Ep. 1699 - BODYCAM: Another Violent Attack From An Immigrant Proves We Need Denaturalization
Today on the Matt Walsh Show, after another violent attack by an Afghan "refugee," Donald Trump says that we will cut off immigration from the third world and start denaturalizing immigrants who aren't loyal to this country. It's way past time to do that. And today I'll explain exactly how this can be done. Also, Senator Mark Kelly condemns the military strikes on drug boats. But those strikes are far more legitimate than anything he was involved in during his time in the military. Plus, Representative Jasmine Crockett claims that white supremacists commit crimes at a higher rate than immigrants.
Ep.1699
- - -
Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://bit.ly/4bEQDy6
- - -
Today's Sponsors:
Mizzen + Main - Get 20% off your first purchase by using code WALSH20 at checkout on https://MizzenandMain.com
STASH - Go to https//get.stash.com/WALSH to see how you can receive $25 towards your first stock purchase and to view important disclosures.
Priority Tax Relief - Book your free consultation at http://prioritytaxrelief.com/walsh
Hallow - Get 3 months free at https://hallow.com/mattwalsh
- - -
DailyWire+:
Once a year, every year, we give you our best deal of the year. And it’s happening right now. DailyWire+ memberships are 50% off. https://getdwplus.com/blackfridayMATTYT
Finally, Friendly Fire is here! No moderator, no safe words. Now available at https://www.dailywire.com/show/friendly-fire
Get your Matt Walsh flannel here: https://bit.ly/3EbNwyj
- - -
Socials:
Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3Rv1VeF
Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3KZC3oA
Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eBKjiA
Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3RQp4rs
- - -
Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
AI agents are everywhere, automating tasks and making decisions at machine speed.
But agents make mistakes.
Just one rogue agent can do big damage before you even notice.
Rubrik Agent Cloud is the only platform that helps you monitor agents, set guardrails, and rewind mistakes so you can unleash agents, not risk.
Accelerate your AI transformation at rubric.com.
That's r-u-b-r-i-k.com.
Is your home's title still in your name?
With one forged document, scammers can steal your home title and equity.
But now you can protect yourself.
Home Title Locks at Million Dollar Triple Lock Protection provides 24-7 title monitoring, urgent alerts to changes, and if fraud happens, they'll spend up to a million dollars to fix it and restore your title.
Use promo code DailyWire at hometitleck.com for a free title history report, plus a free 14-day trial of their million-dollar triple lock protection.
Head over to home titlelock.com now with promo code dailywire to ensure your title is still in your name.
Today, the Matt Wall Show, after another violent attack by an Afghan quote-unquote refugee, Donald Trump says that we will cut off immigration from the third world and start denaturalizing immigrants who are not loyal to this country.
It's way past time to do that.
And today, I'll explain exactly how this can be done.
Also, Senator Mark Kelly condemns the military strikes on drug boats, but those strikes are far more legitimate than anything he was involved in during his time in the military.
Plus, Representative Jasmine Crockett claims that white supremacists commit crimes at a higher rate than immigrants.
Talk about all that and more today on The Matt Walsh Show.
This is it.
The biggest sale we do all year guaranteed.
Daily Wire Plus is half off for a limited time.
Get access to every show, movie, and the Penn Dragon cycle, Rise of the Merlin.
Go now to dailywire.com slash subscribe.
Most dress clothes are uncomfortable, high maintenance, and uncomfortable.
I already said that.
What's worse, too much time is spent ironing, dry cleaning, and tugging at stiff fabrics just to wear a few pieces for the day.
Thankfully, Mizen and Maine offers a solution.
I love my Mizen and Maine clothes.
The quality is great, but my favorite part is that it looks ready to wear after being cleaned.
And, you know, I don't walk around looking like some kind of hobo as I usually do.
Mizen in Maine makes classic menswear with performance fabrics, so looking sharp doesn't have to be a hassle.
They invented the performance fabric dress shirt over 10 years ago, and they've been perfecting it ever since with modern fabrics that really deliver their shirts and pants look refined and professional while simultaneously being stretchy, lightweight, moisture-wicking, and wrinkle-resistant.
So no matter what the day holds for you, you'll stay comfortable and confident.
Plus, everything's completely machine-washable, so no more ironing or dry cleaning runs, which save so much time with a busy schedule.
It's a timeless style that you can invest in once and enjoy for years, which is why thousands of guys swear by Mizen and Maine when they want to look great without all the hassle.
Right now, Mizin in Maine is offering our listeners 20% off your first purchase at mizen and maine.com promo code Walsh20.
That's Mizen spelled M-I-Z-Z-E-N and Maine M-A-I-N.com.
Promo code Walsh20 for 20% off, mizinmaine.com, promo code Walsh20.
And if you'd rather shop in person, you find Mizen in Maine stores in select states.
Fairfax, Virginia, a suburb of Washington, D.C., is one of the most reliably Democrat counties in the entire country.
More than 65% of residents voted for Kamala Harris in the last presidential election.
It's also a mostly white, affluent county where the median household income is well over $120,000 a year.
In Fairfax, to the extent you come across any local drama at all, it usually has to do with dismantling the school system in the name of diversity or how Donald Trump is being too mean to government workers or how delusional boys should be allowed to compete in girls' sports and use the girls' locker room.
So put another way, Fairfax is one of those places where Democrats congratulate each other for being far more civilized and far more rational and forward-thinking than their political opponents.
In Fairfax, they've rejected the bigotry of the Trump administration, the xenophobia, the racism, the horrific ableism that's involved in calling reporters retarded to their faces and so on.
Fairfax, unlike most of the country, is enlightened.
They don't simply want to help the marginalized.
They want to save their lives.
That's the prevailing attitude.
So it must have come as a great shock to the residents of Fairfax when on April 23rd, one marginalized member of their community, a 36-year-old man named Jamal Wally, declared during a traffic stop that was being conducted by Fairfax police officers that every white person in Fairfax is a complete and total moron for allowing him into the country.
And then when the police informed him that he would be receiving a speeding ticket, Jamal declared that in his estimation, the Taliban is far better than the government of Fairfax.
And then to make matters significantly worse, Jamal began shooting the police officers from inside his 1999 Toyota Corolla.
Now, this was a shooting, the attempted murder of several police officers in a county that overwhelmingly supports open borders and fake refugees that didn't receive any national attention at all.
Even in local media reports, the shooting was sanitized.
But in retrospect, it was one of the most significant stories of the year that no one talked about.
It's very clear that these officers who ultimately killed Jamal saved many innocent lives by doing so.
This was a terrorist attack waiting to happen.
So we'll start with the body camera footage.
And I want you, as you watch this, to also listen carefully to what is said.
So you, you brought me to this.
You people brought me to this country and I'm dying every single day and I have four children and we wholly survive because you're a vicious people.
Yeah, because I can't get a job.
I can't get a disability.
And they took my license because I'm not able to pay the insurance.
So why are you trying to kill me?
I'm not turning.
No, you are.
I'm already dying.
I don't give a damn.
You are not today.
So what I'm asking for is you to identify yourself.
You dumbass lion's wife, people.
You lied for 25 years.
All right, bravo, will you direct on that?
You brought me to this country.
I served with special forces.
I lost my own brother.
I lost my everything.
I have nothing.
I'm sorry to hear that.
No, you sorry to hear that?
No, no, no.
Don't play that.
I should have served with Taliban better than you.
I was concerned and a dumbass when I was concerned about Taliban, but in America.
So now you want to give me this?
Hey, don't you read that?
800 Bravo shots fired.
800 Bravo shots fired.
800 Bravo Signal 1.
So the direct quote, in case you missed it from the heavy accent, it was, you effing dumb white people, you brought me to this country.
And he also says, I should have served with the effing Taliban.
Now, those are quotes that, for obvious reasons, did not appear in any Virginia-based news outlets coverage of what happened.
That's because you have to imagine that, all things considered, this is not the quality of refugee that the residents of Fairfax imagined they were importing into this country when they voted for Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.
They didn't imagine that they were importing people who would literally say, you dumb effing white people, you brought me into this country before they start blasting.
After all, the refugees had supposedly fought alongside U.S. troops in Afghanistan.
And it's simply not possible that the refugees had no morals whatsoever, even if they had betrayed their own countrymen in exchange for a quick paycheck from the U.S.
I mean, we certainly shouldn't consider when we hear so much about the Afghans who helped the United States and how it's our obligation to bring them into the United States.
You know, we shouldn't consider the possibility that actually being an Afghan turncoat makes you, if anything, an even less trustworthy person and therefore even less qualified to become an American citizen.
No, we shouldn't say to ourselves, well, yeah, thanks for helping the U.S. government, I guess, but I mean, you turned coat because we paid you, so I don't want you here.
No, these refugees all must love America deep down.
They must be patriots.
They must strongly believe in freedom and the U.S. Constitution.
And on top of that, all these refugees were carefully vetted by the Biden administration.
The refugees had to certify that in their wildest dreams, they would never dream of waging jihad against Americans.
So what could have gone wrong here?
And how do we fix the problem that's been created throughout the entire country by people like the residents of Fairfax?
That's not a rhetorical question.
With every act of murderous violence by fake Afghan refugees, it's become clear that we need an answer to this question.
We have to reassess how we have allowed foreigners into this country, and we need to start removing the people who lied to us as part of that process.
Otherwise, many more innocent people will die and are dying.
Now, the day before Thanksgiving, as you've seen by now, two National Guard soldiers were shot in the streets of Washington, D.C. One of those soldiers is now dead.
The other is fighting for his life.
In addition to the ambush in Fairfax, this is just the latest act of terrorism by Afghans living in this country over the past year, but it's far from the only one.
We can't forget about the Election Day terror plot in Oklahoma, another planned attack in Texas that was foiled just the other day as well.
Watch.
Well, right here is the nearly 30 pages of federal court documents in them.
Prosecutors lay out a timeline of the two suspects' actions, how they supported ISIS, and a planned Election Day terrorist attack on U.S. soil.
On October 7th, Tahedi and the juvenile met with an FBI asset in rural Oklahoma to try and purchase two AK-47 assault rifles, 10 magazines, and 500 rounds of ammunition.
That's where the two were arrested.
They've always been a little strange.
While Tahedi lived in Oklahoma City, neighbors in Moore, where the juvenile suspect lived with his father, mother, and five siblings, say the family had never been friendly.
They've always been weird, but it's never been like called the police here.
DHS is confirming that an Afghan national was arrested Tuesday after posting a video of himself on TikTok indicating he was building a bomb with an intended target of the Fort Worth area.
Mohamed Dawood Alokazai is charged at the state level with making a terroristic threat.
According to DHS, listen to this.
He came to the United States as part of Operation Allies Welcome.
So here you have it.
This happened Tuesday.
So if you're keeping track at home, which you should be, this is multiple Terror attacks or planned attacks by Afghan quote-unquote refugees in the span of one year.
Now, it's clear that all these terror plots and attacks, particularly the attack on the National Guard soldiers in Washington, have led to a major shift in Donald Trump's priorities on immigration.
And we're not just talking about a shift on immigration involving Afghanistan.
We're talking about a shift involving other third world countries as well, including Somalia, one of the world's top exporters of dysfunction and violence and fraud to the United States.
On Thanksgiving Day, Trump posted a lengthy message that read in part: quote, this refugee burden is the leading cause of social dysfunction in America.
Hundreds of thousands of refugees from Somalia are completely taking over the once great state of Minnesota.
The seriously retarded governor of Minnesota, Tim Walz, does nothing.
I will permanently pause immigration from all third world countries to allow the U.S. system to fully recover, terminate all the millions of Biden illegal admissions, and remove anyone who is not a net asset to the U.S. or is incapable of loving our country, end all federal benefits and subsidies to non-citizens of our country, denaturalize migrants who undermine domestic tranquility, and deport any foreign national who is a public charge, security risk, or non-compatible with Western civilization.
Only reverse migration can fully cure this situation.
Now, in case there was any doubt about whether Trump himself wrote this tweet, although I think it's pretty clear, he was asked about it several times.
In every case, he doubled down on the language.
And it was very evident that on a personal level, he's furious and rightfully so.
Watch.
Just reported this year that there was thorough vetting by DHS and by the FBI of these Afghans who were brought into the U.S.
So why do you blame the Biden administration?
Because they let them in.
Are you stupid?
Are you a stupid person?
Because they came into on a plane along with thousands of other people that shouldn't be here.
And you're just asking questions because you're a stupid person.
And there's a law passed that it's almost impossible not to get them out.
You can't get them out once they come in.
In that same post, you mentioned Tim Walz, and you called him what many Americans do find in offensive war retarded.
Do you stand by that claim of calling Tim Walz retarded?
Yeah, I think there's something wrong with him.
Absolutely.
Sure.
Do you have a problem with the president?
You know what?
I think there's something wrong with him.
Anybody that would do what he did, anybody that would allow those people into his state and pay billions of dollars out to Somalia, we give billions of dollars to Somalia.
It's not even a country because it doesn't function like a country.
It's got a name, but it doesn't function like a country.
Yeah, there's something wrong with Walls.
Well, he's right about that, about all of it, including Walls being retarded.
But this is the president's chance to reverse the trajectory that the Republican Party is on.
If he actually delivers on what he's promising to do, if in addition to stopping migration from the third world, he begins denaturalizing foreigners who have lied their way into the country, then the lives of millions of Americans will be clearly, markedly improved in every way.
And therefore, millions of Americans will have a reason to vote for Republicans in next year's elections, which at the moment they don't really have.
So how would mass denaturalization work exactly?
So the first thing you need to know about denaturalizing a foreign national is that in recent history, it's been extremely rare.
During Trump's first term, only around 168 denaturalization cases were filed in federal courts.
During Biden's term, the number was even lower at just 64.
But that doesn't mean that mass denaturalization has never happened before.
By some estimates during the Great Depression, the United States constructively denaturalized, as they put it at the time, meaning kicked out of the country, more than a million American citizens, most of whom were born to first-generation Mexican immigrants.
So no process was followed for the most part.
No legal scholar, quote unquote, will defend any of that.
But as a factual matter, it did happen.
They had to go back to Mexico at a time of extreme crisis in this country where jobs were scarce.
People with genuine ties to this country, Americans born to American citizens, forcibly removed people without those ties.
Now, what's changed since the Great Depression is that through a series of laws and court cases, the process of denaturalization has become very well defined and much more challenging for the government to actually implement.
Essentially, the government has to demonstrate that the naturalized citizen had lied in some significant way during his application for citizenship.
And there are other ways too, like showing the citizen has joined the Communist Party or a terror group, but that's the main one.
So this is a high standard, but it's not insurmountable at all.
We can certainly find more than 168 Somalis in Minnesota alone who would qualify easily under this standard.
These are foreigners who, as part of their citizenship application, pledged loyalty to the United States and only the United States.
They also certified that they were not involved in fraudulent marriages or anything like that.
And very often, these Somalis were lying.
Here's Joseph Edlow, the director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and here's what he has to say about it.
Watch.
Since September 19th, officers from our Fraud Detection and National Security Directorate working in teams have conducted over a thousand site visits across the Minneapolis-St. Paul area as part of this operation.
What they found should shock all of America.
Focusing on a list of over a thousand target cases involving more than 900 individuals, our officers encountered blatant marriage fraud, visa overstays, people claiming to work at businesses that can't be found, forged documents, abuse of the H-1B visa system, abuse of the F-1 visas, and many other discrepancies.
Over the course of the operation, our officers found indication of fraud, non-compliance, or public safety and national security concerns in nearly a little less than 50% of the cases interviewed.
You're aware of the CHNV, the parole programs that the previous administration was involved in, bringing people in.
People here were allowed to sponsor individuals to come in from certain countries.
As I said, we found organizations here that were involved in sponsoring many, many individuals.
They did not know necessarily the individuals they were sponsoring.
They were doing almost a blanket sponsorship.
That is fraud.
That's something that should have been caught.
It's something that I know the previous administration was aware of how the sponsorships were happening, and no action was taken.
I'm glad to see that we're taking action.
So this rampant fraud, we can assume, is one reason why the Trump DOJ in June of this year issued a memo stating that the Civil Rights Division should prioritize, quote, the denaturalization of naturalized U.S. citizens.
The administration is aware of the extent of the problem, and now it's time to do something about it.
And we need to go way, way beyond the easy cases where there's forged documentation or fake marriages.
Obviously, they should be kicked out of the country, but it needs to go beyond that.
And here's one way to go about that.
Let's say a Somali comes to this country, becomes a naturalized citizen, and immediately begins defrauding us.
Maybe they go to Medicaid and file a fraudulent autism claim to their child, which is something that virtually every Somali seems to do, which is why, as we discussed last week, Medicaid claims for autism in Minnesota grew from $3 million in 2018 to $400 million in 2023, five years later.
It's all fake.
Now, in this case, the Somali should lose his citizenship.
He clearly came to this country to rob us.
He lied on his immigration form, assuming he didn't tell us that when he came.
Hey, why did you come to the country?
Well, I came to rob you.
We're going to assume he didn't say that.
So he lied.
He lied to immigration officers, and therefore he has forfeited his right to live in this country.
You know, imagine if you invite a house guest over, someone who you just met at work or something.
He tells you he's, you know, really happy to be here, looking forward to dinner.
And then when he's gone, you realize that he's stolen your wallet and your television and your computer and your couch, hauled them all away in a U-Haul truck driven by his friends while you were in the bathroom or something.
Now, in that case, you'd obviously conclude that, in fact, this house guest was lying about looking forward to dinner.
He was lying about being your friend.
And it goes without saying that you would never let him back in your house ever again.
I mean, that's common sense.
It's so obvious it doesn't need any explanation.
Our immigration policy needs to work the same way.
And once these Somalis are deported, government officials in Minnesota need to go to prison.
Here's an extraordinary message that was posted over the weekend from a social media account claiming to represent over 480 current staff of the Minnesota Department of Human Services.
And here's what they wrote: quote: Tim Walz is 100% responsible for massive fraud in Minnesota.
We let Tim Walz know of fraud early on, hoping for a partnership and stopping fraud.
But no, we got the exact opposite response.
Tim Walz systematically retaliated against whistleblowers using monitoring threats repression and did his best to discredit fraud reports.
Instead of partnership, we got the full weight of retaliation by Tim Walz, certain DFL members, and an indifferent mainstream media.
In addition to retaliating against whistleblowers, Tim Walz disempowered the office of the legislative auditor, allowing agencies to disregard their audit findings and guidance.
As staff, we firsthand witnessed and observed fraud happening, yet were shut down, reassigned, and told to keep quiet.
Sometimes more.
Leadership did not want to appear to discriminate against certain communities and were unwilling to take action, such as stopping fraud, that would have an adverse impact on their image.
Now, to be clear about this, by all accounts, this post appears to be genuine.
And in a second, we'll get into reasons why it appears to be genuine.
But at the same time, it needs to be said that even if nothing in this post is true, Tim Walz should still be put on trial.
It's beyond dispute at this point that he allowed massive fraud to take place.
We know that.
The only question is whether he deliberately allowed it or whether he's so criminally incompetent that somehow he didn't notice that hundreds of millions of dollars were being stolen from the taxpayers every year.
Well, neither option is good for Tim Walz.
And the truth, as that post states, does appear to be that as a matter of state policy, the administration of Tim Walz effectively endorsed this fraud.
This is from the New York Times, a paper that obviously is not in the business of hitting Democrats most of the time.
But in this case, the allegations are so devastating and so obviously true that they have no choice.
They want to eliminate Tim Walz politically because he's become a liability.
So here's what they reported.
This again is from the New York Times.
Over the last five years, law enforcement officials say fraud took root in pockets of Minnesota's Somali diaspora as scores of individuals made small fortunes by setting up companies that build state agencies for millions of dollars worth of social services that were never provided.
Federal prosecutors say that 59 people have been convicted in those schemes so far and that more than a billion dollars in taxpayers' money has been stolen in three plots that they are investigating.
That is more than Minnesota spends annually to run its Department of Corrections.
Yes, that's more than a billion dollars in taxpayer money.
Scammed by Somalis who shouldn't be here in the first place.
And the link to Walls is clear.
Continuing with the article, quote, in one case, hundreds of providers were reimbursed for assistance they claimed to have provided to people at risk for homelessness through federal, though federal authorities said services were not provided.
The program's annual costs ballooned to more than $104 million last year, the authority said, from a budgeted projection of $2.6 million when it began in 2020.
In another program aimed to provide therapy for autistic children, prosecutors said that providers recruited children in Minneapolis' Somali community, falsely certifying them as qualifying for autism treatment and paying their parents kickbacks for their cooperation.
Prosecutors have so far charged one provider, Asha Faran Hassan, 29, with wire fraud.
Ryan Pakyaga, who also has represented other defendants in the fraud cases, said that some involved became convinced that state agencies were tolerating, if not tacitly allowing the fraud.
No one was doing anything about the red flags, he said.
It was like someone was stealing money from the cookie jar and they kept refilling it.
Yes, just one autism treatment provider has been charged with, you know, in quotes, of course, has been charged with wire fraud after hundreds of millions of dollars were stolen from the program.
Just one.
That's why Somalis are so brazen about committing these crimes.
They know that in all likelihood, they won't get caught.
The feds will catch maybe one or two people while tens of thousands of fraudsters get away with it.
Now, if you were watching the Sunday shows over the weekend, you probably saw how on various shows the suggestion was made that not all Somalis are like this.
Tim Walz, for example, said something along the lines of, you know, it's wrong to blame an entire community for the actions of a few.
That was the gist of what he said.
But actually, in this case, it's completely appropriate to blame the entire Somali community for what's happening in places like Minnesota.
Yeah, we can blame all of them.
They're committing a massive fraud.
We're talking about, again, well over a billion dollars in just a few years in one state.
And this is unlike any other foreign fraud in American history.
It's a fraud that is only possible with the support of a very large number of people.
It's a fraud that's consistent with how Somalis destroyed their own country.
It's a fraud that's being committed by the same Somali community that just a few months ago rallied in support of a Somali degenerate who sexually assaulted a child.
As you remember, they sent letters to the judge defending the child predator.
In fact, the Somali community also threatened the mother of the victim after she cooperated with authorities.
So that's the Somali community that we are told by Tim Walz only has one or two bad apples.
Well, actually, no.
Okay, the reality is that the vast majority of Somalis and Afghans in this country simply don't have the IQ or the culture or frankly the morals to be good apples.
And until we're capable of recognizing that and until we begin removing these people from our country, whether they're citizens or not, they will continue to rob us, assault us, and murder us in the streets.
That behavior is inconsistent with civilization.
It's also, in many cases, inconsistent with the claims they made when they first entered this country to obtain citizenship.
And for that reason, there's only one viable solution.
The Trump administration must begin the largest denaturalization campaign in the history of this country.
Look through their social media feeds.
Identify everybody involved in these fraudulent charities and nonprofits.
Collect a very large list of names of foreigners who openly despise this country and feel no loyalty to it.
And then lawfully and promptly, get rid of every single one of them.
Now let's get to our five headlines.
This podcast is brought to you in part by Stash.
It's never too late to start investing your money, but it can feel like a guessing game and you might not know where to start.
But with Stash, you can grow with confidence no matter the market.
Stash isn't just another investing app.
It's a registered investment advisor that combines automated investing with expert guidance.
So you don't have to worry about figuring it out on your own.
You can choose from personalized investments or let Stash's award-winning smart portfolio do the work for you.
With Stash, investing doesn't feel like gambling.
It's simple, smart, and stress-free.
So your money can finally start working as hard as you do.
Get access to world-class financial advice with personalized guidance for just $3 a month.
Don't let your money sit around.
Put it to work.
With Stash, go to get.stash.com slash Walsh to see how you could receive $25 towards your first stock purchase.
And to view important disclosures, that's get.stash.com slash Walsh.
Paid non-client endorsement, not representative of all clients and not a guarantee investment advisory services offered by Stash Investments, LLC, an SEC registered investment advisor.
Investing involves risk.
Offer is subject to TNCs.
This episode is sponsored by Priority Tax Relief.
Are you overwhelmed by constantly worrying about your back tax debt?
If you owe more than $5,000, then you're officially on the IRS's radar, but you can protect yourself today.
Go to prioritytaxrelief.com slash walsh.
Whether you hit a rough patch, fall behind on filing, pulled money from a 401k or ran into another burden, priority tax relief has you covered.
Priority tax relief is a team of highly qualified tax professionals who deal with the IRS directly to find a solution that saves you time, stress, and most importantly, money.
They've negotiated thousands of successful cases that have saved millions of dollars for clients, which is great because what hardworking American doesn't want to be free of debt and start moving forward.
Plus, the IRS has brought back some pretty aggressive collection tactics.
We're talking wage garnishments, bank levies, even going after your home, your car, your retirement accounts.
Priority tax relief can step in before it's too late.
Listeners who owed $25,000, even $50,000, were able to get their debts reduced to a fraction of that.
Some even had their debts fully erased.
They act fast and they guide you through the entire process.
So you always know what's happening.
So if you received collection letters and you're constantly worrying about your tax debt, don't wait.
Book your free consultation at prioritytaxrelief.com slash walsh.
That's prioritytaxrelief.com slash walsh.
All right, hope you had a great Thanksgiving.
Thanksgiving is one of my favorite holidays because it's an American holiday.
It's centered around food.
There's no gift giving or receiving involved, which I like.
I would prefer if we abolished all gift-giving occasions for adults.
Kids should get presents, but as an adult, there really is no point in exchanging presents with adults who could just go out and buy whatever you're giving them if they really wanted it.
So I've been saying this forever.
I've been trying to rally people towards this cause to no avail.
But that's why it's funny whenever I open a gift and the person who gave it to me is like, oh, you don't already have that, do you?
And it's like, no, I don't already have it.
But if I wanted it, then I would already have it.
That's the thing.
So I don't already have it because I just don't want this thing.
If I did want it, I would just buy it.
So, you know, I think that's why I like Thanksgiving.
There's no gifts, you just eat.
And we had a pretty great Thanksgiving.
I strained my hamstring pretty severely playing football, chasing my son down.
He was in the other team and took a bad angle in the pursuit.
Didn't even make the play.
He scored the touchdown, pulled up with a hamstring injury.
My son, of course, had no sympathy whatsoever.
He was just gloating about scoring the touchdown, which I get, which I get.
I mean, I would have done the same thing in his shoes.
And Apple didn't fall far from the tree.
So I'm getting old is the lesson.
Pulling your hamstring, playing pickup football is like the classic old guy thing.
And that's where I am now, which is fine, which is fine.
I want to start with, well, this is related to, I almost mentioned this in the opening, but it's not exactly national news, but it very much relates to the topic at hand.
So this is a viral clip from the whatever podcast and plays right into what we were talking about, like denaturalizing.
What would that look like?
Okay, if we were going to start a campaign of mass denaturalization, not just mass deportation, which we also need and we don't have right now, but also mass denaturalization, what would that look like?
And how do you identify the people who should be denaturalized?
If they lied on their application when they came here, how do we know?
Well, fortunately, if we're going to pursue this, many of these people, you know, they don't hide it.
They don't hide the fact that they lied.
And so here's a clip that I think kind of makes that point.
Watch.
Let's say the United States went to war with Colombia.
Who do you side with?
Colombia.
Get the f out of our country.
Holy.
Why do you side with Colombia?
Because I'm from Colombia.
You've lived here for 10 years and you're now a citizen.
Okay, still, that doesn't mean I'm not going to like cyber.
You have no, okay, I'm looking this up.
Yes, becoming a citizen requires taking the oath, the oath of allegiance.
By taking the oath, you pledge to renounce any foreign allegiance, support and defend the U.S. Constitution and laws, and perform service to the country when required by law.
You do not become a citizen until you have completed the oath ceremony and received your certificate of naturalization.
Did you receive your certificate of naturalization?
Yes.
Did you complete the oath ceremony?
Yes.
So you're a liar?
Do you remember this?
Here, read that again.
I do solemnly swear that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure.
I don't even know what the that means.
All allegiance, Colombia, and fidelity to any foreign prince or the potentate.
Is that a fruit?
What the f is that?
It's like a pomegranate and a potato.
State or sovereignty.
Did you say that shit?
Yeah.
So you didn't, you lied to get into the United States, bro.
You have allegiance to Colombia.
Isn't that allegiance?
Originally, you said Colombia.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Yeah, we'll switch to Diane to that answer.
Okay, so first of all, this is an easy call because anybody who has face tattoos should be deported anyway.
I don't care if your family came here in 1655.
If you have face tattoos, you should really lose your, certainly lose your right to vote, but also you shouldn't be a citizen anymore.
But second, this woman obviously needs to be denaturalized and kicked out of the country.
She lied on her application.
She lied when she took the oath.
She committed fraud.
And this is a clear-cut case.
It's what we talked about in the opening.
We need to actually go do it.
If we're going to start denaturalizing, this would be a good place to start.
Trump administration, that woman shouldn't be hard to find.
Go find her and denaturalize her and kick her out of the country.
That's the other thing, too, is that if you're going to say stuff like this, then you have to go do it.
You might as well go do it because you're going to get blamed for it anyway.
Now that you've said this, if you're the Trump administration, now that you've talked about denaturalizing citizens and kicking them out of the country, well, as far as the left's concerned, you've already done it.
And so they're going to hang that around your neck anyway, which, okay, like I'm not, this is, this is not an argument against doing it.
Quite the opposite.
What I'm saying is, okay, you've thrown down the gauntlet.
And so now whatever blowback you're going to get politically, you're going to get regardless because you said it.
So you have to do it, though.
You have to actually follow through.
If you say the thing and then don't do it, now it's the worst of all worlds because now you'll get the blowback for having done the thing, but you don't even get the results of having done it because you didn't do it.
And this has been one of the problems for Trump since even going back to his first term.
And I think they've done a lot of great things this second term, but you also have these things of like saying, okay, we're going to do this, we're going to do that, and then it doesn't happen.
But because you said it, you're going to get blamed anyway.
So don't say it unless you're actually going to do it.
You say you're going to stop all third world immigration.
Obviously, I'm a big fan.
I've been calling for that forever.
But you got to do it.
Denaturalizing citizens and kicking them out of the country.
That is, that is, in comparison to what, to the recent precedent, that's a radical step.
But we need radical steps.
So I'm all on board for it.
But you got to do it.
And so this is it.
And, you know, I think the problem is that, especially in recent history, we treat citizenship like it's a like it's a not guilty verdict in court or something.
You know, once you get the verdict, there's no going back.
That's double jeopardy.
So you could be found not guilty and then and then very clear evidence materializes after the fact showing that you actually did commit the crime.
Doesn't matter.
You were found not guilty.
You can't be tried again for the same crime.
And we seem to treat citizenship like that.
You know, someone becomes a citizen, and then it becomes very clear that they committed fraud, that they lied, that they're here for all the wrong reasons.
And our attitude is, well, they're a citizen.
Double jeopardy.
You can't take it back now.
No, you can take it back, actually.
You can.
There's a legal mechanism.
And we've always had that legal mechanism.
So citizenship is something you can lose.
And you should lose it.
There's a lot of, there are many people who have it now who should lose it.
And we should create an atmosphere where if you're an immigrant and you come here and you get to be a citizen and you're naturalized, where now you realize you have to walk a kind of a fine line and you have to mind your P's and Q's or you're gone.
It's not, oh, you get citizenship and now, oh, I'm home free.
No, it's okay.
You're a citizen now, but we made you a citizen and we can unmake it.
So you better get in line.
You know, you better go out there.
You better love this country, at least act like you do.
If you don't, fake it.
You better fake it.
Because if you don't, we're going to kick you out.
Because here's the other point about this video.
Most immigrants, the vast majority, feel exactly like face tattoo woman feels.
Notice how she says, well, I'm going to side with my country, which is Colombia.
So she's lived here for 10 years.
But when she says my country, she means Colombia, not the United States of America.
That's how she sees it.
In fact, she doesn't even really understand why he's asking the question.
She's confused by the question because it's so obvious.
When he says, well, would you side with Colombia or the United States?
It's not even as though she perceives this to be kind of a gotcha or she has to reveal some dark secret.
It's just like, oh, Colombia.
What do you mean?
Of course, Colombia.
It's my country.
Why are you even asking me that?
That's her attitude.
And here's the thing.
Which maybe it'll surprise you to hear me say this.
Although if you've been paying attention, it won't surprise you at all.
I respect it.
I respect that attitude.
When she's asked why she sides with Colombia, she says, because I'm from there.
That's what she says.
Why do you side with Colombia?
She doesn't say, oh, it's a great country or, you know, the GDP or the crime rate.
She doesn't mention any of that because that stuff is not good for Colombia.
But it's not about that.
She just says, well, I'm from there.
That's where I'm from.
Very matter of fact.
It's as simple as that.
It's like if you ask, if you were to ask her why she sides with her family, she would probably say, because it's my family.
Why do you side with your brother?
Why do you take your brother?
If you could take your brother's side or some other brother's side, someone else's brother's side in a conflict, whose side are you on?
Well, I'm on my brother's side.
Well, why are you on your brother's side?
Well, because he's my brother.
That's it.
It's not because he's a good person.
It's not because he's nice.
It's not because he's smart.
He might be those things or he might not be.
But I'm on his side because he's my brother.
That's it.
And that's the attitude that most people have instinctively.
If you ask me why I love my children, you know, if you were to say, why do you love your children?
I'm not going to say anything about their talents or their intelligence, how obedient they are or how well they do with their schoolwork or anything like that.
Now, I appreciate those things about them, but that's not why I love them.
If you ask me why I love my kids, I'm not going to mention any of that.
I think all my kids are really smart, but even if they weren't, I would still love them.
No, I love my children because they're my children.
That's the reason.
So if you say, Matt, why do you love your kids?
Because they're my kids.
What do you mean?
That's it.
That's why I love them.
And if you don't understand that, like if you actually need more of an explanation, then you're barely human.
Because any human should be, that should be all the explanation that you need.
And that's how it is, or how it should be with your homeland, with your country.
You love it and you side with it because it's yours.
It's where you're from.
Right?
Why do I side with America?
Why do I love America?
Why am I a patriot for America?
Because it's my country.
Because I'm from here.
Because I was born here and my parents were born here.
You know, because I have ancestors who fought in every war that America's ever been involved in.
That's the reason.
And you could look at all that and say, well, you know, that's just an accident of your birth.
It's got nothing to do with anything you've personally achieved.
What, you love America just because it's your home, just because you live there and your parents?
Yeah.
That's why.
I'm tied to this country by blood.
And blood is stronger than personal choice or personal achievement.
That's the truth.
That's a truth that almost everybody on the planet understands instinctively, which is how you have these people from third world crap holes who come here and their countries are a disaster and they still have pride in their country and they value it over ours.
And we as Americans, we often say, well, how could that be?
How could you still care about this country?
Look at what a disaster it is.
Well, the answer is, it's because it's their country.
It's because it's where their ancestors are from.
It's where their grandparents are buried.
That's why.
So, how could an immigrant who chooses to come here to a country that is objectively better than their homeland still feel a deeper tie to their homeland?
Well, again, I'll tell you how.
Because blood is stronger than personal choice.
Yeah, they chose to come here, but they are tied by blood to their country, to their homeland.
They were born there.
It's where their ancestors are buried.
They will always feel a greater loyalty to that place.
And like I said, I respect that.
I truly do.
I actually respect people who are from crappy countries, but still feel pride in that country.
You know, it's like loving your mother, even though she's an alcoholic crackhead or something.
If somebody says they love their mother and I know that their mother is a disaster of a person, I'm not going to say, well, what do you mean?
Look at her.
She's terrible.
Well, how could you love her?
No, look, you should still love her.
It's hard for me to feel any affinity towards her as an outsider.
She's not my mother.
So I can look at that and say, well, thank God that's not my mom.
But it is your mom and you should love her.
And so I respect that.
I understand that.
But that's why I say, well, you got to go back.
Nothing personal.
You know, I get where you're coming from, but you got to go back.
And these immigrants, they come here not because they love our country.
That's a small minority.
I'm not saying that there are some people who come here and they with American flags waving and they just really, really want to be an American.
And I'm not saying that never happens.
It obviously does happen, but I think that's a small minority.
I think the vast majority of people who come here, they care about their own country more and they always will.
They always will.
And even their children will.
And because why?
Because why do they actually come here?
For the most part, they come here not because, oh, I really want to be an American, not because I have any great desire to be an American per se.
They come here because it's an economic opportunity.
They see America as an economic zone, as a place that it will benefit them personally to come here.
And it will benefit their own countries that they actually care about, their real countries, because they're going to come here.
They're going to make more money.
They're going to send some of that money back to their homelands.
Or they're going to come here and defraud our system and rip off our taxpayers and send that money back.
And they're not going to care about it because they're going to say, like, this is, I don't care.
I'll defraud these people.
They're not even, these aren't even my people.
That's how most immigrants are.
In fact, you know, here's another clip I wanted to play briefly.
This is from an immigrant who's being profiled on the local news, whatever local news channel this is.
I'm not sure which one, talking about self-deportation.
So this is, okay, Colombia, actually, so another Colombian, and she's going to be self-deporting.
And just listen to this conversation with the reporter and the reason we hear why she came here in the first place.
And listen to what that reason is.
Here it is.
For three years, she's been raising her children on her own since January after her husband was deported.
She tells me she wanted to stay in the country longer and have better education for her kids.
Go Esantos says ICE agents contacted her over the phone and gave her an option to either be detained or self-deport.
She believes leaving is the best choice for her family.
She says, I don't want my kids to see someone come into the house with a gun or have them or her be handcuffed.
Goes Santos plans to make the most of her last few days she has here.
She still says she has plenty to be grateful for.
She's thankful to God, for her kids and family.
I asked her what she'll miss most about being here in the U.S. Last person.
The people, she tells me.
So this is another one from Colombia, been here for three years, does not speak a word of English.
And three years has not bothered to speak English.
And why is she here?
Well, she wants a better education for her kids.
She wants economic opportunity and education for her kids.
Which, again, I get it.
You love your kids.
You want them to have a better education.
And so you realize they're going to get a better education here than they would in Colombia.
Great.
I mean, not great.
Understandable.
I get it.
Because you're looking out for your kids.
But we have to look out for our own country and our own kids, which means you got to go.
That's it.
And she does not say anything about, she talks about the people.
That's nice.
But she doesn't say anything about, I love America.
I love this country.
I love what it, you know, whatever.
I respect its traditions and its history.
And it shouldn't say anything about any of that.
Almost none of these people would say anything like that if you asked them, why are you here?
Okay, you go up to any immigrant on the street and ask, why did you come here?
Almost none of them, not none, but almost none will say, oh, I just love America so much.
I just want to be a part of its traditions and its culture.
And you're not going to hear that.
You're going to hear, well, I can make more money here.
Yeah, I want my kids to go to a good school.
We don't have any good schools.
I come from our third world country.
We don't have any good schools.
They're going to say something like that.
And, you know, in a lot of ways, that's like the attitude they should have.
But that's also why they got to go.
You got to go home.
This is not your home.
And even you would admit that.
Okay.
It's like if we say to you, you got to go home and you know what we mean.
Because to you, when you hear go home, you don't think, oh, I got to go back to my, oh, you mean go home?
You mean go back to my house in Cincinnati, Ohio?
You don't think that.
You think, oh, when we say go home, you know we mean go to Columbia because you consider that to be your home.
Still.
So that's why you got to be there.
Breitbart reports, Sunday on CNN's State of the Union, Senator Mark Kelly claimed the Trump administration's first military strike on an alleged drug boat in the Caribbean was a war crime.
Host Dana Bash said, I want to turn to the new questions around the first U.S. military strike in September.
You sources tell CNN after the missile strike, the boat, there were survivors.
The second strike was launched to kill anyone that was left.
He was asked what he thinks about that.
And in fact, we have a little bit of the clip of this conversation, but he says that it's a Pete Hegseth is totally unqualified for the job and that this was an illegal strike.
He's one of these senators that's been out there encouraging the military to defy orders that are given to them, which is an act of insurrection.
So he's an insurrectionist.
But here's what he says.
Listen.
Based on what you, what CNN is reporting, what the Washington Post is reporting, do you believe if there was a second strike to eliminate any survivors, that that constitutes a war crime?
It seems to.
If that is true, if what has been reported is accurate, I've got serious concerns about anybody in that chain of command stepping over a line that they should never step over.
We are not Russia.
We're not Iraq.
We hold ourselves to a very high standard of professionalism.
And this is where I'm really troubled about this is because I have so much respect for people in the United States Navy.
I served in the Navy for 25 years, and there is no organization more professional than Navy STEALs.
And they should be revered.
And that's why I say, I hope what I've heard about this strike is not accurate.
You mentioned that you were a captain in the Navy.
If you received that order, would you have carried it out?
No.
No, and I'm a guy who I have sunk two ships.
You know, I've sunk an OSA-2 missile patrol boat in Kuwait Harbor, a Palnakne troop carrier in the Persian Gulf during the First Gulf War.
I never, in that situation, questioned whether those strikes were legal.
We were given an order to do this.
It was a time of war.
These were Iraqi ships with Iraqi crew members who posed a threat to the United States, military in this case, who they invaded Kuwait.
We're trying to kick them out of Kuwait.
This was approved by Congress, all of that, right?
So, but if I was ever given an order for a second, I've had questions about the operation in general, and I've been saying this for weeks, putting service members kind of like, are you stepping over a line here?
Is this legal?
They have tied themselves in knots trying to explain to us on the Armed Service Committee how this is legal.
Not sharing, you know, all of the information either, which is really troubling.
But, you know, going after survivors in the water, that is clearly not lawful.
Okay, now, I don't know if the strike on the survivors is true or not, but I suspect it isn't.
But even if it is, why would that be unlawful?
This is a kind of just kind of abject silliness that has hamstrung our military for a long time.
This idea that there's something, so you can hit the boat, but then you can't kill this.
Like the whole point of hitting the boat with a missile is to kill the people on board.
You have people on board, you hit it with a missile to kill them.
Why did you do that?
Was it were you playing a prank?
Was it just for fun?
Were you just trying to give them a fireworks show?
A little friendly ribbing, some teasing between friends?
No, the idea was to kill the people.
So if there are people who were not killed, why would it be out of bounds to hit them again?
Is the rule that you can only hit them once and if they survive, you got to be a good sport about it?
Oh, be a good sport.
They made it.
Let them.
It's fine.
Let them off.
It'll be fine.
If they were in a building and you blew up the building, would you also be required to have like firefighters on standby to put out the fire and rescue the people from the building that you just blew up with people inside it?
Is that like, what are we doing?
It just seems totally arbitrary to me.
The idea that like you can kill them when they're in the boat, but you can't kill them when they're swimming in the water.
Why?
You tried to kill them and some of them are not dead.
So you hit them again.
That's war.
And as for hitting the drug boat to begin with, which Mark Kelly also objects to, well, this is very revealing because notice how he talks about his mission in Kuwait.
Right.
And first of all, he says that it's a very revealing.
Maybe you might have picked up on it.
But he says that he hit Iraqi ships because they posed a threat to the United States.
Pause.
Right.
He says, well, they pose a threat to the United States military in this case.
You know, there's like a pause.
He says they pose a threat to the United States military in this case.
So he almost, because here's what happened.
He almost said that the Iraqis posed a threat to the United States.
But then he stops himself because he realizes that that's an indefensible claim.
Not that he's really usually concerned about making indefensible claims.
But in this case, he stops himself because he realizes like, well, the Iraqis didn't pose any threat to the United States.
Okay, he was fighting this war.
It had nothing to do with the United States at all.
They posed zero threat to the United States of America.
So that's why he stipulates that, well, they posed a threat to the United States military.
Well, why do they pose a threat to the United States military?
Well, because the military was over there fighting them.
Which, of course, by that logic, you know, we could go invade any country and then justify it on the basis that they pose a threat to the U.S. military, because since we're invading them, now they obviously pose a threat to us because we're, you know, shooting at them.
But that's an important difference because that was, they're all the way over there.
They pose no threat to the United States of America at all.
These drug, these narcoterrorists pose a direct threat to the United States of America.
They are harming actual Americans in this country.
Not in Kuwait, okay, but in this country.
And what is what he says, the point of his mission, his mission, which was so much more noble, so much more noble than what the military is doing now.
He says, well, we were trying to kick them out of Kuwait.
Well, why were you trying to do that, Mark Kelly?
You were trying to kick them out of Kuwait?
He's trying to kick the Iraqis out of Kuwait.
Why were you trying to do that?
Who gives a shit if they're in Kuwait or not?
Why should we care about that?
Of course, we don't get a follow-up to that.
Okay, so you can kill Iraqis because they're in Kuwait, but we can't kill narco-terrorists who are trying to come into the United States of America to kill Americans.
Killing people to protect Kuwait, that's legitimate.
But killing people to protect America, our actual country, our homeland, well, that's troubling.
That's problematic.
This is really how these people think.
Like any military operation that happens close to home with the objective to protect America itself and its people, that troubles them.
That disturbs them deep down.
They're not even faking it.
They're really disturbed by it.
They're like, it makes them sick to their stomach.
Oh, what do you mean?
You're using the military to protect this country?
No, the way they think is that we should only use the country, use our military to protect other countries that are thousands of miles away.
That is honest to God, what they believe deep down in their souls, if they had them, which they don't.
Down in that empty pit that used to be a soul, what they really truly believe is that we should only use our military only to protect and serve other countries, not our own.
That's really what they think.
Because the honest truth is that blowing up a drug boat off the coast of the United States of America is a more legitimate use of American military power than anything we have ever done in the Middle East.
Okay?
Just one strike on a drug boat headed towards America is more legitimate and more morally defensible than anything the United States has ever done in the Middle East.
Anything, ever.
And that to me is, that is the kind of statement that will sound provocative if you are so far gone, if you're just a died-in-the-wool neocon and you're so far gone that again, you just instinctively believe that you can't even articulate it, but you really believe that the American military should never actually be used to protect America.
It should only be used a thousand miles away where we can't see it and we're killing people for like reasons we don't even know.
We're killing people that have nothing to do with us, that if they lived, it would have no effect on us whatsoever.
Using it close to home, you know, to protect our country is just the only thing that's out of balance to these people.
So it really is.
It's just, yeah, kill every drug trafficker, kill them all.
Kill them everywhere.
We know where they are and just kill every single one of them.
Mass slaughter.
of every single drug trafficker who does any business inside the United States of America.
Every single one.
That's what we should be doing.
We should be killing them in their drug boats.
We should be going to the cartel compounds, wherever they are, and just annihilating them, wiping them out.
Missile strikes, sending the Navy SEALs, utter and total slaughter of these people is what we should be doing.
And it will again be far more legitimate than anything we've ever done in the Middle East, ever.
Okay.
This episode is sponsored by Hallow.
We are officially in the middle of holiday season.
All the Christmas chaos can mean it's hard to find peace amid the cookies, wrapping paper, and half-pack suitcases that litter your front entryway.
So this year, take a breath and lean into the stillness of the Advent season.
Thankfully, my friends at Hallow have designed a challenge that's impactful and perfect for a busy holiday schedule.
This Advent, you'll dive into the real story of Christmas, come to understand that it was probably just as chaotic as our own and learn to surrender it all to God anyway and find real peace.
Throughout Hallow's Advent challenge, Pray 25, Be Still, you'll have the opportunity to meditate on the words of Psalm 46, be still and know that I am God, and hear powerful excerpts from the Read of God and the Ruthless Elimination of Hurry.
Experience the stillness of the Holy Family amid the chaos and busyness of the world and dive into the story of the Nativity.
Get three months free of Hallow Today at hallow.com slash MattWalsh.
Prepare your most peaceful Christmas season yet.
It's Cyber Monday, and this is your final shot at the biggest deal we do all year.
Daily Wire Plus annual memberships are 50% off right now.
You get every show, every documentary, every movie, and our epic news series, The Pendragon Cycle, Rise of the Merlin.
All Access members get episodes one and two early on Christmas Day.
Everyone else gets it on January 22nd.
This deal only happens once a year.
Join now at dailywire.com slash subscribe.
Finally, we have this from Jasmine Crockett quickly, a scholar and genius, and she has thoughts about deportations that she wants to share since we're on the subject.
Listen.
Because if that's the case, let's talk about the white supremacists and how many of them need to be kicked out of this country because I can guarantee you I can track down more crimes that they've committed because overall, immigrants have a lower crime committal rate than white supremacists, but we don't want to talk about that.
Immigrants have a lower crime committal rate than white supremacists, a crime committal rate, she says.
Now, needless to say, this is totally false, just a fabrication, made up out of thin air, not challenged.
You know, she says that there's no, like, an obvious follow-up is, oh, well, what is the crime committal rate of white supremacists?
What are you talking about?
Can you, but you brought it up.
What do you mean?
She would not be able to answer that follow-up because it's totally invented.
You know what the crime committal rate of white supremacists in this country is?
Like zero.
It's a crime committal rate of zero.
Zero percent of the crime in this country is committed by white supremacists.
You could wander this country from coast to coast and in between for 100 years And your chance of ever being victimized by a white supremacist in any form is 0%.
Okay?
There is no threat from white supremacists.
You're more likely to be, I don't know, gored to death by a moose in the forest somewhere than you are to be killed by a white supremacist.
Now, obviously, I realize that when Jasmine Crockett says, the crime rate of white supremacists, what she really means is white people.
Because to her, every white person is a white supremacist because she's an anti-white bigot with a 45 IQ.
She hates white people.
She has the intelligence of a tree stump.
And so she thinks that every white person is a white supremacist.
But here's what's funny.
Even if that were true, even if we accept that the definition of white supremacist is any white person, still her claim would not be true.
Still, white supremacists would commit crimes at a much lower rate than almost every other group.
And that's not even taking into account that the white crime rate is hugely inflated because a significant number of Hispanics are categorized officially as white in order to raise the white crime rate and lower the Hispanic crime rate.
So, and we know that that's happening for a fact, which is why you could go through and look at the stats, look at any cases of, go through mugshots of people convicted of murder and drug trafficking and that sort of thing.
And you're going to find a lot of like among the white criminals, you're going to find a lot of Ramirez and Gonzalez and that sort of thing.
You're going to find a lot of those last names for the white people.
So, but even that, you just fine, fact, whatever.
Ignore that.
It still doesn't matter because the crime rate among white people is so low that even if you inflate it by including a bunch of non-white people, it's still lower than almost every other group.
That's the actual reality of the situation.
But that's what you get from Jasmine Crockett, who is aggressively mediocre and dishonest and unimpressive in every imaginable way.
And therefore, may likely be the 2028 Democrat presidential nominee.
It would not surprise me at this point in the slightest.
All right.
That will do it for the show today.
We'll wrap it up there.
Thanks for watching.
Thanks for listening.
See you tomorrow.
Have a great day.
God.
Oh, this is an illusion.
An echo of a voice that has died.
and soon that echo will cease they say that merlin is mad They say he was a king in Dovid.
The son of a princess of lost Atlantis.
They say the future and the past are known to him.
That the fire and the wind tell him their secrets.
Let the magic of the hill folk and druids come forth at his easy command.
They say he slew hundreds.
Hundreds, do you hear?
That the world burned and trembled at his wrath.
The Merlin died long before you and I were born.
Merlin Emirus has returned to the land of the living.
Vortigen is gone.
Rum is gone.
The Saxon is here.
Saxon Hengist has assembled the greatest war host ever seen in the Island of the Mighty.
And before the summer is through, he means to take the throne.
And he will have it.
If we are too busy squabbling amongst ourselves to take up arms against him, here is your hope.
A king will arise to hold all Britain in his hand.
A high king who would be the wonder of the world.
You to a future of peace.
There'll be no peace in these lands till we are all dust.
Men of the island of the mighty!
You stand together!
You stand as Britons!
You stand as one.
Great darkness is falling upon this land.
These brothers are our only hope to stand against it.
