Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

April 24, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell

01:00:27

The Lindell Report (4-24-23)

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical and achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedoms.
	And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
	Good evening.
	Glad you're with us.
	Welcome to the broadcast.
	I'm going to be joined by Joe Hoft on the shocking news that apparently even took Tucker Carlson by surprise.
	He's out at Fox.
	We'll also be joined by Ivan Reikland, who this weekend was at an event with General Flynn and President Trump.
	We'll get to all that and more in just a few minutes.
	First tonight we have some sad news to report and send our condolences and prayers to Mike Lindell and his family.
	Mike called me today and told me that his father had passed away unexpectedly.
	He did give permission for us to announce that tonight and specifically Requested your prayers.
	So we send our prayers to Mike Lindell and his entire family on the completely unexpected passing of Mike Lindell's father today.
	So please join me in remembering Mike and his family in your prayers and thoughts.
	Very tough time for his family.
	Joining me now is Joe Hoft of the Gateway Pundit.
	Many of us today woke up to the news, and it is pretty much the biggest story in the news right now, and that is the departure of Tucker Carlson from Fox News.
	Rumors are swirling and everyone has their speculation as to what's really going on.
	I voice my speculation and I'll reiterate again, it's just simply my speculation.
	Many of you, I told last week, a week ago Saturday, I received a phone call and someone said, a very well-placed source, that they had a source as well that was telling them that Fox News was going to settle the Dominion case for $600 million.
	They also said they believe that a hedge fund was going to then also purchase Fox News.
	That was what their source was telling them, and this is a very credible source of mine.
	Well, it turned out on Tuesday, after the court proceedings were delayed on Monday, on Tuesday that settlement was indeed announced.
	But somewhere along the way, the figure, I guess, reportedly went from $600 million to $787 million.
	to 787 million. So my source knew exactly what they were talking about.
	The numbers just went up apparently.
	But at the time, that's what he was being told.
	Right on target as far as settlement and very close to the final figure.
	So, was my source also right?
	That eventually Fox News will be sold to a gigantic hedge fund of some sort?
	If that is indeed the case, I look at what's happening at Fox with the separation of Fox with Dan Bongino and now Tucker Carlson and maybe, reportedly, yet to come, a few more hosts.
	I don't know.
	What's going to happen to Judge Jeanine?
	What's going to happen to Maria Bartomaro?
	I don't know.
	But it seems as though Fox might be cleaning house and one would have to speculate that maybe it's to make their network more appealing To some woke hedge fund.
	Are they getting rid of their non-woke hosts?
	I don't know.
	But it seems like something's in the offing.
	Maybe my source was right on both accounts.
	My source was right on the first.
	That's what I was told on Saturday, and the settlement was announced on Tuesday.
	Yes, the figure went up a little bit, but my source was still right.
	And maybe part two of his information was right, too.
	That we're about to see the sale of Fox.
	But to who?
	Joining me now with his thoughts and opinion on this is Joe Hoft of The Gateway Pundit and joehoft.com.
	Joe, welcome to the broadcast.
	Thank you for joining us tonight.
	Great to be here, Brandon.
	Thanks for having me.
	And condolences to Mike and his family.
	Yeah, sorry for that news.
	So God, you know, God bless them today and every day.
	Yeah, very sorry to hear that.
	Very, very tough and unexpected news today for the Lindell family.
	What do you think of my little comments here about what my source was telling me a week ago Saturday and what then finally transpired on Tuesday with the public notice of the settlement?
	Do you think that this is the kind of... I mean, you come out of an accounting world.
	You come out of big corporate America.
	Is this the kind of clean-up that someone like Fox might do if they are trying to polish their network up to be bought by a politically correct hedge fund?
	That's a very interesting Yeah, thesis there, Brandon.
	And I gotta tell you, I'd actually heard the same about Bartiromo and Judge Jeanine, that they were perhaps on the chopping block from somebody else.
	So, there may be some truth to that.
	I don't know.
	You know, I guess as you were talking, the one thing that kind of hit me is it's like stepping back to 2016 and we saw a drudge report that was so prominent.
	And if you got a story on drudge, you were thrilled.
	First of all, it sent a lot of traffic to your site.
	Like a website like Gateway Pundit.
	But then if you got the headline, man, and you saw volume, I saw Jim freaking out.
	Jim, my brother, the founder of Gateway Pundit, because it would shut down his website and get so much traffic on some of it.
	So he had to figure out ways to build his bandwidth so that didn't happen.
	And it was so prolific.
	If you got a story at Drudge, you knew you had the top story in the world.
	And that was 2016.
	And it was a real powerful platform.
	And then suddenly, after the election, over the next two, three years, it became far left.
	And it was just like, I remember days thinking, gosh, is George Soros running this site now?
	We never did hear what happened there.
	But there was an attack on Drudge, and it definitely changed.
	And some people were saying, no, it's Drudge himself.
	I kind of felt like, no.
	It was so drastic to me it appeared that they'd cut some sort of deal and sold.
	But I don't know the answer to what happened there.
	But there's this constant attack on us who are sharing the truth.
	And now we've got Fox News.
	Certainly Fox has been a thorn in the side of Obama and all the lefties.
	They hated Fox.
	It was really almost the only show in town for a long period of time.
	And then actually in 2020 in the election, election night, they, uh, you know, they failed, they failed all of us.
	They threw, uh, these, uh, jokers in front of us.
	We were forced to listen to their, you know, uh, hate towards president Trump.
	They never put Trump ahead all night long.
	And, uh, people like myself and a number of people, I talked to a couple last week when, when Fox, uh, had settled with Dominion, uh, that, uh, they felt the same way as me.
	They've never watched Fox since.
	And, uh, I would get clips of Tucker Carlson though and I can see I like a lot of the stuff he said and actually I saw last last week on one night he was had the top 10 he made the top 10 list of all shows on cable not just cable news shows all shows and he was he was top in the you know in the TV marketing cable news so now they've now they've let him go so it's it appears to be the same destruction
	Uh, that we saw of, uh, of drudge and now Fox and certainly the destruction that the Obama gang and, uh, Biden and, um, and I don't know who else China or Soros are doing to this country.
	So, you know, taking, I talked to a former rep last week who said that it's like they're heading down a highway, 150 miles per hour, driving towards a brick wall.
	That's what Biden's doing to this country right now.
	And so it's this effort.
	Take to attack the truth and then to destroy America and we're sitting back You know all of us that are especially those watching the show tonight trying to figure out what did it what is it?
	That we can do to save this country because we're seeing it get destroyed and when it happened with the 2020 election And then it's just continued ever since in full force.
	It's not they're not even hiding it anymore It's like, you know, it's out there.
	So this action Fox is really almost suicidal what they've done over the last couple days.
	Suddenly, we just talked about this last week, Brandon, they settled with Dominion, and then right before me on this show, and by the way, Brandon, I put this up at the Gateway Pundit over the weekend, both Dershowitz interview and mine, Dershowitz, attorney Dershowitz from Harvard, he shared with you on Friday, I believe it was Friday night, Hey, what's Fox?
	Why'd they settle?
	He says they had a better than 50% chance of winning the case.
	He said there had to be something else.
	That's the piece that I wrote last week, seven or so questions on why did they settle?
	It just doesn't make any sense.
	It really makes no sense.
	It's a real high bar for Dominion to prove that Fox committed malice and intended to hurt them.
	And then there's the question if they've been hurt at all.
	My understanding is everywhere they were before the election.
	So it hasn't impacted their revenues in any way or their profits that I can see, this awareness of who Dominion is.
	So that's puzzling.
	They make this huge settlement with Fox and now they get rid of their star player.
	They just fire him.
	They terminate him.
	Well, from a business standpoint, this makes no sense whatsoever.
	No.
	From a political standpoint, absolutely.
	From a political standpoint, it makes sense.
	Or, from an economic standpoint, if you are about to sell to some massive, huge hedge fund, and they don't want to come in and do this, so they're going to let Rupert Murdoch do it.
	If you guys will go to him on a full shot, I'll bend over and plug in my computer here.
	I forgot to plug that in.
	But you've got a brand new article out at TheGatewayPundit.com and JoeHoff.com, and your headline is, actually I guess it's one of your other writers, but it's at The Gateway Pundit, Rupert Murdoch was reportedly behind the decision to oust Tucker Carlson.
	Now, I don't know if you've seen the article in TheDailyMail.com, but it seems like they're now out to smear Tucker.
	They're now claiming, according to the Daily Mail headline, it has something to do with an associate producer.
	Well, let me just read the headline.
	I don't like to give credence to all this, but what I am trying to show is I think, for some, they're going to use this to try to smear Tucker.
	Tucker Carlson was blindsided by Fox News firing that was a direct order from Rupert Murdoch after January 6th conspiracy claims and producers' lawsuit alleging bullying, sexism, and anti-Semitism.
	Now that's the headline at the Daily Mail right now, if you guys want to show that.
	Again, I hate giving even air time to this kind of thing, but I do think it's important when that's what the Daily Mail is saying, because it's now like, wait a minute.
	And I think Ivan, who's going to be with us next, is going to tell us this is all about setting up for 2024.
	And it kind of fits in with the whole Ray Epps 60-minute piece.
	So maybe there's connections here, Joe.
	No, I agree.
	And remember, I mentioned that last week, too, is that what Dominion's, you know, this big settlement with Dominion was all about, to give credence to this narrative, which is a lie, that the election never was stolen and therefore Fox settled with Dominion.
	So when we go to this January 6th case that we expect these criminals that are running our DOJ and FBI, when they try to indict Trump for sedition because it's the only way they can truly prevent him from running for president, that they're going to use this Is there justification?
	They're gonna say, see, even Fox News knew that there was nothing wrong with Dominion or the voting machines, and therefore it's all a lie about the election being stolen.
	Well, that's a fallacy, that's a lie, but it's a strategy that they're using now.
	I think that along with their January 6th committee, where they spent two years basically Littling us the American people and all of the millions of us the majority of Americans that voted for President Trump in 2020 and They know that they stole this thing Biden.
	Nobody I've heard never heard anybody say yes I absolutely believe Joe Biden got 81 million votes.
	That's not just laughable.
	It's a lie.
	So Yeah, that's maybe this they're playing the long ball.
	They're trying to get rid of They also want to get rid of Fox.
	So this is great.
	They want to you know, and and I think You know, Paul Ryan, who's on the board there, and the younger Murdoch, and now maybe Rupert Murdoch himself.
	He's ready to get rid of it.
	Let's just make some money on this thing and move on.
	And I think that's what they're doing.
	They don't care about the truth.
	Tucker was really good in a lot of ways.
	He got a big audience, for one.
	And then here's the thing too, you know, he got this information on January 6th and then Schumer and what's his name, McConnell, both attacked basically Murdoch and said, you got to stop this.
	And that was it.
	We got one night.
	So one night of information, a new video from January 6th.
	So there does seem to be a concerned effort to, and we know it, we're seeing it.
	They shut down the truth in the media.
	So I mentioned earlier today in an interview, it's like we've got this fire hose of information pushed at us from the media that's a lie and that keeps coming.
	And Americans are smarter than this.
	And so places like the Gateway Pundit and Lindell TV are growing, are blossoming.
	Where the rest of these media outlets are shutting down, cutting.
	I heard BuzzFeed last week is going to shut down for good, this far-left terrible website, in my opinion.
	You've got all these players in the media firing people.
	Now layoffs all across the board, even the NPR.
	And we're growing.
	And the reason is because people want the truth.
	And we're winning too, Brandon, because I saw two polls last week that were devastating for these lefties.
	They're going to try to build this case against Trump that he committed sedition, and yet 60% of the people in a Rasmussen poll last week said that they believe that the Fed absolutely had something to do with the riots on January 6th.
	So we're getting through to the people.
	Another poll that Rasmussen had just last week was something like 60% of the people believe that our recent elections have been tampered with and impacted by cheating.
	So we're right.
	We're, you know, we're nailing it.
	And we're effective.
	And that's, you know, that's the other thing the media, nobody's going there anymore.
	Nobody's going there.
	No, they're not.
	Here's a headline at the Gateway Pundit, another one tonight.
	This one is by Joe Hoft.
	I'm sure it's also over at joehoft.com.
	Ray Epps on 60 Minutes plays innocent victim, says, quote, he's hard to see, it's hard to see our capital under attack, end quote.
	I'm also reading tonight over on, I think I put it over at worldviewreport.com, Let's see.
	Did I put it up there?
	Maybe I didn't.
	I thought I'd put it up there at worldviewreport.com.
	That's our aggregated news site.
	He talked about the Drudge Report.
	We got Worldview Report, which is the alternative.
	But if you go to revolver.news tonight, here we go.
	Here it is.
	Revolver.News is reporting desperate Ray Epps enlisted notorious Democrat Clinton operatives to threaten Tucker and Revolver News for January 6th reporting.
	That's true.
	So you want to speak to this issue tonight from your article?
	Yeah, well yeah, and that's what happened.
	So Ray Epps was interviewed last night by 60 Minutes, absolutely crushing any belief that that The publication, that website, that TV show, 60 Minutes, has any merit anymore.
	It's total propaganda.
	They tried to build a case that Ray Epps was a victim on January 6th and 5th, and they showed this information.
	They didn't show it all, of course, which is what the media does.
	They hide a lot of information from the American people.
	But they interviewed Ray Epps, and he singled out Tucker Carlson.
	He singled out Revolver.
	And basically claimed that he's an innocent man, that was basically wronged, that he did nothing wrong, even though we've got all this information on the guy the night before, calling, we're going to go into the Capitol that day, leading the charges and not just, and right there involved with the people that are tearing down the first barrier and then a second barrier.
	We found that in that second barrier, when it was proposed or presented in the court of law in D.C., they cut this segment out.
	A couple observers there saw that.
	They went back, somehow got the video and saw, oh, they cut out the section that showed Ray Epps up there, you know, pushing this fence and leading the charge against a second barrier against the police.
	We know Ray Epps helped push this Trump sign.
	And Jim put this piece up today.
	With a group of people, a huge Trump sign towards the cops.
	And it was, it was, they lifted it and pushed it.
	Eight of the people that did that are in prison today.
	They've been charged with, you know, violent crime.
	Ray Epps is walking free.
	So why did Ray Epps not get charged?
	We knew he was on like this most wanted list for like six months or so.
	And all of a sudden his name just disappeared.
	And he makes these claims like he contacted the FBI.
	It's just been terrible.
	And he's hiding out.
	Blah, blah, blah.
	The guy's on, you know, on video doing all this stuff.
	And here's the deal, you know, to Mr. Apps.
	It's like, hey, you know, four people died that day, Ray.
	Four people died.
	They were all Trump supporters.
	They were killed that day.
	And you were leading this charge and telling people, this way, this way to the Capitol.
	Our enemies are within the Capitol.
	He's saying things like that.
	Leading them down there.
	And four people died that day.
	And I didn't hear them.
	They didn't bring up any of those names last night in this interview with 60 Minutes.
	It was pathetic.
	And he said things like that.
	Then as he left, he says, I know it's sad.
	So sad or something to see the Capitol being attacked like that.
	It's like, you know, who is this guy?
	What's he saying, you know?
	Let's play a little bit of this from 60 Minutes under federal fair use.
	Let's play a minute or two of this.
	Listen to this and we'll have Joe respond before we go to Ivan Raiklin.
	Watch this.
	For millions of consumers of conservative news, Ray Epps is a notorious villain,
	a provocateur responsible for turning peaceful protests on January 6th
	into a violent assault on the U.S.
	Capitol.
	The irony is that Epps was a passionate supporter of President Trump, who went to Washington to protest the 2020 election.
	But his often contradictory behavior that day spawned a full-fledged conspiracy theory, casting him as a government agent who incited an insurrection.
	Today, Epps is in hiding after death threats forced him to sell his home.
	So who is Ray Epps?
	Tonight, you'll hear from the government and the man himself.
	The story will continue in a moment.
	As soon as President Trump is finished speaking, we are going to the Capitol.
	It's that direction.
	At six foot four in his desert camouflage, bright red Trump hat, and military-style backpack, Ray Epps stood out from the crowd on January 6th.
	That's him running toward the U.S.
	Capitol alongside the vanguard of rioters who first attacked and overran police.
	What do you think when you see this now?
	It brings back some bad memories.
	It's hard to see our Capitol under attack.
	It's been more than two years since the storming of the Capitol, but Ray and his wife Robin told us they relive January 6th every day of their lives.
	Some people have said, well, just let it go and let it die down.
	It doesn't.
	What they don't understand is it doesn't.
	What exactly was the role of Ray Epps in the chaos of January 6th?
	The theory, Epps, a former member of the Oath Keepers, was an FBI informant who incited the crowd on January 6th, bubbled up from a right-wing news site called Revolver News, run by a former Trump speechwriter.
	He's the smoking gun of the entire Fed's erection.
	And landed on Fox News primetime.
	According to a new investigation from Revolver, Epps may have led the breach team that first entered the Capitol on January 6th.
	The convoluted conspiracy theory made its way to Capitol Hill.
	It's not the Proud Boys who engage in the initial breach.
	It's Ray Epps at that precise moment.
	How did Ray Epps know that there were going to be pipe bombs?
	Ms.
	Sadburn, who is Ray Epps?
	That question has animated Fox News host Tucker Carlson for nearly two years.
	Well, isn't that interesting timing?
	That last night, and then we wake up today to find out Tucker is gone.
	Very interesting timing, Joe Hoff.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	And it was a disgusting piece, Ray Epps playing this victim role, basically.
	And hearing him, of all people, say it was so hard to see Capitol under attack when here he was.
	Charging the way, and like we pointed out, there's eight people that did the exact same thing he did with this one large Trump sign.
	He's walking free.
	They're all sitting in prison now, facing years in prison.
	And haven't members of Congress asked the FBI and other officials with government agencies who the guy is and they won't answer, they won't talk?
	Yeah, and they've asked, you know, did he work for the FBI?
	They won't answer.
	What does that tell you?
	Well, of course, it's real clear.
	This guy's got some sort of connection to some group, and he was put there for a purpose.
	And for him to sit with his wife and just play this, you know, try to play It failed miserably, the show, even then.
	I mean, because if he wasn't somehow tied in with the powers that be, wouldn't he be arrested like the other eight people?
	Well, he should have been.
	And the fact that he says he's a Trump supporter and he just went there.
	Here's the thing that these people on the left don't think of.
	His argument is that the election was stolen then.
	So he's saying that he thought the election was stolen and that's why he was there.
	So they're kind of going over that, too.
	This narrative It's just so impossible for these people to explain.
	It's, it turns out like that.
	It was just a mess.
	Well, I didn't watch the 60 Minutes piece, but does this, is 60 Minutes not asking why he's not been arrested?
	If he is a, an election denier, pro-Trump guy, and was there and filming and showing, running and telling everybody what they're going to do, did 60 Minutes, because again, I didn't have time to watch the piece, did 60 Minutes ever turn and say, hey, Ray, why haven't you been arrested?
	Hey, Ray, have you been contacted by the FBI?
	Hey, Ray, have you been brought in by questioning?
	Hey, Ray, did the FBI SWAT team kick down your door?
	Right, right.
	Now he said, as soon as I heard that my name was on this one list, because he was on this most wanted type of list that the FBI had, six months later it fell off.
	And he says in this interview, as soon as I found my name, my wife and I, we called the FBI immediately.
	Well, he was still on it for another six months.
	So we don't know what he said to the FBI, if he indeed did contact the FBI.
	We don't know, but for some reason his name was taken off that list, And he seems to be like the only guy whose name was.
	Maybe there's one or two others that we've identified as well that were on that list that fell off.
	And you gotta say why.
	And we still got people like Jake Lang sitting in jail, not even prison.
	He's sitting in jail now and has had his third birthday in jail without a court date.
	So this is the kind of Garbage that they don't lay out there.
	They don't lay out.
	Hey, Jake Langston here.
	He hasn't been even even gone to court.
	Hey, four people died that day, right?
	What do you think about that?
	You know, hey, one lady was shot.
	Hey, what about the January 6 report?
	They only mentioned one of these individuals that died.
	They're supposed to investigate what happened at the Capitol.
	Four people died and they only mentioned one person's name.
	I mean, what?
	How thorough was that report?
	You know what I mean?
	It's really clear that this is all a strategy to get Trump.
	It's January 6th.
	They've got to use this.
	This is all they got.
	It's all made up.
	It's a fairy tale.
	And people like Ray Upps, and they didn't bring up in 60 minutes either.
	It's not just Ray Upps.
	We've got some confirmation, something like 20 people infiltrated either the Proud Boys or the Oath Keepers.
	Just one of those groups alone.
	And another there's there the numbers more than 40 people that we know that we can identify that have been admitted by the government as being there as government informants.
	So it's not just Ray.
	It's it's a much bigger thing that happened.
	And a couple hundred people could easily start a riot.
	And there was one guy who's sitting in jail today in DC.
	He's looked at this stuff.
	This used to be his profession in the military.
	And he says, look, this group here, this is their purpose.
	They're supposed to agitate this group over here.
	They all got yellow hats and look what they're doing now.
	And look at this other group over here.
	They got like blue hats and looks, look what they're doing.
	And he could, he could see that this was a government op that, that, that ended up killing four people.
	And, and our government's not going to say anything about it.
	Ray F's isn't clearly going to say anything about it and neither is our media.
	And that's why people are coming to our site.
	How much do you know about the Smith-Munt Act?
	Just tell us the truth and then we'll, you know, and I think the more they lie, the more
	they hide, the clearer it is what really happened.
	Do you, how much do you know about the Smith-Munt Act?
	You know much about that, Joe?
	I can't say that I do right now.
	All right, the Smith-Munt Act, I've been researching it for some time.
	It looks like this was an act that was reauthorized in 2012 and went into effect in 2013.
	And guess what it, guess according to all my readings what this allows the government
	to do.
	It wouldn't affect 2013 under Obama.
	It allows the government to be involved in propagandizing the American people.
	Whereas before it was illegal, now I'm told, and I've been reading and researching for months on
	this thing, that what it allows is for the federal government now to lie to the American people,
	propagandize the American people, brainwash the American people. Whereas before this could be
	done by our government overseas, it can now be done by the government itself. It's completely
	legal. Doesn't that show us the massive change in the government narrative and media and behavior?
	I mean, it was bad before this. I'm not saying they were all following the laws, but doesn't
	2012 Did 2013 show us where things really started to perhaps change based on this new information I'm sharing right now with you?
	No, I have heard about that, Brennan, and ironically that happens during Obama years.
	Ironically, there was a Republican that was maybe even pushing for this.
	There was, there was!
	Yeah, they made it legal for the government to even push or even, I guess, support some of this stuff, and that's what we're seeing now.
	We've got information that the Department of Defense was backing this entity called NewsGuard that was a fact checker just put in place to attack conservative media.
	We know the Department of State was involved with another fact checker that's down in the Tampa area.
	We know that now we found out some evidence of this global disinformation entity that's out of the UK that has somehow set itself up as a non-profit in the US, but they're being paid for by the Department of State, UK, EU, and George Soros' Open Society.
	And their whole purpose is to attack conservative advertisers, conservative media advertisers.
	So this is what our government's paying for now.
	And we're seeing it again, you know, it kind of leads all back to Fox News today getting rid of Tucker.
	That guy was their, you know, that was their golden goose.
	Steve Bannon said today, now that Tucker's gone, why would anybody go to Fox News?
	It's not worth your time.
	And so it's good for all of us.
	God does miracles and this is where people go to get the truth.
	And again, Brandon, we're winning.
	America sees this.
	They look at Ray Epps, they don't believe he's an innocent person.
	This was a garbage piece.
	It wasn't even a good piece of propaganda.
	It was garbage.
	It was like trying to make a mushroom out of a cheeseburger.
	It didn't make sense.
	Absolutely not.
	As always, Joe, you're appreciated here.
	Let me show Joe's website real quickly.
	Go there.
	JoeHoff.com.
	There we go.
	There it is.
	JoeHoff.com.
	JoeHoff.com.
	You can find out more there.
	And of course, TheGatewayPundit.com, where he writes and works as well.
	TheGatewayPundit.com.
	As always, great work, Joe.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, Brennan.
	God bless you and Mike and his family tonight.
	Thank you, Joe.
	Joe Hoft, check again.
	Check out his site, joehoft.com and thegatewaypundit.com.
	Joining me now is Ivan Reikland.
	Ivan, welcome back to the broadcast.
	Thank you for joining us.
	No audio, Ivan.
	Are you there?
	All right, let me go.
	He still don't know how to lip sync.
	I don't.
	All right, hold right there real quick.
	Let me do this.
	Put him on hold real quick while he figures all that out and gets framed in.
	Let me show you this here, folks.
	Mypillow.com, mypillow.com, mypillow2.0.
	We are brought to you by you.
	So we need your support, folks.
	This is how we keep everything going and growing.
	And again, it costs an awful lot to keep television going.
	Look at that.
	Right now, we've got the luxurious Giza Dream bedsheets as low as $29.98, 50% off.
	I want to go back to one of these here I just showed.
	Where did it go?
	Right there.
	It's where we started.
	Let's go All right, there we go.
	The slippers, sandals, and slide sale as low as $25 with that promo code L77.
	L77.
	I was wearing my pair last night.
	You say what pair?
	This pair right here.
	That brown pair right in the center there.
	That's the pair I have.
	I was wearing them last night.
	I was wearing them this morning.
	I love them.
	They're awesome.
	They're comfortable.
	And they're, well, as low as $49.98 now.
	We're $149.98.
	This is being moved out.
	They're going to one style, so you might want to get them while you can.
	They make great Father's Day gifts.
	They also have them for women, as you can see.
	Mother's Day gifts, graduation gifts, whatever.
	Again, I've been telling you for weeks now, while this sale is going, because eventually the inventory is going to go, you ought to grab them, 10 per customer, put them in a closet somewhere, and save them, and then pull them out at Christmas, and you'll be giving an awesome gift.
	At a great price.
	So then you got the Giza Dream Sheets that I showed you a while ago.
	But let me show you how this is working.
	You want to get the queen size?
	Was $139.96, now $69.98.
	How about king?
	King size was $159.96, now $79.98.
	How about for the college dorm?
	Let's go with a twin.
	There you go.
	That was $59.96, now only $29.98.
	159.96 now 79.98 how about for the college dorm?
	Let's go with a twin. There you go. That was 59.96 now only
	29.98 so they go the my pillow Giza dream sheets
	Take advantage of it while you can, my friends, but please use the promo code L77.
	It denotes that you're watching The Lindell Report, Mike's show, and you want to support Mike and his work.
	My Mattress Topper 2.0 3-inch coil hybrid topper.
	Check that out.
	Again, promo code L77.
	So there you go.
	We're brought to you by you.
	Thank you for that.
	All right, joining me now is Ivan Reikland.
	Ivan, did you have a chance at all to listen to any of my interview with Joe Hoff?
	Yeah, I listened to most of it, actually.
	And I also happened to watch the entire Ray Epps psyop that was promulgated.
	And this is hopefully what we're going to talk about.
	I did a 30-minute, essentially, rant this morning as soon as I found out about Tucker Carlson leaving.
	I kind of essentially thought that that was going to take place because he had been really pushing and pushing and really going against the Paul Ryan and Murdoch narrative over the last couple of weeks, particularly.
	I mean, I think it started, I'll be honest, I know that some people may take it the wrong way, but when you have General Flynn on your daytime show, right?
	Tucker Carlson, that is.
	When you have Ivan Reikland talking about, essentially, the show that I was on, and then when he had Elon Musk, there's a lot of folks that he had on, particularly RFK Jr.
	He's pushing the envelope to show that the narrative that we've been presented is totally false.
	I think the RFK one was where They talked about pushing back against the fake narrative on the COVID madness and how big media was being manipulated and coerced into, through money scheme, right?
	With the advertisers to push certain narratives in order to benefit those folks.
	Meanwhile, they all knew that it was unsafe and ineffective.
	That coupled with, uh, there, let's look at the timing, right?
	So you have Ray Epps is on the biggest, the highest rated show of the week in America.
	Like that's a deliberate thought process on who you're going to have and the timing of it.
	I don't care who you are.
	That has to be if you're on the highest rated show, right?
	And then number two, Tucker is released.
	And then last week on Tuesday, there was a settlement just before they started the trial after a jury selection.
	Fo News goes ahead and does a settlement with Deviant Voting Systems, right?
	I think that's how you pronounce it.
	So Fo News settles with Deviant Voting Systems.
	In the tune of $800 million.
	They call it that.
	Ivan Reikland calls that, and this is my opinion, based on a lot of research and assessment, that was a straight up $800 million bribe to deviant voting systems in order for them to make sure that the candidate of choice for Faux News is going to win and secure the primary in 2024.
	And then eventually make sure that that same candidate has the public persona look and legitimacy so that the popular vote, quote unquote, through those machines is commensurate with the electoral college vote, which currently is in the bag for the establishment RNC in the tune of 275 electoral votes.
	Here's the problem.
	All those people that I mentioned, except for, you know, save Tucker and, uh, you know, I'm talking about the, Paul Ryan's of the world, excuse me, the deviant voting systems of the world, they want to guarantee that Trump does not secure a re-election.
	The entire establishment, the National Security State, the FBI, the DOJ, all those folks.
	So they're trying to set this thing up so that they have the maximum opportunity, infrastructure-wise, to make sure that that happens.
	Because you've got to remember that primaries, the way that they're conducted, It's the same underlying electoral system as a general election.
	So to secure a primary to get the delegates of the particular party that you're at, you're still using, in the states that use deviant voting systems, you're still using it for the primary as you're using it for the general election.
	So I argue it was essentially an investment in the tune of an $800 million bribe for a quote settlement so that you could have control over the next four years Wow.
	of upwards of $30 trillion budget and downstream economic impact when you're sitting in the
	White House.
	Wow.
	Are you familiar at all with the Smith-Montag?
	Yes.
	Right.
	Yes, right.
	Remind me again?
	This was a bill that, this was a piece of legislation that was amended in 2012, when in effect 2013, that many read as making it possible for the government to use basically... For the propaganda component.
	Yeah, I caught the tail end of that when you were talking with Mr. Ha.
	What are your thoughts on that?
	Because it seems like this is... I haven't looked at the details of it.
	I mean, I need to take a look at that in order to be able to give a substantive kind of commentary and analysis.
	So I'm going to hold off on that.
	Well, let me let me read to you from Business Insider.
	Here's an article.
	No, I'd rather refer to the the base document, like the actual law and the wording and the text of it, and then see what transpired immediately after that.
	But if you have that, I would be happy to discuss.
	Otherwise, I think it would be inappropriate.
	That's just me.
	For you to comment.
	Yeah, because I need to have the underlying legal frame before giving my assessment.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Well, you do that as a constitutional attorney.
	You do that and then come back.
	I'd love your analysis.
	Here's the Business Insider from back in 2013, and this is not a right-wing publication.
	Certainly not now.
	U.S.
	government-funded domestic propaganda has officially hit the airwaves.
	I'm going to highlight one paragraph. The reform effectively nullifies the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948,
	which was amended in 1985 specifically to prohibit U.S.
	organizations from using information to influence public opinion in the United States." What I
	believe was largely done was to not have communism, if you will, pushed on America. And of
	course, it allowed for anti-communist groups to put out the truth.
	But our government could be involved in disinformation overseas.
	Right.
	But it's not allowed to be involved in government agencies being involved in disinformation deliberately on the
	American people, lie to the American people.
	The article goes on to say the new law enables U.S.
	government programming such as Voice of America, an outlet created in the 1942
	to promote a positive understanding of the U.S.
	abroad to broadcast directly to domestic audiences for the first time.
	Voice of America and other programs are now produced by the Broadcasting Board of
	of Governors, which shares a quote, strategic communications budget, unquote, the State
	Department, and has an annual budget of more than 700 million.
	So many people are saying what this allows is for the government and the State Department
	and other groups now to propagandize the American people.
	Look into that and give me your thoughts, but it seems like- I'll take a look at it, but two things real quick that come
	to mind that connect the dots for me.
	I do remember that one thing is that it was primarily focused in order to be able to influence
	the conversation about America overseas.
	But if that changed to where it can now be done domestically, you got to take a look and see what John Brennan's role was in that particular, if you will, law change.
	That's essentially the first thing that comes to my mind is what role did John Brennan have Indeed.
	Yeah, do.
	particular law, legal change or amendment to the law.
	Indeed.
	But I'll take a look.
	Yeah, do.
	All right.
	I want to go back to Brandon, if I may.
	I want to go back to the discussion about linking and doing the analysis of the settlement,
	the bribe, right, for 2024, I call it.
	And then you have Ray Epps showing up all of a sudden on Sunday, giving his testimony.
	He was never tested and asked about, they asked him, were you a Fed?
	Were you an FBI guy?
	I've said for quite some time now, maybe 18 months probably, that due to the fact that when I saw the FBI pull Ray Epps off of their most wanted list, I just made the assumption that, let's just make the assumption for argument's sake, for analysis, that He does not work for the FBI.
	And that's how you can say that, okay, that's, that's why the FBI, uh, pulled, you know, may or may not have pulled them off, uh, of their most wanted list.
	How can you explain that?
	My only logical explanation is that based on all the evidence and facts is that he was a fed, but not for the executive branch.
	He was a fed for Nancy Pelosi.
	So in essence, or her sergeant at arms, or her daughter who was on the inside, or her son-in-law, that would basically answer the question of, because the FBI saw the evidence, we're going to include him in the people that were going to be criminalized for being on the Capitol grounds.
	But when they went to do that, they probably reached out to the U.S.
	Capitol Police Board in the form of the new acting police chief, Yogananda Pittman, who on January 6th was the Head of Intel and Interagency Coordination, if you will.
	She was the one that said, oh, no, no, we're not going to criminalize this kid because guess what?
	He helped us out in the coup.
	That's the only logical answer I can give to the circumstances of Ray Epps.
	Was he asked when he was under under oath in a transcribed interview that was published by the J6 cover-up committee?
	He wasn't asked that.
	Was he asked that in the in the interview yesterday in 60 minutes.
	He was not asked that.
	Was he asked that when he did an informal interview that there's no document or testimony or transcripts of it back in November of 2021?
	No.
	Where we can find some of this detail is that he supposedly claims he went to the Phoenix field office and said everything in his role as it applies to January 6th.
	I'd like to see that What is called the FD 302, the infamous 302.
	How about you kind of provide that to us, FBI, to the American public, and then we'll kind of see for ourselves whether or not what we need to believe.
	Because guess what?
	The credibility of the FBI, I wish I could say it's zero, right?
	But it's worse than zero.
	Everything that has been coming out from the FBI is literally total garbage.
	They are, if they were neutral, that'd be one thing in terms of like providing no value whatsoever.
	They are intentionally making sure that crimes are covered up and lawful activity is converted into some sort of criminalized lawless activity.
	Meaning First Amendment wrong think is now a crime.
	Mispronunciation.
	We're literally on the verge of somebody mispronouncing something is now going to be a crime.
	So I just wanted to throw that out there as well.
	Yeah, well, absolutely.
	OK, so tell me what you were at an event this weekend with General Flynn and President Trump.
	Tell me why that was such a significant event this weekend, please.
	The last time that General Flynn was with President Trump At an event open to the public with media kind of was January 20th of 2017.
	That was inauguration day for the first term for President Trump.
	I happened to be at both of these events.
	That was when I actually snuck in with a newly minted National Security Advisor General Flynn on January 20th.
	It was, I don't know, 7, 8, 9 p.m.
	in the evening at the military Uh, inaugural ball, you know, it was like two, a couple hundred people.
	And that was the last time there's a lot of media.
	I mean, those, uh, if you look it up, there's a lot of, uh, you know, media blitz on that event.
	The reason why seven years later, this is so important is not because they were there together.
	That's one aspect that should indicate something, but also when he introduced the people that were there at the event, and there was almost 900 people at this event.
	This was a big fundraiser for the Lee County GOP, okay?
	When he references General Flynn, I wish I could, you know what?
	You wanted me to send you the link here?
	Yeah.
	To play the 10-second clip?
	Sure.
	Because I think we really need to listen to the words.
	Send it to Logan.
	Okay.
	The bottom line, I might not be able to find it, but Bottom line is that President Trump refers to General Flynn in a very respectful and laudatory, uh, manner.
	Basically calling him brave, my good friend, uh, who, you know, had it, they had it out for him from the very beginning.
	So there's, there's no, everything coming out of President Trump's mouth during that introduction was very laudatory.
	And when you juxtapose that with his commentary, his last two years of commentary on Mike Pence, which is, I'll translate it for you, toxic, feckless, stone-cold coward.
	Those are my words.
	But President Trump's words are a little bit more suave because he's a little bit more delicate than I am sometimes.
	And he says, you know, failed Vice President Pence did not have the courage to do the right thing in order to defend the country.
	That's kind of some of the terminology that he used.
	So in that frame, coupled with the Tucker firing, coupled with all this other stuff going on, you're starting to now see publicly the lines are being drawn.
	And when General Flynn stood up there in his speech, 13 minutes, done my telegram, he's been making the rounds, the key highlight there was General Flynn is asking for everybody that's considering or currently running To be the nominee for the GOP in the primary for the presidential election to go home and move out the way.
	And so I thought that that was a pretty bold and big statement, but very well appropriate because guess what?
	I don't, I can't remember a time when a president, when seeking reelection, where the party even has a primary.
	So this is what they just, they just can't stop.
	Trying to conduct a coup and continue to keep out who the people demand to be the president who's going to expose the rot, corruption, and poison that is incipient in our entire system.
	So, I thought that was a pretty big event.
	Absolutely.
	Let's take some calls.
	Let's open the phone lines.
	901-316-8404.
	901-316-8404.
	We'll squeeze in a few phone calls tonight on what we've been discussing here tonight.
	one three one six eighty four oh four will squeeze in a few phone calls
	tonight on what we've been discussing here tonight what is your reaction by
	the way I think this is only going to help Lindell TV We're going and growing, and there's not really many outlets left that are free and independent, and here we are.
	So, a lot of people are saying today that are texting me, this is going to be really good news for your audience.
	To grow even more.
	What are your thoughts, folks, on what's been going on and what we've been talking about?
	901-316-8404.
	Squeeze in here.
	We'll grab a few calls.
	Make your points quick and fast.
	We'll run through as many calls as we can in the remaining 10 minutes.
	901-316-8404.
	My guest is Ivan Reikland.
	He has a Substack, ivanreikland.substack.com.
	ivanreikland.substack.com.
	He also has a daily 30-minute show.
	Did you guys know this?
	Let me show you.
	Oh yeah, that's right.
	Today's show was fire.
	Absolute fire.
	Go to www.tv.com, that's my channel.
	Go to www.tv.com, scroll down the page, and you'll start seeing pictures that'll pop up.
	Pictures up.
	Well, there he is!
	Ivan Reikland on the 21st.
	Today's show will be up soon.
	That's Friday, yeah.
	Click all episodes and you'll start seeing more of him, but his show from today will be up pretty quick.
	It was live.
	And if you want to watch Ivan or Dan Eastman or any of the other shows, Rob Linstead, any of the shows we host over here, you can find them at www.tv.com.
	Ivan Reikland on every day for 30 minutes.
	So since we are waiting on a call, we got him, but go ahead.
	OK, yeah, absolutely.
	So at the event, I have I was invited by the chair of the GOP down there.
	I got to give a shout out to Michael Thompson.
	Absolute.
	And I'm going to say it in a good way.
	Absolute political thug.
	He basically went from a small, tiny little GOP committee down there.
	They're called the Republican Executive Committee.
	I don't know, it's like barely a couple hundred people.
	I think he tripled it in the course of the last several months due to his efforts and basically had an event with, I call it, the two most popular people in the national discourse in our country, hands down, right?
	President Trump, General Flynn, Roger Stone was there, and I was sitting at the table with Chairman Michael Thompson, and I don't know why, but he said, you know what?
	You need to come down and you need to sit in between Congressman Byron Donalds and Congressman Greg Stubbe.
	And I thought to myself, well, I can't refuse that.
	So I took him up on his offer, had the best seat in the house, right in the middle there amongst two Patriot.
	I mean, you have a Freedom Caucus member, Byron Donalds, this was in his district.
	And then just up the road, adjacent district is Greg Stubbe's district, who happens to sit on the Weaponization Committee.
	And he gave a little insight.
	If you missed his speech, uh, I'll, I'll summarize it this way.
	Congressman Stubbe talked about his time on the weaponization committee and they're interviewing what I call the 60 scum, meaning the 51 that are named individuals saying that the Biden criminal syndicate or criminal cartel laptop was Russian disinformation.
	And then also I took, I whispered in his ear.
	I said, Hey, hey, a lot of people are saying 51, but if you go back to the Folitico article, that published that memorandum by those 51 folks.
	There's actually 9 unnamed.
	It's crucial to find out who the remaining 9 are so that we can identify all 60 scumbags and then we get to work.
	Getting to work meaning we call them in to testify under oath and I guarantee we're going to get every single one of them and give them the Roger Stone treatment when we get back in So that we can conduct, you know, a raid.
	Maybe Lindell TV will be there live on scene, making sure that that raid is happening.
	Right.
	Cause we're going to get the tip just like CNN got the tip, uh, from, from the folks over at the DOJ.
	So we're just going to, you know, use that as precedent, but we're going to continue to escalate it.
	So then we're going to have literally 60 days in a row of raids.
	And maybe we'll just do three a day so that we only two or three a day.
	So that's only a month long.
	Cause you know, it'll get old, right.
	After a certain time.
	But yeah, I look forward to it.
	Let's go to the phone lines.
	Anita or Annette.
	Annette.
	I'm sorry.
	Annette in Arizona.
	Thank you for calling in tonight, Annette.
	Hi, thank you for taking my call.
	Hey, I have a question for Ivan.
	You know, besides General Flynn, he'd be a great team with President Trump, but is it possible to have a vice president who's a Democrat?
	Like, meaning Robert Kennedy Jr.?
	Yeah, so I want to make a comment about that.
	A couple weeks ago, Roger Stone, who's a, I call him a, you know, a national political aminal, who's been in the game for, what, 40 years just advising different presidents.
	A couple weeks ago, Roger Stone said that Wouldn't it be something if we had Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
	as President Trump's VP pick?
	Because, let's face it, of all the folks that are in the political ecosystem, I kind of exclude General Flynn because he's in the category of his own.
	He's not a politician, nor I have not seen any indication of him wanting to be a politician, whether it be in any level.
	So it leaves it up to, like, of everybody out there, who was the most fervent And correct, as it applies to COVID vaccines and all of that, so-called vaccines, right?
	It was Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
	And it's because, I argue, we were all as a nation in the world collectively bamboozled and hoodwinked by Anthony Fauci, Deborah Birx, Mikey Pence, and Jared Kushner, who were heading up that COVID task force.
	While everyone in that ecosystem was making money hand over fist, it was Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
	that still pushed back and got it accurate, we now know with all the Twitter files releases.
	And even President Trump was hoodwinked by his staff, as I mentioned.
	Mikey P, Jared Kushner, Anthony Fauci.
	And I think the easy way to correct the record and essentially atone for some of that nonsense would be This is the argument that Roger Stone made would be to bring in Robert F. Kennedy Jr.
	in as, you know, essentially a unity ticket to get our country back on track collectively to push back against these commies.
	Because, you know, Robert F. Kennedy Jr., from what I've seen, I agree with him on, if you read his book, I don't know where his stance is on a lot of these other issues, but on the issue of And he's opposed to COVID passports, he's opposed to them using digital dollars to track us, to limit us, to put us basically into digital ghettos.
	I mean, he talked about that with me.
	Absolutely.
	All of that corruption.
	Oh, perfect.
	Oh, hi.
	Hard to hear you there.
	They took the question right out of my mouth with the RFK.
	and a lot of the other one is about how you know they can put you in a 15 minute city and then anything outside that
	15 minutes everything goes up or your dollars don't even work so we he's opposed to a lot of stuff we're opposed to
	will from California line to will go quick we're gonna get two more calls in here go will I will.
	Oh hi hard to hear you there. They took the question right out of my mouth with RFK I think that would be a great
	solution to a problem where Trump doesn't buy into the solution that RFK buys into.
	However, my second idea was how are we going to hold our Speaker of the House, Kevin McCarthy, true to his promise to release the 44,000 hours of unedited footage that belongs to We The People instead of giving it to the likes of Rupert Murdoch And or Benny Thompson on the other side.
	We need the unedited version.
	Okay, Ivan.
	Thank you.
	Thank you, Will.
	Ivan, I need a 30-second answer so I can get Wayne from North Carolina in.
	Absolutely.
	Fantastic question.
	You can help me.
	Well, one, you're looking at him.
	And number two, you can help me by contacting the House Admin Committee and reminding them That they need to give access to those people that they've already promised to give access to, and then anybody else that's credible.
	So that's what I'll say on that.
	Wayne, line three.
	Wayne from North Carolina.
	Thanks for calling in, Wayne.
	Yeah, I would like to know, Ivan, you need to have a committee that gets Dennis Montgomery and Mike Lindale testifying to the 32 bits of terabytes to Hammer's scorecard.
	And to show that President Trump did not lose the 2020 election.
	He won the 2020 election, and we are all being psyoped by the CIA, FBI, and the deep state.
	So I would recommend you contact Congresswoman Laurel Lee, who used to be Ron DeSantis' Secretary of State, who's now a freshman Congresswoman in Congress, who chairs the Subcommittee on Elections of the House Administration Committee.
	Wow.
	Congresswoman Laurel Lee.
	I think Wayne from North Carolina is on to something there.
	I think he's on to something, because I think the CIA has their fingerprints all over this.
	So does Congressman Bill Posey of Florida.
	We're about to bankrupt the news organization known as Faux News, because no one's going to watch them anymore.
	Please continue watching Lyndell TV.
	Absolutely.
	Brannon House.
	Thank you, Ivan.
	Ivan Reikland checking in tonight here on the Lindell Report.
	And as we sign off again, condolences and prayers to the Lindell family on the unexpected passing of Mike Lindell's father this afternoon.
	We found out the news from Mike himself.
	So pray for Mike and his family, if you would, please.
	We appreciate that very much.
	Thanks for watching.
	Take care.

▲