Myron Gaines and Ryads report dissect Operation Epic Fury, noting Iran's mobile "mosaic defense" across 39 provinces and potential underwater cable sabotage in the Strait of Hormuz despite depleted U.S. munitions. They contrast this with North Korea's 2022 mandatory retaliation law and Kim Jong-un's ICBM capabilities, which preclude direct engagement unlike Iran's regional focus. The discussion critiques MAGA strategic misunderstandings, China's "first" policies, and GOP dynamics involving Marco Rubio, concluding that geopolitical instability threatens global connectivity and economic stability ahead of the World Cup. [Automatically generated summary]
Transcriber: CohereLabs/cohere-transcribe-03-2026, WAV2VEC2_ASR_BASE_960H, sat-12l-sm, script v26.04.01, and large-v3-turbo
Time
Text
Iran's Missile Recovery00:04:26
activities.
So I think through the process of targeting that Epic Fury has been able to go go through certainly that and if you want me to pause it, bro, so you give commentary, let me know targeting package has gone after those sites, but we haven't been able to do an effective bomb damage assessment.
You know, the effects based operations that we're all about, which is to conduct an operation and then be able to pressure test what it looks like.
What were the results?
And I think that's what we're seeing right now that the Iranians have indicated not only are they immensely politically resilient, but militarily resilient as well.
To your point, there has been evidence gathered of Iran recovering some of its missile launchers.
And you see some of the dump trucks there, the front and loader as well.
So it seems like a lot of this is mobile, much of it hidden underground.
The Times is reporting that Iran retains roughly 70% of its pre war missile stockpile, including ballistic missiles and cruise missiles.
And this is where the foreign minister came in and said that they're at 125% pre war.
You know, I believe in, I'll tell you why.
They've had quite a bit of time to get their stockpile back up.
And the important thing that you guys need to know is that the Iranians make everything domestically, chat.
So when you make everything domestically, your drones and your missiles and everything else like that, well, you obviously can go ahead and easily get your stockpile back up very quickly, especially when you make it domestically.
All their stuff is made domestically, despite the fact that they have crippling sanctions.
I mean, look, bro, the Iranians are very smart people.
They've been able to.
Oh, my thing froze.
They're very smart people.
They have high IQ.
And they've been able to kind of deal with this, this is how they've been able to fight back against the sanctions.
Yeah.
Yeah.
100%.
And I think 125% is probably closer to accurate.
I think it's definitely more than 75%.
I think intelligence has a reserved estimate.
And whether that's because of the fact that they just don't have the full picture because all of this stuff is happening underground or the fact that they're trying to be conservative, not to scare people.
I mean, intelligence is intelligence.
They're going to be honest about these things, which is why it's not serving really the agenda or favoring Trump or Marco Rubio or Pete Hegseth's rhetoric.
And Iran is very intelligent.
Just recently now, I read a couple articles that Iran is fondling with the idea of cutting these submarine internet cables, these fiber optic cables under the water, which is what powers the internet.
People don't know.
I think a good or a majority good deal of the internet and its responsibility of function across the world.
Actually, it happens underwater.
You have these fiber optic cables that connect every single country.
They're called communication cables.
And Iran is now flirting with the idea of using Chinese weaponry to go down, anchor against these cables and pull them up, pull them out of the water, or really just cut them and disrupt them.
And they can cut off connection to countries, primarily like India, which is the one that would be antagonized first.
And so, you know, that's also something that they're flirting with.
And the Strait of Hormuz is their water.
You know, that's kind of their backyard.
And so maybe they're going to start.
Taxing for other countries having their fiber optic cables running through the Strait of Hormuz.
That's going to be something else they'll make money on.
And so they're really squeezing all the juice out of the lemon here.
They're making sure that this war can be as painful, not only for the United States, but for the world as much as possible.
And, you know, I saw Patrick Bedavid talking about that, and maybe we can react to it.
It's funny that he's talking about that, and he was also like pro war just like six or seven weeks ago.
However, regardless, yeah, Iran is still got a couple things up their sleeves that they have not utilized.
And that internet route is something that they may try and exercise if the United States, again, Launches strikes.
Like, if they launch strikes, we've got the Gulf countries, we've got the Strait of Hormuz to worry about, we've got U.S. casualties to worry about if we operate this ground element, as well as now the internet situation with these fiber optic cables underground in the water.
And I think like every mile is around $450,000, $500,000 to build or construct.
And a lot of these cables belong to the big tech companies like Facebook, Meta, and others.
So it's, you know, a concerning reality that can, you know, effectuate in maybe the next few weeks.
The United States resumes strikes.
And Iran has shown they don't have any real red lines, right?
They're just ready to do whatever they need to do if it means this is an existential threat for them, you know?
Like, this is for their existence.
So there's no doubt that's definitely not off the table.
Nothing Left to Lose00:03:39
Absolutely.
Absolutely.
And, you know, for them, they have nothing to lose.
That's the other thing people got to understand is like, they have nothing to lose at this point, you know?
At all.
No, they did that.
Obviously, that means that as we look at the range that, Iran is capable of reaching, there is still an enormous threat that it poses in the region.
Yeah, it does, and it will.
We have to be very clear eyed about what the effects are of this operation.
As we've indicated, the Iranians have been able to resist the onslaught of Epic Fury, and let's be frank, that has been immensely well executed.
But any nation that is relying on its definition of.
Because here's the thing, too, also.
So, guys, let me be clear about this.
Operation Epic Fury, from a military standpoint, was executed very well, right?
Very few casualties, if we're going to talk about that.
You know, we're talking about 13 casualties.
I think there's actually more.
But in the grand scheme of things, when it comes to war, when it comes to the ability to, you know, utilize all the resources we have and, you know, bomb them into an oblivion, sure, they were able to do that.
But you guys got to understand that war is done when war is conducted when diplomacy is done.
Is no longer really a viable option.
And you must understand that the whole purpose of war is to push your political will upon another group of people by force, right?
If you can't handle it with diplomacy, hey, we want XYZ.
They say no, pound sand, then you go to war, right?
If you are not able to get what you want via the war, even if you destroy them militarily, well, that's not really a W, especially in modern day warfare.
Go ahead, Ryan, do you have something?
No, I just got a huge super chat.
So Don DeMarco for you, Prince Slime sent $500.
And he says, and maybe we can open up the phone line.
Thank you so much, my friend.
He says, Hey, could you guys have me on the show for five minutes?
I have some good talking points about the war never heard before.
Look, man, I really appreciate the super chat.
I don't know, maybe we did a call in show last night.
So I wish you were here last night because we spoke to everybody calling in for like, for literally like two or three hours.
It was in the middle of the night, granted.
But you know what, man?
If we don't have time tonight, I'm going to bookmark that.
I'm going to make sure you can call in and get the chance to share conversation for an extended period of time, whatever you want to talk about.
Unless you were doing it tonight, but I don't know what you wanted to do because I know Brett's like handling that and everything like that.
Yeah, no, I don't know if we'll do it tonight.
And I know you, you probably can't, you're probably, I know you're tired as fuck, bro.
You didn't sleep at all and you worked all last night.
So I won't even hold you up.
Yeah, yeah, no.
It's okay.
We're grinding.
We're grinding.
Here, Prince Lime, I'll go ahead and get your stuff and then we'll figure that out and set it up from there.
Thank you so much for the big super chat, Don DeMarco, for you again.
Appreciate it, bro.
Thank you so much.
You were saying, though, go ahead because you were making some great points.
I was just saying, oh, yeah, no.
So, what I was trying to explain to everybody is like, it's important to understand that when you're going to war to achieve strategic goals.
And if you're not able to achieve those strategic goals militarily, well, it's kind of an L because you've expended an enormous amount of resources, lost soldiers' lives, et cetera.
The whole goal to go to war is to get a strategic W.
So if you're fighting a military that's significantly weaker than you, like the Iranian military is, and you're not able to get your strategic goals, well, that's effectively an L.
And another reason why I would say that it's an L is because Marco Rubio literally said the other day that we're trying to get the Strait of Hamas open.
Effectively, they want pre war conditions to come back.
Strategic Victory or Loss00:09:21
The country that is, or the side that's trying to get pre war conditions back, typically is the losing side.
So you can win militarily, but still lose strategically.
Yeah.
Yeah.
And that seems like the crux that the dumb, dense MAGA tards can't seem to understand.
It's like inconceivable for them.
It's like if they see destruction, and this is like the whole right wing steel man position, it's like they see destruction, they see the fact that Iran is having to defend themselves, and they were, you know, towards the end of the conflict and the bombing campaign.
Having a harder time keeping up than they were in the beginning.
And so they see that as some like huge strategic W or military W.
But I mean, you know, it just doesn't mean anything.
And we know that because Donald Trump has now opted for the economic warfare route.
This has been an economic war for the last 40 days, really, or 30 days since the ceasefire started on April 7th.
Yeah, we've had some strikes here and there.
We hit the coastline, we hit Benderabes, Kesham Island, and then Mineb.
But ultimately, it really hasn't been like this kinetic strike back and forth, you know, tit for tat situation that we saw in the first 40 ish days before the ceasefire.
Came about.
Yeah, obviously, Kuwait got a little bit of smoke with some drone attacks.
I think the other day you had the Fujita situation with the oil supply company or the oil facility that was hit by allegedly Iranian drones, although they denied the ownership of that attack after like the second or third day.
But you know, it's been economic, and that's because of the fact that Donald Trump understands Iran is now leveraging like every resource they have to make this painful for the United States.
They're kind of extending their tentacles wherever they can and involving any country that may not have been involved prior.
And so these are really worrisome things.
Now they're entertaining the idea of cutting these internet cables in the Strait of Hormuz.
Keep in mind, Egypt and the Suez Canal, they toll for those internet cables.
These big companies like Meta and others make a lot of money.
So maybe Iran's going to get a bright idea and go, we should make money.
The Strait of Hormuz is our waters, it's in the Persian Gulf.
We're going to start charging for these fiber optic cables underground, these maritime cables, the same way Egypt is.
And we're going to make money on it.
And we're going to ensure that we have something that's going to allow us to economically thrive so we can stay in an extended conflict with the United States for maybe even years.
You know, so that's really the concerning thing Iran is good at making this attritional from a military perspective, but from a strategic perspective, they're full blown winning.
And there's not even like competition there.
I can't even think of like more than two or three things that we're doing from a strategic perspective to make this painful from Iran.
Somebody may bring up the blockade.
The naval blockade is really ineffective.
I mean, remember, four Sundays ago, approximately, Donald Trump had said their pipeline is going to blow up because of the lack of oil.
And so the pressure is going to build up.
It's going to blow up on Wednesday morning.
Wednesday morning comes, nothing happens.
And the parliament spokesman.
Mohammed Ghalibov, he comes out and he says, What happened?
I thought the well was going to blow up.
I thought the pipeline was going to blow up.
And so it's like day after day, week after week, Donald Trump's plan, Operation Freedom, or blocking the naval blockade, blocking the Strait of Hormuz, entering the Strait of Hormuz, not getting help from Kuwait and Saudi Arabia, which was huge.
All of these things pile on that list of strategic W's for Iran.
How long is this going to go on before somebody in the administration or somebody says, We've really got to can this?
And it's becoming increasingly concerning because What did somebody say last night when we were on the calling show?
Gas is $7 in California.
You know, so that's scary, scary stuff.
You know, we people always do the fear mongering, warmongering.
You know, it's doomsday, get your canned food, stack up on your guns.
And, like, you know, I will never go that far with this conflict.
But I mean, this is the closest that we've been to, like, really an economic crisis in a long time.
And I think we're entering the beginning stage or really the middle stage of what is about to turn into economic turmoil for the United States.
It'll happen over time here if we keep going.
I think Hannity did an interview with Trump after he met with Zizhen.
Let me see if we can react to that full interview, by the way.
Yeah, yeah.
And some really, really interesting things said by Xi Jinping as well.
He spoke about this theory.
I think it's called, I can't even remember what the theory was called, but he was pretty much entertaining the notion that the United States is declining power.
And when a declining power that still is the number one hegemon in the world is approached by the developing power that's going to be from number two to number one, steal their spot, there is going to be inevitable warfare unless the first power concedes to the second power.
So Xi Jinping.
Kind of like vaguely noted at the fact that the United States and China will eventually enter like a full scale conflict at some point because they're going to go head to head for that number one spot in the near future.
Then Trump responded on Truth Social.
So we'll get into all that, but go ahead.
You can play the interview.
Yeah, no, I'm pulling up Hangout with Hannity.
It looks like he did a couple of interviews on Air Force One.
And I'll pull up a couple of things here.
Okay, let me keep playing this and we'll react to Hannity's interviews.
Sovereignty is all about.
Its position opposite to its regional partners, wants to destroy Israel, doesn't want to be a member of the global community of nations, and wants to eliminate the Great Satan.
Very quickly, let's get these.
Jake from afar and Prince Lime, thank you so much again.
I'm going to find your handle here.
Jake from afar says, Keep up the good work, boys.
Riyadh, you're killing it.
Sad to see the state of the union, but refreshing to see a young, articulate mind that gets it.
Hey, thank you so much, man.
I appreciate the kind words.
Thank you for the 20.
And then Shrimp Paste 1692 says, Love you, brothers.
Keep up the great work.
Salaam alaikum.
Walaikum salam, bro.
Thank you so much.
I appreciate that.
Sogno Spray, hey, what's up?
When are home prices going to crash, though?
I don't know.
I don't know.
It's not something I can give an estimate on, hopefully, soon, but that's far fetched at this point.
And that's it.
All right.
Cool.
So, this is a nation that has spent close to five decades, and this literally came out minutes ago.
Trump on FZ will provide military equipment to Iran.
So, we'll cover that next.
Digging deep, creating redundancy.
And what we see now is a lack of.
Command and control, that operational command and control, where these units that have the missiles, that have the drones, they've got the capability to operate within what's known as commander's intent, kind of a mission, a broad mission statement.
I don't need my boss to tell me what to do.
He already did early on, and I'm going to continue.
Yeah, they did before.
That was Ali Khamenei.
He did that before he died.
He literally put out, you know, what needs to be done if you were to be assassinated.
And they're going through it now.
This is why this whole concept of like assassinating people is not going to help.
Now, Iranians practice something called the mosaic defense, which the mosaic defense guys is basically a defense structure where you have what's called second strike capability.
Second strike capability is the ability to attack even if your government is decapitated.
They learned this from watching Saddam Hussein get toppled because he had a top heavy government where everything had to go through him.
What they did, they said, look, we're going to have a decentralized military where if a triggering event happens, we will already have predetermined targets, predetermined leadership.
What is it?
Is it 39 provinces in Iran, if I'm not mistaken?
39?
Yeah.
There are 39 provinces in Iran with their own sections of the IRGC, okay?
And the IRGC is a completely different part of the government chat.
They don't answer to anyone else except for the Supreme Leader.
So he already has instructions.
31.
So, they already had their instructions put in place, right, to bomb certain locations.
And if anything were to happen, that is why when the Supreme Leader was killed, within one hour, missiles were going towards Israel, missiles were going towards, and drones were going towards Tel Aviv, Haifa, the U.S. bases all across the Gulf.
So, they don't need a leader in place to be able to attack.
And that's what's going on here.
So, this whole concept of like assassinating people and thinking that, oh, yeah, we kill Ali Khamenei and the top 50 people in the military, it means absolutely nothing because the Iranians have already.
Created a military literally to have that second straight capability that I told you guys about before.
Unless I hear something different.
Guess what?
I'm not going to hear anything different because my command and control network has gone away.
So you're going to see this type of.
That command and control network is not needed, stupid.
That's what I'm trying to say.
Like, yo, this nigga's retarded.
See, this is why, guys, it's so important for you guys to watch the news with a grain of salt, bro.
Because unfortunately, a lot of these guys that get on these shows think they know what they're talking about or whatever.
And it's kind of crazy how.
Me and my brother gave y'all more accurate analysis than these, like, you know, experts.
These experts don't know what the fuck they're talking about because they clearly don't understand there is no real command and control with the IRGC.
It's decentralized for that very reason, so that if you do go ahead and kill high ranking members, if you do go ahead and assassinate individuals, it doesn't matter.
That does not stop their ability to continue to fight.
Okay?
And they had to make it this way because they're fighting against the United States and against Israel, both nuclear armed powers, both powers that have very, you know, capable intelligence services where the intelligence services can compromise.
Infiltrate and get assassinations across.
So they had to make their ability to retaliate this way, where it's completely autonomous of the structure within the leadership.
China's War Concerns00:15:23
Capability, resilience.
Yeah.
On the other side, there are indications that the U.S. has significantly depleted its stockpile of key munitions, including precision strike, FAD, and Patriot missiles as well.
What does this mean, not only for this conflict, but potentially future conflicts?
Well, it's conflicts where they might occur.
Look, every one of these combatant commanders, European Command, Indo PAC Command, Southern Command, all of them rely on the same stockpiles that are being used right now, very liberally, have been used very liberally and effectively against Iran, the Central Command.
So all of those combatant commanders go forward on a routine basis, daily, minute by minute.
They evaluate their ability to execute their tasks, and it's all about their readiness posture.
And a part of that readiness posture is access to the stockpiles.
That all of them rely on simultaneously.
So we have always understood, irrespective of Epic Fury, that those stockpiles must be routinely replenished.
And through the normal operations that we've conducted over the past 20 years, those overseas contingency operations in Iraq and Afghanistan, we have dwindled those stockpiles, but we continue to build them up.
And what we've seen now with Epic Fury is clearly, I would state with some level of confidence, that they've been depleted.
I could not Quantify what that looks like, nor would I add an adjective to it.
All I'd say is it's been depleted.
There has to be a legitimate effort across the board to make sure that we reach that level, that minimum essential level to operate along those tasks.
So it's not surprising at all that we're probably at a level that bears some significant consideration of making this a priority moving forward.
Major General James Spider Marks, thanks so much for joining us.
Some perspective now joining us is Senior National Security Analyst Alex Pletzes.
So, what do you make of the administration's claims?
Obliterated, degraded everything, military gone, missiles mostly depleted.
If Iran retains the ability to resume full scale military strikes, I mean, do you think we've knocked out their facilities as much as the administration is saying?
It sounds like some of it actually may have been recovered as well.
So, some of the entrances to the tunnels to underground facilities and caves or things of that nature have been struck.
Yeah, that's one thing as well.
So, we're not going to get access to things like that.
That's another thing.
And I've been saying this.
This extended ceasefire is really hurting us.
Like stopping, I don't know if it was as smart, but at the same time, you've got the liability of the Gulf nations always getting struck as a result of us striking them.
I think that was the main motivation for pausing the conflict.
However, pausing the conflict has now introduced arguably a larger issue, which is the fact that Iran has so much time to clear out the rubble from the entrances that we bombed in order to make it difficult for them to access these underground facilities where the missiles are, where the drones are.
And then we've also allowed them to formulate a plan.
And while they have all this free time, kicking their feet up, sitting back, waiting for the United States to strike again, potentially, which is where it's leading because talks have been futile, to say the least, they're talking about cutting internet cables.
They're talking about making more money on the straight.
They're talking about deeper allegiances and ties with Russia and China that they already work with closely.
Now they've got routes in Pakistan for trade and other things like that.
I mean, it's just like as time goes, Iran is just building the blocks and they're getting ready for another attack.
They're bolstering their economy, they're getting stronger.
This is not like pro IGC.
You know, propaganda, that's what we're seeing.
You know, and as time goes and we get deeper intelligence analysis on what's happening on the ground here in Iran, we're coming to see that the more time we give them, the harder it's going to be for us to restart the war and get back to where we were, make things even worse.
And then, something I didn't even mention amongst all of those things, all of those things are so problematic.
The biggest thing that I didn't mention is their nuclear program.
You know, they might be enriching uranium to a higher level as we speak right now.
Maybe they're really close to a bomb.
Maybe they've already made a bomb.
We don't know what they're doing.
Trump tries to act like he knows what's happening.
All of this stuff is underground.
If they don't know what's going on with the missile system because the spokespeople are saying one thing in Iran, our intelligence is saying another, well, then probably the same thing is true for the nuclear program as well.
Who knows what they've got going on?
So the longer the ceasefire drags on, man, the worse it's actually for the United States in regards to reaching our goals, which is like no nukes, no missiles.
Like that's exactly what they're building on.
Yeah, I mean, for them, time is on their side and it's not on our side.
That's really what it comes down to.
Time is not on our side.
Yeah.
Time is on theirs.
They can.
They can weather the storm when it comes to a blockade or sanctions.
They've been sanctioned for 50 years, dude.
So for them, it doesn't really matter.
They've already found ways to get around it, whether it's, you know, shadow fleets or getting support via the Caspian Sea.
They figured out, you know, ways to kind of get around this crap.
We haven't.
And Trump has a midterms that's literally around the corner, that's breathing down his neck, and he knows this.
And even with the missiles, it's a question of how many launchers they have left, right?
So if they've got, you know, 6,000, 8,000 missiles, but they've only got a couple hundred launchers, that's a strategic choke point.
But it's clear the Iranians have been able to recover since then.
And also, I mean, when speaking to Central Command and asking about battle damage assessments, even in the beginning they said, look, it's very difficult for us to get there.
It's going to take a little time for us to figure this out.
So I think there's been a little clarity after action there.
I think the Iranians have recovered some, but it is quite clear that they retain substantive military capabilities at this point.
So would Central Command have anticipated this?
I mean, that they.
It's kind of crazy because, you know, in the beginning of the war, they were like, yo, we've destroyed them.
The Navy is in the sea.
The Air Force is gone.
They're, you know, they have no more missile capabilities.
I remember the Israelis were saying, like Netanyahu or somebody from the Israeli government was saying, they only have 100 launchers left.
Like, bro, such cap that the runners could dig out.
And you knew it was cap because they were saying that so early on.
Yeah.
It was like on the fourth and fifth day, the Pentagon or Pete Hegseth really was saying, We destroyed this much missile launchers.
We did this, we did that.
And then, you know, they were working hard at it, but he was clearly overextending the actual accomplishments of the United States military.
And then now we're getting the truth.
And that's what always happens.
After time, we actually see what really happened.
And who knows, in the next two or three months, it may even become worse.
You know?
So, just so you guys know, the reason for this is because this war is wildly unpopular.
Okay.
Like, even amongst people in the Republican Party, This war is very, very unpopular.
The only people that really like this war are Zionists and MAGA Tards.
Like, these are the only people that are still, like, cheering this war on, dude.
It's so full.
Senators are starting to flip.
They're starting to be against the war.
Yep.
So it's a matter of time, really.
It is a matter of time until everybody turns their back on the administration.
Absolutely.
Well, I mean, the fact that the campaign stopped when it did was also a political decision, right?
So I don't think that they anticipated, you know, that potentially, I mean, obviously, reality could have happened, but in terms of the timing, when it happened, what would be left, how long that would last, would the Iranians have the ability to dig out?
Those are all factors that wouldn't have been really weighed into military planning, but they're a reality of the battlefield at the moment.
Do you think President Trump is going to ask China for help regarding the Strait of Hormuz?
I mean, actually, sort of having them be the power broker over the Strait of Hormuz?
That's not a bad question.
But I don't mean, I mean, honestly, I don't even think the Iranians would listen to China like that if they try to tell them anything.
Like, no one can really tell Iran anything because this is an existential war, bro.
Like, you know, kind of like we told Ukraine, like, yo, we're not going to support you on ninjas.
You know, you guys got to like give up or whatever.
Like when Trump tried to fight Zelensky, if you remember February 2025 when they had that epic fight in the White House, like Iran has way more capability than Ukraine does, right?
And it has more leverage than Ukraine does.
So, like, why would they, like, China's not going to tell them what they can do?
Because I would argue Ukraine is still running the fight and we support them way more than China supports Iran.
So it's like, oh, 100%.
We're giving them our best stuff.
Yeah.
You know, the argument has been from the Ukrainian side recently that they have these.
New technologically complex drones that are going to override the Russians and make it difficult for their invasion.
And we're going to draw back how much land they've actually captured so far.
And I will admit, in the last year, Russia's been back and forth.
They've been on and off.
It seems like they're now restarting their, who knows what number it is now, their bombing campaign.
But it's slow.
And I think they're chopping the wood slowly, intentionally.
That's kind of the idea in Russia.
And now, allegedly, the populace in Russia is becoming frustrated about how slow it's been, despite the fact that they are winning effectively.
But yeah, we've given Ukraine.
So much advanced weaponry.
We've spent way too much money on that conflict in regards to China and Iran.
China gives them a couple missiles there, some satellite.
I mean, this is bullshit for China.
China's just like, yeah, here, here, nigga, like take this bullshit.
This should do the job.
And the Iranians operate from such a position of like disadvantage that for them, any piece of technology, any piece of weaponry already adds to their like large stockpile.
So for them, it just couples in nicely.
You know, this maybe is why.
That surface to air missile hit the F 15.
Maybe it was Chinese radar.
So they've got the missiles.
They've got all the good stuff.
They just need maybe a little satellite there, maybe a little Russian intelligence there.
And it makes it very difficult.
It proves a difficult deal.
To make it simple for you guys, in other words, the Iranians are far more autonomous than the Ukrainians are.
So, you know, in other words, the Ukrainians need us way more than the Iranians need the Chinese.
And the Ukrainians have not been giving up on the war.
So you think the Iranians are going to give up?
Fuck no, bro.
And they need less help from China than Ukraine needs from us.
So, what do you think is going to happen?
China can't tell them nothing, dude.
Like, they just can't.
And China knows what Trump is likely telling them.
What was that?
No, that's what Trump is probably begging him to do.
But go ahead.
Yeah, no, I was going to say, like, and the other thing too is, like, at the end of the day, like, China knows that a big part of the reason why Trump did this war is this.
This is what I think Trump's grand plan was here, okay?
The grand plan was this January, topple the Venezuelan government, take control of the oil, take control of the energy that China had just been investing in and was getting a significant amount of the energy from.
Boom, right?
Then, February, topple the Iranian government, get it done in 96 hours, hope that people are going to go ahead and topple the government and take control of the energy.
Spin it back, go back to South America, take over Cuba.
Cuba would be crippled by then after about one month of no energy from Venezuela from Maduro being kidnapped.
And then finally, go to China at the end of March with a lot of leverage of taking over Cuba, Venezuela, and Iran's energy resources, taking over Cuba and then taking Venezuela, Venezuelan and Iranian energy, and coming to Xi Jinping from the position of we control a majority of the oil.
We want to strike some kind of deal.
That's what I think Trump was trying to do.
Because if you guys remember, this summit meeting was supposed to happen at the end of March.
Into early April.
It didn't.
He had to push it back until May because the Iranian war he did not anticipate would take this long.
But he was hoping to have all of this done, have his ducks all in a row, and then go to China in a position of power by controlling Iran and Venezuela, which were responsible for getting China a significant amount of cheap oil, cheap energy.
Because remember, Venezuela and Iran were both suffering from crippling fucking sanctions.
And the only person that was really buying their oil or a majority of their oil, both countries, was China and buying a significant amount of it at a discounted rate.
So Trump going there.
Could throw in the oil that they used to be able to get at a cheap price would have been a huge advantage from him from a leverage geopolitical discussion talk.
But he didn't have that.
He doesn't have that.
That's why he kept pushing the summit back chat.
That was his goal originally, and it failed.
So, yeah.
Yeah.
And Marco Rubio has just sat down and done some interviews, I think, ahead or right after the summit.
And this is kind of like the concern with this administration is China.
China's been a big focus, which is why they've done all of these things.
But Marco Rubio was saying it's obvious China's rushing to be the number one global superpower.
And you can see he's careful with his rhetoric and his speech.
He doesn't want to say we're trying to stop them, but he gives the most political, circumvented answer of saying we're trying to stop them.
You know what I mean?
And they did sanction him.
Yeah, he had to change his name, right?
Yeah, I think what happened was they, on like his travel documents or whatever into China, they had to change his last name or change the spelling on it a little bit.
So he was very sensitive.
Yeah, because he says there's a couple things that China's very sensitive about.
And one of them is like their human rights violations.
So, they get really mad about that.
That's actually what got the mayor out of California jammed up is that she sent out like a message at the direction of some like, you know, PRC, you know, agent operative, saying that China was not involved in some human rights violations.
And she put it like on a website or some shit like that.
And that's what ended up getting her charged.
So, China is super sensitive and gets mad whenever you mention certain things.
And look, let's be honest here China, guys, it's a communist country.
They run on propaganda.
There's a reason why the tank man.
Picture to this day, and I think it's Tiananmen Square, if I'm not mistaken.
If you guys know what I'm talking about, this picture right here.
This picture right here, chat.
Look at this shit, bro.
If I go tank man, this picture is illegal in China, chat.
This picture is literally illegal in China.
Okay.
It's an unidentified individual, presumed to be a Chinese man, who stood in front of a column of Type 59 tanks on Chang'e. Ann Avenue near Tiananmen Square in Beijing on June 5th, 1989.
The confrontation occurred one day after the government of China forcibly cleared the square, following six weeks of pro democracy demonstrations resulting in the deaths of hundreds of people, primarily in the areas surrounding the square.
This picture is fucking illegal, dude.
You will go to jail for even having this.
So that's crazy.
Yeah, bro.
Yeah.
China has a tight, you know what I mean?
Niggas know how to run the propaganda mill properly.
You know what I mean?
But the point I'm trying to make is that, where was I going with this?
I was going to tell you guys something.
Damn, I lost my train of thought.
What was I saying before that, Riyadh?
Their propaganda.
You were talking about the United States scrambling for the power.
We're speaking about Rubio, Hannity, something along those lines.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Sorry, sorry.
Yeah, Marco Rubio got jammed up.
Thank you.
Marco Rubio, China didn't like him because he had made comments about their human rights violations, and China doesn't like that.
Yeah.
So that's why, that's a big reason why this picture is illegal.
And the reason why it's illegal is because he was protesting the tanks after people were killed in a sign of protest for trying to push for democracy.
So China controls information flow quite a bit.
Everything is done through WeChat, right?
Which is obviously government, you know, Filtered, we've knocked out their facilities as much as the mystery.
And it's a police state.
Fox News showed yesterday they had like hundreds of cameras all around Beijing.
Yeah, they were trying to do some propaganda press run before Trump got out of there.
Did you see that?
That was hilarious.
They were like scrambling to create some.
I saw a clip on Twitter.
They were like, Yeah, I'm surprised the Chinese government let that slide.
It's because they were with Trump, otherwise, that would have never flew.
Them niggas would be in jail, bro.
Yeah, I'll try to find you right now.
100%.
Yeah, that's one thing about these Asia countries, bro.
Niggas don't around.
North Korea Scramble00:14:09
Did you see that North Korea put a law in place where if Kim Jong un is assassinated, they're going to launch their nukes?
Yeah, I saw that.
And you tweeted, and your tweet went viral.
Like a real ass nigga.
I said he's a real ass nigga.
I mean, imagine you're not to be a Kim Jong un apologist here, but let's just put ourselves in the shoes of everybody.
Imagine you're Kim Jong un.
The United States has now threatened to invade Cuba, threatened sanctions on Mexico for supporting Cuba, which they've historically done, destroyed Venezuela's regime in like two seconds, attacked Iran in the most unprecedented, unexpected attack.
That we've seen in recent history, honestly.
And then, you know, at the same time, he's the only other like real nuclear threat in the world that we try to worry about.
So for him, he's like, yo, let me set some shit up just in case Donald Trump gets a funny idea because he's been erratic.
He's been super volatile.
So that was really funny.
I could pull your tweet up here.
That was hilarious.
Yeah, this is how you know he's a real nigga.
Yeah, he is a real nigga for that, bro.
Like, because the reason why is because, yeah, like I'm glad that you mentioned all that shit.
Like, you got to put yourself in your enemy's shoes, right?
Like, they're looking at it like, yo, if this nigga dares fucking like assassinate me, y'all are getting nuked.
Like, you probably should try it.
Like, it's a statement.
Like, because he saw what they did to Ali Khamenei, bro.
So he's like, yo, if y'all assassinate me, bro, y'all niggas are.
And here's the thing with Korea.
Here it goes right here.
So, and I got to double check and make sure this shit is real, but I think it's real.
Justin, North Korea updates the constitution to automatically launch nuclear strike if Kim Jong-un is assassinated.
Like, yo, what?
Hold on.
It's blocked on my end.
Maybe you have it on a different screen.
Oh, hold on.
Is it not there?
What the fuck?
Okay, give me one second.
I don't know.
Maybe just turn the screen share off and turn it back on.
Yeah, let me turn it.
I'll turn it back on right now.
Bro, that shit had me fucking dead, dude.
Hold on, hold on.
Like, you got to respect it, bro.
You're like, yo, what?
Yeah, I have it here.
Realist nigga on earth.
1.7 million views.
Let's go.
That's hilarious.
Yeah.
I mean, no, Bricks News, it's probably true.
I don't think they typically lie about big headlines like that.
But yeah, it's like, you know, all the granular details, they're a little bit wrong, but the big news, they're pretty good.
Yeah, it makes sense.
And I'm not going to lie, like, you know, not to sound crazy, like, you know, These dictators and authoritarians, they have aura sometimes, you know.
So, they set up these policies to ensure the United States doesn't try and infest this, like, you know, policeman state democratic control ideology into the nation, which is what we've been trying to do in the Middle East for like 20 something plus years.
Yeah, I thought that was very funny.
But do you have the Rubio Hannity interview ready?
I have it queued up as well.
If you want to share that.
Not Marco Rubio.
I got the other one.
I got the one with Trump on China.
So, we can do both.
We can do both.
These are both going to be really good.
Yeah.
Go ahead.
You share it.
Yes.
And I double check, bro.
Yes.
It's according to North Korea's own nuclear policy law.
So, North Korea has officially codified a dead man switch or automatic retaliation policy in its nuclear doctrine.
The key provision from the 2022 law on the policy of the nuclear forces reportedly, in the case of command and control system over the state, nuclear forces is placed in danger owing an attack to hostile force.
A nuclear strike shall be launched automatically and immediately.
So, this applies if Kim Jong un is killed, incapacitated, or if the leadership command system is under andor judged to be attacked.
Bro, see, and that's the thing.
Like, look, it's all about deterrence, man.
I mean, like, yo, Donald Trump said, oh, I got a red button too, and mine works.
What did Donald Trump do after?
He went to fucking North Korea, bro.
You know what I mean?
Like, yeah.
Like, Trump respects other people that have power.
This is why he respects Xi Jinping.
This is why he respects Vladimir Putin.
This is why he respects Kim Jong Un.
Don't forget, look, guys, people will be forgetting that.
Let me show you how this shit real quick.
Trump.
People will be forgetting that, like, Trump met this nigga, bro.
Like, hold on.
Let me see.
Look, this is a historic moment right here.
Let me share this with you real quick.
First president to do it.
He crossed the border right in front of him.
And this all came after they argued with each other about nuclear weapons.
Trump respects power.
I ain't gonna lie, this was a very, like, this is gonna go down in history.
Like, yeah.
I was shocked when this actually happened.
It's pretty oracle, I'm not gonna lie.
Bro, you know those Secret Service agents and Kim Jong Un's protection detail, both those niggas were sweating.
Sweating.
Sweating.
Go.
Well, you know what it probably is.
The security detail is probably terrified and nervous because Trump is going to do the handshake pulling shit.
Yeah.
And then Kim Jong Un is going to get mad and then run to his desk to hit the big red button.
Yeah.
No, but really, Trump does that like that pulling thing.
I always get nervous when he shakes a world leader's hand.
Yeah, he does that shit, bro.
That shit is so stupid that he does.
Like, it's very rude.
And he does that shit all the time.
And I was like, nigga, like, yo, okay, do that shit with France's shit.
Fine.
But like, nigga, when you're meeting these dictators, like, chill, man, what's wrong with you?
Yeah, don't do that shit.
Don't do that with Putin.
Don't do that with Kim Jong un.
You can do that with Macron and everyone.
No one cares about them.
But these are not the guys to do that with.
Especially this nigga.
He's crazy.
He's really crazy.
Kim Jong un.
If there's any crazy dictator, this is one of them.
But in Korea, for those that don't know, if you commit a crime against the country, against the state, you don't just get punished three generations to go to jail.
If you sneeze the wrong way, bro.
If you sneeze without covering your mouth, your head is chopped off in North Korea, bro.
They don't play any games.
I try to always do research on North Korea and like see what's going on.
Yeah.
And all the journalists there are like walking on the thinnest ice.
They pull out their phone in their hotel room, like, hey guys, it's 3 a.m. right now.
I'm not supposed to be doing this.
And, you know, it just goes to say, it goes to tell like the North Koreans, they don't play any games when it comes to propaganda, bad press, media, none of that shit over there.
Big fat frame of King Jam Un in every corner of the house.
Yeah.
You know?
Yeah, and if you take it down or anything like that, it's like a crime, bro.
It's like a big crime.
It's like espionage.
It's like a punishable crime.
There was an American guy that famously went to jail for taking down a poster, a pro North Korea poster, a government poster.
And they put him in jail and worked him and probably waterboarded him, all that.
Yeah.
That's a fucking crazy thing that he crossed the line.
Oh, come on.
Oh, you saw that?
Kim Jong Un walked into him, so he wouldn't pull him.
You saw that?
Look.
Yeah, yeah.
That's what they do.
Boom, and he walks in.
Yeah.
Get very close.
Thank you, Mr. President.
You did.
And just so you guys know, North Korea does have intercontinental ballistic missiles, bro, with nuclear capabilities.
That's why we don't fuck with these niggas, bro.
And, you know, I hate to say it, but that's the only way that you're going to ensure that you don't get attacked.
You know?
That's the thing.
Iran poses no threat to the United States or really the U.S. soil.
Yeah.
Like, because they just don't have intercontinentals, you know?
They're not even really that close.
I don't think they're even close to even getting those.
You know, North Korea is far more capable when it comes to making things painful for the U.S., they could hit us domestically easily, you know?
So that's like the scary part about North Korea.
And they're crazier.
I just had a super chat I forgot to read.
Kachima says W breakdown, W dynamic duo.
Thank you so much.
Appreciate the 10.
Sorry, I didn't see that just until now.
But yeah, I've always thought Kim Jong un is like the most entertaining world leader and he just makes me laugh.
Like, I'd be like, but no, I didn't know you do that too, Riyadh.
Yeah, I'd be randomly researching North Korea shit.
Like, I'd be always researching, like, I always try to see.
I mean, stuff like that really intrigues me.
Like, I always am intrigued by these countries that operate differently, but you just can't get the most information with North Korea.
You know, the most you get is like that one lady who escaped the country and is always on Joe Rogan.
What's her name?
But like the things she says, I feel like are just fabricated.
So I don't even know if what she's saying is true.
The chick that escaped.
Forgot her name.
Yeah.
Yeah.
She's one of the chat will put it.
Yeah.
She's some chick that like escaped North Korea and shit like that.
Yeah.
I know what we're talking about.
Yeah.
Trump has just walked across the demarcation line.
That's crazy, crossing that demarcation line.
Being the first U.S. president to visit our country.
I just want to say that this is my honor.
And to be honest, I'll probably be the only one.
Because people forget that Barack Obama was very harsh on North Korea.
Barack Obama was extremely hawkish on North Korea.
So this is why this was so historic.
Yeah.
Well, yeah, Trump definitely.
Wasn't Kim Jong un testing, doing nuclear testing during Obama's administration, Rihanna?
I believe he was.
I believe he was.
And that's why Obama got so upset.
Yeah.
I'll double check.
Go ahead.
You were going to say something.
No, Trump is just very good at, at least in his first term, he was good at building relations with these foreign countries that.
We had no ties to or that were direct adversaries of us or ones that we were even in somewhat of a vague shadow or cold war with.
So, you know, he did a really good job of that.
And then you got to give him credit.
His first term was so much better than his second.
I'm fact checking it right now.
Chat, you guys got to notice more that, like, when me and my brother are talking, I'll just fact check shit because I don't like not being accurate.
So let's see here.
I'll keep playing this while I really expect it.
We were in Japan for the G20.
We came over and I said, hey, I'm over here.
I want to call up the chairman, Kim.
And we got to meet, and stepping across that line was a great honor.
A lot of progress has been made, a lot of friendships have been made, and this has been, in particular, a great friendship.
Nigga didn't utter a word.
Oh, sorry.
I would invite him right now.
Let's go to the White House.
Nanny ain't going to the White House.
Nah, he won't.
He's worried about.
Okay, you want to do the Marco Rubio one, right?
I'll end the CNN shit.
Yeah, we could do Trump and then Rubio.
And let me read these chats very quickly.
Excuse me.
Andrew Niggas, nice name, says, W. Byron and Myron, I love these moments, W. Y'all.
Thank you so much, bro.
Appreciate it.
Fifth Elemental says, bro, you can't even fart in North Korea.
Yeah, I know.
It's crazy.
Thanks for the super.
North Korea hates Israel, by the way.
That's from its Leo reaction.
Yeah, they do.
Yeah, they do.
And for all the right reasons, obviously.
Any country, if you notice, any country that does not have to kiss up to American ass or kiss the feet of America will always acknowledge like Israel is a problem state.
So it's really just a matter of, The ones that acknowledge Israel are more concerned about the United States and ruining their relations with the U.S. more than anything else.
That's what it boils down to.
Okay.
Let's do Rubio first because it'll make more chronological sense.
Okay, sure.
And I'm double checking this thing with the nuclear weapons.
Here, let me just crank the volume up here.
Oh, hold on, let me.
Top geopolitical fault.
Yeah, it's both our top political challenge geopolitically, and it's also the most important relationship for us to manage.
I mean, it's a big, powerful country.
It's going to continue to grow, but we're going to have interests of ours that are going to be in conflict with interests of theirs.
And to avoid wars and maintain peace and stability in the world, we're going to have.
To manage those, there are clearly areas where they're so important for the United States that we're going to have to raise those issues and we'll continue to do so.
The President's going to continue to do so.
There might be some areas of cooperation too, and we want to make sure we don't walk away from those.
You know, it's interesting.
The one thing the President always says, he's America first.
He understands President Xi is going to be China first, Putin will be Russia first.
I think having that understanding is a little bit unique, historically speaking, as if.
We should be surprised that they put their country above ours.
Actually, foreign policy and national security matters work best when you understand that point.
Every country should do what's in the best interest of their country.
And then where there are areas of alignment, where what's in our best interest and their best interest are aligned, that's where you have cooperation.
Unless it's Iran.
Can't do anything for your benefit if you're Iran, though.
Okay, so I double checked here, guys.
So it says here, so basically, North Korea got their nuclear bomb.
They got their first nuclear test October 9, 2006, under George Bush.
Okay, under Kim Jong un II's rule.
This is when North Korea demonstrated how to work in nuclear advice.
They had their second test in 2009, early in Obama's presidency.
And then Kim Jong un joined.
He took power in 2011.
They had tests in 2013, 2016, and then September 2016, 2017.
And they ramped up.
So basically, what Obama did was he had, he put heavy sanctions on them and containment and isolation, trying to get them to the table to negotiate, but they didn't.
And then another thing that pissed him off was they had some escalations.
Basically, the Qianan sinking and Yan Piang shelling pre Kim Jong un, but during Obama.
So basically, you know, they tried to stop them andor prevent them, but it didn't work.
And they tried the sanction, it didn't work.
And they have a nuclear bomb anyway.
So, but a lot of this did happen during later in the Bush administration, and a lot of it happened with more progression during the Obama administration.
So, yeah.
So they've had it for almost 20 years then.
So they've been.
They've been a nuclear state since 2006.
I didn't know that.
I thought they became a nuclear state in the 2010s, but actually, even earlier.
Well, Trump just conceded, right?
Like, Obama tried to fix what he could while it was fresh and to no success.
So, Trump just said, hey, we're not going to stop these niggas from anything they want to build.
No point in even attempting to halt nuclear proliferation or anything like that when it comes to these Asian countries, just North Korea as a whole.
So, yeah, it was a lost cause.
Vance and GOP Strategy00:04:53
And they're crazier.
You know, they're crazier.
They're a rogue nation.
They really are.
So, yeah, they really are.
But, you know, Rubio Late.
Yeah, they are very rogue.
I think they're more reckless than Russia.
I think they're more reckless than any.
I think they're the most reckless country.
Not even close.
Not even close.
I'll be, maybe I'll be a contrarian, play devil's advocate.
I feel like Russia has been really fair.
I felt that they were patient with the expansion of NATO.
You know, obviously they invaded Ukraine.
Maybe that wasn't the best set of circumstances or choice that they made, but they were probably planning on doing that for years.
They really got pushed to the edge before they did that.
So, you know, North Korea is in their own lane.
You know, one thing I want to say really quick, too, in regards to Marco Rubio.
Have you?
I don't know if you've noticed.
I've seen it a lot on TikTok, on Instagram, and stuff.
I'm looking at comment sections on YouTube.
There has been an uptick in support for Marco Rubio and acknowledgement of how well spoken he is, how level headed he is, how intelligent he is.
There's been like this uptick in glaze.
I don't know what's been going on, but it seems like right now, we're not even in the end of 26 or 27 yet.
No one started their presidential election race, no one's announced that they're running.
It seems like he might be the front runner out of the GOP.
I don't know.
I don't know if there's really much chance for Vance.
Big prediction, but it seems like this guy is really going to be past the torch out of the GOP because.
A lot of people have been glazing him recently.
Yeah, I mean, he's always been a.
And the reason why is because when you look at him and Trump speak, it's night and day.
Marco Rubio is able to articulate in a much better fashion.
He's able to take the president's policies and put it in a far more palatable and understandable fashion that isn't as crude and, I guess, lacking of detail.
So, you know, but Marco Rubio is a very powerful politician.
People forget that he's been around for a very long time.
He's been doing this for a long time.
That's what he has over Vance.
You know, Vance has got no experience.
I think Vance only had two years in the Senate before he got promoted to vice president, which a lot of people argue was.
Conspiratorial, he got planted there, but because of his connections to big tech and whatever.
However, Marco, he's got skin in the game and he's ran for president before.
So, you know, it's very interesting to see him in this position now.
It's weird.
Like, I've seen a shift with him.
Like, he has been a lot more refined, a lot more well spoken.
We'll see in this interview, but if you watched his White House briefing too, when he filled in for Carolyn Levitt, again, he was very charismatic.
And I'm seeing it.
Like, Stephen A. Smith is like, I got Marco Rubio.
I want him to win.
Like, all these guys now are chiming in.
So it's interesting.
And then you had that development like two months ago, Trump was saying the donor class is going to get behind Rubio, you know, so.
Who knows what happens?
Yeah, no, I mean, like, again, it's just because he's so polar opposite to Trump.
Trump's inability to really articulate himself in an intelligent manner.
So, whenever he speaks, you're able to get quite a bit more clarity to what the president's trying to do when you listen to Marco Rubio.
And this is kind of what I did when I was watching the campaign, when Trump was campaigning, I'd actually purposely watch a Trump interview.
Then I'd go watch a JD Vance interview, and a JD Vance would be a lot better at kind of, you know, elucidating what Trump is trying to say with, you know, with what he was saying.
Like, he would say, I'm going to end the war in 24 hours.
Okay, what the fuck does that mean though?
What does that actually look like?
And then I would watch JD Vance interview and he would be like, okay, we'll put a demarcation lines, all this other bullshit.
We would create military no go zones.
We would do this.
We would promise Ukraine can't join for 20 years, some shit like that.
So he would actually go deeper into the stuff.
But yeah, Marco Rubio is a superior politician.
So JD Vance has been in the game for a long time, way more experienced, obviously able to articulate things in a lot better fashion.
But regardless, there's no way we're voting for him.
Like, fuck that.
No, he's still a shill, right?
He's a big Zio shill.
That's why I call him Mark Zio.
He's got Zio money all in his pockets, no doubt.
Miriam Adelson, everybody's all over him.
Yeah, he's an Adelson, like, huge puppet.
But no, there is no denying that he's a good politician.
He knows how to speak.
And he's able to be a very good mouthpiece for the administration.
If I'm not mistaken, is he still the national security advisor, too?
He's secretary of state and the national security advisor?
Because when they fired Mike Waltz, I don't think they ever filled Mike Waltz's job, bro.
Like, Let me double check, man.
I think he's still acting national security advisor, too.
Yeah, he is.
Yeah, like they never got replaced him with never replaced.
Yeah, yeah, because Mike Waltz got fired for the he was doing Netanyahu trying to, you know, egg on a war earlier.
Um, right, and the whole signal gate situation with Pete Hegseth.
Uh, but yeah, like Rubio's been doing two jobs, I guess, because he hasn't really been a secretary of state as much as he should be.
Like, why he should be the one talking to the Iranians, not the fucking.
And dumbass Jared Kushner.
Like, what's going on here?
Like, yeah, and that would be a lot more fruitful.
But you know, like even with the envoy in the Middle East and JD Vance try to go and it proved useless, you know, at the end of the day, the demands that we're making is what is halting the ultimate peace deal.
Kushner Political Tension00:01:31
It's not even who's going.
Although Jared Kushner, Stephen Witkopf are definitely not the brightest people.
But, you know, it doesn't matter if you send the smartest guy, you could send anybody there.
You can send the smartest guy on the planet who has the best mouthpiece, the best orator.
You give him the set of plans that Trump is asking for, he's going to fail.
So it doesn't matter who comes out of the GOP.
You've got to change the policies.
You know, you've got to change everything that this administration has done, you've got to untie it.
Make it undone before anybody with a brain takes you serious.
But yeah, no, I've noticed there's been an uptick of support for this guy.
I think he's going to be a problem in 28 for sure.
And the Midnight Snack, 12 a.m., says, thoughts on how the World Cup is going to.
All right, super chat's cut off.
Give me one second.
Thoughts on how the World Cup is going to go with current events going on in the world?
Remember, Iran is in the tournament.
Yeah, I know Trump allowed them in a tournament.
He announced that like a week or so, like two or three weeks ago.
But maybe it'll be political.
I don't know.
It's a good question.
Thanks for the super chat.
It's definitely going to be.
A little bit more politically tense than other ones, that's for sure.
You know, with all the economic disaster Europe and Asia are facing right now.
So, yeah.
And that's where you have alliance.
Okay.
So, let's, I'm going to end my YouTube stream here, guys.
Come on over to Kick or go to my brother's stream, Riaz Report, is tagged in the thing.
Either or come to my Kick or go to my brother's YouTube channel, Riaz Report, and continue watching the stream.
But I'm going to end my YouTube stream here, guys.
I turned it on for a little bit, but I'm getting off the JTube right now.
So, come on over.
I'm going to end Party and X as well.
So, come on over and just, I'm ending Party, Twitter, and YouTube.