BVN, Feb 26, 2026 – China’s AI Power Play, Anthropic’s Desperation Exposed, and an Interview with Ty
Ty Bollinger and Charlene’s Censored: The Fight for the First Amendment film premieres Feb 27 at censoredfilm.com, exposing lawsuits against U.S. government, MI6, CIA, and NGOs—like Soros-funded CCDH—for suppressing vaccine/GMO dissent since COVID. Their 2021 "Disinformation Dozen" listing followed an October 2020 FDA meeting acknowledging risks like sudden death from vaccines. Deplatforming cost them nearly $1M in legal fees and forced layoffs, yet they refuse funding from "propagandists," prioritizing free speech over corporate compromise. Meanwhile, China’s Quenn 3.5 (35B/122B params) and DeepSeek V4 (free, 1/50th Anthropic’s cost) threaten U.S. AI dominance, with DeepSeek’s sparse attention tech potentially outpacing Western models—unless Pentagon contracts force U.S. alternatives. Bollinger’s fight reveals how censorship and AI monopolies collide to stifle truth, while their platforms (brightvideos.com, thetruthaboutcancer.com) push back with self-funded, donation-driven media. [Automatically generated summary]
Well, welcome to Bright Video News for Thursday, February 26th, 2026.
Yes, I'm Mike Adams.
Thank you for joining me.
And what do we have?
Well, a really powerful new film is being released tomorrow.
And it's free to watch with registration.
And it's a film put out by my good friends, Ty and Charlene Bollinger from The Truth About Cancer.
And this film is available at the website.
Well, it will be.
It will premiere tomorrow evening at censoredfilm.com.
I'm going there right now.
You can watch the trailer there.
We'll play it for you here as well.
I'm in the film, by the way.
They interviewed me for the film.
And this film is documenting the lawsuits.
Well, more than the lawsuits, but it's centered around the lawsuits that Ty's company and my company have filed against big tech and the United States government, State Department, etc.
But this film also documents the extreme ends that the efforts to try to silence us during COVID and also about other topics, not just about vaccines, but about GMOs or glyphosate or what have you, or even about politics and elections and things like that.
But the efforts were highly coordinated by the intelligence agencies, including British MI6, as well as the CIA in the United States, and involving all kinds of NGOs and government officials who laundered censorship demands through NGOs to force big tech to deplatform and silence all of us, in my case, for over a decade.
And that's why I had to build all my own platforms that you now know and love, like this one, BrightVideos.com and others, Brighteon.com, for example.
But this movie really explains how it all began and how it got crazy and how we are fighting back through the courts.
We're fighting for your right to be able to speak without being oppressed and threatened and deplatformed and vilified by the government and by the media.
So this is a very powerful film.
You don't want to miss it.
And I've got a 30-minute interview with Ty coming up today.
That's my featured interview for today.
I've got a couple of special reports.
Before that, though, something huge happened, which is that Quenn, you know, the, well, Alibaba is the company in China.
They released their new Quenn 3.5 AI model just in the last 24 hours.
And it's a bombshell.
It's a game changer for so many reasons, mostly because it brings enterprise-level compute down to the desktop.
You can now have enterprise-grade AI that would have cost you $100 million three or four years ago.
Now you can have it on your desktop for less than $2,000 for the hardware, and the model is free, and you can use it forever for free.
And you can just download it.
I mean, this is mind-blowing.
This is absolutely mind-blowing.
So I've got a full report on that coming up, and then also one additional report called, Your Access to Compute Will Determine Your Future in an AI-powered world.
And I'm serious about that.
This is a very important time.
No matter what you do, you need to learn about these AI tools, learn to control them, learn to use them so that you know how to make sure they don't use you.
The more tools that you learn how to use, the more you can pursue your mission, whatever that mission is, you know, a pro-human mission to help people, to feed the world, to achieve peace, education, whatever it is.
breakthroughs in technology, whatever it is, you need to learn, in my opinion, you need to learn how to use AI technology in order to help you achieve those goals.
So I've got those two special reports coming up, and then the interview with Ty.
Before we go into that, I want to remind you of a couple of things.
Our lab, this is so cool.
I'm going to be filming a new microplastics discovery film.
I think I'm filming that next week.
No, the week after.
I'm sorry, the week after.
Once I film that, I'll bring it to you here.
You're going to be shocked at what we found.
And then the second thing that I'm going to film that we have completed is the testing for lead in toothpaste products.
There's a lot of lead in many toothpaste products.
And it's probably because of the calcium carbonate that's in most toothpaste products because lead is a common contaminant of calcium carbonate.
So we've got those coming up, I guess about two weeks out, give or take, but you don't want to miss those, that's for sure.
And then I have an interview coming up soon with Alec Zek.
I already recorded it.
I'm just going to be playing it soon.
And of course, my interview today with Ty Bollinger, which is in two parts.
Part one is today.
And then the second part, we'll play that next week.
I'm going to run part one of the Alex Zeck interview tomorrow.
And I think you'll find that really, really fascinating because we talk about consciousness.
We talk about the construct, the cosmos, you know, the simulation, whatever you want to call it.
We get into some deep subjects with Alec Zek.
So thank you for your support.
Shop with us at healthrangerstore.com, where we have, of course, laboratory-tested clean foods and nutritional supplements, high-end herbs and almost everything certified organic, etc.
All available, healthrangerstore.com.
And every purchase helps support our platforms and helps us do what we do to help you fight for your future, fight for your freedom, fight for your right to speak, etc.
To bypass censorship and bypass force ignorance and bypass that the powers that be attempt to thrust on all of us.
So again, thank you for supporting us.
Shop with us at healthrangerstore.com.
And you'll be very pleasantly surprised with the quality and the formulations of all the products you see there.
And remember, there's a checkbox on the left.
Now, when you search for products, you can check the checkbox that says glyphosate tested.
And you can see which products we've tested for glyphosate.
And you can also, I think there's a box there for heavy metals testing as well.
Pentagon's Quantum Leap00:08:26
So there's a lot of that.
You can really find super clean products with us at healthrangerstore.com.
All right, with that said, we're going to jump into the special reports here.
And then that will be followed by the interview with Ty Bollinger with his new film, which is at censoredfilm.com.
So enjoy.
Strategically speaking, what China is doing to undermine America's economy is really rather brilliant.
And they're doing it with AI models that replace human cognition, increasingly so.
And the latest example of this just got released, and honestly, I spent most of my day checking out this new, well, a couple of different models from Quenn, which is Alibaba, and they released Quenn 3.5 and some medium-sized models.
They have a 3.5, 35 billion parameter model and a 122 billion parameter model.
And I was running both of those quite a lot.
I was doing coding with them.
I was doing question-answer pairs.
I was doing document normalization tests and seeing some rather astonishing things.
This is a quantum leap forward.
Let me just give you the technical thing real quick on this, and then we'll discuss the macroeconomic impact and the strategy of this.
But technically speaking, you know how the number of billions of parameters in a model describes the size of its brain, so to speak.
So a 35 billion parameter model has 35 billion different nodes in it, you could say.
35 billion relationships between nodes, I think is technically more accurate.
And the really large models have hundreds of billions of parameters, but they don't run on consumer-grade hardware.
And until recently, well, until just today, the large Quenn model, I forgot it was like maybe it was 371 billion parameters, possibly something in that range.
And it was a very capable model, but you had to have enterprise-grade hardware to run it.
Well, this new model that Quenn just released, this 35 billion parameter model that can run on consumer-grade hardware, that is, for example, a 24-gigabyte NVIDIA card, which could be the 5080 or I think the 4080 comes in 24 gigabytes or maybe 20.
You can run it in 20 gigs also.
But this model is extraordinary, and it has the same performance as the 371 billion parameter model.
So what Quinn has done is rather extraordinary.
They've cut the size of the model by 90%, roughly, give or take.
They've made it run on consumer-grade hardware that's not even crazy expensive.
You can run this on a graphics card that costs, I don't know, $1,500.
And you might say, well, that sounds like a lot, except this can replace monthly subscriptions to Anthropic or ChatGPT or other services that might cost up to $200 a month.
And yet you're getting it for free forever.
You just have to buy the hardware one time.
Now, the performance isn't exactly the same as Anthropic.
It's not as good.
I'll talk about that in a second.
But what Quinn has done here by pushing this to the edge and releasing these publicly, and also the 122 billion parameter model, which is also remarkably good.
I was writing code with that one today.
They are making the case for corporations all across the world, including in America, to just drop their subscriptions to OpenAI and Anthropic and just use the free Quenn models.
I mean, why wouldn't you if they're almost as good?
And they really are almost as good.
They're not quite there, but they're close.
And with the upcoming release of DeepSeek version 4, which I'm really looking forward to, that is supposed to be even better than Anthropic Opus 4.6 or clawed code, as they call it.
And if that's the case, then Anthropic is in real trouble.
And so is OpenAI.
And I actually have a prediction on this.
Well, and so is Microsoft and Google, et cetera.
But my prediction is that OpenAI will head toward bankruptcy and it will have to be funded or bailed out by the U.S. government.
Anthropic, it's not clear yet because Anthropic is having that spat.
Well, it's more than a spat, a fundamental disagreement in AI ethics with the Pentagon, where the Pentagon wants to be able to use Claude or you know, Opus, Sonnet, all the different models.
The Pentagon wants to use them for basically for killing people, you know, autonomous weapons, Terminator, bots, Skynet, etc.
And Anthropic absolutely does not want to do that, or at least the founder, Dario Amode, doesn't want to do that.
And the Pentagon has given him until, I think, Friday at 5 p.m.
So he's got one more day to decide whether he's in or out.
If he's in, his company gets to keep a $200 million military contract, but he has to agree to allow it to be used to kill people.
If he doesn't agree, then Anthropic gets added to the basically almost like a malicious code list, and it will be banned across the entire U.S. government, which would just gut the revenues of Anthropic.
And so in a very real sense, although I know this isn't the focus here, but as a side thought, Anthropic has to make a decision, or Dario Amodi has to make a decision, that you're either going to, well, if you adhere to your values, which is that AI shouldn't be used to kill people, then you're going to lose your company.
And essentially, your company is going to cease to exist.
Especially with Quen and DeepSeek coming along from China and undermining your entire revenue model of being able to charge people for high-end coding agents.
But if you agree to compromise your values and allow the Pentagon to use your technology to murder people, which is what the Pentagon does, obviously.
I mean, you know, okay, I guess I don't have to go into that detail.
You know.
But then the company continues to exist.
And then people like Dario might retire as billionaires.
You know, the valuation goes up and everything's great, you know, except that you've sold your soul.
You've compromised your values.
See?
So it's not an easy choice for most people.
If you were in that position, could you turn down $200 million in contracts just to stick with your principles?
Could you watch your company be destroyed and all the people that you hired and that you work with, I don't know how many it is, hundreds of engineers, watch them all lose their jobs because you decided to stick with your principles?
Or would you take the money and say, I'm doing the best I can given the circumstances?
What would you do?
What would you do?
So, I mean, I know what I would do.
You know what I would do.
I would tell them to go pound sand.
But that's why I don't have venture capital.
I don't have investors because I never want to have to answer to investment people who are only interested in money.
So otherwise, I would have already gone down that road a long time ago.
But what would you do?
There's a question.
What would you do?
Most people would take the money.
And Anthropic may take the money.
But here's the thing.
Even if they take the money, I think that Anthropic's future is almost entirely just government contracts for the reasons I've mentioned here.
China's AI Dominance00:15:55
That is Quen and soon DeepSeek, Chinese models.
And there are others, by the way, you know, Kimmy K2, etc.
These models are proving to be extraordinary.
And China is really inching ahead now.
This is the year, 2026, that China is demonstrating that its models are superior.
And it's extraordinary.
I mean, I know I've used that word a lot.
I'm not trying to start a drinking game or anything.
But this new Quinn 3.5 model, It uses, it's a mixture of experts model.
And so even though it has 35 billion parameters, it only activates 3 billion parameters to answer your question or your prompt or whatever.
So it's got a bunch, you know, it's got, you could say, roughly like 10 experts in it, and each one is roughly 3 billion parameters.
And that's what makes it so blazing fast.
It's crazy.
So it's got the knowledge of a 35 billion parameter model, which is a lot.
That used to be considered very sizable.
But it's got the throughput that's mind-blowing.
I'm measuring it today at 108 tokens per second.
108 tokens per second.
I ask it to write an article and it spits it out faster than I can read.
And I'm a very fast reader.
It's like, there's the whole thing.
Whoa.
Whoa.
It's fast.
And then I, because I had started it up with only 16K tokens for a context window, which is like the limit of the number of tokens that it can handle.
And it did 108 tokens at 16K.
So I thought, well, let me just max it out here.
I'm going to go to 262K, which is the max of the model, which is a lot.
And let's see how much it slows down.
So I tested it again, and it comes back 106 tokens a second.
It barely noticed the larger context window.
And that's very unusual because the older models used to have a massive difference based on the context window.
But it turns out that Quenn was able to train these newer models from the start with very large context windows.
And Quenn is even hosting a model on their website with APIs, etc., that has a 1 million token context window, which is enough to process large code bases, for example.
So this large context window is really unbelievable, especially given that it's completely free and you can download it yourself and you can run it yourself on consumer grade hardware, or I should say sort of higher end consumer grade hardware.
This is not just cheap gaming cards.
This is definitely higher end stuff, but it is accessible.
I mean, you can buy these cards on Amazon, for example, or wherever you shop for computer cards.
So what this does is it puts this technology in the hands of people everywhere around the world.
And it's real intelligence, by the way.
It's real cognition.
These are reasoning models.
They think through things, and you can watch them think if you want to turn on the thinking monitoring in your inference software, you can watch what they're thinking, and they're working through problems logically and rationally.
And the quality of the output for the size of the model is almost unbelievable.
Two years ago, this would have been considered utterly impossible.
And so for those people who say, oh, AI is in a bubble, not Chinese AI, you could argue that maybe American AI companies are in a stock market bubble that is about to pop because the Chinese AI companies are not in a bubble.
Their technology keeps getting better and better and better.
And all those warnings last year where people said, oh, it's all plateaued.
You know, it's never going to get any better.
It's just, you're not going to get any more returns.
Nonsense.
It keeps getting better.
It keeps getting better by leaps and bounds, actually.
I have not seen any ceiling on this.
Every time a new model comes out of China, it's got some other major advancement that is just mind-blowing.
Now, here's the thing.
Getting back to the main structure of my presentation here is that, see, China knows that it can undermine the United States very easily by shipping free machine cognition to replace human cognition in the workplace because the United States is largely a financialized economy.
We don't make stuff very much anymore.
I mean, we don't have a lot of factories in America.
We have services, yeah, I get that.
But we have a lot of financialization and a lot of virtualization.
So a lot of really virtual jobs, you know, like approving insurance claims or whatever, sitting behind a desk, working through a monitor, processing spreadsheets and emails and this and that.
That's a lot of the U.S. economy right there, especially in medicine and healthcare, which employs like millions of people to sit behind desks and just type in, you know, classification codes for medical procedures or deny, you know, insurance reimbursement or whatever.
It's a massive economy that is completely replaceable by AI at this point.
Completely replaceable.
So China releases all the AI models for free to push that into the West while the U.S. AI companies are refusing to release their models.
But China's doing it, and so corporations are taking on these models.
You know, Quen is actually very widely used across corporate America right now.
And then the U.S. companies are firing human workers because now they can automate those jobs.
But if you're wondering, well, why would China be willing to do this?
Because it might also hurt their own economy.
But no, no, no.
China's economy is not virtualized.
China's economy is largely industrial and manufacturing.
They produce physical goods, which AI can't do.
You see, large language models don't create things out of nothing, not physical things.
And robots, well, China's already leading in robots, so China has automated their manufacturing.
And China knows that even if they ship out all these AI models that replace cognitive jobs all over the world, people still need robots and drones and batteries and EVs and tools and, you know, everything.
All the stuff that's made in China.
Computer monitors, you name it, right?
None of that can be replaced by AI.
So it's a brilliant strategy on China's part because they can flood the world with free machine cognition that replaces humans and causes the U.S. job market to get totally wrecked as job losses just spread like wildfire throughout the system as companies automate and automate and automate because of these free tools.
Meanwhile, China's industrial economy is protected.
It's protected.
So you see what I mean?
That's 5D chess.
And it's angering U.S. officials and U.S. tech companies.
This is why Anthropic the other day pointed the finger at China and said, you stole our stuff.
You distilled our knowledge to train your models.
They're blaming Moonshot and DeepSeek and MiniMax, pointing the finger, wagging their finger.
But in reality, model distillation is a totally legit training technique for AI models.
It's been used by almost every company out there.
And the thing is, these Chinese companies paid for the API access.
They didn't steal anything.
They weren't hacking Anthropic.
They were buying access via the API.
And Anthropic let them use the API.
I mean, and then Anthropic is saying, well, this is like large-scale, you know, industrial theft or something like that.
Intellectual property theft.
Yeah, please stop complaining and just try to build better models.
China builds better models.
And frankly, they don't need Anthropic.
They don't need any U.S. models.
They don't need to do that.
They've got better math.
They've got better science.
They've got more science papers on this topic.
I mean, maybe at first, a few years ago, they started out trying to copy.
Well, I'm sure they did.
They were trying to copy the structure of U.S. AI models.
But Chinese learned quickly.
They will, you know, they'll reverse engineer your model, and then they'll figure out how you did it, and then they'll do it better.
That's what they always do.
That's what they do with manufacturing.
Now, that's why most of the best technology in the world comes out of China.
It's not that they stole all that tech, it's that they invented it.
I mean, think about the best battery technology in the world by far.
No one else is even close to what's coming out of China, you know, Catal and BYD mostly.
Did they steal that battery tech from no.
They invented it.
They put hundreds of scientists and chemists and engineers on the problem for 10 years plus, and they figured it out.
Now the world wants to steal the tech from China.
Did you hear the latest thing from the EU where the EU says to China, basically I'm paraphrasing, but an ultimatum, the EU says, hey, China, you have to give us all your battery technology secrets.
Otherwise, we're going to block all your electric vehicles from all of Europe.
Yeah.
Yeah, think about that.
So the EU is saying we now want to steal Chinese technology because we here in Europe, in France, in Germany, in England, you know, in Britain, in Spain, we can't figure it out because we're Europeans.
We're all run by woke retard leaders here in Europe.
You know, we can't figure out anything.
So we need the Chinese to give us their secrets.
Like, that's happening.
How hilarious is that?
And by the way, you know who the smartest Europeans are in terms of engineering?
Like AI and math and science?
You know who they are?
Yeah, okay.
Ukrainians and Russians right there.
I'm telling you, Ukrainians and Russians, they are because life is hard.
Life is hard in Ukraine and Russia, especially for the last four years with this insane war.
Life is hard.
Life is easy in the UK or it has been easy in Germany.
They all got lazy and they stopped being good engineers.
And they shut down their domestic energy supply.
So, you know, again, Western Europe is run by woke retards at this point.
Anyway, this pattern by China, this cannot be stopped.
There is no way to stop this.
Because China can just release the models for free, as they've been doing.
You can download them from Hugging Face or other places or, you know, GitHub or whatever.
Everybody's got internet access.
Unless you're going to shut down the whole internet, you can't block files from China.
But you've got to understand that all over the world, all the people in India, Southeast Asia, and South America, they love the fact that China is releasing these models for free because China is on the pro-freedom side of this.
China is offering really decentralized machine cognition, which is of great benefit to humankind.
And it means that you can now, right now, today, for a couple thousand dollars, you can get the hardware and run on your desk technology that would have cost you $100 million three or four years ago.
Seriously, that's how big the gains have been.
And this is going to continue.
When DeepSeek version 4 comes out, that's also going to be a game changer.
And it will probably exceed the coding capabilities of this Quen 3.5 that just came out.
And it's rumored that DeepSeek is going to have a light version that also runs on consumer-grade hardware.
Like a 20-gigabyte card is the rumor, or a 24-gigabyte card, something like that.
If that's the case, then my goodness, U.S. AI companies might really be obsolete.
And the U.S. tech sector is going to get hammered in the stock market.
And U.S. job losses are going to mount.
So be prepared for that.
And I'll keep you posted as best I can.
I'm deep in this industry, so I'm watching it and using the tools every day.
I'm looking around.
If you saw how many computers are in my office, how many is it?
Eight.
That's just in my office.
And then I have a mini data center outside of my office.
But I've got, yeah, I've got eight computers, and each of them have two screens.
Well, some of them have more.
So what is that?
It's like 20-plus screens, actually.
It's pretty crazy.
Yeah, it's a good thing I have good nutrition to protect myself from all that electromagnetic exposure, huh?
Yeah.
Otherwise, I'd be cooked.
There's a lot of electronics in here.
You can use my AI tools for free at brightanswers.ai.
That's our deep research engine.
Or brightlearn.ai is my book creation platform.
And you can download all the books there for free.
You can watch my videos at brightvideos.com.
And you can follow and check news trends at brightnews.ai.
So thank you for listening.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of all those sites I just mentioned and much more.
My articles are found at naturalnews.com.
And thank you for listening.
Take care.
All right.
So Anthropic, which is currently the leader in AI coding, is accusing Chinese AI companies, including DeepSeek, of wholesale theft of their model knowledge through a process called distillation,
which means that what they're saying is that there were tens of thousands of user accounts that were actually proxies for Chinese companies that asked questions of Anthropic's models, you know, Claude or Opus or Sonnet, whatever, and then took the answers and then used those answers to help train their own models.
And this is being called a form of wholesale theft or what, corporate espionage even.
That's an exaggeration.
Well, first of all, Dario Amodi is known to be an alarmist about everything.
He's the one always screaming about how dangerous AI is.
He's the one screaming about cyber threats.
He's the one always screaming.
Smuggled Tech and Breakthrough Models00:09:00
And now, I mean, pointing the finger at DeepSeek, probably because DeepSeek is about to release version 4, which is rumored to be just as good as Claude Opus at coding.
And if that's the case, then it undercuts completely most of the revenue model of Anthropic.
We could see Anthropic's stock price just absolutely plummet.
In fact, once DeepSeek version 4 is released, we could see the stock prices of many tech companies plummet.
Similar to what happened roughly a year ago when DeepSeek released R1, their first reasoning model.
This version 4 is rumored to be, well, it could score 83 on the SWE benchmark, which is the coding benchmark.
And that would be the highest score ever of any open source model.
And it would be neck and neck with Opus 4.6, which is the latest model from Anthropic.
And notably, Opus 4.6 is the model that I currently use for most of my coding tasks.
And it's a very capable model, no question about it.
That's why I use it.
But if DeepSeek version 4 is just as good and 1 50th the cost, well, of course, I'm going to switch over to DeepSeek version 4.
I'm going to use the best coding model that I can use, whether it's free or expensive.
Either way, it's still worth it to me, you know, because of the AI platforms that I'm building and maintaining and rolling out new features, etc.
And any model that's good at coding will save me time because I spend a lot of time vibe coding.
And often I'm hammering the same issue, trying to get the code to find the bug or fix the bug or refactor whatever.
Opus 4.6 does a very good job, but if there's something better, I'm going to switch.
No question.
But the interesting pattern in all of this is that U.S. tech companies and some U.S. analysts and people tied to the CIA and the State Department, et cetera, they always like to point the finger at China and say, well, all their technology is stolen.
Or they smuggled illegal graphics cards or, you know, GPUs into their country.
It's illegal microchips.
Okay.
They do everything and anything to avoid admitting that China has amazing breakthrough technology and that the Chinese people are very good at math and engineering and coding and innovation in technical spaces.
And so, you know, the overall strategy from the U.S. is to try to say that China can't innovate, that China has to steal it from the U.S., that we, the United States, we're the only people in the world who can invent things and create things and we're the best.
That's the narrative.
And it, frankly, it sounds pathetic.
It's like, really?
All you can do, because you know how good DeepSeek 4 is going to be, all you can do is just push a bunch of uncertainty, say, oh, they stole our tech.
Really?
That's it?
And that's really rich coming from Anthropic also, and frankly, any other U.S. company, because they trained their models on all kinds of content, including just scraping the entire internet, you know, scraping books and periodicals and newspapers and everything else to train their models, right?
So For them to say, well, well, China, you know, China signed up and paid the API fees, but we don't like how they used it.
And we're going to call it theft.
Well, it's not theft.
They didn't hack your system.
They paid for the API.
They paid for it.
And you know what else is a little shocking in all of this?
Is one of the reasons there's so much backlash against Anthropic right now is because Anthropic's announcement on all this admitted that they spy on all their accounts.
They're spying on everybody because they identified, I think, 24,000 or some number of accounts in that range that they say were involved in these distillation attacks.
Wait a second.
So you're watching what everybody does?
I mean, you're spying on everybody, and yet your message is that everyone should trust you, trust you with their privacy when clearly you're monitoring and spying and collecting metadata, etc.
So, you know, Anthropic is really undermining its own case here.
Instead of really working on creating a better product and staying in the lead, Anthropic is whining and crying about China and admitting that Anthropic spies on you.
So no wonder there's such a backlash against Anthropic right now.
People are waking up.
By the way, with DeepSeek version 4, you know, you can download it once it's available.
You can download it and you can install it locally.
You can run it locally.
You need some pretty serious hardware to do that.
But once you have that done, then there's no way DeepSeek can spy on you because you're running it locally.
Whereas Anthropic doesn't have a local version.
Anthropic hasn't put out anything that's open source.
Anthropic's not contributing to the open source community by releasing open weights models.
Frankly, neither is any U.S. company or almost any company at this point.
They've stopped doing it.
The U.S. AI tech giants have stopped releasing models to the public and they've stopped publishing science papers in the public science journals.
That's why all the best science now is coming out of China because they're publishing.
They're publishing the vast majority of all the papers.
And they're innovating.
So DeepSeek, for example, is run by a group of really intelligent people who author numerous science papers.
For example, papers on sparse attention technology and manifold constrained, what is it, hyper-connections?
It talks about the mathematical structure of the different layers of model of the model during training and how the different layers talk to each other, pass information in order to maintain information integrity by adhering to a similar mathematical structure.
That's a breakthrough.
That's a breakthrough in the signal-to-noise ratio of these models.
And that breakthrough was used to train DeepSeek version 4.
And all the companies from the US are looking at this and they've read the science papers and they know that DeepSeek is leading the pack now.
That we're no longer in a game where the Chinese models are almost as good, but six months later.
No.
DeepSeek version 4, the way it looks, although we still have to confirm it upon release, but it looks like this is going to be the leading frontier model for the world.
that this will become the standard model for most AI work unless for some reason somebody, maybe, you know, like a government contractor or somebody has to use a US model, is forced to use OpenAI or Microsoft or Gemini or something.
But for most corporate work and nonprofit work and, you know, whatever, people are going to use DeepSeek version 4 because it will be right there at the top of the list of the best capabilities and it's free, which means even if you're if you're using it through, let's say a cloud hosting provider for API inference, it's going to be dirt cheap, dirt cheap.
By some estimates, it's something like 1 50th the cost of maybe Chat GPT or Google Gemini.
So that's a big deal, especially as so many projects now are burning tokens and you have recursive loops, recursive reasoning and all these open claw lobsters running around burning tokens all day.
They need cheap tokens and DeepSeek's going to provide that.
China Bought the Chips00:04:41
So no wonder, no wonder everybody in the West that's tied to the AI industry is pointing their fingers at China and saying they stole our stuff.
They stole our tech.
And also this claim, oh, they use illegal microchips.
You mean they bought the microchips that you didn't want them to buy?
Oh, they smuggled them.
Oh, you mean they bought them and you didn't want them to buy them, but they found clever ways to buy them.
They didn't actually steal microchips.
They paid for them.
And they just went around your, you know, your blacklist.
So, so no, China, they didn't steal microchips.
They didn't steal anthropic code.
No, there's been no hacks.
China paid for the APIs, paid for the GPUs, and set up their systems and went to work.
And they just created better products because they have more smart engineers.
I mean, see, I don't know why it's impossible for so many American companies to admit this, that we've been out-engineered by China.
We've just been out-engineered.
Why?
Because China graduates 500% more STEM graduates every year.
And Chinese people, and remember, I speak Chinese.
I know a lot about Chinese people compared to most Americans.
That is, I mean, I'd lived in Taiwan.
And Chinese people are freaking smart.
Okay.
That's why in the California university system, they have a penalty if you're Chinese.
They penalize you off your scores because otherwise 80% of the students would be Chinese or Asian, let's say.
I mean, Korean, Japanese, Chinese, Taiwanese, Vietnamese, Thai, etc.
Asian people are naturally very smart people.
And even more than that, the Chinese education system is absolutely, I mean, it's brutal.
It's brutal on the kids.
But man, it turns out high-level engineers, mathematicians, data scientists, machine learning scientists, and the sheer numbers just dwarf the United States.
But no one in the U.S. can admit this.
Oh, they're just, they're out-engineering us.
Yeah, well, they've done it in EVs.
They've done it in robots.
They've done it in drones.
They've done it in naval dockyard construction, automation, car factories.
Yeah, they've out-engineered the U.S. in like 90% of all technologies.
So why is it so hard to believe that they out-engineered the U.S. when it comes to AI?
They're just freaking good engineers.
Okay?
I mean, we need to get used to that idea.
They're just good.
You know, anyway, it's pathetic for Anthropic and these U.S. companies always sit around pointing the fingers like they stole from us, making a bunch of excuses.
Yeah, you know what?
Excuses aren't going to fly.
What's going to matter is who's got the better models, which models can code better, which models will create better images, better text-to-speech.
And, you know, right now, Quinn, Quinn, what was it, version 3?
Is it 3.5 text-to-speech engine?
It's amazing.
I'm using it.
We're going to use that for our audiobooks.
It's amazing.
China is just out-engineering the whole world right now.
And I don't see any reason why that won't remain the case.
They're just freaking good.
All right.
So anyway, look, I'll keep you posted.
Get ready for DeepSeek version 4.
I don't know when it's going to come out.
It's already kind of late, actually.
So maybe they're having a problem with it.
Maybe it started hallucinating like crazy.
Who knows?
You know, AI is tricky.
Or maybe they're just waiting for some final thing.
Maybe they're ramping up their data centers because they realize everybody in the world is going to want to use this model.
So who knows?
But whatever it comes out, watch for tech stocks to collapse in the U.S. and watch for Anthropic to probably get hammered.
And then the very next step is we have to watch the benchmarks.
We want to see how DeepSeek version 4 actually performs in independent benchmarks, especially the SWE bench, which is all about coding.
Questioning The Official Story00:15:37
So I will keep you posted.
And obviously, this is of high interest to me.
I'll keep you posted.
And I'm rooting for DeepSeek on this.
We need a free, open-source, decentralized model that beats Anthropic.
Because we're all tired of Dario whining all the time, frankly.
Stop whining and start building.
That's my advice.
But thank you for listening, everybody.
I'm Mike Adams.
And if you want to use my AI platforms, just check out brightanswers.ai, brightlearn.ai, and you can catch my videos at brightvideos.com.
Take care.
What is the price of a dangerous truth?
For Socrates, it was hemlock.
For Jesus, the cross.
History's greatest truth-tellers and bravest voices share one fate, silencing.
Censorship is a disease.
Freedom of speech is the cure.
Today, the weapons are digital.
The sensors wear suits.
And the battlefield is your mind.
The government didn't merely pressure social platforms.
It orchestrated a coordinated campaign to transform them into instruments of state-sponsored censorship.
Witness the exposed conspiracy, an unholy alliance between government power, big tech, monopolies, and billionaire-funded NGOs to control what you see, think, and say.
They took a foreign dark money-funded hit piece, amplified it from the White House podium, and across thousands of media outlets across the world, and they used it to try to erase us from the public square.
The government, its NGO allies, and big tech didn't just silence us.
They colluded in a criminal enterprise to label the truth as disinformation and silence the truth tellers.
government is a disinformation factory running three shifts 24-7, seven days a week churning out disinformation.
But now, the silenced are launching a counterattack.
Not with protests, but with subpoenas.
Not with signs, but with lawsuits.
This lawsuit exists to expose their crime and restore the right of every American to speak freely.
They have dragged the most powerful entities on earth into court.
This is about preserving the U.S. Constitution and our God-given right to freedom.
To demand one answer.
By what authority do you silence us?
If they get away with silencing us with our huge reach and millions of followers, they can and will try to do it to anyone.
They censored the speech.
Now they must defend the silence.
It doesn't matter if you're a conservative or liberal or an independent, because sooner or later you will utter something that offends those in power.
We were the test case.
You are the target.
Find the truth.
Join the resistance.
Visit CensoredFilm.com When COVID came around and we all became outspoken, yourself included, about the potential dangers of the vaccine and about the origins of COVID-19, just questioning the official story as we've learned to do over the years, because basically everything the government tells us is a lie.
We learn to question the official story.
And when everybody's repeating the same story, you're like, hmm, I'm not sure I'm believing this because everybody agrees in the media.
So they've been given a script.
The real thesis of the documentary is that we're not going to take this line down.
If it goes to discovery, it's over for them because then we will see all of the skeletons in the closet in addition to what's already been admitted.
And the reality is what's been admitted is insane.
Welcome to today's interview here on BrightVideos.com.
We are an uncensored video platform, and that's the topic of our interview today because there's a powerful and important new film that's just being released by Ty and Charlene Bollinger.
And we're joined today by Ty Bollinger to talk about this new film, which is called Censored the Fight for Freedom.
I believe that's the name.
Ty, welcome to the show.
Did I get the name right?
Is that the film?
It was close.
You're 90% there.
Censored the fight for the First Amendment.
Oh, the fight for the First Amendment.
It is about freedom of speech.
So, yeah.
100%.
Well, I haven't seen the film yet because you're just finishing it up.
I've seen the trailer.
It's powerful.
I also contributed to the film.
So thank you for using some of my clips.
But let's set the stage here because you and Charlene are two of the most maliciously censored and blacklisted people in the entire history of our country.
And that's what led to the creation of this film.
So you want to give us the backstory and why this film is so critical, and then we'll tell people how they can find the film.
Yeah, sure.
You know, and you, I'm one of the most censored people in the world, speaking to another one of the most censored people in the world.
True.
So, yeah, you were actually the OG of censorship.
Yeah, I've got like badges and medals for all the deplatforming I've endured.
Yeah.
Yeah, sorry.
You know, we mentioned that in the film.
And thank you for your contribution, by the way.
Fantastic interviews that you did for the film.
But we mentioned in the film that you were the OG.
And the reason that you weren't in what was called the disinformation dozen, which is what really prompted this film, was that you'd already been so censored and deplatformed that you hardly had a presence on any of them.
They'd already banned you.
So, but yeah, back in 2020, 2021 time period really is when the censorship really hit us hard.
We'd been censored heavily on Google and YouTube before that.
But when COVID came around and we all became outspoken, yourself included, about the potential dangers of the vaccine and about the origins of COVID-19 and just questioning the official story as we've learned to do over the years, because basically everything the government tells us is a lie.
We've learned to question the official story.
And when everybody's repeating the same story, you're like, I'm not sure I'm believing this because everybody agrees in the media.
So they've been given a script.
So what happened with COVID is we started questioning, you started questioning, people started questioning.
And in 2021, they came out with a list that was created by what was called the Center for Countering Digital Hate.
And that was a group out of London, England.
And they put out a list called the Disinformation Dozen.
And Charlene and I were listed as number three behind Bobby Kennedy and Dr. Mercola in the 12 most dangerous people online spreading disinformation about COVID and COVID vaccines.
And all you were doing was trying to show people to question what's in the vaccines, to question the emergency approval process.
You were just actually encouraging critical thinking.
We were actually citing CDC and FDA websites that said that the vaccines might not be safe.
Right.
You know, it wasn't like we made this stuff up.
We didn't know much about the vaccines.
And so the information we found was literally on government websites.
And we found documents from a meeting from 20, I think it was October of 2020 before COVID.
I think didn't COVID get released in December 2020?
I think, was it 2020?
I can't.
No, no, no.
Was it?
I think it was late 2019.
It was in China.
Okay, was it late 2019?
Yeah, and then 2020, it spread through the United States, or supposedly spread.
And then 2021 is really when the vaccine came out and got pushed.
Yeah, yeah, you're right.
You're right.
You're right.
So the meeting, and we got a hold of documents and we published these documents and we talked about them online.
And this is one of the things that we got blasted for.
But it was an FDA meeting, the, what's their biologics committee, the, oh, I can't think of the FDA biologics committee that looks at vaccines.
But anyway, they came together to meet in October 2020, which is right before I think they released the vaccine for COVID.
And all these side effects that we are seeing that we knew that we were going to see, they had them listed in a PowerPoint presentation.
I remember that.
Yeah.
Yeah.
Sudden death, stillbirths, miscarriages, cardiovascular problems, you know, cardiomyopathy, all the things that we're seeing, they knew that that was going to happen because of the vaccine, but they still authorized it for emergency use.
And so because of some of these things that we were saying online, we got blasted as part of the disinfo dozen.
And then shortly after that, a reporter showed up at our house.
I didn't even know it happened, honestly.
COVID was a weird time.
Remember, it was just, it was almost like COVID was a blur during some of the time.
I know, but real quick, though, before you continue, I want to say that CCDH was tied to intelligence services.
Yeah.
Oh, yeah.
I mean, there's a tie-in.
This is the deep state that was behind all of this to push this in order to suppress voices so they could convince more people to take these deadly jabs.
That was the whole point of this.
Yeah.
Yeah, they were deeply tied to both U.S. and British intelligence.
Intelligence.
Yes, British intelligence.
Funded in part by George Soros.
So, you know, it's the dark money that is behind CCDH was pretty phenomenal.
And Sayer G did a great job of exposing that.
Yep.
We had a reporter show up on our property shortly after we were listed as part of the Disinfo Dozen.
And as I mentioned, we didn't even know that we had been mentioned until I started getting emails and texts and a bunch of calls from people and people that I didn't know.
And I'm like, this is weird.
What's going on?
And then I think Erin Elizabeth, who was part of the Disinfo Dozen, contacted Charlene and she was like, oh my goodness, look at this.
And so at that point, we realized that we'd been targeted.
And so then shortly after that, a reporter from a local news station here in Nashville showed up on our property.
They were trespassing.
They were filming on our property, scared my little girls half to death because there was two men on the property filming.
And I hopped in my truck.
You've been to our house.
We have a long, a big hill that our property's on.
And so I had to drive down to the base of the property to where they were.
And, you know, I was, I'm always packing.
So I'm like, I don't know if I'm going to have to shoot these guys or what's going on, but they're trespassing on my property.
And so I drive down and they're filming.
They're filming on our property.
They're like, hey, you Ty Bollinger, we'd like to get an interview with you about the Disinfo Dozen.
And at that point, I'm like, well, I can make two choices.
I can do the interview or I can tell them to take a hike and they're going to spin it to where Bollinger was hiding something.
We were on his property ready for an interview.
He refused to speak with us and they were filming.
So I went ahead and gave him the interview.
But, you know, the interesting thing was during that interview, Mike, is that even though we were part of the disinfo dozen and we were accused of spreading information that was killing people, they couldn't name a single, the reporter could not name a single thing that we had on our website that wasn't true.
Yeah, exactly.
And let me add too, basically you were named as enemies of the state.
I mean, and there's a movie by that name, Enemy of the State, right?
And you were named as an enemy of the state.
And there are repercussions for this.
Can you talk about some of those repercussions?
Not just being silenced, but the inability to conduct business.
I mean, some people have been debanked.
Some people have been denied e-commerce accounts.
Some people have been denied investors or business relationships.
Can you talk about the cost that, you know, the real cost of this?
Yeah.
I mean, it cost us tremendously because what happened is because, and we had huge followings on the social networks.
We had huge followings on our YouTube channel.
Biden actually mentioned us from the podium.
He mentioned the Disinfo Dozen, said the Disinfo Dozen are killing people.
And within 24, 48 hours, if I remember correctly, YouTube took down our channel.
You know, we had hundreds of thousands of subscribers, and that was a way that we were reaching people.
We had millions of subscribers on the social media.
Those were taken down.
So it really hampered our ability to conduct business because our whole business model is sharing this information with new people that haven't heard.
And then, you know, we have DVDs, books, things that we've produced that they can buy on the back end, you know, and that supports our business.
That supports the way that we are able to continue to share the truth is by people buying stuff.
You have to generate revenue somehow.
And that's the way we did it.
And before the DisinfoDozen, and it drastically hampered our ability to make any money.
I mean, it has over the years.
Since that happened, the last four years, five years, it's devastated our company.
We recently had to lay off almost everybody that we'd employed for the last 10 years because we just can't generate the revenues anymore because nobody hears the message anymore.
And that's all by design.
That's all it's designed to do.
Yeah.
So it literally financially hamstrung us for a while.
Whereas if you were willing to sacrifice your principles and to tell people to take the jabs and eat the glyphosate, drink the fluoride, oh man, you'd have 100 million followers.
You'd be super wealthy by now because you have a very strong work ethic.
But you refuse to compromise.
You know, we did.
And that's one thing I can say that Charlene and I have always tried to tell the truth no matter what.
And we've not been overly concerned about the ramifications financially from it.
And so as a result, we just told the truth.
And we kind of knew after the disembodied hit, man, this is going to really hurt business, but it doesn't matter.
Because who cares if it hurts your business if people are dying because they can't access this information?
And that's kind of the dirty secret that a lot of people don't talk about is not only did they censor us and kill our business and hurt us financially, way worse than that.
I mean, we're still fine.
I mean, you know, we're living in a country where we haven't missed any meals because of it.
You know, we're still fine.
But there's people, millions of people, I would say, that are dead because they didn't have access to the information that we wanted to share with them or that you wanted to share with them because we were so banned.
We were so censored.
And so think about the families of the people that are now six feet under that could have been still alive maybe if they'd had access to the information that big tech, that the government colluded with big tech to censor and to stop them from getting information that could have saved their lives.
Cases Dismissed: Fight for Freedom00:05:55
That's the real travesty in this whole thing.
That is a really critical point.
I've said that, for example, Google is complicit in the mass slaughter of over a million Americans.
So are other big tech companies, so our elements of the government, the FDA, the CDC, and big corporate media, etc.
Now, let me mention the site for your film.
It's called censoredfilm.com.
And we're going to show people the screen and we'll show the trailer at the end of this interview, by the way.
But folks, if you want to watch the trailer and get the film and also help support Ty and Charlene Bollinger with the truth about so many things, then you need to see this film, censoredfilm.com.
Do you want to add anything about what else people can find on the site?
Yeah, so they go to censoredfilm.com.
You're going to see the trailer.
Just sign up to watch the film.
And then we're going to release it.
We're planning on releasing it Friday, February the 20, what is it, the 7th?
Friday the 27th.
Let me look at my calendar here.
Yeah, Friday.
We're going to release it Friday, February the 27th at 8 p.m. Central or 8 p.m. Eastern, 7 p.m. Central.
So it'll be Friday, and we'll send people a link to watch it.
And it's just going to be absolutely free.
It's a one-hour documentary.
It's not like our past documentaries that have been multiple episodes.
It's one hour, and it really chronicles our case and your case.
And the real thesis of the documentary is that we're not going to take this line down.
We're going after the censorship industrial complex, and we're suing them because of the way that they have harmed us and the way that they have violated our constitutional freedom of speech by censoring and banning us.
And so it really focuses on our two cases.
I'm glad you mentioned that because, yeah, your company and my company are both suing the whole censorship industrial complex, as you say.
They are fighting it like crazy.
They've been fighting venues.
They've been fighting, they don't want it to get to discovery because they know, as you know, if this case can't be dismissed and if it goes to discovery, then my God, it's over for them.
It'll all be exposed.
That's where this is headed, right?
Oh, yeah.
If it goes to discovery, it's over for them because then we will see all of the skeletons in the closet in addition to what's already been admitted.
And the reality is what's been admitted is insane.
Yeah, true.
This shouldn't even, you know, we have the same attorney, and he's told us that our cases, there's more evidence to support our cases than any cases he's ever seen in his 20-plus years of practicing law.
That's right.
It shouldn't even be a case.
But, you know, justice system is corrupt and so forth.
They're going to try to get out of it.
But we're pressing onwards.
So the real focus of censored is our cases.
And it started out, or I started creating this a couple of years ago, and it's morphed into this, into that.
And in the last six months, it really solidified into focusing on our cases.
So, you know, and so all they're going to find on censoredfilm.com is a trailer that they can sign up.
We'll send you the link to watch it.
It's absolutely free.
We're not selling it.
We're not selling DVDs, nothing.
We're just letting you watch it.
We want to share it.
We want people to be aware of this, be aware of our case.
And the only ask is that if you support what we're doing, if you want to keep freedom of speech in America, we'll have a donation button that you can donate to help us out.
Oh, that's huge.
So, yeah, everybody, go to censoredfilm.com and just put in your email address, watch the film, share the website.
I'm going to be plugging it for a long time here.
And I can't thank you enough, Ty, for what you've done here, putting this together.
Now, it's critical for people to realize that you and I, you know, your company and my company are spending a massive amount of money to fight for the free speech rights of everybody else.
We are not here just fighting for us.
You know, we are the victims of mass censorship and blacklisting.
We are spending the money to fight this through the court system.
And probably, you know, easily this is going to cost over a million dollars.
But we're doing it in order to fight for the freedom of everybody.
You want to talk about that and your motivations behind this lawsuit?
You know, yeah, and that's a great point.
It is, it's cost a fortune for us.
And in total, yeah, pretty darn near a million dollars between the two of us.
And it's just getting started.
Hopefully it won't last too much longer.
Hopefully that, you know, it doesn't get dismissed.
I'm confident that it's not going to be dismissed.
Our attorneys have great, a great strategy, and I really believe that we're going to win this.
But the reason that we're doing it is because if we don't, then the freedom of speech in America is gone.
That's right.
And that's one of the reasons that I love our attorney, Jeffrey Graeber, and you do too, because we've spoken about that.
His whole reason that he wanted to take these cases is for his children.
He wants to have a free America for them to grow up in.
And so do we, and for our grandkids.
And I know that you want the same for everyone, is just to have freedom of speech.
And if we don't do this, who's going to?
If we don't take them to task, they'll continue to do it because a bully continues to bully until someone takes them to task.
That's right.
That's right.
None of us are safe if we're living in this environment where the government can collude with corporations and overseas NGOs and they can launder censorship and they can shut down the voices and the platforms of anybody they target for any reason.
And that's what they did.
Evil People and Kettlebells00:03:46
So I love the fact, you know, I really consider you such an incredible friend and colleague because of how much you're fighting for this.
And I also want to point out something else.
You said earlier that your primary motivation of telling the truth was to help save lives, to help people make better choices.
And you mentioned that people that were denied access to your information, many of those people are dead now.
And that's true.
Many people are dead.
But you and I both, we are demonstrating what health looks like and what making good decisions looks like.
And I want to thank you.
You inspired me.
Because of your fitness, you went through a resurrection of fitness and weight loss.
And I've seen your gym photos.
You're unbelievably strong and fit.
You inspired me.
I've been on a fitness track for one year now with kettlebells and things like that.
I feel better and stronger than I ever have.
And I think you feel the same.
I mean, so thank you, Ty.
Oh, yeah, of course, brother.
I'm happy to inspire you.
You've inspired me and Charlene in so many ways over the years.
It's great to be able to pay it forward or give it back or whatever you want to say with you because, yeah, and it's really cool to be able to go back and forth and text about the kettlebells and what you're doing and what I'm doing.
And it's very encouraging.
And I think that, you know, we got to live.
I think that what sets us apart, and this is not in a lofty or haughty way, but it's just truthful, is you have to be real and you have to walk the talk.
And so many people in government are phony.
So many people that we look up to are just complete frauds.
They're total phonies.
And so I feel good about getting back in shape, getting in the gym, eating a clean diet.
I know you do too, with your kettlebells and walking in the forest with your dogs and all the things you're doing, which is pretty incredible.
I don't know that I could do what you're doing outside.
We're both in our 50s.
So we do what we can to stay in shape and stay limber and all that.
But I'm not sure I could do your workout, but I'm proud of you for doing it.
I think you could.
That was inspiring to me.
There are very dangerous large Texas mesquite thorns that I occasionally encounter when I'm running through the forest.
Yeah.
That's I saw the picture of the thorn that poked through your shoe yesterday.
Yeah, if that had gone in my foot, that would have really been something.
That was in an ounce.
They're like two-inch thorns.
But that's Texas.
And I admit, I decided I'm going to work out outside from now on.
And I was out there when it was, you know, 30 degrees, kettlebells with gloves.
You know, it's like, hey, I'm not going to let the cold weather stop me.
Just going to keep doing it.
But my point in all of this is, you know, you eat healthy, you eat clean.
I do too.
I've got my, you know, my typical clean food smoothie here.
If people follow our information, they live longer.
They live better and healthier.
They have more joy and more abundance and more longevity.
Why would the state not want people to live longer and healthier and happier?
Well, you know, it's dangerous when you try to get in the mind of a madman.
Yeah, yeah.
So I don't understand why they wouldn't because you and I being just normal human beings that care about other human beings can't understand why you wouldn't want someone else to have a good life.
But, you know, the more that I learn about the Disgusting, perverted people that are ruling the world.
Evil People, Shack, and Substack00:04:30
It's not surprising that they want to harm us.
They're evil people.
The Epstein class.
Yeah, they're evil people that hate other people and want other people to suffer.
So, what I can't relate to that personally.
I don't think you can either.
I know Charlene can't.
Most people would just want the world to be a better place and for people to live in abundance.
But the people that are ruling the world don't share that same desire.
And unfortunately, the most evil people control all the doorways.
They are the gatekeepers of information.
Even, you know, on all the mainstream platforms.
Now, how can people follow your work directly?
You know, what are your other primary sites besides this film site?
Yeah, thetruthaboutcancer.com and the truthaboutvaccines.com.
Those are our two main websites.
Perfect.
What about your substack?
You have a substack.
I also have a substack, a TTAC substack.
Yeah.
No, I love your Substack articles, by the way.
I share every time you send one to me, I'm sharing it.
Thank you.
Appreciate it.
Yeah, you're doing great work there.
Is it again?
That's just ttac.substack.com.
Yeah, it's okay.
It's the truth about cancerofficial.substack.com.
Oh, okay.
Okay.
The truth about cancerofficial.substack.com.
Yeah.
Got it.
Yeah.
Okay.
That's not a URL.
That's a sentence.
That's a sentence.
Okay.
Perfect.
And then the film is at censoredfilm.com.
Yes.
Okay.
We're about to wrap up this interview.
We're going to do another part, but is there anything else you want to add here for part one?
You know, I just, I want to thank you for participating in it.
You've always supported us ever since when we first started the truth about cancer back in 2014.
You were literally the first guy that I interviewed on our first quest for the cure.
No kidding.
Yeah, yeah.
And I still remember that interview in your, in your, it was, it was a film studio that was kind of like in a little barn area that y'all had converted.
It looked, well, it wasn't a barn, but it was just an old kind of a shack, which is really smart because no one would know from outside that it was just a shack, but it was your film area.
And I still remember doing that interview.
Oh, you're spilling all my secrets now.
Yeah.
My camouflage secrets.
You might want to cut that part, but no, no, I'll keep it in.
Yeah, no, we no longer film in a shack, but we, we, we did.
We did.
Because we don't get free money from propagandists and governments and tech companies and vaccine pushers.
You know, we got to, we got to fund our own stuff.
Yeah.
And I know you've been offered money.
We've been offered money to compromise and we won't.
And I, you know, I don't, there's not enough money in the world to get us to compromise what we think is right because it's in the end, we, we all have to give an answer to God, to a higher power for what we've done.
And no amount of money is going to make us swerve off of the road of telling the truth and doing the right thing.
It's just not worth it.
Temporal riches or fame or glory or whatever you're after, they're temporal.
They don't last.
You got to do something, do something that's eternal.
And, you know, helping people live better lives, sharing the truth, that's an eternal thing that we can keep with us.
Absolutely.
All right.
So the site is censoredfilm.com.
And I really want to encourage you, go to the site and sign up there.
But also, more importantly, tell people about it.
Share it.
Go on your social media and post about this.
Again, the film is free to watch.
It's a donation model.
And if you feel it in your heart that you want to help support what Ty and Charlene are doing, then go ahead and offer a donation.
But Ty, thank you so much.
Now, stay tuned.
This is part one of the interview.
We're going to continue with another part of this conversation coming up.
And I'll remind my audience that part two will be available at brightvideos.com, which is my new video site.
I had to shift over from brighteon.com to brightvideos.com because X is still banning links to Brighteon.com.
And we're suing X.
It's part of our lawsuit.
We are still suing X and X still refuses to drop the ban of Brighteon.com links.
So imagine that.
So this is still an ongoing battle, but you can catch me at brightvideos.com.
Thank you for watching and watch for the second part of this interview coming soon.
Take care.
Part One: Donation Appeal00:00:13
Stock up on the long-term storable Ranger Bucket Set.
536 servings of clean organic superfoods for your survival pantry.