All Episodes
Previous Next
April 28, 2025 - MyronGainesX
01:36:49
Haz Al-Din And TruthTeller Debate: Bolsheviks, Communism, And Zionism! (Part 2/2)
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
All right, what's up, guys?
Welcome back, man.
So, we got the space cracking.
Right now, I am I just joined it.
We had to make a new link because the one that Suleiman was using for some odd reason wasn't working.
So, let me go ahead and get this thing going.
Here, I'll screen share with you guys.
here we are on Twitter so this is like the wait music he has guys um while waiting so
So, okay, we're just waiting for everybody to get in, guys.
I'm gonna give it a second.
I'll be right back.
I'll unmute this.
Um, you can see Haz is here, Truth Teller's here.
So, we're just waiting for this thing to populate.
If you guys want to listen to this space on your phone, I will go ahead and give you a link right now.
That's the XSpace link if you guys want to listen in on there.
But I will be live streaming it as you guys can see here, and I'll tweet it out as well, right, guys.
Appreciate you guys joining in and listening.
Unfortunately, the previous link that we had wasn't working.
I was trying for a good three, four minutes to start the space, and it wouldn't start, so we had to start another one.
We had at least about 1,200, 1,3p0 people who would set a reminder on that.
Unfortunately, so do me a favor: retweet, respect, share the space, let everybody know we're live.
That would be brilliant.
I am sending a link out to a few people as well because people were prepped up and hyped up for this debate.
On the Bolshevik and Holdemar, it's gonna be Haz Aldeen from the ACP and Truth Teller debating.
I want to welcome Marin in as host.
Myron, how are you doing?
Hey, what's up, man?
Can you hear me?
Yes, loud and clear.
Nice, nice.
Yeah, no, I'm also broadcasting this thing right now on YouTube and on Rumble, so we got even more eyeballs that way.
So this is going to be a big one.
Got a lot of people that obviously are waiting for this.
I'm tweeting out the space as well.
So yeah, welcome to Truth Teller and welcome to Haz, man.
Yeah, I just want to welcome Truth and Haz as well onto the spares.
Haz, thanks for joining us.
Haz Aldin from the ACP party and truth teller here to debate.
Haz, is your mic working?
Are you ready to debate?
Yep.
Thank you so much for having me on.
I've been excited to have this debate for a long time.
And, you know, thank you both for hosting it.
Should be good.
I appreciate that, Haz.
And Truth, are you doing well?
Are you ready for the debate?
And is your mic loud and clear?
Do a mic check.
How is it?
It's a teeny bit low unless it's me.
Is there any way you can just increase it slightly?
Or is it me?
Okay, I'm speaking right into the mic right now.
How is it now?
Okay, it must be me.
It must be me.
Can you hear him clearly?
All right, can you hear me okay?
Yeah, I can hear you fine.
I just turned up the volume on my end because I'm on my computer.
Can you hear me?
Oh, yeah, I can hear you fine.
I can hear him.
I turned up the volume on my end.
Silman, if you're on a computer, maybe use the master volume thing if you have that extension on Google.
But that's what I did.
Oh, yeah.
No, I realized what it was.
It's because Haz's mic is actually extremely loud.
And then when it's in comparison to yours and truth, then it looks pale in comparison.
So that's what it is.
It isn't actually his mic.
So appreciate everybody coming on.
Guys, do retweet, reshare the space.
And this is a conversation that's being had on social media.
A lot of conduct.
Candace Owens mentioned it.
A lot of Brick profiles mentioned it.
And I think it's really good debate.
First of all, Hazardine and Truth are well versed in the topic.
I think it's going to be a fire debate.
And it's an important point to learn.
The structure of the debate, and Myron's going to be timing it, is going to be that both sides are going to start off with a five-minute introduction.
They're going to present their argument and their position on the Bolshevik and the Holdemar.
And then we're going to have a scenario where we've got five main topics and we'll go back and forth on those.
Two minutes each side and we'll probably do two to three rounds.
And then we'll ask both sides if they want to continue the rounds on that specific topic or not.
And then what we'll have is two additional modes within the debate.
The first mode is going to be, and by the way, both sides don't know about this, so they're both in the exact same situation.
And I give credit to both of them.
They literally, this was the easiest debate to put together in the history of debates.
I message has within like 10 seconds, he was like, yes, let's do it.
I messaged truth.
And then he said straight away, let's do it.
I messaged has and he straight away agreed to the time.
And then same with truth.
He then messaged and agreed to the time immediately.
It literally was very, very smooth.
So big credit to both guys that they were ready for this debate.
So then what we'll do is the second format.
And by the way, they're both in the exact same situation.
The messages I sent were exactly the same to both sides.
So they're both aware of the same thing at the same time.
And the second side part of the debate, if Haz and Truth are okay with it, is going to be where both sides are able to propose a question to the other side and have a back and forth dialogue on that.
Hopefully that works out.
And then the last side, and this is where the audience comes in, put your questions in the tweet in the nest.
Because if there is questions, for example, you've got what you want both sides to speak about, because obviously Haz Al Deen comes from the communist perspective.
Truth believes, obviously, that communism is a Jewish construct.
And so therefore, there may be certain aspects that haven't been covered in the debate.
And you're like, I really wanted these two to debate or have questions on this issue.
So that'll be the third part.
So is that okay with you, Truth and Haz?
Sure.
Yeah, sure.
Brilliant.
Brilliant.
Really excited for the debate.
So guys, do retweet, reshare the space.
I'm going to just put it on my, I'm going to put it on my pin and then we'll start.
Myron, are you ready with the timer?
Yeah.
So the way it's going to go, guys, is the first two rounds.
Well, it's actually the first round, but each of you is going to get a five-minute preamble to state your position.
If you guys could just articulate where you stand on the Bolshevik Revolution, I think the first topic is going to be for this first five minute is that the Bolshevik Revolution was run by Jews.
Is that the first topic or just an overall preamble?
Yeah, the first five minutes will just be an overall preamble from both sides.
We'll go let Truth go first.
Okay.
And then we'll go to Haz because he'll give his contentions and his positions and then we'll reverse it at the end.
But yeah, the first general is going to be general peramble.
And then the first topic after the first five-minute introduction is going to be world where the Bolsheviks are Jewish.
Okay, so cool.
So truth will go first.
I got a timer here.
What I'll do is when you have 10 seconds left, I'll say 10 seconds.
Does that work for both of you, Haas?
That way I interrupt you guys as least as possible.
Could you repeat that?
My bad.
I didn't catch that.
No problem.
When you guys each have your round, so for this first preamble, it's five minutes.
When you guys have 10 seconds left, and I'll do this every time for every round, I'll tell you 10 seconds.
Or I'll say 10.
Oh, yeah, I got it.
For sure.
That way, you know, to wrap up.
You got 10 seconds to go.
And if one of you do goes over, what I'll do is I'll make sure I add that time to the next person.
So let's say truth goes over by 10 seconds.
I will give you an extra 10 seconds, Haz.
Cool?
Yeah, for sure, for sure.
All right.
Awesome.
If there's anything else, Ruth, are you good?
Yeah, I just want to make sure you guys can hear me okay.
I can hear you perfectly, man.
Excellent.
Cool.
I'm ready.
All right, man.
I will start talking now and I'll start the timer.
Sure, yeah.
Thank you.
First of all, thanks to the host, co-host for moderating the debate.
Thank you to Haas for showing up as well and for everyone that's here listening.
Appreciate it.
Thank you for taking the time on Sunday night.
All right.
So I'm of the contention that the Judeo-Bolsheviks were primarily of Jewish descent, heritage, and many of them maybe even tried to hide their heritage.
But in fact, communism in and of itself is a Jewish construct.
Nobody has to take my word for it.
I like to use, well, Jewish sources who claim the same thing.
So I'll start with Rabbi Harry Watton, who says, the communist soul is the soul of Judaism.
Hence, it follows that as in the Russian Revolution, the triumph of communism was the triumph of Judaism.
The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism.
That was Dr. Oscar Levy.
And then some may call it communism, but I call it what it is.
Judaism.
That's Rabbi Stephen S. Weiss.
For those who have a little bit of understanding of the Talmud, it's quite clear that communism is essentially a manifestation of what Judaism wants, which is to create the slave state where the Jews would be on top, in charge of all the means of production.
And then the slaves, being the Gentiles, would be the ones working within the gulags and also within factories under slave labor type conditions.
This has always been the intention, contention of what communism was.
So then we ask, well, who founded this?
Who founded communism?
Who drafted the main manifestos?
We have to cite then first.
Moses Hess.
He wrote the book, actually.
And before that, he was expressing his ideas.
And he met with both Frederick Engels, Karl Marx, his real name, Moses Mordecai Levy, after he changed it.
So he met with them and discussed ideas for both Zionism and communism.
Communism, its definition, is quite clear.
It's the violent overthrow of the establishment so that those who they claim are proletariats, the factory workers, will then take control and be in charge of the means of production.
So Moses Hess, of course, wrote his book, and he also collaborated with both Karl Marx and Frederick Engels, where he then drafted the Communist Manifesto and later the Das Kapital, which would serve as the main pretext to then go about the invasions later on that would take place because it's an ideology, a socio-political, economic ideology.
It isn't based on anything peaceful or democratic or through election.
Again, it's done through violent overthrow.
As we've seen throughout history with respect to how Jews operate, they've never been ones to operate by the letter of the law.
They like creating their own legal systems, their own ideologies, their own manifestos to then go about achieving it.
Fast forwarding a bit to 1897, we had the establishment of the Jewish Bundling.
And at the same time, also the Zionist Manifesto was released.
How convenient.
And then they slowly went about trying to push their way through.
And even prior to that, they were pushing their way through.
They actually assassinated Alexander II, who was the Tsar of Russia in the early 1860s, even before that, actually.
He liberated all the serfs in 1861.
Now let's talk about pre-SAR, or actually during the Tsar's reign and what the conditions were like for Russia.
Well, in fact, they had some of the best working conditions that were established before World War I. The workers, first of all, the so-called workers, peasants, serfs, whatever you want to call them, they were more like first-class citizens.
They had private property rights.
They had their own property.
In fact, they could bear arms.
They all had secure, guaranteed jobs.
The Russian economy was a top four economy with only a 2% tax rate and minimal debt because they had their own state-run treasury where they were issuing their own notes.
And so they weren't having to worry about these serious banksters through the Rothschilds who were taking over slowly all of the major countries around the world.
They first started when they took over the bank in Amsterdam in 1609, then they moved up to the UK in 1694.
And they would get up to the US in 1913 and many other banks in between.
Their objective was to get to Russia, which is the first thing they did when they took power is they installed their bank.
And this way took control of the Russian monetary policy and also the faith of the Gentiles.
Now, this beef between Russia and Ukraine goes back many centuries.
And the Jews, they don't forget.
It was always their contention, intention, objective to want to take back the land they lost during the time of Kazaria when they had their empire between the 7th and 10th centuries before it got disbanded by Count Vladimir.
They never forget, they always tried, they made attempts.
Communism was their way to get it done, a violent way because they were going up against a monumental, an amazing and incredible Russian Tsar regime that was a benevolent leader who just sought to give back to his people and provide a level playing field so that everybody could have a chance of promotion.
Everybody could have a shot at the Russian dream, which is a steady job.
A family to have spiritual fulfillment because it wasn't based on atheist system.
There was no degeneracy.
There was no abortion.
There was heterosexual values.
There was Christian values.
There was a strong sense of identity and a very high standard of living for all.
That's time.
Yeah, my bad.
I didn't.
I had myself fucking muted.
Hold on, what the fuck?
Hold on, let me mute my shit.
I appreciate that.
Truth check, 10 seconds, and then we'll give Haz an extra 10 seconds.
Sure.
I'll be discussing what life was like on December.
And then we'll proceed with that and discuss how things failed essentially under Congress and essentially collapsed by 1991.
I'll get into more details during the rounds.
Thank you for coming out.
I appreciate that.
So how's it, you'll have five minutes and 15 seconds.
Once Byron is ready, we'll start the time.
Hold on, chat.
Oh, that's what it is.
Okay, okay, I'll do it.
One second.
Let me just get the clock up so that you get the exact time.
So that's fair.
Right.
Okay.
Go ahead.
Thank you so much.
So I'm Hazal Dean, the executive chairman of the American Communist Party.
And as the executive chairman of an actual Communist Party, I am amazed at this colorful description our resident communist and Marxist scholar Truth Teller has given about communism.
Now, as somebody who's studied Marxism for since I was 12 or 13 years old, I'm amazed at this new scholarly interpretation where it's all about enslaving the Goyim and having Jewish people on top.
It's the first time I'm hearing about this.
And I'm sure that as the debate progresses, we're going to find that Truth Teller is extremely well read and extremely literate regarding the classics of the canon of Marxist and Marxist-Leninist literature.
I'm sure he's read many Marxist books.
I'm sure he's read the writings of Karl Marx and Lenin and Mao and Stalin and others.
And I can't wait to have a scholarly exchange with him about his beautiful and extremely articulate understanding and description of Marxism.
Now, to be actually rather frank, I'm just going to go ahead and say that it's pretty baffling because every single claim that he made, every single claim he had just made within the five-minute time he was allotted, is comprehensively, completely, and without ambiguity, a total lie and fabrication.
From the claim that the Russian Empire had no debt when it was in fact held by the Balls by French banks, and it was in fact the Bolsheviks' cancellation of all of the foreign debt, which was owned by the private banking cartels abroad, that actually got them invaded by the entire world and besieged and embargoed even and sabotaged at every turn because these capitalists basically had all of their property confiscated and their debts completely liquidated.
To his claim that under the beautiful paradise of czarist Russia, there was no degeneracy when you had registered child prostitutes as young as 11 years old who were basically roaming the streets of Russia's major cities with the permission of the state.
You're talking about a state where maybe at best by World War I, a quarter of the population could read and write.
Abominally low literacy rates, where people were living in huts and the overwhelming majority of the country were living in the backwoods as peasants, barely teetering on the edge.
If any famine came, they would just basically die in mass numbers and nobody would do anything about it because nobody cared and they just considered it a humanitarian tragedy.
It's precisely such conditions, the rapacious capitalist exploitation of these peasants, stealing their land and then preying on them as wage laborers, the robbing of the peasants of their land, the sending them off to die in a vain war against an overwhelmingly more industrialized Germany, where Russia was so backward it couldn't even sustain itself and defend itself against foreign aggressors.
These are the conditions that led to the success of the Bolshevik Party.
And regarding the formation of the Russian revolutionary movement, to begin with, it's true that the Tsar Alexander II abolished serfdom, and that's great.
But following the abolition of serfdom, all that happened was that the Russian peasantry were placed under debt obligations by creditors and basically became de facto serfs.
Again, the ones that didn't went on to be trafficked and shoved into these factories with abominable working conditions, where they were treated like cattle.
They had no rights whatsoever.
They were living under the most depraved and miserable conditions imaginable.
And these were the circumstances that led to the widespread proliferation of Marxist ideas among the underground revolutionary intelligentsia.
Marxism has always formed in response to a fundamental oppression and exploitation of the people.
They say that how bad the communist regimes were and how terrible communism was, but they never actually go into the weeds and the facts of how terrible and awful it was before and how much communism actually improved things relative to where they were coming from.
And moreover, I mean, I don't even know where to begin.
Every single thing he said doesn't make any sense when you scrutinize it from the basic perspective of historical fact.
How could communism be about Jewish people being on top and all the Gentiles enslaved when the majority of communist states throughout history did not have any significant Jewish presence?
We're talking about China.
We're talking about the DPRK.
We're talking about Cuba.
We're talking about today's Venezuela, not necessarily communist, but definitely Marxist and socialist.
We're talking about, you know, across Africa and South Yemen.
The overall majority of communist political construction was happening outside of the West, outside of places that had significant Jewish populations.
And this has led a lot of these tweakers who are just pulling things out of their ass, lying about the Bolsheviks, lying about communism, to say that Kim Jong-un is a Jew and that Xi Jinping is a Jew.
And at a certain point, people have to wake up and realize how far are we going to take this complete sham?
It's just total fabrication and they're pulling it all out of their ass.
And I can demonstrate that pretty easily.
I appreciate that, Haz.
Thank you so much.
That was exactly five minutes and 15 seconds.
And I can take it from here.
The software I was using was I had to figure out where to turn it off when it rings, but I got it.
Each round from this point forward is going to be how long?
Suleiman?
Two minutes.
And just before we get on to the next round, guys, if you can do me a favor, retweet, reshare the space.
We have 1,200 people on YouTube, Myron's YouTube channel.
We have 900 on Myron's Rumble channel.
And I believe we have almost 1,200 on this Twitter space.
So retweet, reshare the space, a huge space, a huge debate.
I think everyone's been talking about it.
It's going to be fire.
So retweet, reshare the space.
So we're going to go on to the first round.
The first round, as Myron said, is going to be two minutes long.
We'll do multiple rounds.
And then once we think that both sides maybe want to, and then we'll speak and we'll discuss with this both sides.
But maybe I'm going to do three rounds each.
And then if we think that there's a need for another round, we will.
And it'll be two minutes long.
And the first topic is: were the Bolsheviks Jewish?
Let me pass it back over to Myron to speak and then conduct the debate.
Sure, no problem.
Okay, so the first topic is: were the Bolsheviks Jewish?
I guess I'll turn it over to True Teller again.
I got two minutes on the clock.
Once you start speaking truth, I'll start.
I'll hit the timer.
And then again, I'll give you a 10-second thing.
Sorry about that first mishap with the software, but I got it figured out now.
So once you start going, dude, I'll start the timer.
Sure, yeah.
Thank you.
Yes, the Bolsheviks were primarily Jewish, not all Jewish.
And you don't need to take my word for it.
Take the word of Vladimir Putin, who stated that around 85% of the Soviet regime was made up of Jews.
Why don't you take the word of Alexander Solshenit, who actually served in the Red Army, unlike anyone here?
And he was also a prisoner in the gulags.
And he said the majority of the Soviet regime was also Jewish and he broke it down.
He actually went up to about 90, 95%.
They said it was Jewish.
And I can name names.
Of course, the likes of Sverdlov or Yagoda, Yeshov, Beria, Kaganovich, and just so many more names.
Naftali Frankel.
And it was, of course, funded by Jews.
It was not just funded by Jews.
It was created by Jews, as I mentioned.
It was used to created the manifestos.
I've already mentioned Karl Marx and of course Moses Hess.
It was used and financed it from Max Warburg, of course, Jacob Schiff and Armin Hammer, Ashberg.
And it was used that carried it out under the leadership of Trotsky.
and also Lenin, who is a quarter Jewish at the very least.
And Sverdlov and many of the other militants, terrorists who came and invaded Russia.
And of course, the first law they instituted was an anti-Semitism law to ensure they would be protected and they could use their law because they canceled the laws of the Tsar's regime to essentially destroy any type of dissent.
Because this was not a tolerant society out to help anybody.
It was just out to help themselves and acid-strip the country, which is the first thing they did when they stole all the gold.
In addition to that, they carved out a Jewish oblast for themselves.
They were also building settlements for themselves.
That's what Kaganovich was doing on the outskirts of Ukraine.
They were just stealing land and stealing resources while they were killing off slaves within the gulags and forcing them to work for meals while they owned nothing.
Because communism entails owning nothing and making no profit.
Zero.
The complete antithesis to what was going on in the Tsars under the Tsar's rule, where he allowed for everyone to own property, have property rights, bear arms, have rights, have insurance.
And also literacy rates.
He mentioned the literacy.
They were over 56% by 1897, and they were on their way to being 100% within 20 years because they were building 10,000 schools a year.
So it baffles my mind that somebody would lie about the fact there were famous scientists within Russia.
They were doing all kinds of incredible things from building trains, planes.
I'll add an extra five for Haas.
Haz, whenever you're ready, I'll get it going.
Sure.
The literacy rates were absolutely nothing close to 56% for the overall population of the Russian Empire.
That's just blatantly a lie, just like all the other things you just said in your little spiel there.
So there was never a point in which the Bolshevik leadership, however you looked at it, was majority Jewish.
And there was only 5% of the Bolshevik party as a total were Jewish in general.
Now, there were some prominent Jewish personalities in the Bolshevik Party.
And the question you have to ask is: what are the causes of that?
If the causes of that are the consequence of some kind of in-group Jewish orchestrated conspiracy to assert their interests at the expense of Gentiles, why did these Jewish members of the Bolshevik leadership not act in unison?
Why were they constantly forming on opposite sides of the debates on opposite sides of the power struggles?
For example, Zinoviev and Kamenev fighting against Trotsky in the 1920s.
For example, Yagoda, a Jew, being the one who shot Zinoviev and Kamenev and oversee their executions.
Why was it that, and Kaganovich, who was Stalin's right-hand man, who himself was totally against these other Jewish personalities?
So if we're going to go with the idea that this is mainly a Jewish thing, that these are all Jews working together to assert their interests, how do we explain the fact that they are constantly on the opposite sides of different factions within the Soviet government and within the Bolshevik Party?
It doesn't have any explanatory value and it doesn't make any sense.
If we actually want to get into the weeds of why there was a Jewish presence at all in the first place in the early years, we could get into that and I'd be happy to.
But any notion that it was coming from this in-group Jewish orchestrated conspiracy is complete bullshit.
Regarding foreign funding, there's absolutely zero evidence whatsoever that there was any foreign funding for the Bolshevik Revolution.
In particular, all sources demonstrate very clearly that all of the capitalists abroad who were hopeful about the February Revolution, as soon as the October Revolution happened, where they basically canceled all the foreign debt, they completely rejected the revolutionary movement in Russia and actually supported war efforts by capitalist governments to invade the revolutionary Russia and depose the Soviet government.
So that's completely fabricated and completely made up.
That is time.
All right.
So I think you went about seven seconds over there.
It's fine.
You guys kind of evened out from there.
Do another, I guess we'll do another one so that they can.
Yeah, for sure.
Okay.
Truth, go ahead.
I got two minutes on the clock when you're ready.
Sure, yeah.
Thank you.
So it absolutely was foreign-funded.
There's no way you can finance a 90,000-plus army coming from New York with bags of gold to be able to pay off mostly, mostly Jewish army by Trotsky, by the way.
He was the one who created the Red Army.
He was, of course, a Jew.
Nobody disputes that part at least.
With help from Lenin, Stalin, Sverdlov, and many of the other leaders who would go on to massacre close to 100 million Russians based on many different estimates from many different scholars.
It's not even really denied anymore that they killed a lot of people just because they could.
And the whole objective was, again, to asset strip the country because the first thing they did was steal the gold.
There absolutely was a massive Jewish presence.
I already cited Alexander Solshenisin.
No comment on that.
And he's a subject matter expert.
Even Putin said he respects him.
Even Putin stated 85% of the leadership was Jewish.
So did Dmitry Gordon, a Ukrainian journalist who's Jewish, the top journalist in Ukraine.
He even admitted, based on all the research he's done, people should look him up.
He's a very intelligent guy.
He said the leadership was primarily Jewish as well.
And it served for the main purpose.
Again, taking the assets from Russia, installing the bank, and getting back at the GOI, getting back at the Slavs, who Karl Marx absolutely hated.
He called them genetic trash.
And what's amusing to me is this foreign invasion that took place because most of these guys were not even native Russian that showed up there.
Why would anybody defend their interest over the actual Russians who were subject to the massacres that would take place?
And let's look at who actually got killed.
The majority of the people got killed were mainly Orthodox Christians.
Their churches were destroyed.
Over 200,000 priests and monks were killed.
Close to 54,000 were destroyed or turned into wheat silos because, again, there was a process of collectivization that would lead to famines like the Holodomir to slaughter people deliberately by design.
Now, Vladimir, for those who don't know, just means death by taxation.
It wasn't even the first one.
They were doing all throughout the 20s because they could never figure out farming.
All right.
Is that it?
Yeah.
No, that's time now.
Okay.
I never hear you say 10 seconds.
I literally say it, but you don't hear me because you're talking.
Oh, sorry.
You know what?
I'll start setting my own time.
That's fine.
No, no.
I say it, but then you just keep going and then I'll say it again.
And then by then, it's already 10 seconds.
But all right.
Haz, you ready?
Yep.
All right.
So, Solzhenitsyn was a prolific liar and a complete bullshitter who betrayed his own motherland and fabricated a bunch of claims.
I don't know why you're making it seem like anything he says should be taken as fact.
There's no primary source evidence whatsoever that suggests the outlandish and ridiculous claims he makes regarding how the revolutionary government was funding its actual overwhelmingly Russian army, Red Army, that was manned by the Russian peasantry.
They didn't need to fund it because they just seized the Russians and peasants.
They seized all the factories, they seized all the energy, they seized all the resources, they seized all the wealth.
They just took it.
That's what the revolution did.
And that's why the foreign capitalists bankrolled the actual foreign invasion of Russia, which was actually led by global capitalist powers on behalf of the white movement to depose the revolutionary government, to get back their loans, to get back their wealth, and to get back, for example, Royal Dutch Shell.
All of its oil was simply taken by the Soviet government because the Russian Empire's resources and oil was all owned by foreigners.
So, this idea that they needed somehow outside funding when all they had to do was just mobilize the working class and the peasantry to just rise up and seize the wealth.
It's ridiculous.
They didn't need any foreign funding.
They were a highly organized organization for decades.
I mean, you haven't even studied anything about how the Bolsheviks were organized.
You don't know anything about their origins.
You haven't even read any of Lenin's works or writings.
You couldn't possibly understand what they were motivated or compelled by.
You say that it was all about Jewish revenge against Gentiles, but have you ever read a single word of Lenin?
Do you know anything about the actual ideology or the outlook of Marxism?
Do you know anything about the debates and polemics and discussions that were happening in the early revolutionary period within Russia?
Have you ever actually set yourself to the task of even trying to comprehend or understand Marxism?
No, you're just resorting to these crazy claims.
You mentioned this one Jewish rabbi who claims that communism is Judaism.
I could give you like dozens of more quotes by actual reputable Christians, by the way, including the Pope.
All right.
That was 10 seconds right there.
I'll do it that way since it'll be easier.
I said 10 seconds, but I don't think Hans heard me.
So I'll unmute the space again and I'll turn it over to the truth teller because I think that's the easier way to go.
Because I think some of you guys, sometimes you guys aren't hearing me when I say 10 seconds, 10 seconds.
Do you want me to time it, Marin?
Because I think it is your mic scan over a bed by the mics.
That could be it, too.
That could be it, too.
It's up to you.
If you want to do it, that's right.
Yeah, let me try this round.
And then if it doesn't work, then we'll do the mute thing.
Sure, no problem.
Go ahead, Truthell, whenever you're ready.
And Silverman, I appreciate it, Mar.
Go ahead, truth to two minutes.
Sure, yeah.
Thank you.
So, look, nobody needs to take my word for it.
Let's look at what some historians said about Russia under the Tsar's regime to see if it was so horrible.
Let's look at what William Howard Taft said.
He, in fact, said that the Tsar had created an incredible and advanced labor system that was a boon to the entire Russian economy.
He was so impressed by it.
It was something he wanted to bring back home.
And even though he was told personally to abrogate the treaty with Russia that had been in place since 1832 for commerce and navigation, he didn't want to do it.
Of course, Karma still forced him to do it because American Jews were putting pressure to cease relationships with Russia to try to isolate the country under the Tsarist regime.
It was part of the reason why they instigated World War I to begin with.
Now, again, let's look at some of what took place while these Jews took power in the USSR.
I like to let action speak.
Who cares what the words are?
What?
Lenin or Stalin, whoever said, why would you institute an anti-Semitism law?
The first thing that you do if you're not in charge, you obviously want to protect yourself as the ruling class.
Why would you be carving out a Jewish oblast for yourself if you're not in charge?
I thought communism was supposed to be based on egalitarianism and classless.
So why is a certain group being protected and given its own property?
Why is it that Stalin supported this establishment of a Zionist state close to 1947, 1948, when he voted in favor of creating Israel?
And he also, of course, spoke Hebrew and he spoke Yiddish as well.
He was married to Rosa Kaganovich, Gagonovich's sister, and he had kids with her, of course.
And he was a no one's going to call him a devout Jew by any means, but he was, of course, ethnically Jewish himself.
And what these Jews like to do, the ones that came from Russia essentially, is they like to hide their identity because they can't, a lot of them came from the pale settlements where they were restricted with whether they could do for works that would pretend to convert over to some kind of Christian faith so this way they could find other opportunities within Russia.
But in fact, they remained Jews, crypto Jews, in fact.
So they absolutely were.
I'll take Putin's word for it.
I'll take Bolshinitsin's word for it.
I'll take Dmitry Gordon's word for it that the majority of the Soviet regime was absolutely Jewish because they benefited themselves.
Time.
Brilliant.
And then Haas, go ahead for your two minutes.
Yep, sure.
So here's the thing.
You're claiming that Russia was this paradise before communism.
One in four of every baby that was born died of infant mortality.
That number was reduced by a quarter after the Soviet industrialization and modernization efforts.
So what you're saying is a complete lie on that front.
Now, this idea that there is an anti-Semitism law is a complete fabrication.
Just because you saw a JPEG somewhere on Twitter claiming it doesn't mean it's true.
There was never a single law in the Soviet legal code at any point in the history of the Soviet Union, which specifically outlined anti-Semitism.
There is a general law against the spreading of racial enmity in general.
So this applies to Armenians, Aziris, Georgians, and all the other minorities.
Nothing exclusively about anti-Semitism whatsoever.
It's a complete lie and fabrication.
I'm going to go through the entire Soviet legal code throughout the 1930s, throughout the 20s, throughout the 40s, 50s, 60s, whatever you want.
And we can go through it one by one and you'll find there's absolutely nothing.
Now, regarding this claim that the Jewish autonomous oblast means that Jews were in power, what about all of the other small ethnic minorities, not to mention all of the actual Soviet republics for Georgians, for Armenians, for Azeris, for Ukraine, for Belarus, for so many other nationalities, all the ASSRs, for all of the sub-ethnic groups and nationalities within the SSRs.
Everyone was given their own territory.
They experimented briefly with the idea of giving the Jews their own a blast.
It wasn't even an ASSR.
It wasn't even an SSR.
Somewhere deep in the Far East, like in Siberia, and it wasn't even popular among them.
How does that somehow explain that they're in power, that they're being given this small sliver of very infertile, inhospitable land all the way in fucking Siberia that just somehow proves they're in power?
It doesn't even make any sense.
Yeah, sure.
Nassar, you have 10 seconds.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, that's all.
Okay, brilliant.
So, guys, hasn't truth.
You've done three rounds on this topic.
Do you want to do one or two more rounds, or do you want to move on to the next topic?
Sure.
No, we can keep going.
We want to do one more round on it at least.
Yes.
Okay, cool.
Let me...
Okay, I'm about to start the timer.
Yeah, go ahead, Truth.
Sure, yeah.
Thank you.
It's cute that he's concerned about the infant mortality rate under the Tsar.
While abortion was illegal on and off during the Carmenist regime, and they did 200 million abortions, killing unborn babies.
What about that?
Did you know the birth rates under the Tsar's rule for about 30 years was an average of 10 kids per woman?
Nine to 10.
That came down to about two to three because, well, the USSR was constantly in a state of war, essentially, because they were a war-raging expansionist state seeking to spread their demonic ideology to other countries.
And so the birth rates came down considerably.
And they had a population of roughly 160 million before 1917.
They're only at around 144 million now.
Explain that.
Because the population was decimated so hard by abortion, by famine, by the disease, by, of course, legalization of homosexuality, LGBTQ, degeneracy, filth, usury.
And he tries to claim there wasn't debt during the USSR.
Of course, they were in debt.
What about the Landlease agreement from 1941, where they took a billion dollars from America and they took $11 billion more?
Otherwise, it would have never had any chance in World War II.
Did you forget?
$20 million from Jacob Schiff in 1917.
And then that obviously got paid back with the stolen gold.
You couldn't even figure out manufacturing or farming or anything like that.
You needed help.
You signed a Rapollo agreement with the Germans you supposedly hated so much so they could help you build infrastructure.
And then you signed off on a deal with Henry Ford in 1929.
You couldn't figure out how to build cars, tractors, trucks, or do any type of farming.
All you knew how to do is collectivize based on the minimal that you were doing because during the Tsar's reign, Russia was considered the world's bread garden because they were exporting so much wheat, oil, barley, rye, etc.
I say, look at the numbers.
And I posted all this stuff.
I've got over 42,000 posts of my name in many articles.
You can see that compared to what the communists were under the Tsar's reign, nobody starved to death.
There were no mass famines.
So you can clearly see the difference where during one reign, you've got a collectivization process with the other, you're the world's garden basket and you're a net exporter.
I appreciate that.
Okay, we're going to do one last round on this, but it's.
Oh, sorry.
Haslasvok.
Sorry.
One second.
Give me two seconds.
Okay, yeah.
Lend-lease was completely negligible.
85% of it came after the decisive battles that actually turned the tide of the war already.
Historians estimate that it only shortened the war maybe by a few months, actually.
So Lend-Lease was completely negligible.
It was about 4% of the supplies that they had used.
And it was old.
It wasn't even used in time.
So that is complete nonsense.
It's one of the fucking Russophobic myths that are used by NATO and Western countries today to downgrade the Soviet effort during the war.
Now, regarding the problem of the demographic crisis, people not having enough kids.
Well, when you modernize and you industrialize, that tends to be what happens.
It's happening in Japan today.
It's happening in South Korea.
It's even happening in China.
It's a global crisis in general.
You can't blame communism specifically for that.
India, a very poor, impoverished country, had a huge explosive birth rate.
We know that very, very poor, kind of really, really backwards countries tend to have high, high birth rates.
Doesn't mean there's some kind of advanced civilization.
This whole thing about the legalization of homosexuality is complete bullshit.
They threw out the entire legal code in the early years of the revolution.
That didn't mean they institutionalized or tolerated homosexuality.
It was still being persecuted under common law.
So that's another complete lie.
By the way, Rosa Kaganovich never existed.
Stalin never had a Jewish wife.
I don't know if I caught that last time.
The idea that there was usury under the Soviet Union is laughable.
I mean, there was not even any tolerance of market relations until the NEP.
But the idea of usury, when this central bank was nationalized and owned by the state, it's impossible that there could be any usury.
You want to know where there was usury?
Under the Tsar.
The Tsar's regime, first of all, was under the control of usurious powers abroad.
But usury was a widespread practice, especially by Kuwaks after the Stolypin reforms who would prey on peasants in times of famine and basically force them to take out usurious loans in order to steal and gobble up their land, which is also the tactic capitalists were employing even before the Stolyipin reforms.
So it's complete nonsense.
The czarist famines, you had 1 million people die in the 1890s Volga famine.
You had 1897, 300 to 500,000 people die.
Okay, yeah, I can name more of it.
Brilliant.
Yeah, three seconds.
I'm also going to get that to truth.
Truth.
Concluding remarks on this topic.
Go ahead.
We'll do 90 seconds of concluding remarks.
And then we'll move on to the second topic.
So truth, go ahead.
Obviously, you'll have the extra three seconds.
So 93 seconds for you.
Go ahead, Truth.
Thank you.
So I always say, judge on actions.
Who cares what anyone else says or thinks?
And it's quite clear that Russia was an industrialized country, a top four economy with low tax rates, high GDP growing at 10%, 8% to 10% per year for 30 years before World War I. They weren't under any type of, they had their own in-house treasury.
It was imposing at best very low interest loans that nobody wasn't subjecting anybody to type of to like repossession of homes.
There were no market crashes for the most part.
Things were very stable, in fact.
You know what there wasn't during the Restar's reign?
There were no mass famines.
They weren't killing people by the millions.
There was no holodomir from 1932 to 33 where they killed over 10 million Ukrainians, Belarusians, and of course Kazakhs by starving them to death.
That didn't happen.
Why were there 70 famines during the USSR if they were so advanced and it was such a great ideology?
Why did communism end up failing by 1991 if it was supposed to be so successful?
Why did they make so many bad decisions, like going into Afghanistan and engaging in a 10-year stalled war that led to just murder of death on both sides?
A lot of bad decisions.
They couldn't afford to finance their debt anymore.
They actually left communism with $100 billion in debt.
They were saddled with that because they were spending 50% of their revenue just on military.
So this way they could go and invade other countries and spread their filthy demonic ideology so they could kill off the governments in power and install their own rogue regimes and steal the resources of the land just as the Jewish banksters were sponsoring them to do.
Thank you.
Perfect.
That's perfect.
Time in.
And Haz for your concluding remarks on the first topic for 90 seconds.
Go ahead.
Right.
They had such a high military budget because they were being besieged by the most powerful capitalist countries in the entire world.
I mean, untold tens of billions of dollars were being, even more than that, were being spent in a concentrated effort by all the world's major capitalist powers, including the most powerful in the United States, to destroy the Soviet Union and to destroy its ability to have any kind of international relations.
So that's why they had to have such a high military budget.
They learned the lesson of the Nazi German invasion and they couldn't allow it to ever happen again.
They know that they were being encircled and that at any given moment they were going to be completely toppled and destroyed by foreign rapacious capitalist powers.
So ask yourself the question, why did they need to defend themselves so aggressively?
Why was their system such a threat to the powers that be into the global system that prevailed?
Nobody seems to be asking these questions.
Nobody seems to be asking the open and obvious question of why are all of the countries today which are resisting the global system mostly aligned, at least having some connection to the communist tradition and communist history.
There's a reason for these things.
The notion that under the czar that you didn't have usury, you didn't have debt, it's a complete laughable lie.
Everything he's claiming is completely pulled out of his ass.
The idea 10 million people died in the so-called holodomor, a lie invented by the CIA-backed organization of Ukrainian nationalists, is also laughable when estimates put the death toll much, much lower and due to natural causes.
And after that famine, there was never another one again, except the one that was a consequence of the World War II.
So we can get into it.
I'd love to get into the weeds of these so-called statistics that he's getting for that because, yeah, okay, go ahead.
Yeah, and I put enough that's going to be the next topic.
But guys, I appreciate has and truth.
That was the conclusion of the first topic.
In the comment section, who do you think won the first round?
Which is, were the Bolsheviks Jewish?
Was it Hazal Din from the ASCP party or was it Truth Teller?
In the comments and let us know.
In addition to that, remember the last round, it is going to be questions from the audience where has and truth will debate.
So do put your topic questions or points you want them to debate on in the comment section.
And finally, do retweet, reshare the space.
I believe we have 1,300 people on here and about 2.5 to 3,000 on YouTube and Rumble.
So a large number of people are listening to this debate.
Myron, anything before we jump onto the second round?
And you can introduce the second round as well.
Yeah, you guys can hear me now, right?
Because I don't know what happened.
I had myself unmuted, but for some odd reason, it didn't work.
I unmuted on Twitter and on my roadcaster, but it's fine.
They can hear you.
The issue is that, you know, when has and truth are speaking and then you speak, they can't hear you.
Yeah.
Yeah, I noticed that because I was like looking back again and I saw that I was unmuted and it wasn't working.
So that's fine.
No biggie.
I'll just be here.
I'm running a poll on my chat as well right now with who they think won the part one.
But yeah, we'll go right into the second topic if you can introduce it to the people.
I appreciate that, Myron.
Yeah, the second topic, funny enough, they have just touched on it, has and truth.
And I will get Haz to go first on this topic.
And it is going to be, and because I am interested in his contention and position on this, is the second question.
Is the Holdomar real and was it a genocide of Christians?
Hazal Din, we'll do two minutes.
Yeah, again, I think we'll keep it to two minutes.
Go ahead, Haz.
You've got two minutes to provide your position.
The Holy Moor was a term that was invented around the 70s and 80s by the Ukrainian diaspora that were Nazi collaborators and fled to the West where they were funded and backed by USAID and the CIA to basically make it seem like the Soviets had their own equivalent of the German Nazi Holocaust to put them on the same level and to demonize the Soviet Union in this way.
It's a fabrication created by Ukrainian nationalists to call it a genocide.
Now, the idea that it was somehow targeting Orthodox Christians because Christians were victims is nonsense because the majority of the population at the time were Christians.
So it follows that the majority of the victims were also Christian.
But that doesn't mean that all the victims were Christian.
They were Jewish victims of that same famine.
It was a famine.
It wasn't intentional.
It wasn't deliberate.
And the Soviet government in 1933, when they received word of it, did everything in their power to relieve that famine and divert foreign exports back to give it famine relief, giving far more in terms of famine relief than they did for foreign exports, which were just as dire and necessary.
Because here's why they needed to export grain in order to get mechanization and modernization of agriculture with industrial equipment, because that's the only thing that actually puts an end to famines in the long term.
That's why following Stalin's industrialization, you never saw famines of this scale ever happen in the history of Russia ever again, because they managed to industrialize and modernize their economy.
There was one that happened after World War II as a consequence of the devastation of the Nazis on Soviet industry, but you could hardly blame the communist system for that.
They lost about 27 to 30 million people.
Now, reputable historians never ever put the famine's death toll at these ridiculous numbers that he's talking about.
He claimed that 100 million people died according to the because of the regime's intentional policies.
That's completely ridiculous.
I mean, even the authors of the Black Book of Communism, who have since admitted that they were bullshitting, put the total, which includes China and every other communist state, at 100 million.
The idea that it happened in the Soviet Union alone, it's just complete nonsense.
It's ridiculous.
Haz, was two minutes enough, or do you want another minute to provide your thesis or your position?
Yeah, that would help.
Another minute would help.
Brilliant.
Let's do because then it's the starve so people understand the foundational business.
Yeah, go ahead, Hazko, for another minute, and then we'll do true three.
Yeah, so the causes of the famine of 32 were the result of a poor harvest due to environmental factors, and it affected many other regions, not just Ukraine.
It affected Turkey, Romania, Bulgaria, and it affected other parts of the Soviet Union, like Kazakhstan.
It was the result of a poor harvest.
Now, this was very common.
It was a constant, never-ending cycle for a thousand years in Russia, where because of a drought, because of environmental conditions, there would be famine and everyone would just starve and nobody would give a shit.
I mentioned the millions and millions who died of hunger and famine under the Tsar.
Nobody cares about that.
They all considered it a humanitarian catastrophe.
So when it happened under the Soviet government, before they were able to industrialize and therefore put an end to the famines in the long term, everyone's blaming communism for famine, but famine was the norm before communism.
It was the Soviet industrialization efforts that actually put an end to famine in the long term.
Appreciate that, Haz.
Truth, you're going to get three minutes.
So do go ahead.
Thank you.
So this is typical Jewish behavior, blaming the victims.
Oh, it was natural causes, disease.
It just happened.
No, it was deliberate.
There were 70 famines between 1917 and 1991.
The Holodomir was just one of the bigger ones.
And again, in terms of acknowledgement, well, guess what?
The Ukrainian courts already acknowledged it and found posthumously both Kiganovich, Postiev, and others who were working on their Stalin of guilty of the Holodomir famine.
So they went through all the records and the deaths that took place, realized it was by starvation.
It was by spread of disease because there was malnutrition taking place deliberately because of the process of collectivization, because the economy was weak.
They weren't producing enough.
They went from not producing enough to being net exporters where they were net exporters under the Tsarist regime because once again, these people couldn't figure out farming because they were grossly incompetent.
Jews don't know how to do farming.
They're not good at manual labor.
That's why they also have to outsource it and get help from the likes of Henry Ford and also the Germans, both through the Rapollo Treaty and also even after World War II, when they brought in over 200 German scientists to help them figure out their aeronautical division so they could build fighter jets.
So you see, it's because of gross negligence.
It was not just negligence.
It was a deliberate, systematic effort to kill people by starvation because that's the cheapest way to kill.
You don't even have to use a bullet.
And they weren't killing people with starvation.
They were using gas chambers.
It was in 1935, in fact, that Davidovich Berg invented the first mobile gas chamber where he was connecting his exhaust pipe to the chamber and killing off Russians that were within that chamber as they were being transferred to the gulags.
And if they survived, they'd end up getting tortured to death.
One example of a torture routine they used, they would tie up the Russian slaves and literally saw them in half because that's how demonic these individuals are.
Just as they wiped out the Tsar's entire family, him, his wife, his five kids, and even his dogs, they wiped them all out.
There's no due process because due process never existed under the Tsar under the Soviet regime because these people are violent, criminal, Judeo-sadists.
They worship Satan.
And for them, when they commit these types of sacrifices, it's towards their God, which is the devil, because that's who they ultimately worship.
Now, let's look at some other proof of the Holodomir.
Why don't we look at the statements of Arthur Kessler?
He was a Jewish journalist.
He came in as an outsider in 1932 and witnessed for himself the horrific starvations that he saw on the trains that he was going from town to town within what's modern day Ukraine, Belarus, and other cities.
Why don't we also look at the testimony of Gareth Jones?
He was a Welsh journalist.
He came in three times in the Soviet Union between 1931 and 33, and he posted 20 separate articles talking about the holodomir that took place and the famine that was imposed on these poor victims, victims of vicious Jewish behavior to steal the fundamentals of food, oat, wheat, barley, and leave them with nothing to eat.
Because that's how vicious these people actually are.
So there's absolutely no reason.
But we have both the Ukrainian courts that have acknowledged it took place and even put guilty pleased on those who were in charge of it.
And even the Russian courts have acknowledged it as well.
So there's simply no disputing.
We've got eyewitness testimony and we've got the courts guilty pleas.
Thank you.
Thank you for that, Truth.
Guys, in terms of the first round, we have got the tweet in the nest.
Who won the first round?
Were the Bolsheviks Jewish?
Has Al-Din and Truth.
The percentages are very similar at the moment.
Haz is on 52, truth on 48.
There's been 300 votes.
So the tweet is in the nest.
Vote how you please.
In terms of round one, there's 1,400 people listening to space, and I believe about 3,000 on YouTube and Rumble.
Do retweet and reshare the space.
The way you do it is you go to my profile.
It's the pinned tweet on the profile and you just click the retweet button for those people who are unaware how to do it.
Great debate going on.
The second topic that we're speaking about, which the introduction has been done by Hazaldin and Truth Teller is, is the Holdemar real?
And was it a genocide of Christians?
I'm going to give the mic straight back to Haz.
Haz.
You've got two minutes.
Go ahead, start whenever you want.
Citing the courts of modern-day Ukraine who came to the determination that it was a genocide as part of an explicit policy help and funded by the CIA and USA to demonize Russia and accuse them of genocide is laughable as if they don't have biases.
There's not a single Russian court that has ever determined that the Soviet government was guilty of genocide against Ukrainians or genocide in general.
So that's a complete lie.
And moreover, you're selectively choosing these testimonies of anti-communists.
What about even people who are not even communists, like Sir John Maynard, who was an official in the Indian government, who stated that the idea of three to four million dead has passed into legend, that the notion that the calamity is comparable to the one that happened in 1921 and 22, which was before collectivization, this is when the kulaks were basically allowed to run rampant throughout the 1920s.
That's why there was the famines that happened after 1917, by the way, and before the time of the Soviet government in general, because the agriculture wasn't collectivized.
They didn't have mechanized agriculture.
They didn't have tractors.
They didn't have modern machinery.
They didn't have any of the modern farming equipment that was necessary to actually mitigate famines when environmental disasters struck.
You can't explain why, after this collectivization, after this industrialization, the periodic famines that used to plague Russia for a thousand years came to an end.
People stopped starving to death every time there was an environmental disaster because they had the modern technology and mechanized equipment to mitigate it and get much, much higher yields than before.
So this is what you're not understanding is that, yes, there were famines before the collectivization efforts when kulaks were hoarding grain and acting as speculators and the so-called market was allowed to be in command.
But that's an argument in favor of collectivization.
And I finally want to make the point.
If this was somehow a Jewish orchestrated thing, these were Jewish satanic people eating babies and they were all Jewish.
How do you explain the fact that the main personalities that were Jewish in Bolshevik leadership actually opposed Stalin's plans for collectivization?
They sided with Bukharin.
The Komenev Zenobiev bloc sided with Bukharin against Stalin's collectivization.
Trotsky was against Stalin's collectivization.
The Jews in the main were not in favor of it.
Even Yogoda was against Stalin on this.
You're completely wrong.
Okay, for sure.
Truth, go ahead.
You've got an extra nine seconds for your rebuttal, which is going to be two minutes and nine seconds.
Go ahead, Truth.
Sure, yeah.
Thank you.
Yagoda and Yeshov were in on the deliberate starvation tactics used during the holodomir, but not just during the holodomir.
I mean, this was going on in the 1920s as well.
They were using starvation as a deliberate tactic to starve people to death because it was an easy way to kill people because they came in, they invaded with a vengeance to get back at the Gentiles for what they felt was, you know, the anti-Semitism they'd been facing for centuries within Russia because they weren't allowed in because of all the misbehaviors and criminality they'd been doing and the terrorist activities they were doing before 1914, before even the before 1917, even because they were committing so many acts of terrorism.
And once again, you don't need to take my word for it.
It was Jacob DeHaan, who actually came in.
He was a Jew from America, who came Holland, who came in and witnessed how many Jews there were in the jails for committing crimes.
They weren't even that badly treated or starving to death.
And they went off to Israel and did his own thing.
In terms of other testimony, like I said, I'll remind the audience, eyewitnesses who have no reason to lie witnessed the holodomir.
Arthur Kessler witnessed the holodomir.
He was Jewish.
He's already dead.
He had no reason to lie.
He was publishing his articles in real time, and he got so disgusted with the policies of these satanic worshipers that he left.
He didn't want to have anything to do.
And he was a Marxist before he showed up in 1932.
And what reason would Gareth Jones have to lie?
He was a Welsh journalist.
And do you know what happened to him?
He was killed in 1935 because the Jews paid off an assassin to take him out.
So that's what took place because they didn't want the truth to come out.
This is just another typical cover-up of the Jews because they never want to be held accountable for their crimes.
And of course, whether it was 7 million or 10 million, they want to make sure that number never comes out because it's above 6 million.
And that's a very special number to the Jews because they love to use that as a pretext to be able to collect reparations to the state where they collectively take from the Germans who weren't even around during World War II to having even been accused of any crimes because that's how these Jews roll.
They expect perpetual punishment from those they claim punished them, but they'll deny the crimes they've committed on those involved.
Let me tell you about another crime the Jews also committed against the Germans, the same Soviet Jews.
And that's that they killed 11 million Germans after World War II and raped 2 million of their women between 1945 and 1948, which they actively denied because they engage in violent event denial of crime in the United States.
Appreciate that truth.
Go ahead, Fiyatoumas.
He's acting like these people never had any incentive to lie about the Soviet state and demonize it in every possible way.
When the Soviets committed the worst possible sin in the eyes of the global capitalist elites, which was repudiate and completely destroy the debt that was enslaving Russia before they nationalized all their resources, they took the oil from the major oil conglomerates.
They took all the wealth and resources back from the foreign capitalists.
So, of course, there's a huge monetary and financial and material incentive by the capitalist governments of the world to do everything in their power to have agents completely lie about what was going on in the Soviet Union.
You're conveniently leaving out other sources like Duranti Duranty, who completely Walter Duranty, who completely repudiates the narratives that you're talking about here that somehow there is some kind of uniquely atrocious thing going on because of the famine in 32, 33.
Finally, this idea that it was deliberate and it was a policy of deliberate starvation here, once again avoiding the elephants in the room, which is the question of the policy of collectivization was not supported by people like Yogoda.
Yogoda was not a friend of Stalin's, and Stalin actually had Yogoda shot.
If anything, the fact that Yogoda was ever in a position of power just goes to show that Stalin didn't even fully consolidate full and complete power over the complete Soviet government.
He was someone who sided and was more sympathetic with Bukharin and that completely other block.
By the way, if you don't know who Bukharin is, because you're illiterate, Bukharin didn't want collectivization.
He wanted market mechanisms to prevail in the countryside and basically allow the kulaks to go run rampant.
But despite that fact, this was causing a profound crisis in the Soviet Union because of the fact that they couldn't feed their people.
They weren't producing enough grain because they were hoarding it in the countryside.
There is no solution to this crisis other than collectivization in order to get the necessary capital to actually fund mechanization and modernization.
You're consistently ignoring the dire and pressing need to modernize and industrialize the economy, not just for the sake of avoiding famines in the future, but also building up the military necessary to resist future invasions like the Nazi invasion that did come in 1941.
Truth, go ahead with the rebuttal.
Sure, yeah, thank you.
So now, Russia and Germany actually had a non-aggression pact signed in 1939, and it was Russia that was going to violate it through the Operation Groza that was planned three months before there was even an Operation Barbarossa, where Germany was ended up having to take a defensive position and protect their interests.
Otherwise, Russia was planning an invasion of Western Europe.
It's so funny to hear the USSR painted as a victim state.
They have to spend all this money on arms when they were the aggressor.
Communism in and of itself is an aggressive, violent ideology.
Once again, it entails the violent overthrow of the establishment to then take control of the means of production, take the resources, assets, That strip it and then decimate it essentially.
And that's essentially what the Jews in charge, those funded by the central bankers, such as Jacob Schiff, Max Mohrberg, Armin Hamber, Ashberg, etc., were looking to do as a flip side to capitalism.
So this way they could create cold wars, finance both sides, and win.
The part he doesn't talk about, why does he talk about Maxim Liptonoff?
Who is he?
Or maybe he knows him better as Meyer Finkelstein.
He was the guy that was financing Stalin and the whole operation.
He was the guy Stalin had to answer to.
He was the arm of the Rothschilds, a name that rarely gets mentioned.
So he was the guy calling the shots and he got to stick around well longer than Stalin did.
In fact, go figure.
Imagine that.
So we see who's actually in charge.
It's always been the Jewish banksters.
And he couldn't deny that they did take debt.
There was a land lease agreement for a billion, then $11 billion more because they couldn't even afford to defend themselves, much less be on the aggressive side because they had to be financed by Jewish banksters who owned them, just like they owned them in 1917, just like it was Henry Fourth that had to come and teach them how to build tractors, cars, cars, and other infrastructure because they couldn't do anything on their own.
That led to the starvation of their own people.
So whether you want to say it was deliberate or it's because of an incompetence, it's on them because there was a leadership and they couldn't figure out how to do farming and feed their people.
But they actually did.
They were doing collectivization and stealing whatever it is they were making under the circumstances that they put themselves in deliberately because they jailed all of their specialists and knew actually farming.
Okay, brilliant.
So we're going to do the concluding remarks on by Haz and Truth.
90 seconds.
Hazard's going to get an extra five seconds because truth on another five seconds, I mean 95 seconds.
But the concluding remarks, Baihaz and Truth are on is the Haldemar real and were Christians persecuted genocided.
Go ahead, Haz.
Your 95 seconds.
First, he claims that it was a deliberate policy of starvation.
Then he's just claiming that it was just because they were incompetent and didn't know how to farm.
Which one is it?
You're completely contradicting yourself here, and it's totally incoherent.
And if you were correct that they were fundamentally incompetent and didn't know how to farm whatsoever, why was that the only actual famine that wasn't a direct cause of the war, which was the one that happened after World War II in 1947?
This was the only one that happened.
If they didn't know how to farm, you would have thought the famine would have continued on for the rest of the 1930s and it didn't.
It only happened once and they quickly relieved it and it came to an end.
So you're completely wrong about that.
You're making the claim that the Soviets were planning a war of aggression against the Nazis before Operation Barbarossa.
There's zero evidence to substantiate that whatsoever.
You just totally pulled it out of your ass.
Now, why would the Soviet Union have developed the country so much, modernized, gave people education, built up so much infrastructure, improved the quality of life so drastically as they did?
Caloric consumption, literacy rates, healthcare, building twice as much hospitals that existed under the czars.
If the goal was to ASEP strip it and completely devastate and destroy it, the opposite happened.
They built a prosperous, thriving, and very powerful civilization, became the number two superpower in the entire world.
They did the opposite of what you're saying.
They didn't ask to strip it and devastate it.
They built it up to become a nuclear-armed superpower that made the entire established colonial world tremble in fear.
Now, the idea that Stalin was answering to anyone whatsoever is a joke, but the idea that he was answering to some random foreign Jewish banker or whatever you're talking about, it's just some random schizoid nonsense you pulled out of your ass.
Now, finally, the Soviets didn't take on debt in the 1930s or the 40s because Lend Lease was actually never paid back and it wasn't even decisive in winning the war's outcome, which I've demonstrated already.
Appreciate that.
Sorry, truth, truth.
Go ahead.
You've got 93 seconds for your concluding remarks on this specific topic, which is, is the Holdemar real and were the Christians persecuted?
Well, in summary, yes, Laudomir was real based on eyewitness testimony, based on the decision of the courts, both in the Duma in Russia and also in Ukraine.
So I don't know Russia, why Russia would shoot itself in the foot, acknowledge a crime that would hurt its reputation when it was the USSR if it wasn't actually true.
And that's, of course, in addition to the witness testimony from Arthur Kessler and both Garrett Jones as well, who saw the exact same thing and documented in real time.
And it was unfortunately Garrett Jones that led to Garrett Jones' demise at the tender age of around 30 years old because, well, that's just what Jews do.
They like to sacrifice Gentiles, especially the ones that tell the truth.
She says, I have a bounty on my head for the same reason.
The Jews like to silence those who speak up against them.
And they hired these types of Shaboskoy here to smear them.
And he keeps telling me that I'm pulling stuff out of my rear end.
I have not even once insulted him.
And that's fine.
So in summary, we can conclude that Vladimir was absolutely happened.
And it wasn't even the first famine.
It was one of the biggest famines that took place.
There were so many of them, you lose track.
And there were absolutely Jews involved with it.
Now, has there been infighting among Jews?
Let's discuss that for a second.
Yes, there has.
Of course, there has because they also operate as double agents.
Jagoda and Yeshov weren't executed because of the crimes they committed.
They were executed because they were double agents.
If you go to was also a diamond, it was diamond smuggling as well.
And he was subject to he was doing corruption.
He was a corrupt guy.
And so Stalin, you know, laid punishment for that reason because he was no longer loyal.
It wasn't because of the crimes that were committed.
So Jews will even double-cross each other.
That's all that shows.
It's not because they're against the policies.
They're all for it.
Appreciate that truth.
And that is the conclusion of round two.
The tweet is in the nest.
Who won round two?
Is the Holdemar real?
And was it the genocide of Christians?
I appreciate has and truth going through that.
The second, the third, I appreciate everybody.
Guys, do retweet, reshare the space.
Let everybody know we're live.
We're live on Twitter, YouTube, and Rumble.
There are around 3,000 people on Rumble on YouTube, and I believe 1,400 on here listening to this debate.
The last section will be questions from the audience.
So put your questions in.
And do us a favor, retweet, reshare the space.
Myron, any comments before we jump on to round three?
No, I'm doing a poll up on my end here.
We got about 2,500 here between Rumble and YouTube watching live.
And then we got another, I think you said 14 or 1300 here on the space.
So no, it's good, good turnout, man.
Especially for something, this topic, which is very particular and, you know, direct, but is good.
For sure, I think there's a lot of people learning a lot of information.
So I really appreciate has and truth providing people with this debate.
The third topic is, and it has been something that's been covered by both of them in the previous aspects of the debate.
I'm going to go for truth first.
Is and it's communism Jewish?
And again, it'll be three minutes to lay down the foundation.
I think people appreciate that.
I got a message just saying three minutes to lay down the foundation of the argument and then we'll go back to two minutes.
But yeah, truth, three minutes, you'll have to go with topic number three, which is, is communism a Jewish construct?
Go ahead, Truth.
I mean, as I explained before, it absolutely is because the Jews say it is.
So take them at their word.
Otherwise, you'll be anti-Semitic, right?
So Jews say it's communist.
I'll repeat a couple of the quotes I read earlier.
The Jewish elements provide the driving forces for communism.
That's Dr. Oscar Levy.
Some may call it communism, but I call it what it is: Judaism.
That's Rabbi Stephen Weiss and Bobby Fisher said the exact same thing.
He had an IQ over 180.
I don't think anyone else has an IQ that high, and he recognized communism for what it was, a Jewish construct.
Now, in terms of actions, I will say, look at the actions.
What were the actions of communism?
Well, we know the communist manifestos were drafted by Jews.
Karl Marx, Moses, Mordecai Levy.
Of course, Moses S. and Frederick Engels was a shabbous guy.
So, yes, it was drafted by Jews, both the Communist Manifesto and Das Capital.
We know that it was funded by Jews.
I've already named the bankers.
He can't name any other.
He thinks just things just happen magically and they're just not funded.
Oh, no, they didn't need any funding.
People just work for free and otherwise, you know, they're willing to go kill for free.
Well, it didn't work that way.
Jacob Schiff, Max Warburg, of course, Armin Hammer, and Ashberg were the ones who funded communism.
So Jews funded it.
Jews are the ones who drafted it.
And it was Rothschild, who was behind the whole time, enabling the whole thing as the head of the Federal Reserve at that time.
And of course, it was Jews that disproportionately benefited from it.
They're the ones who instituted the anti-Semitism law as soon as they came into power so they could protect themselves.
They're the ones who built up settlements for themselves in Ukraine.
They were the ones who carved out the Jewish oblast in 1934.
They are the ones who were sacrificing Gentiles, Christians, especially about 100 million of them, killing over 200,000 priests and monks and destroying about 54,000 churches as well.
But you know what?
They didn't touch?
They didn't touch any synagogues or Jewish community centers or Jewish schools.
Those were never touched in the secret language that they speak, Yiddish or Hebrew.
Stalin could speak it.
All the leaders could essentially speak those languages.
They communicated very well with the Israeli leadership, as Stalin did when he talked to both Golda Mayar and David Ben-Gurion.
So communism, yes, is absolutely a Jewish construct.
And it's the flip side to Zionism.
They work together essentially to destroy countries.
They're both expansionists and they don't care about the Gentiles that they kill.
Just like the Israelis don't care about the Palestinians they killed.
The Soviet Jews don't care about any of the Russians, Kazakhs, Belarusians, or any of the Gentiles they killed there.
And that's why I stand by it.
That communism is absolutely a Jewish construct.
Thank you.
I appreciate that truth.
Haz, you've got three minutes.
Go ahead with your rebuttal about is communism Jewish.
So he cites these random Jews that by the way, the Jew that he cited also claimed that Nazism was actually Jewish in spirit.
So he's not very reputable.
But there are far more Christian authorities, including popes like Pope Francis, as well as various Orthodox authorities, especially patriarchs that were under Soviet rule and even before, like Patriarch Tikkun, who said that Lenin had a Christian soul, especially the patriarchs that came afterwards.
It's more and more common for Christian authorities that were in proximity with communist movements to compare communism with Christianity, actually.
The modern-day Communist Party of the Russian Federation, led by Genneti Zayuganov, actually constantly calls communism Christian in spirit.
And he works in tandem in collaboration with the Orthodox Church.
And it's not an uncommon view whatsoever in Russia today to compare the two.
So finding these random people that are claiming, oh, this or that is Jewish, Nazism is Jewish, Communism is Jewish.
What about all the Christians who compare it to Christianity?
Now, finally, I want to make sure.
That everyone can catch this guy and his lie.
He said that Moses Hess wrote the Communist Manifesto.
The only person who was Jewish that had anything to do with the Communist Manifesto was Karl Marx.
Hess didn't have anything to do with it.
And as for who funded Karl Marx, he was funded by his Aryan friend, Friedrich Engels, who owned a factory.
And there's letters that confirm Marx constantly asking his friend for money.
Marx also worked as a journalist on the side.
He wasn't funded by any bankers whatsoever.
Speaking of bankers like Jewish Jacob Schiff that he's mentioning, well, U.S. Department files actually confirmed that investment banker Jacob Schiff was actually against the Bolshevik regime.
He supported the February Revolution, not the Bolshevik Revolution.
Two distinct events.
The idea that the 200,000 priests were killed is nonsense because there wasn't even 200,000 priests before the Bolshevik Revolution in the first place.
There wasn't even that many that existed.
The Jewish religion was persecuted by special departments that were meant to modernize the Jewish community under the Soviet government.
And that's a fact.
Atheism was promoted wholesale, not just against Christians, but also against Jews.
The Soviets were consistent opponents of Zionism.
They condemned Zionism.
Stalin condemned Zionism as a reactionary movement of bourgeois nationalism.
The Soviet press constantly denounced the Zionist efforts.
And the Soviet government was actually the one that exposed the Balfour Declaration, which was supposed to be secret, actually the Sykes Pico, which was supposed to be secret.
And they constantly said that the international capitalist class was trying to create and traffic all the Jews into Palestine.
So they were exposing that and completely opposed to it.
So he's completely lying about that.
Now, regarding the UN vote to partition Palestine, that happened in 1947 and the Soviet role in that, I can get into it.
But no, communism is not fundamentally Jewish, and it's ridiculous to assert that when the overwhelming majority of communists who have ever existed were not Jewish, there were some prominent Jewish involvement in the socialist movements in Europe and Western Europe in the late 1800s and early 1900s.
But throughout the rest of the 20th century, you're seeing Africa, Middle East, Asia.
Yeah, okay, sure.
Appreciate that.
Truth, your rebuttal, you get an extra five seconds, that'll be two minutes and five seconds.
Go ahead, Truth.
Sure, yeah, thank you.
Stalin was an absolute friend of the Zionists and the Jews.
The weapons he took from Germany in 1945, he gave to the Zionist Jewish gangs.
He was smuggling them through Czechoslovakia to help them wipe out and kill Palestinians he claims to care about.
Clearly, he doesn't know Stalin that well.
And why would the USSR vote in favor of a Jewish state?
And why would they convince five other countries in Eastern Europe to do the same if they weren't Zionists?
And why were they bringing in the foreign, why were the first country to recognize Israel?
Why is it that Golda Meyer was the foreign minister to the USSR if they weren't Zionists?
Why is it David Ben-Gurion was congratulating Stalin for 33 years of communist devastation because he looked forward to doing the exact same thing to the Palestinians?
Because, hey, Jewish minds think alike.
Let's go kill off the natives of the land, steal the land for ourselves, assets, trip it, and get rich quick, essentially.
Now, let's talk about some more about the famines that were taking place, led essentially by Jews.
In fact, there was absolute discrimination.
Naftali Frankl was one of the popular Gulag administrators.
Stalin had a particular favoritism towards him because he came up with the idea of the nutrition scale cycle that essentially entailed starving off the least productive slave in the gulag, but then rewarding the most productive one with the meal.
So if you didn't work hard enough as a slave, making nothing essentially and going back to your shoebox of an apartment, you'd be slowly starved to death.
This was Naftali Franklin.
When he got caught trying to escape before he became Gulag administrator, he was with like three other Gentiles.
You know what happened to the Gentiles?
They were executed.
What happened to Naftali Frankl?
He got rewarded because you see, there was a preferential treatment when it came to Jews.
And he was one of Stalin's favorites because he starved off so many Gentiles because that's just what they do by design.
Now, going back in general to speak about Zionism and communism and whether it's, oh yeah, he mentioned Karl Marx as well.
I never said that Moses has wrote the communist manifesto.
I said they collaborated.
Of course, it was both Engels and Moses Mordecai Levy called them by his Jewish name.
Why do the Jews always change their name?
10 seconds.
Why is that?
What do they have to hide?
Vladimir Lenin?
Is Vladimir Williamov Blanc?
Did you know that his grandfather on his maternal side was actually a Jew and he tried to change his name?
Why is Stalin change his name?
It's Jakob Jujuk Philippe Stalin.
Appreciate that truth.
Haz for your rebuttal, you've got an extra four seconds, two minutes and four seconds.
Go ahead, Haz.
Yep, sure.
So, regarding the Czechs who smuggled weapons to the Zionists, they were actually shot in the Slansky trial, and this was leading up to the anti-Zionist purges that were happening under the late Stalin government when they were finding out that there was an attempt by Zionists to infiltrate the communist-aligned governments.
So, the Czechs who smuggled weapons weren't doing it on behalf of Stalin.
They were doing it in secret, and they were shot for it.
Now, the Soviets did not support Zionist ideology.
What they supported was a joint Arab-Jewish state with equal rights, not an exclusively Jewish one.
And they were being completely lied to by people like Ben-Gurion when, in reality, it was the Urgu and Lehi terrorists that were actually in control.
And the Soviets caught wind of this.
They supported efforts to actually sabotage the Lehi and Urgu and nationalist fascist terrorists and completely sabotage them at every turn.
There were Jews in the Gulag who were sent to the Gulags.
If the Gulags were just meant for Gentiles, why were there thousands of Jews in them?
And the notion of the slave stuff of killing off the weakest, again, you just pulled it out of your ass.
Sorry to hurt your feelings.
The per capita rate of people in the gulags in the Soviet Union, by the way, has never actually surpassed the one that exists right now.
They were the worst thing ever.
They were bad conditions when the material conditions overall in the Soviet Union were bad.
It was never the intention to torture anyone sadistically.
And by the way, Jews were regularly executed, but that doesn't matter to you because you're just going to pin that to Jewish infighting.
How convenient.
It's a complete way to avoid theological inconsistencies in your arguments.
Marx wasn't even fundamentally Jewish besides his blood and his antristy, which shows that for you, Judaism is a racial thing.
Marx was raised as a Lutheran.
He was a devout follower of Christ before studying under Hegel, an Aryan.
And it was actually Hegel who inspired him to abandon religion.
And if you don't understand the background of Hegelianism and how that was so fundamental to Marx's transformation, you're emphasizing people like Moses Hess, who Marx and Hegels regularly made fun of and didn't respect and had nothing to do with the Communist Manifesto.
It's ridiculous.
Moreover, it's a widespread myth that Lenin's grandfather was Jewish.
I was saying thank you to Anon for the $100 super chat.
Sorry, guys, if I was muted.
Thank you for that, Anon.
Appreciate that greatly, my friend.
For your reboot.
Go ahead, Truf.
That's amusing that he didn't know about it, but his sister knew about it.
Lenin's sister knew, and in fact, wrote a letter about it and knew that her grandfather's maternal side was Jewish.
Lenin absolutely knew as well.
And look at his physiognomy.
He looks like a Jew.
Now, with respect to Karl Marx, why did he change his name from Moses Mordecai Levy?
Why was he given a Jewish name if the plan was to become a Lutheran and then just abandon religion altogether?
A little confusing.
What's going on here?
Maybe it's under the guise of pretending to be atheists, pretending to be Lutheran, because, well, that's the only way you can really get ahead.
Because at that time, Jews were subject to different types of treatments because they kept getting caught committing criminal activities as they've been doing for 2,000 plus years.
And that's the reason why they've been kicked out of 109 countries 1,034 times from various crimes entailing things such as usury, spreading degeneracy and filth, pushing atheism.
And of course, now, of course, communism, one of the main Jewish constructs.
That's the whole point of today's debate.
So once again, there was no answer about the Neftali Franklin that I mentioned.
He was the one who came up with the starvation tactics in the 1920s.
This had nothing to do with, say, oh, a crop failure or whatnot, and to claim that it was natural.
No, it wasn't natural causes.
They were deliberate starvation tactics to kill off the population.
And in fact, it got to a point where even though they had allowed for abortion, they actually had to ban abortion.
I think it was close to that.
I'll get the exact date.
Around the 1950s, right after around World War I, not just World War II, even close to the 1930s, because they were running out of people because they'd killed so many.
I believe it was after 1936.
They said, well, we got to stop on the abortions.
We need more people.
We've killed too many.
So that's an obvious indicator.
Not only did the Holodomirs and all the famines take place, they killed too many people and they ended up having to take people out of jail to help them out with farming, to help them out with things they just weren't able to do.
Because again, the Jews that were there didn't understand anything about engineering, building infrastructure.
They relied on slave labor and help from the likes of Henry Ford, help from the Germans, of course, through the Treaty of Apollo.
And, of course, help from the Germans through Operation Vladimir when they brought in 200 scientists to help them build things because they couldn't do anything on their own, unlike during the time of the Tsar, where they weren't dependent on others to build things for themselves.
Thanks for that truth.
And then let's go to Hazka had two minutes for your rebel.
Yeah, well, we have proof that Lenin was actually a sincere, sorry, that Marx was actually a sincere Christian in his youth because he would write poems about Jesus.
He would talk about Jesus and how much he was sincere about his faith.
No one was forcing him to do that.
His father did convert to Christianity.
Maybe it was because to avoid the restrictions that were placed on Jews.
Maybe it wasn't.
But we know that Marx was a sincere Christian and he was actually a student and disciple of the Christian German philosopher George Hegel.
So you don't know anything about Hegel because you don't read books.
But if you did, you would understand why Marx made the transition to communism as a consequence of his study under Hegel.
Now, the notion that Frankl somehow proves that there was Jewish control.
Frankl was appointed by Yogoda, and Frankl was one of the Gulag administrators.
But Yogoda was actually shot and he was removed from power.
Frankl was also removed from power.
So what does that prove?
How could these people be in power if they're being removed?
You're going to peg that up to Jewish infighting.
What was the infighting about then?
Explain it to us concretely.
The notion that Lenin's sister knew that he was Jewish.
Yeah, that was the source of the claim that people make that Lenin's grandfather, Alexander Blank, who was a vulgar German and Tatar, was Jewish.
But that's a complete fabrication and there's no evidence for it.
Now, the notion about Henry Ford them needing Henry Ford, every single industrialized country in the world relied upon the accumulated scientific knowledge of mankind.
Nobody just creates the whole inventions of mankind by scratch.
Henry Ford relied upon the inventions of the British engineers and scientists that came before him, and they in turn were relied upon the inventions that came before them.
The idea that they were engaging in trade practices where they were getting mechanized equipment and cars and stuff, they weren't taking this out on credit.
They weren't doing it.
It wasn't being given to them for free.
They had to pay for it on the international market.
And they had to do it to speed up industrialization.
They only had 10 years.
And the 10 years later, what do we see?
We see the German invasion.
So they had to do it.
And the notion that trading for foreign machinery and foreign technology to rapidly assist and prop up your own industrialization, modernization efforts, what's wrong with that?
No country in the world can just invent everything from scratch.
Oh, yeah, for sure.
For sure.
So we're going to do concluding remarks on this topic, which is, and we're going to go to truth.
Truth is going to get 90 seconds, but obviously I'm going to give truth an extra nine seconds because it has one over there.
So it'll be one minute and 39 seconds for you, truth on the third topic, which is, is communism Jewish?
Go ahead, truth, for your concluding remarks on this topic.
So in conclusion, communism is absolutely Jewish.
Jewish scholars have stated this.
Bobby Fisher stated this, one of the smartest chess players in the world who was ethnically Jewish, of course.
And we will look at the actions one more time.
Of course, communism was drafted by Jews, Moses Mordecai Levy.
Yeah, yeah, Marx was such a devout Christian.
But then he became an atheist.
So he went from writing songs about Christ to disavowing him.
A little confused, who knows what he was on?
Perhaps it was because he was getting funded by Rothschild.
I have the actual copies of the checks he received.
So maybe he was actually devoted to money first, like a typical Jew.
And he absolutely did collaborate with Moses Hess in addition to drafting both the Communist Manifesto and also Das Kapital on how to screw over Gentile countries because the Jews just don't really like to work.
None of the so-called proletariats were even factory workers.
Most of them were just writers.
Both Stalin and Lenin were writers just living off royalties from their books.
They never got their hands dirty.
What did they even know about the factory worker in general?
But now this whole need to even need communism in the first place, there was never a need.
Because again, during the Tsar's reign, things were great.
He created a top four economy around the world with advanced labor rights, according to, well, a U.S. president who came to visit William Howard Taft, who had nothing but good things to say and high praise about the incredibly advanced, sophisticated, and benevolent labor system that the Tsar had established for all of his citizens who he viewed as equals.
And people could advance very quickly if they just worked hard on merit, but they didn't even need to work as hard because taxes were so low at only 2%.
There was hardly any inflation, hardly any unemployment.
And they were mass exporters of almost every major agricultural product and industrial product that was out there.
They were already industrialized, but when the Soviets showed up, they couldn't figure anything out for themselves.
And that's why they failed miserably and starved people off.
Appreciate that.
And then it has 92 seconds for your concluding remarks on is communism Jewish?
Sure.
Far more Christian scholars and far more actual heads of Christian churches, including the Pope, claim that the essence of communism is actually Christian.
So that outweighs any of the fringe and marginal people he's trying to cite that were Jewish claiming this.
There's no evidence whatsoever that suggests that Marx was funded by the Rothschilds.
It didn't even make sense, by the way.
And yes, Marx became an atheist just like Frederick Engels did, who was an Aryan and also a Christian.
And that was because of their engagement with Hegelian philosophy and the young Hegelians.
There was nothing Jewish about the young Hegelian movement.
You don't know about these things because you don't read books.
Moses Hess had nothing to do with Daskop at all.
I doubt you could even cite a single sentence from the Capitol because you've probably never even read.
Not only have you not read Capital, you probably never read a single page of that book.
Stop talking about it if you don't even, you're not even familiar with the basics.
You're coping about czarist Russia being some kind of like advanced, lost Atlantean civilization which had spaceships and was like this beautiful paradise or whatever.
It was a total shithole.
Majority of people lived no different than slaves and were treated basically as cattle.
One four of all babies that were born died.
And it was basically a total shithole.
And this first opportunity that the majority of people got to rise up and depose the state, they took it right away.
Because that's how discontented they were with it.
This was beginning with the revolutionary movements in the late 19th century, which was because the peasants were just starting to spontaneously rebel against the state and the government, even in the middle of the 19th century.
Discontented they were with it.
This was beginning with the revolutionary movements in the late 19th century, which was because the peasants were just starting to spontaneously rebel against the state and the government, even in the middle of the 19th century.
So it was deeply unpopular, and they overthrew it.
It was very popular, that revolution they had.
I appreciate that.
That was the end of round three.
Let me just quickly send Marin the co-host again.
The tweet is in the nest.
Who won round three?
Is it who won round three?
Which is, is communism Jewish?
Was it Hazardin or was it Truth Teller?
The tweet is in the nest.
Vote as you please.
That was an excellent round.
We're going to move on to the fourth round.
We're going to start off.
Before we do, guys, retweet, reshare the space.
Let everybody know we're live.
It's got, if you go to my profile, the pinned tweet is the tweet.
Just press the retweet button and the like button and share the tweet.
We've got almost 1,400 people here.
And I believe we have about almost 3,000 on Rumble and YouTube on Marin Gaines as a YouTube and Rumble channel.
So do do that for us.
Before we start, round four, Marin, anything you want to say?
Are you back?
Okay, Marin might be having mic issues possibly.
So round four, and we are with round four.
Gonna be can you guys hear me?
You guys should be able to hear me now.
Yeah, I don't know what the fuck.
See, and this kind of happens with X a lot where I'll be on it on my I'll be on it on my on my computer and it'll act stupid.
So this is what I'm gonna do guys.
Shit.
God damn it.
All right.
So guys, I'm gonna get off.
I just don't feel well.
Not gonna lie to you guys.
Really tired.
Barely slept.
Been going really hard this week and I got a very stacked week ahead of me.
I gotta go ahead and do we got Viva Frey tomorrow, four o'clock.
Then I got Frederick for you guys Money Monday.
And then nighttime we got after hours.
So we got three shows for you guys tomorrow.
Then I'm gonna be going to Tim Poole's thing.
So if you guys want, here, I'm gonna give you guys a link.
I'm gonna go back in this thing.
I'm still gonna moderator from X. So don't worry.
I'm not gonna quit yet.
I'm gonna drop the link for you guys here.
Here's the link, guys.
I'll end the stream, but we are still gonna, the show goes on.
So here's the link, guys.
You guys can join in.
All right.
I'm dropping a link for you guys in there.
So you guys can still listen to the space on Twitter.
All right.
But I'm going to be on tomorrow at four with Viva Frey.
Okay, guys?
So, how the fuck you have a 200k set up and have mic issues?
Raruka, in case you didn't realize, retard, that's Twitter.
That's not me.
It's not my setup.
It's Twitter.
Twitter on web is very bad.
It's very bad.
Okay, that's why everyone, it's widely known that Twitter is fucking terrible on PC.
It's good on computer.
Sorry, it's good on phone.
Terrible for PC.
So that's the problem, dude.
So, yeah.
Dude's a fucking dumbass.
You got 200k setup.
Why is it working?
Stupid ass thing.
It's Twitter.
It's the platform itself, retard.
Twitter is meant to be used with your phone.
Anyway, yeah.
So yeah, guys, I will be back on tomorrow, 4 p.m. with Viva Frey.
Love you, ninjas.
▲
Export Selection