All Episodes
Previous Next
March 11, 2025 - MyronGainesX
06:05:26
20 Trump Supporters Take on 1 Progressive Reaction
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Loading like a freight train, flying like an aeroplane, feeling like a space brain one more time tonight.
The fact that I'm a West Coast button, one bad motherfucker rock and snake suitcase under my arm.
Said I'm a bean machine and drinking guess me, and honey, you can make my motor on.
Well, I got one chance left in a nine-line track.
I got a doggy dog by a smile.
I got them all dog, copped with a match to go.
I smoke my cigarette with a style.
And I can tell you, honey, you can make my money tonight.
Wake up late, honey, moon on your clothes.
And take your ready to go to the liquor store.
Well, that's what you'd do for me by tonight.
I've been loading like a freight train, flying like an aeroplane.
Feeling like a space brain one more time tonight.
I'm on the night train.
Follow me.
I'm on the night train.
I'm on the night train.
Ready to crash and burn.
I never learned.
I'm on the night train.
I got that stuff.
I'm on the night train.
I got the camera.
I'm on the night train.
Never to return Never to return Never to
return Never to
return Flying like a milplane.
Speeding like a speed spring one more than day.
I'm on the night train.
Grandma fucking balls.
So I'm on the night train.
I can leave this slow.
I'm on the night train.
And I'm ready to freshen my Welcome to the show, Ninjas.
Welcome to the show.
We are live and we are about to get lit.
Let's fucking go, baby.
Y'all know what time it is.
Let's go.
Hold on, hold on.
We got some new lighting.
We got some better quality.
We got the chat going crazy.
We got new camera angles, right?
All from all types of places.
Okay, I need you guys to like the goddamn video right now.
And I want to see the chat start flying between all the different platforms.
Let's fucking cook, motherfuckers.
Let's go!
Speeding like a space spring wall No time to day I hate I'm on the night train And I'm the boss of the night train I'm on the night train.
I can leave this slow.
I'm on the night train.
And I'm ready to freshen my Y'all know what time it is.
I want to see nothing, ball slash chat.
Let's fucking go.
Let's cook, baby.
We got lots to talk about, man.
We got a bunch of MAGA retards.
We got some weirdos that infiltrated the MAGA movement.
Let's fuck go.
We got to call these losers out.
Go!
*Mario plays*
Let's go, baby.
All right.
Welcome to the stream.
Welcome, welcome, welcome, welcome, guys.
I'm gonna adjust the ISO on my camera real quick.
I think it's a good card.
I'll fix that right now.
What's up, guys?
Welcome to the show, man.
Welcome to the show.
Got some upgrades you guys can see.
Fix some things, you know, making the chat or making the experience better for you, ninjas, as always.
Let me see here.
Let me turn up this light a little bit for you guys.
Is that better right there?
Is that a lot better, chat?
Now I'm not as black as fresh.
I had that shit on like 250 on 250 fucking ISO right there.
But yeah, this is good now, right, guys?
Give me ones if the audio and the video is good.
We got the multiple camera angles, as you guys can see.
All right, this one's a nice little close-up.
Blurs the background a little bit.
You know what I mean?
You could look right into, you know, look at me.
I'm the captain now.
And then obviously we got the high top one right there.
So, you know, switches some things up.
But yeah, give me ones, guys.
I'm looking at the chats.
Oh, yeah.
And if, yeah, I definitely rolled out of bed not too long ago.
Yes.
And I was working with Bills on some shit as well, chat.
Because he was creating this thing.
And as you guys can see, if you guys look right there, we got the chat going crazy between all the different places.
If you guys don't mind, doing me a favor, look, I know on Rumble, you guys like to go wild and say all kinds of crazy shit.
Can we like not go too, too crazy so I can keep chat on screen today?
Do you guys think that's possible?
Can we?
Just for today, guys.
So that before I like fix the words and shit.
I'd really appreciate it if you ninjas could do that for me.
Just for today.
Someone said that the audio is low.
Bro, you audio niggas are pissing me off, bro.
Everybody else saying it's fine.
Then you motherfuckers come in here and say, oh, bro, audio.
All right, Castle Club niggas.
So yo, is chat good?
I mean, sorry, is audio good?
Here's the thing.
I could put Castle Club chats on here too, but now you guys put images up.
You guys go fuck my shit up.
Castle Club.
Oh, man.
Someone said low audio on the second camera.
All right, nigga, you're getting timed out for that.
You are getting timed out for that one, buddy.
Because now I know you're fucking trolling because the audio doesn't come in through a goddamn camera, you retard.
I independently run the audio and video.
I use a Roadcaster Pro for my audio and I run a fucking video switcher for my video.
So Roadcaster Pro for audio, a Roland V8 HD for video.
Dumbass.
See, I had to time you out myself, nigga.
But yeah, what else I gonna say?
I got, hold on, let me put up the thing.
Shout out to Bills, man, being so fucking creative and making shit, dude.
Literally awesome.
Bills found a way, bro, to literally combine all the chats with some kind of software, which I've never seen before because it's a lot harder to do with Rumble and shit.
So, but yeah, you guys can see the chat going from the different platforms.
You can see where the people are chatting from, which is awesome, right?
Even X, you niggas are even involved.
We let you guys get in the fun too, right?
So, X guys, you guys, yeah, you guys can see that you guys are in there as well.
So, yeah, we're definitely improving.
We're improving the improvements.
All right, let's see here.
Let me okay.
So, the first thing I want to show you guys, I need your guys' help with.
I need the OSLA already a couple minutes into the show.
I need the O slash squad real quick because I just dropped a video, okay?
Just dropped the video, and it's called the Harsh Reality by Johnny Somali and Modern Streamers.
All right, so I'm gonna drop this in the chat for you guys, and I would greatly appreciate if you ninjas need to rally the troops on this one as well.
I think you guys know what time it is we're gonna have here.
You guys know what time it is.
I don't know where I'm going.
So, the name of the video, guys, the name of the video, guys, is The Harsh Reality About Johnny Somali and Modern Streamers.
I'm dropping the link in all the chats, guys.
Go in, like the video, play it in the background.
It was literally just released like 20 or 30 minutes ago.
So, we need to really bump it up, guys.
Okay, channel's growing.
Clips are doing good, right?
For some of them, some of them are hitting really well, some of them are not.
So, we need to like the video, get this thing up, because as you guys know, your boy Somali is trending, and we need people to find the video, like the video, and we got to get it through YouTube.
So, I put the YouTube link right there for you guys.
Give me one sec.
I need you guys to fucking start going crazy.
I ain't wasting no more time.
Here I go again.
Y'all know what time it is, man.
Here I go.
The OSS General's in the house.
We're all aboard the fucking game train.
I want to see the chat go crazy with the O slashes and also want you guys to come down here and just type in OSS is here.
We're gonna rally this shit up and we're gonna blow up the fucking algo.
Spooky cook, baby.
And I'm gonna go through it.
I'm going to like all y'all comments right now.
Appreciate you, nudges.
It's a charity.
you Yeah, guys, the first few like hours of the video are critical to like if it gets pushed in the algo or not.
So, you guys doing this and interacting with the video helps it a lot, man.
So, yeah, just click OSS is here in the comments section, and we're gonna blow this shit up.
We're gonna blow this channel up, guys.
The OSS ranks will continue to grow.
We're going at a good rate, man.
Channel's doing all right, pretty good, despite the fact that we're fucking shadow banned, chat.
We're fucking demonetized, right?
Blackballed by the industry.
People are scared to talk to us, right?
But it's cool, though, because we got the OSS.
What they're scared of us, right, for is precisely why the OSS is so lit, because we got to band together because these motherfuckers are super politically correct and lame.
I'm going to talk to you guys about this here in a second about MAGA, how it's been infiltrated.
We got a lot to talk about today, guys.
And we don't got fresh food today, so we could go ahead and cook here tonight.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Let me all right, we're back.
What the fuck?
I can't get attacked by the Mossad, bro.
I'm telling you, the Mossad is coming after me, chat.
God damn it, man.
Bruh.
Niggas want me gone.
I think we're back.
Give me ones if you guys can hear and see me.
Give me ones if you guys can hear and see me.
All right, sweet.
Good, good, good.
Bruh, I don't know what the hell happened.
Like, my OBS just crashed.
Give me one sec, Ninjas.
Bruh.
Give me one sec, Ninjas.
We're back.
It looks like we're back.
Bro, so fucking lame.
But all right.
That thought they could stop us, but they can't.
We're back in it, ninjas.
All right.
Here's the link again.
We're going to do this for like another minute.
And then we're going to get into the reaction.
All right, ninjas.
We can't be stopped.
We won't be stopped.
Y'all need to know what time it is, man.
Is this the same video?
Here I come again.
And I'm going through liking all your guys' shit right now, man.
And then we're going to get into the reaction.
But yeah, this is basically, guys.
So this is the way YouTube works, right?
When you talk about trending topics, obviously your video is going to get pushed more into the algo, right?
Now, on this video, I was actually very balanced.
I don't hate Johnny Somalia.
He actually did some funny shit yesterday when I was reacting to it.
What he did at the wall was hilarious.
But this monologue that I give here is more along the lines of covering what's kind of went down when it comes to streamers and modern day streaming and how the internet has kind of taken over and almost poisoned youth to do stupid shit for attention.
So I go into this in detail on this While I'm covering it, but don't worry, we're gonna hit the news.
We're gonna react to Sam Cedar.
We're gonna talk about free speech.
We're gonna talk about a bunch of shit, guys.
It's gonna be a good time.
All right, and we got a little bit more time today because obviously, you know, we're gonna just do this.
Thank you guys so much for the love, bro.
Every time I go through y'all's comments, all right, cool.
Got that out the way.
Bam.
Okay, so let me close this out.
Bam, boom.
Okay, so yeah, so this is the video.
Like I said before, I'll show you guys like a little bit of it.
So I always do, when I do these clips, athletes like jail.
As much as the internet has created enormous convenience for us in the first world, it's also created a toxic community of people that understand that they want to go ahead and get attention at any cost necessary.
People prioritize fame and money on the internet over their character.
And that's where we are now.
Now, he's stuck in Korea facing a criminal trial that might put him away for years.
Sometimes it's.
So we talk about his case a little bit and then I go into how we even got here.
All right.
But anyway, let me get rid of this.
So, I made a post, man.
I made a post yesterday on this shit.
And let me go ahead and go main cam.
And what I said was this.
Let me show you guys the post I made, which kind of led me to say what I said.
Right.
So here's one.
I'm just pulling up a couple of tweets for you guys right now.
Now we're going to get it to the show ninjas.
Now we're going to get into it.
Punch.
Okay.
That's one.
And then.
And then I got another one here where I ratioed the fuck out of this idiot.
Actually, you know what?
Hold on.
I got another one.
Here, I'm just pulling up a bunch of tweets for you guys so that once we start cooking, we're cooking.
Boom.
This is another one.
And now the last one I'll pull up for you guys.
Your boy, we ratioed Ben Shapiro earlier today, chat.
We ratioed Ben Shapiro earlier today.
The Great Awakening is officially here in Ninjas.
Telling y'all, man.
And then this fucking idiot.
Because I got into it with some of these MAGA morons, bro.
And I'm gonna define for you guys what a MAGA moron is.
Give me one sec.
Yo, if you guys saw what is on screen right now for my Twitter replies, oh man, we'd get bad, bro.
We would get bad.
Oh, bad.
I'm glad I don't have this shit on screen share, bro.
Oh, God.
Okay.
All right.
All right, cool.
All right.
Sorry, guys.
Welcome to the stream.
Sorry for the.
I know that the OBS's shit crashed like that, but yo, we got some new things coming in.
Like I said, you guys can see the chat on the side.
You guys can see the different camera angles.
We're improving this bitch, making it better day by fucking day.
I'm getting in a new video switcher as well, which pretty soon we'll be able to use to get even better video for you guys, right?
So we're definitely going to be chatting some things.
So as I was watching the Sam Cedar debate, right?
The yesterday, I was watching yesterday.
I noticed one thing, man.
I noticed that the conservative movement, the right wing, the MAGA movement, whatever you want to call it, has been infiltrated by invaders.
Okay.
And not only has it been infiltrated by invaders, but it's been infiltrated by invaders that you could tell either are new to the right-wing ideology or are just there to subvert it, right?
With their own agenda because they understand that you could do fairly well being someone who, how do I say this?
Being on the right wing, but not looking like it, okay?
This is where a typical blonde bimbo that's stupid, right, will grift on the conservative side because she doesn't look or she's not typically the demographic that would be right-wing.
So she's welcome with open arms because she's able to kind of hit a new audience.
And for me to really explain this, we need to go back in time, okay?
Let's go back, guys, to the Republican National Convention earlier late last year in the summertime.
Actually, before I do that, let me read this tweet for you guys.
So I go in here, right?
The MAGA movement has allowed gays, T's, legal mass immigration of H-1B, you know what it says here, feminists disguised as Tradcons and dual allegiance Zionist Jews to usurp the right wing.
I'm watching this Trump 20 supporters versus Sam Cedar, and I'm shocked at the stupidity of some of these Trump supporters.
This was an embarrassment to the right wing.
We need to stop letting these posers speak on our behalf.
I'll be doing a deep dive breakdown on this debate tonight at 5 p.m. Eastern Standard Time, blah, blah, blah.
Right?
So I saw this coming, but I didn't think it was going to be like this.
Now, let me explain.
I'm going to go back in time to the RNC.
Now that you guys see my tweet, I'll show you guys what I mean with this.
So when I went to the RNC, right, late last year, it was like in July or August, right?
Republican National Convention.
This was the first speech that Trump gave after being shot in Baltimore, Pennsylvania.
Okay?
It was his first public appearance in his first speech.
You guys remember he had been shot in mid-July.
I think it was like July 13th or 15th or 14th, somewhere in that range.
I think it was the 13th.
But he was shot, as you guys know, by Matthew Crooks, who was killed by Secret Service, right?
And when I went to the RNC, I saw a bunch of shit that I was very surprised to see.
I saw a lot of people with Israeli flags, Zios.
I saw a lot of gay people.
Saw a lot of minorities.
I saw a lot of, you know, bimbos.
And the most important thing that I saw there was Amber Rose went to the RNC, guys.
Amber Rose.
Yeah, that Amber Rose, the thought, the one that's in all the music videos with the ball that, yeah, her, right?
And this is a woman that's a porn star, 304, OnlyFans, all the deplorable shit that you guys could think of when it comes to female degeneracy she's participated in and still participates in, by the way.
And as a matter of fact, she had a sale for her OnlyFans when she was at the RNC.
She gave a speech, right?
I think it was either the RNC or maybe the one before that.
But the point is, she was wearing a MAGA hat, you know, make America great again, et cetera.
And this is a woman that doesn't fit the conservative archetype whatsoever.
And at that point, I saw, damn, maybe it is being infiltrated, right?
And I saw this at first, and I was like, this is weird.
But then as things have progressed, right?
And I saw people in the movement, I was like, damn, this thing has been completely taken over.
You got gay men like Scott Presler, right?
Who looks like a transformer to a degree.
I'm not going to lie to you guys.
Right.
Being one of the main people.
You got people that are pushing for H-1B visas and more immigration, like Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, right?
And what I realized was MAGA's basically been watered down, guys.
The conservative right-wing movement has been watered down.
We've allowed all these different groups of people to hijack it, come in, kind of make it more tolerant of strange things, right?
Like, for example, Dave Rubin adopting a kid as a gay man.
That's something that is unheard of.
But he was widely accepted for doing it by the whole RNC, by everyone, by all the mainstream conservative commentators, right?
So it's a little weird that the movement has been basically bastardized by all these individuals that have their own agendas, right?
So I'm going to give you guys an example of some of these MAGA tards to kind of give you an idea of what I mean when I say that the movement has been usurped, right?
It used to be a super America first movement, but now it's been infiltrated by dual allegiance Zionists, gay people, teas, and basically feminists that pretend to be right-wing.
All right?
So let me go ahead and show you guys kind of an example what I mean here.
So this video went kind of viral.
Rob Smith, right, says pardoning Derek Chauvin is a terrible idea.
It does nothing for Trump's agenda.
It will cause racial strife in America.
It is an idea so toxically destructive, I don't know what Ben Shapiro is thinking, right?
So Ben Shapiro brought it up, pardoning Chauvin, which I actually agree with.
One of the few things I agree with.
But let me show you guys this clip.
And this is an example.
This is a gay black man, by the way.
Nice guy.
I've met him before.
There is.
But I strongly disagree with him on this, and you guys are going to see here right now why.
Thank you.
It's absolutely nothing beneficial that pardoning Chauvin would do for the Trump administration, for this country, for race relations, for anybody else.
It is absolutely destructive.
It makes no sense.
And so for me, when I first saw this, generally conversations that happen come from the ground up.
Usually there's some sort of murmuring under, and then it kind of like bubbles up, and then it becomes a national conversation.
This seems to be a very top-down conversation that comes from somebody with an enormous amount of influence.
This is nothing that anybody was talking about or thinking about.
So it really makes me question, why is this conversation happening right now?
It makes me question, why did Ben Shapiro want to start this conversation right now?
Who does this benefit?
Doesn't benefit Trump.
Doesn't benefit America.
Doesn't benefit race relations.
It doesn't benefit anything.
And the last point I'll make on it is this.
There are very few people that can actually really speak to in depth what was going on in that trial, excuse me, how George Floyd actually died, et cetera, et cetera.
There's probably five people that have spent the bulk of their day on a podcast set every single day like Ben Shapiro, like maybe two or three other people that can really talk to you in depth about this.
So then they're positioning themselves to say, no, listen to me.
I'm the one who really knows about this.
So what?
Trump's agenda is supposed to be derailed.
Where we're at as a country right now is supposed to be derailed because these leftists and these Democrats are looking for a reason to have another race war.
That is what they love.
So why this conversation is happening right now, I have no idea.
I'm not for it at all.
No.
I am not.
So obviously I commented underneath this, right?
Because I strongly disagree with this, right?
And I wrote basically, I disagree.
No innocent man should be jailed unjustly for fear of criticism.
This is precisely what our forefathers fought for.
It's better to let 100 criminals walk free than to keep one innocent man in jail, right?
And then he responds, I don't know all the facts of the case.
I don't serve on the jury.
None of us did.
We all know, we know what we read and saw play out on the media.
Play out media.
If there's a precedent for a fair trial, so be it.
But a pardon based on trust me, bro, from some podcasters is a bad move.
Okay.
So here's my response to Rob Smith when he said that stupid shit, right?
That's the problem.
You don't know the facts of the case.
George Floyd committed several felony crimes when he was apprehended by police.
This is the worst racial divide case in American history.
The death of George Floyd led to the utter destruction of several major cities all across the United States thanks to BLM.
Chauvin did not get a fair trial.
How could he?
The mayor, police chief, media, and public made him guilty far before his trial.
The jury had an enormous amount of pressure to find him guilty.
To top it off, a BLM activist, Brandon Mitchell, was a member of the jury.
A photo emerged showing Mitchell, a black man in his 30s, wearing a BLM shirt with the phrase, get your knee off our neck and BLM, as well as Black Lives Matter.
He lied and answered no to questions on the juror questionnaire about participating in demonstrations or marches against police brutality.
The medical and autopsy reports give different information.
Floyd consumed a deadly amount of fentanyl before being apprehended by police.
He said he can't breathe several times before the police put him on the ground.
Then use of force experts came in and said the technique he used was wrong.
Well, see the attached photo below.
That comes from the Minneapolis Police Department training manual.
He's using the same technique as Chauvin.
This is the technique I'm talking about.
Oh, did I not get posted here?
I got a picture of it.
I'll show you guys.
These are just a few of the problems in this case.
At minimum, he should have had another trial far away from Minneapolis.
Rob Smith saying that an innocent man should stay in jail because of retarded BLM riders that will destroy the city is a stupid take.
Any BLM writer that tries to destroy a city because of Chauvin getting another trial or pardon should be jailed for terrorism and treated accordingly.
It's time we take these radical left-wing organizations like BLM, NTFA, et cetera, and make them domestic terrorist organizations and punish them to the fullest extent of the law.
Derek Chauvin did not kill George Floyd and did not get a fair trial.
And I stand on that, right?
So that's my response to Rob Smith.
Obviously, he's not going to respond to this because I'm cooking, right?
But you don't even have to watch the full trial.
Just off of the facts that he didn't get a fair trial and he had members of the jury that were inherently biased, that alone makes it where, bro, there's got he's got to get at least another trial.
One of the jury members lied.
It was a BLM activist.
Right?
So this is ridiculous.
Completely ridiculous.
And hold on, let me.
I think I did because I do got a picture here that I want to show you guys that I'm trying to find it for you guys.
Give me one sec.
Because I had a picture that shows the technique that Chauvin was using actually was taught at his police department.
It actually was taught.
So I'm just trying to find it real quick for you guys.
God damn it, man.
Okay, here we go.
Boom.
Look.
What is this?
Look at that.
This comes from the Minneapolis Police Department.
Same fucking technique, knee on the back of the neck or back of the head.
And then look at this from the autopsy report.
No life-threatening injuries identified blood and drug and novel psychoactive substance screens.
Bro, this is like enough to kill a horse, this fentanyl.
And then here's the technique right here.
So Rob Smith is wrong on this.
And the fact, and here's the other thing, too.
He's not even arguing that Chauvin got a fair trial.
He's not even arguing that yet.
He's saying this will create racial divide and there's going to be protests.
So let me get this straight, man.
Like you're more concerned with stupid idiots that want to destroy the city, and we know who, right?
Versus dishing creating an air, creating a sentiment of liberty.
Right?
It's guilty beyond a reasonable doubt.
It's innocent until proven guilty.
Everyone thought Chauvelin was guilty before he went to trial.
There was no way that he was going to get a fair trial.
No way.
Because of the amount of media that was on this case.
If you guys go back in time, right?
If you guys go back in time to 2020 when this occurred, keep in mind, guys, the country was locked down.
Everyone was supposed to be in their house.
The stupid mask mandates were in place, right?
This incident happens.
And then what does everybody do?
They break the fucking rules.
No more social distancing.
You know, they're destroying the city of Minneapolis.
They're destroying cities all over the left.
The same liberals that told you to stay in your house and get the jab were the same liberals fucking protesting in the streets, destroying Minneapolis.
I'm going to say that again because people tend to forget things.
Let me remind you, niggas.
The liberals overwhelmingly supported lockdown mandates and the vaccine.
But then those same liberals took to the streets and destroyed major cities all across the United States for BLM.
And they didn't practice the very social distancing they had been pushing on us for months.
And I remember this vividly.
This case got an enormous amount of press.
Everyone and their mom was talking about this thing.
The George Floyd riots, guys, in my opinion, I think probably created the worst racial divide in American history.
Worse than OJ, worse than Rodney King.
And the reason why was because it was all documented on the internet and we had the social media.
So there was absolutely no way he was going to get a fair trial.
I mean, just off of the fact that a BLM protester was in his jury is enough to completely say that this is bullshit.
Right?
So Rob Smith isn't even arguing that he got a fair trial, they convicted him properly.
He's arguing that, yo, if you release them, they're going to destroy the city.
What?
So we could violate a man's rights because we're scared about what a couple of fucking are going to do?
Fuck that.
We put them in jail.
We put serious consequences on them.
If we could go ahead and lead a whole crusade to arrest the January 6thers, I think we could definitely loot a crusade to arrest all these fucking BLM rioters as well.
Fucking preposterous.
And this is exactly what our forefathers fled from England for.
They fled for liberty.
They fled for justice.
They fled for the First Amendment.
They fled for the ability to bear arms.
Give me liberty or give me death.
So saying that we're not going to release someone who's innocent because of idiots rioting is completely antithetical to the principles that this country was founded upon.
There's a reason why the burden of proof is so high and that you're innocent until proven guilty.
Because our forefathers understood that it's better to let a guilty man walk than to allow an innocent man to sit in jail.
And it seems like I'm the only fucking person that still remembers this shit.
And this is what I mean when I say MAG has been usurped.
Because remember, this all comes back to what?
People that aren't really conservatives coming into the movement and still pushing their agenda.
This guy's supposed to be a conservative.
But he's over here saying, oh, I'm scared of race riots.
Oh.
Fuck that shit.
We put their dumb asses in jail.
BLM is a fucking domestic terrorist organization.
I've been saying this shit for years.
So anyway, now we're going to go ahead and get into a bit of freedom of speech here.
Well, actually, you know what?
Let me cook this idiot because this dude is a retard too.
So this guy's Sean Foreshare, right?
This guy is like the definition of a MAGA retard.
Definition, dude.
He has a fairly decent Twitter following, like 270K or some shit like that.
Let me see here.
Yeah, 277.
Nobody interacts with him, though.
Nigga whack.
Right?
But this guy's like the definition of a MAGA tard.
He goes, but Nick Flint is Jake Shields, Candace, Owens, Myron Gaines, and the rest of the cult that told me Israel controls our country.
Right?
What he does is he shows this list here.
Top 10 countries 2016 and 2024, their contributions.
And then Israel's here at 188 million.
Once I saw him post this, I was like, stupid.
And I responded, hey, stupid fuck.
Miriam Adelson donated more than this herself just to Trump.
She's giving him 200 plus million dollars.
This doesn't count.
APAC, private donors, other Zionist lobbies, and other politicians.
You are my definition of a MAGA retard.
Look, he gets 2.3k likes with 311K, or 311K views.
I only got 47K views, 7.2K likes.
Ratio to fucking oblivion.
Calculum!
Punch!
Right?
Because another distinguishing feature of a MAGA retard is someone who refuses to criticize Donald Trump or Israel.
Okay?
There's two factions in the right wing, guys.
All right?
There's two factions.
You got your guys, right, that are what I call MAGA retards, where Elon Musk is the best thing ever since sliced bread.
Donald Trump could do no wrong.
All of his cabinet picks are awesome, right?
He's above reproach.
And you show for Israel.
This is where most MAGA, big conservative political commentators stand.
They stand with Israel.
You know?
They stand with Elon Musk and Trump no matter what.
Then you got another group of guys that understand that Israel is a parasitic nation state that takes our money and uses it to wage war and kill innocent people.
Right?
And most of the MAGA base is an idiot like this dude.
Because he actually thought he was like doing something here by putting $188 million.
Like, bro, bro, Miriam Adelson herself donates more than this.
And some of you guys might be wondering, Myron, who's Miriam Adelson?
I got you guys.
Miriam Adelson.
Miriam Adelson is an Israeli-American physician, businesswoman, and political donor.
She was married to Sheldon Adelson, founder of Las Vegas Sands Casino Company and the Israel Hale newspaper from 1991 until his death in 2021.
through the Adelson Foundation, they gave hundreds of millions of dollars to Jewish and Israeli causes.
Mary Madelson is one of the largest supporters of Donald Trump, who awarded the Presidential Medal of Freedom in 2018.
Adelson has been a major donor to Trump's presidential campaigns as well as his 2017 presidential inauguration and his legal defense fund against the Mueller investigation into Russian interference.
So this woman has donated hundreds of millions of dollars to Donald Trump.
What do you guys think his policy is going to be?
I tell you guys this all the time when it comes to politics.
Follow the money.
When you find out who the donors are, you're going to know what the policies are.
I'm going to say that again.
Follow the money.
If you know who the donors are, you know who the policies are going to be for.
Someone like Miriam Adelson doesn't give you $200 million for nothing.
Upon taking office, Donald Trump withheld foreign aid from every other country except Israel.
Okay?
That's how far that $100 million goes to a president's campaign.
And also keep in mind, guys, right?
Some of you guys might be saying, well, Myron, why is he taking money from Miriam Adelson?
He makes his own money.
He's a billionaire, Myron.
Why can't he fund himself?
I'll tell you why.
The reason why Donald Trump couldn't fund himself, guys, is because many of you might forget he was indicted four times in four different jurisdictions.
He was indicted in New York on a false document case, state.
He was indicted in Georgia on the RICO case with Giuliani and a bunch of his lawyers by Fannie Willis.
And then he was indicted twice federally, one time in District of Washington for the insurrection, and then one time in the Southern District of Florida for the document case.
These legal proceedings are extremely expensive.
He's got a legal team damn near for every one of these cases that he's fighting.
On top of that, right?
He was being sued by people like Genie Carroll and other people coming out saying that Donald Trump did something to them 30, 40 years ago, right?
So he needed money.
Enter Miriam Adelson and the tech bros.
This is why he picked J.D. Vance as his running mate.
Yeah, I know, right?
You guys are like, wait, what the fuck?
Hold on.
Yeah.
The reason why Donald Trump picked J.D. Vance as his running mate is because J.D. Vance brought the tech bros and brought a lot of money.
He brought Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, all these guys, the PayPal bros.
He didn't pick J.D. Vance because he's like an excellent politician.
He picked him because J.D. Vance got him Silicone Valley.
You know, the same Silicone Valley that banned him everywhere in 2021.
Remember that?
Remember that, guys?
Remember after January 6th, how Trump was banned off of every single social media platform as an insurrectionist?
J.D. Vance brought those same idiots to Donald Trump, and they switched their tune and supported him because they knew he was going to win.
So you got Miriam Medelson and the tech bros coming in and giving him the money.
What the fuck do you guys think is going to happen?
This is why when J.D. Vance was out giving a speech in Europe, him and Vivek Ramaswamy have talked about this.
They talked about less regulation for AI.
So again, show me the donors and I'll show you the policy.
Now we have a very pro-Israel foreign policy, thanks to Miriam Maidelson giving all the money that she gave in the Zionist lobby.
And we also have a very big AI and tech industry coming, thanks to J.D. Vance's donors.
Mark Zuckerberg donated a million bucks to Trump almost immediately.
Mark Zuckerberg, the same guy that fucking banned Trump everywhere in 2021.
The same guy that was pressured by the Biden administration to make you guys get fucking jabs.
The same guy that banned you if you said anything that conflicted with the vaccine and COVID narrative.
So again, show me the donors, I'll show you the policy.
And this is why idiots like Sean Foresh, to bring this all back full circle, are morons because they're not willing to critically think and question where this money comes from or who's involved.
Now, next thing I want to show you guys was Ben Shapiro, right?
So he goes, Deja Tumbles dramatically leaving political opening for Democrats, Democrats, Leroy Jenkins, right?
He's basically poking fun at this guy.
This is Khalid Mahmoud Khalil.
Okay?
Now, if you guys don't know, this is a big fucking story going on right now.
Mahmoud Khalil, you know what?
me go ahead and pull a video because I did cover this yesterday a little bit, but some of you guys might be new and you guys didn't.
All right.
Actually, okay, this comes from today.
White House Press Secretary says, former Columbia student Mahmoud Khalil is in the process of being deported.
Right for the American public to prevent a government shutdown.
Oh, this is a YouTuber, this dude.
I forget his name.
He's from one of these things.
A green card holder.
I wonder if they'll ever let me in the White House.
I think I applied, but I don't know what the fuck.
We'll see what happens.
With the crime to be eligible for deportation.
Well, in fact, Secretary Rubio reserves the right to revoke the visa of Mahmoud Khalil.
And I'm glad you brought this up.
Under the Immigration and Nationality Act, the Secretary of State has the right to revoke a green card or a visa for individuals who serve or are adversarial to the foreign policy and national security interests of the United States of America.
And Mahmoud Khalil was an individual who was given the privilege of coming to this country to study at one of our nation's finest universities and colleges.
And he took advantage of that opportunity, of that privilege, by siding with terrorists, Hamas terrorists who have killed innocent men, women, and children.
This is an individual who organized group protests that not only disrupted college campus classes and harassed Jewish American students and made them feel unsafe on their own college campus, but also distributed pro-Hamas propaganda.
Flyers with the logo of Hamas.
That is what the behavior and activity that this individual engaged in.
And I have those flyers on my desk.
They were provided to me by the Department of Homeland Security.
I thought about bringing them into this briefing room to share with all of you, but I didn't think it was worth the dignity of this room to bring that pro-Hamas.
Of course, he uses that as an excuse, bro.
Propaganda, but that's what this individual distributed on the campus of Columbia University.
And this administration is not going to tolerate individuals having the privilege of studying in our country and then siding with pro-terrorist organizations that have killed Americans.
We have a zero tolerance policy for siding with terrorists, period.
See, now, here's the thing, right?
And I actually talked about this.
I'm going to show you guys a tweet that I made, right, in response to this.
So, Homeland Security, right, tweeted out on March 9th, 2025, in support of Donald Trump's executive orders prohibiting anti-Semitism and in coordination with the Department of State.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement arrested Mahmoud Khalil, a former Columbia University graduate student, Khalil-led activities aligned to Hamas, a designated terrorist organization.
ICE and the Department of State are committed to enforcing President Trump's executive orders and protecting U.S. national security.
So I wrote here, right, as a former DHS special agent, I'm ashamed the agency violated the First Amendment of the Constitution we took an oath to uphold.
Doing it on behalf of a foreign nation makes it even more egregious.
Let me be clear.
I don't agree with Khalil, which I don't.
But infringing on someone's freedom of speech in the United States is antithetical to what this country stands for and what separates us from the rest of the world.
This is a dangerous precedent we are setting.
Today it's a green card holder.
Tomorrow it will be a U.S. citizen.
And this guy, Yankee Doodle, actually, really smart guy, he posts a bunch of different court findings that shows that this is actually unconstitutional, man.
Kuang Hai Chu versus Colding, 1953.
The court held that a lawful permanent resident was entitled to due process protections reinforcing their constitutional rights to apply to non-citizens present in the United States.
Pryler Plyler versus Doe.
Though not directly a First Amendment case, this ruling affirmed that 14th Amendment's equal protection clause applies to all persons, not just citizens.
Strengthening the argument that non-citizens benefit from constitutional protections.
But I mean versus Bush, the court ruled that even non-citizens detained at Guantanamo Bay had certain constitutional rights, further demonstrating that constitutional protections are not limited to U.S. citizens, right?
So let me, oh, and then Bridges versus Wixon, the court ruled that a lawful permanent resident, a non-citizen could be deported, could not be deported solely for political speech, affirming that First Amendment protections extend to non-citizens.
So here's four different cases that show a legal precedent that foreign nationals and green card holders especially enjoy the same constitutional rights that we do, right?
Now, look, right?
oh and then i made a post on this as well i find it funny that maga retards are jumping for joy that left-wing colombia student mahmoud khalil got arrested by ice for political speech Any right-wing personality knows we were heavily censored the past four years.
We complained the left censored us, deplatformed, and financially persecuted conservatives.
Now we have a liberal green card holder being arrested for the same political speech we fought to get back for years.
And those same conservatives are cheering like retards.
Do you guys understand that we are celebrating the very censorship we fought so hard to destroy?
And that, my friends, is kind of like the bottom line here, right?
Because what I'm realizing with a lot of these MAGA people, whether it's Rob Smith saying that a guy should stay in jail because of potential racial riots, or idiots like Sean Foresh saying that the Israeli lobby doesn't control this country and only donated $188 million, right?
Or idiots that cheer for censorship that had literally just been complaining about censorship a year ago.
I find it incredible that these people don't have principles.
And that's the fucking problem and the basis of my argument.
Okay?
And it's simply this, my friends.
We have allowed a bunch of idiotic, un-American, unpatriotic individuals to invade the MAGA movement and use it for their own personal ideals.
Whether it's Rob Smith cosplaying as a gay black man to show that the MAGA movement can be diverse, yet in the same sentence, having a very BLM stance of don't let him out because there's going to be riots, or stupid ass Sean Farresh, who unequivocally supports Israel like the fucking moron that he is.
Or Ben Shapiro cheering for fucking people getting arrested and or banned for free speech.
You know, the same free speech that he complained about for a very long time.
Right?
And this is where I commented, right?
Right, he goes and makes this joke right here.
DJ Tumbles, dramatically leaving political opening, right?
Leroy Jengans, ha ha, so funny, right?
And I go and I commented, and this is why I ratioed him.
He got 2.3k likes, I got 2.9.
This motherfucker got 7 million on Twitter, by the way, chat.
We didn't even do an OSS on him, and we erased him.
And I go, Ben, aren't you a harsh critic of censorship?
I don't agree with Khalil, but he has a right to free speech.
Why are you advocating for the violation of the First Amendment to someone lawfully here?
Much case law demonstrates foreign nationals have free speech.
Today it's a green card holder.
Tomorrow it's a U.S. citizen.
Wake up.
And that's the fucking problem with these idiots, man.
They don't have the foresight to understand that this is a problem.
Whether it violates a Palestinian green card holder's rights or an American citizen.
Guys, they don't take your rights immediately.
It's a slippery slope.
It starts with them taking away other people's rights.
Maybe a visa holder here, a green card holder here.
And then it progresses.
Right?
How did COVID start?
Oh, like just wear a mask and six feet distancing.
Then it was a complete lockdown.
Then it was you need to take a vaccine.
Then it was you can't go to this area.
You can only be outside of your house these times.
Once they get an inch, they always take a fucking mile.
And the fact that we're just sitting here blind and allowing the government to censor political speech, which by the way, is the speech that this fucking country was founded upon.
If I was going to go ahead and say that there's speech that needs to be protected, political speech is at the top of that fucking pyramid.
That is the speech that invokes change.
That is the speech that allows you to criticize your government.
That is the speech that allows us to continue to have a fucking democracy.
So if we remove political speech for one, we're inevitably creating a totalitarian state for all.
I'm going to say that again for the stupid ass motherfuckers that don't have common sense.
If we limit freedom of speech for one, we invite totalitarianism for all.
And this is why I hate these stupid MAGA conservatives that cheer when liberals get their rights violated.
Because I know that if they violate that guy's rights, even though he might be in a different political party or he might have a different ideology than me, I know that I'm going to be next.
And I find it incredible that the same conservatives that were bitching about the censorship regime a year ago are jumping and cheering for someone on the left being censored now.
And not only is he being censored, he's being censored to the worst degree.
He's being censored with the threat of law enforcement, political persecution.
He has the definition of a political prisoner.
And again, I hate that I even have to fucking defend this guy, by the way.
Clearly, he's a raging liberal on the left.
I don't agree with a lot of the shit that he says.
I've seen like one or two of his speeches.
But it's really frustrating.
And any of you guys that have seen me talk about free speech, you guys know this fucking hill that I'm on all the time.
It's extremely frustrating to me how people don't have the wherewithal to understand that when you remove free speech for one guy, you're fucking next.
You're next.
And I'm not fucking Goldberg from WCW.
I'm dead ass serious.
You're going to be fucking next.
And the fact that we got morons like Ben Shapiro, Sean Foresh, Rob Smith, these guys are the leaders of the movement.
These are some of the biggest voices in the conservative movement.
Not the biggest, but they're big voices.
And I'll be fucking damned if idiots like Ben Shapiro, who is an Israel first guy, by the way, or Rob Smith, who's scared about racial riots, or Sean Fresh is too much of a fucking retard to understand that this country is run politically by Jews.
I'll be damned if these idiots are going to speak up for everybody.
And this is what I mean when I say MAGA retards.
Because they're not on principle.
I'm on principle.
Even if that means I'm going to disagree with Donald Trump.
You guys know I like Donald Trump.
I voted for him.
I truly do like Trump.
But that doesn't mean that I can't criticize him.
I'm not so blinded where I'm not going to call out bullshit if I see it.
And I see a lot of bullshit here.
So, absolutely crazy, guys.
Absolutely nuts.
By the way, this guy is a green card holder, and he has a pregnant wife that's a U.S. citizen.
All right, so let me look at this.
A judge blocked his deportation.
Let's look at this right here.
President Trump weighed in after Mahmoud Kahil's arrest, saying that he and others like him will be deported, but that is now on hold.
Also, happening now, there are protests that have been underway.
Yeah, because it's unconstitutional.
Way after the arrest, including this one at Foley Square in Lower Manhattan, hundreds calling for his immediate release.
There are a lot of breaking developments in the past hour, so let's get to News Forwards Erica Pfeiffie.
Who's at Columbia University with what we know?
Erica.
Also, let me say this real quick, too, because I forgot to say this.
Let's just go, like, let's just have an uncomfortable conversation, chat.
Gaza was given to the Palestinians roughly in 2007, 2006.
They held an election and Hamas won.
And Hamas has been in power ever since.
Hamas has two parts: there's a military wing and a political wing.
They are the government of Gaza.
So when people advocate for the people of Gaza, right?
The innocent people that are being killed, you must talk about Hamas.
You must, unfortunately.
They're the governing body of that strip.
So when the White House press secretary says, oh, this guy Khalil supports a terrorist organization, whatever, that's very, that's murky waters.
And the reason why it's murky waters is because you can't talk about the Palestinian citizens and innocent people unless you talk about Hamas because that's who governs them.
So...
Let's play this clip and then I'll finish up what I've got to say.
Yeah, David, we were here in this gathering here behind you.
You can see it's just breaking up now when this news came out that the judge had blocked what everybody was saying was happening with Mr. Khalil.
The gathering here was with faculty members who were calling for that same thing that we heard from students downtown.
They wanted to see him release.
All of this unfolding just south of here at the main campus at Columbia.
And earlier today, we saw a lot of people protesting outside the gates.
Free Mahmoud Khalil!
No!
They yelled Mahmoud Khalil's name outside of Columbia University, a fellow pro-Palestinian protester now in ICE custody.
I think that the students have a right to their free speech on campus.
I think anybody who supports interests that are anti-American, pro-terror, anti-Semitic, and is not a U.S. citizen can be deported.
The former.
Well, that's unconstitutional, dummy.
Again, do I agree with his rhetoric concerning Hamas?
No.
But that is precisely what the First Amendment is there for, to protect speech that offends you.
No one gives a fuck about speech that isn't offensive.
Columbia University students week in arrest coming after months of being the face of discontent on campus.
He was among those organizing and speaking to the media when students pitched tents and refused to leave after the Israel-Hamas war broke out.
On Saturday, federal agents took Khalil into custody from his student housing apartment.
His attorney telling News 4 that Khalil is a permanent resident and green card holder.
We are going to eradicate anti-Semitic behavior.
President Donald Trump echoing the same sentiment on social media, saying more arrests are coming.
Now, here's the other thing that's extremely problematic for you guys.
You guys want to know who defines anti-semitism?
So these are the guys, the IHRA, okay?
International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance.
All right?
Look at this.
Working definition of anti-Semitism.
You guys see that?
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Y'all see that?
working definition.
This should scare every single American.
Every single person that lives in the United States that stands for free speech or stands for the First Amendment needs to be looking at this.
Okay?
This definition is what our legislation when it comes to anti-Semitism is based upon.
And when you go to the website, what does it say?
Working definition, that means that it can change.
You guys understand that?
The definition can change.
So let me get this straight.
We have laws in place that are based around the term anti-Semitism.
But here's the problem: the definition of anti-Semitism changes all the time, according to the website.
It used to be, hey, hatred of Jews.
Fair.
Fair.
That's unacceptable.
The hatred of any people is unacceptable.
You're not going to get pushback from me on that.
All life is valuable.
Nobody is better than anyone else.
And whether Jew, Muslim, Christian, white, black, whatever, everyone deserves human rights.
I stand on that.
I think most of you guys would agree with me on that.
But the problem here is that when you have a working definition of a term, that means that it can change.
Right?
They call it the hate that mutates.
And I think the ADL calls it that.
So what ends up happening here is you have this term.
And look at this.
Gets even better, guys.
What does that say, chat?
Read the full text of the IHRA's non-legally binding working definition of anti-Semitism and learn more about this important tool with the Lord-related resources.
So on their own website, read the full text of IHRA's non-legally binding working definition.
Do you guys not see what I see?
I'll tell you what I see.
I foresee a term that's going to be changed multiple times to fit whatever political agenda it needs to fit to get shit done.
This is fucking problematic.
Extremely non-legally binding.
But the issue is that this term is going to be used in legally binding legislation.
So you have a non-legally binding definition of a word that's going to be used for legally binding legislation that can put people in jail, as you guys see right now with Khalil.
Again, I hate the fact that I'm even defending this motherfucker.
But this is fucking wild.
And just so you guys know, the IHRA is not even an American organization.
You can see here it says international.
So we have an international agency defining a term that is the operative word for U.S. law.
Again, we have an international organization defining the operative word that is used in U.S. law.
That's a fucking problem, man.
Thank you.
Khalil was originally taken into federal custody to a facility in New Jersey.
His eight-month pregnant wife, who is an American citizen, went to visit him, only to learn he was no longer there.
ICE confirms that he's currently in Louisiana at the Jana LaSalle detention.
I've been to that detention center, actually, a few times.
Detention facility.
That's a big ICE facility in Louisiana.
The database listing his home country of birth as Syria.
Meanwhile, his attorneys are working to free him, and they're stressing he is not charged with a crime.
The Department of Homeland Security's lawless decision to arrest him solely because of his peaceful anti-genocide activism represents a blatant attack on the First Amendment's guarantee to free speech, immigration laws, and the very humanity of Palestinians.
This development coming on the heels of the Trump administration clawing back $400 million in grants to Columbia University because of its treatment of Jewish students on campus.
I was telling you to do research here over the summer in the mechanical engineering department.
So like now I probably won't be able to get funding.
So, something else we're learning tonight from this judge.
The judge is saying he wants to see the parties involved in this case with regard to that student in court on Wednesday at 11:30 in the morning.
So, we'll have to be there to see how that all unfolds downtown.
We also heard today from Columbia's interim president what the message was there.
It was actually four bullet points saying that they take their mission seriously.
They're going to support the community.
They're going to follow the law.
And the institution is deeply committed to freedom of speech.
Reporting live in Manhattanville, Eric Byfilm is for New York.
Crazy shit, chat.
Crazy, crazy shit.
Hold on, one sec, guys.
All right, let me read some chats, by the way.
I didn't get to read chats.
Guys, get your chats in now.
I'm going to read them and then we'll get into the Sam Cedar stuff.
But yeah, guys, this is a very dangerous precedent we're setting, man.
Really bad.
All right, we got here.
Mr. Minnesota, a person that was just outside the city of Minneapolis, it was a shit show.
They didn't do shit about the riots in Looney for three weeks plus.
I know.
It was crazy, bro.
Did you guys know when the National Guard showed up?
They weren't allowed to put, they weren't allowed to rack their guns.
They didn't have any rounds in the fucking chamber.
Do y'all know that?
Crazy, bro.
It could be argued that freedom of speech isn't about a person saying anything they want, but limit others to the ability to censor people they disagree with.
Yeah.
Scuffed, subscribe.
Shout out to you, scuffed.
Thank you for joining the Castle Club.
Guys, Castle Club is a place to fucking join, man.
Welcome!
Punch!
All right, let's see here.
What else do we got?
And guys, again, if you guys want to get involved in the show, MyronGainsX.com, okay, is how you guys can get involved with the show.
Donate to the show that supports the mission directly.
We got a chat here from Jacob Young says the more you take, the more you take a drug, the more resilient you become to it.
If it was enough to make him OD, it wouldn't take over an hour to take effect.
How long was he supposed to be held down?
That affected his death.
All right, buddy.
Bro, you don't become resilient to the fentanyl, bro.
Shit will kill you, man.
Yo, Myron did that.
Because remember, he swallowed it because he didn't want to go to jail.
Come on, man.
Use some critical thinking skills.
Yo, Myron, did that ninja Aiden do right by Icy?
Not sure yet.
Okay.
Let's see here.
Albo A says these anti-Semitism laws are literally doing the complete opposite and actually make people more.
Yeah, they're pissing people off, bro.
They're pissing people off.
They absolutely are.
And the sad part is like, bro, it's not all Jews.
It's like just some fucking idiots, right?
Bro, there's bad people in every group of people, right?
Like, that's just how it works.
There's good Muslims, bad Muslims.
Good Christians, bad Christians.
Good Jews, bad Jews.
Like, that's just how it goes.
That's life.
Someone said druggie in a chat.
Yeah, I know, bro.
Dude, he said, oh, bro, you could get used to fentanyl.
Shut up, nigga.
All right.
So, guys, give me ones in the chat.
Does that make sense, guys?
I know we did a little bit of a longer monologue there, but like I'm trying to show you guys the problems that we have in the MAGA/slash right-wing movement, how it's been invaded by a bunch of morons that don't stand for free speech, that prioritize race riots over liberty, that prioritize Israel over America.
Give me ones that that all makes sense.
Because I did all that to show you guys the idiocy that you guys are about to see with the Sam Cedar debate, where a lot of them made themselves look stupid.
Be honest with y'all.
Give me twos if you guys are shout out to Red Pill saying, by the way, he's in the Twitter chat.
He puts a lot of funny ass clips on X of me.
Shout out to you, bro.
Posting my stuff all the time, dude.
I appreciate that.
Here's his.
Actually, you know what?
I'll do you a solid right now, bro.
Because I do use a good amount of your clips.
Shout out to him and Wyron Gaines.
They post my clips and OSS General.
These are some clips channels.
So, hold on, let me pull this up.
Okay, so Candace Owens reacted.
Let's get Candace Owens' take on this because I saw that you clipped this, bro.
So, so here he is right here, charging Red Pill saying.
He goes, Candace Owens on deportation anti-Semitism laws.
By the way, guys, do me a favor.
Follow him.
If you guys like my, you guys want like bite-sized portions of my stuff, pause.
Follow Red Pill Saiyan.
Also, follow Wire and Gaines updates.
It's Wire and Gaines.
And then follow the OSS General.
Follow these three Twitter pages.
They post my clips.
OSS General and Wyron Gaines are my guys.
I know them personally.
And then Red Pill Saiyan, he just posts his own stuff.
But he posts a lot of my stuff too, but he posts everybody.
He posts everybody.
So check these three channels out.
Red Pill Saiyan, he's independent.
He's on his own.
He does his own thing.
And then Wyron and OSS General, they work with me.
So, okay, let's, but I don't tell them what's a clip.
They just post their own shit.
Candace Owens on deportation and anti-Semitism laws.
Let's see her take on this.
Proactively prosecute a law.
Okay.
If it was not the law or the position when Trump was in office and under the Biden regime, he didn't care about this.
How can you go back and prosecute someone for a law that didn't exist when he violated it, which is passing out flyers, apparently?
Liars that we're not allowed to see.
Why wasn't the exact same thing done when students were harassed by BLM?
If this is really about protecting students, okay?
Some people are saying, oh, well, this is different because Hamas is a designated terrorist group.
Okay.
Well, you guys are saying this is about protecting students, though.
So you could have done this exact same thing to protect students under BLM.
You didn't do it.
Why?
Is it because white people shouldn't be protected?
White people who live here, by the way, Israelis don't live here.
So people protesting Israel has less of an impact on the lives of people than people who are saying that all white people are terrorists and that white people deserve to die and the signs that we saw during these BLM things calling for a white genocide, professors that were engaging in that rhetoric, calling for a white genocide.
That happened factually in this country.
Why didn't we care?
To the contrary, when Trump did get involved, when he recognized that conservatives were being chased and violence was happening when we tried to speak on college campuses, he did sign an executive order.
But guess what he did?
He signed an executive order to increase speech, not to squelch it, to increase it.
Here is an old PBS clip following that executive order from 2019 protecting speech due to the way conservatives are being treated on campus because of our perspectives on BLM and other matters.
Take a listen.
With a stroke of the pen, President Trump issued an ultimatum to U.S. colleges.
Universities that want taxpayer dollars should promote free speech, not silence free speech.
The executive order signed today requires colleges to certify that their policies support free speech as a condition to receiving federal research grants.
It does not affect schools' access to federal financial aid for student tuition.
President Trump first proposed the idea to a gathering of conservatives in Washington earlier this month.
We believe in free speech, including online and including on campus.
Oh, I'll do you one better, Candace.
I'll find you this.
Look at this.
I'll do you one better, Candace.
She's talking about the one that got put in 2019.
I'll do you one better, man.
Yes, sir.
We'll have a 49 deal.
The first is the decisions of 78 Biden-era EOs and presidential memorandums.
Remember this, guys?
Day one?
Oh, if you want me to, sir.
Why don't you say what I'm saying?
Sure.
The first item that President Trump is signing is the rescission of 78 Biden-era executive actions, executive orders, presidential memoranda, and others.
Second item, President Trump, is a regulatory freeze.
The next item, sir, is a freeze on all actives of government going forward.
Could you imagine Biden?
Sir, the next item, as you announced in your speech, is a requirement cast of living crisis that sorry, guys.
I'm finding it right now.
He spent a million executive orders.
Paris Climate Treaty.
Drawing from that treaty.
Nations explaining that we are withdrawing.
Next item is a directive to the censorship of free speech during the restoration.
This next.
All right.
This was on day one, by the way, guys.
This year.
Next item is a directive to the federal government ordering the restoration of freedom of speech and preventing government censorship of free speech going forward.
Come on, man.
What the fuck?
Trump, you signed this executive order, bro.
What?
Do I gotta do this shit again?
Hold on.
Kennis brought the one up in 2019.
I'm bringing up the one this year.
Look.
Freedom is a directive to the federal government ordering the restoration of freedom of speech and preventing government censorship of free speech going forward.
And lastly, sir, before we Do you guys see now why I'm losing my mind over this shit?
You guys see now?
Do you see?
And there's no one that knows more about censorship than Donald Trump.
After the insurrection, alleged insurrection in 2021, he was banned everywhere.
And the government colluded with big tech to censor him everywhere.
That's why he signed this executive order, Chad.
So I find it incredible that Donald Trump, who's been the victim of censorship to the highest degree, is now endorsing the deportation of someone who's legally here for political speech.
The same political speech that they took from him.
The same political speech that they tried to destroy him with.
The same political speech that he was not able to defend himself with when they indicted him four different times.
And they practiced lawfare against him.
Guys, keep in mind, when he got banned off all the platforms, he went and the only place he could talk was True Social.
So his voice was effectively silenced.
Every interview that he went on, they banned it on YouTube.
Do you guys remember when he did the Nelk Boys interview?
I fucking do.
Back in like 2022, 2023-ish?
He talked about the election and how he felt it wasn't fair.
They took that video down and banned it.
They got like a million views in like an hour.
They took that video down and banned it.
YouTube did.
So there's no one that knows about such shit better than your boy Donald Trump.
He signed an executive order for it on day one.
Now you guys see why I'm saying, what the fuck is going on here?
I I got the fucking receipts right here for y'all.
You see it.
Signing the executive order right there on day one.
So clearly, this was very important to Donald Trump.
See, and this is the difference between me and other MAGA retards.
I like Donald Trump, but I'm going to call him out if there's some bullshit.
and there's bullshit here.
Crazy shit, man.
Let's go back to Candace.
He brought on stage conservative activist Hayden Williams.
They won our dollars and we give it to them by the billions.
They've got to allow people like Hayden and many other great young people and old people to speak.
In February, Williams was recruiting on UC Berkeley's campus when he got into an altercation with this man who then punched Williams in the face.
That man was arrested and charged with assault at the university.
He condemned the attack.
Williams spoke to the news hour while in Washington earlier this month.
Well, I think there's a culture on college campuses that sort of promotes one side over the other.
And, you know, conservatives are the minority on college campuses across the country.
So the question is, why didn't the Trump's Department of Justice move at that moment to begin deporting people who held perspectives that were radically pro-BLM, that were calling for the genocide?
I'm just genuinely asking this question for those of us who voted for Trump and support Trump.
And here's what I want to say, by the way, to the people who are extraordinarily Zionist, who support Israel and everything that they do, the people who dropped the Israeli.
Joe says Chauvin is guilty of breaking the law period.
He might not be guilty of murder, but he's 100% guilty of violating the Eighth Amendment and Stell versus Gamble 429 U.S. 97.
It carries jail time.
That said, I'm unsure about the murder conviction.
Well, he didn't get convicted of that even federally, bro.
He got convicted of the FBI charged him with deprivation of civil rights.
And here's the thing: the FBI case was heavily contingent upon the state case.
So, I mean, you could go ahead and bring up statues that you think he's guilty of, but the point is that he got convicted of the murder charge or manslaughter, whatever the fuck it was, murder for second or third degree.
Then he got convicted of the federal statute for violating due process and sorry, violating his violating his rights under the color of law federally.
But that federal case was heavily reliant upon the state case.
The flag in the chat, thinking that it's going to transform.
Matter of fact, since we got Candace Owens on it, Candace actually did a pretty good documentary on this.
And somehow.
This is going to backfire.
Take it from me.
Take me to the bank.
This is going to massively backfire.
So if your stance in this is let me defend this action because I have to defend Israel, the exact opposite thing will happen.
Do you guys remember this earlier this week when the Gallup— Bro, if you're going to defend this bullshit, bro, this is un-American.
Silencing the freedom of speech of someone is unfucking American.
Poll was released the other day.
I can show you this, this headline.
Less than half in the U.S. now sympathetic towards Israelis, okay?
And then it says support for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state remains at majority level.
Yeah.
Look, I've said it before.
I'll say it again.
If Israel truly wants peace, they need to create a two-state solution with the Palestinians.
Bro, this isn't negotiable anymore.
Like, have they not learned, bro, there's been fucking turmoil in that part of the world for almost 100 years.
Plus, you're never going to have peace.
And most importantly, which is what Israel cares about the most, by the way, because they don't care about the Israelis don't really give a shit about Palestinian sovereignty.
They don't care at all.
They want to be recognized by the Arab world, though.
They want to be recognized by Saudi Arabia.
They want to be recognized by all the Gulf states.
They want to be recognized by countries that used to be their adversaries so they could live in peace.
But the problem is they don't get is that in order for these Arab countries to recognize you, right, you need to give the Palestinians a state.
The Arab world is going to continue to have problems with Israel until they give the Palestinians their own state.
And Netanyahu can't get this through his fucking thick skull.
And they were reporting this all across that.
They've never seen such.
And as a matter of fact, he's done everything in his power to stop it.
There's been recordings of him purposely bragging about destroying the Oslo Accords and blocking Palestinian sovereignty.
Low support for Israel in America ever.
And you want to know why that.
You're right.
And it's getting worse and worse for them.
That's why the ADL is freaking out.
I talked about this on TikTok.
Guys, I made a video on this on TikTok, which I really want you guys to watch, right?
where I broke this down in fucking detail.
Right here, if you go to my channel, I got clips.
Clips right here.
Right here's the video.
At this time, they did.
You want to TikTok?
I go in detail about how TikTok has made a lot of people dislike Israel.
Drop the link in there for you guys.
go in detail about the TikTok ban.
That is?
It's not because you can legislate people to support Israel.
It's not because you can deport people to support Israel.
It's because the opposite thing is more likely to happen because it looks like politicians are willing to forego American principles when it comes to the topic of Israel.
Again, I would feel great about this if you told me that the Department of Justice did this under Trump to protect white Americans at school during BLM riots.
And are we supposed to all magically forget while this is going on that back in 2020, BBNet and Yahoo?
Norman says it wasn't political speech.
He was propping up terrorist ideology by chanting for Antifada, occupying buildings, harassing Jewish students, destroying properties and blocking access.
This beyond freedom of speech is he was inciting violence.
Look, here's the thing, bro.
There were many different protest groups at Columbia.
I don't agree with violence.
I don't agree with destroying property either.
Trust me, I don't.
But to pin all of the riots that went down in Colombia, which is a huge university with a bunch of people that were there on one dude, it's kind of wild, right?
Now, the other thing, too, because you're saying that he's propping up, you know, terror ideologies or whatever.
The thing you got to remember, bro, is that Hamas runs Gaza.
So the two are inextricably linked.
You understand?
You can't separate the two, unfortunately, because that is the governing body of Gaza.
Right?
That's like, that's like, let's say some country designated the United States as a terrorist organization, and you said, like, yo, we need to be free in America.
This is fucked up, blah, blah, blah.
They would call you a terrorist because you are endorsing for your country or your land that's run by your government.
But they would go ahead and attribute you, your support of your country as supporting a terrorist organization.
You see what I'm talking about here?
So, in other words, you can't talk about freeing Gaza without talking about Hamas because Hamas governs them.
So, it's a catch-22.
You understand, my friend.
So, Normad, with all due respect, you're an idiot.
Sorry, bro.
How are you going to talk about giving these people sovereignty and stopping the conflict when the people that rule over them is Hamas, bro?
Are you aware of the fact right now that when they did the ceasefire, who do you guys think Israel's negotiating with?
Who do y'all think they're negotiating with right now?
Some random niggas?
They're negotiating with Hamas, you retard.
That's what they're negotiating with.
That's the governing body.
So you can't avoid that conversation.
You can't avoid talking about them or having them involved in this situation because they are the negotiators.
They're the governing body.
They're in power.
What the fuck are those people supposed to do?
And I'm not endorsing Framaz.
I'm not saying that I endorse him.
No.
But I also understand that they're the governing body in Gaza.
They're the ones Israel's negotiating with.
Who was sounding like a gangster saying that he was going to get speech laws passed in America and any person that boycotted Israel would themselves suffer?
Let's take a listen to Bibi Net and Yahoo, and this is going to be in Hebrew, but don't worry.
I will interpret it for you and then give you some tweets.
This is Bibi Netanyahu.
He is saying we will punish people who boycott Israel.
This is a foreign leader.
Guys, I'm not restricting your free speech in the chat, bro.
I don't know what you're talking about.
I'm not banning any of you guys.
Of a foreign state saying whoever boycotts Israel will themselves be boycotted.
We are getting laws passed.
There are laws passed in most states against boycotting us, and you will be punished.
How's that for gangsters?
Not only that, there's laws in America, guys.
If you want to be like a contractor at the state level, you have to sign an agreement that you are pro-Israel.
Do you guys know that?
Guys, there's laws in place at the state level where if you're like a contractor, you do work for the state government, you have to sign a document saying that you are pro-Israel.
There's like 36 states that practice it.
I was talking about it with Brad Lee, actually.
Crazy, dude.
Crazy.
Because he has a house in Tennessee and one of his buddies wanted to do contract work for the state.
And he was saying that he had to sign a document saying that you got to be pro-Israel.
Why is a foreign nation's support being mandated at the state level?
Do you get it?
A foreign nation has to be supported at a state level.
Makes no sense, bro.
Mr. Speech.
And to back that up, they tweeted in perfect English, by the way, on the Israel Twitter account.
They wrote, This is 2020, Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu, whoever boycotts us will be boycotted.
The UN Human Rights Council is a biased body that is devoid of influence.
Not for nothing.
I have already ordered severing ties of it.
Guess what, guys?
That has now happened here in America.
It was also not for nothing that the American administration has taken this step together with us.
In recent years, we have promoted laws in most U.S. states, which determine that strong action is to be taken against whoever tries to boycott Israel.
Fascinating that he can do that, that he can say that, that we are supposed to be a party that is America first, and it seems that laws are being dictated according to what this guy wants.
And I've been very clear in my stance on him.
I think he is a monster.
I think he's a gangster and he's acting like a gangster.
And now it seems that politicians are just following his every order.
They're just following his order.
Just gonna, well, it doesn't matter why we got ready if we went.
Bibi Netanyahu wanted us to.
You know what actually, what we wanted as the American people?
We want you guys to focus on the Epstein files and the JFK files that were promised.
Okay?
This isn't where we need you guys to flex your muscles.
We're never getting them shits.
I'm Mahoumood Khalil, who doesn't have a criminal record here and has a wife that's pregnant for eight months, like, wasn't at the top of my list.
I got to be honest.
Wasn't even on my list, if I'm being honest.
And it's interesting to hear when people recognize that and ask that question.
Well, what about these Epstein files and JFK files that were promised to be released on day one?
Here is how Caroline Levitt answers.
A week ago, Attorney General Bondi said a truckload of Epstein files had been delivered to her office from the SDNY.
Why can we expect those files to be released?
That is so comical that it took her so long to even like grow.
She's the boss of SDNY and she put the blame on SDNY.
I would defer you to the Department of Justice.
I don't have a timeline here.
Do you have any update on the JFK files?
I don't at this moment.
Again, I would defer you to our DNI director, Tulsi Goward, and also the Department of Justice.
I know that they are working on that diligently, as the president requested them to do.
All I'm saying, guys, is I don't like it.
I don't like the way it feels.
I don't like that it seems increasingly that we are abandoning our values.
Again, I had these same values when people were taking extraordinary efforts under the Biden regime's DOJ to go after American citizens for practicing their speech and rightfully assembling, rightfully assembling to support Donald Trump.
And this feels like the exact same thing in both regards, calling people terrorists and telling people not to look at the details.
So check this out, guys.
Very interesting.
Also.
So Tucker Carlson actually talked about the JFK files.
He had an interview with Kumo, Cuomo, whatever the fuck to pronounce it.
I want to play you this fascinating exchange between Tucker Carlson and Chris Cuomo on why they think the Trump administration is having such a hard time releasing the JFK files.
It's fascinating because I think Tucker knows why.
He definitely knows why.
He knows he can't say it, but he kind of indirectly hints at it.
Tuck Carlson's been doing a good job of noticing in silence.
At the very end, if you pay super close attention.
What is that?
Why have these been secret for so long?
Why don't they put it out?
Because institutions protect themselves, Tucker, as we both know.
Really?
And there is clearly information in those files that are going to make the CIA look bad.
Just the CIA.
Well, whatever.
Different agents.
Not whatever.
I mean, let's.
I mean, I don't know because I haven't seen it.
But it could be the FBI.
Okay, so I've always thought that.
And then in January, you know, there was a scramble over who's going to get what jobs in the new administration.
And at one point, there was someone who was being discussed for a job in the Intel world.
And a member of the SSCI, the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence and Intel Committee, went to the people making the decision and said, you cannot hire this person because this person will be certain to push for the release of the JFK files.
So this is in this effect.
So this is in 2025, less than two months ago, and you have a sitting member of the United States Senate whose main goal is to keep those files secret.
And then you have to ask yourself, why?
Yeah.
I mean, it doesn't actually make sense.
The story doesn't make sense.
And by the way, we have the file numbers of most of the files that have not been disclosed.
So it's like Trump issues an executive order on January 23rd saying you're going to release this stuff.
They kind of can't not release it.
And yet now it's the first week of March and they haven't released it.
So pressure is currently being applied on the administration not to release those files.
It seems that way.
By whom?
I don't know.
And the CIA has already been through 50 years ago, the church committee hearings, 1975, where we sort of note they were sassying people, dosing people with acid, all this stuff.
It's like the CIA has already been discredited.
So if you're telling me that six weeks ago, a member of the United States Senate was trying to keep someone out of a job in order to keep these files secret, that is to protect the CIA, I don't believe that for a second.
So what do you think it is?
I don't know.
But this is, I mean, there's no one at the CIA who's involved.
Actually, yeah, who's involved in the Kennedy sessions?
There's no one in America who's involved in the assassination.
That last part, did you catch it?
He says that there's nobody alive in America.
Yep, I caught that one.
Good catch by this dude.
Who was involved in the JFK assassination thing, meaning that there is no domestic institution to protect.
There is no individual here in America that they need to.
Let's play that back again because that's a good catch.
Don't know.
But this is.
You're telling me that six weeks ago, a member of the United States Senate was trying to keep someone out of a job in order to keep these files secret that is to protect the CIA.
I don't believe that for a second.
So what do you think it is?
I don't know.
But this is, I mean, there's no one at the CIA who's involved.
Actually, yeah, who's involved in the Kennedy session?
They're all dead.
There's no one in America who's involved in the assassination.
That last part, did you catch it?
Even Clint Hill, the Secret Service agent that jumped on the famously jumped on the back of the motorcade, the vehicle when Kenny was shot, he just died like two or three weeks ago, guys.
Literally just died.
This dude right here.
One of the last survivors that was around at that time just died, chat February 21st, 2025, 93 years old.
He says that there's nobody alive in America who was involved in the JFK assassination thing, meaning that there is no domestic institution to protect.
There is no individual here in America that they need to protect.
And clearly, perhaps there is some kind of foreign entity that could be implicated if those files were to be released.
And I'm pretty confident in saying that if it was China, Iran, Russia, Saudi.
Norman says, with all due respect, you're the idiot.
You're letting your criticism for Jays blind you from the fact that what he did was wrong, though there were many organizations where he was radicalizing these groups and was the head of the snake hence why they got him.
Okay, Norman, how about this?
You go make your own political commentary channel and talk about why it's okay to take away people's First Amendment right.
How about that, bro?
Go over there, like with the other MAGA retards, and sit there and say, oh, well, yeah, we're going to go ahead and just censor speech because we don't like what they got to say.
We think he's aligned with a terrorist organization.
Go ahead over there, bro.
Because you're too dumb to realize that the First Amendment was made precisely to protect political speech.
And whether you like it or not, Hamas is the political organization that runs Gaza that is currently negotiating with the Israelis.
You stupid fuck.
Saudi Arabia or any of those kinds of countries who would be implicated if those files came out, those files would have come out 62 years ago.
There's really only one country in the entire.
Also, I've seen his speeches and he was really big on being peaceful.
Entire world that America will never point fingers at no matter what they do.
And for the record, I don't know which one.
Crazy.
Crazy, crazy.
All right, so I see some of you guys wanted me to cover the Thomas Massey situation.
So I'll actually cover this real quick.
For some of you guys that don't know, Thomas Massey, right here he is.
Thomas Errol Massey is an American politician engineer, a member of the Republican Party.
Massey has been the United States representative for Kentucky's fourth congressional district since 2012.
The district covers much of northeastern Kentucky, but is dominated by the Kentucky side of the Cincinnati area in Louisville's eastern suburbs.
Okay.
Now, this guy is wildly popular in the American First Movement, and the reason why is because he does not take any foreign aid.
Okay, guys, this is like the only guy that doesn't take money from Israel.
And actually, matter of fact, he was the one that exposed that people have APAC handlers.
Everybody but me has an APAC person.
What does that mean?
This is crazy.
Like, we obviously knew this, but he brought this into the mainstream, Thomas Massey, with this interview with Tucker Carlson.
Everybody but me has an APAC person.
What does that mean?
An AIPAC person.
It's like your babysitter, your APAC babysitter, who is always.
And after this, his wife died and he's been on the fucking chopping block and people have been trying to come after him, by the way.
He's talking to you for AIPAC.
All right, hold on.
Let me see if I can get the full but me.
Why have Republicans Times joined Tucker Carlson over the weekend?
The two discussed the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, otherwise known as APAC.
Let's watch.
Why have Republicans who come to me on the floor and say, I wish I could vote with you today?
Yours is the right vote, but I would just take too much flack back home.
And I have Republicans who come to me and say, that's wrong what APAC is doing to you.
Let me talk to my APAC person.
By the way, everybody but me has an APAC person.
What does that mean?
APAC person.
It's like your babysitter, your AIPAC babysitter, who is always talking to you for APAC.
They're probably a constituent in your district, but they are, you know, firmly embedded in APAC.
And every member has someone like this?
I don't know how it works on the Democrat side, but that's how it works on the Republican side.
But it's not like...
What have I told you guys all year?
I told you guys that the Republican Party openly cucks for Israel versus the Democrats hide it.
And Thomas Massey confirmed what I told y'all.
They openly cock for Israel.
Hold on, where did that video go?
APAC is doing this for all countries.
Let's listen.
It's the only country that does this that has somebody that like uniformly.
I guarantee there's some spreadsheet at AIPAC where, you know, the AIPAC dude who's matched up with the congressman is there, and then all the congressmen's votes on the issue.
Oh, has the congressman been to Israel?
They pay for trips for congressmen and their spouses to go to Israel.
I may be, I mean, I don't, I'm not the only Republican who hasn't taken the APAC trip to Israel.
Matt Gates hasn't either.
W for Matt Gates.
Calculum!
Paunch!
That's why they didn't want him to become Attorney General.
And Matt Gates knows about Epstein.
He also knows what's going on over there.
He talked about Benny Johnson.
He didn't want to name Israel, but he knew.
I'm probably one of a dozen that hasn't taken that trip, and the other ones just haven't got around to it.
APAC responded on Twitter, writing, quote, once again, Massey lies and tropes about AIPAC.
We are a United States organization of 4.5 million American members funded only by Americans.
Yeah, but you guys are also dual citizens with Israel.
Massey's disdain for Israel and for fellow Americans will not deter us from working to strengthen our country's ties with Israel.
During the interview, Massey also revealed what former President Trump said to him after Massey opposed the coronavirus relief package in 2020.
Listen, he comes off and goes, I'm coming at you like you've never seen.
Never in your life before.
Have you seen the way in which I will come at you?
I'm more popular than you in Kentucky, and you know it.
I'm back in your primary opponent and you're gonna lose.
Come on.
That's kind of funny.
Oh, crap.
I probably will lose.
Massey added that Trump and him have since patched things up and have a better relationship.
Well, I must be well, not anymore.
And I will go ahead and show you guys why.
Where I put it.
So this was Ian Smith Sr.
He wrote a really good piece on this on Twitter.
He said, Trump is openly calling to primary Congressman Thomas Massey because Massey refuses to rubber stamp another corrupt GOP spending bill.
Let's cut through the noise and talk straight.
Massey is one of the few, one of the few in D.C. who still stands on principle.
He refuses to sell out taxpayers, won't fund endless wars, and rejects bloated budgets that betray everyday Americans.
Trump's attack exposes exactly where he stands, firmly with the establishment, Republicans and foreign lobbies, especially the powerful Israeli lobby.
Thomas Massey is completely right to oppose the disgraceful GOP spending bill.
Here's why.
It continues funding Biden's weaponized DOJ, targeting conservatives.
It spends billions more overseas to Ukraine instead of supporting American veterans' infrastructure and border security.
It adds choice to the national debt, robbing future generations.
It hands your taxpayer money to woke bureaucrats, lobbyists, and cronies who despise America first values.
It includes no meaningful spending cuts or accountability.
Massey's bravery makes him a target, not just Trump, but also of the MAGA influencer machine.
Watch grifters like DC, called DC Gabo, which is kind of funny.
He's talking about DC Draino, but yay.
Good play on words.
And other fake America First influencers, people who've never risked a thing for their country, launched their coordinated attack on Massey again.
Their loyalty isn't to America, but clicks views and cashing in on the MAGA occultism.
These influencers are a patriotist.
They're opportunists, as slimy as any career politician.
They've never sacrificed political safety for principle.
Massey has repeatedly.
I agree.
Trump's attack also reveals another uncomfortable truth.
Trump consistently prioritizes Israel first interests over American interests.
Massey stands firm against endless foreign aid, lobbyist influence, and foreign entanglements draining America dry.
This moment clearly shows who's real and who's fake.
Thomas Massey put America first through actions, not slogans.
Trump and his influenza alleys have exposed themselves as willing participants in a corrupt game, profiting from patriotism while betraying American values.
Remember who stood strong when it mattered.
Massey won't bend.
True patriots see exactly where he stands.
And very well-written thing.
Very good write-up here.
So, let me see here.
Guys, let me get you guys something here.
So that kind of goes over why they've been targeting Thomas Massey over the past 24 hours.
the maga people are going after him in 2013 there was a coup underway Like there was a military overthrow of the Egyptian government.
And we've been sending them $1.3 billion a year for as long as I can remember and ever since I've been in Congress.
Back in 2013, I thought, if we're not sure who's in charge of the Egyptian government, maybe we could hold off a year on this.
We also give a bunch of money to Egypt, which we shouldn't be doing either.
But we give them that money because they play nice with Israel.
1.3 billion until things sort themselves out and we see who's got the name on the checks when it goes into their checking account over there in egypt so i offered an amendment and uh i had so you guys could see he's against foreign aid not just for israel but for egypt as well He doesn't like foreign aid.
And I agree.
Fuck foreign aid.
So Republicans planning to.
All right, so here we go.
Here's a clip that's more recent from today, breaking points.
And the title of the video is Trump Declares War on Thomas Massey Over Spending Bill.
Vote on what's called a content.
Hey, guys, this is like the hot topic in the political right wing right now with this whole situation with Thomas Massey and Trump.
There's two factions.
You got the Magatars that love Israel, and then you got the guys that are America First that say, nah, Thomas Massey is a patriot because he's willing to stand up to the powerful Israeli lobby.
Guys, I got to take a quick piss.
I'm going to play this video for you now, Joseo.
Continuing resolution to basically keep the government open.
President Trump has been baking the pitch, like, just give me some a few more months so we can then, you know, tackle this out-of-control spending and pass our budget.
So that's the pitch he's been making because, of course, you've got some people in the caucus who do not want to continue spending at the current levels.
They're, you know, into fiscal austerity and they're concerned about the debt and the deficit.
People like Thomas Massey, who has been most consistent Republican on this issue, true, like died-in-the-wool, libertarian and Tea Party type, really concerned about smaller government.
You know, he's not my political ideology, but I respect the fact that the man remains quite principled at times when it's very difficult, including on things like free speech in Israel.
In any case, Trump is out now threatening Thomas Massey with a primary challenge.
Let's go ahead and put this up on the screen.
He posted this on True Social.
He says, Thank you to the House Freedom Caucus for just delivering a big blow to the radical left Democrats, their desire to raise taxes and shut our country down.
They hate America and all it stands for.
That's why they allowed millions of criminals to invade our nation.
Sometimes it takes great courage to do the right thing.
Congressman Thomas Massey of beautiful Kentucky is an automatic no vote on just about everything, despite the fact that he has always voted for continuing resolutions in the past.
He should be primary and I will lead the charge against him.
He's just another grandstander who's too much trouble and not worth a fight.
He reminds me of Liz Cheney before her historic record-breaking fault loss.
The people of Kentucky won't stand for it.
Just watch.
Do I have any takers?
Anyway, thank you again to the House Freedom Caucus for your very important vote.
We need to buy some time in order to make America great again, greater and greater than ever before.
Unite and win.
Soccer, you.
Yeah, I ain't gonna lie, man.
Trump always writes these very long run-on sentences, which is hilarious.
But when you actually read it out loud, you're like, this dude's just going in like a whole rant.
You may know more about this than I do.
I know Thomas Massey has faced primary challenges before.
I don't think that he's faced one that was backed so directly by President Trump or been put on blast quite to this extent by President Trump.
So you have to take that seriously.
I will say I think he has his own like support.
Hold on one sec, chat.
Base and people in his district seem to really, you know, really appreciate him for the principled stances that he's been taking.
But when you've got the combination of Trump, who has his cult of personality, and Elon, who has almost limitless money to fund said primary challenges, of course, you have to ultimately take this seriously.
So what did you make of this move from Trump?
And does it betray sort of any nervousness about whether or not the CR is going to pass?
Because I did see there were a few other Republicans who may continue to be holding.
Yeah, they should be afraid because it's not just about the House.
Don't forget, they've got to pass this thing through the Senate as well.
And all the Democrats are currently on the record.
No, they're going to have huge problems being able to get this piece of legislation.
On the Massey front, I mean, look, like you said, I remember five years ago, I hated Thomas Massey because he voted against a lot of the COVID stimulus checks and he was, you know, holding it all up.
You can say what you want about the guy, but I think what it has proven out is, like you said, he's principal.
He's one of the rarest people.
He is principled, which is very important with politicians because most politicians are not principled.
In Washington, right?
There's like only four or five people like him in the entire United States Congress, including the Senate.
So I think people have people like him around.
It's good.
It's good for us to have wild cards.
And it's not the Republicans.
It's not Massey's fault that the Republicans only have a two or three.
Have to agree with everything, but you can at least fucking respect, you know, being principled and not taking foreign money.
That in itself is wildly, you know, awesome because most people don't fucking do that shit.
Like, all politicians take money from foreign governments.
And I think that's problematic.
Also, Massey, which I agree with, he says no dual citizenship should be allowed to serve in U.S. government, which I agree with 100%.
Three seat majority.
But that's considered anti-Semitic and, you know, bigoted.
Right?
It's like, it's, why are we backing primary challenges against him?
As you said, he also wants to dissolve the Fed.
He's been absolutely courageous on foreign aid, on Israel.
He stood up to AIPAC, free speech.
I mean, yep, yep, he has stood up to APAC, and they've come after him for it, guys.
They fund his opposition.
They try to be getting him out.
They've been trying to get him out for a while.
This guy, maha.
I mean, don't forget, by the way, even on the Elon thing, it would be preposterous for Thomas Massey to speak out against Elon.
Thomas Massey was one of the first people in Congress to buy a Tesla.
And if you'll all recall, he Massey was on that call with Elon Musk when Ron DeSantis did his disastrous campaign launch.
Thomas Massey loves Elon Musk and he loves Doge.
So this idea is ridiculous that he's not in the camp.
It's just that he is a libertarian and he doesn't want to vote for CRs and continued spending.
He even said, he's like, look, according to you, Doge, you found massive fraud in USAID.
This CR continues.
The good thing about libertarians that I agree with them, guys like Dave Smith, Thomas Massey, et cetera, is they're anti-war, right?
Unlike a lot of these fucking neocon warhawks.
Needs to fully fund USAID.
So aren't you guys kind of full of it from the White House asking for full funding of an agency you say is corrupt?
So what's up with that?
Right.
None of it makes any sense.
Now, you're right.
He has survived multiple primary challenges.
I was just looking back here.
I know AIPAC came after him.
Oh, they came.
Big time.
And here's the thing with AIPAC guys, they got a lot of money.
So they will fund your opposition and try to get them to destroy you.
What was it?
Corey Bush or something like that?
Down in Louisiana or St. Louis, somewhere like that?
Bro, APAC spent like $2 million to get her out.
Came out and funded her.
And she lost.
Primary challenge in 2020.
I don't think they even came close.
He didn't even break 20%.
Yeah.
And Massey is, again, he's one of those folks who is genuinely, he's like Bernie.
He's one of those people to me, at least, where all the caricatures of him are BS.
You know who he is.
He's a principled guy in his votes, in the way he talks, in how, I mean, he's made decisions, which are some of the most inconvenient in all of Washington because of what he believes.
And I think his constituents reward him for that.
So broadly, I don't think that.
Yeah, a lot of people love him on Twitter.
A lot of people love him on Twitter.
I like him too, man.
This will work.
You know, people like him, Chip Roy is another example who Trump is currently backing a primary challenge against.
These guys are, you know, they actually believe what they say, which is one of the most rare things in the entire city.
So I'm behind him 100%.
And I do think it's pretty ridiculous to primary him for the problems and the challenges that are a creation of this GOP caucus, not of Thomas Massey.
It's not his fault.
Also, by the way, you could easily have the CR pass if you had worked with Democrats, right?
But you're not, you don't want to do that.
Right.
There's a lot of different varieties.
It's like, this is just where they demand fealty to the king.
And I think that's just ridiculous.
Not to overanalyze this, but also the comparison to Liz Cheney.
Yeah, right.
I mean, these are ideologically like wildly different people.
But to me, it's the perfect emblem of how politics in the Trump era just collapses down to the central divide.
Are you with Trump or are you against him?
And so if you go against him on anything, even though he's like completely, I mean, he is probably the biggest Doge supporter.
You know, he's all about the project of cutting government that Elon is engaged in that Trump has fully thrown his backing for at this point.
Like he would be the number one guy in support of that.
But because he dares to buck Trump on anything, then you get thrown in the category of Liz Cheney, which, you know, for Republicans, that's like the greatest insult you can possibly be imagine to be compared to a traitor such as Liz Cheney.
So I thought that was, you know, interesting and very telling as well.
Let me go ahead and get into some of the details of this bill.
I think Sabra makes a good point about.
So real quick, so he's obviously Thomas Massey is trending heavily on political Twitter.
I'll show you guys some of the some of the stuff real quick.
So if you just search Thomas Massey, right, here we go again.
Remember in 2020 when Congress Thomas Massey heroically stood up against a $2 trillion COVID spending, right?
And then here, here actually he is.
He posted this an hour ago.
He says, the lowdown on the continuing resolution, it's a fake fight here in the House that will become obvious when the Senate Democrats vote for the stinker.
Massey here.
So let's hear from him himself.
This comes from his official government account.
To know about the fake fight that's going on in the House of Representatives right now over this CR.
They're trying to pitch it as a conservative CR versus liberal Democrats.
And even the Democrats are going along in the House.
But let me tell you why that's a fake fight.
Okay, before he gets into why it's a fake fight, I'll read some chats real fast.
Just watching Myron Gaines while waiting for Iftar.
Love you, Myron.
I hope you run for president one day, 100% getting endorsed by me.
I appreciate that, injected Wolf.
Platinum Diamond says, Because you've helped me realize so much that was wrong in my life and thinking, sorry, I got you, bro.
Definitely files were promised to Israel 2,000 years ago.
Okay.
Hey, Myron, can you get me unbanned from CC?
Bill said he would do it.
However, I'm still banned.
This is comfort zone.
Okay.
Bro, can you send in a chat for like a buck on Wednesday when we're live when Bill's in the studio tomorrow?
Do these people forget that the term semite just doesn't apply to them?
Do they not know the semites apply to anyone from the Middle East or people who speak Semitic languages?
That is true, my friend.
Official says, hey, Myron, big fan, I'm going to on Tim Cast and whatever after wrecking Sam Cedar, which you'll see.
I'd love to come out sometime if you have some availability.
Official who?
All right, I'll, like, look you up.
King Rich, two bucks.
Appreciate that.
Scuff, subscribe.
Cool.
Oh, Grimley says, the first person I bought about when you said the media glorifies degeneracy was DJ Vlad from Vlad TV.
He's always interviewing hood rat ass rappers early life every single time.
Yeah, bro.
And Vlad, just so you guys know, Vlad will never have me on because he thinks I'm racist.
I got some insider info.
The reason why you guys haven't seen us on Vlad TV is because he says that we're racist.
So, and obviously a lot of people that work for him are black and shit, so he's scared.
When he brought Kevin Samuels on, he got a lot of backlashing.
We're way more controversial than Kevin Samuels.
But Vlad is a pussy, bro.
That's the problem with these music industry niggas, bro.
Like, they can't speak freely.
I find it interesting how someone like Vlad will bring on literal killers, drug dealers, scumbags, fraudsters, grapists.
He'll bring on the worst people ever on his show, but then he'll go ahead and draw the line at people like me that are racist or politically divisive.
Isn't that crazy, chat?
Isn't that absolutely wild that people are more scared of me than fucking murderers?
People would rather fucking interview crooks, criminals, killers, robbers, fucking scammers.
The worst kind of people.
But he draws a line to someone like me that talks about degeneracy in the black culture that he promotes, by the way.
And fucking credible, bro.
Welcome!
Punch!
The most hypocritic bullshit ever.
But yeah, fuck glad.
What else we got?
Oh, let's go back to Thomas Massey.
They plan to pass it with all Republicans here in the House, but after we leave town, the Democrats are going to vote for it in the Senate.
That's right.
They're going to need about eight Democrat senators to vote for this thing over in the Senate.
That means that this deal has already been cut, that Mike Johnson has cut a deal with the Senate Democrats, Senate leadership, and even Hakeem Jeffries.
He's in on this so that they can pitch their fake fight here in the House.
Now, how do I, why am I so certain this is going to pass in the Senate when it gets over there with eight Democrats or however many Democrats they need?
Well, Mike Johnson is.
So this guy, Norman, says, you're so quick to dismiss someone with different opinions, even though I was respectful.
Do you want everyone to watch you hold?
Do you want everyone that watch you to hold your same views?
Freedom of speech is to have peaceful protests, but he was making death threats of holding students' hostages.
Okay, do me a favor, Norman.
Send me a clip of him making death threats or holding students hostage.
Oh, wait.
Send me a clip of it.
Send me a clip of him doing that stuff.
I am open to you presenting your evidence.
I'm a rationally sound guy.
I will definitely look at the evidence.
Send it to me then if you're so confident.
Sending us home a day early.
We're going to vote on this thing and skip.
Because everything I've seen, he's always said, no, we're going to do this peacefully.
But go ahead and send it my way, bro.
Town.
If you thought there was really a threat of them not I see someone said people said Myron, can you go on the Matt Kim Pod?
I probably will.
I've spoken with him.
I just got to find a time, bro, because he's in like he's in the Atlanta area.
So I got to, you know, that's a, I got to find out a time to go out there.
I'm also going to probably go to Texas as well, do something with Infowars.
Passing it in the Senate, why would you leave town?
Well, Owen Schroyer and Chase.
And I think Ian Carroll's over there too, so I'll probably go out there.
I just got to find a time to do it within the next few weeks.
Myron, what version of Minecraft do you have?
There's a few.
I'd have to go get it, but I'll tell you.
The other thing that's going on is.
Also, guys, we got only what?
Well, I got 1.2K likes.
Niggas like the video.
Guys, let's get this engagement up, bro.
Let's get this engagement up, guys.
And also, guys, do me a favor.
If you're watching me on Rumble, please open up a tab and watch on YouTube.
And the reason why, guys, is the more people we have watching live, the more people will find the stream.
So if you're watching on Rumble and Cast Club, do me a favor.
I'm dropping the link right now, right, for you guys on all the platforms.
Open up a tab and watch this on YouTube.
You don't got to watch it.
Like, you don't have to actually watch on YouTube.
If you prefer Rumble, that's fine.
Just open up a tab.
I want to see that viewership shoot up on YouTube to like 2,700, 3,000, somewhere in that range.
Because what's going to happen is that's going to help with the engagement.
More people are going to find the stream and more people we can recruit to the OSS.
So if you guys could do me that favor, I would really, really appreciate it.
The Democrats have a retreat, an offsite retreat, where they're going to get together and party and have, you know, guest speakers and stuff.
And that starts tomorrow and runs through Thursday and Friday.
Now, you think they're not going to let this thing pass?
What would happen if, let's say, the Freedom Caucus decided to take the conservative stance on this CR and oppose it?
Well, they would be about 30 or 40 votes short here in the House.
The Republicans would.
But Hakeem Jeffries wouldn't be able to pretend, along with Mike Johnson, in this fake fight, that this is a conservative versus liberal battle in the House.
And he would just hand over at least 40 Democrats.
And once you get the 40 Democrats, it'd probably be a whole lot more Democrats.
So that's what's going on.
It's all a fake fight.
You're going to find this out when it goes over to the Senate and you have Democrats in the Senate voting for it.
Now, here's the other thing a lot of people aren't telling you about this bill.
In the FRA, stands for Fiscal Responsibility Act.
I'm not saying it was that responsible, but in the FRA that passed a couple years ago under Kevin McCarthy, the deal that was cut between myself and others on the rules committee was that if you will guarantee a 1% cut in spending on any CR that goes past April 30th and put that into law, use the sequester language and put that into law, then we would raise the debt limit or suspend the debt limit for a period of time.
I voted for this because a 1% cut seemed like a wonderful thing if they would go and do a CR for a full year, which seemed like almost a certainty at some point in the next two years.
Well, here we are under Mike Johnson, and we've got the one Drew Drew G sent in the dollar and said, what does OSS mean?
Well, you're going to have to find out, my friend.
Your CR that they're going to do.
It's actually a six-month CR because we're already six months into this.
And it's going to go past April 30th.
It should.
All right.
So it talks a little bit about the CR, but look, Democrats try to use school shooting takes our guns away.
Here's Thomas Massey standing ground against radical Democrats that want to take gun rights.
Have you ever worked in the school?
Have you ever worked in the school?
Look at this nigga, bro.
Bro, why do the stereotypes always got a fucking align?
Bruh, this nigga loud as hell.
Bro, what the fuck, man?
Have you ever worked in the school?
This is just a bad part.
Have you ever worked in the state?
You will not answer my question.
Don't stop and talk, Mr. Shea.
Bro, zero decorum, bro.
Okay, I'll bring it down to now.
All right, folks.
Have you ever worked in the school?
I've got a bill to repeal.
I worked in the school for 20 years.
You're just screaming.
I was a Jesus.
I was speaking before you was giving it.
Bruh.
This nigga going crazy, bro.
I worked in the school for 20 years.
I worked in the school 20 years.
And every school.
This nigga keeps touching him.
What's wrong with this guy, bro?
He's a spirit counselor.
Look at this nigga, bro.
Why are you behaving like this?
I was a middle school principal.
So fucking embarrassing, bro.
Fuck.
Damn, man.
Y'all niggas do this dumb shit and make me look bad.
God damn.
Calculum pawns.
What the fuck, man?
Holly.
Power.
I'm for free speech.
Like, all of these resolutions run afoul of those things, and that's why I can't vote for them.
Tell us what the free speech part of it.
So recently they brought a bill to Congress, and this was actually a binding bill, not a non-binding resolution.
Right.
This was going to have.
Get the likes up, guys.
We only got 1.4k likes, man.
We need 2,000.
Let's go, ninjas.
The effect of law, and people would get prosecuted if they engaged in anti-Semitism on campuses.
And the problem with this bill is they use some international definition of anti-Semitism on a website somewhere.
My first question is: why don't you just put the definition in the bill?
Why are you pointing to somebody's URL in a piece of legislation?
You are the Congress, right?
Right.
We are the laws.
We should be.
Instead, we're referencing a website.
That's not even hosted in the United States.
And so, but so I went to this website and it's got a fairly short definition, but it's also got examples of things.
So, yeah, man, that's just some examples of Thomas Massey.
A lot of people support him.
Right.
Oh, he corrects this thing, too.
This suite from Trump's account is very misleading.
I never voted for a continuing resolution that became law.
I did vote for a CR under McCarthy that included an 8% cut to all discretionary spending, but unfortunately, that CR did not become law.
Do research and you'll find that I've been consistent.
Because here he says, no, he can't even approve a continuing resolution when he approved them many times during his career as a congressman.
And why don't more representatives stand on principle?
Because telling the truth can get you in hot water.
Go ahead and need your help.
I will run again because we need at least one person in Congress who won't cave.
Can you show support by contributing now?
See, guys, he's trying to, Trump is saying he should be primaried.
...
See?
So they're going after him.
Congressman Massey in the past did not.
But he's definitely wrong on this one.
And that's why I don't agree.
And I have defended Congressman Massey in the past.
Go back and watch the shows.
I don't get emotional about these things.
He has been amazing on the January 6th pipe bomber case.
Incredible.
He is wrong here.
He's just, I'm sorry.
He's wrong.
He doesn't have a tactical plan to cut spending.
I just gave it to you.
Get rid of this CR, deal with it for three more months.
Move on to reconciliation and fight the well here, bro.
Come on, man.
See, here's the thing.
Dan's a former government player like me.
He knows he's just going to kick the can down the road.
Like, the CR is like, it's always just, it's fucking kicking the can down the road.
The fight there.
That's why he doesn't want to sign it.
Actually, have the numbers.
Does that make sense?
Anybody disagree?
If you think that I'm a toolbox and a jerk right now, and you're like, yeah, that's just crazy.
Tell me in a chat.
I'm opening it.
All I'm asking you is if you believe that, tell me what your plan is.
Tell me what your plan is to get over the Senate filibuster.
If you have it, I'd love to hear it.
Everybody, you know, everybody can talk a big game.
The problem is you have to have a plan to implement it on the field.
But he's definitely wrong on this one.
And that's why I don't agree.
And I have defended Congressman Massey.
All right.
Chat from Large Rich goes, love you, man.
Keep doing this shit.
Appreciate it, bro.
Be in the past.
Interesting thing, guys.
Some breaking news here.
I just realized this came up on my timeline.
I saw this.
And don't worry.
We're going to do the Sam Cedar thing very soon, guys.
I got a million times open.
Holy.
I got to close some of this shit.
But look at this.
Benny Johnson says, AOC going to jail for hiring illegal aliens to work in Congress.
What?
Hold on.
I got to look this up.
That's what we want.
We want on this program handcuffs.
WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE
SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD
FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR
WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR
WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR WE'VE SAID HEAD FAIR I think we're I think we're back, chat.
All right, we're back.
Sorry about that.
I don't know what the fuck, bro.
Them boys are coming after me, man.
Them boys are coming after me, chat.
I don't know what the fuck is going on with this shit.
It's pissing me off.
But we're back, niggas.
We're back.
We are back.
Give me one to the chat if you guys...
give me one's in the chat we're good give me one's in the chat if you guys can hear me and see me All good.
Give me ones.
All right, sweet.
All right.
Sorry about that, ninjas.
I don't know what the fuck happened there, but we're back, niggas.
We're back.
Okay, bro.
All right.
Now that she's an exposed for us.
We're back to the show.
The show goes on, niggas.
We can't be stopped, man.
I'm not fucking leaving.
The show goes on.
This is my home.
They're gonna need a fucking wrecking ball to take me out of here for compromising national security.
Apparently, AOC hired illegal aliens.
Let's see the legal.
Breaking U.S. law.
We're starting the campaign today.
AOC for Gitmo, former illegal immigrant, criminal alien who worked in AOC's office at a top-tier level has self-deported.
Would you look at that?
Ladies and gentlemen, InfoWars journalist Jamie White murdered in Austin, Texas.
We'll get you the latest from Alex Jones and InfoWars as what exactly is happening there.
A lot of very interesting energy right now inside of the White House, gearing up for some massive global victories for President Trump.
We're going to cover sort of where all of the administration officials are, and we'll be joined by administration officials today.
Council Law to the President, Alina Haba, will be on the show.
Yeah, sorry, guys.
I don't know why the fuck this shit just like fucked up.
I don't know.
She'll be live from the White House, and we're going to ask her a little bit about AOC.
Can't wait.
Let's freaking mix it up and get going.
My name is Danny Johnson, and this is Denny Show.
Listen, I got to tell you, I'm really excited about gas prices.
I drove by a gas station this morning.
When's the last time you saw gas below $3 a gallon in Tampa, Klein?
I don't know.
It was like a long time ago.
Maybe not.
I've lived here for four years.
Maybe nothing's like that.
I just want peace.
I can turn it all around.
But I decided to read this this morning.
Just to just.
Okay, yeah.
So, look, AUC 1324, this is actually what I used to charge all the time when I was an agent chat.
Inducing or enticing an illegal alien.
Happens dance because it happens to Link with a very interesting story, ladies and gentlemen.
Oh, yeah.
Oh, totally.
Yes.
Okay.
Ladies and gentlemen, we have a breaking announcement here that Alex Jones can actually join the program live here coming up pretty soon.
So we're going to blister through this.
We want to give Alex had a member of his staff that was killed.
And we don't know why or how.
We have no idea.
But it's where Soros prosecutor is in charge in Texas.
It's an awful tragedy, and we want to get the news straight from Alex.
So Alex is going to join us here in about 15 minutes.
So lock in, ladies and gentlemen.
Very, very sad for our friends over at Infowars.
Okay, here we go.
Here is this criminal code.
And I'm going to find this to be pretty cut and dry here.
This code makes it unlawful for any person or entity to hire a recruit or to refer for a fee, unemployment, the employment of a United in the United States for an alien, knowing that the alien is an unauthorized alien as defined by subsection 1324A, H3.
This section makes it unlawful for any person or entity after hiring an alien for employment to continue to employ the alien in the United States, knowing the alien has become an unauthorized alien with respect to Section 1.
This section provides that if any person or NT engages in a pattern or practice of the violations, subsequent section A1 or A2, shall be fined not more than $3,000 for each unauthorized alien with respect for which violation occurs and imprisoned for six months.
If the entire pattern or practice or both continues, well, ladies and gentlemen, maybe even some more severe penalties.
Uh-oh.
Oh my.
I just wanted to go ahead and read.
Go ahead and read this section of the criminal code here because AOC is employing criminal aliens.
Here we go.
Former top aide to AOC, somebody who was working for AOC just last month.
Ladies and gentlemen.
So Tom Homan, as you guys know, as the borders are right now, and he's been calling for like AOC to be criminally investigated.
Has self-deported home to Colombia.
Oh, yeah.
This is a wild one.
So AOC had a criminal alien working for her.
The illegal alien, who was a top staffer.
By the way, let me tell you, like one of the top positions you can have on Capitol Hill is a director of communications.
It's really important, especially if your member of Congress is a fast mover.
If your member of Congress has millions of followers, like AOC does, hey, Alex, Danny, am I wrong?
Does AOC, is AOC the most followed Democrat on all Capitol Hill?
AOC, if my numbers are correct, and we follow these numbers pretty closely.
Ashley, what do you think?
Do you look up her accounts?
I think AOC is the most followed Democrat on all Capitol Hill.
A criminal alien was in charge of the largest social media accounts for one of the parties in a two-party system.
That is true.
I would say she's the most famous.
Yeah, she's Puerto Rican.
For one of the bodies, Article 1 of the Constitution.
A criminal alien was being employed in AOC's office at a high level for years and has had to self-deport AOC is clearly in violation of the U.S. criminal code.
Let's read.
A legal ingredient who worked for AOC's campaign has moved to Colombia in a frustration over the pace of progressive immigration reform in the United States.
Oh, I'm so sorry.
So sorry you had to go home because you just hate it here so much.
Because this entire nation didn't get down on its knees and bend to your will.
Diego de la Vega said, it's bittersweet.
I hadn't left the country in 23 years from the age of seven to the age of 30.
Oh, okay.
Hey, Diego, how exactly did you as a seven-year-old get into America?
Illegally?
Somebody explain that to me?
Was Diego a victim of child trafficking?
I don't know.
I don't know.
I'm asking questions.
How does a seven-year-old, how does a seven-year-old get their seven-year-old who live on our black?
I have a four-year-old.
They're like seven-year-olds who live on our block.
Tom, you got AOC out there, Alexandra Casio-Cortez, Congresswoman, putting out a webinar, doing a webinar to help illegals avoid, I guess, apprehension, giving tips about how to.
That is crazy.
I ain't gonna lie.
That is absolutely wild that she's doing that.
You could say that that's getting on the verge of breaking the law right there for sure.
Continue to remain in the country and ultimately gain the system.
And I sent an email today to Deputy Attorney General.
At what level is that impeachment?
Is that impeachment?
I'm not an attorney.
I'm not a prosecutor.
Is that impeachment?
Is that impeding our law enforcement efforts?
If so, what are we going to do about it?
Is she crossing the line?
So I'm working with the Department of Justice and finding out where's that line that they cross.
So maybe AOC is going to be in trouble now, but I need the AOG to opine on that.
Impeachment is impeachment, in my opinion.
I'm not a prosecutor, but we need some further guidance on that.
But again, if we have to take every federal dollar out of this city, we'll do it.
I mean, we're done.
This is.
Okay.
Tom Holman saying that he's already investigating right now.
Tom Holman saying just this weekend that now he is planning on, or he has already asked, waiting for the clip here, has already asked the DOJ to charge AOC.
There we go.
Okay, here we go.
AOC wrote a letter to them.
Here it is right here.
She goes, February 27th.
Dear Attorney General, General Bondi, Attorney General Bondi, I write to request clarity on whether the Department of Justice yielded to political pressure and attempts to weaponize the agency against elected officials' speech they disagree with over the past two weeks.
Borders or Tom Homan has gone on multiple forums threatening political persecution against me, citing resources distributed, informing my constituents and the American public of their constitutional legal rights.
On February 13, 2025, Mr. Holman announced that he had asked the Deputy General to open an investigation and that I will be in trouble now.
It has been 14 days since Mr. Holman threatened to weaponize your agency, but I have not yet heard any referral from the federal government.
Homan's actions undercut core constitutional rights and further transparency is necessary.
I'm sure you are aware of the First Amendment of the United States Constitution, right?
Obviously, freedom of speech.
Which, yeah, that's a good argument.
That is a good argument.
Indeed, last week, Vice President Vance said that we may disagree with your views, but we will fight to defend your right to offer in the public square.
Okay.
Mr. Homer's repeated attempts to use your agency to politically intimidate duly elected officials are a textbook threat to the right to free speech in the United States, threatening criminal proceedings for exercise the First Amendment is itself a violation of the First Amendment, educating the public about their rights, especially in a time of rising uncertainty.
I don't think they're going to arrest her chat off of her saying this stuff because it would look bad.
But they might go after her for this illegal alien that Benny Johnson's talking about, though.
Ladies and gentlemen, Tom Holman coming in over the world.
They've talked to you if the alien was in fact working illegally.
No, no, no, no.
You're not allowed to from a congressional, you're not allowed to take a taxpayer-funded salary and then break American law.
No one's above the law.
All right, let's cover this.
This, obviously, this tragic murder staff was murdered.
We don't know much else, ladies and gentlemen.
And so Alex is going to hop on the stream and is going to inform us.
And, well, our prayers up for InfoWars.
Here we go.
Alex, thank you so much for joining the program.
I know that you're very busy this morning, and our prayers to you and to your staff.
We are so sorry to hear about this tragedy.
Can you tell us more?
All we've heard about is that this individual was killed outside of their home, and that's it.
Do we have any more information?
I have a lot more information for you.
Jamie White was here seven, eight years.
Really good friend of mine.
He was our best writer.
They're all great, but they would recognize he was the most prolific.
You couldn't keep him out of here.
He worked really seven days a week.
And when he was on vacation, we really missed him.
He was the only writer that is actually basically outside the control room.
His desk is right through that control room that I'm looking at.
I could look through the open door at his desk.
And I mean, I talked to him every day.
I sent him articles.
We were constantly on the phone.
Really good friend of mine.
And I'm in shell shock right now.
He was up here Sunday night for the Sunday show we do that I was doing with Chase Geyser and the rest of the crew.
I wasn't on air Sunday night.
I'm normally, I was up here doing work.
So I saw him one last time.
And then he went home.
And right before midnight, out by his car, he was either shot or stabbed.
The police won't tell us.
They said the call was a hot shot call, meaning serious wounding, stabbing, or shooting is what they call it.
And we were really worried yesterday morning when he works early in the morning.
And we were calling him.
He wouldn't answer for hours.
So one of the riders who's really good friends with him went over there.
And there was yellow tape and everything.
You'd seen in the news there had been a murder in the early morning hours.
The police got there two minutes after a 911 call of someone seriously wounded.
They got him to the hospital at 15.
But as they rolled him in, he died.
The hospital said right when he died on the table.
They were starting to attend to him.
And the crew member, just to give you an idea, said there was just blood everywhere.
He could see over the yellow tape.
The police came over, said, we're not going to talk to you.
They said, no, no, no, we're his friend.
He works with us.
Showed the cop, obviously, pictures with him.
And that person, because they hung out a lot.
Jamie and his girlfriend.
And then Don Salazar and his wife is also a reporter.
But she doesn't work for us, but we work with him.
Yeah, my bad, guys.
I moved my face.
You said the audio is loud, guys?
There you go.
I'll bring it down a bit.
So they were really big friends for years.
Don's been here 14 years.
And so people were crying up here in the morning, trying to not tell me what was going on.
The police had asked them not to say anything until the family was told.
And yeah, man, I looked on my Twitter and he was following me, man.
It's a shame that I never got to meet this guy, bro.
Because I was planning a trip out to Infowars not to, like, I was supposed to go this week, actually, guys, out to Infowars.
And they told me by one o'clock, you know, he's dead.
He's the guy that got killed, but we haven't gotten to all the family yet.
So we can't talk about it.
By four o'clock, the father and his sister were very close.
They said, no, the rest of the family knows.
You can now tell people.
And so I went on air at about four o'clock, did a special report on it and told people what I knew.
After that, we talked to the detectives again, and they said they have two suspects.
That's all they'll tell us.
They still aren't going to tell us gun or knife because they, you know, obviously that's part of the investigation for people they talk to.
They don't want other people to know, you know, the details.
They said that they'll be releasing more soon.
I'm going to talk to them here as soon as I get off with you.
They've got some more information.
And obviously, everybody started seeing immediately that he was one of the few people.
A U.S. senator got put on the list.
Jack Pesoba got put on it.
Jamie White got put on it.
We're going back over two, three years ago, putting U.S. aid and Soros in reports about all the illegal funding into Ukraine that's now top story the last few months with Doge.
And so you can go see his post on X about being on that enemies list.
And the people running that enemies list, one of them is an American citizen, a trans person, if you remember, was saying, yeah, we're going to come after U.S. citizens.
We'll get you where you live.
We obviously have the U.S. citizen leftist going over there and then getting all this training and recruiting people with all the clear CIA connections, all the passports and money coming back and trying to kill Trump at Mar-Lago.
So there's a lot coming out of there.
It's really nick.
And then look at this.
He actually put himself.
I'm on the Ukrainian enemies list due to my work at Infowars with real Alex Jones.
And there's a bunch of people that are on this list, by the way, guys.
I know Jackson Hinkle is on it, Scott Ritter, like people that are outspoken about the war pretty much all got put on this kill list by the Ukrainian government.
NATO attacking America through Ukraine and through that lawless black hole.
People are saying it could be that, could be the crazy leftist, followed him.
And you guys can see it right here.
Here's his tweet that he's on this list, which this is not uncommon.
A lot of people are on this list that are anti-Ukraine war and funding it.
From the studio, he went to see his girlfriend reportedly, and they may not have got him there.
And then they waited and got him when he got home.
We don't know all the details of that.
It could have just been a crazy crackhead.
There's a lot of crime here.
We have the worst.
He's recognized out of all the Soros DAs, over 800 of them and county attorneys and others in the country.
He is the worst, which is saying a lot.
He lets people out of jail that shoot multiple people on 6th Street, but didn't kill them.
And that's the bar district and lets them out the next day.
Yeah, Austin, guys, is a very liberal city, bro.
It is not really Texas, to be honest with y'all.
It really isn't.
It is not Texas, bro.
Most liberal city by far in Texas.
So this guy.
Especially now with all the tech bros over there, a lot of tech bros in Austin.
Love you so much, bro.
Keep doing this shit.
We got them boys attacked the stream again, W Mustache Man.
Appreciate that, bro.
Will not prosecute hardened criminals.
He says if they're not white, he says it's all racist.
He famously, when the Army sergeant off duty was doing a lift, Black Lives Matter blocks him.
The anti-member points the AK-47 at him.
Yes.
And then the sergeant shoots him.
He had to be pardoned, totally clean shot.
You see the guy aim the gun at him and tell him, get out.
And he defended himself.
Total legal shoot.
The governor had to pardon him.
So, I mean, we have the worst person, Jose Garza.
So whether it's Ukraine in the Soros group or whether it's a criminal, which I tend to think that's probably it because there's a lot of crime.
But I mean, who knows?
It's just Soros everywhere.
This is literally, they admit that Garza was literally financed almost his entire campaign.
And then Chase got swatted, guys.
Chase Geyser, I think his name is last name is Bronze.
He got swatted today, chat.
So they're targeting Infowars.
Five years ago to be the new DA.
And I mean, he's so horrible.
He calls people and Zoom meetings.
You pull these up, type in Austin DA, Jose Garza, calls city officials comrades.
I mean, this guy calls people comrades.
He's an admitted Marxist-Leninist.
And so he has aided and abetted this.
He is an accessory to this.
Look, Chase, and this is a contributor to InfoWars as well.
I actually had a really cool Twitter space.
Boom, he got swatted earlier today, 216 p.m.
And he's a member, obviously a contributor to Infowars.
He's good.
I was talking to them earlier.
So, yeah.
They're definitely targeting Infowars, bro.
The fact that he got swatted.
If it wasn't the Ukrainians or some leftist.
So it could have been the Ukrainians, could have been a crazy leftist, staked outside the office, followed him, could have been a crackhead, could have been a gangster type.
But regardless, every position we look at, it's all part of this crime wave and all part of the globalist system.
So, Alex, this is important.
The police say that there is a suspect now.
Suspect.
Okay, suspects.
There are two.
They said suspects.
Okay.
So, I mean, that'll obviously be key in determining who this was and what their motivation was.
Jose Garza is, again, a Soros DA.
There was a Soros DA here in Tampa where we broadcast.
The governor here in Florida said, you're not allowed to just openly violate the law and make one of our beautiful cities a crime-ridden hellscape.
I'm going to remove you from office.
Why don't Texas Republicans have the balls to do that?
Austin is where the Capitol sits.
It's a beautiful building.
Austin is a great city with a lot of good energy.
Why don't Republicans do something about this?
Well, debatable.
I think Austin is one of my least favorite cities in Texas.
Super woke, man.
I mean, I haven't been there in a while, but when I was there, I was already getting woke.
So I would imagine it's only worse now.
The governor did put the state police into the city, but all they did was write tickets.
And I'm not trying to attack them, but I mean, myself, my family, we all got pulled over repeatedly.
Oh, you're five miles over the speed limit.
And so they didn't do any real law enforcement.
And absolutely, I mean, Soros overthrows governments.
He made his money first, crashing markets and stealing old people's pension funds and is proud of it.
He says the best time of his life was working for the Nazis in Eastern Europe when he was a teenager.
I mean, the guy and his whole system is just, it's the deep state.
And absolutely, and they are getting removed in some areas, as you said.
They're not being removed in Texas.
The legislature is pretty bad.
They just gave the Democrats as many seats on the boards in the state a few weeks ago.
And so, yeah, we've got a big problem.
Texas is full of rhino, dirtbag, George W. Bush-type people.
And the process of removing them is ongoing.
We have not cleaned house like Florida or some of the other states yet, and we need to.
Alex, I know you're justifiably upset right now.
We pray for you, your staff.
We said so last night as soon as we heard this horrible news.
If there's anything that we can do to support Jamie or his family, let us know.
I haven't even thought of what to do that.
And I'm so from everything so broke, but we're put something together to help.
And we're talking to the family about.
We'll share it and we'll donate, Alex.
We'll be there for you.
So thank you.
Hey, brother.
You're kicking butt.
God bless you and your crew and your great viewers and listeners.
You can find me on Exit Real Alex Jones.
We're all in this together.
Benny, I really appreciate you.
Godspeed, Alex.
All right.
God bless you.
Yeah, crazy shit.
Thanks for caring about because this is a journalist that's been killed.
It should be investigated.
I think Pam Boni should look at it.
It definitely can be.
I mean, sorry, it definitely should be.
Get to it.
The Austin Police Department admitted they're totally overwhelmed.
They said they can't really respond to most crime scenes.
That's a whole other area.
I'm asking the Trump administration, this is important.
This is a journalist that's been killed.
It needs to be investigated.
It could have been a hit.
There's a chance, a good chance it could have been.
The more I'm talking about it, the more I'm thinking about it.
A lot of smart people are calling me saying, Alex, this is this.
Eight people have been killed the last two months here in the first year.
Okay.
What's the chances in the town of over 2 million people that an InfoWars lead reporter gets butchered?
So we need to investigate this.
I'm asking the Justice Department to investigate.
All right.
Thank you for that update, Alex.
Our prayers are with you.
Godspeed.
Thank you, sir.
All right.
All right.
Let's go ahead, guys, and get into the Sam Cedar debate now.
We covered quite a bit here.
We'll get into the main topic.
Let me go ahead.
And before I do that, we will go ahead and read some chats.
David Soto says, shout out from Oregon, the worst liberal state.
Do you ever think we'll have an ADOF 2.0 since we are all fighting so hard against the Jay supremacy?
Seems like history repeats itself.
And if yes, who do you think will be the next leader?
Well, bro, too much control, bro.
It ain't happening.
Too ingrained in mainstream society, bro.
The only thing we could do is just make sure that we don't have them in politics where dual citizens are running our foreign policy.
That's the best we could do at this point, in my opinion.
Let's see here.
What else do we got?
Let me read some of these Rumble rants.
Make sure I didn't miss.
Okay, the Austin DA came in trying to put cases on a shit ton of troopers that had been in clean shoots years ago, and even some had moved into federal agencies.
Wow, I didn't know that.
That should tell you everything you need to know.
Martin, did you ever hear any stories of the San Isidro port of Europe or Orco?
I've been there for almost 11 years.
Should as well, yeah, bro.
One of my classmates, a friend of mine, started his career in San Isidro.
I'm very familiar with San Isedra.
You guys got the biggest port in the country, pretty much.
Hey, oh, Martin, if anything ever happens to you because of them boys, what do you want the OSLA squad to go after first?
Amen.
Just be successful.
That's what I want y'all to do.
Drop on the floor to distract agents coming after you.
Okay, Platinum Diamond.
Martin, I gave out 20 subs before the stream started.
Not sure if you saw it also.
Thought on the Office of Refugee Settlement over $2 billion in government funding in 2025.
No, I didn't see it, bro.
I did not see the gifted subs.
Let me go back up here and look.
I don't even see it, man.
I don't see it.
But thank you so much for the gifted subs, bro.
And that's from Santos 6693.
I appreciate that, man.
God says, Myron, can you tell us where you bought your MindConf in the link, please?
I didn't buy it.
I got it from someone gave it to me.
The first person I bought about when you said the media glorifies gender was DJ Vlad.
Oh, yeah, yeah, yeah.
Okay.
I think we're caught up.
All right.
Let me get some, uh...
I got water right here.
All right, guys, let's get into the topic at hand.
This is a debate between Sam Cedar and 20 MAGA people, 20 Trump supporters, which some of them were smart, some of them were not.
julie needs to bring me on who's with the culture truth we already have a dominant culture I mean, look, I got to be honest with you.
Like, you and I have a fundamental disagreement.
We will never see eye to eye on this.
Hi, I'm Sam Cedar, host of the Majority Report.
And today I am surrounded.
And real quick, you know what?
Some of you guys might not know who this guy is.
So let me go ahead and just type it in for you guys real quick.
Sam Cedar, here he is.
We've been in the game for a minute.
He's an American actor, liberal political commentator, a media host.
He works with the film Who's the Caboose as well as the television shows beat court beat cops and pilot season.
He also appeared on Next Stop, all these fucking shows.
But basically, right now, what he's known for, guys, since 2010, he has hosted a daily political talk show, The Majority Report with Sam Cedar.
He also voices Hugo, a recurring character on animated series, Bob's Burgers.
And of course, yep, every single time.
And he earned a bachelor's degree from Connecticut College and enrolled at Boston University School of Law, illusion by the schools, commercialized culture, he dropped out of studying law to pursue a career in comedy.
Funded by 20 conservatives.
Now, here's the thing: I will give Sam Cedar credit.
Smart guy.
A lot of people in the conservative space are scared to debate him.
You know, I've watched this shit before, because like I said before, I think watching liberal political commentators is how you kind of set yourself up to be able to understand their viewpoints and worldviews to debate them more properly.
So.
My first claim is Trump's attack on DEI hides his real goal, which is to give corporations more power.
All right.
Sergeant.
Uber.
All right.
I'll let them debate, and then I'll kind of give you guys my take as they're talking.
i think i and remember his position is simply you know let me move this chat so his position guys is trump's attacks on dei hides his real goal which is to give corporations That's a very broad argument.
And I think he did that on purpose.
Have a slight issue with the back end of the premise.
I guess Trump's attacks on DEI being a real goal to give corporations more power.
I'd rather center the conversation around the Democratic, especially as conservatives, the issues that people have with DEI and why I believe Trump would want to support the issues that people are voting for.
I mean, I'm talking about his whole attack on DEI.
It's actually DEIA, right?
You know that in government agencies, the A being for accessibility.
Right.
Yeah, and I think the attack on DEI isn't an attack on people's protections.
It's on the other end of the spectrum, right?
Wanting to end DEI doesn't want to end protections for someone being disabled, someone being inaccessible to get into a job.
It rather wants to de-incentivize corporations to push them to hire these people on unfair bases, right?
Okay, but DEI is not about quotas or anything like that.
It is about protections for people within these organizations or to make sure that you have different communities that have the opportunity to apply to these things.
So it can mean within government agencies, it means things like, let's pay interns so that not only wealthy people can have their kids do internships in these agencies.
Or let's put out notices around different parts of town, metaphorically speaking, so that people know this job exists.
This is where it begins, but this isn't the ultimate goal that conservatives have an issue with.
Conservatives don't have an issue with trying to spread job applications to poorer communities.
Well, then why isn't DEI requirements?
Because the problem with DEIA is there may not be like perceived actual number quotas, but that's what it devolves into, and especially with corporations.
Is there any evidence of that?
I mean, sure, we can look at corporations that are government agencies that are hiring people on not true proper basis.
We can even look at any evidence that that's happening.
Yeah, even the DNC's nomination of Kamala as president this year.
There was no reason to nominate Kamala as she wasn't democratically selected.
She wasn't, she didn't go through a single primary.
None of these things.
So you're saying that Kamala was the vice president of the United States after the president drops out two months before the convention.
You think that's a DEI?
Every presidential nominee is democratically selected to be the nominee for that party exceptional.
There were not even primaries prior to 1972.
Sure.
This isn't before 1962.
Why understand?
But what did you think you were going to run primaries in those two months?
I mean, Joe Biden should have dropped out even three years ago.
Well, sure, but even before when Kamala was running in primary, she wasn't the next man up.
None of this, she wasn't the next person.
She was the vice president.
Right, of course.
But she wasn't.
So let's talk about this real quick.
So both of them have a point.
And let me explain.
So one guy, the conservative guy, is saying she's a DEI higher.
She didn't deserve the position, right?
And then Sam is basically saying, hey, look, well, you know.
Hold on, let me get his position one more time.
Make sure I don't misread him.
Don't misrepresent him.
Three years ago, we were going to run primary.
Money is democratically selected to be the nominee for that party exception.
There were not even primaries prior to 1972.
This isn't before 1924.
Why understand?
But what did you, you think you were going to run primaries?
That argument didn't make sense.
Those two months?
I mean, Joe Biden should have dropped out even three years ago.
Okay.
So yeah, so Sam's argument is she came so that he dropped out so goddamn late there was another choice.
Now, here's the thing, bro, right?
So the conservative guy is correct as in maybe she might not have been qualified for the job and she didn't get democratically put in.
Fair.
You can make that argument, right?
I agree that she was put in more on the basis of her skin color and her being a woman as vice president, because the vice president position, let's be honest here, guys, it's a ceremonial position in general, right?
Versus her competence, right?
And Democrats play race politics quite a bit, right?
Now, to the Democrats' defense, this was literally two months before the DNC, when Biden decided that he was going to drop out.
So obviously it put the Democratic Party in a very tight bind because did they have the time to properly do it and get everybody to run and everything else like that before the DNC?
Probably not.
And on top of that, she was vice president of the United States, and it would have been really bad optically to not make her the candidate.
Because remember, what I told you guys before, Democrats run on race politics and gender politics and ID politics in general.
That's what Democrats run on.
So if the Democratic Party had not given her the position so close to the DNC, it would have looked bad for them.
So it was a lose-lose situation is my point here, guys.
Right?
So I think two things could be true at the same time.
Was Kamala Harris qualified?
No.
Clearly, we know this.
Right?
We know that she was picked in the first place because of her race and her skin color, et cetera.
So I think the problem began at the beginning when she became the vice president.
Not even that she got pulled in as a Democratic nominee.
And then I also see Sam Cedar's position where it was like, yo, two months before the fucking DNC, how are they going to find somebody else?
And also the race politics, which he doesn't want to admit, which play a heavy role in the Democrat Party.
And also, another thing, the Democrat Party prides itself on getting the black vote.
Why do you guys think Kamala Harris leans so hard into her being black when she ran?
That tells you everything you need to know.
Sure, but even before.
Carry on.
When Kamala was running the primary, she wasn't the next man up.
None of this, she wasn't the next person.
She was the vice president.
Right, of course.
But she wasn't in primary detail.
That's not a tiny detail.
See how he kind of slipped that in there?
I would have might have wanted.
She shouldn't have been the vice president, but again, she got picked as the vice president for race politics.
So when it was time to add in the new, when it was time to bring in the Democratic nominee to run for the election, two months before, who else are they going to go to?
It was a lose-lose situation, chat, for the Democrats.
I'll be honest with y'all.
It was literally a lose-lose situation for them.
Wanted a different candidate as well.
But that has nothing to do with Trump rescinding orders that basically say you need to search for a wide range of candidates, not necessarily give any different benefits, but you need to make sure different communities have access to the awareness of this job.
You need in your office accessibility for people who have physical handicaps.
Sure.
If you have folks who identify as now they're getting off topic a bit because now they're going, look, notice how they said corporations was the argument, but now they're talking about the government and DEI.
Two totally different things.
It's trans.
You need to make it at least.
See how they've been, the argument's been kind of derailed now.
Hospitable and not, this is all non-discriminatory stuff.
That's what this is all about.
But you're cherry-picking the portions of DEI that even conservatives don't have issues.
Conservatives don't have issues.
That's what it is.
The whole DEI apparatus within our government was a function of doing exactly what I said.
Had nothing to do with courtesy.
And it's unfortunate that those things get taken out.
And there might not have been specifics.
What else is he trying to take out?
It's trying to take out people getting jobs that don't deserve those jobs.
People getting pushed into positions that have health qualifications.
There is no evidence of what you just said happening in these governments.
That's actually not true.
So let me let him finish the sentence and I'll answer.
That's not true at all.
I mean, I'm not going to, we're not allowed to sit here and have notes and numbers to pull up for you.
You can't give me an example.
You can't ask me to pull up numbers when I'm not, you know, I'm not able to sit here and look on a computer for you, but these are okay.
And this is the problem when you bring idiots in.
The conservative guy is actually right.
Yes, there are absolutely DEI practices within the federal government that push for people to be hired of certain backgrounds.
The FBI, the DEA, HSI, I've seen them do minority-only announcements.
I've seen them do women-only announcements, right?
Where they're trying to recruit people to create a more diverse workplace.
This has been going on for years.
absolutely been going on for years hold on Let me show it for you guys right now.
I'll look for this on the side while we keep doing this.
-Conservatives.
Sorry, you've been voted out.
please turn to your seat.
Thank you, sir.
See ya.
Okay, so I think the roots issue with DEI isn't what the previous gentleman was trying to point.
Conservatives aren't necessarily have issues with those things like accessibility to the people who might need help.
The issue is, and I kind of referred to this before, when you have agencies and systems, what tends to happen.
All right, so I have to go get this from an old forum.
But look at this.
HSI hiring announcement out I'll show you guys.
I have it right here.
This comes from the old Delphi forums.
Join our team, HSI.
HSI hiring criminal investigators be on the lookout.
HSI female hiring announcement, right?
August 22nd, 2023.
Does this not prove my fucking point, man?
So Sam Cedar is wrong that the government doesn't practice DEI.
They absolutely fucking do.
They absolutely do.
And this is the first time I've seen, I've seen this shit.
You can't find them now because they're getting scrubbed off the internet.
But I've seen female-only announcements, I've seen minority-only announcements for the FBI, I've seen it all.
So he's incorrect about that one.
However, I will concede, he says here, Trump's attacks on DEI hide his real goal, which is to give corporations more power.
I actually agree with that.
But here's the thing, that's a very broad argument.
Power where?
And who they want to hire?
Yeah, it does.
He's actually correct.
I agree that DEI does give corporations more power, whether he wants to say that it's being hidden or it's a common sense, right?
Because if you remove DEI, think about it.
If you say we're going to remove DEI, what does that do?
Inevitably, it gives the corporations more power to hire who they want.
Right?
Like, it's common sense.
It's almost like a default answer.
So, again, this is why I say Sam Cedar's smart chat.
And I'm looking beyond this shit.
His argument is so goddamn broad that he's not really wrong.
If we're going to be honest here, because the argument is so goddamn broad.
So by him saying this, yes, it gives more latitude and leverage to the companies to hire who they want, but that's not a bad thing.
You understand?
He framed it in a bad premise, but it's not bad for companies to have more power.
Why?
Because when companies have more power, guess what they can do?
They can hire the people that are actually best for the job.
Okay?
It becomes a meritocracy.
Now, some people might say, no, that's not true, Myron.
But every corporation is different.
But yes, removing DEI is inevitably going to give corporations more power because now they're not bound by DEI practices.
So he's actually correct.
They get more leverage to hire who they want.
You know?
So.
And when you have government overreach, big government.
But he's framing it as if it's bad, but it's really not.
Government is that agencies and systems get abused.
And I think unequivocally, DEI was heavily abused in practice.
It was great in theory.
It's idealistic, which is sure, sure is fine that a lot of people can get behind.
But it was abused in a lot of ways.
When you have actors, like we're in California right now, when you have actors, white male actors who are being told, we do not want white men.
We're not going to cast any white men.
We only want this particular kind of gender race, right?
That is an abuse of a system.
It's no longer fair, but more about just perpetuating one aspect of visual compelling aspects.
Because at the end of the day, what's going to happen is companies are going to say, well, we want to look the most diverse.
And what that is, it's moral grandstanding.
It's saying, because we have more black women, we sell better soda.
I got you.
That is not.
Well, that's getting a little far afield from what Trump's DEI orders are.
But I can tell you, as somebody who was a sitcom actor in the 90s, I would walk into a room and everybody I would see would look like me.
And I was doing a second position, which doesn't even exist anymore, where you do two pilots a year.
And I was looking around basically every part of television when I was a kid, I was centered in some fashion.
It was either this is about my mother or this is about my father or someone like me was centered.
So, you know, we can argue as to whether or not Hollywood is overcorrected in some fashion.
But on a governmental level, the DEIA directives that agencies were following for the past four years, there's nothing.
I don't know what you mean by abuse on it, but there is no evidence that it was an affirmative action program in those instances.
It was about anti-discrimination.
You cannot discriminate against these people.
And you want to open up opportunities for a broad swath People again, the internship is like one of the most material things that exist there, where the idea that you need to pay interns.
And that's important because you want low-income people to have the same sort of like opportunities to see these things as wealthy people.
You know, my kids can maybe afford to do an internship for the summer instead of going and getting a job.
I don't know.
So I think we're talking about two different things.
But I'm talking about Trump's DEIA rescission is a way of basically driving people out of these agencies, making it a-you're saying Trump specifically.
I understand why you're saying Trump, but I think the American people as a whole have kind of like, and I won't say whole because obviously it's not 100%, but a majority of American people have kind of rejected DEI because I don't think a majority of DEIA is.
That may be the case, but again, my point is we're talking about abuse of a system.
What you're talking about is not necessarily what was happening.
What people were seeing were, hey, because you're white, you can't do this.
And liberals like to do this thing where they create systems and then they like they created the whole idea of woke and then they backed away and then conservatives say woke.
And then they're like, we don't know what woke is.
They created DEI.
Biden literally said.
Yeah, I don't lie, bro.
Like this guy I wouldn't think would be a conservative.
This guy gives me woke vibes.
But this again, this is what I mean when I say like a lot of these people that are you guys are going to see here debating.
You would think that they're liberals by the way that they speak and convey themselves.
But yeah.
Kamala Harris is being chosen because she is a black woman.
And then all of a sudden Democrats for the rest after that said that's not why she was chosen, even though Biden literally said that.
And then we have this cognitive.
We have this.
Look at this guy.
This weirdo.
This guy is.
This guy looks like a like a hippie machine.
This guy's considered conservative.
What the fuck's going on?
It's a distance as if we're not living in reality.
So I didn't want to make sure that there was some that there was an opportunity for a black woman to be his vice president.
So why?
So why did Democrats move away from that?
Say no, it wasn't because she was a black woman.
I don't know what to do.
My point is that.
It's not because she's a black woman.
But that's what they said.
I can agree that it's not because she's a black woman.
But that's what they said.
Why did they say that then?
No, because there were plenty of black women, right?
Like he could have picked anybody.
But he picked specifically her.
You're positing the idea that there wasn't a black woman who would have been qualified for that position.
No.
And I don't believe that.
No, that's not what we're saying.
Conservatives aren't saying that there aren't.
Because, again, even in the Republican Party right now and in Trump's cabinet, there are people of color that Democrats pretend don't exist, like J.D. Vance's wife.
J.D. Vance's wife is not in the cabinet.
No, but if J.D. Vance was a Democrat, his wife would be lauded all over everything because of her color of her skin.
Listen, I'm not here to defend the Democrats.
Well, they kind of are lauding his wife.
They used her as kind of like a bridge between the United States and India.
So that dude's wrong on that case.
I mean, they talk all the time about how J.D. Vance's son is named Vivek.
You know, like the same name as Vivek Ramaswamy.
So he's actually wrong in that regard.
Democrats'choice on every policy.
But there is one party in this country that is identitarian.
There is one party that is represented and it is homogenous and it is the Republican Party.
Eighty-five percent of Republicans are white.
And that's just the reality of it.
So does that mean that's not true?
But what does that have to do with anything, Sam?
Like, what does that have to do with anything?
I would argue the Democrat Party is more identitarian.
You guys force diversity, if we're going to be honest.
Like, you guys force diversity.
So you guys are far more identitarian than the Republican Party.
Because with you guys, you guys force multiple identities.
We want to be representative of the populace.
So you could absolutely make the argument that the Democrats play far more identitarian politics than Republicans do.
And as a matter of fact, Kamala Harris'fucking ability to become the Democratic nominee, even though not being voted in, goes to show how much Democrats align on identitarian politics.
They knew that if they didn't give it to her, it would be a death blow to the Democrats.
This is supposed to be the group that champions diversity and inclusivity.
You're going to pass up a black woman to run for President of the United States when she's the Vice President, whether or not she's qualified?
I would argue identitarian politics is what made you guys put a shitty-ass candidate in place.
So I disagree with that one on Sam.
And as you guys can see here, I'm disagreeing with either party here and giving my points of view, whether conservative or on the Sam Cedar side.
Trying to be objective here.
And some of you guys might agree or disagree with me, too.
It's the whole purpose of having discussions like this.
So hold on, hold on.
But here's the thing.
You said even if— Let me just get some water real quick.
Even if—let's just say, okay, that's true.
80% of Republicans are white.
Does that mean that they're less moral?
That they can't run an effective government?
It's just that the idea that— What does race have to do?
What does race have to do?
They don't have to say.
Hold on.
What does race— Donald Trump didn't have to say.
What does race have to do?
My vice president's going to be a white male.
what is it?
Because they all knew what was going on.
No, this is the premise of DEI.
What does race have to do with running an effective government?
What does race have to do?
Let's say DR on the micro level.
I'll tell you right now.
DR on the micro level.
McDonald's.
I'll tell you.
I'll tell you what.
I'll ask you if the cashier is black or white.
What does that have to do?
I'll tell you what it is.
First of all, DEIA means that if you come into this agency or corporation, you're not going to be discriminated against because you don't look like everybody else or you don't have the same physical abilities as everybody else or you may require handles on the bathroom or whatever it is.
That's what DEIA does.
And just so you guys are wondering, this is what I got here.
Got a protein shake?
42 grams of protein.
Because I'm lazy and don't fucking want to drink multiple shakes.
And I got some dried mangoes here.
Mango strips.
Nothing else.
But does it make a government better if there's a broad representation of the people it's supposed to govern?
Without a doubt.
Without a doubt.
Correct me if I'm wrong.
You guys can correct me if I'm wrong.
Regardless of DEI, don't we already have things in our Constitution that protects people's rights, protects people?
No.
We don't?
No.
Do we or do we not?
No, we do not.
Tell me.
Tell me what just what protects people from discrimination in housing and in work and hiring or getting loans.
It's all statutes.
It's all statutes.
And in these government agencies, there was nothing except for that order.
That's why Trump just rescinded it.
I'm going to tap out because I think someone else has a better can defend that point specifically better than me.
alright please return to your seat Hey, how are you?
All right.
This is funny.
I don't know how this guy is a conservative.
You guys are going to see here in a funny, but this shit's about to be entertaining.
Good.
Okay, when it comes to DEI, essentially if a...
Some idiot in the chat said, "Maren, eat a full meal, bro." Nigga, I'm streaming.
Fuck you talking about eat a full meal, you retard.
Unless you guys want me to get off.
Damn, people are stupid.
Questions, answers.
In the YouTube chat, nigga says, yo, Martin, eat a full meal, bro, in all caps.
Nigga, what the fuck does it look like?
Oh, I'm about to get a three-course meal and let me just start dining and chowing down in front of the fucking camera, bro.
What the fuck, nigga?
Stupid?
Person was not racist.
He would hire someone regardless, right?
So why would we need a policy to protect a person if we've moved past racism?
So would you consider yourself racist?
Wait, are you suggesting we've moved past racism?
Would you consider yourself racist?
I consider myself, and sometimes I practice, I think we all practice like some form of white supremacy.
I think actually like we all want to say white supremacy, but racism, yeah, well, bro, being racist-based, man, come on.
I'll do to some degree.
Well, I'm glad that you're saying that.
So I guess going to the LGBT topic, it seems like it's very prevalent for you as an issue.
It seems like a big issue.
The Republican Party spent literally hundreds of millions of dollars demonizing trans people.
Well, the reason why they've done something like that, and I think you're misconstruing the narrative, they haven't demonized them.
They simply want protections back for their own children because children are being stripped away from them.
Who's their own children?
Children are being stripped away from their parents?
Yes, due to AB 954, they've now included gender identity as a premise to remove and strip parental rights for children who maybe they are rejecting their gender ideology.
So but you'd be okay with parents who agree with their children's doctors to provide gender-affirming care.
I do not agree with that.
Do you?
I believe that parents and doctors can make those decisions with the kids.
If a child can't smoke, drink, or have sex before the age of 18, they should not be able to consent to a sex change.
Now, in terms of the DEI initiative, in terms of a DEI initiative, the reason why there's military bans on trans women and trans men is because they do not have the ability to cooperate at a mental capacity when they're constantly undergoing hormone treatment, as well as depression pills, as well as different mood stabilizer pills.
And so when you go out to combat, do you really think you're going to bring an ice cooler pack with your, whether that be hormone, estrogen, or whatever it may be, while you're about to shoot someone of the opposing world?
The executive orders that Trump gave were DEIA orders that had to do with agencies that have nothing to do with the military.
Yes, they do.
Yes, they absolutely do.
The FDA?
They just revoked the ability of the Air Force to teach Air Force members about the Tuskegee Airmen.
What?
What are we talking about here?
Okay, well.
Honestly, like, they're rewriting history.
Well, that's your perspective, right?
But at the end of the day, if a person-Seeking airmen, we can all agree it existed, right?
Listen to this.
If you were racist, right, and you were an employer, and if you wanted to absolutely be racist, an exercise that you would.
I think DEI sort of prevents people from seeing the reality.
If a person truly wanted to hire you based on your intellect, based on your skill set, they would.
DEI essentially provides tax cuts for the end of the year when you create your tax returns.
They give you a tax credit for hiring someone who's black or a person of color.
In these agencies?
In agencies and private businesses.
In government agencies, they don't get tax cuts for hiring people of color.
This is to protect people from discrimination.
The other thing I want to kind of state here is that I've realized that...
Private companies, yes.
Government organizations, no, bro.
Come on, man.
This is why we got to be careful of letting, you know, weirdos like this in the movement, man.
A lot of the times with the liberals is that you guys push for, for example, for DEI and people of Latino or Hispanic descent.
And a lot of the times what you don't realize is you're actually doing more harm than good by putting them in position...
See, bro, look, man.
I don't want to be an asshole or whatever, but this is a problem when you bring niggas like this in.
Right?
Like this fucking guy right here.
This guy's one of the biggest voices in the MAGA movement.
He has me blocked, by the way.
Yep, of course he has me blocked.
Right?
Look at this, man.
Consider voting no to retention.
Court elections.
Look at this, bro.
Bro, we've been invaded, man.
And I am asking you very kindly to consider voting no to retention.
We have three Democrats that are all trying to stay on the court.
And they ruled against fair elections.
They ruled for closing us down.
And so I ask you to vote no.
Okay.
And this guy was running all around the RNC.
Look.
Come on, man.
We are here in Lancaster County at Roots Country Market.
The early vote action team is out here making sure that every single person is registered to vote at their current address.
We're also making sure that people are ready to vote in the March 25th special election.
Our Republican candidate is Josh Parsons.
Yep.
Now you guys see what I mean.
Bruh.
...sitions where you make them believe that it's based on the color of their skin.
It's based on...
D-E-I-A does not...
It's based on merit.
D-E-I emphasizes color, skin color.
Physical attributes.
It says that the people who work in your agency, it's about anti-discrimination.
Discrimination against what?
Against people who may have different cultural mores, may have different...
But that's irrelevant to a job, right?
It should be based on...
Yeah, I know some of you guys in the chat are shocked.
Yeah, that's MAGA, chat.
That is MAGA.
Merit.
And that is the emphasis here.
People get hired as merit.
But if you're...
If the D-E-I...
Not if you get a tax...
If the D-E-I...
I'm talking about Trump's rescission of these orders...
If you receive a tax cut as an employer, wouldn't you hire a person of color?
Dude, if...
If you could pay them less...
Listen, we're talking about government agencies that do not get tax cuts.
They don't...
They...
Government agencies...
They don't.
No, these are...
Yes, they do.
They absolutely do.
I'm talking about...
Every...
Every private and public sector gets tax cuts when you hire a person of color.
Government agencies don't pay taxes.
Government agencies operate on...
Are funded by the government.
That is not true.
That is not true.
Oh, man.
Sam got them there.
I ain't gonna lie, bro.
Sam got them there, bro.
And you know what?
I think...
I think the whole juxtapose of this entire conversation...
What month is this?
This is January.
Okay.
So we can agree on that.
The FDA does not pay taxes.
It does not get a tax cut because it doesn't pay taxes.
Yeah, because they're funded by taxes.
I can't believe that this fucking dude doesn't understand this.
Bro.
I like that.
I like that.
I love that buzzword.
You must do your best effort.
I love that buzzword.
Okay, pause.
You know what's funny?
If you were to freeze frame this chat...
Chat...
Who looks like the liberal and who looks like the conservatives?
Look how Sam Seder's dressed.
Jeans.
Jacket.
Like a sweater of some kind.
Right?
Gray hair.
Glasses.
Right?
Look at this dude.
Super fucking metrosexual.
Right?
Look at this dude.
I don't know what the fuck.
He's like a reject rocker.
Look at this nigga.
Suss face.
Look at this guy.
Strange, awkward mustache.
Like it's 1975.
Look at this guy.
Flannel.
With a cleanly shaved face and a weird slick back.
Like, it looks like Sam Seder's a conservative in this fucking picture, doesn't it?
Meanwhile, all these guys look like the fucking liberals.
But it's flipped.
It's the other way around.
notice that Sam Cedar, surprised he looks like the fucking conservative here, and all these guys look like liberals.
And this is what I mean when I say the MAGA movement, the conservative movement has been infiltrated by weirdos like this guy and Scott Pressler.
We don't want these fucking guys speaking on our behalf, man, because they don't have conservative values.
I'm sorry.
Being gay is antithetical to conservatism.
I fucking said it, okay?
Calculum punch.
Do I got to be the fucking bad guy here?
Being gay or lesbian or adopting kids as a gay couple is antithetical to the conservative movement.
The conservative movement, right?
The most paramount thing to it is the family unit.
The family unit is based upon Abrahamic religions institution of marriage.
Marriage, whether people want to accept it or not, is a religious institution.
This is why gay men cannot be married.
It's impossible.
Because marriage is a religious institution, and religious institutions do not include homosexuals.
Oh, well, is that considered hate speech?
Maybe, but it's the truth.
This is a fact.
None of the Abrahamic religions accept homosexuality or recognize it.
It's a sin in all three.
Marriage is a unity between man and woman for the purposes of having children and having a family.
That is what conservatism is absolutely based around.
That is the pinnacle of conservatism, the nuclear family with a man, a woman, and children.
But now, conservatism is homosexuals like Dave Rubin adopting kids.
Gay men like Scott Presler speaking in an effeminate tone, telling people to vote.
Look, I don't want to be an asshole, but the truth is, conservatism is called conserving because we're conserving traditional values.
I'm going to say that again.
Conservatism is conserving traditional values, namely the nuclear family.
So all of this sexual degeneracy is antithetical to that because it does not create a family.
This is why I say all the time: if you want to be gay, that's fine.
But you can't, gay men should not be allowed to be married.
You can get a civil union, you can get all the legal benefits of it, but to call it marriage bastardizes the term and is disrespectful to the people that get married within the confinements of our Abrahamic religion.
It's the truth.
Thank you.
Someone said I'm an atheist.
Shut the fuck up.
I'm not an atheist, Phil Cohen.
Of course, your last name is Cohen, by the way.
Nigga had the nerve to say I'm a fucking atheist.
Fuck off.
Never.
Yeah, Scott Pressler did help Trump with votes.
You're absolutely right.
He did.
He brought the Amish out.
You're right.
And the Amish swung around Pennsylvania.
I'm not taking away from Scott Presler's help with the GOP, but we got to be honest here.
Conservatism has never been pro-gay.
It is what it is.
It's the cold hard truth.
You have to.
You're pressured to.
Nav says, bring Chris Johnson on your podcast, Well Squad.
He's a Bitcoiner, sold all his rental properties for BTC and is thriving convinced from me from his podcast, Never Get Real Estate.
He breaks it down really well.
He's a good following.
We already got crypto guys.
Shizzy B says, I would like to see you debate in some of these surrounding videos since Jubilee.
So Jubilee is probably too scared to have you back on.
Do you think it's possible for you to do to set up where people debate you on the chosen points?
Maybe.
Yeah, we could probably set it up ourselves, actually.
I think we'd think of mentioning it.
The F-Dog just got home from work.
I rock with the stream.
Almost always tune in or watch the playback.
WFNF, WMARN, W.Chris is a bum.
He is a bum.
Yes.
You shouldn't be pressured to hire someone based on skin color.
No, not to hire someone on skin color, but put up notice about that the job exists.
Make sure that you put it in different communities so that you have as wide an application pool as possible.
And therefore you get tax cuts.
All right, return.
At the end of the year, when you file taxes, you get a tax cut for hiring someone who speaks a different language for a different skin color.
I don't know how to respond to that.
Because you're so dumb.
How you doing?
So I want a little bit more clarification because I don't even know if we got it yet on which part benefits corporations.
All of these Trump supporters are super sus, man.
From your perspective.
So agencies, the U.S. government agencies, the vast majority of them, what they function to do is inhibit corporations from essentially externalizing their costs onto society.
So the example would be, I used it before, but it's a good one.
I'm making the Teflon, C8, for instance, okay?
And C8 is supposed to be burned instead of deposited because it's a forever chemical.
And I can go out and instead of burning it, it's too expensive to burn it.
I'm going to dump it into a river.
And the EPA comes in and says, you can't do that.
We're going to fine you.
You're not allowed to do this.
Well, what the company is doing when they do that is they're going to take the profits that come with lowering their costs by dumping it into the river.
And those costs are then borne by everybody who lives around that river.
They're going to get cancer.
They're going to get gastrointestinal problems, whatever it is.
And society bears the cost of that.
You have thoughts for me, though?
Because it sounds like we're talking about social media.
No, no.
And so the DEIA stuff is just the beginning of demoralizing these agencies and trying to wreck them from the inside.
It's all part of like Russell Vogt's thing.
The OMB, the whole Schedule F where they get rid of civil servants and they demoralize people and they don't want them to be able to function.
So then, would you agree if this is about demoralizing?
I mean, over 75 million people voted for Trump, right?
You won the popular vote.
Do you not think that in part, you even said yourself that Americans don't really know what DEIA is according to your definition of it?
What?
My government's definition of it.
Okay, well, I would argue that the average American is demoralized by what they've seen, the way that the government goes about their DEI policies and the military and other organizations, not just the military.
Please refer to your seat.
Hey, before we go any further, we want to take a moment to say thanks so much to Straight Arrow News for power.
No thanks, Chopstick, man.
Okay, so let's tackle one aspect, religious fundamentalists.
What benefit would religious?
So this is actually a very interesting position that he took here.
Fundamentalist.
Okay.
Fundamentalist or a xenophobicist.
Now let's get into it.
My next claim is: unless you're a billionaire or religious fundamentalist.
I'm going to get my face out the way.
Unless you're a billionaire, religious fundamentalists, or a xenophobic nationalist, voting for Trump was a mistake.
Fundamentalist or a xenophobic nationalist, voting for Trump was a mistake.
Okay, so let's tackle one aspect, religious fundamentalists.
What benefit would religious fundamentalists get?
And also, can you define what is a religious fundamentalist?
Maybe you could say more of like a Christian nationalist in this instance.
But things like, you know, the attacks on trans folks, the attacks on a woman's right to choose, the idea that we're going to get stuff like an enhanced RIFRA, which is going to mean that if you're a pharmacist and you don't want to provide birth control, you may not have to.
Don't you think you're assuming that?
If you believe that public education, we should take that money and pour it into religious schools, you're going to get a benefit out of a Trump administration.
Don't you think you're assuming that's the vast majority of Americans who are moderates?
What do you think you're going to get out of the Trump administration?
Economic relief.
What kind of economic relief?
They're going to cut Social Security.
You're going to have to pay for your parents.
They're going to cut when they go after the agencies like they're going after, right?
And this is outlined in Project 2025.
Russ Vought, who's going to be the OMB head, he was the OMB head the first time around.
He wrote all the book on this stuff.
Well, you bring up the money.
When you cut, when you cut agencies and go after them, and you fire all the inspector generals so that they're not being able to make sure that the agencies are working, who do you think profits from that?
It's corporations.
They're going to go after agencies.
Well, the OIGs are.
They're not doing their jobs, man.
That makes sure your food is not full of botulism, that your air is not full of mercury, that your water is not full of C8.
This is what they're going to do.
Agencies exist to curb corporations from externalizing their costs and privatizing their profits.
So, it may be cheaper for a company to dump their chemicals into a river than it is for them to dispose of it in a safe way.
And so, they get the profits from that, but the costs are borne by society.
They're born by society in the form of like people get cancer.
They're born by society in terms of like we've got to do the cleanup.
That's what agencies do.
All right, so I'll be honest with y'all.
This is my stance on this, right?
Because remember, his position here is: you can see it right here up top: unless you're a billionaire, religious fundamentalist, or a xenophobic nationalist, voting for Trump was a mistake.
I think that's fairly accurate.
Now, where would I fall in?
I guess you could call me a xenophobic nationalist.
Now, some of you might say, oh shit, what?
Yeah, I think that bringing a bunch of foreigners in isn't good.
Because the problem with when you bring too many foreigners in, and you guys don't believe me, you could look at Canada.
Look at Toronto.
It's basically become New Delhi.
What's up happening when you bring too many foreigners in is they come to your country, they utilize the resources, but here's a big problem: they refuse to assimilate.
And when they refuse to assimilate, they bring their backwards culture that they fled from a lot of the times to your country.
And then your country stops being your country.
Okay?
Now, I am a proud fucking nationalist.
And the fact that people use nationalism or xenophobia as a pejorative term, like Sam Cedar is trying to do right now, is ridiculous in my eyes.
Because here's the reality: every other country can be fucking xenophobic, and nobody gives a fuck.
Japan is xenophobic.
They don't let people become citizens randomly.
They don't like tourists.
They literally openly discriminate against people.
They call them Gajans or Gaijans, whatever the fuck it's called.
Which basically, if you're someone who is a foreigner and you go to Japan, they can refuse to give you service.
It's their country.
They don't give a fuck.
They're a homogenous society.
What?
I think they're the top third or top, they're in the top five most strongest economies in the world, right?
All these other countries practice xenophobia.
They're not going to give you fucking citizenship.
Saudi Arabia won't randomly give you citizenship.
UAE won't give you citizenship.
Japan won't.
A lot of these countries won't.
Right?
Why?
Because they understand that they're a nation of people.
They want Japan to stay Japanese.
They want China to stay China.
They want Korea to stay Korea.
So nationalism almost always gets put in a negative tone or a negative connotation by liberals.
But I think that's an incorrect way to look at it.
Because nationalism is nothing more than loving your country and understanding that your country has an identity and you want to fight to preserve that identity.
So I would argue being a nationalist means you care about your country first, which what that means is you prioritize American interests only.
And when I say prioritize American interests only, I truly mean that shit.
That means no more foreign aid to Israel.
That means no more fucking foreign aid to Egypt.
That means no more foreign aid to fucking Jordan to keep Israel safe.
Right?
That means we're going to take those billions and give it back to the fucking American people.
It's ridiculous that we got American veterans sleeping in the fucking streets.
Meanwhile, Israel gets all this money when they got free health care.
Ludicrous.
So a nationalist will look at this and say, that's fucked up.
That money should be going to us.
No more foreign aid.
But that's considered bad.
Or they'll call you a fascist or some other stupid ass term like that because you love your country and you don't give a fuck about nobody else.
So yes, I don't want mass immigration because people come here and don't assimilate.
Trump had to sign an executive order to make English the language of the land.
You guys understand that?
Like last week, he had to sign an executive order to make English the official language of the United States.
No other country has to fucking do that shit.
This whole melting pot concept is bullshit.
It's a construct by them boys to facilitate more mass immigration.
And immigration, who does it help?
Not you.
Definitely doesn't help you.
It helps the big corps.
Because now they can hire those people for a cheaper wage.
And you don't have a job now.
This is why I fought against H-1B visas so strongly.
Because we have plenty of Americans that are 100% capable of coding and doing a lot of the tech work, but they need livable wages.
So what do these tech bros do?
Like Elon Musk, Mark Zuckerberg, Sam Allen, all these losers, you know what they do?
They pour foreign labor for fucking India.
And then these guys come in on H-1B visas.
They're damn near indentured servitudes.
They can't leave their company.
They can't ask for a wage increase.
They work for a third of what an American would get paid, and they take your fucking job.
And when you do this over and over and over again, guess what ends up happening?
Not only do they come in and take your jobs, they also reproduce at a higher rate than the Americans.
Why?
Because in their culture, there's no such thing as feminism.
They believe in a nuclear family back where they're from, unlike here.
So what ends up happening is they reproduce and they quickly start to repopulate the country with a foreign culture and people.
And if you want to maintain America as it was, you need to limit immigration.
But these big companies would rather save money and get bigger profits than keep the nation as the America we grew up in.
anyway you've been voted out by the majority Please return to your seat.
That's good.
APPLAUSE That's a nice question.
Nice to meet you.
Okay, so I would like to touch on the religious fundamentalist aspect.
Are you an atheist?
I'm a Reformed Jew.
I don't, I'm my, I don't have a strong belief in the existence of God, but I don't think that religion in and of itself is bad.
Okay, so what's wrong with religious fundamentalists?
So like when you said you said trans rights and women's rights or something like that?
Well, the problem I have with religious fundamentalists, and really more, I guess it's really theocrats, is that they want to impose their morality that comes from their religion on the rest of us.
And I don't, I don't.
But morality, from your view, is going to be a preference, right?
It's not morality, it's a preference.
So morality without a foundation is going to reduce you to a preference.
Well, I have a foundation for my morality.
Which is what?
It's a humanist vision of what basically creates as little suffering as possible for as many people.
Okay, so you're like a consequentialist?
Utilitarian?
I don't really bother myself with being a consequentialist or a utilitarian.
It's always going to reduce you to a preference.
So if you say that killing is wrong and I say it's right, you would really have no contention with that.
Well, no, I don't base my understanding of civil society on religion.
And so we have a civil society.
We have laws that we have decided as a society in a democratic way.
And for some people, it's okay for it to be informed by their religion.
That's okay.
Okay, perfect.
So if tomorrow society comes together and we say, hey, trans folks don't deserve rights, you would be okay with that?
No, I would be against it, but I mean, it would be...
It would be morally right under your...
No, no, no.
I'm not talking about morals.
Okay, so here's where I'm getting to, right?
Religious foundations provide an ethical framework for one to live their life offering.
I believe you can have an ethical framework without.
And if we take the leftist view to its logical tail end, to its extreme view, you have low reproductive birth rates.
You have a reproductive dead end.
So two men together can't reproduce unless they have to take from a healthy, straight couple.
Religion provides this foundation where you do prioritize the nuclear family.
So do you have a problem with gay people being married?
It's not that I have a problem.
I just don't see a justification for why they ought to be gay outside of it just feels good.
Can you give me another justification for it?
Well, I think maybe that's the way they were born.
Okay.
Yeah, I don't know if they're born.
I don't think they're born gay, man.
What about pedophiles?
Are they born that way?
They may be, yeah.
Okay.
So should we let a pedophile off the hook since they were born that way?
No, I think we have a society as a society-Should implement duties to prevent them from acting on that innate urge, correct?
Well, I think between consenting adults, it's a different thing than you're okay with a 45-year-old dad with a 19-year-old daughter as well.
Incest.
No.
If they consent, you're okay with that.
No, I think so.
See, and this is where liberals, their worldview comes crashing down because, again, see how it doesn't, the logic just doesn't make sense.
Society has also determined that it's like it's not beneficial.
Right.
There's duties and obligations that we have.
So religion provides those duties.
Life isn't about freedom and exercising what you want.
I mean, well, you want to impose your religious doctrine.
No, because you just admitted we need duties.
We have a responsibility as a society to keep us functioning, to keep us thriving.
Your leftist view, the liberal view, doesn't provide anything besides, it just makes me feel good.
Religion does.
So what's your argument?
What's my argument as to why I don't want your religion to You have no contention.
First of all, I don't think that you have the right corner what God is telling us is And there are differences between religions.
And so my argument is, you know, like, you're not going to keep halal or kosher, right?
I mean, I don't believe that someone has a corner on religious truth.
And the reason why we have a democracy is because we didn't want a king.
And the kings came from the idea that their God said that they're the ones who are supposed to be king.
And so we can disagree on this.
I don't want to live in a country that is ruled by religious fundamentalism.
Well, you know, the country, look, the founding fathers, that's why the separation of church and state was very important, right?
So that we wouldn't have a theocracy.
But, you know, at some level, right, there's always going to be religious influence.
There's a reason why the president, when he swears in, he puts his hand on the Bible, right?
Or when you take O2 office, a lot of the times they put their hand on a Bible.
So it's almost impossible to separate the two to some degree.
Like, you can try to minimize religious influence in the state, but it's always going to be there to a degree.
And if I do, you have no issue with that.
And no, no, no.
And this is why I say, under Trump, yes, you have one.
Yes, you have a Christian.
You have a Christian nationalist.
So I concede the point that under Trump, your Christian nationalism has gained an advantage.
Yeah, I don't think, I mean, they went on a whole thing here where he's trying to assess Sam Cedar's worldview.
But again, like, remember, guys, the argument is, unless you're a billionaire, religious fundamentalist, or xenophobic nationalist, voting for Trump was a mistake.
This guy is a religious fundamentalist.
So it's like, I don't want to be an asshole, but like, there's really nothing to argue here.
I mean, in this case, he was just trying to figure out Sam Cedar's worldview, but this guy is a religious fundamentalist.
He bases his worldview on the Bible, which there's nothing wrong with that.
But again, and Sam's admitting this, you will benefit from the Trump administration because you're a religious fundamentalist, and that's kind of what it is.
But even though Trump is fairly secular, I would argue, he's not really, he understands and respects Christianity.
But someone made a claim that Trump fucking someone made a claim that Trump is a converted to Judaism.
I don't think that's true.
So, but yes, for sure, if you're a religious fundamentalist, which there's nothing wrong with that, you know, I think religion is a fantastic way to base your morality.
It's a fantastic thing to base your morality on.
Yeah, this is a W for him.
Like, you know, that Trump's in office.
Have more kids.
We're going to have less abortions.
We're going to have more family.
We're going to have stable family households.
Sorry about better education.
Gay people should be out there.
They should be straight.
Women should be secondary to their husbands.
Women should secondary to the husbands.
They should be secondary to the husbands.
We know that.
You don't need a religion to tell you that one.
That doesn't mean they're slaves.
It means they are protected.
You got to have it.
Let me ask you.
No, no.
Should women be drafted.
Should women be drafted.
Listen, I think I think this is the vision that you have, and I think Trump supports it.
I think the Christian nationalists he has throughout his government are all going to work towards your vision.
And my hope is that when people look at this, they say, hey, wait a second.
I don't want my life to be dictated by the notion of a...
See, Sam fucked up here because he let this guy control the frame and he was able to dominate in this round.
And Which should have said, look, bro, you're a Christian nationalist.
Like, very clearly, there's nothing to argue here.
This administration benefits you, which is what his prompt was.
I don't know if you guys are catching on, but Sam Cedar takes a very broad stance in each of these prompts.
And he does that on purpose.
Because the more broad your prompt, the more wiggle room you have to concede in a way where it doesn't make you look bad.
Does that make sense, Chad?
So he ended up losing this round because he's over here answering these questions to try to for him to ascertain his worldview.
But the reality is, is that this administration does benefit him as a religious fundamentalist.
A Christian nationalist prescription.
Now, you may win out.
I mean, certainly, like, if you look at a country like Iran, they have a theocracy there.
And apparently that's, you know, good for them if they want it.
My final point is that whenever.
I don't want to live in a Christian.
My final point is whenever we see people live out Christian values to its full extent, we see a great society.
When we see people deviate from that, that's where all the problems arise.
I think you are at home in the truth.
Yeah, no, he's saying, which I agree.
And I agree with him too.
Christian societies do great.
A lot of the world, the world's modern innovation was from the Christian nations, European Christian nations.
Thank you very much.
You've been voted out, please return to your seat.
Sorry, guys.
I think I have an issue with the implications of the prompt.
I mean, of course, I'll stick on the religious fundamentalism.
I think it's unfair to view Christianity separated from the ideology that Christianity informs, right?
You have an ideology that you vote upon because you view it to be the truth that benefits everyone in this society.
That's how a democracy works.
I, as a Christian, have an ideology that informs my opinions, and I believe that it is the most moral and correct way for a society to function.
So I think if we put religious fundamentalism in a box where you say any moral implications that I draw from this religion is unable to be voted upon, unable to be pushed onto you because simply it's a religion, it's unfair to view it that way.
Religion is an ideology like all ideologies are.
You vote away.
I don't mind you.
I don't dispute the idea that you could have a religious ideology and want to see it imposed upon.
Real quick, I'll read some of these chats so I make sure I don't forget you guys.
We got here.
That was the guy that wanted to come on.
Yeah, okay.
I see UK animals.
Majin, them boys, Marin O slash C, how what?
Okay.
Loki trying to push that shit on us.
I was born in Cuba, lived in the U.S. and I was six.
Okay.
Myron, where did you buy your Sony camera?
Amazon.
Myron, think about this.
Them boys created the LGBT flag in 1996.
Not surprised.
DEI does not include the A because the ADA, the American with Disabilities Act, was enacted in 1990, which requires employers to provide equal opportunity accommodations to those with disabilities.
L Sam Seider.
They could call him Sam Seider.
Mario, what are your thoughts on Patel reviewing the JFK files?
He said that there was nothing new that the public already knows.
I don't think he's being transparent with the whole investigation.
He said there was nothing new that you mean the public doesn't already know is what you mean.
We'll see, man.
My can tell me which three cameras are using right now.
Also, did you buy them new?
I did.
This camera right here is a camera right here is a Sony FX3, which, by the way, you know, I'm going to bring the ISO down one.
Guys, tell me if, tell me if, okay.
freeze frame this in your heads all right What looks better?
Right now or what it was a second ago?
Give me ones if this one looks better.
Give me twos if the last one looks better.
Give me ones if this one looks better.
The lighting and shit.
I adjusted the ISO.
I made it a little bit darker.
Give me ones if this one is better or twos if the other one was better.
one if this one is better two if the other one is better twos Okay.
So the one before was better.
Someone said no difference.
Show us the last one.
All right, there you go.
Fucking guys, man.
All right, fuck it.
I'll fix it.
Anyway.
All right.
Let's see here.
Let's go back to the other stuff.
Yeah, so this FX3 and then the other ones, this one is a A7R.
And that one's A7R.
Okay.
Hey, Mario, just ask why Andrew has been on pods.
He's back.
He's been on other pods and streams.
I thought you guys first.
No, there's no beef, bro.
Just remember, guys, we were in Vegas when they first came originally.
So we just got to link up a time.
But yeah, when they first got here, that was the day we actually left for Vegas.
Justin says, in your time at DHS, did you work with the U.S. Coast Guard?
Any thoughts on joining the military as a young male?
If you don't have any direction, bro, it's a good way to go.
But yeah, I worked with Coast Guard very closely when I came to Miami.
Others, and it's not inconsistent with my claim.
My claim is that Donald Trump is ushering in an element of Christian theocracy that I can't remember his name.
And you may be excited about, but I'm not excited about it.
I don't think the vast majority of Americans are, but maybe I'm wrong.
I mean, I don't think this country was set up to be a theocracy, and I find it problematic that it will be.
Others will be happy about it.
I think it's unfair as well to label any morals that comes from religion inherently immediately theocratic.
Like, having a theocracy is something different than having.
I think love thy neighbor is a good precept, and I don't know that we should necessarily legislate it, but I think it's a good precept.
I think there are things from religion that are good.
I interviewed Desmond Tutu years ago who said that religion can be like a knife.
It can be used to spread butter, it could be used to stab people.
But that doesn't mean that I want religious doctrine to be the same as the law of the land.
We have a democracy, and it was founded on trying to get out from some type of religious oppression, which means one religion shouldn't dominate in this country.
That's my sense.
Yeah, and I see that, but I think I have an issue with where you would perceive religious doctrine is derived from, right?
A guy doesn't, at least in Christianity, a guy doesn't go in a room and come out and say that he is a secret message from God that everyone now has to follow.
Religious doctrine is grueled over, it's reasoned over, the same way any ideology is discovered.
I'm not talking about the validity of religious doctrine.
I'm talking about religious doctrine supplanting democracy in civil society.
And I'm saying that religious doctrine is democratic inherently.
And in the way that you earlier...
Well, I mean, look, we can have a debate as to whether or not women should be subservient to men.
I don't think they should be.
You guys already know that.
Make them sandwiches.
They should be.
And in a democracy, I don't think it's healthy.
Right.
But when you said earlier with him that someone shouldn't have a, I don't know the exact word, like a chokehold on what is religious truth and what isn't religious truth.
That's not how religious truth itself works.
And that's not how religious truth is brought to the political table to have that work either.
I don't know.
When Pete Hegseth is in a bar yelling, you know, we're going to kill all Muslims.
Well, that's.
Yeah.
I mean, well, yeah, but now he's in charge of the largest military in the history of the world.
Bro, he's always drunk, man, Pete Hexeth.
He had an alcohol problem.
And he is informed by his Christian nationalism.
I think that's a problem.
But we can disagree on that.
Yeah, I don't take.
Pause, you've been voted out by the majority.
Thanks, Sam.
Can you turn to your seat?
Beep, beep, beep.
Okay, so, Elie Azar mentioned his views on gay marriage.
And I saw that you believe that essentially conservatives don't believe that gay marriage should be allowed.
I want to ask everybody in this room, is there any law or legislation that Donald Trump has passed to prohibit same-sex marriage in the last four years?
Okay.
Is there anyone in here who would.
Yeah, but that's, bro, that's because Donald Trump isn't like a traditional conservative, bro.
Like, come.
Oh, man.
Bro.
Like.
I showed you guys, Scott Prusler.
That's like one of the main guys in MAGA, bro.
Like, MAGA openly accepts guys that switch hit.
Potentially opposed to people kissing in public that are of the same sex.
You could raise your hand if you want.
Yeah, we definitely oppose that shit, bro.
We're not trying to see that, man.
Come on, bro.
Yes, in public.
Kissing in public.
No, no law against it.
Just your own opinion.
Okay, so these are all people's opinions, right?
The same way you have your opinions about Christians is the same way these people are allowed.
I don't have a problem with Christians.
Well, you do not believe that theology should be its as a.
We should not have a theocracy.
Correct.
And so what I'm saying is I think that Christianity, I'm a Catholic, I think that Christianity is...
Wait, what?
Bruh.
Man, come get your boy, Catholics.
I think fundamentally very important to instill family values in myself as well as every person who wants to have children.
Now let's talk about-I'm okay with that too.
Let's talk about Order 1, 14,166.
That is an executive order that Donald Trump just imposed on identifying what is male and female.
So I personally believe, as well as many transsexuals, friends of mine, believe that a A woman is a biological female, as well as a man being a biological male.
You are assigned what you are at birth.
You are not assigned your gender later on.
What you choose to express is something that is similar to wearing a garment, similar to what you decide to put on your face.
And I don't think there should be laws or legislations dictating people or imposing laws to manipulate children, for example, to castrate their bodies at such a young age.
50% of children.
Do you know how many children are treated over the past five years?
Let's say I think it was from 2018 to 22.
There was a study that just came out from Harvard.
Do you know how many children received?
I'm here, Ninjas.
I'm just going to fix the camera real quick.
Gender-affirming care, but broken down into puberty blockers and then.
Give me the numbers.
You tell me.
I'm curious.
I'm curious because you're right.
No, I have the numbers.
Okay, tell me.
I do, but I'm curious if you know.
Tell me what the numbers are.
I promise to tell you after you tell me what you think you're doing.
I'm not going to tell you.
Because I have a feeling that you're not.
We're not playing this game.
No, no, I am playing this game because I think you think it's much higher.
When you tell me that kids are being castrated, I know you don't really know what these numbers are.
And I do know these numbers are.
Okay, well, I can tell you this much.
It was reported that scientifically every single child who has received gender-affirming care, about roughly 50% of them regret it.
And 50% of them are suicidal because of it.
They're actually more depressed because of it.
How many of those kids, how many psychologists?
How many over the course of five years?
Well, tell me.
You tell me.
Just curious.
I know what you're trying to do.
You're trying to put me in this chokehold of like, I got you.
No, no, this is definitely an I got you moment because I'm suggesting to you that you think this problem is much bigger than it is a huge problem.
Medical.
You know Medi-Cal comers in trans women.
I understand.
I know one person has had that surgery.
I understand how my taxes should go for an inmate prisoner who wants a transition.
Well, I think because we've got to do health care for prisoners.
You don't consider health care.
The government has imposed $2.6 million on 100 kids over five years.
That is a lot of children.
That has a lot of children.
AP 547 just passed including gender identity.
Gender identity to allow children to be separated from their parents just due to not affirming their gender identity.
But here's the point.
Listen, Trump is, how is he hurting these people?
He just rescinded the ability of the Labor Bureau to investigate discrimination in workplace.
Are you for trans people being discriminated at workplace?
They're never being discriminated at all.
Are you for trans people being discriminated with?
I'm very passionate about that question.
And can I answer it?
Okay, so I believe that affirmative action should be.
It's not affirmative action.
Oh, then what is it?
It's anti-discrimination.
That's not saying regardless.
You can't hire trans people.
You can't fire someone when you find out they're trans.
Okay, well, hold on a minute.
So when you hire someone or when you interview someone, for example, you are supposed to interview them based on their knowledge and their work ethic, not based on sex.
I'm not saying it's not a fair thing.
Not based on their sexuality.
Are you allowed to fire them if you find out they're trans?
If you need to.
If you need to, then you should.
If you need to.
We have a disagreement.
I don't believe people should be discriminated against.
Pause.
And that's not discrimination.
It's based on your knowledge, not what you sleep with, not who you sleep with.
Just saying.
Hi.
Sam.
So I actually think that this liberal world order needs to be thrown away completely.
And I think Christian nationalism would be a good alternative.
What we're seeing right now is just And congratulations.
Yeah, and thank you.
And yeah, I think what we're seeing right now is a culture of death.
This is the most suicidal generation ever.
We have millions of children dying by abortion.
People aren't even reproducing.
We don't even have like a Should we mandate people reproduce?
No, I don't think we need to mandate.
We can just stop them from killing their kids.
You wanted to outlaw abortion.
Yes.
Yes.
I mean, this is, we have a fundamental disagreement on this.
And my claim was that if you voted for Trump, it would be to your benefit if you want to outlaw abortion.
I think it would benefit everyone.
Yeah, I disagree.
I think that women should have the right to choose.
I think that it would benefit everyone to bring back the family unit to stop having women just thrown into the workforce.
Maybe we shouldn't allow women to choose to divorce unless their husbands say it's okay.
I mean, I don't really believe in divorce in general, so like, sure.
All right.
I mean, this, I think, though, reinforces my point that if you are.
It would be better for society.
It would be better for everybody in society.
Same with xenophobic nationalism.
Like, what's the problem with xenophobic nationalism?
Don't you think that's better for Americans in general?
Like, xenophobia.
We should have a coherent culture.
Everyone should be a part of the same culture.
We should have assimilation.
Which do you get to choose what the culture is?
We already have a dominant culture based on European and Christian values and identity.
That is a dominant culture.
It's rooted in European identity.
So your argument is that That has been the dominant culture.
And we're not letting people assimilate to that.
We're saying you should keep your culture, and this is why our culture is so divided.
Your argument is that Trump is good for those who want a dominant white European culture.
I mean, that is what America is.
It's rooted in European identity and Christian values.
That's what it has been.
Like, would you really disagree with that?
What is it then if that's not the identity of America?
Well, I think the identity of America.
For the majority of time, America's been a country.
You don't think that's been the identity?
Well, actually, no, I think actually the identity of America has been, you know, for better or for worse, a melting pot in that regard.
Yeah, yeah, maybe since like the 1960s.
Even then, like even we had this idea, a melting pot literally.
Yeah, the melting pot thing, which is, oh shit, I think I fucked up the, it's a little too bright, isn't it?
I'll fix this right real quick, guys.
Yeah, this girl didn't really do, look, all right, let's play it from the beginning.
Sorry, guys.
Divorce unless their husbands say it's okay.
World order.
You need to, then you should.
Because if I'm not mistaken, that girl is a she's like, she became a Catholic like in her adulthood.
You need to.
I don't believe people should be discriminated against.
Pause?
And that's not discrimination.
It's based on your knowledge, not what you sleep with, not who you sleep with.
Just saying.
*applause* *phone rings* *phone rings* *phone rings* Got it.
Sam.
So I actually think that this liberal world order needs to be thrown away completely.
and I think Christian nationalism would be a good alternative.
What we're seeing right now is just a Congratulations.
Yeah, and I think that's better, chat.
But yeah.
Right now, guys, I got my settings on like 500 ISO and like 200 shutter speed.
Any camera bros in here, let me know.
Yeah, I agree with her on that.
Liberalism is a fucking problem.
Thank you.
And yeah, I think what we're seeing right now is a culture of death.
This is the most suicidal generation ever.
We have millions of children dying by abortion.
People aren't even reproducing.
We don't even have like a Should we mandate people reproduce?
No, I don't think we need to mandate.
We can just stop them from killing their kids.
We wanted to outlaw abortion.
Yes.
Yes.
I mean, this is, we have a fundamental disagreement on this.
And my claim was that if you voted for Trump, it would be to your benefit if you want to outlaw abortion.
I think it would benefit everyone.
Yeah, I disagree.
I think that women should have the right to choose.
I think that it would benefit everyone to bring back the family unit to stop having women just thrown to the workforce.
Maybe we shouldn't allow women to choose to divorce unless their husbands say it's okay.
I mean, I don't really believe in divorce in general, so like, sure.
All right.
I mean, this, I think, though, reinforces my point that if you are.
But it would be better for society.
It would be better for everybody in society.
And same with xenophobic nationalism.
Like, what's the problem with xenophobic nationalism?
Now, this is what everyone should have said.
Because, again, he's right.
If you're a xenophobic nationalist, which I don't like the term xenophobic, but it's fine.
I get what he's saying.
Xenophobia, guys, is nothing more than just a phobia of foreigners.
But of course, he's framing it in a pejorative sense.
What she's saying here, this is the question she should have came up with, and other people, too, is like, what's wrong with xenophobic, xenophobic nationalism?
Don't you think that's better for Americans in general?
Like xenophobia?
Xenophonia is better.
We should have a coherent culture.
Everyone should be a part of the same culture.
We should have assimilation.
Of course, Egga, yeah.
Do you get to choose what the culture is?
We already have a dominant culture based on European and Christian values and identity.
That is a dominant culture.
That's correct.
That is what founded this country.
White Christianity.
It's rooted in European identity.
You could see that she's shaking and shit.
She's not really as convincing or sure of herself, but she's correct here.
Your argument is that— That has been the dominant culture.
And we're not letting people assimilate to that.
We're saying you should keep your culture, and this is why our culture is so divided.
Your argument is that Trump is good for those who want a dominant white European culture.
He's not the best for it, but he's better than Kamal Harris, of course.
I mean, make no mistake about it, guys.
Trump wants to still import H-1B visas.
America is.
It's rooted in European identity and Christian values.
That's what it has been.
Like, would you really disagree with that?
That's true.
It has been in European.
America was founded by white Christian men.
It's the truth, man.
What is it then, if that's not the identity of America?
That is the original identity of this country.
People might not like it, but that's what it is.
Well, I think the identity of the country.
For the majority of time, America's been a country.
You don't think that's been the identity?
Well, actually, no.
I think actually the identity of America has been, you know, for better or for worse, a melting pot in that regard.
Yeah, yeah, maybe since like the 1960s.
Even then, like even we had this idea, a melting pot literally means assimilation too.
It means melting.
It means you're assimilating to the dominant culture.
Is that not what that means?
Now instead we're saying there's something wrong with xenophobia culture.
No.
I mean, look, I got to be honest with you.
Like, you and I have a fundamental disagreement.
We will never see eye to eye on this.
It's a choice.
And people, I think what you're expressing though, is really what the Trump movement at its heart is about.
And I think that's problematic.
You guys want to know where the melting pot comes from?
Time to wake your niggas up.
The melting pot is a play by Israel Zangwill.
First stage in 1908.
It depicts the life of a Russian Jewish immigrant family, the Kixanos, in the United States.
David Kixano has survived a pogrom which killed his mother and sister and he wishes to forget this horrible event.
Here you go.
Israel Zangwill.
Here's the guy that founded this term of melting pot.
Let you guys come to your own conclusions on that one.
I don't think Trump's like anywhere close to being a Christian nationalist.
That's ridiculous.
Like Trump's basically a Democrat from like 15 years ago when it comes to social media.
So you don't think that he's conservative enough for you?
Oh, definitely.
Nowhere close.
No.
He's not xenophobic enough for you.
No, he's trying to pour a bunch of H1Bs.
Are you kidding?
Right.
She's right about that one.
Oh, so you want to get them out too?
Yeah.
No, I mean, I think you're making my argument for me.
She did.
What she should have done was, look, instead of coming in and saying, like, I would have pressed him more on what's wrong with xenophobic nationalism.
That's what I would have done.
I'd have been like, yeah, you're right.
Again, guys, Sam Cedar's smart.
He frames it in a way where it's very broad.
Unless you're a billionaire, religious fundamentalist, or xenophobic nationalist, voting for Trump was a mistake, right?
What I would say is, what's wrong with xenophobic nationalism?
And then have that discussion.
Because he didn't really, she didn't press him hard enough on that.
She should have attacked him on what's wrong with xenophobic nationalism.
All right.
And then I would have countered his melting pot point.
And what I would have said was this whole melting pot thing, it's a concept by them boys, as I proved to you guys earlier, to allow more mass immigration.
It's basically what it is.
My next claim is the GOP.
She might not know that the melting pot where it originally comes from.
That's why she probably didn't argue with him on that.
All right, claim number three.
The GOP will destroy Social Security and healthcare.
It will destroy Social Security and healthcare.
I see it.
So what if Social Security should go away?
That's my question to you.
Because Social Security keeps two-thirds of our elderly out of poverty.
And not only does it keep our elderly out of poverty, it's essentially a social insurance program that protects you if at the end of your life you don't have enough money to survive.
So right now, do you know that it's also the albatross around our generation's neck?
No, it isn't.
Okay, so let me just explain this.
Well, you're going to do this back to lecturing about Social Security.
Well, we don't.
That's what we're talking about.
Yeah, Social Security is one of the top three funded.
Social Security is almost the biggest thing that our government does.
Exactly.
And we are more than $30 trillion in debt.
Well, first of all, Social Security cannot contribute legally to the deficit.
Because they don't even account it in the federal deficit.
We have 30 years.
It's more funding.
When Social Security started in 1936, you have more workers than retirees because people haven't entered into retirement.
By 1970, it was at 3.5%.
And then they actually fact-check it, too.
Social Security is funded through a dedicated payroll tax paid by both employers and the employee.
However, trust fund reserves are expected to run out by 2035, which will lead to a decrease in benefits.
Hey, TPC Films, bro, I see that you said, you said check your DMs.
What was your username again, bro?
Sell me what your username was again.
Tyrese, because people haven't entered into retirement.
By 1970, it was at 3.5 to 1.
Now it's at 2.5 to 1.
But productivity has increased during that time.
So the amount of money paid into Social Security has been up there.
The reason why we are running out of money just for the trust fund, not for Social Security.
Like I say, if we do nothing with Social Security now, it is statutorily unable to contribute to the debt.
The math is right there.
The reason why the trust fund is running out is because wealth inequality has hoarded so much money above the capital.
I think it's because the government does a terrible job managing their money.
They have a huge spending problem.
And they go, oh, look at all this money.
That's earmarked for 60 years from now that we're just going to spend on something.
40 years ago, they predicted this.
This is an actuarial table.
Accountants sit there and look at it.
This is a very easy math problem.
Accountants in the government are always right, right?
That's totally the thing that you're saying.
But they're always correct about money, right?
That's why we have a $40 trillion debt problem.
The problem isn't the math with the $40 trillion debt problem.
It's the UF tax problem.
It's the spending problem.
I totally agree with you, which I would argue is part of why Social Security has gone in the hole already.
That's not, that's simply not true.
Oh, okay.
So we're out of money from the Social Security bucket.
No, no, no.
Statutorily, by that I mean by law, Social Security pays for itself.
If we do nothing, we do nothing, the 6.2% that your employer and your employee.
Well, yeah, we saw a bunch of people getting paid Social Security.
It needs to be absolutely reformed.
Again, another concept that looks good on paper, but in practice is right with fraud.
As you guys saw, there's like people that are like 200 years old getting Social Security benefits.
Fucking wild.
He pays into it, will pay out 78% of benefits starting in 2033.
And why is it going down?
If everything's so much better, why is it only 78%?
If we raise the cap, there's a cap right now at $176,000.
So for instance, if you make $100,000, you pay $6,200 into that a year.
But if you make $4 million, do you know how much money you pay into Social Security?
$6,200.
Hang on.
Why should...
Yo, TPC Films.
I'm going to take a picture of my camera real quick and send it to you on DM so you can see what the fuck it is.
One second, chat.
Wealthy people pay a higher percentage.
No, they should pay the same percentage.
$6.2 on $400,000, $6.2 on a million dollars.
And why should they pay even more money at all?
Because they make more money?
Again, you fundamentally have this idea.
Okay, you have an idea that because somebody makes more money, that that's fundamentally wrong, right?
No, no, I don't think it's fundamentally wrong.
I think that they should pay more taxes into it.
Now, I do think as a society, they should not allow billionaires.
We can pay more taxes generally, but why the question should be?
We have our economy.
Hang on, does a billionaire get more money from Social Security if they went to go take it than I would?
No, no, no.
Why should they pay more?
I'll tell you what.
Because it is a social insurance program that keeps you from being in poverty when you're a senior.
And the reason why I think billionaires should pay more taxes than other people, even a higher percentage, is because it works better for society.
The greatest expansion we've had in this country in terms of economics and the least amount of wealth disparity was in the 40s and 50s.
Look, I have no problem with taking care of seniors and having this program, but it absolutely needs to be reformed because the issue is that it's fucking rightful corruption.
It's rife with scamming.
Social security scamming is fucking so common and prevalent, the whole system needs to be fucking redone.
I see what Sam is saying.
He's like, hey, look, pay into it so we can take care of our people down the road, right?
And the people that make a lot of money should contribute more.
I see his perspective here.
But again, just like what communism sounds good on paper, doesn't work in practice.
And those exposed Social Security is having a bunch of fucking fraud.
50s and 60s in this country.
Do you know what the top marginal rate was?
It was high.
I don't know the exact number, but if you made over $470,000 in 1955, every dollar you would make above that was taxed at 90%.
So I have a question.
90 cents on every dollar was taxed above 470.
So if we had the, TPC, I sent you a picture, by the way.
Shout out to TPC.
It's going to help me with making this camera even better for you, ninjas.
So let me know.
Which is wild, by the way.
And it's also the greatest expansion we had of the economy.
Yeah, you can help.
Hold on.
Every dollar was taxed above hacked at 170,000 rate was because it works better for society.
The greatest expansion we've had in this country in terms of economics and the least amount of wealth disparity was in the 40s and 50s and 60s in this country.
That's actually true.
Those were the golden years of this country.
Do you know what the top marginal rate was?
It was high.
I don't know the exact number, but.
If you made over $470,000 in 1955, every dollar you would make above that was taxed at 90%.
That's fucking crazy, bro.
There's no incentive to make more than $470K then.
Good question.
90 cents back then at least.
And every dollar was taxed above 470.
So if we had the, which is wild, by the way.
And it's also.
And then in 1955, individuals making more than $200,000, which is today $2.4 million, are married couples with an income of more than $400,000, $4.8 million today were taxed at 91% at the highest tax bracket.
Holy.
But you can make the argument that the country was better back then.
This is before, but also keep in mind, guys, this is before feminism.
This was before feminism.
So was it the high taxes that helped the most, or could it be women not being in the workforce?
Who knows?
The greatest expansion we had of the economy.
Yeah, you can expand for a time, and then you see places.
You see like Nordic countries that were like, oh, let's tax the hell out of our rich people, right?
And then they go, whoops, we mess up.
We can't actually live off of our terrible.
We basically are able to live off our economic boom that they had between like the 40s and the 90s.
Yo, TPC Films, I sent you a picture on your DM.
Check it out.
It's the camera settings.
And then we have to revert all of that because we made a terrible choice and we were able to have a party for 50 years until we realized we ran through all the money that capitalism got us.
So let me ask you real quick.
So the average, the average person, right?
Right now, they fundamentally look at Social Security, young people like me, and they go, I'm going to have that money sitting waiting for me when I retire.
Since your opinion is whatever works best for the average person is better, wouldn't you rather shift towards something that I would agree with, which is getting people that are 19, 20 years old into funding their own retirement rather than relying on other people to fund it for you?
Sure, not just a 401k, but IRAs, any other type of retirement.
Hey, man, 401ks are bullshit, bro.
Do you agree with that?
Would you disagree with that?
Social Security was set up as part of a three-legged stool where back in the day when I was a kid, we had defined benefit pensions where you'd know how much money you would get out.
That all shifted in the 80s to define contribution, where you know how much you put in.
The 401k started during that Reagan era.
It has been a disaster because he's right about this.
Fact of the matter, for better or for worse, people just don't save in the way that you're talking about it.
Why?
They don't.
Because Americans are stupid when it comes to spending money.
We live in a very consumer-based society, man.
America is the number one consumer-based country.
Americans are really bad at saving money, dude.
Because we live in an accredited society.
So, yo, TPC, right now I got it on full screen so you can see what it looks like on camera.
Those are what the settings I gave you, by the way, TBC Films.
Shout out to TBC Films.
He's a Cast Club member.
He's looking at this shit right now.
But anyway, yeah.
So, shit, I lost my train of thought.
All right, we'll go back to the video.
Fuck.
Sorry, guys, I didn't sleep much last night.
Would be nice if you're not going to be able to do it.
If the government were changing the mindset and actually pushing the way that you're talking about it, it would be nice.
I'm sorry.
My bad.
Yes.
401ks.
The reason why they don't work is because people don't contribute enough, man.
This is why so many companies and governments, government agencies, when you do open up your 401k, they'll match it.
Why?
Because they know people are stupid and don't save enough.
We live in a consumer-based society.
People will sit there.
Something like some ridiculous amount of people that make $100,000 plus a year still live paycheck to paycheck.
Right?
So someone said Myron is moving to the left.
No, I'm just not a retard.
I understand 401ks are a lot of the times bullshit and don't work for a majority of people.
That's why I tell you guys to buy real estate so much.
Because you'll make more money from the real estate than fucking contributing to your 401k.
I've done many videos on this.
I don't know why this is new to y'all niggas.
I've literally done videos.
I did have it.
Bro, you know what?
Instead of me talking shit, look, look, look at this shit.
I brought Chris Cronon right here.
And we talked about this in detail.
If you guys want to check it out.
So feel free to go check out that episode, but we've been talking about 401ks being, you know, sucky for a minute, bro.
nice if we if the government things are if the government were changing the mindset and actually pushing that cultural shift towards we're not i know i was like Someone in the chat said, Myron, you got new viewers.
You're right.
You're right.
I do have new viewers, so they might not be familiar with my stance on real estate.
Yes, guys, I am a real estate investor.
I got 21 properties.
Okay.
One commercial, 20 or 21 or 22.
I think 20 or 21 of them are residential, single family, all the way up to fourplex.
Then I got one sixplex, right?
So the problem with 401ks, and actually I withdrew my 401k to purchase a house.
That's made more money for me than fucking just letting it sit there.
Nothing wrong with having a 401k, guys.
But number one, most people don't contribute to it enough.
And then number two, if you're going to only rely on that, that's a problem.
And then, yes, Sam Cedar's right.
Your 401k and your social security typically are supposed to be a one-two punch along with your pension.
It's supposed to be your pension, your 401k, and your social security.
That's what's supposed to take you care of you in your old age.
That's the three-legged stool that he's talking about.
Just going to hand you money when you're 65.
You have a 40k?
You've got to experiment with that, the government affecting the cultural mindset, and it failed.
You've had a 40-year experiment of everybody.
You know what my parents say?
Do you know what grandparents say?
They go, well, I'm just waiting for my Social Security check to come in rather than I have $800,000 waiting for me because I thought about it when I was 19 and 20 because I didn't have this grab bag of money waiting for me.
You're assuming that you're great.
I try and tell my kids.
So we agree.
We should get rid of Social Security.
You don't have to.
So we should phase out.
How would you listen to this idea?
You phase out Social Security to where people who have five years left before they retire get 100% of the benefits.
And then people like me, who have 40 years until we retire, I'm not going to get it.
I'm going to screw you.
I'm going to get screwed either way.
You really think I'm going to get Social Security?
I guarantee you, at the very least, you're going to get 78% of your benefits.
That's awesome.
I'll get $9,000 a year.
in calling for our government to increase the cap, in fact, get rid of the cap, then your grandkids will get socialized.
I would much rather...
And again, maybe we'll just disagree, but I would much rather result to, hey, 20-year-olds, please save for your own retirement, invest for your own retirement, because the government is bad at dealing with money.
And what happens?
Don't rely on them.
What happens if what?
What happens if those 20-year-olds don't listen to you?
The same thing that happens if a 20-year-old just doesn't go and get a job because I tell them to.
They're going to have a problem, but that's not my fault.
No, I got news for you.
It's not your fault, but there used to be in New York City 30,000 people sleeping.
No one in this room was alive before Social Security.
We've all lived under this, just like the, just like the income tax.
The most successful government program in the history of our government.
Things that are successful don't just start to die out and end up.
It's not dying out.
It's the grab bag of money, the massive excess that was there in the early years because of the 42 to 1 beneficial.
It wasn't a massive excess in 1930.
42 to 1.
It is a massive excess.
There weren't that many people who had entered into the social security program.
And the fact that it-In 1970, it was 3.5 workers to one.
Now it's 2.5, but productivity has increased it.
Someone's asked me, Myra, can you explain what a pension is?
A pension, guys, basically is where they give you a percentage of your salary when you were working.
So I'll explain for law enforcement.
So a lot of law enforcement agencies will give you somewhere between 40 to 70% of your top three years for a lot of different police departments.
So let's say you made $100,000 your top three years, right?
What they'll do is they'll give you, let's say, 60% of your top three years combined.
So the top three years, you made $100,000, another $100,000, you made another $100,000 for easy math purposes, right?
They'll give you 60% of those three years combined.
So it would be 60K.
You'd get that 60K per year after you retire.
That's how pension works.
It's a very, I grossly simplified it for you guys, but that's in general how it works.
I've told you why the Social Security Trust Fund is running out.
It is because of wealth disparity.
Billionaires hiding and hoarding their money above the cutoff line, which is $176,000.
That's the cap.
If you're not afraid of the money, billionaires are keeping $2 billion under their mattress.
They're investing it back in.
They're just putting it into some stock market.
That's true.
Just looking around.
What do you think of 401k?
That's why I tell you guys all the time that billionaires are inherently globalists.
This is why, like, I'll keep it a thousand with y'all.
This is why I don't trust people like Vivek.
This is why I don't trust people like Elon Musk.
Like, they're globalists, bro.
You know what I mean?
At least Trump lost money by going into office.
He lost money.
He had a higher net worth before he went in.
But in general, you can't be a globalist billionaire and also be a nationalist.
Relies upon.
It relies on the stock market and things like that.
Yeah, 401k relies on the stock market.
And I knew people who were retiring in 2008 when the stock market tanked and they got screwed.
That's a whole social security problem.
You would argue that's largely driven by the government being, once again, terrible with policy and freedom.
Social security is there regardless of what happens with the stock market.
You've been voted out by the majority.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Hey, Micah.
Getting an example.
There's an idea that you have that basically government can kind of fix all these problems, right?
If you didn't say for retirement, well, then the government can just come in, swoop in, and save you.
Well, not swoop in.
It starts literally the day you get your social security.
Sure, sure, sure.
It swoops in once you retire, right?
Once you can.
Right, right, exactly.
And so you believe this idea basically that government is an effective organization, which it does time and time again, if you look at history, that's proven to not be true.
When you're hidden at retirement, you don't know.
This is an insurance program.
That's it.
It's an insurance program.
And it basically says you're insured against eating cat food when you're 65.
And it works.
It works.
No, it doesn't.
You should have, well, one, you should have your own personal.
How doesn't it work?
How doesn't it work?
Well, I mean, we've already discussed the details of how it is just completely failing as a program.
How is it failing?
Because I'm not going to receive any such thing.
No, I've already told you right now.
I know.
I'm not going to rehash out that debate.
The main issue.
You've just been told this, and you know why you've been told it?
It's because they want to rate it to give tax cuts to rich people.
That's why.
So are you saying the Trump tax cuts were only for rich people?
You're saying they're only for rich people.
Oh, okay.
Then how can you?
Rich people benefited more from it than low-income people.
And I always say that.
And what do you mean benefited more from that?
Because we already went over the percentage numbers, and we know that's not true.
They don't need the money as much, and they don't need it.
What are you talking about?
Remember, guys, I'm going to read chats here in a little bit.
You can donate.
If you guys are watching the show on Castle Club, donate on Castle Club or Rumble Rat or Myron Gaines X. If you really ride with me, that's the best way to donate to the show.
Myron Gaines X right here, man.
Nice and big for you guys.
It's pinned at the top of the chat.
And yeah, that's the best way to support.
And yeah, appreciate it, guys.
I'm going to read the chats here a little bit.
Yeah, MyronGainsX.com.
Did I just...
God damn it.
All right.
I just messed it up.
It's fine.
These rich people are the people that are investing in smaller businesses.
These are the people that are giving other people jobs to allow them to provide for their families.
Okay, pause, pause.
Thank you.
Hey.
Good to be back.
Nice to see you.
Okay.
Yeah, nice to see you too.
I want to zoom out a little bit.
Okay.
So obviously you're pinpointing on Social Security and there's a reason for that.
And healthcare too.
Oh, okay.
But Social Security is the program that you're very concerned about.
Medicare.
I'd love a Medicare for all program, but go ahead.
Yeah, so I think the reason you're focusing on Social Security precisely is because Social Security is the most successful in a shadow of social welfare programs and government spending.
It's like the Democrats.
It's also the biggest budget.
It is the biggest bucket.
But the Democrats have these social programs and this deficit spending, and it just never ends.
It's never enough money.
So you're focusing on Social Security because it is the one successful child, but you're ignoring all the social welfare, the social welfare state that we've become.
Social Security and Medicare and Medicaid make up all over like a 70% of our federal spending is mandatory.
You're right.
It's Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, interest on debt.
8% of our, we're paying for that.
So the Democrats run on this, essentially, they want a welfare state.
So yes, Social Security might help a lot of people, but it's like we're closer to a welfare state than we've ever been.
38% of our GDP in the U.S. is government spending.
That's the highest since World War II.
So us conservatives, we're trying to tell you, like, you guys are fiscally really interesting.
Are you worried about the tax cuts and what that does to the debt and deficit?
The tax cuts increased revenue.
No.
Yes.
I want to tell you about Kansas.
Okay, tell me about Kansas.
Sam Brownback in 2012 brought in Arthur Laffer.
You know the Laffer curve, right?
That's the argument that if you cut taxes, you're going to get more revenue.
It's a good question.
That's exactly what happened.
That's exactly what happened to you.
All right, Kansas enacted the tax and spending cuts in 2012.
In 2013, Brownback argued that this fiscal potion would generate an explosion of economic growth, but overall growth and job creation in Kansas underperformed both the national and the national economy and neighboring states.
Interesting.
All right, let's look at this again.
Right, so 70% of our federal spending is mandatory.
You're right.
It's Social Security, Medicare, Medicaid, interest on debt.
8% of our, we're paying for that.
So the Democrats run on this, essentially, they want a welfare state.
So yes, Social Security might help a lot of people, but it's like we're closer to a welfare state than we've ever been.
38% of our GDP in the U.S. is government spending.
That's the highest since World War II.
So us conservatives, we're trying to tell you like-Also, we don't build anything anymore.
That's another problem.
We don't build anything anymore in America.
We used to build so much shit, but we outsource it to China.
According to the Treasury Department, government spending is equal to 23% of U.S. gross domestic product in 2024 in World War II, and it peaked at 40% in the most recent peak was 31% of GDP in 2020 at the height of the COVID-19 pandemic.
You guys are fiscally worried about the tax cuts and what that does to the debt and deficit?
The tax cuts increased revenue.
No.
Yes.
I want to tell you about Kansas.
Okay, tell me about Kansas.
Sam Brown back in 2012 brought in Arthur Laffer.
You know the Laffer curve, right?
That's the argument that if you cut taxes, you're going to get more revenue.
It's not going to be a good question.
That's exactly what happened to Transportation.
They destroyed Kansas.
By 2016, the Republican legislature raised taxes again.
They destroyed their education.
Reality is against you, my friend.
Look up.
The Trump administration, they sent Sam Brown back and made him the ambassador to faith because they didn't want this guy around the world.
If you want to tax the rich, you should vote Republican because they pay more in taxes under Republican.
It was the same as Laydown.
It was the same as Trump.
Look at KUS.
Look at the U.S. American Pansy House.
The numbers are a lot of money.
Obama's best year-increasing pales in comparison to Trump's worst year.
Do you get what I'm saying?
Does more taxes necessarily equate to more revenue?
Yes.
No, that's where you're wrong.
So if you look at TCJA, and I'll say the numbers again, the top 1% paid more, more into the system.
GDP grew.
Wages grew 3% year over year under TCJA.
So when you're saying tax the rich, like it sounds like you're actually Republican.
You just don't know yet.
You're not.
You're confusing causation with correlation because Obama's economic recovery was way too slow.
And I agree with you on it.
Way too slow.
Way too slow.
When you have tons of stimulus, what you're doing is you're creating the Great Depression for the bottom 90%.
All the assets inflate.
So who does that benefit?
Your policies benefit the 1%.
Inflation disproportionately benefits the 1%.
It's an immoral tax on the poor.
And that's exactly what happens when they steal it.
And the inflation was not a function of monetary standards.
It absolutely was.
They increased the money supply by $6 trillion.
I understand they did that.
I understand they did that.
And they could pull it back in tax.
Yeah, something like 50 to 60% of all the U.S. dollars in circulation right now were made during the pandemic, man, which is fucking wild.
With the wealthy, you're making an argument for higher taxes.
Okay, do you think taxing people makes the country wealthier?
Is that what you think?
Does it make the country?
So do taxes make us wealthy?
Is that government increasing taxes?
Are we now more wealthy?
Do you think that the only thing we create wealth is by producing if you tax and spend government stimulus can, yes, increase GDP, of course?
Is GDP wealth?
Is GDP wealth?
If we import 10 million immigrants and our GDP goes up, are we now wealthier?
If the housing costs more, if CPI goes up because there's no.
No, I understand.
Inflation is under control, and we haven't pulled that money off the table.
Right, but I'm just saying that what?
Inflation is back down because we had a problem.
The welfare state makes us fall poorer.
No, that's yes, it does.
And you can see if you compare.
People want to come here for economic opportunity.
We don't want handouts.
We want opportunity.
That's why, as an immigrant, that's why my family came here.
We left the socialist paradise.
It's garbage.
The people that come here want economic opportunity.
And you're stifling that.
You're undermining capitalism in the free markets with your utopian vision.
There is no free market.
Well, there's not anymore.
No, there's no further money.
There used to be.
That is what makes America the greatest.
America is the greatest economy in the world because of the free market.
The greatest capitalism is the most ethical Erica had was when we had 90% tax.
That's true.
The numbers are against you.
In 1940, 1950, 1960, the highest top margin was a lot of people.
So taxflation.
When Halton Friedman predicted tax flation in the 70s with your social welfare shock that drove inflation way up, and that was a function of OPEC.
But in the 1940s, 1950s, and 1960s, highest top marginal tax rate was 90%.
We had wealth inequality shocks.
Post-World War II collection.
We had a great compression and more people enjoyed it.
And it was World II Industrial Revolution.
We were producing.
We were producing more than every other country.
It's because we're producing more than every other country.
That's what creates a lot of people.
And we're doing that with a 90% tax rate on the wealthiest.
Which was less when Reagan came in and brought it down.
The top 1% paid more.
Can you believe that?
No, no.
Do you know that federal income tax?
Wait, wait, wait.
Do you know federal income tax?
When it was established.
We're talking about the laugher curve.
And I'm talking about it.
Here's my last thing.
Federal income tax in 1913 when it was established was only targeted at people making $100,000 and over.
Now, we don't even know.
Most people don't even know that.
It's just a base tax.
Why?
Because the projections that they had of taxing the rich didn't work out like they thought.
Because it doesn't work out.
There's a ton of loopholes.
The rich are smart.
Like, the rich people are smart.
So focus on top marketing.
They're not even talking about social security anymore.
It is double what it is today.
It was 50%.
Effective tax.
More taxes.
I don't know what you mean by wealth.
I mean, it's production of goods and services.
That's taxes.
That's more taxes.
People think money is more taxes.
Money creates less wealth inequality.
And then you have wealth that is shared by more people rather than being in the hands of a plutocracy or a plutonomy.
And then you get stuff like an oligarchy.
What happens when you punish your top producers over and over again?
They leave, they stop producing, the government...
Yo, Big Dog Cruz.
Cruz.
Yes.
You never send in a chat, bro.
What the fuck are you talking about saying I donated and you didn't read?
I don't see a chat from you anywhere, bro.
I'm looking around.
I don't see it.
No, it isn't.
You cripple the economy.
Guess what happens next?
Wait, wait, when did this happen in the country?
When we had a 19% campaign.
It happens in every socialist country.
This is the socialist playbook.
They come in and they're like, guys.
This is not a socialist country.
And I'm not calling for socialism to happen.
It is more socialist than ever before.
We have more social welfare spending.
I'll say it again, 38% of GDP is government spending.
We have more social...
In 2024, the U.S. government spending was estimated to be 38% of the gross domestic product GDP However, welfare only accounts for about 77% of government spending.
And look at what happens both and socialist playbooks.
They come in and they're like, guys.
This is not a socialist country.
And I'm not calling for socialism to be able to get it.
It is more socialist than ever before.
We have more social welfare spending.
I'll say it again.
38% of government spending of GDP is government spending.
We have more social welfare programs.
And look at what happens.
But how come we have all these programs and the black community is still living in poverty?
What programs are you talking about that are giving towards the black community?
In 2021.
We extended.
Hold on.
In 2021.
What do you mean?
What program?
How much money is enough?
When is it enough?
You have the richest country in the world.
We offered 300.
The way you guys think, which is insane to me.
Let me just finish this.
In 2021, we extended the child tax credit, which is basically a payment.
$300 per social welfare.
We cut child poverty in one year by 45%.
By 45%.
But because no Republican would join the Democrats and Kristen Sinema and Joe Manchin voted against this provision in Billboard, I'm talking 2021.
From 2021 to 2022, we cut child poverty in this country by 45%.
Look at that.
I feel like when I look at it, I'm recognizing that.
I guarantee you.
I will give you my phone number.
I'm calling you when we cut it along.
All right, we'll call it.
I'll do it off camera.
And you will see that we cut child poverty in a year by 45%.
And I'll look into your claim.
All right, guys.
We'll talk about it.
My next claim is Trump's policies make the rich richer and the working class poorer.
Hold on, sorry.
Hey, Dr. Howell.
Nice to meet you.
Nice to meet you.
Okay, so do you mind if I ask what policies in specific are you referencing to?
Tax cuts for the rich.
I think his idea of tariffs on countries in the way that he's talking about will make people poorer.
I think all the work that they're doing in terms of attacking the government agencies will make people poorer.
Because when you get agencies that are supposed to protect us from corporate interests, they will externalize their costs, those corporations, instead of actually assuming themselves.
So their profits are made on the backs of all of us, whether it's our health, our protection from consumer rights, worker rights, his anti-union policies will make us poor.
So real quick, I'm going to touch on one of the things that you said.
Now, there is a lot to unpack there, but there's a lot of policies.
Yeah, we'll start at the very beginning.
All right.
So the standard Democrat argument, trust policies are going to make the richer richer and the word class poorer.
Talked about taxes.
Let's talk about in his first term, the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017.
There were a couple things in that specific policy that actually do benefit the middle class and the lower class more than the top 1%.
So you mentioned taxes, right?
But in that, from the IRS data that came out, the middle class and lower class got affected.
I think they ended up saving like 3% to 4% on their taxes on their tax cuts, whereas the billionaires only save 2%.
So if we're talking an actual dollar amount, sure, the billionaires save more, but they also make a lot of money.
Oh, you guys are making fun of this guy's fucking tie?
Y'all roasted him?
More, right?
Also, the billionaires don't really care about an extra grand or two.
In that specific policy, the child tax credit doubled from $1,000 per household to two.
No billionaire cares about an extra grand in their pocket, but I can guarantee you the working class does.
So how would you rebuttal that?
I would say in terms of the taxes themselves, well, the policies that Trump wants to pursue this time are to expand those taxes for wealthy folks.
And over time, what starts to happen is you have this wealth disparity.
And as the wealth disparity increases, it becomes harder for working people essentially to keep up.
Things become more expensive.
You get inflationary pressures when you have people with more money.
We have more and more billionaires than we did four years ago.
And a large part of that was obviously COVID.
But a large part of it is also money starts to accelerate.
Like you say, when a millionaire gets a tax cut for a couple of grand or $60,000 or $500,000 at the end of the day, they end up investing that and ends up growing because they're not out there working for their money.
Their money is just doing all the work.
Okay, so yeah, I mean, I think we can agree with you on that.
And that's where you guys want to be at, where your money works for you and your money actually increases your net worth without you having to do anything.
This is why real estate is so goddamn important, chat.
Okay?
Like, you can, and as a matter of fact, what ends up happening is you can actually, if you invest correctly, guys, you can make less money earned, but still increase your net worth over time if you buy the right asset classes.
And that's what the rich people do.
They invest in assets that pay them back dividends and increase their net worth so they don't have to make as much money working, so they don't have to work as much.
When it comes to billionaires and millionaires and there being a wealth gap in our country, right?
I don't think Republicans or liberals would disagree on that, but I think where we will fundamentally disagree is under Trump, right, the stats show that take-home pay was higher for the middle class and the lower class.
Inflation was down.
They weren't paying as much money.
Inflation was down, but wage growth was actually greater during the Biden administration.
Well, that's because due to COVID, when a lot of people lost jobs.
No, no, no.
I mean, I'm talking in percentage comparison between those four years and these past four years, wage growth grew, not as a baseline on 2020, but I'm talking as a baseline from 2016.
Interesting.
Okay, well, then another point that I want to talk on with you real quick is you talked about slashing government agencies.
For instance, the Department of Government Efficiency.
I'm sure you've heard about that a lot in the news.
That's not a government agency.
That's just something.
It is actually an executive order was signed to make Doge an official government agency as of less than a week ago.
So it is an official government agency.
Oh, they did.
Okay.
They did this right after Trump was sworn in.
Okay, interesting.
Okay.
So obviously we're talking about money.
We want people to be able to afford a house.
Doge is not a full government agency.
President Trump reorganized an existing group within the executive office of the president to form those, which has team members working with agency heads.
16.
Interesting.
Okay, well then another point that I want to talk on with you real quick is you talked about slashing government agencies.
For instance, the Department of Government Efficiency.
I'm sure you've heard about that a lot in the news.
That's not a government agency.
That's just a signed to make Doge an official government agency as of less than a week ago.
So yeah, it is an official government agency.
So obviously we're talking about money.
We want people.
Interesting.
So it's not a full bro.
What the fuck does full mean?
It is a government agency.
It'll be able to afford a house.
We want them to be able to afford to raise a family.
As a young man myself, I want to be able to grow up in America and be able to afford food one day, right?
I mean, I can't now, but continue that.
And that the way things are going, it's unsustainable for people on the left, people on the right, people in the middle.
So we have to come to a common ground on how to fix that.
What's unsustainable?
The fact that cost of living is increasing.
What does Doge do to inhibit cost of living?
Yeah, absolutely.
So what Doge is going to do, the Department of Government Efficiency, is slash a lot of the federal spending, right?
So what happens when the defendant?
The spending is going to get cut.
So I'm getting there.
One second, sir.
So what's going to happen is the Department of Government Efficiency is going to slash a lot of federal spending.
What happens is the government, Republicans and Democrats alike, spend a bunch of money that, excuse my language, but it's nonsense, right?
They spend it out here, they spend it out there.
Be more specific.
Here, there, are you talking about covering for expense?
Because they're not going to cut defense.
For example, $100 billion.
No, no, no, no.
Let me finish.
Let me finish.
$175 billion to Ukraine.
First and foremost, that was a bunch of nonsense.
So we're going to talk about that, but we also have a bunch of other things in the Defense Department, as well as a bunch of DEI departments.
Well, they're not touching.
First of all, there are no DEI departments.
That's completely false.
Listen, defense spending is not going to be touched by Doge.
And when you talk about the government, what's the biggest expenditure government has?
Our military and social security are top two.
And Medicare and Medicaid, right?
Now, they're not going to touch the military.
All right, the Pentagon is looking for $50 billion in budget cuts for next year, or roughly 8% of its budget.
The Defense Department is also cutting 5% to 8% of its workforce.
Are they going to cut Social Security?
You're asking me like I'm part of Doge.
No, no, no.
Well, you're telling me that Doge is going to help everybody here.
And I'm telling you, if they cut Social Security, everybody in here is going to get hit.
Because these folks are going to have to pay for their parents because Social Security keeps two-thirds of our elderly out of poverty.
So tell me what they're going to cut that's going to make it easier for Americans.
I already did.
What?
I told you the $175 billion that we've sent to Ukraine.
We're no longer going to be able to.
So he's going to be a good question.
Donald Trump has signed an executive order.
Thank you.
I don't know what bro's wearing, but okay.
Okay, so why did we see a higher increase in the top 1% paying as part of federal income revenue under TCJA?
Why did we see a higher increase in the...
So under TCJA, you know, it was past 2017, effective 2018.
2018 and onward, we actually saw the top 1% pay more.
They had more of the federal income tax burden.
They paid 45% as opposed to Obama.
During Obama's tax plan, they only paid about 40% to 42% of the increase.
So they got more money.
Right, okay, so they got more money.
They got richer.
But why are they paying?
Guys, also, we only got 1.9k likes, man.
Let's get this bitch up to 2.3, 2.4.
Come on, guys.
Why did they get richer so this goes on inflation?
That's my point.
Is the rich are getting richer?
Right, but you, yeah, you mentioned, and so you, why would you during the Obama administration's share of the federal income taxes paid by the top 1% range from 35 to 39 percent, 39.5 percent?
During the first term of the Trump administration, the share paid by the top 1 percent range from 39 to nearly 46 percent.
Source, IRS, the tax foundation.
Interesting.
So, the rich actually paid more under Trump, interestingly enough.
Okay, so they got more money.
They got richer.
But why are they paid about 40 to 40 federal income tax burden?
2018 and onward, we actually federal income revenue under TCJA.
Why did we see a higher increase in the so under TCJA?
You know, it was past 2017, effective 2018.
2018 and onward, we actually saw the top 1% pay more.
They had more of the federal income tax burden.
They paid 45% as opposed to Obama during Obama's tax plan.
They only paid about 40% to 42% of the tax.
So they got more money.
Right, okay, so they got more money.
They got richer.
But why are they paying?
And why did they get richer?
So this goes on inflation that I mean, that's my point.
Is the rich are getting richer?
Right, but you, yeah, you mentioned, so you, why would you say that they're getting richer?
But you mentioned inflation?
No, they're not.
Well, I mean, I think that they, in inflation, to the extent that there was money that wasn't a function of like logistics and other problems that we had during COVID, yeah, the rich got richer.
Not all inflation is a function of monetary inflation.
That's true, but when we look at COVID and we can see that they increased the money supply by 40%, they added $6 trillion, and you have a Federal Reserve System that's doing quantitative easing and pumping stimulus into the economy.
You can attribute that to TCGA, guys, is Tax Cuts and Jobs Act.
To left-wing policy, the entire Federal Reserve System is Keynesian economics.
Those are very left-wing of 2017.
The Federal Reserve ebbs and flows between monetarism and Keynesian economics.
Monetarians believe in controlling the supply of money that flows into the economy while allowing the rest of the market to fix itself.
Keynesian economists believe that a troubled economy continues in a downward spiral unless an intervention drives consumers to buy more goods and services source Investopedia.
No, no, no, they didn't have the same level of stimulus they needed.
No, they absolutely did.
They did.
You can look at Japan.
I hear this topic all the time from the Democrats.
They say, oh, inflation was global.
Not true.
China never went above 3% inflation during all of COVID.
And they were actually, they were under deflationary pressures.
Japan, which is part of the G7, was also never had deflationary pressures.
They never had inflation.
The only countries that I'm talking in Western Europe, you could see inflate.
Well, England, Germany, Italy, they didn't simulate as much as we did.
It wasn't monetary inflation.
If you look at the cost of goods and logistics, they had screwed up because of COVID.
So let's look at the reason.
All international trade, because we're the world reserve currency, is done in U.S. dollars.
Because we experienced it, domestic inflation was high.
So you're saying our inflation?
Absolutely.
That's not what it is.
Well, you can look at the facts.
International trade is we have dollar-denominated international trade.
All international trade is, that's why we're the world reserve currency.
You guys claim that the U.S. recovered faster than anybody else.
It's like, well, it did.
It's because we have a privilege of being the world reserve currency and we export our inflation.
Like the strength- Explain that.
Let me explain that.
The U.S. dollar is the most safe asset in the world.
In times of great crisis and great volatility, the COVID crisis, everybody turns to the dollar.
Many currencies are tied to the dollar.
So it's like when you...
The euro is not tied to the dollar.
The Euro is not, but international, international.
Okay, so the Euro actually crashed against the dollar during COVID.
The Euro used to be above.
I'm unclear what your point is.
My point is that the inflation is caused by left-wing policies.
So inflation was caused by supply shock and print pumping trillions of dollars a year.
Well, first of all, first of all, you understand that the Federal Reserve is not part of Biden didn't have control of the Federal Reserve.
Yeah, it's a private institution.
Not, but the entire Federal Reserve system is left-wing in economic theory.
That's the Keynesian economics.
It's interventionist economics.
So they say they're saying that the more you stimulate easing.
The more you staminate, why didn't we get it through QE?
We do get it.
Why didn't we get inflation during the Obama years?
We did get inflation.
We didn't get it.
The wealth gap that you guys contributed.
Wait, wait, wait.
We absolutely did.
What numbers of inflation did we get during the Obama years that were outside of like the 2%?
From 2008 to 2014, the Federal Reserve did quantitative easing, buying up treasuries to increase the money supply.
You know what, man?
I got a, you know who's really good at this shit, man?
George Gammon, man.
He's a whiz when it comes to this shit.
Sort of Fed target.
I don't think it was the highest COVID.
COVID hit us.
No, that's not even remotely.
When we look at the effects of compounding inflation.
QE1, 2, and 3 all happened during the Obama years.
If your theory was correct, we would have had rampant inflation.
In fact, Glenn Beck was talking about how we were going to turn into Weimar Germany.
And none of that happened.
None of it.
Here's the fact that we're going to be able to do it.
So if we look at what's happening at Western Europe, we didn't close the European Union.
The clear down in the economy.
The Biden administration closed down the economy.
I understand.
No, it wasn't.
Excuse me.
The Biden administration?
Yes, they forced mass mandates.
They supported Democrats.
Wait, wait, wait.
Do you not remember who was president in the first year of COVID?
Yeah, it was Trump.
I'm not saying Trump had a role in this, but I'm saying...
Wait a second.
By the time in 2021, the economy was opening back up.
Yes, the economy was not.
No, thanks to the Democrats.
The Democrats wanted to keep it closed.
You can talk about hypothetically what the Democrats want, but the economy closed down in 2020.
March of 2020.
Well, okay.
Donald Trump was president.
Pause.
You've been voted out by the majority.
Please retake your seat.
This guy's smart on economics.
Good.
How are you doing?
Sam.
Good to meet you.
Nice to meet you.
When you're talking about inflation.
In 2021, Janet Allen said it would be transitory.
Janet Yellen, by the way.
And then again in 2022, she said it would be transitory, and it turned out to not be transitory.
And then one major thing happened in 2022.
I think we all know what that was.
That was the war in Ukraine.
And I believe, and I can explain that the war in Ukraine was explicitly caused by Joe Biden's bad foreign policy.
And that shot inflation up from, like, there was already pretty bad inflation in early 2022 and late 2021, but it shot it up from the low kind of margins in like 3 or 4% all the way to 9% in 2022 of July at the peak.
Inflation is now down around 2%, around where, you know, the war in Ukraine increased global inflation because Russia and Ukraine are both major producer commodities like wheat, fertilizer, oil, and gas.
Bro, Nago, hold on.
How long have I been saying this?
I've been saying this for like almost two years now.
And everyone thinks I'm crazy when I say this shit.
I've said that the reason why you guys are experiencing inflation and higher food costs is because of the war in Ukraine.
I've been saying that forever.
And this fact check proves me right, man.
I'm fucking vindicated.
Clockholm!
Punch!
You can't have a conflict in a fucking area where they make a majority of the wheat in Europe and then expect food prices to stay the same.
It's not happening.
It's not happening.
Yeah, where they're looking to get it.
And we have really close to record unemployment that we've had over the past four years.
But how does this have to do with Trump's policies not making the richer richer and the rest of us poor?
Okay, so what I was just explaining with, I was going to get into oil prices.
So oil prices skyrocketed in 2022.
Hey, Dave De Niro, shut the fuck up, bro.
David Nero, whatever the fuck.
You just say you're going to get off and go goon, you bitch-ass nigga?
Dude says, stop pausing the fucking video.
Fuck you.
Go on your Xbox and go goon, you bitch-ass nigga.
Because in 2021, when Biden got into office, we are producing right now more oil in this country than we ever have in the history of any country everywhere.
Yeah, I know.
On top of the fact that Biden is credited by oil traders, and this isn't something that I'm terribly excited about.
What did he just put on the city?
Apparently, what Biden did during the past four years is he used the strategic oil reserve to drive down oil prices in our central country.
And it's filled back up.
He filled it back up.
And he broke.
He broke the negotiating power and the price-setting power by oil countries across the world.
I mean, oil traders hail him for doing this.
And frankly, I don't think it's that impressive.
But let's talk about what Trump's policy is.
We only have a little bit of time, but I was getting to that.
So oil prices, in 2021, Biden took all the sanctions off of the pipeline in Russia.
And then the pipeline in Russia ran straight through Ukraine originally.
And he knew that if he invaded Ukraine, Ukraine would destroy the pipeline and his economic success would be destroyed in Russia.
And then he, when the sanctions...
Putin knew that that would occur in Russia if the sanctions were taken off of that pipeline.
And Biden took all the sanctions off of Nord Cheng 2 in Russia, like the second week he was in office.
And then a year later, Putin invades Ukraine.
Sanctions happen all over the world, and inflation rises within six months, all the way up to 9%.
Trump is going to do great things with oil and let us drill and what that actually does for the Ukraine.
Like I said, we are producing more oil in this country than any country in the history of the world.
What executive order did Biden just sign to have to do with offshore drilling in the East Coast?
He stopped it.
Yeah.
Really dumb idea.
We're about to begin a new beyond even the record-breaking.
Are you aware of climate change?
And that lowers inflation.
We're going to sell this economy better.
We don't use the oil.
We sell it.
We sell it.
We're getting money in the pockets of citizens.
We sell it.
How is that oil getting to the pocket of American citizens?
Because when you lower the prices of oil, that lowers the prices of the bank.
No, I understand.
I understand that the inflationary price is a fact of energy.
But the fact of the matter is, they're just going to sell it.
We're not going to sell it.
You want to produce even more oil than we are now.
And you don't think climate change is going to impact.
You don't believe in climate change.
Well, that's a whole other discussion, but no.
No, I mean, this is sort of the same discussion.
Yeah, no, I believe that climate change is, well, there's obviously an element of climate change that is partially true, but lowering raising the man-made raising temperatures by one to two degrees Celsius in the next 150 years isn't necessarily a detriment to society.
You don't think so?
Human beings are very good at innovation, and we can build seawalls and we can create carbon columns.
What kind of seawall are you going to build for Miami?
What are you going to do about this raising it?
I'm talking about the economy right now, which if we get back on topic.
All right, guys.
Sorry, time's up.
I'll let you go.
No problem.
I choose Ben because he let me lecture him about Social Security.
My claim is that abortion is immoral and should not be legal.
Yeah, I disagree because largely because I think the primary rights that we have under society should belong to the person, and I don't believe a fetus is a person.
Okay.
Okay, so you, that's very interesting.
You don't believe the fetus is a person.
When do you think that it gains personhood, in your opinion?
Because you agree it's a human life, at least.
Yeah, I guess you could say that.
I mean, yes, I think that's, I mean, largely, I think that claim is largely like, it's not relevant to the way that I think about it.
I think about it in terms of personhood.
I mean, I think like, you know, life exists all around us.
Not human.
Like human life, but not like there's not human life in a tree.
Right, correct.
So it's human life.
It's human life.
But it's not a person?
It's not a person.
At which point does it gain personhood and gain the value of being a human?
Well, I think it becomes a person when it's born.
Why?
So five seconds prior, stop born yet.
Not person.
Five seconds after Exodus the Birth Canal, person.
Is there a magical quality to the birth canal?
What is that?
The person becomes separate from the host that has been growing inside.
Okay, so would you assign that to other human beings that are attached to things?
Like, for instance, if I'm attached to a machine, am I a machine now?
Am I part of that machine, or am I still a human life?
I just need support in order to stay alive.
If you've never been born and you're growing in, let's say, a test tube, for instance.
All right, guys, I adjusted the camera settings.
So.
Let me see if that's better.
I think I might be a little too bright there.
I might need to bring the ISO back down.
But they're having the abortion debate.
You already know this is going to be crazy.
Instance.
Then, yes, I would argue you're not a person yet.
Okay, so then, but it's not, so it's not really the disconnected part.
It's the being born part.
Well, being born means being disconnected from your mother.
Okay, so you're specifically aligning having the quality of being birthed as what makes someone a person.
A person within the context of our society and civilization.
So, just in our society, you wouldn't say that objectively that it's a person.
You would say that we just decide that it's a person because it's a birth.
Yeah, rights we give to persons.
Yeah.
Okay, so I guess that's an interesting kind of definition of what human life and specifically person is.
Well, no, I don't, like, I'm conceding that it's human life, but that as a you're not a person until you're born.
And you do not have the same rights that we would give.
Like, you know, look, we have rights about cruelty to animals, for instance, right?
But they're not persons within the context of the world.
But yeah, I'm not saying that they are, but specifically, it seems like you're just kind of saying, oh, it's a person when it's born, but you're not actually providing any consistent reason for that.
You're just saying it just is a person.
I'm saying that on some level, there's a certain amount of arbitrariness as to when we give rights.
Like, one could say, like, is it, do you say it's at conception?
Sure, yeah.
So, so, IVF, in other words, would have to be illegal under your under your principle because I mean, I'm not sure that I would agree with IVF in that case.
It really depends on the particulars in that case, but I believe.
What do you mean the particulars, man?
Well, so, for instance, at conception, you would still be a human life, but that doesn't necessarily mean that the fertilized egg attached to the wall is not.
Is it human life for you or what?
It's human life, yeah.
Okay, so human life should be protected.
Yes.
Okay, so IVF.
Yeah, I would say that.
So, IVF should be illegal under your rubric.
No, no, no.
So, so they're human lives, correct?
The IVF is when the egg and the sperm in that, and then they're supplanted.
Yes.
When is it human life?
As soon as it has unique human DNA.
That's a human life.
Okay.
It's a new human, correct?
Now, you know, in the IVF process, there's stuff that gets thrown out.
Yes, you would consider that.
Yeah, I'm not even, I'm not even defending IVF or going against it.
I'm specifically saying abortion.
That was my claim, right?
I'm not going to argue IVF.
But isn't that abortion under your?
I would say if you get rid of human life after conception, I don't think that's moral.
I'm not going to argue the IVF particulars because that's not what my claim was, right?
When we're talking about laws, right?
Because you want to outlaw abortion.
Yes.
Correct?
Okay.
When we're talking about laws, it's not just morality when we form public policy around and create laws.
Not just, but it should be moral, correct?
Well, I mean, I think like you're definitely.
All right, guys, what I'm doing here as I'm adjusting the stuff real fast.
I got this at TPC Films helped me out behind the scenes.
This is 160.
This is 160 ISO, TPC, right now.
160 ISO, 25 frames per second, 50 shutter speed.
Background looks a bit dark.
Okay, I'll bring it up to 200, and we'll get back to it.
Sorry, chat.
As you guys know, I'm really a stickler on the quality, trying to make shit better for you guys.
And the beauty is, once I set these camera, once I got the perfect settings on, I'll never touch it again.
I'll literally never touch it again.
So I'll move it up to 200.
Chad, let me know what you guys think.
Let me keep playing this for you guys, though.
Definition of what constitutes moral in mind.
Also, like the video, niggas.
Like the video, guys.
I'm going hard in the paint here.
You guys see all these extra camera angles I'm doing and shit?
I'm over here turning chairs and shit.
Like, come on, man.
Got this one right here.
This is like a sigma one.
This is like a close-up on the face or whatever.
This one I think has a really good cinematic look to it.
And then, and then obviously we got that one up there.
The above, the above one.
So, yeah.
Let me go ahead and go back here.
Go back to the film.
I'm going to do 200.
I'm going to do the 200 ISO.
Are different.
For instance, I would prefer in a perfect world not to have abortion on demand until you know, up until a birth, right?
Sure.
In a perfect world.
However, we know in practice that when you start to restrict things, like say, only in the threat of life to the woman, let's say, that's the only way we're going to allow abortions, right?
All right, now this is on 200 ISO.
TVC, tell me if this one is better.
And chat, what do you guys think?
Is this one better or the setting I just had it on?
This is 200 ISO.
The last one you guys saw a second ago was literally 160 ISO.
Let me know if this one is better.
I think this might be the magic number, 200 ISO.
Mario looks lighter-skilled with a camera, too.
Well, I'm not a dark ass nigga, bro.
I am a pretty, I'll say I'm like a regular skin.
And you know what the crazy part is, but guys, I'm actually lighter than this.
If you guys like, look at my actual skin color, like underneath this shit.
I've got like a bad farmer's tan right now, bro.
So this one I think is good.
TBC folks, tell me how this angle looks.
I think this one looks pretty cinematic, but if you want me to, if I should switch anything on this, let me know.
I think this is probably one of the crispiest camera shots I got.
But yeah.
200 is the best, guys.
Yeah, this is 200 right now.
Someone said Myron got the OnlyFans set up.
Bro, does it look like I got a fucking leather couch behind me, niggas?
What are y'all talking about, bro?
Myron Spielberg with the angles.
You know it.
All right, I'll keep it at 200.
ISO.
This is good.
Um...
Let's see here.
And then, guys at the Castle Club, let me know if you guys got anything you guys want me to look at after.
I'll stay on stream for like another 45 minutes or so.
Get off at like 11.
Fox just titled one of the video Red Pilled.
Oh, shit.
Interesting that Elon took the red pill.
When you start to have these exceptions, they're in practice.
They don't work.
Because when your life is in jeopardy and you come into a hospital, the doctor doesn't see a bulb that shows up above you and say, like, your life is in jeopardy.
It's always a subjective assessment.
And what is life in jeopardy?
Hold on.
What does life in jeopardy mean?
Does it mean a 30% chance of death?
Does it mean a 50%, a 70%, or a 20%?
That's why we now have women who are dying.
Because doctors are afraid to perform abortions on them.
That's true.
Are you referencing just because some doctors misread plain text doesn't mean that they're all assumed that life is less valuable?
No, it means that you are subjecting the woman to more risk and it's impossible.
These exceptions are all canards.
Gene, when you oppose a law, it is not just about morality.
It's about it's in practice.
I understand that.
You cannot do this without sacrificing women's lives because you have to have children, though.
Because let's go back to your born.
Unborn children.
So let's say you have a person.
You have a nine-month child.
The mother has more rights in my mind than the unborn child.
Yeah, that's a claim that you can make.
But so a nine-month birthed child, or just nine-month and just now born, it's a newborn baby.
A five-month could be emergency C-sectioning, could be birthed, right?
Let's say they don't do that.
What's the difference?
And guys, like the video.
We're at a 1.9k between the arbitrary choice of taking that child out of the womb at 60% of the time.
I don't take all children.
What I'm saying is that the personhood just because of birth runs into a problem where it starts to say, well, I'm really, I hate to do it, but I got to do it.
I'm sorry.
That's time.
All right.
Let me click this red pill video.
Senior Trump advisor Elon Musk has been paying the price for trying to help our nation.
The liberal media mocked him after SpaceX's latest rocket launch fail.
Watch.
It is the second consecutive Starship.
Okay, you know what?
me get this link in give me one second then because i got y'all Tim, after SpaceX's latest rocket launch fail.
Watch.
It is the second consecutive Starship test flight from Elon Musk's company to end with destruction.
All I could think about was, oh, I can't say that.
His response to all of this was: rockets are hard.
And Mr. Musk, if they're so hard, why don't you go back to your day job?
Moreover, anti-Musk protesters are targeting Tesla dealerships and staging boycotts.
And now his stock is taking a hit.
MSN.
Yeah, he's been losing a lot of money, man.
A lot of money.
Let me look at some of these chats here.
All right, we got.
Hey, Myron, I sent in a donor earlier under EddieQuest.
My YouTube IG name is from Myron Gains Dona.
I could definitely DM you on Twitter to get you set up the way you want.
I think I'm good now, bro.
You sent that.
I think I'm good now.
I think 200 ISO is the magic number.
I think it's pretty good right now, but I appreciate it and appreciate TPC Films.
Appreciate these streams, Myron.
Thank you.
I got you, bro.
Just don't change the lighting.
Every time the lighting changes, you'll need to adjust the ISO.
Shutter speed, F-stop.
Yeah, right now, guys, I got a F4, 200 ISO.
It's F4 stop, 200 ISO, 150 shutter speed.
That's what I'm running right now on this camera as we speak.
And this is a Sony FX3 with a 12 millimeter to 24 millimeter lens.
Myron, you always play rock.
Don't forget about your roots.
EDM Trans Forever, Myron.
You know it, dude.
Jeff from Dallas.
The crazy how weirdo liberals will cry about Doge, but turn a blind eye to Bill Clinton, cutting nearly half a million jobs.
Yep.
I don't mean to be super visual, but all these maggas look like a bunch of.
Oh, man.
Okay, nigga.
What, bro?
You niggas trying to get me banned, bro.
All right.
Speaking of four, it's been four days, Myron.
Four days.
Are you still hiding from us, Myron?
The Karen Reed case?
Okay.
Is BTC and Ethereum going to be the new 401k?
Probably.
Yo, Myron, could you ever cover the Alex Murdoch double case of South Carolina?
It's the case with Netflix documentary.
I covered it already, bro.
I'm almost certain I already covered it.
Let me look here.
i think i did yeah i did Right here, bro.
Him.
Three-hour long video, too.
Fed explains Murdoch-Murder case step-by-step with timestamps.
Morse organized breakdown.
Got you, bro.
Yo, guys, I do this, man.
Here you go.
Here's a video, bro.
There you go.
Dropped it in all the chats if you guys want.
cab boots so there you go
All right, let's just from Thomas Telson.
Shout out to you, bro.
100 bucks.
I appreciate that greatly.
Next time, do Marin Gaines ex Ninja.
Thomas Till says, Europa, I've been waiting for a while.
I stopped watching halfway through because I value your commentary during the stream and want to save the last of it with your commentary, diss donations for the full Europa doc.
Appreciate what you do, man.
I know it's a big ass because it's a long documentary, but I appreciate it.
Heavy show others do W Political Streams, WSS.
Yeah, bro, I know.
I know.
I know, man.
It's just that I've been so busy.
I'm giving you guys all these streams, bro, going live every day.
Because, guys, I'm like streaming like easily low on six to 12 hours a day, easily.
Because remember, that doesn't include the prep and everything else that goes into it.
But don't worry, you guys will get it.
I promise y'all, because it covers actually the best part of it.
And I'm actually writing a mega thread on this shit right now on Twitter on that event that went down in World War II, if you know what I'm saying.
So, yeah.
Let's go back to this Doge thing, though.
NBC's Joe Scarborough took a swipe at that.
Watch.
I mean, Tesla has been overvalued, analysts believe for years.
It's sort of a meme stock.
People are investing in sort of the genius of Elon Musk.
That's obviously been shattered over the past couple months.
Yeah, speaking of overvalued.
Now, Musk told Fox Business's Larry Kudlow that he's just looking out for America.
Yeah, I mean, really, I just don't want America to go bankrupt.
So it's a call to action.
You're hearing a call to action.
Yeah.
You're giving up your other stuff?
I mean, how are you running your other businesses?
With great difficulty.
Yeah, I mean...
But there's no turning back, you're saying?
I'm just here trying to make government more efficient, eliminate waste and fraud.
And President Trump is coming to his defense, posting this, quote, "I'm going to buy a brand new Tesla tomorrow morning as a show of confidence and support for Elon Musk, a truly great American.
Why should he be punished for putting his tremendous-?" Yeah, a lot of liberals are going crazy.
Look, you guys know I've had my criticisms of Elon Musk for being a pro-mass immigration H-1B fucking grifter.
But it's absolutely wild that these liberals are going crazy attacking Tesla's this shit because they don't like him.
Rumble sometimes be lagging, but YouTube rarely lags, but it's easier to donate on Rumble.
Yeah, thank you, King Richard.
I appreciate that.
Mario Gains X, bro, that's the best way.
I know we need YouTube to bring over the normies, but they are so.
Yeah, I know, bro.
I know it's annoying, dude.
But again, guys, that's why it's so important that we, you know, you guys got to like the video and engage with the content on YouTube, bro.
Helps a lot.
It really does.
And this skills to work.
Play, play, play, play-by-play for real says, hey, Mario, I turned 18 Lands Winston.
I'll be graduating this year.
I currently have 10K saved.
And while I recognize not a substantial amount, I'm going to learn how to make money work for me.
Got any tips?
First time donating.
Appreciate that, bro.
Save that money and make more.
Okay?
And then put it into an asset class.
I mean, you're young, you're 18.
You probably can't get real estate yet.
And you're not going to have enough anyway with 10K.
But maybe get some cryptocurrency, bro, just to start out.
Dollar cost average end, don't go too crazy.
But make sure you have three to six months of emergency funds as well.
I don't know if you live with your parents, but in order to help make America great again.
And that's the question right there, Paul.
Why should he be punished for it?
Why shouldn't everyone be grateful?
Boy, the left couldn't wait for this talking point, right?
I think Joe Scarborough has a little rocket envy.
So think about what's really going on here.
Let's go back 10 years ago or so, right?
You remember when Elon Musk was the person who was going to lead us into a carbon less future?
Do you remember when the Barack Obama administration lent them almost $500 million, which, by the way, Elon Musk paid back?
Yeah, any of you guys that got banned on CC, don't worry.
We're going to fix that shit tomorrow.
Just give me a reminder.
I'm going to tell them.
I don't even know what the fuck that happened.
You guys should never be getting banned on CC.
Early or Rumble.
We have Teslas thanks to the Obama administration, folks.
These are all Barackmobiles that are flying around right now.
All right.
And all of you have conveniently forgotten that.
And the reason is because he's showing up to be a cop.
He's showing up to say, okay, look, we can't keep printing money this way.
I'm a businessman.
You know, TPC Films, I sent you a DM.
The way I am somebody who paid the government back.
I know how this works.
And nobody likes sometimes when the cops show up and say, no, you can't do that.
But that's really what's happening.
He's coming in to be the adult in the room.
We can't keep running the printing presses.
And that's just the bottom line.
And Ainsley, I'm still shocked, frankly, by that point of view being espoused on these television stations, cheering for failure, cheering for potential loss of life or harm to others, cheering Molotov cocktails to car dealerships, and the failure of a genius that is emboldened by trial and error so that his accomplishments can benefit all Americans.
Yeah, I mean, he wants to go and rescue those astronauts.
If that is successful, can you imagine?
They'll still hate him.
He wants to reduce waste and fraud.
He wants to save American tax dollars, but they still hate him.
He's helping the blind to see, he says, and they still hate him.
And then he's making people that have spinal cord injuries walk again, and they hate him.
It's evil.
It's mean.
Laughing because the rocket blew up.
I mean, why?
I hope that we would never do that, even if we disagree with his politics.
They only hate him because they hate Trump.
And that's the only reason.
But now he has assassination attempts.
He has dealerships vandalized, charging stations set on fire.
Where's the common sense people?
He's saving hundreds of billions of dollars in taxpayer money.
It's indefensible.
Yeah, you know, the fact that our politics has become tribal, I mean, that's what you're describing.
They don't want this to be able to come back, do they?
They want him to fail.
Well, they want the country to fail.
Yeah.
Because they aren't in control.
And the country was failing when they were in control.
So they had both at one point.
So you can only imagine how much they wanted to fail and they're out of power.
You know, I do think it's worth mentioning as we are now on the precipice of maybe Democrats willing to fall on a sword and say, you know what?
Let's just shut it all down.
Let's not give them any more power.
Can't believe they're willing at this point to let us fail in that way and not pass a continuing resolution for the budget and get us to the point where we can increase taxes by not letting them sunset.
All of that is coming down the pike by Friday, potentially, as they stand in the way.
And why do I bring this up now?
Because that would be the epic failure that they could take credit for and say we stood in the way of Republicans.
They don't care about real Americans because if they did, they would have heard the calls about Bidenomics not working from the people who said we don't want to talk about this woke stuff anymore.
They are on their own train.
And I predict they'll run out of tracks unless they figure out what to do.
Which is sort of my question to you, Kaylee.
And it's one of perspective.
You've worked so closely with this administration the first year and you have such good insight into it.
My question is: for the mob mentality, is it simply that once they get a new beast, they'll leave Elon alone?
Or at what point, to Ainslie's point, will he do so much good that they will indeed release this hatred for him?
What will change?
They'll never leave Elon Musk alone.
I had been in the administration about two months, and I remember distinctly the day when Elon Musk sent a tweet in May of 2020, and it was a tweet about being red-pilled.
And I remembered at some point.
Oh, shit.
I remember when you tweeted that, too.
And the administration flagging for President Trump.
This Elon Musk guy says he's being red-pilled.
I mean, that's really interesting.
You know, he's the richest man in the world, or he was close to it at the time.
And the red pill tweet, you know, I thought was an indication I might be moving to the Republican Party.
I think it was a reference to the Matrix.
Of course, she's going to give that normie take.
The red pill means you're taking the pill of truth.
The blue pill means you're living in ignorance.
Elon Musk chose to take the red pill.
And that means with everything to include females.
And live in truth.
And what that meant is exactly what he's doing.
Realizing we are a bankrupt country with 37 trillion, we're leaving our kids the height of irresponsibility.
And what is he doing?
He said in the cabinet meeting, I'm not trying.
Yo, Amara, not sure if you'd be okay with this, as I know you're not all about donos, but you could do a segment during stream where you give people 10 minutes to debate you on stream if they disagree.
You could charge $100 or so and get some extra content.
I don't think Knickers would pay $100 to debate me, bro.
I mean, if they really want to, but I don't think they would.
Trying to be capricious here or arbitrary.
Because the thing is, is that most people that disagree with me and don't want it and want to debate are like haters, and haters are broke nine out of ten times.
Brary, I am trying to do what's best for this country.
And I think Trump deeply resonates with him.
Trump said he's putting it all on the line.
Trump said this is something that's really not good for him.
President Trump chose to do something for our country.
He could be on a yacht somewhere floating around with Melania.
He put it all on the line as a billionaire.
Elon Musk put it all on the line.
And it's not self-serving.
They're doing it for the good of the country.
So let's give them a break here as they try to save the future so that Nash, Blake, Hayden, all of our kids don't have to pay for our irresponsible credit card.
That's right.
And you know what you call that?
That's being in the arena.
All of these people in the stands are simply watching.
All right.
What else do you got here?
I'm going through the Castle Club thing.
Marco Rubio's status?
Let's see here.
What do you got to say?
Damn, they're canceling 83% of the programs at USAID.
Damn.
So Marco Rubio says, Bro.
Alright, hold on.
Alright, after six weeks of review, officially canceled 83% of the programs at USAID.
The 5,200 contracts that are now canceled spent tens of billions of dollars in ways that did not serve and in some cases even harm the core national interests of the United States in consultation with Congress.
We intend for the remaining 18% of programs, we are keeping approximately 1,000 now to be administered more effectively under the State Department.
Holy shit, bro.
Well, that's what happens with the ridiculous government spending, man.
That's what happens.
Actually, I should follow him so I can get this updates.
Let's see what else is going on.
Chair, anything else you guys want me to cover?
I'm going to start wrapping up here pretty soon.
Somebody said Marco Jubio.
That's funny, bro.
That's funny.
All right, let's see here.
What else do we got here?
Hmm.
Let's look at this from Donut Operator.
Donut here.
Have I told you recently how much I love the criminal justice system?
Why would you say that?
Because today we're going to talk about a man who, despite multiple arrests, Jebra Hogan says, Icy banned them last night because those posting videos of her stripping days and she didn't like that.
Yeah, but she can't ban him for that, bro.
How the hell did y'all niggas even have videos of that?
What the fuck, bro?
Casco guys are fucking crazy, bro.
She banned him last night because...
Alright, I'll talk to her.
A violent criminal history and a protective order under his belt was out on Bell.
And what did he do with his newfound freedom?
Well, he decided to try and kill an entire police department.
He injured seven officers in an all-out gunfight before becoming a barricaded suspect inside of an apartment complex.
You know, just normal stuff.
We're going to break this crazy shootout down that actually happened in my hometown of San Antonio and a couple of other incidents.
After a word from our sponsor, our sponsor for this video is which is probably the most Los Angeles story I've ever heard in my life.
Who's homeless and sick?
January 11th, 2025, 11:15 a.m.
This all starts at a residential treatment facility near USC.
A staff member calls 911 after being stabbed in the face by one of the patients.
Quick story: When I was in the Navy, we couldn't go to Chicago on the train because one of our sailors got stabbed in the face by a homeless person.
Huh?
Kind of a reoccurring theme.
Anyways, here's our first clip.
Someone's trying to kill people here.
You already stabbed me.
What the fuck?
He's uh, he's going, he's just killed, trying to kill people.
Uh, police, uh, emergency.
Does anybody need a paramedic?
Uh, I might need going, he's just killed, trying to kill people.
Uh, police, uh, emergency.
Does anybody need a paramedic?
Wow.
I might need one.
I don't know how bad I'm stabbed.
Okay.
I don't know how people stay on the line.
Now, if you're an officer responding to this, you're probably already thinking, suspect has a knife, suspect's already stabbed someone.
And this is probably going to end with Donut doing a video about you on his YouTube channel.
Officers show up, talk to witnesses, and then they start calling for the suspect to come outside.
They don't want to rush in there.
Dude's got a knife and he's already stabbed someone.
Try and get him outside first in the open where you can shoot him.
Joking.
kind of but this is where things go off the rails drop it drop it drop it i think that's a beanbag shotgun And almost right after officers arrive on scene, the suspect comes out with a knife.
immediately chases an officer with a knife and immediately gets flattened.
Now that's not a lethal round.
That's some of our 40 Mike Mike rubber ouncey rounds.
They're meant to knock someone down or convince them to stop advancing.
Trust me, they hurt.
For a second, it actually works.
The dude eats pavement, but he gets back up, still holding the knife.
Hey, hey, hey!
Drop it, man!
Drop it now!
Drop it!
Drop it now!
Drop it!
And he just keeps coming.
I can't stop coming!
I'm sorry!
Dude has eaten a buffet of beanbag rounds to the gut and he just keeps advancing.
Yeah, man, they're fucking his ass up with those beanbags.
He pops back, but they're trying to fucking, you know, do this in a non-lethal way.
It comes to this shit all the time, bro.
The only thing that comes is just trying to kill niggas, bro.
That's not true.
Hold on, chat.
Hold on, chat.
Thank you.
god damn it up like jason voorhees if he just snorted a bag of peruvian snow Yeah, this dude is on drugs, bro.
The suspect is just ignoring all the final warnings and continues to go at officers.
This time, the LAPD fires real rounds, the ones that make you go to sleep and you don't wake up.
Well, he finally drops.
Officers move in, get the knife, and start rendering emergency aid.
Too late, though, he's pronounced dead at the hospital.
Staff member who almost got his face cut off, he was treated at the hospital and then released.
And here's the knife.
That is not a little guy.
It's a six-inch folding knife that was recovered at the scene.
Of course, the LAPD is reviewing the incident.
It's pretty cut and dry, in my opinion.
Don't try to call.
Yeah, it's a clean shoot all day.
100% clean shoot.
Carve someone's face off and then charge at LAPD with said knife.
The next incident that we're going to take a look at is so wild that if I tried explaining it, it's going to sound like I'm making this shit up.
Well, let's give it a shot.
Dude crashes into a cop car, pulls a knife on a Jamaican officer, dives into another cop car, and then for good measure, starts stabbing himself.
Yeah, what the fuck?
I told you it's crazy.
This all kicks off at around 6.10 p.m. in Northwest DC.
Ooh, to thunk it, another shit hole.
A dude in a white sedan is swerving into oncoming traffic when he suddenly slams into a police car.
I feel like the cops are going to have to talk to him at this point.
All right, let me move this shit out the way Only my lane.
Look at that.
Crashing into a police car is already a terrible life decision.
But what does he do next?
He bells out of his car and immediately pulls out a knife like it's London.
After he hit the police cruiser, he ran up to the officer's window, tried to reach in, and demanded the officer's service weapon.
Hey, hey!
What the fuck?
Hey, hey!
Give me a gun, man.
Bro, say give me the gun.
What the fuck?
Back up!
I don't want to shoot you!
Hey!
Give me a fucking gun!
All right, this might be the dumbest knife attack that I've seen.
Oh, man, this dude's a dumbass.
In a hot minute.
I mean, bringing a knife to a gunfight is already a pretty fucking poor decision.
But starting a knife fight with a cop who's sitting in a patrol car staring right at you, it's so dumb it's confusing.
Needless to say, the suspect ignores all commands, and that's when this happens.
Hey!
Give me a fing gun!
Say how to show you!
Oh, shit.
You heard that nigga scream, bro?
What the hell?
Man's, and that's when this happens.
Hey!
Give me a fing gun!
Say that to show you!
Oh, cooked!
Fuck her out and find out, man.
That's the definition of fucking route and find out, man.
By the way, if you want to see all of this uncensored, go to pepperbox.tv.
Back to the story.
So this guy's been shot.
But instead of stopping, he picks up the knife and starts advancing towards the officer again.
What has it been with this video in my past couple?
There's just a bunch of Terminators running around.
But it's like the AI from the future didn't quite nail down the lethal part.
It programmed the robots to smoke a bunch of crack and then try and stab a person with a gun.
Officer involved shooting.
Send the board and send out his unit.
I'm done.
STAY WHERE YOU ARE!
So this dude is actively leaking everywhere and still trying to end the officer, which is already wild.
Backup rolls up, and you think this would be the cue to, hey, maybe I should drop the knife and give up.
I just got shot.
Nope.
Instead, the suspect comes up with a brilliant new plan.
Suspect got a knife.
He's walking me down.
Bro, this dude's idiot.
Hey, Furman, he's stabbing himself with a knife.
He's got to be on drugs, bro.
Okay, he's stabbing himself with a knife.
Copy.
It's 1814.
I didn't say it was a good plan.
Dude gets a second win, and then in front of everyone, jumps into the other police cruiser.
Oh, shit.
Grab him.
Right there.
You got a shit?
He got a knife.
He got a knife.
Watch yourself.
Get out the car.
Get out the car.
Sir, get off the court.
35 once I've got Jarja.
I have no idea what the game plan might have been for him here.
Holding a knife, bleeding everywhere, and trying to steal a fully marked police car while staring down the barrels of several police officers.
It's a plan about a solid Taco Bell.
I feel like it shouldn't have never gotten to this point in the first place.
Longer the dude stays in control of the situation, the more that someone or the officers can get hurt.
What does the suspect do next?
He hops out and just starts running, which puts even more people's lives at risk.
Now it's not just a suspect problem, it's an innocent people trying not to die problem.
Get a 40!
Get on the ground!
Yeah!
Doesn't that?
Yes!
Yeah!
F***ed.
Poor innocent bystander getting shaked almost happens.
He runs up to a woman's car that's trying to pull out of a laundromat parking lot, swings the door open, still gripping the knife, and tries to rip her out of the car.
Thank God at that point, the officers open fire on the suspect.
Dude drops but doesn't get back up this time.
This is why the suspect should have been put down a little bit sooner.
That is definitely lethal force territory.
Not even counting the other.
Luckily, no officers or civilians were hurt during this rampage.
And now for the final video.
January 22nd, 2025, San Antonio, Texas, just before 8 p.m., San Antonio PD gets a brutal 911 call.
First call comes from a guy who's saying he's going to shoot himself and any cops who try to stop him.
We call that Harry.
I'm over here at Farmer Stone Oak.
I better be careful.
I have high-power rifles and everything.
If they come at me, I'm coming at them.
Not a minute later, his mother calls 911 and says he is outside, he is armed, and he is already firing shots.
I need the police.
Bruh.
He's outside.
He's shooting.
This wasn't just some dude having a bad night.
He had a stack of violent arrests, domestic abuses, and had already violated a protective order a couple days before this went down.
So yeah, this is not really a tax-paying, upstanding citizen.
When police showed up, they knew that this wasn't going to be a simple welfare check.
This is that building.
We've got the building and question.
It's going to go directly to your left.
We need to get her out of it.
Directly ahead into the left.
I'll go with you.
I'll go with you.
Okay.
That's when this happens.
I'm hit.
Officers roll up to the apartment complex on Stalnoke Parkway, and before they could even get a plan together, shots are being fired.
One officer barely gets his foot out of the car when he is shot in the leg.
Another one gets hit while trying to lay down cover fire.
More officers roll up to help, and guess what?
the suspect starts lighting them up too.
By the time it's over, 7 officers are either struck by gunfire or hit by shrapnel.
This wasn't some random spray-in prey.
This guy was hunting cops, picking his shots, and trying to take them all out.
I think we might have more officers hit.
They took rounds and there were shots fired again.
Soon as you come in, it's gonna be towards living 10.
He's sitting outside the window.
We got two officers shot.
We need an armor in front of that window.
And mind you, this dude, of course, was out on bail.
We're talking about a guy who beat up three elderly people, dragged a woman by her hair, and crashed his car while blacked out.
So yeah, maybe he shouldn't have been out walking around free all willy-nilly.
After the first shootout, he's still not done.
He barricades himself inside of an apartment, gearing up for round two.
Swat rolls in and sends out a drone to kind of get a feel for the situation, and he immediately shoots the drone down.
They say, all right, fine, we'll send in the police robot.
Well, he shoots that out too.
At this point, SWAT is done playing around.
They gassed the apartment, breached the door, and engaged one last time.
Wow.
Unleashed.
Fucking unleashed on him, man.
When the dust settles, officers find him dead inside of the apartment, probably the officers doing, and he still had the firearms beside him that he had used for the ambush.
He got hit multiple times, and at first, there was a talk that he might have taken himself out, but the medical examiner shut that down.
This was not self-inflicted.
Swat was the ones who ended it.
Good job, boys.
How did we get here though?
Five days before, he was locked up for assaulting several family members and then driving drunk.
He had a history of violent criminal arrests, including beating people up and a couple of domestic violences.
Like a lot of them.
Despite all that, he was back on the streets trying to turn North San Antonio into a war zone.
Luckily, all of the officers who were wounded made it out alive.
They were treated, some of them released later than sooner from the hospital.
And like I said, no lives were lost.
Well, no important lives were lost.
That's all I have for you, fine people today.
Please go to pepperbox.tv.
Support the channel by going to donutoperator.com.
All right.
So, and guys, if you want to rock with me, of course, you know, you know what to do.
CastleClub.tv, guys, is the best place to support, man.
That is how you support the mission.
Keep us going despite the fact that we are demonetized.
Let me go ahead and do.com.
Let's go to police activity.
See what new videos are out.
The four-year-old call to the police after his mom made ice cream, bro.
You serious?
All right, let me make this big.
Enemy 10301 Beach Boulevard.
And it looks like he just jumped the curb and he's gonna be driving up on the.
You already know that this is gonna be crazy.
It opens up and the dude's already driving on the fucking sidewalk.
Here we go.
You already know this shit's gonna be crazy.
Holy.
Guys, do me a favor.
Like the video on YouTube.
We're at 2.1k likes, but I know not all of you guys have engaged with the video.
So like the video, ninjas.
Guys, what I might start doing to really grow this channel, I'll tell you guys what the plan is.
And I think it'll work.
If I take like the last 20 minutes and move all the Rumble guys over to YouTube and watch and we do the stream on YouTube, finish it off there, maybe for like the last 10 or 20 minutes, that will dramatically increase the views and the channel will grow significantly.
I think I might start doing that.
Maybe not tonight, but that's something I might do in the future, chat.
If we really, really want to grow the channel, that's what we'll have to do.
Again, grow the channel, bring people over to Rumble and Castle Club.
That's how we got to do it.
Chat.
I don't know if we're on the front page, Rumble, right now, guys.
I don't think we are.
You got to scroll all the way down to podcasts, not under picks.
Yep, no, I'm not on the front page.
I see Bongino Report, Glenn Greenwald, Kim Iverson, and Tim Cass IRL for picks.
Yeah, Cow's Club's a subscription.
Yeah, but why would you want to grow your YouTube, not rumble?
Well, here's the thing.
You grow the YouTube to bring them over to Rumble.
Guys, let me explain this to y'all.
So YouTube is a search engine and growth app.
Rumble is a viewing app.
So in other words, when you're on YouTube, you're more likely to browse for content.
When you're on Rumble, you're going there for a specific reason, right?
Like I'll go to Rumble to watch people that I can't watch on YouTube, right?
Or a lot of people do it that way.
Me, I'd just be on Rumble because I like Rumble.
But for the average user, they're going to go to Rumble to look for somebody specific versus people tend to browse on YouTube.
So in order for us to get more recommended, we need more views.
You get more views, you get more recommended, and then you see the fucking snowball effect.
But since I'm here, right, what I'm doing is I'm like basically splitting my audience, which is fine.
I don't mind it.
I've been doing it for almost two years now at this point.
But if you really want to grow, what you got to do is you got to bring as many people over to one place, watch you, especially like for YouTube growth, and then you migrate those people over.
No need to buy people.
Nobody's buying anybody, bro.
What are you talking about?
Someone said Dr. Spec shows more love to Rumble than you now.
Are you stupid, nigga?
Are you stupid?
This would only be for Myron Gains X, just for this channel.
Remember, guys, Fresh of Fit is under the Rumble banner.
But again, I like Rumble way better.
You guys know I hate YouTube.
I fucking hate YouTube.
YouTube is just a tool for growth.
You got to use it for the property marketing.
Yeah, see, Matt Meta's here says you are shadow banned.
I know.
I'm shadow banned because we got to break through the algo.
That's what I'm trying to say.
That's how you break out of the breakout of the algo, bro.
Rumble is way better than YouTube, bro.
Way better.
But again, YouTube is a search engine.
Rumble is a video sharing platform.
So that's what it is.
I agree with y'all.
Rumble is better.
But YouTube is more commonly known to the masses.
Yeah, no, Rumble is not controlled by the enemy, bro.
Chris Pavlovsky is not the enemy, bro.
He's not one of them boys, chat.
He's definitely not.
And I'm almost certain Dave Rubin sold his share.
So he's not even a part of it anymore.
So yeah, that's what it would be, chat.
That's what it would be.
If I did it, I'm thinking about it.
I'm thinking about it.
But like I said, I would do it only periodically.
I wouldn't do it all the time because I really hate YouTube.
I'll do it just so that we grow the YouTube, increase the views on YouTube, then we get recommended more.
Because guys, this channel is shadow banned.
Bad.
This channel is fucking shadow banned.
Someone said you promoted Twitch.
It got banned.
Yeah, Twitch is pussy, bro.
it was experiment yeah someone said someone said youtube's shadow band and channel they They definitely are, bro.
They definitely are.
That's why I'm saying that's why I'm saying I'll have to do, I'll probably have to do it where we do a couple of streams where we shift.
And I'm going to do it periodically.
One day I might shift everybody over to YouTube.
Another day I'll shift everybody over to Rumble and we'll just do it that way.
But yeah, we're going to have to have a couple of videos like really pick up in views for us to break the shadow ban.
Because guys, when you're shadow banned, there's only one way to really fucking defeat it.
You got to have an explosion of views and get one video to go viral.
Once you get that one video go viral, that will be recommended all the time.
And then other videos will go viral.
You need to go viral one time, guys.
And then bam, everything else is going to go viral behind it.
So that's the path, my friends.
Maybe not today.
Definitely not today.
Because I don't want to fucking drag y'all today to do that shit.
But it's just something I'm thinking about.
Just something I'm thinking about.
Because that's how we're going to break through the shadow ban.
Because, guys, do I like, I mean, give me ones.
If I'm if you guys, if it's hard for you to find me on YouTube, give me once if it's hard to find me.
This channel, Myron Gaines X, give me ones if it's hard to find the channel.
Or find if I'm live.
Because I'm pretty confident that it's hard for you guys to find me or for new people to find me.
Give me one if it's hard to find.
Amen.
Yeah, see?
Yeah.
So look, look, the Rumble guys even say it's one.
Yeah, so see it's hard for you all the time to find it, to find me.
Yeah, if you're subbed and your notifications are turned on, then yeah, you'll know.
But But I definitely think I'm pretty shadow banned on YouTube.
Yeah, Fresh has his own channel.
It's called A Fresh Start.
Driving on up here, southbound.
Like, look, I'll give you an example.
Like, let me, if I type in Myron Gaines, right?
We'll go to YouTube, right?
I type in Myron Gaines.
It doesn't even show that I'm live.
Look.
See that?
It doesn't even show that I'm live right now.
So you got to come.
You got to click on my video.
And then when you come here, you see that it's live.
But yeah, bro, like, I would consider this fairly blackballed.
You know what I mean?
So that's kind of what it is.
Definitely blackballed to a degree.
Oh, yeah.
I did an interview with Jake Shows.
Did he drop the interview?
Let me see.
He didn't drop it yet.
I did one with Sean Kelly as well.
see if he dropped his interview now you didn't drop yet That was going to do good for him with the Tate one.
Oh, yeah.
I actually want to talk to you guys also about fucking COVID, man.
That might have to be a Rumble exclusive, though.
Someone said I still have to type in FedRex against your channel.
I know, bro, it's fucked.
Yep, he's driving himself down on the pier at slow speeds.
He's got a few pedestrians.
This is a still driving on this club here.
All right, now you guys get the full screen.
I got myself out the way.
There we go.
Oh.
Shit.
Uh-oh, you stopped the camera up here.
Oh, shit.
Here we go.
Oh, he got cooked.
Oh, man.
Wow.
Shot fired, suspects down.
Shots fired, suspects down.
Oh, he had a gun in his hand.
He has a 417 in his right hand.
Wow.
417 in his right hand, suspects down, Trump's fired.
Bro, he could barely get out the car.
Cool.
Cool.
Bro.
So he gets there.
Gets out.
They didn't even waste time, bro.
They didn't even waste time.
He got cooked.
He got fucking cooked, man.
Wow.
Incredible.
Somebody in the chest said he need milk.
Bro.
All right.
Philosopher now says, mainly Muslim countries are attacked and destabilized by what?
Religion-dominated countries.
I tell you, it's the one about to be D-ranked from the number one most practiced religion in the world being manipulated by money.
Let me see here if we got any other chats.
We got here.
Myra, what are your thoughts on the insanity workout program?
Lame.
Here, man, I think messages got skipped over a few days.
If not, my apologies.
What are the three or four stocks you invest for Roth IRA?
Thank you.
My index fund, if you know what I'm saying, it's SP 500 total stock market.
I saw a truth teller post today that Trump converted to.
Oh, shit.
And received the Herzl award.
We are cooked.
God damn.
Hey, Castle Club, get in Discord.
Oh, this is Josie.
And post a link to your X account in general chat and tag me.
Making a list for fear over here.
Yeah, I appreciate that, Josie.
Yeah, yeah, yeah.
Guys, get in the Castle Club in the Discord and put a link to your X account so I know if I see you guys on Twitter space, give you guys a mic.
I appreciate these streams, Marin.
I'll super chat in tomorrow and remind you of my band in CC.
Thank you, meekly.
Hey, brother, I sent a before and after picture on X and always wanted to say thank you for choosing the debrief as your new podcast names.
It feels like an honor that you went with the name I chose.
Thank you for that.
Appreciate that, CBC Films.
It's truly a blessing to help you and the cause for all that to give you to give us CC members is nothing in comparison.
I appreciate all you and Fresh do.
Thank you so much, CBC Films.
And thank you for helping me out.
Oh shit.
That's, I gotta look at, look at that.
I guess that's a blurry thing.
Let me fix this real quick.
This camera angle.
God damn it.
Hold on.
All right.
There we go.
So, guys, what do you think about this camera angle?
I think I net.
Yeah, TBC Films.
I know you told me that I need to adjust the F or something like that.
Go from 1.8 to 2.5 or some shit.
Because right now it's at 1.8.
F is 1.8.
Yeah, bring your F.18 to F.25.
I guess I'll do that.
But in general, this is a pretty good camera.
I mean, a good thing because you guys can see me right here.
And then, you know, everything else in the background is kind of blurry, which has a nice little crispy film shot.
So, yeah, I will go ahead and fix that.
But, yeah, I got to fix the lighting here.
TPC was helping me with that.
But anyway, guys, I think that's going to do it for me, man.
For tonight, Rumble sometimes be lagging, but YouTube rarely lags.
I get what you're saying.
I know we need to bring YouTube to bring over Normans, but they are so.
Yeah, I know, bro.
I know.
I know.
Trust me, bro.
You guys think I like fucking YouTube?
I fucking hate YouTube with a passion, bro.
They did us fucking dirty, man.
Niggas demonetized us for no fucking reason.
Because they didn't like a guest that we had on the show.
Think I fucking like YouTube, bro?
Hate them with a passion.
Honestly, the only thing we're going to do is like we're going to just go on YouTube to bring people over to Rumble and Castle Club.
That's really what it is, bro.
Make them join the OSS Army.
That's the only thing YouTube is really good for at this point is fucking discovery.
Other than that, it's fucking garbage.
The censorship is ridiculous.
The community guidelines are whack.
They don't evenly distribute punishment.
It's fucking ridiculous, dude.
Like, we do shit, we get banned.
I've seen other people do shit, they don't get banned at all.
It's fucking crazy, bro.
So absolutely ridiculous.
Nick is live.
Yes.
So, y'all go ahead and support Nick.
Raid his chat and put OSSs here.
I'll drop the link for you guys.
Go check them out.
So, But I am going to hop offline, my ninjas.
Been going out for about six hours.
Six-hour stream.
Go raid, Nick.
How do I do this shit again?
It's Josie.
What is it?
Backslash raid?
and
then the link all right ninjas
Love you guys.
I'm going to get off.
I'll be back tomorrow at 5 p.m.
Cover some other topics.
Probably Bonnie Blue being a whore in Cancun.
So, love y'all, ninjas.
Peace.
Nick's going to go live now.
So go jump over there.
Go support him.
It's slash raid link.
Yeah, I did that.
It doesn't work for some odd reason.
He probably has a setting that doesn't let you raid him.
All right, guys.
Love y'all, ninjas, man.
Peace.
See you guys tomorrow, 5 p.m.
We're going to be cooking.
Welcome!
Bunch!
▲
Export Selection