Ep. 1763 - The Pro-Queer Muslim Socialist Victory In New York EXPLAINED
A pro-queer Muslim socialist wins big in New York, the Liver King is arrested after threatening Joe Rogan, and NATO calls President Trump "daddy."
Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://bit.ly/4biDlri
Ep.1763
- - -
DailyWire+:
Right now, when you join DailyWire+ for a year, we’ll cover half of it. Join now at https://dailywireplus.com and use code FREEDOM.
Ben Shapiro’s new book, “Lions and Scavengers,” drops September 2nd—pre-order today at https://dailywire.com/benshapiro
GET THE ALL-NEW YES OR NO EXPANSION PACK TODAY: https://bit.ly/41gsZ8Q
- - -
Today's Sponsors:
Balance of Nature - Go to https://balanceofnature.com and use promo code KNOWLES for 35% off your first order PLUS get a free bottle of Fiber and Spice.
Helix Sleep - Go to https://helixsleep.com/knowles for an exclusive discount.
- - -
Socials:
Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3RwKpq6
Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3BqZLXA
Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eEmwyg
Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3L273Ek
- - -
Privacy Policy: https://www.dailywire.com/privacy
The Muslim socialist who just won New York's Democrat mayoral primary and who will almost certainly be the city's next mayor is awful.
He is one of the most repulsive candidates I have ever seen up for a prominent office.
There are a million reasons that we will get into why he should not be the mayor of New York.
And conservatives are attacking him for all the wrong reasons.
I'm Michael Knowles.
This is the Michael Knowles Show.
Welcome back to the show.
Well, you were all focused on the threat of the Iranian nuclear program to Israel, Europe, the United States.
You were not paying attention to the threat posed by the Liver King to Joe Rogan.
We will get to that.
The Liver King has been arrested.
Pull over your car, sit down.
This is big news.
I have many more thoughts and things to say, but first, you must go to balanceofnature.com, use promo code Knowles.
You've heard me talk many, many times about Balance of Nature.
That is because Balance of Nature, fruits and veggies, is the most convenient way to get whole fruits and vegetables daily, especially if you're focused on creating a healthier, happier lifestyle.
Nature is pretty good at giving us the nutrients we need through our fruits and veggies.
So Balance of Nature takes fruits and vegetables, freeze-dries them, turns them into a powder, puts them into a capsule.
You take your fruit and veggie capsules every day, then your body knows what to do with them.
Balance of nature is just one ingredient of a balanced lifestyle.
Has no intention to replace a healthy diet, exercise, sleep, or any other healthy habits.
It is intended to be used in concert with other healthy habits.
You know, I absolutely love Balance of Nature.
Everyone around here really loves Balance of Nature.
So if you want to look like a hot beefcake like me, head on over to balanceofnature.com.
Use promo code Knowles, KNOWLES, for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer.
Plus, get a free bottle of fiber and spice.
That is balanceofnature.com.
Promo code, K-N-O-W-L-E-S.
Zoran Mamdani.
He has won the Democrat primary for mayor of New York.
He beat out Andrew Cuomo.
I guess Andrew Cuomo could run as an independent.
You got the Republican Curtis Liwa, who's a legend in New York, but probably not going to win.
Then you've got Eric Adams, who is the current mayor of New York, who is a Democrat, but compared to the other Democrats in New York, he's like a far right-wing fascist, meaning he's at least semi, sometimes kind of reasonable, and he could run as an independent.
And so it's a messy primary.
But right now, Zoran Mamdani is far and away the favorite to be the next mayor of New York.
And the conservatives have decided to focus on the fact that he's Muslim.
They say he's Muslim.
He's Shiite.
He's not just Shiite.
He's a 12-Shiite, just like the Ayatollah of Iran.
Sure.
I guess is that kind of true?
Doesn't seem totally true because of tweets like this.
This one's been making the rounds last 24 hours.
From Zoran Kwame Mamdani, queer liberation means defund the police.
Doesn't exactly sound like Saladin, does he?
Not exactly Saeed Qutib.
You think this is a Muslim radical?
You think this is some jihadi?
I don't think so.
In many ways, it would be better if he were.
In many ways, if this guy were a sincere 12-er Shiite Muslim radical, that would be an improvement over his actual beliefs.
His actual beliefs, which are just kind of run-of-the-mill pinko-ism with a fascination for weird sex stuff.
That's it.
He's in many ways more assimilated than many right-wingers in America.
He's assimilated to liberal culture in New York.
Queer, what was it?
Queer liberation means defund the police.
Oh, man, that is bad.
That is bad.
This guy, Zoran Mamdani, strikes me as Muslim in the way that Joe Biden is Catholic, which is to say, he is that thing in as much as it is convenient for advancing liberalism.
That's it.
Same with Biden.
I'm not trying to examine their own self-identity or the way they think about their relationship to religion.
I'm just, I'm looking at Biden.
Biden flagrantly ignores non-negotiable aspects of the Catholic faith, ignores them, contradicts them, mocks them.
But when it's convenient for him, he makes a big show about being a Catholic.
Ignores Catholic teaching, violates important aspects of doctrine.
But when it's helpful to advancing his true religion of liberalism, he puts on a good show.
I think it's the same thing with Momdani.
Say what you will about the Ayatollah.
The guy's got nine lives.
We almost took him out.
He's still sticking around in Iran.
Say a nasty fellow.
Nuclear program.
Death to America.
But say what you will about him.
He doesn't support queer liberation or defunding the police.
I think he likes funding the police.
And I think he looks with a great deal of opprobrium on LGBTism.
That's not it.
If you want to go after this guy, go after him for his real problems, which is that he's, what's the phrase that people use?
A race communist, a gay race communist.
He focuses on the LGBT stuff and the weird racial stuff.
And most important of all, he focuses on class issues.
Don't forget, the big issue in the campaign was affordability.
And he didn't focus his whole campaign on transing the kids, though he wants to do that.
He didn't focus his whole campaign on letting criminals out of prison, though he wants to do that.
He focuses his campaign on soaking the rich and freezing rents and creating government-run grocery stores to drive down prices from private industry.
That's what it is.
In many ways, he's more of an old school leftist than a lot of the woke people.
And that could present a challenge because wokeness is repulsive to most voters.
Wokeness was taken out back like old yeller and shot in the head during the 2024 presidential election.
I think wokeness is deader than disco.
But left-wing populism might still have some life in it.
And Mamdani is channeling that.
And if conservatives miss the real ways to go after him and they pretend that he's, you know, Osama bin Laden or something, it's not going to work.
And the guy's going to be mayor of New York.
Now, Trump gets it.
Trump, after I was writing that, I was just taking some notes through the show today.
And I was looking at Zoran.
I said, you know, this guy's, he's not, he's really not some, you know, jihadi.
He's not, he's not the great Imam.
He's, he's like a big crazy leftist.
Trump tweets this.
He says, it's finally happened.
The Democrats have crossed the line.
Zohran Mamdani, a 100% communist lunatic, has just won the Dem primary and is on the way to becoming mayor.
We've had radical lefties before, but this is getting a little ridiculous.
He looks terrible.
His voice is grating.
He's not very smart.
He's got AOC plus three.
Dummies all backing him.
I think he means the squad, AOC plus three.
Dummies all backing him.
And even our great Palestinian senator, Krai Inchuner, is groveling over him.
Yes, this is a big moment in the history of our country.
That's the way to go after him.
Trump gets it.
Trump is not afraid.
He's not some squish.
He's not afraid to go after Islam when it's appropriate.
Trump was accused of the Muslim travel ban.
Trump has made plenty of politically incorrect statements about Islam and radical Muslims.
He just realizes this guy isn't a radical Muslim.
In many ways, it'd be easier to talk to him and reason with him if he were a radical Muslim.
At least there are some points of commonality.
At least they believe in God, right?
Does this guy believe in God?
I don't know.
I don't get the impression that he does necessarily.
This is it.
This is the way.
He's a communist lunatic.
That's really what he is.
And the pretense that he's a Wahhabist or something is silly.
I get we have this reflexive impulse to, and it comes really from the early 2000s, but this reflexive impulse to oppose Sharia and radical Islam.
You don't need to convince me, man.
I'm well aware that Western civilization has been fighting expansive Islam for 1,400 years.
No need to convince me of that.
But Zoron ain't setting up the caliphate.
He's going to set up red lions.
He's much closer to the secretary general of the Communist Party than he is to the caliph or the 12th Imam.
Now, there is a big winner in that primary.
And I guess it's Zoron's a big winner, but the biggest winner is not Zoron, certainly not the people of New York.
It's another New York politician who is now looking at presidential prospects.
Hold on, pull over, sit down.
One second.
We'll get back to my very important point.
First, though, go to helixleep.com slash Knowles.
I absolutely love Helix.
Though I have to confess to you, I had a terrible night's sleep last night.
It had nothing to do with my mattress, and it was mostly because my wife, sweet little Alisa, is nervous about flying to Italy.
But can you imagine the night's sleep I would have had without my mattress?
That would have been absolutely horrible.
I wouldn't have gotten a second's sleep.
I adore Helix mattresses.
I've had my Helix for what, like five years or something now.
Helix, it will improve your night's sleep.
It will allow you to rest as your best self.
It is a mattress that is made for you.
They match you with the perfect mattress for your body and sleep style, whether you are a side sleeper, a back sleeper, anywhere in between, they got you covered.
You take the sleep quiz, you find your ideal match.
And then when you try it out, you will wonder how you ever slept on anything else.
If you sleep hot, the temperature regulation is a game changer, especially as we head into the surface of the sun months here in Tennessee.
Right now is the perfect time to upgrade your sleep.
Helix has a fantastic 4th of July sale.
Go to helixleep.com slash Knowles, get 27% off site-wide.
HelixSleep.com slash Knowles, 27% off site-wide.
Make sure you enter our show name at checkout so they know that we sent you helixleep.com slash Knowles.
The big winner in the New York City mayoral primary, not exactly Zoran.
It's AOC.
New York Post is reporting.
This is a quote from Corbin Trent, AOC's former spokesman, who is obviously still promoting her quite a lot.
It says, it just continues to open more doors.
It just broadens her horizons.
You can always count on AOC being underestimated for sure.
That's a given.
AOC came out, endorsed this guy, went to the mat for this guy.
You had other Democrats lining up behind Cuomo, and this guy won.
The old school Democrat Party, the Bill Clinton wing of the Democrat Party, they lost.
The AOC and the squad wing won.
This means that AOC's prospects are rising.
She's already being floated by her former spokesman here implicitly as a 2028 presidential candidate.
And I think she would be a good 2028 presidential candidate.
I'm not even, I'm not trying to psyop her into the nomination because she'd be easier to beat.
I'm just looking at it.
If I were advising AOC right now, I would say you should seriously consider the 2028 run.
She already floated that.
She was prancing around the Midwest and she put out some commercial talking to the voters.
I'm just a girl from the Bronx, but I represent you and whatever.
She clearly wants to run for president.
But the question right now is, what is AOC's next step?
Should she run for president or should she run against Chuck Schumer for his Senate seat in New York?
She could do either.
Her star is rising still.
I think she should run for president rather than Senate.
And the reason is it'll be tough to beat Chuck Schumer.
Even though Chuck Schumer has made all sorts of missteps and no one totally loves him, he's good.
He shows up to everything in New York.
I've been to multiple events in New York.
I'm a Republican.
I've been to multiple events that Chuck Schumer shows up to, even to support Republicans.
He's just a good retail politician.
He would be a very tough candidate to beat in New York.
For the presidential race, it's wide open.
Who's she got to beat?
Gavin Newsom?
Gavin Newsome is one of the big losers of that New York City mayoral primary.
One of the big, big losers.
Because Gavin Newsom, especially with his recent pivot to try to appear more moderate, to start his podcast, to try to be friends with Charlie Kirk and Steve Bannon, Gavin Newsome is the Bill Clinton wing, the Tony Blair wing, the 90s wing of the party.
The Andy Cuomo wing.
We're just, we're going to grow together.
We're going to reach across the aisle.
We're going to be abundant.
We're going to, yeah, no.
Zoron runs.
He's going to soak the rich.
We're going to eat him.
We're going to eat up the millionaires.
That's the AOC wing.
He won.
So who's AOC got to beat right now?
To be a leader in the Democrat primary, she's got to beat Gavin Newsome.
Gavin Newsom is weak.
Who else does she have to beat?
Pete Buttigieg, give me a break.
Kamala Dunn.
Gretchen Wintmer, I guess, is no.
It's open.
I'm not saying she would win.
She's got some problems, but I think she'd have a better shot for president than for Senate.
If I were advising her, I mean this.
There's no trick up my sleeve.
I'm just, if I were a Democrat operative, I'd said, tell her to run for president.
Now, then you got to ask, all right, on paper, I see how she could win.
I know, it chills up our spine, but does she have the goods?
Yeah, I get in theory an AOC-like candidate.
Maybe Zoran Mamdani could win, but could AOC herself go all the way?
Well, here's her audition.
This is her on camera responding to President Trump responding to her calls for Trump to be impeached.
He wanted to pick a fight with me.
Little oh me.
And he's going to lose that.
So maybe don't send our country into war when the vast majority of Americans, Republican, Democrat, and Independent, don't want us randomly bombing countries because you're in some type of mood.
They're not even briefing Congress.
Congress was supposed to have a classified briefing today, and they canceled it last minute.
It's giving scrambling.
It's giving disorganized.
It's giving they are having problems behind the scenes.
And by also not by not even briefing Congress on a bipartisan basis, please understand that this is Trump's war.
This is a Republican war.
I mean, I think war is bad, like just in general, but don't let them, you know, don't let them.
Okay, not exactly a Rhodes Scholar, is she?
That goes without saying.
Not the brightest bulb in the pack, probably didn't get the highest SAT score, probably didn't do the best on her academic courses.
However, she's got something.
So first you have to ask, can a not very intelligent person become president?
And in both parties, usually the people who become president are pretty smart.
Let's just go to the ones in my lifetime.
George H.W. Bush, very, very intelligent man.
Bill Clinton, very, very intelligent man.
George W. Bush was mocked as an idiot, but he's quite an intelligent man.
He downplayed his intelligence, but he's a pretty smart guy.
Barack Obama, very intelligent guy.
I'm not saying he's going to solve From Attleboro's theorem, but he's relative to politicians, a very intelligent guy.
Smarter than your average legislator.
Donald Trump, he also, people say he's dumb, obviously very, very intelligent guy.
So could AOC do it?
AOC is almost certainly not even close to as smart as any of those people that I just named.
But I left out one president, and that would be Joe Biden.
Joe Biden, not the sharpest tool in the shed, even before the senility.
Never was the brightest bulb in the box.
I don't know, whatever metaphor you want to use.
Not super high IQ, one would imagine, but a very effective politician.
Got elected to the Senate before he was constitutionally eligible to be in the Senate, served there for almost half a century, became VP, got himself elected president, maybe at age 150.
Very talented politician.
What did he have that those other guys did not?
He had pathos.
He could simper.
He could rub your back.
You could really feel Joe Biden.
And AOC has that.
AOC, she connects with people in a way that the rest of the squad cannot, in a way that really no other Democrat can right now.
She connects that weird face right up against the camera.
And you connect with her.
She makes you feel something, whether she makes you feel anger, pity, nausea, whatever it is, you're feeling something.
And she has another thing that Joe Biden had, and I guess continues to have if he can still speak, which is she can code switch.
She can speak to a lot of different groups.
You notice there that phrase, the one that stuck right out to me, he goes, it's giving disorganized.
It's giving, it's giving.
AOC is a millennial.
She's older than me.
It's giving is not millennial slang.
It's giving is Zoomer slang.
A millennial would say, it's giving, if you were to use that phrase, we would say, it's giving and then a noun.
So you would say, it's giving disorganized vibes.
It's giving bad juju.
It's giving, you would, this is, it seems pedantic, but it's actually crucial to the way that this woman communicates.
We would use a certain idiom.
Zoomers, a younger generation than me or AOC, use this phrase, it's giving, followed by an adjective.
So it's giving disorganized.
It's giving sexy.
It's giving whatever.
She's speaking like a Zoomer.
She can do that.
Joe Biden had the ability to do that.
He had the ability To switch, to use language in a way that was quite evocative, that had a lot of pathos.
His rhetoric didn't have a lot of logos, not a lot of logic there, not a lot of logic for AOC, not even a lot of ethos, not a ton of credibility, especially not Joe Biden, or neither Joe Biden nor AOC.
I mean, they were both absolute infamous liars.
Joe Biden lied about everything.
I mean, plagiarist, lied about so much of his biography, lied about tragedies, lied about everything.
And AOC, same thing, lies about her biography, lies about where she grew up, lies about all that stuff.
But the one thing they have is pathos.
Do not bookmark this.
Do not underestimate AOC for president 2028.
Right now, she is one of the leading candidates for the Democrats.
Now, speaking of fights, finally we get to a real important story.
The Liver King has been arrested for threatening Joe Rogan.
Do you know who the Liver King is?
I kind of remember the Liver King.
Liver King is this guy.
I think Brett introduced him to me.
Brett, young, young hip cool Zoomer introduced him to me.
I wasn't paying attention to who he was.
He is this beefcake guy who said that he got all of his muscles because he ate raw animal parts.
I'm not even going to say meat because he'd eat things like testicles and all sorts of gross stuff.
So that's what he said.
He said he's lived this natural, primordial lifestyle, and that's how he got all his muscles.
It later was reported that he was also using about $11,000 a month in anabolic steroids, but he became popular.
Joe Rogan then called him out.
It was like, this guy's obviously roided up and his career was destroyed.
He later admitted to the steroids.
And now he's threatening Joe Biden or Joe Rogan, rather, while holding two guns.
Joe Rogan, I'm calling you out.
Men to liberty.
Man to man.
i'm picking a fight with you yeah i have zero training as you did so you're a black belt you should dismantle me but i'm thinking of fighting with you your rules Whenever you're ready to go, when I'm waiting, I'm waiting for night this morning.
I'll come to you.
Whenever you're ready, whenever you're ready to go.
So he's got an animal skin on his head.
Looks like he's in that Kanye music video.
And he's got these two guns.
He says, I'm ready for you, Joe Rogan, while shirtless.
Now, that's a bit of a threat.
He then went further and seemed like he was maybe following through on his threat.
We'll get to that in one second.
First, what happens when a battle-testured green beret takes on the world's most bibulous internet game show?
Find out in this episode of Yes or No, where I sit down with my guest, Nick Freytas.
Take a look.
Protestants and Catholics need to stop bickering and focus on the real enemy, the Jews.
No, no, that's the Jehovah's Witness.
The Jehovah's Witness.
I'm excited.
I'm excited.
Watch the full episode now at the Michael Knowles YouTube channel.
Liver King threatens Joe Rogan, but then you think, okay, maybe it's just some idle, stupid threat on the internet.
He then releases this video, apparently on his way to go attack Joe Rogan.
Because Joe Rogan, we don't have to make videos to pretend anymore.
All of this is happening.
We're coming to you.
I've challenged you man to man to a fight honorable.
And we don't have to pretend or make any videos.
The world is watching.
They'll make the videos for us.
And you don't have to hold a camera.
You can hold the hand of somebody that you love because what happens next to you, you're going to need to remember that feeling.
You're going to need something more than what you did to give you something to fight for because I have my family to fight for.
And then I'll die for them.
You know that.
And you're a black belt, but you've never come across something like this.
Willing to die, hoping that you'll choke me out.
I pray to God because that's a dream come true.
It feels good.
And then the limbs, I'm fighting for my family.
So limb, limb, limb, limb, limb, limb.
Go ahead.
Okay, so this guy is good at getting attention on the internet.
So you say, well, maybe it's all just a big performance.
Maybe he wanted to get arrested.
Maybe I don't.
But I don't know that he's that good an actor.
I'm starting to think he's just really got a screw loose and he's been driven crazy by some combination of steroids and revenge.
And that's the real key to it here.
You know, vengeance is mine, saith the Lord, and I will repay that their foot shall slide in due time.
Part of the reason that it's not a good idea to go out and seek revenge for personal slights is the, what's the old expression attributed to Confucius?
He who seeks revenge should start by digging two graves.
You just end up destroying yourself whenever.
And then there's the even clearer biblical instruction.
Vengeance is mine, saith the Lord.
I will repay.
This guy could have had it all.
Maybe not all, but this guy blew up.
He was making a ton of money.
I think he had some kind of supplement business.
And he was a fraudster.
So he was going to get caught.
He was a fraudster.
And he was exposed by Joe Rogan in part.
And at that point, you say, okay, well, this guy, he messed up his body.
He committed a pretty serious sin of deceit and fraud.
But I'm sure he's still got a bunch of money.
He's still got a platform.
He could take the lump and do something for good.
But it doesn't, it just didn't work out that way.
He instead, he tried to pivot.
He ate more weird animal parts.
He seemed to get angry and spiral into his bitterness.
And now he's arrested.
And now he's got nothing.
It's not, there's so many cats.
To me, the interesting part of the story is almost not the liver king.
It's just how vengeance works and how people, we all do bad things.
If you do something Bad.
If you just acknowledge it to yourself and to God, maybe confess your sins to a priest, and then just turn it around.
There's almost nothing so terrible you can do that you can't be forgiven for it and just move on.
There is literally nothing other than blaspheming the Holy Spirit.
And on the other hand, if you refuse to change your mind, if you refuse to admit you did something wrong, look yourself in the mirror and confess your sins and turn it around, then there's almost no sin too slight to destroy your entire life.
Not a good turn of events for the Liver King.
Now, speaking of fights, you know, there's this reporting in the establishment media that, okay, first the reporting was Trump is a weakling.
He's going to let Iran get a nuclear weapon.
Then the reporting was Trump is a belligerent maniac and he's going to start World War III because he won't let Iran get a nuclear weapon.
Then the reporting was Trump is, even though the operation was successful, he's going to get a lot of Americans killed because he tried to stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.
And then when none of those things were true, the reporting became, well, he probably didn't even stop Iran from getting a nuclear weapon.
Yeah, well, he probably didn't even destroy the bunkers.
Well, yeah, he probably wasn't even that good.
Never mind.
Look away.
So the CIA has just come out.
They would never lie to you.
No, in this case, I think the CIA probably is being pretty straight.
The CIA says, this is from the director John Ratcliffe, CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates Iran's nuclear program has been severely damaged by the recent targeted strikes.
This includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source slash method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.
CIA continues to collect additional reliably sourced information to keep appropriate decision makers and oversight bodies fully informed.
When possible, we will also provide updates and information to the American public, blah, blah, blah.
So the reason I think it's worth believing the CIA here is the reporting that said that Trump didn't really do much to the Iranian nuclear program was ostensibly coming from leaks from the military and the intelligence community.
So then if the director of the CIA comes out and says, hey, hold on, look, we know, you know, you're citing the IC here.
You're citing the deep state.
Well, hey, I am the deep state and I'm telling you these facilities were destroyed and the Iranian nuclear program has been severely set back.
Then it just blows up that bit of fake news too.
So add that one to the pile of the establishment media getting every single thing about this story for weeks completely wrong.
But not to put a cherry on top of that Sunday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth addresses this directly at the Pentagon this morning.
I mean, specifically you, the press, specifically you, the press corps, because you cheer against Trump so hard, it's like in your DNA and in your blood to cheer against Trump because you want him not to be successful so bad, you have to cheer against the efficacy of these strikes.
You have to hope maybe they weren't effective.
Maybe the way the Trump administration has represented them isn't true.
So let's take half-truths, spun information, leaked information, and then spin it.
Spin it in every way we can to try to cause doubt and manipulate the public mind over whether or not our brave pilots were successful.
How many stories have been written about how hard it is to, I don't know, fly a plane for 36 hours?
Has MSNBC done that story?
Has Fox?
There are so many aspects of what our brave men and women did that because of the hatred of this press corps are undermined because people are trying to leak and spin that it wasn't successful.
It's irresponsible.
100%, 100% right.
And notice here what Pete does.
He's not just going after MSNBC and the left-wing outlets.
He goes, what about Fox?
What about my old employer, Fox, the supposedly conservative outlet?
How come none of you guys are focusing on the parts of the story that really matter?
You're taking half-truths and non-truths and even the things that have a grain of truth in them.
You're spinning them beyond recognition into the land of the farcical.
This is the liver king problem.
The American press has the liver king problem, which is they have never forgiven Trump for calling out their deceit and their fraud.
Trump, more effectively than any president, any politician of my lifetime, pants the press.
He didn't have to pants them because they were an emperor without any clothes on.
Goes out there and he says, you're a fraud.
You're liars.
You are fake news.
And that attack resonated because it was true.
And then what the press could have done at that point, it's amazing.
This providentially follows the Liver King story because she didn't even make this connection when I was writing my show notes.
But what happened was when the press were exposed and humiliated by Trump, they could have looked in the mirror and said, okay, yeah, we've gotten a bit corrupt.
We've gotten things wrong.
Yeah, okay, whatever.
We're going to take our lumps.
We're going to turn it around.
We're going to do a good job for the American people.
We're going to report the truth.
We're going to talk about what matters.
Okay, we're going to do that.
And the press would be looking great right now, but they couldn't do it, could they?
They got caught in their fraud and they just, they had to get revenge on Trump.
They had to get revenge on the guy who exposed them.
And the problem with that is they still have not gotten Trump.
And every time they try to get him, it's like Wiley Coyote with the Roadrunner.
They just keep humiliating themselves more and more.
Just the four or five narratives that we've had over the Iran story, one more ridiculous than the next, contradicting each other every step of the way, but they have one common thread.
They're all just trying to get Trump and they can't because Trump is the Roadrunner and he always beats Wiley Coyote.
And Hegseth just has a field day spiking the football on Their heads.
That's it.
Now, what does this mean for the actual operation?
What does this mean for the actual future of the Iranian nuclear program?
We are starting our Independence Day celebration early with something big: six months of Dailyware Plus for free.
Right now, when you join Dailyware Plus for a year, we will cover half of it.
That means ad-free shows from the most trusted, handsome, sexy voices in conservative media, exclusive docs, hit movies, breaking news alerts, and the best investigative journalism in the business, all in one place.
You are not just subscribing to become a member.
You're joining millions of people who share your beliefs and your fight.
Don't wait.
Get six months for free right now at dailywareplus.com.
I want to tell you what Matthew Jason14 said yesterday.
He said, speaking of singing Trump's praises, he said, Trump is a once-in-a-multi-generational president.
I truly believe he will be highly regarded by historians, and I hope I'm around to see that happen.
I agree.
Not only, let me separate two things.
I really like Trump.
I bought the MAGA hat in 2016.
I voted for the guy for president three times.
I like him.
I'm a supporter.
Let's put that over here for a second.
If there are presidents that I don't like, then I can admit are consequential presidents looked on as formidable, if not magnanimous, by historians.
LBJ, I think LBJ was one of the great villains in the history of the United States, but that man was a consequential president.
That man matters to American history.
Historians certainly agree with that.
I agree with that.
I don't like the things he did, but I can acknowledge that.
FDR, extremely important consequential president, obviously, did a lot of horrible things, in many ways ruined the country.
But I think that in about 100 years, if America still exists, Trump, without question, will be looked at as an extraordinarily consequential, talented, great president, including by liberal historians, even if they hate him.
If they're honest at all, they're going to have to admit, man, this guy destroyed the Bush dynasty, destroyed the Clinton dynasty, reordered the Republican Party, won the highest office in politics the first time he really gave it a try, then got booted out of office because all the election rules changed,
and then managed to become only the second president in American history to be elected to a non-consecutive second term, survived two impeachment attempts, survived at least two assassination attempts, one of which came pretty close and blew off part of his ear, and managed to rewrite a lot of domestic policy and a lot of foreign policy.
Even if you hate his freaking guts, how can you not say this is a consequential, great president, great in historical terms?
Going to be hard.
Even the liberal historians are going to have to admit it, I think.
Now, what does that man have to say about the Iranian nuclear program?
Here he is at the NATO summit.
Because I don't think they'll ever do it again.
I just don't think they're going to do it.
I think they're going to take their oil.
They're going to have some missiles and they'll have some defense.
I think they've had it.
I mean, they just went through hell.
I think they've had it.
The last thing they want to do is enrich.
They've been trying to do it.
By the way, it's hard to enrich.
And, you know, when you look at a site like that, very, very hard to build, very, very hard, very expensive.
They spent trillions of dollars trying to do this thing and they didn't come up with it.
And we're actually getting along with them very well right now.
Okay, so he says his prediction is they're not going to try to get a nuclear weapon anymore.
I think a lot of people are going to roll their eyes at that and say, yeah, really?
The thing they want more than anything in the world, they're going to stop pursuing that.
Clearly, Trump is using a rhetorical device whereby he is engaging ostensibly in description when he's really engaging in prescription.
That is to say saying, well, here's what I think is going on.
And when he says, here's what I think, then he just is trying to persuade them to do something.
He's trying to will his desires into being.
That said, he gives them some reasons.
The way that that rhetorical trick works is you give people reasons and it makes them think, okay, actually, maybe he's got a point.
Namely, he says, look, you got a lot of oil.
So you have plenty of energy.
You don't need to pretend, oh, we need nuclear energy for civilian purposes.
Give me a break.
You're Iran.
You have enough oil.
You'll be fine.
They have plenty of oil.
They just got blown to smithereens.
Implicit there is you almost got your entire regime overthrown and you almost had your capital city glassed.
Trump threatened both of those things.
So he says it was bad enough what just happened to you guys.
You were humiliated.
You had years and years of work blown to smithereens and could have been a lot worse.
Let's not forget that.
And by the way, that's all the stick.
Here's the carrot.
We're getting along great now.
You know, and so they've been, it's very expensive.
They've had a lot of problems with money.
Maybe implicit, maybe we'll ease up on some of those sanctions if you play nice.
Implicit is for decades you've had one foot in the international order, one foot out of the international order.
Well, maybe if you put both of those feet in the international order, maybe I'll hold off my friends, the Israelis, who have been trying to topple you.
Maybe I'll let you continue to exist.
But you got to play nice.
That's what I think.
That's what I would do if I were them.
That's what Trump is saying.
Is it going to work?
I don't know.
I'm kind of skeptical, but maybe.
Maybe.
It's certainly a good way to play it right now.
And then if we got to go back in in five years, maybe we got to go back in.
Now, speaking of government programs, there's a great advertisement that's been airing for a while now, though.
It's just come to the attention of the media.
This is from the Department of Homeland Security, and it's an advertisement for.
It's a commercial selling self-deportation.
I'm Christy Noam, the United States Secretary of Homeland Security.
Under President Trump, attempted illegal border crossings are at the lowest levels ever recorded.
And over 100,000 illegal aliens have been arrested.
If you are here illegally, you're next.
You will be fined nearly $1,000 a day, imprisoned and deported.
You will never return.
But if you register using our CBP home app and leave now, you could be allowed to return legally.
Do what's right.
Leave now.
Under President Trump, America's laws, order, and families will be protected.
Okay, here it is, folks.
We're arresting all these people.
It's a longer ad.
I actually cut off part of it.
We're deporting people left and right.
And if you deport yourself, maybe we'll let you come back legally at some point.
This is the brilliance of this ad.
So the libs are furious about it.
Here's the Atlantic reacting to that ad.
This is just yesterday.
The self-deportation PSYOP.
With a repurposed app and free teddy bears, the Trump administration is pressuring migrants to leave PSYOP.
It's a psychological operation.
It's just, that's not really what I'd call it.
I'd call it a carrot.
This week has been about sticks and carrots, hasn't it?
The only way that both parties have ever thought about illegal immigration is with the stick.
We're just going to, either the Republicans will say, we'll threaten you.
You need to leave right now.
We're going to smack you with the stick.
Or the Democrats will say, hey, we're not going to hit you with the stick.
That's it.
But that's the only, but no one has ever thought about the carrot, which is, hey, we'll incentivize you to leave.
Not only threaten you, but also incentivize you.
And the Atlantic's furious about this because the Atlantic wants millions and millions of foreign invaders to come into our country, violate all of our laws, tax our resources, and change our demographics and give Democrats a permanent electoral majority.
That's what they're after.
So they say this is a self-deportation cyber.
You're telling me you have effectively free, peaceful way for illegal aliens to leave and for the law to be enforced without a single cop putting on his uniform.
This is the best way to enforce a basic aspect of American law.
And you say, oh, you're grumbling about it.
It's a psyop.
Why?
Because you don't want the law to be enforced.
Okay, so forget about the Atlantic.
I am once again forgetting about the Atlantic.
I'd forgotten about it until a day or two ago.
I'm forgetting about it again.
Why is this program so smart?
Because it could be effective.
That's why The Atlantic is writing an article about it.
That's why the Libs are furious about this in the way they have not been quite so furious about other immigration enforcement programs.
They're furious because it could be effective.
According to the Center for Immigration Studies, a million illegal aliens have self-deported already, like this year.
A million people.
So it's been very, very effective.
The Libs are frustrated that it's effective, and it's effective because it understands basic human nature, basic incentives.
It's got sticks and carrots.
Very, very smart policy.
Now, speaking of Trump and incentives, this we're saying a lot of very nice things about our president.
He deserves it.
He's had a good week and he's done a very good job.
But this one, this maybe goes a little far.
This is from a journalist at the NATO summit asking the president if he is daddy.
This is from Sky News.
Mark Ritter, the NATO chief who is your friend, he called you daddy earlier.
Do you regard your NATO allies as kind of children?
No, he likes me.
I think he likes me.
If he doesn't, I'll let you know.
I'll come back and I'll hit him hard, okay?
He did it very affectionately.
Daddy, you're my daddy.
Do you regard your NATO allies, though, as kind of like children, and they're obviously listening to you and they're spending more and you're obviously appreciative of that.
But do you hope that actually they're going to be able to defend themselves, defend Europe on their own without?
Do you think they need help a little bit at the beginning?
Trump is such a good showman that when she asks this question, he keeps a perfectly straight face.
Your NATO allies, your NATO ally, you're actually the chief of NATO has called you sweet, cute, lovely little daddy.
Daddy, daddy, please lead me in battle, daddy.
What do you have to say about that?
And Trump, completely straight face.
And Rubio is not a TV star.
He's not an actor.
And he just busts out laughing.
Of course.
And what's notable about this exchange, Trump handles it very well.
You know, he keeps a straight face.
He lets the reporter get the joke in.
It's a funny bit.
It goes viral.
It's a flattering narrative to have out there anyway.
So it's good.
It's good that it makes a round.
And then he kind of brushes off the question.
Oh, yeah, we get along great.
We got along great.
Whatever.
You know, he just does the Trump thing.
But what's notable about this story for the political order is, do you remember where the Trump is daddy meme first came from?
A lot of people attribute it to Tucker Carlson in this past campaign.
Tucker gave some speech on the campaign drawer.
He says, oh, it's kind of like daddy's back.
Okay, so finally we've got daddy coming home.
So it was good.
It was a good bit that Tucker did.
But it wasn't Tucker who coined that phrase.
Goes back further.
Goes back, as far as I can tell, the first person to do it was Milo.
In 2015, 2016, Milo Yiannopoulos called Trump Daddy.
And that was so extreme and crazy and wacky and fringe and weird at the time.
Now you have a Sky News journalist at the NATO summit.
Straight face for most people other than Rubio saying, hey, Mr. President, are you daddy?
Yes, I am.
Yes, I am.
What a shift.
What a difference a decade makes.
What a successful political movement to shift culture and even the world order in this way.
