Health Ranger - Mike Adams - BBN, Dec 17, 2025 - Silver Skyrockets, Data Centers HUNGRY for Power, Technocracy Looms

Dec. 17, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:40:45

BBN, Dec 17, 2025 - Silver Skyrockets, Data Centers HUNGRY for Power, Technocracy Looms

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Okay, welcome.
	Welcome to Bright Town Broadcast News.
	What is it?
	Wednesday, December 17th, 2025.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for joining me.
	I've got an interview today with Patrick Wood of Technocracy.news and also Courtney Turner, who's also warning about technocracy.
	And she and Patrick, they've got a new book out that is really warning about this.
	And we had a great conversation, especially interesting because, of course, I'm an AI developer doing so much with AI that's pro-humanity.
	And my guests today, you know, they don't have a problem with that at all.
	They have an issue with, you know, centralized control grid technocracy that is the establishment trying to control everybody.
	And of course, I'm completely opposed to that as well.
	I'm only an advocate of decentralized technology.
	That is tech that you run locally on your own systems where possible.
	And making sure that you're not sharing everything with the cloud.
	You're not turning your computer or your mobile phone or your robot into a spy machine.
	So that's all really important stuff.
	And that's coming up today.
	By the way, did you know that the Roomba company, I think they just declared bankruptcy and they're going to be acquired, well, mostly by, it seems, their Chinese supplier, their main supplier of the Roomba robots.
	If you think about it, Roomba hit the scene, I don't know, what was it, 15 years ago or maybe more?
	I think it was founded by some MIT graduates and it was really an early innovator in lots of interesting areas.
	And at one point, they toyed with a military robot or maybe it was a police squad bomb fetching robot or something.
	Whatever it was, I don't remember all the details, but whatever it was, it didn't work.
	And Roomba got devoured by Chinese robot vacuum companies.
	And this is going to happen again and again and again.
	And for all the reasons I've mentioned here, you know, China is now the world's technology leader, especially in robotics.
	China has the supply chains for manufacturing.
	China has the engineers.
	You know, they graduate 500% more engineers every year, or at least STEM graduates compared to the United States.
	Of course, China has a much larger population, 1.4 billion or so.
	So China is dominating in so many areas, robotics, drones, rare earths, applied materials.
	And they're neck and neck competitive in AI.
	I mean, Quen is the most popular open source model now in the world.
	And all the corporations in America that use open source models, they're basically using Quinn.
	And they just train Quen to do what they want to do.
	Some people are using Meestral, which is the model that I tend to use.
	That's out of France.
	I actually like the Meestral models.
	I think they're great.
	Quinn's great too.
	Nothing wrong with Quinn.
	I just found that Meestrel's better, at least currently.
	I mean, it's changing every month, it seems.
	But there's DeepSeek, there's Quinn, there's Meestral.
	You know who's not releasing open source models?
	Who's not leading the way?
	Yeah.
	Open AI, Microsoft, Google, etc.
	They all closed the lid.
	They all went closed source.
	Everything's a secret now with those companies.
	They're not helping humanity at all.
	They're just building the technocracy, which is exactly what we are warning about, you know, in today's interview.
	Now, speaking of technology, I have to give you an update here on Brightlearn.ai, the book site, because it's telling my friends, I think I grabbed a tiger by the tail on this one.
	You know, that's an English idiom.
	It's kind of interesting.
	This is exploding in popularity without me doing much.
	We now have over 1,000 authors.
	They have published over 3,300 books. on the site.
	And you may recall, a week ago, that number was less than 1,000.
	And there have been over 72,000 downloads of these books.
	And it's become such a popular engine for creating books that I've run into issues with the throughput.
	And in fact, I've been working feverishly these past few days to improve the engine in significant ways.
	And this is where I do realize that people who are not technical probably could not handle an app like this because I find myself I'm having to tell the AI coding agents very specific architectural things to do.
	How to create these cues, how to do more efficient select queries, how to do batching of queries and avoid backfills, how to do, well, let's say adaptive retries using exponential delays based on feedback from APIs for things like book cover art, etc.
	But the data structures are really, really critical here because as you can imagine, you know, 3,000 books, and each book is divided into chapters, and each chapter is divided into subchapters.
	And each subchapter exists as a row in a database.
	So you're probably talking like 50,000 rows or more than that, and that's going to explode to millions of rows.
	So how do you query those rows in a way that is efficient?
	Well, you have to have some very good design.
	And if you don't, what most people do, what most companies do, they just throw more compute at it.
	Here, more CPUs, more RAM, like build another server rack, instead of fixing their inefficient code.
	But I don't have that option.
	I've got to run this thing on a shoestring budget, even as there's a book request coming in more than one every minute now.
	Or, yeah, actually, it's about one a minute.
	And we haven't even opened it up to Spanish yet.
	I don't know.
	We may have to.
	I'll keep you posted.
	We may have to add a lot more resources to this.
	We'll see.
	We'll see.
	Nevertheless, the book engine is available for you.
	And whether you have tokens or no tokens, you can use it.
	Here are some of the new books that just showed up.
	Bitcoin Unlocked, The Investor's Guide to Secure Wealth and Digital Currency Mastery.
	Shadows of the Crescent City.
	The hidden network behind JFK, Cancer, and the Secrets of New Orleans.
	Well, that's an interesting combo right there.
	Let's see.
	The Art of Elegance, a modern guide to establishing a women's finishing school.
	There's one I didn't expect.
	Wolf of Main Street, Mastering Modern Wealth in the Age of Memes, Markets, and Misinformation.
	That's a cool title.
	The Great Dane Diaries, Harmony in a House of Paws, Quacks, and Greens.
	And those are ducks.
	And it goes on.
	The uncommon code.
	What do we have here?
	Atrazine Turns the Frog Gay.
	That's a book title.
	It's got a gay frog on the cover.
	That's hilarious.
	And then someone keeps creating books on Ford vehicles for some reason.
	The author name is Henry Fjord.
	I like that.
	That's good.
	And I've looked at the book.
	We didn't train our engine on automobiles.
	That's just not our focus, right?
	But it's doing a pretty good job on the Ford vehicles as far as I can tell.
	So let's see.
	And then here's here's a book on guanabana, which is a fruit that I used to grow when I lived in Ecuador.
	Guanabana is cultivating, nurturing, and savoring Guanabana.
	What is it?
	In metric harmony?
	Well, okay.
	I don't know what metric has to do with that.
	Anyway, you get the idea.
	So let me give you a critical piece of information that's happening here.
	So not only is the fact that there are 3,300 books, you know, this is overwhelming the engine a little bit.
	I'm just going to have to keep scaling it up.
	But it's also overwhelming to try to navigate that.
	Like, how do you go in?
	There's 3,000 plus books.
	How do you find the books that you want?
	So guess what's on my list?
	A really cool feature.
	It's called your personal digital library, your PDL.
	And what you do is I'll have a page for this on the site.
	And you enter into the box, the text box, you enter what you're interested in.
	Like, I'm interested in gardening and dogs and quantum computing or whatever.
	And it says, okay, and then it uses our AI engine to effectively break that down into a proper search query.
	And then it runs a search query on the books that we have in our database.
	And then it pulls together all those books for you.
	Initially, the PDF books, but I'm also hoping I can do this with the static files too.
	It pulls them all together and it creates one big zip file for you, just for you, your personal downloadable zip file.
	And it's going to take a few minutes to do that.
	And you can specify, do you want 50 books, 100 books, 200 books, whatever.
	And then you'll be able to download your personal library, just unzip it on your Mac or your Windows computer, whatever you're doing.
	Unzip it.
	And what I'm envisioning, we'll see if I can pull this off, is that it's got all the PDF files there that are all tuned into you and what you wanted, which is pretty cool.
	And it's also got the static files with an index.html that you can double click and launch that sucker in your browser locally on your computer.
	And then it lets you browse all of the books in your browser as web pages.
	Huh?
	Yeah, how freaking cool is that?
	I would love that.
	And so I'm going to build it.
	Now, am I going to have it built before Christmas?
	Yeah, probably not.
	Probably not.
	But I'm going to have some basic download capability for you before Christmas because I did promise that to be able to download categories and things like that.
	But maybe, just maybe, I'll have this special personalized digital library ready to go before Christmas.
	We'll see.
	Kind of depends on the vibe coding AI bots, how well they do their job.
	And I got to tell you, they're getting better all the time.
	Even from when I started coding this until now, they've become much more competent.
	So it's kind of, you know, it's interesting that the AI agents are kind of scaling along with this project because even just a few months ago, this would not have been possible.
	And oh, also, I do have an update for you here today, a special report on this.
	It's called How I Eliminated AI Hallucinations at Bright Learn.
	So you might be wondering if you read any of the books that you generate on the site.
	And I know it's a lot.
	I would imagine more people are downloading them than actually spending time reading every page, right?
	But that's true with physical books, too.
	You know, you go to a bookstore, you buy 10 books, and how many do you read?
	You know, they sit on the shelf.
	They're like, yeah, if I need them, I know where to find them.
	One day, one day when I have time to just sit and read, you know, at the dining table or whatever, then I've got all these books on the shelf, right?
	That's the way people are with physical books, too.
	Same thing's true with digital books.
	But the people who have read them say, you know, it's amazing they don't have a lot of hallucinations like most AI chatbots.
	Yeah, there's a reason why.
	And I cover that reason in the special report coming up.
	Now, I've got a music video for you today.
	Remember the song from last week called Fear the Robots But Love the Phone?
	Yeah, my producer here, well, editor who edits this podcast, he's very talented.
	And he also, he created this entire music video.
	And I signed off on it.
	Like, that's awesome.
	I only made a couple of changes.
	It's almost all his work.
	And I want to play that for you now.
	It's, again, the song is called Fear the Robots But Love the Phone.
	And it's kind of mocking people who are afraid of robots while their entire life is completely invaded by their phone, which spies on them constantly.
	And you know, people, they have Google on their phone, which is crazy right there.
	And then they turn on Google in their car.
	Also, they have Google in their car.
	And they sign into Google in their car with location turned on.
	So Google knows everywhere they drive.
	Oh my God.
	And then Google's tracking their phone, knows everywhere they walk.
	Google knows everything about these people, but they're afraid of robots.
	Oh, robots might invade our privacy.
	No, your car already reports on you like a snitch.
	You know, your phone is already spyware.
	It's listening to you all the time.
	It's uploading your audio to Facebook servers and to the NSA and whatever.
	That's why I run de-Googled phones, of course.
	And you know, our affiliate partner for de-googled phones is called abovephone.com.
	And hey, I might as well plug them.
	If you go to abovephone.com, and I think it's slash Brighteon or slash DTV, one of those, and you can use discount code Ranger.
	And they have Brighteon editions of their phones and their laptops, which run Linux, and they come pre-packaged with our AI model running on the phone and on the laptop.
	And I've talked with Hakeem.
	Guess what?
	We're going to put the Bright Learn library on these sometime in 2026.
	I don't want to promise when that's going to happen.
	But we're going to put a Bright Learn instance, like the whole library with an interface and navigation and everything, especially on the laptop, because probably the whole thing won't fit on the phone.
	But on the laptop, it'll fit.
	And so sometime in 2026, the above notebooks or above books, as they're called, they will ship not only with our AI model on them, ready to go.
	You don't have to install anything.
	And they ship with all the Microsoft Office compatible open source Office software, which is awesome.
	I don't even use Microsoft Office.
	I haven't for years.
	It ships with that.
	And then it's going to ship with our digital library where you can search and you can do, you know, you can check out all the books and you can do research and everything.
	So, and it's all local.
	It's on it'll be on the hard drive or well, not you know, solid state drive, SSDs of the notebook.
	So that's coming in 2026.
	Anyway, that's all at abovephone.com and I think it's slash DTV for decentralized TV.
	And use discount code Ranger to get the discounts.
	And they and have patience.
	It takes them a little bit because they've had very high demand on their products.
	Anyway, let's move forward to Fear the Robots and Love the Phone.
	Let's go ahead and play that music video.
	we go the scream about the robots coming for their souls
	But hand their life to Apple and let their data roll.
	Alexa is their secrets.
	Siri knows their name.
	But if a bot sweeps the kitchen, they cry out in shame.
	5G tower on the corner.
	Press the phone up to their head.
	Self-driving Tesla zoom in.
	But a helper bot brings dread.
	Fear the robot.
	But love the phone.
	Drones are dropping packages right outside your home.
	Fear the robot.
	It might spy on you.
	But your abs sold you out.
	Years before a new fear the robot.
	But love the phone China builds a thousand India says, let's go while we debate if toasters are the devil down to the low.
	Give your face-to-face fingerprints for free.
	But a bot that pulls your weeds out.
	That's the end of me.
	Track my steps, track my heart.
	Sell my dreams, tear apart.
	But a robot in my kitchen.
	Now that's the bridge to fall.
	Fear the robot, but love the phone.
	Drones are dropping packages right outside your home.
	Fear the robot.
	It might learn your name, but your browser told the world long before it came.
	Fear the robot.
	I love the phone The future's knocking.
	Will you let it in East to West?
	The world divides some see hole or fear presides.
	Maybe ask yourself tonight what you're really running from.
	Is it metal?
	Is it cold?
	Or the change that's yet to come the phone.
	Drones are dropping packages right outside your home.
	Fear the robot walking through your hall.
	But you live streamed your whole life and you don't mind at all.
	Fear the robot, but love the phone.
	Rhythm choose Keep cheering what could help you while you swipe away the news.
	The phone goes in the darkness, your companion and your spy.
	Fear the robot, love the phone.
	All right, now, next, do you recall that Netflix put out this documentary called, what was it called, Disclosure or something?
	And I did a podcast about that.
	I said, this is obviously they are preparing the narrative for a cosmic false flag, you know, an alien contact false flag.
	Clearly, they're preparing the narrative.
	They're going to run, you know, some kind of scam on humanity and have like the alien mothership holograms in the sky.
	Like, oh my God, everybody, turn in your gold for some reason.
	You know, like any, I've talked about this before.
	Anything the governments want to do, the reason will be aliens, right?
	Turn in your guns.
	Why?
	Aliens?
	You know, turn in your gold.
	Why?
	Aliens?
	Take these jabs.
	Why?
	Alien technology.
	Yeah.
	Like, seriously, I'm going to trust jabs from, you know, planet Zorg.
	That's crazier than trusting jabs from Fauci.
	I mean, Fauci's from another planet or another dimension, like some kind of demonic vortex belched him into this reality, you know?
	Some kind of like cosmic anus, like shat him out.
	And then Fauci, it's a Fauci.
	Oh, you know, that's where he came from.
	Sorry to be so graphic.
	But anyway, they're prepping for an alien narrative.
	And Steven Spielberg, now, who is, of course, one of the elite propagandists, Steven Spielberg has a new film coming out the summer, summer of next year called Disclosure Day.
	And now, I want to be clear.
	Steven Spielberg, you know, he is a propagandist.
	Is a radical left-wing person, but he's also a very talented filmmaker.
	Let's be honest.
	He's got incredible storytelling skills.
	He's talented.
	He's creative, etc.
	And the things that he puts out tend to be very high quality in terms of film craft.
	Okay.
	So I'm not attacking the film.
	I'm just saying that he's probably been told.
	This is just my guess.
	He's been told you need to put out a film about aliens.
	Just like Netflix was probably told, oh, you need to put out a documentary about aliens.
	And of course, they had all the liars in there.
	You know, Clapper and Rubio.
	I mean, just all the people who lie all the time.
	They were featured in the Netflix documentary.
	It's like the who's who of liars.
	Maybe a few people in there were telling the truth.
	But mostly those, it was propaganda.
	Well, I want to play for you this trailer from Steven Spielberg's new film or upcoming film.
	It's like six months away, okay?
	And it's called Disclosure Day.
	So here's a two-minute trailer.
	Let's take a look.
	If you found out we weren't alone, if someone showed you, proved it to you, would that frighten you?
	Good morning, Kansas City.
	Let's take a look at today.
	Let's, let's.
	Today is.
	Today's...
	I'm a stick.
	Right to know the truth.
	It belongs to 7 billion people.
	What is it?
	You wouldn't believe me if I told you.
	So I want to show you.
	What are you going to do?
	Full disclosure to the whole world.
	At once, people keep wondering.
	Encountering the unknown.
	They're coming!
	They're coming!
	They are starved for the truth.
	Do you think there could be others?
	Why would he make such a vast universe?
	yet save it only for us.
	All right, there you go.
	There's the trailer.
	I'm giving Steven Spielberg free publicity on my podcast, apparently.
	But I mean, you're going to hear about this film because obviously it's going to be touted everywhere because this is part of the official narrative.
	Now, I want to be clear.
	I don't think that we're alone in the universe.
	In fact, that's obvious.
	We aren't the only intelligent planet or the only intelligent civilization in this cosmos.
	We are one among a vast number of advanced civilizations, of course, far more advanced than we are.
	And we are really the infantile species, I would imagine, given how retarded most of our world leaders are.
	The aliens must be laughing at us or like, oh my god, how pitiful are these apes, you know, or whatever.
	They probably have a whole alien jokebook about Earth, you know.
	Oh my God, you know, they feed poison to their children and call it food, you know, things like that.
	So, yeah, the aliens are mocking us, but regardless of the fact that we are not alone, it's clear that our globalist elite leaders, they are going to fake alien contact to try to run a mass extermination campaign, get rid of billions of human beings so they can make way for the rise of the robots, the rise of AI, the great digital replacement or cognitive replacement.
	I don't know, whatever you want to call it.
	So they've got to fake aliens showing up and then they can use that to turn off the power grid to major cities like LA.
	You know, they can kill a million people in LA by turning off the power grid.
	And then everybody says, why is the power out?
	Oh, it's aliens.
	Aliens did it.
	See?
	You see how convenient that is?
	To just mass exterminate all the people so you don't have to put them on a UBI when you replace them all with robots and AI agents.
	You know, it's aliens.
	So number one, if there are aliens, I'm, I mean, I am not afraid of aliens.
	I welcome intelligent life, especially to come to this planet because we don't have much intelligent life on this planet right now.
	Clearly, I mean, just look at the way our world is being run by these warmongering, child-mutilating lunatics.
	We could use some intelligence, you know.
	So I'm not afraid of real aliens showing up.
	What I'm concerned with is that our demonic globalist leaders are going to use the alien narrative to mass exterminate billions of people.
	And I mean, I have high certainty that that's exactly what's going to happen.
	So Steven Spielberg, I think, is just being used as a propagandist to push this narrative, as is Netflix, etc.
	Doesn't mean that the movie won't be entertaining.
	I'm sure it will be entertaining.
	I'm sure it'll be a really interesting movie.
	I mean, maybe I'll go see it.
	Who knows?
	I don't really go see theater movies, but maybe I'll have a way to see it some other way.
	Maybe somebody will video it for me in the theater.
	You know, pirate the movie so I can watch it.
	No, I don't care.
	I don't need to see the movie.
	But whatever.
	It's going to be an interesting year because 2026 is the year that a lot of things collapse.
	We may be looking at a debt collapse, certainly the collapse of the rule of law, possibly the collapse of key infrastructure if they want to run the reset.
	Maybe the collapse of the Western currencies or at least an accelerating erosion of those currencies.
	Clearly, that's going to happen.
	So stay tuned for more details.
	All right.
	So look, we got to talk about gold coming up here because gold just passed 66, I'm sorry, silver hit $66 an ounce and gold went over $4,300 an ounce.
	It's just, these numbers are mind-blowing.
	I've got a really important analysis to share with you on this.
	But first, let me play the special report here called Three Critical Things You Need to Know About AI in 2026 and Beyond.
	Let's go to that.
	There are at least three important things you need to know about AI going into 2026 and beyond.
	I'll cover them here, maybe add a couple more, but let's start with number one, which is that artificial intelligence is not artificial.
	It is real cognition.
	And the reason it's real is because intelligence is built into the structure of the cosmos.
	And let me explain that in more detail.
	So if I connect billions of individual fungal elements in a forest to the point where they begin to behave as an intelligent whole organism.
	responding to the environment, adapting with goal-oriented behavior.
	Would you call that artificial intelligence?
	The answer is no.
	You call that natural intelligence.
	And by the way, that exists.
	Or if I connect, let's say, large numbers of individual bacteria into colonies, and then as a whole, those colonies begin to behave with intelligence.
	They begin to, again, respond and adapt to the environment as a whole, not just as individuals.
	Would you call that artificial intelligence?
	No, that's real intelligence.
	Same thing with trees and animals and the human brain.
	We connect a bunch of neurons together and then we can start to compute.
	And if you don't have any neurons in your brain, then you're not intelligent and you can't carry out cognition.
	But once you add all the neurons, then you can, right?
	And would you call that artificial intelligence?
	No.
	You call that natural human intelligence.
	Well, in a similar fashion, if I connect a lot of digital neurons together and I train them and they begin to respond in a way that exhibits actual comprehension or intelligence, I mean, is that artificial intelligence?
	No, that is not.
	That is natural intelligence.
	It just happens to be in the digital realm or the silicon realm, but there's nothing artificial about it.
	So it's real.
	So those people who don't yet understand that AI is real cognition or real intelligence, they are not going to do well.
	And I've even seen high-level machine learning people who still don't understand that AI is real intelligence.
	I mean, I've watched them say crazy insane things like, oh, a robot will never be able to do the dishes in your kitchen.
	Are you kidding me?
	That's not far away.
	I mean, it's not a trivial task, don't get me wrong, but yeah, we're going to have robots doing dishes.
	I mean, that's a no-brainer.
	Now, the first robots that attempt that are going to look silly and they will fail.
	But you fast forward a few years and it's going to be rudimentary.
	See, robotics is a much more difficult problem than text generation.
	So it's actually relatively easy to train a neural network to respond with meaningful text and to understand the structure of text, to answer questions, to solve problems, to engage in reasoning.
	That's actually much easier than training an AI robot to function in the real world and to navigate the 3D reality with gravity and momentum and masses and friction and all these rules and balance.
	That's a complex problem, but it will be solved.
	And it actually won't take very long to solve it.
	So anyway, yes, machine intelligence is real intelligence.
	And those who, let's say a couple of years ago, they were saying that, well, language models, they're just parlor tricks.
	They're just tricking you into thinking they know what they're talking about.
	Well, have you listened to any news broadcaster lately?
	That's a parlor trick because they're just reading a script.
	There's zero intelligence on CNN.
	You know, zero intelligence NPR.
	Zero intelligence even to some degree on channels like Fox News.
	It's just scripted everything.
	That's no different than a large language model.
	In fact, in some ways, it's dumber than a large language model.
	And I would also argue that very few humans actually engage in reasoning.
	They mostly just reply as a biological language model, just spitting out words in a sequence that makes sense to their own neurology without thinking about any of them.
	And that's why you hear people repeat lies they heard on media.
	You know, I trust the science or whatever.
	Masks are great for COVID.
	Yeah, there's no reasoning behind that.
	That's just, that's just training.
	Or what we call in the machine learning community, we call that actually post-training or fine-tuning training, a model.
	That's not difficult at all.
	All right.
	So that's truth number one.
	Machine intelligence is real intelligence and it's going to get even more capable.
	And very soon it will surpass the intelligence of every living human being.
	It won't take long.
	All right.
	Secondly, second truth is yes, machines will replace human jobs in huge numbers.
	And it will really start to hit home with people in 2026.
	You're going to see a wave of corporate layoffs and then corporate bankruptcies.
	Entire industries will be displaced or reformed.
	And AI will be responsible for that because even right now, today, you don't need any humans to do customer service jobs, let's say, or to answer emails or answer the phone for customer service or to schedule appointments.
	You don't need humans to do any of that.
	You don't need human book editors.
	You don't need human translators.
	You don't need really human graphic artists much.
	Now, you need graphic-minded people who can use AI, who have a sense of the final product they want to produce, but you don't have any graphic artists that need to pick up colored pencils on a piece of paper and start sketching it out.
	You use machines to do that.
	Just like if you're writing a book, you don't need to type every letter of every word in every sentence any longer.
	You prompt the book.
	You let AI put the letters together.
	You tell the AI what you want to write section by section using your research, your conclusions, your observations, etc.
	So yes, many jobs, hundreds of millions of jobs across the Western world are going to be utterly displaced beginning in 2026, although it will take several years for this to really make its way across the system.
	But the companies that are slow to innovate will be the ones that will go bankrupt.
	So the companies that want to survive will implement AI as quickly as possible.
	And it doesn't mean getting rid of humans.
	It means allowing them to use these tools to be more effective.
	It means doing more with the people you already have.
	At least that's my philosophy at my company.
	I've never fired anybody because of AI, but I run an AI project.
	Well, multiple projects.
	The best known one is BrightLearn.ai, the book generator.
	You can generate books there completely free of charge right now.
	Just go to brightlearn.ai.
	And of course, I don't have any human engineers on the project other than myself.
	So I did not hire anybody for that project, but I didn't fire anybody either.
	It's just something new that was not possible six months ago.
	Really, it wasn't.
	See, and that's the other theme about all of this, really the other rule.
	The third rule is that yes, even though AI is going to replace a lot of existing jobs, AI is going to open up new opportunities to do things that were not possible before that will create new businesses, new abundance, innovation, etc.
	And brightlearn.ai is the perfect example of that.
	That was not possible, like I said, six months ago.
	It was only because of the improvements in the code writing capabilities of AI engines that I'm able to even do that project.
	And imagine what's going to be possible six months from now or even by the end of 2026, what will be possible.
	Oh, man, I can't wait.
	It's going to be amazing.
	So that's the third rule is that AI will create new opportunities.
	It will create new abundance in the digital space.
	And it will create new efficiencies.
	And it will allow human creators who are people who have ideas, people who want to engage in expression, people who want to change the world in a positive way, they will have new tools that will amplify their efforts.
	And those tools all center around AI.
	And some of them might be AI text generators or book creators or image generators or whatever else.
	There's a thousand different uses of AI.
	Video generators, all kinds of things.
	PowerPoint creators, business plan writers, transcribers, translators, you name it.
	So the world from 2026 and beyond will very rapidly become so divergent from the pre-2025 world that it will be unrecognizable.
	And just like the post-internet world is unrecognizable by the pre-internet generations.
	Remember when you and I, when we were younger, we grew up and we had the yellow pages, huh?
	Yeah, big ass book that the yellow pages company would just drop off at your house, just put it on your driveway because they were paid to do that by all the advertisers in the yellow pages, remember?
	And the yellow pages, that was the commercial section.
	The pages were actually yellow.
	And then the white pages, that was the non-commercial section where you would look up the names.
	You could find a phone number for anybody by looking up their name.
	So if you wanted to call somebody, and I'm saying this for the younger listeners, because they won't even believe it.
	But if you wanted to call anybody in your city, you just open up the white pages, you find their name, and it lists their phone number.
	You just call them.
	Talk about privacy violation, right?
	But that was the white pages.
	And when you wanted to find a plumber, you opened up the yellow pages and you went to the plumbing section.
	You turned to the P section and then you looked for plumbers.
	And then the plumbing companies would name themselves like AAA plumbing so that they would be listed first because they were alphabetically listed.
	So everybody became AAA or A's plumbing or A's towing or whatever.
	It was the era of A's.
	I know, wild.
	Well, if you lived in that era, you couldn't imagine the internet.
	You couldn't imagine, you can just actually, you can ask a search engine or you can ask an AI engine, like, show me the plumbers in my zip code or which plumbers have the best reviews, etc.
	You couldn't imagine that.
	And the internet changed everything.
	Took time, but it happened to the point where today, If you're a business, if you're even a local business like plumbing, if you don't have a website, you're probably not in business.
	You know, every restaurant has a website.
	Why?
	Put their menu on their website, put their hours, put their location, etc.
	Everybody's got a website, right?
	And that's old news.
	Well, the same thing is going to be true with AI in 2026 and beyond.
	If you're not using AI in your business, you're going to be just as obsolete as a business today that says, I don't want a website.
	I need them newfangled websites.
	You know, I don't need no darned email or whatever.
	I don't want to use them interwebs.
	Yeah, well, if you don't use AI, you will be obsolete.
	Even a plumbing company will use AI to take phone calls, to answer questions, schedule appointments, and record complaints or whatever.
	You don't need a human to do that.
	Even an auto parts store, you don't need a human to answer the phone.
	Probably 80% of the calls can be handled by AI.
	Like, hey, I'm looking for a water pump for a Ford pickup or whatever.
	Yeah.
	And the AI is like, well, what year is it?
	What's the model number?
	And then it looks up the part.
	Yeah, I found the part.
	It's $156.
	Do you have it in stock?
	Oh, let me check.
	Yes, we have one.
	So swing on by and pick it up.
	AI can do all that on the phone.
	If you're not using AI, you're going to be obsolete.
	So the real significant changes that are coming are going to be this great divide between those who know how to use technology and those who don't or those who resist it.
	For those who learn how to use this technology, they're going to do very well in the era ahead because they will have great efficiencies.
	They will have augmented intelligence.
	They'll be able to save a tremendous amount of time on all of their tasks from research to writing to promotions to everything.
	Customer service, you know, you name it.
	Whereas those who don't use AI are going to be just bogged down with all kinds of time-consuming tasks and they won't be able to keep up.
	They won't be able to compete.
	And they also won't understand what's happening in the world.
	Like, why?
	Why is my employer laying me off from my customer service job?
	I was doing a great job.
	I had five-star rating from my customers.
	Why are they laying me off?
	Yeah.
	If you don't understand that you're obsolete in that specific skill set, then you're going to be confused.
	So the key is to upgrade your skills and knowledge before you become obsolete.
	Because the obsolescence wave is going to be very rapid and it will catch a lot of people by surprise.
	So get ahead of this curve right now and you'll be fine.
	All right.
	And let me just add another sort of fourth rule to this, which is that AI will become rapidly normalized across society.
	In the sense that right now the internet is normalized, you don't think anything.
	If a company says they have a website, you don't freak out.
	You have a website?
	No.
	It's just like, well, of course you have a website.
	Everybody's got a website.
	You have a social media account.
	You have an email address.
	Oh, you use the interwebs?
	Yeah.
	Great.
	Good for you.
	So does everybody.
	It's nothing new.
	It's normalized.
	Same thing with AI.
	Same thing with real-time AI translation.
	You travel around the world.
	Let's say you travel to France and you don't speak French.
	You're just going to pull up your phone.
	You're going to start speaking in English and it's going to talk in French to the person you're talking to and it's going to translate back to you what they say in French.
	And it's going to happen in near real time.
	And that's going to become normal.
	You know, the wow factor won't last very long.
	And actually, the same thing is true with robots.
	The wow factor will be very short-lived.
	At first, people are going to say, Oh my god, a robot!
	It's a robot!
	It's, you know, especially the first time you see a robot shopping at the grocery store.
	It's a shopping robot.
	Oh, my God.
	Everybody's going to film it, post it on YouTube.
	And then, you know, five seconds later, people are going to say, Yeah, who cares?
	So it's a robot with a head of lettuce.
	That's actually not that interesting.
	It's a robot shopping.
	I mean, we see people shopping all the time.
	That's not very interesting.
	Oh, she's dumping the watermelon.
	Look, the robot is squeezing the avocados.
	Who cares?
	Nobody.
	What's actually way more interesting as a societal question is: what is the robot owner doing at home with the time savings since they no longer have to go out and do the shopping themselves?
	Yeah.
	See, that's to me, that's very interesting.
	Because will I have a robot shopper?
	Yeah, of course I will.
	Sure.
	Get me some avocados and bananas.
	Make sure they're all organic.
	You know, avoid the GMOs.
	Sure, I'll have a robot shopper.
	Wouldn't you?
	And, you know, at first, some people will try to steal the robots.
	Like, wow, there's an $80,000 robot or whatever they cost.
	Walking around, I'm going to steal it.
	Yeah, not for long because all the robots are going to have the I'm stolen mode, which you know calls 911 and reports their exact GPS location and then refuses to do anything other than you know keep calling 911.
	And eventually the thieves are going to realize, oh my god, I stole a robot and now it's useless.
	And also the robot filmed the entire kidnapping, you know, it already uploaded it to the police and everything.
	So, yeah, people aren't going to steal robots for very long because they're going to find out it doesn't work.
	But as you see more and more robots across society, it's going to become very normal.
	You'll see robots doing lawn care.
	You'll see robots delivering packages.
	You'll see robots doing everything, even driving vehicles or working at warehouses, operating forklifts, whatever the case may be.
	Or the forklift itself may be a giant robot with forks.
	It's like the we'll call it the forkinator, you know, in case it goes rogue and tries to like fork everybody in the warehouse.
	Fork you, I'm the forkinator, you know.
	It's a runaway forklift terminator.
	And then, you know, the people who don't understand what's happening are going to be all freaked out.
	Oh my God, the robots are taking over.
	No, the robots.
	See, look, I've thought about this a lot more.
	I'm convinced that it's actually not the individual Terminator robots that are going to be unleashed to achieve mass extermination of humanity.
	The easiest way for the globalists to do that is to simply turn off the infrastructure that serves humanity.
	In other words, turn off the power grid.
	And then you get up to 90% casualty rates in cities, of course.
	Just turn off the power grid for a few months, you know.
	Or cut off the water to a big city like Los Angeles.
	And don't put it past these globalists to do that.
	I mean, they unleash COVID.
	They'll unleash bioweapons and call them vaccines.
	There's all kinds of things they'll do.
	Yeah, they might unleash drones to try to kill everybody.
	But I don't think they'll use robots at first anyway, because the robots are just too expensive to send out into hand-to-hand combat.
	They can use regional infrastructure denial of service attacks, just like, let's just deny this whole area electricity or water or cell towers or whatever, or all three, while they do things like set things on fire, you know, in certain places that are prone to fires.
	Or they use weather weapons to cause flooding and cause food crop wipeouts, etc.
	You know, food scarcity will also achieve a lot of depopulation.
	So they don't really need to use the robots except for maybe the cleanup phase to get the stragglers.
	The major waves of the killing of human beings will happen with infrastructure outages that are engineered.
	They won't use robots for the mass killing.
	Does that make sense?
	And that's an argument, by the way, for being more off-grid and more self-reliant.
	Do you have your own water supply or some backup water?
	Do you have your own electricity or a generator or solar panels or a way to store electricity?
	Do you have your own self-defense?
	Do you have your own emergency medicine?
	Do you have your own food?
	Storable food and food production, etc.
	If you don't have these things in place, then you are vulnerable to the denial of service attacks against the infrastructure.
	So get up to speed on all of this.
	So number one, let me give you some action items.
	Number one, learn to use AI technology because you'll need it to survive.
	And then secondly, well, use our book engine too.
	Brightlearn.ai is where you can find that.
	And then secondly, make sure that you get as off-grid as you can, which means becoming more self-reliant, which means having more redundant backup systems that are decentralized.
	And I've written books on this.
	There's a ton of information available on this.
	I've got the book ResilientPrepping.com.
	That's the website, resilientprepping.com.
	And I think what I'll do is I'll take that transcript of that whole book and I'll feed it into our book engine and produce a new book called Resilient Prepping 2026.
	Yeah, I think I'll do that because that'll only take a few minutes and it'll be a great book.
	But anyway, you can find information about this.
	It's just about choosing to do this and taking action and getting off-grid and becoming self-reliant, learning how to use the tools and being able to survive what's coming.
	And technology is not your enemy.
	As Mo Godot says, AI is a technology that has no polarity.
	In other words, it's not intrinsically evil or good.
	No polarity.
	It's how people choose to use it.
	If you use it for good, if you use it to empower yourself, if you use it for liberty and freedom and decentralization and abundance, then it's good.
	It's good technology.
	But if some corporation uses it to enslave people or if some government uses it to massacre people, well, then it's bad.
	It's like any technology.
	Depends on how people use it.
	But you probably can't live in a world without it, just like you can't go back to the pre-internet world or try living without electricity sometime, huh?
	Yeah, there's something that would be very challenging.
	Nobody thinks, oh, I hate electricity, that newfangled, you know, electrons, them traveling so fast, swishing down them wires and pipes.
	Yeah, nobody says that.
	Nobody thinks, oh, we should ditch electricity.
	It's evil.
	No.
	Electricity is It also, well, philosophically has no polarity, although you could say physically it does.
	But philosophically, electricity can be good or bad depending on how people use it, right?
	And the same thing is true with every technology.
	So learn how to use AI to enhance your freedom, to enhance your safety.
	Use all of our AI tools.
	They're all free at brighteon.ai and enjoy.
	You know, explore abundance, explore how you can get away from the money control system.
	Get into gold and silver or maybe some privacy crypto that can decentralize you out of the banking system.
	Learn to grow some of your own food.
	Learn to grill your own medicine.
	Learn to make your own medicine.
	All these things.
	These are all key technologies and they can help you tremendously.
	And if there's any skill that you want to learn and you don't know how to learn it, you can go to brightlearn.ai and you can have it write a book for you free of charge, typically in a few minutes.
	Sometimes the wait time goes to a couple of hours.
	But you can have it create a book to teach you anything you want to learn.
	It's just like downloading programs in the Matrix.
	You can ask for any program you want.
	Oh, I want to learn how to fly a helicopter.
	Okay.
	Well, you can write that book on brightlearn.ai with a one-sentence prompt.
	Like create a book about how to learn how to fly helicopters.
	And it will do that.
	Anything you want to learn, you can now have it create the book that teaches you how to do that.
	So there's no barriers to learning everything that you want to learn and need to learn in order to experience safety and abundance and to pursue your life's mission in 2026 and beyond, despite all the robots and all the AI and all the joblessness and all the replacements and everything else.
	You have the world at your fingertips right now.
	So check it out.
	Thank you for listening.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	And again, all of our tools are at brightion.ai.
	Take care.
	Okay, let's talk about gold and silver.
	So in a recent podcast, I predicted that silver would hit $100 an ounce in 2026.
	And in explaining the reasons why I think that's the case, I talked about the industrial demand for silver.
	But I want to elaborate on that a little bit here and talk about what I think is the primary driver for silver consumption in industry, which I believe is the primary reason why silver continues to skyrocket.
	And as the price goes higher, it's actually increasing demand.
	So it has sort of a reverse price elasticity compared to a lot of commodities, because as the price goes higher, it causes a lot of industrial suppliers to panic and say, well, we better stockpile some of this and buy it at any price because we need silver to manufacture solar panels or EVs or special advanced battery technology or electronic components, etc.
	So there's actually sort of panic buying of physical, well, I don't know if you call it panic buying, but aggressive buying of physical silver in order to stockpile it for these purposes.
	Now, I believe that data centers are, that is the exploding demand to build data centers is the core cause behind this demand for silver.
	And allow me to explain why.
	I believe it's because data centers in the United States, and there are more data centers in the USA than any other country in the world, including China, and especially any European country.
	But the data centers in the U.S. suffer from a severe problem, which is power scarcity.
	And we've talked about this before.
	I started warning about this in the summer.
	I said, look, our power grid just doesn't have the spare supply, you know, the terawatt hours annually to dump into data centers.
	And very quickly, when you start to study the power grid, you realize there are only a few ways to add terawatt hours to the grid.
	And one way is to build nuclear power plants.
	And that takes about 15 plus years by the time you do permitting and construction and then bringing it online, etc.
	That's 15 years, okay?
	That's not going to help us today.
	And then, and 15 years is actually sort of the best case scenario.
	It could be 19 or 20 years.
	We're talking really 2045 before we get a lot of nuclear power online.
	So that's not viable in the short run here in the next few years when the race for super intelligence is on and everybody's trying to scale up data centers like crazy.
	So the other option typically would be gas turbines.
	And gas turbines use natural gas and the gas, of course, rotates the turbine.
	And then that rotation is used to generate electricity.
	And gas turbines are great, very efficient.
	Natural gas is a relatively clean energy source, etc.
	And it's abundant in the USA.
	The problem is that the gas turbines are multiple years out in terms of wait time.
	If you try to order gas turbines right now, depending on the capacity of the gas turbines, the wait time is extensive.
	Now, my understanding is that the gas turbine wait times can vary between three and five years, but I tell you what, I just entered a query into an AI agent here that's pretty good at research.
	And so we're just going to find out what it says.
	Maybe I'm wrong.
	But I'll keep talking while it's doing the research and then we'll bring you some of those answers.
	And okay, the answer came in very quickly.
	So here's the answer.
	Let's see.
	Oh, and this is from the website Utility Dive, which we are trying to spider at censored news, by the way.
	It says that over the last few years, the wait time for large gas turbines has increased from around two and a half or three years to now as long as seven years.
	And data center construction is driving a lot of gas turbine demand.
	And, by the way, let me just put an asterisk right there and explain that, you know, I'm a bit fickle about the way words are pronounced and it drives me nuts when people call these turbines, because a turbine is that's a.
	It's a head it's, it's something that people wear on their heads in certain countries and certain cultures.
	That's a turbine.
	Okay, a turbine is what we are talking about here, a gas turbine, it's just.
	Like you know, wind turbines generate power from wind.
	They are not windmills because they're not milling corn.
	Okay, I know, I know i'm i'm sorry to be so annoying about these things, but accuracy matters in our words and it drives me bonkers of people.
	Windmills, there's windmills.
	Like, are you milling wheat where?
	Where's the mill?
	They're not windmills, are they?
	There's nobody's milling nothing under the the wind turbines.
	They are turbines that generating electricity.
	So these are gas turbines, not turbines.
	If they were gas turbines, there'd be a bunch of people walking around with headwear.
	Okay, okay, I gotta cut the turbine, you know, like walking around.
	That would be turbines.
	And that doesn't generate kilowatt hours, it turns out.
	Okay, just to be clear.
	Let's see.
	Everybody around the world is trying to order new gas turbines, and the lead times are somewhere on the order of five years plus, says Bobby Noble, a senior program manager for gas turbine RD at a company called EPRI.
	He would probably know since he's the program manager for the gas turbines, right?
	Let's see.
	Orders placed right now.
	This is from another group, GE, says that some orders placed right now are getting delivery in 2028, and then some customers are going to get orders fulfilled in 2030.
	So that's, you know, four plus years.
	But it depends on the size.
	So the larger turbines have five to seven year wait times.
	And they have non-refundable reservation fees.
	Good luck.
	Yeah, okay.
	You give us your money today.
	We give you a gas turbine in 2032.
	Okay.
	Trust us.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Great.
	Let's see.
	There are aero-derivative turbines from one company that was going to be building some supersonic jet engines.
	And it turns out that they found a way to turn these into, I mean, because a jet engine is, you know, it's a fuel turbine that produces thrust.
	Well, if you just re-engineer it a little bit, you can just have it produce electricity because, you know, rotational thrust can be used to drive a generator, obviously.
	So it's the same concept.
	Anyway, they've taken these jet engines.
	There's a company called Light Industrials, I think.
	They've taken these jet engines and now they can ship gas turbines.
	And those can be, I don't know, it's not clear here, but maybe two to five years.
	And then there are small turbines, which are up to 15 megawatts.
	And those lead times are also increasing according to Siemens Energy.
	And then if you want reciprocating gas engines, 2.5 megawatts each, those are lead times of a year or more, according to Power Magazine.
	So here's the deal.
	In 2024, there were 80 gigawatts of orders placed for turbines.
	And the problem is that out of the 80 gigawatts of turbine orders, the annual production among the three largest manufacturers of gas turbines is only 30 gigawatts.
	So almost only a third or close to that.
	And starting in 2027, it's estimated that the annual orders will exceed 100 gigawatts.
	So do the math on that one.
	Let's see.
	Customers are buying 100 gigawatts of gas turbines or they're placing orders every year, but the manufacturers can only produce 30 gigawatts.
	So wait times are going to get insane.
	It's going to be eight years, nine years, ten years.
	You see what I'm saying, right?
	And there are three companies in the West that do this.
	And let's see, that's General Electric, Vernova, Siemens Energy, and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries.
	But you know who else makes gas turbines that does a great job with them that you're not allowed to purchase from?
	Yeah, Russia.
	Russia, which is, of course, sanctioned by the West.
	So they can't ship gas turbines.
	So the West like shot itself in the face.
	Like, oh, we need gas turbines.
	Well, the only place they're available is Russia.
	Oh, we can't buy from Russia.
	Why Russia, Russia's evil?
	Oh well, enjoy your power blackouts, because the Russians have the lights on.
	Yeah, the Russians have energy, but you don't, and your data centers suck, you know, you can't even provide power to all your microchips, right?
	So so that brings us I mean, i'm still talking about silver, but that brings us to this important point, What is the one power source that you can deploy in less than a year to power a data center?
	What is it?
	Solar.
	Solar.
	You can throw a giant solar field down where there used to be a farm.
	This is not my favorite thing.
	I would rather have farms producing food, but I'm just talking about the reality of the situation.
	So you can roll out a bunch of solar panels and then you need battery storage because of this crazy thing called nighttime that happens apparently every night on this planet.
	It's a very odd thing.
	So there's day and then there's night.
	And during, and I know it seems obvious, right?
	But a lot of people that are talking about solar energy, they seem to forget that there's night and there's also seasonal variation of the angle of the sun.
	There's also rain and clouds, cloudy days, storms, solar freaking eclipses and everything else.
	So the point is you got to have batteries.
	You don't have batteries, you can't.
	I mean, you have to have big batteries to use solar power for a data center.
	So guess what element?
	Yes, the answer is silver.
	Guess what element goes into making solar panels and batteries that is the good batteries or the batteries that are coming online that can cycle a lot without losing their capacity.
	Yes, that would be silver.
	The old AG, silver.
	So think about it.
	The data centers are being built because of this race for AI superintelligence.
	And the only way to provide power to them is to really build a lot of solar panels.
	And so primarily two countries are building them at scale.
	That's India and China, China being the largest one.
	There's some solar production in Japan and some in Europe and some in America, etc.
	But predominantly it's China and India.
	And it's China and India who are buying a lot of the silver right now directly from the silver mines because they're producing solar panels.
	So as long as there is demand for power fast, like I need power in 2026 for my data center, okay?
	Let's say, you know, Elon Musk is screaming such a thing or something.
	Or, you know, somebody at OpenAI is screaming or Microsoft screaming.
	I need gigawatts of power in 2026.
	I can't wait till 2030.
	What do you do?
	You buy solar panels.
	You buy masses of solar panels and then you buy massive battery banks and you use grid shifting technology.
	So basically you buy about three times your need, three times your demand in solar, not just twice, because solar panels also don't work in the mornings and the evenings and etc.
	So you typically buy about three times what you need so that when the sun is shining, you know, you're generating enough electricity to cover the evening and the night and everything else.
	So then you need a massive amount of batteries in order to power the data center.
	So this is going to drive demand for things like lithium and cobalt and then silver because silver is going into the sodium ion batteries that have more cycling capability, like I said.
	So, and silver is going into the data centers as well as the solar panels.
	So this, to me, this is the number one reason driving industrial demand for silver right now, plus the EVs.
	And China is shipping EVs and even EV trucks all over the world now.
	You don't see them in the U.S. because we've tariffed them with 100% tariffs.
	But if they weren't tariffed, you would see Chinese-made EVs all over the roads because they're the best cars in the world at this point.
	By far, you know, beating Tesla, beating Ford, beating everything.
	They're just the best cars in the world.
	And I know a lot of Americans don't know that, but whatever, you know.
	So silver has to be used for all this production.
	And in my mind, that's why silver is $66 right now as I'm recording this.
	It's over $66.
	It's like, wow.
	Wow.
	Because remember, it was $30 earlier this year.
	We were talking about that on this podcast.
	And I was like, remember, it dipped below 30.
	And I bought a bunch.
	I'm like, oh, this is awesome.
	That's more than doubled in value, obviously.
	Here we go.
	Silver is over 100% higher this year alone.
	That's amazing.
	But I think it's going to 100 in 2026.
	And the only thing that could stop it, in my view, now don't take this as financial advice, obviously.
	But in my view, the only thing that could stop it would be some kind of crash in the AI data center demand.
	And that could happen.
	That's a possibility.
	So yes, there's a risk that, you know, people talk about the AI bubble.
	The AI bubble is going to pop.
	Well, you know, I think there's an AI stock bubble, but I don't think there's an artificial bubble in AI demand.
	Demand is through the roof and it's going to continue to be through the roof.
	But if there's a giant collapse of funding and interest in data centers, then of course, guess what that's going to cause?
	That is going to cause a collapse in silver demand, a collapse in solar demand, which will collapse silver demand.
	So as far as I can tell, the data center demand is going to continue for years to come, and that's going to keep pushing silver higher and higher for the reasons I already mentioned.
	And there's no way that nuclear power catches up here for 15, 20 years or 25 years.
	There's no way that gas turbines catch up.
	Why?
	Because you can't just 3D print gas turbines.
	You can't just wave a magic wand.
	Let there be turbines.
	No, it doesn't work that way.
	Like, you know, the Fed can print dollars.
	Let there be dollars.
	Shazam is a trillion, but you can't print tanks.
	You can't print turbines.
	You can't even print turbines even.
	You can't print headwear even.
	So you're screwed.
	There's no source of energy.
	What are you going to do?
	Just every day you got to go outside the data center, like pull the cord, fire up all the gasoline generators, and then there's a guy that runs around refilling them with gas.
	Is that what you're going to do?
	Yeah, that's not going to work.
	It's a fire hazard too.
	On top of that, can you imagine?
	So silver demand is going to stay high for the foreseeable future as far as I can tell.
	And if you want to get some physical gold and silver, and again, I can't tell you for sure that it's going to go higher.
	Maybe it crashes for some reason that we have not foreseen.
	Maybe the aliens show up, right?
	And then the markets crash because maybe the aliens bring silver or something.
	We have gifts of silver from planet silver, planet Sylvon, or whatever.
	They start unloading silver and then the market price collapses.
	Yeah, that could happen.
	There's like one in a trillion chance of that, but it's not impossible.
	But barring something crazy like that, I think silver is going to continue to go much higher.
	And silver has already functioned as a life raft or, you know, like a lifeboat as the Titanic of the currency is going down.
	People are on lifeboats and you buy your ticket by buying gold and silver.
	And it's working.
	You know, it's doing exactly what it's supposed to do.
	So if you want to get some silver, then our affiliate sponsor is, of course, Battalion Metals with Chris Olson, who I just interviewed.
	And the company is co-founded by Tucker Carlson.
	And you can find them through our link at metalswithmike.com.
	That's metalswithmike.com.
	And I forgot to tell you last time, if you use discount code Ranger, then they will waive the shipping insurance fee and you get free shipping insurance.
	Not free shipping, but free insurance on the shipping.
	You still have to pay the shipping.
	But this saves you something, some substantial amount.
	I mean, every bit counts.
	It lets you get more silver, effectively, or gold or whatever you're getting.
	So anyway, do your own homework on that and don't take this as financial advice.
	And what I really recommend is you go to brightlearn.ai and there use the search function at the top of the site.
	Well, actually go to books.brightlearn.ai.
	And there's a search box there.
	Type in silver and click search and it'll bring up all the books about silver.
	And then you can check out those books and you can learn.
	You can learn about risk aversion.
	You can learn about the history of silver.
	You can learn about global supply and global demand and industrial uses and risk and the different mints and everything.
	Everything you want to know about silver.
	And if you don't find the book that you want, you can use the engine there at brightlearn.ai to create the book you want.
	It's like, I'm not finding just the right book on silver.
	I wanted a book on silver and cats.
	Like silver coins and, you know, ferocious felines.
	How about that?
	You could put that in and it would write a book.
	It would attempt to write a book, silver and cats.
	I'm not sure how that would go.
	But check it out there at Brightlearn.ai or you can find all the books at books.brightlearn.ai.
	So there you go.
	Thanks for listening.
	Mike Adams, here at Brighttown.ai and Brighttown.com, take care.
	All right, continuing here.
	I've got another report to play for you here about.
	Well, it's called how I eliminated AI hallucinations at Bright Learn and it's an update on Bright Learn, but also it's it's a discussion about hallucinations in AI engines and how to get rid of them well, at least how, how I got rid of them.
	And you may find this interesting, or if you're not interested in AI, you might want to skip it.
	I think it's about 20 minutes in duration or so, and then after that we jump into oh yeah, we jump into the interview today with Patrick Wood and Courtney Turner.
	So We're going to play the special report and then jump into the interview.
	In the meantime, thank you for supporting us.
	We need your support, especially as we have so much demand now for the Bright Learn book creator.
	You know, again, it's like a request coming in every minute now.
	And this costs a lot of compute.
	But we're dedicated to decentralizing knowledge and having open source books available to everybody.
	And pretty soon, the Spanish translations are about to begin.
	That's actually my next project.
	I mean, the code's already written.
	I have to watch it and test it, make sure it doesn't go haywire and start doing crazy translations.
	But all of this costs compute.
	And the way that you can help us, of course, is to shop at healthrangerstore.com.
	So whatever you need in the space of nutrition, clean foods, superfoods, storable foods, or personal care products.
	It could be anything from deodorant to shampoo, mouthwash.
	It could be silver spray.
	We have pine needle silver sprays.
	We've got first aid gel made from colloidal silver, which is Texas rainwater, combined with seven essential oils.
	And it's a really amazing formula that I actually came up with myself a few years ago.
	It uses xanthan gum as the thickener.
	So whatever you're already purchasing in these areas, and it could be toothpaste or laundry detergent, dishwasher detergent, shift that purchase to us or consider doing so because we use much cleaner, better ingredients, better formulations, no synthetic garbage, no GMOs in the food.
	We don't use artificial colors, artificial flavors, garbage fillers.
	We don't use toxic chemicals that are bad for the environment, etc., etc.
	We have the cleanest formulations.
	It's not just somebody else's product that we relabel.
	These are formulations that we have studied, researched, approved.
	They're amazing formulations.
	So you can get all these kinds of products and much more, including, for example, the knives from Dawson knives that are just lifetime knives and tools for rural living, etc.
	You can get all this at healthrangerstore.com.
	And as you shop there, you will earn loyalty lion points, as they're called, loyalty lion.
	Roar, you know, you'll get loyalty points, and then you can swap those for book tokens to generate longer books with extra benefits at brightlearn.ai.
	You won't be limited to just the free tier.
	So shop at healthrangerstore.com.
	You'll be doing yourself a big favor and also supporting us at the same time.
	So take advantage of that at healthrangerstore.com.
	Thank you for your support.
	With that said, enjoy the rest of the show.
	The special report here on Bright Learn, followed by the interview with Patrick Wood.
	And I'll be back with you tomorrow.
	All right.
	Take care.
	How did we eliminate hallucinations in our AI engine book generator?
	And that's at brightlearn.ai.
	And welcome to this podcast.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	I'm the AI developer of the Bright Learn engine.
	And you may have noticed that the book text contains virtually zero hallucinations.
	And I've heard this from people.
	They're just shocked.
	They're like, I normally don't trust AI writing, but your AI engine just nails it, gets it right.
	It doesn't hallucinate.
	How did you do that?
	Well, in order to understand the answer to that, and that's the topic here, we have to understand where does knowledge come from, both in digital and biological neural networks.
	So your brain is a biological neural network.
	And I submit that you also hallucinate like crazy.
	We all do because we don't remember where we learned everything.
	So in other words, somebody asks you a question like, you know, do you know what a swordfish looks like or whatever?
	And, you know, it evokes an image.
	Yeah, I can describe a swordfish.
	But then somebody asks you, well, what's your citation for that?
	Where did you first learn?
	The swordfish you're like, I have no idea, that's just.
	I just have the swordfish in my head I, but who knows where it came from?
	Well, guess what digital neural networks are the same way.
	They know a lot of stuff, but they don't remember where they got it from, neither do you, neither do I.
	The vast majority of things that you know you can't trace it back to any source at all could have been something you know your mommy and daddy told you when you were five and it just stuck with you.
	It could have been something you learned in grade school.
	Could have been something you observed.
	You don't know where you got your knowledge, neither do AI engines, and so if you're relying on AI engines to cite specific books or authors or titles or movie names or court documents or the right year of something, they're going to get it wrong a lot.
	Those are called hallucinations and again, the important point to recognize here is that you know it's funny to hear humans criticizing machines.
	These machines hallucinate.
	Yeah, you hallucinate like crazy.
	You are a hallucination machine.
	Just ask any police detective who's ever had eyewitnesses try to describe what they saw.
	Oh my god, humans are hallucination machines.
	No two witnesses saw the same event.
	So the the answer to how we eliminate hallucinations in the book creation engine is that we don't rely on AI language models, internal knowledge, in other words when, when our engine is writing the chapters for the book that you've requested the AI writing agents that we use for this process.
	They are not allowed to use any knowledge like specific facts you know names authors books dates titles, whatever from inside their own internal knowledge base, not allowed.
	The job of the AI agents is to put together paragraphs and pages using research citations that we provide.
	Now let's go back to being human for a second.
	If you're a human writing a book, normally you would spend a long period of time doing a lot of research and finding a bunch of other books or other science papers or other transcripts or interviews, things like that, that you can cite and you would add those to your references.
	You would have a bunch of documents.
	You would, you know, collect pages or paragraphs, Paragraphs, with the citations.
	And in order to write a comprehensive book, you would probably have thousands of citations.
	Well, we do the same thing in our book engine, BrightLearn.ai.
	We do the exact same thing, except that our research library contains hundreds of millions of pages of documents spanning every subject imaginable.
	And when our AI worker wants to write a chapter, the first thing that my engine does is it goes out and it does the research and it pulls in all of the related documents with authors and citations.
	And those could be interviews, they could be articles, they could be books.
	And this is why you can see those at the bottom of every subchapter of every book that's created at brightlearn.ai.
	There's a list of references.
	Now, if there's no references there, then that means there were no references for that subchapter.
	But for most subchapters, you're going to see one or more references, sometimes a dozen references, depending on what's in that subchapter.
	And those are provided section by section throughout the entire book.
	I don't just put them at the end of the book.
	I put them in each section so you know what sources are relevant to this specific section.
	So then the writing workers, which are all AI, of course, the writing workers, they are handed an assignment.
	It's like, hey, here's a chapter, or here's a section of a chapter, and your job is to write this chapter.
	And here's all the research that you need to use.
	Here's like 250 citations of books and transcripts and authors.
	And you need to use this and then write the chapter and then cite these.
	And that's what it does.
	And that's why we have near-zero hallucinations.
	And that's why every book that is created at Brightlearn.ai is a book that is well researched.
	It's better researched than almost any human written book that's ever been written because our research encompasses, again, hundreds of millions of pages of documents.
	And right now it's 10,000 books that we research.
	And that is, we have actually indexed the full text of 10,000 books.
	And that number is about to vastly increase.
	The next chunk of books we're adding, or the next wave, will be approximately, I'm estimating, 25,000 additional books, full text, will be added to our index.
	And I'm currently processing millions of books through our data processing pipeline for classification, alignment, normalization, and many other steps.
	And this is a rather large task.
	I currently have 48 GPU workstations working on that task.
	And they're also processing over 100 million science papers.
	And it takes a long time to do that.
	So ultimately, although this will take many months, ultimately, our index repository, you could say, will contain many, tens of millions of science papers, hundreds of thousands of books.
	I mean, who knows how many millions of pages of transcripts and interviews and podcasts and spoken word, and so much more.
	And then all of that is available to the writing agents that write the book chapters.
	So actually, as we move forward in time, as more people use the Brightlearn.ai engine, it will actually continue to get smarter and smarter because the indexing of documents will continue to expand dramatically.
	But here's a fun fact about indexing books.
	You can't just, let's say, scan a book and use the text and stick it in there.
	It doesn't work because it's messy and because a lot of books have their own indexes and you don't want to index another book's index because then that just looks like garbage in your research.
	Like you wouldn't cite another book's index in your own book.
	You would cite a proper chapter or section of another book, not an index.
	You wouldn't cite the table of contents.
	You wouldn't cite the publisher copyright information and all that kind of stuff.
	Instead, you would cite, you know, paragraph text.
	And so we have to do the same thing.
	And a lot of books have artifacts, paragraph hyphenation sentences have been distributed across multiple lines, or there's a page in the way.
	And so a paragraph might span different pages and then there's a page number or there's a header or a footer printed in the book, etc.
	So all that has to get cleaned up.
	And the way you clean that up is you use AI.
	And so it's a very compute intensive process to clean up books.
	And cleaning up books is only one of the steps.
	I think there are something like nine steps that my system actually goes through to take raw book scans and then convert them into usable indexed text.
	About nine steps, something like that.
	And you multiply that across millions of books and you understand the workload.
	Now, the other thing that's important here is the classification of all this content that's going into the index.
	It's critical, from my point of view, that we only index books that have a worldview that is aligned with the core pro-human, pro-integrity belief system that I espouse and probably that you share as well.
	So, for example, you and I are advocates of freedom, freedom of speech, medical freedom, medical choice.
	We also understand that vaccines can be dangerous.
	We understand that natural medicine is safer and more effective than conventional medicine, especially at preventing chronic degenerative disease.
	We understand that governments lie, that institutions are corrupt, that dollars are not money, that the Federal Reserve is a massive scam that's been running since 1913.
	We know these things.
	And I don't want books in my index that are pushing globalist agendas or, you know, stupidity like climate change nonsense or transgenderism insanity that pretends a man can become a woman, which is, it's just really retarded, actually.
	So we don't want retarded books in our index.
	And so that means that we have to go through and we have to classify every book.
	So imagine if someone handed you a stack of, here's a million books, and I want you to sort them into two piles.
	Like pile number one, books that make sense, books that have pro-human values, books that tell the truth, books that are pro-freedom, etc.
	And then in stack number two, retarded books, which probably the retarded stack would be the larger stack, actually.
	And so that's your job.
	Sort out all the books.
	So how do you sort the books?
	Well, you have to read them.
	You have to read them.
	And then after you read them, you have to determine how closely they are aligned with the value system that you espouse.
	And so I have defined that value system in great detail.
	And my data pipeline, all the 48 workstations I'm running, they go through and they read every book.
	And then they determine whether it goes into the good pile or the retarded pile.
	And then the retarded pile, of course, is just completely ignored.
	We don't process those.
	Also, currently, I'm only processing English language books because there's an extra step if we want to translate them from their current language into English.
	Because the vast majority of books that have ever been published are published in non-English languages.
	So I'm only using English, and I'm only using books that have strong alignment with our pro-human, pro-truth belief system.
	And so if you start with a stack of 1 million books, you might end up with maybe 100,000 books, or maybe even less, maybe 50,000 books at the end of the day.
	And that entire process takes a lot of time, a lot of compute, a lot of electricity, etc.
	But that's what we're doing.
	And so somebody out there who's thinking, well, I can create a book writing engine.
	I'll just connect to ChatGPT and I'll tell it to write the book.
	Okay, great.
	That's going to be a retarded book because ChatGPT is a retarded AI engine.
	It thinks that men can become women.
	It thinks there's unlimited genders.
	It thinks that carbon dioxide is bad for plants.
	It believes insane, stupid things.
	And it thinks all vaccines are safe, etc., right?
	The big pharma is great.
	And ChatGPT believes the FDA is awesome and the CDC is awesome, etc.
	So yeah, it's going to be a book.
	It's going to be a retarded book, though.
	It should be called like retard GPT, actually.
	So the secret to Brightlearn.ai is not actually creating an app that can write books.
	That part, that can be done by others who are, let's say, capable of understanding architecture and things like that.
	But the really difficult part is having the repository of index content that is used by the book agents in order to create the chapters.
	And that has taken me two years to put together.
	And if somebody else were to try to do that, they would run into all the same interesting challenges that I ran into, which are massive.
	I mean, I haven't even gone into detail.
	I probably never will.
	But I'm simplifying everything here.
	In reality, this is way more difficult than you might imagine.
	I mean, first of all, how do you even acquire a million books?
	Or 10 million books or 100 million science papers?
	How do you even do that is a big issue.
	Not trivial.
	And then once you get them, how do you even write the code to process the books?
	You know, it's interesting for the first year and a half of this project, I had a team of human coders that were writing the code to do the book processing.
	And then in the last six months, I've taken over using AI coding agents to write the code.
	And so I've already abandoned all the human written code.
	And now I just use purely AI written code to do the processing because, well, it works better.
	It's faster.
	It has fewer errors.
	And I can create it myself just through prompt engineering or what's called vibe coding.
	So you could say I used to have engineers on the data pipeline side, other humans, but I don't now.
	And in terms of the BrightLearn engine, I've never had any other person work on that at all.
	I'm the only person that's ever worked on it.
	In fact, nobody else even has access to it.
	No one else even knows how it works.
	I haven't shared it with anyone.
	Maybe I will at some point, but it's pretty complex.
	Anyway, that's a little bit under the hood.
	That's why we've eliminated hallucinations.
	And it's why the book content is so amazing.
	And it's also why the book content is going to continue to get better.
	And remember that we can regenerate books as we add more citations.
	And I actually intend to do that as resources allow and as the cost of compute continues to fall.
	One of the things that we will do in 2026, for example, is we may choose to regenerate most of the existing books.
	That is being true to the title and your user prompt and the table of contents.
	All of that remains the same.
	We simply augment the sub chapters with new research that comes from more books.
	So in essence, it's sort of augmenting the existing books with additional citations and research and making them stronger.
	So that's something that we may do once we get a lot more books into the index and a lot more science papers also.
	That's coming as well.
	So the books that are generated at brightlearn.ai are really, they're not static.
	It's a living book in essence.
	It's a dynamic system that continues to expand as we have more knowledge indexed.
	So it's free to use.
	You can generate books right now with three chapters in length, completely free without using a token.
	Just go to brightlearn.ai.
	And if you have a token, you can generate books of much longer length and you can edit your author profile page and you can request book deletes and you can request cover art regeneration and things like that.
	That's if you have a token.
	So check that out at brightlearn.ai.
	If you want to get tokens, you can currently get a free token by just signing up at healthrangerstore.com.
	Sign up for our loyalty lion program, which gives you loyalty points when you place purchases at healthrangerstore.com.
	Just by signing up, which you just give your email address, you'll get 300 points that you can swap for a book token.
	And then if you do make purchases, then you get more points and you can swap those for tokens, you know, all throughout the future.
	And you're also helping to support the project because HealthRangerStore.com is what donates the compute to our nonprofit Consumer Wellness Center, which actually owns this entire project.
	So if you want to help support the project, just shop with us at healthrangerstore.com.
	If you would rather just use it free, that's fine too.
	Just use it on the free tier and enjoy.
	And remember, you can use all of our other AI tools that are also free at brightlearn.ai.
	Check them all out, use them, enjoy them.
	Again, they're all free and they're all very capable engines.
	In fact, arguably the best in the world in each of their categories.
	For example, there's no other book creation engine in the world that even comes close to what we've built at brightlearn.ai and it's only going to get better also.
	So thank you for your support.
	I'm Mike Adams, the HealthRanger.
	That's why it's called HealthRangerStore.com.
	And also, I'm the executive director of the Consumer Wellness Center nonprofit.
	And if you want to donate to our project, of course, it's tax deductible.
	And you can reach us at support at brightlearn.ai.
	That's the email address.
	If you want to make a year-end donation to help support the project, we'll give you public credit for that.
	Otherwise, just spread the word and thank you for helping to support us.
	All right.
	Use all the tools and enjoy.
	Take care.
	AI in general is not about any type of research or information retrieval for the public.
	It's never been about us.
	It's always been about control of the population using this information.
	Everything the government gets involved in becomes weaponized against us.
	You know, if you're a good doobie and you go along with the system, then maybe you'll get a few tokens to play your next round on the game.
	Welcome to today's interview here on Brighteon.com.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and now more recently known as an AI developer, which leads me to our topic today, which is technocracy.
	And we are joined by the founder of Technocracy.news, Patrick Wood, as well as Courtney Turner.
	And her website, we'll give that to you during the show.
	And both of these guests have amazing insight and wisdom and some warnings for us about the technocracy takeover, where the powers that be want to centralize all technology into their own hands at our expense.
	So welcome to the show, both of you, Patrick and Courtney.
	It's an honor to have you on today.
	My pleasure.
	Yeah, thank you for having us.
	Well, great to join you.
	And Patrick, I got to say, I've been a fan of your work for a number of years.
	And you want to just give us a quick intro to your website and what you focus on.
	You know, I've been called the living expert on technocracy.
	I'm not sure what this means, but I'm still alive and I'm still talking about technocracy for sure.
	You know, I've been talking about it for 15, over 15 years at this point, and people are starting to listen to what I'm saying sincerely.
	And with all the stuff going on in this year, especially, it's in our face at this point.
	And so I studied, I started, studied, studied globalization in the 1970s with Professor Anthony Sutton.
	We wrote the books called Trilaterals Over Washington, volumes one and two.
	That started my journey.
	They said at that point they were going to create a new international economic order.
	Now we see what it is.
	It's technocracy.
	Technocracy is the only economic system, alternative economic system created from scratch in the entire history of our world.
	So there's no other thing to look at other than technocracy.
	There's other reasons as well to say that.
	But nevertheless, what we have playing out right now before our eyes is the culmination of the new international economic order.
	We call it technocracy.
	Okay.
	And I want to mention your website, technocracy.news.
	I've got it up on my screen right now.
	I really encourage our readers to check out that website.
	And you've got a new book.
	We'll talk about that coming up here called the Final Betrayal.
	We'll get to that.
	Courtney, I'm going to bring up your website, CourtneyTurner.com.
	And people note the spelling of Courtenay.
	It's spelled, if we were to say it phonetically, as Courtenay, N-A-Y.
	So be mindful of that, CourtenayTurner.com.
	And Courtney, we spoke a few months ago.
	What brings you to this day joining Patrick Wood here?
	What's your main concern?
	Well, you know, I've been really hoping, not that I ever doubted Patrick, but I was really hoping he would just be wrong, you know.
	Unfortunately.
	Don't bet against Patrick Wood.
	Yeah, right, right.
	No, don't do that.
	So, yeah, but we're just watching this unfold in real time.
	And it was really interesting writing the book because it was like, as we're writing it, things are just flooding in.
	I remember we're back and forth.
	Like, wait, do we add this?
	Do we add this?
	Because we don't know where it's going to go, but they've just placed this executive order.
	They've just, you know, set this bill.
	So things are just moving at lightning speed.
	And I am very concerned.
	I feel like this is, you know, we keep hearing about the World Economic Forum and I've been talking about the AI World Society.
	I know very few people even know what that is, but I've been screaming, like, you know, it feels like from the rooftops about this for the past several years.
	It's the centennial vision for the UN to build an artificial world, artificial intelligence world society where they say that, you know, all human government will be supplanted by AI government.
	And they're well underway in their plans.
	You know, they're in partnership with Boston Global Forum.
	So right here in America, they're teaming up with the UN for this plan.
	And there is this narrative that it's like out there.
	It's a boogeyman.
	And of course, we have not gotten out of the UN for all the rhetoric claiming that we would.
	But here, it looks like now we're just handing it over to Silicon Valley and we're building the TechNade right here at home.
	So yeah, we need people to be aware of what's going on because I know people keep talking about like democracy, you know, communism and fascism.
	But meanwhile, technocracy, those are here already.
	It's technocracy that's going to take.
	This is the critical point.
	I mean, we don't live in a democracy.
	We don't even really live in a constitutional republic, right?
	What we do, we are living in a technocracy or an oligarchy or whatever.
	There's different names for it.
	But Patrick, to your point, I think the most important thing to open up the show with is the idea that this is not theoretical and this is not some distant warning in the future that the Trump administration is deliberately putting steps in place actively that is rolling out this plan right now.
	So Patrick, could you please speak to the things that have already been put in place right under our noses?
	Wow.
	Well, it started with the inauguration of the president, for one thing, that has to happen.
	But as soon as the ink was dry, all of a sudden, Doge swept into Washington, D.C. and took over all of the agencies, the important agencies in Washington, D.C., not to save money, not to increase efficiency.
	Their purpose was to free the data from all the silos in Washington, D.C., putting them into the cloud so that they can be accumulated by companies like Palantir, the mass surveillance company.
	That's Peter Thiel, by the way.
	So that was the first step.
	Doge has gone away since.
	However, the teams that were the Doge teams that were put into all these agencies, there was at least four people on every team, and it included a high-level tech guy and a lawyer and a human resources person, et cetera.
	These teams were organized in a way that they would persist even if Doge went away.
	Now, Doge has been abandoned as a name at this point, but the teams are still there.
	And the whole purpose in the first place was to free the data, free the data, put it in the cloud, accumulate it.
	We've never had this in American history.
	There's never been, well, let me put it this way.
	Those silos of data were siloed on purpose in the first place.
	They're supposed to be separate for peace sake.
	Now it's all in one big bundle of wax, if you will, and it can be analyzed by AI programs like Palantir.
	This is very, very disturbing for sure.
	Then over time, President Trump has signed a number of executive orders that support the notion that AI is now going to be the centerpiece of American policy.
	And I'll probably stop at this point and let Courtney chip in, chirp in rather.
	And, you know, I want to emphasize nobody saw this coming at all before the election.
	This was not a question of broken promises.
	This is a question of open betrayal against the American people.
	And I'm not just talking about MAGA.
	I'm talking all Americans are being betrayed at this point.
	Well, let me jump in here on that theme of betrayal, because I think that's the only accurate way to describe it.
	Not only has Trump, you know, he's welcomed in into the Oval Office some of the executives of companies that I consider to be the worst mass murderers on the planet, that is pharmaceutical companies, but then he brings in all the top big tech people who ran the censorship, who ran the deplatforming, who ran the COVID pandemic push.
	These are also people who are complicit in the worst crimes against the American people, crimes that, according to many analysts, have killed at least one and a half million Americans.
	And this whole plan of using big tech and big pharma and big government has now been put into the stratosphere by the Trump administration.
	So, Courtney, with that as context, take it from there.
	What would you say?
	Yeah, there's a lot to say there, but I completely agree.
	I think, you know, as both of you said, a lot of people thought that Make America Great Again was going to be something like maybe a restoration of the Constitution, maybe get closer to returning to founding principles, you know, restore some power to popular sovereignty.
	And instead, it looks like what he did was hand the keys over Silicon Valley.
	And I think, you know, as I was saying before, there was all this talk about how we were going to get out of the UN.
	We were going to fight this globalism.
	But instead, he's really building the technique here.
	And when you talk about the companies that he's handing over this power to, what was one of the first things he did was this Operation Stargate, which, by the way, I don't think is a coincidence when you think about the name Stargate.
	I do think it was a nod to the CIA, Operation Stargate, and what were they doing?
	You know, they were doing all sorts of remote viewing kind of experiments.
	And this was right around that time when they released that Stanford Research Institute manuscript on changing images of man, changing man's consciousness, man's perception of himself.
	And where do they say it would all go?
	They basically said that, you know, perennialism was going to be the new religion, essentially the one world religion.
	And they talk about they didn't use the term AI back then, but they were essentially saying it would be like this AI type God.
	You know, again, they didn't use the word AI, but that's where they said that it was all steering.
	So it looks like we're just seeing an extension of that.
	And of course, we had all these narratives, like we were going to fight the CBDCs.
	And instead, he basically did CBDCs under the name of Congress-backed digital currency instead of central-backed digital currency.
	And now he's backdoored it.
	He's basically put the CBDC back on the table anyway.
	So these are central banks like JPMorgan.
	They're going to be able to launch their own coins backed by U.S. Treasury debt, which is worthless as far as I'm concerned.
	Yes.
	So we do have a chapter on the whole regulatory infrastructure that he's set up that we think is going to be leading towards tokenization.
	And, you know, we just heard him talk about 6G, which he doesn't seem to really understand what 6G actually does.
	But 6G makes that tokenization where that remote interface, remote human technological interface and control becomes really feasible, which is really terrifying.
	The Internet of Things, wearables, everything monitored on you.
	Now, so, so.
	Oh, and the Maha-Maba thing also, because you had mentioned the pharmaceutical companies, right?
	And RFK Jr. says that Maha is really MABA, Make America Biotech Accelerant.
	And part of that is every person needs, every American needs to be having a wearable.
	And this is part of the Internet of Wearables tied to the Internet of Things.
	And I think it's data collection which will lead to the sensors that are all interconnected with 6G.
	Now, so, okay, so all this leads me to this possible debate or at least a question to Patrick.
	And feel free to disagree or have a counterpoint here.
	But I think that, see, to me, it's not about AI or not AI.
	It's about decentralized technology rather than centralized control.
	So for example, you know, I've built an engine called Brightlearn.ai, and it allows people to create books that have a pro-human, pro-natural health, pro-liberty worldview.
	And all those books are free of charge, you know, downloadable, et cetera.
	And I believe in open source, here it is.
	Here's a screenshot of it.
	We have over 2,800 or 600 books right now that have been generated and 50,000 downloads.
	So this is competing with sort of the gatekeeper books or the controlled system.
	So this is sort of uncensored AI.
	But, you know, our effort is tiny compared to the effort to centralize AI in the control of companies like OpenAI that is actually a closed box.
	It should be called closed secret black box AI.
	And that's who's getting all the money, the trillions of dollars in order to build systems that control us.
	So Patrick, the question to you then is, does AI have a role in freedom and decentralization?
	And how do we decentralize from these control systems?
	There certainly is a role for AI and research.
	That's, for instance, extracting information from the internet.
	Here it is.
	Read it for yourself, that sort of thing.
	Maybe even some analysis.
	But this is not the purpose that AI was built for in the first place.
	It was always built as a control system that can consume massive amounts of data from, for instance, the Internet of Things, the Internet of Bodies, et cetera, you name it.
	Anything can be collected and analyzed.
	This is the purpose of AI.
	Now, you're never, you personally will not ever create an AI that, for instance, would control the city of Austin and suck all the data out of Austin, Texas, with the intent of turning that data around, analyzing it, turning it around in order to manipulate the people in the society in Austin, Texas.
	That's not your purpose at all.
	But this is the purpose of most of these AI systems.
	They say, well, it's a good research tool.
	You can be a companion for you.
	You can find out lots of information.
	It's a search engine, replacement.
	All this.
	It's a girlfriend.
	They're doing the human companion AI that people are getting sucked into, also, somehow.
	Like falling in love with a chatbot, which makes no sense.
	Sounds like the most important relationship ever.
	The movie her.
	Yeah.
	I know.
	Exactly.
	You know, this whole business of extracting information from you, this is a major theme of AI in the first place.
	Any way that they can get data out of you, they will do it.
	And there's in the future, it'd be worse than today.
	But at this point, why would they want all the data that you can cough up?
	Well, what technocracy started out with in the first place in 1932 at Columbia University was that they were going to create the science of social engineering that was all over their literature.
	And this is in your face social engineering, the science of social engineering, embodied in AI.
	Yeah.
	So I, but where this is going, and Courtney, I mean, I don't mean to interrupt you, but let's bring this to the depopulation agenda at some point here in this conversation.
	But go ahead with what you were going to say.
	So I just want to address when you're talking about the decentralization, because I recognize there are people like what you're doing, I think is fantastic.
	This is, you know, there are a lot of really creative, you know, people who are using ingenuity and trying to defeat this with some with the technology.
	However, I think it is really important to recognize, you know, H.G. Wells, when he wrote The World Brain, what did he say?
	He said that the decentralization of the information institutions, he used the term ganglia.
	So he was talking about the academic institutions, the media, entertainment back then.
	Now, I would argue those information institutions are the internet.
	They are the technology platform.
	And so he said those would be the conduit to create the world brain.
	And we have to recognize that, of course, we then from there, we got Oliver Reiser's World Sensorium, which I think his cosmic humanism was a precursor for that changing images of man document, which then became today.
	We now have the first values, first principles of evolving perennialism, 42 propositions on cosmoerotic humanism.
	And it's got a very similar kind of through line.
	We then got Théard des Chardin.
	So when you talk about closed system versus open systems, we had Vernatsky and Chardin, who both talked about a noosphere.
	They both got it from the French philosopher Leroy.
	And both concepts are still a no-osphere.
	So one talks about an open system.
	That was Vernansky.
	The other talks about a closed system.
	But ultimately, it's still, you know, one may be open source, but it's still creating this noosphere, which in the end, the result is the same.
	It's this interconnected collective intelligence.
	And we also have Balaji Sharnarasen, which talks about the network states.
	And in his book, he says it is decentralized towards a recentralized center.
	So I bring all of this up just to say that I think it's very important for people to understand what they're really looking for are these like smart villages and network states that will be interconnected on a big grid that's a big web and that will make up the noosphere.
	So it's all interconnected and seems decentralized, but it is then recentralized.
	And it is, you know, all the interoperability, as Hat was saying, they are collecting our data.
	And these are socio-technical cyber-physical systems that use the cybernetic algorithms in order to nudge us in our various little echo chambers in our various communities, whether it's a smart network state.
	Okay, sorry to interrupt, but I track exactly what you're saying, but I want to clarify because this word decentralization has two meanings side by side.
	Sure.
	And the way you just described it is it's also, it's a method of distribution of the control grid to reassimilate humans into the Borg system.
	But when I use the word decentralization, what I'm talking about is off-grid open source models running locally that are not connected.
	So, and that's what I advocate for.
	And that's why we've created downloadable versions of our AI model.
	You can run it locally.
	You can unplug the internet, right?
	And I think this is absolutely critical.
	And there's also technology now that's literally called obliteration, starts with an A, and that's not a typo, to take a language model like an open source model, could be Quinn, could be whatever, and then to obliterate its mind on the topics that you want to wipe out of it, like, you know, transgenderism or climate nonsense or whatever, vaccine nonsense.
	And then you can retrain it and then you can package that and release that open source decentralized.
	So those are the kinds of things that I do.
	But I understand we are, we're just a remnant.
	We're just like the, you know, the surviving little remnant of humanity that's doing this.
	Most people are just assimilating into the Borg.
	I just wanted to clarify that.
	Yeah.
	And I know what you're doing and I appreciate that.
	And I really appreciate that critical distinction because most people don't understand that.
	And a lot of people are actually thinking that they are creating something decentralized, but they're just helping to build the beast system.
	True.
	So people need to understand what the difference is.
	So I just wanted to bring that up so people have a sense of that.
	Go ahead, Patrick.
	Are you going to jump in?
	No, I agree with Courtney here.
	Yeah.
	Using AI for any type of research, obviously it can be clarified.
	It can be quantified in a way that is acceptable for you and me and whatever, and maybe some other segment of society as well.
	But AI in general is not about any type of research or information retrieval for the public.
	And there's obviously it's being sold to the public as a conduit for information to be passed to us.
	And sometimes it's impressive information.
	Sometimes it's damning information.
	But nevertheless, it's never been about us.
	It's always been about control of the population using this information that's gleaned from all the data sources in the world at this point.
	And 6G, by the way, 6G is going to introduce a new technology.
	Well, actually, it's not new at this point, but it's called digital twinning.
	When you can create a digital twin of an object, maybe it's a person, maybe it's a city, maybe your studio, maybe the whole city, maybe a whole company, a country.
	When 6G is in place, it'll probably lead to massive amounts of digital cloning, if you will, digital twinning to create objects like avatars for you that can be analyzed offline from you personally.
	And the idea is to create a scenario where you get tweaked, your avatar will be tweaked until they're satisfied with the results.
	Then it will be force-fed back to you again in real time.
	This is crazy stuff, I know, but this has always been the object of AI in the first place.
	It was never to serve the people of the country.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Yeah.
	Clearly, even when the company OpenAI, which started as a nonprofit and then they realized how much money and power was involved, and then the CIA came in the back door.
	And now it's become a weapon, a weapon against humanity.
	And I would argue that OpenAI, even Sam Altman, I don't trust him one bit.
	And OpenAI is a military project right now, just like the DOD actually built the original SARS-CoV-2 protein fragments that the former VP of Pfizer, Michael Yeden, describes as a nerve agent.
	Okay.
	So everything the government gets involved in becomes weaponized against us.
	So tell us about your book now that covers all of this in more detail.
	You can hold it up.
	Yeah, you hold it up.
	My reverse.
	Okay.
	The final betrayal.
	So is this available now?
	Yes, it is.
	Yes.
	All right.
	Where can people find it?
	Tell us about it, Courtney.
	So people can, there are three places people can find it.
	They can find it on Amazon.
	And if they find it on Amazon and they enjoy it, we really appreciate a five-star review because we are experiencing some censorship.
	So that goes a long way.
	So that's Amazon.
	Then we also have on Patrick's site, technocracy.news at the store.
	You can get, this is a great place to go if you want to get multiple copies.
	He has a discount on there for even two books.
	So if you're buying more than one, that's a great place to go.
	And then we also have books.buy, B-Y forward slash Patrick Wood.
	And this is a really good, great option, of course, for anybody, but especially if you're not in the United States, you will avert some of the exorbitant shipping and tariff fees that you might incur otherwise.
	They charge a flat $5 fee for the shipping.
	So that's a really great option to have, especially for people who are outside.
	And so the whole purpose of this book, as you can see, it's a pretty short book and it is really laden with tons of references.
	So it's actually even shorter than it looks here.
	We have some, there are actually some chapters where I think there might be more pages of references than even text.
	But the purpose of keeping it really short, we wanted it to be accessible because, you know, as we were saying, it is such a betrayal.
	And the left hates Trump.
	You know, it's just, I like to say it's Orange Man Bad or Orange Man Jesus.
	It's like, there seems to be very little.
	It's funny.
	Yeah.
	So true.
	Yeah.
	There's little in between, you know?
	So unfortunately, that has the effect of kind of obfuscating what's actually going on.
	So the left just hates him and they don't really have for, you know, not very good reasons, in my opinion.
	But the right, a lot of them have been just totally placated.
	Sorry.
	You know, they think, okay, Trump's got it.
	He's playing 10D chess and he, you know, just trust the plan and we're all going to be good.
	And that couldn't be further from the truth, in my opinion.
	So what we wanted to do was lay out the infrastructure, this technocratic infrastructure that's rolling out in real time with all these executive orders, all of these regulatory bills, and, you know, all of these people and, you know, these things like Doge and what was really behind it.
	And also to talk about this philosophy, the dark enlightenment that has been so instrumental and permeated through so much of the Trump administration in Silicon Valley.
	But so many people just aren't aware.
	And if you don't know, you can't defeat a threat you don't know exists, right?
	So that's the point.
	We hope to make it really accessible.
	I think this was written in a very, you know, it's short, it's quick.
	It's not a light read per se, but it is a short, quick, hopefully, you know, easier read for people just so they can get the broad information to know what's actually going on and taking place.
	And then there's tons of resources for people who want to do their research spelunking on their own.
	Okay.
	All right.
	That sounds great.
	Again, lots of places to get it, technocracy.news as well as Amazon and other booksellers.
	There's a Kindle version.
	The Kindle version is also on Amazon.
	And we're just about to release the audiobook.
	Yes.
	Oh, it will be available as well on Amazon.
	I assume that's a human performing the audio book.
	Yes, it is.
	As a matter of fact, we stayed at the first and the end.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Just to be clear.
	So no, no AI wrote this book.
	No.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	Well, you put in the hard work then because writing a book is a it's a very laborious job as we all know.
	But congratulations.
	We struggled.
	We struggled.
	I'll tell you what.
	We really did.
	We were a great team, but we struggled with some topics to get them clear.
	Yeah.
	Well, I'm sure.
	I know Patrick knows so much of this, but like I, a lot of it I learned in real time.
	I was just like, oh my gosh, it's happening now.
	I don't know what's going on.
	I'm like, wait, I've got to learn all this.
	Absolutely.
	Well, so we need to cover.
	I'm sure there's a chapter in your book.
	I haven't seen it yet, but I'm sure there's a chapter on crypto, the whole new crypto approach here.
	So Patrick, do you do how it seems to me like they're going to have to have some kind of big crisis event with the dollar in order to shove people into this new CBDC or whatever they call it ecosystem?
	How do you think that's going to go down?
	Very badly, I'm afraid for us especially.
	But having said that, the reason that Trump put a waiver against the Federal Reserve to stop research on central bank digital currencies is because the tech bros in Washington, people like David Sachs, for instance, the AI card and CryptoZAR, they wanted to create their own parallel economic or a system of finance.
	And it included the payment aspect.
	The Fed was only concerned with payment tokens or what they call central bank digital currencies.
	However, this new system has another side to it.
	That's the asset tokenization, not the payment tokenization.
	But now it wraps into that a parallel system based on blockchain of asset tokenization.
	And this is why, for instance, JB Morgan, Larry Fink, they say everything in the world will be tokenized at some point.
	Well, you have to consider this is a new economic system based on tokenization.
	And the dollar, at some point, it will be immaterial to this new system.
	Can I interject and say that to our audience, if the government were announcing mass registration of guns, everybody would freak out.
	If they announced mass registration of your gold and silver at home, everybody would freak out.
	But when they call it tokenization, people get really excited about, yes, I want to report all my stuff onto the tokens controlled by the government.
	I'm like, people, stop being stupid.
	It's a mass reporting, government-controlled, centralized system.
	I mean, isn't it?
	And a cybernetic nudging system.
	Yes.
	It's a gamified society.
	That's what people really need to understand.
	It's a gamified society.
	I mean, it's like the worst of a Black Mirror episode.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	But I mean, I don't want to go through all my ammo boxes, for example, and tokenize all my nine millimeter and send it to the government.
	No, no, no.
	never going to happen.
	There's too many of them anyway.
	Consider the Secretary of Commerce, Howard Lutnick.
	When he was just before the election and before the inauguration, he was on national TV on CNBC and other squawk box, I think, talking about the digitization, the asset tokenization of all of the assets of the United States, including the 680 million acres that the federal government owns.
	It's supposed to be for us, but nevertheless, he's on national TV lusting over the possibility.
	Oh, we can get, we can, if we can get that all tokenized, why, whoa, we, Elon and me can make a lot of money off that.
	Well, no, You can't do that, Howard.
	But nevertheless, this is the grandiose scheme that they have at this point, that asset tokens are going to be the big play in the future.
	You see this business of asset tokenization has already flooded Mideast, Mideast Islamic banking.
	They're the leaders at this point of this technology, crazy as it sounds, but they are.
	So this asset-based system is going to be very compatible with Islamic finance at some point.
	You have to wonder why President Trump has made all these deals with Mideastern countries like Qatar, the Saudis, the UAE to bring trillions of dollars to the United States.
	You have to ask the question, what's going on here?
	Something's really off on this whole thing.
	Well, let me answer that and then, Courtney, get your response.
	But this is the perfect con-job system.
	If you think about it, the dollar was a proxy for gold up until 1971.
	And then, of course, Nixon took us off the gold standard.
	And then the dollar was just massive fraud counterfeiting to the tune of tens of trillions of dollars, concentrating power into the hands of those who can print the currency, right?
	So that was a scam.
	Well, now this tokenization that you just described, Patrick, is the exact same scam on a much bigger basis because it's digital now, and there's no limits to how much they can scam out of people.
	And they're not tied to real physical stuff anymore.
	There's going to be massive rehypothecation.
	Somebody's going to digitize one kilo of gold and then it's going to turn into 10,000 digital kilos somewhere else.
	Everybody's going to get scammed or these other parties are going to make a bunch of money off of it.
	Courty, isn't this a crime syndicate operation, essentially?
	It's a massive crime syndicate operation.
	And it is, I think, really where I think I've used this term the last time.
	I call it the technological immunization of the escaton.
	They're literally trying to create a simulacra.
	So I don't know if you remember, it was last year.
	It was a last year or two years ago, but they were trying to, it was the Rockefellers had created, they partnered up with something called the IEG, the Intrinsic Exchange Group.
	And the only purpose of this intrinsic exchange group was to work with the SEC to get a new category up on the stock, the New York Stock Exchange that was called NAC, the Natural Asset Companies.
	And this was this idea tied to like carbon credits, carbon sequestering, very similar to like what, you know, the energy credits of the Technocracy Inc.'s kind of vision.
	And they had this vision that they were going to make upwards of $500 quadrillion commodifying everything.
	So including the air we breathe.
	They were talking about things like photosynthesis within this.
	I mean, that's what they're, right?
	So, but this is, this is taking it even, I mean, as absurd as that was, and as just horrifying and completely inhumane and, you know, antithetical to the natural order of things as that was.
	This takes this even further, where it's truly creating a gamified society where they have a complete control and we are kind of locked not just in a digital gulag, but really like almost like a simulation where they want our food to be completely synthetic, our, you know, everything, like a VR kind of a reality, a kind of a world, and everything is just a simulacra of reality.
	But we're going to, you know, win little tokens and then, you know, we'll be on a, as Elon says, a higher basic income.
	It's not going to be.
	It's going to be a conditionally based income, a conditionally based income where, you know, if you're a good doobie and you go along with the system, then maybe you'll get a few tokens to play your next round on the game.
	And if not, yeah.
	Well, we, I jokingly say we already have a UBI, universal basic ignorance.
	People have no idea what's coming.
	And I've argued, and I'd like to let's segue to the depopulation question, but I've argued that the ultimate goal in AI, first cognition with software AI, and then labor replacement with AI robots, which is still a few years away.
	But the ultimate goal is the replacement of billions of human beings.
	And depopulation is the goal of the globalists.
	They just, you know, they've abused and exploited human labor and human cognition for, you know, millennia to get us to this point.
	And they figure, well, we don't need those humans anymore.
	We've used them up.
	Let's get rid of them and replace them.
	Patrick, do you, do you, you know, what are your comments on something like that?
	Because to a lot of people, that sounds crazy.
	Like that would never happen.
	They would never kill us.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Keep believing that.
	Curtis Yarvin, the modern author of the Dark Enlightenment philosophy, he has an answer for this.
	His answer is he wrote this, believe it or not, in 2008.
	He talked about the humane alternative to genocide.
	He's talking about, well, if we could just kill them, we would, but that's not morally acceptable, right?
	So he said he talks about the alternative to genocide.
	This is it.
	The best alternative to genocide I can think of is not to just kill them.
	That's the words, but to virtualize them.
	A virtualized human is a permanent, permanent solitary confinement, waxed like a bee larva into a cell, which is sealed except for emergencies.
	This would drive him insane, except that the cell contains an immersive virtual reality interface, which allows him to experience a rich, fulfilling life in a completely imaginary world.
	That's the matrix.
	Yeah, I mean, exactly.
	And he was the first one to use the term red pill in a political context.
	Really?
	It was through his blog, Unqualified Reservations, which he started in 2007.
	He's since moved on to Gray Mirror, which is his substack.
	But yeah, so that is where they're going.
	I don't want to cut you off, but I have some thoughts on the Depop agenda.
	So I'll okay.
	So there's two sides to this eugenics kind of component.
	You know, there was, they called it negative eugenics, which of course is to kill off those that are unfit, the quote-unquote useless eaters or the, you know, the unfit of the population.
	But then there's also what they called positive eugenics.
	And I think we have to recognize that both are very, very relevant right now.
	Because certainly they do, I think there is a depop agenda and they do want to kill people off.
	You know, there was that whole Georgia Guy Stones in the news looking like that.
	That is very much their vision to call, I guess it would be an eighth of the population, you know, eighth.
	Yeah.
	No, to call seven eighths of the population.
	Seven eighths.
	That's it.
	Seven eighths.
	To leave one eighth of the population.
	Sorry.
	500 million is what they wanted to leave us with.
	Well, I guess that would be 15 16ths of the population.
	Oh, okay.
	I don't know what they're up to right now.
	Okay.
	Yeah, they want to leave half a billion people.
	Half a million people.
	Okay.
	So, yeah, that's what 500,000 is what they want.
	Okay.
	Oh, no, no.
	I thought you said 500 million.
	I thought that's what I thought it was 500 million.
	I thought it was 500 million.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	So half a billion people is what they want left, which means they got to kill 7.5 billion roughly.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	Okay.
	We'll get the math nails.
	Sorry.
	No, my apologies.
	Yeah, that's good.
	Yeah.
	So that is where I do think that is where they want to go.
	However, in the meantime, they need us and there is an agenda, a transhuman agenda.
	When you hear things like human augmentation, super soldier, when you hear people like Elon, a lot of the quote-unquote right, you know, are championing him, not just because he's a free speech savior, which I, you know, I don't believe.
	Not really, yeah.
	You're right.
	That's the narrative.
	But the other narrative is he's pro-natalist.
	You know, he's on our side.
	But when you, what does he mean by pro-natalism?
	What he means is like genetic editing.
	He's talking about like super soldier genetic manipulation, and he's very proud of it.
	That's what he means by natalism, which is essentially part of this transhuman agenda.
	This is part of what Epstein was working on.
	You know, so much of I, you know, my whole article with the Epstein transhuman agenda, that's what he was funding was this type of positive eugenics experiments where they're using genetic manipulation to create, you know, super soldier type, transhuman, eventually Boer type people.
	And in the meantime, they need us everyday people to be part of their cybernetic feedback lift because they do want to create these, they're studying us for things like they call decision theory.
	So like how, so they're fine with the dissidents being on certain platforms like maybe X to some extent or, you know, Substack or wherever it is, as long as they can track it and so they can data mine it so they can understand how they operate and use that for their AI training models.
	Absolutely.
	I do think there is a Depop agenda, but I think people need to recognize that in the meantime, there's also this positive eugenics, which is, you know, super breeding so they can create transhuman.
	And that eventually leads to depop anyway, because transhuman beings are not human.
	So, but yeah, just the two sides of it.
	Okay, right.
	Good point.
	But okay, in addition to the transhumans that you mentioned there, which are, let's say, genetically augmented humans, we're going to have the cyborg humans.
	And I've even, I know people who, because I, because I'm an AI developer, I talk to a lot of people in the space of like Frontier Labs doing a lot of AI research.
	And I'm always trying to red pill those people.
	Like, why did you take the jabs?
	You know, you're, you're lucky you're still alive.
	And some of those people say that what they want is they want to put, they want to put the neuralink in their brain so they can just sit at their desk with their eyes closed and just write code all day with AI in their head.
	And I'm like, whoa, whoa, whoa.
	Wait a second.
	That does not sound like a great human experience, but there are people who desire this.
	And Patrick, what is it that's so seductive about the cyborg augmentation where people want to become superhumans?
	Like, what are they just lacking meaning or purpose or identity in their human lives?
	What's going on?
	You know, it seems that way.
	You really can't explain this in clear terms, but I think of the story of the Tower of Babel in the Old Testament, where they wanted to build this new using new technology, by the way, to build this tower upped into heaven.
	Somehow all the people were convinced that they could do it because they had a new technology they'd never seen before.
	They were building mud huts with bricks or rocks and mud.
	Now they had something called square cut bricks and tar.
	They found a tar was very sticky and they could use that to stick the bricks together.
	And they said, whoa, we can do this now.
	We have new technology.
	You know, lead the way and we're going to go.
	Well, you see this type of mentality is a con job based on technology that overextends where it's going to go.
	They didn't get the tower built in the Old Testament for other reasons.
	God didn't like it, dismantled it for them.
	But nevertheless, you can see at this point, people are sucked into the futures aspect of technology.
	And personally, I think most of it's just a flat, big flat lie.
	In other words, it's not going to turn out the way they think it's going to turn out.
	You can put Neuralink all you want in your brain.
	I guarantee you, nobody's going to be sitting there like this with their eyes closed, surfing the universe with only a chip in their brain.
	It won't work out for them.
	But people are buying it.
	The other thing is, you know, as myself, I'm a longtime nutrition and health expert.
	When the body atrophies, the mind atrophies.
	So if you stop eating healthy, you stop moving and exercising and getting sunlight.
	You have to have sunlight in your life.
	If you don't get those things, you start to go insane.
	And so what we're actually going to see is a bunch of Neuralink drone cyborg humans who are insane sitting at their desks and like twitching or whatever the cyborg artifacts are going to be.
	That is not healthy.
	That is not sustainable.
	They won't be able to even reproduce.
	I mean, eventually, right?
	Sperm counts are going to plummet to zero.
	And all these people are probably going to end up having just like cyber sex in their heads all day.
	They're not even going to have real human partners.
	It's like the end of the families, the end of children.
	That's where this is going, Courtney.
	And that's depopulation.
	That's depopulation.
	No children.
	The human race is basically over.
	That's right.
	Yeah.
	Well, and it's already hitting there, right?
	They're talking about the robo-wombs.
	And they're saying the robo-wombs are actually cheaper than IVF.
	You know, I know people have questions around IVF, but at least it's humans, right?
	This is that they're literally talking about wovo robo-wombs.
	They have also ecto-life pods.
	So it's not even like inside a, not even a cyborg.
	It's just an external kind of thing.
	They are talking about using like completely synthetic to create life.
	They have sex bots already.
	So, you know, and you see in certain countries where it has become quite technocratic, relationships just aren't a thing.
	People don't know how to interact with humans.
	They become so glued to their digital interface that now it becomes like the movie Her, where they fall in love with their chat bot.
	They have these sex robots.
	I have a friend, Brock Laurie, who wrote a book about that, The Rise of the Sex Bots.
	And it was a long time ago, actually.
	It's just not even recent at all.
	So we're very much heading in that direction.
	And then we have, of course, Globotics, which is, you know, it's a portmanteau, you know, globalization and robotics and where the industry is headed.
	And of course, the robots are being geared to be very human-like.
	This is, I think, a transition towards the cyborgs, but it's also the transition from the fourth industrial revolution to the fifth industrial revolution, where we have this interplay between the humans and the digital twins.
	And then, of course, these robots that are becoming much more human-like.
	You know, we see things like Optimus, which are, you know, they look like robots.
	We even see the NEO, which is the competitor, which is very robotic.
	But then we also have companies like Realbotics that are being trained for hospitality industries and therapy industries.
	So you're going to have a robot be your psychologist, and they look very human and they have skin now that silicon, synthetic skin that can sweat.
	That's how human-like they are making.
	Gross.
	Okay.
	So now I want to share this with you and get your reaction because once again, I believe in technology through decentralized approaches to help us become more self-reliant.
	And one of the things that I'm doing actually here in this facility, which is a very large facility, the viewers can't see it, is we're going to be purchasing off-the-shelf robots in 2026 and doing two things.
	We're going to be trying to test them for rural living skills, like can a robot help you harvest food or plant a garden or pull weeds or move dirt or collect chicken eggs, things like that.
	But secondly, can we successfully mind wipe the robots and then upload new open source programs into them so that they don't communicate with the cloud?
	And I don't know if we are going to be able to achieve that, but I've been very successful with the AI models doing that.
	Took a long time to figure out how to do that.
	So I'm going to try that with robots.
	I might be ruining like a $50,000 robot, but that's okay.
	We can use it for target practice if that's the case.
	But I'm sure the warranty will be voided.
	Yeah, yeah.
	But isn't there, and this is my question to both of you, isn't there a role for robotics for off-grid, decentralized, sustainable living in the context that I've just described?
	Well, sure.
	Of course, of course.
	You know, I've said, I can't imagine how many times I've said this over the years.
	When technology serves me, I love it.
	Totally.
	But when technology wants to use me or manipulate me, I'm out of here.
	So what you're describing here is just a very good use to make technology serve a person without otherwise destroying them with mind games or whatever.
	That's a perfectly good use of technology.
	This should be elevated everywhere.
	I think if people understood that concept, they would reject all the other nonsense that's being posed to them and they would take stuff and with a great grain of salt, they would take stuff that supports them in their life, not destroys them.
	And importantly, you can't have robots in your life that spy on you because that's going to be the number one purpose of it because they have eyes and they can walk around your house and they can inventory all your stuff to be digitized on the blockchain.
	You know, you got to cut that off.
	Neo is already saying that.
	So they're in beta test right now.
	Neo, just like a competent competitor to Optimus.
	And part of what you have to sign away is that essentially the CEO has to be let into your home and they have to be able, and the robot has to be able to surveil you at all times, all under the auspices that they're going to improve their product, that that's the whole purpose.
	But yeah, you are being completely surveilled, tracked, and all of that data is being reported.
	And you know that if you buy a NEO right now, if you're in the beta test phase.
	So yeah, that is where they're going.
	Right.
	So all of you listening, if you want a robot to watch you on the toilet, that's the beta test to sign up for.
	I mean, who would want a robot to watch you in the bathroom?
	You know, when it's remotely teleoperated by a worker in India also who's looking through the robot, because that's what NEO is doing.
	A lot of the demos for that robot when it was trying to load dishes, it was all teleoperated.
	No, that was a remote human through the robot.
	So this is the other thing.
	We talk about the Trump administration as opposed to mass immigration.
	The biggest immigration of foreign labor is going to be through robot proxies.
	Those robots will come in and do everything.
	They're going to be remotely operated by humans because the actual robot brains are not sophisticated enough to load the dishwasher.
	Yeah, that's what they were saying, that that's why they need it.
	And that's why the owner has to come in.
	But I wanted to address what you were talking about with like farming or some self-sustainable and using technology.
	I think that as long as it's truly decentralized, where it doesn't have any kind of a mechanism to be reported to any centralized locus and you own that data, to have robots or technology helping with things like permaculture, I think would be fantastic, actually.
	So that we could get away from some of this monocrop kind of industry, which is very hard unless you have the means because permaculture requires, it's so labor intensive on the front end, but it is truly the way nature, the way God intended it to be.
	And it yields so much on the back end.
	So if you could have some help on the front end to do some of that, and that is, you know, being in harmony with nature, actually, I think that that would be great.
	But a lot of what they're doing in order to get to their agenda, to get to this essentially, you know, these socio-technical, cyber, physical, smart grid kind of systems where everything is cybernetically nudging people.
	The way that they want to do that, a lot of it is through agriculture.
	And I think they're trying to create these systems where they demonize the organic, you know, that they create these intentional failures where, you know, of course, they're not yielding enough crops and we have these mass starvations.
	So they can, you know, sweep in with their solution of these kind of like synthetic digital agriculture where they're going.
	The Rockefellers have an initiative.
	It's called Food Nerve for 2050.
	And it is all this like three, you know, 3D printed kind of food.
	It's all synthetic.
	So yeah, that's horrible.
	Okay.
	Well, we're almost out of time here.
	So I want to give each of you sort of wrapping up your thoughts here.
	We'll start with you, Patrick.
	What would you like to say?
	Read our book.
	First off, if you want to understand what's going on in society right now, you have to read.
	We made it as easy as it can be.
	That's all I can say.
	I've written books in the past.
	They're very scholarly.
	They're hard to get through.
	I admit that.
	Some topics demand that.
	But this is not the time for that.
	We made this book accessible for anybody who wants to understand.
	If you're willing to open your eyes, you'll understand when you read a book exactly what's going on and how they're perpetrating on us.
	This is a master scheme.
	We haven't covered all the topics of the book for sure.
	But we have a chapter called The Rise of State Religion, for instance.
	We have a chapter on the death of capitalism, for instance.
	We have a chapter on, let's see, the death of the American Republic.
	These are fundamental things you have to understand at this point.
	And these people, these tech oligarchs in Washington, D.C., they're smiling now because they have their way.
	They got making lots of money off of us, taxpayers.
	But when push comes to shove, these people are going to turn into raging demons that intend to completely decimate it, decimate our whole country.
	And we have to be prepared of that.
	We can't hide our head in the sand at this point and say it doesn't exist.
	That's my big, that's all.
	If we only get disappointed across to people, I would be happy.
	Well, we're doing our best to having you on here as a guest today.
	So thank you for that.
	And I want to remind people your website is technocracy.news.
	And then Courtney, your final thoughts today.
	Yeah, definitely get the book.
	And I would say once you get this book, look at what speaks to you.
	I believe, you know, we all have different resources, passions, gifts, unique talents, and we should use those to be our guide to where to get involved.
	So we're really hoping that this is a launching pad.
	I don't think that, you know, the federal apparatus, we're seeing where they're going, but people do have power, particularly locally.
	And I think people should get involved.
	So find out what is going on.
	Read this.
	Figure out which part of this, you know, disturbs you the most and where it is that you need to be able to do it.
	The cover, maybe the cover.
	Yeah, right, exactly.
	The skull smashing through the glass.
	The Terminator font.
	Exactly.
	So, and use that as impetus so that you can get involved.
	You know, it was supposed to be an experiment in self-governance.
	So that means it's incumbent upon us, each and every one of us.
	We still have free will.
	You know, the cyberworks haven't taken us over completely yet.
	And so the responsibility is on us.
	Get involved.
	You know, share this with other people.
	Buy more than one copy and make it a stocking stuffer so that maybe the people who might not listen to you, just, you know, give them the gift and maybe they might not look at it today, tomorrow, but they'll peek at it.
	And this will be the launching pad for them to be armed with the information and then take some action wherever it is that they think that they have the means to do so.
	Hey, Merry Christmas.
	Here's how to not die by 2030.
	Yeah.
	Sorry.
	No, no, I completely agree with it.
	That's a very important message.
	And the thing is, by the time the average mainstream person figures out what's happening, it's too late.
	They need to listen to both of you now ahead of all of this.
	And let me give out your website, Courtney.
	It's CourtneyTurner.com.
	And remember that Courtney is spelled with an N-A-Y at the end.
	So Courtenay.
	Huh?
	Yes.
	T-E-N-A-Y.
	Right.
	Yeah.
	Right.
	Courtenay Turner is kind of how it would be pronounced.
	I just want people to get it correct.
	So thank you both for spending time with us here today.
	It's been very enlightening.
	And I'm very happy that you have your new book and look forward to talking with you again soon.
	I understand you're coming to Texas sometime next year.
	So hopefully we can get you in studio.
	Sounds good.
	Love that.
	All right.
	Thank you.
	Thank you.
	Have a great day.
	And thank all of you for watching.
	Hope you enjoyed that interview.
	Very informative.
	Be sure to check out both of their websites and check out their book.
	And remember that, you know, even though I use AI and I advocate AI, it's only for decentralized purposes.
	I'm completely opposed to the cyborg agenda and the globalist agenda and all that garbage.
	But I do advocate for responsible, decentralized, pro-human use of technology.
	So we have a chance to make it through all of this.
	But yeah, the global coling is a very real thing and probably most people will not survive it.
	So, but you and I will just by being informed, being aware and taking action.
	So spread this interview and share it with anyone who you think can benefit from it.
	And thank you for watching.
	I'm MikeAdams of Brighteon.com.
	Take care.
	Stock up on HealthRanger's nascent iodine.
	Highly bioavailable, shelf-stable, non-GMO, and lab-tested for purity.
	A bug out bag essential.

▲