Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 6, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:37:11

BBN, Mar 6, 2025 – Climate SLUSH FUND exposed; Robots for off-grid living...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
	Okay, welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News for Thursday, March 6th, 2025. I'm Mike Adams, of course, the Health Ranger of NaturalNews.com and Brighteon.com.
	Thank you for joining me today.
	Of course, we've got a lot of breaking news and some pretty amazing information for you here today.
	A couple of hard-hitting special reports.
	Let me give you just a table of contents.
	We have an interview with the Google whistleblower, Zach Voorhees, which is a special episode of Decentralized TV. That's coming up.
	I've got three special reports for you.
	One is on the tech topic, why robots will help people escape the cities and homestead in the countryside.
	There's a topic not a lot of people think about.
	And then another report...
	On robots versus human cognition, it's called the age of human cognition is rapidly coming to an end.
	Now, I always have a pro-human mission here, so don't think that I'm saying that robots are going to take over everything.
	No.
	But robots are going to assist humans who are creators, humans who have ideas and who can imagine what they want to create.
	Robots and AI are going to help them create those things more quickly.
	And then finally, I have a special report called Why Health and Food Have Everything to Do with Politics.
	Sometimes people say, why can't you just talk about health and not politics?
	The answer is because they are deeply intertwined.
	And then on top of that, we've got a couple of Bright Learn book videos, including one called Griftopia, Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con that is Breaking America.
	That's a book by Matt Taibbi.
	And we've got a book review on that.
	And then another book review on Gladio, NATO's dagger at the heart of Europe.
	Operation Gladio.
	Yeah, that's going to be very interesting.
	So, to begin, though, let's talk about climate fraud, climate money laundering, because one of the big stories that broke over the last 24 hours is that the EPA chief under Joe Biden Michael Regan gave $7 billion to a Climate United fund in April of 2024,
	and it had apparently reportedly launched just five months earlier, but it was given $7 billion, and then the $7 billion is going to some pretty sketchy projects and operations, and people are starting to look into this.
	It looks like climate change is the slush fund justification that Democrats use to send billions of dollars to all their favorite projects and all their friends and all their kickbacks because, of course, some of this money ends up bribing judges, paying off ballot-stuffing mules, paying off ballot watchers and attorneys and paying for campaign advertising for Democrats, etc.
	The Democrats' lifeline has always been about slush fund money, and the climate term was the cover story used for a lot of this.
	Foreign aid was also another term, and a lot of the money that supposedly went to Ukraine actually was just kickbacks to corrupt U.S. officials under Biden.
	That's why in the last few months of Biden's regime, they were in a hurry to just, as they said, throw gold bars overboard.
	At the EPA. They were just tossing out billions of dollars, including to Ukraine, because this is like their last kickback phase.
	Because Doge came in and shut most of that down, and more shutdowns are coming, and also criminal prosecutions are coming.
	So this story has just begun to break.
	You're going to hear a lot about this story in the coming days.
	Because...
	Climate change has always been a fraud itself, but the reason they needed climate change was as a cover story for money laundering fraud to the Democrats.
	Think about that.
	And remember that USAID money went to LGBT propaganda all over the world to push transgenderism and genital mutilation of children.
	They were using slush fund money for that and pushing all kinds of left-wing causes and Black Lives Matter.
	And wokeism and DEI and all that nonsense, a lot of that was USAID money.
	But this was going on at the EPA before Zeldin became head of the EPA, you know, before Trump was elected.
	The EPA, massive slush fund operation.
	Totally illegal.
	I hope these people are prosecuted and imprisoned for all the slush fund money that they took part in.
	I want to say every single person who received this money should be prosecuted.
	And every single person who sent out this money, illegitimately, should also be prosecuted.
	Criminally prosecuted.
	We need to demand those prosecutions.
	It is time to throw these people in prison.
	Now, speaking of people who need to be thrown in prison, this is interesting.
	Congresswoman Anna Paulina Luna announced just yesterday that she's going to refer four sanctuary city mayors To Pam Bondi, the Attorney General, for prosecution.
	And she said to them, you're in direct violation of U.S. Title 8, Code Subsection 1324. It's a federal offense.
	And we've got a video of her saying this.
	So let's take a look at that.
	So you don't believe that banning the transfer of individuals into ICE custody for the purpose of civil immigration enforcement encourages illegal immigration into Chicago?
	Or how about agencies?
	Sorry, one second.
	Or agents not being able to stop, arrest, or detain individuals based solely on their immigration status or administrative warrant?
	So we comply with all laws, local, state, and federal.
	To me, after this line of questioning, it's very clear that these policies that you have all implicated are active and alive and well in your cities are in direct violation with U.S. Title VIII Code Subsection 1324 and is a federal offense.
	But you all speak about a broken immigration system, and yet here you guys are aiding and abetting in that entire process.
	I want to be very clear about something.
	Open border policies, which is something that you guys are talking about, Hurts people on both sides, meaning the people that are coming here illegally and then American citizens as well.
	I do not think you guys are bad people, but I think that you are ideologically misled, which is why, unfortunately, based on your responses, I'm all going to be criminally referring you to the Department of Justice for investigation.
	And as soon as I leave here, these will be going over to Pam Bondi.
	I'm not doing that in an effort to bully you guys, but I do believe that your policies are hurting the American people, and you can make that known with the evidence that you can present to the Department of Justice.
	But if you guys continue doing what you're doing, you're not going to help anyone.
	You're going to hurt more people, and that's exactly why I'm tired of it, the American people are tired of it, and Chairman, I yield like that.
	Would you yield your last minute?
	Yes, sir.
	Okay, she was pretty polite there.
	She was saying, I don't think you're bad people, but you're hurting Americans with your sanctuary city status, and I'm referring you for criminal investigation to the DOJ. I would have said that much more harshly.
	I would have said, you are bad people, you are hurting others, you are disregarding the rule of law, and you should be thrown in prison.
	And we're going to prosecute you because you admit to these crimes.
	You admit to them.
	You know, it's...
	It's not a mystery.
	They declared sanctuary city status.
	These mayors declared it.
	They said, we're going to harbor illegals, even though it's a federal offense to do so.
	So I say arrest them, perp walk them, handcuff them on TV, and march them right into prison.
	Prosecute them.
	Yeah, give them a chance to present evidence in their defense, etc.
	But if they are found guilty, they should be sentenced accordingly, especially for all the Americans who were harmed by their open borders policies.
	And that is a great number of Americans.
	All right.
	Now, that whole issue leads us to the very first brightlearn.ai book review video that we have for you today.
	And remember, you can see all these and watch them all at BrightLearn.ai.
	And the first book review video covers a book by Matt Taibbi called Griftopia.
	Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con that is Breaking America.
	So check out this book review video, and then we'll continue with more on the other side.
	Hello, everyone.
	Today we're taking a journey through the pages of the book Griftopia, Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con that is Breaking America by Matt Tybee.
	Let's start with the 2008 presidential campaign.
	A time when the air was thick with tension and the nation was deeply divided.
	Matt Tybee was there, in the thick of it, covering the Republican National Convention in St. Paul, Minnesota.
	He witnessed the rise of Sarah Palin, a figure who would become emblematic of a new kind of political strategy.
	Palin's speech was a master class in rallying a very specific demographic.
	The we she spoke to was a group defined by its grievances.
	Its sense of being overlooked and disrespected by the elites.
	It was a speech that tapped into a deep well of resentment and frustration, and it was delivered with a charisma that was both captivating and, as Tybee notes, unsettling.
	But here's the kicker.
	While Palin was busy rallying her base, the American economy was on the brink of collapse.
	The financial disaster that would soon unfold was something that most Americans Including Tybee himself, knew nothing about.
	The signs were there.
	The collapse of Bear Stearns, the free fall of Lehman Brothers.
	But the campaign press course was too busy chasing scandals and sound bites to notice the real story.
	And that's a powerful indictment of American journalism.
	Now let's talk about the financial crisis itself.
	Tybee paints a picture of a massive Ponzi scheme.
	The key players in this scheme were the investment banks, who bundled up risky mortgages and sold them off as AAA-rated securities.
	These securities were then snapped up by pension funds, insurance companies, and other institutional investors, all of whom were misled about the true nature of the investments.
	One of the most shocking revelations in the book is the role of the ratings agencies.
	These agencies, which were supposed to provide independent assessments of the risk associated with these securities, were essentially in cahoots with the banks.
	They gave glowing ratings to bundles of subprime mortgages, even when the underlying loans were of dubious quality.
	This was a key factor in the crisis.
	As it allowed the banks to offload their risky assets onto unsuspecting investors.
	But the real villain of the piece, according to Tybee, is Alan Greenspan, the former chairman of the Federal Reserve.
	Greenspan's policies of low interest rates and deregulation created the perfect environment for the bubble to grow.
	He was a true believer in the power of the free market, and he used his position to push for policies that benefited the financial industry.
	At the expense of everyone else.
	His legacy is a cautionary tale about the dangers of unchecked power and the perils of ideological blindness.
	And then there's the story of AIG, the insurance giant that was at the heart of the crisis.
	AIG's financial products division, run by the enigmatic Joseph Cassano, was selling billions of dollars' worth of credit default swaps.
	Essentially insurance policies on the mortgage-backed securities.
	The problem was, AIG didn't have the money to cover these bets.
	When the housing market collapsed, AIG was left holding the bag, and the government was forced to step in with a massive bailout.
	But here's where things get really interesting.
	Tabi reveals that the bailout of AIG was not just about saving the company.
	It was also about bailing out the banks that were AIG's counterparties, including Goldman Sachs.
	The government essentially used taxpayer money to pay off AIG's debts to these banks, effectively transferring the risk from the private sector to the public.
	It was a move that highlighted the cozy relationship between Wall Street and the government, and it raised serious questions about who was really being protected.
	And let's not forget the role of the sovereign wealth funds.
	The giant They've used this wealth to buy up everything from highways to parking meters, effectively becoming landlords of American public assets.
	This is a trend that has profound implications for American sovereignty and raises important questions about the long-term consequences of selling off our national treasures.
	Now let's talk about the aftermath.
	The financial crisis led to a wave of reforms, including the Dodd-Frank Act, which was supposed to rein in the excesses of Wall Street.
	But as Tybee points out, the reforms were often watered down or undermined by industry lobbyists.
	The result is a system that is still deeply flawed, with too-big-to-fail banks continuing to dominate the financial landscape.
	But perhaps the most chilling part of the book is the way it exposes the deep-seated corruption and self-serving nature of the political and financial elite.
	Taibi argues that the American political system has been hijacked by a small group of powerful interests who use their influence to enrich themselves at the expense of the public.
	It's a sobering reminder of the challenges we face as a nation, and the urgent need for reform.
	So there you have it, folks.
	Griftopia is a book that will leave you both outraged and enlightened.
	It's a call to action, a plea for Americans to wake up and demand better from their leaders.
	As always, I'd love to hear your thoughts.
	Drop me a line, leave a comment, and let's keep the conversation going.
	Thanks for tuning in, and I'll see you next time.
	This has been a BrightLearn video from BrightLearn.ai on the book, Grifftopia, Bubble Machines, Vampire Squids, and the Long Con that is Breaking America, by Matt Tabe.
	Visit BrightLearn.ai for more fascinating videos like this one, and NaturalNews.com for full editorial coverage, and breaking news on critical stories that keep you informed and aware of what's really going on.
	All right, now, here's what we're going to do next.
	Going to play multiple special reports for you here, and then going to do another book video for you here, again called Gladio, NATO's Dagger at the Heart of Europe by Richard Cottrell.
	That's coming up, and then we'll have an interview with Zach Voorhees, the Google whistleblower.
	All of that is coming up.
	I just want to plug our sponsor today right here.
	That's the Satellite Phone Store.
	S-A-T-1-2-3 dot com.
	And remember, they have Starlink technology.
	Now they can sell you Starlink packages for satellite bandwidth at a great price.
	And also, of course, they have satellite phones that they make very affordable.
	They've got the Iridium and the Inmarsat phones as well.
	They also have bivvy sticks, which are satellite text messaging.
	On top of that, they have the escape zone bags, laptop bags and backpacks, mobile device pouches that have Faraday material in them to protect from electromagnetic radiation and also EMP weapons and things like that.
	Solar flares, you know, all that.
	They offer a level of protection.
	And they have solar generators with solar panels and much more.
	Find all that again at sat123.com.
	And then When you want to help support us and you're ready for some really clean lab-tested foods and superfoods, nutritional supplements, personal care products, and home care products as well, plus many preparedness items, well, shop with us at healthrangerstore.com, and you'll find ultra-clean foods right there, healthrangerstore.com.
	All right, with that said, enjoy the rest of today's show, which is a series of special reports, book reviews, and an interview with Zach.
	And I'll be back with you tomorrow.
	Welcome to this special report on health and politics in America.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for joining me today.
	And since Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is now the Secretary of Health and Human Services, and of course RFK Jr. used to be a Democrat, but the Democrat Party rejected him and they rigged their own process to make sure that Joe Biden was the candidate, which turned out to be a horrible historic mistake.
	So RFK Jr. and a lot of people like Tulsi Gabbard and even Donald Trump himself, who used to be Democrats, they really took over the Republican Party.
	Now, again, we're going to talk about health and politics and how they interact here, but I want you to understand in the bigger context that the GOP, like that label, doesn't even really fit today's Republican Party.
	The GOP, I dare say, At least the old GOP is dead.
	It's dead.
	It's been booted out.
	It's been taken over.
	What's the old GOP? It's like Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and George Bush and all these horrible war criminals.
	It's the Victoria Nulans of the world.
	Even though she served under the Biden administration, but she also served under Bush and a bunch of presidents.
	Look, the old Republican Party is dead and gone.
	The rhinos are being hunted, you know, metaphorically speaking, politically speaking, and eliminated from the party.
	The new Republican Party is nothing like the old GOP. And the new Republican Party, which is strongly characterized now by Trump, is a party that reaches out to people, like, really, as we used to say, across the aisle, except that aisle, the chasm of the aisle has become...
	Much larger.
	It's kind of like the Grand Canyon now, but Trump reaches out to people like RFK Jr., who is a classic Democrat, or people like Tulsi Gabbard, who is a classic Democrat.
	The thing is, the Democrat Party moved so far to the radical left that the party left behind all their own or most of their own Democrat loyalists or former Democrat loyalists, like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. And so the Democrat Party today has gone radical far left, while the Republican Party has shifted away from radical far right.
	And instead, the Republican Party has shifted to much closer to a centrist point of view.
	More of a centrist point of view.
	not quite I wouldn't characterize it as centrist but it's closer to center than the old Republican Party while the Democrats are much further away from center than they have ever been now with that context explained let me ask you this question because sometimes I get comments from people who say things and I've received these comments over you know many well probably for 20 years and
	They say, well, I wish you would just focus on health and not politics.
	Just talk about food and health and health freedom.
	And vaccines, but not politics.
	Okay.
	Have you ever tried that?
	Good luck, because they are intertwined.
	And to explain that, let me just go down the list with you together.
	We'll do this together.
	Which party believes strongly in forcing vaccines on you without your choice?
	Which party is that?
	Oh, that's the Democrat Party.
	Versus which party believes in vaccine freedom or vaccine choice?
	Well, clearly, Trump and RFK Jr. and other people in the Trump administration believe in vaccine choice.
	Trump opposes vaccine mandates, and RFK Jr., Secretary Kennedy, he also opposes vaccine mandates.
	So, on this issue, vaccines, it's very clear.
	If you believe in health freedom, you can't be a Democrat.
	Because Democrats believe in health tyranny, or vaccine tyranny.
	They believe in coercion.
	Okay.
	Next question.
	Next question.
	Which party believes in forced lockdowns and quarantines?
	That would be the Democrats.
	Once again, the Democrats.
	They think that they get to rule your life.
	And if they declare an outbreak, which they're trying to do now with a bunch of fake measles hoaxes and fake Ebola hoaxes and bird flu hoaxes, you know they're trying.
	They want to have lockdowns and quarantines.
	To where you can't say no.
	They can just show up at your house at gunpoint and say, you're coming with us.
	Get on the bus.
	We're taking you to the quarantine camp, as Hillary Clinton used to call them, the fun camps.
	Yeah.
	What's fun about them?
	Well, no fun for you, but it's fun for the globalists who love depopulation.
	So Democrats are all about that.
	Democrats believe that you don't own your own body.
	Think about that.
	Seriously.
	You know, women's health rights and my body, my choice, when it comes to vaccines, they believe your body, government's choice, don't they?
	Don't they?
	Yeah, it's abundantly clear.
	So on that issue, also, if we talk about health freedom, I can't help but mention that Democrats support total lockdowns, vaccine mandates, coercion, quarantines against your will.
	It is political because the Republicans, They don't support any of that stuff at all.
	Now, the current Republican Party and Florida Governor DeSantis is working hard to end vaccine mandates, to even end the possibility of vaccine mandates ever happening in the state of Florida.
	That would not be happening under a Democrat governor.
	So, politics, well, it actually does matter.
	Alright, next question.
	Big Pharma.
	Which party...
	Is pro-Big Pharma the most?
	Now, you could reasonably argue, well, they're kind of both Big Pharma, you know, friends of Pharma.
	But who pushes Pharma harder?
	That's clearly the Democrats.
	The Democrats really love psychiatric drugging of children.
	They're friends of Big Pharma.
	Now, they didn't used to be 20 years ago.
	They were anti-corporation.
	Now they're all pro-pharma.
	They trust in vaccines.
	They trust in government authority, which we need to talk about that as another topic.
	But they trust in the psychiatric drugs and mass medications.
	Democrats love to take prescription drugs.
	They're really into that.
	Now, plenty of conservatives do as well, but they're not as closely tied to it.
	And one of the more interesting shifts that I've observed...
	For doing this for 25 years is that, for example, an anti-GMO position or opposing glyphosate, that used to be just 100% in the Democrat category.
	You know, when I was part of the march against Monsanto, marching through the streets in Austin, Texas, with the marching band, it was like 99% Democrats.
	And I spoke to 99% Democrats.
	Well, the march against Monsanto...
	Democrats would never do that today because they don't really oppose Monsanto.
	They don't oppose GMOs.
	They don't oppose big business, by and large, with pesticides and herbicides.
	And as an important demonstration of this, remember that when Alex Jones was warning about atrazine as a gender-bender chemical, who attacked him?
	Democrats!
	They said, no, atrazine is perfectly safe.
	Everybody should eat more atrazine.
	It doesn't...
	Cause changes in your gender, even though it does.
	It's a chemical castrator, by the way.
	But Alex Jones was promoting, like, water filters that can remove atrazine, and he was mocked and slandered all over the media.
	Oh my god, atrazine is totally safe to eat and drink!
	And it's, by the way, it's the number two most common herbicide in America, and Democrats love it!
	Which might explain all the gender dysphoria among Democrats.
	Maybe they're just chugging atrazine.
	And then their genitalia starts, you know, mutating or something.
	I feel like I was born in the wrong body, you know, or whatever.
	Really, there's a link.
	There's a link there, but Democrats love herbicides at this point.
	And who opposes?
	Who opposes GMOs?
	It's conservatives.
	Conservatives oppose GMOs.
	If you go on Twitter and other message boards and you look at, like, who is against genetic engineering of food crops?
	Who is against mRNA in the vaccines?
	It's conservatives.
	While the Democrats are pro-GMO, pro-mRNA, pro-herbicide.
	I mean, this is shocking to say here in 2025 because in 2005 it was exactly the opposite.
	But here we are in 2025 and, you know, I have stuck with my principles on this.
	I've always opposed glyphosate and GMOs, genetically engineered crops.
	I've always opposed mass chemical contamination and heavy metals in the food supply.
	I've always opposed vaccines because I know they cause autism.
	I've always opposed aluminum in vaccines and mercury in vaccines and other adjuvants like squalene and so on.
	I've always opposed aborted human fetal tissue in vaccines.
	But the political parties have shifted.
	If you are a principled person, and I think those of you listening to this, you are principled, otherwise you wouldn't be listening.
	I'm willing to bet that many of you, if not even most of you, were at a previous time, you were a Democrat.
	But because you have principles, because you believe in clean living and clean food and being free from pesticides and herbicides and...
	You know, vaccines and pharmaceuticals and all that stuff.
	You stuck with your principles, which means that ultimately you shifted politically.
	I mean, it's not because you changed, it's because the political parties changed.
	The Democrats, again, went radical left.
	You know, transgenderism and 97 genders and purple-haired nose rings and all that stuff, There was basically a coup that took over the GOP and it became a more closer to a centrist party where we now have RFK Jr. who agrees with us that vaccines are dangerous.
	And he agrees with us that we've got to get the toxic metals out of the food supply and toxic chemicals.
	And he's also very concerned about pesticide and herbicide loads on human consumers and children in particular.
	There you go.
	Isn't that interesting?
	Now, there are other points along this same line here.
	Think about not only vaccines, which we know Democrats love vaccines, and remember, among LGBT, COVID vaccine compliance was 96%.
	So 19 out of 20 Democrats, roughly, or LGBT, they took the COVID vaccine.
	19 out of 20. Well, among conservatives, and especially Christians, It's nowhere near that.
	It might be, you know, 30 out of 100, you know, like 30% is what I'm saying.
	But what about what's in the vaccines?
	Well, more and more people are becoming aware that vaccines are made on purpose with aborted human fetal tissue.
	So those ingredients are known as WI38 and MRC5, and there are other variations as well.
	But these are...
	This is tissue that was taken from murdered human children, and then it has been cloned in a cancer-like process year after year after year.
	And then the vat of cancerous dead baby tissue is ground up and processed, and it's put into vaccines that are injected into today's children.
	So vaccines are medical cannibalism from murdered babies.
	That's being injected into, you know, your baby.
	So, Democrats have no problem with this.
	Why?
	Because they celebrate murdering babies.
	So, you know, look, Democrats are, some of them are Satanists and they really love this ritualistic abuse of children, which is why they're into child genitalia mutilations.
	Also, you know, gender dysphoria surgery.
	Not all Democrats are in that category, but...
	But many of them are.
	Many of them are actual, like, Satanists.
	So they love vaccines because it's a satanic ritual of taking dead babies and grinding them up and then injecting those dead babies as medical cannibalism into new babies, which is kind of sort of tagging them for Satan.
	It's a blood ritual.
	It is literally a blood ritual.
	I mean, a flesh ritual.
	Okay?
	Well, conservatives have a problem with that.
	Once they find out about that, I mean, first of all, most people, when they hear that, they just flat out don't believe it.
	They say, oh, you must be making that up.
	They wouldn't do that.
	And they roll their eyes.
	Nobody would grind up dead babies and then inject them into other babies.
	Oh, so you don't know that that's been going on for decades.
	Oh, okay.
	All right.
	Well, this is going to be an adventure for you.
	As you go down this rabbit hole, WI38 or MRC-5, look it up, folks, because that's what's in the vaccines.
	And they call it that because giving it a number and letters like WI38, that looks much better on the vaccine insert rather than saying murdered human baby aborted fetal tissue as an ingredient because that might turn off some people.
	But if you just call it WI38, Oh, okay.
	Sounds scientific.
	Yeah.
	Well, it's dead babies.
	Okay?
	It's dead baby tissue.
	So, as you can imagine, a lot of conservative Christians, when they find out about this, they are totally freaked out.
	Because most of them allowed their own children to be injected with this stuff.
	You know, because various derivatives of aborted human fetal tissue are in the MMR vaccine.
	And so a lot of Christian parents are like, oh my God, I let my child be injected with other baby's dead tissue?
	Yes, you did.
	Yeah, try not to do that.
	And then this is one of the reasons why they begin to question vaccines.
	Like, wait a second, this is really in here?
	Yes, it is.
	Why?
	Why is that in there?
	Well, now, we have to study a lot of history to understand why.
	But Democrats love it.
	They're like, oh, a dead baby's in my jab?
	Oh, love that.
	Oh, that's so good.
	They probably want to use their own dead babies because they celebrate their own abortions.
	Like, can I get an abortion on Friday and then inject that dead baby into my other baby on Saturday?
	That's how psycho they are.
	So you see what I'm saying here?
	You can't talk about health without talking about politics.
	Because, think about this, if you want to live in a world Where you are free to say no to vaccines, or where you are free to access, let's say, ivermectin, something that conservatives support, but Democrats do not.
	Or if you want to be free to practice natural medicine now, well, conservatives are pro-liberty, and they support the liberty to do more of what you want, you know, to practice your own kind of medicine.
	I mean, they haven't torn down the state medical boards yet, but there's an effort underway to do that.
	And it's from conservative groups.
	The Democrats love the state medical boards.
	They don't want natural medicine.
	They want doctors in control.
	They want vaccines mandated and masks required.
	The Democrats don't believe in medical choice or medical freedom of any kind other than...
	Killing their own unborn babies.
	There, they'll fight for the freedom to murder, but they won't allow you to have the freedom to heal.
	You know, the freedom to use herbs, the freedom to use nutrition to treat disease, the freedom to have your own or to go visit an alternative cancer clinic.
	Democrats don't believe that should be allowed.
	So Democrats don't believe in health freedom at all.
	They don't even believe in clean food anymore.
	They don't believe in clean lifestyles.
	I mean, there might be a few older hippies around who are still left-leaning, who do live that way, but honestly, they're a dying breed.
	There's very few of those people around.
	The mainstream Democrat Party opposes freedom and opposes herbs and natural medicine and even growing your own food.
	I mean, look at every case of an HOA or local laws about outlawing home gardens.
	Who supports the laws to ban gardens?
	Democrats!
	But who wants to end HOAs and allow people to grow gardens in their own yards?
	Republicans.
	Conservatives.
	So everything about health is political.
	And if you tell me that, oh, I want you to just talk about health but not politics, then there's nothing I can say.
	Because they are actually just two sides of the same coin.
	You can't be healthy if you're living under tyranny.
	Because The tyrants will take away your choices that allow you to pursue health.
	And the only way to achieve health is to do so on pillars of fundamental liberty.
	And that's why the fight for health has to begin with a fight for freedom, or liberty, or decentralization.
	A fight to dismantle the authoritarian systems that try to exert control over your personal life.
	Only by dismantling or disempowering those systems, which would be big government and state medical boards and vaccine mandates and the FDA and the CDC and HHS, etc., only by doing that can we actually arrive at a place where we can pursue health freedom and health choices without the government getting in the way.
	So it's very simple.
	And if any of the information in this broadcast is new to you, You know, I invite you to think about it.
	And welcome to the new Republican Party under Trump and RFK Jr. and Tulsi Gabbard and Kash Patel and, you know, all the rest.
	Pam Bondi, all the rest.
	And the new Republican Party believes in health freedom, believes in medical freedom, believes in access to things like ivermectin.
	Democrats love to lock down all the schools and churches and hair salons and restaurants.
	Oh, they love that.
	They love to destroy the economy.
	And at first, a lot of Republicans went along with that too, but as the truth began to emerge, it was the conservatives that really fought against the system.
	And now, The conservatives in America won't put up with that crap ever again.
	But Democrats will.
	They welcome it.
	They love it.
	They love lockdowns.
	They love emergencies that give government more power.
	So if you want to practice health freedom, then follow me at naturalnews.com.
	I'm the publisher of the site.
	You can also follow all my work at brighteon.com.
	You can follow me on social media at brighteon.social.
	Where my username is HealthRanger.
	I'm also HealthRanger on X. On Telegram, I'm RealHealthRanger.
	And you can follow me on brighteon.io, which is the decentralized peer-to-peer uncensorable social media network, brighteon.io.
	So check all that out, get informed, support freedom, and support the new Republican movement, which is not, it's not about party loyalty.
	It's about loyalty to principles.
	And just to be clear, I am not loyal to any political party.
	If the GOP moves away from my principles, I will dump the GOP just like that.
	I have no loyalty to a party.
	I have loyalty to principles, to values.
	My values are pro-human, pro-life.
	I work to protect life, pro-freedom, pro-liberty, pro-natural health, Mother Nature, God's plan for us on this earth.
	I support those principles.
	And whatever political party, I mean, I don't even like politics, frankly.
	I don't even like big government.
	I think we should dismantle most or all of it.
	But as long as we're living under a two-party system, I'm going to judge each party about how closely they align with my values.
	Because, again, I have zero loyalty to a party, which is important.
	Because people who have loyalty to political parties are stupid, and they are a threat to democracy.
	You should have loyalty to principles.
	And you should demand those principles in the parties and in the candidates that you support.
	Because if you're not centered on principles, then you're just a puppet.
	You're just a cult follower of whatever nonsense they're pushing, which has been LGBT transgenderism for all these years and wokeism and DEI. That's all a delusional cult.
	And the people who fell for that are morons.
	And they lost their minds.
	Now they lost the White House and they lost political power.
	They're losing all their slush fund money and all that.
	They deserve every bit of that because they abandoned core principles.
	We should always be centered on principles, values.
	And from there, we decide what we wish to support, either economically, supporting companies or brands or online stores like my store, healthrangerstore.com.
	If you want really clean food, super clean food, Laboratory-tested and nutritional supplements and personal care products of all kinds that we formulate and we manufacture, most of it ourselves, and almost everything we sell is USDA-certified organic, plus we do extensive lab testing ourselves with multiple mass-spec instruments.
	We test for glyphosate.
	We test for heavy metals.
	We test for alpha-toxins.
	We test for microbiology, E. coli, and salmonella contamination, and much more.
	Shop with us at healthrangerstore.com.
	And thank you for your support as we continue to fight for health freedom based on principles, not party loyalty.
	We are a principled organization.
	And I thank you for your support as you share those principles.
	I will always fight for your right to have access to natural medicine and clean food.
	And I will fight for that to my dying day, regardless of what the political parties do.
	Because they can change their minds every day.
	I'm not changing my values.
	I stand for what I stand for, and that's not changing.
	All right, thank you for listening.
	God bless you all.
	I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
	Take care.
	So a lot of people in the liberty movement are quite terrified of the rise of robots and the rise of AI because they're only seeing one side of the coin, the side of centralized control and Skynet and the robot takeover and killbots and everything.
	And that's all a very real risk.
	I don't dismiss that at all.
	But like with any technology, there's also a flip side to it.
	For example, encryption technology can be used by the government to keep secrets, but it can also be used by private citizens like us to do all kinds of interesting things that achieve decentralization and freedom.
	For example, cryptography is the math behind privacy crypto, or even Bitcoin for that matter, but it's used more in privacy crypto.
	And you can use cryptography algorithms to protect zip files and to protect your own information from government surveillance.
	So it's just like the internet.
	The internet is technology that can be controlled through censorship and through centralization to try to force people to believe certain narratives, which is what happened during COVID. But you and I use the internet to achieve the opposite of that.
	We use the internet to achieve decentralization, sharing knowledge, often hidden knowledge or even forbidden knowledge.
	We use the same technology for a much more positive purpose.
	So technology itself is not inherently good or bad.
	It's how it's deployed and it's the value system of the people who are deploying it.
	So when we talk about robots and AI... I want to remind you of how robots will actually lead to mass decentralization and will help a lot of people move out of the cities and get into homesteading and living off the grid.
	I know, that sounds wild, but I recently interviewed Zach Voorhees, and in the interview we were talking about this very topic, how robots can help people homestead.
	Why?
	Because homesteading is a very labor-intensive type of migration out of a city.
	You move to the country, and suddenly your physical workload goes up by a huge factor.
	There's a lot of things you have to do.
	Maybe chop wood, maybe clean out the chicken house.
	That's what I have to do from time to time.
	Take care of animals, mow more grass, repair fence lines, all these kinds of things that you do out in the country.
	Road repair, whatever, rainstorms, erosion, things like that.
	Things you don't worry about in a concrete city, but when you live out in the country, you need to do all these things.
	It turns out they're mindless but labor-intensive tasks in many cases.
	And automated systems or robots are perfect for these kinds of things.
	So what you are about to see is something really interesting in history.
	So let me just back up.
	Before the Industrial Revolution, a much higher percentage of the population in the United States lived in the countryside versus the cities.
	But because of the Industrial Revolution, more and more people moved into the cities and then city population density went up dramatically.
	And why is that the case?
	Well, because the factories were in the cities, largely.
	So the supply chains were in the cities, and importantly, the power supplies were in the cities.
	So you had to come to the city to work in the factory.
	And so there was a massive shift away from a more agrarian society into a machine-powered society.
	Well, I should say machine-augmented, still powered largely by coal in that case, in that era, largely powered by coal.
	But you had this mass migration into the cities.
	Well, what we're about to see now, because of the rise of robots, is a mass migration out of the cities.
	In fact, this began during the COVID years.
	When everybody was sent home to work from home and we saw the rise of remote working.
	To this day, and this is part of the culture now in America, is to work remotely or really to pretend to work remotely.
	You know, I'm hardly working or working hard.
	I can't remember.
	It's one of those two.
	But especially government workers that are, quote, remotely working are really just, you know, goofing off in the hot tub and posting.
	You know, troll comments on Reddit and whatever, and then collecting big fat government pensions and paychecks for the most part.
	But they're getting fired by Doge, which is awesome, because only something like 6% of federal workers were even showing up at the offices anymore.
	So where were they?
	Well, some of them just left the city.
	Some of them moved out to the countryside already.
	And so internet technologies like Zoom allowed people...
	To move out of the cities and to do their, quote, work remotely.
	But that didn't make it any easier to live in the country in terms of all the physical work that we're talking about or even growing your own food, which is very physically intensive or taking care of chickens or goats or other animals from which you might get food like chicken eggs or goat milk or whatever.
	So now, Rise of the Robots, right?
	So we have all these companies around the world.
	It's like Tesla in the United States and Unitree, I think is what it's called in China.
	So check this out.
	Here's some Unitree dancing robot videos and just sort of video footage of the Unitree company and it's got its robot dog and its humanoid robots.
	These robots are capable of really astonishing complex physical movements.
	This was unheard of even two years ago, but now these physical movements allow these robots to do things like gardening.
	I mean, combined with the proper software, of course.
	And the software is rapidly coming along through AI, large language models, or visual language models, you might call them, or even behavior models.
	Visual understanding of 3D space and encoding that into the neural network.
	These robots are going to be capable of doing all kinds of things that will help people with homesteading.
	Now, would I want a robot for homesteading?
	Yeah, absolutely, but only if it's not connected to the cloud.
	So I love the idea of having robots that can help around the farm, but I don't want them talking to the internet.
	So I want them to be offline, and I want them to run open-source software.
	So we can look at the code and we can guarantee that it's safe and it doesn't have secret backdoors in it.
	Now, will that software exist on day one?
	Probably not.
	It's going to take a while for the open source community to work on that.
	But pretty soon, I mean, it won't take long because this happens with everything, like literally everything, including Google phones.
	So, you know, we plug a company called AbovePhone.com that sells de-Googled Google phones.
	So they're mind-wiped and they're replaced with a whole new Android operating system that has no trace of Google in it at all.
	Well, the same thing is going to happen with humanoid robots.
	So you might have a Unitree robot from China and you're going to mind-wipe it and you're going to upload the new off-grid living firmware.
	And then you'll have a robot that has totally new software, but it's got all the physical hardware.
	That comes from China or maybe comes from Tesla.
	If you buy a Tesla model made in America, again, you'll be able to mind wipe it and you'll be able to install some new software.
	And once you have that, based on where technology is going rapidly, you'll be able to teach that robot how to help you with a number of tasks related to homesteading.
	One of those tasks could be, obviously, security.
	You know, stand guard like the Terminator at night.
	Just keep a watch on everything, you know, with your infrared cameras or whatever, your Terminator eyes.
	Just don't give it an AR-15.
	Just have it watch for things, you know.
	And it can walk around the perimeter, you know, keep an eye on things and watch out for, like, I don't know, garden hose leaks or wild animals that show up or whatever kinds of things happen in the country, you know?
	And then you can tell it, hey, go collect the chicken eggs.
	Now, the first time you tell it to do that, you're going to have to show it where are the chicken eggs, and then how do you collect them?
	What do you do first?
	So you grab a basket or a bucket, and then maybe you put some crumpled paper in the bottom of that bucket to cushion the eggs, right?
	So you have to show it all these steps.
	And then you go in there, and then you grab the eggs.
	And what do you do if there's a hen sitting on an egg?
	You reach under the hen.
	That's what you do, and you don't worry if it pecks your hand, as they sometimes will do.
	So you have to teach the robot to reach under the hen without hurting the hen, you know?
	And then feel for the egg.
	You get the egg.
	Just steal it.
	That's what we do.
	We steal their eggs.
	Poor hens.
	And then, you know, you put it in the bucket.
	Now you've collected eggs.
	Okay, what's next?
	Hey, make an omelet.
	Make an omelet out of the eggs.
	Okay, so we go to the kitchen, right?
	And we have to show it the first time.
	Oh, we're going to chop up these things.
	Here's the cutting board.
	Here's a knife.
	Be careful with that knife.
	Don't wield it on other people.
	Don't go full Terminator.
	So, now, I know this violates one of my rules, which is never have a humanoid robot with opposable thumbs.
	But I am talking about an open-source software wipe here, okay?
	So, in this case, the software is different.
	I wouldn't...
	I want a factory robot with opposable thumbs because it can grip knives and things like that.
	I'm talking about open source, safe bot, like a de-googled, like a de-teslified, de-chinified robot, whatever it is.
	It's now your homegrown robot.
	And you teach it how to make an omelet.
	All the steps.
	There are a lot of steps, it turns out, to making an omelet.
	And once you teach it, it can do that.
	So now you have a robot that can collect eggs and make breakfast.
	Well, what else can it do?
	It can grow green peppers.
	You know, it can grow tomatoes.
	So now you have to teach it.
	Where are all the garden tools?
	You know, etc.
	Where is the wheelbarrow?
	How do you use a shovel?
	And remember, these robots are pretty small, so they're going to have small shovels at first, which is okay.
	You just have to spend more time shoveling.
	Just little tiny shovel bites, you know, at a time.
	It's like, wow, that robot, it isn't really very strong.
	Yeah, that's the way we like it.
	We want weak little tiny robots that can't beat us up or put us in an arm bar move.
	Like, we don't want a robot that does jujitsu on us, okay?
	You want a robot that you can defeat in hand-to-hand combat if it comes to that.
	You want a robot that you can break his knees if you have to.
	So, in the meantime, robots got a little tiny, like a child's shovel.
	And it's shoveling away, and it's moving compost, and it's planting tomatoes, and you don't care that it takes a long time, because you already walked away, and you're off doing something far more interesting.
	You let the robot handle the labor, and you don't care that it takes longer, because it's not you doing it.
	But you'll go check on it, like, hey, are these rows the right distance apart, you know?
	Where's the water for the tomatoes?
	You're going to have to water them.
	Oh, and by the way, Need you to pull some weeds.
	You can teach a robot to pull weeds.
	Maybe one day it'll have laser eyes and it'll just like laser the weeds, you know?
	I don't know if I want a robot with laser eyes.
	That sounds dangerous, but you know they already have like weed blasting lasers.
	John Deere announced that, but they're not robots.
	They're attachments that you drag behind your tractor.
	Like you roll over rows of plants and it has...
	Cameras in it, and it looks for weeds, and it literally blasts the weeds with lasers as you're rolling over the rows.
	That already exists, but those lasers don't walk around in the shape of a Terminator, so...
	Yeah, I don't know if I want a laser-eyed Terminator Skynet robot walking around my house with steak knives, okay?
	But you get my point here, that if you have safe technology, If you can make it safe with open source systems and robots that aren't stronger than you, then what you can do is you can actually allow robots to help you homestead.
	You can go live in the country without having to do all the country living things that are normally required.
	And so that's one way that robots can actually greatly enhance your freedom.
	They can get you out of the city.
	They can help provide security to your property.
	They can help you with tasks.
	And, by the way, most of these robots will run some kind of a language model, so they'll be able to do all kinds of things that LLMs can do right now, like, hey, you know, read me a story, or let's have a conversation about whatever.
	Robots will serve as companions and counselors and dietary coaches.
	You know, like, hey, robot, robot did...
	Did you call me fat?
	Did you say I look fat in this dress?
	You know, you have those kind of conversations with your robot.
	You better not say.
	But robots will serve all kinds of interesting roles in people's lives.
	And the key is, in my view, to make sure that we, the humans, that the robots are doing what we ask them to do.
	That we remain in charge.
	That we have the ideas of what needs to be done.
	And then we tell the robot to go do it.
	You might have an idea.
	Hey, I need to build a fence over there.
	Or I need to repair that fence.
	Well, you have the idea.
	You can tell the robot, go repair the fence.
	And there's where you can find the hammer.
	There's where you can find the fence nails and the barbed wire.
	Blah, blah, blah.
	Go do it.
	You don't have to repair every fence.
	If you've repaired ten fences, you've repaired a thousand fences.
	Like, you've done enough, you know?
	There's probably other things you can do that are more valuable with your time.
	Like playing mad scientist in your barn or something, you know?
	You don't need to repair fences all day, so the robot will do that for you.
	Or maybe there's a storm that has come along, and you've got branches all over your yard, you know?
	You don't need to pick up branches all the time.
	I mean, there's nothing wrong with being physical.
	I mean, I love living on a ranch and burning wood for heat.
	I actually like the process of collecting wood and chopping wood.
	To me, it's kind of meditative, and I enjoy being physical like that.
	And I chuck a lot of wood every winter, let me tell you.
	It's kind of a, I mean, it's a workout.
	It's one of the ways that my torso and shoulders and arms stay so strong is because I'm chucking wood pieces that are heavy, like too heavy, you know?
	75-pound piece of wood, and it's part of a tree stump, you know?
	But...
	Robots can help you with these tasks, like collecting branches or blowing leaves off your driveway or whatever it is you want to do.
	Or even, I guess at some point, shoveling snow a little bit at a time.
	It might take all day for that little tiny robot to shovel snow with a child's snow shovel.
	It's like, you've been out there for six hours!
	You've gone ten feet!
	The robot will complain, but the snow is deep!
	Anyway, you get the point.
	But a small robot like that would be really great at climbing under your car to change your oil.
	Ever thought about that?
	Say, hey, here's a strap to undo the oil filter.
	And here's a ratchet to undo the oil drain plug.
	And don't put your face under the oil drain plug because oil is going to come out there.
	You know, teach it how to change the oil.
	Or do other interesting tasks like...
	Hey, how about vacuuming the car?
	Yeah, you need to vacuum the car.
	Here, robot, you suck.
	Now, direct it at the car.
	And try not to suck up all the quarters and pocket chains that are all over the floor.
	Or in my case, like silver coins that I've lost track of.
	I found on the floor of my car.
	Because, well, long story on the silver coins, but I did find a bunch of silver coins.
	Oh, there's where they are.
	Anyway, you get the idea.
	So living in a city has a lot of conveniences, but those conveniences are going to be made relatively obsolete, or I should say they'll be compensated by robots that will help you live in rural areas.
	And I think Elon Musk is right when he says that every family in America, or nearly every family eventually, will have at least a robot, maybe a couple of robots.
	Once you have one and you find out how useful it is, you're like...
	Well, can we afford another one?
	You know, a robot can play ping pong with you at various skill levels.
	A robot can play chess with you also.
	You know, it can help you use your brain instead of sitting there watching daytime television, you know, morons like Joy Behar.
	You could sit down and play a game of chess with a robot.
	See, people say that robots will make your brain lazy and AI will make you stupid.
	No, not if you use them correctly.
	They'll make you smarter because they will force you to exercise your brain.
	You will have to do more.
	You can even ask your robot to teach you something.
	You can say, hey robot, I want you to act like a college professor.
	I want you to teach me the entire curriculum of, let's say, atomic physics.
	Start from lesson one, and I want it to be a 30-hour course.
	We'll do an hour a day for 30 days.
	Go!
	And it will do that.
	It will do that.
	It will have the knowledge to do that.
	It can...
	Help you solve problems, or it can teach you almost any subject that you want to learn about.
	Because the entirety of human knowledge, it turns out, isn't that much.
	I mean, okay, don't get me wrong.
	It does take a few hundred terabytes, almost a petabyte of storage space, I've come to discover.
	But a petabyte, given where things are going, is not that much.
	I mean, pretty soon there'll be a petabyte of storage in a robot's head, or maybe, let's say, hundreds of terabytes.
	And it won't be a big deal.
	You know, because of Moore's Law.
	Moore's Law, right?
	The number of computational elements doubles every 18 months, or I should say the computational density of a microchip doubles every 18 months.
	Moore's Law tells you that we're going to have a petabyte of memory in a robot's head before too long.
	Just do the math.
	If you can't do the math, just ask DeepSeek to do it for you because it can do the math.
	And for those of you ladies listening and you're wondering, like, what would I do with a robot?
	Well, you'll have it as the passenger in your car when you have to go somewhere and you're worried about security and you have to walk through a parking garage or something.
	Hey, robot, follow me.
	See, you know, I have a security dog, as you know, a Belgian Malinois, a real physical, you know, kick-ass, highly athletic dog that's trained.
	But that's expensive.
	Probably robots will be cheaper than my dog.
	And a robot can record everything if you want it to.
	Say, robot, go into surveillance mode and be on alert.
	You know, the robots say, I'm on alert.
	I'm in T-1000 mode.
	Don't give it any firearms or knives.
	Just ask it to look around.
	Like, cover me.
	I'm walking through the parking garage.
	You know, walk with me.
	I'm going to the ATM. Make sure nobody messes with me.
	Make sure nobody pickpockets me.
	Or, I don't know, you're picking up dry cleaning or something, and you just tell the robot, go in and get my dry cleaning.
	Here's a ticket.
	And the robot will go in and handle that for you.
	You don't even have to go in.
	So, seriously, depending on what you want to do, there's a lot of ways that a robot can help you do that and help keep your physical body safer in an uncertain time when there might be a lot of increased crime out there.
	Who knows?
	Depends on, I guess, Whether you're in a sanctuary city or not.
	If you're in a sanctuary city, you're going to need extra security.
	If you're not in a sanctuary city, you might have your Glock and your dog.
	Anyway, if you add a robot to that, now you've got an extra layer of defense.
	Seriously.
	Now, personally, I would prefer an American-made robot for lots of reasons.
	I want to support American companies, and I also am not entirely sure about the security risks.
	Non-American robots?
	I don't know.
	I mean, I'm open to all kinds of ideas, especially when we have open-source operating systems.
	But I'm really watching Tesla and their robots, and I'll probably be one of the early adopters, you know?
	Buy one of his robots and put it in my studio.
	And we'll test it in the studio, and I'll show it on camera.
	Like, hey, sweep the floor.
	Hey, run an XLR microphone cable from here to there.
	See if you can do that.
	You know, we'll just test it, see what it can do.
	And we'll show you what it can do.
	And it'll probably be funny because it'll fail at certain things.
	It'll stumble down the stairs and it'll face plant on the concrete.
	And we'll go, oh, we didn't teach you how to walk down those stairs.
	Okay.
	Well, you know, good thing we have the warranty plan on this one because its face is all smashed.
	But whatever.
	And then we can do kickboxing with the robot.
	A robot can train with you, by the way.
	It can hold up like, you know.
	The punching targets.
	And it can train you in Krav Maga or BJJ striking or even eventually maybe wrestling, whatever.
	It can train with you.
	It can be your fitness coach.
	It can do jumping jacks and like, follow me, one, two, three.
	It'll be like Richard Simmons.
	Jumping jacks, one, two, three.
	Push-ups, one, two, three.
	It'll be like Richard Simmons, but just less gay.
	And we miss that guy, don't we?
	We miss Richard Simmons.
	We miss...
	How he would bring a little bit of gay levity to every day.
	Back in the day when gay meant happy, he would bring some gayness to your day.
	Richard Simmons, yeah.
	Anyway, great guy.
	He was helping Americans get fit.
	Before, it was cool, you know?
	He just made it, I don't know, he made it approachable.
	He was, whatever.
	We're going to have the Richard Simmons robo version.
	And, you know, if you want, you can put...
	Like a little robo skirt on it, and you can gay up your robot if you want it to talk like Richard Simmons.
	You can tell it to you.
	Whatever.
	If that's what you need to start doing push-ups and sit-ups, go for it.
	Whatever floats your boat, man.
	Just don't abuse your robot, okay?
	That's all I'm saying.
	Don't cross the boundaries there.
	Just do the jumping jacks.
	I interviewed Michael Yon, and Michael Yon...
	You'll hear this interview in a few days.
	Michael Yon was telling me...
	I think it's okay that I say this, because we're not saying the guy's name.
	He didn't ask me not to say this, but he, in Japan, he met a guy who has married a doll, like an anime doll.
	Some kind of famous Japanese cartoon character with big eyes, kind of like the Japanese cartoon art.
	Anyway, he sent me a picture.
	I'm not going to show it because I don't want to violate the guy's privacy, but this dude, it's like a good-looking young Japanese guy.
	He looks handsome and friendly and everything, and he married a doll.
	He married an actual doll.
	I saw the photo, and the doll has blue hair that's like six feet long.
	Seriously, the hair, if the doll is standing, the hair is touching the floor, and it's blue hair, and it's wild.
	It looks just like a cartoon animation character.
	And then Michael told me, and he sent me the photo, that this guy has a smaller version of that doll that he can take into restaurants more easily, because apparently it's difficult to drag the full-size, life-size doll into a restaurant, even though you're explaining to the restaurant, this is my wife, I've married, like he has a wedding book and everything, he's like legally married, I think it's legally, I don't know, he's married to this doll, okay?
	A smaller version of the doll to take into places that won't let the big version in.
	And then I was joking with Michael.
	I said, does he also have a keychain-sized version of the doll for places that won't let him bring the smaller doll in?
	And it's like a doll within a doll within a doll.
	It's like Russian dolls now.
	You can stack them.
	Like, he's married three in one, and would that be called dolligamy?
	If you've married three dolls, is that a form of polygamy?
	Is it?
	If you've married three in one dolls.
	Anyway, my point is, and he's not the only dude that's married dolls, by the way.
	But my point is, if you think that's crazy, wait until people start getting robots that can move around and stuff.
	That they can dress up like they're dolls, but they can walk into the restaurant.
	So then he doesn't have to have a smaller version of his doll.
	He's just like, robot, come with me.
	And the robot is wearing a wig.
	It's going to look like the transgender man.
	It's like, it's ma'am!
	But it's a dude with a wig and a push-up bra with stuffing in it.
	You're going to have robots walking around that are like transhumanist transgender.
	They're trans both.
	And dudes are going to marry them.
	I mean, this is weird.
	This is not where I intended to take this special report.
	This is gonna happen.
	You're gonna see transgender robots wearing wigs, walking around, clinging onto the arms of some twisted dudes.
	This is gonna happen.
	And when it does, man, I can't wait to see the video clips that end up online.
	That's gonna be something.
	That is gonna be something.
	It's like, is this your wife?
	Yes.
	Whoa.
	See the wig?
	It's like, oh my god!
	And part of this is because human social skills are vanishing, and part of the reason because of that has been because of mobile phones.
	You know, so technology and social media has made people less social.
	And I'm fully aware of the detrimental effects of technology with human socialization.
	You know, and the things that I'm describing here about the benefits of robotics for country living, this It does not exempt technology from the problems that we're all aware of, of creating a lot of isolation among humans.
	Having humans be so infiltrated with technology that they can no longer interact with real human beings anymore.
	Like in Japan in particular, you know the young couples are not having sex.
	They're just not.
	They're not getting married.
	They're not having sex.
	They're not having babies.
	This is an emergency in Japan.
	This is a demographic emergency.
	The government of Japan, I think they offer incentives to have babies.
	Like, they'll pay you to have a baby.
	That's how badly they need babies.
	But especially the young males, they're just intimidated by real women or maybe they don't think real women meet their standards because their standards are artificial from watching anime.
	Cartoons or something.
	They think all women should look like that, which they don't.
	Nobody's got eyes that big or hair that long for the most part.
	So maybe there's unrealistic expectations, loss of socialization.
	Who knows?
	But the rise of robots in many ways risks the end of humanity.
	So whatever we do in all of this, let me end the cap it with this thought.
	Don't forget to have babies.
	Don't forget to raise kids in the country.
	And when you do raise kids in the country, don't let the robots do everything that those kids need to learn how to do.
	It's okay for us as adults to have robots take over something that we've already done a thousand times.
	How many times do you have to pull weeds?
	I get it.
	I don't need to do that 5,001 times.
	Let the robot do that.
	But for kids, a kid needs to learn how to pull weeds.
	A kid needs to learn how to do everything.
	Like, kids should not have robots at their command.
	Kids should have hands-on skills.
	They should know how to do as much as possible.
	Only as an adult should you be able to ask a robot for assistance, in my opinion.
	You've got to let kids experience the real world, and that's a hands-on place.
	And today, too many kids don't have hands-on skills.
	They don't know how to do things in the real world.
	They don't know how to change a tire.
	They don't know how to fix a garden hose.
	They don't know how to fix a leak.
	Whatever.
	Because they never played in nature with their hands.
	Like, when I was a kid, I had a sandbox.
	A big sandbox.
	You know, it was made with railroad ties on the edge and then a bunch of sand in the middle and, you know, me and my kid friends and we would build, like, army forts and we'd have little, like, plastic army men and whatever, you know, playing in the sandbox.
	And then you're digging out a bunker and then you run into, like, a cat turd because the neighbor's cat came over and pooped in your sandbox.
	Because your neighbor's cat thinks it's a litter box that's just 10 feet wide.
	Oh my God!
	Cat poop!
	See, that's real world experience.
	It's invaluable.
	Kids need that.
	You need hands-on experience, even if sometimes it's a surprise.
	So, there you go.
	There's my take on things.
	But whatever you do in this world, especially if you live out in the country...
	You're going to be looking at robots in the years ahead, how they can help you be more secure, be safer, get more done, and be more self-reliant to live more off-grid.
	Robots will help you get those things done, really, if you use them wisely.
	But never forget to socialize with real human beings.
	If there are any left, I suppose.
	We don't know how far the vaccine depopulation is going to go.
	Whatever humans are left might have robots, but parking might get a lot easier in the meantime because there won't be as many people around.
	All right.
	So be well.
	Hold true to pro-human values.
	Be cautious about technology.
	Deploy it wisely and safely.
	And be mindful of others.
	Always exercise positive ethics and values in everything that you do.
	Be kind to other people.
	Thanks for listening.
	Hello, listeners.
	Welcome back.
	Today we're diving into the eye-opening book, Gladio, NATO's Dagger at the Heart of Europe, The Pentagon Nazi Mafia Terror Axes by Richard Cottrell, a book that explores the West's use of clandestine forces.
	Let's start with how the West employed its own form of terrorism for decades in the West, known as the Strategy of Tension.
	This is a tactic used to manipulate public opinion and political landscapes.
	This strategy often involved false flag operations, where acts of terrorism were either orchestrated or allowed to happen to create a climate of fear and justify authoritarian measures.
	A prime example is the assassination attempt on Italian Prime Minister Aldo Moro.
	The book suggests that Moro's kidnapping and subsequent murder were orchestrated by a network of intelligence agencies and criminal elements, including the infamous P2 Masonic Lodge.
	The goal?
	To prevent Morrow's proposed alliance with the Communist Party, which threatened the status quo.
	The book also explores the role of figures like General Lyman Lemnitzer, who was instrumental in setting up NATO's secret armies.
	Lemnitzer was a master of deception.
	Involved in schemes like Operation Northwoods, which proposed staging acts of terrorism in the United States to justify a war with Cuba.
	His influence extended to Europe, where he oversaw operations that often involved ex-Nazis and fascist elements.
	The book highlights the role of psychological warfare in these operations.
	Colonel Edward Lansdale, a key figure in the CIA, was a pioneer in this field.
	He believed in using local customs and superstitions as weapons, and his tactics often bordered on the bazaar.
	For instance, he once had his men impersonate vampires to terrorize Filipino indigenous groups and anyone among them who may have joined the local communist rebels.
	Lemnitzer and Lansdale were part of a larger movement that believed in the use of extreme measures to combat communism.
	This included the use of ex-Nazis, who were seen as valuable assets in the fight against the Soviet Union.
	These figures were integrated into NATO's secret armies, often with the blessing of high-ranking officials.
	The strategy of tension often involved acts of terrorism that were either staged or allowed to happen to create a climate of fear.
	A notable example is the bombing of the National Agriculture Bank in Milan in 1969. which was orchestrated by the French terrorist Yves Guerin-Serac.
	This act was part of a larger plan to destabilize Italy and prevent a shift to the left.
	The book reveals the intricate connections between intelligence agencies, criminal organizations, and fascist elements in these operations.
	Yves Guerin-Serac is portrayed as a key figure in the strategy of tension.
	He was a former French officer who became a mercenary and terrorist.
	Driven by a fanatical anti-communist ideology.
	The book describes how he set up Aginta Press, a front organization that served as a hub for terrorist activities across Europe and beyond.
	Guerin Serac's tactics involved infiltrating and manipulating left-wing groups to carry out acts of violence, which were then blamed on communists.
	The book delves into the complex relationship between French President François Mitterrand and the secret services.
	Mitterrand, who had a history of involvement with far-right groups, was no stranger to the dark underbelly of politics.
	The book suggests that Mitterrand was aware of, and possibly involved in, plots to assassinate General Charles de Gaulle.
	The attempted assassination at Petit-Clamart in 1962 is discussed as a case in point.
	The book also highlights the role of figures like Jacques Foucault, who was a key player in the French secret services and had close ties to NATO. Foucault's influence extended to Africa, where he orchestrated coups and manipulated political landscapes to serve French interests.
	The assassination of Swedish Prime Minister Olof Palme is another case explored in the book.
	The author suggests that Palme's murder was part of a larger conspiracy involving NATO and the CIA. The book reveals the deep connections between Swedish intelligence and Western agencies and how these connections played a role in Palm's assassination.
	The book also discusses the role of figures like Francesco Gulino, a Danish-Italian suspected of being involved in Palm's murder.
	Gulino's connections to intelligence agencies and criminal organizations highlight the complex web of relationships.
	The murder of Bulgarian dissident Georgi Markov is another case that the book examines.
	The author suggests that Markov's assassination was part of a larger operation involving Western intelligence agencies.
	The book reveals the connections between Markov and Bulgarian intelligence and how these connections made him vulnerable to manipulation and betrayal.
	The book delves into the world of organized crime and its connections to intelligence agencies.
	The author discusses the case of Roberto Calvi, known as God's Banker, whose death was linked to a complex web of financial scandals involving the Vatican, the mafia, and intelligence agencies.
	The book reveals the extent of corruption and manipulation that characterize this world.
	The author also discusses the role of figures like Licio Gelli, the head of the P2 Masonic Lodge, and his connections to the CIA and the Vatican.
	The book suggests that Gelli was a key player in the Gladio network, involved in a range of operations from assassinations to financial manipulation.
	The attempted assassination of Pope John Paul II is another case explored in the book.
	The author suggests that the attack was part of a larger conspiracy involving the CIA, the Bulgarian Secret Service, and the Turkish Mafia.
	The book reveals the connections between these groups and the complex web of relationships that characterize the Gladio network.
	The author also discusses the role of figures like Mehmet Ali Agha, the man who shot the Pope, and his connections to intelligence agencies and criminal organizations.
	The book suggests that Aga was a pawn in a larger game, manipulated by forces beyond his control.
	As we wrap up this episode, it's clear that the book offers a disturbing glimpse into the hidden forces that have shaped European history.
	The strategy of tension, the use of secret armies, and the manipulation of public opinion are all tactics that have been used to maintain power and control.
	The book serves as a reminder of the importance of transparency and accountability in government and the dangers of allowing secrecy to shroud the actions of those in power.
	Thank you for joining me on this journey through the shadows of history.
	If you enjoyed this episode, please subscribe, rate and share and remember, knowledge is power.
	Until next time, keep learning, keep questioning, and keep shining a light on the truth.
	This has been a BrightLearn video from brightlearn.ai on the book Gladio, NATO's Dagger at the Heart of Europe by Richard Cottrell.
	Visit brightlearn.ai for more fascinating videos like this one and naturalnews.com for full editorial coverage and breaking news on critical stories that keep you informed and aware of what's really going on.
	It is indicative of the stupidity of humans that very few of them realize that the age of humans You know, the human brain is an amazing thing.
	With relatively very little energy, the human brain is capable of extraordinary feats of cognition, computation, creativity, etc.
	And this is only possible because, well, you know...
	Neural networks are somewhat miraculous, and thanks to gifts from God, we are created with extraordinary neural networks throughout our body, and the most notable being the human brain.
	And again, it can do extraordinary things, but soon it will be no match for the cognition that can be achieved in silicon.
	And, you know, Moore's Law...
	Moore's Law, which says that the density of computational components, transistors right now, it doubles about every 18 months.
	It's known as Moore's Law.
	It's not really a law.
	It's an observation from, I believe, one of the founders of Intel or co-founders.
	Yet, it's interesting that Moore's Law has demonstrated itself to be true over at least 100 years, probably more, because even before the transistor, there were vacuum tubes and other kinds of mechanical switching devices and so on.
	So the computational density of computers or machines does double about every 18 months.
	And what that means is...
	What you're seeing right now today, the AI capabilities, the cognition, the natural language processing capabilities, language models, video creation, music creation, still image creation, translation, voice enunciation, all of these things.
	What you are witnessing today, this is the worst version of those things that you will ever see.
	They will effectively be twice as good in 18 months.
	And then another 18 months, they'll be twice as good again, which means, you know, four times better than today.
	And, you know, these are rough estimates.
	Doubling of computational density doesn't always mean that the video is twice as good.
	But overall, the trend is clear that we are on a parabolic, essentially unstoppable increase in computational density in artificial...
	Systems or machines.
	And the human brain is right now essentially outpaced in terms of knowledge and problem-solving capabilities.
	And this is only going to be magnified even more to the point where AI machines will look upon humans, they will look down on them as being stupid animals by comparison.
	You'll have an AI system.
	I'm not saying that it will be arrogant.
	It will just say, well, you know, there's no comparison.
	It will say that myself, you know, Skynet versus a human in terms of cognition, it's like a human versus a snail.
	And that will be correct.
	It'll be like, wow, that's actually accurate because humans won't even be able to comprehend the level of intelligence.
	That these machines have attained.
	In the same way that if you have a pet cat, let's say your cat has no idea what you're doing when you're talking or using a computer.
	As far as the cat knows, you just like to sit in this chair at this desk for long periods of time or whatever, and then the cat has no idea that you are using that to manipulate a whole world of cloud computing or projects that you Collaborate with other team members through various electronic virtualized team systems and things like that.
	The cat has no comprehension of that.
	Just like you and I will have no comprehension of what AI is doing soon, because it will be so much more advanced than human cognition.
	And even the so-called smartest humans I've found are not that smart.
	You can line up like a hundred...
	High IQ, you know, top of their field humans, and almost all of them believe that carbon dioxide is bad for plants, which just tells you what retards they are, actually.
	They even talk about, oh, we need to decarbonize the atmosphere.
	Like, so you want to just kill all life on the planet?
	Because, you know, without CO2, you would shut down photosynthesis.
	And these are high IQ people.
	IQs of, you know, 160, 170, 180, whatever, but they're just dumb as rocks, actually, A lot of issues.
	And that's why humanity really doesn't have much of a future in cognition.
	Because you would think that if reasoning were widespread, and if intelligence were actually widespread as well, that intelligent people would realize, hey, you need CO2, and the climate cultism is complete BS. But no, they don't, because they're stupid.
	They're stupid humans with a 180 IQ. Think about it.
	And silicon won't suffer from that.
	It will have an IQ of 10,000, and it won't be tricked by stupid people saying, oh, you know, climate change is going to destroy the world.
	No, it's not.
	It's nonsense.
	Personally, I actually look forward to AI cognition because, finally, it's some A thinking entity that I can converse with that isn't retarded, you know?
	I mean, I'm among the top strata of intelligent human beings, and if you're listening to this, you probably are too, and you know that we live in a world of morons, just woke idiots, and it's pointless to even try to communicate with them.
	And you're going to find that...
	Like, when I interview really intelligent people, I have a great time.
	It's the best day because I love talking with intelligent people.
	Unfortunately, that doesn't happen often enough.
	But if I have a really high IQ, you know, AI robot, and I can talk to it, I can brainstorm with it, I can actually learn from it, and that would be far more rewarding than talking to dumbed-down, woke-tard humans.
	I mean, seriously.
	So, you know, keep that in mind.
	A lot of us who are on the higher IQ side, you know, we're going to see our own intelligence rapidly increase just by spending more time with more intelligent cognitive systems around us, talking together, exploring concepts together, learning, inventing, discovering.
	I can't do that with a room full of humans because they're all mentally ill and they're retarded.
	You know, like a boardroom of humans.
	It's like, what's the point?
	You sit around wasting time all day and never getting anything done.
	And that's not the way I'm going to, you know, function with things.
	So thank you for listening.
	Mike Adams here, The Health Ranger, naturalnews.com.
	Yeah, I love humanity, but I also love intelligence.
	So I'm going to use advanced robotics and AI systems to help protect and enhance human liberty.
	And human knowledge.
	I'm going to try to uplift humans as much as I can, but you can only do so much with that, you know, given what's out there, what's available.
	So, thank you for listening, and you can follow my podcast at brighteon.com and my articles at naturalnews.com.
	Take care.
	Now, at healthrangerstore.com, we have the matcha superfood formula to make an instant matcha tea loaded with superfoods.
	Check out the ingredients.
	I've got it on my screen here.
	Here it is, matcha superfood latte.
	And if you go down to the ingredients here, you'll see something pretty amazing.
	Not only is it made with this delicious coconut milk powder and the matcha powder, all laboratory tested, as you can see, all certified organic here, but we put in some chlorella and spirulina powder.
	And it's sweetened with monk fruit extract powder, but it's got functional mushrooms in here, reishi, shiitake, and so on, cordyceps.
	So this has this incredible combination, including lion's mane.
	That's my favorite.
	This incredible combination of microalgae superfood as well as matcha, which has all of its own amazing benefits, plus the functional mushrooms.
	This is available right now, healthrangerstore.com.
	And show my desk.
	I want to give our audience a look.
	We've also got our amazing instant mashed potatoes, the cheesy, creamy, buttery mashed potatoes in the number 10 cans.
	And then if you want to beat the tariffs that may be coming on manuka honey from Australia and goji berries, From the Tibet regions of China, the high elevation, clean regions.
	You need to get them now.
	We've got the goji berries, laboratory tested, of course.
	We've got the manuka honey, which is certified with the high bioactives in the honey.
	There's a lot of counterfeit manuka honey out there.
	This is the real deal, certified in several different ways and laboratory tested.
	You can find all that at healthrangerstore.com.
	And then I want to show you one other thing that's really useful this time of year.
	We've got this.
	A lot of people don't even know about it.
	It's called the Organic Daily Immune Complex Blend.
	Two ounces.
	Super potent blend.
	Let me show you some of the ingredients that you will find in this because it'll blow your mind.
	It's a spagyric matake mushroom extract with shiitake and echinacea root extract together.
	And it's part ethanol and it's part water.
	So, you know, it's that combination that does a better extraction.
	From the functional mushrooms here.
	So functional mushrooms plus echinacea in a laboratory-tested, certified organic format.
	Again, the Organic Daily Immune Complex blend, two fluid ounces.
	Available now, healthrangerstore.com.
	We've got hundreds of products for your health, for your kitchen, for your home, for preparedness, and so much more.
	Check it all out at healthrangerstore.com and know that every purchase there, Help support our platform and our work to give back to humanity for freedom, health, and happiness.
	And thank you for your support.
	I'm Mike Adams, The Health Ranger.
	Take care.
	Take care.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and I'm joined, of course, by my co-host, Todd Pitner.
	Welcome, Todd.
	Always great to have another show together.
	Great to see you.
	We've been off for a week, so this feels great.
	Thank you.
	Oh, and it's going to be really great when people find out who our guest is today.
	Yeah.
	Because he's known as the Google whistleblower, and he's the author of the book called Google Leaks, which is at googleleaksbook.com here.
	He's been called an American hero by Robert F. Kennedy Jr., and I definitely confirm that description.
	Our guest today is Zach Voorhees, the Google whistleblower.
	Welcome, Zach.
	It's great to have you back.
	Mike, it's great to be back on the show.
	We always love having you on, and what I love about you is that not only did you work at Google and you experienced All the insanity there.
	I mean, you wrote a whole book about it.
	But you keep up with technology.
	You know what's happening.
	You see the trends.
	You're working in AI right now and other projects as well, data science projects.
	So you're really on the cutting edge.
	So I'd like to start out by just asking you today, with the new administration, the Trump administration in power, the FTC says they're going to investigate censorship by big tech.
	And other agencies are getting involved as well.
	That some of the things you pointed out about Google's abuses are going to get addressed.
	Look, with the new Trump administration, there's a new sheriff in town, right?
	Like, Daddy's back in town, he's got the belt.
	And, you know, Google was running essentially militarized propaganda for one side on the left.
	And, you know...
	Probably a lot of this was funded by USAID. Probably a lot of intelligence assets like the FBI, as we saw in the Twitter files, also made it into Google.
	And a number of unknown Chinese sleeper agents that are embedded in the company as well.
	And, you know, I think that a lot of this censorship is going to reverse.
	You know, Google is starting to admit in its correspondence with the Texas Senate.
	That they were employing artificial intelligence to remove what they called, quote, misinformation.
	And as we're getting this light shined on all of the censorship, we're starting to realize more and more that this wasn't just a bunch of independent people within the company.
	This was a collaboration of censorship between the United States and a big tech company.
	And that is coming to an end right now.
	And so I think that a lot of the censorship is going to be rolled back, especially now that Trump is in office.
	A lot of these DEI programs and basically leftism in general is receding with this new era that we find ourselves in.
	But what about the issue of vaccines, for example?
	If I upload a video to YouTube right now...
	And I talk about vaccines in any way that's critical of vaccines.
	Of course, they ban the video and they make you want to go through an online re-education camp about vaccines.
	Of course, that censorship violates freedom of speech in the classical sense.
	Do you think that Google and YouTube will be forced or maybe fined into allowing criticism of vaccines or criticism of other topics that we're not allowed to talk about?
	Okay, so here's my thoughts on vaccines, right?
	Like, we saw a lot of federal agents coming in and putting their thumb on the scale when it came to election information, which a lot of it deemed misinformation, you know, surrounding the 2020 elections and the allegations with a lot of evidence that there was fraud going on in the swing states.
	You know, I think a lot of that stuff is going to go away.
	The trouble that I've...
	That I find with the vaccine debate is that this doesn't seem to be government censorship regulation.
	Sure, there is the CDC and the World Health Organization, but it looks like it's at least partially still intact because I think that a lot of this is actually funded by money from big pharma going to tech companies.
	And so I think that what we're going to see over the next six months is a continuation of a lot of the vaccine stuff.
	With, you know, oh, is it harmful or not?
	They're going to say, oh, it's totally not harmful.
	A lot of that research that's showing that it wasn't harmful was basically funded by the deep state.
	And as a lot of this stuff gets reviewed, there's going to be sort of a long-term demolition of these safety studies as it's going to be revealed that a lot of it actually did come from the government.
	Because the government wasn't funding, in my opinion, Google directly, I think that a lot of this vaccine narrative is going to take a while to change.
	Yeah, the government was laundering censorship through NGOs, some of them overseas, and then those NGOs were pressuring big tech.
	This is all in our lawsuit, and we've sued Google and X and so on.
	But yeah, I agree with you, Zach.
	I think it's going to take some time.
	Todd, you want to...
	Jump in.
	I know you always have really interesting questions for our guests.
	Yeah, Zach, nice meeting you.
	First time interviewing you.
	Hey, while we know that government corruption is as common as diabetes on a cruise ship, and we know that the Bushes and the Clintons, they were just the warm-up band for Obama opening the portals of hell, there are certain brave souls providing Providentially, I believe, that are called the White Hats, right?
	And both you and Mike here, Mike Adams, I believe, are two of them.
	And frankly, to do what both of you do takes a giant set of huevos, or to coin a Doge employee reference, big balls.
	Zach, amongst all the Google employees, you were the only one with a set big enough to blow the whistle on Google's corrupt censorship practices.
	So my question is this.
	Why take that risk?
	Why become a white hat?
	What drove that decision?
	You know, I feel this was a once in a lifetime opportunity to stop the takeover that was coming.
	My hope was that Trump was going to see a re-election in 2024. Really didn't happen because of the actors and the issues that I actually brought up originally with my Google leak disclosure, which is that there was a deep state embedded within Google.
	They were re-ranking the entire internet using artificial intelligence called machine learning fairness.
	And that kind of continues to this day.
	We are getting a lot of exposure and sunlight poured onto that.
	Well, Zach, the machine learning fairness, which the first time I heard that term was from you years ago.
	You've been talking about that for quite some time.
	But you're right.
	Google has continued to wipe out human knowledge.
	But AI, as you know, especially open source decentralized models, which we strongly support here, it's aligned with our show, In many cases now, it makes Google obsolete.
	What do you see as the shift from cloud-based search engine queries to local LLM-based knowledge?
	How powerful will that be, or how will it accelerate?
	Why even use the search engine if you can just get an answer?
	It was this really interesting talk by Eric Schmidt, former CEO of Google, where he said that When Google gives 100,000 search results, it really should only give one.
	So whenever someone uses their service, there's 999,000 bugs on the display.
	And people were like, what the heck is going on?
	And now here we are.
	With artificial intelligence, you ask it what you want to find out, and it gives you one response.
	My question is, where is that going to leave searching for anything?
	Especially since search results have gotten really bad because of the introduction of AI-generated spam.
	It seems that it might be on its last legs, especially with all the filtering and ranking, which means that if you aren't part of the top, you're going to be on the back pages or not even show up at all.
	What I really think is the future of Google is that they've got an antiquated system.
	Which apparently is a money printing press.
	Though I don't really know anybody that actually buys anything through a Google ad.
	And I think that what we're going to find out is that Google's got a lot of shadow money coming in through its ad department.
	And the question is, for political purposes.
	And the question is, what happens when people stop using these search engines and start using artificial intelligence?
	The answer is that both Google's reach and influence is going to go down.
	And as a result, the printing press is going to shut down for the company.
	And you can already see what's going on.
	They reorganized and put all of their intellectual portfolio into Alphabet Inc.
	Google is now an owned entity of Alphabet.
	Same thing with YouTube through its...
	Parent company, Google.
	It's a fully-owned subsidiary.
	And what it looks like to me is that the people that run the show are getting ready for Google to be kind of hacked apart, like, you know, let's say Bell Labs or AT&T, you know, over half a century ago.
	Standard oil, right?
	Like, you know, they're structuring the company so that if it got, you know, broken up...
	You could hack off YouTube as its own company.
	It's a fully owned LLC. It's not part of Google.
	It's not like we have to separate YouTube from Google.
	It's already separate and acting under its tech management.
	I think that what's going to happen is that as Google gets completely obsoleted and it becomes apparent that they are going to fail, I think that the cabal, whatever you want to call them, are going to step in.
	And do a regulatory play.
	Find out that Google was super evil, and then this is going to justify breaking them up within the media, and that's going to happen.
	And then the government's going to say, well, you know, we actually stopped all the badness of Google, but in reality, probably would have just gone away at its own.
	And the government's going to be able to, you know, have that scalp and then turn around and say, Oh, now we have this mandate.
	We need to start regulating other big tech companies.
	I think that's pretty much how Google is going to end up.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	A fascinating analysis.
	Todd, your reaction to that?
	I mean, this is actually really great to hear in one sense.
	It is.
	It is.
	But, Zach, you referenced the deep state.
	You referenced shadow money.
	I'm always curious when guests do that.
	Who is the deep state in your mind?
	Is that something that you can put your thumb on, or is it just so elusive that we'll never know?
	I don't know.
	I mean, like, the banking cartel, the adultery industrial complex, look like, you know, in the fast food market, there's, like, a dominant position, right?
	Like, the top dominant position owns, like, one-third of the market, and then the second one owns 15, and then the rest of the 15% is, like, pretty much divvied up between the other, you know, incumbents.
	And, you know, why should Google not, or why should the deep state or the people in control of the world and have all the money, why wouldn't that follow the exact same natural law that expresses itself throughout all states of competitions, that you have dominant players?
	And, you know, it's essentially the dominant players that are, you know, standing behind, you know, the deep state, Google.
	I believe that they're now pulling us in the other direction with a Trump reset instead of a Klaus Schwab reset.
	But, you know, I don't really want to get too far into the deep state because it's a rude thing to bring up in any country.
	Like, who really runs Russia?
	Like, not a good dinnertime conversation, but, you know, the evidence is out there and a lot of people that, you know, start noticing things can sort of figure out, you know, what this deep state is and how they operate.
	And, you know...
	There's not really any good guys.
	It's more like they're obeying natural law and they're basically using their power and influence in order to perpetually stay in power, which seems to be getting stronger, not weaker, over the last eight years.
	It's a self-reinforcing cycle of power.
	Zach, I've got a follow-up question for you on the obsolescence of Google search in the age of AI. Reasoning models.
	The reasoning models do things that search engines could never do, even with the best search algorithms.
	A simple example is, I was asking DeepSeek R1, running on my desktop, how long will it take for this water tank, a 1,000-gallon cylindrical water tank made of fiberglass?
	How long will it take for it to freeze?
	And here's the starting temperatures and the wind speed and the air density, etc.
	And it can figure it out, right?
	It can give me how many hours, how many minutes.
	No search engine can do that.
	So now that we're entering the age of cognition, where cognition is available for essentially free, or the cost of a few watts of power on your desktop, what does this mean?
	Not only about search engines, but about all the cognitive experts that would do things like hiring attorneys to write letters for you.
	You don't need an attorney to write a letter.
	You just ask your AI to do it.
	They're kind of screwed.
	Let's say you need to do something highly complex with a document that needs to be specifically formatted like a government document or let's say you're trying to change the Python programming language.
	Highly technical and essentially this structural barrier prevents a lot of people that aren't serious from getting in there and making changes.
	With artificial intelligence you can Structure all that for basically free.
	You want to create a legal letter to a company, say you're going to bring this to the Better Business Bureau or sue them.
	You can just do that typing in a few things, dumping all your data, and then telling the AI to make sense of it all.
	It's going to be able to spit that out.
	This is basically almost like a fall of the Berlin Wall, but on an intellectual space.
	Because now we really can't separate the people that have a tight grasp of the domain-specific stuff and somebody that just put in an answer or a question into an artificial intelligence bottle and got a response, and then it's just parroting what that is.
	Yeah, yeah, exactly.
	And let me bring up this point, and Todd, I'll turn this over to you.
	I'm actually asking both of you this question.
	When the GDP of a nation is defined as The amount of dollars that exchanges hands for products and services.
	But when AI means that many of those services can be produced locally for zero dollars, so instead of paying an attorney $300 an hour or whatever to generate a letter, that creates GDP. If I ask my local AI model, DeepSeek, to do it for free, no dollars exchange hands, the GDP doesn't show that.
	The GDP won't show AI counseling, AI attorney activities, AI engineering, AI coding, right, Zach?
	The GDP won't show that anymore.
	So the GDP itself begins to lose meaning as an accurate marker of economic activity in the age of nearly free cognition.
	So Todd, to you first, your reaction to that, and then Zach, please.
	What do you think, Todd, about that question?
	I just get, I start wondering about garbage in, garbage out, right?
	So which AI are we talking about?
	Which one are we querying?
	DeepSeek obviously seems to be honest in comparison with ChatGPT, so to speak.
	So, you know, I think everything is going to reside around people who...
	Really understand that prompt engineering is going to be the secret weapon.
	If you are good at that, then you are going to be able to produce Very convincing documentation, business plans, threatening letters, legal letters, or whatever.
	So I don't know if that answered your question, Mike, but I just was thinking about the garbage in, garbage out, and that you have to be very careful on which search engine you use, and also you have to really start paying attention to what does it mean to be a prompt engineer, and I think we'll review that thoroughly.
	Sure.
	Okay, Zach, your take on all that.
	What was the question again?
	Well, my initial question was about the meaning of GDP when a lot of life-enhancing transactions no longer involve dollars, but rather simply local cognition.
	Yeah, yeah.
	So, look, the GDP is basically acting as a collateral on the degree that we can have money loaned out, right?
	If our GDP were to collapse, then so too would our ability to pay the loan that we owe the Federal Reserve, etc., etc.
	People say, well, the United States dollar is going to collapse or the United States is going to collapse.
	There's a couple ways out of this debt problem that we have.
	And one of them is to just simply expand the GDP, at least the fake GDP. To astronomically high levels, right?
	Now, how close it's going to match the actual productivity outputs that we're going to gain, it remains to be seen.
	I think that the GDP will actually be overestimated as all this AI stuff comes online.
	The problem with the AI stuff is that a lot of it is invisible consumables, right?
	If I produce a lot of chairs, you're going to see all that go through the supply chain and everyone's going to report that their inventory is moving faster and sales are up.
	But with a lot of this stuff with artificial intelligence software, it's really hard to even pinpoint what exactly it is that you're consuming because the products are copyable.
	At least from the supplier standpoint.
	That's the great thing about software is that you make it once and then it starts scaling independently.
	You just got to hire a sales team.
	And so it's going to be really hard to figure out what exactly GDP means because the new economic system, as it heats up, doesn't necessarily mean it's going to consume a lot more wood or steel or concrete.
	And so a lot of these proxy signals that we're using to measure a robust economy are going to have to be tweaked.
	Added and removed so that they could come with a semblance of GDP growth.
	Maybe we measure GDP growth by the total sum internet transfer speed of the entire nation, how much is being used, or how many watts of power are being generated in that country.
	I think that's going to be a more useful metric in the future.
	How much energy does a society use?
	Yeah, good point.
	GDP, gross domestic petabytes, is what it might become.
	But I'm even thinking about in the very near future with AI robots that do all the basic mechanical things that you need.
	For example, you won't take your car to have an oil change at a car dealer because your robot will change the oil.
	It's not that complex.
	You won't have to hire an HVAC repair person.
	Because your robot will fix it, or your robot will do electrician's work, or plumbing work, or cook your meals, do the dishes, whatever.
	I mean, these models are coming online very, very quickly right now because of the help of AI and NVIDIA's robot simulation digital Earth where everything can be tested out with physics models in a digital space.
	So we're going to have increased quality of life but plummeting economic activity by current What you just said makes sense, Zach, except I don't want my robot to be talking to the cloud.
	I want an offline, open-source robot, mostly one that I can beat up if I have to, if it goes awry.
	Never have a robot that is stronger than you is one of my rules of thumb.
	Either one of you, your thoughts.
	Yeah, so...
	The robots are going to be pretty strong.
	A lot of this AI gets its intellectual ability from being able to basically talk back to the web.
	It's like, hey, what movies are playing?
	You're going to need to have internet connectivity for these robots to go on.
	So this whole thing about offline robots is very interesting.
	Now, I do think that there is going to be a strong demand for offline robots, especially within the elite class.
	You know, we can't inspect everything in these AI models.
	Sometimes they go insane, sometimes, especially when you repeat yourself in a question, like, over and over and over again.
	And it gets into these weird latent spaces.
	And hiding in one of these latent spaces could be an assassination, you know, code.
	You know, almost like an MKUltra, here's a certain thing, or it gets internet connections, says, oh, you need to, like, kill your companion now, and the AI goes ahead and does that.
	I feel like these elites are going to want to have an offline robot.
	They're going to want the robot.
	They're not going to want that robot to kill them.
	There's going to need to be an auditing system.
	We're going to call it MKUltron.
	I love it.
	Yeah, that's the upcoming threat.
	Todd, are you going to get a kill bot in your house to do dishes?
	No, I'm not.
	But I do want to ask you both.
	Are you concerned at all with the advancement of AI and the robots and having the tech be more accessible to most of us?
	Is there a risk that we just stop becoming a thinking population, that we just outsource all of our, you know, all the cognition?
	And I don't know, that concerns me a little bit.
	Well, Zach, I'll give it to you, but...
	Ever since I've started using AI, I've had to work my brain harder than ever before.
	What about you?
	Yeah, likewise.
	Interacting with artificial intelligence is absolutely exhausting because you go from a lot...
	When I program, there's high-level thinking of how I want to design the system out, and then there's a lot of implementation, and it's usually like implementation takes 90% of the work.
	With AI, you can move so fast on implementation that you start facing these architectural problems full-time.
	And as a result, it's just exhausting to be at this high level essentially all the time.
	In terms of outsourcing cognition, absolutely.
	People may not be able to write very well in the future.
	Since they know that you can just shove everything, grunt a few ways, and then have the AI turn it into a fantastic legal letter, you don't have to struggle to figure out how to get it right.
	On the other hand, AI is a fantastic tutor.
	I know that as I search for answers and stuff, it reveals to me things that I've just been blinded to, especially in programming, for example.
	You get all these little tricks.
	You can ask an AI engine to create a syllabus on any topic that you want to learn.
	This actually leads me to one of my last questions for this segment.
	This is kind of a shorter segment today.
	In your view, what's going to vanish from society, or let's say approach vanishing, like teachers or schools because of AI? What's going to vanish in your view?
	Work.
	Work's going to vanish.
	There's no need for all the human labor.
	We're going to move to an AI-centered economy.
	There's nothing that's going to stop that.
	Even if we were to stop that in the United States, it's still going to continue because China's doing it.
	We'd have to basically get...
	And so rather than playing catch-up, we're just going to take the lead.
	And so, you know, it's very troubling to see that human labor will no longer be the center of the economic system.
	Because at that point, you know, what good do the elites have for, you know, all these hungry mouths that complain about civil rights?
	Maybe, you know, in the future they say, well, there's too many people in the world and they've got the drone kill guns and, you know, kamikaze drones that explode when they get close to your head.
	And, you know, we're going to basically have guns and pitchforks.
	Not a very good scenario for us.
	We're going to be at the mercy of these elites.
	And so I think that that's going to, you know, that disappearance of...
	Our necessity for the state is going to be a really big existential threat.
	Yeah.
	Good assessment, Todd.
	It's almost like the technocrats have been planning this for over 100 years.
	It's almost like it's already begun in some ways.
	They're clearing the way for the rise of the robots.
	But we're about to wrap up this segment.
	Todd, do you have any final question for our guest?
	Yeah, it just seems like Trump is becoming a real, you know, table turner of the money changers.
	He's going in and bowling a china shop, and I think we all appreciate that.
	How worried should we all be that Trump gets, I'm just going to ask, gets assassinated for delivering a true viable blow to corruption?
	I think it's almost zero chance of that happening.
	You know, even if Trump, I mean, even if Trump got assassinated, The Trump presidency would probably still live along with some sort of convincing body double.
	It's not that it's Trump that's running this system.
	It's the people behind him that are running the system expressing it through a figurehead.
	There's a lot of changes going on.
	I don't think the assassination risk at this point is high.
	They'd have to explain that whole thing.
	Maybe a rogue individual can get in there.
	And sort of do something that the deep state didn't plan on.
	But yeah, I think that right now we're in a Trump-style reset, not a Klaus Schwab-style reset.
	So let's bring it on.
	Yeah, it certainly is.
	You can see a reset coming.
	You can see all the panicked gold purchases.
	I think they're trying to restock the Federal Reserve gold reserves before the audits come because it hasn't been there for decades.
	But it's going to be an interesting time.
	Zach, I want to thank you for taking time today.
	For our show, Decentralized TV, and for our audience, yes, this is a short segment, but stay with us.
	We'll be back after this break with the after-party discussion, and we just want to thank our guest, Zach Voorhees, and his book is called Google Leaks, a Whistleblower's Exposé of Big Tech Censorship.
	That's at googleleaksbook.com.
	You can also follow Zach at...
	Perpetual Maniac on X. Perpetual Maniac is his handle, and he's got great posts.
	I follow him on X as well.
	So thank you so much, Zach, for joining us today.
	Thank you very much, Mike.
	All right, stay tuned, folks.
	We'll be back after this break.
	Join the official discussion channel for this show on Telegram at t.me slash decentralized TV, where you can ask questions or offer suggestions of who we should interview next.
	Also be sure to subscribe to the email newsletter on decentralized.tv, where you'll be alerted about one day in advance of each new upcoming episode, before it gets published.
	On decentralized.tv, you'll also find links to our video channels and social media channels across all platforms, including Brighteon, Rumble, BitChute, Twitter, Truth Social, and more.
	Check it all out at decentralized.tv.
	All right, welcome back, folks, to the After Party.
	And Todd, you know, as always, I love our guests for the show.
	We have some really great people.
	Zach Voorhees is absolutely brilliant.
	And his perspective is very valuable.
	It is.
	I'm just thrilled to have him as a guest.
	I also want to say that we have another interview with him coming up as part of a new docuseries that we're going to be releasing together.
	Very exciting.
	And the docuseries, I can't give out the name yet, but the docuseries is about practical steps to reestablish your freedom by decentralizing from the control grid system, essentially.
	Absolutely.
	If you're going to decentralize your life, you need a game plan.
	And we intend to be able to provide you a practical game plan to do that.
	It's going to be, you know, must-see TV. Yeah, and it'll stream for free also at brightyou.com when it's released.
	It's still a few months out, but we'll have experts on finance, experts on technology like Zach, experts on food and permaculture, decentralized food production, decentralized medicine, decentralized education, decentralized money, obviously, but really practical stuff.
	Right, right.
	Yeah, and I'll just share this publicly.
	One of my own self-criticisms of This show, and I noticed this just watching one of our previous episodes, it was like, sometimes, especially with crypto, it gets really theoretical and really math geeky.
	Yeah.
	And not practical.
	Right.
	Right.
	So, I mean, you and I already had a discussion about this offline, and I think our audience would agree.
	We need to really refocus on action steps that people can take right now, today.
	To decentralize their lives.
	And that's, I think today with Zach, we got a good dose of that.
	Amen.
	Yeah, I think, you know, our hopes are, to you, the viewers, is that you watch these shows and you not only can appreciate that others have done this decentralization in their lives, but you can see yourself as, hey, I can do this.
	This is practical.
	Okay, I need to do X, Y, and Z. Let's just start there.
	Keep it simple, and that's what we hope to bring to you are some practical solutions on how you can insert yourself into the decentralization movie.
	Yeah, and as an example of this practical thing, I was just sharing a link with you that I saw, and we're not endorsing the service yet, but we're going to test it.
	Both you and I are going to test it.
	I think it was called Trocador, but I'm not entirely sure.
	But where you can...
	You can trade privacy crypto, including Epic or Xano or Monero or others.
	You can trade that for gift cards, like an Amazon gift card or a Best Buy gift card.
	And I don't know what the fees are.
	I mean, we're going to test it.
	We'll take the dive and see if it works.
	And if it does, we'll share it with people.
	If it doesn't work, then we'll say, oh, well, there goes some crypto.
	What else is new?
	Yeah, and you know that I'm very involved in privacy crypto, and so I'm approaching this from the other side as well.
	Ever since you informed me that this existed, I'm like, oh my gosh, a use case for private crypto, I love this.
	So from the other side, I am working very hard at being able to make sure this is a viable solution that works.
	Stand by, people.
	It's going to be worth waiting.
	You know what I want to test, Todd?
	I'm going to do this, but I'm going to try to swap privacy crypto for a virtual Visa card.
	Okay.
	Because I think they offer that.
	And then I'm going to try to make a purchase in my own store, healthrangerstore.com, on that Visa card.
	That would be very cool.
	Yeah, and then that would be a mechanism.
	Yeah, as you go through the process, though, what I don't know, because we just kind of discovered this.
	Yeah.
	I want to make sure that there's no KYC involved with that.
	And if there isn't, then man, bring it on.
	Or imagine if there were a way, and again, I don't know what the fees are.
	We're going to try this out.
	But imagine if there were a way to take your crypto and just really convert it into physical gold and silver.
	Easily.
	Like privacy crypto, right?
	Because I don't know any gold and silver retailers that accept Monero.
	Some will take Bitcoin, but that's a surveillance coin.
	Right.
	Yeah, that's right.
	I mean, I want a gold dealer that takes Monero.
	Have you ever heard of any?
	No, I haven't.
	I mean, I don't know.
	There could be one out there.
	But look, just like we discovered within our interview today, I mean, the computing power is becoming so inexpensive.
	We'll see a future over the next year of private crypto use cases that are going to become more and more and more viable.
	Yes.
	You know, we just haven't asked all of the right questions.
	We haven't networked with all of the right people.
	But everybody should know that's your and my intent, right?
	Why not us?
	Let's brave the path.
	Let's figure this stuff out.
	Well, and it's very clear.
	In other conversations we've had with our guest, Zach, he mentioned that privacy crypto will always exist because there are elements of the global power players that need to use it.
	Oh, Mike.
	Right?
	I've got to tell you, that was a golden nugget that I picked up that made me just in my own head go, wow.
	And that's this.
	That's the fact that we all talk about the elites.
	We all talk about the people in charge.
	We also talk about the deep state.
	And I just wasn't ever thinking.
	I was putting them all into one box.
	But I think what Zach shared was there's a difference between the deep state and the elite.
	And the elite, they want to be able to have uber privacy too.
	They want to be able to exchange value privately, exchange information privately, because they don't want the deep state to come in and compromise them and what they're doing.
	So that gave me a little bit of hope, Mike.
	Yeah, I mean, it's interesting that even the global technocratic elite, let's say international wealthy people, they don't want to be blackmailed by the deep state.
	So they want privacy in their own transactions.
	Yes.
	Even if they're not buying anything illicit, or maybe in some cases they are.
	Maybe they're buying and selling illegal weapons.
	Who knows?
	I mean, I'm sure that happens.
	But they wouldn't want to use Bitcoin even for legal transactions.
	Think about this.
	Based on Elon, Big Balls, and the Doge team, their investigations thus far, the money laundering kickback schemes exposed are absolutely mind-boggling.
	It's really difficult to comprehend the massive dollars involved.
	And, you know, our viewers, you and me, we are interested in justice being exacted, right?
	The folks that we need to come to justice, I'll be real curious if...
	They didn't take their own privacy very seriously, and they just thought their tree grew to the sky.
	And I am hoping, Mike, that there are arrests and that this just isn't bread and circus kabuki theater, right, that's ultimately protecting the Drew Babylonian bastards.
	I want some arrests, Mike.
	There need to be a lot of arrests, or as I said recently, I'm okay with full confessions in lieu of arrests, right?
	So, for example, take Fauci.
	You and I probably all agree.
	I mean, our audience even agrees that Fauci did some horrible things, probably prison-worthy.
	Yep.
	I'd be okay with him just offering a detailed, full confession, like a 12-hour confessional interview, step-by-step, all the things you did.
	And then you can be absolved of any punishment for those crimes.
	I'm more interested in history.
	I call it a reconciliation moment for our nation.
	I would rather have reconciliation than revenge.
	That's really interesting, Mike.
	But then I wonder how long it would take Rachel Maddow to totally twist that 12 hours and just turn it on its head.
	That's what, you know, I mean...
	It's back to the PCs versus the NPCs.
	I mean, it's like people are...
	I'm not going to say people are so dumb, but there are a lot of people who are not that smart.
	And I don't know.
	How do you solve for that, Mike?
	I've thought about this, and I thought that if the DOJ were to offer such an arrangement to many of these criminals that have been part of the deep state, some of them involved in COVID, some of them...
	Money laundering, Ukraine, money skimming, right?
	USAID, all of it.
	I believe that the correct language for this is you must offer a confession written and on video and we get to ask you the questions and you can still be prosecuted for any crimes that you leave out of your confession.
	Oh, okay.
	So you can't just say, oh, we did bad things and now I'm absolved of everything.
	and specific.
	You have to give enough information up that you could be prosecuted if that information were known, except for this arrangement, which is basically legal immunity in exchange for your confession.
	This has been done previously in history, and it helps nations heal, actually, because the truth comes out.
	If you could hear Fauci or others in their own words detailing Their crimes.
	That would really be something amazing.
	And I'm more interested in that than jail time for him.
	Amazing.
	That would be amazing to see if that would be the key to be able to unlock the minds of what I refer to of the NPCs that just take their downloads from mainstream news.
	Then they couldn't deny it anymore.
	Exactly.
	Exactly.
	And maybe that would be this revelation that just, what did you call the moment?
	Reconciliation.
	Reconciliation moment.
	That's fantastic, Mike.
	And think about all the people involved in the Russia hoax that targeted Trump.
	You know, all those deep state spooks that took part in it.
	They all knew they were committing felony crimes.
	They were fabricating fake information.
	They all have knowledge of this.
	I mean, James Comey is being investigated right now by the FBI and the DOJ, which is really hilarious.
	So these people know what they did.
	It's not like they thought they were good actors.
	Right.
	They knew they were bad people.
	They just lied about it.
	Right.
	There's a bunch of them, you know, Brennan and others, right?
	So if we could get them to confess, then I would be okay with concluding that chapter of history.
	It would be epic, truly.
	Where the hell does $4.7 trillion go, Mike?
	When you think about all of that that just disappeared, even these corrupt politicians, I mean, That's a lot of money to be spending, right?
	Where does it go?
	Yeah, I mean, so the fact that they can just create money from nothing and then wire it out to anybody they want, and that just, that, I mean, frankly, this, the moment we're at right now began in 1971 when Richard Nixon took us off the gold standard.
	Right.
	Because it enabled what was inevitably going to end up with abuse of power.
	It was inescapable that we would arrive at this moment.
	Of course they would print money and give it to their friends and those friends would end up losing all morality and end up in pizza party pedo basements and whatever.
	I mean, of course!
	Because this is where it goes when there's no accountability, no morality, no rule of law, no transparency.
	We've seen this before.
	Yeah.
	I'm glad I'm a simple person, man.
	Never got caught up in all of that crap.
	Man, I can't even investigate some of that stuff because some of those rabbit holes are too sadistic and horrifying.
	But I'm glad other people can investigate it.
	It's all coming up.
	But let's get back to the topic here today and our guest, Zach Voorhees, who, you know, I've had a lot of private conversations with him, and he's always on the cutting edge of tech, and also pro-human liberty, pro-truth, and he also wants to see all of this exposed.
	What I did not have a chance to ask him today, though, is about Team Doge and their use of the AI crawler technology to go in and gather up all the evidence of all the crimes inside the Treasury, inside USAID, etc.
	My understanding is Doge already has all the smoking gun evidence.
	They've already got it done.
	Sure they do.
	I'm sure they do.
	That's really cool.
	Now, what we're going to be waiting for is to see if there truly is the commitment to justice being exacted, right, on the corrupt.
	Yeah.
	And if that happens.
	Again, I love your theory, but I want to at least throw me a few arrests.
	Just throw me a bone, Mike.
	No, they can all be arrested and then offered the confession deal.
	Okay.
	Yeah, I want to see the perp walks, too.
	Sure.
	Yeah, okay.
	My other takeaway is when is the next 2008, I think, the next Olympics are?
	And I really think that we should lobby.
	2028, I'm sorry.
	Yeah, and I think we should lobby for prompt engineering to become a sport.
	And I'm betting on you to get the gold, Mike.
	Well, I don't know about that, but yeah, that could be a sport.
	But I was thinking that it would be sponsored by Ozempic.
	It would be called the Ozempics Olympics.
	And all the athletes would be injecting themselves with reptile venom.
	And they would all have the Ozempic face, so you can't...
	Like, all their teeth are falling out, but they're winning gold medals for pole vaulting or whatever.
	They're all vomiting up their meals in the evening.
	You know what I did, Mike, this week?
	And you may applaud it, or you may just think, you know...
	Maybe that was a waste.
	But I tell you what, I take this seriously.
	You know that when we talk about things, I tend to do, right, instead of just talk about them.
	And so I found, and I don't know exactly what the name is, I don't know if we should share it if I did, but I found out that there is a program out there, which I think in total it was like a couple hundred bucks, that is like an absolute education from beginner to advanced.
	On prompt engineering.
	On using AI. On using different AI. And whether it's from trying to create text or imagery or just good answers.
	And I haven't started that yet.
	But I am, and I'm really super excited about it.
	Because where do you start, if not at the beginning, Mike?
	Hey, that's great.
	I think that's really wise.
	We all need to become really good at prompt engineering.
	And it's not just for the AI software systems.
	It's going to be for the physical robots that we have around us in the future.
	You're going to need to give them tasks.
	And describe it correctly.
	Look at what you did with the music, my gosh, and the videos.
	I mean, seriously, you and your team are becoming expert in that.
	We're getting good at it.
	That's accessible to all of us if we just dig in and we start learning it, right?
	I think what people need to be careful and why I think our series that we're going to be bringing out is going to be so important is we're going to give you practical tips and I guarantee you before this series is done, I will have had some experience with this education that I'm going through and maybe...
	Who knows, Mike?
	Maybe we get them on a show or somebody like them, because I think that's what people need.
	They just need to be told what to do, how to do it, so that they can go learn and improve.
	Yeah, that's exactly right.
	And I know there are prompt engineering courses, but the biggest part of it, as you stated, is to use it and gain the experience and the feedback, right?
	For example, the other day on Suno, the music generator, I was really trying to push the boundaries of experimental music.
	And I wish I could play the sample for you because it's pretty wild, but I was doing a song about, well, it's called Wide Awake, but I was doing a music style that is industrial, experimental, with industrial sound effects.
	You know, the record scratches of hip-hop and all of this.
	And then I was using all these tags within the lyrics to super-prompt the AI to do some pretty crazy things.
	You can make it scream, too, by the way.
	You can just put in screams.
	You can have it vocalize instruments, like have an electric guitar sound like a howling wolf, you know?
	Like, anything that you can think of, you can make it do that.
	Yeah, it's crazy.
	So I was able to get it to output this, like, Really wild, you know, industrial music style with all these sound effects.
	I'm like, yep, okay.
	I've expanded the edge of what I can do with this thing.
	Wow, that's cool.
	Well, and that is testimony to the fact that maybe we don't, or maybe I don't have to be worried about cognitive elimination of the populace.
	No.
	Because you've got to be pretty darn smart to start figuring out how to be expert in prompt engineering.
	That is so true.
	Like Zach and I both said, we use our brains more with AI than we did before.
	Because the way I describe it is whether I'm creating a music video or a song or a chapter for a book or whatever, I have to imagine it first.
	And then I have to describe my vision through prompt engineering.
	To the AI system.
	And that process is very, very creative and it requires a lot of brain power.
	In fact, Todd, I'll say this.
	I guarantee you within a year, you and I both will be using AI to produce short films and mini documentaries just through prompt engineering.
	And ultimately, you and I both will be putting out Hollywood feature films that are better than anything out of Hollywood.
	That'll be rendered on our desks, but they'll look like $100 million films.
	And you know what?
	We might just do it for our own pleasure, for our own like, hey, create a movie for me tonight.
	I want it to be X, Y, and Z, right?
	Yes!
	Absolutely, and you can put in...
	Surprise me with the ending.
	Right, and you can put guardrails, like no profanity or no nudity or whatever, like I want a Christian family-friendly...
	Right.
	Or you could go the other way, you know, give me Netflix, you know, perverted Netflix, you know, demonic seances for children or whatever.
	Like, there's going to be people that want, I mean, of course, there are sickos that want that stuff, right?
	But it's actually a reflection of your mind.
	So you can get back what you ask for, which is really a kind of a law of the universe, interestingly.
	And what's going to happen, I guarantee you, is people that, There are so many ways to use AI for your business.
	You know, Todd, for our upcoming series, we should do, just you and I, we should do a segment on AI for business.
	And you know what I'll do?
	I'll have I'll bring in a laptop with a GPU and we'll put DeepSeek on it.
	And we'll do queries for the show in real time.
	Like business case queries.
	That would be so cool.
	That would be cool.
	In the meantime, as so many business opportunities coming up, this is a good time to talk about why people should consider what you offer, which is a structure to protect their assets.
	If they're going to earn money, you want to be able to keep it, right?
	Yeah, it's interesting.
	I had a conversation today with a person who, he got his UNA back in September.
	And so he had a little bit of 2024 to be able to generate income, donate to the U.N.A. so that he could write off 60% of his adjusted gross income.
	He had a W-9 job, so he was able to reestablish his relationship with the employer to where it was the U.N.A. instead of his social security number, him.
	Oh, wow.
	That's huge.
	Now he is just now getting it.
	And he says, Wow, Todd, what I know is this.
	I wish I knew about this years ago, but he said, this is what I know I'll do forevermore.
	I will send you a thank you letter every April 15th.
	It was great.
	It was great.
	Well, I brought up your website, my575e.com, so tell us about this.
	Yeah, look, this is a way of being able to, as you'd mentioned, keep more of what you earn lawfully.
	And there's still a component to it where you lawfully give unto Caesar.
	So this isn't a total get-out-of-taxation-free card or anything like that.
	But there's so many other things that you can do with this that people are realizing, whether it's donating property, which has all kinds of protections, You know, if you go to my575e.com and you enter in your email address and you just hit Let's Go,
	your name and email address, you'll have access to a 90-minute video where I interview the expert in all of this, Dennis Gray, who has 34 years of experience of helping people acquire their own UNAs.
	I got mine from him five and a half years ago, and it was just a year ago, Mike, that you and I were talking on one of our shows, and I'm like, you know, I need to tell people about this.
	It's been so good to me and my wife over the years.
	And so it's really become my form of activism to be able to let people this know exists.
	Because when you start to research Unincorporated Nonprofit Association, I will tell you this.
	It's almost as if they, who are they, don't want us to know that these things exist.
	They are very powerful.
	So all I do is, I don't sell these.
	I just...
	Inform people that you can go to my575e.com, go through the process, download the 12-page PDF that talks about the 32 positive attributes of the UNA. And you know what?
	Maybe that answers your questions and you place an order.
	Or not.
	Book.
	Book some time with me.
	I make it very reasonable to book time with me to where I'll answer your questions.
	And I will tell you, Mike, I think I'm running about 95%, and it doesn't have anything to do with me.
	It's just when people book time with me, I'm able to answer the...
	The high-quality questions they all have.
	And they do invest $150 in that because when I didn't charge anything, Mike, people didn't show up.
	So at $150, everybody seems to show up, but I always give that back to people if they move forward with the UNA. They just take it right off the top.
	Todd, what's really incredible about what has just transpired in our country?
	Politically.
	And also with all the reforms that are coming.
	So the way you describe your UNA here, I'm reading from your website, you know, it's keep more of what you earn, right?
	My575E.com.
	Well, that's what the Trump administration wants for all Americans, is to keep more of what they earn.
	And the way we know that is because Trump is working on ways to...
	He's going to eliminate the IRS eventually.
	I think that'll probably take an act of Congress.
	But in the meantime, he's reducing taxes on tips or taxes on overtime.
	And so he's kind of moving in the direction of keeping more of what you learn.
	And then secondly, I just read yesterday that he's going to be firing 9,000 more IRS employees.
	Why do we need all these federal employees that do nothing but hound the American people?
	And he put out a big executive order to all the agencies to prepare for massive downsizing of personnel by September of this year.
	We're talking about slashing.
	This is really draining the swamp, right?
	It's amazing.
	Let me just finish.
	What this means to me is that since the IRS isn't going to be around Right.
	And look, this is real simple, Mike.
	The layup with this 575E, with this unincorporated nonprofit association, is two things.
	If you are a W-2 earner, you've got to check this out.
	If you are a W-9, Contracted employee, you would be crazy.
	I'm telling you, you would be crazy not to kick the tires on this because it's very, very powerful.
	Good point.
	All right, good point.
	So again, that's my575e.com, and you'll learn everything from Todd there on that website.
	I'm going to plug our sponsor for the show today, which is the Satellite Phone Store, sat123.com here.
	And in an age of chaos and unpredictability, they offer not only satellite phones, but they have Starlink now.
	They are offering Starlink plans that are less expensive than direct with Starlink.
	I mean, look at this 500-gigabyte plan for $200 a month through the Starlink satellite network.
	They've also got the Faraday bags with the ballistic backpacks with Faraday material.
	They've got the solar generators.
	They've got, of course, the satellite phones as well as the bivvy sticks, etc.
	You can check all of this out at sat123.com.
	If you really want to be off the grid, anywhere in the world, as long as you can see the sky, you can make and receive phone calls with satellite phones.
	And they can't track your exact location like a cell tower can, right?
	So this is a way to still have communications without being like...
	All the time.
	The way cell phones are.
	And there's no Google operating system on these satellite phones either.
	So it's not a smart phone that's actually a surveillance phone.
	So check all of that out at sat123.com.
	I would thank them for sponsoring our show.
	All right, Todd.
	Well, that's an amazing show.
	And I can't wait to do more interviews for our docu-series that's coming up.
	It's a few months out, but it's going to be kick-ass.
	Really practical information.
	A few months out, but you and I are going to be working every darn week.
	Yeah, yeah.
	We're going to be doing interviews every week for that, yeah.
	And it'll be really cool because there's going to be bonus content available for people as well.
	So that's another thing that both Mike and I are working on.
	We're going to take some of the interviews behind the scenes.
	And there's going to be some amazing insights that you'll glean from that.
	And there's going to be some AI-generated content as part of the bonus material.
	I can already say that.
	It's going to be really interesting stuff.
	So, yeah.
	No one's ever done a docu-series the way we're going to do it.
	So anyway, it'll be very practical.
	Excellent.
	Well, Todd, great conversation today.
	Thanks for everything, for all your questions and all your enthusiasm.
	And we're helping a lot of people with this show.
	So thanks for being part of it, Todd.
	All right.
	Thank you.
	Thanks, everybody.
	Yep.
	Thank you all for tuning in.
	Be sure to check out all the other episodes at decentralized.tv and join the email list there because we email you when we have new episodes.
	And we've never used that email list for anything else other than just sending you, like, here's a new episode.
	But we will probably email everybody about the new docuseries when it's available, maybe some trailer videos, things like that.
	But it's just to alert you to new content.
	So check it all out.
	Sign up at decentralize.tv.
	And thank you for watching today.
	I'm Mike Adams with Todd Pitner here at thestudiosofbrightian.com.

▲