutting of our manufacturing base, and saw all this other stuff.
	But you have to trace the antecedents to that in Reagan.
	So I'll say that by our standards, retrospectively, we have to stop with the Reagan worship.
	But we also have to put it in context, which is to say that for his time, you know, he was a good president, I believe.
	He met the challenges of his time, but that was in his time.
	We have to leave him where he lies and embrace the party of Trump.
	Yes, thank you!
	We're working on one more graphic for the intro, and then we're good.
	Or he says, Nick, Nick, Nick, as a new Catholic convert, all I can say is that Catholicism is epic.
	Does Fortnite dance also cool logo?
	Yes, thank you.
	We're working on one more graphic for the intro, and then we're good.
	Then we've got the logo, which means merch.
	So I'm going to talk to some of my friends.
	We're going to design some merch.
	Hopefully I'll get that to you this week.
	I've just got, like, so many things on my plate right now, but I think we'll be able to finalize a design, hopefully by the end of the week.
	I don't know, it's going to be kind of hectic tomorrow, so maybe by the beginning of next week we'll have a design finalized and everything, but what a hassle that was, you know?
	Like, I had to redesign the logo, which I had a really solid guy do it, and he was very helpful and very good.
	And I really like the new logo.
	Then there was the graphics thing.
	Now there was a guy who I emailed while I was getting the logo made.
	The logo was even finalized.
	And I emailed this guy.
	I said, hey, can you help me redo the graphics?
	He's like, yeah, sure.
	Logo gets finalized.
	I say, okay, here's a new logo.
	Here's everything you need.
	Thanks so much.
	I don't hear back from him for like a week.
	I never heard back from him.
	So then I have to put it out.
	I email another guy who did graphics.
	Never hear back from him.
	So then I put it out on Twitter.
	And some people get back to me.
	And so we're finally.
	And then there's just a lot.
	Okay, I don't want to get into all of it right now.
	But it's just a lot.
	So we should have merch ready for you Very soon Jordan Abbott says hello.
	Nick does default dance.
	I want to be tracer.
	Well, you can't cuz I'm already tracer Jordan Abbott says Nick Fuentes Pepe style does default dance.
	I have to learn how to do the default dance I'm really The physicality, not my forte.
	My IQ is almost totally all verbal.
	You know, when you start talking about hand-eye coordination, you talk about dancing, sports, walking correctly, not clenching your jaw.
	I mean, just countless things.
	It's like, not quite it.
	I know I could do public speaking.
	I've been doing that for a long time, but you talk about dancing, Forget about it.
	For some people that comes very naturally, the physicality, moving in the right way, not so much for me.
	Never been really my strength.
	I've been trying to... I'm kind of too embarrassed to even do it, even alone, to try and learn it.
	But I'd like to learn the Fortnite dance so that we could do it at funerals, at all kinds of different things, tragedies.
	Like John McCain's funeral.
	I would have loved to go out outside the funeral and do the Fortnite dance, you know, or something like that.
	I would love to have gone to CPAC and go to the Lone Conservative booth and do the Fortnite dance on the table, but somebody's gonna have to teach me!
	Where's the Fortnite dance classes?
	Somebody has to teach me.
	I need a mommy GF to come teach me the Fortnite default dance.
	Stephen Campbell says, after President Trump's terms, who do you see picking up where he left off?
	Unfortunately, we don't have an heir right now.
	We don't have a successor lined up.
	It could be Kobach.
	I think a lot of people in the administration who are our guys like Kobach.
	Honestly, I don't see anybody else, really.
	So who knows where that could go.
	We've got to start looking for that immediately.
	Mike Mack says, that new logo sucks.
	Man, I offered to make a much nicer one and some t-shirt designs and you blew me off.
	Not happy.
	Sad.
	Okay, so clearly you're just very salty.
	The logo, people love it, but I don't understand.
	I'm not going to apologize for that.
	I blew you off, really?
	I responded to 75 emails this weekend.
	Oh, I didn't get to yours.
	I didn't get to your DM.
	Grow up, you know.
	Honestly, people who feel entitled or whatever, maybe you offer to do something, but I can't respond to everything.
	You can't hold me responsible for that.
	You know the position I'm in.
	So, I don't know if you're joking or not, but that kind of negativity, it's just, uh, it really rubs me the wrong way.
	You know, you're going to insult my logo, which I worked my butt off to get that done, to get the graphics done, and, you know, like I blew you off.
	Ugh, you know, these people.
	It's very ungrateful.
	Very ungrateful.
	This is why you have to be.
	Oh, I don't want to say that.
	Yeah, never mind.
	I'm not going to say that.
	Stephen Campbell says the Republicans running in Maryland where I live are rhinos.
	Doesn't matter.
	You gotta vote for them.
	We can whip Republican votes, we can't whip Democrat votes.
	So true.
	Pragmatic Culture says, materialism, big philosophical gay retweet.
	So true.
	Jake D says, how does your predicted portfolio look right now, King?
	I don't really bet on predicted anymore, only because, like, unless the odds are, unless you're buying a share for 20 cents or for 15 cents, to me it's just not great margins because of how much they take out from it.
	I remember I won, what did I win in the, I think I won like $1,000 or $700 in the election and they took a ton off the top.
	So to me it's like you spend tons of money to make a small margin and then you get a bunch cut off.
	Or it's very risky, you know?
	I don't, I haven't really been buying on predicted so much.
	Lovell Best says, thanks for putting all this info together man.
	I don't have time to research all this and not knowing what's happening makes me anxious as hell.
	Best anxiety treatment America first with Nick Fuentes off.
	See, I thank you.
	That's, that's the kind of warm, I only will accept compliments.
	If you're gonna criticize You're gonna get, you're gonna get the bull, okay?
	You're gonna get the horns, alright?
	But we're only taking compliments, only positivity.
	People who post mean comments on my YouTube channel, uh, are gonna be looking over their shoulder for the rest of their life.
	But, uh, but yes.
	That's what we try to do.
	We're trying to dispense the white pills here.
	JP says, Future Commander, you're lucky to live in Art Jones District.
	Wanna trade places so I can vote for that honorable man.
	Uh, yeah, no.
	No.
	I don't know what- Jay, you're killing me here.
	Art Jones is not honorable.
	Art Jones is a clown.
	Art Jones is a buffoon.
	Who makes everybody look bad.
	Everybody.
	So I don't know what you're ta- I have- I have- This ain't it, chief.
	This ain't it.
	I remember on Gab, people were like, Nick won't volunteer for Art Jones because he's a coward!
	No, because Art Jones is a clown.
	Art Jones is a stooge.
	Okay.
	And look, even if you were inclined to... He says that six million people didn't die in the Holocaust.
	What a crazy, controversial thing to believe!
	Let's say you were inclined to be sympathetic to that view.
	That's not a campaign, okay?
	You know, voters don't care about that.
	If it's going to hurt your campaign, don't talk about it.
	This is the same goofy stuff that got Paul Nealon in trouble, Pat Little, these psychopaths, these nutjobs, who are making us look unserious.
	So, so no.
	If you want to, I just, what are we doing here?
	Whitehotep says, if you think about the midterms and what we need to do to win, Nick Fuentes Pepe-style bottom text.
	Hey, I can't, I can't argue with that.
	Sam Ellis says Reagan was only elected because he got upvotes on Gab.
	You know, that's true.
	JP says, did you see Tucker Carlson with Ben Shapiro?
	I did not.
	I saw a clip from it, and it was funny because Tucker Carlson just really went hard on anti-industrial, anti-intervention, and I could see that smarmy, what did I call him the other day?
	The other day I called Ben Shapiro a smarmy little homo, and somebody in the comments was like, actually Ben Shapiro was married, he is not a homosexual.
	Oh, I was, oh really?
	Oh, I didn't know that.
	I'm sorry for the language, but it just gets frustrating.
	But yeah, I didn't catch that one.
	I'll have to watch that, because I really did see that Ben Shapiro is getting triggered by facts that didn't care about his feelings, and we'll have to catch that.
	One of these days, I'm gonna engage with Ben Shapiro, and it's gonna be over.
	It's gonna be over, okay?
	I've done my time.
	I work hard.
	I do the debates.
	I read the books.
	This guy debates kids.
	Purple Juices says, Wow, Nick Fuentes, you are so handsome and high IQ.
	Great work.
	Keep it up.
	See, now that's the kind of stuff we like.
	That's the kind of comments we appreciate.
	Otto Weimer says, I made an American nationalist channel because of you.
	Good to know.
	But I don't encourage people to do the YouTube stuff.
	That's good.
	You know, by all means, do your channel and everything.
	But it's not for everybody.
	You got to be careful because At least if you're going to do your voice or do your face or whatever, because I wouldn't recommend it for everybody.
	It's been a tremendous cost to me to do what I'm doing.
	People see the good side of it, that I have a show and I make a little bit of money and whatever.
	I make money doing the show, but it's been pretty tough.
	But good.
	I'm glad to hear it.
	I'm glad I'm inspiring people.
	By all means, take up arms on YouTube.
	Arya Yemi says, Hi Nick, I'm an Indian and I love your show.
	Wow, see?
	Jared Holt, are you going to do an article about that one?
	You know, it's funny, Jared Holt, he only does articles about the nasty stuff.
	He'll do an article when I say something that's like, oh, it's a little bit controversial.
	But, you know, when I have black people on my show, and I have Jews on my show, and I have women on my show, and I get countless live chats, super chat like that, where people say, you know, I'm from another country, or I'm a minority, or whatever, and I love your show.
	I get what you're saying.
	Never reports on it.
	You know, when we were giving to charity, didn't report it.
unidentified		That's okay.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		We gotta, we gotta prank Jared Holt.
		We gotta put Jared Holt on Punk'd.
		You know?
		I was going to, when I was in D.C., I was going to go outside his house with a megaphone and read out.
		Remember that Facebook post that he did after high school where he was like, oh, hello.
		When he was in college, I think, he posted on Facebook in a group of all his high school people from Bentonville, Arkansas.
		He posted a big long post where he was like, attention freshmen, welcome to hell.
		You suck.
		You're underclassmen.
		You suck.
		And if you date senior girls, no one's going to think you're cool.
		And all the freshman girls are sluts.
		Shut up, freshman!
		And it was all this dumb nonsense.
		I was gonna take that and get a... Because I have a big megaphone.
		I was gonna read it in front of his house at like 3 a.m.
		But then I thought, like, what if that's not his house?
		Then I found his real house.
		But I was like, what if he calls the police on me?
		What if he files charges against me?
		Can't do it.
		Can't take a risk.
		So... Anyway, Chris Long says, great show!
		Going to do my part tomorrow and vote.
		Hey, God bless you, man.
		Everybody go out and vote.
		Mike Mack says, I probably should have sent you an email.
		Logo doesn't look right.
		I could rework it for you.
		No, no, no.
		Stop with the negative.
		I want to just, all these people who just come in and like, what's the purpose?
unidentified		Banned.
nick fuentes ▲ ● ▼		You're banned for this.
		You're banned for this.
		You're hidden on the channel.
		You're in a timeout and you're hidden.
		I don't even want your money.
		The negativity isn't worth it.
		We can't have it.
		Anthony says, do you know what has happened to Paul Nealon?
		Last I saw him, he was smearing shaving cream on his upper lip because he is deranged.
		Yeah, did anybody ever, did anybody ever say, sorry Nick, I was wrong?
		Did anybody ever say that to me about any of this stuff?
		About Richard Spencer, Patrick Little, Paul Nealon, the alt-right, Charlottesville.
		Any of this stuff?
		The thought war.
		I'd appreciate a little... You know what, Nick?
		We said some nasty things, but in the end, you turned out to be right.
		Because I've never... I feel like I've never really gotten the adequate apology.
		I took a lot of heat, if you remember, when I said why, you know, Paul Neal's a little bit too crazy for me now.
		Do you remember how people were mass disliking my video and all this other stuff?
		And then he's in the shower doing a Hitler mustache with shaving cream, okay?
		And then Patrick Little, this other goofball, So, I don't know, I feel like I need a proper, I feel like I need a proper apology from the, uh, from the alt-right.
		Cyrus Irena says, Nick Fuentes versus the progressive voice.
		One of these days, right?
		Watch the Ensign Hour says, nothing but respect for owning the Ben Shapiro fanboys epic style.
		We have to do it.
		We have to do it.
		Cole Marshall says, I would pay to see you debate Ben Shapiro.
		A lot of people would, I would pay to debate Ben Shapiro, but he, uh, he knows that wouldn't be good for him.
		Aria says, Hi Nick, I hope the USA becomes better.
		I feel people don't look at your side a lot.
		Love from India again.
		Stop calling us poos.
		You mutts!
		Well, I don't call you that.
		I love everybody.
		I would never say anything disparaging about anybody because I love Indians.
		I love Asians.
		I love Africans.
		I love Hispanics.
		I love Jewish people.
		I love Arabs.
		Slavs are they're okay, too.
		Okay, they're they're fine.
		So I love everybody And yeah, I hope the USA becomes better too because man Things are tough, but we'll turn it around.
		We can do it.
		NotOP says, Nick, I tried to sub for premium on your website, but there was no way of applying.
		What's going on, big guy?
		Have a good night.
		That's just a glitch that some people have.
		Again, I don't know if it's... It's something going on with the website where it's like if you go to the payment gateway and it's interrupted in the middle of it, then it, like, creates an account.
		I don't... Look, I'm not a computer guy.
		I know what the problem is.
		I know how to fix it.
		So just shoot me an email and I'll be able to solve it for you.
		Mustafa Shaban says hi Nick.
		I am a Muslim and a big fan of your show.
		Wow.
		Well, thanks You know, it's funny.
		I post a lot of stuff that sometimes upsets the Muslims, but glad to hear it Glad to hear it.
		See it's a real multicultural show everybody Understands that what I'm saying is totally based on logic and not based on hate McDouble says Why did you turn your camera off when Cantwell came on the sweat on Friday, big guy?
		Maybe you want to use your imagination for that one.
		Maybe you want to put on our thinking caps, maybe.
		That's more of a hood gesture.
		We want to put on our thinking caps.
	Why would we not want to be on the same screen as Christopher Cantwell?
	You know, that's a tough one.
	I don't know, it was a totally random thing.
	I guess my internet must have went out.
	Enix Square says, Hi Nick, I'm sorry about all the epic Nick Fuentes Pepe style.
	I will find a way to monetize this for you.
	No, I actually, I'm not, uh, maybe I'll do a t-shirt.
	Maybe that's the way we monetize it.
	That'd be pretty fun.
	Rock the Vote says, Nick, a few things.
	Here's five people you have to debate.
	Here's five suggestions for your channel.
	Uh, get E. Michael Jones on.
	Also, how do I red pill my entire family?
	Wait, what?
	Where are the five suggestions?
	Oh, that's a little parody post.
	Now I understand.
	I can't tell because the parody and the reality there's just no line between them anymore.
	I appreciate that.
	But let's see, we've got one last one from Tan Staphelis.
	Hi Nick, I'm a gay, Jewish, illegal Honduran.
	Love your show!
	See, there it is!
	There it is, right?
	It's just like our fan with autism who's in the hospital.
	Jared Holt, you really hate kids with autism who love America first.
	Give me a break.
	I'm somewhat obsessed with Jared Holt.
	I don't know if you know, it's funny because he always posts like, I'm living rent free in Nick Fuentes' head.
	Does he think that's a good thing?
	The other day he tweeted out, he was like, because I said I wanted him on my show the other week, and some like fat retard Jew on Twitter was like, oh, he was like live tweeting the show, and he added Jared Holt, he's like, oh, at Jared Holt, Nick Fuentes wants you to come on the show.
	And Jared Holt's like, um, I'm not, lol, I'm not going to do that.
	I'm more of a observer, not a participant.
	I think to myself, you know, that's a very convenient way of looking at things when your job is to ruin other people's livelihood.
	Do you think it's really your choice, you know?
	Do you think that, you know, let's say hypothetically you ruin somebody's livelihood.
	Do you think that you're still an observer and not a participant?
	Sorry to say, you become a participant.
	So, when he's playing with fire, he really has to hope that everybody he writes about lands on their feet.
	He really?
	Man, Nick Fuentes with nothing to lose?
	I don't know.
	Maybe that's not the best outcome for Jared Holt.
	But we're doing fine.
	He can't stop us.
	We're not even going to think like that because we're doing just great.
	And we just want to get to know him.
	We just want to understand him.
	Jared, I just want to get to know you.
	Big guy.
	But, uh, let's see.
	We've got actually one more here.
	I know we're gonna call it.
	Thomas Howard says, Nick, uh, spice up the show and bring on Amanda.
	Uh, yeah.
	Hug and kiss.
	Yeah, good one.
	Now I get in catch that right away.
	See, now it's...
	I'm immune to that now.
	I figured it out.
	I know all your tricks.
	You thought you got me one time, okay?
	I was tired, alright?
	It was my off day.
	But I'm hip.
	I'm hip to your tricks now.
	You can't pull a fast one on me anymore.
	I'm too wise.
	But it looks like that's everything.
	That's all we've got for you on the show tonight.
	Remember to go out and vote.
	Tomorrow we're doing our big stream.
	It's me, Red Elephant, Brian and Proctor.
	It's going to be very fun.
	7 o'clock.
	We'll be going until the polls close.
	We have all the best analysis.
	All the best data.
	Should be a fun time tomorrow.
	Remember to check us out on nicholasjfuentes.com slash membership and get your America First premium membership.
	Only five bucks a month.
	You get an extra show every week.
	We do it on Sunday.
	So for everybody it's Monday through Friday.
	For us it's Sunday through Friday if you're premium, if you're on the in club.
	And I'm much nicer to those people.
	You know, it's a much more relaxed Nick.
	You get to see a side of Nick that you don't normally do.
	It's much more in-depth.
	This week we did our whole, we analyzed every Senate race.
	We analyzed all the numbers for the House.
	We looked at all the polls for the Senate race.
	I gave all my predictions for every race in the Senate and my prediction overall for the House.
	It's some really good analysis.
	We did that yesterday.
	We did the Ship of Fools review the other week.
	Very solid stuff, so be sure to check it out.
	Link is in the description.
	If you have any problems with that, just email me, njfuentesblog at gmail.com.
	Remember to like the video, subscribe, leave a comment, click the notification button every time we go live.
	We're on the air Monday through Friday, 7 p.m.
	Central, 8 p.m.
	Eastern Standard Time.
	This is America First, I'm Nicholas J. Fuentes, and thank you guys for watching the show.
	Thanks to our Streamlabbers, Superchatters, everybody who's supporting us premium members, and we'll see you tomorrow for the big election.
	Until then, have a great rest of your evening.
unidentified		Americanism, not globalism, will be our credo.
		It's going to be only America first.
		America first.
		The American people will come first once again.
		America first!

▲