A lady at the DNC warns that Trump could weaponize the DOJ, Bernie Sanders blasts billionaires before the Democrats cheer one on, and it’s not okay to say, “It’s okay to be white,” in the UK.
Click here to join the member-exclusive portion of my show: https://bit.ly/4biDlri
Ep.1557
- - -
DailyWire+:
From the white guys who brought you “What is a Woman?” comes Matt Walsh’s next question: “Am I Racist?” | Get tickets NOW: https://www.amiracist.com
Get 35% off an Annual Membership NOW with code FIGHT: https://dailywire.com/subscribe
Order your Mayflower Cigars here: https://bit.ly/3Qwwxx (Must be 21+ to purchase. Exclusions may apply)
- - -
Today’s Sponsors:
Balance of Nature - Get 35% off Your Order + FREE Fiber & Spice Supplements. Use promo code KNOWLES at checkout: https://www.balanceofnature.com/
Helix Sleep - Get an exclusive discount at https://helixsleep.com/Knowles
- - -
Socials:
Follow on Twitter: https://bit.ly/3RwKpq6
Follow on Instagram: https://bit.ly/3BqZLXA
Follow on Facebook: https://bit.ly/3eEmwyg
Subscribe on YouTube: https://bit.ly/3L273Ek
There were lots of wild speeches last night as the DNC made it through its second day.
We had Michelle Obama, Bernie Sanders, a former backstabbing Trump staffer even.
Well, a current backstabbing, a current backstabber, but a former Trump staffer.
However, no speaker more perfectly encapsulated the Democrats 2024 campaign Then some random state senator lady, whose name I didn't even look up, who had this to say about the threat posed by a second Trump administration.
Donald Trump would be able to weaponize the Department of Justice to go after his political opponents.
He could even turn the FBI into his own personal police force.
That is not how it works in America.
That's how it works in dictatorships.
Something tells me this Democrat lady doesn't read the news much.
Because if she did, she probably would have read that President Trump's former White House chief strategist, Steve Bannon, is currently in jail.
And the senior Trump White House advisor, Peter Navarro, just got out of jail last month.
Both of those men were imprisoned by Democrats in unprecedented and, to my mind, illegal prosecutions.
She might have read that Democrats are currently trying to imprison Donald Trump in four different ways.
She is right about one thing.
In America, we did not used to do that sort of thing.
That is what dictators in banana republics do, and that is exactly what Joe Biden and Kamala Harris have turned us into.
to.
I'm Michael Knowles.
This is The Michael Knowles Show.
Welcome back to the show.
the United Kingdom is punishing people who say it's okay to be white far more harshly than it is punishing pedophiles and people who assault police officers and all sorts of other criminals.
It's a very strange perversion of justice in the UK.
We'll get to that in one moment.
First, though, the DNC has leaned into the theme from the first night.
The theme from the first night was we're the party of labor.
We're the party of the working man.
And they did this, I observed, and I think this was proven correct after watching the second night.
They did this because the Democrats are terrified that they're losing the working class.
They're losing their identity as the party of labor, the party of the working man, the party of the little guy.
They would always portray the Republicans as rich uncle pennybags.
You know, these plutocrats who are on Wall Street, who they're the big money guys, the big capitalists.
We're the party of the working man.
However, now President Trump, especially since President Trump took over the GOP, has made the GOP the party of Pittsburgh and the Democrats the party of Paris, to use a phrase from Senator Cruz.
So the Dems try to invite a big union boss on day one.
Problem is the biggest union boss in America, the head of the Teamsters, Spoke at the RNC, not the DNC.
So they bring out Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez because she was a waitress once or something.
They're doing their best.
But it doesn't quite work because the reality of the Democrats is they really are the party of the elite.
They really are the party of Wall Street.
They're the party of all the big institutions.
They're the party of the big money.
They're the party of the corporations.
They're the party of the billionaires and the millionaires.
So how can they reposition themselves?
They give Bernie Sanders a big speaking slot.
They send out Bernie.
They say, Bernie, please give us your best working man routine in vain against the millionaires and the billionaires.
We need an economy that works for all of us, not just the billionaire class.
You'll notice Bernie stopped invading against the millionaires and the billionaires.
He switched it just to the billionaires after Bernie became a millionaire some years ago.
So all of a sudden the millionaires are okay.
But they send him out anyway.
We are not merely going to represent the billionaire class.
And then the very next speaker was this guy.
Donald Trump thinks that we should trust him on the economy because he claims to be very rich.
but take it from an actual billionaire.
Trump is rich in only one thing, stupidity. - Boo!
Okay, so these billionaires are terrible.
We are not the party of billionaires.
Ladies and gentlemen, please give a round of applause to this trust fund baby, J.B.
Pritzker, the governor of Illinois, a billionaire.
Hey, everybody, I'm a billionaire.
And then the Democrats go wild.
Look at our billionaire.
We love our billionaires.
Now, For those of you who are not familiar with that man, he is the governor of Illinois, J.B.
Pritzker.
He is the heir, one of the heirs, to the Hyatt Hotel fortune.
And, just a quick little fact check here, he says, you know, I'm an actual billionaire.
Donald Trump isn't really rich, he's just stupid, but I'm an actual billionaire.
Donald Trump is much richer than J.B.
Pritzker.
Just according to Forbes, Forbes tracks the net worth of wealthy individuals.
Forbes, today, puts Trump's wealth at $4.3 billion and Pritzker's wealth at a measly $3.4 billion.
So, Trump is, according to Forbes, according to the best measures we have, about 33% richer than J.B.
Pritzker.
But here's what's crucial.
The libs always attack Trump for being a trust fund baby and inheriting his wealth.
President Trump has made significantly more of his wealth on his own than the Democrats J.B.
Pritzker has.
There's a strange coincidence.
Trump and Pritzker both inherited money in the same year, in 1999.
That's when the head honcho of the Hyatt fortune died, and that's also when Trump's father, Fred Trump, died.
Trump inherited, according to the New York Times, $413 million in 2018 dollars.
So the New York Times adjusts for inflation, even though it's back in 1999.
They say in 2018 dollars, Trump inherited $413 million.
$413 million.
J.B. Pritzker inherited in 1999 $1.4 billion, which is the equivalent of $2.1 billion in 2018.
Meaning Pritzker inherited more than five times the amount of money that Trump did.
And yet Trump is significantly wealthier than Pritzker.
Because Trump is not only a billionaire, but he's much, much more of a self-made man than the Democrats billionaire.
The billionaire that the speech right before we were told is awful, terrible.
We don't represent these guys.
But then the billionaire walks out.
Look at all this money I inherited!
And the Democrats go crazy.
Because they are, in the year of our Lord 2024, the party of the plutocrats.
They're the party of the billionaire class.
They're the party of big corporations.
They're the party of the oligarchy.
That's what they are.
And they can pay a little lip service.
They can send AOC out there to do a little soft shoe routine and try to give the impression that this is a working man's party.
They can send the two-bit union boss.
They can't get the head of the Teamsters anymore.
He's working for the Republicans now.
But they can get the understudy to go out there.
They can even get Bernie Sanders to go out and do the same routine he's been given for 50 years, but it doesn't change the underlying reality.
And I don't think it's going to fool very many people.
The Democrats represent an out-of-touch, self-interested, elite, wealthy, plutocratic class that has very little care for the common good.
And the Republicans are now the party of the working man.
There's so much more to say.
First, though, go to balanceofnature.com.
Use promo code Knowles.
Balance of Nature Fruits and Veggies is the most convenient way to get whole fruits and vegetables daily.
So, Balance of Nature takes fruits and vegetables, they freeze-dry them, they turn them into a powder, then they put them into a capsule.
Simple as.
You take your fruit and veggie capsules every day, then your body knows what to do with them.
Balance of Nature is just one ingredient of a balanced lifestyle.
It's not a way to totally replace a healthy diet or exercise or sleep or any other healthy habits.
It's intended to be used in concert with other healthy habits.
Of course, you know, we're people with integrity, we're a whole being, but this is a wonderful way to augment all of those other things that you're doing, especially if you're like me.
And you're on the road a lot, and maybe you're, you know, getting a little Mac attack on the highway every now and again, and you don't always have that time to get your fruits and veggies, Balance of Nature can come in and just take that anxiety totally off your mind.
Go to balanceofnature.com, use promo code NOLTSKINNEDWLAS for 35% off your first order as a preferred customer, plus get a free bottle of fiber and spice.
I absolutely love Balance of Nature, and I strongly encourage you to go to balanceofnature.com Promo code Knowles.
Speaking of generational wealth, Michelle Obama shows up at the DNC.
She takes on the scourge of wealth.
My mom, in her steady, quiet way, lived out that striving sense of hope every single day of her life.
She believed that all children, all people, have value.
That anyone can succeed if given the opportunity.
She and my father didn't aspire to be wealthy.
In fact, they were suspicious of folks who took more than they needed.
They understood that it wasn't enough for their kids to thrive if everyone else around us was drowning.
So my mother volunteered at the local school.
We should not aspire to be wealthy.
We ought to be suspicious of anyone who takes more than they need, says the woman who demanded $65 million to write a book.
Michelle Obama's book deal, it was a joint deal with her husband.
That book deal was $65 million, which is impossible to recoup.
There's really a political bribe, as a lot of these book deals are, but that's a story for another time.
All that really matters for the purposes of Michelle Obama's hypocrisy in this speech is, seems like she took a little more than she needed, wouldn't you say?
And it wasn't just that she went after wealth from the perspective of the individual, she also attacked generational wealth.
She understands that most of us will never be afforded the grace of failing forward.
We will never benefit from the affirmative action of generational wealth.
Yeah, you preach, Michelle!
How much are you worth again, Michelle?
A really conservative estimate of Obama's net worth.
I'm not just talking about a windfall or some income, just their net worth.
Is $70 million, and it's probably significantly higher than that.
Are they going to spend that all, or do we think that Sasha and Malia are maybe going to get a little bit of an inheritance?
I suspect, even if they have lavish spending habits, Michelle and Barack, I suspect they're going to leave a little bit of money to their kids.
And in fact, I suspect that most beneficiaries of generational wealth in America Are not those hillbilly, deplorable, roughneck Trump supporters.
I suspect they're a little closer to those coastal, liberal Democrats.
Guys like JB Pritzker, who gave a speech just last night right around Michelle Obama's speech.
I suspect it's them.
Every single, I say it frequently, I don't want to sound like a broken record, but Every accusation these people make is an admission of something they themselves are doing.
And by the way, I'm not knocking her for general.
I hope she leaves a lot of money to her kids.
Generational wealth is great.
I didn't grow up with money.
Money was actually a little bit of a problem when I was a kid.
However, I had a number of wealthy friends.
I've known plenty of wealthy people.
I don't begrudge them one cent.
In fact, I think generational wealth can be a good thing because, one, from the political perspective, it can establish the conditions for a kind of cultural inheritance, not just a financial inheritance, but a cultural inheritance.
We're going to pass something along to the next generation.
We're going to try to pass on the privileges that we had to another generation.
And this has effects far beyond just one individual or beyond one family.
It creates a kind of stability across the years for a civilization.
It's also a good thing at the individual level, because I'm not working to buy a nice car.
I don't really care about cars.
And I'm a cheapskate, I don't know.
I don't know if it comes from my Italian side, I don't know if it comes from the WASP side, but I'm kind of a cheapskate.
I don't even want to buy new shirts half the time, okay?
Even when my shirt gets a little ring around the collar or something, I'd rather bleach it.
I'm not really all that interested in stuff.
The one fancy thing I'd probably buy is cigars, and I have my own cigar company, so I don't even have to buy those.
I'm not working to buy stuff for myself, generally.
So what am I working for?
Why am I making money?
Why are you making money?
Beyond just paying the bills, it's because you want to leave something to your kids.
You want to make sure that your family is okay.
You want to provide for those who are closest to you.
Maybe you want to give to charity as well.
But that's the impulse for it.
If the only reason I were working is to buy a new car, I would just stop working.
Okay?
It's not just about... It's a very liberal idea.
Sometimes people joke.
They say, you know, the key to life is you got to spend every last dollar before you die.
I'm going out on a jet ski, baby.
But it's a joke.
No one really thinks that.
If you're only living for yourself, then you're living in an extreme version of liberalism.
No, I'm glad even the Libs want in their own practice to have some generational wealth.
But the reason, ideologically, that they attack the idea of generational wealth is from the liberal ideology itself.
Because of the idea that we're primarily, really essentially, individuals.
And we shouldn't worry about leaving an inheritance.
In fact, as Patrick Deneen pointed out very well in his book, Why Liberalism Failed, The liberal society bequeaths to the following generation no other inheritance really beyond debt, and there's something really wrong with that.
Now, speaking of family, it was reported yesterday.
This is a very interesting little political story, because what's interesting about this is not the thing that happened, it's really the thing that didn't happen.
It was reported yesterday by Philip Wegman, very prominent, very respected White House reporter.
News, Trump to call for making child sex change surgeries without parental consent a felony.
And this was reported by people close to President Trump, and he was supposed to do this during a speech in Michigan.
Per prepared remarks, Trump to say in Michigan that to protect our children from sexual mutilation, we will make it a felony for any medical professional to perform surgery on a minor without parental consent.
And what's strange about this story is I've looked for clips, I've looked for coverage of this.
It doesn't seem to me that he actually said it.
Now Trump has come out against the gender ideology broadly, at least as it pertains to kids, but this was leaked to the media and then it doesn't appear to have actually happened at the speech.
So what is this?
It seems to me this is the Trump campaign floating this idea.
And so it's obviously going to be attacked from the left, because the left wants to trans the kids.
But this was also attacked from the right, because people looked at this, they said, hold on, hold on.
Trump is going to call for making child sex change surgeries without parental consent a felony?
Just because a kid has some pervert parent who wants to castrate him doesn't mean that should be legal.
This should be totally illegal, even if you have parental consent.
And beyond that, really these surgeries should just be illegal, period.
Because the only people who are inclined to procure them are suffering from serious mental illness, because a man can't actually become a woman.
So even a grown adult who thinks that he's giving his consent to this surgery, well, look, he's deeply mentally ill, so his ability even to consent to such a thing is severely compromised.
No way, man, this shouldn't be legal at all.
The first prominent sex change surgery, if such a thing were even possible, the first prominent genital mutilation in American culture was in the middle of the 20th century, and it was George William Christine Jorgensen.
Who had to go to Copenhagen to have this surgery done because no one did it in America because it's insane and medically irresponsible.
Then, later on, there was the Johns Hopkins Gender Clinic that opened up to perform these kinds of surgeries.
And Dr. Paul McHugh, the surgeon who was in charge of it all, ended up shutting down the clinic because he said it wasn't actually helping anybody.
Only in really recent years Has this kind of medical experimentation been permitted by the law on anybody?
At any kind of scale?
And so this really shouldn't be legal for anyone.
It certainly shouldn't be legal to perform on kids.
And whether the parents consent to it or not doesn't really matter because it's abject child abuse.
So then add on to all of that, the fact that Trump floated this very specific policy proposal, but then didn't, it would appear, maybe there's a clip and we've all just missed it and it's just for some reason not been reported in the news, but that it didn't quite actually happen.
What does that show you?
Well, it shows you something I said the other day.
I said this about immigration, another issue.
Many of Trump's supporters think we need to restrict immigration.
We just have way too many people coming into the country, and we have had that for about 60 years now.
This is the view, depending on which survey you're looking at, of the majority of Americans, including many independents and many Democrats.
Just too many people.
60 million people in 60 years.
It's the largest movement of human beings in recorded history, okay?
It's just too much.
No knock on the immigrants, but, like, good grief, people.
You know, you gotta keep your country somewhat coherent.
That's the view of most people.
That is not the acceptable view in politics.
In politics, the only acceptable views are, open up the borders, that's Kamala Harris's view, or we need to stop illegal immigration and we need much more legal immigration, which is Trump's view.
There is no politically tenable view to the right of that.
Even though, depending on how you ask the question, Most people seem to think we have too much migration.
However, it just doesn't seem that our body politic is willing to go that step of actually excluding people from the country.
It might be the same thing here.
Of course, as a purely principled matter, either a man can become a woman or he can't.
This was the point of my speech at CPAC two years ago.
So if a man can become a woman, then I guess the trans surgery should be permitted, and actually we should probably trans the kids.
If it's possible for a man to become a woman, I guess you should try to do it before puberty, if that's real.
But if it's not real, as it obviously isn't, then it shouldn't be permitted for anyone.
There's no reason to say a man secretly can be a woman at age 19, but not at age 17.
That doesn't make any sense at all.
However, there is a great chasm between what is philosophically true and obvious and what is politically tenable.
And I think President Trump, floating this yesterday, was just taking the temperature.
Is our country so fallen?
That we can't even say that we shouldn't castrate kids without parental consent?
Oh my goodness, can you imagine?
It's the most modest, mild statement of truth I've ever heard.
Is our country so fallen, has it become so perverse in our political order that we can't even say that?
Seems to me that's what we're testing, and I'm not quite sure what the answer is.
There's so much more to say.
First, though, go to HelixSleep.com slash Knowles.
Helix Sleep is a quiz that takes just two minutes to complete, matches your body type and sleep preferences to the perfect mattress for you.
With Helix, you are getting a mattress that you know will be perfect for the way you sleep.
Love being a helix mattress owner.
I have been a helix mattress owner for now years and years at this point.
And I was actually I'm not even joking.
I was just thinking as we were doing the introduction to this.
Okay.
Look, I'm glad.
Uh, I told you my eldest son just moved from his crib to his bed and he gets a beautiful Helix mattress, but I was already thinking, I said, it's not going to be long before my younger son, my middle son is moving from the crib to the bed.
And I was saying, I was like, I got to get another Helix mattress immediately because otherwise then the younger son is going to be so jealous.
What, the other Knowles men get the Helix, but he doesn't?
That would be very wrong.
So, be like us, okay?
You want a mattress?
Take the quiz.
Order the mattress that you're matched to.
It's shipped right to your door.
HelixSleep.com slash Knowles.
Go to HelixSleep.com slash Knowles.
Helix is offering 25% off all mattress orders, two free pillows.
HelixSleep.com slash Knowles.
This is their best offer, yet it will not last long.
With Helix, better sleep starts Now, speaking of transvestites, we had the first transvestite of the DNC.
Can't believe it took this long.
Thank you to Libs of TikTok for posting this clip around.
Some fella from New Jersey, dressed up like a lady, making this statement on the convention floor.
My name is Dr. Joey Perella, pronouns she, her, hers.
I'm a proud resident of the Garden State.
I'm proud to stand with Kamala Harris and Tim Walz because they stand with the LGBTQ community.
It's time to turn the page on Trump.
First Thank you.
I like how he loses his train of thought.
He's so enraptured in the ecstasy of pretending to be a lady that he loses his train of thought.
He's, we gotta stop Trump for... Anyway, bye.
Boy oh boy.
Now I shouldn't, this probably, almost certainly is not the first transvestite of the DNC.
I imagine there are many there, but this is the first official transvestite of the DNC.
The first person in an official capacity in the convention to come out and make remarks as a man wearing a dress.
And I'm surprised it took a full 24 hours for that to happen.
This is really depressing.
We can laugh at the Democrats, we giggle, this is really, we can actually feel some pity for the man who's been encouraged in this perversion and delusion.
But it is very sad for the country because our country has become a Monty Python sketch.
This was once the country of George Washington.
This was once the country of George Patton.
What other famous Georges do we have?
This was once a serious country, okay?
And we would go out and we'd win wars, and we'd build up industry, and we'd sail, we'd conquer the world, okay?
We were a real serious country.
And now we're the country of People who are alternately or both perverted and mentally ill, wearing dresses, giggling and beaming about their sexual fantasies at one of the major party conventions.
In fact, probably the most significant political party because it's the political party that wields virtually all of the power in America.
That's sad that we have become a Monty Python sketch.
Like an actual Monty Python.
You remember the Monty Python sketch where the guy goes up and says, you know, I want to be a lady.
I want to have babies.
We're that.
We're literally that sketch.
That's sad.
I like living in the most powerful country in the world.
I like, it's cool, especially if you travel abroad.
It's kind of cool that when one is a citizen of the global empire and you can just basically do whatever you want all over the world and you can feel safe and you can feel strong and, you know, the whole world is paying attention to American politics because we're the global hegemon.
It's kind of, I like that.
I take an appropriate degree of pride in my country.
And it's sad that our country is now doing its damnedest to become some modern simulacrum of Sodom and Gomorrah, some kind of circus rather than the global empire.
Sad.
Very sad.
Speaking of the Kamala Harris campaign.
President Trump just absolutely destroyed a reporter for raising a line of attack that the Kamala campaign has been advancing.
This was in Howell, Michigan yesterday.
Thank you everybody very much.
Thank you for coming.
Who was here in 2021?
Thank you.
Thank you, everybody.
So in case you couldn't hear, if the audio was a little bit low, the reporter says, President Trump, how do you respond to Kamala Harris's campaign suggesting that your appearance in this city has to do with racism, that this city has a racist history?
Because I guess some Klansman or something lived in Howell, Michigan once.
What do you have to say that your appearance here is a racist appearance?
And Trump, amazingly quick on his feet, Or very well prepared, or both.
He said, hold on.
Who campaigned here in 2021?
And the reporter knew.
It almost makes me think that the reporter was not attacking Trump, but was giving Trump the opportunity to respond to a silly attack from Harris.
The reporter says, Biden was.
And he goes, okay, thank you.
I don't remember this question of Joe Biden.
Mr. Biden, you're showing up to a random town in Michigan.
Why do you love the Ku Klux Klan so much?
By the way, Joe Biden actually was close friends with an exalted cyclops of the Ku Klux Klan, his fellow Democrat Senator Robert Byrd.
But very few questions about that.
No questions about his appearance in Howell, Michigan.
The Trump shows up, he says, Trump, you love the Klan, right?
That's why you came here to Michigan?
He goes, hold on.
Who came here three years ago?
Biden.
Okay, thank you.
Bye.
It was a beautiful smackdown of the reporter.
Or, if the reporter was simply asking questions, a beautiful smackdown of the Kamala Harris campaign.
But this is all they can really run on.
It's just racism, sexism, this-ism, that-ism.
Especially racism.
And they're gonna, the Democrats and the Republicans can show up to the exact same town for the exact same purpose.
And when the Democrats do it, it's good.
It's a defense of ordinary Americans in the forgotten parts of the country.
American labor, the worker!
And when Trump does it, when the Republicans do it, it's because they love the Ku Klux Klan.
That's gonna be the case no matter where they go, no matter what they say, no matter what they propose.
Republicans are going to propose policies, they're going to be racist and awful and sexist and bigoted and terrible and disastrous.
Then Kamala is going to steal those policies and in some cases she's going to even exaggerate those policies and it's going to be wonderful.
That's happened twice now in the last two weeks and it's just the way it goes.
That's just how the media operate.
Now speaking of racism, I have to give a hat tip here to first Aaron Siberian, a reporter for calling my attention to this, Washington Free Beacon, and Abigail Anthony, who has compiled this list of examples of white people saying anything from perfectly ordinary and defensible things to maybe slightly what you'd call racist things.
Being punished much more harshly than hardened criminals, violent criminals, child abusers, etc.
This is unbelievable.
I'm just going to read directly from Abigail's reporting here.
So, there were these stickers that this guy was...
Was distributing.
The stickers had phrases like, it's okay to be white.
It's okay to be white.
Not even that it's good.
It's okay to be white.
Reject white guilt and they seek conquest, not asylum.
To people who are coming into the UK illegally.
Judge Tom Bayless said, the publication of this kind of material is corrosive to society.
And further told the accused, Samuel Malia, That I'm quite sure that your mindset is that of a racist and a white supremacist.
And so, for this crime of passing out stickers that say it's okay to be white, the Judge Bayless sentenced Melia to two years in prison for saying it's okay to be white.
Then, in 2017, this very same Judge, Judge Bayless, spared a man from jail A man who possessed child and bestiality pornography stating, quote, I don't pretend for one moment to know what possesses someone like you to get sexual pleasure from watching children as young as three or six or even seven being raped because that is what you're watching.
Nevertheless, he doesn't go to jail.
You say it's okay to be white, you go to jail for two years, you watch the most heinous, you encourage, you support, you in a more distant sense help to fund the violation of little children and animals too.
No jail.
Some other examples.
Judge John Temperley.
Gave a man 12 weeks in prison for a racist Facebook post.
I haven't even read the post.
Let's just say it is racist.
A lot of these are not actually racist, whatever that means, but let's say it is.
12 weeks in prison for that.
He did not impose any prison time on a man with 46 indecent images of children.
Same judge.
Judge Benedict Kelleher sentenced a man to 18 months in prison for chanting who the F is Allah.
Fair enough question in a country that doesn't really have much of a history with Islam.
In a country that's supposed to speak English, not Arabic.
This very same judge gave a lighter sentence to a man who physically assaulted a police officer.
Judge Rupert Lowe, another British judge, sentenced a man to nine months in jail for yelling supposedly racist comments at a soccer player.
He sentenced a man to nine months in jail because he's a soccer hooligan who yelled some nasty comments.
This same judge gave no jail time to a doctor who surreptitiously served a woman his own bodily fluids, rather nasty bodily fluids, in a cup of coffee.
And of course, of course, of course, I'm not even really surprised.
Because for the liberals, racism is pretty much the worst thing you can do.
Because what do they mean by racism?
They don't even just mean, you know, burning a cross on someone's lawn or something.
What they mean by racism is if you think it's okay to be white, if you don't actively despise white people and despise yourself for being white, If you have any feeling of kinship for people who are your kin, you know, or your broader kin, or for your national heritage and identity, if you have any feeling of that, that is about the worst thing that you can possibly do.
Whereas, if you have some sexual disorder, They wouldn't probably wouldn't even call it a disorder a lot of the time.
Well, that's you know, that's just innate.
That's just who you are.
Love is love.
That's how you're born.
That's your orientation.
We need to be open-minded.
You know, come on.
We got to extend the rainbow, baby.
If you assault a police officer, that's probably a good thing, because the police are the enforcers of white supremacy, of the illegitimate state that is founded on prejudice and racism, and on the backs of the poor, oppressed, racial minorities, and indigenous.
Oh yeah, it's probably a good thing.
Give the guy an award for attacking a cop.
Or a guy who, you know, who does this depraved bodily fluid activity.
I'm trying to speak in euphemisms because the actual thing he did is so disgusting and this is a family show.
But he does another depraved sexual act.
Well, hey, man, you know, sex isn't that big a deal, right?
We live in the sexual revolution.
It's no big deal, man.
It's just like a handshake or something, you know?
That's why, if that's the case, if sex doesn't really mean anything, if it doesn't mean anything beyond just bumping uglies, then sexual assault is no worse than regular assault, right?
And even then, you know, I mean, look, it's all just kind of love is love, so we don't really need to punish that too hard.
Of course.
Okay.
Well, if you accept those premises, if you accept the premises of the sexual revolution, if you accept the premises of intersectionality and identity politics and DEI and just broadly the anti-white narrative, if you accept liberalism, this is where you're going to end up.
Now, we all know that the conclusion of this is completely unacceptable.
So, if that's the case, maybe we got to question some of those premises.
Speaking of racism, if you've already secured your tickets for the September 13th premiere of Daily Wire's first theatrical release, Am I Racist?
Thank you.
We're hearing that some theaters are not yet showing the film.
Every ticket sold helps us to get it into more theaters across the country.
Head on over to amiracist.com, buy your advance tickets today.
My favorite comment yesterday is from Kathleen Kalman 4796.
She says, it was the Democrats who several years ago said, go to Thanksgiving, start a political discussion, get unpleasant, make it miserable for everyone.
That's true.
That's true.
They're the ones who send out the pamphlets and the brochures and the little videos and pajama boy.
Here's how you yell at your uncle for not supporting Obamacare.
Here's how you scream at your cousin for liking Trump or whatever, not voting for Hillary.
Yeah, they're the ones who do it.
Republicans don't do that.
We joke about that.
We don't do that.
That's true.
And then Tim Walz comes out.
He says, don't you miss when you could just go to Thanksgiving and not talk politics?
Yeah, I do miss that.
I miss the time before you guys ruined it.
Yeah, I certainly do.
Too bad.
Too bad you did that.
I hope you would stop.
That would be great.
Now, getting back to the courts.
In America, the courts are looking a little bit better.
Great news out of the Supreme Court, and I haven't really seen much reporting on it at all, but this is a huge news story for conservatives.
The Supreme Court just struck down Joe Biden's crazy Title IX ruling, pro-trans, pro-radical gender ideology, Title IX rules, 5-4.
So, Title IX protects girl sports.
Basically, it does a few other things, but, you know, women's rights in schools and women as distinct from men.
So, women have certain rights and privileges and, you know, they're different.
Men and women are different.
We used to all agree on that.
Joe Biden wanted to change that.
And in Title IX, Change the protection for rights on the basis of sex to rights on the basis of gender identity or sexual orientation, which undermines protections on the basis of sex.
To use a simple example, if a woman has a right to her own bathroom because she's a woman, but then You changed that right to a right on the basis of gender identity.
Now you're saying a man has the right to use that bathroom because he identifies as a woman.
But if a man has the right to use the girl's bathroom, then the woman necessarily no longer has the right to have her own bathroom absent men.
Title IX initially said girls have the right to their own sports teams and schools.
Transgenderism and the Biden agenda here says men have a right to play on the girls' Sports teams.
If men have a right to play in the girls' sports teams, then the girls no longer have a right to their own sports teams.
You gotta pick one or the other.
So the Supreme Court came down on the side of the girls.
The Supreme Court ruled that the updates, which were supposed to go into effect August 1st, are no bueno for now.
So this decision is not a final ruling.
It just kind of holds up the process of Biden changing things.
There are other lawsuits challenging the Title IX rule.
Those cases will now return to lower appeals courts.
Now, as a result of that, the matter might go back up to the Supreme Court.
But it raises a big possibility.
that even fewer people are talking about, which is the reason the Biden administration felt so empowered to go after Title IX and to inject transgenderism into Title IX is because the Supreme Court already allowed the libs to do that through Title VII, which is civil rights law and employment law.
There was a case some years ago now, I guess it's going back to 2020, where there were a couple of cases that were pushing in this direction, The one that I've talked about on the show a lot was the Harris Funeral Homes case, where a fella decided he was going to start wearing a black dress to work in his funeral home, and the owner of the funeral home said, hey man, you can't do it.
People are grieving here.
You're creating a huge distraction for them.
It's really not about you and your sexual fetishes.
It's really, this is more about the grieving families.
That's where our business serves.
And the guy sued, and then there was this ruling on a related case that said, yeah, actually protections on the basis of sex in Title VII are protections on the basis of gender identity.
So undermines protections on the basis of sex.
So the libs thought, okay, if the Supreme Court ruled that way on Title VII, they're going to rule the same way on Title IX.
The thing is, in between those two cases, we lost a liberal judge on the court and we gained a conservative justice on the court.
We got Amy Coney Barrett in the meantime.
So, Neil Gorsuch, who is supposed to be a conservative, Neil Gorsuch is the reason that the pro-trans Title VII rule went through him back in 2020, because he sided with the libs on the Bostock case.
But even though Gorsuch sided with the libs on this ruling, it wasn't enough.
It was still 5-4 because now we have Amy Coney Barrett on the court.
Shows you how important these judges really are.
How important getting every single one of these judges can be because while the Supreme Court is unanimous or nearly unanimous a lot of the time on these crucial cases that determine how the country is going to move into the future on important social issues, it can be really, really close.
So the question is now, not only what will happen with Title IX, do the girls get to keep their sports, do girls get to keep their bathrooms, are we going to have transgenderism in schools?
Could the court overrule the Title VII decision?
The trans issue is still a very, very live issue.
The libs want to pretend it's all settled.
It's not settled.
It's completely absurd.
If we keep pushing hard, if we win this election, if we keep, if we stop the libs from totally destroying the Supreme Court, as Biden is proposing right now, if we can get maybe even another conservative judge on the court, we have a chance to make some real gains.
Because the Supreme Court is, for now, probably the most powerful branch of the government.
And we're pretty close.
The Supreme Court is signaling, oh, hey, conservatives, don't lose hope.
There's still a chance that you can wield some political power to help restore even some semblance of normality in the country.
Hey, conservatives, you don't need, necessarily, to live in a Monty Python sketch.
Now, even more good news coming out from elected and appointed officials.
The Georgia Election Board just adopted a new rule on Monday requiring county election officials to generate lists of voters who vote in elections.
And then examine them for duplicates.
So, George is now requiring the number of votes cast to be reconciled with the number of votes counted.
This seems like a minor rule, but this is really important.
We heard all sorts of accusations coming out after 2020 that the number of votes that were ultimately counted did not correspond to the number of people who actually showed up to vote on any given day, even when you factor in for mail-in ballots.
So what happened?
Were some ballot boxes stuffed?
That certainly happened before.
FDR, going all the way back to FDR and LBJ, they joked about this.
They said, you got to sit on that ballot box, boy.
LBJ almost certainly won his Senate seat in 1948 because they stuffed a ballot box in Texas.
That happens.
This rule, in a crucial state, we got to win, Georgia, could be significant.
Are we going to see this elsewhere around the country?
We still have a little bit of time, not too much time.
The hour grows late.
But while we're all talking about messaging and appealing to this voter and this little news clip, hey guys, the election is probably going to come down to basic rules such as this.
You gotta make sure, you can never have a perfect system, but you gotta make sure it's much harder to steal the election.
Now, speaking of the people who might try to steal that election, who are trying to win that election, The case of Tim Walz, Kamala Harris' running mate, gets even stranger.
Tim Walz just went after Trump and J.D.
Vance for supposedly opposing IVF.
And IVF and the whole surrogacy industry has all sorts of problems, the most basic of which is it commoditizes human life and it treats people as commodities just to be bought and sold.
It also establishes the domination of technology over the origin and destiny of human life and it trods over the legitimate rights of babies.
Uh, and pretends that babies are nothing more than accessories for parents, etc, etc.
However, that said, the Trump campaign is not running against IVF.
The GOP is not running against IVF.
I think there are serious bioethical reasons that they ought to reconsider their position, but it's just, it's simply not the case.
Nevertheless, Tim Walz has claimed that IVF is how he formed his family.
First of all, it was up to him.
I wouldn't have a family because of IVF and the things that we need to do reproductive.
My kids were born through that direct, you know, that way.
And also I make sure that I'm the guys and our folks are investing in prenatal care.
We're the ones that are there for universal pre-K.
We're the ones that are providing school meals at this.
I'm not going to back down one bit on this whole family values thing and it's us.
That construct that he's putting out there is absolutely untrue.
We're making it more affordable to have children by having paid family medical leave so that you can go home when your kids are sick and take care of them.
Or if you're a dad, I don't have to go right back to work five days later after my wife had a C-section because our insurance wouldn't pay for it.
We're boosting those things up.
There's nothing pro-family other than having women be incubators for their vision of this and I don't know.
Once again, it's weird.
I don't want J.D.
Vance talking about my family.
I certainly don't want him talking about my daughter or my wife.
It's none of his damn business.
None of his damn business.
Okay, you get the point.
He's just going to keep blabbing.
The most important part is the first part.
He says, my kids were conceived through IVF.
I wouldn't have my family if not for IVF.
I thought, oh wow, that's interesting.
I didn't know that.
That's too bad, because one of the other big problems with IVF is, practically speaking, when people do it, they create lots of little people.
They create lots of babies, and then they just put them in a freezer forever, and then they either destroy them in a way that's tantamount to abortion, that is to say murder, or they just leave them on ice forever.
People don't really consider the bioethical implications of it, so I have some sympathy for people who've gone through it, but, you know, it's really not bioethically defensible, which is why The church, broadly, has opposed it from the beginning.
The Catholic Church certainly has opposed it from the beginning.
The Southern Baptists just came out against IVF and surrogacy.
It was just the largest Protestant denomination in America.
So, you know, people are beginning to consider this issue and realize it's no bueno.
But all of that aside, the craziest part is it turns out Tim Walz is totally lying.
Tim Walz did not get his kids through IVF.
That's not how they were conceived.
The New York Times came out and reported this.
The New York Times said that they were conceived through some other way.
Many have assumed that his family relied on IVF, or I'm sorry, this is NPR.
No, no, no, New York Times.
Sorry, it's easy to confuse the two.
That his family relied on IVF to conceive the two children.
Several news outlets, including the Times, the Associated Press, the Minnesota Star Tribune, have reported that the family relied on IVF.
He said, my wife and I used IVF to start a family, but when asked if the Waltzes wanted to share more details, the Harris-Waltz campaign recently clarified that the couple did not rely on IVF, but rather another method.
So he's just a pathological liar.
He lied about his military service.
He lies about... really bizarre lies.
He lies about how his family was conceived and pretends it was conceived through this really controversial and specific and expensive method that he obviously knew he didn't use.
He's just a liar, man.
This guy is a liar through and through.
I wouldn't trust him as far as I could throw him.
Not surprising whatsoever.
Now, a man who's not a liar...
is my guest in the Membranum Segmentum.
That would be my friend Spencer Clavin.
The rest of the show continues now.
You do not want to miss it.
Become a member.
Remember, use code Knowles at checkout for two months free on all annual plans.
Republicans or Nazis, you cannot separate yourselves from the bad white people.
Growing up, I never thought much about race.
It never really seemed to matter that much, at least not to me.
Am I racist?
I would really appreciate it if you left.
I'm trying to learn.
I'm on this journey.
I'm gonna sort this out.
I need to go deeper undercover.
Joining us now is Matt, certified DEI expert.
Here's my certifications.
What you're doing is you're stretching out of your white.
There's more for you in this field.
Is America inherently racist?
The word inherent is challenging there.
You want to rename the George Washington Monument to the George Floyd Monument?
America is racist to its bones.
So inherently?
Yeah.
This country is a piece of...
White.
Folks.
Trash.
White supremacy.
White woman.
White boy.
Is there a black person around here?
There's a black person right here.
Does he not exist?
Hi, Robin.
Hi.
What's your name?
I'm Matt.
I just had to ask who you are because you have to be careful.
