All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 24, 2023 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:07:39
The Lindell Report (2-23-23)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
quality coffee you're ever going to have.
It starts with the beans that are grown in Honduras.
Honduras' volcanic soil and humid climate make the perfect growing conditions for coffee
plants, which produce the best beans ever.
Then each batch is tested for its aroma, taste, and other aspects to meet the highest standards
in the coffee industry.
And after that, it goes into production, which is all done right here in the USA.
It's like you're getting that small batch specialty coffee but delivered right to your front door.
So go to mystore.com or call the number on your screen.
Use the promo code and you'll get your very own My Coffee for 25% off.
You guys all know that I've traveled the country for the past year and a half.
I've stayed in hundreds of hotels.
I've tried every coffee out there.
Well, some of the coffees have that terrible aftertaste, some that leave me jittery or I get an upset stomach.
Well, my coffee is different.
It's the richest, smoothest, best coffee I've ever had.
My coffee comes in a variety of flavors.
You get them ground or whole bean, plus it's certified organic and non-GMO.
I guarantee it'll be the best coffee you've ever had.
So go to mystore.com or call the number on your screen.
Use your promo code and you'll get my coffee for 25% off.
And I'm going to give you deep discounts on all my store products.
That's mystore.com.
It's my new platform for USA entrepreneurs.
Please order now.
This is the Lindell Report, bringing you news combined with hope by offering practical
and achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving faith and freedoms.
And now, here is your host, Mike Lindell.
All right, Brandon House, in for Mike Lindell, who is out on business tonight, but we have a big show for you tonight.
We are going to have with us live, at the bottom of the hour, Colonel John Mills and Ivan Reikland together.
Why?
Both of those guys at once?
Both of them together tonight, live from Phoenix, Arizona, where they have been testifying before a Senate and House committee today on the elections.
So both of them at the bottom of the hour, live from Phoenix, Arizona.
Then we'll have, we may even have Seth Ketchum come in and be a part of that as well.
We'll see.
We told him, bring anybody you want.
But before we go to them, what I'd like to do, before we go to them live, what I'd like to do is play a little bit of their testimony today.
A little bit of the testimony by Ivan.
Ivan went for an hour, is that right?
They let Ivan talk for an hour?
They both went for an hour?
Wow!
Close to an hour each, huh?
Wow!
Well, obviously we can't play all of that.
We were streaming some of that today earlier on LyndellTV3, but then we got really busy with other production stuff and we had to bail.
But anyway, I'm going to bring some of it to you now, some of their taped testimony from earlier today in Phoenix, Arizona in this, I think, a combined House and Senate Okay, now before we do that, before we go to that, I want to remind you, look folks, all of this comes to you by you.
You are our sponsor.
And here's how you can keep this going and support the wonderful work of Mike Lindell.
Can you please go to MyPillow.com?
The brand new MyPillow 2.0 is out, and you can get it, but use that promo code L77, get one free.
Buy one, get one free.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers, robes, and so much more.
MyPillow.com, promo code 2.0.
Promo code L77.
But you get the MyPillow 2.0.
Promo code L77.
Then, MyStore.com, the home for American entrepreneurs.
You'll find the MyCoffee there that everyone seems to absolutely be loving.
The MyCoffee in medium, light, dark roast, whole bean, ground, the coffee pods, a non-GMO, organic, not sprayed with pesticides.
The My Coffee at mystore.com.
You can also do a subscription.
While you're at the mystore.com, while you're at mystore.com, you can also get this all-natural energy and health supplement.
This is an all-natural energy and health supplement that I developed.
There we go.
Try to get it right.
That I developed with a team a few years ago.
There we go.
I developed that with a team a few years ago.
All-natural energy and health supplement.
I take it every day.
My wife mixes it into water and brings it to me.
Not uncommon I have it in the afternoons as well as an all-natural energy and health supplement.
What is in it?
Bilberry extract, grapeseed extract, red wine extract, pine bark extract, and vitamin C. Now you don't have to take my word for it.
You can go do your own homework and due diligence on The reported benefits of bilberry extract, grapeseed extract, red wine extract, pine bark extract, loaded with antioxidants, an all-natural energy and health supplement.
Did you know that I'm really 90 years old?
No, actually, I'm 54 come April.
But anyway, this is partly where I get some of my energy today and every day.
An all-natural energy and health supplement.
I say partly because I think some of it is just God-given, but if you're interested in this all-natural energy and health supplement, then you can check it out.
And folks, you don't have to hold your nose to drink it.
Someone asked me today, what does it taste like?
It tastes a little bit like grape.
Mostly like water, because you're mixing it with water, but it has a great flavor to it.
So there you go.
MyStore.com and use the promo code L77.
You can get a discount and support the work of Mike Lindell at the same time.
L77 at MyStore.com.
And while you're there, you can not only pick up the My Coffee, Extra activity, pick up some other products by American entrepreneurs right there at mystore.com.
All right?
That's two of the ways to support us and keep all of this going.
All right, with that, let's go to the first testimony there.
Who we want to start with?
You wanna start with Ian or Colonel Mills?
All right, let's start with Colonel Mills.
Remember, both of them are gonna be with me in about 20 minutes.
So let's go about 10 minutes each on their testimony.
Here's Colonel Mills.
Watch this.
Okay.
Great.
Thank you.
Madam Chair.
Colonel.
I promise.
Thank you.
And speak real close to the mic, sir.
Okay.
Yeah.
So, Colonel John Mills, about 40 years of surveillance, and we'll talk about that a little bit more.
And what is this?
...Secretary of Defense, also as a senior civilian, as the Director of Cyber.
That was a lot of money.
That was about three billion per annum over the top.
Cyber warfare very well.
Also at the National Security Council.
And also was a key player in a major promotion from about 2007 to 2014 called the CNC.
I can launch into the rest of the presentation.
Go ahead.
Madam Chair.
Okay, thank you.
So under the NEIA, and Ivan works with me on the NEIA, and so we've fought, and I fought personally, helped coach counties around the nation, but also in my own county here.
I got involved in this in 2019, so long before the 2020 election.
I said, something is wrong here.
Something's wrong with Virginia elections.
I got to get involved.
And I started going at it with my registrar.
My registrar, here you call him a recorder.
So we call him a general registrar in Virginia.
So, her and I went at it for a while, and in 2021 she resigned, and now she's under criminal indictment and her trial begins soon, so like in May.
So, we actually have somebody who is charged in Virginia, in my county, with 2020 election fraud.
Okay, it happens.
So, and the Attorney General Meares, I was asked to come in and brief his staff earlier last year, and that started the ball rolling.
So, the General Registrar is one of the key, again, you call him a recorder, one of the key players at the county.
And the title of my whole presentation is the county is the first line of defense, not the federal government.
It's the county when it comes to election integrity.
And the only people who really attacked me when she resigned and now she's been indicted was my county GOP.
And I'm a non-profit.
I don't really care.
I'm non-partisan on this.
So they were the only ones who attacked me, not the Democrats.
But we've cycled through two.
I expressed my displeasure with them.
And those two chairs are now gone.
We're on to a third chair.
But another point here I want to mention, it's been brought up several times, the Carter Center is considered the gold standard in elections.
And there's three key themes, I think we've used one of the words, but there's three, if you read all the Carter Center documents on elections, transparency, its auditability, and its simplicity.
I think we've used the term, I think the term has been used, transparency, But these two other themes are very key.
That's the foundation to a fair election.
Transparency, auditability and simplicity.
And, you know, kind of my bottom line up front, I'll go into the rest of my presentation.
You know, when you look at Maricopa, again, I'm from Virginia, but I've understood a lot of counties, understand the federal, the minimal federal law on elections.
Maricopa County is, has now attained the august status of being in the bottom 1% of the 3,300 county, county equivalents across the nation as far as Transparency, auditability, and simplicity.
So they joined the August ranks of Fulton County, of Cook County, of Philadelphia.
I don't think that's where you want to be.
You don't want to be in the bottom 1%.
We have roughly 3,300 counties.
That's including the territories.
That's where the roughly 3,300 when you got to include the territories.
So this is affecting the whole nation.
The inability for Maricopa, and I gave sworn testimony here in July as part of the Cary Lake federal hearing.
The whole nation is being affected by the inability of Maricopa to conduct an election.
The entire nation is being wrapped around the finger of Maricopa, Fulton, Philadelphia.
I kind of give Cook a pass because they've been corrupt for so long.
Nobody even flinches anymore.
But it's important.
This is important.
So let's go into federal law.
And it's been said here, and as Ivan just mentioned, There's very little federal law.
There was such a huge, and my career has been at the federal level, so I'm a federal guy, but I've had to teach myself about the states and the counties, and again, just the county that's at the forefront.
There's very little federal law on elections, and we're letting the federal government get away with pushing things that actually they don't have legal authority for.
We're letting the federal government get away with it.
We're going to talk about that, so huge misperception.
Maricopa, and I want to bring up Scott Jarrett, who you may know, co-director of Maricopa Elections, and he said two things in his July, I reread the testimony from the hearing in July of last year.
And he said, hey, nothing touches the Internet.
That's the famous last words of any computer information security officer for any corporation.
Nothing touches the Internet.
Famous last words.
Everything touches the Internet.
Copper power lines.
Everything touches the Internet.
He also says logic and accuracy testing.
Well, I don't know about you here.
We use that term out in Virginia.
And guess what?
We actually have no written definition of what logic and accuracy testing is.
So the registrar can say that all they want and guess what?
Unless the election board pounds them on this and says, come up with written guidance.
So this term logic and everybody shuts up and is quiet when somebody says, oh, we have logic and accuracy testing.
Really?
What are the written standards?
Oh, we don't have any written standards.
Okay.
So you can't let them get away with that.
Let's go really quickly through some of the, some, there's only a few federal laws.
I might have missed one or two, but in 18 U.S.
Code, there's like three citations.
You've got to be a U.S.
citizen to vote.
That's non-negotiable in a federal election.
Everybody's saying, oh, but all these, we should literally, no, no, it's actually federal law.
It's federal law.
And in Arizona, that's Arizona 16-101.a.1.
You know, same thing here.
It's actually Arizona law.
You've got to be in a federal election.
You've got to be to vote.
I've got to look a little closer.
Maybe you mean in all of your elections, including your local elections.
Let's go.
2002 HAVA, Helping Americans Vote Act.
Never ever trust a nice sounding piece of legislation because obviously Americans couldn't vote before the Helping Americans Vote Act.
So a lot of misunderstanding on that law.
A lot of misunderstanding.
It does not mandate machines.
I have read that over and over again.
It does not.
It says if you use And this term machines is now getting very hazy and now people are stopping to use the term machines.
But it says, if you use machines, here are the standards on those.
But it doesn't reference standards on poll books, printers, or any other of the associated equipment related to an election.
Those standards are complex.
They're not transparent.
Oftentimes they're not auditable and they're not simple, but there's no standards on any of the things because a lot of the battle has really shifted over to the poll book.
Okay, guess what?
The EAC created, the Election Assistance Commission created by HAVA has no standards on poll books.
None.
Zero.
Zippo.
Okay.
The 1964 Civil Rights Act, 1965 Voting Rights Act.
Very important pieces of information, but much of those have really sunset.
I mean, Virginia was under it.
I don't think Arizona was under it.
The 1993 National Voter Registration Act.
This is the one that causes a lot of problems.
The Motor Voter Act.
where voters are registered when they come in to get a driver's license.
That is the point of breakdown.
Definitely in Virginia, and I've talked to the Attorney General regularly.
I'm going to talk to him again next month.
We've got to figure this out because that's the point of breakdown in the IT systems between your DMV and your Department of Elections.
Where is the assertion that that vote that that person wanting to get a driver's license is, in fact, a Real ID U.S.
citizen compliant person?
OK, we got a problem here because I know in Virginia we don't we don't verify that.
And I think most of the states are like that.
You just you go from one database to another database.
Nobody asks any questions.
Bam, you're a voter, but you're not Real ID compliant.
You're not a U.S.
citizen.
Well, how can that be?
And then 52, U.S.
Code retention of ballots.
But again, that's about it.
That's about it.
I might have missed a one or two here, but we're letting the federal government get away with throwing their weight around on these matters when there's actually not.
It's very spotty on the U.S.
Code.
So we can't let the federal government get away with that.
So let's go on.
What authority does CISA, Department of Homeland Security, Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, How can they claim that election infrastructure is critical infrastructure?
I've been scratching my head on that.
One, what do they know about elections?
That's not very classified.
Operations, activities, most of them interagency, most of them joint work very closely with the FBI, DHS, CIA, all the IC, State Department.
I am challenged to name a single person in the federal government who has any clue as to how the elections are conducted at the county level.
I can't find any U.S.
code for CISA's role.
They're citing a presidential directive from the Obama era.
Again, the EAC is really bad.
Let me jump on to a couple of other things here, because I want to get to my 10 points, which are guidance for best practices.
And once I'm done, I will pass this over and this can become part of the record here.
But not only is there little federal law, how can we trust a federal government when we have all kinds of problems here?
We have all kinds of problems.
Let me jump ahead.
I'm jumping ahead a little bit of my notes on the After the 2016 election, I was called on the top secret phone and said, hey, John, you've got to be part of this interagency process.
We're going to finalize the story that Donald J. Trump is a Russian asset.
And we're going to try to delay or block the inauguration of Donald J. Trump in 2017, January.
I said, you've got to be kidding me.
This is insanity.
Okay, and what little problem with that Intel Community Assessment Report that was written personally, personally by Comey and Brennan, there was nothing in it that actually stated that Donald J. Trump was a Russian asset.
So I said when I had to validate it and do the final package for Ash Carter, who's now dead, The Secretary of Defense, you know, my recommendation with this process, I had worked on it, I said not concur.
There are no dinosaurs in this dinosaur park.
There's nothing in here that states that Donald J. Trump.
I say my recommendation was not concur with this document because there's no, you've got to have information backing it up.
You can't just say in the executive summary, you've got to be data so uh but i was told don't worry about it jim comey and john brennan are personally typing this intel community assessment ash car has already signed it we're done move on to the next task and it's like whoa okay this is crazy you never get a director of cia and director of fbi personally preparing an ica personally hands on keyboard was the quote personally hands on keyboard you never get what you got a staff for
So, okay, let's go on here.
Oh yeah, Charles McGonigal.
Let's talk about Charles McGonigal, the FBI, retired FBI special agent who was in charge of the Russia, Russia, Russia story, who now has been arrested because he was taking money from the Russians.
Imagine that I mean that is just I didn't even see that one coming so how does this happen?
Okay, the very people the feds who are supposed to be doing this are the ones that are conducting the conclusion I worked with a lot of FBI people I didn't and I I've given a very lengthy statement and had to update it twice and to the Durham investigation.
I didn't know McGonigal personally, but I know who McGonigal worked for, and was one of the people I named to the Durham investigation.
So, oh yeah, and his translator too, Sergei Shestakov.
Always watch the translators.
I've run a lot of translation operations.
If you can't trust your translators, I mean, who can you trust?
That's very bad.
I could go on with a bunch of others.
The U.S.
government is replete with people.
Jesus James Angleton, former director of counterintelligence at the CIA, always thought we had a spy, a Russian spy, inside the CIA.
He was wrong.
We had three.
Okay?
So, you know, Larry Wu-Tai Chin, Aldrich James, Robert Hanson, actually, if you want to add Anna Montez, Ed Snowden.
Okay, you can't trust any of them.
Okay.
So, we mentioned the, okay, Big Tech, Elvis Chan, FBI, I helped develop the Silicon Valley relationship, resurrect the Silicon Valley relationship as part of that CNCI program.
What could possibly go wrong?
We're going to be good.
We've got to get involved.
The U.S.
government has got to get involved with big tech.
This is back in 2007.
What could go wrong?
Well, now we know what could go wrong, okay?
Elvis Chan carrying a briefcase to Twitter.
These are the Americans I want you to silence and censor.
This is wrong.
This is wrong, and that's in testimony.
That's now in court testimony.
Okay, Mudge Zatko, who I used to work with, who was the former Twitter security officer, says you have active Chinese and other...
All right, let's go to a little bit of footage of the testimony by Ivan Reikland today before both of these men come on with us live tonight.
By the way, thanks to one of our viewers in Wisconsin who just sent over this news report.
I don't have my computer plugged in, but I can tell you about it.
Sad news, Trump-backed state lawmaker loses Wisconsin primary Janelle Branschen, who has been a guest here many, many times.
Janelle Branschen, So reports the Associated Press, a Republican lawmaker endorsed by former President Donald Trump was defeated Tuesday by a fellow state legislator in a three-way GOP primary for an open state Senate seat representing Milwaukee's northern suburbs.
State Representative Dan Notte of Germantown beat Trump-backed State Representative Janelle Branschen.
Well of course we know they've been after Janelle for a long time because she was over that committee related to elections, she was bringing the truth, bringing the hearings, bringing the information, and of course I think they raised a lot of money to try to make sure she lost that news tonight that I'm just being brought up to speed on that indeed she has.
We'll see if we can reach out to Janelle, get her on soon, but she of course is a A warrior that has been out there trying to present the truth to the American people under great, great attacks by the left-wing media and the rhinos, the rhinos and the left, the Uniparty.
All right, let's go to some footage here of Ivan Reikland testifying today in this House Senate committee in Arizona before we're joined by both Ivan Reikland and Colonel Mills live.
let's watch a little this army special force and I'm also going to touch on
briefly the plenary authority your credentials and from where you hail and
then to be able to move forward so that it can then repel these foreign okay my
name is Ivan Raiklin as you mentioned I'm honored to be here and my background
just before we jump into the discussion because we're limited on time.
I was going to discuss two topics generally Let me just tell you guys what's going on here.
We're pulling this footage from a site.
There was a team that was there sending it out.
Sometimes when you get in those buildings, particularly if you have a metal roof, other people in the building doing the same thing, then you end up with a broken feed.
So I apologize for that.
Not much we can do about it, but it'll give us the gist.
Hopefully it'll settle down here in a minute.
But that's not on your end.
I don't want you to think it's on our end.
It's not on your end.
It's on the original recording.
All right, so don't don't panic.
Everything's fine with us.
Everything's fine with you.
It's the recording.
Let's watch it.
Propel these fallacies, counterintelligence, human intelligence across the constitutional
order and the electoral system in Arizona.
Okay.
Okay, a little bit about my background.
A little bit about my background.
Yeah, pull the mic a little closer and tell us your legal credentials and your military
Yeah, pull the mic a little closer and tell us your legal credentials and your military
credentials.
credentials.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Yes, ma'am.
Yes, ma'am.
So a little bit about my background as a detachment commander in the special forces deployed to
So a little bit about my background as a detachment cross social order and the electoral system in Arizona.
Senate last year.
So for 25 years, I spent most of that time in the national security ecosystem, retired
as a lieutenant colonel Green Bay.
Bottom line, I spent quite a bit of that time as an intelligence officer at the tactical
operational strategic level, conducting analysis, counterintelligence, human intelligence across
the deployed numerous continents, countering ISIS, Taliban, MLA, 13, Russian aggression
as a military attack, and a little bit of French.
And one thing I wanted to note here before I jump in is as a detachment commander in
the special forces.
Deployed to three and a half years Other than focusing in I haven't really mentioned it.
I'm a I'm an attorney So when I wasn't on active status because I was in guard reserves and active guard and reserve status During that 25 year period I picked up on a law degree focused on national security law and constitutional law However, amidst that, the last three and a half years, I
was also an adjunct instructor at the Defense Intelligence Agency, where I instructed on
critical thinking.
And essentially going through the process, and so I'll get into that, go to the presentation,
is the last, I would say, three assessment on a particular intelligence question.
Okay, mention it.
I'm a I'm an attorney So when I wasn't on active stat the last three years helping stand up what's known as the army reserve?
75th innovation command in the Silicon Valley in Greater Bay Area where my portfolio focused in on tech scouting on behalf of the army Companies that worked on artificial intelligence, mixed reality, gaming technologies, to be able to increase our capacity in the national security ecosystem, to be able to counter threats, particularly coming from the global leaders in AI, China, the Chinese government.
And then, in my reserve capacity, I spent European, what most would consider allies.
Thank you.
Madam Chair, Mr. Ranklin, really quick on your experience.
Uh, where'd you go to law school?
What kind of law did you practice?
What firm or where and for how long?
Sure, so I went to Turrell Law School on Long Island.
And as far as, again, it was part-time role I spent focused on national security.
I've done personnel security, helping get folks through the security clearance process to get their security clearance.
And then also focused in over the last, I would say the last two and a half years is where I really focused in.
And it's mostly in the legislative ecosystem, advising on legal theories I tell you what, let's skip ahead a little bit past his introduction of himself and see if he gets into the meat and then we're going to be joined here in just one minute by both Ivan and by Colonel Mills.
that I'm going to be discussing today, the Plenary Authority,
worked briefly with Justice Gabelman in Wisconsin.
I tell you what, I tell you what, let's skip ahead a little bit past his introduction of
himself and see if he gets into the meat.
And then we're going to be joined here in just one minute by both Ivan and by Colonel Mills.
Let's see if we can skip ahead to some meat today.
But when the world is kind of competing for global dominance,
in this instance, China, you have to break it down and assess who is doing what and what capacity they have
based on four categories, which we talk about.
Which is their reach globally in the diplomatic space, information ecosystem, military, and then economic influence.
So I argue, again, this is my assessment and I can provide quite a bit of evidence to support it, but in the interest of time I'll give you the top level and I'll hopefully dig deeper in the Q&A period to be able to back up these assessments.
The Chinese Communist Party has essentially been coordinating with Russia And being advised by Russia, based on their previous experience, to do what's known as ideological subversion of the West.
So, for those that are not aware, there's a video out there, back in 1984, a gentleman by the name of Yuri Bezmenov, which was a defector from the KGB, and he articulated in detail exactly what the Soviet Union was doing in order to infiltrate our national institutions.
All of them, whether it's education, whether it's in order to be able to influence things, right?
I argue that that model was used over the last probably decade plus to work with China and they have an increased capacity and capability to then apply that at scale in the West to include the United States.
Okay, so that's the information landscape.
Couple that with the ability to scale that in the tech ecosystem with apps like TikTok.
Also having leverage over big tech companies and big media players in the United States.
So if you're a big company in the United States and you want to do business in and have access to 1.4 billion people market, you're gonna have to play by their rules.
And some of those rules are You have to do things like create friction in your own country in order to create this chaos so that China can continue to rise.
This is my argument.
So what else can they do?
We talk about diplomacy.
They have a seat at the table on the UN Security Council.
They have an influence on staffing in the United Nations.
All right, joining us now are those two gentlemen.
We have Ivan Reiglin and Colonel John Mills both together.
Boom!
I mean, wow.
Mic drop.
Can you believe it?
Wow.
That's a lot of testosterone right there, guys.
A lot of— That's a lot of testimony.
A lot of toxic masculine energy right there in one place.
Both retired military, both with military intelligence.
I mean, wow.
Just those two guys alone would be worth capturing and brain trust, right?
Right there.
They had to clear the Capitol grounds.
I mean, there was so much.
That's right.
All right, guys, we've been watching some of your testimony.
Tell me who wants to go first.
What was the purpose?
How do you feel about it?
What what were some of the questions?
What were some of the biggest things you disclosed today?
Well, and I mean, I totally think Ivan was the one who put this together, so it was it was awesome.
It was legislators need.
They need education.
They need language.
They need text.
This is why they have hearings.
And so this was an awesome opportunity for legislators to try to find out more about what do they need to do.
I mean, it is the one side still has the Republican side and I do this nonpartisan.
I'm not I'm not for the Republicans or the Democrats, but the Republicans still have the The House and the Senate, slim margin, but the forces of evil and corruption have taken over much of the state.
And so they're saying, how do we save our state?
How do we figure it out?
What do we do?
I mean, one of my big proposals was you got to divide up Maricopa.
You got to break up Maricopa.
And so they just got to figure out a way to do that.
But this is the man who did it.
Go ahead.
I had nothing to do with it other than dragging you out.
Thanks for coming out, John.
No, I mean, I think it was a lot of credit needs to go to Representative Liz Harrett.
She spearheaded this effort where, you know, we're talking kind of brainstorming.
Can we do this still?
You push pressure against this, let's call it what it is.
I'm free to speak a little bit less diplomatic on this show.
Sons, expletives of course, Brandon.
This is a family friendly show.
We're trying to do it in a more temperate fashion with all the evidence that has come out over the last two years that Mike Lindell, you, your show has presented.
Collectively, we have gone way beyond a reasonable doubt to decertify this.
Mike, Frank.
Yeah, this was good.
There was a dramatic moment at the end there where we had one impassioned citizen.
There's a senator out here, Bennett, that It clearly may be part of the swamp in Arizona, and so there was some high drama at that time.
I don't know if you were able to see that.
No, we were not.
Can you tell us about it?
No, I did not see that.
I'm not a lawyer, this gentleman is, so we've got to be really careful about our language.
Okay, there was allegations with documentary evidence and proof provided to the Joint Senate and House hearing of individuals Katie Hobbs.
within the government that were taking bribes and conducting fraudulent activity across
multiple lines of effort and topical areas to include election fraud that included, I
think, wasn't it Katie?
Katie Hobbs.
And then the individual that was most responsible.
Ken Bennett.
It was almost as though he's looking through it.
He's like, listing names.
Where are the names?
name of Senator...what's his name?
Oh, Ken Bennett.
Ken Bennett.
Yeah, yeah.
It was almost as though he's looking through it, he's like, listing names, where are the
names, what page, what page?
It's almost as though he's looking at it like, oh, is my name in here too?
That was high drama.
It was quite a way to finish off the whole thing.
Okay, let's back up a little bit.
So, who was it that was testifying and said this?
Come on in, Gail.
Gail, I don't think you're here.
Hey, Brandon.
Hi, Gail.
Gail's all in here.
Yeah.
I can't hear.
Oh, I've got my own in here.
Hey, Brandon.
Gail's all in here.
Yeah, hey.
Yes, good.
So, who was it that was testifying and saying this?
Okay, let me grab my phone.
Her name is Broker.
And she was a citizen.
She was a citizen?
She was a citizen that essentially... Go ahead.
Let me put this in here.
There it is.
I've got her number.
And she slapped down the goods on a senator.
It was high stakes, high drama.
So are you telling me that there was an open opportunity for the public to speak?
Is that what happened?
Open mic?
Liz Harris had invited her to speak.
In fact, the Senator insisted on knowing who was it that invited her.
And I'll tell you, you could cut the tension with a knife.
It was high stakes, high drama.
Well, we've got to get this footage.
We've got to get this footage.
Logan, do we have it?
Do we see it on that other site we've been grabbing stuff from?
It was the last testimony, at the end.
Very last, right at the very end.
She was with an investigative law firm, okay?
I don't know her name.
I've got to look it up but she's with an investigative law firm and I was interviewing a subconsul outside so I came and when I came but just before that I was kind of watching you know what was going on and reading what was going on and I said oh my god they're talking about Hobbes they're talking about deeds and deeds of trust and things like that and so what what I found out was It looks like they were doing money laundering through real estate.
That's what was going on.
And so, working through cartels, and we have Ducey involved, we've got Governor Hobbs involved, we've got Adrienne Fontes, the Secretary of State, involved, and she's got all the proof, she's got the receipts.
Can someone make sure this woman has security for Pete's sake?
We did get her out of here right away, actually.
We escorted her out right away.
This was a big deal.
This was a big deal.
And you're saying she has receipts.
What do you mean by receipts?
All the documentation?
Yes.
Yes, and she provided it to the hearing today.
Okay, so can someone explain to me how this supposedly worked?
By the way, how long was her testimony?
I think it went on for easily 15 minutes.
Okay, so we have some of it.
Do you want us to play some of it?
Yeah, go for it.
How far in should we roll ahead where she really gets to the meat of it?
Well, she started, you know what, she started pretty right away.
Alright, listen, just don't go anywhere.
I will see how this comes out and then we'll come back to you.
Don't go anywhere.
Wait, oh, wait, wait, wait.
She'll introduce herself and who she is and all of that right away, so, you know, so you'll know who she is and then it'll go into it.
Well, skip all that.
Skip all the introduction because I want to just get right, I don't know, how far in, guys?
Three, four minutes?
Yes.
Try that.
Three, four minutes.
Here we go.
Watch this.
Watch this.
Directly damaged by these racketeering activities.
The investigation originally focused on fake notarizations, fake deeds of trust, fraudulent buyers and or sellers of the real property transactions, as well as other companies used in real estate transactions, such as real estate brokers, mortgage companies, title and escrow companies, real estate inspection companies, service companies, and so on.
so on. Over 120,000 documents have been reviewed to date.
These documents have definitely evidenced multiple racketeering enterprises, which include
narcotic sales, money laundering, tax evasion, payroll theft, bankruptcy fraud, life insurance
fraud, auto insurance fraud, bribing of elected and appointed officials, creating and modifying
public record.
Falsifying professional licenses and related credentials, swatting individuals who pose a threat to these enterprises, and last but not least, election fraud.
I walked in and heard briefly that you spoke about a compromised computer system.
Well, that is something we will be addressing.
I will be addressing in quite some detail.
I'm going to share with you that which we've uncovered, how we uncovered it, and the conclusions drawn therefrom.
I'll also share with you how the racketeering enterprises inextricably are intertwined with election fraud.
It is important to note that our office has been limited in resources and in terms of authority, such as subpoena power.
As a result, the conclusions that I'm bringing here to you, that we've reached to date, are just the tip of the iceberg.
As a result, our office stands ready to work with any of the relevant enforcement agencies.
Our primary findings were first reported to Governor Ducey in 2022.
Furthermore, Thaler has met with Attorney Generals in five states, the FBI, the IRS, the U.S.
Bankruptcy Trustee, and with several U.S.
Attorney's offices.
Currently, there are active and ongoing investigations in federal and state jurisdictions, and both California and New Mexico have already used our report and taken some corrective action.
The final report will include the election fraud and will be completed and published as a book entitled Report to the Governor.
This is going to be a book of 300 pages with approximately 3,000 attachments.
Excerpts from this book and other necessary documentation will be available on reporttothegovernor.com after this presentation.
Our report contains 47 separate filings.
I have provided you with a packet and I do apologize that I failed to, my assistant failed to number the pages, but in pages 11 to 14 show you those, detail those 47 findings that we have in our report.
I am going to just mention a few of those that are very pertinent to this committee.
As I mentioned, beginning in Illinois, Idaho and Iowa, in the early 80s, cash earned or otherwise collected in the sale of illegal narcotics and human trafficking activities conducted by the Sinaloan cartel had been laundered through the purchase of single-family residences.
Laundering of this cartel money in Arizona through purchase and sale of the single-family residence began in and about 1994 and focused on new construction, particularly in Santan Valley, Litchfield Park, Goodyear, and Avondale.
Cartel monies mostly came from illicit narcotic sales, which include crystal meth, cocaine, heroin, and fentanyl, as well as human trafficking.
In addition to purchase and sales of single-family residence, cash is laundered through inflated and falsified construction invoices, falsified charitable donations, tuitions paid on fake students allegedly attending private trade schools, and falsified bankruptcies.
Wells Fargo bankers in Arizona and in multiple additional states have engaged in opening, checking, and direct deposit accounts for phantom people.
Resources, including city government officials and agencies in Mesa, Arizona has also been integral in the laundering activities.
Since 2010, money laundering has exceeded $7.5 billion.
In Arizona, laundered cash is used in part to bribe elected and appointed public officials and their support staff.
The principal preparers of the documents necessary to effect the racketeering enterprise are Donna Rae Chavez, a resident of Mesa, and her daughter, Brittany Rae Chavez.
To date, more than 10,000 falsified documents have been recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder's Office.
We estimate that more than 35,000 warranty deeds and trust deeds evidencing fraudulent transactions exist in the database.
The number of falsified notarizations exceeds over 15,000.
Donna and Brittany participate in racketeering activities, which also include facilitating the bribes to the public officials, tax evasion, payroll theft, bankruptcy fraud, insurance fraud, and extortion.
The city of Mesa is a racketeering organization, as their term is defined in 18 U.S.C.
section 1961.
To protect the enterprise, civil rights are systematically and systemically violated to preserve racketeering activities.
Fines and outrageous cash bonds are used to collect monies which are then skimmed and redirected into the racketeering enterprises.
The City of Mesa Police Department operates within it a private police department that is used to support and protect racketeering enterprises.
Officers participating in this force are compensated with monies paid through the phony mortgage schemes and other related schemes.
Officers operating within this private force systemically violate our Fourth Amendment rights by breaking and entering into private properties, wiretapping, computer hacking, cell phone hacking, and by using related surveillance techniques without warrant.
Officers also plant evidence and hide exculpatory evidence.
Multiple state agency databases have been infiltrated or hacked, thus allowing falsified documents to be uploaded into them and allowing legitimate documents to be removed.
For example, the database for the University of Arizona and Arizona State and Northern Arizona have been infiltrated and hacked.
It permits individuals to be given degrees who never attended or graduated from these schools and allows phantom individuals to be awarded degrees, thus lending legitimacy to their existence.
Further, state licensing databases have been infiltrated and hacked to permit individuals with fake degrees to permit phantom individuals to have state licenses issued.
And these licenses, like accounting or real estate, mental health care, even law licenses, we have seen phantom attorneys Registered with the State Bar.
The Maricopa County Database for the Recorder's Office and for the Superior Court were designed in 2014.
They were set up for outside infiltration so that falsified documents could be uploaded or legitimate documents removed.
Since 2015, hundreds upon hundreds of falsified court documents have been loaded into the database.
These documents include falsified default judgments, criminal restitution orders, child support orders, all of these used in swatting activities against individuals posing a threat to the racketeering activities.
Since 2004, elections within Pima County and Maricopa County have been manipulated through the infiltration of the county databases, resulting from bribes paid to executives at election service providers, including, but not limited to, principals at run-back election services.
In addition to impacting local elections, bribes and infiltration were used to affect the outcome of the races during the November 3, 2020 election, including the outcome of the race for Maricopa County Recorder and the outcome of the November 8, 2022 election race for Governor, Secretary of State and Attorney General.
Public officials who have received bribes include multi-state officeholders, State House and State Senate, local officeholders, county supervisors, judges in the Maricopa Supreme Court, judges of some city courts, including two presiding judges, judges assistants, prosecutors within certain cities within Maricopa County, prosecutors for Maricopa County, peripheral legal specialists, including attorneys, approved mental health care providers, as in court-appointed advisors, and related specialists.
In the Superior Court of Maricopa County and Pinal County and Pima County, at least 25% of the active judges have accepted bribes in exchange for protecting the racketeering activities.
Bribe payments generally begin before the individual is even appointed to the bench.
Bribes are usually paid as an incentive for the attorney to leave their private practice.
By way of example, Mesa City Prosecutor's Office routinely files charges and convicts innocent individuals who knowingly or unwittingly pose a threat to the racketeering enterprise.
With respect to judges in the Mesa City Court, Judge Tats, Judge Alisha Lola preside over these invented cases filed by the City Prosecutor, falsely convicting and sentencing the defendant.
In the Maricopa County Superior Court Family Division, child custody evaluators, commonly known as court-appointed advisors, routinely accept bribes in exchange for favorable reports.
Bribes are often facilitated by attorneys representing one party.
But let me explain.
As I stated earlier, in 2018, Mr. Thaler found trust deeds recorded with the Maricopa County Recorder Office, evidencing money laundering and tax evasion.
These documents, as I mentioned, were prepared by both Brittany and Donna Chavitz.
Both of them are connected to the real estate agents suspected of setting up the home purchasing laundering systems in Arizona.
Their principal employer was and is the Sinaloan Contel.
Today we know that their participation in the creation of documents necessary for the criminal enterprise runs more than 25 years and includes facilitating bribes to public officials.
Our initial discovery included more than 100 fake trust deeds and warranty deeds in Maricopa County, where either Brittany or Donna executed the document as either buyer or seller or as the notary under an assumed name.
At least half these documents purported to be executed by married individuals.
The discovery of the falsified deeds led to the discovery of additional racketeering enterprises, including but not limited to, as I've mentioned, insurance fraud, payroll fraud, and bankruptcy fraud.
It also led to the discovery of the extortion schemes I've already mentioned.
Maricopa County Recorder's Office has at least five appointments made by
Adrian Fontes, our county recorder, from 2017 to 2021, who are phantoms, non-existent individuals.
These phantom individuals hold positions related to election services.
Further, during the same period, the office has at least 15 individuals whose appointments were falsified and thereafter kept hidden from the public during the 2020 election cycle.
The appointment documents for all of the above individuals have forged signatures, falsified clerical signatures, which means that the tracings are from a signature stamp, and fake dates.
These falsified notarizations were made by Brittany.
Said falsified clerical signature and date were made by Donna Chavitz.
I'll be sharing examples of this in a few minutes.
In addition to election fraud, manipulation of the city and county databases include falsified default judgments, restitution orders, child custody orders, and so on, as I've explained.
Brittany and Donna have also been able to forge signatures of judges.
Well, that summarizes the findings, at least those that pertain to you guys, of the book.
But as I stated, the parameters of our investigation did not originally include election fraud.
It's important to note that we do not have, we do not represent any political candidate or political party or political action committee or any similar organization or individual.
Mr. Thaler himself did not vote in 2022.
He's not donated to any party.
In November 2019, Brittany approached Mr. Thaler and his colleague, attorney John J. Stanley, with a request that they obtain for her WITSEC protection.
However, prior to obtaining approval, Brittany was threatened in such a manner that she broke off direct communications with our office.
She has continued to surreptitiously provide evidence concerning these criminal activities.
In October 2020, shortly before the November 3rd election, Thaler was provided certain information.
First was evidence that the Maricopa County computer database had been designed with various backdoors, allowing outsiders to infiltrate it and to change the data.
Okay, this... We told you we were being told there would be bombshell information released.
We told you that!
And I kept trying to find out today what it was and where it was, and these guys didn't bother to text or tell me until they got on the air!
But at least they told us and we were able to find it.
So you guys did not disappoint.
This is explosive.
What was the movie on Arizona with the one-armed vet who returned to Arizona and it was a corrupt town he returned to?
It was a World War II movie.
Come on, help me out, Brandon.
You know that.
Oh, it just shows.
It shows the fraud in Arizona.
I mean, this was explosive.
Let's get the bullet points.
Bullet points real quick.
Is she an investigator with a law firm?
She has some legal capacity.
She has done an investigation with a law firm.
She is implicating a number of current standing officials.
Who?
Who?
Well, Bennett was one of them.
Who is Bennett?
He's a state senator.
He was in the hearing today.
Katie Hobbs, the new governor.
Ducey, the old governor.
That's your uniparty.
That's your uniparty, Republican and Democrat.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
And this is the Sinaloa cartel using real estate.
So a lot of local officials are involved because they're buying real estate to launder the drug proceeds and hey Americans this includes fentanyl
which is killing this is a Chinese China fentanyl is a Chinese weapon to kill us it is not a
drug it is a poison so wait a minute so you're telling me that the drug cartels are working with
local and state officials to launder money through real estate realist and that's
what she's saying That's what she's saying.
That's her claim.
That's her claim.
We don't know whether that's true or not.
We're all hearing it for the first time here.
They heard it live.
Then they, what, use that money to bribe local officials?
Yeah, well, they're in on it, and that's what threw the 2020 election here.
And the claim is that 20 states involved, $25 billion, $7.5 billion in Arizona.
Do I have those figures right?
Well, again, this is her findings, her statements, but it's bigger than Arizona.
So this is like national corruption.
Was Bennett the former Secretary of State?
Yes.
And this woman works with a law firm?
What?
Maricopa County Audit.
He was the liaison, remember?
Is the law firm she works with?
She works with the Thaler Harris Law Firm, is that right?
I didn't get the name.
We'll have to get back to you on that.
We're getting the name right now, Brandon.
I mean, if this is true, what she's saying...
This is narco-terrorism in this country.
Arizona forensic investigator Jacqueline Breger, B-R-E-G-E-R, testifies in the Arizona Senate and House
joint meeting that runback was infiltrated in 1820 and 1822 to affect
election outcomes.
That's from Gateway Pundit reporter Jordan Conradson an hour ago on Twitter.
An hour ago?
This is multi-state.
This is multi-state.
I was just looking on the Gateway Pundit for that article.
He hasn't written an article yet.
That's just a tweet.
That's a tweet?
That's from his personal account.
We'll see what he writes up.
So I gathered they set up, and I'm getting some help from Michelle Swimmeck back in Arizona, they set up non-profits, LLCs, and even churches?
Yeah, well, there's a number of churches.
I don't want to get into attacking certain churches, but there's a lot of churches that have profited from the lawlessness of the border.
They've gotten a lot of government proceeds, and so yeah, there's churches that have been involved, and there's a lot of churches that get money from the open borders.
I'm not going to name which ones.
We've done shows on that for years since the Obama administration.
Billions.
Billions.
Yeah, yeah.
But I guess what I'm trying to get at is she also said that local officials would take
part in making sure they had fake crimes against people that tried to blow the whistle so they
would go to jail so those whistleblowers could be thrown in jail.
Yeah, so they were swatting them.
They were, uh, I think one of the most onerous and just absolutely evil is, uh, using child protective services to essentially for, you know, it sounds like for false claims against child abuse, the child protective services potentially coming in and seizing children.
I mean, it's just absolutely evil.
So if this is true, if this is true, we're being run by a political narco state.
Is that right?
One aspect.
That's not an unrealistic and inaccurate way to look at it.
Would this explain why people like Marjorie Taylor Greene were swatted day after day after day?
Would she be one example of that?
Well, yeah.
I mean, Steve Bannon too.
I mean, this is a standard tactic of the left here.
Is this, Ivan, why you can't go to an airport without them wanting to do a proctology exam on you?
I'm not sure this has any connection with it.
I frame it differently.
That's why the government fears me when I walk through the airport.
That's how I would frame it.
But yeah, possible.
So the bottom line, though, is they're using the power of government to intimidate people to speak the truth.
I don't care about the music.
We can go over for a minute.
You're talking about fake liens, judgments, and crimes.
So would this be where, if again, big if, We're all hearing this for the first time.
We're just reporting what's been reported to a committee of House and Senate in Arizona.
That was a committee of House and Senate, right?
And he had one of the senators run out when this was being talked about.
Which one?
Bennett.
And that was the one that had been the Secretary of State.
Why would he run out?
Anybody's guess, but based on my knowledge of nonverbal cues and my assessment ability, I think he's trying to make sure that his name is not in the mix.
And he was clear when people were giving their statements.
I mean, I could tell right away.
I mean, it was obvious.
Well, it was obvious he couldn't care less about this stuff until that lady outed him.
So what you're saying is he didn't start banging and screaming, lie, lie, lie, lie.
He didn't start saying all that.
No, he ran out of the room.
Up until that testimony of that lady, he really didn't pay attention to any of our testimony.
And again, we were told there would be jaw-dropping information.
We were told that nobody could know about it until it happened.
I was told that by sources off the air as well, that you will not believe what's going to be presented, Brannon.
And you know, we hear that, we hear that, and sometimes you get worried.
And that's why I kept trying to get in touch with you guys all day, because I kept waiting to see what's coming.
And if this is true, and we don't know, but if this is true and she has 3,000 pages of documentation, people are going to prison.
Yeah, well, you know, we would hope.
Yeah, we would hope.
We're gonna have to get out of this.
I mean, we can't trust a lot of the feds on this.
I mean, we can't trust the FBI.
We're gonna have to bring in the U.S.
Marshals Service and deputize them as extensions of the U.S.
House of Representatives.
How did this end?
How did this end?
Did someone cut her off?
Did she get to finish her testimony?
No.
No, no.
Bennett turned tail and ran.
Before he did, he asked, who asked you to come here and testify before this committee?
After he berated her saying, how come you don't have any page numbers here?
That's his defense.
You don't have page numbers.
Yeah, throw everything out.
We don't have page numbers.
Did she mention any church or church denomination involved in this?
Did she mention a church or church denomination?
I'm sure I'm sure it's in her documents.
I just that's what an area I like to be very careful on because I I don't it sounds like just just attacking other denominations But there's a lot of denominations that have been involved and been profiting from this So what were you guys thinking or what was going on in the room while this was being where people looking at each other?
Were they typing on their phones?
Were they was there any press in the room scribbling and care?
I mean was there any all of a sudden like whoa?
The tension was thick.
You could tell this was a bombshell.
How were the people on the panel, other than Bennett, you said, run out.
How were the rest of the people on the panel?
Were they taking notes?
Were they texting?
Were they just... Oh, no.
The others were paying attention.
There was a caution and a counsel about besmirching other character.
However, that was stated just for decorum and process.
But the lady who was presenting was very professional.
I thought that was very professional.
Those weren't...
You know, she'll have to stand, you know, I mean, it's her document, she'll have to stand to account for that, but she presented it in a very professional way, so nobody can criticize her for making wild accusations.
Very well documented, very well presented.
Senator Liz Harris is the one that brought her in, correct?
Representative.
Representative.
And from Arizona.
How long has she been a state representative?
Anybody know?
This is her first term, and she is a real estate agent.
Oh, so she would be able to look at some of these documents and know, perhaps.
Well, she's probably seeing it.
This is, again, money laundering.
It's always real estate and casinos are always the best ways to launder money, from what I've been told, not that I've done it personally.
And so, that's the way to do it.
That's the way to do it.
Would you think that Liz had her staff vetting a lot of this?
And if so, for how many days, weeks, or months?
That's a question for her.
Is there anything else you guys want to say?
We're going over tonight with this breaking news.
Is there anything else either one of you want to say about this breaking news?
I mean, if this is true, this is just stunning.
I can say that people in the Trump world, at the highest levels, kept an eye on today's hearing.
People in the Trump world were all watching this.
I didn't say all watching it.
I got a message saying good job from a very high-level individual.
Why would they tell you good job?
Were you involved in this?
No, they watched the testimony.
Okay.
I know you gave testimony, but I didn't know if you were involved.
No, I was just trying to see if Ivan was involved with Liz Harris in this.
That's what I was trying to say.
As far as it applies to that, I had nothing to do with it.
We were just sitting in the 7-Eleven parking lot smoking a cigarette.
I mean, we had nothing to do with it.
No, I was just trying to see if Ivan was involved with Liz Harris in this.
That's what I was trying to say.
As far as it applies to that, I had nothing to do with it.
I'm hearing it for the first time when she was in there.
I had heard...
Well, I saw the was it yesterday the speech the title of the speech was on there
And it's called it's called the book is called report The book or report being released is called report to the
governor and it will come out I don't know when do you want to know when that'll come out?
Once the book coming out Her report when she's coming out. I didn't hear her say
I didn't hear her say it.
I didn't hear when it's coming out, but I don't know.
Did she say that Governor Ducey received this report in May of 2022?
I'm not sure.
I was in and out because I was talking to some media.
And reportedly the AG had it too, reportedly.
That's what we're being told.
So anyway, this is huge.
We don't know if any of it's true.
It's got to be validated.
But I would hope to think that the law firm wouldn't let her go out there unless they validated it.
That the representative Liz Harris wouldn't let her go out there if it's been validated.
So based on your opinion, how trustworthy is this, you think?
I've never met this lady before, but I've heard lots of presentations.
Uh, the way and the manner and what and how it was presented and what was presented was all seemed to be very factual, level-headed, uh, yeah, seemed very credible.
So I give high marks to this.
Wow.
All right.
Any other closing comment for either one of you before we go?
Oh, we're hungry.
All right.
I think it's time to have some breakfast.
It's time to do what, Ivan?
It's time to eat my breakfast.
Okay, alright, well you guys go eat.
We went over, we've gone over, but this is huge, huge, huge news tonight.
If it's true, it's even bigger news, right?
Amen.
Thank you, Brandon.
Thank you guys.
Thank you guys.
All right.
Thanks for covering it.
No, thank you.
We're gonna stay on this guys.
We're gonna try to find out more.
We'll try to get a hold of the reporter with the Gateway Pundit.
See if we can get him on yet even tonight.
So again, we're not gonna go away from this story.
We're gonna try to validate it to the best of our ability based on, again, reporting.
We cannot validate any of this.
We're all hearing it for the first time.
We're waiting for the proof, the 3,000 pages.
We're just reporting what was given to a Senate and House committee and streamed out on a government, state government website.
We are only reporting.
We're not validating.
We're only reporting what was presented and asking questions.
And we'll go now do our homework and do a lot more digging on this.
All right.
We did go long because it is breaking news.
We're going to go to the Worldview Report.
I'll be on live tonight at, well, about 7.40 Central, since we're behind now.
I'll be joined by Rebecca Walzer, Mayor Rudy Giuliani, and others tonight.
Thanks for watching the Lindell Report.
Take care.
▲
Export Selection