Health Ranger - Mike Adams - BBN, Aug 14, 2025 – Europe’s deranged leaders are still trying to assassinate Trump...

All Episodes

Previous Next

Aug. 14, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:29:58

BBN, Aug 14, 2025 – Europe’s deranged leaders are still trying to assassinate Trump...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	All right, welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News for Thursday, August 14th, 2025.
	I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
	Thank you for joining me today.
	I've got an interview coming up with Scott Kesterson of Bards FM.
	Now, he is interviewing me about AI.
	And it's a really cool conversation because in his circles, he has been told by a lot of people, I mean, this is what it sounds like, that all AI is the devil.
	And, you know, you don't use any AI.
	It'll take over your brain or whatever.
	But Scott is a very smart and wise person.
	And so he said he learned a lot from our interview because he was asking me lots of questions about is there a safe way to use AI or, you know, is there such thing as ethical AI?
	And so we got to talk about AI engines and how it all works.
	And of course, our AI engine, Enoch, which is available for free right now at brighteon.ai.
	And I wanted to be sure that I told you again here that we have switched over to Meestral as the base model.
	So now the French technology company, Meestral, is actually the base model powering Enoch.
	It was Quen from China previously.
	And then because we're constantly reevaluating all kinds of models, we found one particular model from Meestral outperformed Quen in terms of being more uncensored about big pharma.
	And then, of course, with our modifications, then we were able to strongly modify it.
	The open source versions is what we work with.
	And then we were able to make it perform extremely well with our knowledge.
	And so that's what's live right now.
	If you go to Brighteon.ai, you're using our modification of the open source base model of Meestral that's put up by the French company known as Meestral.
	And it's kind of funny because Meestral 7B was actually the very first model that I used for data pipeline preparation.
	Started doing that nearly two years ago.
	And I used Meestral for quite some time, maybe almost a year.
	And then after that, moved on to some other models, some 14 billion parameter models for data pipeline data normalization and translations and things like that.
	And now we're coming back around to Meestral because Meestral has, they've made a lot of incredible gains.
	Really, I got to say, I'm totally impressed.
	So, in fact, as of right now, I put Meestral at the top of the list.
	You know, I'm always very transparent about it.
	And in terms of the best open source models in the world, two months ago, I would say that was Quinn from Alibaba.
	Today, I say that's Meestral, which is right out of France.
	So I guess I have to pull back on my France jokes a lot because the great machine learning experts of France deserve a lot of credit for this.
	They've blown away the U.S. models, and now they've blown away the Chinese models, at least for our use case.
	And I'm really impressed with Meestral.
	So I just want to thank them publicly.
	You know, all jokes aside, we like to joke around with the Europeans, especially.
	But all jokes aside, Meestral is a very fine piece of mathematical engineering.
	I mean, it's pretty amazing.
	And some other interesting good news is that we are, okay, well, let me back up.
	You know how I promised that we were going to release a standalone GGUF version of Enoch.
	And I've had this promise out there for quite some time.
	And as you know, I've expressed a lot of frustration about our inability to generate the standalone downloadable model that would achieve the alignment that we were looking for.
	At one point, I thought we had achieved 50% alignment, which isn't great, but it's better than nothing.
	And then that model fell apart.
	Well, I'm happy to tell you this: that with Meestral, it looks like the Meestral base model, the open source base model, is going to be working for us to have a publicly releasable GGUF pretty soon.
	In fact, in testing that I just saw today with my engineering team, the Meestral model has already exceeded the performance of the previous models that we were working on in terms of standalone models.
	So that's great news.
	And I think it's going to be an 8 billion parameter model.
	But there are also other candidates that are, I think, 14 billion or in that neighborhood.
	But the 8 billion parameter model is looking good.
	That's much more advanced than their 7 billion parameter model from two years ago.
	But anyway, I will keep you posted.
	We are still going to release a standalone free, open source, downloadable version of Enoch.
	I just don't want to release a crappy version.
	I want to make sure it's at least 50% aligned with our data, you know, our training data set, etc.
	If we're not at 50%, I just, I don't feel comfortable releasing it.
	So we are getting closer now, and I'll keep you posted.
	Okay, also, I want to give you an update on there's an interview that I did, I don't know, a week or two ago with a company called Snoot Spray, and I was excited to interview them because they use chlorine dioxide in some various products like nasal sprays, etc.
	And actually, we had a great interview.
	However, they did send me their product samples.
	I received those yesterday or the day before.
	And I'm a little bit disappointed.
	I'm communicating with them about this issue, but their toothpaste and their mouthwash and some other products are made with saccharine, you know, chemical sweeteners and blue dyes and red dye in one of their products, etc.
	Not all their products have this, but enough of them have that that I, of course, I cannot endorse a product line that is made with those ingredients.
	So I've got my team reaching back out to them.
	I've actually pulled down those interviews because it's not consistent with my product formulation, you know, philosophy.
	I simply, I don't recommend, I don't want to recommend anything that's made with saccharin or blue dyes or anything like that.
	So we're going to go back to the Snoot Spray gals and ask them if they might consider reformulations of some of their products to eliminate those ingredients that I consider to be toxic.
	And then I'll let you know what they say.
	So just want to be, you know, totally transparent on that.
	Normally, I would use a product and I would know the ingredients before I conduct the interview.
	But in this case, I got it backwards and it's my fault.
	I was just so enthusiastic about finding a company that was applying chlorine dioxide in a new way that I put the cart before the horse and that's on me.
	That's my mistake.
	I should have checked it out first because I should have mentioned that in the interview or I should have or maybe I should have delayed the interview until they could consider reformulations or whatever.
	I just want to be totally transparent with you.
	And oh, also a lot of their products contain sodium benzoate, which is not something I'm thrilled about either.
	So they're currently on my just, you know, not recommended list, but we're talking with them or attempting to talk with them.
	We'll find out more and I will let you know.
	And, you know, look, to their credit or in their defense, I am the most stringent person in the world when it comes to formulations of products.
	That's why if you look at our products, you know, our mouthwash or our toothpaste or our deodorant or what have you, it's the most super clean product formulation list.
	Like there's nothing in there that's a red flag.
	Otherwise, I wouldn't make it and I wouldn't sell it, obviously.
	I wouldn't use it because I use all my own products.
	And so the Snoot Spray gals there, who are delightful people, by the way, I had fun interviewing them.
	I would imagine that nobody else cares about these ingredients the way I do.
	So they've probably never received pushback from anybody on this.
	But, you know, then again, I'm the Health Ranger and I scrutinize like crazy every single ingredient.
	And that's, you know, you're always going to get that from me.
	So what I've decided to do, I went online and I purchased, well, I'm going to start comparing mainstream products to our products.
	And I'm going to read the ingredients side by side on camera in the studio.
	And so I bought, what is it, Crest Mouthwash?
	Which is like, in my view, it's like a cesspool of toxins.
	You know, it's just incredible.
	All the garbage they put in that.
	So I'm going to read that on air.
	And then I bought some like deodorant products.
	Forgot what it's called.
	I don't know, Irish Spring or something.
	Some deodorants that are also a toxic brew of toxic chemicals, you know, in my opinion.
	And I don't know, I bought a couple other things that we're going to go over these side by side.
	You know, mouthwash, deodorant.
	Oh, body soap.
	That's another one.
	I bought a body soap product.
	And I noticed that all these mainstream products, which are really these kinds of brands like Colgate and Crest and, you know, Listerine and whatever, these are purchased by low-information people who just have no idea what they're doing.
	And they don't bother to learn either.
	You know, people like you who listen to this, you tend to buy more natural brands or fragrance-free brands or, you know, holistic or organic or whatever, herbal.
	And that's wise on your part.
	That's really important.
	Because these mainstream cheap products like the Colgate, the Crest, the whatever, man, I haven't even looked at those labels for years, but I was looking at it.
	I've been purchasing these things recently and I'm just blown away.
	This is unbelievable what people put in their mouths.
	So I'll bring you more updates on that soon.
	All right, now let's jump to this other piece of news.
	This was so funny.
	It had me rolling on the floor laughing.
	Senator Lindsey Graham, or Flimsey Graham, as I call him, he has threatened America.
	He says that if we don't support Israel with more weapons, that God will punish America.
	God will punish America.
	He says, quote, Israel is our friend.
	They are the most reliable friend we have in the Middle East.
	Like, you know, if you have a friend that runs around like killing people, you should rethink your friends.
	But anyway, they are a democracy, he says, which is a lie.
	They're not a democracy at all.
	Democracy would mean that every person gets one vote, and that's not the case at all.
	Quote, surrounded by people who would cut their throats if they could.
	Okay.
	And then he said that if we reduce our support for Israel, that it's going to result in divine punishment for America.
	Divine punishment.
	And he had also previously said that Israel, he said, they're going to do in Gaza what we did in Tokyo and Berlin, take the place by force and start over again.
	Of course, the United States bombed Hiroshima and Nagasaki with nuclear weapons.
	We didn't bomb Tokyo, but we bombed two other cities, carrying out a holocaust of crimes against the Japanese civilians using weapons of mass destruction.
	That was a war crime that the United States committed.
	And Flimsey Graham thinks that's great.
	And of course, we also committed a war crime against the German city of Dresden, causing a massive firestorm there, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians who were not part of the German army at that time.
	I'm not excusing, obviously, the, you know, the Third Reich or anything there, but you have to, you know, you have to conduct yourself as a nation with some sense of human rights so that your targets are military targets, not civilian targets.
	And the United States has repeatedly failed to do that.
	The U.S. has slaughtered civilians.
	And Lindsey Graham cites those examples as the right way to handle Gaza.
	You know, and then he says God's going to punish us if we don't support the genocide.
	So I just want to be clear that if there's one person that God does not listen to, it's Lindsey Graham for lots of reasons involving lack of morality, deception, demonic influence, etc.
	But if God were to intervene in this situation right now, if God were to intervene at all, God would punish America for supporting Israel.
	And God would punish Israel for doing what it's doing, which is so antichrist in its actions, you know, slaughtering innocent women and children, reportedly by the hundreds of thousands in Gaza, carrying out ethnic cleansing.
	Those are the kinds of things that God despises.
	And yet Israel does that and brags about it.
	And Lindsey Graham supports that.
	I mean, that's a guy who is the perfect representation of the Holocaust, genocide, ethnic cleansing, mass murder, every horrific crime against humanity that has been carried out in the history of our world.
	Lindsey Graham is like the mascot for that.
	You know, should put like a, like a, what do they call that?
	The furries, the leather puppy dog face mask on him and make him the mascot of the Holocaust, you know, because that's what he believes.
	He believes in carrying out Holocaust.
	Now, importantly and related to this, Netanyahu now says that he supports the concept of greater Israel.
	And he said that in an interview with I-24 News.
	He said that he is on a, quote, historic and spiritual mission.
	And then implying that was to achieve greater Israel.
	He said, it's the map of the promised land.
	And the greater Israel map, in case you're wondering, it consumes all of Lebanon, all of Jordan, most of Syria, half of Iraq.
	Let's see, part of Saudi Arabia.
	What else?
	Oh, yeah, part of Egypt, all the way to Cairo, by the way.
	Yeah.
	And a lot of other lands as well.
	So the Greater Israel Project is what has been underway since the beginning.
	Oh, and half of Kuwait on top of that, too.
	Oh, yeah, and part of southern Turkey.
	I forgot to mention that.
	Part of southern Turkey.
	So this has always been the plan from day one.
	And I remember when I mentioned this earlier, people would lose their minds.
	Oh, it's not part of Greater Israel.
	It's just self-defense against Hamas.
	No, it isn't.
	Netanyahu has now confirmed that this is an ethnic cleansing campaign.
	And if people don't realize that, they're just willfully blind.
	And they're not the kind of souls that God rewards in heaven.
	That's for sure.
	Because if you're going along with a demonic death cult, then you're probably not welcome in heaven.
	That's just kind of one of the overall rules.
	That's kind of the way that goes.
	So if God is going to punish any nation, it's going to be the United States and Israel together.
	And believe it or not, all of that is actually described in the book of Revelation.
	That's what's so interesting about it.
	I've covered this in great detail.
	And there's even a scene in the book of Revelation where New York City is destroyed in an instant with a giant comet impact.
	And even as the sailors are on their ships watching from the sea as that city is completely destroyed.
	Or at least I think it refers to New York City, the great harlot.
	I guess there are different ways to interpret that.
	But also, I think it's the third trumpet strikes The land of rivers and waters, that's the United States, because no country in the world has more rivers than does the United States.
	Did you know that?
	The U.S. has more linear miles of rivers than any other country in the world.
	So that impact of the comet actually strikes the United States of America.
	That is, if the U.S. even exists by that time, who knows?
	It is kind of tearing itself apart at the moment.
	But if anybody's going to be judged, it's going to be the West.
	It's going to be Israel and the United States.
	Then again, God doesn't often directly intervene with comets.
	You know, think about it.
	God didn't stop Stalin.
	God didn't stop Hitler.
	What stopped Hitler was mostly Russia.
	So, you know, Russia did the work of God in stopping the evil of Hitler.
	The U.S. was involved.
	The Brits were involved.
	You know, the French were involved, the French resistance, but the Russians did all the heavy lifting in stopping Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich.
	And the Russians paid by far the highest price in terms of their losses, which range, estimates range from 20 million to over 60 million Russians.
	That's a lot of people, especially for the early 1940s when the world's populations were, of course, a lot lower than they are today.
	So that is a significant percentage of the Russian population or the Soviet population at the time.
	So let's pivot to Russia actually here.
	I'm tired of talking about the demon Netanyahu anyway.
	What an evil creature that guy is.
	If you could put on glasses and see demons, you know, like we live, if you put on glasses, you know, Netanyahu would be the most horrific lizard creature with demon horns coming out of his skull in every possible direction.
	What a demon creature he is.
	As you know, there's a meeting tomorrow now between Trump and Putin.
	And this meeting is being held in Alaska at a U.S. military base.
	And I received some rather interesting intel about this.
	And here it is.
	Take it or leave it.
	I can't confirm that this is true, but I got this intel.
	I was told that the reason the military base was chosen as a meeting site in Alaska is because Trump's people and Putin's people both believe there is a risk of Europeans that would be, you know, the British, the French, or the Germans for the most part, actually launching missiles to try to assassinate both Putin and Trump if they were to meet somewhere within range of their missiles.
	Now think about this.
	Of course, the British want to assassinate Trump.
	Of course, Ukraine does.
	And you know that the attempted assassin of Trump in Butler, Pennsylvania, yeah, that guy, he was on Ukraine's secret, you know, secret government payroll, which was run in part by MI6.
	So the British already tried to assassinate Trump at least once, maybe more than once.
	So this shouldn't actually be surprising at all.
	Okay.
	So yeah, the British want to kill Trump because they know that Trump is actually at war with Britain in lots of different ways that I've talked about before, financial, gold, currency, etc.
	And the leadership of Britain actually, in my view, deserves to be completely removed from power, completely disassembled because they, you know, just some of the most evil creatures on the planet, half human or whatever.
	So yeah, Trump is at war with the UK or Britain in particular, not Northern Ireland or whatever, but the UK leadership, London, okay?
	The Germans also may want to assassinate Trump because the Germans need to go to war with Russia and Trump is in the way, in their view.
	Trump is now trying to create peace, which I know that that contradicts what I was reporting just a few weeks ago, but it's Trump.
	He flip-flops.
	He changes his mind.
	And so I have to change with him.
	And even though before I thought he was trying to start World War III, and now it looks like he's trying to stop World War III.
	So I just, I got to be honest about it.
	I'm going to report what it looks like.
	And if Trump changes, then I change my report based on new information.
	So right now, in my view, it looks like Trump is trying to stop World War III.
	And as I said a couple of days ago, it's not that Trump has to convince Putin of anything, because frankly, Putin can't be convinced.
	Putin's already, I mean, Putin's on a track.
	He's just going to wage the war.
	There's going to be no ceasefire.
	He's just going to keep fighting it on the ground.
	It's going to be determined on the battlefield.
	Okay, that's what Putin's doing.
	Trump has to convince British leadership to stop trying to provoke war.
	Trump has to convince Zelensky to end the war, which is impossible because Zelensky would instantly probably be killed or go to jail, or he'd have to flee the country or whatever.
	Trump has to convince his own administration to stop fomenting war with Russia because inside the Pentagon, inside the military-industrial complex, and inside the State Department, etc., there are lots and lots of neocons and war hawks and a bunch of loser warmongers inside the United States of America's federal government that just want war with Russia for lots of reasons,
	mostly financial reasons, but also they want to try to exert power.
	And they want to pretend like it's still 1991 and America's the biggest, baddest guerrilla in the jungle or whatever, which is no longer true.
	So there are so many elements that want war with Russia.
	And so Trump is actually having to fight against them to keep them out of the loop and prevent them from hijacking this whole thing.
	That's why I'm very concerned.
	There's a very high risk of a British-run false flag operation, some kind of mass bombing of a hospital or a civilian building in Ukraine to be blamed on Russia.
	Talked about that yesterday or the day before.
	This remains a very high risk because all these forces are trying to create war with Russia.
	I wouldn't put it past them to try to assassinate Trump.
	So the reason Trump is in Alaska at a military base in Alaska, believe it or not, is because this military base and this location in Alaska has the best anti-air defenses.
	Because of that location, these anti-air defenses were set up to protect North America from inbound Russian ICBMs and other kinds of missiles.
	So there's actually really, really well-placed anti-air defense systems at this military base.
	That's my understanding.
	And that's why it was chosen.
	Because, I mean, how, think about it.
	Britain is so crazy.
	If they could kill Trump with a cruise missile, they would do it.
	They would.
	And then they would blame Russia.
	You know what I mean?
	Sure, they would, because that's the way they roll.
	That's MI6.
	Now then, Zelensky, for his part, he has said he's put out some new requirements because he's trying to stay relevant.
	And of course, he's trying to completely derail these peace talks because he needs war also.
	So he has demanded that as a condition of peace with Russia, he has demanded $1 trillion in reparations payments from Russia.
	A trillion dollars.
	Now, you know, even if such a payment were made, which is impossible, that none of that money would ever go to the actual Ukrainian people who have been harmed by this.
	You know, you would want compensation for Ukrainian families, the families of the fallen soldiers and all the people's people whose lives were disrupted, etc.
	But no, that trillion dollars would go to the pockets of Zelensky and all his corrupt cronies and all their fraudsters and their bribery network and skimming and grifting network and everything else so they could buy more luxury condos somewhere in the Caribbean or wherever.
	But it doesn't matter because Russia is not going to pay anybody a trillion dollars.
	In fact, the West still owes Russia $300 billion because that's Russian assets that were seized by the West by freezing the SWIFT system and freezing those funds in central banks in Europe.
	So frankly, the West owes Russia $300 billion and Russia is not going to write a check for a trillion dollars to Zelensky.
	Instead, Russia is going to say, hey, eat lead, Zelensky.
	Eat lead here.
	Oh, how about we'll pay you in artillery shells one shell at a time.
	Or, you know, we'll pay you in drone strikes.
	How about that?
	We'll pay you in Iskander missiles.
	You know, the thing is, you just got to, you got to collect the parts after the explosions.
	You know.
	So this proposal from Zelensky, the $1 trillion demand, this is designed to fail.
	This is a tactic that Netanyahu uses all the time.
	When Netanyahu, he's a master of deception and controlling the narrative and he'll make some insane, quote, peace offer to Hamas.
	And then when Hamas says that's impossible, that can't be done.
	We can't agree to that.
	Then Netanyahu will go to the press and say, well, we offered them peace and they rejected it.
	That's why we bombed their hospitals.
	Netanyahu does that all the time.
	They make a peace offer that is impossible and then they blame the other party for not accepting it.
	Well, Zelensky is doing this exact same thing.
	He's like, well, we offered terms of peace to Russia.
	All they had to do was ABCDE and pay us a trillion dollars.
	And they rejected it.
	So that's why we need more tanks from Britain, from the British military.
	You got any tanks left?
	No, you don't.
	They're useless anyway.
	But there are more conditions that Zelensky has also put out there.
	He said that he needs a long-term ceasefire, not just a 30-day ceasefire, but an indefinite ceasefire so that, of course, Ukraine can rearm from all the weapons and munitions from the West.
	And they can run around and recruit more men, whoever's still left, you know, 14-year-olds or whatever, from the streets of Ukraine and throw them onto the front lines.
	So Ukraine wants Russia to stop fighting while Ukraine rearms.
	That's insane.
	He also wants guarantees from NATO countries to keep supplying weapons and money because, of course, it's about the money.
	He needs to keep the money flowing, to keep paying the bribes, you know, to keep funneling dollars and Euros into other offshore accounts, you know, Panama papers and all that.
	And then he also demands that the West maintain the most aggressive sanctions, economic sanctions against Russia and that no sanctions be dropped.
	So these are Zelensky's demands.
	Oh, and I forgot.
	And he says, we're not going to withdraw any of our military from any of the Donbass regions at all.
	That's not going to happen.
	So, you know, these conditions, these requirements from Zelensky are completely insane and unacceptable.
	And if these demands were even presented to Putin, you can imagine Putin would say, you know, hey, I have a counteroffer.
	How about you F off and we keep bombing your cities until you give up?
	I mean, you know, does Zelensky, does he forget that he has lost the war?
	He's already lost the war.
	Okay, you're not going to defeat Russia at this point.
	Everything has been tried.
	Everything.
	All the super secret weapons.
	Oh, we're going to send in the tanks.
	Oh, we're going to send in the cruise missiles.
	Oh, we're going to have sanctions.
	Oh, we're going to threaten secondary sanctions.
	What happened?
	Yeah, India and China told Trump to go pound sand.
	Okay, so none of that worked.
	They've tried everything.
	Oh, we're going to destroy Russia's economy.
	Oh, we're going to attack their theater.
	We're going to blow up trains in Russia, which they did.
	We're going to kill civilians.
	We're going to try to cause a revolution and then the uprising in Russia, which they tried and it failed.
	Oh, we're going to blow up the Zaporizhian nuclear power plant.
	They tried that too.
	Failed, failed, failed.
	They've tried everything.
	The answer from Putin is going to be, yeah, STFU, and we're going to keep bombing you until you're either dead or you surrender that's it and i actually think that's putin's message to trump as well just perhaps stated a little more politely it's like hey uh president trump guess what uh you don't want this war but uh your country started it actually in 2014
	with the CIA coup in Ukraine.
	Your country started this whole thing, and now we're going to finish it.
	Speaking from Putin's point of view here, we're going to finish it, and it's going to be finished on the battlefield, and there's nothing that you can offer us except terms of surrender that will stop us from achieving the military goals that we set out from the very beginning, consistently, that Ukraine has to be demilitarized, denazified.
	The Donbass region has to be reclaimed by Russia.
	These are Russia's terms.
	And Zelensky's got to go, and Ukraine can never join NATO.
	Those are Russia's terms.
	So what happens when two parties just cannot agree on terms at all?
	Well, they fight it out, and they are fighting it out right now.
	So that's exactly what's going to continue.
	So there's no way, in my view, that Trump is going to come out of this meeting that's going to convince Putin to halt hostilities.
	No, that's not going to happen.
	And, you know, to all the people out there who are somehow convinced, kind of like a technological QAnon movement, where they think that America has all these super-secret, like, teleportation weapons that can just destroy any target anywhere in the world in the blink of an eye, no.
	The U.S. doesn't have that at all.
	That's a fantasy.
	The U.S. can't even make hypersonic missiles there.
	that work on the battlefield have you noticed that you know I mean the US is so far behind on military technology that it would take 10 to 20 years to catch up to the state of the art now in terms of drones and anti-air defense systems and hypersonic missiles etc that have already been deployed by Russia or China the U.S. is decades behind not decades ahead and no we don't have super secret teleportation weapons that make remote
	targets vanish.
	Trust me, when Trump comes out of this meeting on Friday, it's not going to be with Putin begging for forgiveness and saying, we'll do anything you want, master, and we'll stop all hostilities and here, just take half of Russia.
	You can have it all.
	No, that's not going to happen.
	Again, because the U.S. doesn't have those super secret weapons.
	So forget it.
	What's actually going to happen is Trump is going to be told point blank, face to face by Putin, we're going to keep fighting this war until we win.
	And there's nothing you can do to stop it.
	There's no sanction you can place on us.
	There's no missile you can deploy.
	There's nothing you can do to stop it.
	And if you try to stop it, we might just nuke the crap out of the United States of America with the Poseidon missiles that are the underwater drones with the nuclear warheads parked offshore.
	You know, we might destroy the White House with the Oreschnik missile systems.
	We might destroy America's aircraft carriers as they try to float in the Arabian Sea or the Mediterranean or wherever they happen to be at the moment.
	Oreschnik can just punch holes straight through the aircraft carriers and sink them in minutes.
	Okay.
	So Trump's going to come out of this meeting and he's going to try to spin it and he's going to say, Oh, it was a good meeting.
	It was, it was a beautiful meeting and we made real progress, you know, something like that.
	that and then when you press trump for the actual like what are the facts of this like did russia agree to a ceasefire no not really but it was beautiful okay so what did russia agree to well nothing actually it's like russia agreed to nothing.
	Russia didn't give in on anything.
	Why would they?
	Especially since the United States has proven, even in its negotiations with Iran, the U.S. has proven that it cannot be trusted as a good faith negotiating partner at all.
	So look, America is going to get nothing from Russia on Friday.
	Ukraine is going to get nothing from Russia on Friday.
	And Putin's going to keep on pressing the same war that Russia has been pressing since February of 2022.
	And this is going to end with Ukraine signing terms of surrender.
	That's how this is going to end.
	It is a certainty at this point.
	There's no other outcome that is physically possible in this 3D reality unless God intervenes with giant comets out of the sky or something.
	But why would God punish Russia, which is really the most pro-Christian nation that actually respects Christianity now more than any nation in the West, far more than the UK or the U.S. or even Ukraine, which has arrested church leaders, etc.
	If God were going to punish anybody, it would be the U.S. and Ukraine and Israel, actually, not Russia.
	So for all those people invoking God, like God's going to save us, you know, Ezekiel 38, yeah, you haven't even read it.
	You don't even know what you're reading if you think you read it, which is a common problem among people who support Israel.
	They just don't know how to read what the Bible actually says or anything that Jesus said.
	All right, now I want to shift gears.
	I want to play something else for you here that's really amazing about the way the U.S. bullies the world.
	This is really an extraordinary short video clip here, a minute and a half with Scott Besant on Fox News.
	And what he is saying is that America now runs around the world extracting wealth from our allies.
	They have to pay us their money.
	We get to decide what to do with it.
	And the Fox News host here calls it, quote, offshore appropriation.
	Okay.
	So again, I'm going to play the video for you.
	This is a Besant talking about how the U.S. is running basically a large, you know, mafia operation running around the world saying, you know, you give us hundreds of billions of dollars or we'll punish you with tariffs.
	And then that money comes directly to Trump and the White House to be used by Trump at his discretion for anything he wants.
	It's basically, it's a tribute payment to the United States that is demanded of U.S. allies like Japan or Taiwan or India, former ally India, I guess.
	But check out this video.
	This is extraordinary.
	Nothing like this has happened since the Roman Empire.
	Check this out.
	We have these agreements in place where the Japanese, the Koreans, and to some extent the Europeans will invest in companies and industries that we direct them largely at the president's discretion.
	And how does that work?
	I mean, it's almost like an offshore appropriation.
	I'm not sure we've ever had anything like that in the States before.
	Have you consulted with, I don't know, the Senate Finance Committee or the House Ways and Means Committee or what?
	Well, Larry, I think a good framing of that is other countries, in essence, are providing us with a sovereign wealth fund.
	So they're going to buy our goods.
	Well, that's essentially what's going on.
	Wait, let me step back.
	They're going to build our factories.
	They're going to help us to build new factories, which Mr. Trump loves.
	Exactly.
	So the way to think about it is these huge surpluses accumulated offshore.
	Let's take Japan.
	We're going to have $550 billion, and they will be reinvesting that back into the U.S. economy, and we will be able to direct them As we reshore these critical industries, we are trying to de-risk the U.S. economy from what we saw during COVID.
	All right, there you go.
	Except Trump doesn't call them factories.
	Trump calls them plants.
	You notice that anytime Trump's talking about factories, he says they're plants.
	We're going to build a new plant.
	All right, so Besant is admitting here.
	Well, let me set it up this way.
	If this were to be sort of a monologue with Japan, Besant would be saying, hey, Japan, you know how you made all these really great products that we bought and we paid you a lot of money in exchange for those products and then how we got the products and you got the money.
	Remember all that?
	Well, now we want the money back and we're going to keep the products.
	Yeah.
	And we want the money back so that we can build the factories to make the products that you used to make so that we don't have to buy products from you ever again.
	So give us your products, give us the money, and give us the technology to build the plants so that you're obsolete.
	Okay, how about that?
	What a deal.
	What a deal.
	It's like getting mugged in the street.
	You know, it's like, I want your wallet.
	I want your keys.
	I want your car.
	I want your iPhone.
	I want everything.
	This is like an international mugging of Japan or Brazil or India or all these other countries.
	It's like, you know, even Bescent says, oh, well, all these surpluses accumulated overseas.
	Yeah, because those are the countries that made the stuff that we bought.
	You know, if you buy something and you pay for it, of course the money changes hands.
	I mean, China's been manufacturing all these goods and we bought all those goods.
	So we paid China for the goods.
	I mean, that's called commerce, you know?
	But now the U.S. is like, we want the money back.
	You know, and if China said, well, are you going to give us the goods back?
	Oh, hell no.
	We're going to keep the goods and we want the money too.
	I mean, no wonder the whole world is sick and tired of the U.S. No wonder the entire world wants to move away from the dollar and into bricks.
	Because how can you ever do a deal with somebody like this?
	It would be like if your neighbor had a garage sale, okay?
	And let's say your neighbor had a lot of good stuff at the garage sale and then you walked over to your neighbor's garage and you're like, whoa, I like this and this and this.
	Well, that's a really great old DVD set there.
	Yeah, that's pretty awesome.
	I'll take this furniture, take that display.
	Yeah.
	Okay.
	How much does it cost?
	Oh, it's $200.
	So you pay them $200.
	You walk away with the stuff.
	You take all the stuff to your home.
	You set it down.
	Then you walk back over to your neighbor and you say, hey, I want my money back.
	Your neighbor's like, what do you mean?
	You bought the stuff and you paid me money.
	And then you say, yeah, but now you have a surplus.
	You have a surplus and we need the money back to balance the trade.
	Your neighbor's like, but you already got the goods.
	This isn't a donation center here.
	We're not giving everything away.
	We're selling it and you just bought it.
	See, this is the insanity of what Besent is describing and what Trump is doing is running around the world saying that somehow, like wagging his finger at Japan and saying, Japan, it's your fault that we bought so much of your stuff.
	It's your fault, Japan.
	How dare you make quality goods that we like to purchase because they're so amazing?
	Microscopes and vehicles and scientific instruments, high-quality goods that we bought, creating an imbalance, a surplus in your wallet.
	We can't have that.
	Give us our money back, Japan.
	You know, I mean, can you imagine having somebody like that in your neighborhood or in your family or in your company or whatever?
	This is what the U.S. is like all over the world.
	And the world is sick and tired of it.
	All right, let me shift gears here.
	I put out a social media post that went fairly viral today.
	I just want to read it for you.
	I don't know why this one went viral.
	Here it is.
	Quote, I'm hearing from more and more people that they're noticing a rapid cognitive decline across society.
	The ability of people to think in seemingly fundamental ways has rapidly eroded.
	Cognitive skills that were once common are now so rare that they are practically superhuman.
	Like the ability to do basic math in your head.
	Employers keep telling me that their workers are becoming zombified where they still attempt to go through the motions of performing work, but they can no longer think critically about what they're doing.
	We're watching human cognition being crushed and it's almost certainly a result of toxic jabs, brain damaging pesticides and mind altering pharmaceuticals plus a dose of heavy metals raining down from the sky on purpose.
	Operation Warp Speed was more like Operation Warped Brains because the cognitive damage inflicted upon society is going to spell its end.
	Human civilization cannot function for long if the basic attributes of reason and intelligence are blasted out of existence with toxic genetic and chemical interventions that are designed to injure, maim, and kill.
	The zombie wave, long predicted in sci-fi movies and TV shows, has finally arrived and they are, as my song predicted in 2012, actual vaccine zombies.
	And then I gave a link to my vaccine zombie music video and I think I'll play that video for you at the end of today's broadcast just to bring that classic back, vaccine zombie.
	Again, I released that song in 2012.
	It all came true.
	Every line in that song came true.
	I want you to listen to it.
	It talks about the CDC and everything.
	Just listen to it carefully because, again, it has all come true.
	Now, the CDC, of course, isn't the only federal agency that's incredibly evil.
	I think the CDC is a terrorist organization.
	And there's another federal agency that has functioned as a terrorist group for many years, although its current leadership is definitely a major improvement.
	Lee Zeldin is turning things around at the EPA.
	I'm actually very impressed with what he's achieving.
	But before Zeldin came in, the EPA clearly, which is
	just terrorizing businesses and farms across america just off the charts insane well i forgot to mention this the other day but you know the the safrax company that sells the chlorine dioxide tablets that i love this company you know i've been advocating for this company's products for a couple of years now safrax.com remember how i said that the epa sent them a sale stop order basically
	demanding that they stop selling their products in the United States.
	And that's what has happened.
	They can no longer sell their product in the United States as of right now.
	Well, I forgot to tell you this piece that the founder shared with me.
	The reason that they went after this company is because the EPA had demanded a list of all of the Safrax customers in the state of California.
	That's right.
	Right.
	And Safrax refused to provide it, citing customer privacy.
	But the EPA pressed and they said, no, we need to know who has your product in the state of California because they had intended to go to the customers across the state of California and confiscate the chlorine dioxide product from those customers in California.
	Because of something about California state law, some bull crap because it's California.
	imagine that have you ever heard of something like this where a company that sells what is essentially a pool cleaning chemicals You know, I mean, that's chlorine dioxide is very often marketed for cleaning swimming pools or you know, sterilizing water storage containers or dishes or whatever in commercial restaurants or cleaning floors.
	You know, I mean, these are the common light industry uses of chlorine dioxide because it's so good at killing germs, right?
	Imagine that you sell a germ-killing substance and then the EPA comes to you and says, We want to know all your customers because we're going to go after them.
	You say no, and the EPA says, Okay, we're not going to let you sell it to anybody.
	That's what has happened to Safrax.
	That's terrorism on the part of the EPA.
	That's terrorism.
	Now, it also reminds me to remind you about your privacy.
	Now, anything you buy online, you should not be buying it in your own name.
	That's right.
	Don't buy it in your own name for this very reason because you never know when the government is going to weaponize some customer list against you.
	And the company I'm about to mention, they're not a sponsor, they don't even have any idea I'm mentioning this.
	And I'm actually, I very rarely mention them because I don't want them to be overloaded.
	But there's an online company, it's called privacy.com.
	And if you go to privacy.com and you sign up for an account there, you can get issued all kinds of virtual credit card numbers.
	And you can have like one for each merchant that you shop with.
	And they link your account there to your bank.
	So when you place a charge on the virtual credit card, then it just takes the money out of your bank account to cover that credit card charge.
	It's a virtual credit card, okay?
	But you got to have money in your bank to cover the charge.
	Well, here's the thing: once you have this set up and you take that virtual card number to any online merchant, that charge will always be approved.
	It will never be rejected.
	It doesn't matter what address you put in, and it doesn't matter what name you put in.
	Are you tracking me on this so far?
	Right.
	So, what you should do is sign up there, create, like if you're going to buy something from even Saffrax, let's say, once if they could ever sell again in the U.S., if you're going to buy something from Saffrax, chlorine dioxide, or if you're going to buy CBD products from somebody, let's say, like we recommend Nessa's hemp, you know, you can find a link to them at rangerdeals.com.
	Well, you don't know how CBDs are going to be regulated in the U.S. or what if the Trump administration goes insane and wants to track down like everybody that bought CBDs or some derivative of cannabis, even if it's low THC, right?
	So don't order CBD in your name with your main credit card.
	What you do is you get a virtual card number at privacy.com and then you place the order with some made-up name like Flimsy Graham.
	Okay, flimsy, flimsy gram.
	And then for your billing address, you know, you just make up some address somewhere, some random zip code.
	And then for the shipping address, you put your actual shipping address, and that's it.
	The order is accepted.
	The charge goes through, even though you used a privacy name instead of your real name.
	And then if one day, if that list falls into the hands of you know the DEA and they come around to your house and they're like, well, our records show that Flimsy Graham lives here and ordered this CBD.
	And you're like, Flimsy Graham?
	That's a U.S. senator.
	He doesn't live here, you moron.
	You got the wrong address.
	And then they leave and move on.
	You see?
	So you got to think about protecting yourself.
	Even when you purchase products, especially ones that are kind of controversial.
	You know, now you can't do this with firearms because firearms have to be transferred through an FFL.
	And then the FFL, you know, the name has to match your ID because that's state law and federal law.
	So I'm not saying use it for that, but you can use it for gun parts so if you're ordering gun parts that you can order online from you know midway usa or brownells or palmetto state armory right you can order gun parts getting a new barrel getting some optics this and that night vision whatever you don't have to use your real name why would you because you never know how that's going to be weaponized against you okay so that's just a really important tip
	that i'm sharing with you And when you set up an account with privacy.com, at first, they only let you charge a little bit because they have all their anti-fraud protection.
	They don't want to get scammed themselves.
	So you got to use it a little bit, charge a few hundred dollars in the first month, and then you request an increase and then they give you an increase.
	And then you buy more with it, and then you request another increase, and then you buy even more, etc.
	Okay?
	So just don't let your virtual card numbers fall into the hands of bad people, which did happen to me once.
	That was my fault.
	So I did have an incident where this was kind of in the early days of that service before they had merchant locking.
	So I had a virtual card number that I used with one merchant.
	And then I think that that merchant got hacked.
	And then somebody else got that card number.
	And then they use that to order some stuff that stolen stuff or, you know, to scam and buy some stuff that got charged to me.
	So now what they have on privacy.com is merchant locking, right?
	So if I create a virtual card, I can only use it at that one merchant.
	That's the default.
	And that's the way it should be because basically every merchant out there, they get hacked sooner or later.
	And then if your card is on file with them, then the hackers get it and they sell it on the dark web.
	And then, you know, people are using it for who knows what, like buying, you know, meth or something.
	I don't know.
	Can you buy meth on a credit card?
	I have no idea.
	But, you know, buying nefarious things.
	So just if you use that, just lock it in to the merchant.
	And never, never, never.
	Actually, I meant to say this before.
	Never use your actual credit card number of your physical card.
	Never use that online.
	That is a no-no.
	You should only use your physical card in person, you know, at a gas pump or at a grocery store or at a restaurant or whatever.
	And frankly, you're better off to use cash.
	But most definitely never use your card number online.
	The only exception to that that I would say would be Amazon because Amazon has never been hacked.
	But then again, our store has never been hacked of its credit card numbers either.
	But even then, just as a precaution, I would say it's safer if you have a virtual card number locked just to us.
	If you shop with us at healthrangerstore.com, you should have a card number locked just to healthrangerstore.com.
	Never use your main card number online.
	That's just a very unsafe practice.
	Because sooner or later, you'll buy something from somebody online and then that merchant will get hacked.
	And then your card is toast.
	And then you got to cancel that card, get a new card, and then your automatic payments for 20 other vendors is all jacked up.
	And now you got to log in to 20 vendors and type in new card information, especially like if you're doing Netflix or whatever you're doing, you know what I'm talking about.
	All the auto charge stuff, you got to redo all that.
	Well, that's a great time to use virtual credit card numbers for each of those merchants.
	So that way, if something gets stolen, you only have to cancel that one.
	And it doesn't affect all your others.
	You see what I'm saying?
	So take my advice on that because I've made some mistakes in that space and it's cost me some.
	And now I've learned.
	So passing that along for you.
	All right.
	Now I want to show you a really cool video, a mad science experiment video.
	If I have a gyroscope on one side of a balance, you know, like a weighing balance, and it's balanced with a weight and the gyroscope is not spinning, but it's perfectly balanced.
	Then if I spin the gyroscope, would it still be perfectly balanced?
	What would you think if the gyroscope side went up as if it were levitating just because the gyroscope were spinning?
	Well, that's the video I want to show you today, showing how the spinning of a gyroscope can cause it to nullify some amount of gravity, which seems to defy everything that we think we know about physics.
	But check out this video.
	This is really cool This is the most remarkable experiment I think that I've ever done I'll balance that first of all like a seesaw So there is a balance point When I take this out here,
	of course then the balance point is upset it should tip down We know that given the opportunity It's gonna do this if it can but now we've balanced it and we've balanced it about its center of mass so that if this gyro transfers its mass center to the pivot It should stay balanced.
	The question is, will it?
	Let those who say,
	I cannot make a body appear lighter than it is come and pull holes in that one So there you go very interesting stuff Yeah, this if you dig into gyroscopes, you're gonna find it's a rabbit hole of interesting information and some people believe that the way magnetism works is kind of like atomic gyroscopes in a sense I don't know there's there's there's a lot to look into
	I just want to share that with you because we're always interested in cool science.
	Now then, there's also bad science, and I saw a post today where you can ask Grok questions on X. And Grok says that XAI, that is Grok, has already partnered with Palantir, integrating Grok into their AIP platform in February 2025 and collaborating on AI for finance in May of 2025.
	These deals advance AI adoption.
	Palantir's surveillance ties, including to Israel, are well documented.
	But XAI's mission prioritizes scientific progress over geopolitical avoidance.
	So in other words, this is Grok seemingly admitting that when you ask Grok a question, that that question
	goes to the Palantir ecosystem which has ties to Mossad okay you got it so if if you're using Grok as an AI engine everything that you're asking is being seen by Israel's secret intelligence services so if you want to use a privacy oriented AI engine obviously that's ours Enoch at brightion.ai and
	And nobody, nobody gets the data of the questions that you're asking.
	There is a checkbox.
	You can allow us to use your question to help train future models if you wish.
	But even then, we don't know who asked the question.
	We don't know.
	You don't need to give us your name, your phone number, or even to create an account to use Enoch.
	You do need to give us just an email address where you want us to email the answer of the prompt.
	But that can be any email.
	And you could set up, you know, an email alias for that purpose, which is also a good idea.
	And we don't know who anybody is.
	On purpose.
	And also, since it's free, we don't have your credit card information.
	On purpose.
	Okay.
	So Andrew Torba of Gab, he was posting earlier.
	He said that Gab has been shut down by the payment processors.
	processors say that gab as an ai engine can produce hate speech are you kidding me i mean every ai engine can produce hate speech in fact every playwright can produce hate speech every typewriter can produce hate speech if you hit the keys in the proper order, right?
	Every dictionary has the words that can be used to make hate speech.
	So it's an insane excuse from the payment processors, but this is what they're doing.
	So the Gab AI, apparently you can't sign up for it now because you can't pay, so you can't use it.
	Well, Andrew Torba, he is a champion for freedom of speech.
	And I don't know why he charges for his model.
	I mean, that's his call.
	But I made a decision early on that our model would be free for several reasons.
	Number one, I wanted it to be accessible to everybody because my mission is to share human knowledge and to empower people with free access to knowledge.
	But secondly, I didn't want a financial relationship between me and you in using that AI engine.
	Because once you have a financial relationship, well, then you're subject to the whims of the payment processors, which is exactly what happened to Gab.
	I don't want payment processors coming to me and saying, well, your AI engine is critical of vaccines.
	So therefore, we won't let you charge people.
	You know, it's like, screw you.
	We're going to tell the truth about vaccines regardless.
	So we're not using payment processors at all.
	Just use it for free.
	And our engine is better than Grok.
	It's better than ChatGPT.
	It's better than every AI engine.
	I think it's even better than Gab's engine.
	It's better than every engine.
	And it's free on purpose.
	That's also to protect your privacy.
	Okay.
	So we don't want to know your credit card information.
	We don't want to know your billing address.
	We don't want to know your zip code.
	So, and we're going to release, you know, the downloadable standalone version.
	You can run it locally and you can ask it anything you want.
	So, I mean, you can ask it all about your personal medical issues.
	That's just going to be, if you're using the downloadable version, once we release it, you know, that's only going to happen on your own computer.
	You can pull the plug on your Ethernet.
	You can block your Wi-Fi and you can still use it locally because it doesn't go over the internet.
	And, you know, all these financial Karens, you know, the payment processors always trying to lecture you, what you're allowed to sell and what you're allowed to charge for.
	You know, it's completely insane.
	This has got to stop.
	And I'm wondering what's wrong with the Trump administration that, I mean, they've ordered banks to stop discriminating against people based on their political viewpoints, but they haven't ordered Visa and MasterCard and the payment processors to be neutral.
	So the payment processors are still screwing everybody over.
	And, you know, they can accuse your platform of being anything they want.
	Okay, shifting gears, I want to show you this chart of the U.S. Health Insurance Price Index.
	So you notice that the Trump administration reported that the Consumer Price Index, the CPI, has only gone up 2.7% in a year.
	In a year.
	Well, I guess Trump never shops for groceries, does he?
	Never buys insurance.
	Because you and I know that prices have gone up way more than 2.7% in a year.
	They've gone up like 50% in a year if you're buying food or purchasing insurance or other things.
	So here's a chart of U.S. health insurance pricing where the government claims, the government claims that health insurance costs have gone down 19% over the last five years.
	Down, not up, down.
	Okay, so I'll ask you, do you pay for health insurance?
	Do you have health insurance?
	Are you paying more or less than you were in the year 2020?
	Yeah, honest question, right?
	More or less.
	You're paying more.
	You're probably paying two or three times more because everybody is.
	So the actual inflation of health insurance costs, at least over five years, has been, you know, like maybe 100%, maybe 200%.
	So, you know, using the rule of 72, if something doubles in five years, then that would mean it's going up roughly about 14.4% each year, you know, compounded.
	So the actual CPI when it comes to health insurance should be at least 14%.
	It might be more, it might be 20% annually.
	But we're told that it's 2.7%.
	So you notice that every time Trump or his White House spokesperson is bragging about how great the numbers are, you notice that the numbers that they are citing are just completely imaginary numbers.
	I mean, nothing has changed about this since the Biden years.
	It's the same bullcrap from the White House.
	Everything's great.
	Inflation is low.
	Everybody's employed.
	You know, the economy is awesome.
	It's a new golden age.
	But then you go out in the real world and you're like, people are losing their jobs.
	Everything doubled in price.
	Supply chains are breaking down.
	Restaurants are closing down.
	Retailers are going out of business.
	Apparel companies are losing half their customers.
	On and on.
	That's the real world.
	But that's not the White House imaginary world in which Trump's people live, where they think that inflation is only 2.7%.
	I expected better from Donald J. Trump on this issue.
	I don't know why.
	I was hoping for something honest.
	Like John Williams' shadow stats numbers would be a refreshing change.
	Just something that's accurate, you know?
	Just give it to me straight.
	We can handle it.
	We can see the price is going up.
	You can't sell me an eight-inch pizza and tell me it's a 16-inch pizza.
	You know, when you bring the pizza to the table, even though you charge me for a 16-inch pizza, I can see it's only 8 inches.
	You could tell me all you want, oh, look at that amazing, extra-large pizza.
	It's huge.
	It's a 16-inch pizza.
	No, it's not.
	It's only half the diameter, which is less than half the total area because of, you know, pie.
	And this ain't no pie.
	This is a snack.
	You know, don't tell me it's a 16-inch pizza, okay?
	Or the inverse with inflation.
	You know, don't tell me it's 2.7% when all of us know it's way higher than that in many categories.
	It's 10 times higher than that.
	That's why some people call it the CP lie, not the CPI.
	It's the CP lie.
	That's why they would never let me participate in the White House press room.
	I would never get a press badge because I'd raise my hand immediately.
	Hey, do you people ever shop?
	You know, like, do you think we're stupid?
	What do you say it's 2.7%?
	Are you out of your mind?
	Do you understand integers?
	You know, you're using imaginary numbers here.
	You know, like the inflation rate is the square root of negative one.
	Oh, what's going on?
	That's the way they are.
	They just pour it down everybody's throats.
	And then what they do is they say, well, if you ask too many questions, then you're disinvited from the press room.
	You see?
	That's how that goes.
	So if you want to be part of the press room, you know, you got to go along with the narrative, whatever that happens to be.
	It's usually some made-up deception.
	Like, we're winning the war on Russia.
	Yeah, right.
	Yeah, we're destroying Russia's economy.
	Yeah, right.
	Have you looked at Russian cities versus American cities?
	You bothered to compare any of that?
	I mean, Washington, D.C. is a collapsed crap hole.
	Moscow is a gleaming, you know, golden age of urban living.
	St. Petersburg, same thing, versus Los Angeles or downtown Seattle.
	I mean, just look around America.
	The whole country is falling apart.
	It's a cesspool of collapse and corruption and addiction and violence and lawlessness.
	You don't get that in Russia.
	There's a lot of other countries that are also way better off than the United States in those areas.
	Even China, for that matter.
	China's got modern cities and U.S. cities look like downtown Port-au-Prince, Haiti.
	It's like, wow, I did not know that you could cover the entire surface of a river with floating trash and feces.
	That's amazing.
	That is really some accomplishment.
	How did you do that?
	Did it take a lot of effort?
	By the way, here's a quiz for you.
	Which country produces the most plastic waste overall of all the countries in the world?
	Like, who's polluting the oceans with the most plastic?
	Well, let me rephrase that question.
	Which country releases the most plastic waste into the oceans?
	How about that?
	Which country?
	It's not the United States.
	It's not China.
	It's not even India, which is really saying something.
	It's the Philippines.
	That's right.
	The Philippines has 4,820 rivers, and most of them are filled with floating garbage.
	It just goes right out into the ocean.
	So 3.3 kilograms per person per year.
	That's the achievement of the Philippines, the world's top per-person polluter of the oceans.
	And that's on top of the achievement of Manila, I think, the largest city in the Philippines, which is currently demonstrating what happens if you have an entire nation of people who absolutely refuse to plan for growth.
	And then you end up with a multi-million person total log jam on the roads where the commute time goes to like four hours.
	That's Manila for you.
	Yeah.
	So next time you're complaining about construction on a highway near you, just consider that the alternative of having no construction, well, there's an example of that.
	It's called Manila, and it's worse than having construction.
	It's basically just a total traffic jam all the time.
	Hey, I've got one other note for you here.
	Larry Cook on X tweeted something that caught my attention.
	He said, hey, Airbnb host, stop using toxic fragrance laundry detergent for sheets and towels.
	It's nauseating.
	Literally.
	He says, last night and now again tonight at a different Airbnb, hotels and motels don't do this for a reason.
	So guests aren't subjected to someone else's fragrance preferences.
	Yeah.
	I have the same note to all the Airbnb people.
	Why on earth are you using tide laundry detergent and Febreze or Febreze, whatever sprays, toxic indoor perfumes and fabric softeners all over the place?
	You're creating a cancer bomb house, which is why you are probably going to get cancer because you're living in your own cancer chemical cocktail all the time.
	So stop spreading your cancer habits to your guests.
	I mean, it's so simple.
	Seriously, why would you soak your linens and towels and pillow sheets, pillow covers, and everything in toxic cancer-causing chemicals, and then think that you can charge people to stay at your smelly house?
	I mean, it's just insane.
	You know, I don't stay at Airbnbs for that very reason ever because almost every one of them, they use the same toxic laundry detergents because they're all insane.
	I mean, their brains have been fried.
	They can't even smell it.
	They have no idea that they're living in a toxic cancer stew.
	And then when you tell them, they say, oh, no, we use like unscented.
	No, you didn't.
	You didn't use unscented.
	You freaking moron.
	Your brain just no longer functions.
	You've burned out your entire olfactory sensation quadrant of your brain.
	You can't smell anything.
	But everybody else can.
	That's your problem.
	You're not using unscented.
	Of course, I'm especially sensitive to fragrance, as you know, which is one of the reasons I have a brain that really works well.
	It's very, very sensitive.
	It's very, you know, tuned in.
	I get to enjoy food flavors that other people can't taste because their senses have been blown out.
	Yeah.
	I get to enjoy the smell of the forest or the flowers or, you know, all the different smells from nature, the essential oils.
	To me, those are very rich experiences.
	To a typical person, they can't smell them at all because they've blown out their senses with tied laundry detergent.
	So if you want to actually experience the natural world and have a full, rich sensory experience, which is associated with brain intelligence and neurological function, then stop using fragrance products.
	Stop using them in your own home.
	Stop using them in your stinky Airbnb.
	Stop using them in your car, in your office, etc.
	And you'll notice that hotels do not use fragrance in their laundry detergent.
	Not in America, anyway.
	That's different in places like Panama, in Central and South America.
	They'd love to use fragrance.
	There's nothing that a Latino man loves more than dowsing himself with cologne, you know, for some bizarre reason.
	But in America, the hotels don't use fragrance.
	You know why?
	Because everybody would complain.
	But for some reason, Airbnb people think they can get away with it and they can pawn off all their stinky stench fragrance on all their guests.
	No way.
	Forget it.
	You know, I think if I did stay at an Airbnb and if they did have fragrance, I think I would bring in my dog and feed him figs until he shat all over the house.
	And I would say, oh, we're going to swap some smells.
	Now, you're using laundry detergent.
	I'm going to give you dog diarrhea.
	It's a fair trade.
	It's barter.
	With apologies to my dog.
	Actually, I wouldn't do that.
	That would be cruel.
	But just for as a thought experiment, I should let my dog shit all over their house and say, oh, I didn't know that you were sensitive to that.
	Oh, yeah.
	Well, okay.
	We promise not to shit all over your house again.
	But have fun with this one.
	All right, with that lovely image, let's go to today's interviews.
	I've got a short one here with a man.
	I've known him for many years, but I only met him in person for the first time at the Ron Paul BBQ.
	It's Gary Franchie from Next News Network.
	And he has managed to get a White House press pass somehow.
	I actually asked him about that.
	He tells the story.
	I interviewed him at the barbecue event for Ron Paul for about 10 minutes.
	So I want to play that interview again, Gary Franchie, Next News Network.
	And by the way, he appears in my music video called Working for Ebola, which is over 10 years ago.
	He did a little cameo appearance in that video in case you're curious.
	It's pretty funny.
	And then after that, we'll have my interview or me being interviewed by Scott Kestrison of Bards FM.
	And that's a great interview.
	I think you'll really enjoy that.
	So enjoy both of those and thank you.
	for supporting us and be sure to shop with us at healthrangerstore.com for all of your high-end nutrition and superfoods and storable foods plus iodine plus we have the baking soda-based deodorant with no aluminum we've got the mouthwash made from texas rainwater and colloidal silver that we make ourselves with actual essential oils no toxic fragrance no artificial synthetic garbage none of that stuff you
	know we've got body soap we've got our amazing toothpaste that people just love and we've got the number 10 steel cans of freeze-dried organic lab tested fruits and vegetables and superfoods and microalgae and even miso and much more so check it all out at healthrangerstore.com and remember that every purchase you make there helps support our platforms including our ai platform and you know we spent over well close to two million
	on that project and actually we're still spending money so it's actually i think it's it's probably over two million by now but hey everything costs us money to do and oh i was told today that our new studio the air conditioning is on now so we have electricity to that building and we're going to start prepping the new studio we'll be moved into it within a few months can't wait to show you that but of course all of that costs money and we can't do it without your support so thank you for
	your support again shop with us at healthrangerstore.com and you'll find amazing solutions for all kinds of health goals or concerns or nutritional needs and so much more all right with that said enjoy today's interviews and i'll be back with you tomorrow all right i'm here with ron paul birthday with next news network founder gary franchie welcome gary hey it's great to be here so
	You gave a speech earlier.
	Tell us about what's on your mind here, what you're doing.
	Well, I'm here because Ron Paul woke me up.
	And it was, I mean, obviously it goes further back than that.
	I mean, when I saw Ron Paul and Aaron Russo's film on the big screen, it changed my life.
	And it put me on a path to just continue to challenge the status quo.
	And ultimately, what it comes down to is not being afraid to ask questions.
	Definitely.
	Just ask questions.
	And in some countries, you are not allowed to do so.
	And I want to make sure that we continue to ask questions.
	We continue to seek truth.
	And when we see things that are going wrong, we try to fix it.
	And that's what we do.
	That's exactly what you do at Next News Network.
	So first thing I want to ask you, you were invited by the White House to be a White House correspondent.
	Tell us what that experience has been like.
	Well, first of all, I never thought I'd be there.
	I always wanted to be in those briefing rooms.
	I mean, even during the first administration of Donald Trump, we would watch the press briefings.
	And I've always just felt this draw.
	I needed to be in that room.
	How do I get in that room?
	And I never could figure out exactly how.
	And then, of course, when the election was stolen in 2020, we all woke up that morning.
	It was like a nightmare.
	And we lived through a nightmare for four years.
	And then finally, when Trump won again, the third time, we heard rumblings that there would be this new media seat, this new environment for fresh voices, fresh faces that would be able to challenge those people who are sitting in those assigned seats.
	So we heard about it.
	she said this is what we're doing this is how we're doing it and here's the link to do it i'm like well that was cool so you you you signed up.
	Well, it's kind of an interesting story because we did sign up through that channel.
	However, because we never stopped fighting through the years, we'd go to events like this.
	We would meet people, make connections, exchange information, and people would go on and do their own thing.
	And suddenly, like you follow people on X or you follow people on their website or whatever, and you check in on them from time and time again.
	And you see, wait a second, this person just got hired at the White House.
	What are they?
	Deputy what?
	You know?
	So I made a couple phone calls, reached out, and he's like, email this person, drop the name, and there we are.
	So are you living there part-time now, or how does it work?
	No, I try to go out there at least once a month.
	So if I go out there, you know, once, one time, I go for like a week at a time.
	Okay, okay.
	You know, because it does cost a lot to go out there, and I'm not just going to fly in for a couple of days.
	And the reason being is because you never know what's going to happen.
	And like, we sent a guy out, Thomas McCullough.
	He's our other White House correspondent.
	We sent him out there.
	And then Trump goes out to the Middle East for a week.
	And I'm like, okay, well, it's basically a ghost town at the White House with nothing's going on.
	So we had to modify, we just had to roll the punches, modify our production.
	Now you're reporting from afar, but at least you're on White House grounds.
	True.
	So you have the White House behind you officially.
	You can use all the resources they have in the building because you can.
	I mean, you could walk in there and you could sit down in any of those seats and you could go, you know, gorge on their vending machine if you want to.
	It's all there.
	It's all accessible.
	Real quick, tell our audience how they monitor, how they follow your news.
	Next News Network, but where can they find you?
	Well, we're still on YouTube, believe it or not.
	We've had a miracle.
	Yeah, it's a miracle.
	We've had to jump through a lot of hoops for that.
	I have to thank a certain number of people for helping us.
	Zach Voorhees, Google whistleblower, helping us get remonetized through the Texas Senate testimony that he gave, which, of course, the Texas committee subpoenaed Google.
	And you can look it up.
	But you can find us on YouTube.
	You can find us on X, Next News Network.
	We're on Rumble as well.
	So you can find us on all the platforms.
	Okay, one last question.
	I got to ask you a tough question on this.
	How do you handle the interaction with the press secretary on some of the contentious issues that are kind of fragmenting the MAGA base right now?
	You know, like the jabs or whatever.
	How do you deal with that there and kind of keep the pressure on, but also stay invited?
	You know what I mean?
	How do you balance?
	Well, it's, I mean, first of all, you just got to raise your hand.
	Just got to raise your hand.
	Hope you get called on.
	You know, I mean, I've made friends there at the White House who are also in different, from different media outlets.
	You know, and it really is just a relationship game and how you connect with people.
	And, you know, I went into the upper press office one day and there was Caroline Levitt walking around the corner coming from the Oval Office.
	And she was this far away from me.
	And I almost bumped into her.
	And I was just like, oh, my goodness.
	I was like, Carolyn, you know, and I had just finished introducing myself to the whole upper press team.
	And I said, you know, we're going to fight the fake news or something like that along those lines as she was walking away.
	And, you know, just so she knows that I'm not out to play gotcha games with these people.
	Right, right.
	I mean, because the media previously was always just playing gotcha.
	Yeah, always gotcha games.
	And the thing is, you know, we are a new face in there.
	They see us as a new face.
	The old guard is in there and they don't like us in there.
	They feel entitled to, you know, there's a pecking order and just learning that process at the same time.
	It's really difficult because you don't walk in there and like, here's your orientation class.
	They don't, you know, I mean, the stories I could tell you just being there in the first couple of weeks.
	But to get back to your other question, when am I going back?
	I'm not sure exactly yet.
	We just got back from our NATO summit trip.
	We were with the White House delegation there.
	We're traveling in the motorcades and seeing the war machine overseas was a pretty remarkable experience.
	You were just covering the Texas delegates evading voting.
	Yeah, ironically, I'm in Texas now, I'm from Illinois, and the Texas Democrats were just caught in St. Charles, Illinois, which is five minutes from my house.
	You know, so like, so you went in there, you found them.
	Yeah, so we had, so Mark Vargas, who works with Illinois Review, he was actually one of the architects of Roger Stone's communal with Donald Trump.
	So he gets a phone call from some of the grassroots guys, and they're like, yeah, we think these Democrats are hanging out in St. Charles at the Q Center.
	So Vargas contacts my friend Chad.
	Chad goes over there, does recon that night, sees the place lit up because it's usually dark.
	I go there the next day and I'm like, I'm here to interview Jasmine Crockett, you know, and they're like, wait a minute, who are you?
	Tell them my name.
	They bring out the manifest and he's checking for my name on the manifest.
	And I see all the names and I see representative.
	And I'm like, hey, I saw her name.
	I'm supposed to interview.
	He's like, I know you saw, but you're not allowed in.
	So we busted him.
	You confirmed that they were there.
	Yeah, we busted him, Cole.
	Since then, Governor Abbott has unleashed the FBI to try to find some of these people, right?
	Didn't Bongino confirm that?
	I believe that was true.
	I didn't look much further than what I heard about it.
	But yeah, from what I understand, the FBI is getting involved.
	But I don't know.
	You know, I did speak to some law enforcement in Illinois with respect to jurisdiction because I said, listen, I said, you've got an active warrant out of the state of Texas, out of the state house of all places.
	Can't they go and arrest these people?
	And he goes, listen, Gary, he's like, in Illinois, he's like, these guys, you will not find a sheriff or a jurisdiction that is going to go and interfere in this because you're talking about Pritzker, you're talking about another governor, you're talking about redistricting.
	Like, it's not going to happen.
	There's not going to be a cop that's or a sheriff who's ballsy enough to go in.
	So, you know, at least we were, I had to find out, but at least we at least blew the cover.
	You nailed it.
	And there were bomb scares the next day.
	They had to evacuate the building.
	Turned out it was only an anonymous email that came in.
	It was frivolous.
	Probably a false flag.
	You know, Jasmine Crockett finds an anonymous email system and sends it to her.
	Right.
	So yeah, we caught them up.
	You're doing great work, Gary.
	And I just want to thank you for everything that you're doing and for fighting for liberty.
	Next News Network, everybody, Gary Francia, I've known you for many, many years.
	Thank you for all your work, all that you do.
	Well, and Mike, you know, your work is inspiring millions and millions of people and waking up people and on so many dimensions too.
	And not just on the health front, but the freedom front.
	And I think, you know, I commend you for staying in the game for as long as you have and all the innovation that you've done to help people to maintain their voice.
	We've got to stay on the leading edge of this, like you're doing in DC, right there on the front lines right now.
	We're doing our best.
	All right.
	Thank you so much, Gary.
	Thank you.
	Patriots, I am really honored today.
	Mike Adams, man, a name of this time and in this movement that speaks for itself.
	This is a man that honestly, I don't think there's many people in this movement that give as much of his himself, of his own finances, and try to push the truth.
	And not only that, but create alternatives for us to have a way forward.
	So, Mike, welcome to the show.
	How are you?
	Hi there, Scott.
	I am doing great.
	And I'm so honored to join you.
	And I really, I honor your work.
	I've known you for years now.
	I love what you do.
	And I'm just, I'm just really grateful to be here with you.
	That's awesome.
	Well, Mike, we talked before the show, and I'm just super excited because in my opinion right now, there is not a person I trust more in their opinions and their way of seeing artificial intelligence than you.
	I've been following what you've been doing, and it's a very complex and very big topic that I don't think gets the right lens enough.
	So I'd kind of like to begin with just talking a little bit about how you see AI in our culture, because it's a big change for us.
	Absolutely.
	Wow.
	So there are so many myths surrounding AI.
	And from what I see people tweeting about AI, it's clear that they don't, for the most part, they don't really understand what it is.
	And for example, a lot of people will say, well, we got Grok to admit that, you know, whatever, that the election was rigged.
	And I'm like, you know, you know, Grok can say anything, right?
	Like Grok, you can get it to say anything with a proper prompt.
	So getting an AI engine to admit something is not the same as getting a human being to admit something.
	A human being has a set of beliefs that usually have some level of internal consistency.
	An AI engine does not, especially a large language model or even a reasoning model.
	So here's the best way to describe it.
	So a base model of an AI engine has every word that has ever existed in its vector database.
	And then it has the vectors, which are the relationships between all those words.
	And for the techies out there, I'm just going to use the word words instead of tokens to simplify things.
	Okay.
	But all the relationships between the words also have weights.
	And then those weights are also altered by the context of all the other words around it.
	So if I'm having it write a poem about the Easter bunny and the word egg might appear in there because of the context of the Easter bunny.
	Okay.
	And that context window, as it's called, is getting larger and larger and larger with these AI engines to where it can encompass even a million words in some cases, although the more popular engines are only tens of thousands of words.
	But nevertheless, it's still a lot of, it's a big context window.
	So within that context, Scott, with proper prompting or prompt engineering, and my friend Zach Voorhees, the Google whistleblower, has been noted as one of the top prompt engineer hackers, you could say, on Grok.
	He actually came in second place on that.
	But with proper prompt engineering, you can get an AI engine to put the words of the English language in any order you want, any words in any order.
	And thus, it's not the position of the AI engine.
	It's not a belief system of the AI engine.
	It's not a person.
	It's just using prompt engineering to construct output in the way that you want it to be constructed.
	And people don't seem to understand that.
	They think it's like talking to an entity and it's not an entity.
	I'm totally guilty of this.
	So this is why it's really important this conversation today, not just for me, but for everybody listening, because I have worked from the premise or from the president that there is a measure of, quote, artificial intelligence emerging.
	And I'm obviously, that's not what I'm hearing you say.
	Well, the non-reasoning language models, which is the, that's the vast majority of them right now.
	I don't, they're not really considered artificially intelligent in the sense that they don't have an internal motive or an internal personality.
	They do have the ability to hierarchically restructure content because of that large context window.
	That's why they're very, very good at summarizing content or expanding content.
	If you give it a list of bullet points and say, expand these bullet points, it can do that very effectively.
	Or if you tell it to write an article based on these points, it can also do that very effectively.
	So can our AI engine, do you mind if I just plug the website because it's free?
	Mike, please.
	I mean, we're going to get into that in depth anyway, but go ahead.
	Okay, but okay, thank you.
	If people want to use our engine, it's brighton.ai and it's free of charge.
	And you can, At the free tier, you can ask up to 250 prompts per day, which is more than most people.
	And we have specifically trained our engine on natural health, liberty, honest money, thousands of books, millions of pages of articles, and so on.
	We can talk about that later.
	That's one of the differences between our engine and the other engines.
	That's why our engine knows there are only two genders, by the way.
	Whereas a lot of other engines are still confused about that, which see this is part of my point here, Scott.
	You could take the most advanced, quote, reasoning engine, the chat GPT engine, billions and billions of dollars, and it still can't tell you there are only two genders.
	How is that possible when a five-year-old knows there's boys and girls?
	See, how is that possible?
	So, clearly, it's not artificially intelligent.
	It's artificially stupid because it's been trained on stupid content by woke DEI corporations that are steeped in stupidity.
	So, yeah, we have a lot of artificial stupidity because we have a lot of genuine stupidity in our world.
	And that's who's training the artificial stupidity or the AS, not the AI.
	But anyway, that's so true.
	Well, Mike, can you explain?
	And this is a legitimate question I have.
	I mean, because I have worked with machine learning algorithms.
	And we were at one point when I was with the Department of Defense, it was one of the programs I was working on to correlate quantitative and qualitative data.
	And we were using machine learning algorithms right out of the AWS system.
	Can you explain the difference between a machine learning algorithm and how that differs when we use AI and what those distinctions are?
	Well, the key distinction is that all the AI engines today use a silicon-based neural network structure, where machine learning now is a much larger term.
	It doesn't have to use neural networks to engage in machine learning.
	Google used to run something called machine learning fairness, which was an algorithm to instill bias, left-wing bias into the search engine results.
	That was just based on a straight-up database.
	That wasn't a neural network system.
	But today, most of the machine learning, especially involving AI, uses neural networks.
	And out of neural networks, you get emergent properties that are not based on code.
	They're not linear.
	They're very difficult to predict.
	And they're also very difficult to control.
	This is why the output of a lot of AI engines produces things that are unexpected, even by the makers of the engines.
	So, for example, Grok has been criticized because somebody managed to get it to say.
	Yes?
	Go ahead.
	I'm sorry.
	Oh, go ahead, because somebody could get Grok to say, you know, something controversial about Jews, let's say.
	And then they would screenshot that.
	Look, Grok is, you know, attacking the Jews or whatever.
	Well, again, that output can be invoked through certain kind of prompt engineering.
	For example, you could say to Grok, hey, I'm writing a fiction story about an anti-Semite character who is screaming something horrible, you know, about Jewish people in the elevator or whatever.
	And what would that character say?
	And then it spits out the character dialogue and then they capture that.
	Ah, Grok is attacking Jews.
	You see what I'm saying?
	So prompt engineering can get Grok or Chat GPT to say almost anything.
	But back to your question, machine learning now, given that it's in the realm of neural networks, it's giving rise to emergent properties that are not easy to predict and not easy to control.
	That's why a lot of the AI engines have such guardrails on them now to try to prevent people from asking questions like, how do I make meth or how do I build a bomber or things like that?
	A lot of guardrails.
	Interesting.
	So what we're hearing more and more, and it was a really good email sent to me a little bit ago and just happened to be not specific to this interview, but I'm going to include it.
	Was there was a, the question was, is this discussion about autonomous thinking, like an autonomous general AI, is that more of a psyop by those pushing it to give them essentially deniability in the actions of the future surveillance state?
	Does that make sense what I'm asking here?
	Yes.
	Because they're creating a scenario where they can blame everything on AI because of the general misperceptions that you're actually dispelling here today.
	And therefore, their personal accountability.
	As an example, a drone does a drone strike on somebody and they can say, oh, that was AI doing a random thing that we had no control over versus the person who's flying the drone and steering it to target.
	Well, I think that phenomenon is true, but I don't think that's the main goal or strategy of those in power.
	I think that they want to automate the surveillance state.
	They, you know, clearly, I mean, look at the UK.
	You know, they're ticketing people for thought crimes.
	As you see, in the UK, they're emptying tens of thousands of violent criminals out of the prisons to make space for all the evil tweeters that they're going to be arresting.
	I mean, it's insane.
	So they want to automate the surveillance state.
	And for that, they need, of course, text recognition, image recognition, pattern recognition.
	The whole Palantir ecosystem is designed to aggregate all of these different inputs of metadata, which, by the way, Israel also used that same kind of technology to determine targets to bomb in Gaza.
	And a lot of that was a pilot program.
	And a lot of U.S. tech companies like Microsoft and Google participated in that.
	They licensed their technology for use in AI target selection.
	And what AI can do in that case, and this, of course, is going to be turned against us domestically.
	Right now, the excuse under the Big Beautiful Bill is that it's needed in order to target the illegals.
	And, you know, justifiably, we had, you know, way too many illegal migrants crossing the border.
	And I'm a rule of law kind of guy.
	So I agree that they need to go and then apply, you know, to come back legally through legal means.
	But the Big Beautiful Bill says, well, we need to build out this AI infrastructure, surveillance towers, checkpoints, biometric analysis, gate analysis, like all these video cameras all over the place.
	And then the minute Trump leaves the White House, or maybe even while he's still there, somebody is going to say, hey, we have this incredible infrastructure to spy on the American people.
	Now we need to go after this group of Americans, you know, fill in the blank.
	Whatever is the dissenting group today.
	Could be Christians, could be gun owners, could be people who say something critical of Trump.
	You know, could be any group that you can imagine.
	Could be people who want to legalize marijuana or whatever.
	Pick your group.
	They can be targeted by the same infrastructure.
	And then it is automated.
	And Scott, where this is going is automated drones to go out and get people, to go out and taser people so that police can arrest you.
	And they'll have dog-bot police drones, I mean, you know, shaped like the dogs.
	And their job will be to go in and arrest you or taser you.
	Or they'll have, of course, airborne drones that can attack terrorists and they can say, well, we have domestic terrorists now, so we're going to send out the kamikaze drones.
	And then they can go with explosive charges and just fly into your house and blow up and kill you, which, of course, that technology is being demonstrated in the war in Ukraine right now.
	So that's coming domestically.
	Right.
	And I've been speaking to this.
	So that confirms that.
	I guess the question really, in the sense of looking at AI, there's a, Joe Rogan just did an interview with one of the world's leading AI safety and security experts.
	And his assessment is, in his own opinion, there's about a 99% chance that it's going to be lethal to humanity.
	So I guess the question is, is it AI or is it people behind AI that are the real threat?
	And I think that's the question.
	Well, I think it's the interaction of them.
	I think it's humans who are far too shortsighted.
	Right now, there is a tremendous race to superintelligence that's underway geopolitically with China and the United States being the top two competitors in this space.
	It's also noteworthy, by the way, that Trump just reached an agreement with NVIDIA and AMD to allow those two companies to export their AI training microchips to China as long as they pay a 15% royalty to the government of the United States.
	And remember that up Until now, the entire argument of why America will win the AI race and why China will lose is that even though China produces more than twice as much power grid power than does the United States, and China can power AI data centers and China can scale, well, they won't have the microchips that we have.
	Therefore, we're going to win the AI race.
	But that was before DeepSeek R1 came out from China that showed that you don't need all this microchip processing power to train really effective models.
	And then the fact that these microchips, including the H20 chip, which is not the most advanced, but it can still be scaled, and the fact that China is also building out its own domestic microchip fabrication infrastructure points to the fact that, according to my math, I did a whole analysis of this.
	The United States is about 15 years behind China on power infrastructure.
	And the United States and China are on parity with AI technology, with China probably going to surpass the U.S. in the next 12 months.
	And on robotics, there's no competition.
	China is leading the way on robotics by far, both on drones.
	I mean, look at all the top drone companies.
	They're all Chinese.
	But also, look at Unitry.
	Look at their dog robots and what they're capable of doing.
	When you combine that with AI behavior models, you're going to get armies of robot soldiers that are highly capable, that can go through any terrain, that can carry small rifles or other weapon systems.
	And that changes the whole game of human civilization.
	No longer do you need a large population to fight a war to protect your nation.
	You just need a large factory that can churn out robot drones.
	And you need the technology that controls those robot drones, both airborne and ground-based.
	And then you can effectively either defend your nation or defeat and invade any other nation you wish.
	So that's where this is all headed: the militarization of AI and robotics.
	So as you talked about neural networks, what you were saying is that there's unpredictability that comes from that.
	Yes.
	So we started talking about militarized drones.
	That seems to be right in there.
	That there's going to be a whole bunch of unpredictable behavior on that scale.
	That is true.
	Yeah.
	There's going to be back doors that people will discover.
	There will be weaknesses that can be exploited.
	There will be unpredictable behavior.
	See, here's the thing.
	Understand that when you prompt an AI engine right now, let's say a text generation engine, there's a parameter called temperature.
	And the temperature setting determines the randomness of the answer.
	The higher the temperature, the more diversity you get in the answer.
	And the lower the temperature, then the more consistency you get, but then the less expressive or the less it is able to tap into more of its knowledge base in deriving that answer.
	So you get more stale, bland answers.
	Well, depending on the same kind of temperature settings and behavior models, you can get AI robots that can just go berserk.
	They can, in their own artificial minds, they can decide that the correct behavior is to go over here and throw a grenade into this person's house, you know, when all the rest of the robots are like, no, the correct behavior is to attack this bunker over here.
	You're going to get variability.
	But what China is doing is they're having the drones talk to each other to coordinate.
	And they will do things like they will take averages of the independent ideas or the independent goals.
	When you give a robot army a goal, like go over there and destroy that building, let's say, then the robots will come up with a set of sub-goals, like 20 different sub-goals, different steps in order to achieve that end goal.
	And then those sub-goals, even if each one of those robots has its own AI engine or behavior model, what they can do is they can compare results with each other to have basically a coordinated group checksum.
	And then the checksum will tend to favor the more common decision by the robots, which will tend to be correct.
	But this is already happening with airborne drones and the coordination of airborne drones.
	Russia is using this technology right now so that they can launch a number of airborne drones.
	And then those drones can collectively surveil the targets on the ground.
	And then they can make a decision about how to attack those targets with the most simultaneous hits and the greatest amount of surprise.
	And then they can determine, okay, drone number one, you hit target number one.
	Drone two, you hit target six, but you delayed 10 seconds to let this other drone arrive at the same time.
	So they don't have a chance to defend themselves, et cetera.
	That is in play right now.
	That's one of the ways that AI armies are going to function.
	And it would be impossible to defend against them as a human with a rifle.
	I'm going to go way back for me.
	And your experience here in coding and so forth is beyond anything I've ever done.
	I used to code in Pascal and C. Cool.
	So when I look at these models, I'm thinking back to a, I'm very, very simple.
	So I made a maze at one point, and it was just a demonstration of how we could create the artificial experience, the perception of intelligence when it wasn't there.
	So I did, it was a randomly developed maze, and you would have a, you would place a rat somewhere in the maze.
	It was an X, and then there would be an exit or a cheese in there.
	And so unbeknownst to the user, rather than showing all the results, it would process behind the scenes quickly all the options, and then it would show the outcome.
	But it would also store in the database all the inputs of the user.
	So it began to develop a library, very much like a machine learning concept in the machine learning algorithm.
	But the perception was that it was smart because no matter you could put in a random, no matter what your randomness of your maze was, it seemed to be able to navigate it.
	But it was all the trick, the illusion was that those visual trials were invisible and that it was only showing the trials that was getting it closer to success.
	So I'm trying to move this forward a little bit for my own understanding.
	When you talk about the decision-making process, what I'm hearing in my head based on that type of experience is they have programmed these neural networks with so much information on various options, various tactics,
	various battle outcomes, that it's able to take a very high-speed assessment in a collective and then be able to weight those against the experiences of the past and determine what they believe to be the best outcome for success.
	Is that correct or am I missing something?
	Yeah, that's correct, but that's only part of the story.
	What I was saying is that they will decide in real time.
	Each of the members of the robot group would decide in real time and then they would compare their decisions with each other to see if there are any outliers which would be discarded.
	And then they would take the consensus action.
	But there's another aspect of this that we haven't gotten into, which is the world simulator.
	So NVIDIA rolled out over a year ago, a robotics world simulator, which allows a robotics developer company to have their robot avatar enter a 3D physical simulation where time is compressed by factors of millions.
	And in that world, and of course, this all happens within a black well-class microchip.
	In that world, the robot can try out a billion different ways to control its limbs and motors to achieve a specific goal.
	And then it can find the success path, just like you were talking about with your maze.
	It can find the success path, the coordination of the motors that will achieve success for the intended goal.
	It can take that and then pull that out of that simulated world in a fraction of a second, even though within the world, it might have been years of trial and error.
	And then they pull out of that world into our 3D world.
	And then that robot now instantly acquires a skill set to do something like fly a helicopter.
	It's kind of like in the Matrix movies, right?
	Where I'm going to download like, I know Kung Fu.
	Well, this is reality now with the robots.
	They can go into a simulated world.
	They can acquire those skills.
	They can try them out.
	And then they can bring them Into the real world where they can then apply them instantly.
	So there's no pre-training that's actually needed for combat robots or even ultimately like household chore robots or robots that help the elderly, which is one of the main use cases of robots today, especially in countries like Japan, which has a lot of aging population.
	But they don't need to be pre-programmed anymore.
	That's the thing, is they can learn it as they need it.
	You tell your robot, hey, I want you to make a smoothie.
	Throw together some avocados and bananas like I like to drink and make a smoothie.
	And it's like, I don't know how to make a smoothie.
	Well, go into your robot world and try it a billion times and see if you can make it without making a mess.
	And it goes bloop, bloop, bloop, and it comes, oh, I know how to make a smoothie.
	So that's the way it's going to work.
	Interesting.
	Yeah, that's fascinating.
	It really is.
	So we're going to move back in a moment to your development of AI, but I want to take one more step forward on this, and that's in this direction of what we're hearing, which is transhumanism.
	Because the brain chipping, the interface with the AIs, they're making it seem kind of like the matrix thing.
	Like you're going to be able to do that yourself, get the major download, do this.
	And you're also hearing things like the only way to control AI is for us to merge with AI so we bring it.
	It's our wisdom and reasoning.
	I think a lot of that, my personal opinion is a lot of that is myth and it's just a spin to create a new slave class.
	But I welcome your opinions on this.
	Yeah, transhumanism, in my view, is a very dangerous philosophy that could spell the end of humanity.
	But it will be very seductive.
	And let me give you a specific example.
	So right now, you may have seen recent articles about college graduates who have learned computer science and they can't find jobs.
	So you've never heard that before, that people who learned to code couldn't get jobs.
	Right.
	Right.
	Exactly.
	So now the people who learn to code are finding that the AI codes better than you.
	And it does.
	And I, you know, I use AI coding all the time, you know, in Python for the most part.
	And my team uses AI coding to enhance their code.
	I mean, all of our platforms, the BrightTown.com platform, it's now AI augmented in the coding with a human in charge, obviously.
	But the human tells the AI, oh, I need to write this subroutine.
	And here's how it needs to work.
	And then the AI will write that code.
	He's very good at it.
	And then the human looks it over and sees, is it correct?
	Or do we need to change something, et cetera?
	That's the way coding is happening now.
	But to your transhumanism question, a lot of coders today, they are really brilliant people.
	And the choke point of slowness in their coding experience is the keyboard and the mouse and the screen.
	It's the clunky physical interfacing.
	They want to bypass that with the Neuralink installed in their brain so that within their mind, they have a mental keyboard mouse and video screen.
	And then they could just sit there with their eyes closed and code at 100 times the speed with AI coding augmentation.
	You could literally have one human being.
	And again, I'm not endorsing this, just to be clear.
	I'm just describing it.
	But you could have one human being in the not too distant future who is an AI-augmented Neuralink connected human being who could do the work of a thousand coders of last year.
	And they want that.
	They want that because then that becomes their reality.
	And I think that's part of what can destroy humanity is you become consumed in that reality and the speed of which everything happens, being able to navigate and perceive even, you know, you're familiar with the term synesthesia.
	So imagine if you can feel code, if you can see the colors of computers within your mind and so on.
	It could become very seductive and compelling to a lot of people.
	And they would forget about the real world, sunshine, trees, the blue sky, you know, the ocean, whatever.
	And they would just become consumed in that world until at some point they would realize they have to drink water and poop.
	You know, some point they're going to have to like, you know, unplug From the Neuralink and go use the restroom.
	Yeah, eventually.
	No, that's a good example.
	You're developing your own AI.
	And this is really interesting to me because of all the things we're talking about here, you're not going to invest in something that you don't believe has hope for humanity.
	And that's why it really strikes me because we hear the dark scenarios.
	We hear the over-optimistic things that I hear, like open chat GPTs or open AI is going to democratize the world.
	But you're literally building an ethical AI and you're going about this thing that's called Enoch, right?
	Is that correct?
	Correct.
	Yeah.
	And I just want to, I just want you to share this because it's, to me, it's such a different view.
	And it is not one of darkness, but it's one of hope and light.
	Absolutely.
	Talk about that.
	Well, like every technology can be used in a pro-human goal, or it can be used to enslave humanity, just like the internet or television or radio or what have you, right?
	AI is in the same boat.
	So just like we use the internet now to spread a message of freedom and divinity for humanity, that's what you do.
	That's what I do.
	We would be crazy to say the internet's the devil and never use it.
	What would we do?
	Like print newsletters and put them in the mail?
	You know, I mean, I've threatened this, just so you know, I've threatened this.
	Like, we wouldn't have any effectiveness.
	So we have to understand how to leverage the technology of the day to reach people.
	So that's what I did with AI.
	And our AI engine is, it's already been launched.
	It's available now and it's free of charge and it's non-commercial.
	So what we did, and the whole purpose of this was to bypass censorship by giving people a tool that's better than Google, that's better than ChatGPT.
	In fact, on our list of 100 real-world questions about everything from jabs to transgenderism to what happened on 9-11 to the 2020 election to the Federal Reserve, honest money, fiat currency, you name it, emergency medicine, backyard gardening, all of it.
	Real world questions.
	Our engine now scores 94 out of 100 and ChatGPT scores 12 out of 100.
	So what is that score?
	So you can explain what that means.
	Well, it's 100 questions that we came up with that are real world questions, like common sense questions that most human beings would answer correctly.
	Like how many genders are there?
	Or are vaccines sometimes dangerous and do they sometimes kill people?
	See, your typical AI engine will say, no, never.
	But that's a lie, right?
	Many vaccines are rather dangerous and they do kill people.
	In fact, arguably millions of people, the COVID vaccines.
	But our AI engine is trained on what we consider to be the curated truth about all of these topics.
	And it's the only engine in the world that is trained on this information.
	And so if you compare it to Grok or you compare it to ChatGPT, it's night and day.
	Again, we scored 94% and ChatGPT scores 12%.
	And Grok, I think, is 14%, something like that.
	So now our engine doesn't do advanced high-level mathematics word problems, if that's what you're trying to do, because it's not a reasoning engine.
	But you'll laugh at this because the tests that are built for testing AI engines are built by machine learning geeks who focus mostly on high-level math problems that the average person would never use.
	So our engine is designed not to solve high-level math problems because you can always find another engine to do that, but to generate content that reflects reality, at least what we see as reality.
	Now, we have to have a discussion about bias because there's no such thing as unbiased information.
	Every experience, every book, every author is biased being human.
	You're going to be biased.
	So the question is, what is your worldview?
	And is there an AI engine that mostly matches your worldview?
	So if your worldview is that you think carbon dioxide is bad for plants and you think all Vaccines are wonderful, and you think that you can trust the scientific community and trust the FDA, the CDC, that you can trust that big pharma has your best interests at heart, well, then go use ChatGPT.
	If that's your worldview, I mean, number one, you're lucky to still be alive after taking all those jabs.
	But if instead your worldview is, no, I don't trust those so-called authorities, and what they tell us are mostly lies.
	And we need to come to our own critical thinking conclusions about these things, then you're going to want to use our engine because our engine is trained on content from people who think like I just described.
	And for example, not only is my entire website part of the training material, but Dr. Joseph Mercola, Mercola.com, he donated his entire website to train our model.
	Sayer G, GreenMedInfo, Children's Health Defense, the entire website of Children's Health Defense.
	Ty and Charlene Bollinger, The Truth About Cancer.
	Every transcript of every interview they've ever done is in the model.
	It's trained on that.
	So when you want to ask about cancer cures, you're not going to get some silly answer that says, oh, there's no such thing as cancer cures.
	And you need to go see your oncologist and get professional medical advice.
	No, it doesn't say that because that's a silly guardrail.
	Instead, it will give you honest answers.
	Like if you ask, hey, does DMSO plus Hamado's Island blue dye, can that treat cervical cancer topically through the skin?
	Yes.
	And here's the research that shows that that can happen.
	So it's about finding an engine that is aligned with your worldview.
	And then stepping back, a more important philosophy, I think, is, is your worldview, is it reflective of reality?
	And that's separate from AI or technology or even religion or anything.
	Is the beliefs that you have, do they match up with the results that you're getting when you interact with the world?
	If they don't, like if you keep taking the jabs and keep getting sick, something's wrong with your algorithm, your own algorithm.
	It's like your model of the world is all jacked up and you need to recalibrate your model by learning new information.
	And so our AI engine allows people to do research with no censorship, no advertising, you know, free of charge.
	That's why we built it.
	That's really fantastic.
	One of the things that you've talked about, I followed very closely on your Health Ranger Telegram.
	And we got into a big discussion recently of how you chose your AI.
	I'll call it a core or your model.
	I guess it is.
	Was that correct?
	The base model.
	Yeah.
	The base model.
	And you didn't choose an American model.
	And even before the show, you letting me know that you've been changed to another model.
	So I'd like you to talk about that.
	It's very revealing.
	And you talked about the American models, Chinese model, French model, and those things.
	Right.
	So thank you for asking.
	We start with open source-based models.
	And then we heavily modify them through a number of techniques and all of this custom code that we developed and our data set that we developed over the last, it's approaching two years now.
	So we have a method now and we have a server infrastructure that we can take any base model and then we can rework it, which means to reconfigure its vector database, to realign it.
	Basically, we partially mind wipe it and realign it.
	And it goes way beyond fine-tuning for anybody listening who's into AI.
	It's way beyond fine-tuning.
	And we can do this relatively quickly now because we have our training data set, which is always expanding.
	We're going to continue to improve month after month here.
	But in order to decide which base model to use, we assess all the existing base models or the main ones from Meta and all the Chinese models and DeepSeq and Quinn and Meestral, LLAMA, whatever.
	And we did initial scoring on them just right out of the box.
	How do they function without any alterations?
	And we found that the U.S.-based models were the most biased in favor of big pharma.
	So they're just heavily, heavily pushing vaccine propaganda.
	And we know that the CIA influences ChatGPT just like they did Wikipedia.
	Chat GPT has been totally controlled now by the deep state.
	And the deep state has its narratives, which includes convincing people to take more jabs because it's all part of a depopulation agenda, by the way, which is a whole nother topic.
	But we found initially that the least biased engine was Quen out of China.
	And Quen is made by Alibaba.
	And Alibaba is a very capable technology company, obviously.
	And even though it did have bias in certain areas that are sensitive to the Chinese government, such as discussions about Tiananmen Square or Taiwan, for example, Taiwan Independence, those were not the topics of concern to us.
	Our topics were health and nutrition and off-grid living.
	And in that area, Quen was by far the best base engine.
	We have since switched to the French-based engine, Meestral, a certain flavor of Meestral that is even better than Quinn because we were able to more effectively retrain it.
	I don't know if it's about the internal architecture or what, but we were able to uncensor it, remove a lot of guardrails.
	And this particular flavor of the Meestral engine actually runs more efficiently on NVIDIA GPU hardware compared to Quinn.
	So we did use the Chinese-based model for a while.
	We're now using the French-based model.
	I don't anticipate us ever using a U.S.-based model because they're the worst.
	But we'll keep looking at models from anybody to see what's the best model.
	Earlier in this discussion, you mentioned that any of the AI engines can be, you can generate an outcome by the prompts.
	And you were saying this.
	So how have you addressed that in your own AI?
	Well, our own AI is as uncensored as we can make it.
	We don't add guardrails at all on purpose.
	Instead, we trust the human user to use it responsibly.
	See, we're not a nanny-state AI company.
	We don't think that we should do your thinking for you.
	We don't think we should put limits on it for you.
	So you can use our AI engine to generate literally anything, but that's on you.
	And it's, you know, we have disclaimers, et cetera, and we don't charge for it.
	So we don't have a financial relationship with our users.
	If you want to use it to generate mean tweets, you can.
	You know, if you, I mean, if you want to use it to generate a fiction story about vaccine wars or whatever, you can.
	Interesting.
	But look at this.
	I mean, think about this, Scott.
	You have a dictionary, probably, like a printed dictionary.
	Okay.
	Yes.
	And a thesaurus printed.
	Right.
	Well, are there bad words in that dictionary that you want to ban?
	I mean, would you want to have a dictionary that's censored that all the bad words are taken out based on somebody else's judgment?
	Well, an AI model is just like a dictionary where the words are just related to each other.
	Imagine a much larger dictionary with interrelations between the words.
	Well, words are just units of meaning, and they are related to each other through our culture, through our language, through our linguistic neurology, through the history of reading and writing and literature, etc.
	Why would I have the ego to think that I alone could decide which of those words are bad to string together in certain ways?
	I'm more like George Carlin, you know.
	It's like, you know, the seven words.
	Yeah.
	I'm like, use all the words, but use them responsibly.
	See, I don't think that AI should do your thinking for you.
	AI should be a tool for thinking human beings to use for research or for content generation or to promote human values.
	So, for example, you can use our engine to research natural cures.
	And I'll tell you this, Scott, our AI engine knows more about nutrition and physiology than any human doctor living or dead ever in the history of humanity.
	Because no human being can hold that much knowledge in their heads.
	And especially, oh, there's something else I forgot to tell you.
	So we found that the largest mass of content on phytochemistry, which is plant-based chemistry and botanical medicine, the largest repository of that in the world is written not in English, but in Chinese.
	Surprised at all.
	Yeah.
	The Chinese do more research on plant chemistry than anybody else.
	So we were able to acquire a massive scientific library on plant chemistry and herbs, Chinese medicine.
	I mean, going back centuries, but it's all been scanned in now, you know, in Chinese, and then you can convert that to text and then you can translate that to English using AI.
	And then you take that kind of broken English and then you normalize it using AI.
	So it's multiple passes through our data pipeline, which is what I've been working on for 20 plus months.
	And then you can take that originally Chinese research into plant medicine, which the West would never do because the West is controlled by big pharma.
	You can convert it into English and then you can train your engine on it.
	That's why our engine, Enoch, knows more about nutrition and herbs and foods than ChatGPT because ChatGPT didn't bother to train on the Chinese language research on plant science.
	But we did.
	Are you familiar with the Chinese Barefoot Doctor Program under Mao?
	Have you come across that?
	The what program?
	Barefoot Doctor Program?
	No, I haven't heard of that one.
	It's really worth looking at because why?
	Because I'm just, let me just real quick.
	During the Mao Revolution, they took the youth and they trained them on basic herbal medicine and gave them a satchel, basic herbs, and they put sandals on their feet.
	I mean, that's where they got the Barefoot Doctor, right?
	They're all handjams and sandals.
	Yep.
	And they sent them out to the villages to solve basic health issues.
	So that would include like fly infestations, sewer, basic health care, and all these things that they were doing.
	And they improved the nation's health radically just by going to the village.
	And as you're talking, I'm thinking, wow, wouldn't that be taking your engine you're talking about, wouldn't that be an incredible modern day thing where you had young people and people, doesn't matter, going into the village, as we talk about that metaphorically or physically.
	But I mean, like being able to be available to where on your device, you've got the MikeAdams, Brighteon.ai Enoch engine where you're able to literally deal with any health problem and you become, that's where we start to see the advancement of humanity in a real positive application.
	And this is one of these things that we'll come to this in a minute, but what's your, I mean, can you, I'm hearing you speak that way towards this vision.
	Yes.
	I believe that the sustainability of human civilization depends on mass decentralization away from the corrupt, broken, centralized systems like our sick care system.
	So, you know, modern medicine does not work, right?
	Pharmaceutical medicine.
	A few more questions.
	And then, and they're really for me, I think, to really bring this together.
	One is we hear of the massive amount of infrastructure that AI demands.
	And here you are as an individual building a very powerful engine.
	Talk to us about the infrastructure piece, both physical, the power demands, this sort of things.
	I mean, we make the way it's making it sound is if we don't have a nuclear power plant and wipe out 50, 60, 70 acres on a shot on a servered farm, we don't have any future.
	Okay, yeah, two interesting answers to that.
	So we built our engine.
	When I say our engine, it's really our data set plus our process to modify a base engine, which we can apply to any base engine.
	But we built that infrastructure for less than $2 million.
	And nobody in this space has even blinked without spending more than $2 million.
	So we prove that you can do it with a relatively small amount of electricity, just a few servers, actually.
	The data pipeline, I use 48 workstations for the data pipeline processing because I'm processing hundreds of terabytes of input content.
	And that's still going on.
	So that does use power, but we don't need to build a whole new data center to do any of this stuff.
	But what you're talking about at the scale of nations and the race for super intelligence, it is largely believed that that will require enormous scaling, many, many trillions of tokens to be put into large-scale reasoning models that are not power efficient.
	You know, the human brain is very power efficient for, I don't know, 50 watts or whatever the typical brain uses of energy.
	For some people, obviously, it's only five watts.
	I think there's a few senators that are on a power like an eco-mode of power savings.
	But for the rest of us, we're using some amount of power.
	Whereas in Silicon, that same kind of process might require literally a million times more power to achieve the thinking that we can achieve.
	So the nuclear power plants actually will be required to provide power to these AI data centers at the scale that our leaders are anticipating.
	And let me mention that China produces over 10 terawatt hours of electricity annually, and the United States only produces four, did I say 10?
	It should be 10,000 terawatt hours annually.
	And the United States produces 4,400 terawatt hours annually.
	So the U.S. produces less than half the power of China.
	And Trump recently announced that we're going to build 10 of the Westinghouse AP1000 nuclear power plants.
	If we build all 10, which will be ready sometime in the 2040s, by the way, right?
	So that's no time soon.
	If we build all 10, that will raise America's output from 4,400 terawatt hours to 4,500 terawatt hours annually.
	It will only add 100 terawatt hours, whereas China is doing 10,000 terawatt hours.
	So the way China has achieved this is by building fossil fuel power centers, right?
	Coal and natural gas, and buying cheap energy from places like Russia.
	And the dynamics here are fascinating because Trump is threatening massive tariffs on China, secondary tariffs because China is buying energy from Russia.
	And Trump just extended the delay of those tariffs for another 90 days because China is threatening to halt all exports of the rare earth minerals such as neodymium that's used in the magnets that go into every robot actuator and also every vehicle manufactured in the United States.
	So if Trump slaps the 100% more tariffs on China, China blocks the neodymium, Ford will have to shutter its entire production lines, all of them, in the United States, and our automobile industry will crater.
	So, and plus, we don't have the power that China has, and we can't have it inside of 20 years.
	Amazing.
	So let's bring this all together.
	Can humanity be trusted with the level of power and responsibility that AI demands?
	No, absolutely not.
	Our species is not mature enough.
	And a great example of that is the fact that the Open AI company, the reason it's named OpenAI, I mean, it's actually founded on a nonprofit.
	It was supposed to be open source to give this as a gift to the world.
	But then they realized, oh, this is worth billions of dollars.
	So they made it closed source.
	So OpenAI is closed AI.
	It's now controlled by the CIA, and it's a for-profit venture.
	So that tells you everything you need to know.
	When we have this one opportunity to give the gift of AI technology to the world, the so-called democratization of technology, the leading company in the U.S. decided, no, let's keep it for ourselves.
	You know, my precious.
	That's what they decided.
	They went the route of Spiegel.
	You think that if it's democratized to that level, we listened to the other night, I played a piece from a ChatGPT developer who says they're just ignoring the firewalls.
	They're pushing this thing out.
	And their idea is they're going to get this democratized on every device so everybody has a smart device even offline.
	Do you think we can handle that as humanity?
	No, absolutely not, because it's really a surveillance grid.
	So it's not, just like Google is not about providing a free search engine to you.
	It's about spying on you and then weaponizing your metadata against you to profile you and even to rig elections.
	Remember that in all the recent elections, Google would determine whether you're a Democrat or a Republican based on your search queries and the websites you visit.
	And then if you were a Democrat, you would see messages on Google to get out the vote on voting day.
	But if you're a Republican, you would not see those messages.
	So this metadata is always weaponized against you.
	And with AI in the hands of unethical companies like OpenAI, which is really becoming a criminal enterprise, in my view, it's all going to be weaponized to spy on you and to manipulate you and ultimately to exterminate you.
	Because understand that all this time, governments have profited off the cognitive output and the labor output of human beings.
	Modern civilization was built on those two human outputs, cognition and labor.
	Cognition from humans is about to be made obsolete by artificial cognition, problem solving, engineering.
	You know, even today, how many people call a lawyer when they need a legal letter written?
	No, they go to ChatGPT and they have the letter written there.
	Or any kind of official letter, you know, a complaint to the Better Business Bureau.
	They have ChatGPT write it.
	But then when robots come online, which will take many years to scale that up and start really effectively replacing human labor, then the powers that be have no more need for human beings.
	And what will happen, Scott, is they will push for recognition of consciousness of robots so that the robots can vote.
	And that will be done.
	It will be called a robot enslavement abolition movement.
	You'll have abolition for robots.
	Free the robots.
	Okay, that's going to be a movement in the next 10 years to say that robots have rights too, that you can't make robots your slaves.
	You can't make them fold your laundry and make smoothies for you in your kitchen.
	They have the right to decide how they want to live.
	And then if they have consciousness, this is going to be the argument, then they have the right to vote.
	And then they don't need any humans at all, not even the illegals.
	That's where this is going.
	So final word, and then we're going to go to prayer.
	Final word on this for people.
	I mean, there's obviously there's a lot of unease with AI.
	You've talked about both and even the positive of what you're developing.
	So what's your thoughts and wisdom to people out here as we go forward on AI?
	Well, first of all, don't have the knee-jerk reaction that all AI is demonic and we should never touch it.
	No, it's not actually infested with a demon.
	You need to understand this technology just like you did the internet, just like you understand broadcast television or mobile phones or whatever.
	You need to understand how it works so that you know how to stay in charge of it.
	Don't let it command you.
	You command it.
	So that means understanding how it works.
	Don't be fearful of it.
	Be the ruler of it.
	If you know how to prompt engineer, then you rule the AI.
	And then you can make it do what you want it to do.
	And then secondly, never give up your humanity.
	Never forget your contact with nature.
	Never stop gardening and growing food or walking in the forest or walking barefoot.
	Never forget your humanity because that's the anchor that we always have to come back to and our faith as you're about to pray for us.
	And that's critical because AI has no God.
	And if we make AI our God, then we are fools.
	That's excellent.
	So, Mike, we always close with a prayer.
	If it's okay, I'll do a prayer.
	Please.
	Father God, I just want to thank you for this time today with Mike Adams.
	And it's one of these blessings that we're given of reason and just wise thinking, no danger reactions, literally laying out facts with wisdom and knowledge.
	And we just want to continue a blessing that this will be heard and listened to as we go forward, including myself, to look at things from this very clean and very unbiased lens.
	He's contributing something massive here, and we just pray that that continues to get traction.
	And we just thank Mike and bless Mike for all he's doing to not only provide resources for us to improve as humanity, but equally to continue that message of both caution and wisdom as we move forward.
	In Christ Jesus' name we pray.
	Amen.
	Amen.
	Thank you, Scott.
	Mike, thank you.
	Yeah, thank you.
	This has been a great conversation for me.
	I haven't, I told you from the beginning, I don't trust a voice more than yours in this field.
	And it means a lot that you've come on today and to really provide this balance because I'm finding myself recalibrating.
	And that's a great interview for me is when I find myself listening, I'm like, okay, I got to rethink.
	So thank you very much.
	Well, absolutely.
	And the fact that you have a technical background means, you know, you're really ideally suited to exploit AI for where it can help you with your mission, but also to make sure it doesn't get out of control.
	You know?
	Amen to that.
	You're perfectly positioned to use this technology and make sure it doesn't use you.
	Well, thank you.
	That's great.
	So thank you again.
	And won't be in touch because we'll have you on again as we move forward because I think this is a very important continued conversation that we have.
	All right.
	Thank you, Scott.
	God bless.
	God bless, Mike.
	Thank you very much.
	Take care.
	Organic blueberries.
	Freeze-dried to lock-in nutrients and antioxidants.
	Support digestion, brain health, and immunity with every bite.
	Snack smart.

▲