The Mike Lindell Show - MYPILLOW VINDICATED IN DEFAMATION CASE
|
Time
Text
You ever see this guy with the pillows on Fox?
My pillow guy, Mike Lindell.
He is the greatest My Pillow guy.
Mike Lindell.
And he's been with us right from the beginning.
Wow.
We got it.
I'll have to get an update of that made with the opening there.
I haven't seen that in a while.
It's good to see.
And you have been through it, Mike Lindell.
But today we haven't seen you here on the show.
I know you've been so busy making media appearances and your phone's probably been ringing a lot.
But let's start first.
I know a lot you want to talk to the viewers about today, but first, your reaction to yesterday's verdict.
It's great, everybody.
It was a big win for our country for MyPillow.
100% MyPillow vindicated.
This is what, you know, back, this is kind of like, it's kind of funny, Vanessa.
You say that the, you know, the media pushed out, oh, he's fine and this and this for defamation.
There were so many things that went on that were suppressed, but let me tell you, they went down.
It came down to two statements I made.
Both of them were when my pillow was directly attacked.
And remember, Dominion sued my pillow in February of 21.
Eric Coomer and Dominion made a deal with Newsmax at the end of April of 21, which directly affected my pillow because I couldn't go on Newsmax anymore.
Not to talk about elections, but I couldn't talk about the great things that MyPillow was doing around the country.
And that hurt our business terrible.
I knew it was going to hurt us.
It's actually around over $20 million over 40 years.
It was just more cancellation.
Now, the next time that I ever talked about Eric Coomer was when a year later, when he sued me on the state capitol of Colorado on the steps of the, right in front of it, right when we're in the middle of a press conference.
Now, I compare this, of course, was I upset?
Absolutely.
I called him the biggest criminal crime family and him and his lawyers.
But let me tell you, to me, it's like you did something when you were put in jail, falsely put in jail.
And you got, and then, you know, so, you know, the thing that I think hurt the most is that the judge ruled that there was deflamation, that all of these 30 statements or whatever they tried to say it was.
And Vanessa, by him or by her saying that, they didn't even have to determine if the statements were deflamatory or not.
She's basically told him, oh, they're all defamatory.
You find out if Mike Lindell meant what he said and all this other stuff, conspiracy.
And so I'm very happy with the verdict.
It was a breakthrough that we've been waiting for.
MyPillow is the only one that has gone all the way to jury trial and won.
And these others have all their insurance companies covered and said, we're not going any further.
Let's quit talking about the elections and quit talking about these machine companies.
And interestingly enough, everybody, those SmartMatic had lawyers there.
Dominion had them all over the place, but SmartMatic, what are they there for?
Oh, that's right.
They sued MyPillow too for millions and billions.
And so this isn't about, and Vanessa, this wasn't about, to me, defamation.
I think his lawyer said it all when the last statement he made to the jurors before they went in to deliberate was, hey, we know Mike Lindell, my pillow.
You've heard they don't have any money left.
And if this bank, we're asking for 60 million, and if this bankrupts them, so be it.
We need to send a message to anyone else out there that'll put out disinformation or misinformation or malinformation about our elections and our election platforms.
So on this show, I do want to show one key piece that the judge denied, and we can go from there.
But I mean, Vanessa, were you surprised?
You were there most of the trial.
Were you surprised that they focused so much on the machines themselves and whether they're vulnerable or not?
Absolutely, Mike.
As you see right now, I still have my notes from trial and I go home and I read over them because I just can't believe what I heard over the last two weeks.
And you said it multiple times on the stand.
You testified, Coomer started off the trial by testifying after the jury was seated.
Then Coomer, you testified.
And then the whole rest of the time was about the 2020 election.
And Mike, you kept telling them, this is not about the 2020 election.
We had to hear about voting machines and how they're made and all these things for days on end, hours on end.
And really didn't have anything to do with defamation.
And so you said that.
Yes, I was surprised.
And I think everyone in the gallery was surprised too, because we would, you know, go out in the hall and out to lunch and say, you know, what's the 2020 election have to do with anything here?
That's a completely different case.
Yeah, no, that it's exactly right.
And everybody, this is what, this is the bigger picture.
This is why I knew that this is going to be one of the most important trials in history.
You know, this, the gateway now that we broke through with my pillow getting completely vindicated.
And of course, the other stuff the lawyers are going to look at, they didn't prove any damages, even though it came out there.
Mike owes 2 million, whatever.
And guys, let's not worry about that because the lawyers are going to be talking with them and they have other plans for that.
They never proved any damage because they didn't care about that.
What they cared about was: here's the narrative.
You too, if you speak out against these electronic voting machines, look what can happen to you.
Like, you know, they did this back in 2021.
Dominion sent out 150 or more letters to citizens that had voluntarily went to watch what, you know, be election watchers and so on.
And they seen something that didn't seem right.
But they got a letter saying, you better not talk about it or else you could be brought a lawsuit against you.
These people were very afraid.
I got a couple of those letters back in 2021.
Course, I didn't listen to him.
I've had letters that looked like that from the mafia before back when I used to bet football bands.
Same type thing.
You do this or else.
You pay today or else.
I mean, it was disgusting, those letters.
But I want to tell you, I want to really get into one thing.
Vanessa, were you, I don't know if you were there the day they brought up Doug Frank.
Were you there when they brought up Doug Frank?
And nobody had even brought him up because he wasn't in absolute proof.
Everybody, they kept focusing on absolute proof and the cyber symposium and Dennis Montgomery, who, by the way, if you don't know who he is, he works with the CIA.
And he was where I got my original evidence from or data from or which was on January 9th of 2021.
But as they continued to focus on that, and then all of a sudden they started discrediting everyone that was written a movie, Absolute Proof.
They'd bring him up, Matt Toperno.
They'd bring up this person, this person, Colonel Phil Waldron, General Clinton.
They'd bring up different ones and they would discredit them to the jury.
Well, little did he know.
I've got a list of 35 experts or 35 cyber people and government officials that I work with.
That's just minimum.
That's just the ones I can recall by name.
But he discredited, and so a guy, the name is Dr. Douglas Frank, everybody.
This is really important that y'all listen right now to what I'm going to tell you.
We did absolute proof and it came out February 5th of 2021.
Now, when Halderman, Alex Halderman was asked on that, asked on that stand, well, did you watch all the, did you know the movie Scientific Proof and Absolute Interference?
Did you watch them all?
He goes, well, and then he says, yeah.
And he says, well, what was in him?
It was all the same stuff.
An absolute lie, everybody.
Okay.
It wasn't the same stuff.
They were trying to convolute all the movies into one.
And then he, all of a sudden, he brings up Doug Frank, Dr. Frank, brings him up.
And here's what he did.
This is exactly what he did.
He went back and he goes, I think he's, it's just how he talked.
He was a math teacher for a high school math teacher.
That's just the way he said it.
And he left it at that.
And Mike relied on a high school math teacher.
Well, we're here today to show you what the judge did not allow in that court.
Because after they brought up Doug Frank, I wanted to get back on that stand and say, there's many things you lied about here, Halderman.
You didn't want scientific proof because there was only two people in scientific proof, me and Doug Frank.
And when we went into film absolute interference, everybody, I started talking to this professor and I'm going, what?
And I said, we're going to make a movie just about what he had because everybody, first of all, I'm going to show you his credentials.
If we can pull them up and I'm going to read them.
And this is what I'm going to have to get my glasses for this.
Hold on one second.
Or Vanessa, can you read off his credentials?
I don't have my glasses.
I can't.
Yes, I can.
And I'll also say, Mike, too, you know, you made a very good point because that was brought up in trial and again in closing arguments that just because he didn't have a PhD or he's just a math teacher, your attorney said this is how the club thinks of average everyday Americans.
You don't have a PhD.
They think you're not as smart as them, or you don't know what you're talking about.
And so, um, but here's the problem: that that's that's all there.
But he does have a PhD.
This is what they suppressed.
So, they were gonna right-that's exactly what they were trying to put the narrative that he's worthless because he doesn't have a PhD.
But in fact, that was a lie, like you said.
But they were also doing the narrative: who are you, Mike Lindell, without just a high school education thinking you know so much about our elections, right?
No, you're spot on, yeah.
Yeah, but pull them up.
I'm gonna skim.
I've read them.
I'm pulling them up again.
I'm gonna read just a few things you guys.
I can read it now.
Yeah, so Dr. Doug Frank, he does have a PhD, everybody.
And he was he did teach high school math, but it was to people that are kids that had IQs of 145 or better.
Dr. Frank's IQ is 175.
He's got a BA in chemistry, college PhD requirements completed, low energy election, electron diffection.
He was up for the, he was up for a Nobel Prize, everybody.
Why don't you scroll down a little bit?
I want to that go ahead and scroll down if you can't.
I'm here.
I mean, we don't have to get into all this.
Go down one more here, but he has written over 60 peer-reviewed pamphlets, biographies, and over 60.
I mean, this guy, you're talking about, you're not talking about just a math teacher.
This guy is a genius.
The people he has taught are in our NASA and our governments.
I mean, it just goes on and on.
But we had this.
We don't have to go through it all.
This guy is probably the most qualified genius that ever walked the planet to dig into what happened in our elections.
Now, knowing that, everybody, and I could get into his PhD, but you all get it.
You could take the highest rated person that would be qualified.
You could take Dr. Alex Halderman's credentials and multiply them by 10, and you probably still wouldn't be up to where Dr. Frank is.
And by the way, he's went around the country and he's done, I think he told me the other day, over 800 talks for free.
I mean, they just donate whatever, but he devoted his whole life after what he found in the 2020 election and to trying to save our country.
That's all he does.
He just goes around every fifth, all 48 states he's been, he's done talks in.
But anyway, I'm going to tell you what happened now, Vanessa.
You're going to hear the story here.
Why don't we can we roll a little bit of scientific proof?
I'm going to give you a little background, everybody.
So, about after absolute proof came out, then we were talking about the China interference and stuff.
It was called Absolute Interference, because by then we had learned a lot more than John Ratcliffe, John Ratcliffe had came up for the DNI that on January 7th.
But we already by then we had found out a lot more stuff when absolute interference came out, which was about a month and a half, two months, or about a month and a half after absolute proof.
But as Dr. Frank came upstairs when we were filming in Tennessee and we started talking, I said, stop the presses.
This is different.
And what he had, everybody, is evidence that was completely different than the Montgomery evidence I had or any other evidence of deviations.
This was different.
Why was it different?
Because it came right from the Secretary of States and right from the right out of the machines.
The voter rolls, and it came from what the states provided, which you can get under the Freedom of Information Act.
And you can, which, but anyway, can we roll a little bit of Vanessa?
Do you have anything else to say before we roll out a little bit?
I want people to see, this is what I wanted to bring into that courtroom and talk about Doug Frank because what you're going to see here, this movie, when that happened to me that day with that one-hour meeting with Doug Frank, I'm thinking of this movie, it changed my life forever for the next year and a half.
I put in 700 and some hours on an airplane, wore out four pilots, and spent almost every single day meeting with Secretary of State, attorney generals, politicians, everywhere in this country.
That was my life.
And it was all because I'm showing them their own role.
Why don't we roll a little bit of that movie Hello everyone As you know, we've been filming a new documentary this week and it's going to come out in a week or so.
But when I was interviewing everyone, Dr. Douglas G. Frank here has more stuff than you could even put into a 10-hour documentary.
So what I wanted to do was a separate one here.
This is so important to our country.
I want to get this one out right away.
So we're going to have an hour interview here with Dr. Frank.
And welcome.
I mean, what you showed me before, I want everybody to see in this hour.
I want to say how we met.
I met, it was like a divine appointment here.
I actually met a Congresswoman, a gal that was running for Congress in Pennsylvania.
I met her in DC at random in January, and she said that she had won.
And then all of a sudden, we woke up on November 4th and had lost.
And she knew that there was something terribly wrong.
She basically went door to door.
She did her own investigation and she proved herself.
She goes, yes, it was cheated.
She didn't really know how.
And so she went out and got a hold of different people to help her with this.
And one of them was Dr. Frank.
And when I was doing this documentary, she said, well, you need to see what he has.
It was amazing.
And well, so let's get into it.
What's your background?
I'll tell everybody.
I'm a PhD scientist.
I've been doing science for about 40 years aggressively.
Got about 60 scientific publications.
Some of them are cover articles and invited articles because I happened to make a pretty good discovery once back in the early 90s.
I left academics in 1996.
And ever since then, I've been teaching at a special school for extraordinarily gifted kids as well as working on new inventions and analyzing election data later.
Right, right, right.
So very overqualified, everybody.
But what you're going to see just speaks for itself.
I mean, for him to even dig in and get this and figure out the algorithms and then to have absolute proof.
What we have over here, what you're going to see when this is done, when I showed you an absolute proof, the first documentary we did with all the cyber attack on our country, who did it, when they did it, why they did it.
We know the IP addresses, the IDs of the computers, everything.
Now you're going to see that this was nationwide.
And these two come together and it is absolutely fits like a glove.
So why don't we just get right into it?
So what did you, what do you, what do you have?
Found were the algorithms that control how many registrations and how many ballots you need in every county to control an election.
That's what I figured out.
Right.
And it's widespread.
It's in every state that I've checked so far and it's to magnificent part per million detail.
So I know it's not an accident.
Right.
It has to be done by an algorithm.
Right.
It cannot be done by humans.
It could not be done.
I want everybody to know that.
But you're going to see it's impossible to be done by humans.
It had to be done by machines, i.e., computers, and they had to be online.
Absolutely.
The whole time.
The whole time.
You have to beforehand, during, and after.
Before.
Stick there for a second.
Okay.
So I want you to know, Vanessa, right there, and everybody that's watching, did you hear what there's a couple takeaways right there in the beginning?
By the way, you're going to be able to watch scientific proof.
We're going to put it up in Lindale TV now, and it's going to stay there.
It's going to live here.
Because two things happened, everybody.
They're right there when I said actually, there were three.
One, he said he found an algorithm in four states, everybody.
Four states, okay?
I think, believe it was Ohio, Pennsylvania, I think Colorado, and one other one.
Maybe Wisconsin.
I don't know.
I can't remember.
You'd have to watch the full movie.
But what he found was an algorithm.
And what did he say?
It couldn't be done by humans.
It could only be done with machines, i.e., computers.
And what was the other one?
And they had to be online.
Okay.
So what we have here, what those guys tried to do to this case in Colorado, they attacked the Dennis Montgomery evidence.
The evidence that there's a Samar scorecard that can go in, break into our elections, and change things at will with no footprints.
That was developed by our government, Dennis Montgomery and others, to use on other countries' elections to steal theirs.
But it was turned on our own country.
That's the story behind it.
Now, have all of Dennis's data been released?
No, because it was under a government gag order back then where you couldn't.
In fact, I tried to get it released about five weeks ago.
And no, they still don't want that out there.
There's a reason for it.
We tried to get it out a few years ago in Nevada, took it to court.
The government does not want that information out there.
They don't want us to see it.
They don't want you to see it.
That's fine.
So you have this, but I've had experts, I've had people go in and validate.
We validated who Dennis was and everything.
Anyway, my point being is when I got Dennis's data or his story and data on January 9th of 2021, I tried to get it to the president.
We all know the famous story when I'm outside there on January 15th.
I tried to get him to sign it.
You guys all know that story.
Okay.
No one knew his name then.
And I kept hearing people for the next five months, you know, you better not put out that, you better stay away from Dennis Montgomery.
He's out fraud.
I said, whoever said anything about Dennis Montgomery, I never did.
I never mentioned his name until after the cyber symposium, which was August of 21.
But now imagine, everybody, what Dennis Montgomery's data is saying that any election, if it's all connected to the internet, it's done massively.
It's done horizontally, not just in swing states.
It's like you're doing this so that your deviations don't get detected.
So it's kind of like skimming a casino.
You skim everywhere.
So you bring the water level down.
And whenever you, where it was here, you just bring it down.
And you can do, so it smooths out.
When you say, when the mafia used to skim casinos, you wouldn't just take from a craft stable or a slot machine.
You would even, you take from everything, even the food.
Because if you had more food sold, then everything was related.
All the numbers are related, if that makes sense, everybody.
So if you just took from one thing, it would go, wait a minute, where'd all the money go for this particular item?
So you have to bring it down.
Now, deviations occur when what?
When you don't have this, when you don't take it from everywhere.
And that's where we had deviations in the 2020 election because they misjudged their baseline.
And even though they were stealing across the board, They didn't steal enough where Donald Trump was going to win seven more states.
So they had to stop everything and steal every one of those with crazy deviations.
Like 106,000 votes in Michigan came down for Biden in the middle of the night, 2,000 for Donald Trump.
Well, those were the mail-in votes.
No, they weren't.
The mail-in votes in Michigan were counted on the morning of the third, not in the middle of the night on the fourth.
So things like that.
But here's how important Dr. Douglas Frank was.
Remember, everybody, this is almost three months, January, February, March, three months after my Dennis Montgomery evidence of a computer that did this nationwide.
Now, his data, when you watch scientific proof, what did he tell you?
He's got proof that they're all in line, that there was an algorithm.
And when you watch scientific proof, you will be blown away.
You can actually, it's this data comes right out of the machines.
You can get it.
And I even said to him after filming that, I said, Dr. Frank, where did you get this?
He goes, Mike, you can go right to the Secretary of States and get whoever voted, it's all the data rolls.
It's the data files for every state.
So you get, here's everybody that was eligible to vote on the voter rolls.
Here's everybody that voted, their address, their phone number.
I mean, all kinds of stuff.
All their information is right there for anybody to get.
You just don't get to get who they voted for, of course, but you get to get that they voted and their address and where they voted and who was taken off their voter rolls afterwards.
Kind of like a voter's history there, right, of the election.
So I'm going, wow, Dr. Frank, and you found this algorithm in just these four states.
And he goes, and I said, what if it's nationwide?
I said, that would validate evidence I have over here, kind of like having two camera angles from a diamond heist.
You have one camera over here that catches this, but there's, remember, everybody, there's only one truth.
There's only one truth.
It doesn't matter which angle you get them at.
If this one over here, well, I don't believe in Dennis Montgomery's data.
Well, good for you, Special King.
We got another set of data that came right out of the machines.
And every Secretary of State and State, you can request it and get it.
So after the movie of Doug Frank, after that movie of scientific proof, Vanessa, you know what I did?
I hit the ground running.
I was so excited going, I'm going to go to every state and get that data, those data files.
So I did.
I went everywhere.
Every state, every, some of them you had to pay for, like Alabama cost me $41,000 to get their roles.
I didn't care.
I poured money out over the next 18 months in 21 from the time we sat there because I knew how could they deny, how could they deny that their own data, their own things.
I don't care what they say.
Well, you don't have any evidence, Wynne.
Well, this came right out of your machines.
This is what you're, this is what happened in your election, Wisconsin.
This is at your election, Alabama.
What I did, everybody, I put on over 750 hours in an airplane, wearing out four pilots.
This is back when I had a plane.
I just poured money in.
I went to every state I could, and I started with the red states, thinking that they would care about their elections.
You all know the story of Alabama.
This came up during this trial.
I said, I went down to Alabama.
This is what one of my first blockers actually, actually, Missouri was first blocking.
Let's use Missouri first.
So I go down to Missouri.
Remember, Donald Trump won Missouri by a ton.
Why would you go to Missouri?
It doesn't matter who won.
We have to find, we have these algorithms now.
And if it's in every state, we got big problems.
I mean, this is it.
This is huge.
This would prove that Dennis's stuff is right.
This isn't just somebody hacking into an election over here in this county or this county.
No, this would mean that we're completely controlled by some force out there, deep state globalist, uniparty.
This is when I started to find out that the Uniparty Republican blockers were real.
It surprised me.
Anyway, we get to Missouri.
The Secretary of State was there.
This is early, this is in 21 now, everybody.
The Attorney General office was there in Missouri, and all these politicians, I'll bet there was 20 of them around this big table.
And Dr. Frank and I were there and were given this presentation.
But also by that time, we had all the voter rolls in Missouri.
And we showed Missouri something that was very strange.
200,000 people, it was like, I think it was 210,000 because it happened in Minnesota too, almost identical.
210,000 names on the voter rolls.
210,000, a clump of them were added two weeks before the election.
And then three weeks after the election, that same block of names was taken down.
Now that's just bizarre, right?
Now we showed Missouri.
We showed them, this was we by then we had this tool that I helped develop with this other company.
We could beam in on any one of their cities or counties.
We beam in and go, okay, here it says six people voted from this household here on 4th and Maine.
And we beam in, it looks like a one-bedroom apartment or a one-bedroom little house with one car.
Well, then, you guys, we would do canvassing.
We'd actually go there and find out that only one person voted.
Only one person lives there.
And the other five live in another state or they're deceased.
I mean, how do you deny that?
You can't because it came out of their data, their voter rolls.
Now I go down to Alabama, and I don't know if you were there for this one, Vanessa, when I gave the Alabama example.
This is one of my favorites, everybody.
And Alex Haldeman stood on the stand and listened to me tell about this.
In Alabama.
This is my favorite too.
Yeah.
In Alabama, the Secretary of State of that time, the summer of 21, it was the guy named John Merrill.
Okay.
A Republican.
Boy, we got our back, John.
You know, a lot of people call him rhinos.
No, there's a different name for people like him.
They're uniparty Republicans.
This is what's happened to our country.
But anyway, I get down to Alabama and the first president, the first part of the presentation was, this should really get his attention, guys.
And I walk in there.
By the way, there's like six people in the room with John Merrill.
And he's going, Mike, we have the most secure election machines in Alabama.
You know, Donald Trump won by this much, and we are the best, and blah, blah, blah.
So, you know, we don't have any problems in Alabama.
I'm sorry.
Yeah, you do, John.
Let me show you your voter rolls that you charged me $41,000.
By the way, everybody, this was out of my personal money too, back then.
Back when I had tens of millions of dollars, I just poured it.
I didn't care what I paid.
Let's get to the truth and save our country.
So I go, John, 4,662 people in your state.
This is your data, say they voted and they're over 110 years old, all the way up to almost 200 years old.
And John looked at me, well, Mike, we live pretty good here in Alabama.
And I go, okay, that's funny, John.
What are we going to do about this?
For the next two hours, he argued over different things that could have, this could have happened, this could have happened.
That was just one deviation we showed him.
Just disgusting.
What are you going to do about it?
Instead, John doubled down.
When we sent people, we sent people, our teams in, to where they were testing the Dominion machines and these other, I think there was another brand there too.
But we went to test the machines when they do their testing.
And people came to those tests.
This is what we did in different states.
We brought people there that came with this piping paper you buy at a fed or at an office depot, just typing paper as a ballot.
Looked around, shoved it in the machine, and it worked.
Are you kidding?
And then when John heard about it, he banned all the public from those tests across Alabama.
And he doubled down and did what?
Bought more machines to be more secure with the current machines.
In other words, one computer to watch another computer.
Just disgusting.
So when this was brought up in the trial, Vanessa, as you know, to Alex Halderman, you know, because I brought up this example and he goes, who cares?
That was his thing.
Who cares?
Well, John, just because you think it didn't affect the election in Alabama, because it's all red, that's why you're saying who cared?
Then the lawyer said, in Alabama, do they have voter ID?
Or his lawyer said, when he counter and said, do you know if they have voter ID in Alabama?
He says, I believe they do.
That's it.
So that makes it okay that they had voter ID.
To me, to me, Alex Halderman, it would make it more impossible that they voted, that they just used their names.
They just used their names.
Well, we did check into those names.
And those people are long gone.
And their names voted.
Okay.
So they typed him in and they voted.
So my point being, everybody, is for 18 months, I went around our country on my dime, tens of millions of dollars.
This is when I spent all my money.
It wasn't the Dennis Montgomery camera angle.
It was our 50 states data that comes right out of the machines angle.
And what we did, you had Dr. Frank's algorithm.
And you know what the media did to him?
You look it up, everybody.
Every town he went to, they called him a math teacher.
Don't miss this math teacher.
But they could never discount his data.
They could never do it.
Why, everybody?
Because it came from the states, right out of the machines.
They can't say, well, his data is no good because it came from them.
And then as we went around and I got the data from every state that I could, which was, I think we got it for everyone.
Pieces we were short in a couple places.
I believe maybe Maine and another one was harder to get information out of than others.
But anyway, all of those data rolls and stuff, every single state, every single politician of most of them uniparty Republicans would block and block and block.
And the media would be out there.
Mike Lindell has nothing.
He has nothing.
Every one of them was computer manipulated, according to Dr. Frank.
When you watch Scientific Proof, that algorithm.
And it's never, it had never happened before.
We went back to other elections and checked.
Everything was computer manipulated.
Now, does that prove the election was overturned?
No.
But it certainly proves that computers were used everywhere we looked in every single state that they were used because it had a pattern.
It had a pattern that you can't deny.
Now, that's what that, now, if I'm the court, I want to leave that out of there because what it does, it gives them two fronts to deny.
You're denying Dennis Montgomery's stuff theory, which they spent, as you know, probably 90% of the time, Vanessa, their experts was talking about how the machines are good, right?
Machines are good.
You can't hack them.
They're experts.
We're all talking about the machines are so good.
Yeah, and Mike Lindell is putting out disinformation.
Well, if you don't allow me to say that scientific proof and Dr. Frank, that this, what he discovered, remember he was up for the Nobel Prize, everybody.
This guy like invented some molecule thing.
I mean, this guy, I mean, he's a genius beyond geniuses, and he felt something in our elections.
And it's in every single county and state we went to, every single state we went to.
So you look at that and you go, don't you want to know people?
I mean, it was bizarre.
They just suppressed him.
But boy, some people are interested.
He's done over 800 talks in four years because he loves this country and he wants to save our country.
Now, here's another thing they left out, Vanessa.
And this is big.
And this might not have been so much the judge, but I think I brought it up in my talk.
And they just didn't, they didn't even want to talk about it.
And that was called the cast vote records, everybody.
Now, a cast vote record, we should have talked to more, but we didn't know where their experts were going to go.
So you guys, in the summer of 22, remember from Dr. Frank, from his, from there, now in a separate timeline, I had experts validating Dennis Montgomery right up to the cyber symposium, experts validating his data that it's there and getting and trying to get that with the government to sign off on it and all kinds of stuff.
But during that time, remember, two months into that, so I still got people working over here with Dennis, white hat hackers and others.
Now, after Scientific Proof, which was March of 21, from that point on, all the way up until the spring, actually it was June of 22.
I never stopped.
That's where I spent most of my money, not only having lawyer bills where I was fighting Dominion, who had sued me by then, Ms. Coomer, had sued me in the spring of 22.
SmartMatic sued me in January of 21.
I'm 22, I'm sorry, a year later.
So you got all these lawsuits going on, but that most of my money was spent going around to all 50 states with the new evidence that came right out of their own machines called the data file rolls.
I mean, everywhere there was a thing.
I'll give another example, Wisconsin.
7.2 million people are on their data rolls here.
They're the people that could vote, the names that are put on there.
But if everybody voted that was eligible in Wisconsin, it's 4.2 million.
Why do you need another 3 million names on your rolls, Robin Boss?
You uniparty guy, you one of the, you know, I'm going to be careful not to call people what I was not supposed to say.
And it rhymes with.
You have to be so careful now, Mike.
We all do.
It's really a sad day for free speech, but we also have a long way to go on free speech, too.
It's scary.
Well, I mean, yeah, the free speech, when you can't talk about our governor, I mean, our government and machine companies that I believe when they're doing something against your country for getting out, is that a traitor or not?
I believe it is.
I believe you're, you know, when you're traitor, you're supposed to be working for us, the people.
And if you're using it to suppress the truth and you can't talk about your government and you can't question your elections, there's problems.
But now I want to get back in.
Okay.
No, go ahead.
Go ahead.
I'm going to tell you.
I was just going to say back in the 1800s, then President Ulysses S. Grant, he made a quote that was very famous back then that there are now two parties, traitors and patriots.
That was back in the 1800s by President Grant.
Wow.
But now in 2025, you can't call anyone a traitor.
Right.
Do you know what I said?
Do you know what Mike Lindell said for the last two years?
Everybody, the fight we're in, I said there's either heroes or traitors.
There's nothing in between anymore.
I said that.
And there you go.
You had somebody say it in the 1800s.
President said it then, I mean this is, so this is where we're at.
So now I'm going to finish that timeline, though, because this is something that's very important.
From the cyber symposium, let's see, let's go from scientific proof on, everybody, for the next year and three months.
I developed teams.
We got Cause of America, teams all over the country, because they were doing a third.
Now, this is a third.
Remember, we had Dennis Montgomery's data, Dr. Frank's data that comes from the states, and then there's a third kind.
And that third kind is called canvassing.
There were groups all over our country that started canvassing.
They tried to shut it down in Colorado.
They took the canvassers to court.
And guess what?
We won that.
God bless the cause of America.
It was the people that had started in Colorado.
I know Sean Smith led that part, the Colonel Sean Smith, and they won.
They fought and fought and fought because if you lose that rank to canvas, now you lose all verification.
Okay.
Here's what canvassing is, everybody.
You would go into, let's say it's Defend Florida.
They were a big canvasser.
So in Florida, you look up, remember, we have their data now, and I was able to pass out the data.
And if you get, if you had someone that was, like I say, six people, usually with six people or more, anytime you found where six voters voted from the same house, I would bet it was like 90 some percent you got there.
And they're going, wait a minute, only one person voted here.
Five don't live here.
And you, then you have a team that looks up the other five.
Now, some of them were still in the state in another county, but most of them lived in another state or they were deceased or you couldn't even find them.
It was, you know, it could be a made-up name.
This was crazy.
So, canvassing in Florida, now remember, now we have these three camera angles.
So, you had Dennis Montgomery's Dr. Franks, which came right from the states.
Now, you had a new one called canvassing.
In Florida, we had these three camera angles intersect, and we validated one against the other, and they came out within about 10,000 votes of all being the same.
And that average was 970,000 votes stolen from Donald Trump in the 2020 election.
The state of Florida was third on the list of votes stole from Donald Trump.
Well, he won Florida.
That's right.
He also won Texas.
Texas was second with almost a million votes stolen.
First one was California, where 1.5 million were stolen, according to these three camera angles.
Now, here's the big one, everybody.
Here comes your fourth camera angle.
You talk about evidence.
In the summer of 22, it was June of 22, and I wanted for all the people that had worked so hard.
Actually, I was going to have a big donor event up in Bedminster, where the president is out there on this golf course.
I was going to have a big donor event and have this event there and raise money because I was starting to get out myself or I didn't have any more money.
I just poured it out over those last year and a half.
Well, I changed my mind.
I said, you know what?
I don't care about that.
I said, let's have an appreciation night.
We brought in all of the everyone that had helped out, the cyber people, the attorneys, I mean, people on the ground, the team leaders from the states.
And we got there, and our great president, he came, he talked to him.
We came in for an hour of his time.
And we had this great event free to them, just an appreciation night for all the hard work they've done.
Now, the next morning, this is a very important time in history, too.
All of these cyber guys got around me.
There was seven of them, and it was like an intervention.
And they were telling me two things.
One is they wanted one of them to go validate Dennis Montgomery, which we assigned Jeff O'Donnell.
He went down there and he validated that.
But that was about a month later.
But the one thing they wanted to do was tell me about something that they had discovered called the cast vote records, everybody.
That under the Freedom of Information Act, we could get those cast vote records.
That's the one thing we could get.
Some of the states call it the Sunshine Act, but everybody knows, although most states know what it is and know that that's the one thing you can get under the freedom of anybody can request it.
So they're telling me about this and they go, like, what we have found so far is every one of them was computer manipulated.
And I said, well, explain these cast vote records.
And they said, okay, imagine everybody if you missed a football game and you went back to watch the just the highlight replay in order.
So this is like the order the votes come in.
So think of a football game.
First quarter, 7-7, second quarter, 21-14, third quarter, 14 to 10.
What?
Numbers don't go in reverse.
So if you have a cast vote record and a number goes in reverse or unnatural, it's computer manipulated because it goes numbers go one, two, three, four, five, six, seven.
They don't go one, two, three, four, five, two, three, four, five, two, three.
They go in order.
That's how they go.
So if what a cast vote record discovers, if there's either computer manipulation or there's not, it doesn't prove that the election was overturned or the election was overturned.
It proves that it was computer manipulated.
So they had my attention in June of 22.
There were seven of them there.
I'm not going to name them all.
I could.
You'd probably know some of their names, but they've been attacked enough for their trying to help save our country.
And they all told me, Mike, there's bad news, though.
We only have till September 3rd to get the cast vote records in the United States.
I said, why is that?
They said, because in any election, it's federal law.
You have to hold the records for 22 months.
22 months, which would have been the November 3rd election of 2020.
We only had till September 3rd to get the cast vote records in this country.
So I went on and I went on shouting from the top of my lungs.
Okay, everybody, we need the cast vote records.
Go request it in your county and get them.
Well, armies of people went out and requested them.
We were able to get 1,100 cast vote records, 1,100 counties out of 3,143, one-third of the United States.
Now, why weren't we able to get the other ones?
You had places like Minnesota going, we don't know what a cast vote record is, but if we find out, you can't have it.
You had places like South Dakota where you couldn't get a cast vote record.
They're going, uh-uh, no, no, no.
Kentucky, another horrible place.
You can't get our cast vote records.
Oh, it's just too much work for the clerks.
The reports came out.
Mike Lindell's going to ruin our country.
These were the headlines, everybody.
Mike Lindell's going to ruin our country because he's making the clerks so busy requesting these cast vote records.
Boy, if he comes to Kentucky, we're going to put him in prison.
That's what the Kentucky politicians were saying.
Well, you know what?
We just looked over at Old California in San Francisco Township.
There's some Democrats.
You know what they did?
They put the Cast Vote records right up on their website because it's our information.
How simple was that?
Boom.
Here's our cast vote records.
Quit calling the courthouse or quit calling us here.
It's yours.
The public.
It's our right to see them.
Well, here's what happened, everybody.
We had those cast vote records analysis.
Remember, you had Dennis Montgomery's, you had Dr. Franks come right out of the machines.
You had canvassing across our whole country, which we had all the data for.
Now you had another thing called the Cast Vote Records.
Those cast vote records of all 1,100 counties collected, ready, were machine computer manipulated, every one of them.
So we had to go back in time and find ones that weren't computer manipulated in other elections back in time.
And you can see, you can see it for yourself.
It's totally different.
One's random and one's like.
You've all seen the little F curves and all that stuff they show on the crooked elections.
Well, then just to finish that, the Cast Vote Records, then what did this country do when the 2022 election came along and we asked for those cast vote records?
We were only able to get 450 because the counties and every states shut it down.
Mike Lindell's bought cast vote records.
And in the state of Missouri, a guy named Shane Scholler, I think he ran for, he might even be Secretary of State.
No, I don't know, but he was a high-up politician.
And what did he do?
This nice lady asked for her cast vote records in her county.
He sued her for asking.
Sued her for asking.
Shane Scholler, you can look it up, everybody.
It's disgusting.
This is just disgusting.
This is when it went on.
And those cash vote records are another camera angle.
Now, in the 2022 election, everybody, we actually found about 15 counties that were not computer manipulated.
So now we had a perfect picture.
What would the United States look like without computers, without machines?
And it was beautiful.
You had a secure, fair election because they did computer manipulate.
They chose not to.
Actually, Vanessa, they probably made a mistake going, gee, what if, and you know how we fell down?
Because I questioned the Miami-Dade County election with Ron DeSantis because it hadn't been.
I think we lost Mike there.
Hope to get him back soon.
In the meantime, I know we are following.
I wanted to get Mike's reaction to this.
We have about nine minutes left in the show.
FBI Director Kash Patel dropped a bombshell last night regarding the 2020 election and China, some involvement with China.
I think we have Allison Steinberg live in Washington, D.C. right now.
Allison, if you're with us, good to see you.
Thanks for sticking around as we talked about the verdict.
And that's segueing into what was released by Kash Patel last night, just hours after that verdict in Colorado.
Yes, Vanessa, the timing could not be more incredible on this one.
Major news as far as more exposure into the stolen 2020 election.
Newly declassified intelligence reports from August of 2020 now show that China had mass produced fake U.S. driver's licenses to ultimately hijack the 2020 election with fake mail-in ballots explicitly for Joe Biden.
So I think it's safe to say conspiracy theorists are right again.
Kash Patel tweeted this out last night and he is now making it known.
The intelligence came from a relatively new confidential source in the summer of 2020 claiming the Chinese government was manufacturing and exporting these driver's licenses.
We also know that former FBI director Christopher Wray was asked about this in a hearing, testified saying there were no known interference plots ahead of the 2020 election, blatantly lying and trying to shift the focus onto the Russia, Russia, Russia situation.
So we know all of these characters were in on it.
They just lied and continued to lie all throughout it.
And then when brave patriots like Mike Lindell dare to question the mainstream narrative, they are then, you know, sued and taken to court, which is absolutely ridiculous.
So I'm so happy about the verdict coming down after Mike Lindell's trial.
This is just one more major piece of evidence to add to the ever-growing list that the 2020 election was indeed tampered with and rigged.
Right.
And Allison, I wish again Mike was with us.
We had some difficulties with his phone there, but it was brought up in trial for the last two weeks that Mike Lindell was a conspiracy theorist.
Mike Lindell lied about China's involvement.
Well, Mike was speaking just once ago.
I'm going through my notes here all the times that China was mentioned.
And Mike Lindell is just making this up.
He has millions of followers and he's confusing the base.
That's what was said in court.
He's confusing Americans by making up all of these outlandish claims.
And so again, for that to come out on the same day that the verdict was read is very interesting when it comes to the timing of it all.
But it goes back to Tulsi Gabbard a month or so ago in a meeting with President Trump says she has the best of the best investigating these machines.
And she has evidence that they can be tampered with.
And the report she told the president is not ready to be released yet, but she does have the evidence.
And then you have Kash Patel talking about China and China's involvement in the 2020 election.
And so, you know, we hear conspiracy theorists all the time.
But so far, the conspiracy theorists, as they're named, have been right.
It really is amazing.
I love to see it.
You know, I have gone through my fair share of hardships trying to talk about all of this online.
I've been censored and shut down many times on social media platforms.
So it's nice to be vindicated, I must say.
But it just goes to show the immense corruption that's happened in various platforms.
Mike Lindell does a fantastic job exposing the corruption within the voting machines.
I know he notoriously says to burn them down and turn them into prison bars where all of the corrupt people that push this narrative should be held and locked up for eternity.
And then we also have China now interfering with these ballots that were given to non-citizens.
Fake IDs were given out.
And that's how people were allowed to vote in the election.
In many states, no voter ID was even required to vote in elections.
Where I'm from, in Comiforn, you don't even need an ID.
You can just walk up and say you're Joe Schmo and vote in any old election.
So they have numerous tactics.
This is just yet another one that's now coming to light.
And it's great to see that those of us that have been vocal about this are now actually have the proof to show the evidence that this was indeed orchestrated.
And I guess China had a big hand in this too.
No surprise, seeing as Joe Biden was installed and we had to suffer through that for four years.
Now it's up to President Trump to continue exposing this, his administration to continue to expose this and actually make some arrests so we don't endure something like this again.
If we don't get these elections sorted out and go back to free and fair elections, single-day voting, paper ballots, we will never have free and fair elections again in this country.
So this is a critical issue that must be dealt with.
I know President Trump signed an executive order on election integrity earlier this year and said that more was still to come on that front.
We're still waiting to see what that is, but I hope that they are still actively working to further cement the importance of restoring elections in America.
I agree with you.
And you know, Allison, during the trial, they had the experts come out talking about how secure these machines are.
And then, you know, you had Mike Lindell's attorneys who showed a video of a conference where these election companies, these voting machine companies were invited but didn't show up.
And it was your everyday American, you know, these computer literate adults who showed up.
It was a conference and they pretty much set them in front of the computer and said, hack them if you can.
And they were all hacked.
They were all able to be hacked.
So the experts differ, the testimony from the experts differed from the everyday Americans who could hack these machines and get into them.
In fact, they actually showed video into evidence how these hackers were on a computer and they were watching someone, you know, it was a mock voting machine voting at another computer.
And the hacker said, watch, I'm about to turn the computer off.
Hit a button, the computer turned off.
So I know.
So it was very interesting, very interesting two weeks in trial.
But again, The plaintiff and his attorneys tried to make the jury believe that Mike Lindell is just a conspiracy theorist and a crazy man who's out there, you know, lying to his base.
But we are pleased with the results.
A lot of the fake news media out there are saying Mike Lindell lost.
We didn't get the full win.
There's still a lot of work to be done for our First Amendment rights and freedom of speech.
However, my pillow is safe, vindicated.
And there were 10 charges against my pillow, and it was cleared on all counts.
And I think, you know, that alone is a lifesaver, and thank God for that.
And then you have Mr. Coomer, who was after over $62 million, and the jury only awarded him 2.3.
But Mike Lindell will, of course, appeal that.
So I see it as a win, Allison.
The fake news, you know, doesn't see it as that, but I see it as a win.
I still think it's a huge win, and I think the ultimate win is that Mike Lindell went to bat for something he truly believes in, something every American should believe.
And as we know, many of the other people who faced very similar lawsuits, other big media corporations, just you know, settled with many of these people involved.
And that ultimately is a big loss for free speech.
So Mike Lindell is really the only person brave enough to battle this out to the end and fight all the way through and actually pursue this.
I think it's a huge win, and we're still not done.
Lots more work to be done, and I know we will prevail, of course, with the Lord's help.
So I think it's an exciting time.
Absolutely.
They tried to wipe Mike Lindell out, but Mike Lindell is still here, still standing, and he says he will not stop fighting for America and for secure elections.
That'll do it for us here today on the Mike Lindell show.
Quick mention: as we have about 15 seconds left, go help donate.