Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 16, 2014 - No Agenda

03:13:45

600: Seven Proxies

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	How very dare you, Glenn!
	Adam Curry, John C. Dvorak.
	It's Sunday, March 16th, 2014.
	Time for your Gitmo Nation media assassination episode 6-0-0.
	This is no agenda.
	Celebrating 600 episodes of the best podcasts in the universe from FEMA Region 6 here in the Travis Heights High Dog in Austin, Texas.
	In the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry.
	And from northern Silicon Valley, where my count is 599.5, I'm John C. Dvorak.
	Always the Joker!
	This is show 600.
	Hey!
	Eric and Maria came over last night.
	Friends of ours here.
	Eric is the lawyer.
	The constitutional lawyer.
	Because Mickey had arranged...
	For VIP guest list access to DJ Tiesto here in one of the clubs as a part of South by Southwest.
	Holy crap!
	Because she knows him.
	Okay.
	You like Tiesto, right?
	You're into that kind of stuff.
	Never heard of him.
	Really?
	You don't know DJ Tiesto?
	Why would I know DJ Tiesto?
	I thought you liked trance and house music.
	Well, if you're listening to that stuff, you don't really care who's playing it.
	Okay.
	DJ Terresto.
	DJ Terretzo.
	Oh!
	Terretz?
	He's got Terretz?
	That's my new DJ name.
	Hey, everybody, it's DJ Terretzo!
	Fuck, fuck, fuck!
	So, no, he's DJ Tiesto.
	He's a Dutch guy.
	He does, like, $70 million a year spinning records in clubs.
	Why don't you have him donate to the show?
	Yeah, well, there's that.
	Yeah, okay.
	So Mickey, of course, knows him since she ran all of Amsterdam Nightlife for a while there.
	And so she tweets him.
	This is my mom.
	She tweets him.
	Hey, I hear you're playing.
	Put me in the guest list.
	She says, yeah, plus one.
	And I'm like, oh, that's kind of cool.
	I've met him.
	I think I gave him an award like 10 years ago or something.
	An award?
	An award.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	I'm like, oh, this will be fun.
	And then, of course, oh, no, it's Saturday night, and, you know, it's, uh, crap.
	So Eric and Maria come over.
	Eric is driving the girls.
	Because he's a lawyer.
	He's not going to go hang out and dance like me.
	And they're tweeting pictures.
	They're popping bottles in the club.
	Like, hey, look, it's me and Tiesto.
	You know, selfies.
	How old are these women?
	I'm sitting here in my underwear prepping show 600.
	I'm like, the world is a little unfair.
	Well, you'd rather be there doing selfies at the club?
	Well, so Mickey comes back and says, oh.
	Check the calendar.
	Mickey comes back and says, ah, it was a lot of fun, but, you know, the whole VIP thing was just, it was all hookers.
	I'm like, oh, make it worse!
	Well, now you're talking.
	Yeah, like, don't hurt me.
	It's all hookers.
	It's all hookers.
	Like, uh, really?
	How many hookers are in Austin?
	I don't know.
	Seriously?
	Well, let's look at backpage.austin.com.
	Actually, let's not.
	A lot.
	There's a lot of them.
	There's a bunch of rich guys there, so I guess there would be hookers.
	It's funny.
	Well, it's South by Southwest, so of course it's going to be...
	Oh, the hookers came in from out of town.
	Well, I think most hookers usually come in from out of town.
	The ones that are worth anything...
	But there was the New York Times, actually.
	What is the out-of-town they come in from?
	Dallas, Houston.
	They could come from New Orleans, L.A. Traveling hookers.
	New York Times report, in-depth report details economics of sex trade.
	And right here, without accreditation, of course, it's right here, a whole paragraph on Dvorak's law.
	In the New York Times, the recession has caused some in the sex industry to offer deals or drop prices.
	Atlanta law enforcement officials reported some sex workers even offered Veterans Day specials.
	Eh, they should.
	And let's just remind everybody of Dvorak's law of economics.
	You can tell – the one – was that?
	Very good, John.
	Well, the law essentially says that in a down economy, the hookers get better looking.
	And there's more of them.
	There's more of them and they're cheaper.
	Yeah.
	That's what the whole thing is.
	Welcome to Western civilization.
	Works well.
	Yes.
	So anyway, I'm going to do that.
	I'm going to become DJ Toretto.
	Yeah.
	That'd be kind of fun.
	You need to develop some stammering or something to make it interesting.
	Let me just see.
	Maybe I can get...
	How would you spell that?
	Tourette's.
	Should I do DJ Tourette's or just Tourette's?
	No, DJ and there would be the word Tourette's.
	But should it be DJ Tourette's or Tourette's?
	Tourette's.com is the way I'd go.
	T-E-R-R-E-T-S-T. That's not the way you spell Tourette's.
	Okay.
	T-O-U-R-T-O-R-E-T-T-O-R-E-T-T-O. Okay.
	I have T-O-U-R-E-T-T-S-O. Does that sound right?
	No.
	There's double T in there.
	T-O-U-R-E-T-T-E. S-O? S-O. Okay.
	All right.
	Register.
	All right.
	Let's see.
	No one will want that.
	Would it be funny if it was...
	I'm sorry, it's taken.
	No, it's not.
	No, it's not.
	Nailed it.
	Done.
	I've got it.
	Yeah, great.
	To Arezzo.
	I can have a whole career.
	Hey, everybody, welcome to the club.
	How you doing?
	Fucking, fucking, fucking.
	Yeah.
	All right.
	Hey, look, it's either that or go work for CNN who are now touting the headline.
	Let me get the headline.
	Reporters at risk in Crimea!
	Hell yeah, that's what they're doing.
	Reporters at risk in Crimea.
	They had Margaret Warner from the NewsHour roaming freely around Crimea, giving all kinds of interesting reports.
	I thought, you know, she used to be one of the anchors on the NewsHour.
	They kicked her out, you know, thanks to Bill Gates.
	But she looks happier than ever now.
	She's a world traveler.
	Well, yeah, she's traveling.
	He's gotten out of the office, which must have been horrible.
	I have a report here.
	Let's take a look at it.
	This would be Ukraine.
	Oh, yeah, this is actually interesting.
	This is Margaret roaming around Crimea, and this is the Ukraine ballot.
	Which is taking place as we speak, I guess, right?
	Yeah, it is.
	Oleg Kobernik is going door to door in the small Crimean town of Zhankoy, urging his fellow Ukrainians to go out and vote Sunday to once again become part of Russia.
	He shows them a sample ballot on how they should vote.
	Their choice appears to be essentially between voting to join Russia immediately or to declare independence from Ukraine as a prelude to that.
	Kobernik volunteered for the new so-called self-defense forces after protests in Kiev ousted Russian-backed President Viktor Yanukovych and installed a Western-backed government.
	He likens the current political struggle to the bloody battle over Ukraine 70 years ago between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany.
	Ah, alright.
	Interesting how that AK-47 was just...
	Yeah, you know, if I wanted to sweeten a clip, I'd do it myself.
	I'm sorry.
	You got a new toy.
	No, no, no.
	We've had that for a while.
	Well, anyway, so the ballot says this stupid election is such...
	I don't know why this isn't reported on more.
	The options are the following.
	Do you want to join Russia now?
	Do you want to join Russia later?
	Yeah.
	Listen to your two choices.
	Is that really exactly what it says?
	Well, essentially it says, well, according to her, and she had the ballot there, it says we need to join Russia immediately, and the other one says we're going to become an independent republic with the option of joining Russia later.
	Right.
	So what about no?
	Is there a no possibility of just saying no?
	No, this is rigged.
	Well, yeah.
	Yeah, it's rigged.
	Yeah, it's rigged.
	Rigged.
	It's also, you know, everyone's getting in on the game now.
	Vienna.
	Was it Vienna?
	I think it was Vienna.
	Hold on.
	Yeah, I'm sorry.
	Venice.
	Venice is getting a referendum ready to secede from Italy, which is exactly the same thing, by the way.
	Little crazy thing down there hanging off of the island.
	It's underwater.
	If it wasn't for the country of Italy, Venice would be broke.
	They got tourism.
	Yeah, but it's not paying for the bills to keep those buildings propped up.
	Yeah.
	There's not much...
	I mean, Italy is broke.
	It doesn't make much difference.
	Yeah, I guess that's true, too.
	And they're going to start trading again.
	World traders.
	Going to go right back into the old history books.
	Let's play my other clip on Ukraine so we can get it out of the way.
	It's from the same report.
	Okay.
	There we go.
	For centuries, Crimea was part of Russia until the Soviets transferred it to their Ukrainian Republic in the 50s.
	And Crimea remained part of Ukraine after the Soviet Union collapsed in 1991.
	The peninsula still hosts Russia's Black Sea Fleet.
	And voters like Svetlana Kalinina insist a majority of Ukrainian citizens here want to be Russian citizens again.
	We've been waiting for this a long time.
	We felt oppressed for years.
	While we lived in poverty, the money Crimeans were making went straight to Kyiv.
	Many parts of Crimea are impoverished, with high unemployment and low levels of government services and benefits.
	There are no jobs, nothing here.
	29-year-old Alexander Kuzienko has only now found steady work as a courier.
	He too yearns to join Russia for economic reasons.
	Celeries and pensions are bigger in Russia, while prices are lower.
	That's why I think the majority will vote to join Russia.
	We've discussed this before, this man-on-the-street stuff, and it skews reporting to such a degree.
	Everything, everything we're seeing is bullcrap.
	Yeah, it's bull crap, but there is one underlying theme which I think is probably accurate, which is that the Ukrainians are lazy.
	Okay.
	Now, I'm going to relay the story because Buzzkill Jr.'s best friend spent like two or three years in Ukraine, and now he was on some Russian island.
	And now he's just lounging around the house smoking weed?
	Is that your...
	No, no, he's always floating around Russia because his parents, he lives in Tennessee or someplace like that.
	Mm-hmm.
	His parents work that he doesn't get a job in the United States.
	But he just got kicked out of the Russian island.
	Because apparently the Russians are pulling all the visas of foreign workers that are American.
	As we speak.
	Like yesterday, he just got kicked out.
	But he says when he was in Ukraine, he was always trying to start little businesses the way Americans do.
	He says he started a magazine and he had everything lined up.
	And then the day they opened, nobody showed up.
	Why don't you come to work, son?
	Didn't feel like it.
	Can't I just work from home today?
	I didn't want to work from home.
	Feeling a little under the weather.
	Wow.
	Here's the stuff that's really not being reported, but it's, of course, not going to be in this report from this woman.
	Big companies, big American companies are getting very nervous about Jerry Carey and his Yalie skull and bone douche knuckles and the neocons and Noodleman about, you know, the sanctions that of course are good to go, that they're kind of forcing.
	The president is just a puppet in this case.
	PepsiCo and General Electric have now openly warned Carey That sanctions can backfire, of course, and I have a clip from Putin.
	They've got business in Russia, and Putin is now saying, hey, why don't I start some sanctions over here on some of your stupid companies?
	Here's a...
	I don't know what news outfit this is from.
	The Russians have essentially put out the message that you sanction us, you're going to pay the price.
	We're going to seize American businesses' assets in Russia.
	And remember, there are a lot of major multinational American corporations who do business in Russia, and they're concerned about that.
	At the same time, in terms of how far the sanctions could go.
	All right.
	So here's what we're talking about.
	PepsiCo's...
	PepsiCo has earnings of, I think...
	More than a billion dollars in Russia.
	General Electric has a joint venture with two Russian gas firms for gas turbines.
	Ford has car partnerships.
	Is this really the plan?
	Obviously, it can't be.
	No, and we already know that Merkel won't do anything, and she's going to veto anything that the EU is going to try to do, because the Germans are worse off than we are when it comes to being connected.
	Yeah, they really need the Russian money.
	So I think ultimately this will just be about putting some bombs around, putting some ICBMs at the borders, stuff like that.
	Well, I think they should just pull back from the whole thing.
	I still don't think it's our business to deal with this.
	Yeah.
	Oh, hold on.
	Dvorak for president!
	But I'm still under the sneaking suspicion that unless the Russians are completely naive about this or they're just so prideful they can't live with it, I just still think it would be in the Russians' best interest to let the Ukraine fall under the influence of the EU and maybe even join the EU at some point.
	Because it's not a country that...
	It's almost like a toxic country.
	And I think it would just completely screw over the EU over the long haul.
	Yeah, but the Russians don't want that either.
	They need the EU. It's their customer.
	You don't want the customer to die.
	Well, I guess there's that.
	So what is this then?
	It's just bull crap as far as I'm concerned.
	I think it might so.
	I don't understand exactly how it works, but it feels like it has something to do with the petrodollar.
	And by the way, it would not surprise me.
	If the State Department...
	Because Obama's out.
	He's just on the sideline.
	He's just...
	What?
	I gotta do what?
	I'll sign this exec...
	Yeah, I'll sign that.
	Alright.
	Hey!
	Muppet movie!
	Two Ferns!
	The guy's so clueless.
	It wouldn't surprise me if the Yaley Jerry Carey neocons are in cahoots with Putin.
	Maybe they have a plan together.
	To screw Germany, maybe.
	I don't know.
	Nothing seems logical from an economic perspective, that much we know.
	Here's Jerry Carey talking about one of our original theses, or my thesi.
	Which is the export of liquid natural petroleum to Europe to, you know, in case Putin starts to do something weird with the gas.
	It does seem that if the administration would move to allow the export of natural gas into the Ukraine, that...
	That's not him, by the way.
	That's one of the chair in the Senate.
	That would send a powerful signal that we could indeed...
	Do something here that would produce American jobs.
	After all, we're flaring a lot of gas here.
	We're actually capping a lot of our wells.
	If we exported that specifically to that market, it might take time, but once we made that signal, investors would then put up Put up the terminals necessary for us to do it, and it would go into the calculus in Moscow about whether or not they wanted to lose...
	I hate that word.
	Do they have like a...
	Have you noticed the usage of the word calculus?
	No, no, no.
	Oh, no, it's a meme.
	It's like, oh, we're going to have to change the calculus.
	We have to do the calculus.
	Oh, the calculus.
	I don't know.
	It makes no sense if we do the calculus.
	Do they have one of those abacus things?
	Is that how they do their budget in Russia?
	It's a meme.
	That position.
	And it might bring them to the table, and I wanted to raise that.
	The calculus is evidence-based.
	...issue with you.
	Well, we're all for it, Mr.
	Chairman.
	Oh, we're all for it.
	All in.
	In fact, the Department of Energy has the jurisdiction over this within the administration.
	They have issued six licenses already for 8.5 billion cubic feet per day to be exported to free trade and non-free trade countries, including Europe.
	So...
	It's a possibility.
	Now, the first major project to export gas is not going to take hold until sometime in 2015.
	But since we're in March, Ukraine's needs are You know, such that they ought to be able to get, if there is any manipulation of...
	We just send them propane tanks.
	What is he saying?
	What is he trying to say?
	I think we'll send them propane tanks.
	He's saying that because it's March and it's not that cold anymore, it's not a dire necessity, so 2015 is early enough.
	Yeah, so screw them.
	They can cook with nothing.
	Burn some books or something to keep warm if you've got a problem.
	You guys in that corner of the world know what to do.
	Cook over wood!
	We've been talking about the neocons running this operation, whatever their ultimate goal is, which is kind of published, the Project for a New American Century.
	And I've got a very upsetting email, a short one, but a very upsetting email from one of our knights that I wanted to share because I thought it was so unfair.
	I listened to the whole Cheney rant.
	This was where I was saying that he's the worst person in the universe.
	All he wants is to kill people.
	He wants the bombs at the border, which he was literally saying.
	He wants, you know, let's put the ICBMs back up there.
	Let's get our war machine all cranked up.
	That's what he was saying, correct?
	More or less.
	Yeah, and I said, the guy's an a-hole.
	You said that for sure.
	Yeah.
	So I listened to the whole Cheney rant and thought it was very distasteful.
	It is very hard for me to feel good about supporting someone, that would be this show, who so viciously rips a person who is out of power while forgiving those who are now in power and committing such crimes against us.
	Like, what show are you listening to?
	What?
	Yeah.
	We're forgiving who are we forgiving specifically?
	Apparently I'm forgiving the NSA and Obama.
	Sounds like you're ripping him every week.
	Yeah, no, I'm forgiving them for committing such crimes.
	No, I'm not!
	I don't think so.
	And that's exactly what I said.
	Don't insult me!
	Don't insult me with this!
	I'm just telling you that I didn't like something!
	No, you're accusing me of things I didn't do.
	No, no, no.
	We go after all these...
	I don't know who we've ever made an excuse for.
	I guess...
	What's his name?
	The guy that was ousted by them reapportioning his area.
	Oh, it was Kucinich.
	Kucinich, yeah.
	That's about the only guy I like.
	They railroaded him out.
	Yeah.
	That's like the only guy I like.
	Listen to him, and we also, I think, with Rand Paul once in a while.
	Yeah.
	Him less so than Ron Paul.
	Yeah.
	But then we've also gone after them for being corrupt in some way or other.
	No, no, it's bullcrap.
	Somebody obviously is all in with the torture and with the Cheney, and Cheney bullcrap is just completely out of control.
	Well, this night, needless to say, after what you just said there, will never ever support the show.
	Unless he wakes up and smells the coffee.
	We have no agenda, people.
	For 599.5 episodes, we've had no agenda.
	None.
	The only agenda I have is to be able to do another one.
	Yeah.
	Just want to be able to do another one.
	I just see the bullshit behind all this stuff.
	And Cheney is not...
	And why is he even on the TV anymore?
	He's out of power.
	You're not out of power if you're on Face the Nation blathering about what America should do.
	That's a powerful place to be.
	How's that out of power?
	And if he's out of power...
	It's not as though the guy's decided to live a quiet life in the middle of nowhere, Casper, Wyoming, with his wife and family up in the mountains, and we're jamming him because even though he wants to get out of the public eye, that's not what's going on.
	No.
	If he was out of power, his heart would stop.
	The guy should rethink his priorities.
	Something interesting popped up on the Federal Register.
	This is Notice of Determination in Section 301 Investigation of Ukraine.
	This is something not talked about because, oh, let me think.
	Yeah, it's so hard to read the Federal Register.
	They have an RSS feed even.
	You can subscribe.
	The trade representatives made the determinations in their investigation on February 28, 2014.
	The trade representative initiated Section 301 investigation of certain acts, policies, and practices of the government of Ukraine with respect to intellectual property rights.
	See identification of this.
	The acts, policies, and practices subject to investigation were those that formed the basis of Ukraine's designation in the May 1, 2013 Special 301 report as a priority for a country.
	Those acts, policies, and practices involved are the Administrative Ukraine System for Collecting Societies, that's your ASCAP, BMI, Harry Fox Agency, which are responsible for collecting and distributing royalties to U.S. and other rights holders.
	By the way, when money is collected, it comes to us first.
	Because we invented that.
	We invented music, you see.
	We invented motion picture.
	Use of infringing software by Ukrainian government agencies and online infringement of copyright and related rights.
	The notice of initiation proposed, the determination by these acts, policies, practices, actionable under Section 301.
	No, no, no, no.
	So, they're getting in early.
	Hey, we got a new government there in Ukraine.
	Get in line.
	Let's be in line first.
	Yeah, we're the ones who also invented the overnight line.
	The bread line.
	Didn't we invent that in the Depression?
	That's right.
	It's a fine American tradition, ladies and gentlemen.
	The bread line.
	And this is essentially a bread line.
	It's a bread line.
	Yeah, I was just about to say that.
	Meanwhile, of course, we do have to scorn Putin and Russia once again.
	The Paralympics are currently taking place in Sochi, which will have a grand total of 52 hours of television coverage during the entire Games, which boils down to about 2 times 30 minutes a day on NBC around 3 a.m.
	And Putin is now like some handicapped, I'm sorry, disabled human being resources.
	He's being confronted because he didn't have the proper ramps because he hates cripples!
	Not only does he hate gays...
	I didn't see this at all.
	Well, yeah, it's all over the place.
	So there's not the proper ramps, and it's Putin's fault.
	Yeah, it's Human Rights Watch again, of course.
	I'm telling you, you can say whatever you want about the gas and all the rest.
	This is all about Snowden.
	Yeah, but what you do is you just take anything bad, and you just put Putin in front or behind it, and it's okay.
	So blank hates cripples.
	He hates dogs.
	He hates gays.
	He hates gays.
	Yeah, he hates dogs.
	He hates gays.
	And he hates cripples!
	Yeah, no, he's a hateful person.
	Paralympians.
	He's just a horrible, horrible, horrible man.
	He doesn't want the right ramps.
	It's an outrage, says Human Rights Watch.
	And you know what else?
	He won't give up Snowden.
	No, of course he won't give up Snowden.
	A lot came out regarding that, man.
	This, uh...
	So first of all, someone sent me an email, and the more I think about it, the more our idea that this entire Snowden, all these people who are popping up around him, which includes Laura Poitras and Jacob Applebaum, I.O. Air, and the whole Intercept crew over there to Pierre Drive My Car's outfit.
	Oh, hey, another week has gone by.
	And you still haven't read an article?
	You haven't read The Intercept.
	It is so obvious their job, their mission is to protect the Google Who book.
	This is my new name.
	The Google Who book.
	The Google Who book?
	Yeah.
	That's Google, Yahoo, Facebook.
	Google Who book.
	The Google Who book.
	Yeah, it's the trifecta.
	The Google Who book.
	So the first email I got is from one of our producers who said, oh, the seven proxies thing that you recall Snowden did a Google Hangout at South by Southwest.
	And the first thing that the ACLU shill lawyers said, well, you know, in order to hook this up, we got him on seven proxies.
	Apparently, this is a meme that you and I were not aware of.
	Seven proxies?
	Yes.
	It's a 4chan meme, and the meme is, I went through seven proxies, good luck trying to find me.
	So either this was an incredible joke on someone's part, which I don't think was the ACLU guy, No, it was probably his writer.
	Yeah, his writer.
	I didn't know that.
	I had never heard of this.
	Well, that's a good one to look for.
	Yeah, I'm behind seven proxies.
	Good luck in tracking me down.
	Oh, yeah, that's like the meme.
	Yeah, well, these guys, I think they're responsible for, you know, I for one welcome our new so-and-so overlords.
	Yeah, that's another one, exactly.
	Now, Snowden's South by Southwest talk, as you and I deconstructed, pretty much was not saying stop using Google Who book.
	It was, we need encryption.
	Yes, we need encryption.
	More encryption.
	This coincided to the day...
	With Google's announcement of taking steps to encrypt search results, This whole thing was a promotion.
	What difference does it make?
	They keep all your search queries...
	Thank you.
	...at the Google offices for 18 months to three years.
	So if I type in, hello, I'm looking for someone's, you know, somebody, Google saves it, and they keep it.
	They got all these computers.
	They store it.
	I don't know why.
	Oh, so they give me better ads.
	That's why.
	Yeah, that way I can...
	What did I do?
	I bought something the other day, and...
	Just before you go off on the tangent, Now, go on.
	I'm sorry.
	I won't go off that tangent, but you know what I was going to say.
	Yes.
	The ads, yeah.
	But here we have Snowden.
	His only point is encryption.
	It happens almost on the same exact moment that Google announces, and he's on a Google Hangout, and Google announces, oh, hey, we're doing encryption now for all your searches.
	Everything's safe now.
	How is it safe?
	Don't argue with me.
	Of course it's not safe.
	I'm getting to a point here.
	Just follow the point.
	Everybody listening to the show right now knows it's bullshit, but let's figure out who the players are.
	Zuckerberg then comes out in Politico.
	Well, I had to call the president because it turns out that the NSA was spoofing, pretending to be my side Facebook.
	I wish you would do a real Zuckerberg voice instead of that character you're doing.
	I don't have a Zuckerberg voice.
	Now, to bring this all together, we have Steve Levy, who I'm sure you know.
	I do know Steve.
	Steve Levy, he wrote an article for Wired Magazine.
	About how the United States almost killed the internet and still might.
	Cover article.
	Steve, I think...
	I'll give you my first impression of him.
	Total Google shill.
	Tell me, you know Steve.
	What is he?
	Is he a good guy?
	Well, I've had plenty of drinks with him.
	He is an opportunist, and he, as a writer, he's a good writer, but he was on the Apple bandwagon forever, and he was just a shill for Apple.
	And I'd say this to his face, and he'd go, yeah, whatever.
	And yeah, shill for Apple, shill for Apple, shill for Apple, friends with Steve, shill for Apple, wrote a couple bunch of books, special access, Steve dies.
	Now what?
	Now he writes the Googleplex.
	Okay.
	That makes sense.
	Which is all about Google.
	That would be Steve.
	And Googliness.
	And he's Googly, and he loves everything Google.
	I'm sure he does.
	That's the way he works.
	He's the Google who book whore.
	He is essentially a walking native ad for these guys.
	Thank you.
	So he is on C-SPAN, which, as you know, is pretty much the only...
	They have it in HD now.
	Ooh.
	Except I don't have C-SPAN 3 HD. I have never seen, it's not on the Dish Network, it's not in HD. Yeah, they have, C-SPAN 1 is HD, but of course some of the content is just inherently not HD, but some of it is HD. So the Washington, what is it, the Washington Hour Daily, the call-in show, which for some reason our producers, they're too lazy.
	Our producers must be all from Ukraine.
	They're so lazy, they can't think.
	There's three phone numbers you can call up.
	And there's interesting people.
	Stephen Levy is a Google whore.
	He's a shill.
	It's a perfect opportunity.
	And the people that did call up were, oh, the other day, I was actually a woman.
	I had three tabs opal on my Google.
	That's literally what her browser she calls Google.
	And I had, because I'm researching a turtle, and all of a sudden the word prism showed up at the top of one of these tabs.
	I didn't know that was possible.
	And Levy's just like, uh.
	And I didn't clip that because I want to get to the important stuff.
	He's not used to dealing with the public.
	But this is the kind of people that call.
	Our producers need to be called.
	We've only had one guy call in once about the six-week cycle, which we'll get to.
	But please, people, call into the show.
	It's hilarious.
	Yeah, you can have some fun with it, too.
	So here is Levy.
	Here he is.
	His entire job now, now that Steve's dead, Is to promote the Googliness of the Google book, of Google, and talk about encryption.
	And of course, obviously, he's been hanging out with Eric Schmidt, probably on the jet, on their listening tour.
	And we learned from Edward Snowden just recently at the South by Southwest conference this week that encryption works.
	Right.
	It does work, though it's not flawless.
	In order to do encryption right, you actually have to be relatively sophisticated.
	It's not so easy for just plain people to use it, and that's an ongoing complaint.
	I have a question about that.
	Really?
	Did you just, like, sigh because I have a question?
	I did.
	Why?
	I sighed.
	Why?
	Why?
	No, because it's a stupid...
	I don't care why.
	I don't know what he's saying, what he's talking about.
	I don't know that he knows what he's talking about.
	I just thought it was a...
	I wasn't sighing it had anything to do with you.
	I'm just saying.
	I'm sensitive to that.
	It's a scifle clip.
	Okay.
	It's not even over.
	So, this is the meme that is ongoing.
	The meme is, encryption is hard, you have to be sophisticated to do it, it's not all that easy.
	Why is it, do you think, that Google, I'll just take Google or Facebook, whose entire mission has been to make things on the internet easy...
	Why have they not spent any time in creating the be-all, end-all encryption product that once and for all integrates your address book, your email communication, your PGP keys, makes it really easy to do?
	Gee, do you think that's because it is not in their best interest?
	It's an advertising agency.
	They don't care about encryption.
	I'm just pointing out that if you think Google is great, you're an idiot because these guys are screwing everybody by not making the one thing.
	Snowden, if you're there clapping for Snowden, yeah, encryption!
	We need encryption!
	Then you need to force these companies to make it easy for you to do.
	They make everything easy except that.
	At South by Southwest, I interviewed Eric Schmidt.
	Well, Eric Schmidt, as you know, he's probably an important dude.
	He was the executive chair of Google.
	Yes.
	As I hang out with him, Google.
	I'm sorry, I've got to complain about this Levy cat.
	And a co-author of a book he wrote, Jared Cohen, and they did a big international listening tour for their book, and they said they were surprised at the degree to which even dissenters in countries who have a lot to lose from having their communications intercepted don't use the tools that are available to them to scramble their communications because it's too complicated.
	Okay, so why doesn't the executive chairman change that?
	He's not going to.
	Now, on to Steve Levy, who's going to explain exactly how these companies work and why these companies exist.
	Here's a tweet from a viewer who asks this.
	How much money does a typical company make off of our data?
	Percentage of profit.
	Can we forbid them from keeping data beyond a billing cycle?
	Do these companies make money from the government for mining this data and handing it over?
	What would the correct answer be, John C. Dvorak?
	The correct answer is that most of the large companies, Twitter, Facebook, Google, these people hold data and sell it to the government or anybody else who wants to buy it, and it's a very profitable business.
	That's the correct answer.
	When are you having drinks with Steve Levy next?
	So, you know, well, you know...
	Oh, crap!
	Oh, no!
	Well, here's what's going through his mind.
	Oh, man, if I tell the truth, Eric Schmidt will never let me back on the jet.
	Oh, I'll be banned from the Googleplex.
	Oh, what am I going to say?
	For mining this data and handing it over.
	Sergei, no.
	So, you know, the first part of the question, whether it's from the government or not, just from their own use, is, guess really to the essence of what's complicated for these companies about this.
	Because these companies, as, you know, your tweeter implies, you know, they're...
	The model of serving the customer is based on having information about the customer and being able to target information those users want or deliver the information that they want based on who they are.
	That's really important to those companies.
	And those companies sort of...
	These companies want to cut a deal with us.
	I just want to jump in at that point because they sell this information then to other companies who want that research?
	No, they don't sell it.
	They use it for themselves.
	Oh, crap.
	They sell it.
	It's a known fact.
	No, no, no.
	...to make our lives better.
	They use it for themselves to make our lives better, John.
	Not for advertising.
	It's to make our lives better.
	Yes, that's what they do.
	The deal when we search in Google is that Google might store our behavior while we search and what we click on, but then they give us better search results.
	Oh, that's why.
	I always wondered why they stored all that data.
	Facebook says that if they know more about us...
	It's okay.
	I can't take it.
	No, no.
	It's 13 seconds.
	Come on.
	They could provide more relevant information when we go on Facebook and look on that news feed that scrolls by.
	Oh, more relevant information.
	They don't sell it to the government.
	No!
	They do get reimbursed for supplying it to the government.
	They get what?
	It's reimbursement, John.
	It's not selling.
	It's a reimbursement.
	I think we should stop calling it donations and just call it a reimbursement.
	Reimbursement?
	Levy is a big liar.
	All right.
	He gets on one of these, what do you call it?
	It's not a bandwagon, a tit.
	It's a cow's tit.
	A teat.
	He gets on a teat and he's on his way.
	I would have a drink with him and call him out on all this stuff that he just said that you interestingly clipped.
	And he'd go, yeah, what are you going to do?
	Yeah, no, I'm sure he doesn't care.
	He's selling books.
	He doesn't care.
	The final clip that I have, this is the essence of what he is doing and what First Look Media is doing, The Intercept.
	And Snowden, I have to say, is deflecting away from the true vacuum cleaner, which is these companies.
	And the meme now is, oh...
	Boo-hoo!
	Ew, you're making us look bad, President Obama.
	I'm Mark Zuckerberg.
	I'm calling you.
	Stop it!
	You write this at the beginning of your piece for Wired Magazine.
	Google, Facebook, Microsoft, and the other tech titans have had to fight for their lives against the U.S. government, against their own government.
	And, of course, let's position them as heroes.
	An exclusive look inside their year from hell and why the internet will never be...
	Wait, wait, stop.
	So in other words, the list of heroes is that list on that one slide of the guys who sold out to the NSA, the Prism slide?
	Yes.
	Speaking of Microsoft in 1999.
	They're heroes.
	And then up and up and up and up to Apple.
	That's our list of heroes?
	Heroes.
	Is that what they're kind of angling for here?
	Yes.
	They're heroes.
	They are fighting the man.
	Same.
	Why has it been a year from hell?
	Well, for what I was talking about before is...
	This is what Levy wrote, by the way.
	I don't know if you read his article, but he says it's been a year from hell for these companies.
	Oh, I'll bet it has.
	They've been through hell with billions in profit and billions in value for the founders.
	Companies are under constant scrutiny because they ask so much of us.
	They ask us really to give up part of our privacy in order for the benefits that these companies provide to us.
	And also, these companies sell ads against that information.
	They don't give the information to the advertisers, but they use that information to service ads.
	Oh, okay.
	Let me just make sure I understand how this works.
	They take the information and they service the ads...
	This guy's really off the rails.
	So it's part of their business model as well.
	So they've spent years trying to get us comfortable with that deal, and they've done a pretty good job because we use these companies a lot, even though we know that we're sharing information that in other circumstances we might not be comfortable with.
	Now something new comes into the equation.
	Not only is that information being used by the companies, but wait a minute, the government's getting hold of that information there.
	So in other words, like Little Brother is collaborating with Big Brother there.
	And that just throws all the trade-offs askew and could make us very uncomfortable with it and really threaten those companies' core models.
	Ah, well, good.
	And the gall, the gall of Mark Zuckerberg to pretend, I don't know, maybe he did call the president.
	I don't know, maybe, I'm sure he can.
	Zuckerberg on the line, sir.
	Hey, Mark, what's up?
	Hi, everybody, what's up?
	The gall of him to say, wait a minute, you guys spoofed Facebook to plant malware?
	While in the Time magazine, we know that Robert Mueller, the FBI director, has an office in Facebook and is just walking around, and that the CIA's very own investment venture capital firm invested in both Facebook and in Google.
	Google has a known, although the detail's not been published, a deal with the NSA. They have a joint venture.
	And Amazon is hosting $600 million worth of CIA data.
	People, wake the F up!
	Come on!
	And what's happening here, and I'm just convinced of it, is we have these journalists who are producing journalism, which is squarely bent at making the government look really bad and exposing what is going on, but making the tech companies look like the good guys and the heroes with PowerPoint slides.
	I have no proof.
	I have a PowerPoint slide with some top secret, your eyes only, SIGINT, info, no RF, and coding, with some arrows that shows how you could hijack through DNS, I presume.
	To make it look like someone's getting a Facebook page.
	There's no code.
	I have no log files.
	I have no proof of this.
	So this is all just theater of the mind as far as I'm concerned.
	Not that I doubt it can happen or has happened, but this is not journalism.
	This is PowerPoint slides.
	I'm not impressed.
	I don't know, to be honest about it, I don't know that if anybody really appreciates this show, how anybody, and you managed to do it, it wasn't the best thing I've ever heard, but you managed to take a Steve Levy article and produce an entire segment.
	Based on it?
	I don't know.
	It's like watching a magician.
	Hey, but I have no...
	But I have no tricks.
	This is...
	It's not just tricks.
	It's true.
	Fine!
	No, but...
	Okay.
	And here's where it came home for me.
	You just were galled by this Levy article.
	No, no, no.
	Because I've been...
	No, what happened...
	Or the C-SPAN thing must have just got on your nerves.
	And then no, no, no agenda people call.
	No.
	Which is wide open for anybody to harass him.
	Wide open.
	Now here's what happened.
	Wide open.
	Because I saw the PowerPoint slide.
	We have a PowerPoint slide.
	Let's write an article that's three times too long and publish it on a subdomain of something from a billionaire.
	On a WordPress blog.
	I wanted to set up our goodnight 19-inch rack.
	It was helping me set up DNSSEC, Secure DNS, which is the way you can thwart people hijacking your page.
	And I really wanted to do it for NAShownotes.com.
	We have offline text copies of every single webpage that we have in the show notes.
	I don't want any...
	It's what you do, and it's not that hard.
	Now, curry.com is where we started, and the show notes, I've registered this at Network Solutions.
	Network Solutions, which is one of the oldest registrars on the web, the Internet, they were the Internet before they were bought, and then they were bought again, do not support DNSSEC. Do not support it.
	One of the oldest registrars on the web.
	This is insane.
	Why can't you just use an IP address?
	No, no.
	Just because you don't know how it works.
	DNSSEC is a specific function.
	It's basically like putting an encryption key into your Whois information, and then when the DNS is queried, the keys are used.
	So it's not just an IP address.
	You have to have the registrar.
	Okay, so it has to be authenticated at some level.
	Now, if they're not supporting it, then who's supporting it and what good is it?
	Well, strangely, I will not use them.
	GoDaddy supports it, but I will not use GoDaddy.
	I can't deal with the amount of clicks you have to go through.
	And then I went through the fine experience of transferring a domain name to another registrar.
	Have you ever had that fun?
	I have my guy do that.
	Essentially, you have to answer all these questions.
	Why do you want to leave us?
	For what reason?
	Are you sure?
	That depends on where you're transferring from.
	From internet.
	Yeah.
	Well, they, what they wanted, and they, well.
	I mean, why do you want to leave us is not always there.
	It's only with whoever it was you were registered with.
	Yes.
	Yes, that's what I'm saying.
	They ask, why do you want to leave us?
	Because I'm trying to transfer it.
	And then you have to go through.
	Right.
	And you say, because you suck.
	What did you tell them?
	No, I said you do not provide...
	It's a drop-down menu.
	You can't say you suck.
	Oh.
	So you have to go through all these drop-down menus.
	It's a DNS issue.
	Because you have to get a token from them.
	And then they're like, oh, wait, before you leave, would you like a deal?
	We gave you 10 years.
	I would be pissed about that.
	If I'm going to get the deal, I want it up front.
	I don't want to have to answer a bunch of questions and then get the deal.
	This, by the way, here's a tip from Adam.
	If you want to register with a porn site, always take the free option and then immediately leave.
	Because upon leaving, they'll say, oh, well, hold on a second.
	We'll give you a year for a dollar.
	It's the best way to get cheap porn.
	Anyway, but then I had to call them.
	And I had to go through another 18 menus before you get a guy who reads a script.
	And then, are you sure?
	We'd love to offer you a deal.
	No!
	Anyway, it's these companies that have ruined the internet and Steve Levy's Wired article.
	Shame on Wired for this article.
	Shame on you.
	Shame on Steve Levy.
	Shame on Snowden for promoting bullcrap from the same companies who are vacuuming up your stuff.
	There you go.
	Whoo!
	A rabbit.
	That brings us to what the real issue is, and this is the great report, this ICANN report, apparently.
	Yes.
	This is the report, this is the kind of crap that you get from Fox.
	And by the way, I want people, there's a lot of people out there listening.
	We have some older listeners and they would be listening to Fox once in a while.
	They had the worst news organization.
	Yeah, Shepard and that other guy, Bayer.
	Those guys are okay.
	Because they just report straight news.
	They don't do anything like what you're going to hear here.
	Where they bring on some idiot, some woman, whose name is Pran or Fran or something like that.
	The correspondent, Elizabeth Pran, I believe.
	I looked her up.
	Graduate of University of Florida in journalism.
	Real pretty.
	She was an intern turned producer.
	I mean, Fox must be crawling with these women.
	Good-looking blonde, doesn't know anything.
	And this is what we're going to hear, and I do want to comment on it, because this is going to be my column in PC Magazine next week about what's going on with ICON. Well, the U.S. government is planning to relinquish control over the body that manages Internet names and addresses.
	It's a move that's expected to bring more international cooperation over the management of the World Wide Web, but it's also making some American businesses nervous.
	Elizabeth Pran is joining us now to tell us more about why it has some folks rattled.
	Hi, Uma.
	Well, the Commerce Department has been overseeing the Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers, or ICANN, for almost a decade.
	ICANN maintains and administers domain names as well as IP addresses, among other web requirements across the world.
	That, however, is scheduled to expire next year, and it appears U.S. officials will give up its oversight role and let the contract run out.
	The job may be taken on by groups that lead private businesses as well as other interested parties, not just multiple governments.
	Recently, however, critics have been raising concerns that other countries may try to take control.
	I think that's kind of what I'm seeing with the Internet.
	It's almost as if rather than admit that we made some stupid...
	Because he doesn't know what he's talking about.
	And by the way, at the end of the report, they said they're going to go to Pat Buchanan to discuss this.
	There are people that know something, but go ahead, play, play.
	Multiple governments.
	Recently, however, critics have been raising concerns that other countries may try to take control.
	I think that's kind of what I'm saying with the internet.
	It's almost as if, rather than it...
	Hold on, I like this.
	He's sitting in his command center.
	And he's looking over the internet, and this is what he's seeing.
	Is that what he just said?
	Yeah, yeah.
	This is what I'm seeing on the internet.
	To admit that we've made some stupid and even some unconstitutional mistakes in invasion of privacy, let's clean up our act, but let's not give away the whole process.
	Democratic lawmakers such as Senate Commerce Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller are praising the decision, releasing a statement and in part it reads, Since 1998, the U.S. has been committed to transitioning management of the Internet's domain name system to an independent entity that reflects the broad diversity of the global Internet community.
	NTIA's announcement today is the beginning of that process.
	While the decision is historic, Internet users should notice really no changes if anybody at home is concerned.
	Oh, man.
	Thank you very much.
	Of course I knew that this, I read the articles, this is happening.
	And we know that the ITU, the United Nations, the telecommunications union has been wanting to get this for a long time.
	I had no idea that the way they'd spin this...
	If I just heard this correctly, and by the way, the IP addresses and network segments, I believe that's from RIPE and not from ICANN. It's not important to the story.
	It is important because they're taking people like Huckabee, and people have absolutely no knowledge of this, and they're letting them spin the Snowden NSA story into a...
	Yeah, it's got nothing to do with it.
	But when you see, I mean, what Huckabee says has got nothing to do with anything.
	I don't know why they even put him on.
	This is horrible.
	Fox is behind this.
	And then they have, they do the quote from Jay Rockefeller, who's a Democrat, which is also reconfirmed.
	He's New World Order is what he is.
	He's New World Order.
	Here's the deal.
	And this has been going on since 1998, almost the day that Icahn got into the business of doing anything, maintaining the DNS servers.
	Here's what's really, and you know this as well as I do, this is about, and it's not about diversity or anything, this is about giving it over to the UN. The United Nations wants to get, they've been wanting to get a hold of this for years.
	I have been flown down to the ICON headquarters more than once to be lectured by the guys running and saying, we're going to be fucked!
	When these guys take it over, they're trying to screw us.
	The internet is dead once they take it over.
	So it's been stalling for a while.
	Rockefeller, of course, being on the wrong side of this.
	The idea is you get the UN to do this, and now all of a sudden, all those things about not being able to say bad things, hurtful things.
	It's a right censor the internet program, Agenda 21, everything.
	You won't be able to produce this.
	This show is going to be one of the targeted things that's going to get killed.
	We're going to get killed by the United Nations.
	Well, that can happen any day now.
	But that is not true.
	And I do want to set you straight on this.
	While they can capture the DNS system, they can do all kinds of things with the quote-unquote web, the network itself at the network layer level is rampantly out of control and there's no way for them to stop it.
	There is an ITM DNS service.
	If people want to get this show, we can teach them how to...
	It's not easy.
	I'm not saying it's going to make life better.
	In fact, it'll make it much worse and we'll become pirates on the outside.
	It's a small number of people that will go through the trouble.
	Excuse me, what do you think our audience is?
	We have a small number of people.
	But they will go through the trouble.
	They won't go through the trouble of calling C-SPAN. Those people?
	Is that who you're talking about?
	Why do you have to bum me out like that?
	I'm just saying.
	You're the one that brought up the C-SPAN thing, and you've made the point.
	You've made it before.
	You've made it a lot of times.
	Our audience will support the show, but they won't do any work.
	Well, the only work they would have to do is change one number on their computer.
	That's all it would take.
	It's a big jump.
	I understand.
	You're talking about the DNS number?
	That's all you have to do.
	The one that most people have set to Google?
	In fact, that somehow many is automatically set to Google.
	The 8.8.8.8?
	I haven't seen anyone automatically set to Google.
	Oh, it happened to my...
	Here's how it works.
	The router on your cable modem, if it reboots or if they initiate a reboot, they can set it to Google.
	And then that propagates through to your machines unless you have the machine specifically set manually to a DNS server that you like.
	And I saw that happen just the other day.
	So it will come down to that.
	I totally agree.
	And there will absolutely, this is about shutting us up, about disconnecting entire network segments.
	Not shutting us up, shutting up anyone who doesn't go along with the program.
	You know, so it's...
	That's what it will come down to.
	And this is why...
	I'm a true prepper.
	I mean, you're the meta prepper.
	I know you've got the list and address of everyone who's got food.
	But I've been prepping myself for the inevitable day when you will have to have your own email server in order to email without restrictions, where you will have to have your own DNS, where you will have to have some form of different search, which I have, Yacy.
	I've talked about that a lot as well.
	Um...
	That day is coming, and you might as well let your kids start seeing it and understanding it, because that's what we should be learning, not how to swipe your fingers over an iPad.
	I'm sure the specific topic is part of the Common Core.
	In fact, that's the book I should be writing, Digital Prepping.
	Actually, that would be a good book.
	I would look at that myself since we're on the topic of this sort of thing.
	I had to get this clip.
	And this is because...
	This is just an interesting clip.
	Because we got to do a debate around the house here about...
	This is...
	And my thing, of course.
	This is why you need a ham license.
	Was this you?
	That was me saying that.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	This is the Stingray Report.
	Oh, yes.
	Now I'm familiar with this.
	Okay.
	It's a ham.
	In California, newly revealed documents show local police are using powerful devices that allow them to secretly collect location and other data from cell phones.
	Known as stingrays, the devices pose as cell towers to intercept real-time data from all cell phones in a certain radius.
	While their use by federal agencies was previously known, new records obtained by News 10 in Sacramento show stingrays are in wide use by police forces in California from Los Angeles to Sacramento and Oakland, where they were used to make 19 arrests in 2009 alone.
	According to News 10, quote, when Miami-Dade police in Florida submitted a grant application to buy a stingray, they told the city council they needed one to monitor protesters at an upcoming World Trade Conference.
	Parking a stingray outside the protest would give law enforcement the names and telephone numbers of everyone nearby, News 10 said.
	Yeah, it's essentially the same thing they did with Facebook.
	Yeah, this is the analog for your cell phone users.
	And, of course, this plays right into your little, I don't carry my cell phone around anymore kind of thing.
	I don't have a southern accent, do I? I can't do your accent.
	So could everybody please, who's listening to this right now, and if you're in the car and you can't do it, we'll just write it down and memorize it.
	OpenNICProject.org.
	So that's OpenNIC, N-I-C, Project.org.
	It'll give you two new DNS servers right there.
	It's the alternative DNS system.
	Everything will work.
	Everything will work just fine, except it's not controlled by ICANN. And through the OpenNIC project, you can actually register.
	There's a whole bunch of cool things you can do.
	It's the Linux of DNS. And you should do that.
	Do that today.
	Do it right now.
	Do it on all of your computers so that you can't get spoofed.
	I'm sorry.
	Anything can happen, of course.
	But this is a start.
	It's a good alternative to these agency-controlled networks that are now being hijacked for the United Nations.
	And I take your point, and you're absolutely right, John.
	It is about controlling speech.
	But it will be called Internet Freedom.
	Crazy enough.
	It's internet freedom.
	That's right.
	Speaking of internet freedom, I'd like to say, for the 600th time, thank you for your courage and kittens and in the morning to you, John C. Dvorak.
	Well, actually, technically, I don't think it was until about show 100 before we came into this little back and forth.
	That's why we call you the buzzkill.
	In the morning to you, Adam Curry.
	In the morning to all ships and sea, boots on the ground, feet in the air, subs in the water, and all the dames and knights out there.
	And to our artistes, thank you very much, Martin J.J., for your album artwork for episode 599.
	Hello, and in the morning to you there in the chat room, always ready with a snide comment and sometimes a word of encouragement, then even sometimes a good idea.
	All the human resources, noagendastream.com.
	This is the program where for the 600th time, we are bringing you completely non-agenda held content.
	We have no advertising, no native advertising, no sponsorships, no in-show mentions, no compensation whatsoever for any products or services we discuss.
	The only way this show stays on the air and has been staying on the air for 600 episodes is because of you, the producer.
	By the way, you are a producer.
	If you have supported the program with material, with information, or with your financial means, you are a producer.
	That is the law of the land in Hollywood.
	We're just giving the same props to you.
	Go ahead and try that in Hollywood.
	Hey, I got 50 bucks for your movie.
	They'll laugh at you.
	Who are you, slave?
	Go out, get out of my face.
	Here, we give you credit.
	Well, we do have a couple of three executive producers and two for show 600.
	There's a little light, actually, for this end of the spectrum, but okay.
	Lots of $60 donations, which we'll mention later.
	That's awesome, yeah.
	Bashir Osman in Harrow, Middlesex, UK, $600.02.
	Congratulations, John and Adam, on 600 shows.
	Here's the 600 more.
	Oh, good.
	Oh, my God.
	Another 600?
	There's truly nothing like the No Agenda show, which is accurate.
	And proud to finally achieve a knighthood, episode 500 and 600 donations.
	That's interesting.
	He wastes 100 shows.
	To donate.
	Well, but then he did it big.
	Yeah, well, he could probably donate at $500.
	I don't have the number here, but $500 for show $500 and $600 for show $600.
	We will expect $700.
	In three years.
	For sure.
	In three years.
	No, it's less than that.
	No, it's 100 shows, which is two years.
	Which is still a...
	No, actually, it's a year.
	It's about a year.
	A year from now.
	Yeah.
	But it's a pretty good deal.
	I like it.
	What is it, $8 a month?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, no, it's...
	The lords, dames, knights, slaves and elites, please be upstanding for another donation from the Grand Duke, Ron Pelsmappens.
	Steven Pelzmacher's in Belgium, $600, and he says, ITM, gentlemen, and congratulations on 600 shows.
	Wow, a stunning achievement.
	You have provided countless hours of infotainment and kept me both informed and, more importantly, highly amused when this was sorely needed.
	I'm sure it's a coincidence, but the 600 show falls on 3-16-14, which adds up to...
	No, no, no!
	No, these things are no coincidence.
	It's no coincidence.
	It's pretty weird.
	Little girl laugh.
	Yeah, yay.
	Yay!
	Some karma, please, for all the dames and knights who have supported this journey.
	You embarked upon so many years ago, as well as Mimi and Mickey and the Dvorak and Curry clans who have shared you with us.
	Finally, some karma for you both so that we may move on to the next 600 episodes of the best podcast in the universe.
	Thank you, thank you, thank you.
	I'm not quite sure he says, would you play...
	Okay, thank you, thank you.
	Here we go.
	Boom, yes.
	Gotcha.
	You've got karma.
	Robert Love in Orlando, Florida, $333.33, the mark 33 today.
	In the morning, are you a happy 600?
	I'm a relatively new listener, and even though I agree with most but not all of your observations, we don't need to hear that.
	We know nobody agrees.
	Why would anybody agree with everything we say?
	If John and I agreed on everything, you wouldn't be listening for 600 episodes.
	Yeah, because, for example, in the recent...
	But kerfuffle with Russia, I believe it's got nothing to do with anything except Snowden, and he thinks it's just oil.
	Now, of course, I'm right, but that doesn't matter.
	He's right about other things.
	And I would say gas, not oil.
	That's how well you listen to my theory.
	Thanks.
	Yeah, I know what it is.
	Gas, oil, but advertising.
	Advertising.
	Whatever.
	In the morning to you, Happy 600 Relatively.
	New listener, I do enjoy your unique perspective on the bullshit and your deep understanding of the true nature of this corrupt police state that has all of us imprisoned.
	I was at first skeptical about your value-for-value model, but after listening for a while, I see the light.
	You make us think we need that.
	I have redirected my frivolous spending to something of greater value, the best podcast in the universe.
	Would you play...
	Predictor drones?
	I think he means Obama with predator drones.
	Oh, okay.
	Predator drones.
	Think of the children and send some karma to all the people living in the abject poverty around the world.
	Bless them.
	I like predictor drones, actually.
	I think that's pretty funny.
	I have two words for you.
	Predator drones.
	Oh, won't somebody please pick up the children?
	You've got karma.
	Nailed it.
	You nailed that one.
	Sir, uh, Gief.
	How do you pronounce that in?
	I would, Gief.
	I would say Gief.
	Gief, Gief, Gief, Gief.
	Oslo, Norway.
	We should, we should know, but, oh well.
	Uh, this should bring me to a new knighthood or dame.
	How about, how about Sir Gear?
	It's just a mistype.
	Oh, it could be gear.
	Yeah, it has to be.
	It says Sir Gear in the note.
	Oh, there you go.
	Hello.
	Sir Geef.
	But from now on, he shall be known as Knight of the Geef.
	I will be dedicated to my daughter, Dame Tina, or Tina.
	To the show?
	If Tina is already taken.
	Is he sacrificing his daughter to us?
	Yeah.
	Yeah, he's going to send her to us to be used as an intern.
	Okay, so that's nice.
	This is probably his third...
	Knighthood?
	Maybe more.
	I don't know.
	It's been quite a few.
	Dedicated to his...
	It'll be Dame Tina.
	Yes, she shall be damed.
	We should go visit him.
	You know, all the Scandinavian and Nordic countries...
	Norway's the only one I never stepped foot on.
	I need to do at least a toe tap.
	Yes.
	Sir Michael Levin in Brooklyn, New York.
	$200.
	Bucket list.
	ITM. John and Adam Sir Levin here.
	Some cool stats.
	Show 666's in 33 weeks.
	Damn.
	Whoa!
	Go figure.
	Please send happy sales karma to my wife.
	Thank you for your courage.
	Oh, right.
	Nice.
	Woo-hoo!
	You've got karma.
	We've got Joe from HealthySurprise.com.
	He's coming to Austin, he and his wife, or girlfriend, I think, and we're going to go out to dinner.
	Oh, well, before you talk about that, can I do one more mention on this readout?
	Yeah.
	Because it's a make good.
	Do you remember when we had Susan Bell in No Note as one of the associate executive producers?
	Yes.
	It turns out to be John Bell, also known as JB from DC. Since you missed this, I heard you scrambling to find my note on the production recognition segment on Thursday.
	My wife is on the check, so you always announce it from Susan Bell.
	Anyway, he did have a note.
	Does he not have his own checks?
	Is that a thing?
	Is she bossy?
	I think he's in the security business.
	I think his wife is bossy.
	I don't know.
	Bam Bam and Pee Pebbles, thank you for all you do at the Gatekeepers of Reality.
	I'm a long-time listener, probably not a show 160 or so.
	A monthly donor.
	A few shows ago, you talked about the militarization of the U.S.
	I thought I would share an experience that happens at nearly every University of Maryland basketball and football game.
	At one of the breaks, they trot out.
	I believe we may have talked about this.
	And I bitch about it, too.
	At one of the breaks, they trot out four military personnel that work at cybersecurity command at no such agency in Fort Meade.
	Usually a large number of fans do a standing ovation.
	Oh, gosh.
	Really?
	Good times, he says.
	Man.
	That is bad.
	That's really bad.
	That's bad.
	This is the end of the country.
	Standing O. Slow clap.
	The phony baloney cybersecurity command.
	I would like a karma shout out to all the monthly donors who help keep the lights on but do not get the recognition like individual donors as individual donors by name.
	I would like to also get a douchebag shout out for anyone who has listened to at least 10 shows and has not donated.
	Douchebag!
	And finally, I'd like to call out George Caleb for not donating yet and being a douchebag.
	Douchebag!
	If he has donated, he will let me know, I'm sure, and if I'm wrong.
	I will cut another check at the next show as my experience, as my repentance, and give him a karma.
	Okay, so then he just needs a karma.
	Yeah, here we go.
	Bend over, here it comes, here it comes.
	You've got karma.
	Wow!
	Well, nice list, of course.
	We can always count on our knights and our dukes and archduke, grand dukes, super dukes, uber dukes.
	Uber dukes.
	And we should mention that everyone who donated $600, even backwards $600, like Sir Rice, that...
	We'll be on the list of executive producers for this show, so you'll have two producerships you can credit to your IMDB or your LinkedIn.
	It's funny, I was looking for someone the other day, someone had sent me an email and I wanted to find out, and I knew it was a listener or producer.
	But he had kind of a common name.
	And here's what you do.
	Invariably, these people all show up on LinkedIn.
	There's like 28 people with this name are on LinkedIn.
	And they just look for the one that is a no-agenda producer.
	Bam!
	You've got him.
	Yeah.
	It's very, it's a good way.
	Very handy.
	Very handy, I agree.
	No, if you have a common name on LinkedIn, this is one of the problems with the service.
	You cannot, unless the person is famous or validator at the top of the list, you'll never find them.
	No.
	Hey, I'm going to work on that digital preppers book idea.
	That's an actual good idea.
	And there will be ham radio stuff.
	No, it's a great idea.
	You can do your email server where you can do some ham radio stuff.
	I want you to get a ham license.
	But also just the concept that people understand that we don't have to use all these services.
	Well, yeah, if you want to stalk some ex-girlfriend from high school, well, okay, there's that.
	But we really don't need all this stuff, all these trinkets.
	Have we learned nothing from the Native American Indians?
	Well, we might get a casino out of the deal, but...
	I have a special PR mention.
	A lot of work was done by a long-time producer.
	He's one of these guys who emails me about 10 times a day.
	You know, you got those guys, right?
	Yeah, we both have a couple of the same ones.
	Oh, yeah.
	And it gets to a point where you don't answer most of them.
	But then, once in a while, I'm like, oh, that was kind of cool.
	And then you say, hey, thanks.
	Just so he'll know that he can keep emailing.
	It's my own little social network.
	P.G. Kelly.
	I'm sure he's emailed you from time to time.
	And he says, congratulations on your 600th episode.
	I knew he was working on this, but I had no idea he went to this extent.
	This link I present to you is for the No Agenda show on archive.org.
	All of the episodes have been archived in their natural state.
	I have also made an animated GIF that rotates through these 600 episodes of artwork, which changes every six seconds.
	So he's got the show notes and all, well, after today it'll be 600 episodes on archive.org, which of course is the archive of the internet.
	Yeah, until they shut it down.
	Well, oh man!
	The guy who runs that, he'll fight that.
	What's his name?
	He's a good guy.
	Yeah, he's a great guy.
	So we appreciate it.
	Brewster Kale.
	Yeah, Brewster Kale?
	Kale.
	Yeah, Brewster, I don't know, he's an interesting character.
	Really appreciate that, P.G. Kelly.
	That's cool.
	And, of course, highly appreciate the support from our associate producers, executive producers, and associate executive producers.
	As well as everyone else who will be mentioning in our thank you segment, which is coming up later on.
	We will have a show 601, and it will happen on Thursday, and we'd appreciate support for that as well as we continue into our sixth year.
	This is our seventh year.
	It's up there.
	It's up there, yeah.
	Dvorak.org slash N-A. Always remember, we need your help with propagating the formula as well.
	Our formula is this.
	We go out, we hit people in the mouth.
	Shut up, slave.
	Shut up, slave.
	Shut up, slavelets!
	I found a new show on TV. Oh, boy.
	That is the future of all news.
	Let me just look at your clips here.
	Let me see if I can find out which one it's going to be.
	This is science?
	No, no.
	Abby Martin Chris Hedges?
	God, let's hope not.
	All right.
	Okay, the clip is right this minute.
	I want you to describe for me, after you hear this clip, what was going on.
	Hello, meteorologist.
	But this could potentially be the smallest rainstorm ever.
	What?
	No, that's coming from a building.
	Yeah, or a fire hydrant.
	Or the line across, right?
	Oh!
	The camera pans up.
	It doesn't look like there's a building up above.
	What?
	You know what it could...
	And then look around.
	The camera pans around.
	You see everybody else standing.
	Do I get to say it now?
	Yeah, you can say it anytime you want.
	Somebody urinating off the building.
	No.
	That's not what...
	This is the future news that this store...
	Okay.
	That would be news.
	Let me listen to the rest.
	So there's a YouTube clip of a pile of water.
	It's like a little rainstorm that's about three feet by three feet in the middle of a street in Palermo, Italy.
	And everyone's like, oh, this can happen.
	These guys, these...
	Here's the news.
	Here's the way the news is.
	It's like a set similar to TMZ, only more compressed.
	They've got the screens behind them.
	It looks like you're in the CBS headquarters.
	And each one of these people have an Apple laptop, and they play a YouTube video that they find fascinating.
	Oh, wait a minute.
	Wait a minute.
	Is this a Ron Bloom production?
	They all sit around talking about it, trying to, well, I don't know, what do you think?
	I don't know, what do you think?
	It's just like complete idiots, you know, millennials that don't know anything.
	They never did any research.
	They just play these videos and talk about them.
	Yes!
	That's the shit.
	That's news.
	Exactly.
	I'm all in.
	Where can I sign up?
	The thing is that here's the problem with the show.
	By the way, it's called Right This Minute and it's syndicated.
	The problem with the show is that these guys aren't interesting.
	If they were talking about it in some, or if they were comics even, I mean the Five tries to do this but they're not that funny.
	It's possible that this could work, but it's not going to work with this crew.
	Well, this format, it's a variation on a format that has been tried for many, many years.
	And the whole idea is, and the local news stations try it, is we get these viral videos.
	And I've seen the variation.
	It's the viral video show!
	Even my brother-in-law, who's the Italian actor, he did a version of the show on Rai Uno or whatever on Saturday night.
	He might still do it.
	It's great.
	You get a bunch of viral videos.
	You show the videos.
	It's very funny.
	If you're a comedian, you can make a joke about it if you're interesting.
	So this is basically failing, this one.
	Yeah, but it is the future of news.
	Well, I think what you've glommed onto here, it's the future of news.
	That's the difference.
	Instead of it being a comedy thing where, look at the dog!
	And you've seen it on the big news shows.
	They bring in the Twitter feed, they bring in, oh, here's what they're showing on Twitter about us.
	And then they show the Twitter people, and there's always some, you know...
	You know, Jack the Dog is the guy's name.
	These handles, and they read these things on CNN. They do it.
	On France Van Cat, they have a whole web section now.
	Oh, yeah.
	Where they just show clips again, you know, YouTube clips that are as news.
	I don't know.
	This is the way it goes.
	If either of us believed in the medium, and we had the time, and we were hot-looking babes, we could do this show with video.
	Yeah, probably.
	Yeah, it would be great.
	The problem is we're dudes with headphones on.
	This is not a good look.
	Yeah, well, I don't wear cans.
	Well, true.
	Let me deconstruct a little thing for you here.
	This was kind of funny when this popped up.
	Anyone can do this at home, and more and more of our producers seem to be catching on to the system.
	You'll see a news report, and it'll go something like this.
	Boston's big St.
	Patrick's Day parade suddenly finds itself without one of its major sponsors.
	The maker of Sam Adams beer withdrew sponsorship because they say...
	Organizers are excluding gay groups from taking part in the parade.
	The iconic Boston Beer Company says it's disappointed parade organizers could not reach an agreement that would have allowed gay veterans to march on Sunday.
	At least one bar had threatened to stop serving Sam Adams if they continued to sponsor the parade.
	No comment yet from parade organizers.
	All right, so this is the news.
	You can find this every...
	If you just Google this, Sam Adams pulls out.
	Oh, no, no gays.
	Oh, Sam Adams is for the gays.
	We love the gays.
	This is, of course...
	There's another non-profit NGO behind all of this.
	And it's very easy.
	You just have to figure it out.
	Here's another little news snippet which takes us a little bit deeper into who's behind this beer ban.
	Breaking news in South Boston.
	By the way, breaking news in South Boston.
	Patrick's Day Parade.
	Organizers for the parade have rejected a second application to march from a gay advocacy group.
	Parade organizers say they were misled by the group Mass Equality.
	Aha!
	The organizers say the gay rights group had applied to march on behalf of 20 veterans, but the organizers say they could not find evidence that the group LGBT Veterans of Equality Organizers was a recognized veterans group.
	So here's what Mass Equality did.
	MassEquality.org, whose sole mission is to pressure people with LGBTQQIAAP... Although they're old school, they're still LGBT. No, they actually have the Q there.
	They make up, I guess they make up, this group of veterans who are LGBTQ, which cannot be confirmed that they are an approved veterans organization, and they want them basically to march in rainbow flags and rainbow colors instead of veteran uniforms.
	And the parade guys said, no, are you a real organization?
	Could you please show us that?
	But what happens is then these guys, MassEquality.org, who have two non-profits, the Mass Equality Education Fund, which is a 501c3 organization, that's your traditional non-profit NGO, but then they also have the Mass Equality Political Action Committee, Which is a 501c4 corporation, which is a lobbying group.
	And I really must say, my gay brothers and sisters, you should question these groups and what they are doing in your name.
	In our name, as a heteroflexible.
	They are abusing your sexuality to lobby in Washington.
	And it's not just for rights.
	They're a pack.
	So they try to influence elections.
	There's a lot of stuff going on here.
	But the way it's portrayed on the news.
	Oh, Sam Adams.
	Oh, I know them.
	I heard of them.
	That's a beer.
	What?
	Oh, something's wrong.
	I'm surprised they didn't get Putin in on this.
	They wanted to have pictures of Putin with rainbow flags.
	You're right.
	That would have been the trifecta, wouldn't it?
	It would have been great.
	So Sam Adams just basically got caught with their pants down, as it were, and they're just acting stupid.
	Well, by us.
	No one else has called this, only we called.
	Of course not.
	That's never going to happen.
	I'm sure, like me, John, you've been just enjoying the non-stop coverage by just a bevy of experts on aviation across the news spectrum.
	Yeah, I'm trying to look here if I have a clip.
	I was able to find something.
	Besides the Tourette's guy, which I'm not going to play.
	I tweeted that.
	I thought that was great news.
	I'm not going to play.
	You shouldn't even have looked at it.
	I don't have anything.
	I have something here.
	I'd like to point out that...
	I do have questions for you, though, by the way.
	Okay, I'll point something out and take some questions.
	I have a statement and then a Q&A. Okay, you make your statement and I have questions.
	Okay.
	The statement is, I'd like to point out that everything they're talking about now, such as the overage on lithium batteries, the whole idea that whatever was in the plane or passengers or cargo was more important, that this thing flew on and landed somewhere, this is being hidden, all of this was discussed on this show a week ago.
	A week ago.
	Yeah, long before we had all this new information.
	And people have been sitting through hours of commercials with Richard Quest.
	The closest he's got to the cockpit is first class.
	But this is CNN's top guy.
	And then they bring in all these pilots and everyone's got an opinion.
	Okay.
	I have two clips.
	From someone I have not seen on the scene before, but oh my god, I want her to be on all the time now.
	The best news model ever on CNN, Evie Pompouras.
	Have you ever seen this woman?
	No, how do you spell her last name?
	I'll take a look at her.
	Okay, P-O-U-M? Wait, wait, wait.
	I've got to close a couple things.
	Close the porn site now.
	P-O-U-M. P-O-U-M. P-O-U-R-A-S. She needs to change her name.
	No.
	Now she is, according to her bio, she is a former Secret Service agent who protected presidents such as the current one, the First Lady, the Bush, Clinton.
	And she's an interrogation specialist.
	And she's smoking hot!
	But when she talks, it's frightening.
	I actually stepped back a step from the computer screen when I saw her talk.
	She's got a very interesting sneer-like smile.
	That would be what I'm talking about.
	Now, for some reason...
	She's like she wants to...
	She's like...
	She should be like...
	You know, she's just not...
	She doesn't like men or women kind of thing.
	Yeah, exactly.
	She has disdain.
	She gets up and eats penis for breakfast.
	That's kind of what she looks like.
	Well, isn't this a Greek name?
	I think so, yes.
	I was in Athens with some people once, and one of the things we noticed is that all the women, the great-looking Greek women, they all look disdainful.
	I pointed this out to a friend.
	I said, do you notice this, too?
	He says, now that you mention it.
	That is a very...
	Disdainful is the description.
	Yeah.
	Okay, so they have this panel.
	And by this point, or at this point, it's Don Lemon is anchoring the thing.
	Because, you know, Don Lemon is such a whore.
	He'll go on it.
	As long as it can be Don Lemon time.
	But Don Lemon doesn't know anything about aviation.
	But okay, so he is...
	And he's calling shots like, Hey, can we have someone in D.C. make up a graphic on that?
	This is what he's doing on the air.
	It's hilarious.
	Because Don is running the show.
	In the land of the blind, one-eyes king.
	And he's got people on who I've never seen before because they're running out of ideas.
	They have no other events.
	Although, gee, I don't know.
	Turkey's being rubbleized.
	There's tons of stuff happening.
	But no, they've got to continue on this.
	Because ratings.
	This is Jeff Zucker.
	It's a ratings bonanza.
	He knows it and he's right to do it.
	But they're running out of ideas.
	They bring on Evie.
	And the only thing she knows about, apparently, is interrogating people.
	Now, as you pointed out, yeah, yes, whatever you say, mistress, yes, I did it.
	I'm guilty.
	And here she is with her expert advice on the pilots, I believe.
	I do want to point something out with what you said with the game changer, with not trusting your pilots, not trusting people.
	It's a game changer, John.
	You can't trust your pilots, just so you know.
	But next time you get on board of a plane, look that guy in the eye and say, I don't trust you.
	I have to say this.
	I was a criminal investigator and I did polygraphs.
	I did interrogations on people.
	And the one thing I learned is that anybody is capable of anything at any given moment in time should certain things play out.
	I don't trust anybody.
	Pilot or not.
	And maybe I'm cynical due to the job that I had, but I think that is irrelevant because it's the human component, the being inside.
	That's what matters.
	You can be a pilot, you can be a cop, you can be whatever.
	A doctor, the title has nothing to do with it.
	All right, I just want to reiterate.
	This woman was Secret Service, protected presidents and first ladies, and she is essentially saying the MKUltra program is real, and we can switch it on at any time.
	On anybody.
	Second clip.
	That's kind of what she said.
	To me, it seems very clear.
	I love, by the way, how she promotes herself in every other sentence.
	The job I had, the experience I had.
	Yeah, I find that disturbing.
	She is disturbing.
	To me, it seems very clear.
	Again, I don't know if it's that investigative thing or that component of my...
	This is where the hotness factor just doesn't compensate.
	It's like, hey baby, I'll tell you what, can you shut your trap?
	To me, it seems very clear.
	Again, I don't know if it's that investigative thing or that component of my background, but with all these red flags, I mean, from the beginning, it just seems very nefarious.
	And the way it's kind of laid out, it just seems extremely calculated.
	There's some involvement there as far as people being put out or passed out or the pressure and all that.
	All that.
	I can't really say on that aspect or not, but I do feel that there is significant calculation here that this was deliberate, that it was very likely these pilots, considering some of the things that are coming out, especially with the one pilot having certain capabilities, having the simulation system...
	She's an idiot, this woman.
	That's odd behavior.
	That's a red flag.
	That's a red flag.
	If you were watching this, you were either A... Me be a moron!
	You can't watch this, people!
	This is not okay!
	This is completely...
	She's just blathering.
	She didn't say anything.
	And it's hours of this stuff.
	And I turn around, I look at CNN, they're still doing it.
	Because they haven't...
	I said this thing didn't crash.
	There's no evidence of it.
	And I'm just going to...
	That was the presentation part.
	Let's go on to Q&A. Does anyone have any...
	I asked before we started if audience members could write down their questions on a piece of paper.
	And, okay, the first question I have here is from John C. Dvorak.
	Could you please stand up, identify yourself and the new organization you're from?
	John C. Dvorak, a No Agenda show, producer and co-host.
	Yes, what's your question, sir?
	Now, we're under the impression that there was a number of beacons that were on the plane that kept transmitting to some satellite as part of a service that the airlines didn't actually subscribe to, but the equipment's there anyway.
	So all along, they were getting a satellite that was getting the pings.
	And so the satellite knew where the plane was every hour it reported in, even though they didn't turn on the...
	Any of the features that would...
	I'm sorry, sir.
	Do you have a question?
	We have a lot of people who want to ask questions.
	Okay.
	Why, once they knew that this was going on, which they must have known from the get-go, didn't they just track the plane from using that technology rather than making all these guesses and looking in the water when the plane was clearly in the air?
	Security!
	Security!
	Can we have this man?
	The plane was clearly in the air!
	This man is being disruptive.
	Please remove this man.
	He cannot ask good questions.
	Putin!
	Yes.
	Let me just explain.
	I'll explain briefly.
	What you're seeing right now in television is something is being queued up in some other arena.
	This is all distraction.
	It's being done purposely.
	This is why it's on your screen all the time.
	Can I mention something here which is disturbing?
	This does fall right dead smack in the six-week cycle thing, which makes no sense to me.
	It does, because to me, something's going to be lit off any minute.
	Okay, go on with your finish, finish.
	Alright, so this is all distraction.
	There are a number of types of transponders, communications, etc.
	Oh, by the way, this really makes me angry.
	Every single news, when they talk about the transponder, like, well, if, which is, it's basically, it's a device that sends a signal out with the identification of the aircraft.
	The aircraft's call, registration number.
	It sends out altitude.
	And it doesn't even ident all the time.
	And it has a number.
	And it is used to track So typically if you're flying around an airport, certainly in Europe, you'll be squawking as it's called.
	There's four digits you can set, the pilot can set 7,000.
	And then someone is looking at the radar, they can then see this blip and say, oh, that's some guy piddling around.
	When the air traffic controller is interested in you, or if you're transiting through an area where they will be interested in you, they're going to give you a unique number.
	And they'll write that down.
	Okay, we're going to say, make this guy squawk 7177, and we'll write that down.
	This is his aircraft, and we'll keep track of him.
	We can hand that off if we want to.
	Now, there are a couple of numbers in there that the pilot can set if there's an emergency.
	And every single piece that I've seen, so here they are, the numbers are 7500, 7600, and 7700.
	Can you guess what these codes would be for, John?
	I don't know.
	Something about nothing good is happening.
	Exactly.
	So, 7500.
	If I change my number from the 7000 to 7500, that means I'm hijacked.
	If I change it to 7600, that means my radio has failed.
	I have a communications failure.
	And if I have an emergency, it's 7700.
	This is one of the first things you learn when you become a pilot.
	For some reason, everyone thinks it's cool, all these news models.
	If there's a problem, we can change this code.
	I'm not going to show the code to you because, you know, hijackers might not be able to Google what the code is.
	It's really stupid.
	Anyway, so that's one part of it.
	But radar does not need you to be pinging back.
	Radar can just track you.
	And as we discussed on the show, the U.S. military tracks everything above the surface, if they want, on the surface, and below the surface.
	I've seen some of these systems when I was on a Dutch frigate.
	It's amazing.
	I see a Cessna flying in the south of France.
	Then I'm here sitting in the north of the Netherlands.
	They know where the satellites are.
	Every single aircraft, everything can be tracked.
	If this aircraft was flying, it was tracked.
	And not just American military has this capability.
	If you're a submarine, they can track it.
	Once they know you're there, they can track it.
	So all of this is a lie.
	Everything you're seeing here is not true.
	The only thing we don't know is what really happened.
	But that nobody knows where it flew, how long it flew, and when it literally was no longer flying, and where it is on the ground, there is knowledge of this.
	Now, why is this not being told?
	I have to say the 20 engineers and maybe...
	It's a conspiracy nut!
	Yeah, I'm a conspiracy nut.
	The 20 engineers and maybe what they had in the cargo, that overage which was checked off as excessive lithium batteries, maybe from a company that makes rocket guidance systems.
	It could have something to do with that.
	I don't know.
	Gold bullion.
	Nah, I don't think so.
	A thousand pounds of gold, the plane is worth more than that, I think.
	Yeah, it is, but you can sell the plane and the gold.
	No, you can't sell the gold.
	It's nice, it's $20 million worth of gold.
	Yeah, and the plane is $150, $170 million.
	It's not worth it.
	It's worth it in parts.
	It was whatever.
	No, you can't sell.
	This is not a chop shop.
	It's a chop shop.
	I flew it into a South Indian chop shop.
	Hey man, I need it.
	You got a right hand engine for a 777, man?
	Hey, hold on a second.
	Let me check the chop shop.
	I just need a fan blade, man.
	That's all.
	Now, every nut and bowl this track has a lifetime.
	Now, this plane will be found eventually.
	There may be bodies on board or they'll be eaten up by whatever eats them up.
	These people are dead.
	Believe me, the people are dead.
	The crew was in on it, and it was something that was in the cargo.
	Maybe those guys, the 20, had to be taken care of as well.
	I don't know.
	But stop watching it.
	If it comes on TV, unless it's that Evie chick, because it's just freaky to look at her mouth when she's talking.
	Freaky.
	Disdainful.
	Turn it off, because they're distracting you.
	And now let's go to our six-week cycle, which was yesterday, I guess, was the...
	Essentially yesterday.
	Yesterday.
	Eyes of March.
	I believe, and I want to review this with people, how this came to be.
	Because I can see people are confused about the six-week cycle.
	Now it's become a meme where every six weeks, if someone has a shart, then all of a sudden it's, oh, six-week cycle!
	No.
	I get a kick out of that, by the way.
	I do, too.
	But that's not how it works.
	There's a taxi wreck in New York, six-week cycle.
	Yeah, you could say two people killed South by South way.
	It's a six-week cycle.
	No.
	The six-week cycle is specifically from the FBI, the FBI who have to show that they are thwarting terrorism or some kind of incredible danger to the United States public, not the world, United States Public.
	And they do it in...
	They're involved.
	They always have a patsy, a guy, who they've usually honey-potted into doing it, or mind-controlled.
	He, of course, always has a middle name, so we have three names.
	And usually it involves a plastic play-school cell phone that the guy keys in a code thinking he's going to blow up a truck of sand.
	And it's to keep the money flowing into the FBI. Most other things do not adhere.
	Just don't.
	That is the six-week cycle.
	Yeah, that's exactly what it is.
	It's always some phony baloney thing that takes place approximately every six weeks because it takes that long to plan and execute these things.
	And it also takes six weeks to forget what happened the last time.
	Exactly.
	Because I think it's been determined the American public can't remember anything past two or three weeks.
	I don't even remember what you said five minutes ago.
	Well, there's further reasons for that.
	Whatever the case, so right now, something should be happening, but this thing has become...
	I have a question for you.
	What are we going to do about this Malaysian air thing?
	Because it's taking up all the mind space.
	I have a question.
	Everybody's talking about this.
	What could we possibly do to get their attention back to our budget?
	Well, we could fire up HAARP and get a storm going, a super storm.
	Yeah, that would be one thing.
	Let me ask you a question.
	This would be a terrorist attack.
	We're way overdue.
	Can we have that meeting in a moment?
	I know that we're the policemen of the world, but why is it when a Malaysian flight going to China is missing, why do U.S. naval ships have to be involved in the search?
	What are we, like the do-gooders of the world?
	Why do we have to do that?
	That's the thing that I'm suspicious about.
	Everyone, oh, of course, of course we're in on.
	Of course the U.S. Navy's going to go.
	Why?
	We're the good guys, man.
	Is that it, man?
	You know what that costs?
	We're the good guys.
	We're there.
	We're there.
	We're there to help.
	Where do we send the bill?
	We are there to help.
	I want to send the bill.
	You don't have to bill people for the goodwill?
	What is your thing, man?
	What's your thing?
	We'll invade your country later.
	You said they can have a hit minute later and you guys have to agree to it.
	Hey, you remember when we helped you find that jet?
	It could be the freescale semiconductor guys and whatever tech they had on board.
	I doubt it.
	I doubt it, too.
	I was thinking this while I was driving around saying, well, maybe the freescale guys, they had to kidnap them because they have a new super microchip that they invented there from Motorola in Texas.
	I'm thinking, what do they want to do?
	They just buy a license.
	That's the joke about half of these stories that go like that.
	Yeah.
	You buy a license.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	You're done with this topic?
	Yeah.
	The only question I have is about why they didn't track the thing better.
	So I thought the funniest thing that happened this week, I think the most amusing thing that happened this week, was the guy, this guy from The Guardian, named Luke Harding.
	And there's a clip there.
	I got two clips.
	Luke Harding and Snowden is the one.
	Isn't that the guy from...
	No, no, no.
	He's not from The Guardian.
	He's from...
	Yeah, no, no.
	He's from...
	Ah, what's the name of that outfit?
	No, no.
	Isn't he from Change.org or WeBeChange?
	No, no, no.
	This guy.
	He's a British guy.
	He's from The Guardian.
	He's a reporter.
	Okay.
	And I think he's either MI6, which I think the Guardian's got a lot of those guys.
	There is a scripted interview with him, and I say it was scripted because of the way the questions were so quickly answered as though they were anticipated, on the NewsHour with Jeffrey.
	And the guy, I just think, nobody's pointed this out, this guy...
	Wrote the book that Glenn Greenwald was supposed to write.
	He put his name on it, and he takes all the credit now, and Greenwald is out in the cold.
	Jeffrey Brown has our conversation.
	It began with an email.
	I am a senior member of the intelligence community, the beginning of revelations leaked by Edward Snowden of the vast surveillance and collection of data by the National Security Agency, and the beginning of a new book titled The Snowden Files, the inside story of the world's most wanted man.
	Author Luke Harding is a correspondent for the British newspaper The Guardian, which broke the initial Snowden story, and welcome to you.
	Hello.
	I am a senior member of the intelligence community.
	That's what Snowden wrote to Glenn Greenwald, then a columnist for The Guardian.
	But in fact, he wasn't a senior.
	Anything, really.
	What's the impression you drew of the young Snowden?
	Well, he was a junior member of the intelligence community, but someone who had incredible access to top-secret information and who was deeply unhappy about what he saw and thought he would lift the lid on unconstitutional mass surveillance.
	You find insight into the mind of especially the younger Snowden through anonymous postings he made on a tech website, and he used this name, the true hoo-ha.
	Yeah, at age 18 he made his first posting.
	It's a slightly weird name, but these postings give us some insight into how he was as a young man.
	Someone not of the left but of the right, very patriotic, pretty obnoxious in places, but also deeply talented with computers.
	If you say of the right, I mean, really, his strongest political leaning seems to be libertarian.
	He supported Ron Paul.
	Yeah, he's very conservative.
	He's from a patriotic family.
	He even donated to Ron Paul.
	He's related to Ron Paul?
	That's what he says.
	Now this guy, this character is Luke Harding, who Greenwell must be beside himself.
	He's got this book out.
	Do you think that this is retaliation for Greenwell basically saying to the Guardian, F you?
	Yeah, I think so.
	Thanks for all the candy?
	I think he's MI6 because he used to be the foreign correspondent for the Guardian in Russia.
	Hmm.
	And then apparently the Russians figured he was a spy and they kicked him out and he's been refused re-entry since 2011.
	Does that tell you something?
	The milkshakes don't bring him to the yard.
	And so we've got this guy.
	It's interesting.
	In 2007, this is in the wiki page, the Guardian apologized for material in an article by Harding that was substantially similar to another article published earlier that year in the Exile.
	So he got nailed for plagiarism.
	I don't even think he wrote this.
	I mean, I'm sure he had a hand in the book.
	But this is one of those books that looks like the books that Woodward keeps cranking.
	It's from the pundit program.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, they write the book for you.
	Some agency writes the book for you, and then you fiddle with it.
	And then you crank it, and you have this big book that comes out out of the blue.
	And this is definitely a targeted...
	It's targeting Greenwald.
	It's targeting Snowden with the information we had no idea about any of this stuff.
	There's a libertarian, and he's related to Ron Paul, and all this stuff.
	This is one of those very carefully crafted pieces of propaganda that will have all kinds of little pointers in there that just kind of push you over here like this, so you think like that.
	How about this for a theory?
	Snowden is CIA, and his job is to embarrass out and knock down the budget of the NSA. Grant Greenwald, he's part of it, but he is part of the Five Eyes, well really the GCHQ and CIA collaboration there.
	No, it's GCHQ and NSA. No, GCHQ is NSA. I'm sorry.
	Okay.
	Well, then it makes even more sense.
	So this is GCHQ pushing back and screwing him.
	Like, oh, really?
	Okay, well, here's your book.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	We already wrote your book.
	Now, I have to say, it can be the greatest book in the world.
	I hadn't heard of it, and they better do something about the PR, hire the Courier-Devire Consulting Group or something, because Greenwald's book is going to sell no matter what.
	No, that's true.
	Greenwald can write a piece of crap and it's going to outsell this book because this guy, even though he's got good...
	And he's very not...
	He's not really a colorful person.
	Let's play part two and then you can hear a little bit of more information.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	I don't see a part two.
	Parting two.
	Sorry.
	Okay.
	I don't know.
	I usually do.
	I don't have to tell you.
	He said a guiding principle was the Constitution, the American Constitution, which he kind of cherished.
	And he even volunteered...
	Hold on a second.
	Hold on a second.
	I'll start the clip over.
	For every American, the guiding principle is the U.S. Constitution.
	Come on, this is a Brit talking.
	What a dick.
	To fight in Iraq and try to join the U.S. military, which was a kind of disastrous episode that went wrong.
	And even at one point, blast leakers of information.
	It's deeply ironic.
	In 2009, when he's working as a junior analyst for the CIA in Switzerland, he absolutely blasts the New York Times for publishing an article on operations in Iran, denounces them, denounces WikiLeaks.
	But, of course, he changes.
	Like most young people, he kind of goes on a journey, and the more he saw, the more disillusioned he became.
	And that's part of the story that you tell in the book.
	Is there a key moment where he changes, or was it over time?
	I think it was over a period of years, but there were two things which upset him.
	Firstly, he saw more stuff.
	He was a systems administrator, so he could roam around the secret places of the NSA. He saw more documents, which troubled him.
	And second, he became disillusioned with Obama.
	He thought that Obama, even though he didn't vote for him, would roll back some of these programs.
	And when Obama didn't, he decided that he would act and do this extraordinary leak.
	And what's your sense of Snowden, I guess his own level of certainty about what he was doing and what he was seeing and what he should do about it?
	He has this enormous sense of inner calm.
	Ewan McCaskill, Glenn Greenwald, my guardian colleagues who met him in Hong Kong, said he'd sort of reached this place of kind of inner tranquility, if you like, where he decided he was going to do this leak, even though he knew full well that it would have enormous consequences for him and that his life would never be the same again.
	But he felt kind of morally compelled to act.
	And, of course, it was a big price.
	He's now in exile with no prospect of going back to the U.S. Threat.
	He's a very wanted man.
	That first meeting that you describe here, you know, a lot of this is in the IT world, it's the tech world, but that first meeting has a lot of cloak and dagger of old-fashioned spy world.
	It's like something out of a John le Carré novel, sort of crossed with a magical mystery.
	Whose novel is that, John?
	John Le Carre, the guy who did all these big bastards, a lot of spy stories.
	Tons of them.
	He died recently.
	He sends these instructions saying, meet me at a hotel in Hong Kong next to a plastic alligator and I'll be the guy carrying a scrambled Rubik's Cube.
	And of course, Glenn and Laura Poitras, the U.S. filmmaker who met him, were expecting to...
	Oh, I got it.
	I got it.
	This is good.
	Do you hear how it says, Glenn?
	Do you hear that?
	No, I didn't.
	Go back.
	Let me hear that again.
	But of course, Glenn.
	He's next to the plastic alligator.
	Glenn.
	It's cute.
	And of course, Glenn and Laura Poitras, the U.S. filmmaker who met him, were expecting to see an old, grizzled CIA veteran in a blazer.
	It wasn't even what you said it was.
	I can't even quite do it.
	It was Glenn.
	Glenn.
	Glenn.
	It's a very British thing.
	It's like, how very dare you, Glenn.
	Glenn.
	How very, very, very dare you, Glenn.
	Next to the plastic alligator.
	And I'll be the guy carrying a scrambled Rubik's Cube.
	And of course, Glenn and Laura Poitras, the US filmmaker.
	It's also very gay, the way he says it.
	I have to say that.
	Glenn, really, bitch.
	Skinny bitch.
	We're expecting to see an old, grizzled CIA veteran in a blazer.
	And instead they get this young, student-like geek.
	And their first reaction was...
	It's not him.
	It's impossible.
	It's impossible.
	It can't be him.
	And of course, over a period of several days, they debrief him.
	They get his story, and he talks them through the documents, and they discover that he is indeed real.
	And then so much has come out now, and we on this program, and you, we've all looked at this now, so much about the various surveillance programs.
	Where are we in this story?
	Is there more to come?
	What do you think?
	Well, there's more to come, but there have been a fantastic number of revelations over the last nine months.
	We know so much more than we did.
	Hey, great clip, John.
	It's not really clip of the day because it doesn't have like a zinger.
	It's not a great clip either.
	No, it is.
	I really like that, but it also made me think about something.
	If you went, you can go to any technology conference, anywhere you want, and you lined up, you did a line, let's just do a lineup of 10 guys and we say, one of these guys is a systems administrator.
	This is the way he speaks, the way he looks.
	I do not know a single sysadmin who looks like Snowden.
	Not a single one.
	I'm trying to think.
	He's boring.
	He's straight-laced.
	He's, you know, button-collar.
	He talked very articulate.
	There's not a single...
	Come on, man.
	CIS admins, they talk...
	They got swazzled.
	They got swagger.
	They got...
	They usually wear beards or they're fat or they're really skinny.
	They're eccentric.
	Well, I think that the beard and the fat, I think that's not true.
	Yes, there's a lot of that, but it's not the only kind of sysadmin.
	Because you also have BGP guys who do network admins.
	They're a little bit different.
	But this was a Microsoft SharePoint administrator.
	It doesn't feel right to me.
	Maybe that is exactly what the Microsoft SharePoint admins look like.
	I could be wrong.
	Well, I could accept it.
	I'm not quite as skeptical as you are on that particular thing about Snowden.
	But this thing here, this planted book and the story, there's probably information in the book that we need to know.
	I'm going to read it.
	I'm sure there's a bunch of code in there.
	And the guy threatened...
	What's the name of the book again?
	Part of the community.
	He's threatening that he's going to be stuck there for the rest of his life.
	And what was a couple other things in there?
	It was a very interesting little interview because this guy was...
	I've never heard of this guy and I didn't know about this book just like you.
	I was kind of stunned by it.
	I'm thinking, well, there goes at least 10,000 of Glenn Greenwald's...
	Well, I think what's better is...
	Money.
	No, I think the thing...
	You'll lose sales.
	Not a lot, but it's...
	The thing that gets...
	If you want to hurt Glenn Greenwald, tell him he's a dick.
	Yeah, or tell him he's wrong, or this is to get under his skin.
	You know what I mean?
	This is to get under his skin.
	No, you're right.
	This is to get under his skin.
	I'm sure he's irked about this book.
	The Snowden Files, this is the name of the book?
	Yeah.
	They got a Kindle edition.
	Okay.
	Bam!
	Gonna order that right now.
	Buy now, one click.
	Buy now one click.
	I'm going to buy with one click.
	With one click.
	Hold on.
	Oh, boy.
	Oh, man.
	I love when I get a spinning wheel of death.
	Uh-oh.
	Okay.
	Buy now one click.
	Okay.
	Oh, let's look at the...
	By the way, I have clicked the buy now one click, and it always asks me for my password.
	It's not one click.
	I've never gotten one click.
	It's bullcrap.
	I got thanks, Adam.
	But then I have to click again to continue shopping.
	Yeah.
	That's two clicks.
	I agree.
	Should have jumped right out of there.
	I agree.
	Let's look at the reviews.
	Let's see if the spooks are in there reviewing it.
	That's always a good thing to do.
	Oh, yeah.
	This is a good place to spot them.
	Yeah, let's see.
	Of course, you've got to find the guy who says it sucks, and he's okay.
	Do they have customer reviews?
	Oh, reads like a Le Carre novel.
	Yeah.
	Really?
	Must be the same publisher.
	Well, that's the New York Times reviewer.
	But how about...
	Okay.
	What do we have?
	I don't see anything.
	Stimulating gripping page turner.
	American trader or international hero?
	You expect me to read this?
	Oh, here's Glenn Greenwald's comment.
	What did Glenn Greenwald say?
	A book on what is one of the most pivotal news events of recent memory should have been written by someone who can write a book.
	Hey Glenn, your alias W.D. Rupi is a little obvious.
	Tense shift, randomly arranged and sometimes meaningless observations, and an apparently general careless attitude on the part of the author, all combined to turn what should be an engrossing account into a tedious chore of dubious reward for the reader.
	This book practically screams hurried into print.
	Glenn!
	Wait, I got a quote from the Financial Times that interviewed Glenn about this.
	It's probably the same thing.
	No, this is better.
	It's a bullshit book.
	They are purporting to tell the inside story of Edward Snowden, but it's written by someone who has never met or even spoken to Edward Snowden.
	Luke came here and talked to me for about a half a day without my realizing he was trying to get me to write his book for him.
	I cut the interview off when I realized what he was up to.
	Anyway.
	Listen to the last line on this one.
	This could have been a great story.
	Heck, it is a great story.
	I recommend you read it from someone else.
	That's what I plan to do.
	It's so funny.
	You know, Greenwald has a history of doing that, of posting comments on the pseudonyms.
	We talked about that, haven't we?
	Yeah, we talked about it.
	There's a lot of people like that.
	I actually do that, but so rarely.
	My main pseudonym, if anybody ever sees this, is me.
	It's Mark Pugner.
	Hey, why that name?
	You know, the first time I got the Mark Pugner name into the public domain was in the 70s, actually, when I wrote a letter to Playboy magazine.
	Oh?
	And I had this, I can't remember what it was, but it was like a two-paragraph thing, bitching about something.
	And I signed it, Mark Pugner, Berkeley, California.
	And the name just kind of came to me.
	It was no actual rationale, but I've kept using Mark Pugner over the years.
	You won't find it.
	You can try Googling Mark Pugner.
	You're not going to find anything.
	It just shows up in comments, and once in a while, there'll be a Mark Pugner.
	That's usually something to benefit me.
	You know, I usually, you know, you should read Dvorak instead.
	Well, yeah.
	Mark Pugner.
	There's no other reason to do that than to benefit yourself.
	Yeah, that's the reason you do it.
	Don't do that stuff out of spite.
	Well, I've done maybe.
	Usually, I use my own name for that.
	But, you know, Mark Pugner's a good one.
	I also have a female.
	That I use occasionally, but I'm still developing her as a character.
	Okay.
	Well, that is the first step in the process, John.
	And whenever you're ready to talk about it, then you can just let us know.
	Noah will be happy to help you out.
	I'm going to show myself the Lord by donating to No Agenda.
	Imagine all the people who could do that.
	Oh, yeah, that'd be fab.
	Yeah, on No Agenda.
	Hey, whoa!
	In the morning.
	We have a lot of people to thank because we had a lot of $60 donations, which we emphasized.
	And as I'm reading them, Adam will be looking for the most poignant comments and then he'll stop me and then we'll read the comment from the $60 donors because we promised we would if they're interesting.
	Oh, okay.
	That's what you sent me.
	You sent me the email asking about that.
	No, no, that's not how it went.
	But okay, I'll just do it.
	That's great.
	It's a good idea.
	That's what I'm good at.
	It's what I do.
	You're good.
	You're actually quite good at this.
	Meanwhile, let's start with Santosh.
	Oh, stop!
	Oh, no, I'm sorry.
	Not this one yet.
	No, not yet.
	Narayanan in Chennai, Tennessee.
	I think it's Narayanan.
	$160.
	Oh, actually, it says India.
	Okay, well, this is our Indian guy.
	We have plenty of listeners in India, but this is our one...
	No, I think this is, I think the second one.
	No?
	Different guy?
	I don't know.
	Whatever.
	Folks, congratulations on completing 600 episodes.
	However, crossing this milestone does not mean you can rest on your laurels and go to sleep.
	Okay.
	I didn't intend to.
	On the contrary, dear AC and JD, this simply means that you need to strive towards higher goals.
	Their show is 666-669-696-730-737.
	Don't forget 777.
	777, you missed that one.
	And 999, show 1000.
	What is 730, you think?
	73s, maybe?
	730?
	I don't know.
	You need to keep it going.
	666 will be the next big one.
	Pass an executive order and we can celebrate Show 1000 next week.
	Groovy.
	Anarchy has its benefits.
	So keep informing, educating, and blackmailing us with cute photos of kittens and puppies.
	A good one, by the way.
	I love the little puppy in the newsletter.
	You like that puppy?
	I love that puppy.
	He looked tasty.
	I'll tell you, I think it's the captions that make these dogs cute.
	It was cute.
	Hold on.
	I wrote it down, actually, because I thought it was funny.
	Do you remember what the caption was?
	Yeah, I'm running to donate.
	Follow me!
	That's it.
	Eric Fredericks, $145.99 out of Denver, Colorado.
	So Abel last week was ahead of the curve, well behind it.
	Here's one for 599.
	Send another one along for a show of 600 maybe in a week or two.
	Okay.
	Thanks for your courage.
	It's not so much to ask, can I get a Putin?
	Putin!
	Robert Dimoff in London.
	1, 2, 3, 4, 5.
	He's a little confused.
	He says, please make it rain for dancers, Louise and Caroline, but you have to do it.
	It's actually less.
	You put in too much.
	You get penalized.
	Yeah.
	It's 1-11-11.
	I don't know.
	You know what?
	It's probably pounds that got translated.
	Oh, okay.
	It's 111 pounds?
	That would be $3,000.
	No, it couldn't be translated because he's not going to hit 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 by accident.
	I'm sorry.
	Well, we'll take it into consideration with the club is still under construction.
	With the club still under repairs.
	Yeah.
	You know, I didn't think it was going to take this long, but the guy comes in and now we found dry rot.
	No!
	No, I'm telling you, I think it's from the, you know, when they put that, I think there's a leak somewhere, and this is a long story, but the dry rot's got to be removed, and now we have to have a, listen to this, the dry rot's got to go, we have to have a re-inspection, and then we have to have a termite inspection.
	No!
	Yeah, when you get, apparently in this zoning, when you get dry rot, the likelihood of getting termites right after is pretty high, so they make, they require a termite inspection, and you know what, you have to wait weeks to get the termite guy out.
	You know what it's going to be next?
	Then he wants to sell you orange oil.
	Orange oil?
	Do we have to have a radon test as well?
	I mean, that's what I'm expecting.
	No, this is in Florida.
	There's no radon in Florida.
	They don't have radon?
	Christopher Wallace, $111.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Let's go to Ben Pink in Orland Park, Illinois, and he's got a Make It Rain.
	Oh, wait a minute.
	No, this is different.
	Hey, hold on.
	He's making a rain call angel to the stage.
	She's shy and knows what she's doing.
	Hold on a second, John.
	I need to stop you here.
	Mark Pugner from Berkeley, United States, ten months ago, commented on Sharon Stone shows off her lean legs as she rushes through the crowds at a Los Angeles airport.
	Mark Pugner says, bullcrap that she has never had any work done.
	Says who?
	Ten months ago.
	Yeah, that's about my rate.
	Another ten months, I'll bitch about something else.
	I'm a little flabbergasted.
	I'm as flabbergasted you found that.
	And I'm flabbergasted with such a shallow comment.
	Usually I put the plug for the No Agenda show in.
	Thank you, James Varga.
	Is it linked to the No Agenda show?
	No.
	Christopher Wallace, $111.11, says, by the way, that was Angel.
	She's shy, knows what she's doing.
	My commute would be unbearable without you guys.
	Christopher Wallace, $111.11, says, in the Bronx.
	He's going to be knight today.
	And he's a knight.
	Sir Leonard Smalls.
	I knew as a Lightmeister Leonard Smalls, I was going to become a knight after I was arrested for walking between subway cars in New York.
	I didn't know you got arrested for that.
	I don't know.
	On the tracks or just between?
	No, no.
	You're in a car and you want to go to the next car because your car's crowded or there's a guy playing a saxophone.
	Oh, wow.
	All right.
	Transit District Precinct 33.
	That's the way he gave us money.
	Make it rain on douchebag, blah, blah, blah.
	We got it for the club.
	We're all good.
	Danielle, she'll be coming up.
	James Wells, $100 from Flagstaff, Arizona.
	Jeffrey Maxwell, Cranberry Township, Pennsylvania.
	Step up the woman hating, he says.
	We're on it.
	We're on it, boss.
	And Design 7747.
	So I was bitching about Sharon Stone.
	I think it must have been some article.
	I don't know why I was even reading it.
	It says she never had any work done.
	John, look.
	You brought it up.
	No, but if you're smart right now, you let it go.
	People have already forgotten about it.
	See Joseph Bell Illustration and Design 7.
	747.
	Here's what Mickey's going to say.
	Oh my God.
	We've got to help John, man.
	He's sitting there all alone in that house and he's looking at Sharon Stone articles.
	The problem is I'm not alone ever.
	Former monthly donor in Deutschland finding himself in desperate need of some job karma.
	Congratulations on reaching the year seven during which karma, God's willing, I'll be back on the road to knighthood.
	All right.
	69!
	69, dudes!
	69 today for some unknown reason.
	Brian Brown in Orange, California.
	Christopher Gray in Grand Blanc, Michigan.
	Byrar.com, B-U-I-R-A-R, which is the compression system.
	Omaha, Nebraska.
	Brian Lawson in Houston, Texas.
	Oscar Schenk.
	And Castricum.
	Castricum.
	Castricum.
	Yeah.
	He has a douchebag call-out.
	Netherlands.
	Holland.
	Peebo.
	Hold on.
	Oscar has a douchebag call-out.
	Oh, so he does.
	That's why it's red.
	In the morning, my podcast friends, I turn 33 and the magic number 1803 want to call Mark Plottenkamp and Dampy douchebags since they never pay for the show.
	And I'm sure I am more broke than they are.
	Hey, by the way, I am sorry you did that.
	My email is now streaming full with Finding Mark Pugner comments.
	Good.
	And he has a LinkedIn, too.
	Oh.
	I don't have a LinkedIn.
	Someone does.
	All right.
	Really?
	Onward.
	P, I've been busted.
	I can't use Mark Pugner anymore.
	No.
	P, Bo, in Maastricht.
	Twisted Lemon in Elmere.
	Elmere.
	All three, one, two, boom, boom, boom, all from Holland.
	Elmere.
	Almere.
	There you go.
	Kyle M. Bandy, Indianapolis.
	69!
	69, dudes!
	Our $60 donors.
	Dame Andrea and Sir Kelly Garnier in Rocky Mountain House, Alberta.
	Um...
	Martin Volprecht in Berlin, Deutschland.
	These are all $60 donors with various amounts at the end to vote.
	Daniel Tonello, $60.05, telling us we want to go dark.
	Charleston, South Carolina.
	Michael Voss, $60.04, Evergreen, Colorado.
	Jason Becker, $60.02.
	He's right down the street from you.
	He's in Austin, Texas.
	Bob Miller in Seattle, Washington, $60.02.
	Stuart Fawcett, $60.02.
	Liverpool, Merseyside.
	Sir Peter McConnell, 60-02, Stockholm.
	Ryan Wolfe, 60-01, in Covington, Virginia.
	Nicholas Samaras, 60-01, in Charlottesville, Virginia.
	And now just $60, the following people.
	Chris Terhart, and you'll be looking for funny comments, in Abbotsford, B.C. Blacklisted News, Round Rock, Texas.
	Bob Rathmel in Santa Isabel, California.
	Little shout out to Black Listed News.
	They're kind of like a little companion news site to the No Agenda show.
	They're good guys.
	Brandon Fenton, Colorado Springs.
	Sir Roy Stratham in Gosnells, Western Australia.
	Naveen Comera in Houston, Texas.
	Sir Scott in Herndon, Virginia.
	He's protector of the Bikes and Dykes.
	Oh?
	Bikes and Dykes.
	Bikes on Dykes or Bikes and Dykes?
	Bikes and Dykes.
	Sir Glenn Riccio in Charlottesville, Virginia, School of Podcasting.
	Hey, Dave Jackson.
	Nice.
	Thank you, man.
	Thank you, thank you.
	David Good, Flower Mound, Texas.
	I've been there.
	Armando Guerrero.
	Ah, the mail carrier from Texas.
	Guerra.
	Is it Guerra?
	Guerra.
	Congratulations on the show 600.
	Wish I could make this donation ten times as much, but right now my fiancé has too many remodeling and landscaping projects going on.
	Keep up the amazing work.
	I have to say I love long show durations.
	They make my killie, and it doesn't continue for me.
	Sir Joe Wagner in Emeryville, California.
	Eric Allen, Woodlands Hills.
	Robert...
	Sir Sama in Portage.
	Sir Sama in Portage, Indiana.
	Sir Jim in Ringo, Louisiana.
	William LaRock.
	William LaRock, capital L, small A in Locust, North Carolina.
	Christopher Walker in Hortonville, Wisconsin.
	Oh, he wants to learn how to make cheese.
	He actually makes cheese, and he wants to offer us some cheese.
	He wanted to...
	Okay.
	I'm talking with him offline.
	Okay.
	Patrick Adelson in Walking, Surrey.
	Walking.
	Walking.
	Oh, it was Woking.
	Yeah, I used to live right near Woking.
	Yeah.
	Shane Pedden in Cartersville, Georgia.
	Sloan Kelly in Niagara Falls.
	Slowly I turned, Ontario, Canada.
	Thank you, Sloan.
	Wayne Larkham, Sunnybank Hills, Queensland, Australia.
	Dimitri Sadorchuk in Bellevue, Washington.
	You want some job karma, job karma karma for everybody coming up in a bit.
	Marcel Van Eden in...
	Enkenbach, Eisenborn, Deutschland.
	Good.
	Tim Schallberger in Bend, Oregon.
	Vincent Verthuizen in Groningen.
	Vincent Feldhuizen in Groningen.
	Yes, exactly what I said.
	Christopher Dechter in Richland, Washington.
	You guys should meet up.
	Prescott Johnson, East Mountain, Nova Scotia.
	Nova Scotia.
	He's in East Mountain, Nova Scotia.
	Darren Turbiville in Healdsburg, California, wine country.
	Robert Mueller in Chesapeake, Virginia.
	Atomic Insights in Forest, Virginia.
	Ah, that would be Sir Rod Adams.
	I would think.
	Timothy Tillman in Mechanicsville, Virginia, if you know what I mean.
	C.J. Cavell in Chicago.
	Eric Wilka in Rushaville, Indiana.
	Huh, I don't know if there's any Russians there.
	Robin Morley in Nottingham, UK. Ignacio Garcia Perez in Madrid.
	Hey, Garcia!
	Any notes?
	No, just keep up the great work.
	We need some reports from him.
	Sir John Martinez of Garlic Belch.
	Oh, it's Gilroy.
	Chaotic Mass.
	Chaotic Mass.
	Chaotic Mass, duh.
	Arlington, Texas.
	David Eckersley in Yelling Up in Australia.
	Sean Weber Butler in Beer, UK. There's a place called Beer.
	Thelena Fernando in Dover, New Hampshire.
	Keith Shoemaker in Jacksonville, Florida.
	A lot of people.
	We want to thank them all.
	This is great.
	Andrew Nagel in Bismarck, North Dakota.
	James Murray in Huntington Beach, California.
	Richard...
	Lighter in Lincoln, Nebraska.
	And that takes care of our $60 donors congratulating us all for the great work we've done on 600 shows.
	Hey, thank you all very much.
	This is a nice birthday gift.
	Really appreciate it.
	It's nice to...
	And it's a nice way to do it, I think, too.
	Yeah, I think it works.
	Because, you know, 600 is crazy.
	A few lesser amounts to thank, which is Sir Mr.
	Texas of Phoenix, double nickels on the dime.
	Thanks for the picture of your just a handful.
	Oh, yeah.
	Oh, yeah.
	Wojic Moto, yeah.
	Good pictures.
	Wojic Motorsports in Beach Grove, Indiana.
	Double nickels on the dime.
	In the morning, Jen's recently stumbled onto your show after listening to Twit.
	Wanted to start donating immediately after I realized you were paid strictly on donations, so here's my first installment.
	I want to call out all the other listeners who don't donate, as your time is worth something, and I find that the humor and entertainment value alone is priceless.
	Keep up the good work.
	It's a white check, yeah.
	Yeah, that's the whole point.
	Humor repairs the glitches in The Matrix.
	That's what we're all about.
	Brian Lanning in Grand Blanc, Michigan, $55.
	Luke Rayner in London, UK, $54.32.
	The amount, curiously, equates to $33.69 in pounds.
	Oh, really?
	Yeah.
	He says somewhere in Illuminati is getting laid.
	I'll give you some comment in a moment for your cycle event.
	That's funny.
	Lucas Zua.
	Parts Unknown.
	Josh McDonald, and that's $5394.
	Josh McDonald, and the rest of these are $50, just a few of them.
	Josh McDonald, Brunswick, Victoria.
	Chad Inman in L.A., Los Angeles, California.
	Chris Slowinski, our regular in Sherwood Park, Alberta, where all the money is.
	John Haidt in Folsom, California.
	Mark Raley in Germantown, Maryland.
	And finally, our buddy Philip Mison.
	Sir Philip to you.
	And Welsh Pool Pows.
	And John Haidt wanted a LGY for his four-year-old unvaccinated daughter.
	Yay!
	And it's pronounced kite for some reason.
	No, it's just pronounced like, that's why I said Haidt.
	Haidt, kite.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, so I don't know how else you'd pronounce it.
	You've made a grave error.
	I did?
	Yeah.
	You should, here's a tip, everybody.
	If you use a pseudonym online...
	Oh, you're getting every crappy little mention I ever wrote?
	Well, I like this one that you did.
	This has been discussed in great detail already on the No Agenda show.
	Look us up using Google!
	That's my main one.
	And that was on The Intercept.
	Good work, Mark Pugner.
	Everyone should be doing this, by the way.
	I like that you do that.
	That is leading by example.
	And people should be doing this all the time.
	I give Mark Pugner to the public to use freely.
	Great idea.
	From now on...
	Public domain.
	Public domain.
	Mark Pugner.
	Exactly.
	Just use Mark Pugner until Mark Pugner becomes a meme.
	The crazy Mark Pugner.
	There is no Mark Pugner.
	That's the point.
	It'll be everybody.
	And always read that last one again because that's the model.
	But why is Mark Pugner commenting on the Sex and the City movie?
	I mean, this really Mark Pugner guy is really...
	I think that was the week that you had to go see this stupid movie.
	And Mark Pugner hates Frank Sinatra.
	Oh, no.
	Anyway, read the last one again.
	Which last one?
	The one that plugs the show.
	Oh, hold on.
	That's the model for everyone.
	Yeah, here it is.
	And I will do the tone of voice.
	This has been discussed in great detail already on the No Agenda Show.
	Look it up using Google.
	You can, of course, do the alternative.
	Look it up using Bing.
	In fact, I think that should be our code.
	Did I put that in there?
	No, that's what I'm saying.
	That should be our code.
	Bing it.
	Bing it, bitch.
	I am so proud of you.
	You actually do.
	We're not actually friends or anything, but I do love you for stuff like that.
	Public domain, my friend.
	You can use it too.
	Mark Pugner.
	If it's in LinkedIn, somebody else has already stolen it.
	Yeah, I didn't look at the link, so.
	I'm sure there's other Mark Pugners in the world.
	No!
	It's not a name that exists.
	Of course it is.
	No!
	Well, let's take a look at this then.
	Hold on a second.
	Who is this Mark Pugner on LinkedIn?
	Okay, it's not.
	Why is it not actually loading?
	Oh.
	All right.
	This is not a link that's useful.
	Thanks, Deck.
	The link is no good.
	Do you see Mark Pugner on LinkedIn?
	Yeah, I see the list.
	I don't see any.
	I'm going there now.
	So while you're going there now...
	Mark Pugner is an operating engineer at the Danbury Hospital in Connecticut.
	I'm sure that's a real guy.
	And that's sad because he's about to be...
	He's going to be outed as a Frank Sinatra hater.
	Yeah.
	And Sex and the City hater.
	But that's the model.
	Team connections.
	So the payoff is either look it up on Google or bing it, bitch.
	Yeah.
	I think either one will suffice.
	I recommend using that name or any other pseudonym for a lot of these snide comments that people like to make.
	It's just hit and run.
	It's a hit and run deal.
	You go in, you make the comment, you never go back.
	That's the only way it works.
	It's a very old-fashioned way that used to be fought in the 1400s, 1500s.
	They're all hit and run.
	You hit, run.
	Boom.
	You're done.
	And I also want to send out a sincere, heartfelt thanks to everybody who has donated lesser amounts, monthly amounts, under $50.
	Of course, many of you want to remain anonymous for that reason.
	That's why you're $49.99, etc.
	But that's also a big deal to us.
	The more people who do monthly subscriptions, the better it is.
	And here is a heartfelt 600th anniversary karma for everyone who needs it, for everything you need, for all of your dreams.
	Because without you, there would be no agenda show.
	You are the producers of the program.
	You've got karma.
	Oh, yes.
	And then Jason Tim says, Hi, I sent a donation today for $15.50.
	We'll do so for every show for 66 episodes until show 666.
	And that will be a knighthood.
	Oh, that's cool.
	So if you do 1515 for every show for the next 66 episodes, which seems doable, by the way.
	Yeah, that's not much.
	That's a knighthood.
	You should make that a donation level, John.
	Okay, I'll work on that.
	That's a real layaway plan.
	Now, we'll have to throw in the penny, because it's 99999.
	Hey, please make a dope-ass challenge coin for the end of the world!
	And a t-shirt!
	Yes, I'm drunk!
	It's Friday!
	Okay.
	I love those donations.
	Yeah, I'm drunk.
	Here's $15.
	Anything else we have here?
	No, I think that's it.
	Thank you very much for being with us for all this time.
	Dvorak.org slash N-A-N Of course, we still have a list for you.
	Sir Ray Jacobson congratulates his brother Jake, who turns 45 on the 19th.
	Nicholas Samaras says happy birthday to his smoking hot wife, Pia, 32 today.
	Indeed.
	Christopher Walker says happy birthday to his daughter, Lillian Rose Walker.
	She will be one tomorrow.
	And we all say happy birthday from your friends and your family here at the No Agenda Show.
	And we do have two knights and one daming.
	So this is a very good day.
	Let me just make sure.
	Did Bashir have a name he wanted?
	Let me just double check.
	Do you remember?
	No.
	Bashir, Bashir, Bashir.
	No, I guess he wants to be...
	Well, that'll be pretty unique as is.
	So here's my sword.
	Hello?
	Hold on.
	It's stuck.
	It's stuck.
	How many hundreds?
	I got it, I got it, I got it.
	Okay.
	Bashir Osman, step forward.
	Tina Gere, step forward.
	And Christopher Wallace, step forward.
	All of you are about to be inducted into the roundtable of the No Agenda Knights and Dames, and I hereby pronounce these Sir Bashir, Jane, Tina, and Sir Leonard Smalls.
	All knights of the No Agenda roundtable, thank you very much for your support of the program.
	For you, I've got bad signs, perky breast, cumin, cigar, sugar, malt, scotch, hook, fish, and blow, red poison, chardonnay, opium and warm orange juice, rinfo, hot blues, and ruminous, and our mutton and mead.
	And please go to noagendanation.com slash rings to receive your rightfully deserved ring.
	If you want to know what that looks like, I think it is on noagenternation.com.
	Miss Mickey tweeted her picture of the ring in the ceiling wax as a celebratory note for our show today.
	Oh, I had a note here.
	What is this?
	Okay, I think we're all good.
	I think we've got it.
	Oh, I did a little research, John, because it was very annoying to me.
	It's always annoying.
	Well, just about everything.
	This is hearkening back to the band Bossy.
	Oh, we got a lot of notes on that.
	Yeah, I have two.
	Should I read these two quick ones?
	Yeah, read that one.
	Did you get the one from...
	I've got a bunch of them, too.
	I think you got all the same ones.
	So I hashtagged the subject so John probably won't see this.
	This is the new way to make sure that you're kept off the email.
	But I wanted to share with you that I hit my wife in the mouth.
	Not literally, obviously.
	It started bad with you starting off the show with something about 10 sex tips.
	By the way, I... All right, this is actually a good note.
	She asked, what the hell?
	And by the way, we're talking about sex tips.
	Oh.
	We're talking about the tip, nuclear warhead tip.
	What I was doing...
	Okay, I'll tell you exactly what I was doing.
	The entire internet, all of these BuzzFeed and all these sites are all using these crazy, crappy headlines, which are meant to...
	It's clickbait.
	Here's an example.
	How to turn Thanksgiving leftovers into a Tesla.
	Here are six things they don't tell you in preschool.
	Why it's okay to say the N-word in 16 pie charts.
	How one African researcher is changing the way we think about bamboo bicycles.
	So that's why I use that, because apparently a lot of people want to click on these articles.
	These are the fake articles that always go to some crazy site that is not a site you've ever heard of, and there's something stupid about somebody.
	No, no, that's incorrect.
	These are...
	Well, these titles are made up, of course.
	This is...
	Just go look at The Verge, BuzzFeed...
	Yeah, they got headline writers now.
	All of this.
	But it's also...
	They have little kitties, and all they're doing is...
	They're surfing through Reddit to find news articles, and then they get paid minimum wage to post them.
	That's the Internet.
	The Internet is a disgusting place.
	It's gone downhill.
	It's gone downhill.
	Okay, so let me continue with this email.
	She asked, okay, my wife is my daughter's Girl Scout troop leader.
	And when you guys got to hashtag Band Bossy, she got pissed.
	Not at you, but at the Girl Scouts, an organization she puts a lot of time and effort into, an organization that she highly respects.
	After the segment, she was on Facebook messaging the other Girl Scout moms telling them how much bullshit hashtag Bambossi is and that their troop will, instead of banning the word bossy, work to make their girls stronger leaders.
	If that isn't value for value, I don't know what is.
	Thank you very much.
	Name withheld, in this case, by request.
	Then I have a brand new listener here.
	As of the 13th, I've heard five shows.
	Please excuse me for bringing it up.
	I heard on episode 5, Niner Niner, that you all felt you're really down on women lately, which must have been before I tuned in, because I haven't felt that way at all.
	I wanted to email you to tell you a few short things.
	One, loved your coverage of Hashtag Band Bossy.
	I saw a commercial on Lifetime and almost barfed, seriously.
	Two, something to consider.
	And I can't believe I'm about to send this to two guys who didn't know what always was.
	Remember all the hullabaloo about birth control?
	Well, women visits, breast pumps, etc., that will be available for free under the Affordable Care Act.
	Well, around February 12th, all the mainstream media ran a story about how mammograms free under the Affordable Care Act were totally unnecessary.
	I was skeptical, but hadn't been hit in the mouth yet, so I just forgot about it.
	This is the wrong categorized email, but I'll finish it anyway.
	Yesterday, I heard another mainstream story about how pap schmears, also free under Obamacare, ACA, It's a totally unnecessary test.
	At this point, my BS meter went off again.
	I texted a nurse in my life to ask what the endgame was.
	Her reply?
	Kill all the people who can't pay cash.
	Then you don't have to feed, house, or educate them, and they can't breed.
	That's probably true.
	I just thought that was a great letter.
	It is a good email.
	Part of the band Bossy, I went looking for the quote, women are doing 66% of the work and only get paid 10%.
	That was the quote that Sheryl Sandberg and the whole band Bossy crew were using.
	Women do 66% of the work and only get 10% of the pay.
	This apparently was first used by Barbara Conable, president of the World Bank, in 1986.
	He said, in a World Bank IMF meeting, women are half the world's population, yet they do two-thirds of the world's work, that would be 66%, earn one-tenth of the world's income, and they are among the poorest of the world's poor.
	So that's where this apparently came from.
	If you go looking for this...
	1986, by the way.
	And things might have been differently in 1986.
	How many years ago was that, John?
	1986.
	Well, it'd be 20 plus...
	30 years?
	It'd be 28 years ago.
	28 years ago.
	Things might have changed.
	I don't know.
	28 years is a long time.
	Yeah.
	Human Rights Development...
	Human Development...
	I'm sorry.
	Human Development Report, another fine NGO, in 1995 used this statement...
	And they changed this a little bit by saying, in the Human Development Report 1995, nine of developing countries...
	Oh, man.
	I'm sorry.
	I messed that one up.
	Here it is.
	You're not helping.
	Here we go.
	53% of the total...
	That's very hard.
	In developing countries, women do 53% of the work.
	In developed countries, that's 51% of women do the work.
	The hours that are worked, 66% of men do paid work and 33% unpaid.
	This is the report that was trying to explain.
	I don't understand the numbers, how they got to this 1986 number.
	But for women, it's the other way around.
	66% of the hours women work are unpaid.
	33% are paid.
	So the 66 is used a lot in these reports, but nowhere can you find any data.
	Apparently, that work, which I think is always irksome to a certain segment of the population, A lot of that work apparently is counted as child rearing.
	It's probably counted as work because it's unpaid.
	It's probably housekeeping is unpaid.
	Paying bills, unpaid.
	I mean, all these kinds of homemaking things is unpaid.
	And so now it's criticized for being unpaid.
	How do you pay it?
	It's like a partnership with a man and a woman when they're married and one will do this sort of thing unpaid.
	Guys will also do stuff unpaid like wash the cars unpaid.
	When I wash the cars, I'm taking out the garbage.
	Take out the garbage.
	I've not been paid for that.
	So this is bull crap.
	This is just a bunch of taking normal social activities and turning it into work as you would with a slave...
	Everything has to be counted as work.
	Everything is work.
	You get up, I put my socks on.
	That's unpaid work.
	If I was a nobleman, a slave would put the socks on for me.
	This is horrible.
	This is the kind of thing that...
	This is a Sheryl Sandberg...
	I'm disliking this woman as time goes by.
	I think Mark Pugner should call her out.
	Mark Pugner needs to...
	Bitch, Mason, write a letter to the Times.
	Mark Pugner wants to know where the data is, the underlying data that proves...
	That women do 66% of the work and only get 10% of the pay.
	By the way, in my own informal, informal testing, I would say that women do not do 66% of the work in bed.
	There you have it.
	That's unpaid.
	Well, not always.
	Oh, really?
	Really?
	You've been married, what, twice?
	Three times?
	How many times have you been married, my friend?
	I've only been married twice.
	Oh, okay.
	Ha ha, ha ha.
	And then as a special 600 show, I had a little thing, although I'm a little afraid to do stuff now because you say, and then he wraps it up and turns it into flowers.
	It's like magic.
	I'm a little afraid to do anything now.
	Whoa, gun shy all of a sudden.
	I'm a little gun shy.
	Now, we often get comments about our stance on man-made global warming.
	Oh, yeah.
	Wait, hold on.
	If you're going to go in that direction, I've got some clips.
	Oh, good.
	That'll be a good setup.
	First of all, I'm listening to...
	First, there's a...
	Let's start with this.
	Climate change on democracy now with the filibuster.
	Okey-dokey.
	I want to ask you about the all-night filibuster staged by more than two dozen Senate Democrats Monday in order to urge congressional action on global warming.
	This is Senator Edward Markey of Massachusetts.
	The planet is running a fever, but there are no emergency rooms for planets.
	We have to engage in the preventative care.
	So that we deploy the strategies that make it possible for our planet to avoid the worst, most catastrophic effects.
	The worst, most catastrophic, just bad.
	Republicans dismissed the marathon session and called Democrats, quote, alarmists.
	This came as the U.S. Department of Defense released a new report Monday about the threat climate change impacts posed to national security.
	Our guest is longtime consumer advocate Ralph Nader.
	Ralph, could you respond to this?
	Well, this is a welcome development.
	They went all night, led by Harry Reid and Senator Ed Markey in the U.S. Senate.
	Yes, welcome development.
	Yeah, welcome development.
	So, meanwhile, just play the first part of this clip.
	I want to play the rest of it.
	Actually, let's play this whole clip.
	This is Hanson, the father of modern global warming, testifying before Congress about how bad the Keystone Pipeline is.
	I'm finally starting to get a grip handle on what the problem is with it.
	The problem is they believe at least – because there's other – Hearings and other things where they were going on and on about the Keystone Pipeline, which has always been in the news.
	But the point I'm making here is that one thing or another about global warming and climate change is constantly in the news.
	You've heard a few times about it, haven't you?
	Yeah.
	Well, here's what my point is, and then you can go off on your thing.
	My point is that when you listen to that, we're just going to skip the Hanson thing for now, but he's bitching about global warming.
	And so going from news story to news story, there's a new movie coming out with Ben Affleck and all these guys.
	Have you seen this?
	It's going to be some series.
	No, no, no.
	What is that?
	Oh, I didn't get a clip, but I'll get one for the next show.
	It's a huge movie on climate change, and how bad it is.
	No.
	Oh, isn't this just Inconvenient Truth 2?
	Isn't that what it is?
	It doesn't have that title, but it might as well be.
	So meanwhile, so here I go.
	I'm listening to Abby Martin, who's concerned and bitches and moans about climate change constantly.
	And she's got Chris Hedges.
	And he has the nerve to make this commentary.
	I'm sorry.
	For some reason, it's not.
	Here we go.
	...on the horizon.
	Why do you think there's no sense of urgency on a large scale to address these troubling trends?
	Well, because they're not reported.
	The commercial media is about...
	They're not reported?
	It's about spectacle.
	It's about celebrity gossip.
	It's about the Super Bowl.
	I mean, every week it's something new.
	And, you know, if we had a responsible media, especially a broadcast media, we would understand that climate change at this point is an emergency.
	That, you know, at this point the effects of climate change are unstoppable.
	And if we don't radically reconfigure our relationship with the ecosystem very, very quickly, the human species itself is in jeopardy.
	What is the name of the actor you just mentioned who would be in this new movie?
	I think Affleck.
	Either Affleck or his buddy.
	The other guy.
	Damon.
	Damon.
	Affleck.
	Damon.
	Let me just...
	I want to know what this is.
	Oh, uh...
	Schwarzenegger's in...
	Oh, is this a Showtime movie?
	Is it?
	It might be.
	Let me see.
	Jessica Alba.
	Does that make sense?
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	See, Matt Damon, Jessica Alba...
	Heat up trailer for Showtime's climate change series.
	Ah, years of living dangerously.
	Oh, let's see.
	What is this?
	James Cameron harnesses star power in eco-conscious docuseries.
	Mmm.
	There's a video here.
	We can watch the trailer.
	Let's fire this up.
	Of course, this is where...
	Oh, this video is private.
	Oh, mofo.
	Somebody posted it wrong.
	I'll look for that later.
	Okay.
	We'll do it for Thursday.
	But, okay, so we're just inundated with this crap.
	And this guy has the nerve.
	Yeah.
	Chris Hedges has the nerve to say, well, nobody's covering it.
	That's why.
	And, of course, he also says it's unstoppable, which means, what, is he a nihilist?
	That means, what difference does it make if it's not stoppable?
	It's not stoppable.
	So let's go on to something else.
	Just live with it.
	I love it when you get angry.
	It's not angry.
	It's just like annoying.
	It's very annoying.
	I wish that they had the trailer for that thing.
	Why can't we find the trailer for that?
	What do I call it?
	Years of living dangerous.
	Before you go to it, while you're digging that up, you might as well play this clip with Hansen talking to Congress about the Keystone Pipeline.
	It goes back to democracy now where there's an interview with a guy from the Grand Canyon Foundation or something.
	And there's a little tidbit in here that will just blow your mind.
	The United States to approve this.
	If we don't approve it, a lot of that tar sands will never be developed.
	The world is going to realize pretty soon that we've got to limit the amount of carbon we put in the atmosphere, and it's going to have to do that via a price on carbon, and that's going to cause the most carbon intensive things to get left in the ground, and that includes tar sands.
	While the fight over Keystone and the Alberta tar sands has galvanized the environmental movement, far less attention has been paid to a related story here in the West.
	The state of Utah has begun making preparations to extract tar sands and oil shale from vast swaths of public and private land.
	According to one U.S. government report, the region could hold up to 3 trillion barrels of oil.
	That's more recoverable oil than has been used so far in human history.
	Critics say Utah is sitting on a tar sands...
	Hey, hold on a second.
	Hey, we're moving to Utah.
	Whatever happened to peak oil?
	There's more oil than ever used in all of human history?
	And the Mormons are sitting right on top of it.
	Yeah, those lucky Mormons.
	Hey.
	Hey, Mormons, we need more donations.
	Wow.
	Is that a stunner?
	Well...
	It's more than that.
	You know what it is?
	Yes.
	I hate it when you know it.
	There you go.
	Clip of the day.
	Well-deserved.
	Well-played, sir.
	Well-played.
	Well-played.
	Three, two...
	Oh, this is great.
	Okay.
	Everybody, everybody.
	Although, peak oil, they don't do that much anymore.
	They peak oil.
	It's not really a thing.
	No, peak oil's done.
	Now, this is definitely the nail in the coffin.
	Yeah.
	I have the trailer here.
	Years of living dangerously.
	I have not pre-screened this, so anything could happen.
	Before you go there, I just want to make a little follow-up on that last clip.
	Meanwhile, she's got this guy on there, and she is grilling him exactly like a financial reporter interested in an investment would grill somebody.
	Oh, because she wants to get in on it.
	What companies would benefit the most?
	How can I get in on this bonanza?
	It's hilarious.
	Should I become a Mormon?
	Should I be an LDSer?
	I've got to get in.
	How do I get in on this stuff?
	Woo!
	That is pretty funny.
	Here we go.
	Let's see if...
	A new Showtime series.
	99 scientists out of 100 say...
	Hold on.
	99 out of 100?
	They just gained 2% overnight.
	It should be 97.
	Yeah.
	What happened there?
	Oh, well.
	I wasn't looking.
	99 scientists out of 100 say climate change is real and it's only going to get worse.
	So if you were sick and you got 100 doctors and none of them said you had to have an operation, would you get another opinion?
	Yes, I'd go to that other guy and say, fix me!
	These guys are no good!
	That's James Cameron talking.
	You are James Cameron, really?
	I don't think so.
	I don't think so.
	Our world is changing faster and more dramatically than ever before.
	Global warming ended in 1998.
	I'll show you the data for it.
	There's so many political agendas, there's been so many exaggerations, that it's brought a lot of confusion.
	I do know.
	Rising sea level.
	There is no wildfire season.
	We have wildfires all year round.
	What is this Schwarzenegger in a firefighter outfit walking through the woods with forest firefighters?
	The gall of that guy.
	Republicans have gotten in this spot of disgusting scientists.
	Coming out of pipes all over the country.
	That's a big deal.
	At what point does this become the firework?
	Fire commencing.
	Fire commencing.
	Everybody thinks that this is about melting glaciers and polar bears.
	I think it's a big mistake.
	This is 100% of people's stories.
	Oh, it's dramatized.
	Cool.
	So, I've teamed up with the legendary Jerry Weintraub.
	Legendary!
	Hurricanes are twice as bad as they ever were, and ice is melting where it's not supposed to melt.
	This is a lake?
	Yes.
	The world is changing, and it's all because of global warming, I think.
	Jerry and I are putting together the ultimate catch.
	You'll see these stars like you've never seen them before.
	They're going to be the correspondents.
	And you see, they're all looking at each other.
	Oh, man.
	Oh, yeah.
	And they're in the helicopter looking out over ice.
	Oh, the polar bear.
	Oh.
	Meeting the people.
	Jessica Alba is hot, though.
	Affected by this.
	These are the stories of people whose lives have been transformed by climate change.
	We used to have seat inspectors, but now we don't.
	Could Yemen run out of water?
	Yes, possibly.
	This was the first city to run out of water.
	Water just took everything away.
	Climate disruption is not a political issue, it's a moral issue.
	I don't know what's possible.
	It doesn't matter.
	It's happening.
	This is the biggest story of our time.
	And I'm going to tell it.
	This is the time to tell it.
	Yep.
	Years of living dangerously.
	Douche Knuckles on Parade.
	So 2014 will be another year in a string of years beginning in around 2003 or 2004, where it was the last year we could do anything and have an impact.
	Again.
	Alright, I'm very glad you did that, John.
	This starts in April, the Showtime series.
	You could probably just hear by the great, and these are good movie people who are doing this.
	Yeah, there's no slouches.
	This is top-notch, top-of-the-bill.
	And all these people are getting paid, and I wanted to do something about man-made climate change.
	Because, of course, climate change is all the time.
	I wanted to do it based upon the federal climate change expenditures report to Congress, which, funny enough, didn't get much play in the press.
	Now, this is, by law, this has to be reported to Congress, and it just came, kind of dribbled up to the surface.
	Not a lot of people talk about it, because it's better to be speculating about the pilot of the Malaysian Airlines plane.
	And I just wanted to give you the numbers of what, if you're in America, and I'm sure if you're anywhere else in the world, your government has similar reporting of what was actually spent on, well, I'll give you the, I'm not going to paraphrase, fiscal year 2014 report to Congress on federal climate change expenditures.
	John, you've been a CPA for many years.
	Expenditures means what you're paying out, right?
	What you spend, what you're spending.
	The following is an accounting of federal funding for climate change programs and activities.
	Oh, activities.
	Both domestic and international.
	Included in the fiscal year 2014 president's budget.
	This report is provided in response to Title IV, Division E, Section 425 of the Consolidated Appropriations Act, which calls for reporting of this shit.
	Background, and I'll give you a little bit of the preamble.
	They have different categories of spending, much like your household budget.
	Through the U.S. Global Change Research Program, USGCRP, the U.S. scientists are conducting world-class research on climate and global change.
	Interesting.
	Climate and global change.
	The USGCRP coordinates scientific research across 13 federal departments and agencies with the mission of building a knowledge base.
	I guess that's a...
	I have to stop you now.
	Why?
	It seems to me that with 99 out of 100 agreeing and the science is in, we shouldn't be spending a nickel on this.
	The science is in.
	Why are we spending more money on what's already been proven?
	I'm asking you, why are we spending money on something that's already been proven and 99% of all scientists agree on?
	Because it's a gravy train?
	Oh!
	And I have a whole bunch of different stuff to get to, but this report is very interesting because no one will read this.
	No one will tell you about it.
	You will not see these numbers on the news.
	Here's the report.
	So here are the categories.
	Climate change science.
	This is the category that encompasses the U.S. Global Change Research Program.
	Clean Energy Technology, this expenditure category, is Clean Energy Technology incorporates a variety of technology research, development, and deployment activities, including voluntary partnership and grant programs.
	It's funny, it's not free, but it's voluntary.
	International assistance, another category.
	This category describes elements of a whole-of-government approach to mobilize a wide range of resources and make use of bilateral and multilateral assistance tools.
	Wow!
	That's Web 3.0 right there, baby.
	We're using a whole of government approach to mobilize a wide range of resources to make use of bilateral and multilateral assistance tools.
	Wow, that is a gem.
	Isn't that good?
	The gall of someone to put that into a report.
	Then we have energy tax provisions.
	This category includes...
	The bullshit never stops.
	No, it doesn't.
	And it's never going to.
	It's going to get better and better.
	Energy tax provision.
	This category includes tax incentives for investments in certain energy technologies and energy payments that can be used in lieu of certain tax credits.
	I think what this means is if you invent a windmill and it doesn't work, it costs more than it costs, The prepper category.
	There are numerous efforts across the federal government for preparing and building resilience to the impacts of climate change on various critical sectors, institutions, and agency mission responsibilities.
	This concept is also known as adaptation.
	It's what human beings do.
	We've had to adapt throughout the centuries, millennia.
	All right, let me give you the numbers real quick.
	So we've been to the categories, and I want you to guess the number.
	Guess the number.
	And we're looking at the...
	Well, I have the 2012, but I'm just going to give you the budget, or what we spent in 2013.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	And you guessed the number.
	Yeah.
	How much did we spend on U.S. Global Change Research Program?
	That's the USGCRP. That's probably a pretty big number.
	I'd say $40 million.
	$40 million.
	No.
	$2.4 billion.
	What?
	Then we have clean energy technologies.
	Now this is for research into solar energy and windmills and oceans and algae.
	Yeah, research money.
	Yeah, grants and that kind of thing.
	Yeah, how much do you think?
	There's probably going to be quite a bit because we throw away a lot of R&D. We did give Solyndra something like $500 million, so I'm going to say a billion.
	$5.7 billion.
	Okay.
	International assistance.
	Now this is what we just, of our tax money, our money we're just given to foreigners.
	Okay, well that would be low.
	That would probably be about, I'd say half a million, 500 million.
	Still, it's still almost 800 million dollars.
	Okay, I'm close.
	I'm just going to move through.
	Natural resources adaptation.
	That shouldn't be anything.
	Yeah, it's 95 million.
	I have no idea what that is.
	Now, here's an interesting one.
	That's just a throwaway.
	Let's just throw away $100 million.
	Yeah.
	Buddy, my buddies.
	Energy tax provisions that may reduce greenhouse gases.
	Again, I'm going to reread this.
	Energy tax provisions, i.e.
	tax breaks...
	Or actual payments.
	Oh no, I'm sorry.
	Payments is a second category.
	These are actual tax breaks to companies and people.
	Like a non-profit thing.
	So tax not have to be paid for provisions that may, not that do, that may reduce greenhouse gases.
	How much, John?
	Oh, $100 million?
	$5 billion.
	That's just throwing money away.
	That's money we're not collecting for taxes, yes.
	And then finally, energy payments.
	Energy payments, so actual money paid.
	How much do you think that is?
	Okay, I'm going up big.
	This went $5 billion.
	$8 billion.
	Geez, I can't even get...
	Wow.
	The grand total spent, this is not what's coming in 2014, spent in 2013 $22 billion on research and bullcrap.
	And that's numbers going up.
	Of course the numbers going up.
	It's all bullcrap.
	We're on the wrong side of this argument.
	Yeah.
	Well, you have to do it right.
	If you know how to do it, then you get the money.
	Now, what I want to do, and this is the last I have for show 600, I told Miss Mickey about it.
	She liked the idea.
	And I'm really only helping a great guy who has already done the work, John Coleman.
	And we've discussed John Coleman before.
	John Coleman is the founder of the Weather Channel.
	Very early on, he said this, and this back when it was global warming, he said, I've been a meteorologist all my life.
	This global warming business is crap.
	It's not true.
	It's not happening.
	Yeah, he did a three-part video on YouTube that I have not seen for years.
	I think they took it down.
	So he has republished this brand new, but it's about 45 minutes on YouTube.
	That's where I found it.
	It's the history of where global warming came from.
	And for you, I have cut this down to a couple of clips, which I will narrate myself.
	It's fun to watch him do it, but most people, TLDR. They just don't have the time for this, and it's just not going to happen.
	So I have a little rundown for you.
	We're going to start, and I just want you to hear his credentials.
	This is a very cute video that he made.
	Here is John Coleman introducing himself.
	Hello, I'm John Coleman, and the name of this presentation is There Is No Significant Global Warming.
	And I'm the guy that is just doggone sure of that.
	Now, you may think that I'm just a paid-off shill, big oil or something of that sort.
	No, no, no, no, no.
	They've never given me a nickel.
	I'm a television weathercaster with 60 years experience, a meteorologist.
	I was the first weatherman on Good Morning America.
	I'm the man who founded the Weather Channel.
	And this is my accomplishment.
	Broadcast meteorologist of the year from the American Meteorological Society, of which I was a professional member for many years.
	I finally quit the AMS when it became very clear to me that the politics had gotten in the way of the science and it was time to talk about something else.
	Now, did we have a winter or what in 2013-14?
	Oh man, did we ever!
	When I called for my brother in Ohio, his wife said he wasn't coming in from shoveling the snow to talk to some guy in California.
	Oh man, how could you tout global warming when it was the coldest, snowiest, bitterest winter in 30 years, which it was across the United States?
	And it would take a lot of gall to put out a statement as our NOAA, the National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Agency did, claiming that 2013 was the warmest year.
	I mean, it's sheer silliness.
	It is manipulation of the data.
	I have studied the issues carefully and completely, as a good scientist can, and reached an absolute firm conclusion that there is no global warming.
	Alright, so that's a little bit of his background, and he's for real, this guy.
	A known nut!
	Yeah.
	And he takes us back to 1957, actually the mid-50s, Roger Revell, who was at the Scripps Institute, that's in California.
	And he really built this thing up because he was studying the oceans.
	He really built this thing up into an interesting little research facility, and he wanted to have the University of California, San Diego chancellorship, and he really wanted to put all this together, and somehow that didn't happen.
	But he did this paper on CO2 in 1957, and the paper determined that carbon dioxide was a greenhouse gas.
	When he didn't get the chancellorship, he was pissed off and went to Massachusetts and went to Harvard.
	And this is really where the story of how global warming, this scam, these $22 billion that's being spent today, American tax dollars, how that came to be.
	And the first thing we do with John Coleman here is he's going to talk about the data as he sees it.
	He's probably that one lone meteorologist, and he is a meteorologist.
	And he's going to tell you very clearly about the real temperature as he sees it.
	And he's actually tweeted this to all of the usual suspects.
	Absolutely.
	That's why I sent out this tweet today.
	This tweet went out to Al Gore.
	It went out to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change of the United Nations, to the Sierra Club, to the Democratic Party National Committee.
	And what it said is, where is your so-called global warming?
	Because if you chart the temperatures, you can go back into the 70s and come up to today, and there's almost no warming.
	I mean, less than one degree warming since 1978.
	And absolutely no warming since 1998.
	What kind of deal is that?
	I love this guy.
	Well, I'll tell you what kind of deal it is.
	It's the kind of deal that's full of silliness if you're promoting climate change and global warming.
	We are in one of the most stable and beautiful periods of Earth's climate you could hope for.
	And look at the stark contrast between the spaghetti of the many models of atmospheric warming created by various people who have gotten Tens of millions of dollars of federal grant money and works for the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
	And there's the average of all their models.
	And then here's the real temperatures as measured both on Earth and with our satellites.
	And folks, it's just not happening.
	I love the fact that he says measured, by the way, which I learned from you.
	So he, in 67, goes to Harvard and has a, and he still has, now he has this paper about CO2, and he's saying, hey, you know, this is a greenhouse gas, this could cause some warming.
	So he's on the warming side, this is Roger Revell.
	One of his students, can you guess who his student was?
	James Hansen.
	Wrong.
	Al Gore.
	Oh!
	That first year, one of his students was this young man, Al Gore.
	The only science class Al Gore ever took.
	Revelle didn't remember having him in class.
	But, oh, Al Gore, who got a D in the course, was highly impressed.
	He got a D? He got a D. In his one science course?
	Uh-huh.
	Oh, brother.
	Son of a politician out of Tennessee, and he used what he learned there...
	To start his global warming campaign, he wrote a book called Earth and the Balance.
	He ran for the U.S. Senate.
	He claimed that the earth was being challenged by our burning of fossil fuels, and he got him elected to the U.S. Senate.
	And there in the Senate, he conducted hearings, bringing in scientists and spreading the scare of global warming.
	And that's when the money began to flow from the government to research.
	And this was the booby trap.
	The booby trap, John.
	Once billions of dollars of government funding was going out to these organizations and universities and research groups across the nation, and they had to back that global warming claim that Al Gore was promoting.
	With their research, the research began to pile up.
	And if you were a young scientist, you didn't have a choice.
	You couldn't put out a research paper and say, oh, what warming?
	You'd be out of a job.
	You'd lose your job, your car, your family.
	You'd be walking on the streets.
	This is really important stuff.
	People need to...
	I'm so happy this guy is doing it.
	You've got to respect...
	He's, I think, 83 or 84.
	You've got to respect what he's doing here and what he's saying, because this is truly, and we have been very consistent about this.
	I didn't know the Al Gore thing that he was, you know, his student.
	So every piece of information that comes out is more, more, it's more indicting or whatever, just a word I'm looking for, but yeah.
	More condemning, more damning.
	More damning.
	Everything that comes out is more damning and it just never ends.
	So now we have to add a new person to the mix.
	By the way, I do, it's disconcerting how some people, very few of it, I mean, Chris Hedges, Ralph Nair, these guys have probably never taken a science course in their life either.
	And it just astonishes me.
	How everybody gets on board, but they're not doing any common sense thinking.
	It's just, I don't know, this whole thing is very depressing.
	So I think this little thing, and we're past the halfway mark, is good because it's one thing to say, oh, it's bullcrap, but now you have the story in your head and you can say, hey, it was the guy at Scripps, he did this paper, he went to Harvard, Al Gore saw that, wrote the book, and then Al Gore bumped into Maurice Strong.
	No, you had to support it.
	Al Gore had taken Ravel and Seuss's research paper and used it to start the global warming campaign.
	And what did Al Gore say?
	He said, this is Roger Ravel.
	He was my mentor.
	He's my hero.
	He's the man who spread the alarm.
	Well, there was another man that picked that up.
	This man, Maurice Strong.
	Maurice had become a bureaucrat at the United Nations.
	And in 1972, he had a conference in Stockholm on the environment.
	And his whole goal was one world government.
	And he used that...
	The impetus of that global warming scare at that South Home conference to start the initiative that set up the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
	So now we had the U.S. government and the United Nations both promoting climate change.
	And it all came from that Revelle, Seuss paper and the research that followed and the dollars that were now flowing.
	And man, it was underway big time.
	A bonanza.
	And you'll recall that Maurice Strong, with Albert Gore, started the Chicago Carbon Exchange, which it failed because they haven't been able to price it properly.
	And this was their plan from the beginning.
	1972.
	1972.
	Let's get this going.
	Let's do cap and trade.
	We'll have the carbon exchange.
	And when you are the stock exchange, there's money.
	You get a piece of the action.
	Whether people are winning or losing, you make money consistently.
	Yeah, it's like owning a casino.
	Now, the IPCC, this is where we're going to get into the simple fact that consensus is not science and science is not consensus.
	Consensus is politics.
	Voting is not science.
	You don't vote on science.
	And the IPCC was a bonanza.
	So the IPCC, it had scientists and bureaucrats and politicians from throughout the world.
	It had the World Wildlife Federation, the Sierra Club, all the environmentalists, and they all got together and they voted that global warming was for real.
	Hear that?
	They voted.
	They voted global warming's for real.
	99% voted.
	I gotta tell you something.
	You don't settle science by a vote.
	It's not a political issue.
	It's not a vote.
	It's science.
	But never mind.
	They put out their reports.
	I think this is a good way to rebut that, by the way.
	Really?
	99%?
	Do they have a vote?
	Oh, science is now voting?
	Is that how we do it?
	You'll still lose because we don't have, you know, you're fighting $20 billion.
	And they spent a lot of time telling us how we were destroying planet Earth.
	And they had fancy meetings in tropical locations.
	This is not to be undersold, by the way.
	Fancy meetings in tropical locations all around the world.
	About the world.
	And the scientists who supported global warming got the paid vacation trips to these big meetings and got to write these books and have their names and their careers.
	And man, it was a big deal.
	And what did Al Gore do?
	Well, he wrote a second book about global warming called...
	An inconvenient truth.
	We all know what became of that.
	So now I skipped over a whole bunch of parts which are very important.
	But essentially, Roger Revelle then rescinds.
	And he says, hold on a second.
	I've gone back, looked at the data.
	We've got to be very careful with this.
	You can't be so alarmist because there's no evidence that this greenhouse gas is causing global warming.
	And he did a famous interview in Cosmos magazine where he said this, and this is where everybody flipped.
	Everybody turned on him, including Gore, and then once he died, which is unfortunate, then the foundation, his family turned...
	It turned on him and wound up actually giving Gore the first ever Roger Revelle award for climate change.
	His own family.
	And this guy was writing letters to congressmen and senators and the president saying, stop, stop, stop.
	I was wrong.
	My paper was wrong.
	It certainly wasn't saying this.
	It's not going to destroy the earth.
	Stop!
	My own personal belief is that we should wait another 10 to 20 years to really be convinced that the greenhouse is going to be important for human beings in both positive and negative ways.
	So there it was.
	The man who had started the global warming campaign had put up the flag of warning.
	Hey folks!
	This may not be for real.
	Caution!
	Caution!
	Well, he even wrote an article that was published in a new science magazine called Cosmos.
	And he teamed with a professor, Fred Singer, to write that article.
	And that article was called, What to Do About Greenhouse Warming?
	Look Before You Leap.
	And the article concluded, and I quote, The scientific basis for a greenhouse warming is too uncertain to justify drastic action at this time.
	The man who had started it?
	Well, how did Al Gore react to that?
	Well, he said, I've made up my mind.
	Ravel is now senile.
	Pay no attention to that.
	The debate is over.
	And you've been hearing that now for 20 years.
	Al Gore won't debate anybody.
	And he claims it's for real.
	He literally turned on his mentor, the guy he said, oh, he's senile now.
	He's an old coot.
	Senile.
	Senile.
	Science is in.
	Debate is over.
	So that is the story of how global warming came to be today.
	Those are the players.
	Roger Revelle, Murray Strong, Albert Gore.
	And to wrap it up, I like this part the best.
	Our friend here, John Coleman, is going to tell you what we can do about this.
	What would you say we can do about this, John?
	Not a damn thing.
	Now, what's going to defeat this global warming scare...
	I don't think we...
	It's like David and Goliath.
	I don't think we can defeat $4.7 billion, the Democrat Party, the United Nations, and the Sierra Club, and the Wildlife Federation, and all of them.
	They just claim that we're deniers and old goats.
	Old goats!
	They think we're bought and paid for by the big oil companies, which we are not.
	Don't have anything to do with them.
	But I don't think we can defeat them.
	You know what's going to defeat them?
	Time.
	A few more bitterly cold winters, a turn toward a colder climate.
	When the global warming fails to materialize in time, people will begin to believe.
	And I have noted that a recent Gallup poll shows that more and more people are saying global warming, that's not the big deal.
	We've got a lot of big deals going on.
	The list of their concerns is very interesting.
	Those are on it.
	But global warming is down toward the bottom of the list.
	There you go.
	Time.
	Yeah, I've always felt that way.
	I think it's good because it keeps us, the two of us and the show and our producers and listening audience and everybody in between the Knights and the Dames, it keeps us in a kind of a state of...
	I would have to say enlightenment.
	Because if you understand some of these mechanisms and what's going on and you take this side that Coleman takes and that approach, I think it makes you a better person.
	It makes you less nervous about we're all going to die.
	I mean, that one thing you played with, that one guy, he says, we're all going to die.
	Yeah.
	That's what Chris Hedges said.
	Yeah.
	We're all going to die.
	The human race is through.
	Yeah.
	Uh-huh.
	What does he know about this?
	So it's very important.
	She's got her big eyes, those big cow eyes.
	Cow eyes.
	I think doe eyes.
	She's got big doe eyes looking at the camera.
	Oh, we're all going to die.
	We're all going to die.
	Maybe it's just some trick to get laid.
	We're all going to die.
	Let's get laid.
	Well, no, that's not a bad idea.
	I think I can flip-flop from time to time.
	Hey, baby, let's try this thing out because we're going to die anyway.
	We're going to die from global warming, man.
	We might as well try this.
	Hey, I have an idea.
	Let me put it here.
	We're going to die anyway.
	We're all going to die.
	So I applaud John Coleman for putting out that video.
	Yeah, old goat.
	A good old goat.
	And, of course, that's in the show notes.
	You can find that at 600, 600.nashownotes.com or noagendanotes.com.
	And you can send that all you want to people.
	They won't watch it.
	They'll be like, who's this old goat?
	Who's this coot?
	But when you know, and I agree with you, John, when you know in your heart how this worked, That this opportunist from Tennessee saw his plan and went, hey, I can...
	And this is how he became senator and, you know...
	Almost president.
	Almost president, that's sure.
	And, you know, it's a huge scam.
	And it's a good one.
	You know, that's a beauty.
	I think it's a great scam.
	It's worked very well.
	Now, just to finish, because this thing is coming out in April, when you see this, James Cameron, I mean, the man made Titanic come back alive.
	I mean, that looked pretty damn real.
	Oh, you know, Cameron is dangerously good.
	So whatever you...
	And I just look at that trailer.
	There are so many...
	With television, I've learned a few tricks.
	But you can have, you know, 12 frames of something, and it really irks people's brains that it makes you feel bad and you're worried.
	And yeah, exactly.
	I'm going to die.
	We're all going to die.
	It's all over.
	We're going to die.
	We're going to die.
	But the bottom line is, already, only in the United States of Gitmo Nation, I'm not talking about the EU's, $22 billion last year was spent.
	Did it fix anything?
	No.
	It was really just research and tax breaks and money for battery-powered things.
	I didn't get any battery car.
	I didn't get anything for free.
	I didn't get any tax break.
	So you think about that, and then you know, and then you can feel good, and you can sleep well at night, that we all, well, we're not going to die from global warming, but here's Adam Curry's secret.
	Nobody gets out alive.
	I wanted to play one last little clip, a short one at the end, which is just to show you the kind of, you know, scientists are very dedicated is the meme.
	We have a piece of an episode from Grimm, which is about people who transform into various kinds of monsters.
	It's a very good show, actually, based on a thought about Grimm's fairy tales actually being true stories.
	Which is why it's called Grimm.
	And this was just a scene in the movie where some maniac is wrecking the place.
	And this is a little piece of propaganda to make you think that scientists are really this, really, really this dedicated.
	Do you have any idea who this man is?
	Yes, we have.
	It appears their agenda is political.
	Well, I don't care what their agenda is.
	This is science.
	I won't be scared into not doing my research.
	This man is not your normal radical.
	What did he say at the end?
	He's not your normal radical.
	Shut up already!
	Science!
	The science is in!
	The science is in!
	Science!
	Alrighty.
	And that wraps up another episode of the best podcast in the universe.
	600 episodes in the can.
	You did it!
	I know.
	I want to thank Mark Pugner for all of his work on promoting the No Agenda show.
	And a reminder that we will return on Thursday with episode 601.
	There will be more to discuss because we are medicine for today's media sickness.
	I came out almost right.
	We are the medicine...
	You should write that one down.
	We're the medicine for your media ailments, no?
	We're the medicine...
	Well, we're something like that.
	You're making it worse.
	Guardians of reality, that's for sure.
	Well, that's for sure.
	Yeah, that was good.
	I agree that...
	I have to look at that whole thing, because this guy's been around talking about...
	He talked about a lot of the numbers.
	It's just...
	The guy's great.
	And the global warming thing is annoying.
	Hey, John, thank you.
	600 episodes.
	It's been fun.
	I like it.
	Well, thank you, Adam Curry.
	Thanks to all the ships at sea.
	Oh, I'm sorry.
	Coming to you from FEMA Region 6 here in Austin, Texas.
	In the morning, everybody, I'm Adam Curry.
	And from northern Silicon Valley, where it seems to be extra warm today.
	And we're in a drought.
	Climate change is to blame.
	I'm John C. Dvorak.
	We'll talk to you on Thursday.
	Right here, on No Agenda.
	Why?
	Because donating is us.
	Don't eat me, Hillary Clinton!

▲