Can Trump End The Russia-Ukraine War? Jackson Hinkle Gives The BRUTAL Truth...
|
Time
Text
No, all right, and we are live.
Boom, what's up?
All right, Myron Gaines.
What's up?
I'm the only Jackson Hinkle.
What's going on, man?
How are you, dude?
Nothing much.
I haven't seen you in a long time.
I hope you're well.
I'm good, man.
I'm good.
Last time I saw you, I think was we had you on with Zerka.
That was fun.
What happened to him?
Is he still stuck in Canada?
I don't know where he's at, man.
It's like he just like he'll randomly come to the United States and tell me I'm back in the States.
I'm like, all right, cool.
Let's do a show.
So it's like, it just hits me up randomly and I'm like, all right, let's do a show.
So what a character.
Yeah, I remember it was like maybe six months ago or five months ago, I texted, or I, he, he posted something attacking me, and then I said something that was just egregiously over the line.
It wasn't Jill, but it was about the fight.
And immediately he calls me up.
30 seconds.
He's like, I'm sorry, bro.
I shouldn't have said that.
We're on the same team, bro.
So fun.
Oh, the Tiki-Taki fight?
Yeah.
Oh, okay.
Okay.
Yeah.
I'm going to end that beef too.
I'm going to go see Tiki Taki in the UK soon.
So we'll, you know, I'll end that one too.
That's my job, bro.
I try to bring everybody together, man.
I think beefs are stupid.
Well, unless they're stupid comedians.
Are you tight with that guy?
We're cool.
We're cool.
You know, we had some grievances, but like we spoke.
And, you know, he said some really nice things about me.
And I said, you know what, dude, it's really stupid that we're going to argue about this dumb shit.
Like, he publicly apologized.
I was out of line.
I was like, wow.
So I reached out to him and I said, thank you for that.
And we're good.
We'll do something when I see him.
Well, let me just make sure we're good here on my end.
Yeah, yeah.
Take your time, bro.
Okay.
Yeah, it looks good.
Someone said the stream froze, but you know, I'm on that Russian internet, that VPN life, so it is what it is.
Anyways, well, I wanted to talk because obviously, I mean, you're in the thick of it when it comes to all this stuff.
Oh, streams, bit rate.
Let me see here.
No, it's a little bit.
It's a little bit glitchy, but this stuff usually sorts itself out.
Sometimes when I start a stream, it has some issues and then it sorts itself out.
Okay, you can hear me though.
Yeah, I can hear you fine.
And I got your volume up high, so my audience can hear you well, too.
Okay, so you're good.
All right.
Well, anyways, I wanted to talk to you because, um, well, you've been blown up as of late, and we should have talked a long time ago.
I wish I was in Miami, we could talk in person, but you know, it is what it is.
Yeah, but uh, look, um, well, first of all, I wanted to applaud you on your uh, I guess your, I don't even know how to describe it.
It was like a nuclear bomb you set off uh, however many years in the past with Akash Singh.
Yeah, what is that podcast?
Flagrant, yeah, flagrant.
Um, if we weren't on YouTube, I would remove the L, but I think people here are smart enough to know what that word would be.
Um, if you remove the L.
Yeah, no, dude, um, you know, what it really came down to was, um, you know, they brought us on their podcast to try to shame us for some of the comments we made about you know colored women, I'll say that because we're on YouTube, and um, you know, women in general, right?
Um, and they said, Oh, I'm racist or I'm misogynistic or whatever.
And then, you know, Akash wanted to, you know, be this simp and talk about how we're immature, we're like, you know, we don't know what we're talking about, we have a very toxic mindset when it comes to dealing with women, and then boom, fast forward three years later, he's literally getting embarrassed by the very woman that I warned him about three years ago.
And he had just gotten married or was like in the final stages of marrying this chick right around the time we did that podcast.
So, you know, dude, you know, the truth always comes out.
And it's funny because Andrew Schultz at the end of the interview said, oh, well, you know, if you guys are right later on, you know, maybe we'll apologize 10 years from now, bro.
It only took three.
And Andrew Schultz got married right around that time too.
So, um, dude, these comedians are all simps, man.
They're all simps.
Yeah.
Um, I'm just looking at the internet.
It's not great on my end.
I don't know what the hell is going on.
Can you hear me?
Let me look.
No, I can hear you fine.
Um, I'll actually bump up your mic a little bit even more.
um yeah i can hear you fine let me look on my end it's horrific on my youtube You look fine, bro.
Like, I don't think you're lagging on my channel.
No, my whole chat says it's bad, but it's probably just because the stream yards is fine, but the connection to my streaming stream labs is not good.
I don't know.
We'll keep going, anyways.
We'll clip it up later.
Yeah, if your audience wants on mine, it's running smooth.
I can drop the link if they want to watch it on mine and then you can re-upload it later, whatever you want.
I mean, I can even take it down, you put it up, I don't care, whatever you want to do.
Yeah, because my shit's demonetized anyway, so I don't even care.
Like, I could take the stream down and then you post the full thing after.
Yeah, I'm recording it on my end, too.
You record on your life.
Okay, so for everyone that's watching on your end, you guys can come over to my channel, Myron GainesX, watch it here, and then Jackson's gonna put the actual full interview up on his channel.
Boom!
Yeah, and I'll just if it fixes itself, it fixes itself on my end.
But yeah, I'm not gonna try to restart it because why is that such a pain in the ass on YouTube?
But it's so easy on Twitch and stuff.
I don't know.
It's yeah, because YouTube isn't really like you know on point with the streaming as much.
But I can here, I'll drop my YouTube link here and then they can watch it live here.
And then what I'll do is I'll private the video and then everyone has to go to your channel to watch the full interview.
You just upload it.
Yeah, I'll just do that.
All right.
Well, let's keep going anyway.
So, um, the first thing I want to talk about, though, is let's talk about the Candace story first because this is, I want to get your thoughts on this.
So, um, as everyone knows, Candace Owens and Erica Kirk they had this like secret meeting.
I don't know why it had to be private, but they did it that way.
And I don't know.
She's kind of getting grilled in her comments.
I think that'll probably change, but what did you make of this?
Well, I'll give my kind of like official take on this whole situation, and we can kind of go and build from there.
So both stories, both the official narrative and some of the alternative narratives, you know, I have questions on.
I think both narratives have done a fantastic job of creating more questions than answers, right?
The official narrative, obviously, the big gaping hole in that one is a 30-out 60s situation.
Also, there's some questions around Tyler Robinson, how he escaped, what he was doing.
We don't have the full footage of him taking a shot, even though we have the camera of him running across the top of the roof.
Just a lot of things that aren't a lot of anomalies there.
But then at the same time, some of the alternative theories, alternative theories have holes in them as well, right?
So my thing is, I'm just very interested in going to the trial.
I think at this point, I got to go to the trial.
I want to see the trial.
I used to be an agent myself.
I used to investigate this type of thing.
So there's going to be a lot of things that are going to come out at trial that otherwise would have never came out to the press.
So I think the trial is going to be really big on seeing what evidence they have, who was actually involved, the raw evidence, the witnesses, everything has to come out of trial.
So that's really the most transparent we're going to get is if we go to trial, which I hope they go to trial.
Who knows if Tyler Robinson doesn't end up Oswalded somewhere or if he takes a plea deal.
But I think really the trial, hopefully we'll be able to see everything and it'll be a jury.
Well, I understand that.
My only thing is like, well, look at all the trials that they've purposefully scuffed up over decades and decades, especially these high-scale political assassinations.
You mentioned Lee Harvey Oswald, obviously.
That one ended before it began.
MLK, I mean, that was the guy was in prison till the day he died, James Earl Ray.
And that was, you know, he was overturned, I guess, technically in civil, in a civil lawsuit.
He was proven innocent.
Yeah, the King family produced like 70 witnesses.
It was nuts.
70 witnesses, 4,000 documents.
I mean, and it was overwhelming the evidence looking back at it.
So what is your, do you have any fear surrounding that that like, okay, he goes to trial, but they've, they've been through this before.
Of course, of course.
I mean, there's always going to be, you know, problems.
There's always going to be things that aren't going to hold up to scrutiny.
I would say, because at this point, we don't have answers.
I think a lot of us have more questions than answers.
There's so many anomalies in both theories.
So that's why I've been very reluctant to be like, okay, I think this happened and this happened.
What I will say is both sides have a problem and I'm waiting until all the evidence comes out so I can formulate a coherent thought process of what I think happened.
But man, like, you know, I don't like the thing that pisses me off, right?
Someone that used to be on the job, the U.S. government needs to understand that transparency is low, thanks to the Biden administration many decades before that.
The trust in the FBI is low and the trust in law enforcement and the government in general is low.
This case obviously has enormous public interest.
Put it all out, man.
Pull it all out.
You guys already said that he's a lone shooter.
There's no conspiracy.
This isn't a high side case.
Put it all out.
Because if anything, what will happen is you'll regain the public's trust.
Because the reason why, you know, people like Cannis Owens and Ian Carroll, yourself, you know, people that might, you know, doubt the official narrative, you guys are blown up because people don't trust the government anymore.
So Kash Patel has been priding himself on being transparent.
Okay.
It's not that much to beat Christopher Ray out.
So you guys need to go ahead and declassify this case too.
Now, here's the other problem, too.
The FBI is not running this case.
It's actually the State Bureau investigation, which is Utah's equivalent of the FBI, for those that are wondering, the Foreign Watchers.
So every state has like their own investigative body alongside their state police.
They're the ones running this case.
It's a state case.
So that's another problem too that we have where they're not being transparent either.
How do you look at things like the Patsy, you know, saying that Candace Owens has a source on record, I guess, at the nurse at the hospital saying that the Patsy said that he was paid to say what he said, what he did, what he said.
You have, I mean, the 30-odd six, I still don't understand.
People bring up MLK, but it's like even MLK, even jawbone, very, very tough part of your skull, but it still had an exit wound and the fragments supposedly went in through his shoulder or whatever after the three-inch exit wound.
How do you square those things?
How do you square Kosh Patel trying to stop Tulsi Gabbard and Joe Kin from looking into foreign interference in this case?
I mean, like you said, there's a bunch of gaping holes, but there's also a lot of suspicious play here that I don't think could be squared in any way.
Yeah.
Yeah, I can definitely, do you have a chat you want to read?
SM influencer Cash will come.
Can you hear that?
Yeah, I can hear it.
Yeah.
Okay.
Okay.
I turned it off.
Yeah.
No, it's cool, man.
If it runs, I don't mind at all.
Yeah, so I can speak to that a little bit.
So for me to explain this, I'll kind of have to go through and explain 9-11 a little bit.
So as you guys know, right?
So the FBI is a law enforcement agency.
The CIA is an intelligence agency.
And law enforcement and intelligence are two different worlds.
So the CIA operates internationally.
You know this stuff already, Jackson.
I'm explaining maybe for the people that might not understand, right?
Because a lot of people tend to conflate the FBI and the CIA, and they're two completely different agencies.
So the FBI investigates their chief things are, you know, foreign intelligence, terrorism, that type of thing, right?
And especially when it has to do with a domestic nexus, the CIA is international.
So when Joe Kent and Tulsi Gabbard, who, you know, he's, I think he's a higher, higher-up guy over at, he's like Tulsi II, right?
At the, at the DNI, or is that CIA?
He is at the DNI.
DNI, right?
Well, under, right?
Yeah, he's like Tulsi's like number two.
So technically, Tulsi Gabbard, she's the head of, she's a DNI, so she runs all the intelligence agencies, right?
But the FBI is different because the FBI is not just an intelligence agency, they're also a law enforcement agency.
And intelligence and law enforcement are in two different worlds because when you're collecting intelligence, right, and your job is to collect information, a lot of the time that stuff is classified, right?
And a lot of the time, the way that you procure that information is illegal.
Let's just be honest.
You're intercepting phones without orders.
You're beating up people and, you know, the waterboarding them.
You're collecting information all different types of ways.
Intelligence operates in the dark.
Law enforcement tends to operate in the light.
Why?
Because everything is discoverable.
When you arrest someone and you bring them in front of a judge, you have to give everything over during the discovery process, all the evidence to that attorney so they see everything that you collected.
So for that reason, intelligence tends to not line up very well with law enforcement.
So whenever you have like a criminal case like this, right?
And intelligence agencies start getting in, law enforcement is going to obviously bucket that because what might happen is intelligence agencies don't operate in the light.
So they can compromise the case and things might become discoverable that aren't supposed to be discoverable and it puts them in a very bad light.
So I see why Kash Patel did that because the FBI has always had problems with the CIA, right?
Since 9-11 for a very long time, they haven't shared information.
There's been a lot of problems with the IC and FBI because the FBI is one of the few agencies in the IC that is also a law enforcement agency, which is a completely different mission than an intelligence gathering agency.
So that's why I suspect that they had the problems that they had.
Does that make it right?
No.
But coming from a law enforcement background, I just know that the FBI and the CIA and intelligence agencies, for that matter, have always butted with law enforcement agencies because we have two different routes on how we do things.
CIA intel agencies are collecting information in all types of ways.
They don't give a shit.
Meanwhile, law enforcement agencies have to collect them in a way where it's legal because it's going to have legal scrutiny when you present that evidence in a court.
Yeah, I understand what you're saying.
It just looks, it looks weird.
It looks bad quickly, though.
It does.
It does.
It looks very bad.
And I feel like that was only leaked either by way of a personal gripe stemming over a larger issue with Kaj Patel and Tulsi, or it was leaked because there's sincere concern that Tulsi or Joe Kent has regarding this.
I don't think there would be any other motive from anyone else, Susie Wiles, Vance.
Yeah.
It can be for any of those reasons.
You know, I'm just like, you know, me just if I had to take a guess, right?
Agency transgressions from the past on top of personalities maybe not getting along with each other.
The high profileness of the case, right?
People, everyone wants to be the star.
All of these things play in.
Because, man, I've been in boardrooms before on big cases where you got DEA there, you got FBI there, you got a representative from the intelligence agencies.
Dude, they're almost coming to blows sometimes on big cases like this.
So the fighting amongst agencies is nothing new.
It happens all the time.
All the time.
30-odd six magic bullet.
How do you square that if it can be squared at all?
That is one of the biggest problems with the official narrative.
You know, I've seen guys that have put thousands, thousands upon thousands of rounds downrange with every type of gun that you could think of, green berets, navy seals, et cetera.
And the conclusion is the same pretty much by every single one of them.
Or 30 odd six would have blown, you know, Charlie's head open almost, right?
You know, God, I'm glad that didn't happen, obviously, right?
But I think it pretty much every firearms and ballistic expert has come to the same conclusion, even when they do test shoots, right?
This 30 out of 6 is going through, you know, cow vertebrae.
It's going through center block.
It's going through metal.
You know, it's an extremely powerful round.
And the damage that we witness on camera simply doesn't line up with the ballistics, right?
And then the ludicrous story that they gave to explain it away, you know, it was a miracle, you know, like what?
What's going on here, dude?
Like.
Man of steel, right?
When the Superman movie's coming out.
Yeah, you know, it's just absolutely nuts.
So, you know, I can see why so many people are skeptical.
Yeah.
You know, you're not, people aren't crazy for being skeptical with the official narrative.
And dude, as someone that used to work in federal law enforcement, I was pissed off when I saw it.
So I was like, you guys think the American people are stupid?
Like, did you not see JFK?
Do you not see USS Liberty?
Like, like, the American public no longer trusts the government.
Like, what are you guys doing?
This is a monumental, you know, I don't want to F up, right?
We're on YouTube.
So like you have a chance with a case with huge profile, right?
That isn't a high side case.
Like you're saying there's a single shooter.
Put the information out.
Well, there's also another weird thing is I thought I was going to see a bunch of stories about this in the mainstream media today, but we didn't see that.
We had, as a result of this meeting with Candace and Erica, obviously I think one of the biggest items of contention were the texts that Charlie allegedly sent the day before the shooting saying, I feel like they are going to kill me.
He wasn't specific, whatever.
That seems extremely weird to me.
And it seems weird that if those texts were real, the FBI wouldn't say or the state commission, whatever, they wouldn't say, hey, maybe there's something we can gather with further context from these messages.
And Erica Kirk said, no, the texts don't exist.
Well, Candace came out and said Erica did confirm they existed once we met in person because they were signal messages and they weren't in the regular iMessage category.
What is going like, how can they square not looking into the phone?
Erica still has the phone, presumably, and they've never had the phone.
The feds have never had it.
Why would they not look into the phone?
Absolutely crazy.
Absolutely crazy that she's still in possession of the phone.
I mean, the only rational explanation I can say is they, okay, so law enforcement has a device.
It's called the Celbright.
It's actually Israeli technology, right?
And the Celbright, what it does is, is, for your audience, I know you know what it is, but what it does is you don't.
Oh, you don't?
Okay.
So Celbright is a technology.
It's Israeli technology that law enforcement uses where they extract everything off of your cell phone, laptop, et cetera, right?
We call it dumping the phone in the law enforcement world.
So my thing is, the only way I can think in my head that they would give the phone back to her is they had to have extracted that phone.
Now, here's the problem.
Some Cell Brights, or depending on the phone, Cellbrights are 100% like the amount of information you're able to extract is contingent upon the type of phone, right?
So if it's a newer iPhone, you might not be able to get everything out.
Certain apps, you might not be able to get it out.
Or if you do get the information out, it's all encrypted.
So a lot of the times it's always best to have the physical phone.
Always best to have the physical phone, especially with programs like Telegram, Signal, et cetera.
With the rise of these encrypted messaging services, it's always best to have the hard device.
So the fact that she has the phone, that's a bit alarming.
Like they should have the phone.
Or at best, they had to have had the phone for a few days, a week or two to really go through it.
Because the victim's phone is going to be a fantastic piece of evidence to be able to figure out, you know, did he have any enemies?
Who was he communicating with?
Who was he, you know, making phone calls to text messages before and after, like right before the shots fired.
Like all these things are extremely important.
Now, I can see maybe why on Erica's side, because since he's deceased, she probably had to be the one to give consent.
And I wouldn't be surprised if she told law enforcement, like, ah, you guys can do unlimited consent.
I have to be here and like let you guys go through it or whatever, unless they went and got a search warrant.
But, you know, that would be the other way, but that might not look good optically.
So I don't know.
It's a little weird that she has the phone.
I'm not going to lie.
Like law enforcer should have that phone, especially since they know that he was communicating on encrypted apps.
And we know that extracting that from a cell right doesn't always work all the way.
Yeah, it doesn't add up to me.
I saw someone online say, well, you know, the only person who should be worried about their phone being seized by the feds is Tyler Robinson and or any accomplices.
But I would think that if Charlie felt as though someone was going to kill him, there were these public posts on Twitter.
There was, well, anonymous posts on Twitter, people saying that.
Like, I feel like that would insinuate that someone knew something was up.
Someone knew that there was something else going on beyond just Tyler Robinson.
And that would probably warrant even in a case like that, Erica would still have to give consent for the phone because she's next of kin.
More than likely, yeah.
Because what they're going to say, anytime they assess like privacy, right, on that, they always ask, they always ask, like, is there a REP, which stands for reasonable expectation of privacy?
So obviously with your cell phone, that's at this point with the amount of information that are on cell phones, cell phones are like right under your house, right?
When it comes to the Fourth Amendment and getting your probable calls.
So she probably would have to be the one to consent since she's, you know, legally his wife.
And I would not be surprised if she was like, eh, I don't know what's in there.
I don't want all that stuff coming out.
There could be some embarrassing stuff that comes out.
I'm going to be here as you guys go through his phone, right?
Maybe a limited consent search.
But yeah, I mean, it is kind of weird that she has a phone.
Yeah.
And I guess there's a last point to ask you about this for now, because I'm sure there will be more information that comes out.
Candace has already said she's going to do another stream today, probably in a few hours here, actually.
Yeah.
Where she's going to talk about the Egyptian planes once more.
And you look through history, countries, it's kind of rare, but countries have used fake demarcations on their plane, surveillance aircraft to insinuate that they're flying the aircraft of another nation in wars before wars.
And could be something like that.
Apparently, Candace has said that this plane was in Israel.
I don't think anyone really believes that this Egyptian plane, if there was something nefarious at play with Charlie Kirk, was from Egypt.
That just seems very random.
Charlie Kirk didn't have a good relationship with Egypt.
He had a good relationship with Israel.
And Egypt has an ally too.
Yes.
Yeah.
Like the governments at least get along.
Even though the people dislike each other, the governments get along.
Is there anything that clicks you when you continue to hear this story and the fact that however many times it was overlapping with their travels, specifically with Erica's travels?
Yeah.
I'll be honest with you, man.
With the Egyptian angle, I'm not too familiar with it.
I don't really see, I don't really know too much about it.
I haven't seen that part so much of her theory on what's going on here.
But what I will absolutely say is that the official narrative creates more questions than answers.
So I think anyone that's questioning the official narrative, I don't think they're crazy for doing so.
Obviously, everyone has their own theory of what might have happened, et cetera.
But I don't like the fact that they're not being transparent.
And like, for example, like the ballistics alone, like, come on, dude.
Like, the American public are smarter than that.
Like, what are you guys doing?
Like, 30 out 6 and with that kind of wound?
Like, I don't know.
It just.
Well, I want to run this by you, too.
I think you can hear this.
Let's play this.
So, yeah, this is going to be funny.
And for those of you guys that are watching on Jackson's channel, guys, I know some of you guys are saying it's lagging.
I put the link.
Jackson, if you could pin it in your chat.
Let's do that.
Yeah, pin it in your chat so they can so they can come watch it on mine.
And then what we'll do is once we finish the stream, you re-upload it back on your thing and whatever.
And I'll just hide it off mine.
So they can watch it live on mine and then they have to go to yours to re-watch.
My internet's been good as of late, but today we set up new internet and clearly there were some issues.
So the new internet is.
I just dropped it there.
So if you want to pin it, I just dropped it in your chat.
Hey, guys, support my guy.
OSS guys, all you guys, you know, give Jackson's video a like.
Yeah, I mean, I know it's lagging and stuff, but he's going to re-upload it.
So don't worry.
It'll be, it's going to come out super crispy when he re-uploads.
It's going to be in damn near 4K.
There we go.
All right.
Let's talk about this.
So, all right.
So you're the king.
You're the king of the red pill, as they say.
You get attacked by a bunch of Reddit anime nerds online for that.
You were proven right, though, with Akash Shing 100% and countless other victims of this girl boss mentality across the world.
But I think the clearest example of a beta male that we've ever seen is our current FBI director, which is really bad for a number of reasons.
I want to talk about that, but first we should react to this clip of him.
I don't think the full podcast is out yet, but as they are trying to find the Brown University shooter, they can't find this guy.
Yeah, I'm actually surprised they haven't caught him yet, dude.
What the hell?
As they're on the manhunt is going on, they decided to release whatever this is.
Take a look.
You are not from Israel.
No.
So, how did we get to Are You a Massad agent?
You know, that's a great question.
Where's her ring?
Just to clarify, how often has he traveled to see you since January 20th?
Has there been one moment where you're like, you can't make this stop?
Well, he laughs exactly like Akash Shing did in that flagrant episode.
That forced laugh.
You know, it's just not a good look, dude.
It's really not a good look.
Is someone, and I, and here's the thing, too.
You know, it's funny.
Funny story.
A buddy of mine is an FBI agent, right?
I used to work cases with him back in the day.
We had a really big line king case back like 10 years ago, 2015, South Texas.
And I said, dude, it'd be awesome to have you on and we could talk about our old case that we did.
They're all done now.
Everybody got prosecuted, whatever.
People would love it.
He's like, all right, let me let me hit my agency, see if I could do it.
They said, hell no, right?
Hell no.
But then you see the director go on and do a podcast like this.
Like, come on, man.
What's going on here?
You know, and I kind of knew, I'll be honest with you, I knew deep down he's going to get denied, but I said, you know what, try it, right?
Denied immediately.
HQ's like, hell no.
But now you got the director, right?
Granted, this was under Chris Ray, but now you got the director do a podcast.
I mean, look, bro, it is, you know, I'm very, um, I'm, I'm very conflicted with Cash because I think he has done some things good, right?
But he's also done some really stupid things too, right?
Um, and the reason why I say this is because I'm speaking from a former 1811, former special agent perspective.
So I know what the FBI was like before he got in.
So I know like little intricacies that the American public simply won't understand.
That if I explain it to them, they might say, okay, I can see why, but they're not going to care about that stuff.
So to be simple, is the FBI better now than under Ray?
100%.
100%.
But does that mean it's still great?
No.
Like it still has a lot of work to do.
But that goes to show how far the agency had fallen.
So, um, so, so it's not really a high bar, is it?
Yeah, it's, it's fallen a lot, dude.
So, um, the only people that are really going to appreciate um, how the agency has changed and gotten better are people in the field or people that used to be in the field like myself, right?
Like, they all got better for the feds, but not for solving crimes, so to speak.
They are better for solving crimes, and I'll explain why.
So, okay, so we're really going to get in the weeds here.
One of the historic problems of the FBI for a very long time was that they're fucking lazy, all right?
Lazy.
You do a big case, they come in at the end with their Ray jackets, right?
Get all the credit, even though they didn't run the case, they didn't help you with nothing, right?
They just come in and they just take all the glory, right?
Because they're the premier agency, everybody knows who they are.
So, when they show up with those JTTF jackets, people think it's an FBI case.
It's not, and they've been doing this for a very long time.
Anyone that works in law enforcement will tell you this, right?
Um, they don't go out and do surveillance, they don't like to do overtime, they don't like to, well, agents really don't get overtime, but they're not out there like hitting the streets hard.
That's why when Kash Patel said, hey, I'm going to get a lot of these agents out of DC.
That's what he meant because FBI agents, especially out of like, you know, slow field offices like DC, whatever, they're not doing nothing.
Like some of these agents have been on the job for 10 years.
They maybe, maybe, they've made maybe one criminal arrest their entire career.
To put things in perspective, when I started my career in Laredo, Texas with HSI, dude, I was doing five criminal arrests a day because people were getting caught on the border, smuggling drugs, smuggling illegal aliens, smuggling guns southbound, smuggling money southbound.
So we were catching people every single day in all federal arrests.
So the FBI has a bad reputation for not actually getting out there and fighting crime.
So one thing that Bongino and Patel did, which I will give them credit for, but the American public isn't going to understand, is they got their asses out of the office and told them, you need to go and jump on task forces.
You need to bring down the murder rate, get involved with the state and locals more, start doing hitting the streets more, start making more arrests, which they've been able to do.
You know, so they've become a little bit less bureaucratic when it comes to actual law enforcement.
But these are small changes that the American public aren't really going to understand or care about, right?
Like this is shit that only I will understand because I used to come from that world.
So what they really should be focusing on from a large-scale perspective, besides like getting agents out and actually doing their jobs, is more transparency.
They need way more transparency.
And then with cases like this that are super high-profile that people are interested in, they need to be transparent about those, especially like this Charlie Kirk case was a great opportunity for them to really build trust back with the American public and they fumbled it.
Pam Bondi with Epstein files fumbled it big time, right?
So well, Susie Wiles has called that out.
So apparently, now everyone is coming to defend her and say she didn't actually mean what she said.
She's actually the best.
She loves Trump, but she came out in 11 different interviews with Vanity Fair.
And these are some of the, I guess, tidbits they were able to extract from these lengthy 11 interviews.
So make of that what you will.
I find it weird how like every single RC stooge on the planet is coming out and posting how much they love Susie Wiles right now, though.
But it says, Wiles said Trump has an alcoholics personality.
JD Vance has been a conspiracy theorist for a decade.
Russell Vaughat is a right, right-wing absolute vellet.
And Pam Bondi completely whiffed in her handling of the Epstein files.
The only thing I've got is, I mean, I think I probably agree with her on her characterization of most of those things.
But the thing I got to say is like the FBI was created specifically to go after communists and try to eradicate this working class consciousness in the U.S., those who are sympathetic or viewed as sympathetic to the Soviet Union.
That if it wasn't the stated goal, that is what it did for the overwhelming duration of its early years.
And I guess it was kind of a way to connect high crime with the government and go after these people.
And though the FBI might be less bureaucratic for people that were actually solving crimes like yourself today now than it was five years ago, the problems of, I guess, coordinating with high crime or states across the world to cover up or execute certain plans is the problem that most people want fixed that they don't see fixed.
Yeah, I mean, you know, one thing, like I said, going back to the transparency problem, right, with the FBI, I'll give you a funny story when it comes, if you want to talk about like how stupid the FBI can be.
We used to call them like famous but incompetent.
I'll never forget this.
I was doing a Hawala case with them one time.
It was a terrorism case on a Hawala cell.
And it was us, FBI and Secret Service.
I was working for HSI out of New Haven.
And I remember I gave them information on an individual's travel pattern, right?
Because HSI has very detailed access as to people who travel in and out of the country, right?
It's basically you got all the customs.
I gave him this information, and then I think I was out on the street one time doing surveillance or whatever, and I called the analyst back from the FBI.
I said, hey, that information, can you tell me what it was?
And she literally said, that's classified.
I said, what?
I gave you that fucking information.
What are you talking about?
It's classified.
Oh, yeah, it's classified.
That's my info.
What are you talking about?
But that's the bureaucracy and the red tape of what the FBI is.
Like, you give them information and they don't give you information.
Anyone that works in law enforcement, I don't know if anyone in your chat works in law enforcement, whatever, they'll tell you, work with the FBI.
It's a one-way street, right?
So this has been a problem that's plagued the agency for a very long time.
They overclassify everything.
It'll be some stuff that isn't even worth being classified and they'll classify it just because, you know, because they don't have, because when they say it's classified, they don't have to share information now.
You know, so we have the museum of the deep state as problem as five.
Yeah, we don't have, yeah, he said he was going to do a day one, man.
What happened to that Sean Ryan interview, man?
So the thing with cash, and this is the problem.
Over promise, under deliver.
In the government, we have a saying: under promise, over-deliver.
He did it the opposite way because he was a social media guy beforehand.
Him, Pam Bondi, you know, the Epstein thing was a monumental mess up, monumental, right?
There's no excuse for that.
And that's not just the F, like a lot of people blame Kash Patel and Pam Bondi.
We need to put a little bit of accountability on Tulsi Gabbard too, and I'll tell you why.
Tulsi Gabbard, as the DNI, is the head of all the intelligence agencies.
She oversees all of them, right?
All 31, 32, 33 intel agencies.
The problem with Epstein is this.
A lot of people focus on the sex trafficking.
Fine, fair enough.
The sex trafficking was a part of the criminal investigation that the FBI ran.
But people forget that we all know he was also a spy for a foreign government.
That is automatically going to fall under the purview of the CIA and the NSA and the DIA and all these other intelligence agencies.
Now, here's the problem: the FBI is only going to have a limited perspective on what Epstein was doing because they looked at him from a criminal perspective and then they're going to have some limited high side stuff, which is classified stuff.
The CIA is going to have a file.
DIA is going to have a file.
NSA is going to have a file.
All these different agencies are going to have a different file.
Now, the problem here is that Pam Bondi and Kash Patel don't know what DIA has, what NSA has, what CIA has, et cetera.
Pam Bondi is the head of the DOJ.
DOJ really only has like maybe one or two agencies that even are members of the Intel community.
So a lot of people, you know, were beating up on Pam Bondi for being uncompetent, which she is, by the way.
But to put all the ownage of this monumental F up on her and Kash Patel is a bit disingenuous.
It's a failure from the entire government because Tulsi Gabbard, who is head of the entire Intel community, you're telling me she can't get us what we need to get when it comes to the classified stuff on Epstein?
Because everything goes through her.
So Pam Bondi and Kash Patel definitely dropped the ball, but Tulsi Gabbard's got to be wrapped in too because there's definitely classified stuff on Epstein based on what he was doing and the type of information he was collecting and who he was working with.
Well, I mean, look at what she did in Iran.
She knew the truth about Iran.
She knew the truth about their uranium enrichment levels.
How do we know that for a fact?
Because she was the number one person who was convincing Donald Trump to stay in the JCPOA back during his first term.
She's like an expert on this.
She made it her, she was crucified for this and for Syria.
But even though that is true and she did, you know, stick her neck out back then, she is still a staunch Zionist.
And this is as a result of probably her political upbringing, also her religion, um, and her worldview as a result of her family upbringing.
Um, but she's very critical of the Palestinian resistance, she labels them as terrorists, she's very critical of the Lebanese resistance.
But Syria and Iran, she's like much more pacified towards and level-headed towards.
So it's it's odd.
And in Yemen, she's also spoken out against airstrikes in Yemen previously, but not when Trump did it this time.
So it seems as though she's just been completely compromised, completely abandoned all principles.
Uh, she's climbing the ladder.
Roger Stone wants her to run for president next time.
I don't have, I don't have any faith in that woman whatsoever.
She she turned into colon powell, she's Indian colon pal.
Yeah, I mean, the problem is that um, the Zionist lobby has so much power in the Trump administration.
Um, you know, that you know, they like what you mentioned with the JCPO, like that's crazy that, like, she totally did a 180, totally did a 180 on that.
And I was like, because everybody knows, dude, like, do they like the enrichment program that they were running was for bartering, it was for um negotiation purposes, you know what I mean?
Like, that's what it was for.
It was like, hey, this is the trade away.
Let's go ahead.
Let's get these, let's get this deal done, right?
Let's get these sanctions taken off, right?
And they were working very well.
I think that's one of the few things that the Obama administration did well was this nuclear deal, right?
But Trump comes in, Mike Pompeo, the Zionist lobby, hey, get these guys out of here, right?
They pull out the deal.
Mike Pompeo registers the IRGC as a terrorist organization, and then bam, you know, now it's it's it's free reign, and that's what Israel wanted.
I mean, the fact that Netanyahu came to America and defied a U.S. president in the United States, right?
And delivered a speech that was basically like condemning Obama for even doing this deal.
Like, that just goes to show, man, like, who runs this country?
It's ridiculous.
So, well, the other funny thing is the JCPOA.
I mean, John Kerry admitted this, and there have been some Israeli officials actually over the past few months that have admitted this: that the JCPOA literally was, you know, there's different camps in the Zionist movement, and one of those camps thought that the best way of crippling Iran and bringing down the regime was to A, ensure that they never got nuclear weapons, but B, over the long term, using the JCPOA as a mechanism to, I guess,
safeguard everyone from that threat while also allowing for the West to weaken Iran to the point where regime change would be possible one day in the future and preventing them from going the North Korea route, which has, I guess, been very successful for North Korea looking at it.
It has been.
It has been.
And people wonder why Iran wanted a nuclear bomb.
It's like, well, have we been messing with North Korea?
No, we haven't, right?
And that's what ends up happening: they're trying to procure these weapons because Israel started this nuclear arms race back in the 60s after JFK died.
And I want to say this because I actually want to get your perspective on this.
So, John Kurakrau, I might be butchering his last name, Kirakow, I think it's Kariaku, former CIA guy.
He went and did a podcast not too long ago.
And he said that a big reason why Trump bombed Iran was because Israel told him that if you don't bomb Iran and take out these nuclear facilities, we are going to use our nuclear weapons on them.
And it makes sense because I remember back in June, what, me, you, Suleyman, maybe a few others, we were saying back then, and everyone thought we were crazy, that Iran was fucking up Tel Aviv very badly.
They were hitting a lot of their strategic sites.
They hit the Mossad base, they had an Oman base.
They hit them very hard.
And Israel is doing everything in their power to stop journalists from recording what was going on with the damage, right?
Then it slowly started leaking out.
Oh, yeah, well, they're getting hit a little bit harder than they want.
They're begging for the ceasefire, blah, blah, blah.
You know, everyone's saying, oh, yeah, Israel has air superiority.
Operation Rising Lion really damaged them, which it did.
Israel absolutely did some damage to Iran with that with that sneak attack.
However, once Iran recalibrated and they started shooting those missiles back, Tel Aviv was getting destroyed.
And then now, with Karakow saying that, it makes sense because in my head, I was like, you know, this is really stupid that Trump is bombing Iran.
This is a ridiculous risk for no reason.
But now it's starting to make more sense because this isn't the first time that the Israelis have used nuclear blackmail.
Golden Meyer did this back in 73 with Yom Kippur.
Oh, the Arab snuck attack is.
We're going to lose.
Nixon, you better give us this airlifter or else we're going to bomb these Arabs with nuclear bombs.
It's like, all right, boom.
We don't want a nuclear war.
So what are your thoughts on that, man?
Because I guess me and you are vindicated again.
And Sloley mine and everyone else that was saying that Israel is getting pummeled during the war in June.
Yeah, well, I think that, first of all, I'll say John Kiriaku.
I've never met him, so I can't fully grasp his character.
I feel like most of these guys who are ex-CIA feel like they're still CIA, actually.
Of course.
In fact, I don't think there ever is X-CIA.
I don't think there's X-KGB, FSB, any of that stuff.
But John Kiriaku, friend of a friend, I guess, friend of a very close friend, and he did go to prison for exposing the torture program.
And I think that if there was the closest thing we could get to a truth teller coming out of the CIA and doing these podcast rounds, it would be him.
And he's critical of Israel.
And he doesn't even have a pension from the CIA.
That's how much they hate this guy for exposing the torture program.
And he criticizes Israel.
I've never seen a CIA officer criticize Israel, bro, ever.
Yes.
Even what's that other guy with the crazy hair?
The long Andrew.
Yeah.
Yeah.
That guy got asked about Edward Snowden and he he's like, well, Edward Snowden is a villain.
And he started saying all this bullshit.
I'm like, well, maybe still CIA.
I don't know.
But the Kiriaku, I think he's 100% correct about that because it just makes sense, right?
I mean, you hear that and you say, well, Trump probably understands it's going to hurt him politically to airstrike Iran.
He doesn't know.
Dude, the base got pissed.
Everybody was saying no.
Even Bannon was like, well, what are you doing?
You know, like everyone was pissed off, but now it's making sense now, like why he did it.
Because the media, right, for those that forgot, like in the mainstream media, all you saw was Israel's winning this war.
Iran is getting pummeled.
They're getting embarrassed.
Like the mainstream media sounded like, oh, like Israel's destroying these guys.
So when Trump went ahead and bombed them, people were like, why?
What are you doing?
But now it's making sense.
No, Tel Aviv was getting messed up and they threatened a nuclear bomb unless Trump came in.
So now it all makes sense.
And here's the thing with Kiracow: like he has no real reason to lie about that because former CIA guy, it's critical of Israel.
It kind of puts it, makes the president look weak a bit.
But we know that the Israelis have no problem with threatening, using nuclear weapons.
They've done it before.
So it vindicates all of us in my eyes.
But like no one talked about that.
By the way, this Kiriaku is a guy that wants to curry favor with Trump because he still does not have a presidential pardon.
So he can't get his pension.
So, you know, it's like he wants, but he's still saying this.
And there was an article in the Times of Israel several weeks ago citing Israeli anonymous, Israeli military officials who said that by the fourth day, and keep, we all remember the first like 24, maybe a little over 24 hours, there was no Iranian response.
But by the fourth day of the war, all of the Israeli military brass was going to Netanyahu and saying, we need to end this.
And that was before, if memory serves correct, that there was already strikes on the ports, the infrastructure at the ports and some of the air bases.
But I don't think Tel Aviv had been hit hard by day four.
Maybe I'm incorrect.
I know they had a Mossad base there, and they hit some other strategic locations.
There was one tech building, I forget, propaganda.
They did hit Tel Aviv.
I'm just saying by the fourth day, I don't know.
Oh, oh, oh, okay.
Okay.
I got you.
I got you.
They hit Tel Aviv very hard.
But they were saying on the fourth day, all these military brass were going to Netanyahu and saying, we need to end this.
We need to call up Trump.
And Nanyahoo said, nah, I got a better idea.
We're going to force this.
We're going to force his cards.
We're going to, you know, the Israeli article didn't say that he threatened to use the nuke on Iran if the U.S. didn't get involved.
But somehow or another, this Israeli article points out by day four, when everyone was opposed to this in Israel, Netyahoo somehow got Trump to pull the trigger.
Yeah, I mean, and now that like, you know, when you collect more and more facts, it's like the only thing that makes sense, man, because it was wildly unpopular for him to bomb Iran.
I mean, he literally ran on no, no new wars.
So everyone was pissed off.
I remember Candace was pissed off.
Steve Bannon, one of his biggest supporters.
Charlie.
Charlie Kirk was not.
Charlie Kirk pleaded with him in the White House.
I didn't know that.
Like I found that out later.
He got grilled.
He literally went to the White House and pleaded with him to not do it.
And apparently from what Bannon, from what I heard from Bannon, Trump wanted to do it like before the weekend hit and Bannon was able to get it like another day.
So I don't know.
That's maybe, I don't know if that's true or not.
But the point is, is that it was extremely unpopular with the base.
And now it all makes sense why he did it because a nuclear bomb being dropped would have been a huge escalation that could have led to more problems.
And, you know, we all know Iran has a missile inventory that can level Tel Aviv immediately right away.
Like they, if they launched all their missiles, Israel's gone, dude.
Israel's gone.
Like they're a glass cannon.
I think that would have been if they if they had done that, you would have had every single resistance organization and maybe even some states.
Let's look at Turkey.
Let's look at maybe even nuclear Pakistan, who would have joined in because that, I mean, it sounds crazy to think, but a nuclear bomb on Iran, that is a that's a massive red line to the point where no one's even really talked about, everyone's talked about regional war involving Iran, so on and so forth.
But nuclear bomb on Iran, that's such a red line that no one was even discussing it.
But to answer your question, I did ask that question to what's his name?
Professor Saeed Mohammed Morandi, who is an advisor to the Iranian foreign ministry.
And he didn't explicitly say, yes, that happened, but he said, you know, what do you think?
You know, how else could they convince the U.S.?
If Trump is as clean as he says he is, which who knows, how else could they have convinced the U.S.?
Yeah, that was the last puzzle for me, bro, because I was trying to figure out why did he do that?
Like, that was so stupid.
It was such a bad move.
But when he said that in the interview, I said, you know what?
They've done this before.
That makes sense because this is wildly unpopular with the base.
You know, that's why he was so ambiguous about it.
Remember, like the week leading up to it?
I don't know if I'm going to do it.
I don't know if I will.
Maybe I will.
Maybe I don't.
I don't know.
So, you know, that's when I was like, you know what, dude?
Yeah.
The Israelis absolutely threaten to use a nuke.
That's the only reason he would do that.
And me and you know, right?
Because it's it's wild how the mainstream media lied to the public saying that Israel wasn't getting pummeled.
Like they were getting pummeled, dude, bad.
And I did see on some Israeli media articles, uh, sorry, in some Israeli news outlets were saying, like, oh, yeah, we were getting hit pretty hard or whatever.
Obviously, it's in Hebrew.
Most people aren't going to dig it up.
But if you look through the Israeli media, they're admitting that they were getting beat up pretty badly.
But it's amazing how CNN, Fox, every single mainstream outlet was saying, oh, yeah, Israel's destroying Iran.
They're destroying them.
But they didn't report anything about all the damage that Israel's taking.
I had to go on X to find it.
Like you couldn't find anywhere else.
They did a really good job of making it look optically like Israel's winning the conflict.
But dude, they were getting beat up the whole time.
The American media was more sympathetic to Israel's capabilities, defense capabilities than even Israel.
Israeli media was.
Yeah.
It's nuts, dude.
That leads me, though, to I know you said you wanted to talk about Russia.
I don't know how much time you have, but I do want to talk about Venezuela with you and your history.
Yeah.
And I mean, you specifically worked on a lot of drug smuggling cases, right?
Yes, I did.
Yeah.
So as someone who worked on a lot of drug smuggling cases, when you heard Trump initially come out and say that this potential war on Venezuela was going to be about narco trafficking, so on and so forth, what was your initial, the cartel de solos or whatever they called it?
What was your initial reaction to that?
I called it as soon as he designated them as a foreign terrorist organization.
I was like, he's doing this so that he can utilize and leverage the intel community so that they can go ahead and look at these guys as enemy combatants and they can start doing kinetic strikes.
And that's exactly what ended up happening.
Because now all these drug smugglers are effectively like Al-Qaeda was in 2005, right?
It's like kill on site, pretty much.
So now, as far as designating them a foreign terrorist organization, whatever, that's fine.
I get that.
But I don't like bombing drug smugglers.
I don't like it.
I think it's unnecessary escalations.
You know, I think what we're doing with all of the show of force right in Venezuela is right in their backyard is unnecessary.
And quite frankly, I think the last thing we need now is more conflicts.
I'm not a fan of what he's doing with Venezuela.
And then bombing drug smugglers, is it really necessary?
I mean, I think we're a country rule of law, right?
I think that people should be able to get their day in court.
And quite frankly, we're like bombing these guys.
Like they're not even close to the United States a lot of the times when they're getting hit with these strikes.
I was going to ask you, like, they say it would take, okay, there was the submarine.
That was, that was probably something nefarious when they bombed the submarine.
But a lot of these boats, they say they have to be refilled with gas, like fueled nine times.
They're not big.
So it's not really conducive to large-scale drug smuggling.
Do you even think, I mean, the Colombians, Trinidad and Tobago, they've come out and said, you know, these are fishermen in a lot of cases.
Is there any justification really that these, you look at these and you say, oh, maybe they are drug smuggling some of these?
I will say this.
You know, speedboats, drug smuggling, very common.
It's what they do.
Some sophisticated drug organizations do use submarines.
I remember I was working on a case years ago, back like 2020, where we were looking at a Colombian drug traffic organization that was utilizing submarines, right?
The higher end guys, they do have access to that stuff.
But we weren't killing these dudes.
You know what I mean?
Like we were collecting information.
We were, you know, getting people identified.
We're indicting them, right?
We're getting them extradited.
We had a very good relationship with Colombia.
We have a, you know, up until Trump came in, we had an extremely good conversation, a good relationship with Colombia.
There's a big DEA office there.
We're able to carry our guns there.
Like, you know, Colombia was always really good to American officials.
And obviously that relationship is strained now.
DEA has like a full stack office over there, which is like 100 plus agents, right?
So, you know, I don't think that this aggression that we're doing, you know, and we all know why, right?
It's not really about bombing these drug dealers.
It's to justify escalation.
That's what it's really about, right?
It's not about stopping these dudes from bringing in dope.
It's about, you know, let's kill these guys.
Let's see what Venezuela does in retaliation.
You know, let's use this strategically to get access to their resources.
So, yeah, I'm not a fan of that because, you know, I voted for No New Wars and I'm very anti-conflict.
I don't think it's smart, especially when we have the resources.
We can get these guys identified.
We can get them indicted.
We can get them over here.
We can get them arrested.
Like, you know what I mean?
Give them their day in court.
Well, the funniest part is Trump was doing these deportation flights, right?
To all these countries.
Venezuela was among them.
And the Venezuelans were very happy to take in these refuge or these deportees.
Yeah.
And I know the woman who is leading up the receiving end of it in Venezuela, Deputy Minister Camilla Saab.
And she is, it was like a big media campaign.
Like everyone was loving it in Venezuela.
I went down there.
You were there for the elections, right?
Yeah, the regional elections they had.
And I went for the presidential elections.
But during the regional elections, they were like having these big greeting ceremonies where they were meeting the deportees and a group of the young men, because they don't say they're all part of the cartel de solos or whatever, you know, trafficking organization.
Some people were just getting deported for being illegal.
But I was meeting a group of the young men all around my age who were accused of being part of the cartel.
And they were just like working odd jobs in the U.S.
They weren't a part of any stuff.
They don't have any matching identifying tattoos, anything like that.
And I talked to a bunch of people who are like not in government and I was asking them about Cartel de Solos or Trende Aragua.
And they're like, yeah, it used to be a big thing, big issue, but not anymore.
Like it's all over with.
They're making their money in other ways right now.
And then Trump canceled the airspace.
He shut it down.
And the deportation flights into Venezuela stopped.
And then he had to reopen the airspace 24 hours later because he realized it was stupid.
Like it's a complete mess.
You know, and this is my specialty.
Drug trafficking, drug smuggling, this is what I used to do, right?
There's other ways to combat sophisticated drug trafficking organizations like this without necessarily blowing them up and unnecessarily escalating conflict.
Now, the reality is, is that this was all about getting a war with Venezuela, right?
So this was a strategic move to justify pushing up the ladder.
But we have so many different methodologies, right?
To identify, especially for drug traffickers, whether it's the SOD, all these other operations, which I won't talk too much detail because we're on YouTube.
But there's ways to, really sophisticated ways to, you know, combat these drug traffic organizations where you don't necessarily have to blow them up.
And let's be honest here.
If the Democrats get in, dude, they're going to come after Pete Hegseth.
They're going to come after the entire chain of command.
They're going to come after Trump.
They're going to come after every single person that's involved in this because Trump, look, I always say the Democrats started this lawfare against Trump once they've FBI raided his house in Surce Mar-a-Lago.
And we know that that was a political persecution, a bunch of BS, but Trump getting retribution right now on, you know, he's going to probably get Skiff indicted.
John Bolton, the Attorney General for New York, right?
She's going to get reindicted again.
I know Comey got indicted, but now statue limitations got dismissed, whatever.
The point is, is that it's very clear that he's going after his political rivals right now.
If the Democrats ever get back in, they are going to go after every single person from the Department of War, the Department of Defense, when they change back the name, from Hegseth all the way down that was involved in these kinetic strikes.
I have no doubt about it that they're going to go after these guys.
I think that's why that Admiral Halsey, who's the Southcom commander, that's why he left or Admiral.
He resigned.
He said, I'm not going to be a part of this.
But John Bolton being locked in a tiny prison cell.
I mean, God willing, that'd be a beautiful day.
And I was going to say, why is he not doing that?
John Bolton?
No, I'm just saying it's like starting bombing Iran, Venezuela, when he could be doing stuff like that, putting Epstein people in prison, putting Bolton in prison.
And here's the other thing.
Here's the really, really ugly truth.
Maritime smuggling is not the majority of the drugs coming into the United States.
The majority of drugs coming into the United States come in through land borders, through Mexico.
So if we really want to underground or something.
Yeah, like underground, sometimes overground, right?
Depends on where it is.
So like I was in Lorenzo, Texas, they were smuggling across the river.
A lot of times they take it through the bridge and hidden compartments.
I could talk about this all day.
But the long story short is the majority of drugs that come into the United States come in through Mexico.
So if your real job is to, let's go ahead and dismantle these drug traffic organizations, let's really stop this stuff, then you would be targeting Mexico.
So targeting Venezuela is like, you know, let me pick up this dollar bill when there's a $100 bill right here, right?
It's like, it's like, this is a, this is a, if we're going to go ahead and actually go after drug trafficking, it's Mexico that brings in the majority of the drugs.
Maritime smuggling dropped off precipitously after the 1980s and the sophistication of the U.S. Coast Guard.
Yeah, I think that they're walking into Saigon right now and they don't even know what's happening.
It's like now they're shut.
They're seizing, as has been reported widely, they're seizing these oil tankers, any oil tankers leaving Venezuela.
Russia has already said that they're going to start sending in these shadow fleet vessels so they can still get oil out via non-sanctioned methods.
Trump has said that the U.S. will begin strikes on Venezuelan land soon.
Dude, I don't like this on oil sanctioned tankers leaving Venezuela.
The way I see it, and this was reported in the Washington Post this week, that, well, most of Cuba's oil comes from Venezuela because they did not want to be reliant on Russia after being betrayed by Russia after the fall of the Soviet Union.
Russia has obviously said, you know, we're here for you now.
We're going to be your best friend, as has China.
I think if they try to fuck with Cuba, I mean, a lot more people around the world care about Cuba.
A lot of people are going to be very upset in the global south.
I don't think Russia and China are going to let Cuba go down.
I think they'd be far more concerned about Cuba and upholding stability there than they are in Venezuela.
Venezuela should defend itself in all honesty.
But Cuba, I think if they try to do anything there, I think we actually could see like large-scale military installations from Russia and China in ways that we haven't seen in Venezuela.
You think Cuba's a better ally to Russia and China than Iran?
Because I'll be honest, bro.
I was a little surprised.
I mean, I know that Iranians are stubborn.
Like they're very prideful people.
So they probably told the Russians, we got this for the most part.
But I was surprised that China or Russia didn't step in a little bit more when it came to that conflict with Israel.
Granted, it was a very limited U.S. strike, but I mean, what are your thoughts on that?
You might know more than I do.
Well, I guess China sent in military cargo planes during the war, during the 12-day war.
Like for resources, like what did they, did they, their air defense equipment?
Like, what did they bring in?
I would imagine air defense.
I don't think that maybe munitions or something like that as well, but I don't really know.
Russia, Iran has a contract with Russia for SU-57 fighter jets.
But those fighter jets are not supposed to come for until 2026.
And it's not so much as like when are they going to come?
It's about building the infrastructure to house those jets because that's a very large undertaking.
It's about training the pilots.
They still got old, old fighter jets from like the 70s, right?
When the Shah was in, if I'm not mistaken, the Air Force?
Yes, they do.
Yeah.
And so does Venezuela.
Venezuela has like very old F-16s, I think, which is interesting.
Wow.
But Iran is also a big country that can defend itself.
Yeah.
As we saw.
I mean, no drone has caused more problems for any country across the world than the Shahad drone that Iran produced.
And Russia has, you know, advance in technology.
But they're very capable.
I was surprised.
I was very impressed with Iran's retaliation to Israel.
I was like, I don't think people understand.
That was their Pearl Harbor, dude.
Like, we're talking about Mossad assets getting into your country, creating drones in the country, assembling them, destroying your air defenses.
Iran was literally blind for like 24 hours.
And it was bad.
It was really bad, dude.
Literally, nuclear scientists killed the whole top end of their military commanders killed, bombed.
The Israelis did a fantastic job of, you know, dismantling them from the inside out.
But the way that Ira was able to recover in 24 hours and hit them back was, you know, I was shocked at how quickly they were able to hit them back and hit them back very hard.
The main problem was that because there were so many, and you tell me how you got, like, how much time do you have?
We're good, man, because I still want to cover Russia with you.
I want to just let you...
I want you to just cook on Russia because I know that's your specialty.
And Ukraine.
The main problem was that, as you mentioned, they had so many internal saboteurs and Mossad agents.
A lot of these poverty-stricken Afghan refugees that were in their country participate.
Israel is so good at that.
I was talking about this earlier that the thing with the Mossad and the Israelis, why they're so good, is because there's Mizrahi Arab Jews.
There's Sephardic Jews that look Hispanic.
There's Caucasian Jews from East Europe.
There's Ethiopian Jews.
There's Somalian Jews.
And a lot of these guys are Muslim.
People forget that it's ethno-religion.
So you can be Jewish, but be Christian.
You could be Jewish and be a follower of Judaism.
You could be Jewish and be a Muslim.
So, and then they speak the language, right?
So a lot of these guys that work for Mossad, you wouldn't think that they were Jewish, but they are, right?
Egyptian Jews, Moroccan Jews, et cetera.
So that is another thing that no one talks about why Israel is so good and why their Mossad is so good and why their intelligence program is so good in general is because they have informants and they have undercover operatives that look and can assimilate to the country that they're trying to infiltrate.
I misspoke earlier also.
Iran's going to get the SU-35s, not SU-57s, but they were showing the SU-57s off in the air to the Iranian fighter pilots that are being trained in Russia.
There's video of that.
But anyways, as you were saying about the saboteurs, the problem with that was, as you pointed out, they couldn't stop it.
They didn't know where it was coming from.
I mean, they did disband a lot of these cells in the midst of the war, but the air defenses, obviously, a lot of them got just absolutely nuked in these internal drone operations.
Because if the air defense is pointed south and you have drones coming from behind it, it can't do anything about it.
So they actually did save a lot of their air defenses because they just hid them.
They put them back into the ground into their storage.
But people were wondering, like, why is there, there's like no footage of Iranian air defenses doing much of anything.
It's because they made the decision.
Well, either we try to destroy Israel and, you know, bank on that, or we have our air defenses operate and we lose almost all of our air defenses due to these internal drone attacks, which was, I guess, a decision that ended up being quite fruitful for Iran.
They made the right decision.
But to your point about Cuba versus Iran, there's one other point.
Very well-respected professor and political advisor in Russia, Professor Alexander Dugan.
He was the first person to draw up the point, and this has now been echoed by diplomats on both sides in Iran and Russia, that when Raisi was in charge in Iran, they were formulating a plan, an agreement to have a mutual security pact like Russia has with North Korea.
So that was happening right now.
It's like an Article 5, almost.
Almost, not to that extent, but very close.
And Raisi was a beautiful man, an incredible leader.
He was going to be, a lot of people said he was going to be the next supreme leader, the next Ayatollah in replace of Hamini.
And then his helicopter magically fell out of the sky, and no one knows what happened.
And that's what put Pazekin in right now as the president, right?
Yep.
And he's a reformist.
I remember that.
He's backed by these very nefarious forces in Iran, like Javad Zarif, who is a, you know, he has made it his entire qualm, his entire career to push for, you know, JCPOA, closer relations with the U.S. Let's try to avoid sanctions by doing what the West wants us to do.
And when they came into power, they said, we don't need this joint security deal with Russia because we feel as though it's going to upset our friends in the U.S.
So that's what happened there.
And then Cuba also just doesn't have the means to defend itself.
And historically, it means a lot for people around the world.
And I could not see Russia or China or North Korea for that matter allowing Cuba to fall easily.
Yeah, I mean, a lot of people underestimate Cuban intelligence is very good.
You know, you look at the Ana Montes case, you look at there have been some really big leaks and damages to the U.S. Intel community via Cuba.
Cuba is known for stealing American intel all day and selling it to the Chinese and the North Koreans and the Russians.
So I see what you mean when you say like strategically speaking and their intel capabilities, very underrated.
No one ever talks about Cuban intelligence, but they've been busted a bunch of times in high levels in the U.S. government.
It's not Fed Cope.
That's real.
I have friends in Cuba, and when they first told me that for many years, and I don't know if it's still today, probably is, but for many years, maybe not with Marco Rubio in charge, but Cuba's main export was intelligence from the U.S. You know, the FBI down here, you know, I wouldn't be surprised if they don't, if they, I would not be surprised if they didn't have a Cuban anti-foreign intelligence squad, right?
I would not be surprised if they didn't have one.
They're very competent in that because that's one of the main things that they barter with allies.
And so I can see what you mean with China and Russia and North Korea not letting it fall because of its strategic location and proximity to the United States.
I mean, we're talking about a one-hour flight, dude.
Like it's that close.
Yeah, yeah.
I mean, it would be a travesty what's happening to Cuba.
It's a travesty that they are now blockading Venezuelan oil en route to Cuba.
It's horrific.
But I do not have large-scale worries about the future of Cuba.
They've persisted through so much.
Those people are, those are real badasses.
Those are real patriots.
That's a funny story.
They got some of the best.
Apparently, I didn't know this.
Someone told me they got like really good doctors there.
They do.
They export their doctors.
That's another thing they've done: they sent a lot of doctors to help with Gazans all across the world and Gazan refugees and stuff that in other countries.
But I was dating a Cuban girl and she told me, like, yeah, I'm not going to go to a doctor here.
I was like, what?
So I'm going to go back to Cuba and go to Dr. Nero and I'll be back.
I was like, what?
And she was like, yeah, we have better doctors there than here and it's free.
I was like, what?
So that's a medical student.
What was that?
So Jay Guevara was a medical student.
And so that was part of his radicalization.
You should watch.
Have you seen motorcycle diaries?
No, but I'll check it out.
It's really good.
It's not like it's not LARPy or anything, but it's just like a very, it's like a dramatized depiction of Jay Guevara's radicalization.
He went on like a motorcycle backpacking trip through Latin America.
And I think it was when he was in Argentina, he stumbled upon like exiled community of lepers.
And something like that is biblical almost what happened.
And then he was so moved by that that he made it his life's mission to study about working class consciousness.
What's the name of it?
Motorcycle diaries.
It's really good.
Yeah, I'm going to literally just say that right now.
Okay.
I just watched the Lincoln Lawyer.
Have you seen that?
No, I haven't seen that one.
No.
Oh, you guys.
Matthew McConaughey, that movie is so good.
I just watched it before we went live.
I'm checking out.
Anyways, but to talk about Russia, too.
Yeah.
Let's talk about that.
Dude, yeah.
So, you know, it's gotten to a point, you know, you're there, right?
You're there.
You obviously have extremely intimate knowledge of what's going on over there.
And to be honest, you know, you're one of the few people, you, Gonzalo Lira, you know, rest in peace to Gonzalo Lira, you know, and some other individuals, Scout Ritter, et cetera.
There's not many people I watch for Russia coverage, right?
Because the Western media is just like, let's be honest, man, they fucking lie all day.
I mean, under the Biden administration, it was so bad how much they lied.
And now we're kind of seeing it that like we never had the upper hand.
I mean, I think Trump's frustration with Putin and him trying to concede on some of this stuff, the Biden administration lied to us the whole time.
We're winning this war.
We got this under control.
So you, Lira, Scott Ritter, you guys were right the whole time, right?
And it's funny because they banned you off YouTube for being right about it, right?
And now thankfully you're back.
But yeah, dude, I mean, if you could kind of just, because I got a bunch of my people watching now, we got like three, 4,000 people watching between all the platforms.
Yeah, with yours, like a 5K plus.
If you could kind of just give us an update of what's been going on maybe like the last year or so with Russia and Ukraine.
Yeah.
I'll say I'm surprised how many people are still watching my stream despite the technical glitch.
But that's a good sign.
It's good information, bro.
They're just listening.
They don't care about the video.
That's good.
Well, yeah, it's really crazy.
I'm in Moscow right now.
I will say, I think there's some people online who, whether they're talking about the Middle East or Russia or whatever, they try to get the clicks maybe a little bit hyperbolic sometimes.
Like, I'll always be real about the situation.
And I think the most simple way to summarize what's happening right now is in 2022, in the summer of 2022, there was a large-scale Ukrainian counter-offensive, which coincided with the fake outs that the British pulled by telling Putin that we're going to have the Ukrainians agree to the Istanbul peace settlement.
They didn't.
They faked out.
And then the Ukrainians went on a large-scale counteroffensive after the Russians willingly pulled out of some positions to show goodwill on their end of the deal.
So that was a big, that was a big problem for the Russians at that point.
In 2023, in the summer of 2023, the Ukrainians were supposed to have the major Zaporozhia counteroffensive in the south of the Donbass region.
Some of you might remember that.
Did you ever pull up a map by chance?
That would actually be way better.
I'll show you.
Yeah, just because I really want my audience to take in what you're saying here.
Because listen, I'm going to bring up a pro-Ukraine map too.
Sure.
Awesome.
Perfect.
Perfect.
Because, like, this is a, I know my people are going to, you know, they're going to love this.
So I, I, I, um, and obviously, I haven't kept up with what's been going on.
I think the last I looked, um, Trump was frustrated with Russia.
He's not able to kind of get what he wants.
We could talk about the diplomatic situation as well with the United States.
But yeah, I mean, dude, for years, you know, people were, you know, you guys were saying, yo, Russia's kicking their asses.
Russia's kicking their asses.
They were like, no, bro, no, this is a lying.
These guys were all Putin stooges.
Now look at it.
Like, you know, it's one.
Yeah, give me one sec.
Yeah, take your time.
Take your time, man.
Interactive, man.
Let's see.
Yeah, no, it's.
And, guys, I'm going to drop while I wait for you to do that.
Let me drop your channel on the chat for them for my guys so they can follow you.
Guys, give Jacksonico, please give him a follow.
This is the homie right here.
Okay.
I'm going to drop his channel for you guys.
He just got his YouTube back.
Let's get him to help get him to 100,000 subscribers.
Okay.
I know some of you guys say, oh, he's a communist.
I don't care.
All right.
We can have disagreements on political stuff and still be friends, guys.
It's called being an adult.
Okay.
So go check him out.
Go follow his channel.
Go subscribe.
He's also huge on Twitter as well.
One of the homies, known him for years now.
So go check him out, guys.
Subscribe to his channel.
I'm dropping a link right now for you guys.
Let's see here.
I got your YouTube linked in the title and stuff too.
Yeah, no worries.
There, too.
Okay.
Anyways, I'm just going to pull this map up because this is being very stupid.
So, VPNs and whatnot, you know how it is.
Yeah.
Yeah, whatever map you want to use.
You can even use a regular map and just use your cursor to show people what's going on.
That's exactly what I'm doing.
So, okay.
So, basically, you guys see my cursor, so that's good.
Okay.
Anyway, so the 2022 counteroffensive was mainly taking this whole region in the north back.
Harkov.
Wait, I can't see your cursor.
Can you see it?
No.
Oh, you can't see it.
You can't see it.
People on my end can see it.
Let's see.
Let me see if I can pull up a better map that's like interactive.
Okay.
One second.
Oh, now I can see it.
I saw it there for a second when you were moving it around.
Really?
Yeah, I did see it there for a second while you were moving it around.
Let me try one more thing.
interactive map no one has an interactive map Someone said live war map.
Wait, tell me if you can see my cursor when I do this.
Let me show you this.
Okay.
Yep, I can see it.
Got you.
Perfect.
So this is the current situation as it stands in the Russia-Ukraine conflict.
This in red, obviously, is.
We might need you to translate some of those words, though.
Yeah, this is red.
So this is Russian territory.
And just to show you, I have been, so this is Zaporozhia right here, the city of Zaporozhia.
Okay.
And there's a big nuclear power plant over in Ernogadar, which is like right here, I think.
They don't have all the cities on this, but.
I'm assuming that's a civilian nuclear plant for energy.
Yeah.
Okay.
Anyways, but you get the big picture.
Okay.
So look at this.
So basically, Ukraine is really screwed because everything behind these lines is there's no defenses whatsoever.
So you look at Odessa down here.
I don't know if you can see that.
Okay.
Right there.
That's Odessa.
Okay.
Yep.
So the Russians, a lot of people say the Russians want to go until this point right here.
And it's kind of hard to imagine given how the conflict has gone thus far.
But like if they were to get past Herson, which is this city over here, a little bit further over.
I just want to see what it looks like when I do that.
Okay.
Yeah, you can see it.
If they were to get past Herson, there are no defenses really past Nikolaev, this city right here.
And then all the way to Odessa basically would be the Russian military just walking in.
Gotcha.
The Russians are making huge advances in this direction right now.
This is the main direction that they're moving in.
Okay.
It's a little bit, it's a little bit off-center.
Okay.
We can see it on our end.
Oh, there it is.
There it is.
Okay.
The Russians are moving in a huge direction right here.
So like in early November, they were like all the way back here.
And they've moved this much in just about a month and a half, which doesn't seem like a lot, but these are very densely populated cities.
There's a big city called Huliopoly over here.
And they are just completely moving through all of it.
And the Ukrainians don't have much defenses there.
They have a bunch of the guys that they're sending off of the streets in Kiev and Lviv and different places.
They're just sending them up with no training.
They're actually doing training on the front line now in Ukraine, which goes to show how bad it is.
And the Russians are looking to move towards Zaporozhia, this city, and to Dnepro right here, which is on the Dnepro River.
And once they get past that, I mean, it's going to be kind of a straight shot over to Nikolaev.
They're moving extremely fast, about 110 kilometers per week, just in this direction alone.
Real quick question for you, Jackson, not to interrupt your thought process, but just so people understand.
If I'm not mistaken, Ukraine's about the size of Texas, right?
Yes.
Which is huge.
I know Venezuela, to put it in perspective, Venezuela is like two and a half times larger.
Okay.
To Ukraine, because I don't think people understand like how big Ukraine is.
Because like you said, oh, the Russians taking this territory.
Some of you might think, oh, well, that's not that much in a month.
That's quite a bit of land because Ukraine's a big country.
Well, I mean, it's really like, I guess it's not that much land that they're taking when you look at it in the span of the past few years, but they're going up against 27 countries, NATO.
And they have basically taken the principle in most of these major fights to say, this is a war of attrition.
So we are going to take our positions.
We're going to flank the Ukrainians on this side and that side.
And it's dark, but you know, so long as Ukraine is throwing men and Russia's in stable positions, they're going to try to weaken the size of the Ukrainian military as much as possible through that.
YouTube gets a little bit censorious when you talk about Russian military strategy, but that you can understand what I'm saying.
Yeah, I have a question for you.
So these areas that you mentioned here, down, yeah, that area and then pushing it towards Odessa.
From a strategic perspective, why does this land in particular for wheat?
Is it are there military structures there that were set up that they want to disable?
They want to neuter.
What is the like, I guess, the strategic reasoning for these particular cities in this particular area from Russia's perspective?
This is all technically part of historic Novorossiya.
So historically, Russia used it as part of their territory.
And these are all ethnic Russian regions.
So Odessa is a, you know, historically, it's a very important city to Russia.
Lots of ethnic Russians there, majority ethnic Russian, Russian speakers.
Strategically, it landlocks Ukraine.
That's important.
Yep.
It also protects down here, protects Crimea from any sort of naval drones being launched towards Crimea in a sizable manner, which right now that is happening.
I had a friend there last week, and there was a bunch of attacks on Crimea.
Does Ukraine have like an actual navy?
Like, who is it NATO forces that are potentially shooting the missiles down over Crimea?
Like, who's they have naval drones that they use?
Okay, gotcha.
Okay.
So they have naval drones and they have a bunch of naval mines that they've also used to a lesser effect recently.
But the other main thing is it connects Russia with Transnistria.
Now, Transnistria is part of Moldova, but it's like a slightly independent region of Moldova.
The largest Russian or the largest weapons cache in all of Europe is in Transnistria.
And it's Russian, de facto Russian military personnel in Transnistria.
They view themselves as like an independent republic.
And there's a lot of fears that Moldova, the EU, and NATO will completely occupy Transnistria, take it over, and Ukrainize Transnistria and use it as another problem for Russia.
Anyways, looking further up here, though, this is the main Ukrainian defense that's left in Donetsk.
Okay.
Trump said that there's about 18% of the Donetsk Republic that remains in Ukrainian hands.
This is it right here: Kromatorsk, Slavyansk, and Konstantinovka.
Those are the three big Ukrainian defensive positions.
And you can see what Russia is doing.
And they've also done this mostly over the past few months.
The Ukrainian front line is collapsing.
They are moving from the south.
This is Kupyansk over here, the big Kupyansk battle you've probably heard of.
Yeah, is this the region where most of the fighting is happening?
Because I've heard these names before when listening to commentators that are like deeply entrenched in this warfare.
They've mentioned these areas in particular.
Is this where most of the fighting has been going on, pretty much?
Yeah.
Okay.
And the entirety of the conflict, everyone knew that Kromatorsk was going to Kromatorsk and Slavyansk, this salient, was going to be the main battlefield, the biggest battle in Donetsk.
But the Russians, what they're doing is they're doing a semi-encirclement.
So they've captured pretty much all of this territory I'm circling in the last few months.
They encircled that completely.
Lots of Ukrainians were left behind and surrendered.
And what they're doing is forming a semi-encirclement from the south.
And from the north, they are probably going to move.
You can see my cursor.
They're probably going to move all the way across there.
This is the Donetsk River.
They're probably going to move like over here towards Izium and try to do a semi-encirclement of this main salient.
And nothing's really stopping them.
They're moving through each city.
Some of these are big cities with relative ease.
Ukrainians are running out of men.
Real quick, that location, we talked about the other places down with obviously securing the waterways and landlocking the Ukrainians.
This area in particular, what's their strategic purposes here?
Wheat, resources, culture.
What's the main reason for securing that location?
Why has so much fighting been there in particular?
Well, this is, I mean, this is where it all began.
And in 2014, the conflicts that erupted, the fighting started in Slavyansk.
That's where it all began.
With the Maidan Revolution.
Maidan was in Kiev, but yeah, the revolution and then people, the coup, really.
And then people got upset.
They said, we want to become independent.
And the first time in which these people in Donetsk had to defend themselves against the Ukrainian regime and the Nazis that started attacking them was in Slavyansk.
So that was the first battle.
And now over the past eight years, it's become the most well defended by the Ukrainians.
I mean, the amount of defenses they have in this, it is going to be a massive, massive battle.
It's not going to be easy.
Now, why are the Ukrainians fighting so hard for that region if it's mostly ethnic Russians?
Is there a particular reason why they're like, we're not going to, they're fighting so hard to preserve that when a lot of these people are ethnic Russians?
Because NATO told them to.
Lindsey Graham told them, I mean, it really is as simple as that.
The idea is to weaken Russia.
And how do you weaken them by drawing them?
This was what they always said: draw them into a war and try to weaken them, weaken their morale in their own country and weaken their military that will try to liberate these people here.
Fair enough.
So it's Western influence mostly.
It's not even really in Ukraine's interest to even fight for that region anymore.
Exactly.
I mean, it's a suicide mission, really, is what it is.
But you see these big one, two, three, four, these big areas that are circled here, most of which are in red.
Those are the constitutionally recognized new republics of the Russian Federation.
So Russia is not going to stop until they either surrender or lose these positions via the Russian advances.
The Russians will not stop until they somehow get this.
So these blue places, these three blue areas that you're showing us here, the conflict's not going to end until they have those three.
Yes.
And again, some people think that it'll go all the way towards Odessa, even past this.
Do you agree?
Odessa is not constitutionally part of Russia.
Neither is Nikolaev.
Do you think they're going to push it all the way to Odessa, or what do you think?
I do.
I do.
I mean, unless Zelensky comes to his senses and says he's going to negotiate.
Yeah.
But I don't see him doing that.
You see Legans.
The top one is Legansk.
Is already completely taken by Russia.
Yeah.
So this one's, they already got that.
Um, the last interesting point, though, is in the north.
Uh, this region up here could be could be very interesting.
This is the Kharkov region.
It used to mostly be under Russian control.
The Russians lost a lot of it during the 2022 counteroffensive led by Ukraine.
And again, that was some of that was upon the goodwill of the Russians to remove themselves from certain strategic locations.
And now the Russian plan, in all likelihood, is to take large swaths of this northern region.
This little city is called Kharkov, but the main administrative city for the Kharkov region is on the Oskol River, which the Russians have already taken that city.
So they control the administrative city for the Kharkov region, but not the Kharkov region in its entirety.
And, well, I mean, we'll see what happens.
What do you think?
So I have two questions here.
Number one, at what point do you think Russia will say, you know what, we're good, or are they just going to keep going all the way to Kiev?
And then the second thing I was going to ask was, what can Trump do to end this thing?
Or is it even possible to end it at this point?
The easiest way to end it would be to tell Russia, we're going to give you all the territory here in blue.
So these four territories, Ukraine will surrender.
Ukraine will come to the United States.
I see three.
Where's the fourth one?
I see the one up top, middle.
One, two, three, and then Zaporozhye is four.
Gotcha.
Okay.
So if they gave those four, that would end the conflict, you think, at this point.
If Trump was to actually, this is Herson, my mistake.
Okay.
So you think if Trump came to the table and said, hey, look, you guys, because from what I understand, please correct me if I'm wrong on this.
Trump wanted to freeze the lines as they currently stay, which I'm assuming is the red, right?
But that's not enough for Russia, right?
That's not going to happen.
Okay.
So, I mean, right now, this is the capital city, Donetsk, in the Donetsk Republic, which is the most important one.
Ukraine still has this very important salient up here.
Each and every day, they're launching missiles at Donetsk still.
Gotcha.
It's not secure at all.
So it's not just about taking it.
It's about securing it.
So for the war, I guess being realistic here, because everyone looked at the last peace plan that Trump put together.
I think it was like a 28-point plan.
Everyone laughed at it.
They said there's no way Putin's going to agree to it.
And I do remember in almost every single peace plan that Trump puts forward to the Russians, he always says, we're going to freeze the lines where they're at, which I'm assuming it's something very similar to what we're seeing here.
But you're saying they're not going to stop until they get these four regions.
Definitely not.
Okay.
No.
It could happen through surrender, though.
That is a possibility.
Constitutionally, it's a part of Russia.
They're not going to, legally, they cannot stop in their eyes until they get that.
The other big problem is the other big problem is that Zelensky is constitutionally in Ukraine, not the elected leader.
So Russia's worry over signing a deal with Zelensky is not just that he's a bad guy.
It's that, well, if he's violating the Ukrainian constitution by staying in office past his term and we sign a deal with him and we say that means the conflict is over because he signed a deal we like.
What's going to stop the next U.S. administration from coming in and saying, well, Zelensky was technically not the leader.
So that agreement is all null and void.
And we are going to recontinue this effort.
Yeah.
Well, let me ask you this.
Let's pretend that you're Donald Trump, Donald Trump, or one of Donald Trump's close advisors, right?
Would be the expert in this thing.
What would it take?
What would the bullet point plan need to be to end this war?
Because I don't think enough Americans understand what's going on here, which is why I really appreciate you going through the map and going detailed, like, this is what they want, et cetera.
This is the strategic value.
Really appreciate that.
But if you were an advisor for Trump, or if you were Trump, what would be the bullet points that you would put to end this conflict tomorrow, if possible?
All the land I showed you in those four areas, Lagon, Stanets, Zaprozia, Herson has to go to Russia.
Russia will have the ability to prosecute who they view as Ukrainian war criminals that were responsible for crimes against humanity.
And there would be military tribunes, the tribunals, rather.
That's already been something that the Russian foreign ministry has said that needs to be included in a deal.
The seized Russian assets or the frozen Russian assets cannot be seized.
There's a 2000 deal that we have that we're holding their money.
300 billion in frozen Russian assets.
The EU wants to seize it through Belgium and give it to Ukraine.
That can't happen.
And I don't think the Belgians definitely really don't want that because of the legal implications and the economic implications.
What else needs to happen?
There needs to be a new European security framework.
That's been the thing that Putin has been stressing since he gave that speech in 2007 before all those Western leaders.
They need to figure that out.
Now, I don't know if that can be that, that's not going to be something included in the negotiations.
That's something that would have to be done after the fact, but that should be some clause in there should be, you know, we agree to this rough outline maybe, or we agree to discussing this in the future.
And Ukraine, I mean, if they really wanted to end it quickly, they would just simply say that Zelensky is no longer the leader.
The leader of the Ukrainian parliament, the Verkod Narada, is now the leader.
He's going to sign the deal because it's legally binding for the Ukrainian constitution.
And Ukraine will agree never to have nuclear weapons, never pursue NATO membership.
And also, the last big thing is that demilitarization was a really big talking point, as the West referred to it as for Putin.
It's odd for Americans to hear the same thing over and over.
Everyone keeps saying, well, why does he keep saying denazification and demilitarization?
And I guess it's only confusing for Americans because when we enter wars, there's no real express goal or strategy or reason why they just lie about it.
Putin had a very clear aim here.
And the U.S. is talking about maintaining a Ukrainian military to the size of, I think it was like 600 or 800,000 troops.
I think there should be no military.
I mean, if Russia, if they're not.
Do you think that's feasible, though?
Do you like think that they would, the Ukrainians Ukrainians would, I mean, they're not going to agree to a lot of the stuff you mentioned, but like, do you think that's feasible, though?
Where because they obviously want some level of sovereignty, right?
Well, the sovereignty would be guaranteed by the U.S. and by NATO, I guess, saying if Russia ever does anything again, then we will respond by officially joining a military operation against Russia in Ukraine, which is what they, and one of the drafts of the peace deal, that's actually what it said.
So, I mean, if it's feasible for certain countries to not have a military, but still have a state and still have neutrality in the world and still have sovereignty in effect, much more sovereignty than many countries that do have militaries, then who's to say that it couldn't be like that for Ukraine?
Yeah, that would just put us on the hook.
And that would be, that'd be very, I guess, you know, scary for NATO if Russia decided to become aggressive, right?
So, yeah, I mean, I can see why this is such a complex, you know, conflict.
You know, obviously, I do think that the U.S. made some really bad blunders since the Clinton era, maybe even before that, when it comes to Russia.
I think we've really provoked this thing.
I think I know Scott Horn goes into detail on this with his book.
And I think we just really made some really bad diplomatic situation decisions.
And it's coming to bite us in the ass now.
And I think it's really coming back to Trump.
And I don't know if he can, I mean, from your perspective, do you think he'll be able to end this thing?
Or what's your prediction on what's going to go forward here?
Because obviously, I see some of the things that you're saying, but is the White House going to agree to that stuff?
You know, obviously, optics is a big thing.
If they were to say, hey, Ukrainians, you got to give up these four territories.
They're going to be like, what the hell are we giving up?
What's going on?
And then, you know, obviously going to get crucified in the media.
Oh, he conceded to a dictator, right?
That's how they frame Putin in America.
So it's like, even though that might be the rational thing to do, optically, that might be horrible for him.
So, I mean, I don't even know.
What do you think as far as like, do you think this is feasible for us to get this conflict ended or is it wash?
Well, I do agree.
Trump is like too illiterate on this issue to make a convincing case that that would actually be the wise thing to do to the media.
I, I, the, the one good thing he did was when he had Zelensky in the White House, and he's like, he's like, you don't got the cards.
You don't got the cards.
Yo, that was crazy, dude.
I remember it was in February.
Yeah.
But that, that honestly is the situation.
It is.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I was, I was happy he did that, dude.
I was so happy because we had been lied to for years.
Everyone was calling me a Putin Stoog and all this other book.
I'm like, dude, like, this is a waste of time.
Like, we are losing this conflict.
It's a waste of time.
So when I saw Trump melt down on him like that, I told everybody, I fucking told you guys.
I told y'all this is a waste of time.
Even I'll just briefly show you this quickly.
Even in this one area, oh, where is it?
Even in this one area way up here, when the Ukrainians, the last counteroffensive the Ukrainians did was in the summer of 2024.
They have not had a, they never did a counteroffensive in 2025 like they did every other year because they have no men left.
They went into Kursk.
Remember that they went into Russia over here?
Yep.
They lost 80,000 men.
Oh, wow.
I mean, can you imagine 80,000 men in less than a year?
That's nuts.
One little city.
Dude, what are the man?
I'm afraid to even ask this.
What are the casualties on both sides at this point?
You know, and we could go conservative.
We don't even have to, like, let's round down.
What do you think the casualties are?
I know they're keeping it tight to their chest, but we got to have some semblance of a number on both.
The Ukrainians, I would not be surprised if it's above 1 million and not casualties, just KIA.
Oh, KIA at a million.
Yeah.
Minimum.
Yeah.
For the Russians, KIA, I think, I don't know, maybe 250.
I think that's probably that might be an overestimate.
Okay.
So you would say roughly four to one ratio?
Yes.
In the positions that are more advantageous for Russia, like in where Oloidinov was fighting in Bakhmut, for example, I think it was, if memory serves correct, which was like, that was the place where they were just allowing all these Ukrainians to come in and it was just like a complete mess.
I think that was like a three to one ratio in that fight.
I could be wrong about that, but I think I saw him interviewed the general, the commander from Chechnya.
But whatever it is, I mean, it's bad.
A lot of Christians are dying.
A lot of people are dying.
Yeah.
No, it's horrible, dude.
This conflict.
This conflict is actually one of the main reasons I voted for Trump because I knew he was at least going to open dialogue with the Kremlin.
Like, I knew he was at least going to talk to them.
Biden, you know, and Kamala, two idiots.
I have that book over there because I kept that bitch out the White House.
But that's why I had the book there.
I didn't even see that volume.
That was crazy.
Yeah.
You know what I mean?
That's why I had that book there.
Everyone thinks I'm a Kamala fan.
No, dude, I kept her out at the White House.
She literally was there weeks before Russia invaded, by the way.
And it's like, I knew if another Democrat came in, they weren't going to even talk to Putin because they look at it like you're a dictator.
We're not going to negotiate with you.
And I was like, dude, we need to end this conflict.
Zelensky was with Kamala and he said, we want nukes.
We want NATO with Kamala and Vilnius.
Dude, ridiculous.
To answer your last question, which was about the future, Russia is right now very worried.
And I'm worried too, that NATO is beefing up.
I mean, Germany is beefing up their military in a big way.
They're building like nine new weapons, great manufacturing centers.
Oh, wow.
Across the country.
NATO preparing for war with Russia by 2030.
That's from Beloosov, the defense minister of Russia.
Daily Mail, British mothers must accept their sons that have to die to defend Finland.
Wow.
The Finnish president Stoob is like this new guy they're propping up in NATO, in the EU.
Lukashenko and Belarus is warning about this.
And this was kind of like the main thing.
And Finland just joined NATO, by the way.
They just joined.
For a very long time, they were neutral.
But they just joined because of the Ukraine situation.
Wow.
So you don't, so this war is not going to end anytime soon then, basically.
Well, my main fear when Trump got elected surrounding this was that somehow or another, the Ukrainians, the EU and the Brits were going to be, and the deep seat in the U.S. was going to be able to drag Trump along, bullshit him enough to the point where Trump's term in office is over.
Hopefully they can get another deep state sympathetic person in power and at least another anti-Russia person in power.
And then just start it all up again and take the next four years to prepare for that.
And that's kind of what looks like we are witnessing.
You know, and these guys are making money hand over fist.
These defense contractors, like these, these, you know, this, all the people that are involved in NATO, these guys are all making a bunch of money with this conflict, man.
And they're looking at it like, oh, Americans aren't dying.
Who cares?
Which explains why they're fighting in regions that they're not going to win.
Like you're saying, like with Lindsey Graham and stuff like that.
Yeah, so you know, so you don't predict uh, you know, pretty much we're gonna see this thing keep going until 2030 is what you're predicting potentially.
I think we could, I think we really could.
All right, no, no, uh, when does he get out?
2028.
Yeah, it's like midterms are already right around the corner, and both are stupid.
So I don't know.
I'm really worried about it.
And, you know, things could even escalate under Trump.
Trump at one point was threatening to send nuclear-capable missiles to Ukraine.
That was not too long ago.
So that's not out of the question either.
You never know.
Man, yeah.
It's not good, dude.
It's not good.
Like, I'm happy that he's at least talking to Putin because we know Biden and another Democrat probably wouldn't even do that.
But yeah, this is very scary stuff because people forget Russia is a very powerful country.
Like they have nuclear weapons.
Like, what are people like?
They can destroy us.
Like, I don't think people understand how much of a problem this really is.
Like, they literally have missiles pointing at all of our major cities.
Okay.
Like, the last thing I'll say is we can wrap up here.
The last thing they have the Budavesnik missile, this new missile that they released and tested successfully.
It's all, it's like a smart missile, first of all.
So it can, it can evade any air defense system across the world.
Um, if Iranian air defenses can evade Iron Dome, this one can evade everything, whatever the U.S.
They don't even have Iron Dome.
Yeah, we don't even have air defense.
And they can fire it up, launch it in the sky.
It can go in any weather condition, any elevation.
It has a like a small modular nuclear engine, which is new technology that the Russians developed that the U.S. doesn't have.
The U.S. doesn't even have hypersonic missions.
Yeah, we don't even have hyper.
No one's, bro.
I was going to say, we don't even have hypersonic missiles, bro.
I don't think Americans know that.
Iranians have it.
The North Koreans have it.
Chinese have it.
The Russians have it.
Chinese have it.
Iran has it, but the U.S. has not developed the metal alloy needed for it.
It keeps failing when they do these tests.
But they can launch this Budavesnik missile up in the air, and it's called the Stormbringer.
That's what it translates to.
Because it has this nuclear engine and it's a nuclear-capable missile.
It can fly in the air anywhere in the world for I think about up to like four or five months.
That's the official line of four or five months.
And at any point in the duration of that four to five months, they can click a button and literally hit anywhere.
So they don't need fighter jets to be flying over the U.S. anymore.
They don't need, you know, submarines, nuclear submarines near the U.S. waters anymore.
They can just press a button.
And at any point in time, even if everything was wiped out in Russia, it's like a contingency plan.
They launch it up before the nukes hit.
And four months later, you know, it lands in.
And they have a deadhand system too.
They literally have a deadhand system where if we were to nuke them, they have things in the ground that would detect that and literally launch everything and we'd all die.
And I don't think people understand like how serious this conflict is, man.
That's a big reason why I voted for Trump was to end this goddamn war.
And we're seeing that it's tougher even for him, man.
But I appreciate you explaining it to us and what the Russians want and everything else like that.
It seems like these four territories seem to be what they really want and the Ukrainians simply aren't going to concede that.
It's the crux of it, but they're willing to go further.
I think once they get past that, it'd be quite easy.
So unfortunate.
But brother, thank you so much.
It's good talk, man.
That was great.
That was great.
Hopefully, you know, I'll get my internet sorted and we can do this again in the near future.
No, absolutely, bro.
Absolutely.
And like I said, we're going to help you get to 1,000, you know, oh, sorry, 100,000 subs again, you know, obviously get you back up because you were into the hundreds of thousands before they took you off YouTube.
So I'm happy you're back.
And yeah, I'll text you and we'll work out how you want to do it or whatever.
I could take mine down and then you re-upload the higher quality version, whatever you want to do.
All right.
Sounds good.
Well, you have a good next few days.
All right, brother.
You take it easy.
All right.
Awesome.
Awesome.
Thanks, dude.
See you, bro.
I'll see you, man.
All right.
Okay, guys.
Give me one second here.
W interview.
Shout out to my guy, Jackson Hinkle.
We got a black screen here, so let me man.
StreamYard is pretty lit, man.
Not bad.
Like, look at this quality.
He's pretty good, bro.
But the problem is that with StreamYard, it doesn't have the same ingenuity like OBS.
So give me one second and just.
all right all right bam And we're back.
Okay.
All right.
Awesome.
Let me read some of these super chats that you guys got in, and we'll close this thing out here soon.
Coco Manny says to Ratio Kings, W Jackson W. Myron, appreciate you.
Benjamin Nanyahu, tune in for next week's Money Monday.
Okay.
Is that Benjamin Nanyahu?
Okay.
Did you hear about Ukraine's attack on a Russian submarine?
I did not.
I did not hear about that.
Zakono subscribe.
Welcome, bro.
Welcome, welcome.
Yeah, man.
Gave you guys a double header for today.
Guys, I haven't even slept yet, bro.
We're cooking, you know, and I'm going to jump on a flight and go to Arizona today.
So I will be at Amfest.
So if you guys are in Phoenix, I will be out there.
It's going to be a good time.
If you're going to Amfest, come up to me, say what's up, right?
We can chop it up.
You know, it's going to be a good time.
Let's see here if I missed any super chats.
You guys want to show love?
Join up with the OSS.
Only a dollar to join, by the way, guys.
Let me see what else here I got.
Yeah, this was a great interview with Jackson.
Shout out to Jackson Hinkle, man.
I'll do more collabs with him.
I really like his Russian perspectives because he's there, guys.
You know what I mean?
A lot of these, you know, people that cover geopolitics, especially with that war, don't have the same intimate knowledge that he's going to have, pause because he's actually there, dude.
Like, bro, is in Moscow.
um yeah let's see here if we got um any other chats I think we're good, man.
I think we're good.
I'm going to try to take a nap, guys.
Got to hit a flight in a few hours.
It's Leo Kings.
Trump is the president of Israel.
Trump is true.
Very true.
Okay, buddy.
All right.
Cool.
Guys, love you guys.
I'm going to get off right now.
Gave y'all two hours of fire.
Okay.
Go check out Jackson Hinkle if you guys haven't already.
All right.
And I will catch you guys.
I might go live while I'm in Arizona.
So I'll figure that out.
I'll figure that out.
I'll go there.
Dudes are bitching about the microphone being low.
Shut the fuck up, bro.
The mic is fine.
You niggas are just poor.
You got shitty ass headphones.
Shut the fuck up.
Hey, when new niggas come in here and complain about audio, shut the fuck up, bro.
Holy shit.
Dude, all dudes do is bitch.
It's fucking ridiculous.
Ooh, L audio.
Fuck you.
Bitch ass niggas always crying.
Like, why don't you get some good headphones?
Huh, Tyrone?
Stop using the fucking fake AirPods, bro.
The ones you get from fucking Canal Street in New York City.
Get real headphones, you fucking dumbass.
Holy poor niggas always got to complain about some dumb shit, bro.
Your headphones suck.
Okay?
It's not my audio.
I got a good ass fucking microphone.
I got the fucking spaceship over here.
Y'all see this?
Huh?
You see that?
I got a fucking.
Here, let me show y'all niggas this shit because you, you poor motherfuckers, you idiots out there that are talking shit.
Hold on.
Look, I got a roadcaster right here, right?
Roadcaster right here.
I got a Zoom pad over here.
And I got a fucking Roland, right?
4K switcher over here.
Okay?
I don't want to hear nothing.
I don't want to hear nothing.
All right?
This fucking setup that I got, this is like easily tens of thousands of dollars.
Someone said your mic was muffling in and out real time.
Shut up, bro.
Shut up, nigga.
All you guys do is cry.
Fucking annoying.
Also, keep in mind, I'm using his audio.
He's using StreamYard.
What do you want from me, bro?
Turn up your headphones, bro.
Get some Bozes.
Turn up your headphones, man.
Move here talking to somebody on the other side of the world.
Niggas is finding something to cry about, bro.
Anyway, with that said, no, I didn't lower the volume.
My volume was high, bro.
I'm literally looking at my OBS thing here.
It was literally hitting the red the whole time.
Look, you niggas think I'm just kidding around.
Look at this shit.
Look.
What the fuck is this?
You guys see that?
That's where my shit was hitting the whole time.
It was hitting the fucking red, bro.
All right?
So I don't want to hear nothing.
It was literally hitting the red like the damn the entire show.
So your headphones just suck.
How about that one?
Your headphones fucking suck.
God damn.
Niggas out here with some, you know, China-made headphones.
Shit's trash.
Complaining.
Anyway, with that said, all right, guys.
I'll catch you guys.
I'm out.
This nigga said it's low, bro.
Yeah, you're going to shadow realm, bro.
Fuck you, nigga.
Neb Joe Snovo, whatever your name is.
Enjoy the Shadow Rum, bro.
Enjoy the Shadow Realm.
Anyone else got something to say about the audio?
Huh?
You guys with your fucking Timo ass headphones in here?
Bro, the worst, man.
Yeah, facts.
Somebody said Dollar General headphones, bro.
I'm telling you, man.
Telling you, bro.
Niggas got the fucking shitty ass headphones, man.
Okay, this nigga right here said audio is ass at Nick Map6009.
Well, enjoy the fucking Shadow Rum, bro.
You gone, nigga.
Enjoy that one, bitch.
You niggas are in Toon World now.
You went from Nick Map 6009 to fucking Toon World Nick Map 6009.
Knox says I have Sennheiser's their fire.
Okay.
Your mic was muffling in and out for real, though.
Okay, nigga.
All right, cool.
All right, guys.
I'll catch you guys.
You guys probably got some gay Sennheiser's.
I'll catch you guys Probably when I go live over there or some shit like that.