All Episodes
Previous Next
Sept. 19, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
52:01
The Lindell Report with Brannon Howse & Ivan Raiklin
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And who are they?
sworn testimony of Chief Sun with the interaction with the four members, the decent members
of Congress that are on that committee.
And who are they?
Who are those?
Congressman Loudermilk, Congressman Morgan Griffith, and Congressman Despacito, as well
as Greg Murphy, Congressman Greg Murphy.
So Murphy's from North Carolina, Despacito's from New York.
Griffiths is from Virginia.
I know him, not very well, but I know him fairly well.
And then Mark, what is his name?
Loudermilk is the chairman of that subcommittee from Georgia, who happens to be the congressman for Roseanne Boylan.
Now, a lot of things didn't get addressed today, but fortunately some things, the key takeaway is that more scrutiny is going to now be had on Paul Irving, the house sergeant in arms for Pelosi.
The Yogananda Pittman is probably going to be called in publicly as well, and then probably the General Counsel, Ted Tobias.
Basically, if you've been following my sub-stack, I've been saying this for, I don't know, it seems like a decade at this point.
So, who is the one that's really spearheading this?
Those four congressmen you just mentioned?
Congressman Loudermilk is spearheading this investigation.
I think they're going to get to it.
Congressman Greg Murphy really laid it out today.
He said, you know what?
It appears as though Nancy Pelosi did everything in her power to make sure that there was a breach of the Capitol.
And Nancy Pelosi had her daughter up there with a film crew, right?
Yeah, she was there right next to Pelosi doing a documentary.
Her son-in-law, Michael Voss, was on the outside of the Capitol also documenting what was going on on the outside.
I mean, after today's testimony, if you've been reading my sub stack, everything that Chief Sun testified to, while it wasn't as, you know, earth shattering or bombshell or bomb throwing, nothing that he said was inconsistent with any of my assessments that Pittman, Pelosi, the sergeants at arms and the general counsel were either in on it or provided the subsequent cover up to the J6 feds direction.
Now, if Nancy Pelosi's son-in-law was outside filming, was he not in a government-restricted area?
Yes, he was.
Has he been raided by the FBI and arrested?
No, because all the arrests are driven by the political leadership of the legislative branch.
Do you think that your mother-in-law is going to tell the FBI to raid you?
I mean, you know the answer to that.
Yeah.
And of course, that's why Ray Epps.
So because there was so much viral video about Ray Epps and his involvement in the Fed's direction, they had to make it look like they're doing something at this point.
And what better day to do it than to divert from Nancy Pelosi essentially being proven to be complicit in January 6th and at a minimum the failures.
I mean, we're well beyond there were failures of intelligence and security on January 6th.
At this point, we need to move on to proving Beyond any doubt that Nancy Pelosi was behind it.
And the way you do it, you subpoena her daughter, her son-in-law, you get all the records, all of her phone records, text messages of the sergeants at arms.
And that's when we're going to get to full stop proof that Nancy Pelosi was behind all of it.
Now, Chief Sun, is he not, is he the one that also wrote a book that you were talking about?
Yeah.
Back in January of 2023, it seems like a lifetime ago.
He published a book.
And basically, he in his testimony, he mentioned a lot of his book because he's already written about us and a lot of people are going to see and hear for the first time his accounting of what occurred on that day.
And I've read his book.
I listened to his testimony in February of twenty twenty one before the Senate committee and then in this one.
He has not deviated one bit from any of his testimony.
He has been the one that's been most consistent across all the witnesses or anybody that was really in senior level positions within Capitol Police.
And so his note taking and his level of meticulousness is far beyond reproach.
And when he was asked at the very end, I believe by Congressman Loudermilk, would he be willing to Provide his phone records and he said absolutely you can
have absolutely everything I own and you can't say the same for Pelosi and the rest of the
Elk, do you think you could help set up an interview regarding his book with me with Chief Sun? I
Can try my best I'd love to interview him about that book
That's kind of a yes, but it's up to him, obviously, to say yes.
Right.
I'll help tee it up.
But you'll help tee it up.
Obviously, if he's written a book, he's probably interested in it being read and sold.
So therefore, it would be a natural thing to do some interviews to promote it, right?
Yeah.
I mean, I think that marketing a book that you're trying to sell is definitely not something that he would want to do.
Considering that he talked about his book on Tucker and that got, I don't know, 50 million views, right?
And so, and then they talked about it today at the hearing.
I think it would be a good, good moment for him to go on the Liddell Report.
So you're saying he would like to market his book.
And Brandon Howe's show tomorrow.
Yeah, absolutely.
So you are, I don't know if I misunderstood you.
So you said he would like probably to market his book, probably.
Um, I'll have to ask him.
And I'm not saying that I even communicate with him.
Who makes you think that I've ever even communicated with him?
You communicate with everybody, Ivan.
I never disclosed that I communicated with him.
But I can make an attempt through different surrogates and cutouts.
Well, you can just walk up to him like you have the CDC director and other people.
You've just walked right up to him.
Well, that's for tomorrow.
So Chief Sun, because he's telling the truth and he hasn't committed any transgression from my investigations, I have full respect for him.
Now, I can't say the same thing about the acting fake Attorney General Merrick Garland.
Are you going to be in there for that?
I think about 9.55 or so tomorrow morning, you may see me making a cameo appearance and maybe making sounds in the vicinity of that acting fake Attorney General Merrick Garland.
And you might even have me making faces behind him from 10 a.m.
until about 1 p.m.
Are you going to introduce yourself as you do?
You seem to like to introduce yourself to all these folks.
Are you going to do the same here?
I think so.
Tomorrow I might be giddy and I might just say, you know, sir, you remember me from a previous hearing?
Well, my name is Ivan Raklin by birth.
I'm also known as the Deep State Marauder.
Have you met him before?
Yeah.
I confronted him a couple of months ago when he was testifying before another committee in Congress.
Did we play the video of that?
I'm not sure.
We might have to do... You know what?
We might have to show them the first time I met and talked to them.
You might need to do a montage of all of these interviews.
Yeah, do a montage.
Because I've done this to Mayorkas two or three times.
Garland once.
Millie once.
Austin once.
Really?
Do you have all that on video?
Chris Ray maybe twice.
You have all that on video?
Oh yeah.
I haven't seen all those.
We could do a montage.
Yeah, you should put all those together and we can play it.
Basically, all the lawless and illegitimate executive branch actors at the senior levels that were appointed by China's ambassador to the US, the guy, you know, some people pronounce Biden, but I think it's pronounced Xi Jinping.
Yeah, basically all of them.
I've had an opportunity to introduce myself to them and tell them that I'm investigating them.
And if I'm the secretary of retribution, they're kind of top of my list.
So to all of them, you're investigating them.
Yeah.
And how do they respond to that, Ivan?
I'll show you on video in the montage.
It's pretty evident.
Are you asking for trouble?
No, because they're the ones that committed the transgressions against our freedoms.
So now there has to be some sort of mechanism.
They created trouble for themselves by their actions.
And so I'm just there to provide A little bit of scrutiny.
For now.
Okay. So the headline for now is just scrutiny. The headline takeaway is that Chief Sun testified
today under oath. He's backing up all the evidence from what he's provided that this
was a very orchestrated Nancy Pelosi and others orchestrated event, J6.
Now he does it very diplomatically and nonpartisan.
So he doesn't specifically say Pelosi until the members of Congress literally force him to say, is there anybody in the, because he basically uses the term, uh, when he asked on several occasions from the house sergeant at arms for additional support, To protect the Capitol, the House Sergeant-at-Arms told Sund that he would work it up the chain.
And he left it vague like that.
Well, then at the end he was asked, well, who is above the Sergeant-at-Arms up the chain?
He's like, oh, the political leadership of the legislative branch.
And then there he was asked, well, who is that?
Is there anybody in between Pelosi and the Sergeant-at-Arms?
And he would respond with no.
So very indirectly, he's saying that Nancy Pelosi directed this.
All right.
Keep us posted.
Not allowing security around the Capitol.
Is that his last day of testimony?
Is he going to be called back?
That's one.
And I don't know if they're going to call him back, but I think that.
So remember, they hinted at that he came in for a transcribed interview.
So this was the publicly facing hearing for all of us to hear.
I can't wait to read his entire transcribed interview that was done behind closed doors because there's his, there's the general counsel, there's Yogananda Pittman.
She was under oath for seven hours behind closed doors.
So let me just say that my assessment is that there are some threads being pulled that are going to continue to prove Ivan Reikland's Substack articles to be pretty accurate.
Which happens to be what?
Ivanrakelin.substack.com?
Yeah, I think that's what it is.
Spelled R-A-I-K-L-I-N.
I love you, Brandon.
So let me ask you in conclusion here.
When are we going to vacate the chair?
I did.
Oh, by the way, I just did.
I wrote one yesterday.
I'm probably going to do another one in preparation for Thursday's hearing with Elvis Chan.
But it was a list of questions that this committee should have asked Chief Sun.
They got to maybe 5% of them, but I hope they ask the rest of them during the closed door interview of Sun.
So let me ask you then, Ivan, what about is, I don't know, it seemed weird.
I saw on social media today somewhere where a short little resolution or something was left on a bathroom counter about vacating the chair of the speaker.
What was that all about?
Uh, my short answer to that would be just keep an eye on Wednesday, maybe Thursday for that to be implemented.
So is that, that is a true report that really was found in the bathroom there on Capitol Hill?
Uh, purportedly it was found, but it wasn't signed by Congressman Matt Gaetz yet.
He just happened to leave the paperwork in the, in the loo or what?
Yeah, maybe.
You gotta ask him!
I mean it's a very short, it's just like three sentences.
I'll ask him tomorrow morning at about 9.50 a.m.
as they get ready for the judiciary hearing with Merrick Garland.
Okay, but you're saying Wednesday?
The self-proclaimed Attorney General.
Alright, but you're saying we should keep our eye on Wednesday?
You should keep your eye on everything Matt Gaetz does.
Like set him on alerts.
Okay.
Um, please.
And by the way, his Twitter is rep Matt Gates and his personal is Matt Gates.
Okay.
Uh, we need to be supporting everything he's doing.
Oh, another reason.
Hold right there.
Hold right there.
No, he's one of the conferees on the 2024 NDA.
Okay, look at this.
Look at this.
Is this who we're talking about?
Let's play this.
Bring up the audio, boys.
Here we go.
Observe.
I'm, you know, to be honest with you, I'm a little pissed.
Who is that guy right there?
Steven's son, former Capitol Police chief that Nancy Pelosi fired because he would have been the first one to expose the Nancy Pelosi, what I call Nancy-rection, or feds-rection.
Okay, here we go.
Listen to this.
Observe.
I'm, you know, to be honest with you, I'm a little pissed off because it If people were reporting the intelligence correctly, if I was allowed to do my job as the chief, I got a significant experience, but if I was allowed to do my job as the chief, we wouldn't be here today.
This didn't happen.
Then see how you're out there.
You're land-based and in public.
And it's all, you know, everything appears to be a cover-up.
Like I said, I'm not a conspiracy theorist, but when you look at the information intelligence that it had, the military had, it's all watered down.
I'm not getting intelligence.
I'm denied support of the National Guard in advance.
I'm denied National Guard while we're under attack for 71 minutes.
You're in a fight?
Yeah.
A fight for a couple of minutes wears you out.
Yeah, one minute.
One minute.
I was going to say, 60 seconds, three minutes.
Let me tell you, it wears you out.
My officers were fighting for 80 minutes before the protesters.
Wait, can I say, so you describe this as a failure to get the intelligence of the people who needed it, but it sounds like, worse than, it sounds like they were hiding the intelligence.
And that's what I'm getting at.
Could there possibly be people that actually did something to happen and kind of wanted something to happen?
It's not a far stretch to begin with.
I don't know what the other explanation is.
You know, it's sad when you start putting everything together and thinking about the way this played out.
What was their end goal?
You look at what's happening.
Was that their end goal?
I don't know.
Well, I mean, there's no question that what happened on January 6th has really helped the Democratic Party.
It's bravely politicized the U.S.
military and the intelligence agencies and the FBI.
And those are all, I think, bad for America and violations of the Constitution, but they're all good for the Democratic Party.
That's a fact.
That's what happened.
Absolutely, and I write about that because as a cop of 30 years, I'm a rule of law type of guy.
There's a reason that Lady Justice is depicted with a blindfold.
As soon as you take that blindfold off, the fairness of our legal system goes out the window, and that is exactly what has happened.
They've stripped that blindfold away from Lady Justice, and it's not perceived as being fair anymore.
All right, now that breaking up in that file, that's in the file.
That's not us or your interview.
Yes.
I need to make a comment on that, Brandon.
So that was the original interview that Chief Sun did on Faux News when Tucker was still over at Faux News.
And they were going to air that.
The day before that was going to air is when Paul Ryan fired Tucker from Faux News.
And the important thing here to note is Congressman Brian Stile, who chairs the committee that is above this subcommittee, was actually in the hearing and asked several questions.
They went two rounds.
So he used his two five-minute rounds, meaning he, Brian Stile, the chairman of this committee, to ask about Chief Sun's knowledge and kind of test whether or not what he described of Paul Irving was accurate.
And I assess the reason why Brian Stile was really zoning in on Paul Irving, the House Sergeant-at-Arms, was because that Sergeant-at-Arms used to be Paul Ryan's Sergeant-at-Arms.
And Brian Stile replaced Paul Ryan in Wisconsin's 1st Congressional District.
So he's basically trying to protect Paul Ryan from being exposed and being complicit in the Fed's erection coup.
And the reason why I say that is because Paul Ryan probably called Paul Irving and said, Just listen to Nancy Pelosi, do what she tells you to do, and I'll provide you top cover as one of the senior Republican political leaders to provide cover because he was his former boss as the former Speaker of the House.
This is why this is going so slow because one side, Loudermilk's trying to get to the truth.
His kind of boss, if you will, is not trying to get some people in trouble.
That may or may not have been involved in that Fed's direction.
Ivanrakeland.substack.com.
Ivanrakeland.substack.com.
Great segment.
Thank you, Ivan.
All right.
Dinner time!
Go eat!
All right, joining me now is Joe Hoff before we go to Garland Favorito.
How many of you heard this headline today?
There it is at joehoff.com.
Biden and Mayorkas announce new homeland intelligence experts group that includes James Clapper and John Brennan.
You mean John Brennan who was behind the attempted coup d'etat of President Trump according to Colonel John Mills on this broadcast many times?
And in his book, what's it called?
The Nation Will Follow or The County Will Follow?
What's it called?
The Nation Will Follow?
You'd think I would know by now.
And The Nation Will Follow, I think is the name of it.
But anyway, it's about taking things back at the county level.
He told us, John Brennan, James Comey, FBI Director, CIA Director Brennan, were all involved in trying to stop a duly elected president from being sworn in or delay it.
Stop it or delay it.
And yet these guys are now being given more power?
Joining me now is Joe Hoff of joehoff.com.
Hey Joe, welcome back.
Thanks for joining us.
Thanks, Brennan.
Great to be here, as always.
Yeah, let's talk about some of these articles at joehoff.com.
Tell me about this first one.
Were these guys also, did Clapper or Brennan sign that letter of the 51 intelligence officers saying that the Hunter Biden laptop was fake?
Did they sign that?
I believe they both signed that, yeah.
Yeah, I thought they did.
It's not hard to believe, though.
No.
So what does this tell you?
If they're setting up an intelligence expert group, you know, whenever you start seeing more groups being set up with people that are dirty cops and corrupt people, and I think that's the case for what we're describing, you have to wonder if they're doubling down and looking for more ways to persecute more conservatives.
True or false?
Yeah.
Well, true.
And remember, this comes from the same group.
First of all, it comes from Mayorkas and who's really under Biden, really.
I mean, you cannot trust a word Mayorkas says.
That guy, I don't think I've seen anybody lie like he does.
It's just he doesn't even show any emotion.
It just comes out.
Matter of factly, he could say, yeah, the southern border is fine.
You know, nobody's crossing it or whatever he says.
And he has no problem saying that.
He is an absolute monster.
I think somebody that does that's just beyond a narcissist.
There's something really mentally ill with this guy.
And you're talking about the Secretary of Homeland Security?
Yes.
Well, isn't that the kind of person you need to lead a Nazi regime?
And I think that's kind of where we're at, right?
I mean, if you go study the guys that were behind the Nazi Holocaust, and I have studied many of them, a lot of them just seemed, as you say, to be just so debased, dark and hearted, as to be narcissistic, mentally unstable.
But those are the kind of people you need in power to do the kind of lawlessness, cruelty, you know, lacking in humanity.
This is what you need in leadership.
Well, and like what we're seeing at the southern border, You know, I heard the other day from Anne Vandersteel.
I went and saw her actually at a speech in Florida.
She talked about being down there at the border, how children are coming across that border in the middle of the night, and how they won't do it during the day, so you can't see how many children are coming across with no parents.
They're saying some of their parents are getting killed on the way, because then they could capture the children and cross the border with them.
They're being housed in old Walmarts and places like that.
People are dying on the way.
She'll be my guest tonight on my show, by the way, at about 8.15 tonight.
Oh great.
Because she gave an incredible testimony of what she's seen down there at the border.
And it is evil.
What's going on there is evil.
And today, you know, the big question that my brother Jim at the Gateway Pundit and myself, we talk, where are all these people at that have been crossing the border?
And certainly what sort of people have been crossing, mostly men of military age.
How many are in the, you know, are from ISIS or whatever.
Rudy Giuliani said on 9-11 a week ago, he said, you know, these, if I'm ISIS and I see the southern borders open, what's going to stop me from going down there and crossing that border and climbing into this country and getting ready to, you know, do some really serious damage.
Same with China.
We're hearing the Chinese crossing the border.
This is a recipe for disaster.
He's creating a A Trojan horse, and people are dying along the way.
And then he tried to jump into the censorship arena.
Remember he had that lady Jankowicz, what's her name?
Yeah.
That one girl that could sing... The one that was singing the Mary Poppins stuff?
Yeah, Mary Poppins songs to Donald Trump.
We also found out that she was also in Ukraine for a period of time.
When Ukraine was taken over and there was the switch of government from the Russian Leaning president to the more Western leading president during the Obama years around 2014 She was there.
She was involved in this, you know, at least there During this overthrow of the government Then she comes back to the US and they try to make her the purveyor of truth for all of us That was so outrageous when these videos came out about her that they canceled that so what does Mayorkas do?
Well, let's just create this homeland intelligence experts group And we'll put together a bunch of guys who were involved, well at least Brennan and Clapper, who were really close to Obama, that were, I believe, both related to the Russia collusion sham, and others, and that's who's on this group.
This is, you know, they just, they're not gonna stop with their activities to censor us, to spy on us, to push information towards us that's garbage.
And eventually arrest us.
This is what this is.
You're right.
Comparing this to the fascists of 80 years ago in Nazi Germany.
Is not is not unfounded.
It's this is no, it's not when you go down and you look at the when you look at the ideologies of these people, their nationalism and by nationalism.
I mean, they believe that the state is a primary importance.
They call our patriotism nationalism, but our patriotism is not nationalism.
Uh, unless you mean we believe in borders and our own culture and language and laws, but what these people embrace is the definition of nationalism.
If you look it up folks listening and watching, if you look up nationalism, it is the idea that the state is of primary importance.
Not you, not individual liberties, but the state.
So do they believe that?
Yes.
Do many of them embrace a radical environmentalism that puts nature above humans?
Yes.
Was that going on in Nazi Germany?
Yes.
Read Dr. Mark Musser's book, Nazi Ecology.
Were they into anti-Semitism?
Yes, they are.
Are most of these people rabid anti-Semites?
Yeah, many of them are, absolutely.
I mean, are they into social justice, which is socialism?
Yes.
Are they into a merger of big government and big business together for the public-private partnership of what we call corporate fascism, which I predicted in my book in 1995 America would go to?
Yes, they are.
That's the World Economic Forum and the public-private partnerships.
So I can go right down the list and say look at these philosophies or ideas that were in the Nazi regime.
Look at these ideas that are prevalent today with these same people and tell me this isn't a form of a new Nazism.
Absolutely, and it's amazing how this group and the memo that comes out from Homeland Security says these This group is going to be addressing threats from a range of malign actors to include foreign nation state adversaries, domestic violent extremists.
That's what they're really interested in.
They're calling us that.
It's outrageous.
We are Americans who love God, country, our families, and want to be left alone.
And that's who they're calling domestic violence extremists.
And we pay our taxes?
We work hard?
We pay our taxes?
You know what's really sad is if you worked hard and you employed people and you paid your taxes, even if there were people in the government that didn't agree with your politics, they were glad you were a citizen of America because you worked hard, you were lawful, and you provided jobs and housing and you paid your taxes.
But when you are in a society where now they don't care about private property, they don't care about jobs, in fact, they don't want private property, they don't want the free market system, and who cares whether you pay taxes, they can just print the money.
So all of the things that even caused bureaucrats, civil servant bureaucrats, to be apolitical in the job, Those things have been destroyed.
So the things that used to cause a bureaucrat to say, I don't agree with them.
I'm very progressive.
I'm very liberal, but I'm not going to use my job to go after them because they pay taxes.
They provide housing for people.
They provide jobs.
You know, we need people like them.
I don't give their politics, but they produce and they benefit the state.
They help the state and our coffers.
Well, all of the things that have been the barriers for them going after you have now been destroyed.
And our values and our culture is being destroyed.
Yes.
That's what they didn't like.
It's that we enjoyed and valued freedom.
And they don't want that.
They don't want us to enjoy that.
Because that's their enemy.
Their enemy is freedom.
And they're coming after us.
And they're going to malign us and call us all sorts of names.
They're going to throw us in prison for years like they were doing to these January 6th guys.
And then they're going to kill us like they did to four people.
On January 6th, four Trump supporters died.
And who's gonna kill us? I'm telling you right now.
I'm telling you right now.
We are letting the death squads into the U.S.
And trust you me.
Trust you me.
They, some of these enemy states, look, they already know who we are, what we've been saying,
what we've been writing, and they know where we live.
And don't kid yourself.
If war breaks out on the homeland, as Gordon Chang is warning, in the fog of war you will find certain conservative individuals Dead.
And there will be these dead squads that came for them.
Colonel Mills is telling us again and again that China is watching and transcribing the interviews that I do with him about China, and he has reasons for knowing that.
So trust me.
I think it's General Vallely has said some of the top elite in China have already marked out the houses that they want in the U.S.
So, I don't think that many of the bureaucrats will need to dirty their hands with us.
That's what these death squads coming into the U.S.
are going to be doing.
Whether it's Hezbollah, Hamas, ISIS, China's shock troops.
I mean, look out.
Let me show you this picture from Ben Burquam from Real America's Voice.
This is a new video.
I'm going to play it here before we go to Garland Favorito.
But this is a video I played on radio today, slash television, at one o'clock central.
Now, do these guys, these are all Chinese guys lined up, okay, in Panama there.
They've just come out of the jungle.
Do these guys look like they've been treading through the jungle to you?
I mean, I don't know.
I'll have to ask Skan VanderSteel.
But notice the guy in the blue shirt.
He's got a little bit of a belly sticking out there.
Look at this guy back here with the white and striped shirt.
He's not skinny.
Look at how full his face is.
What I'm trying to say is these guys don't look like they've known any hardship.
They don't look like they've been away from good meals and good eating for days on end.
I'm not even sure some of them look physically capable of making that long journey.
I don't know.
Maybe I'm being ignorant.
I don't know.
I have to wonder, I guess what I'm getting at, I have to wonder at what point were these people dropped down and how did they get dropped down?
Were they flown in, dropped down, added into the stream, and voila!
In other words, they didn't have to come through miles and miles and miles and days and weeks that these people were queued up and dropped in to get into line somewhere along the way.
I'm just asking questions.
Do these look like people that, to you, have been on a long journey for weeks on end?
Especially that guy with the red collar.
He looks like an older man, probably in his 50s, maybe older even.
Probably, to me, they could be generals, they could be You know, we're hearing about now these Chinese biolabs in the U.S.
Is that how, you know, could this be them?
You know, we don't know, but that's the biggest dilemma here.
But these are legitimate questions to be asking, aren't they?
Yes!
Any society, any country that's in existence has a border and it's guarded.
What they're doing to America now, this is not from America.
Americans don't want this, never have.
This is Obama's policy.
Open up that border and let people fly through.
And it is frightening.
I gotta get to the restrict act, but let me play this quick video.
Watch this and we'll go to the restrict act.
China?
You speak English?
Anyone speak English?
China?
I'm not.
China.
Wow.
China.
China.
You speak English?
No.
No.
No English.
It's all China.
This whole line of China.
China?
China.
Wow.
It's all China.
Come to America.
Wow.
I don't know about you, but that should keep people awake.
I'll tell you something else.
I'll tell you something else right now, and I'll repeat it again on my show tonight.
We just paid $6 billion for three, you know, what, how many hostages?
Five or six hostages from Iran.
And when you have all of these drug cartels and gang members coming to America, you watch, you watch the number of kidnappings.
That's just my opinion.
I could be 100% wrong, but my gut tells me watch out for kidnappings in America.
Now that they realize, oh Americans will pay money, watch as they stalk and as they search for wealthy Americans and now all of a sudden their daughters or their wife are taken and held for ransom.
And you watch, people will pay it up to get their loved one back.
We're about to see the greatest organized crime gangs ever to enter any country in modern times.
And the American people have no idea the murder, the rape, the kidnappings that are coming.
I hope I'm wrong, but I'm talking to too many experts that tell me this is exactly what's coming.
Well, and Ted Cruz says it's actually closer to $16 billion, and Roger Stone was on my show yesterday, and he says, but we forget to say that the Irans received five prisoners as well.
It was a swap, five for five, plus we threw in $16 billion.
So this is, they have, what, $3 billion per American?
That's a pretty profitable business if they want to get into that.
It's unbelievable what's going on.
Nobody agrees with this.
Nobody's agreeing with any of this.
It's insanity.
All right, let's go to the Restrict Act before I run out of time.
We got to go over to Marley.
This is at joehoff.com.
What is the Restrict Act?
And what does our audience know about this?
They need to know about this.
Yeah, I brought this up again yesterday because the Senator Warner was on the Sunday morning show.
And he was involved in the Russia collusion sham from very early stages.
I just have a real disdain for this guy.
He's not honest.
He lies all the time.
And then we found out that he was pushing this Restrict Act.
This was at the time that we'd uncovered this thing called these Albert Censors, this ability for the government To transfer information that they signed on for all these counties across the country to get on board with this nonprofit, the CIS, and to share your information with them regarding elections.
And this data flows through what we determined the word was Albert Sensors, named after Albert Einstein.
This Restrict Act then comes in and basically will allow that to continue.
But the more, I guess, challenging piece about this Restrict Act is some of the wording in there.
It's just similar to what's going on here with Majorca.
This is a coup.
This is a connected collusion to destroy America.
What they want to do is to say, if you say anything about our elections process, we can throw you in prison.
We can arrest you.
So you're saying the Restrict Act Are you telling me, Joe, the Restrict Act is going to write into federal law prosecuting people that question elections because they are going to be classified as undermining democracy?
That's right, Nick.
Because if you look at the wording in this act, which Warner's pushing, making it sound like a good thing.
He's such a snake.
I wouldn't trust him for as long as I could see him, even.
And the act, some of the wording is that it's designed so Any coercive activities that they define, basically, the Secretary of Treasury, the Attorney General, Director of National Intelligence, the Federal Elections Commissioner, whatever they design.
Now, if you've got a bunch of radical Obama-Biden guys in those roles, they'll design just like what they're doing with these January Sixers.
They're calling them terrorists.
So, whatever they say, then they can basically Use against us.
Some of the wording here is then it's designed to anybody who undermines democratic processes and institutions or steers policy and regulatory decisions and challenges those things then could be could be indicted through this act.
I wrote about it at length in a piece Not long ago.
There's some exact wording.
I've got it out there at JoeHoff.com.
I'm kind of looking for it right now.
But the wording is such that... In other words, it's so vague.
It's so vague that if you just do what Mike Lindell has done, they would have reason to indict Mike Lindell on a federal level.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
I think it's against you, me, Lindell, and anybody that's going to challenge any elections.
They say, no, no, you're a, you're a, you know, You are not agreeing with the Attorney General, therefore we can arrest you and charge you for crimes.
According to this act.
And by the way, we have the former Attorney General Loretta Lynch under congressional testimony.
It's a video clip in my documentary, Siege, where she's openly talking about prosecuting companies that deny climate change or global warming.
If you're a company that denies global warming, she openly said under congressional testimony, your company could be charged.
So how is this any different?
How is this any different?
In other words, if you don't agree with any of our policies, if you go against any of our policies and don't agree with them and you publicly push back, we're going to charge you.
Show me the man, I'll show you the crime.
Yeah.
And so, yeah, the broad powers in this respect are going to be dangerous to any and every American.
Anybody that stands up says, no, I don't like that.
Nope.
You can't say that.
Attorney General and the head of the elections, they said That you're wrong, so we're going to punish you.
It's frightening what's going on here.
They're trying to, again, just codify what they're doing right now, I guess, against those January Sixers.
JoeHoft.com.
JoeHoft.com.
There's so much there that we didn't have time to get to, so I hope you'll check out the articles.
JoeHoft.com.
As always, great work, Joe.
Thank you, my friend.
Thanks a lot.
Yeah, take care.
Joe Hoff, checking in.
Before we go to Garland Favorito, let me remind you, we're brought to you by you.
If you appreciate what we're doing here, Mike needs your support.
Here's two ways you can support Mike.
One is by going to MyPillow.com.
All right, I go with that first.
MyPillow.com.
Use the promo code L77.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes, and more.
There are a lot of sales going on over there.
Some of the inventory will sell out, and they're bringing in new models, so when it's gone, it's gone.
So take advantage of it now.
Perhaps do some of that shopping now for Christmas and put it away.
These are inflation-busting prices at MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
And then, of course, you can go to LyndellOffenseFund.com.
LyndellOffenseFund.com.
Make a contribution of any size, if you would.
Help Mike Lindell as he continues to push these issues that are so vital to a free society and free and fair elections and choosing our own elected officials.
We don't need selections.
We need elections and get rid of these machines and go to paper and that which can be audited quickly and clearly.
LyndaleOffenseFund.org Joining me now is Garland Favorito.
He told me this afternoon he was on the witness stand under oath for three days.
Garland, welcome to the broadcast.
Thanks for joining us.
Hey, Brandon.
Thank you for having me.
Yeah, last week I was out in California.
It looks like you're in California right now.
Where are you at right now?
We are in Georgia, back in Georgia, trying to take a couple of days to recover.
Is that the ocean behind you?
It is.
That's the Atlantic Ocean.
That must be rough, all right.
Yeah, so we're in a beautiful place.
Well, good.
Trying to get a little relaxation down here.
So, who did you go testify on behalf of?
This was John Eastman.
John.
I think I said Dan Eastman earlier.
John Eastman.
Thank you, John.
Right, right.
Of course, John They're attempting to pull his bar license.
For those who don't know, he was one of Trump's attorneys, right?
He was an attorney who was trying to help Trump in a certain case for a very limited time.
He's not actually one of Donald Trump's regular attorneys.
But he was providing constitutional advice regarding January 6th.
Was he the gentleman that had the hat and the tan jacket, tan overcoat and scarf, and was on the mall, right in front of the White House on January 6th, giving a speech, had a hat on?
Was that him?
Tim says that was him.
Yeah, I think it was.
It was definitely on January 6th, giving a speech, and they're trying to use that against him.
They have an 11 count A complaint and not at least eight of those counts are false.
Based on Georgia evidence alone, the account, all 11 accounts are basically hearsay complaint.
The fundamental complaint is that as an attorney, he should have known there was no fraud errors
or irregularities in the 2020 election, and therefore he shouldn't have attempted to help Donald
Trump.
But wait a minute.
Didn't we have attorneys?
Isn't Kamala Harris an attorney?
Isn't Hillary Clinton an attorney?
I believe, yes.
And I can keep going down the list of these attorneys on the Democrat side that in 2016 were saying the same thing.
So shouldn't they, as attorneys, know that Donald Trump won fair and square?
So as attorneys in 2016, the Democrat attorneys could question the election.
But in the 2020 election, attorneys that are questioning the election against the deep state, they can be prosecuted.
Well, exactly.
And that is the double standard that exists So why were you on the stand for three days?
Who called you to the stand?
Were you subpoenaed?
Did you go willingly?
normal practice, as you said, three years ago, is now actually a crime.
So why were you on the stand for three days?
Who called you to the stand?
Were you subpoenaed?
Did you go willingly?
Were you called by the defense or by the prosecution?
Well, obviously, I was called by the defense.
I was there to defend John Eastman.
And John, you know, is really facing, he's facing the removal of his bar license.
And for simply doing his job is really what it boils down to.
And so I was there to explain the actual evidence of fraud, errors, and irregularities In Georgia's 2020 election to prove that he had adequate information known at the time and that John was doing his best to basically try to help Donald Trump.
And, you know, challenge the election.
OK, I'm a little confused.
Did you say this was going on in California?
Yes.
So you're explaining Georgia.
So how is this ended up in California?
Well, it ended up in California because that's where John is licensed to practice law.
OK.
And California is trying to remove his bar license.
The head of the bar apparently is wanted to run for possibly Attorney General.
So they're trying to use this as, I think, as some kind of a chip to give him a heads up.
Because what we're looking at here, it was all hearsay evidence.
And I was there to put the real evidence in the record for John Eastman So that he could show that he was fully justified in everything that he did.
Okay, so he's licensed in California, so they're going after his license there, but was he involved in the Georgia case?
He was not directly involved in the case, but a lot of the evidence that he referred to was Georgia evidence.
So I was there to explain that that Georgia evidence is in fact true, and he was fully justified in every way to use that to attempt to help Trump, whether it be to get Mike Pence to send the electors back to the states and make them ensure that they have the right electors, or Virtually any other thing, you know, his freedom of speech is also being attacked as though he didn't have the right to say some of the things that he did.
And all of this stuff is really all based on hearsay evidence, such as things like Attorney General Bill Barr and the head of CISA said it was a secure election by saying that it has no such fraud that he knew of.
Chris Krebs saying that it was the most secure election in history, and therefore John Eastman should have just gone along with what they said, even though Freedom of Information Act records show that Bill Barr never had conducted.
So is there a jury set in this?
Who is hearing this case?
The hearing is conducted by a judge, Judge Yvette Rowland, and Judge Rowland appears to be remarkably biased.
We had three pieces, three government documents from the state of Georgia, an election board complaint, the governor's complaint, I'm sorry, governor's study, as well as the Senate Judiciary's conclusion on fraud errors and irregularities.
She did not allow that evidence into record while at the same time she was admitting So when you were on the stand for three days, did you ever get questions from the prosecution side, if you will, the people trying to take his law license?
of justice and also there was much more we could go into but that's just one
example. So when you were on the stand for three days did did did you ever get
questions from the prosecution side if you will the people trying to take his
law license or was it just John Eastman's attorneys talking to you in
the stand? Oh yes I was under a cross-exam for two half days.
How did they treat you?
They treated me... In fairness, I have a lot of respect for the prosecuting attorneys.
They were there, I think they were just told to do their job, but they gave me a lot of Hard questions, but fair questions.
I've been in situations before where they tried to attack my credibility, going back to, you know, 10, 15 years on a variety of different subjects that had nothing to do with elections.
But this was, the people who were there were, I thought, fairly reasonable.
Now, the issue is that they have compiled 20 items of material exhibits for this trial, each volume about six inches, about six inches wide.
The state has spent, probably spent tens of million dollars, maybe 20 million dollars altogether on this trial.
So it's a significant waste of taxpayer money.
The Attorneys' fees are supposed to, their licensing fees are supposed to cover this, but I'm sure they've exceeded that.
So when are you expecting a ruling by this judge?
And the judge will be the one that makes the ruling, I'm assuming, from what you've said.
Well, there's quite a bit more testimony to come in October, as of so for a while, so we will see.
The ruling probably weighs off yet.
I may even be going back there again.
And next month.
Isn't this also, Garland, an attack on someone having an attorney?
Are they trying to make it so that nobody can find an attorney that will take their cause when it comes to questioning elections?
No attorneys will ever want to touch it.
If they're Republicans, yes, that's really what it's all about.
And it's all about, they're trying to suppress Anyone from questioning an election, and I'm talking about a secretly counted election, the majority of states here secretly count their votes and this is part of the plan to ensure that they can continue to conduct corrupt elections with secretly counted results for the
Yeah, I'd love for you to get a look at that and then come back on the broadcast and share your thoughts.
So, in conclusion, after spending your time out there, do you think that the people that were cross-examining you, do you think any of them realized, oh, wait a minute, after all this evidence Garland's presenting, Maybe this guy's getting railroaded.
You said they seem to just be doing their job, so they must have given you some hints they were reasonable people.
Did you pick up on anything that makes them think, oh my, this guy, we're being part of railroading a guy that actually had every right to look at this?
Yeah, I did.
I had a really very, very brief conversation, only a sentence or two, with one of the lead attorney.
But I think the most important thing is that Don is financially in debt where he's going to have to appeal this most likely
to the court of appeals.
And he's going to need some funds.
He's got a gifts and go account.
And Eastman is, I think, is the account.
So he's probably already about a half a million dollars in debt.
He's going to need our help to fight this because if he loses, we all lose.
Wow.
All right, Garland Favorito.
VoterGA.org.
VoterGA.org.
I hope you and your lovely wife get some rest and relaxation after three days on the stand there, Garland.
We're doing it.
Good.
Good for you.
Greet your lovely wife for me.
Garland Favorito checking in.
Check out his site, VoterGA.org.
Also, remember, Mike Lindell needs your support as well.
LindellOffenseFund.org, LindellOffenseFund.org, or MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
I'm Brandon Howes, sitting in for Mike Lindell, who is in Mississippi tonight on business.
Thanks for watching.
Until next time, take care.
▲
Export Selection