Patrick Kolbeck hosts the Mike Lindell Show, detailing May Day protests allegedly funded by the Democratic Socialists of America and discussing attorney Stephanie Lambert's exoneration of clerk Stephanie Scott over fabricated confidentiality rules. The episode covers a government shutdown end, CBDC amendment concerns, and Senator Teresa Mandela's claims of Soros-funded voter roll monitoring. It highlights an FBI raid on Fulton County regarding counterfeit ballots and lawsuits against Dominion systems for security flaws. Hosts express hope that "DOJ 2.0" and "FBI 2.0" will indict figures like Obama and Clinton for record destruction, linking COVID-19 oversight to election malfeasance while urging accountability to ensure a proper 2026 celebration. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
|
Time
Text
Two Threads of Intimidation00:14:57
You ever see this guy with the pillows on Fox?
My pillow guy, Mike Lindell.
He is the greatest.
The My Pillow guy, Mike Lindell.
And he's been with us right from the beginning.
Hey, welcome to the Mike Lindell Show.
I'm filling in for Mike.
My name is Patrick Kolbeck, and we've got a great show for you today.
We're going to cover a lot of ground.
We've got some good news to kick things off with attorney Stephanie Lambert and former Adams Township, Michigan clerk Stephanie Scott being exonerated and having all the felony charges against them dismissed.
We're going to go over that right up the top.
We're going to have an update from D.C. from Allison Steinberg, and we're also going to have a great discussion with former.
Or with current Senator, sorry, sorry, Teresa, Senator Teresa Mandela from Montana.
And also, we're going to have an update from Garland Favorito from Voter GA on what's going on inside Georgia.
So, a lot of ground to cover.
And I just want to kick things off today with a reminder that today there's a bunch of May Day strong protests going on all across the country right now.
And I want to make sure everybody understands that these are actually being organized by the No Kings organizers.
They're rebranding and kind of exposing.
Their true colors because May 1st or May Day is a communist holiday.
It was actually first instituted as International Worker Day in the Soviet Union.
So that's what these guys are celebrating today.
That's who's been funding these No Kings protests and supporting them and promoting them.
It's the Democratic Socialists of America, it's the Communist Party of USA, and all their buddies out at the Open Society Foundation just trying to create chaos in our old country.
But you know what?
There's another big celebration that's coming up later this year.
That's the one I'm looking forward to.
That's an American holiday, and it's called July 4th.
And this is going to be our 250th anniversary.
And that's when we're going to be celebrating the land of the free and the home of the brave.
And that is my segue into our first guest for today's show, and that is attorney Stephanie Lambert, because she embodies that brave aspect of being a brave American, because she's an attorney that's one of a handful of attorneys all across the whole country that are willing to take on election fraud cases.
And the reason is.
Because whenever that happens, those attorneys get sanctioned, they get threatened with disbarment, and in some cases, they have criminal charges filed against them just for doing their job.
And so that is the case with Stephanie Lambert, but we got some good news on that front.
So, Stephanie, welcome to the Mike Lindell Show.
Thank you so much for having me on, Patrick.
I really appreciate it.
Well, you've been one of the fighters out there for quite some time, and they've been trying to tie you up with a bunch of lawfare so that you can't.
Go off and peek behind the curtain of their Wizard of Oz operations around the elections because you're probably one of the most, if not the most, knowledgeable attorney on these electronic voting systems in the country.
And the more they get you tied up with this trivial lawfare garbage, the less you can do to expose what they're actually doing to manipulate our elections.
So this is a big deal.
So maybe give people a heads up on exactly what happened yesterday out in Hillsdale County.
Yesterday, the case was dismissed.
The judge actually looked at the law.
Read the law and realized that the government was actually making it up to have a confidentiality requirement that just does not exist in statute.
But let me back up here and explain how one, how this happened and why.
Stephanie Scott was the Adams Township clerk, and she was being instructed by the Bureau of Elections to delete 2020 data, which was suspicious to her and also a law violation, while she was simultaneously raising a red flag that she didn't realize.
Where she was pointing out fraudulent and inaccurate registrations on the voter roll to the Michigan Bureau of Elections.
So they zeroed in on her, got their attention as she's pointing out that she's in the voter roll.
She's looking at the accuracy.
And remember, the BOE, the Michigan Bureau of Elections, Jonathan Brader, the director, inflated the Michigan voter roll just weeks before the 2020 election by 700,000 in Michigan.
He was also at the same time the director of the Eric system.
And the newsletter that went to all the local clerks is say, you know, we have this 700,000 inflation at the direction of Eric.
You won't see a paper trail through your office.
So, Stephanie Scott's elected after the 2020 election.
She was elected in that election.
She didn't run it.
And she's looking at data and the rules and the contracts and looking at everything she's supposed to do.
And she sees inaccurate data.
So, she starts questioning it and sending it to the Bureau of Elections.
So, they want her tabulator, which they're not lawfully able to come and get because they want her to update it.
She says, you know, I can't update it.
It's going to wipe the data.
And it's not due for an update according to contract at this point.
Point.
So when she wouldn't allow them to wipe the data, they went and got a search warrant, misrepresented the law, and took her tabulator.
And then they were off and running.
So no one would help her.
Her township attorney said, I'm not qualified in this election area.
You need outside counsel.
And that's where, you know, people asked me to help Stephanie, and I stepped in.
I didn't really do anything special here.
I'm just an attorney.
I did my job.
Stephanie did her job.
She did nothing illegal.
But the reason we were targeted is they wanted her to delete her EPB data.
And when that was analyzed by her expert, we retained an expert for her, as you do in litigation in every case, nothing special there.
The expert found that the data was off by 11.5%.
So the data was changed at the state level.
So that is why we were targeted.
Once that was revealed, okay, that this data was changed, they were ordering the local clerks to delete it in every jurisdiction, not just Stephanie Scott.
And she didn't delete it.
And other clerks didn't delete it.
It's actually under investigation by the federal government.
They didn't delete their EPB data.
So, Stephanie, yeah, just to highlight this, there's actually two threads of intimidation that are being done right now.
One is on the clerks because they want to make an example out of Stephanie Scott.
And I know her very well as well.
I mean, she's a pit bull.
She's focused on following the law, she's focusing on integrity in the elections, and she's trying to do the right thing.
They don't like people like that.
They want a bunch of drones that are just going to follow their orders.
And And so they're doing the same thing now to Vicki Bishop up in Antrim County, who's a newly elected clerk and she ran on election integrity.
They try to make examples out of these folks.
And then they try to make an example out of you for doing your job, saying, I'm going to represent my client.
We're going to go off and investigate it.
And those are two intimidation threads that are happening all across the country.
I mean, Stephanie Scott, just so all the listeners know, Stephanie Scott is Michigan's version of Tina Peters.
She got exonerated now in the courts, is a big deal, and hopefully, a hopeful sign for Tina as well.
Well, you're exactly correct.
They were trying to silence the clerks and make them think that they worked for Jonathan Brater.
They do not.
He's the Michigan Director of Elections, but they're the duly elected constitutional office in Michigan.
They run their office, they have authority over their office that is separate from Jonathan Brater.
There's a separation of powers here.
But you talked about Antrim, okay, and Vicki Bishop for a second.
There's the why that we need to focus on.
Why was Stephanie Scott targeted?
And why was I targeted as her attorney?
And why is Vicki Bishop getting targeted?
It's the evidence.
Vicki Bishop has access to all of the Antrim data.
Remember, Cheryl Guy thought she deleted most of it, okay?
And she was never charged.
They wanted it deleted.
She admitted it on video.
Vicki Bishop now has access to data and evidence they don't want her to have access to.
So if they can come up with some sham charges on Vicki Bishop, right, they can remove her from office like they unlawfully removed Stephanie Scott from office.
They had her recalled.
So we're being targeted for the data.
And so, on the EPB data that she wouldn't delete, the experts showed that it matched the people that voted in Adams Township for 2020.
Exactly matched, as it should, right?
She's preserving that data.
It matched the county data, but it differed from the state data by 11.5%.
Okay.
And it was, which extrapolates to about the 700,000 that they inflated the voter roll.
And in other jurisdictions, it's off by 4%, 12%, 8%.
Right.
So Stephanie Scott revealed the very secret they didn't want revealed.
And Jonathan Brader testified, you remember this.
He said, We don't maintain a permanent record of who voted in each election at the state level.
So he knew that he was ordering the only copy to be deleted.
That's why we got targeted.
And this is not the first time.
You know, this is my third win against the state.
They tried to have me sanctioned as the local attorney on the Sidney Powell suit.
I won before the United States Sixth Circuit.
Bar grievance, I won.
Now I won this.
I still have Oakland, and the Court of Appeals did a rare move where they're taking the law for consideration for the jury instructions prior to trial.
They're essentially indicating they know that it's being made up.
So we're going to have that reviewed here in the very near future to hearing.
Well, that's fantastic news.
So, you know, I appreciate the fact that you're willing to stand up for folks like Stephanie when they need that assistance.
And this is truly part of a larger effort where they're attempting to get rid of any attorney that's going to stand up and do the right thing.
And I want to give kudos out to Kurt Olson, who I thought argued the point that Jonathan Brader was making up the law eloquently.
I mean, even I, as a layperson, was able to follow his arguments in a very clear way.
And I'm sure that played a huge role.
And the fact that Kurt came out to defend you, I mean, he's Based out in DC, that was a big deal too.
So I want to give kudos to Kurt Olson.
Huge deal.
Kurt did a fantastic job.
And everyone's a little confused.
Why did this take two years to be resolved?
Dan Hartman was the initial attorney on the case.
Dan did an excellent job.
Yeah.
He's great.
He filed motions saying, Judge, they're making up the law.
It doesn't have the word confidential in it.
They're literally making it up.
Dan filed motions and he said it at every hearing.
So I want to make sure I'm thanking Dan.
Dan did a great job.
Oh, yeah.
And then, and he's one of those handful of lawyers that'll take this on.
Yeah, he's in the land of the brave category with exactly.
So, Dan took it on.
Kurt came in.
Kurt did a great cross examination of Jonathan Brader.
Also, Kurt pointed out that the word confidential is not in the statute.
I put it in the closing argument.
Just Judge Stiverson at the district court didn't really consider the law.
That's all I'll say on that, right?
And so, thankfully, Judge Lisney, when she got a first look at it, she said, I read every Transcript.
I read the whole file and, you know, that she essentially agreed that the law was made up by the Attorney General.
Oh, well, it's great that the good guys won this time.
And I'm looking forward to a rapid dismissal of that Oakland case against you as well, because they literally are engaged in malicious prosecution and lawfare.
And like you said, the goal is to silence folks such as yourself, folks such as Stephanie Scott, Dan Hartman, Kurt Olson, frankly, all of us.
They do not want to hear the true story.
For six years, I have been fighting one type of lawfare after another from the attorney general's office to silence me, because all of my clients have the evidence.
Right.
I'm not going to take credit.
My clients have done really important work and they all have critical evidence and they needed to tarnish their reputations and silence everyone and intimidate them.
And it just didn't work.
So it's so thank you so much for having me on.
And it's nice to share good news.
Well, how can people help you going forward?
Because, you know, what they've done is they've drained your time, they've drained your resources, they've drained, I mean, they're deliberately going off and trying to prevent you from other more fruitful pursuits to expose what they're doing.
So how can folks help you?
Well, just keep all eyes on Oakland.
That's the next one.
And I think they need to, you know, do exactly what Stephanie Scott was doing look at the data in their local community.
Don't allow this to silence or intimidate anyone.
People need to have responsibility and know what's going on in their own community and demand accuracy.
It's not a political issue.
We need hand counting, and they need to make sure that, you know, that they don't win the fight here of silencing everyone.
This is what their goal was all along.
Well, it's a great way to end the week here with some good news.
Thank you very much for sharing it.
I'm looking forward to a lot more good news in the coming weeks.
So keep up the good fight.
Thank you, Stephanie.
Thank you, Stephanie.
Appreciate it.
All right, thanks.
And now we go out to DC with an update from Allison Steinberg.
Allison, great to have you back again and a great way to cap the week.
I know you've been busy.
I've been watching on social media.
What's going on?
Yeah, lots of, lots going on here on the Hill, especially in the last week.
We finally ended the longest partial government shutdown in history.
Uh, the house signed off on the DHS funding bill that will go ahead and fund DHS and all agencies underneath it.
So that is good.
Fighting for Legislative Action00:15:35
That's off to the president's desk.
Uh, we also, the house also passed the farm bill, uh, yesterday as well as the FISA bill.
So, uh, they jammed quite a bit in there, uh, on their final day here in DC for the week.
And that's good because now these guys are off for yet another recess, the second one.
In like a matter of a month, right?
They were just on a two week recess like two weeks ago, and now they're already off for another week.
So, uh, I would say they still should probably stay back and get more done.
Uh, there's still a lot more work to be done that is sort of getting put on hold because of this recess.
Uh, different members of the House Freedom Caucus are calling for all members of Congress to stay in D.C. so the Senate can start working on, uh, their portions of everything.
But it seems to me the House is very upset with the Senate at this point in time because there is a lot of major differences happening.
Amongst House Republicans and Senate Republicans.
House Republicans are sort of stating that everything they do, all the work that they get done in the House, is going to die over in the Senate.
We know this is an ongoing problem, but House Freedom Process members are very upset about this.
Let's take a listen to this clip from Congressman Keith Self with more on that.
What we did yesterday, four major events, the Senate basically preemptively said they're not going to deal with any of them.
That is not the way the Senate is supposed to deal with the House.
This is only one of them.
They also said they're going to do their own farm bill.
They're going to do their own E-15 as well as this.
They're not going to take up CBDC.
They're going to send over, which they did, their own FISA.
This is not the way the Senate should treat the House.
And this is why we are doing this.
Because I am, like Chip Roy, I am positive.
The CBDC is still alive.
We've got FISA now still alive.
CBDC can still make it across the finish line.
Let's just push on.
The Senate will respond to the people if they push hard enough.
I'm positive.
Was he pushing for central bank digital currency?
No.
That's the House Freedom Caucus, and they are trying to push.
Back against the central bank digital currency.
There's an amendment in the FISA bill that allows the CBDC, and they're working so hard to fight back against it.
But their concern is that, you know, the Senate is not understanding that.
They're trying to move full speed ahead with paving the way for a CBDC.
So kudos to the House Freedom Caucus for sounding the alarm on this and doing everything they can to try to prevent that from actually becoming the law of the land.
Because as you just heard there, we are right on the cusp of allowing that to happen.
And obviously, that would be extremely detrimental to all of us here.
If we care about our sovereignty and our freedoms.
Excellent.
Well, okay.
Well, that's good news.
So, and good news on some of the legislation that's been passed.
So, gosh, we're on a roll today.
Keep on.
What else you got that's good news?
Well, I don't know if this is necessarily good news, but it is also May Day.
And the radical leftists are saying they're protesting by staying home from work, staying home from school, and they refuse to spend a dime out in public.
So, I'm just looking forward to going out to a nice dinner tonight and not having to deal with any radical liberals sitting next to me.
So, that's a perk, I guess.
Yeah, my wife and I have date night out tonight, too.
And so we should be able to enjoy ourselves as well.
That's good.
But we're going to see Animal Farm, that movie on where these guys really want to take us as a country.
So we should have fun on that.
Nice.
Yeah, that's more of a glimpse into the future if we don't get a handle on what's going on here right now.
Because I think, you know, that Orwellian dystopian, you know, outline that Orwell painted beautifully for us is going to be what we have to look forward to if we don't stop all this madness now.
So we know.
Some members in the House are working hard to prevent that, like the CBDC.
Thankfully, in that farm bill that I just touched on, they were able to strip that amendment that would allow for the pesticide companies to be shielded from any liability.
Let's say you're poisoned or harmed by herbicides or pesticides being sprayed on the food, then the big corporations would be shielded.
Thankfully, in that new farm bill that was just passed, that is no longer, those shields are not in place.
So we're making very small steps.
Very slowly, but we need to do more and we need to keep charging ahead.
Uh, there are growing calls in the house to nuke the filibuster as we've been talking about out like for months now, right?
But we're hearing more and more house Republicans coming forward to say, you know, I was never really in support of this, but now I am because we are at such a critical juncture here.
Time is of the essence, and if we want to get anything done permanently, we've got to nuke that filibuster.
So the pressure is really on John Thune at this point to follow what the American people are demanding and get it done.
Uh, from what I'm hearing inside the Senate, it's sounding like, um, That's going to be a tough, tough ask.
Mike Lee, who's been, you know, very vocal on the abolishing of the filibuster, whether it be implementing the standing filibuster or just doing away with it altogether, is now sort of answering calls for people that they've been, you know, sounding the alarm to rid Thune as leader in the House.
He's saying that is nearly impossible.
So we have to be vocal now more than ever, keep the pressure on Thune.
And, you know, I don't think it's likely he's going to be replaced as leader.
So we have to really continue to urge him to get rid of the filibuster.
Yeah, as a senator, though, you can call for essentially, effectively, a vote of no confidence with your colleagues, and you can actually challenge him and his appointment as a Senate majority leader.
So maybe it seems like Thune's not going anywhere.
Maybe we should start applying pressure to all the other senators.
And I don't know what the latest version of the Senate rules are, but there's some threshold typically necessary to put up a resolution to change the rules and put in a new Senate majority leader.
So I think somebody needs to be drafting that.
Now, it's Typically, political suicide for doing that, but that didn't stop me from pursuing things like that when I was in the Michigan Senate, because you will be kicked off every single committee and you will be cut off from all potential donations, but it's the right thing to do.
And I think there needs to be held accountable.
Yeah, I think that's what so many of these senators are scared of.
I mean, the options within the Senate to actually make a move like this are very slim.
I mean, there's just a handful of decent senators that I think want to actually do the right thing.
And then they'd have to actually be willing to step forward and put everything on the line to actually call for this to move forward with replacing Thune.
So, whether or not we even have the numbers in the Senate right now to make that happen seems very slim to me.
And as I just mentioned, Mike Lee seems to think it's nearly impossible, though I think he would be in support of it.
He would be one of the good ones.
He's saying that due to all the formalities and how well loved Thune is amongst all of these rhinos and Democrats, that it would probably be a long shot.
But I think it's something worth still talking about.
And if I find Mike Lee in the Senate, I will certainly ask more about that.
Yeah, try to get them some friends out there to shake the trees.
Well, we're going to be talking about a Senate of another jurisdiction, the state of Montana, here right now.
So thank you very much for the update, Allison.
Appreciate the update.
And let's see what my good friend, State Senator Theresa Manzella, has to say from the great state of Montana.
Thank you, Allison.
Thanks, Patrick.
All right.
So it's always good to get an update from the folks that are.
On the ground in the various states.
And, you know, Montana ostensibly is a very red state.
And, but it's a very important state because there's a lot of blue that's trying to creep into the state.
So the security of the elections is extremely important.
So, you know, I've known Senator Manzella for quite a few years and she's one of the good ones and she's always trying to do the right thing.
And it looks like with the fan in the background on her, I'm not her only fan.
Thanks, Patrick.
Good to see you.
It's great to have you.
It's so good seeing you.
It's been such a long time.
I wanted to get you on to just kind of talk about what you're seeing from Montana because, you know, sometimes you get into this bubble.
I mean, I'm in the middle of Michigan.
There's all kinds of craziness, as you probably saw from the beginning of the show, going on where they're attacking attorneys and clerks for doing their job and maliciously prosecuting.
So it sometimes distracts you from what's going on on the ground elsewhere.
So, I just want to zero in on 2026.
How are things looking for the security of the 2026 elections out in Montana?
I wish I could tell you great news, but we've made.
I'll settle for good news.
Yeah.
Well, yeah.
Okay.
So we have 35 citizens groups working in 35 different counties, and they're doing great things.
I've had better luck working with our citizens groups and helping to get our citizens groups.
Organized than I have working with our state officials.
The state officials continue to throw obstacles in our path.
And just as I'm hearing from other areas, they're very effective at it.
They're unfortunately very good at slow walking the issues and throwing obstacles in our path.
And we're experiencing that here in Montana.
You know, we've only got a little over 700,000 voters in the whole state of Montana.
So we should be the poster child for.
Fair and free elections and hand counting, and it should be happening here, but we have not been successful in making that happen.
We do have a very large, the common word is rhino, neocon contingency, and we're fighting them like we've never fought before.
As you know, I'm the founder of the Montana Freedom Caucus, and we are working very hard to try to expose the money trail and the fact that it's.
It's Democrats and George Soros that's funding these supposed Republicans.
You know, they build themselves as Republicans and they run as Republicans because, as you said, it is a very red state and they can't get elected as Democrats, but they can, they certainly are Democrats in disguise.
So we're trying to expose that to the best of our ability.
And the citizens' groups are making themselves assets for the election administrators, whereas initially we were.
Came in kind of as in an adversarial role.
Now we have basically humbled ourselves and said, How can we work together?
What can we do to clean up the voter rolls?
And they're doing a great job of that.
We have purchased the voter rolls and have been purchasing them at $5,000 in annual fee since 2020.
And we have a great volunteer data analyst that downloads them every day.
And watches for all the anomalies.
And we find daily.
That's good.
Daily.
Yes.
And when we get closer to the election, he does it on an hourly basis.
And so we can see the infusions and we can see the interesting changes.
And so right now we're just working on.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Exactly.
Yeah.
So I'll take it.
I mean, because literally the Rosetta Stone for election fraud.
Is in Michigan, we call it our qualified voter file, but it's the state, it's a transaction log for the state voter roll database.
So if you're monitoring changes, you know, minute by minute, hour by hour, day, even day by day, I mean, we get it on a, every month we get a snapshot, right?
So they are trying to hide it and play games with it.
Much more difficult to hide with a more frequent update.
It'd be even better to actually get their log to know who was making the changes and what changes were made, but still, up.
That's still huge progress.
So that's good to know.
It is.
They are continuing to play games.
The Secretary of State tries to change the data that's available.
Like it used to be, we got in the voter history file, we got birth dates.
Now we just get birth year.
That's going to have to be something that we address through the legislature.
You know, voting records are still undefined.
So that's very.
A lot of ambiguity in what qualifies as voting records can't get cast vote records.
Um, but we're doing the best we can, yeah, yeah, absolutely.
Well, that's good, we're doing that, that, that is good.
So, um, I mean, you guys keep plugging along.
I mean, I really appreciate the fact that, you know, most of these election officials, they truly do want to do the right thing.
They, and, and naturally, a lot of them will get defensive.
And, um, when somebody tries to tell them how to do their job, I, I get it.
But, um, ultimately, the ones that are working together and the idea of making it a partnership, I, I love the fact that that's the direction things are headed there because that's the key.
There's only a handful of really bad actors that don't want anything to do with oversight.
Uh, the vast majority of clerks I found.
Either they're afraid of getting punished by the higher ups, or they are just, or they really want to do the right thing, or they truly do want to do the right thing.
So, anyway, that's good news.
So, how can people help the efforts out in Montana and help you in particular, you know, giving these 35 groups a larger voice in securing the elections?
Yeah, they can certainly get in touch with me.
And I can, however, you want to do that.
They can find me on Facebook or they can, I can give my phone number, whatever, and I can get them plugged in.
We still have 56 counties, so we still have some counties that need to have a citizens voter integrity group.
And they just need to start building that relationship and creating that interface and letting the election administrators know that they're not going to go away.
Many of our people have gone to election school, you know, judges' school.
And we're doing hand count training wherever we can so that if Trump is successful in banning the machines and the absentee ballots, which our Secretary of State has made it clear that she's going to fight.
So she has no intention of going along with Trump's agenda on that.
But we want to be ready.
I would love to be ready to hand count, should by some miracle that he become successful on that.
All right.
Well, we're praying that he is going to be successful.
I think he's got quite the case to make on this.
And there's going to be more information popping in the next couple of weeks that I think is going to make it a home run to get rid of these machines.
So I'm very hopeful.
And I'm always hopeful after I get a chance to talk to you, my friend.
Partnering with American Independence Gold00:03:43
So it's great seeing you again.
And thank you for tuning in today and sharing a quick update from Montana.
So great to see you.
All right, folks.
That's it for the first.
That's it for the first half of today's show.
We're going to go to a commercial break.
When we come back, we're going to go to another state.
We're going to go out to Georgia and hear from Garland Favorito from Voter GA.
Mike Lindell here.
The radical left in the deep state aren't just coming for our freedoms, they're coming after our money, too.
For years, they've been destroying our economy from the inside out with reckless spending, open borders, woke policies that crush our businesses.
And now they've left us with an inflation disaster that's wiping out the savings of our hardworking families.
They don't want us to be independent.
They want us to be dependent on the government.
Well, that's not going to happen on my watch.
That's why I partner with American Independence Gold.
It's a veteran owned company that's helping patriotic Americans fight back by protecting our savings with real physical gold and silver.
And right now they're giving away up to $15,000 in free silver and a free gold IRA kit.
A portion of all the profits go to 9 11 first responders and veterans at the Tunnels to Towers Foundation.
The deep state can't touch your gold, so visit MikeLindellGold.com or call 844 714 4653 right now.
That's MikeLindellGold.com.
Take back control.
You know, most people think water is just about filtration, but in reality, it's about balance.
What gets removed, what gets left behind, and how the water actually behaves once you drink it.
Well, many traditional systems focus on one thing removal.
Reverse osmosis, for example, strips water down completely.
It may sound ideal, but it removes minerals that our bodies need.
The Sentry Wellness System was designed with a different philosophy.
It removes common contaminants like chlorine, fluoride, and PFAS while restoring key minerals like magnesium and improving alkalinity.
It also does all this without tanks and without wastewater and without requiring a complicated installation.
It installs in about 15 minutes under your sink.
So instead of overcorrecting, it brings your water back into balance.
Please visit SentryH2O.com and use promo code Lindell for 10% off your next purchase.
Well, hello everyone.
Well, I'm turning 65, and let me tell you, Medicare has me confused.
All the junk bill and the robocalls and everything else, it honestly feels like they break the system just to confuse us.
Well, that's why I partnered and working with Chapter.
They're independent and they don't work for big insurance.
They work for us.
In fact, they're the only advisor that compares every single plan nationwide to find what actually fits your needs.
If you're on the right plan, they tell you.
If you're not, they're going to help you switch.
And it's completely free.
Just last year, seniors saved about $1,100 by finding a better plan with Chapter.
So call Chapter at 234 Lindell or go to askchapter.org forward slash Lindell.
Election Certification and Compilers00:13:17
Hi, everybody.
Welcome back to this fun show today on effectively what's becoming Good News Friday.
My name is Patrick Kolbeck, and I'm filling in for Mike today on Mike Lindell's show.
So great to be joined by you.
Thank you for tuning in.
And without further ado, you know, one of the great election leaders all across the country set a great example.
He's been investigating the integrity of our elections for decades, a lot longer than folks like myself have been doing.
And I appreciate all of his insights whenever we get a chance to talk.
To him, it's always good to have him on board.
So I want to introduce, without further ado, a repeat guest, Garland Favorito of Voter GA.
Garland, great to have you with us.
Oh, I can't hear you, my friend.
We got a repeat there.
Your voice is being stolen not only at the ballot box, but also on the broadcast here, unfortunately.
We'll figure that out here in a little bit.
But I love the backdrop there, the nice flames.
It must be, I thought it was only cold up here in Michigan.
All right.
Well, we're having a little bit of technical difficulty right now with the Garland.
So I'm maybe log out, come back in with the default audio.
And in the meantime, I just want to point folks out to a post that I put up yesterday out at the Election Crime Bureau.
If you go to electioncrimebureau.com, I came across this patent a few years ago.
And I think it was actually brought to my attention by attorney Sidney Powell at the time.
And it was a very strange patent because.
In the patent, there's a lot of strange things about this patent, frankly, but the basic premise of the patent was that it was going to provide a way to inject fake voters into the election systems during the election and then sensibly remove those fake voters afterwards.
And, you know, as near as I can figure, it was designed to be like a little radioactive isotope tracer that they could tag along to see if all of your ballots are going through the appropriate hoops and hurdles.
Well, What it really seemed to me at the time, particularly as I come across additional evidence like this Venezuelan whistleblower evidence,
is that this actually seems more like a tool to engage in fraud because it actually aligns pretty much one to one or 100% with what they called the SAES or SAES data utility tool that was described by Venezuelan whistleblowers in support of the appeal for Tina Peters.
And he was highlighting that this tool.
Was used to steal elections.
And this patent, when you actually go off and do an analysis of feature by feature with this SSA utility tool, the patent describes a tool pretty much exactly like this tool that was used to steal elections.
Essentially, they use the audit as a fake security feature to actually conduct the theft of the election.
So, anyway, you can read more about it out on electioncrimebureau.com.
And hopefully, we got.
My friend Garland back now.
Garland, you there?
Have we got some audio now?
Yay, I can hear you.
There we go.
And I can even hear the crackling of the fire.
That's really good.
Yeah, I thought I'd give you a little ambience there.
Yeah, it's a little, you're speaking away from the microphone here.
So, whatever's tuning in for your audio, I don't think it's that.
Yeah, well, I don't.
That's all right.
Keep on going there.
But I just want to bring you back and talk a little bit.
It's been a while since that raid on Fulton County.
And I figured I'd give you an opportunity to, first of all, remind everybody what happened in Fulton County, why they went in and sought the records that they sought with the federal government came in, including Tulsi Gabbard was out there.
Why did they come in and raid Fulton County?
And then what have been developments since then?
Well, the reason they were there in the first place.
There are several reasons.
It had a lot to do with what we had been doing over the last five years.
As you remember, Patrick, we put a preservation order on the ballots filing a lawsuit all the way back in December 23, 2020.
That lawsuit is still active in the Court of Appeals.
And we've got a preservation order on the ballots on none other than January 6th, 2021, when we went to court.
The judge issued the order the next day.
And then that order really persevered until the 28th of January of this year when the FBI executed their search warrant.
And their search warrant was based on a lot of evidence that we had uncovered in the last five years.
Specifically, there were counterfeit ballots.
I think we've talked about those before.
There were the mail in ballots that weren't folded from being mailed, weren't written with a writing instrument, weren't on the correct.
Paper stock voted the same way down ballot.
They found there's over 3,000 now double scan ballots, which were also double counted.
We know that.
There are several other things as well.
There was a reconciliation problem where they basically made the results add up after the fact.
And there are five different areas altogether.
Of probable cause.
So they executed the search warrant on that with an affidavit from the FBI agent.
They then had a hearing.
Fulton County tried to get the ballots back and without the FBI looking at them, they didn't want them to look and see what was there, which was kind of funny.
So they had a hearing.
The judge never has ruled yet, but the FBI has gone ahead.
They have made their Copies of the ballots, given Fulton County a copy back, and they have retained the originals as well as their own copy, and then they are executing that criminal investigation right now.
So that's kind of the latest on the.
Well, you know, I think there's a very good reason why you've gotten a lot more traction out in Georgia than other places like my home state of Michigan, is that you've been at this for quite some time.
And so everything you describe, you're going through all the breadcrumbs of the audit trail that.
Frankly, it takes a little while for grassroots activists to get their arms around, but you're showing everybody how it's done, how the sausage is made, and I appreciate all of your hard work.
And I know part of what you're working on now is actually using all the information that you've gathered to date to file a lawsuit to have Dominion vacated from use in the state of Georgia for the upcoming 2026 election.
How's that going?
Exactly.
That's a whole other interesting story.
And by the way, we have to give the credit.
To our volunteer team.
We've just got an amazing organization of volunteers here that we've built up over the years.
They're just, everyone has their own specialty and they donate their skill to the cause.
So hats off to the VoterGA volunteers.
But yeah, so this is a whole nother interesting scenario.
And there's multiple facets to it right now, Patrick.
One is that the QR code, as you know, Dominion, like the ESS ExpressVote, the Dominion Democracy Suite systems, have a QR code that contains the votes and they accumulate out of the QR codes, which is unverifiable to the voter, always has been.
And it is illegal in Georgia.
They found two statutes back in 2020 that they implemented in 2019, and it violated those statutes, according to the U.S. District Court.
The Secretary of State didn't do anything, and now we're running up against this July deadline in which the legislature wrote another law saying that it's invalid and should not be used.
But we're in court for a little bit different reason.
We sued the EAC because.
The Dominion system never met the guidelines in 2019 when it was certified.
And specifically, it did not, it relies on hard coded passwords, which is incredible, hard coded, unchangeable passwords, which are embedded into certain scripts.
And then, in addition to that, the encryption keys are stored in clear, plain text.
And those violate the guidelines.
Dating all the way back to 2005, under which they were allegedly certified in 2019.
So, we are suing the EAC to uphold the certification, or excuse me, really to vacate the certification of that Dominion system.
And that's a whole nother angle we've got going on in Georgia right now.
We haven't had a hearing on that.
And here's the irony of the whole thing, Patrick.
So, we're fighting the EAC, as you know.
Trump's executive order in March 25 of 2025, that ordered the EAC to decertify QR coded voting systems.
And here we are in court trying to force the EAC to uphold President Trump's order, and their EAC is actually being defended by Trump's Department of Justice.
So it's quite an irony that we're going through here in Georgia.
Well, if you're successful with that motion, you're likely going to lead to a domino effect across all the other states.
So, this is a big deal.
You know, I know also another problem is that they're deploying configurations of the ICX tabulator in Georgia that are not authorized.
They're not the ones that are even affiliated with the certification.
They're putting out tabulator mode versions of the ICX instead of the DRE mode, which can't do that.
And so, it's a.
It's kind of, there's some problems on that front too.
We're in the same issue in Michigan.
Yeah, and here's another thing, Patrick.
What we found on the forensic analysis, we had a county that we were able to get a forensic analysis on, and Stephanie, I think, was a part of that.
So, what we found out is that 3,000 program files had been modified after the installation of the system, which, of course, would have vacated its certification.
And the crazy part about it is that the system had a compiler on it.
And I know you know what a compiler is, but for the folks who are not watching, or not, I'm sorry, the folks that are watching that may not know, the compiler allows the programmer to create malware and distribute it through all the county components without detection.
Yeah, just to put a finer point on this, Garland, the whole.
Certification program is designed to authorize a specific configuration of the software.
And so, if you have a compiler that's embedded in that, what you're allowing anybody who has access to that compiler to do is create a new version.
And you actually made it part of the version that is, or part of the configuration that was deployed in support of the election.
So, that is a no no.
And which is, you know, gets to the heart of the matter is, you know, we're coming up on the 2026 election, Garland.
Do you think we're going to be secure going into this election based on what you see?
Well, I mean, we can't possibly be secure with these kinds of flaws, like you're saying, Patrick.
Securing Elections Through Transparency00:02:30
That was a great, eloquent explanation of it, better than mine.
But no, we can't be secure.
We have a national security crisis.
And we can't be secure if we are still conducting secretly counted elections on secret proprietary software and then secretly preserving the ballots.
There's no way that anyone in their right mind, I don't care who you are, Would think that that was a legitimate way to conduct elections.
But yet, that is the way we are conducting elections right now.
Yeah, transparency is the key.
If you are executing the most secure election in American history, you'd think you'd want to show all your cards face up so that everybody could go off and see what a great job you did.
And they're doing the exact opposite.
And with these illusory provisions of these contracts that prevent examination of the actual voting equipment, they're teeing up.
The Wizard of Oz curtain, so that nobody can take a peek behind it.
And I want to compliment you and the volunteers out at Voter GA for being Toto and pulling back that curtain on these guys.
If it wasn't for your efforts, we wouldn't know half of this stuff, and our elections would be even more at risk than they are today.
So thank you for all your effort.
How can people help you going forward and help you with your battle against the EAC to just do their job?
Well, the best way that can help us right now is to.
If they can't, if they're out of state that you could and you can't volunteer, you can always give us a donation.
We're a 501c3 nonparts and nonprofit.
And Tamara and I, and you know Tamara very well too, but we are volunteers.
The most important thing is it's a volunteer organization.
So whatever money comes in goes straight for the most part into the lawsuits.
And because we have almost no overhead.
So that's a great way to help out.
Are grateful for all the folks at Lindell TV who have donated to us and kept our momentum going.
So we're really, really grateful to you and to Mike and everybody at Lindell TV.
Well, you've got a great professional organization of volunteers out there, and people can go out to voterga.org to help them out.
And thank you for that update there.
I know you've got so much more you could be sharing.
Pursuing Accountability and Truth00:07:43
You could probably be doing this for the whole week just talking about what.
Going on in Georgia, I know.
So, I appreciate you guys giving us just a glimpse of what's going on.
And it gives us hope to see folks like you knowing so much about this and willing to take time out of your day to go off and flag these issues and pursue accountability.
So, thank you.
Anytime, Patrick.
Thank you.
All right.
God bless.
Well, guys, we're almost at the end of today's show and almost at the end of this week here.
So, all the folks that are watching that want to go out to their Mayday Strong parades, you still just got a few more minutes here of the show to watch before you take off for that.
But I wanted to go over, as I like to do whenever I have the opportunity, go over President Trump's recent true social posts.
Because, like I said, they are usually a pretty good bellwether of what is going to be in the news for the next day, next week, or whatever.
It's a kind of a good indicator of what direction.
The presidential policy has taken our country.
So, without further ado, I just want to kick off with, first of all, a truth that President Trump did on Commander Lippold, who was on Fox News talking about the war in Iran.
Now, Commander Lippold was the commander of the USS Cole.
You may recall that terrorists attacked it and came up alongside, sailors were killed.
The ship was damaged.
And And Commander LePaul has been, since that point in time, a very outspoken champion of national security interests, particularly when it comes to the Middle East.
I had the opportunity to meet him at the Fallen and Wounded Soldiers Fund event a few years back, and really a good guy, and appreciate his insights.
And I'm obviously not the only one who appreciates his insights when the president's truthing out a note of appreciation for the commander.
So kudos on that.
But what it's entailing is that.
President Trump is laser focused on getting a satisfactory resolution to the war in Iran, and he's combating the Tokyo Rose testimony by Democrats right now that are trying to grab defeat from the jaws of victory here.
So we're not going to let him do that, and that's why President Trump was promoting that truth, I believe.
Next truth, I want to kind of highlight, which is there's got to be more to this story.
I got to tell you.
But President Trump was putting out a Truth talking about how he was relieving the tariffs on whiskey with Great Britain.
And I thought that was very unusual.
There's got to be more to this than what meets the eye on this.
But essentially, the president's highlighting that without any solicitation on behalf of the king or the United Kingdom in any way, shape, or form, he just decided to go off and give a special relief on whiskey and bourbon for the folks out in Scotland so that the tariffs would be relaxed.
So I just have this feeling like this is a certain inside baseball truth out there, but I can't begin to take a guess as to what it may actually pertain to.
But it just seems like there's more to this than that truth, but we'll see, maybe not.
And the last one, which harkens to an area of the world that has very much got President Trump's attention, Iraq.
And there was a new prime minister elected to Iraq to head up the government of Iraq.
And his name's Ali al Zaidi.
And President Trump just wanted to make sure he congratulated him and essentially extended an olive branch to go off and secure strong relations between the United States and Iraq.
So that gives you a quick insight from some of the truth that President Trump has put out.
You know, we're heading into this upcoming weekend here and got a lot to be thankful for.
I personally have seen significant evidence that the accountability train is leaving the station and is picking up momentum.
So, all these various legal efforts coming out of the Department of Justice and the FBI, I should say, DOJ 2.0 and FBI 2.0, there's actually reasons to be hopeful, particularly on the election fraud front.
There are investigations going on that have been rolled into, from what I understand, the grand conspiracy.
Trials, the grand conspiracy investigations that are going on, where we have a grand jury investigation going on.
There should be indictments coming out of that that may lead up to Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton.
That is a big deal, but hopefully it'll at least address what's going on with John Brennan and James Comey.
Also, we're seeing the fact that two of Dr. Fauci's subordinates have been indicted, one for destroying records pertinent to.
COVID-19.
So for those who've been following elections, who are those who read my book, The 2022, you'll understand that I believe there's a very strong connection between COVID-19 response and the epidemic itself and the 2020 election.
We've seen evidence of it being used to obscure oversight of the election and encourage mail-in votes.
So there is a tie there.
And so the fact that they're indicting Folks related to Fauci is very interesting, not to mention, of course, the fact that there's a strong case to be made that says that the treatment and the recommendations coming out of Dr. Fauci and others were actually harmful and intended to be harmful for a significant swath of population.
So the more investigations we do there, the better from my perspective.
And there's a lot of people who need to be held accountable because a lot of people are suffering right now.
As a result of the response by some authorities on COVID.
So, a lot going on there.
And also, Senator Grassley has called for investigations into the Clinton Foundation to be resumed and brought to ground.
And I think that ties in with everything else that we're talking about as well.
So, guys, there's a lot of news that's breaking.
It's all starting to converge.
I know we're all.
Patient, and we're getting impatient in some cases, but I, for one, am seeing ample evidence of Ford momentum.
And I just want to give these guys a chance to connect all the dots and hold some people accountable for malfeasance going back to 2020.
Because if we don't hold people accountable for election malfeasance, there's nothing that's going to discourage them from doing so in the future.
And this upcoming 2026 election is extremely important for a variety of reasons.
And one of the reasons it's important is that we want to celebrate.
The 250th birthday of America in style.
So, with that being said, everybody take some time off this weekend.