Ep. 1783 - 65K Missed Calls: Biden's Mass Abuse Of Migrant Kids
A Republican congressman reveals the biggest government scandal you've never heard of, the University of Iowa gets caught illegally pushing DEI, and "adults" go to summer camp.
Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://bit.ly/4biDlri
Ep.1783
- - -
DailyWire+:
My new series, The Vatican Files, premieres Wednesday, August 13th, exclusively on DailyWire+. https://DailyWirePlus.com
Ben Shapiro’s new book, “Lions and Scavengers,” drops September 2nd—pre-order today at https://dailywire.com/benshapiro
GET THE ALL-NEW YES OR NO EXPANSION PACK TODAY: https://bit.ly/41gsZ8Q
- - -
Today's Sponsors:
Birch Gold - Text KNOWLES to 989898 for your free information kit.
Good Ranchers - Visit https://goodranchers.com and subscribe to any box using code KNOWLES to claim $40 off + free meat for life!
- - -
Socials:
Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3RwKpq6
Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3BqZLXA
Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eEmwyg
Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3L273Ek
- - -
Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices
We've been talking a lot about government scandals the past few weeks, new revelations on the Russia collusion hoax, the constantly evolving Epstein story, even stock trading shenanigans, which we'll get to momentarily.
But there is one government scandal that you likely have not heard about, and it is probably the most viscerally egregious of all of them.
When Joe Biden invited countless unaccompanied foreign kids into the country and paired them up with sponsors, he set up a hotline for the kids to report issues, danger, abuse, etc.
We are just learning now that 65,000 of those calls by the kids who were potentially being abused, who we kind of just lost, went completely unanswered.
I'm Michael Knowles.
the Michael Knowles Show.
Welcome back to the show.
Speaking of kids stuff, there's a new report out.
Apparently, a bunch of adults are now going to summer camp.
You thought the Disney adults were bad.
No, no.
There are now adults who sign up to go canoeing and drinking Kool-Aid and splashing around.
They go to summer camp.
We'll get to what that means.
Am I just being a curmudgeon in my reaction to that?
Maybe I am.
Maybe that's a good thing.
Before we get to anything, I want to tell you about Birch Gold.
Text Knowles, Kennedy WLAS, 298-9898.
The government is doing a lot of good stuff, despite the perennial scandals of all governments.
The government is doing a lot of good stuff.
You know, Trump is making America great again, dealing very strongly with the U.S. economy, getting good trade deals.
What about your personal finances?
You need to handle that.
That is why tens of thousands of Americans are buying gold now from Birch Gold.
Here are the facts.
In the past 12 months, the value of gold has increased by 40%.
Central banks continue to bolster demand for gold by buying in record quantities, and global instability and tension is the highest in decades.
But you can find peace of mind in gold.
Birch Gold makes it extremely easy to convert an existing IRA or 401k into a tax-sheltered IRA in physical gold, or just buy some to store at home.
Text my name, Knowles, Canada WLIS, to 9898-98.
Birch Gold will send you a free info kit on gold.
No obligation, only useful information with an A-plus rating with the Better Business Bureau, tens of thousands of happy customers.
It is time for you to take control of your savings today.
You know, I'm a little bit of a gold bug.
I've got a decent part of my portfolio in gold.
That's always a great, great thing, but especially in recent years, very happy about it.
You should go check it out.
Text the word Knowles, Canada WLES, to 98.98.98.
I do not want this scandal to disappear.
There are a lot of government scandals right now.
Some are really prominent.
We've been talking about for years, like the Epstein scandal.
Some are old and they're coming back again, like the Russia hoax scandal, which is a scandal reacting to another scandal.
But one of them, if you cut through the miasma of scandal, one of them seems really, really viscerally egregious and very few people are talking about it.
Here is Congressman Eli Crane grilling someone giving testimony on what this looks like.
So you're telling this committee that the Biden administration, while they were letting all of these unaccompanied minors into the country, and as we've talked about today, they weren't keeping track of them.
They issued these kids a hotline that they could call if they had trouble with the sponsor family that they were put with.
And you're saying that 65,000 calls to this hotline designated to protect these kids went unanswered?
Is that what you're telling this committee?
Yes, sir.
Wow.
That is unbelievable.
Unbelievable.
Do you know how many staffers the administration assigned to answering these phones and helping these kids?
One.
One staffer?
Any idea how many hours a day this staffer was working?
No.
Maybe that's why there were 65,000 calls that weren't answered from these little kids, huh?
Unbelievable.
Okay.
So what happened?
Joe Biden said, hey, come on over the border.
Obama said it too.
Come on over the border.
Come on.
And then some of the people who came over the border were not merely the economic migrants, the fighting age men who come over here unvetted to get jobs or whatever.
Some of them were kids, unaccompanied kids.
Now, we've already known for 15 years that 60 to 80% of women and girls who cross the border illegally are raped or sexually assaulted along the way.
We already know that.
That's before they even really make it into the country.
But then you got all these kids who come over here.
They're not with their parents.
They're with some adult that they don't really know.
They're with some criminal coyote or they're just alone.
And then the Biden administration, rather than discouraging this from happening and saying, you got to go back, you got to go to your parents.
You can't.
We're not going to let the illegals in.
Biden creates an incentive for more and more parents to send kids unaccompanied into the country.
And then Biden matches them up with a sponsor.
But you give a young girl to a sponsor family.
You don't know what could possibly happen.
So you say, okay, we're going to set up a hotline.
If you have any problems with your sponsor family, if there's any abuse, if there's any neglect, if there are any crimes being committed, you call this number.
And they did.
The kids called the number 60, well, they called the number many more times than that, but 65,000 of the times they called the number, the calls were not answered.
Because Biden had one person working the phones for all of the countless millions of illegal aliens coming to the country, so we don't know what happened.
I mention this story not because Joe Biden's going to be held to account, not because Biden-era officials are going to be held to account.
We'll get to that more in some of the other scandals, the Russia Hoax scandal, all the rest.
None of these people are going to be held To account.
But I at least want to hold to account the people who voted for Biden.
And I at least want to hold to account the people who complain about Trump's immigration policy.
And I especially want to hold to account the people who preen from a moral high horse about how awful the conservative Republicans are for wanting to close the border.
Because if you supported Joe Biden's immigration policy, you are supporting the abuse, neglect, and rape of children.
Full stop.
You're not supporting this in some kind of indirect way.
Well, this thing led to another thing, led to another, to an unintended consequence, to an unforeseen event, and then some child was abused.
You are directly responsible for the abuse, neglect, and sexual assault of children and the neglect of the reporting of those kinds of abuses.
Because we have known, I remember 2008, 2009, maybe even earlier than that, there was a study from Fusion Amnesty International reported in the Huffington Post.
These are left-wing outlets that said 60 to 80% of women and girls who cross the border illegally are sexually assaulted on the way.
If you encourage an intrinsically unjust, immoral migration system that neglects immigration law, that empowers coyotes, that violates national sovereignty, things that are already wrong intrinsically.
If you are doing that, you are inevitably supporting 68% of those women and girls being raped along the way.
You are also, we now know, supporting the abuse and neglect and neglect of the abuse of children to the tune of 65,000 calls go unanswered.
I bring it all up to say you need to reconsider your moral priors.
Because the supposedly moral open borders policy that the left has been promoting for decades is this.
Is this, is empowering face-to-face Satan-worshiping gangsters, is ignoring federal law, is undermining American democracy, our sacred democracy, which passed the laws for our immigration regime.
Is 65,000 calls from kids who are potentially being terrorized or otherwise abused going unanswered?
That's what it is.
I'm not saying that the Republican, conservative, MAGA Trump immigration policy is perfect.
There's no such thing as a perfect policy in a fallen world, in a real political society.
But if you want to start talking about the morality of immigration, you have the Trump policy, which says close the border, don't put kids in these bad situations, don't empower some of the worst people on earth at the border, don't, don't, don't, don't.
And do follow our laws.
And you got the liberal immigration policy?
It's not even close.
If you have two functioning brain cells and your mind hasn't been so darkened by sin that you think up is down and left is right, the Trump policy is the moral one.
The liberal policy, the Biden policy, is profoundly immoral in ways that should inspire your soul to absolute horror.
Okay.
Speaking of government scandals, a less viscerally repellent scandal, but still a very serious one and actually downright amusing to watch the government officials try to squirm out of it is that members of Congress are outperforming the top hedge funds in the country when it comes to their investment portfolios.
Isn't that a little strange?
All right, there are plenty of very intelligent people in the House and in the Senate.
In fact, the senator who is bringing this scandal to light, Josh Hawley, very intelligent guy.
You get some other members.
Ted Cruz, extremely intelligent guy.
There are some, but I would say on average, if you maybe you look at the median member of Congress or even the Senate, the IQ, not the highest.
And yet, they're outperforming some of the top hedge funds.
This was a report, Nancy Pelosi.
This is being reported by Yahoo Finance.
Nancy Pelosi outperformed nearly every hedge fund in 2024, even beating the infamous Inverse Kramer stock tracker.
It's pretty amazing.
Not saying Nancy Pelosi is a dummy, but has she beaten all the biggest hedge funds?
Because they have insider information.
So Josh Hawley, great Republican senator, is pushing a bill that was initially called the Pelosi Act.
I forget what the acronym stood for, but it was something to the effect of putting egregious legislators on, I don't know, I'm just making up the acronym now, but it was a way to spell out, hey, stop these lawmakers from using insider information to make a bunch of money in their stock portfolio.
Josh Hawley trying to move the ball down the field to stop this abuse from happening.
We have an opportunity here today to do something that the public has wanted us to do for decades, and that is to ban members of Congress from profiting on information that, frankly, only members of Congress have in the buying and selling of stock.
86% of Americans say that members of Congress should not be able to buy and sell shares of stock, individual stock, while they are members of this body.
And they are absolutely correct.
And the reason is, you can see it, there was just another ethics referral in the House last week.
We've seen the former Speaker of the House make millions of dollars in profits.
We've seen members of both parties, I'm sad to say, be investigated for their stock trades.
And the reason for all of this is that, quite frankly, members of this body are privy to information that the normal person just is not.
Now, is that insider trading?
It is not under the laws.
Sometimes people say, well, we already have insider trading laws.
We don't need a stock ban.
Well, the information that members of Congress are privy to is technically not covered by the insider trading laws, but nobody really believes that the information that we get isn't valuable.
It is quite valuable, which is why back during COVID, you saw members of Congress of both parties engage in a flurry of stock trading right after they were getting COVID briefings.
Were members of the public getting those briefings?
They were not.
They're not.
And so you say, well, we have laws against insider trading.
Yeah, we do.
They just don't apply to members of Congress.
And members of Congress are getting these briefings on things that the government of the United States, the world imperial government is doing before ordinary retail investors or anyone, even the hedge funds find out about it.
And then the individual members of Congress are calling up their investment advisors and saying, hey, hey, buy, buy, buy, sell, sell, sell.
And then you're seeing Nancy Pelosi outperform everybody else.
So Hawley says, look, this is obviously corrupt.
This is wrong.
And we shouldn't be able to do it.
Now, you would imagine Hawley's a Republican.
All the Republicans would be on his side.
Maybe all the Democrats would be on the other side.
That's actually not what happened.
Everybody was a little bit worried about this.
The best investor in Congress is Nancy Pelosi, top Democrat.
But actually, just about all the Republicans on this panel were opposed to it.
Here is Senator Jim Langford.
Hold on.
Before we get to Senator Langford's argument against it, I want to tell you about a great investment you can make to Good Ranchers.
Go to goodranchers.com, use code Knowles, Kennedy W-L-E-S.
Summer is here.
You know you love firing up the grill with family and friends, but what you might not know is that over 85% of grass-fed beef in U.S. stores is actually imported.
That means it could be from anywhere with questionable safety standards, hidden additives.
Don't do it.
That's one of the reasons you should switch to Good Ranchers for all the summer grilling.
The main reason is the meat is better than any meat you're going to get anywhere else.
The second reason is the prices are better than you're going to get anywhere else.
The third reason is that these people support you and what you believe and they support America.
The fourth reason is you don't need to worry about that imported stuff.
Every single cut, beef, chicken, pork, 100% American sourced, born, raised right here on local family farms.
No antibiotics ever, no added hormones, no seed oils.
Delivered straight to your door.
No more last-minute grocery runs when you're prepping the weekend cookout.
I just love it.
It's the best meat you're going to get.
The other night, sweet little Alisa took some of the Wagyu burgers and turned them into, the burgers are great on their own, but you turn them into these interesting little kebab kind of things.
You can do a lot with it.
It's all magnificent.
Get any good rancher's box.
When you subscribe right now, you should subscribe to my box, but when you subscribe to any good rancher's box, you get your choice of free meat for life.
That's free, Wagyu Burgers, hot dogs, bacon, or chicken wings in every single box.
Get the Wagyu Burgers.
Use Code Knowles, Canada WLES, and check out Get Anextra 40 bucks off.
Goodranchers.com.
Code Knowles, 40 bucks off plus free meat for life because the moments that matter deserve meat that's made right.
Good Ranchers, American meat delivered.
Also, folks, speaking about really good stuff coming up, when you're sitting there eating that juicy steak, you should get ready to watch the Vatican Files.
I have this great new documentary out, The Pope and the Fuhrer.
It's all about the secret Vatican archive and World War II, one of the most maligned men in history, Pope Pius XII.
We are Pope Pius XII lovers and respectors here.
He has been so, so slandered by enemies of the church, and we got the goods.
So make sure you set your clocks.
The Pope and the Fuhrer, hosted by your favorite podcaster.
Josh Hawley says, members of Congress need to stop trading stocks individually while they're serving the body.
They have insider information.
It's not fair.
Republican Senator Jim Langford pushes back.
For those who know ahead of time that they're going to be joining this body, they can no longer use qualified blind trusts.
And the reason for that is, as you know, the rules on qualified blind trusts are not airtight.
They're actually very loose.
It is very difficult to police.
you don't police them and the ethics committee.
The ethics committee does police that.
So thanks for telling me what I don't do.
We do police that.
You do not police the structure of the blind trust.
We do, actually.
Every single blind trust that's actually put in has to be approved.
And they have to, and so before, and you police then the buying and the selling and the communication back and forth between members?
We do police the communication between the members and the individuals of the blind trust.
That's correct.
And so you think that that's an effective way?
You're saying you think we need no changes now.
You think that effectively accounts for any sort of...
You're telling me what I don't do.
No, I'm just asking you a question because what we found over and over is when members of Congress have been investigated for securities violations, they have said over and over, oh, I had a trust.
So you notice here, Jim Lankford, and he said, hold on, I'm the head of the ethics committee and I investigate these things.
And Hawley's saying, well, you're not doing a good job investigating them.
And so this is a Republican on Republican fight.
And Lankford is raising a serious objection, which is, well, hold on.
You already have businessmen who come in and they have their business interests.
And when they become senators, they put them into a blind trust.
So they're not actively running the business based on this information.
But what are you going to do?
You're going to tell them to give away all their money to become a U.S. senator?
And Hawley says, well, the blind trusts aren't airtight.
So they can still engage in corrupt practices.
And Langford says, well, I'm making sure they don't.
And Hawley says, well, you're not doing a good enough job.
So who's right here?
I think Langford's objection actually is fair, but Hawley is still right on the point, which is there is a lot of corruption in these members of Congress.
So before we get to the right solution, because I have probably the least popular solution of all, but it's the correct one.
Where does President Trump stand on this?
He is the richest president in American history.
He has a lot of business interests.
He entered into the government.
Is he on the pro-business side, let the members just keep running their stuff and their portfolios?
Or is he on the Hawley side that we got to root at corruption in government?
There's a Congress from winning or trading individual stocks.
It extends to the president and vice president.
Are you in favor of that legislation?
Well, I like it conceptually.
I don't know about it, but I like it conceptually.
And, you know, Nancy Pelosi became rich by having inside information.
She made a fortune with her husband, and I think that's disgraceful.
So in that sense, I'd like it, but I'd have to really see the, you know, I study these things very carefully, and this just happened.
So I'll take a look at it.
But conceptually, I like it.
And what I do think is Nancy Pelosi should be investigated because she has the highest return of anybody practically in the history of Wall Street, save a few.
And how did that happen?
It happened by she knows exactly what's going to happen, what's going to be announced.
She buys stock and then the stock goes up after the announcement's made.
So once again, Trump demonstrating a very good political gut and a much better political gut here than most of the Republican senators, with the exception, I guess, of Josh Hawley.
Trump, he said, what do you think about this, this corrupt politicians benefiting off Insider Information Act?
And he says, well, who is this scandal targeting?
Mostly Democrats.
Mostly Pelosi, actually.
Pelosi is the most egregious violator of this kind of ethical norm.
Okay, yeah, I'm for reforming that conceptually.
I got to look into it.
The devil's in the details.
But Trump is saying, look, I don't need to profit off of insider information as a member of the government.
Trump was very, very rich before 2016.
And he remained rich, even though the Democrats tried to destroy his net worth.
He remained rich after he left the White House.
And he remained rich when he re-entered the White House again.
And I bet he's going to be rich when he leaves the White House.
He does not, unlike Nancy Pelosi, who's spent her entire career in government.
It's not that strange that Trump is rich.
He made all of his money in the private sector.
Nancy Pelosi has been in government for her whole life.
How is Nancy Pelosi so rich?
She's been making her money based on being in the government.
So it's the right thing to do to root out the corruption.
But what is the solution here?
My solution, oh man, people are going to hate this.
You're going to hate this.
I'm just warning you.
Before you get your fingers ready to write in the comments, I'm just warning you, you're going to hate my solution, but I'm right.
The solution is we need to pay members of Congress more money.
Don't shoot me.
Don't stop.
Hey, no, put the gun down.
Put the gun down.
The solution is we need to pay members of Congress more money.
That's why.
That's why they're doing this because there's the members of Congress make what, $174,000 a year.
That's a lot of money.
That's a lot of money.
But it's very expensive to be a congressman.
You have to maintain two residences.
You have to travel back and forth.
Now, a lot of travel expenses are covered by the government, so it's not a big deal.
And you can use some of your campaign money.
I know, I know all of their responses to this point.
But to Jim Langford's point, a lot of these members could, in fact, make a lot more money in the private sector, at least the ones that you want there, the ones who are really good at business, the Donald Trumps of the world could make a lot more money in the private sector.
And so if you're telling them they can't even maintain their own businesses in a blind trust, you're just saying, well, there's just no way for me to make any money.
Why would I do this?
Why would I expose myself to all of this liability?
I'm going to stay out of the government, and then you're going to fill the government up with AOCs and then your government's going to fall to pot.
Back when the Congress was founded, back when the U.S. government was founded, our present U.S. government, 1789, Congress was paid $6 per day.
So in today's money, that's about $220 per day.
Members of Congress were paid that to go serve in Congress.
And obviously you didn't serve all year long.
Then in 1815, they said, all right, we're going to bump the pay to an annual salary and we're going to give people $1,500.
That is roughly $31,000 in today's money.
Not a lot of money.
So now you're saying, well, hold on, Michael, they went from six bucks a day, $220 a day in today's money, to the equivalent of $31,000 per year in today's money, to now they're making $174,000.
So why are you telling me they need to make even more money than that?
Because back in the old days, members of Congress and U.S. senators were extremely wealthy landowners generally.
So they were the equivalent of aristocrats in America.
America has always had a more democratic, egalitarian kind of economy going back to colonial times, much more so than in England or the rest of the old world.
But these guys were landed gentry, okay?
So if you want a government of rich landed gentry where you have a much more aristocratic form of government, which we had in this country until the 19th and especially 20th centuries, okay, then you don't need to pay the members of Congress all that much, and it's fine.
But if we're going to have an increasingly democratic kind of country where your regular Joe is going to become a congressman or even a U.S. senator, we need to pay them more because they don't have massive fields.
They don't have giant plantations and estates staffed sometimes by slave labor.
They don't have those things.
Okay.
So if you want to incentivize getting good people into Congress, you have to pay them a very, very decent wage.
$174,000 is a lot of money.
But relative to that job is not enough.
And the proof of that is all of the corruption.
I know everyone's going to hate me for saying it, but Hawley is right.
Jim Langford's objections are reasonable.
Donald Trump is right.
And the solution to the corruption is paying Congressmen more money.
I know.
All right.
Listen.
You don't tune in here because I'm going to flatter you by giving you just absolute bottom of the barrel lowest common denominator red meat.
I am giving you, gentlemen and ladies, my judgment.
And in this case, my judgment may be difficult to hear, but it's correct.
Okay.
Now there is something really, really pathetic, and I am feeling very judgmental over it.
And that would be the surge of adults going to summer camp.
Before we get to that, speaking of bizarre activities that adults should not be engaged in, I recently sat down with one of P. Diddy's escorts.
You know, often in high-profile cases and conspiracies, all we get are a few redacted court documents and then a litany of theories from sources close to the story that never pan out.
Sometimes, however, you sit down face to face with someone who is actually there intimately involved in all of these things.
Like in the latest episode of Michael Land, where I sit down with a former PDD escort who was named in his trial, the stories will blow you away.
Check out this teaser.
So I don't know who I'm seeing.
And so I show up to the address.
I go up to the door, knock, and she opens the door.
So you say it's very performative.
She's like, okay, sit there.
She puts the towel down.
She's like, hey, just pour the baby oil all over me.
I see like the little slit in the room.
There were times in the sessions where I saw that demon, the demon that she talked about.
Personal demon, you know, these are the demons that are afflicting me.
Or Diddy.
Yeah, Diddy.
You actually did this stuff.
Your name and your picture were revealed in court.
Revealed in court, and then it was sort of mainstream when 50 posted that picture.
So this guy is a sex crazed animal.
She was under his control.
Because there's video of him beating her in a hallway.
I was supposed to be there that night.
It's not explosive.
It's not explosive.
Watch a full episode now on the Michael Knowles YouTube channel for the uncensored ad-free version.
Subscribe to DailyWire Plus.
Adults are going to summer camp.
Where is it?
Where's the, here we go.
CBS Mornings is reporting.
Adult summer camps see surge of interest as people seek community and nostalgia.
Summer camp isn't only for kids.
Yelp reports a nearly 350% increase in searches for adult summer camps this year as people search for community and nostalgia.
What's really cool, says one of the adult campers, is all the activities are planned for you.
At Club Getaway in Kent, Connecticut, campers 21 and older come together every weekend to meet new friends and be a kid again.
I did overnight camps when I was younger, and I remember going out on the water, going rock climbing.
Why not do that with some alcohol?
Says, I'm not even going to name these people.
It's so humiliating.
I know they're named in the CBS piece.
I'm humiliated for them.
I don't want to name them.
Open to children during the week, club getaway is welcoming adults.
Oh boy, when I read this, I had an immediate visceral reaction of nausea.
And I called out to Elise, I said, girl.
He said, yeah, Mac.
I said, am I being too curmudgeonly?
Adults are going to summer camp.
What's that, Mac?
I said, I wish she was in the other room.
I said, adults are going to summer camp.
What do you mean they're going to summer camp?
They're going to where kids, the kids go during the week and then adults go on the weekend.
Oh, my goodness.
That's bad, right?
That's bad.
It's okay to be repulsed by that, right?
Yeah, it's repulsive.
It is.
Why is it repulsive?
Am I just being a curmudgeon?
No.
It's repulsive because, to quote the apostle in 1 Corinthians, when I was a child, I spoke like a child.
I thought like a child.
I reasoned like a child.
When I became a man, I gave up childish ways.
Now, this coming from the same book, the Bible, maybe you've heard of it, the same book that tells us that we need to be like children to enter the kingdom of heaven.
Yes, you need to be childlike, not childish.
When you live your life in your proper station, in your proper habits, doing the things you're supposed to do, with awe, with wonder, with humility, recognizing, being well aware of your own limits, that's childlike.
That's good.
You need to have that.
When you try to crawl back up into the womb, when you're a 30-year-old adult who wants to shirk responsibilities and just stick your thumb in your mouth and pretend you're a child again, that's childish and that's bad.
There's the N-word here.
You saw the N-word in the headline of this piece.
That awful, awful N-word.
Nostalgia.
We don't want nostalgia.
Sometimes conservatives are a little guilty of nostalgia.
We fetishize the past as though it were this halcyon, Edenic kind of period.
The only Edenic period of the past was in the Garden of Eden.
The rest of them are fallen and they have problems.
My priest friend, Father George Rutler, says, nostalgia is history after a few drinks.
You should not be doing this.
This is an extreme version of the Disney adults.
Now, look, there are adults who can go to Disney.
You got to go with kids.
You got to go.
I'm sorry.
I know.
This is the tough love episode today.
It's Thursday.
We're past tump day.
We're almost at the weekend.
And I feel like I got to give you a little tough love here.
Not just on Congressman's salaries, but on you, it's weird.
When you're an adult, it's weird for you to go alone.
You can go with your kids.
You can go with your nieces and nephews.
You can go with your godchildren.
You can go with your, if you're a teacher, you go with your students.
You can go do these things.
But they're not for you anymore.
There are other things for you.
Bars are for you.
Civic associations are for you.
HOA meetings are for you.
Those things aren't for kids.
Disney World and Summer Camp, that's for kids.
And the longing to get back to that is somewhat natural.
You know, we all kind of long to be kids again when everything was in it.
But if you actually indulge that kind of longing, you're just going to die.
It just turns you, your life, your whole civilization into a sterile dead end.
Okay, this is not good.
You need to grow up.
People say that sometimes in a scolding, you need to grow up, mister, and just do all these unpleasant things and stop doing fun things.
That's not what you have to grow up means.
You have to grow up means you have to recognize that a life has a scope and you begin a certain way, then you develop a certain way, and then you die.
And you, if you want to thrive in that scope, we're all heading to the same place.
Ultimately, we might be heading to different places, but in this world, we're heading to the same place.
You need to do that which is appropriate to your station in life.
And if you do things that are appropriate to one station in life, but not to another, the things that would have made you happy when they were appropriate will make you sad.
And they'll be weird.
And they'll be out of place.
And they'll be unfulfilling.
And you need to grow up because growing up is good.
And in fact, the only way that you will really be happy, that you will be able to flourish in a natural sense or even a supernatural sense, is if you allow yourself to grow up.
If you try to stay stuck forever in some eternal, unchanging circumstance, this is a temptation of liberalism And modernity, which tries to abstract us out of time and space, if you try to just remain totally rigidly fixed and never grow up and never become anything, you're going to be very, very unhappy.
And you're going to be divorced from reality because the reality is we live in time and space.
And overgrown adults, overgrown children who are supposed to be adults should not be sipping Kool-Aid at summer camp having pillow fights.
That's not for you.
Okay, speaking of kids, some really good news out of Iowa.
Abortions are down 60% since a heartbeat law took effect.
What's the heartbeat law?
Once a baby's heartbeat is detected, which is very early on in pregnancy, you can't kill the baby.
It's good.
Common sense stuff.
Really, you should not be able to kill the baby at any point in pregnancy, but this is a good start.
The law goes into effect.
Now we can measure the effect of the law, and the effect is abortions are down 60%.
Kim Reynolds, who's the governor of Iowa, marked one year since the heartbeat law took effect, calls it a powerful victory for life.
Credits Iowans for standing firm and passing the bill, not only once, but twice.
Just bookmark the story.
This is your answer to we can't legislate morality.
I think we did.
I think Iowans did.
Iowans just legislated morality.
You always legislate morality whenever you legislate, but on this issue, it's very clear.
This is life or death, abortion, as moral an issue as any.
And a year ago, there were many, many more abortions than there are today.
The only thing that changed was not just some kind of nebulous cultural change of hearts and minds.
And what changed was they passed a law and they said, we're going to punish people if they keep killing babies.
And guess what happened?
The number of abortions dropped 60%.
You can legislate morality.
We always legislate morality of one kind or another.
And when you legislate morality rather than immorality, you will save a lot of lives by doing so.
Because these Republican politicians and the citizens of Iowa had the courage and moral clarity to legislate morality in a confident way, many, many people are alive today that would otherwise have been murdered.
You can do it.
We can do it.
Legislating morality happens.
It is effective.
It is really the only thing that we are called to do in our government if we have a self-government.
Because the only option is to legislate immorality.
Those are your choices.
But there's no neutrality in it.
The baby is going to live or die.
Your choice.
What are we going to do?
Now, there's a not-so-great story coming out of Iowa, but it's something that many of us have predicted.
I've certainly predicted it on this show.
We were told DEI is dead.
Undercover footage out of the University of Iowa says, not so fast.
This month, Dailywire Plus is giving you more than ever before.
Streaming now, Journey to the UFC, Joe Pfeiffer.
It's not a UFC promo.
This is a real American comeback story.
Starting Monday, Answer the Call is Jordan Peterson's new series where he returns to where it all started, answering your questions.
No celebs, no headlines, just real people, real problems, real answers.
Coming August 14th, the Pope and the Führer, the secret Vatican files, that is hosted by yours truly.
Plus, this fall, Isabel Brown launches a brand new show on the Daily Wire.
And trust us, the libs are going to hate it.
Members, get it all first.
Ad-free.
Unfiltered.
Dailywire.com.
Join today.
My favorite comment yesterday, speaking of schools, is from Jim Mick, who says, my elementary school principal was scarier than the Cincinnati police chief.
So true.
How did that lady, that Cincinnati lady, become the police chief out there, talking about that riot where a bunch of black people attacked a white guy and a white lady, a single mother, after a jazz concert and had the single mother unconscious, bleeding out of her mouth on the ground.
And then the lady comes out there and she says, well, you know, both sides were wrong here and we're going to make sure that we take this very seriously.
And sure, one of the attackers was only able to clobber these people because he was out on bond.
He was a career criminal and a convicted felon, actually.
And he was out on a $400 bond already.
And don't worry, we're doing it very seriously.
And we're going to punish everybody.
You're going to punish the single mother probably bleeding from her mouth.
How did she become a police chief?
There's actually a lot more to that story.
Maybe we'll get to it tomorrow.
For now, though, this hidden camera footage published by Fox News out of the University of Iowa.
This is a UIowa official describing what's really going on with DEI at the school.
I want to say maybe February, March, our communications person came in and was like, hey, like we have to redo our websites per the regents to take off diversity, equity, inclusion, anything like that, any like buzzwords.
So they swept our websites.
Tell us what's on there.
So it's not there, but we are essentially finding ways to operate around it.
So that was our solution.
We were like, oh, okay, we can't use that word.
Okay, civic engagement.
I think that's a lot of what we're doing.
It's like, oh, okay, we're not allowed to use this word.
Okay, we're just going to do this.
So yeah, that's why you're not going to see DEI listed on any University of Iowa website.
But there have been transitions and things that they've done, so they're not like getting rid of certain things.
On behalf of my office, we are still going to talk about DEI.
We're still going to deal with DEI things.
Like my assistant dean is a black woman, and I could not imagine her being like, okay, guys, yeah, we're just not going to talk about DEI anymore.
Okay, two lessons here.
Two lessons here that correct what passed for conservatism 15 years ago.
The first one is the lowercase C Constitution matters a lot more than the capital C Constitution.
You understand what I mean by that?
DEI is illegal.
The executive branch has said so.
The judicial branch has weighed in to varying degrees on aspects of DEI, like affirmative action in schools.
And so the government has weighed in and said, DEI, this racial caste system that privileges certain races over other races and all that, not acceptable illegal can't do it and what do the universities say they say oh yes okay great we'll totally abide by that and so they get rid of the dei web pages on their sites even just even just for market reasons because it wasn't the government acting of necessarily
of its own volition, you had a popular upswell among ordinary people and voters saying, we don't want DEI.
So the schools, to protect themselves, they say, we won't have any more DEI.
And then when they're on hidden camera, when they're having private conversations or what they think are private conversations, they say, no, no, we still have DEI.
We just don't call it that anymore.
Back 15 years ago, I remember the conservatives would just bang their heads against the wall because they'd say, how is our government acting this way?
How is Barack Obama acting in such a lawless way?
Our constitution says he can't.
And Obama said, yeah, yeah, whatever.
Okay.
Okay.
Go.
Hey, go call up the constitution and have him come, you know, fight me or something.
Oh, oh, you can't because the constitution, the provisions of the constitution have to be enacted by real men in time and space.
Oh, and that's me.
Oh, okay.
Well, whatever.
Your constitution, a buck 50 is going to get you a cup of coffee.
Now, after Joe Biden's inflation, it would be the constitution and like five 50, we'll get you a cup of coffee.
But in any case, we learned that lesson is great for the executive branch to weigh in.
It's great for the judiciary to weigh in.
It's great for the constitution to say something.
But if these things are not being put into practice by the human beings who actually make up political society, it's going to come to nothing.
Now, does that mean we throw up our hands hopelessly?
No.
Because there are ways to bring the lowercase c constitution into accord with the uppercase c constitution.
This is the other corrective of the conservatism of 15 years ago.
As we were told, the uppercase c constitution can never affect the lowercase C Constitution.
We were told the law can never affect the culture.
We were told that politics is just simply downstream of culture, whatever.
That obviously isn't true either.
Look at the abortion story.
So what has to be done here to bring these rogue university administrators who are making money in the public dime into line with what the people want, what the president is ordering, what the Supreme Court is ordering, what is needed is you have to punish these people.
So this woman certainly needs to lose her job.
I have nothing against her personally.
She might be repentant.
She might be a perfectly fine person.
We all sin and fall short of the glory of God.
She cannot remain in that position.
She has committed a massive fraud.
She needs to be fired.
Maybe her entire department needs to be fired.
I mean, you need to look in the documents and see who was collaborating with her here.
Maybe many of her colleagues at the university need to be fired and seriously punished.
Prosecuted, if that is appropriate.
Kim Reynolds, governor of Iowa, has already filed a complaint with the university, but you need to ruthlessly punish this stuff because we have a system right now where the government says one thing, the people say one thing, the president says one thing, the Supreme Court says one thing, but the apparatchics and the bureaucracy who were supposed to put those decrees into effect, they don't feel any heat.
They don't feel any incentive to do so or disincentive for not doing so.
So they're just going to keep on operating.
Yeah, we're going to, they said, okay, we'll take the webpage down, but we're still doing DEI.
No, no, no.
You need to make it hurt for these people to violate the law and the will of the people and basic principles of justice.
That's what you got to do.
And then you can, then your legal decrees and your political decrees really can shape the culture.
And this will have a self-reinforcing effect where these kinds of people, I mean, this girl should not have graduated from a university, much less worked at one.
The way she's speaking, the way she is so flippantly talking about matters of justice and the law, this girl, maybe she shouldn't have graduated from high school.
When you get the right people back in, when you recognize the personnel as policy, when you get the right, then you have a self-reinforcing mechanism where the capital C Constitution and lower C Constitution reinforce each other.
Okay.
Now, I have much, much more to say.
There is a study.
This is a shocking, shocking study that it turns out you can die from a broken heart.
You ever hear that?
You ever hear like, you know, grandpa dies.
Grandma and grandpa have been married for 50 years, 60, 70 years, and then grandpa dies and then five seconds later, grandma dies, which happens.
Happily, sometimes that doesn't happen.
Happily, sometimes grandma lives much longer.
But sometimes, very sadly, it happens.
And we say, well, she died of a broken heart.
Or, you know, some poor mother, you know, her kid dies and then she dies.
And so she dies of a broken heart.
Well, now there's a scientific study showing that that happened.
And the study doesn't tell you that much about human nature.
It does tell you a lot about science.
Well, we'll have to get to that tomorrow because I don't have time right now.
