All Episodes
Dec. 13, 2022 - The Lindell Report - Mike Lindell
01:22:09
The Lindell Report (12-13-22)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
practical and achievable action points to assist you in defending and preserving
faith and freedom. And now here is your host Mike Lindell.
All right good evening.
Glad you are with us.
Mike Lindell is out on business tonight, talking with a lot of the leadership of the Republican Party as he runs for the chairmanship of the RNC, the Republican National Committee.
So, Mike is busy in a lot of meetings tonight, making a lot of phone calls on a lot of conversations being had about, well, the RNC.
Got to fix that RNC, don't we folks?
We sure do.
So Mike is out.
He's asked us if we would hold down the fort and we're going to do just that.
We're going to be joined tonight by Jim Marchant.
He ran for Nevada Secretary of State and a new guest, Robert Beatles, is going to join us.
He's a businessman.
He sued the state of Nevada a few times as well.
He is really up on the election fraud.
Mike and Robert have a lot of mutual friends.
I think they're using some of the same attorneys.
And I think tonight we might even hear, wait for it, we might even hear that Mr. Robert Has been able to validate a lot of the claims of Mike Lindell and what we've heard from Dennis Montgomery.
Wait a minute.
You mean someone else maybe has validated the work of Dennis Montgomery?
Hmm.
I wonder if the press would report that.
Joining us now is Jim Marchant and Robert Beadles.
Guys, welcome to the program.
Thank you for joining us.
Hey, thanks for having me.
Hi, Brandon.
How are you?
I'm great.
Thank you, Jim.
Robert, I want to make sure I'm getting your last name correctly.
Is it Beadless?
Everybody just calls me Beatles.
Everyone just calls you Beatles, okay.
Marshawn.
Jim Marshawn.
Marshawn.
Marshawn.
All right.
Phonics doesn't always work, guys, but I try to use my phonics when possible.
All right.
Robert, I hear you're also related to Ben Franklin.
Yeah, he's my great-great-great-uncle.
Uncle Ben, huh?
He doesn't get much better than that, yep.
Good old Uncle Ben.
That's pretty amazing.
Well, tell us more about yourself.
You're also an entrepreneur as well, correct?
Yeah, you know, God's been great to us.
A Christian husband and father built some of the biggest businesses in the country, invented a ton of different things.
You know, there's just so much I could bore you guys with, but My wife, she said that I had to show people what is going on in our country versus just tell them.
So I kind of started getting into this.
Let's just call it these election issues since January of 21.
And if you want, I can dive into it.
I don't know how much you want me to.
We got an hour.
So I want you to definitely dive into it.
OK.
Well, rather than solving problems for multi-billion dollar companies and companies like my own, I decided to take the wife's advice and figure out what exactly happened in our elections.
So myself and a bunch of incredible people kind of put together a team in Nevada.
Started off with my good buddy, Bobby Pyton, and then of course, Edward Solomon, Roger Fuller, then Joe Von Hutton Pulitzer later.
And the first thing we did is we started looking into the actual voter rolls, because that's the foundation.
And what people really don't understand is everything that's reported out there is complete garbage.
It's BS, all of it.
So when they say the Republicans, they didn't show up this time.
Or they didn't show up, you know, in the primary or they didn't show up in the general or only so much percentage of the Republicans actually voted and they were overtaken by X amount of votes by the Democrats.
It's all garbage because you have to start at the foundation of these issues and that's the voter rolls.
And so right away we dug in and we found that there was at least, you know, we found 42,000 people in a county of around 300,000 registered voters.
And then we found another 40,000.
voters that were potentially in error.
So you could have like 80,000 of 300,000 people in issues, right?
These people shouldn't be voting.
So when they start saying that, well, you know, 60% of Republicans showed up, well, if 80,000 people on the rolls are fake, all that data is garbage.
And then if you're flipping the votes using these machines like hammer and scorecard, like Dennis Montgomery, you were speaking about, then again, the votes there, that doesn't matter.
It's all garbage.
We're being fed garbage in And the media is not covering any of this.
So after we dug through the roles, we then found the algorithm.
So a good buddy of mine, Edward Solomon, was able to figure out exactly how they did it in 2020.
Then we figured out how they did it in the primary of 2022.
And then again, how they did it in the general of 2022.
And basically what it is, is people are familiar with Hammer and Scorecard.
But the way that it works specifically in Nevada is the Republican Election Day votes ended up going to the Democrat mail-in votes, and then the Republican mail-in votes ended up going to Democrat Election Day votes.
And it ended up being around 63%.
You'll see this percentage across the largest county in every single precinct.
Are you telling me, Rob, that you keep seeing the same percentage over and over and over in every precinct?
Yeah, so the method in voting, the percentages of the votes, like say for instance your election day versus your mail-in ballots, you would see that there'd be like a 63% correlation between every single precinct in that same type of vote.
Is that consistent then, is that not consistent with what Dr. Doug Frank has shown us?
That same percentage is being used over and over and over and over, which again denotes I guess an algorithm, right?
Right.
It's definitely, it's a cascading neural network is exactly what it is.
I'm not very familiar with Dr. Frank's work, but I am familiar with Dennis Montgomery.
Well, let's stop right there.
Let's stop right there.
Because, you know, he's a very controversial figure.
The media has made him out to be a controversial figure.
I think there's been a lot of things said about him that he would absolutely say is not true.
Maybe one day he'll have the gag lifted off of him and he can speak freely for himself.
What do you personally know about Dennis Montgomery?
What have you personally been able to validate?
Because we don't get a chance to visit very often with anyone other than Mike Lindell about it, and Kurt Olson has spoken about it, the attorney Kurt Olson.
But other than those two, we've really not had the chance to talk to anyone
who's had the chance to validate his work. So I think our audience would love to hear more about
that because whenever you say scorecard or hammer, you know, the mainstream media calls you a, you
know, conspiracy kook and a freak and whatever else they come up with. We know that these type
of pieces of software, you know, unless you've been read in on them, you don't know about them.
And of course, if you've been read in on it, you're not supposed to talk about it, right?
Right. Yeah. So Dennis, you know, he's from a place called Lodi, California.
So he went from Lodi, then he moved eventually to Reno, Nevada, where I live.
And so both of those are areas of mine.
I'm from Lodi, live in Reno, been in Reno on and off since 95.
So he's known in the area for sure.
I don't know exactly how much I can say because he does have a gag order.
Yeah, and I don't want you to say more than you should that would put you or him at risk.
But yeah, speak in the generalities that you can.
Let's just say that what Edward found is exactly hammer and scorecard.
And the first thing that the media and people like that try to do is they try to attack the character of the person presenting the information.
They always attack the messenger, never the message.
So when like Bloomberg or Reuters or any of these people attack me, I become like the boogeyman of Nevada.
Every day they're making up something new about me.
What you see is they can't really respond to the message, so they attack the messenger.
They try to discredit them any way they can.
If they can't find dirt on the person, they literally make up dirt on the person.
They'll call you anti-Semitic or whatever it takes just to try to turn people against you a little bit to maybe discount your message.
But what I found works really, really well is to shut these people up, I just started throwing money at it.
I'm like, hey, I tell you what, if I'm wrong, if I'm a bad guy, here's 50,000 bucks.
Here's all the data.
Here's the proof.
Here's 15 PhDs that have vetted it and all said it's true.
Here's three PhDs that went on the record, said it's all true.
Come get your money.
Show me that I'm wrong.
Show me that the entire team is wrong.
Show us how- So just to make sure I understand, you're offering a $50,000 reward to prove you wrong.
Yeah, I offer a $50,000, a $30,000, I could offer millions, it doesn't matter.
Has anyone come and taken the $50,000?
Have you had to pay the $50,000 to anyone?
No, it's still unrivaled.
Let's just say that there's been at least dozens that have tried.
And even professors and PhDs at like UNLV, UNR, they've even taken the challenge and said, you know, Beatles, you're right.
But if we say that you're right, That means we're gonna lose our job.
Because they work at these, you know, liberal colleges, and they can't confirm that the elections are being rigged.
They just want everybody to believe that somehow they run a better candidate, somehow they have a better message, and somehow there's more of them than us.
When I can prove that that is all BS, just like you're seeing with Twitter.
You're starting to see how they cancelled and they censored and, hell, they even took me down in, I forget, a year or two years ago, and I had an account there from 2009.
You know, it's, It's not that we're wrong.
It's just like, you know, Martin always told us that you can tear out a man's tongue, but you're not proving him a liar.
You're just proving that you're scared of what he has to say.
And that's what we keep seeing is the media, they're scared of what we have to say.
So they just make up stuff for us.
They just say that we're wrong, that we're nuts.
And they hope people read these headlines and stop there and never look for the other side of the coin.
Never look to see, well, what is he saying actually?
And then when they would go and they would see, Hey, wait a minute, he's offering 50,000 bucks just to prove them wrong.
And another 30,000 bucks on this one over here to prove them wrong.
And every time they've tried, they're like, crap, he's right.
They just don't talk about it.
So now they'll just something else instead.
So, I mean, it's a hundred percent proof that these, these elections are Rick and it's a hundred percent proof that all the data that they're feeding people to try to, you know, keep them at home, to make them feel like they got beat all that stuff's a lie too.
It's all garbage because.
You have to start at the foundation, which is the voter rules.
They derive all of their data from that.
So if that is 40% in error, every single statistic, every single thing that they're showing the people, it's all BS.
And so they have to understand that we are the majority.
Otherwise they wouldn't be attacking us.
They wouldn't be silencing us.
They wouldn't be censoring us.
They wouldn't be trying to lock us up.
They wouldn't be doing all these things if we weren't the majority.
If you look, you know, they would just do like what they used to in the past.
They would just, you know, laugh and just not even cover us.
Instead they attack.
That tells you that they're scared.
They know that they're losing.
They know that we have the proof.
It's just a matter of when are we going to find a judge with a spine and a set of balls to actually do something about it, right?
Right, exactly.
I want to get back to Hammer and Scorecard and that you said that Edward Dowd, not Edward Dowd, I'm sorry, Edward Solomon has confirmed Hammer and Scorecard.
I want to get back to that in a minute.
Jim, respond to what you're hearing here.
You ran for Secretary of State.
How did you meet Robert?
And obviously, if you were running for Secretary of State, you must have known something about the election system in your state.
And you must have known, you know, how this thing really operates.
So you've been able to validate what Robert's saying, correct?
Absolutely.
Because my first dealing with election fraud happened back in 2018.
I was running for re-election for the statehouse out here in Nevada.
And because I am MAGA, And conservative, there's no way they could let me win reelection.
So then, in 2020, I ran for Congress out here.
And once again, I believe I was a victim of election fraud, just like President Trump.
And so since then, I have been working along with Robert Beatles, since January of 21, on exposing what's going on.
Robert, as you can tell, concentrated on the data.
That kind of thing.
And what I did was I built a coalition of Secretary of State candidates that was running around the country.
And we we did election integrity forums all over the place, including with some of them with Mike.
And so we what our goal was to expose what was going on and let people know the data that we were finding and try to just get the word out that our election system throughout the country Is compromised and we've got to do something about it.
So we're still fighting and once again the 22 election proved they're doing the same thing they did in 18 and 20 and certainly 2022.
So what Roberts doing is extremely valuable because it's it's unlike any anything else in the country that's going on and it's good that it's happening in Nevada.
The most professional when it comes to election fraud in the country.
It started here in 2004 with Harry Reid and George Soros.
They began to implement this machine and they have perfected it here.
And the other disadvantage we have here in Nevada is our legislature that is predominantly, or actually majority, super majority almost, Democrat.
have passed laws to make all of the things that normally are illegal in a voting system legal, such as ballot harvesting, such as drop boxes and universal mail-in ballots.
That's all legal here.
So we don't have much opportunity to sue out here, because if you do, the judge is going to say, well, this is all the law.
What do you want me to do about it?
So we have a different challenge out here than a lot of people do around the country.
And, you know, it just takes people like Robert and myself to just dig in and keep hammering and then align ourselves with people like Mike Lindell and yourself and President Trump.
I met with President Trump last Wednesday talking about election integrity issues.
So we're still fighting.
Can you tell me, without violating any confidence, can you tell me how that conversation went?
Went really well.
He gets it.
Can't say a whole lot, but yeah, we understand what's going on and we're working on some options to try to fix this.
And it includes people like Mike and Robert and others around the country that have to step up and address this problem and fix it.
Because he knows, and I told him, I said, you're not getting elected in 2024 unless we deal with this.
How did he respond to that?
How did he respond?
He knows it.
He knew.
I didn't have to convince him.
He knew that was the case.
We all just have to work.
That's why we've got to just keep fighting.
Robert, let's come back to you in regards to Hammer's scorecard.
You said that Ed Solomon's work proved that Hammer's scorecard was real.
What do you mean by that?
One of the unintended consequences of using a system like Cameron's scorecard is it sometimes leaves unintended results.
And he was able to find those using very, very complicated calculations to be able to find the algorithm that's being used to flip the votes.
And again, this is really a cascading neural network.
All right.
So this is, this is something that in live time, When you set it basically for whoever's using it, whoever's deploying it, whoever actually already has their slate of candidates, and they've already determined who they want to win.
They literally, they just kind of put all the people that they want to win.
Then this formula, within this algorithm here, it does everything that it can to make sure that all of those people win without busting precincts, without You know, without creating issues to the other races.
And it literally works in a method in which it's like the path of least resistance.
So it's going to do everything that it can to make sure that the main people that they have to get through gets through.
And then sometimes there's just not enough computation power between all the precincts, all the counties, and so some things slip by.
All right, so, but what it does do is it leaves a pattern that people can find behind it if you're, say, you know, inclined to know some algebra and maybe a little bit of geometry.
And Solomon is probably one of the smartest mathematicians on the planet.
He found it.
It's very complicated because, again, this is neural network we're talking about.
And everybody that, you know, that we ran it through, all the different PhDs, first verify Yeah, this is true that if you have this formula, just say for instance, you know, 2 plus 2 equals 4, it does that every single time.
You know that it's going to do that every single time.
So this formula actually predicts, because it's an unintended consequence of Hammer and Scorecard, there's basically like a trill or a formula that you can follow.
So literally, if I said, here's something for just very, very simple that most people in high school would understand.
If I showed you a box and I said, Here's the height.
Here's the width.
I'm not going to tell you the length.
Now tell me the volume.
There's no way you actually could do that.
But we can do that every single time using the formula that he found showing exactly what the vote percentage will be in every single precinct in the largest counties in Nevada.
You found all that?
It's unquestionably true.
Even when we tried to take it to court, nobody wanted to talk about it because they knew that it was real.
And we've had, you know, 20-something, 30-something PhDs now all confirm that it's real, that they can literally just take the county's own data, plug in the formula, and they'll be able to predict the future.
That's literally one of the unintended consequences of them.
That's a big part, right?
Yeah.
Hey, Brenna.
Yes, yes, go ahead.
Yeah, can I give you an example?
One of the things that Robert just mentioned, all the counties are involved in this whole scheme.
And back in 2014, a homeless guy that was put in a race to try to take votes away from one of the candidates actually won two counties here in Nevada.
He beat the eventual congressman and his challenger, and it's because they screwed up a little bit.
And they, you know, they have to siphon votes off of other counties.
And that allowed this guy to win White Pine County.
And he, you know, he didn't spend a dime.
He was put in the race basically to take votes away from the challenger.
And they got caught.
And we actually went to the DA in that county and begged him, say, let us compare the digital record to the paper record.
And he agreed.
And he drew up the necessary papers.
And then sent it up the flagpole only to be shut down by the judges above that he was dealing with.
So they know what's going on.
You know, they know we know.
And they're just doing everything like Robert said to shut us down.
Now, let me ask you this, guys.
Where is this algorithm running?
Where is it running?
I mean, there are many, many machines, many, many machine companies.
So where is the machine running?
Is it running in the Secretary of State's offices?
Where is it running so that it can control all of these different outcomes?
Sure.
So I guess it'd probably be best right now just to give you kind of a I guess the way that the election system works.
That would probably be the easiest thing to do for the listeners.
And we can also prove, just in the last general election, that they stole 174,000 votes from Jim Marchant, just in one county alone.
So he is the rightful winner of the Secretary of State.
And again, there's a $50,000 reward out there to prove me wrong.
What about Terry Lake in Arizona?
So I've stuck mostly with Nevada.
So I can show that, like, Adam Lacks ...won the Senate.
I can show that Jim Roushant won Secretary of State.
I can show Seagal, you know, Chateau won Attorney General.
I can show all three of those in those state races.
Just in that one county alone, all had around 174,000 votes stolen from them.
So 50,000 bucks to anybody out there that can prove us wrong.
But to explain how the election system kind of works in Nevada, they literally mail, first you have your corrupt voter rolls.
So they mail out ballots to basically everybody, their cat, dog, brother, clown, and everybody gets a ballot.
Ballots for everybody.
Then all the ballots are harvested up, brought to one location.
Okay.
The one location in the two largest counties are called the register of voters, where they're supposed to be doing signature verification.
They're not doing it meaningfully at all.
So basically all those ballots are just being counted.
As legitimate votes.
But who's doing the counting?
Who actually counts the bubbles?
Who actually counts the ballots?
It's a machine.
All the ballots that come in are run through a machine, and then the amount of bubbles, we've got so many votes, and the amount of ballots, all go to this thing called an EMS.
An EMS is an election management system.
Think of it as like a black box.
Then you have, so all the paper ballots are counted, and no man No woman ever counts them.
It's a little machine.
Then you have your actual voting machines where you push the little buttons and they have a little thumb drive.
And at the end, they pull out the thumb drive and then they plug that into the EMS machine.
And so again, no human is verifying that the votes are legitimate.
They're just plugged into this EMS machine.
Now this election management system is of course connected to the internet.
All right.
And so if you talk to Dennis, I don't know how much he's told you.
But there's lots of things that go on in the cloud.
There's lots of things that happen in the internet.
There's lots of people plugged into it.
At that point, that's where the old switcheroo happens.
So you don't physically have to be in the county clerk's office or voter's office to do this.
They can literally be attacking from outside from, say, their grandma's basement, an eight-year-old kid or Maybe some Chinese actor, you know, in China that works for, you know, for sheep, whoever, whoever it could be, can literally be flipping these votes from anywhere on the planet because everything's hooked up to the election.
All the election management system is hooked up to the internet, which they reluctantly admitted.
And we have them under deposition doing that.
So this can be deployed locally.
It can be deployed across the, you know, across the country, across the world.
There's lots of different ways that this can be deployed but the matter is is it has been deployed and it is fixing these elections against we the people and stealing all of our right of suffrage to be able to cast our vote and to be able to select the people that we voted for versus them select who they want to have power over us.
So it's it's a real mess.
You know we've we've sued I think three times.
We got Observation for all Nevadans so they can actually be part of the election, you know, election process.
We've done canvassing across the entire state.
We put together the largest sting operation I can think of where we put up two sting operations in the two largest counties in Nevada and monitored and recorded over a thousand different issues and violations.
Uh, with, with our election system, including, including them breaking the law by counting all of our votes in secret.
So not only do we have to contend with the mail ballots, not only do we have to contend with the machines, but then we have to contend with the people that are running these elections that are counting all of our votes in secret.
Then they broke the law again by not having chain of custody.
So there was no chain of custody of a lot of these ballots coming into these register of voters.
So we, we documented all this stuff.
You know, we took it before the courts, you know, we're not getting anywhere with that.
You know, we're doing demands and petitions, you know, we try to take it to the media now because essentially the courts.
We all see how they just tend to deflect.
They tend to punt.
They want to just find a loophole to get them out of it.
Now, it's up to you as to why.
Is that because the judges are afraid?
Have they been threatened?
Have they been bribed?
Have they been co-opted?
Or are they afraid of being ridiculed?
Looking silly?
You know, I don't want to touch that.
That's crazy talk.
I don't want my name associated with that.
You know, it's kind of like they use the term racism.
And so you don't want to talk about certain issues because even though they're legitimate issues, you know, because if you talk about them, that makes you a racist.
So are some of these judges, it's not that they're corrupt.
It's not that they're bribed.
It's that they're scared of their reputation.
And of course, some of them might have to run for re-election.
I don't know what your situation is in your state, but some of them might be thinking like politicians and running for re-election if they have to get elected versus appointed.
What are your thoughts?
Well, there's a lot there and I can't speak for every judge.
I know that there's some good ones out there and God love them for it.
Unfortunately, the ones that we've been in front of so far, they look for an easy way out.
They have told us in the beginning that this is just going to go to the Supreme Court.
So, you know, basically, You know, they're not going to do anything for us.
But if they think it's going to go to the Supreme Court, aren't they telling you you think you have a valid case?
If you didn't have a valid case, it would never go to the Supreme Court.
So they're in a way telling you you've got a case, aren't they?
Kind of.
Kind of.
The reason why it would go to the Supreme Court is on appeal, because if they just throw it out, well, then the only place you can really go is to the Supreme Court.
So it doesn't mean that they're saying that you have any kind of They're not validating anything.
They're just saying, well, even if we screw you and kick you out of the courtroom, you can appeal it to the Supreme Court because that's the highest law of the land.
It's a hot potato and they don't want to touch it.
Jim, is it a hot potato because they're worried about their reputation or some of them blackmailed or some of them threatened or a little bit of the above?
I mean, who knows, right?
It could be everything.
So Judge Wilson, let's just break this down a little bit.
So there's only two judges in the entire state of Nevada that can hear election issues on a statewide level.
So you've got Wilson and Russell.
Both of them were elected in Carson City with around 3,000 votes.
Yet these two judges represent the entire state of Nevada.
There's no way to recall a judge in the state of Nevada because the Supreme Court deemed it illegal to recall a judge.
Do you see a conflict of interest there?
So these people with 3,000 votes determine 3 million people's lives and things like that.
So it's a real problem.
And even when we took him 100% proof, That the elections are rigged.
He basically said, and I'm paraphrasing, um, so what, you know, basically, so what, even if, even if what you're saying is true and let's say that it is, it's still not enough.
I mean, you would think any judge at that moment, you say, Hey, look, there's, there's an algorithm here, flipping these votes.
Let's just talk math.
You would think that that judge would say, full stop, hold on.
You're telling me there's something happening with our election system right now, where somebody or something is flipping votes within our election system.
Let's take a look at this, boys.
Nope.
He basically just said, so what?
That's not enough.
Get out.
I mean, you can't make this stuff up.
That happened in all my lawsuits also.
It's not that there's no proof.
It's just, there's no judge that's going to really hear it.
And back to your question, why won't they hear it?
Some of them are scared.
Some of them are literally just operatives.
You know, some, again, It goes back to fear because they know that if they expose it just in Nevada, what we found, literally, we've spent the last two years.
I can show you every single way that they cheat, but you got to give me a judge that's going to listen and actually rule fairly.
They know that if they're that one judge that does that, it changes it for all 50.
It's so much bigger than just one state.
It's so much bigger than one election.
It uncovers it all.
And so that's why we're having such a hard time, you know, winning anything because none of these judges want to be the person that basically Opens Pandora's box to showing how we've been right all along, how we're the majority.
And if people actually voted in person, you would see that we're the majority.
If you, if you literally said, Hey, the next election, everybody's going to have to vote in person.
You would see how few Democrats there are compared to conservatives.
You would see how it's literally, it was like 80, 20.
That's what, that's how much they had to cheat in some of these areas.
80% like conservatives against 20% Democrats.
That's how much they have to cheat with all of these legal ballots filled out illegally.
And then all of these machines flipping votes.
It's, you know, it's, it's, it's heartbreaking that we're not able to get this information out to the mainstream.
But then when you realize the mainstream media are all part of the same team, you have people like George Soros, who controls a lot of the media as well.
And it's rumored he put about $250 million just in Nevada, just this past year into these elections.
So let me ask you this.
Do you believe this is actually Scorecard and Hammer running, that actual piece of software?
Yes.
Yeah, even Reuters, when they asked me about Dennis, they reached out to me a couple weeks ago talking about an article that I wrote on Operation Sunlight, talking about caught red-handed, where I talk about Montgomery a little bit and Solomon a little bit.
I said, hey guys, If we're wrong, come take our money.
Another 50,000 bucks for you.
50,000 bucks to prove that I'm wrong, that Marchant won, that Hammer & Scorecard is not being used.
We found it.
We know that it's being used.
Let's just say that we've more than validated that it's Hammer & Scorecard.
Okay, so let me stop right there.
If it's Hammer & Scorecard, doesn't that mean that this has to be the government then?
Because who else would have this piece of software?
Why are you laughing, Jim?
Why are you laughing?
I think everybody understands we have two governors.
Interesting question.
What's that?
Yeah, I mean, that's a really good, that's a $64,000 question, isn't it really?
I mean, this piece of software that was supposedly developed, right, for the government, very powerful.
Jeff O'Donnell, you guys know Jeff O'Donnell, I'm sure, right?
Very well.
Okay, so Jeff O'Donnell says to his wife, Mike has asked me to go out there to look at what Dennis Montgomery has got.
I guess I'm gonna have to be the one to tell him he's been taken.
This is a scam.
So Jeff goes out there, spends a couple days and validates it and comes on TV over and over and says it's real.
You can't believe it.
You can't believe it unless you see it.
That's right.
Right?
So if this is such a powerful piece of software that Dennis was involved in developing and the government now has it from what we've been told by other people, if the government has it, I mean, is this like something that you could just download off the internet and therefore anybody could be using it?
I mean, the bottom line is, isn't this a piece of software only Maybe China, if China's gotten a hold of it.
Only one could be using it would be our government, our intelligence, our deep state, some of the deep state actors, or China.
So who's doing it?
Is it deep state actors that have the software?
Where are they running it out of?
Are they running it on servers in the U.S.?
Are they running it in servers overseas?
Or has the Deep State actors given it to China and is it being run out of China?
Or is it being run out of some other country?
Or is it being run somewhere and making it look like it's coming from overseas?
I know there's a lot of questions, but you know how software and servers and IP addresses work and hiding stuff, but only a certain number of people could get their hands on this piece of software if it is the software that we're told was developed for the government.
Who's got it?
Yeah, it's not just who, it's how many governments have it.
See, that's the thing, everybody's trying to say that it's...
Uh, one person or one country.
It's literally out in the wild.
But wait a minute, doesn't, doesn't the software have a program built into it?
So the op, the person who built it can see that it's operating somewhere.
In other words, wouldn't he be, wouldn't the guy that wrote it be able to tell, Oh yeah, it's running in China.
Oh yeah.
It's running in Canada.
Oh yeah.
It's running over.
Wouldn't he be able to tell that?
Yeah.
Why do you think there was a gag order on them?
Yeah.
Well, so my background, I've been programming computers since 84, and in every software program I've ever written, I've got backdoors in them.
Yeah, so let's just say... So again, I gotta press you because that's my job.
Who?
Who?
Who is running it?
Is this the World Economic Forum?
Is this George Soros?
Is it the United Nations?
Is it China?
Who?
Who's running it?
All of the above.
Because they certainly have a vested interest in destroying our country.
Is it the CIA in concert with the FBI?
Is it the NSA?
Let's just say it could be.
He's really trying to get us killed, isn't he?
It could be.
I don't know.
That's what I'm saying.
What's that?
Say that again.
Say that again, Robert.
You're really trying to get us killed.
Let me just tell you this.
Let me ask you this.
Has our government practice overseas flipping elections through what we call a color revolution?
Has our government been involved with the NSA or the CIA?
More like the CAA probably, but have they been involved in flipping elections overseas and putting in the people that are most friendly to our country and our policies?
Have they been, and that's when maybe there was enough white hats in power, Have they, since we got more dark hats now, black hats taking over our government, were they involved in putting people into place that are not in the best interest of America, but in the best interest of their cause?
In other words, the CIA reportedly, according to Reuters, I think it was, it reported this, I think I pulled it up last week, Reuters running and telling Bolsonaro, you better not be messing around in the elections.
Really?
Well, that's the kettle calling the pot black, isn't it?
I mean, come on, don't you guys have a history of doing that?
Wait a minute, I think you guys also have a history of killing presidents.
John F. Kennedy, maybe?
I mean, that's my opinion.
That's what I've read from Roger Stone and many others.
So the question I come back to is, I think our government perfected this idea of color revolutions overseas.
Now, when I said this at my national conference in October, Someone I've known for 15 plus years, who was in one of the big Intel agencies, came up to me and said, I just had to laugh.
I just had to laugh when you said that, which I just said to you.
And I said, why?
No laughing matter.
Oh, no, it's not.
They weren't laughing to mock me.
Oh, no, they were not laughing to mock me.
I said I had the person said I had to laugh.
Yeah.
It's horrifying.
I was laughing because of the fact that you actually are saying it.
That someone that has the platform that you have, you and Mike Lindell were sitting on
the platform talking and the fact that you and Mike Lindell have the ability to talk
to millions and millions of people and you're sitting there saying this and I just had to
sit there and laugh and think.
Yes!
And the person said, that's all I can say.
And the only reason I can't say anymore is I don't want to go to jail because I think I was read in and involved in hearing things and in my line of work I could be in trouble.
But all I can say is, That's really funny because now there are people out here in the country that are figuring it out who actually have a pretty good sized platform.
So no, they weren't laughing to mock.
They actually said, keep on it.
You are over the target.
You are over the target.
I've known this person for 15 plus years.
I know the agency they worked for.
And when I was making an issue of the government involved in color revolutions overseas, flipping elections.
Now, how about they just after they perfected it over there, they've now carried it out here.
And the person said you are over the target target.
Right.
I believe I heard rumors where most of this software started in Venezuela, you know, hammering it down there and making sure they overthrew that government and they perfected it there.
And then they brought it here.
And that was the 2004 Secretary of State project by George Soros and Harry Reid that started right here in Nevada.
Cause that's the, you know, we're the next state that it came from and it spread all over the country.
So, um, so yeah, you're right.
Have you guys, uh, have you guys ever read the book, uh, Black Box?
Sorry, no.
Is that, was that a documentary done by that lady up in Washington?
Yeah.
And I know about that.
She she I've read her whole book.
It's online for free.
She started doing this.
I'm going to go look it up real quick.
She started this back in the 90s.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, yeah.
She was she is saying she's saying everything we're saying now, but she was saying it back then.
The point, though, her book and her research was mostly the Democrats screaming and hollering that the Republicans were the ones doing this.
Well, the Republicans were because That instance I mentioned earlier about the two counties here in Nevada, that was a Republican primary.
They wanted to make sure they got their RINO candidate in there, and they did.
so it's it's this is not democrat republican this is here it is here it is i i spoke on this i spoke on this at the uh uh summit for mike lindell uh this in august back in springfield missouri but here here it is black box voting anyone could go read the book here are the pdfs look at that chapters 1 through 16 plus two extras for footnotes and stuff black box voting the website is blackboxvoting.org black box voting Now, this was back in 2004 that she released the book, okay?
And look, it was endorsed by Vanity Fair!
Vanity Fair!
You keep scrolling and you find more endorsements.
Yeah, Beverly Harris.
Beverly Harris, yeah.
There's Vanity Fair magazine as you scroll through.
Here's Salon.com.
So if this is crazy conspiracy talk, why do you have some liberal Vanity Fair and Salon.com praising this book?
Yes.
and and and again this is consistent with what clint curtis clinton curtis said at
the moment of truth summit when he was a he's a democrat saying hey i was tasked with
writing a piece of software they could flip votes i thought they were doing it
so they could figure out how to block it and i showed him how to block it
turns out the republicans took what he wrote he said and were using it to flip
votes for republicans Then, of course, the Democrats started screaming and hollering.
Somewhere along the way, they came in and had a uniparty they created, said, okay, we'll let you in on the game, and we'll decide which candidates win.
I mean, I can't figure out, they had to have come to some meeting of the minds, because the ones that were screaming and hollering about it, that were Democrats, are now defending the system we have.
And your crazy talk, if you say what they were saying on video, in Hacking Democracy and And black box and other videos.
Yeah, Bev has a complete video on kind of how she found all of this data.
And she actually got into some FTP servers and downloaded just a ton of data that they didn't secure back then.
I guess they didn't have the technology or didn't deploy the technology to do it.
And she just downloaded a boatload of data and information And it horrified her.
And she went on, you know, that started her mission to expose the voter fraud.
And there's a complete video on YouTube, maybe.
I mean, YouTube may have taken it off by now, but but there's a complete video on that.
So so and you're talking about Clint Curtis.
I know Clint Curtis real well.
I'm from Florida originally.
And I had a lot of dealings in the legislature down there.
And the speaker of the Florida The House of Representatives was Tom Feeney.
Tom Feeney is the one that hired Clint Curtis to do this, and you can also find that on YouTube.
It's a video of him testifying in a court about what he did.
And I talked to him the other day.
I stay in constant contact with him.
He's just as frustrated as we are about this whole election fraud machine throughout the country.
Here, let me play just a moment of this, Logan.
Bring this up.
Here's from YouTube.
It's called Bev Harris and Rebecca Mercury Part 1, Hack the Vote, Election 2004.
Just to show that this has been out there a while.
See, here we go, if they're going to come to the podium.
Here we go.
I'm not a hacker.
I'm not a computer programmer.
I'm someone's grandma who was googling around one day and found 40,000 files that belonged to a voting machine
company.
Since then I've gotten three cease and desist orders and been interviewed by the Secret Service five times.
I wasn't even interested in voting.
In fact, they love to trash me with this.
I don't always vote.
I sometimes vote, and occasionally I didn't.
And that makes it so that I'm not supposedly allowed to criticize what I found.
But when I found what I found, I decided I will always vote after this.
If nothing else, if I don't agree with any of the candidates, just to write my own name in and see if it shows up.
As I began to look at this issue, I knew that we were going to have a problem.
Not because I have background in computers, but because I've been a professional writer for about 20 years, and one of the first things that I wrote about as assignments for corporations was financial fraud and embezzlement.
And I was, I guess, lucky because in my assignments they were very in-depth and I met the embezzlers
who look really nice, they're just regular people, you know, grandma, she's baking cookies
and then she goes in the back room and stuffs her checkbook.
One guy was an Orthodox Jew, we thought.
Probably not as devout as everyone thought.
He would go in the back room to pray at exactly 4 o'clock every afternoon and steal instead.
So you don't know.
The point is, you don't know who it is, and it happens more often than you think.
And when I realized, after looking into this, that we were taking away the checks and balances in our voting system, there is no question that somebody, somewhere, is going to exploit that.
So I got kind of interested in it.
And over the course of the last two years, and in writing a book called Black Box Voting, I found out that this is where we're at.
And I will give you some real examples of some of the recent investigations that we've done that have not been widely reported.
Alright, we'll hold it there, but that's just to show that this lady has been doing this a long time.
How is she saying Jim first, then you, Robert?
How is she saying anything differently than what you guys are saying now, and Mike Lindell and others?
She's not.
She's saying the exact same thing we're doing.
We're just trying to keep the fight going.
And by the way, I don't think she will ever give an interview again.
I think she's done.
I don't know.
I reached out.
I reached out to someone to try to reach her to give an interview.
And I was told I was told that she's done.
She's done.
You know what?
I could see why someone after fighting this for years and years and years would finally say, I'm done, because, you know, it's like beating your head against a wall at some point, isn't it?
Yeah, you're exactly right.
And it's it's extremely tiring.
And, you know, you mentioned Robert's ancestors, Ben Franklin, My fifth great-grandfather's Robert E. Lee and my seventh great-grandmother's Martha Washington.
So, it's in my DNA.
We'll continue fighting until we're done.
So, yeah, we're not going to give up.
You want to comment, Robert?
Sure.
So, she's not saying anything different, for sure.
But the thing is, is you can literally... I've posted it on Operation Sunlight.
You can see there's about a 10-minute clip where there's just from a few years back.
People like Kamala Harris, everybody else, saying the exact same thing that we're saying right now.
Why aren't they being called election deniers, right?
Elizabeth Warren.
Right, she was one of them as well.
There's like a 10-minute clip there.
Yep, just all of them, over and over and over again, talking about how these things can't be trusted, you can't use them, but yet now we point out the obvious and we're election deniers.
And I tell you, the real election deniers are the people that deny that there's issues with our elections.
Those are the real deniers.
Yes, it is.
I was trying to find a clip, because I have that clip that you're referring to, where it's just all of them, one after the other, saying Kamala Harris, so many of them saying the very things we're saying now.
But that was all acceptable to say then.
Now, I guess, all of a sudden, it's not supposedly acceptable to say this anymore.
You just mentioned a website.
What website did you just mention, Robert?
So we do a lot of stuff in Nevada.
Operation Sunlight, so it's just operationsunlight.com, is where we post pretty much every day things that we're finding, issues in the state, proof, evidence, rewards, you name it, all kinds of things.
So we post there pretty much every day.
We do so many different things we'd need another hour just to talk Let me show the website.
Here it is.
Operation Sunlight.
$50,000 reward.
$30,000 challenge.
There you go.
That's their website.
A lot of stuff on here.
Operation Sunlight, $50,000 reward, $30,000 challenge.
There you go.
That's their website, a lot of stuff on here.
Everything's there.
Yep, those are the- Where's the video?
Where's that video?
Because I couldn't find it on my... I've got it but I wasn't able to put my hands on it right yet.
Do you know where the video is of those people?
All the politicians saying the same thing you guys are saying now?
Where is that on here?
You know?
It's in there.
It might be in David versus Goliath.
It might be in what we see...
So if you just scroll down, it's in one of the posts.
Each one of those rectangles there, those are all posts where we're exposing things.
You go ahead and talk.
I'll look for it real quick, see if I can find it as well.
But tell us more.
You said you got so much you could give.
What have I not asked you that you want the audience to know?
Well, again, it's up to God and us.
And so people that are feeling apathetic right now or people that are feeling their votes don't count anymore, we're actually winning, believe it or not.
Just like the Twitter files that we're seeing.
It really validates everything that we've been saying for the past couple years.
They've called us crazy.
They've called us nuts.
They've called us all kinds of names.
And now, guess what?
We're being validated that what we were saying all along is true.
That they're literally trying to keep us from getting the message out.
It's like Thomas Jefferson said, That when the press is free and all men are able to read, all is safe, right?
And we keep saying that's not the case.
So people really need to understand that we have serious issues with our elections.
We're exposing them right there on operationsunlight.com constantly.
So that way they can realize, wait, this is what they're finding here.
And they can apply that to probably the state that they're in because Nevada is literally the worst state in the country for election issues.
Like they've literally said, I mean, to think about Nevada, when you say that you live in Nevada, most people think that, you know, you're a degenerate gambler, or you like hookers and prostitutors, and you got drugs.
That's kind of like what Nevada's been known for, right?
So, it's not a stretch to say that we have the worst elections in the country, and you can actually look at the laws, like AB321, and see for yourself.
So, when you go to operationsunlight.com, everything's free.
It's always free.
You'll never find a way to pay me.
You'll be able to see things that happen in Nevada, how we expose it, and how they can do this in their state as well.
So it's a really good resource for people to stay up on what's happening in Nevada.
It's also a really good resource for people in other states to see how they can do things as well.
And we have an incredible team.
I can't give them enough credit.
They're just amazing.
And they stay mostly in the dark, media-wise, because they see how people like us get attacked.
So they're not able to withstand The attacks as much.
So I love my team very, very much.
And yeah, it's truly up to God and us to set this stuff straight because if enough of us wake up, if enough of us say enough, they're going to run for the exits.
I promise you this.
They will run for the exits because we truly outnumber them.
Like Bobby Pyton has always said, 60,000 to one, if 10% of us just stand up.
That is pretty huge numbers and people need to remember that.
And another thing people need to remember is these people work for us, not the other way around.
It's time we peacefully remind them that.
Yeah, indeed.
In fact, I found that clip.
It's actually on YouTube.
Watch this.
Here you go.
Let's play this.
You ready, Logan?
Demonstration for my colleagues here at the Capitol, where we brought in folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines.
Those that are being used in many states, but are not state-of-the-art from our perspective.
We're very concerned because there's only three companies.
You could easily hack into them.
It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact three companies are controlling them.
43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including back doors.
These companies are accountable to no one.
They won't answer basic questions about their cybersecurity practices, and the biggest companies won't answer any questions at all.
Five states have no paper trail, and that means there is no way to prove the numbers the voting machines put out are legitimate.
So much for Cybersecurity 101.
I know America's voting machines are vulnerable because my colleagues and I have hacked them repeatedly.
We've created attacks that can spread from machine to machine like a computer virus and silently change election outcomes.
And in every single case, we've found ways for attackers to sabotage machines and to steal votes.
Early voters in Georgia in 2018 saw machines deleting votes and switching them to other candidates.
When you say hacked, what were they able to do once they gained access to the machines?
Oh, all sorts of things.
They could manipulate the outcome of the vote.
They could manipulate the tally.
They could delete the tally.
And they could compromise the vote in any number of ways.
I'm pretty sure my undergrad computer security class at Michigan could have changed the outcome of the 2016 Michigan election if we wanted to.
It is that bad.
And we have a combination of very powerful adversaries and unfortunately quite vulnerable and obsolete systems.
That's why I say it's only a matter of time.
Wow.
Logan, did you get that email I just sent you in there?
I couldn't have said it better myself.
I've got another one to play.
Let me know when it's ready Logan.
I've got like four minutes to go.
Let me mention this real quick while he's queuing that up.
Folks, if you appreciate everything you're hearing here, I want to invite you to help Mike Lindell.
Keep the Lindell Report going.
Keep this network going.
Keep Mike's work going.
We're about to play another video.
It's gonna be Adam Schiff.
Michelle Swinnick just sent it to me.
But folks, we need your help to keep all this going.
Go to MyPillow.com.
Please.
Go to MyPillow.com.
Use that promo code L77.
Sheets, towels, blankets, pet beds, slippers, sandals, mattresses, mattress toppers.
Looking to see if Delta was in her dog bed.
She's not in here.
I think they're feeding her dinner.
We need your help.
MyPill.com.
Promo code L77.
We need your help.
How about the Lindell Legal Defense Fund?
LindellLegalDefenseFund.com.
LindellLegalDefenseFund.com.
Help Mike.
Lots of cases to fight.
MyStore.com.
Use the promo code L77.
MyStore.com.
Use the promo code L77.
Lot of products there.
This is how we fund this.
This is one of the biggest ways we fund all of this, folks.
We have to have your help.
Where are you?
You think Sean Hannity's gonna do a show like we just did?
Mark Levin gonna do a show like we just did?
Alright, Logan, is that- Tucker Carlson gonna- yeah, Tucker gonna do this?
Logan, is that ready?
Alright, let's roll that.
OK, we're waiting for the ad to quit playing in front of it.
I guess this is on Rumble.
Michelle Swinney just sent it to us.
And this is what we're about to see is on Rumble.
I think this is a brand new one.
I don't think I've seen this one myself, but I think I just saw a clip of Adam Schiff on here.
So here we go.
Let's roll it.
Continue to think that our voting machines are too vulnerable.
Researches have repeatedly demonstrated that ballot recording machines and other voting systems are susceptible to tampering.
Even hackers with limited prior knowledge, tools and resources are able to breach voting machines in a matter of minutes.
In 2018, electronic voting machines in Georgia and Texas deleted votes for certain candidates or switched votes from one candidate to another.
The biggest seller of voting machines is doing something that violates cybersecurity 101.
Directing that you install remote access software which would make a machine like that, you know, a magnet for fraudsters and hackers.
These voting machines can be hacked quite easily.
You could easily hack into them.
It makes it seem like all these states are doing different things, but in fact three companies are controlling this.
It is the individual voting machines that pose some of the greatest risk.
There are a lot of states that are dealing with antiquated machines.
Right?
Which are vulnerable to being hacked.
Workers were able to easily hack into an electronic voting machine.
It was possible to switch votes.
43% of American voters use voting machines that researchers have found have serious security flaws, including back doors.
We know how vulnerable now our systems were.
We know, I know the hackathon that took place last year, where virtually every machine was broken into fairly quickly.
I actually held a demonstration for my colleagues.
Here at the Capitol, where we brought in folks who, before our eyes, hacked election machines.
Those that are being used in many states.
Aging systems also frequently rely on unsupported software, like Windows XP and 2000, which may not receive regular security patches and are thus more vulnerable to the latest methods of cyber attack.
In a close presidential election, they just need to hack one swing state.
Or maybe one or two.
Or maybe just a few counties in one swing state.
I'm very concerned that you could have a hack that finally went through.
Well, there you go!
Some of those were duplicate, and other of those were brand new clips we didn't play already.
Shocking, but if you talk about it now, you're crazy, don't you know?
Yeah, even our own Department of Homeland Security, Cyber Infrastructure Security Agency, just a few months ago, Came out with a a notice that that describes the vulnerabilities nine of them at least I know there are a ton more They're not up to date.
Like they said they haven't kept their security Licenses up to get up to date.
So they're even admitting they have problems It's a disaster.
We need to go to hand ballots counted by people on a precinct level basis Voter ID.
We need to clean up the voter rolls, and that's exactly what I was going to do if I was Secretary of State of Nevada.
Well, it sounds like you are.
It sounds like you are.
It sounds like you won.
All right, I wish I had more time.
We're going to get you guys back.
Robert, Jim, great Americans.
Thank you, gentlemen.
Thank you on behalf.
I'll thank you.
I myself will thank you for Mike Lindell, because I know he thanks you.
He's the one that said I should get you guys on.
He wanted you guys on tonight.
That's why we did it.
So we're doing this at his request.
So I know he wants me to thank you.
Great show.
We'll get you back.
Jim, Robert, thank you gentlemen.
Thank you guys.
Alright, that's the Lindell Report again, folks.
We need to support Mike and his work.
MyPillow.com, promo code L77.
Thanks for watching.
Take care.
You're watching Lindell TV.
Hello I'm Mike Lindell and I'm excited to announce my original MySlippers are back in stock.
Last Christmas you made them the number one selling MyPillow product and now I've added smaller sizes, larger sizes, wide sizes and all new colors.
And with your promo code you still save $90 a pair.
What makes my slippers different is my exclusive four-layer design that you're not going to find in any other slippers.
My slippers' patented layers make them ultra-comfortable, extremely durable, and they help relieve stress on your feet.
Wear them anytime, anywhere.
You'll absolutely love my slippers, and I'm extending my 60-day money-back guarantee until March 1st, 2023, making them the best Christmas gifts ever.
So go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen now.
Use your promo code to save $90 on my original MySlippers.
That's only $49.98 a pair.
Quantities won't last long, so please order now.
Tonight on the Worldview Report, gun stores are reporting that major credit card companies
are beginning to cancel purchases at the point of sale for some customers.
Perfectly law-abiding customers.
Some predicted that that was the real reason behind the new policy of tracking sales of guns and ammo.
We'll give you an update on what's happening.
Dr. Fauci's replacement appears to be just as much under the spell of Communist China as he was.
An Australian senator throws down on the coming surveillance state masquerading as smart cities.
We've also got a list of America's most woke companies.
And sadly, more athletes are having blood clot issues.
All this and more as the Worldview Report begins right now.
This is Worldview Report with host Brandon Howes.
Whether it is news from the nation's capital or your state capital, from the classroom to the boardroom, from national security to national and local news that impacts you and your family, Worldview Report is your trusted source for vital and uncensored news.
And now, here is Brennan House.
Good evening and welcome to the Worldview Report.
Zero Hedge reports that gun rights advocates warned that a new change to the credit card industry to add a firearm and ammunition specifically merchant category code or MCC for gun stores wasn't about tracking guns necessarily.
But could lead to the denial of lawful firearm purchases by law-abiding citizens.
In September, Visa, MasterCard, and American Express all said they would adopt the MCC code to categorize sales at gun shops.
Well, months later, several social media posts of alleged gun stores and customers claim they experienced card issues.
Twitter account BattleCopTactical tweeted this, quote, Federal firearms license gun shop in a Facebook group shared this, looks like the Doomers accurately called how the new firearms merchant code would go down, end quote.
Battlecock Tactical's images show what appears to be a retail point-of-sale system at a federally licensed firearm facility that reads $913.70.
Transaction was, quote, declined, end quote.
The error code on the merchant's computer read, quote, Transaction declined.
Charge declined.
Restricted card.
Customer bank does not allow this card to be used at this type of merchant, end quote.
As credit card companies were rolling out the new code in mid-September,
National Shooting Sports Foundation lawyer Lawrence Keene explained,
quote, it was never about gathering data to aid law enforcement.
It is and always has been a concerted effort to pressure credit card companies to deny
lawful purchases of firearms and put every single gun purchaser on a watch list, end quote.
Could these be some of the first examples of backdoor anti-gun policies enforced through big corporations?
Could it also be a perfect example of social credit scores and how it can work?
As well as, wait till we get to a digital dollar, central bank dollar.
Again, just simply turning you off on certain purchases.
Well, credit card companies, they face pressure from gun control groups and lawmakers sympathetic to their cause to adopt new merchant category codes for those firearms, which now falls into the category of, quote, general merchandise.
Two dozen Republican Attorney Generals have sent a letter to Visa, MasterCard, and American Express demanding the credit card companies abandon plans to track gun sales in the United States through firearm-specific transaction codes.
We'll keep you up to date on this story.
Natalie Winters reports in an article for The War Room that Dr. Anthony Fauci's interim replacement as head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, signed deals increasing the federal agency's collaborative research with Chinese military-linked scientific institutions that funded controversial bat coronavirus research conducted by the Wuhan Institute of Virology and EcoHealth Alliance.
Well, this individual that's now replacing Fauci has served as Fauci's principal deputy director, the second most powerful within the six billion dollar agency.
He's been there since 2006.
He is also the same aide that Fauci sent panicked emails to, obtained via a Freedom of Information Act request, about the gain-of-function research occurring in Wuhan in the early days of the pandemic.
In a recent deposition, Fauci also identified Auchincloss as responsible for reversing a ban on federal funds supporting gain-of-function research in the case of Ralph Baric, who shared his deadly research tactics with scientists in Wuhan.
The Rare Foundation reports that Australian Senator Alex Antic recently warned Parliament about the rise of the digital surveillance state, manifesting itself in the form of so-called smart cities.
He questions what is happening to all the data being collected.
The senator explains that Australians are sleepwalking into a dystopian technocratic future as smart city technology rolls out across the country.
Invasive technology, such as facial recognition cameras, well, they're now commonplace in Australian cities, along with digital ID and central bank digital currencies.
He warned that Australians are staring at a Chinese Communist Party style social credit future.
We've already lived through the early stages.
That's what he explained.
Watch as he speaks to his colleagues in the Senate about how the formerly free world is morphing into a digital slave state.
Australian cities are becoming digital surveillance precincts with so-called smart city programs being rolled out across the country.
Invasive technology such as facial recognition cameras, license plate readers, smart lights, smart poles, smart cars, smart neighborhoods, smart homes and smart appliances all connected to wireless networks and communicating with each other.
So what's wrong with that?
Technology is good, isn't it?
All this is for your safety, security and convenience, isn't it?
Well, let me tell you.
Your streets are spying on you.
Your mobile phone is spying on you.
Your cities are spying on you.
And the infrastructure for future lockdowns is being put into place right now.
Don't be fooled.
You're being set up to be tracked through your movements and through the future of your digital wallets.
By handing over your data, you're handing over the ability to monitor your behaviour, which will soon be turned into a social credit score.
And once the central bank digital currencies are in place, you won't get to spend your
money without approval.
Digital ID will soon become a reality in Australia.
Many other countries are already rolling these systems out.
Countries like Canada, Scotland and many others.
Eventually, you won't be able to access any government or public services and you won't
be able to travel across borders or access healthcare or the internet without a digital
ID.
You think you won't comply?
I think you will.
The last two years were the dress rehearsal and we fell for it hook, line and sinker.
Australians are sleepwalking into this technocratic future and while we're sitting around scratching our chins trying to work out whether this is really happening, Australia is drifting towards a dystopian digital future.
Well said.
He touched on almost everything we've been talking about on this broadcast for the last year plus, and for the last nearly three years on other channels.
And he did it in a minute and a half.
America, well, we're still looking for a politician who will take up this crusade like he is.
It's time to bring back the expectation of privacy and to realize it's not just the government that's implementing this invasive technological grid.
It's the government working in concert with its corporate partners.
That's called corporate fascism.
Big government, big business merging together.
Many folks question whether the creation of a Chinese-style social credit system could ever really be implemented in America.
But, if you're paying attention, you will know that a form of this system is already thriving in America.
The so-called Human Rights Campaign is an extremely well-funded homosexual advocacy organization that works, well, I think, to bully corporations into promoting the LGBTQ plus agenda.
Support a drag queen story time or gay pride and you get points from the human rights campaign.
Don't support these things and guess what?
You get labeled a hater which then could lead to boycotts from the left and your banishment from capital investment networks.
Is that how this is going to work?
Is that how it's already working?
According to the Human Rights Campaign website, more than 620 major companies have now adopted gender transition guidelines to push transgenderism in the workplace.
In 2008, there were 90 companies on board with this.
Some of the companies that ranked the highest on the list with a 100% approval rating from the Human Rights Campaign include Walmart, ExxonMobil, Amazon, CVS, AT&T, Chevron Corporation, Ford Motor Company, General Motors, Costco, Disney, and Google.
But these?
These are just the big boys.
There are more than 500 major U.S.
corporations supporting the destructive propaganda being pushed everywhere in our culture, including some companies you'd never expect.
The latest to come out in support of this LGBTQ plus perversion is Tractor Supply, a farm and hardware chain whose customers overwhelmingly are hardworking Americans with generally traditional family values.
So I wonder how many are aware that Tractor Supply is now reported to have chosen the side of, well, this raging culture war.
And it's not their side they've chosen.
The traditional value side.
We'll be right back after this break.
Hello I'm Mike Lindell and I'm excited to announce my original MySlippers are back in stock.
Last Christmas you made them the number one selling MyPillow product and now I've added smaller sizes, larger sizes, wide sizes and all new colors.
And with your promo code you still save $90 a pair.
What makes my slippers different is my exclusive four-layer design that you're not going to find in any other slippers.
My slippers' patented layers make them ultra-comfortable, extremely durable, and they help relieve stress on your feet.
Wear them anytime, anywhere.
You'll absolutely love my slippers, and I'm extending my 60-day money-back guarantee until March 1st, 2023, making them the best Christmas gifts ever!
So go to MyPillow.com or call the number on your screen now.
Use your promo code to save $90 on my original MySlippers.
That's only $49.98 a pair.
Quantities won't last long, so please order now!
Last night we brought you the story of Tameri Key, a senior basketball player at the University of Tennessee, suffering blood clots in her lungs and being forced to miss the rest of the season.
This after she'd been one of the healthiest players in recent Tennessee basketball history, not missing a single game in her four-year career.
Tonight we have a similar story coming out of the NFL's Carolina Panthers football team.
At 6'6 and 301 pounds of muscle, Carolina Panthers defensive end Henry Anderson seemed otherwise entirely healthy, so reports Breitbart.
But in October, the 31-year-old player suddenly suffered a stroke that threatened to end his playing career.
Anderson says he was at home on October 22nd when he began feeling his legs going numb and found his speech slurred.
Anderson explained as ESPN reported, quote, it was a stroke.
So it's basically like a blood clot in your brain, end quote.
The player was rushed to the hospital where he underwent a battery of tests.
Doctors found the blood clot in his brain and sent him to surgery to have it removed.
Since the surgery, Anderson now says he feels he's back to tip-top shape.
Quote, I got pretty lucky avoiding anything serious.
End quote.
That's what he told Fox News.
Doctors say they were unable to determine how or why Anderson ended up with a blood clot that nearly made him an invalid.
Well, truth be told, they don't want to find out, I don't think.
Nor does the NFL, the Carolina Panthers, the NCAA, the NBA, ESPN, or the rest of the mainstream media.
That's what I believe.
I think they'd rather write it off as a strange coincidence that young healthy players are having blood clots.
Well, Brandon Goodwin, he was released by the Atlanta Hawks after he suffered a blood clot in October of 2021, ending his season and possibly his career.
Goodwin blamed the clot on his COVID vaccine injection.
In a Twitch livestream, Goodwin said, quote, I was fine until then.
I was fine up until I took the vaccine.
I was fine.
People trying to tell you, no, it's not the vaccine.
How do you know?
You don't know.
Yes, the vaccine ended my season 1,000%, end quote.
He went on to add, quote, I don't know where I'm playing at this year.
I'm not going to lie to y'all.
I don't know.
The Hawks were just like, don't say anything about it.
Don't tell anybody.
I'm like, bro, what?
End quote.
Well, speaking of strange occurrences, we brought you the story of sports reporter Grant Wall last night and how he suddenly collapsed and died while in the press box covering the World Cup soccer match in Qatar.
That happened on Friday night.
Now, a second journalist collapsed and died suddenly in Qatar while covering the soccer tournament.
Photojournalist for Al-Qaas TV reportedly died suddenly on Saturday while covering the FIFA World Cup 2022.
Qatar news media outlet Gulf Times reported, quote, Al-Qaas TV photojournalist Khalid Al-Mizlam passed away recently.
Al-Mizlam, a Qatari, died suddenly while covering the FIFA World Cup Qatar 2022.
We believe in Allah's mercy and forgiveness for him and send our deepest condolences to his family.
We are all Allah's and to him we return."
The cause of Khalid al-Maslam's death has not been revealed.
According to Express, Al-Qaas TV barely mentioned their photojournalist's death on their live show.
It seems they're waiting for more information before issuing a statement.
Former President Donald Trump was banned from Twitter after the social media company was pressured to do so by Michelle Obama and other liberal agitators, so reports Fox News.
Twitter banned Trump one day after former First Lady Michelle Obama and others demanded the company quote permanently and quote remove him.
That's according to the newest Twitter files.
From Elon Musk.
On Saturday, Twitter CEO Elon Musk and journalist Michael Schellenberger released the fourth batch of insider documents that show internal communication by the company's executives between January 6th and January 8th of 2021, including and shortly after the so-called riot at the U.S.
Capitol.
Folks, did we really need the Twitter files to inform us of this?
internal and external pressure," including from the former first lady, fell under the
company calling for Trump to be banned from using Twitter.
Folks, did we really need the Twitter files to inform us of this?
Because it was done right there in wide open.
Michelle Obama wrote in a lengthy post to Twitter on January 7th that said, quote,
Now is the time for Silicon Valley companies to stop enabling this monstrous behavior and
go even further than they have already by permanently banning this man from their platforms
and putting in place policies to prevent their technologies from being used by the nation's
leaders to fuel insurrection," end quote.
Bye.
We brought you a story in October about an Israeli company called Redefine Meat, which is planning to build a large lab-grown meat plant in the Netherlands using 3D printing technology.
Well, now we have another story about another Israeli company that specializes in 3D-printed lab-grown meat that also says it will build an even larger commercial-scale production facility, and this time theirs will be in North Carolina.
Believer Meat, formerly known as Future Meat Technologies, is building its facility with an initial investment of $123 million in Wilson County, North Carolina, which covers a site of 200,000 square feet.
Here's what the company said in a statement, quote, A leading pioneer of the cultivated meat industry officially broke ground today on its first U.S.
commercial facility in Wilson, North Carolina.
Once operational, the 200,000 square foot facility will be the largest cultivated meat production center in the world.
With the capacity to produce at least 10,000 metric tons of cultivated meat, quote, without the need to slaughter a single animal, end quote.
That's what the statement said, adding that, quote, this is a watershed moment for the cultivated meat industry that will allow believer meats to meet growing demand for decades to come."
Democrat Governor Roy Cooper praised the company's entry into his state, which is known as the largest pork-producing state in the U.S.
Real pork, that is.
Real pork.
Here's what the governor said, quote, We're pleased to welcome Believer Meats to North Carolina, end quote.
The facility's groundbreaking is the latest in a series, folks, of developments as the company prepares to introduce its products to consumers, including its rebranding from Future Meat Technologies to Believer Meats.
The Israeli company had an R&D breakthrough with cultivating lamb.
And according to its press release in November, the company was the first to quote, immortalize animal cells without genetic modification, end quote.
The company opened the world's first cultivated meat production line in Israel in 2021, and it claims to be establishing lab-grown meat as, quote, the new standard around the world, leading a bold change in how meat is produced in our global food system, end quote.
Well, the president and founder and chief science officer of Believer Meats said, quote, our name change speaks to our confidence in our mission to make it possible for all future generations to eat meat.
Our team has created a revolutionary technology that blazed ahead of the field in terms of cost, safety, and product experience.
As the demand for meat continues to grow in coming decades, the current conventional meat industry will not be able to meet the supply needed."
It's reported that the company utilizes fibroblasts instead of traditional stem cells to grow meat in a lab dish.
Fibroblasts are robust, connective tissue cells that grow efficiently, even in complex environments.
They undergo a process termed, quote, spontaneous immortalization.
That's according to this statement put out by the company.
The US Food and Drug Administration, well in November, they approved lab-grown meat for human consumption for the first time.
We'll be right back after this break.
Hello, I'm Mike Lindell, and I'm excited to bring you my biggest bedding sale ever, just in time for Christmas.
I know my bedding products are perfect for you, and I'm extending my money-back guarantee for Christmas until March 1st, 2023, making them the perfect gifts for your friends, your family, and everyone you know.
Export Selection