State Of The Union Address , Candace Owens Trailer Sparks Outrage, Tucker Pleads To Stop War!
Eric Slover’s Medal of Honor-winning helicopter landing saved a mission against Maduro’s fortress, while Royce Williams, 100, earned his for surviving 263 bullets in 1952. Trump’s State of the Union warned Iran against nuclear weapons but critics argue his shifting rhetoric—from "no enriched uranium" to "nuclear bomb"—undermines credibility, especially as Iran’s ballistic missile threat grows with Chinese/Russian tech support. A potential U.S.-led war risks economic chaos, like $100–$200 oil spikes, and could drag into a prolonged conflict, mirroring Vietnam or Afghanistan, while destabilizing the Middle East further. [Automatically generated summary]
Many cover of night and descended swiftly upon Madura's heavily protected military fortress.
This was a major military installation protected by thousands of soldiers and guarded by Russian and Chinese military technology.
How did that work out?
Not too good.
While preparing to land, enemy machine guns fired from every angle, and Eric was hit very badly in the leg and hip, one bullet after another.
He absorbed four agonizing shots, shredding his leg into numerous pieces.
And yet, despite the fact that the use of his legs was vital to successful helicopter flight, Legs are the most important part of flying a helicopter to deliver the many commandos who would capture and detain Maduro was the only thing Eric was thinking about.
Then, even as he was gushing blood, which was flowing back down the aisle, helicopter lands at a steep angle, the machine gun stood right in front of him, right in front of him, two machine gunners who escaped the wrath of the previous planes.
Eric maneuvered his helicopter with all of those lives and souls to face the enemy and let his gunners eliminate the threat, turned the helicopter around so the gunners could take care of business, saving the lives of his fellow warriors from what could have been a catastrophic crash deep in enemy territory.
Only after safely landing the helicopter with all the warriors aboard in the exact right spot, which was vital to the mission, we probably would have had to maybe cancel the mission if that didn't happen.
Eric told his co-pilot, also wounded, but not as gravely, to take over.
Eric's Heroic Sacrifice00:04:17
I'm about ready to pass out.
The success of the entire mission and the lives of his fellow warriors hinge on Eric's ability to take the searing pain.
It was unbelievable what's happened to his legs of the bullets and keep on flying and landing.
People knew what was happening.
Everybody in the back of the helicopter knew because they saw the blood pouring down the aisle.
Chief Warrant Officer Slover is still recovering from his serious wounds, but I'm thrilled to say that he is here tonight with his wife Amy, Eric, and Amy.
Come on in.
So we have a surprise, Farrakh and Amy.
In recognition of Eric's actions above and beyond the call of duty, I would now like to ask General Jonathan Braga to present Chief Warrant Officer Slover with our nation's highest military award, the Congressional Medal of Honor.
It's a big deal, man.
Mr. Klabcheek says, give us a real speech, Miranda.
Myron, this ain't it.
Well, let's hear what Trump has to say first, bro, and then we can cover it after.
Well, thank you very much, Eric and Amy.
Great to get to know you.
I met with them and with a lot of their fellow warriors at Fort Bragg recently.
You notice the name Fort Bragg?
We have it back.
We brought it back.
We won the First World War with it, the Second World War with it.
And then they decided to change the name.
So we changed it back.
Everybody wanted to change back, too.
And ten of Eric's fellow warriors from that incredible night of victory will also be receiving medals at a private ceremony that will soon be held at the White House.
And Eric will be there.
Thank you.
Marion Unfilter, thank you for the gifted sub-bro.
Every time you guys sub on the show, by the way, Nat Mordecai comes up.
Thank you, Eric.
Last Living Legend00:04:03
That's a big one.
Tonight we've celebrated many truly extraordinary American patriots, but there is one last living legend to honor before we go.
He is one more heroic American aviator, Navy fighter pilot.
Royce Williams served in World War II, Korea, Vietnam, flying more than 220 missions.
In disguise over Korea in 1952, Royce was in the dogfight of a lifetime, legendary dogfight, flying through blizzard conditions.
His squadron was ambushed by seven Soviet fighter planes.
It was his first aerial combat of the war, and despite being massively outnumbered and outgunned, Royce led the takedown of four enemy jets and almost destroyed the others, vanquishing his adversaries while taking 263 bullets to his own plane and being seriously hurt.
His story was secret for over 50 years.
He didn't even want to tell his wife, but the legend grew and grew.
But tonight, at 100 years old, this brave Navy captain is finally getting the recognition he deserves.
He was a legend long before this evening.
Royce, please stand up, and I will ask the First Lady of the United States to present Captain Royce Williams with his Congressional Medal of Honor.
All the guys from the USS Liberty should also get a medal like that.
All the guys that survived when our greatest ally bombed us.
100 years old is crazy, by the way.
Bro still remembers what it was like when women actually made sandwiches and weren't whores.
Holy bombard!
Imagine going up in a time when women were actually in the kitchen to now where women are getting fucked on in the kitchen on TV.
Crazy.
Red Pill Clippers, will they give this up?
Thank you.
Thank you so much.
Yo, bro is a ride when it was okay to say blacks are retarded, man.
Yo.
Yo.
This guy, bro, has been around forever.
You know?
Just imagine.
Bro was born in 1926.
1926, chat.
Bro was already 20 years old when World War II was done.
Bro saw Kennedy get assassinated.
He saw the U.S.S. Liberty get bombed.
He's older than the state of Israel.
Absolutely nuts.
Women weren't as big a whores back then.
Bro is probably shocked every time he turns on the TV.
Taking it, but if they ever open up that law, I will be there with you someday.
But you know, that's our highest honor, Congressional Medal of Honor.
And guys, don't forget, like, Trump is like 80-something.
Trump's also very old.
Longest Speech Ever00:04:55
That's a big thing.
He masks it with the tanning and shit like that, but he's also super old.
It's an honor to be in the same room with you.
Thank you both very much, Eric.
Thank you. Thank you.
250 years is a long time in the life of a nation, but in another sense, it's really a mere moment in the eye of history.
Two of the gentlemen we met in the gallery this evening took their first breaths one century ago, 100 years before that on July 4th, 1826, the author of the Declaration of Independence.
Brilliant.
Thomas Jefferson drew his last breath.
Just a single long human lifespan separates the giants who declared and won our independence from the heroes who stand among us tonight.
Everything our nation has done, everything we have achieved, has been the work of those few great lifetimes.
In those brief chapters, Americans built this nation from 13 humble colonies into the pinnacle of human civilization and human freedom.
The strongest, wealthiest, most powerful, most successful nation in all of history.
Americans ventured out across the daunting and dangerous continent.
We carved paths through an unforgiving wilderness, settled a boundless frontier, and tamed the beautiful but very, very dangerous Wild West.
From empty marshes and wide open plains, we raised up the world's greatest cities.
Together, we mastered the world's mightiest industries and shattered history's monstrous tyrannies.
And we liberated millions from the chains of fascism, communism, oppression, and terror.
Americans lifted humanity into the skies on the wings of aluminum and steel.
And then we launched mankind into the stars on rockets powered by sheer American will and unyielding American pride.
We wired the globe with our ingenuity.
We captivated the planet with American culture.
And now we are pioneering the next great American breakthroughs that will change the entire world.
All of this and so much more is the enduring legacy, unmatched glory of the hardworking patriots who built and defended this country and who still carry the hopes and freedoms on all of humanity's backs.
For years they were forgotten, betrayed, and cast aside, but that great betrayal is over and they will never be forgotten again.
Because when the world needs courage, daring, vision, and inspiration, it is still turning to America.
And when God needs a nation to work his miracles, he knows exactly who to ask.
There is no challenge Americans cannot overcome, no frontier too vast for us to conquer, no dream too bold for us to chase, no horizon too distant for us to claim.
You, Josh, thank you.
For our destiny is written by the hand of Providence, and these first 250 years were just the beginning.
From the rugged border towns of Texas to the heartland villages of Michigan, from the sun-kissed shores of Florida to the endless fields of the Dakotas, and from the historic streets of Philadelphia to right here in our nation's capital, Washington, D.C., the golden age of America is upon us.
The revolution that began in 1776 has not ended.
It still continues because the flame of liberty and independence still burns in the heart of every American patriot.
And our future will be bigger, better, brighter, bolder, and more glorious than ever before.
Longest State Union Speech00:14:39
So apparently he had the longest speech for the State of the Union address.
he beat bill clinton so let's see um We caught the tail end of it because Trump be happy sometimes.
I ain't gonna lie to y'all.
But let's see here what's going on on Twitter.
Give me one sec, Chet.
We can go ahead and jump into a Twitter space real quick.
You guys want me to jump on a Twitter space?
We'll see what they're talking about.
Let's go.
Venezuela, more than 80 million barrels of oil.
That's not counting the oil that went to Israel.
He said, This is the best one for me, Hannah.
He goes, People are asking me, please, please, Mr. President, we are winning too much.
We can't take it anymore.
We're not used to so much winning.
And I say, no, no, no.
You're going to win again.
You're going to win big.
I was just waiting him to say it bigly.
Al Green was escorted out of the house because he had a poster out saying black people aren't apes.
He said he officially announced the war on fraud to be led by JD Vance.
He also said these people are crazy.
He basically attacked them.
So Democratic restaurants.
He said he stopped so many wars.
So many wars, seven or eight wars.
He stopped many, many wars, including the war between Pakistan and India.
And he said the prime minister of Pakistan would have died if not for his involvement.
I don't know if he actually meant that or he meant that Pakistani president said millions would have died, but whatever it is, this is what he said.
The second thing was his warmongering and galvanizing the people.
Yeah, guys, I'm fixing my mic right now because I already know my mic is going to get powered down as soon as I come into X.
So it's already starting to get powered down.
So you guys should still be able to hear me nice and loud.
But be prepared that you might see the mic go up and down because Twitter's fucking garbage and it does some weird shit.
I've already went into the settings and changed it, but it's still fucking fucks around.
I keep saying this is crazy.
And then there'd be one that's even more crazy.
He said, Iran's already developed missiles that can hit Europe and now they're building weapons and missiles that can hit the United States of America.
He said they want to make a deal, but we've not heard those words.
We will never have a nuclear weapon.
I think I've heard those words.
Yeah, now you guys should be able to hear me fine.
He also said that I'd like to solve this problem through diplomacy.
But one thing is certain.
I will never allow the world's number one sponsor of terror to have a nuclear weapon.
So that's what he said about Iran.
He also continued and said, Space Force is my baby.
So he's talking about Space Force.
And yeah, that's kind of just the crux of it.
Obviously, I'll probably miss something out.
And yeah, listen to Haz on the super chat who says, press the like button and subscribe.
Indeed, do that and do listen to that person.
I don't even think you pinned this anyway.
Okay, appreciate it.
Okay, just want to hear what the people are going to say.
I want to welcome Marin onto the stage as well.
Myron, thanks for joining us.
Hope you're doing well.
We've got Simon back on the stage as well.
Lots to talk about.
Lots of drama.
Let's get Marion first because I know he's going to be jumping on his own stream in a bit.
Or might be already on it, actually.
But Myron, what's your thoughts on it?
I came in at the tail end of it.
So I didn't watch all of it.
But I mean, you know, I find it interesting that he kind of left off with giving, you know, military honors.
You know, Trump has always been pretty, you know, pro-law enforcement slash military, whatever.
But so he didn't say much about Iran then, because I was listening to you summarize earlier, basically saying, I'm never going to let them have a nuclear bomb, et cetera.
That's what he did.
That's what he said.
Yeah, yeah.
He said they're not saying those special words.
We will never have a nukes, which I think is just.
I can't believe he's still using the nuke angle.
Like, we all know why they're really attacking.
Like, it's the ballistic missile program.
It's not the nukes.
Like, they use the nukes as like a convenient example, but it's absolutely ludicrous that they're still talking about, oh, yeah, Iran can't have a nuclear weapon, especially Israel saying that when Israel has an unacknowledged nuclear program that's completely illegal, that isn't a, they're not a member of the NPT.
They don't have IEA, IAEA inspections.
It's like the pot calling the kettle black.
Like, it's absolutely ridiculous that they're complaining about Iran's nuclear program.
And I would take it a step further.
I actually think Iran is far more measured than Israel is.
I think they're less crazy.
You know, people always say, oh, these radical clerics out of Iran, these guys, they can't have a nuclear bomb.
They're going to go nuts.
It's like, well, yeah, I think that they've been far more rational and measured in all of their responses and retaliation to Israeli and U.S. provocation, right?
Make no mistake about it.
Like, people forget that they bombed an embassy.
They assassinated the top general.
They've been destroying depots all over Iran.
Secretly, they literally ran a Pearl Harbor type-like event, and they still didn't destroy Tel Aviv.
So I think the Iranians are way more measured than the Israelis and would probably act better with a nuclear bomb than the Israelis.
But we know how our government runs.
So that's never going to happen.
But yeah, I do think that a conflict is going to happen at any time at this point.
They've just mobilized way too many resources.
I know the last I checked the news, and I apologize if I'm a bit behind because I just woke up.
So you can update me if needed.
The last I checked was, I think the Ford was in Greece, right around Greece, around yesterday.
So it's probably right around in target location by now.
But a fun fact that people don't know about the Ford is it has like some serious plumbing issues.
They should have docked that carrier a while ago, but instead of going back to the U.S. for maintenance, they just sailed right over to the Middle East.
And the personnel on that ship are, you know, they should have been home by now.
So they're doing an extended tour.
And the ship is having issues with plumbing, right?
I know some people might be laughing in here.
It's their toilets.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, it's their toilets.
So like, it's like a 45 minute to one hour wait.
And, you know, the last thing you want is angry and pissed off servicemen in the middle of a conflict.
So especially when they had anticipated that they were going to be home with their families by now.
So and then we have all the other things.
You know, there's so many other anomalies going on that like the mainstream media isn't reporting on.
Like, for example, like that the Russians and Chinese are there, that the Chinese and the Russians are giving Iran an enormous amount of intelligence.
The fact that Iran upgraded all their air defense with sophisticated Chinese radars that are specifically designed to detect American stealth aircraft.
They also got a missile, a ground-to-air missile system with the Chinese as well that works together alongside their stuff that they already have with Russia and their indigenous stuff.
They literally are making like 300 missiles a month.
Like, you know, the mainstream media isn't reporting why Trump is dragging his feet.
The reason why Trump is dragging his feet is because Iran is not Venezuela and they're not Iraq.
They are a very formidable enemy and they can create some serious pain.
Does that mean that the U.S. is going to lose?
Of course not.
The U.S. is going to win.
But now they have to recalculate everything that they do because a first strike can have some very serious consequences.
And, you know, and Iran has been putting out a bunch of propaganda as well and saying we could do this and we could do that.
We'll sink your air carrier, blah, blah, blah, aircraft carrier.
But I think right now, politically for Trump, he's moving very delicately because it's obviously a midterm season.
He's not very well liked based on what's going on domestically with the ICE raids and everything else like that.
And, you know, getting into a war when he campaigned on no new wars, a full-on protracted war, would be very bad.
So I think he's still kind of riding the high of the Venezuelan operation, thinking that he could get this done quickly and it won't be a big deal.
But even his military advisors are telling him, like, yeah, dude, if you strike them, this is going to be a protracted war.
It's going to create serious problems.
And, you know, we're be prepared to be in a full-on regional conflict.
So, and there's more stuff than that, but I don't want to yet forever.
But yeah.
Yeah, yeah.
And obviously, I'm going to like interview you later about specifically about the Iran issue.
But overall, what's your thoughts on Trump?
It's been like a year since he's been in charge in power.
How do you think he's done?
Because you kind of are more towards like Trump right.
So what's your, what's what kind of like on a, I know you're, you praise him when you disagree, uh, when you agree, and you kind of attack him when you disagree.
So give us like your perspective on some of the like, I don't know, two or three things he's done well and two or three things he's done badly.
Sure.
Um, so the other thing, so I got some idiots in my chat saying, uh, the Chinese radars, Venezuela had them and didn't do shit.
Okay, so equipment is only as good as the personnel that operate it.
So for the smooth brain retards that are saying that, like, oh, well, Venezuela had Chinese radars too.
Uh, yeah, they're retards and they don't know how to actually work some of that sophisticated technology.
They got it last minute, they were lazy, they weren't prepared.
It's not the same as the Iranians and the IRGC who are battle-tested.
Okay.
So the equipment is only as good as the operators.
That's first.
But to answer your question with my thoughts, so obviously he does a lot of shit that I dislike, right?
You know, I like the fact that he at least reopened conversations with Putin and Russia to try to bring some type of deal together with the Russia-Ukraine war.
You know, he's obviously failed.
He still hasn't gotten anything done.
But if Kamala Harris got in, she wouldn't even have bothered to have the conversation.
The Biden administration pretty much didn't talk to Putin at all during the entire conflict.
And I still blame the Biden administration for why that conflict kicked off in the first place.
Immigration, controversial take.
I think he's doing good with that.
Now, I know I'm going to have a bunch of progressives that are losing their minds and crying shit like that.
Like, oh, what do you mean he's doing well with immigration?
Well, for you to understand why I think that, you need to understand that before Trump came into office, no president was actually enforcing immigration at a domestic level, right?
All the brain dead idiots always say, oh, well, Obama had more deportations.
Yeah, every Democrat for the most part is going to have a lot of deportations because when Democrats are in office, illegal aliens feel more emboldened to cross the border.
Thus, when they cross the border, they get caught.
When they get caught, they get deported.
That counts as a deportation stat.
So essentially, those numbers that people are flexing under like the Obama era or other Democrat eras are simply people that are caught at the border and turned back, not the people that are domestically arrested and deported back.
So with Trump, right, you have to look at compare apples to apples.
So first he shut down the border.
Good.
Then he put ICE agents and border patrol agents into these interior cities that were historically very difficult to deal with when it comes to immigration enforcement and started doing what's called interior immigration enforcement.
No president wants to do this because it's almost like political suicide and it's a catch-22.
If you do your job, people are going to like you.
If you don't do your job, people are going to complain.
So this is a can that's been getting kicked down the road by multiple presidential administrations.
And Trump is the first president to actually finally go hard in interior immigration, which has been a problem that's been going on for a very long time.
So I'll give him credit for that.
Despite the fact that people are probably going to complain about Alex Predi and Renee Good and all this other shit, it's like, dude, immigration surge like this is unprecedented.
And obviously there's going to be use of force scenarios that we haven't seen before.
And the other thing I want to add before I stop this, finish this immigration part, is I think it's important for people to remember that since immigration has never been enforced to that level, for a lot of people, it's like a shock.
You know, it creates shock for them because they're like, wait, hold on.
These people that are here without paperwork are actually illegal?
Yeah, dude, they're illegal.
They shouldn't be here and they should have been deported a long time ago.
But since we haven't enforced immigration for so long, people are looking at it like it's some radical, you know, Gestapo fascist state.
But it's like, no, dude, these are immigration laws.
It's just that we've been pussies and not been enforcing it.
That's why you're so shocked by it.
But it should have been like this from the beginning.
So I give him credit for ripping the bandaid off.
Now, the bad, I don't like anything that he's doing in the Middle East at all.
I don't like that he has someone like Jared Krishner and Steve Wickoff, who are both, you know, super Zionists that have personal business interests in the Middle East, for that matter, running the diplomacy.
I think that's fucking ludicrous and wild.
There's absolutely no Arab representation whatsoever in the diplomacy process.
And it shows, right?
We're talking about these guys are negotiating for Gaza, for example.
They don't give a shit about the people there.
They just want to go ahead and build casinos and compete with the UAE.
Because something else that's important to note here is that the Middle East, a lot of these Middle Eastern countries are realizing that they can't rely on oil.
So the new trend right now is to kind of build on Dubai's success with bringing in expatriates and having a thriving economy despite the fact that they have mass immigration because Dubai is probably the only city I've seen or sorry, the only country, the UAE, where I've seen mass immigration actually work.
But that's a whole other conversation.
Other countries in the Middle East want to emulate that model and bring tourism to create more revenue.
So Saudi Arabia has started modernizing and westernizing.
They've allowed alcohol in.
They've opened up clubs, et cetera.
I think that the Americans and the Israelis want to replicate that in Gaza because that's prime real estate there.
So, and we've already seen the plans, right?
They've already literally said, yeah, we're going to turn it into an international city.
If you guys remember back in March when Trump met with, I think it was Netanyahu, when he came over, you know, Trump kind of gave the slip and said, yeah, we're going to take Gaza and we're going to cherish it.
Censorship and Coverage00:15:22
And it was like, what the fuck?
What do you mean you're going to take Gaza?
And he hasn't mentioned it since because he got so much backlash.
But that's what they plan to do, man.
So I don't like the foreign policy with the Middle East whatsoever.
It's too pro-Israel.
We got fucking dumbass Mike Huckabee over here talking about, oh, yeah, you know, I think the Israelis should, you know, have it river to river.
You know, obviously that outraged the whole Middle East.
14 different countries came out and condemned them for that.
But the reason why they condemned him is because it's happening.
It's true.
Like we've seen that the United States cannot stop Israel whatsoever with what they want.
So it really hit home for them and reminded them that, look, you guys only exist because the Israelis in the United States are letting you.
So this is why Saudi Arabia and other countries were outraged when they bombed Qatar, which was a huge fucking problem.
All the Gulf states got together and condemned it.
Saudi Arabia went ahead and entered into a pact with Pakistan for access to nuclear weapons.
So Mike Huckabee simply just said the quiet part out loud that he wasn't supposed to and confirmed what we already know.
And that is that the Israelis are quickly working towards some type of greater Israel project.
So yeah, that's my whole take on the foreign policy, why I don't like it.
Tariffs were a monumental failure.
We know that the Supreme Court basically said it was bullshit because Trump invoked some emergency powers that apparently tariffs don't qualify for.
And I'm trying to think what else.
I'm just going off the big things off the top of my head, immigration, foreign policy, tariffs.
Free speech.
Free speech is better.
I will say that he absolutely, him coming into office absolutely helped censorship recede a bit.
Now, some people might not agree with that, but take a look at censorship during the Biden administration versus now.
It's significantly better, right?
We got people on fucking YouTube talking about dancing Israelis.
Dude, like that was a no-go like three years ago.
That was like one of the fastest ways to get your channel banned.
So now the Israelis are kind of ramping up the censorship now.
But I would say that we had a decent run of one to, you know, one year or so where, you know, the censorship had really been significantly receded from what it was before.
So that's a positive thing.
Amar, do you not think that happened towards the end of the Biden administration when Elon took over X?
Because for example, if you look at all the banned people like Nick and various others, they all came back during the Biden administration, right?
No, they came.
Yeah, they did come back towards the tail end, but they were able to exist and go viral on other platforms as well.
Because once Trump came into office, YouTube started relaxing their guidelines significantly.
And so did so did other platforms.
Like Twitch is still the only one that's like very pussy, but fuck Twitch.
But YouTube was a big one that pushed back their censorship, especially when it came to COVID and other topics that used to get you banned.
Elections being rigged, COVID, conflicts.
You were able to openly start talking about it.
There was a period of time, guys.
I don't know if you guys remember this.
If you talked about the Russia-Ukraine war and you said anything about the Ukrainians losing, there was a good chance you could lose your channel.
That's why Jackson Inkel got banned for a few years.
You know, people forget that you couldn't even talk about geopolitical affairs about Russia-Ukraine, let alone Zionism.
Yeah, I think you're 100% right.
Remember, you got demonetized as well.
Yeah.
Even these spaces, now we stream them on YouTube.
I do videos and interviews on YouTube.
And like, I'm very confident that you couldn't do that like more than a year and a year and a half ago or something.
No, you couldn't, bro.
I had to use code words to talk about Zionism or Jewish power, any of that stuff.
At least now we can talk about it.
But does that mean that it's perfect?
No, but it's better than it was.
So overall, when Trump does things I agree with or I think it is good, I'll give him credit, but I'm also very critical of him.
And I would say his biggest blunder is letting the Zionist lobby dictate his foreign policy like many other presidents.
But I kind of knew it was going to, you know, I knew at some point that this was probably going to happen because he took so much money from Mary Midelson.
And when he was running for president, people forget, dude, like he was kind of desperate.
He had no money.
He needed money to run, right?
He was being sued by so many different people civilly.
He had four criminal cases against him open.
One out of the District of Columbia for the insurrection.
One out of South Florida for the document case federally.
So he had two federal cases.
Then he had two state cases.
He had the falsifying documents in New York City or sorry, out of New York for the real estation, the Stormy Daniels bullshit.
And then he also had a state RICO case that was run by Fannie Willis in Georgia.
So, you know, if he didn't become president, dude, he would have went, he'd be in prison right now, 100%.
Yeah, I don't disagree with that.
I think that's what they've got over him.
That's what, yeah.
Yeah, I appreciate you coming up, Martin.
If anyone's got any questions for Marin, do jump in.
Any like final thoughts or things you want to know, we could turn it to anybody.
I'll hang out here for a little bit if people got questions for me or want to engage with anything that I said.
But that's my overall, you know, shotgun commentary on what you asked.
Yeah, no, we appreciate it for sure.
Joe?
No, I don't know.
And yeah, Marin, do appreciate it, guys.
Do give Marin a follow.
Yeah, I'm live right now, too.
And I'll tell my audience, yo, guys, go check out Suleiman on Twitter.
I got your page right up here for them to check out because you do really good war coverage.
Yeah, and YouTube as well.
We've got war coverage on YouTube.
We're doing daily interviews on the war from a military perspective and like videos explaining the kind of the military aspect of it.
Nice, nice, nice.
Yeah, I could talk about that.
I've been doing a lot of research on the war, and it's crazy how much info the mainstream media is kind of keeping from the American people.
For sure.
Yeah, we're going to do an interview later, isn't it?
In probably an hour or so or whenever you want.
So I'll hit you up on that as well.
All right.
But anyone got any questions for Myron?
Do jump in.
And Joe, jump in as well.
Yeah, so I definitely have a little bit of Joe FS, bro.
I didn't have a question.
I was just going to bring up the one thing that changed in Trump's rhetoric about Iran.
He was always talking about no enriched uranium, no enriched uranium, no uranium, or no nuclear, no nuclear.
And today he said nuclear bomb.
And that kind of feels like a retraction for what he used to say, to be honest.
Because he didn't say nuclear bomb before.
He was always just talking about no uranium.
So it feels like now apparently nuclear is on the table, just not nuclear bombs.
I'll be honest, Joe, I think, because it's interesting because he said so many different things, and Witcoff has said so many different things.
Like they can't even keep up with the lies anymore.
Like, I genuinely believe that they just can't keep it straight anymore as far as what they want because they always move the goalpost.
You know, first it's, you know, no nuclear.
Then it's like, okay, you can enrich, but only civilian.
Okay, then you got to give up your 400 kilos of highly enriched uranium to Russia or another country's got to be involved as a third party.
They've been moving the goalpost so much on this topic that none of us can keep it straight.
All of us are pretty well informed from a news perspective, and even we're fucking confused.
So I can only imagine the Iranians on their side negotiating with this fucking wildness.
And the reason why they keep moving the goalpost is because it was never really about the nuclear program, right?
I think the real thing that they're scared of at this point are the ballistic missiles.
The 12-day war showed that the Iranians had the capability to absolutely destroy Israel if they wanted.
And that is why the Israelis have said, if they, because the Israelis, for those that aren't aware, I know Joe and Suleiman, you guys already know this, but the Israelis came out and said, okay, we want no ballistic missiles.
We want no more funding to the proxies, and we want no nuclear program whatsoever.
Let's go best case scenario.
Let's say the Iranians say, you know what?
We're going to abandon our nuclear program altogether.
We're going to give the 400 kilos that we had stockpiled.
We're going to give it to the Russians.
We're going to abandon it altogether.
You know what the Israelis are going to do?
They're still going to attack because the ballistic missile program is what they're really scared of.
So for us, as you know, from the American perspective, we might say, oh, no nuclear.
Oh, it's only civilian.
Oh, da, blah, blah.
It doesn't matter because the Israelis are going to attack no matter what.
Because we already know that the Iranians said no ballistic missile negotiations.
That's our red line.
And no, and we're going to continue to support all the proxies.
So if the Israelis attack, the Iranians are going to attack us too because they're going to look at it like, well, you guys get support from America.
So we need to make them hurt as well.
So Trump is in a very horrible place right now politically because even if he reaches a deal from the nuclear program, the Israelis are going to attack and he's going to be on the hook anyway.
So that's why I think Trump has taken kind of a more assertive approach where it's like, okay, let me build up the military presence.
Let me go ahead and be the first one to strike if we're going to do this, because I would rather control the flow of this war than the Israelis.
So the nuclear thing is just a ruse, dude.
It's complete fucking bullshit.
And they move the goalposts on it every single time.
Witkoff has been caught in so many different scenarios with this topic.
It's bullshit.
Yeah, I agree.
I just don't think we're going to attack Iran at all.
Oh, you don't think so?
No.
Okay.
I think it's all negotiated, enforcing sanctions.
That's why they went after the boat today.
They want to ensure that we keep trading with the dollar.
And if don't attack them, let's assume, let's assume the United States doesn't attack the Israelis are going to do it, no matter what right they probably will.
That's why I keep saying, Israel's the wild card.
And as pressure gets like ratcheted up on Netanyahu, more likely it's going to happen because he's open fronts every single time there's pressure on him and he's he's going to court right now.
Um, so you see, that could happen and yeah, U.s will protect Israel, stop and protect the oil fields in that area, but I don't think America gets involved unless they have a direct strike to take out Khomeini.
That's the only way I can see them doing anything in Iran.
Otherwise I don't think they're doing anything.
So let me give you guys.
So check this out here's.
Here's another reason why I think this didn't get reported in the mainstream media.
But a bunch of uh, military infrastructure and soldiers are leaving Syria, heading towards the Iranian border right now.
As we speak, i'll find the base.
There's a strategic base in Syria, a big one um, and all those guys have pretty much moved and they're going towards the Iranian border right now.
Sorry uh Soleman, you're trying to say something.
I'll get the name.
No no um, what I was saying was, I do think that they're gonna attack.
I've been predicting it for a while.
But if Joe is right, then that the thing that adds credit to his argument is Trump's statement.
Because Trump's statement either is as you said, which is my view, which is that it's more of a confusion, as in he's just saying random things.
But if you would think that it's not confusion and what he's stating is accurate and a point of manipulation, then Joe is right, because what he's doing essentially is conceding, without people realizing it, and reframing the conversation, because now the conversation isn't even about nuclear enrichment but about nuclear bombs.
And he's, he trod up the Jcpoa over just five percent enrichment.
So it means he's going to allow the Iranians to have enrichment and he's just going to ban the nuclear bomb, which is something that Iran already agreed to.
So it just means, if Joe is right, America just completely and Israel completely capitulated to everything.
Yeah, but um, that assumes that we're the only ones at the negotiating table unfortunately, I.
I think um, even if we said we're not going to get involved, the Israelis are going to attack anyway I.
I think the 12-day war um sealed Iran's fate, because when they saw that they can actually hit them back hard the way that they did um it.
That put the fear of god in Israel.
And then the other thing too, also that's important for people to to know, is that the Iranians manufacture almost all their weaponry themselves.
So they have a very sufficient um military industrial complex, essentially on their side, where they make a lot of their own missiles drones, etc.
Obviously they import some sophisticated technology, like what they got from the Chinese and the Russians uh, but a lot of it is is is self-made, so they're able to sustain themselves in a protracted war.
Now the other reason why the?
Uh Israelis are worried is because um, those interceptor missiles that they?
Um have, those are harder to come by, you know.
They're more expensive.
Uh, you can't make as many of them.
So in a war of attrition uh, after the 12-day war the the, the Israelis had depleted a whole bunch of their their stockpile.
So they know that as the months pass on, Iran only gets stronger and builds more missiles, Why the Israelis are not going to be able to keep up from an interceptor missile perspective.
So that's another reason why they're also rushing to get something done.
There's just so many different factors because the more time that passes, it helps Iran and the proxies.
I'm like really confused because I thought that we just dropped 12 MO, like, MOABs on all of their nuclear sites.
So how are they even still doing this?
Like, did the 12-day war just fail?
Sorry, I pay attention to Epstein and not Geopol.
But did we not just take out all their nuclear sites?
That was the claim.
That was the claim.
That's why I never agreed that that was actually something that was successful.
I think that was agreed upon.
Like I said, I remember if anyone's watching our coverage in the 12-day war, I think we were bang on on almost everything.
And we said, look, they've already removed all the centrifuges.
They've already removed all the nuclear enrichment.
They've got everything out.
And I believe that that happened because there was an agreement.
Israel begged Trump to get them out of the war because they were getting hammered really badly.
Iran wanted to get out because of the Mossad operatives they had in the ground, although Iran was winning.
And so this was an agreed upon exit where Iran bombs, sorry, America bombs, Iran then bombs Qatar.
And even though they were aware that they were going to bomb, still about six missiles still got through.
And that became the end of the conflict.
So I don't, quite clearly, they're kind of admitting that they didn't bomb them or that they were successful.
I mean, that's what it sounds like to me.
Like they were, you know, they're trying to disguise it, but they're admitting that they failed.
Yeah.
Which I think kind of makes like it kind of makes America look weak that we were celebrating this.
Oh, we didn't, it wasn't a war.
It was only 12 days.
It's not like we put boots on the ground.
Like we can do it like this.
And then it comes down to it.
And it's like, well, just a month, a couple of months later, they're already back in position and have their nuclear capabilities again and they're getting ready to produce bombs.
So yeah, go ahead, Myron.
No, no, go ahead, Myron.
So just, hold on one sec.
So I went back.
So the bases that I'm talking about in Syria are the, it's Kasser el-Gir and then another in Kuala El Tamf.
Basically two pretty strategic, strategically important locations where U.S. forces were stationed.
War Planners' Ramp-Up00:14:49
Those they're basically leaving those locations and heading towards the Iranian border.
So they are potentially moving what could be boots on the ground closer to the Iranian border.
And the mainstream media hasn't reported that really.
They kind of quietly moved those people out of the region.
I know some people might counter and say, well, Myron, they're moving them out of there because the Iranian is going to strike any of the bases in the region.
True, but two things can be true at the same time.
So I think, yes, they're moving them from harm's way because it's kind of spread out and they're sitting ducks over there.
But I also think at the same time, moving them closer towards the Iranian border with Kurdish Kurdish-backed militia groups also is a sign of a potential maybe we might get a boots on the ground situation.
Because I think Trump and his planners understand that if you actually want to effectuate this regime change, there's no way around it.
You can't just bomb them to hell and think it's going to be good.
You're going to need boots on the ground, which that's another nightmare scenario.
Now, to go back to what Noxi was saying with the 12-day war, and we, so we called this back in June.
The 12-day war, like us getting involved was a fucking, it was, it was all smoke and mirrors, right?
Trump gets on there the next day.
Oh, we destroyed them.
We sent them back several years, blah, blah, blah.
We knew back then that it was a bullshit because we knew that they had been eyeing Fordeau, because that's the main one that the Israelis couldn't get to that was in the mountain.
They had been eyeing Fordeau since fucking 2009 because right after they bombed Iran, I don't know if you guys remember this.
Trump goes on camera, says we bombed them.
We've put their nuclear program back.
Then Pete Hegseth followed up that next morning and went into detail on Operation Midnight Hammer, which is the operation that they had done.
And to me, if you watch that briefing, they basically, it was a fucking sales ad for the B-2 bomber.
Like they were bragging about how they moved it across the world.
We got there in 18 hours.
We had great pilots.
We bombed them.
They had no idea things happened.
We had a bunch of Tomahawk missiles get involved.
We didn't, you know, we were so lethal, blah, blah, blah.
They were basically sucking their own dicks for like the better part of an hour talking about the operation.
But the reason why I think they bragged so hard about the operation was to, you know, kind of get the American people to think, oh, we really pushed them back.
But the reality is the Iranians knew that they had been staking that place out since 2009.
That's another thing they admitted in that briefing was that they were looking at Fordeau since 2009.
Those 30,000-pound bombs that they dropped, they had been putting and manufacturing those since the Obama era, right?
So the Iranians knew this was coming for a very long time.
And that's why they were able to get all that highly enriched uranium out.
And another reason why I think the U.S. involvement in bombing was a colossal fucking mistake is because since they didn't take out the Iranians, they looked at it as a W because they survived being attacked by both the United States and against Israel.
So people that didn't like the Ayatollah or people that opposed the government, all of them united and rallied around the flag because as much as they might not like their government, they hate Israel and the United States even more so, right?
The United States, let's be honest, were responsible for their crippling sanctions.
So they're obviously going to have a beef with us on there.
And then they hate the Israelis because the Israelis have been, you know, doing a whole bunch of bullshit provoking a war for the better part of two years, ever since, hell, even before October 7th.
So I think, right, Trump and his crew said that they destroyed the nuclear facilities to appease the smooth-brained retards that are in America that a lot of times don't follow, don't keep up with the news.
But the reality is that they didn't really set the program back as intensely as they thought.
They maybe set it back a couple of months at best, but it wasn't years.
And even if they did destroy the centrifuges, the 60% highly enriched uranium is out of there, and they got like 400 kilos of the ship plus.
So I don't think it was a success.
I think it actually, if I'm going to go all the way honest, I think it actually backfired because it made the Iranians rally around the flag.
And then the Israelis had to reveal their Mossad operatives in countries and country.
A lot of those guys got caught, captured, and executed.
They had to, you know, they basically busted their load before they could do what they actually needed to get done.
So that's why, you know, they tried the second operation with the fucking Starlink and the protests and the agitators, and that failed too.
So that's why I think that's another reason why they're moving those soldiers out of Syria towards the Iranian border.
Hey, Myron, real quick on that.
What's your info on the Chinese connection with the ship anti-ship ballistic missiles, the supersonic missiles?
My understanding, they've been working that for a long time.
This isn't just something recent.
Do you have anything on that?
Yeah, yeah.
So, well, we know they have the radars.
They have the radars and they have the surface air missile.
They currently have Russian and Chinese people also helping them with support.
But as far as these missiles that you're talking about, I saw that that got reported yesterday.
So right after the 12-day war, Iranian officials were literally in China like next day, you know, trying to get this stuff.
And I know with the Russians, they had a contract in place to get some of their technology.
Now I think the Russians are expediting some of the stuff.
I know they gave them some helicopters and some other stuff like that.
But after the 12-day war, the Iranians have pretty much saying, hey, we need this stuff expedited because we're going to go to war again.
So, I think the deal had been in place, but now they're putting pressure on the Chinese getting this stuff expedited and getting support personnel to help them with it as well.
Okay, great.
Thank you.
Yeah, if I'm not mistaken, I think they have some crazy 20-year mutual benefit agreement.
Maybe Joey, I know you're real good with finding the actual documents and the terms and conditions, but I'm almost certain that the Chinese have some type of mutual agreement with the Chinese, not necessarily like NATO, like where you trigger military action if one is hit, but more along the lines of being a strategic partner when it comes to sharing of intelligence and technology.
Yeah, that I'm unaware of, but I can look.
Yeah, I know they have something in place.
And that was another big thing, too, because with the Iranians, their biggest weakness after the 12-day war was air defense.
So that is another reason why they made sure to get those Chinese radars and the surface air missiles, because it can't be hacked by the CIA and the Mossad.
It's all Chinese technology that they might not, that is significantly harder to crack.
And I know some people are like, oh, well, Myron, the Chinese, like, bro, all their shit sucks.
All their shit sucks.
Okay, let's assume their shit sucks.
Let's assume it's not as good as they boast.
Let's assume it really operates at maybe 70% of the 100 that they advertise it as.
That doesn't matter.
Let me explain why.
When war planners are creating a strategy on how they're going to attack, right?
Let's use the United States, for example, and the Israelis.
The United States and the Israelis, cornerstone of their offensive is air superiority, okay?
And they have to have some degree of confidence that when they send those jets in to bomb certain locations, that they're not going to be shot down, right?
So to the United States, having an F-35 or a Raptor or any of these self-aircraft shot down is like a fucking nightmare scenario.
Because if it gets shot down, you've basically given your enemies the ability to reverse engineer some of your most advanced technology, right?
Keep in mind, guys, even countries that have F-35s, they have a very watered-down version.
They don't have our version.
The only country that has a version similar to ours are the Israelis.
And then the Raptor, nobody has that.
So we really take serious pride in our stealth aircraft.
And with that said, that goes into accounting when it comes to war planning.
So when they bombed Iran the first time, there was no air defense.
They were able to just go into the country, bomb them to hell, and they couldn't do shit.
Now with these radars, even if they're not as efficient as some of you might say, that is still going to add to the risk assessment when it comes to how the war planners are going to approach this.
Now they have to be a bit more conservative of how they attack.
And in some scenarios, that might be enough.
A little bit of deterrence might be enough.
This is why the aircraft carriers have been pushed back, right?
The aircraft carriers, it's not like the United States can't fucking defend against it or like the United States can't really punish Iran for sinking the aircraft carrier.
But what it comes down to is, is it worth the risk?
And a lot of the times the war planners are going to say, no, it's not worth the risk.
So just the fact that they're able to have these tools and make war planners second guess, that is a W in itself because war planning is all based on probabilities, percentages, and especially when you're dealing with things sensitive like F-35 jets, the risk of losing that to reverse engineering is extremely important to the war planners.
So deterrence works.
So Myron, in terms of like China, they do have like a cooperation agreement, but it's not really a defense agreement.
It's just a broad like political economic agreement.
Yeah.
But that's in terms of like a fight.
That's what I was thinking.
Yeah, but in terms of actions, there's no doubt that China has massively supported Iran.
You look at basically the support of the defense missile, the support of the radar, the support of various things, including today.
Today there was, They basically said that they're going to give them the ICBMs and the anti-ship ballistic missiles.
So that's just, and the supersonic ones is the more specific one that they were going to give.
So Chinese have stepped up hard.
And the reason is, obviously, they don't want Iran to fall.
A, because of trade, but I think that's the more minor issue.
I think the bigger one, which I think a lot of people have missed, is the geopolitical one, which is if you look at Iran from a physical map perspective, you'll see that from Israel to Iran, Israel's taken all the countries.
Now, even if you believe Israel is a proxy or America's a proxy, either way, Israel or America, if they take Iran, they already control Central Asia.
They've basically got a direct route to China.
So they'll be on the border of China.
So that's the biggest threat.
So for China, just from their own perspective, they just can't lose Iran.
Yeah.
So, and I like that you brought that up.
So there's multiple reasons as well why the Chinese are super interested in this.
Because when we talk about the Chinese, the Chinese, I would argue, are some of the most pragmatic trade partners in the world, right?
We're over here starting wars.
They're over here building relationships.
So, and that's one thing I think that they do really well that we need to start emulating.
So for the Chinese, I think their interests are multiple, like you had stated.
Number one, the Strait of Hermus is there.
A significant amount of oil, the world's oil, about 20, 30% goes through that strait.
The Chinese absorb a large portion of the oil that comes through there.
So obviously they're going to have an interest there.
Second, this is an opportunity for the Chinese to test their weapons and equipment against the United States, right?
We know that the Chinese are notorious for stealing American technology to try to reverse engineer it to combat it.
So the fact that they're able to give these radars and surface air missiles to test them against American aircraft, that's a win-win for them because now they can test their technology without necessarily having to put their own soldiers or risk of getting involved in nuclear warfare, right?
So they're able to do it through proxy.
And then obviously the geographical reasons that you had mentioned as well, Solia, but yeah, oh, and then also the Iranians sell the Chinese oil at a heavily discounted price, right?
And they rely on the Iranians now even more so because they lost Venezuela.
Before Maduro was taken or kidnapped by the Trump administration, the Chinese were getting quite a bit of their oil from Venezuela at a reduced price because of the sanctions.
Now that Venezuela is gone, the Iranians are really their main source of discounted oil now.
So they have a super strong interest from many different strategic perspectives to support Iran at this point.
Yeah.
Yeah, that makes sense.
Jay, were you going to, did you want to ask Myron somehow?
Yeah, you know, I definitely agree with what Myron's saying about Trump's foreign policy.
You know, like, I think that's a pretty good analysis there.
You know, the only going to add a little bit more context to was, you know, his thoughts on the immigration issue.
And okay, cool.
Let me go to Myron, just another question I've got for you is in terms of when you've got the coming back to the war with Iran, just one last question to you is, you obviously believe that the war is going to happen.
What do you think the role of Israel and the United States of America are going to be compared to each other?
It's either going to, I think it's going to be one of two scenarios.
It's going to be the U.S. is going to look for a diplomatic off-ramp, take that off-ramp, and the Israelis are going to attack anyway.
And then we're going to have to get involved and at least from a defensive perspective, support them.
Or Trump is going to keep the ball in his court, try to do a limited strike, try to avoid a regional conflict after the fact, and go from there.
But the Iranians have already warned that if even if Trump does a limited strike, All the everything is fair game for them.
And that is what has the war planners and Trump very concerned with doing a strike.
You know, this is not going to be like the 12-day war where they just come in and bomb the nuclear facilities and they're able to walk away from it.
This time it's going to be: all right, you guys are coming at us from an existential perspective.
We are going to make it extremely painful for you to do that.
Because I think at this point, the Iranians know that this is a do or die situation.
So they can't hold back if the United States hits them this time around at least.
Oh, another thing I'll also say, because I think Knox was asking about this with the 12-day war, another fact that is very important that hasn't been reported with the mainstream media.
Another reason why the United States had to step in during the 12-day war is because the Israelis were threatening to nuke Iran.
Towards the end of the 12-day war, the Israelis were running out of interceptor missiles.
And if you don't have interceptor missiles, you're basically sitting duck and can get destroyed.
So for them, they're like, okay, well, Trump, if you don't step in and get a ceasefire here, we're going to nuke these guys.
And that's another thing that was, you know, pressing on Trump to get involved and bomb these nuclear facilities because the Israelis had essentially done a nuclear blackmail.
So that also weighed heavily into why we got involved.
And this has been confirmed from many reputable sources.
Yeah, yeah, that was said by a number of people, including John Kiriku and a few, and he's ex-CIA, I believe.
Iranian Firepower Threatens War Escalation00:16:17
So, yeah, quite a few people said that.
And when you do the numbers, when you do the math, it makes sense because, you know, like, remember, all of us were baffled.
Like, remember when Trump bombed Fordeau, we're like, what the fuck?
I was outraged.
You know, a whole bunch of people came out and said, this is bullshit.
We didn't vote for this.
Blah, blah, blah.
And in my head, I was like, why the fuck did he do that?
This is like completely against what his base wants.
But now, months later, when that detail got revealed, then it made sense why he had to get involved.
Yeah, yeah, 100%.
He had to get involved for that reason.
As you quite accrually stated, they were running out of defense missiles.
They'd run out of thoughts, the David Sling arrows.
None of them were working or they were working not to the manner that they need.
Since then, they've replenished, but they've not replenished enough, in my view, to get to the situation that they are.
And that's why the Gerald Ford, if you look at it, it's gone.
So, then, this is a question I want to ask you.
Actually, I was going to ask you in the interview, but I'll ask you here, then I'll ask you there as well.
If you look at the Gerald Ford, which is the second carrier, it's now moved and it's gone exactly where I said where I predicted that it was not going to go to Iran.
It was not going to go to the Persian Gulf.
It was going to go to Israel to defend Israel.
And that's exactly where it's gone.
So, I guess my question to you is: Yeah, good point.
My question to you is: why is it that the Americans are accepting the fact that one of their two carriers has instead gone to Israel to defend Israel against bombs from Iran or Lebanon?
And because I've got sources that say that Hezbollah is also going to attack, why has it gone there as opposed to defend and have two modes of attack in Iran and therefore defend the American American carrier and the other American military artillery?
That's a fantastic question.
And my wheels were turning as you were asking a question because that's a good observation.
This is why I think they're doing that.
From a military strategic perspective, the Iranians can't really hurt the United States, right?
So, since, I mean, like domestically, I mean, of course, they can hurt the United States, but I would argue that attacking Israel, right, might be the smarter strategy to get the United States to kind of back off, right?
Because we know that it's inevitable that if they launch an attack, even if the U.S. does it, the Iranians are going to go ahead and make sure that they shoot a whole bunch of missiles into Israel.
And for those that don't know, the reason why Israel isn't able to shoot down all these different missiles is because the Iranians are smart.
They shoot hundreds of missiles at the same time.
And they shoot the bullshit first.
Once that gets intercepted, then they start shooting the more dangerous stuff to get around the air defense.
And the Israelis know this, and that's why they're so worried about their ballistic missile program.
And that's why the Ford is stationed there to help them.
Also, another X factor that you mentioned was Hezbollah.
Hezbollah, we know, is going to shoot rockets from the north.
The Houthis are going to shoot rockets from the south.
And then you got the Iranians raining missiles down from them from the east.
It's going to be very difficult.
That's why, I don't know if you saw this, Suleiman, but Netanyahu gave an address and said, if the Iranians attack us, or excuse me, if Hezbollah attacks us or the Iranians, we are going to destroy them.
And then I think some news came out today where the Israeli government told the Lebanese government that if Hezbollah shoots rockets into Israel, Israel is going to respond by attacking civilian structure.
Now, this puts the Lebanese government in a very difficult place because technically, Hezbollah doesn't answer to the Lebanese government.
So in other words, the Lebanese government is going to be holding the fucking bag or they're going to get stuck with the bag of having to deal with the consequences of Hezbollah shooting these rockets in.
And for months, the Lebanese government has been trying to disarm Hezbollah, which Hezbollah says, fuck no, we're not disarming.
So I think from the Israeli perspective, they know that once this war starts, rockets are going to come from the north.
And they're trying to tell the formal Lebanese government that even though Hezbollah isn't under your authority, wink wink, we're still going to bomb you as if they are to try to deter them.
But yeah, dude, it's going to be very interesting.
And then the other thing I'll say when it comes to interceptor missiles, I know Pete Hegseth had put in like an order with Lockheed or one of these other guys where they were only making somewhere between 20 to 100 of these things a year.
Hegseth put an emergency order that they need 400 for the year.
But even if they were able to get the 400 for the year, the Iranians are making 300 a month because they make all their own drones and their ballistic missiles.
So even with that expedited and increased production level, they still won't be able to combat the stockpile that the Iranians possess.
Yeah, and that was one of the points that Kane, General Kane, made that came out that was leaked.
We do not have the assets.
In other words, the inventory.
And then Trump squashed it.
I'm glad you mentioned Kane.
We have a munitions shortage, too.
I forgot to mention that.
Yeah, so another thing also that's really factoring into Trump's decision making and the mainstream media isn't reporting is we have an entire munitions low supply because of our ongoing support for the Ukrainians and their Russia conflict.
And just on that, Myron, I guess the other element of it is from the American side, like this, the important part of it is this, that it just shows once again that the Americans are putting Israel before America because this carrier is being sent to defend Israel as opposed to American assets.
What's your thoughts on that?
Yeah, I think they're doing that because Israel is a pressure point that can end the war.
If the Iranians hit them hard enough, I think that's a weak point for the United States.
It's for me to put it more, let me put it more accurately.
The Iranians can get away with hitting Israel extremely hard in a way that they would not be able to do that to the United States without like a severe consequence.
Does that make sense?
So like if they, in other words, so let's say I'm the Ayatollah, right?
I'm the guy fucking planning the retaliation.
If you hit Israel hard, right, versus hitting the United States hard, if you sink an aircraft carrier, you're probably going to get nuked.
To be honest, they're probably going to get nuked.
But if they destroy some strategic locations in Tel Aviv or in Haifa right, they'll be able to do that uh, they'll be able to take that aggressive stance with Israel and get a little bit further without an enormously uh you know painful retaliation from the United States, if that makes sense.
Yeah yeah, I mean like they can get away with more putting pressure on Israel than on the United States themselves, because also, keep in mind that, since the Israelis are a uh I guess they call it an ambiguous uh, nuclear state, there's also another consequence, if the Israelis use a nuclear weapon right overtly, that is going to put them in a bad spot, because now the entire Middle East is going to say yep, now it's confirmed, they have them, we want nuclear weapons too.
Saudi Arabia, all the Gulf States, yep, we want, we want nuclear weapons too.
These guys went ahead and nuked Iran uh, for retallying against them with a strike.
So I think the Iranians will be able to get away with more being uh, more aggressive on the Israelis than on the United States.
But all speculation, of course, I agree with you.
I don't know.
I agree with you in terms of Iran is gonna smash Israel up right, if you look at the artillery fire, if you look at the hypersonic missiles, you look at what they've got now in terms of the support of the Chinese, they're gonna be hitting hard.
But i'm saying what this?
I guess what i'm trying to say is that what this demonstrates once again is the U.s choosing Israel over the U.s.
Because, in reality, the U.s is going to be defending Israel.
Now you're saying, agreed yes yeah sorry no no no, you're right, you're right sorry, go ahead.
Yeah, yeah.
Because you're saying, look, they're thinking about it's like a tag team, isn't it?
You're thinking it's a tag team and they're trying to defend the tag team partner.
But the problem is, the tag team partner is the one who's getting you into all this crap and now that the war is happening, you're going there to fight and then you're having to defend him because he's a weakling and you're risking yourself.
You're risking, you're gonna get pinned, you're gonna risk and you're gonna get choked out.
You're risking all those things just for your weak partner who's causing a huge amount of problems.
No good good, good point.
You know yeah, Israel's basically the loud girlfriend um, that miles off to the fucking guys of the club or the bar and you got to defend them no matter what, because your guest's a pussy or some shit and you're whipped.
So that's it.
That's literally what it is.
Uh 100, you know, and I think Mike Huckabee's statements also kind of prove that.
You know Tucker Callson, you know, if you watch the beginning of that interview, he gave some really alarming uh takes.
He was like, look, you know, I went to Israel to interview Huckabee.
Uh, we said that we're willing to go to the embassy but we wanted, you know some, some security and they refused to send anybody over there.
Right, and i'm like I think that's pretty reasonable that he wants some security, given the fact that Netanyahu has said to call him a Nazi and you know he's not very well liked.
It was very brave of Tucker to go over there.
Um, and it was a little strange how um, Huckby and the American uh, the Americans over there didn't really support Tucker with uh, his safety.
So they definitely have an Israel first uh perspective and then Huckby basically confirming that the stereotype was saying yeah, like I, I have no problem with them taking it all.
That's precisely how the Israelis feel about the entire Levant.
So um, that Tucker interview exposed a lot.
Oh, no doubt, No doubt it did.
Now, one of the things you mentioned earlier was, and it's funny because we're going to be doing this again in a bit, but one of the things you mentioned was, and quite accurately, that there are forces moving from Syria to the Iraqi border.
We also know, and we had this report a couple of days ago, that the INGC have gone to the Iranian border.
And the reason for that is because obviously they're expecting insurgency from that area, from, as you said, the separatist Baloch, the separatist Kurds, who have kind of formed an army, not an army, a militia group.
Yes.
Which has been confirmed by the CIA.
We know there's going to be other basically paid mercenaries, just like there was in Syria, who are going to try and come through.
And so the boots on the ground seems like it won't be American boots on the ground, but more so these boots on the ground.
The MEK is another example of people who tried to infiltrate and kill the Ayatollah.
I think I believe yesterday or the day before, and 100 of them got taken out.
So I guess I'm bringing this all together to say, what do you expect in terms of ground force attacks?
B, do you expect U.S. brutes on the ground?
C, and how do you think that Iran is going to deal with it?
So, good question.
I think that the United States is going to heavily depend on the separatist groups you mentioned that hate the Ayatollah, the Baloks, the Kurds, and all these other fairly ambiguous and smaller sects that, you know, the Druze that dislike the Ayollah.
But what I think is going to happen, so what will probably happen is they'll let them do the brunt of the work and they'll have some green berets and special forces guys that will be there to train and help them.
But that's not going to be enough, in my opinion.
They're probably going to get fucking smoked by the IRGC.
And the United States is going to have to get involved and put boots on the ground at some point anyway.
Because, you know, Saddam Hussein fucked around and found out back in the 1980s that invading Iran is a fucking suicide mission.
They have the same, you know, unforgiving terrain that's in Afghanistan with an actual real army, right?
Like, you know, people forget that, you know, some of our most trained and elite soldiers were struggling to fight Taliban, who are nothing more than ragtag militia idiots in the early 2000s.
They were struggling simply because of the unforgiving environment.
So if you take that same environment and now you're putting an actually trained and loyal military in that environment that's a bigger country against Kurds and special force, it's going to be horrible.
So the boots on the ground scenario is very low.
It's going to be like Vietnam, dude.
It's going to be like Vietnam, but worse because Iran is such a big country.
They have an actual real military.
They're a capable military.
And a ground invasion, you're going to need to go all into bigger levels than you did with Iraq.
Like we had all those forces go into Iraq and Iraq is significantly smaller than Iran.
And we had issues there.
And the other thing that the Iranians have that's a huge advantage that Saddam didn't have is these guys have underground missile cities.
You know, they learned their lesson from Saddam Hussein and Gaddafi and all these other guys that were toppled.
That the United States, you know, with like Tomahawk missiles and precision and drones, having things above ground is literally suicide.
So they've spent an enormous amount of money building an entire underground infrastructure to house or protect their most prized weapons, which are their ballistic missile programs.
So, you know, when you add that into the fray, it's just a nightmare for any ground force.
So even if we had green berets there with, you know, Kurds and blokes and separatists, and, you know, they could sit there and say, yeah, we're totally ready to take over if the government is toppled.
It's going to be very difficult for them to do that with a ground invasion.
And Saddam Hussein, who had a super powerful military, tried this and ended up being an eight-year war that basically the Iraqis lost.
And that actually led to his downfall because that war made him incur so much fucking debt that he needed to invade Kuwait to recoup.
And that's what let the desert starve.
So it's like, you know, people miss out on these historical facts.
That the unforgiving terrain of Iran is actually what kept them safe and led to Saddam Hussein's downfall.
Yeah.
And in terms of from a war perspective, early indications were that Trump's initial plan was for a short bombing campaign.
And as time's gone on, in January, his plan to attack, he pulled out.
February was planned to attack he pulled out.
But as time's gone on, they've realized that they can't do a short attack.
Iran has the firepower to hit back and it's going to end up being a bit more of a longer war.
If you look at the artillery and they've got there, the war planes, the aircraft carrier, basically what they've got there can only last maybe five to ten days, probably about seven to twelve days now, eight to fifteen days.
So looking at that, the fact that America hasn't got enough firepower there to last, let's say, more than two weeks or two and a half weeks, and Iran is Iran just needs to play the long game.
How long do you think this ends up lasting?
So I think it could go for months.
The Iranians are extremely resilient and actually a war of attrition benefits them.
So I think they could go for months.
I know the U.S. Trump is, he wanted to go for just a couple of days or a couple of weeks, but I think Kane kind of came in and gave him a reality check, like, yeah, bro, this is going to be a protracted war.
I think that's also another reason why Trump has, you know, kind of said, you know what?
Okay, let me try to see if we can figure this out and prepare more from a protracted war angle.
Also, that Supreme Court ruling also fucked Trump up.
I'm pretty confident that he was planning to attack on Saturday.
But that Supreme Court ruling, you know, invalidating his tariffs, he was going to rely on that same law to go to war with Iran without congressional approval.
A lot of people don't know that.
So yes, that's why he had to go ahead and use like other laws to justify the tariffs that he's also going to use to justify attacking Iran.
So I think that threw a wrench in his thought process as well.
But I think now at this point, he's accepted the fact from his advisors, especially because Kane was one of the main guys, that this is going to be a protracted war, which isn't in our benefit at all, especially with the limited resources and munitions that we have.
A couple people in the chat said, Myron, how do you know that?
Are you a part of the military?
No, it's just common sense.
Like, think about it.
The Russian conflict literally has been going on for four years.
Food Prices and War Logistics00:07:28
How do you think the Ukrainian has been able to fight all this time?
NATO and us.
Like, people forget that we've literally been fighting a proxy war in Europe for four years now at this point.
And we are basically the only reason that the Ukrainians are even still able to put up a fight.
And that's coming at an enormous cost of our stockpile of weapons.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah, exactly.
People have no idea the logistics surge, the push that's required for something, even that two-week period.
And Suli, you're right, spot on about it being about two-week with that carrier battle group and all that.
We're looking at a couple weeks, maybe at a month, but we need heavy, heavy, heavy resupply.
And but to go the long game, like I agree with you, Myron, that will be, they're going to have the asymmetrical factor that the Iranians can throw at us at the U.S.
And also the long game plays in their court.
That's their game.
We can't do it.
We couldn't do it in Vietnam, couldn't do it in Afghanistan.
And that Afghanistan long 20-year-old, that was a perfect example.
They've seen that.
They know that.
And also, the time is on their side from an economic perspective.
The longer there's a strain on the world's oil, we're talking about, I mean, I don't know if you shared this with your audience yet, Suleiman, you probably know this though.
A couple of days ago, the Iranians, the Russians, the Chinese were doing drills, right?
And Iran shut down the Strait of Hermuz for like two hours, right?
And oil prices shot from $50 a barrel all the way up to like $65.70.
And that was just for a few hours.
Could you imagine if there's an actual conflict and they put, you know, they're full-on in war, they got the mines that they put at the seabed.
That in itself is going to make the gas price, a barrel of oil shoot up to 100, 150.
You know, we're talking into even the $200 range, and we're all going to feel that at the pump.
So just by them shutting it down for two hours, there was a spike.
So I think from a time perspective, they could create an enormous amount of economic pressure as well.
And, you know, when it comes to economic pressure, that hurts everybody.
And that's actually more, that's what benefits them when it comes to war of attrition as well.
And I think that's a huge reason why the Chinese are even there sharing intelligence.
There's a big Chinese spy ship that's collecting on all the U.S. assets right now as we speak, because the Chinese have a super vested interest in ensuring that the Strait of Hermus doesn't get shut down because this bullshit either.
Joe, I can't remember, but last time when there was the 12-day war, what did the oil prices peak at?
Oh, good question.
Simon, I don't think it went.
I don't remember.
Is he breaking apart?
Yeah.
Yeah, I can't hear him.
I can't hear Joe at all.
Okay, he's breaking up.
That'd be interesting if we could pull that up, what the gas price, what the barrel of oil was like back in June.
Yeah, I remember Simon mentioning that it went up to just before the attack, it was roughly at these numbers that we're at now.
And their perspective or their view was the reason it shut up was because it may be that the war is happening, but we'll have to see.
If the war is not happening, then it will be because of the state of Hermuz thing.
The second thing is, in terms of where it peaked, I can't remember now.
Joe will have to come up, or it was only a 12-day war.
And I believe, I can't remember what they said.
I think they said 90 or 100, but I can't remember now.
So I'll have to wait for them to come up.
But yeah, that's going to be interesting.
But you're right.
If it goes to a real war, if Iran, no, I mean, come on, if Iran shuts the Strait of Hermuz, it won't just be 200.
It'll end world trade.
Like, it's going to be the worst thing.
It'll be fucking catastrophic, bro.
It'll be catastrophic.
And I know I might have some people in here, right?
Because the counter argument I get for this all the time is, well, you know, only 12% of the U.S.'s oil goes through there.
Okay, fine.
But we live in a globalized world.
That doesn't mean that your food prices aren't going to go up.
That doesn't mean that your energy costs aren't going to go up because a lot of people didn't analyze this back in 2022.
When Russia invaded Ukraine, right, in February four years ago, I think it's like the anniversary pretty much right around now anyway.
That's what actually led to the spike in food prices, right?
During the entire presidential campaign in 2024, both Kamala Harris and Trump were campaigning on, oh, yeah, we got to get the food, the cost of living down, the price of food, blah, blah, blah.
Well, the reason why the food went up is because the Russia conflict.
And some people might say, well, Myron, why the fuck is a war in Eastern Europe?
What does that have to do with my bread and eggs?
Well, Ukraine is the breadbasket of Europe.
If the breadbasket of Europe is disrupted and they can't produce as much food as they need to, now they're going to need to rely upon other sources to get said food for their population.
That creates a strain.
Then, thanks to capitalism, what do they do?
They increase the prices because supply is down, demand is up, and that's how economics works.
So even if you're far away from a conflict, it won't take long before you start feeling the effects of said conflict economically.
So, that is something that no one really talks about too much: is that how the Russia-Ukraine war was a significant contributing factor to the spike in food prices in the United States?
It took a while to reach us, but we eventually got hit by it to the point where it became a campaign center point for both Trump and Kamala Harris.
No doubt, no doubt, it's going to be one of the worst situations that could occur.
And that's the kind of like the final entendre.
If they need to do the that's like their nuclear bomb is to just shut the straight of Ramus, and it's not about China because China, even though the vast majority of trade China relies on, but the world relies on Chinese trade, especially America.
They're interconnected and interlinked.
And this is what people don't realize.
And the straight of Ramus is a lot of their oil.
Exactly.
So everyone's going to feel it at some point.
Yeah, but the American market will feel it significantly.
Absolutely.
Now, coming back to the coming back to the war, we know the Chinese are helping out quite a bit.
We know the Russians were helping out with the cyber.
So if you remember with the Starlink, and logistics, Suli.
And huge Russians with logistics.
Yeah, yeah, exactly.
They'll help with the logistics because if you look at Starlink, it was the Russians who helped pull out the Starlink because the Starlink was used in order to cause the civil unrest and civil, basically help the collaborators and the protesters.
So how much do you think the Russians are going to help?
With the Iranians?
Yeah, yeah, because remember, they've got a lot of strictly, strictly intel and logistics support.
They're going to be even more pussy about direct conflict than the Chinese because of what they got going on in Ukraine.
So I think it's going to be strictly logistics and intelligence sharing.
And also a thing people don't look at is those ships, even if it's one or two of their surface platforms in the Persian Gulf, there's always that problematic issue.
Oh, man, we got the Russian ship in that vicinity.
It adds another dimension of complexity for the battle planners.
Switching Over To Kick00:00:35
So give me one second.
I'm going to do a quick switch on my end.
You guys can keep going.
I'm just going to mute myself.
Give me like one or two minutes.
I'll be right back.
Hey, when was the thing?
It was mid-June.
Okay, guys.
So guys, we're going to switch over to Kick right now.
We've already been on here way longer than I wanted.
We're on for an hour 40.
Time to switch over to Kick, guys.
You niggas know what time it is.
Fuck YouTube and all these other bitch ass platforms.