Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

March 5, 2025 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:18:09

BBN, March 5, 2025 – Trump announces plan to SAVE AMERICA from the destructive DEMOCRATS

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News with Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
	Alright, welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News for Wednesday, March 5th, 2025. I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
	Thank you for joining me today.
	Trump gave a speech last night to a joint session of Congress.
	The Democrats complained because, well, they hate America doing better now.
	They hate everything about America.
	They hate everything about Trump.
	They hate everything that Trump is accomplishing.
	I thought the speech was great.
	But just to show you how much the Democrats hate Trump and how fake they are, check this out.
	22 Democrat senators got caught.
	It's 22 or maybe it's 23 now.
	Got caught putting out word for word the exact same video.
	Like, literally reading a script.
	They're just actors.
	Nothing but actors.
	These are the Democrats reading a script, including, of course, Senator Elizabeth Warren, who's one of the worst, and Chuck Schumer, etc.
	Check out this video.
	It just shows you how fake it is, how the Democrats are nothing but actors who hate America.
	Check this out.
	When I win, I will immediately bring prices down starting on day one.
	Now, I'm stopping it there because it becomes unintelligible, which is actually what happens when Democrats speak.
	But let me play for you a smaller version of just three senators so that you can actually hear their words.
	So you've got Chuck Schumer, Elizabeth Warren, and Cory Booker.
	With identical speeches, literally word for word.
	And, you know, like 19 other senators did the exact same thing.
	Check this out.
	When I win, I will immediately bring prices down starting on day one.
	That ain't true.
	That's what you just heard.
	Since day one of Donald Trump's presidency, prices are not down.
	They're up.
	Inflation is getting worse.
	Not better.
	The prices of gross gas, housing, eggs, of essential.
	It's not getting better.
	It's getting worse.
	Meanwhile, Donald Trump has done enough boost eggs to lower prices.
	Instead, he's pardoned violent criminals who savagely beat police officers.
	He's letting Elon Musk take a chainsaw to vital government programs and then, even worse, giving him access to Americans from sensitive data.
	Social security numbers, tax returns, health care.
	He's fired thousands of essential workers.
	People who help our veterans.
	All right, I'm cutting that off, but you get the idea.
	They're just rolling out a bunch of lies and a bunch of coordinated complaints.
	And it just shows you that these Democrat senators are nothing but actors.
	They're just reading scripts.
	They might as well just be AI. I mean, maybe they are.
	I'm not seriously suggesting this, but maybe they've already been arrested and taken to Gitmo and just replaced by AI, all fed the same prompt for the script.
	Now, I mean, I'm saying that as a joke.
	But wouldn't it be great if that actually did happen?
	Because AI would be far better than what we have with the Democrat senators.
	They are horrible people.
	They hate this country.
	They just want to destroy it.
	And one of the key points I want to get across today is that right now, the deep state and the radical left are clearly in sabotage mode.
	They want America to suffer under Trump because they want to be able to blame Trump.
	For every bad thing that they themselves can come up with, whether it's a bioweapons deployment, which they call a measles outbreak, or they call it Ebola or bird flu.
	You know that these deep state operatives are running around dropping poisons, dropping bioweapons and chemical weapons all over the place so they can run these stories that say, see, see what happens when critics of vaccines are in the White House or HHS. It's very clear that's what this is.
	I even predicted that's exactly what would happen.
	I called this before January 20th.
	I said they would do this in order to make Trump look bad.
	Now, think about what else is coming.
	They are still destroying chickens by the millions across the country.
	You know, state health departments run by liberals.
	They are slaughtering millions of chickens to cause egg prices to go up.
	This is a food terrorism operation run by the radical left.
	They're doing it on purpose, and they're claiming it's bird flu.
	It's not bird flu.
	There's no such thing as infectious bird flu that's even a threat to chickens.
	I mean, even if there were, the answer to it would be to let the surviving chickens have more baby chickens so you have natural immunity.
	But what do they do?
	They kill the surviving chickens.
	I mean, they kill them all.
	They slaughter them all, including the ones with natural immunity.
	So what does that tell you?
	It's food terrorism.
	It's not a public health policy.
	They're not protecting the public from bird flu.
	They are destroying the food supply to cause inflation so that they can film videos complaining about high egg prices and then blame Trump.
	Well, Trump's only been in power for six weeks.
	Not Trump's people.
	Those are Biden's people and Democrat people.
	And they are carrying out acts of terrorism against this country.
	It's very clear.
	So a lot more of that is going to happen.
	You're going to see deep status and leftists threatening massive sabotage, civil war, shootings, bombings, every act of terrorism that you can imagine.
	This is what the radical left is going to be considering, if not actually carrying out.
	Because they hate America doing well.
	They hate losing their power over the people.
	They want to be in control.
	They want to enslave everybody.
	They want their slush fund, their USAID secret financial supply chain.
	They want to control all the money, all the treasury, everything for themselves so they can enrich themselves at the expense of everybody else while keeping the border wide open.
	This is what Democrats do.
	They keep the border wide open so they can have the child trafficking and the weapons trafficking and the drug trafficking.
	And then they simply offer all those traffickers legal immunity as long as they get kickbacks to the Democrats.
	That's how the Democrats fund themselves in California.
	That's why they hate Trump's wall.
	Because they know if the wall goes up and the border is secure, the Democrats lose another revenue source from the child traffickers.
	Yes, they get kickbacks from the coyotes.
	They get kickbacks.
	They get a piece of every child that comes across the border.
	They're not good people, folks.
	They are evil people.
	They are demons.
	That's why they love to also murder children, not just mutilate them.
	Now, along these same lines, here's a video from Ford in Canada.
	Premier Ford.
	Isn't that the guy that was caught smoking crack or snorting coke or something?
	Somehow he's still in power in Canada because Canada, kind of like the UK, always ends up with the worst possible libtard lunatics in charge, you know, and to some degree Australia as well.
	But this is a video from Rebel News.
	This is Premier Ford threatening to cut off the electricity that provides power to 1.5 million Americans.
	He's going to cut Ontario energy off from Michigan.
	Check out this video.
	This is kind of like what the U.S. did to Germany by destroying Nord Stream.
	So Canada's Ford, or Ontario's Ford, is about to pull a Nord Stream on Michigan.
	Check this out.
	We keep the lights on, the 1.5 million homes and manufacturing in New York, in Michigan, and in Minnesota.
	If he wants to destroy our economy and our families, I will shut down the electricity going down to the U.S. And I'm telling you, we will do it.
	It's unfortunate.
	I would rather ship you more electricity, ship you more critical minerals.
	I want to ship you more energy, more potash to keep your farmers going, and uranium that you use for your nuclear power.
	It comes through from Saskatchewan over to Ontario, and it's going to be a massive, massive problem.
	So here we go.
	Canada, or at least Ford here.
	Threatening Michigan and Minnesota and some of the northern central states there with basically grid-down terrorism is kind of what this is.
	I mean, obviously it's in response to Trump's tariffs on Canada, but Trump's tariffs are in response to Canada putting tariffs on all kinds of U.S. goods.
	And honestly, I agree with Trump on the tariffs.
	I agree with him.
	And I don't know why...
	So many people seem to be opposed to Trump's tariffs.
	Oh, it's going to raise prices.
	Not in the long run, it's not.
	It's going to help America in the long run.
	Yeah, in the short term, it's going to cause a little bit of chaos.
	But Trump said in his speech, he said, look, we're going to put the same tariffs on them that they put on us.
	And this is true for every country.
	If China puts tariffs on U.S. goods, the U.S. is going to put tariffs on Chinese goods.
	If Canada puts tariffs, which they do, they put tariffs on all kinds of things like U.S. dairy products, for example, to protect Canada's dairy industry.
	So Trump's like, hey, you put tariffs on us, we put tariffs on you.
	You know, it's reciprocation for your tariffs.
	Oh, you want no tariffs?
	Well, then drop your tariffs.
	End your tariffs?
	We'll end our tariffs.
	It's really that simple.
	But what does Ford say from Ontario?
	No, we're going to cut off the power supply.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Let's see what happens.
	Let's see what happens next.
	Let's see if then Trump says, oh, really?
	You're going to call the power supply?
	Okay.
	Well, we're going to stop providing ICBM defense for Canada.
	We're going to stand down our early warning systems in Alaska and just make sure Canada is totally vulnerable to Russia and China.
	Oh, yeah.
	We're going to stop.
	Actually providing security for the shoreline of Canada, both the east and west coastlines of Canada.
	Yeah, we're just not going to help Canada at all.
	Good luck.
	You're on your own.
	And then let's see how long Canada lasts without U.S. security defenses.
	Because Canada wouldn't last very long at all without the U.S. providing security.
	Tom Luongo tweeted about this video.
	He said, Ford is about to find out that...
	The U.S. doesn't need anything from Canada, including the oil, since you can't refine your own crude without using our pipelines.
	The electricity you export back to us comes from oil you have to send to us to transport to send back to you.
	So have fun being poor, as now your electricity will be more expensive to produce after the oil goes through a 25% import tax to the U.S. and then Ford's new reciprocal tariff to re-import it back to Canada.
	What bleeping losers?
	And yes, Canada, right now there are liquor stores in Canada that are removing U.S. alcohol, like Jim Beam and liquor products, from store shelves in Canada, even though they've already been imported into Canada.
	So there are no new tariffs on alcohol that they've already imported, but they're taking the alcohol off the shelves.
	That's a form of protest.
	I guess.
	Okay, so I guess Canadians could just get drunk on lower-grade alcohol, which I'm sure there's plenty of that in the Great White North.
	So, you know, good luck getting smashed on whatever crap you guys are serving up there.
	No more Jim Beam for you!
	Now, remember, I am not condemning the people of Canada.
	Just like, I'm not...
	I don't condemn the people of the UK or the people of Germany or the people of France.
	I'm condemning the retarded leaders of all those countries.
	Same thing with Australia and New Zealand.
	You know, look, if you're listening to this podcast, you might be listening from Japan.
	You might be listening from Canada.
	We love you.
	We support you.
	You're all about human liberty.
	I'm not saying bad things about you or your people.
	I'm saying that your leaders are insane, and frankly, you know, our leaders...
	Have been totally insane as well in the U.S. until this election.
	And now we're just barely starting to replace the insane leaders with not insane leaders.
	You know, just leaders that actually want to do good things for America.
	And that's going to take time.
	So I'm not even saying that this is a problem specific to Canada.
	Of course, Canada has Justin Castro Trudeau, which is a special kind of stupid, obviously.
	But then there's Keir Starmer in the U.K. that's...
	Trying to win the gold medal on stupid, you know?
	Well, I guess you just, you go around everywhere and they're all corrupt or stupid for the most part.
	But this guy Ford from Canada, he really is, he wants to play hardball with the United States and he's going to find out that you don't bluff Trump.
	I mean, Zelensky tried that and found out real fast.
	Zelensky faffoed on that.
	F around and find out.
	What did he find out?
	Oh, Trump shut off all aid money to Ukraine.
	Ukraine's on the verge of total collapse right this minute.
	And Zelensky found out.
	Now he's coming back, you know, begging for forgiveness or whatever.
	Oh, I'll do the minerals deal, whatever.
	Trump's like, you had your chance.
	Come back when you're ready for peace.
	Trump is not messing around with these people.
	Trump's not going to mess around with Ford or Trudeau or Macron or any of these people.
	Trump's basically saying, look, this is not a time of compromise.
	We are going to protect America, and we're going to protect America's interests.
	And all the rest of you can go pound sand.
	And you can, hey, in the UK, you can fight Russia by yourself if you think that you can pull that off.
	Good luck.
	Yeah, that'll last about two weeks.
	And then you're done.
	Because your ammo's all gone at that point, and Russia will be laughing.
	Like, wow, we killed 50,000 British soldiers, and it turns out that's all they had!
	Oh my god!
	That's just the warm-up round for Russian artillery, you know?
	I mean, I know it's sad, it's gruesome to state that, but that's how insane Keir Stalin is.
	To send British young men to die on the front lines with Russia, as Zelensky did for...
	So many young men in Ukraine who lost their lives achieving nothing?
	Achieving nothing!
	What a horrific crime against humanity for these leaders to start wars and to send young men to die on their behalf while the leaders themselves are, you know, corrupt pigs who themselves have no values and ethics typically.
	I mean, what a disgusting...
	Turn of events that we have found ourselves in, in terms of what's going on on the world stage right now.
	And Trump is trying to write a lot of that.
	Now, one of the great things that Trump mentioned in his speech was that RFK Jr. is head of HHS, now Secretary Kennedy.
	And Trump said, we've had a huge rise in autism in America.
	And he kind of said it tongue-in-cheek, like, huh, I wonder why.
	And Secretary Kennedy is going to find out why.
	You know that Trump and Kennedy, they both know it's vaccines.
	They know it.
	That was a shout-out to the vaccine truth movement right there.
	That he said that?
	We're going to find out what causes autism?
	Yeah, that's going to be vaccines.
	And RFK Jr., although he has taken a lot of heat lately for his Fox News op-ed, I don't have total patience, but I need to have more patience.
	I'm trying to convince myself to have more patience.
	But RFK Jr., Secretary Kennedy, went on Fox News for an interview, and he really helped to clarify some things.
	About how he doesn't believe in forcing vaccines on anybody and how he wants to restore choice.
	Basically vaccine choice for people, which includes the choice to say no.
	Now for those people who want vaccines, he's not going to take away their access to vaccines because those people want to commit vaccine suicide.
	Why get in the way of that?
	But for those who don't want to die from jabs, he's not going to force jabs on you.
	Because he believes in health freedom and health choice.
	So here's about a minute of his snippet on Fox News where he really is kind of clarifying some of the things that he took a lot of criticism for on Sunday.
	Check this out.
	What we're trying to do is really to restore faith in government and to make sure that we are there to help them with their needs and not particularly to dictate what they ought to be doing.
	Right now, we're delivering vitamin A. We are providing assistance if people need ambulance rides.
	They have treated most of the patients, actually, over 108 patients in the last 48 hours.
	And they're getting very, very good results.
	They report from budesonide, which is a steroid.
	It's a 30-year-old steroid.
	And clarithromycin and also cod liver oil, which has high concentrations of vitamin A. So there you go.
	You mentioned cod liver oil.
	Which I have on my desk right here in front of me, actually.
	Yeah, cod liver oil has high vitamin A and vitamin D in it, and that's something that I take.
	And, you know, it doesn't taste great, but whatever.
	It tastes like you're just chugging oil because you are chugging oil.
	I love the fact that he's mentioning nutrition more and more now.
	He started with vitamin A, now he's talking about cod liver oil.
	He talked about budesonide there, which is, you know, a drug.
	But that's something that surfaced during COVID as something that can help protect people from respiratory illness and so on.
	And it's clear that RFK Jr. is trying to work within the current system as best he can to tell people, look at nutrition, look at nutrition, and we're not going to force you to take vaccines.
	You're going to have these options.
	And that is...
	Believe it or not, this early in his tenure there at HHS, that is a pretty big step.
	That is something we have never seen out of HHS or CDC or FDA for, I mean, I'm thinking decades.
	When was the last time anybody in the federal government promoted any kind of nutrition?
	So we need to take this as a win.
	This is a big win right now, and I know people are...
	Criticizing RFK Jr. for not doing enough and not...
	I mean, some people just want him to go in there and ban all vaccines on day one.
	They're all illegal!
	Come on, that's not going to happen.
	This has to be a realistic, step-by-step strategy to expose vaccine harms.
	And if somebody like Secretary Kennedy is going to demand that vaccines be pulled off the market, he has to show the harm.
	It's just like with a pharmaceutical.
	You can't just, because you don't like a drug, you can't just demand, hey, the FDA should pull that drug off the market.
	Why?
	I just don't like it.
	No, you have to have the signals, which means you have to have data.
	And even then, the FDA is incredibly reluctant to pull drugs off the market.
	Remember the drug, remember Vioxx?
	Remember Resulin, which was a diabetes drug that killed people from liver damage?
	And you remember how the EU pulled that drug off the market?
	It was something like six months or a year earlier than the FDA did, even though all the data were available.
	The FDA knew it was killing people from liver damage.
	They kept it on the market.
	And that was like 20 years ago, so maybe I'm dating myself by even mentioning that.
	But Vioxx?
	Do you remember Vioxx?
	That was killing people.
	Some estimates were that Vioxx killed more Americans.
	You know, over 60,000 Americans were estimated to have been killed by Vioxx, and the FDA kept it on the market, kept it on, kept it on, kept it on, to benefit Big Pharma while people were dying.
	Because anything to help Big Pharma, that's what the FDA does.
	So understand what RFK Jr. is up against here.
	He is up against a culture that is absolutely infiltrated, It's going to take a lot of new data,
	evidence of harm, which won't be hard to collect once you actually put it in place, but once you can show evidence of harm, then you can retract or recall the vaccines, you can look hard at MMR, you can look at the The signals.
	That's how this has to happen.
	And you notice one of the very first things that Secretary Kennedy announced was a new data gathering initiative for vaccine harms or I don't know what term he used, but vaccine problems.
	That's all about gathering the data that can be used to determine whether these vaccines should be taken off the market.
	That's what that whole effort is about.
	This is going to take some time.
	And I know people say, well, children are dying in the meantime.
	Yes, they are dying in the meantime.
	And their parents have a role in that because their parents are getting them vaccinated.
	So it's not Kennedy's fault that children are being taken to get vaccinated by their parents because their parents are gullible enough to believe the lies of the vaccine industry.
	And then that child gets autism or dies.
	Oh, then the parent says, well, I was lied to.
	Yeah, you were lied to, but you have a web browser.
	You have access to the internet.
	You could have done more research.
	You could have asked questions.
	And I know, I'm not condemning the moms that didn't know and then their child became autistic.
	And many of those moms are now fighting for the truth about vaccines to come out.
	But a lot of those moms, they hold themselves You know, in shame because they did not do the research.
	And that's because as a parent, your job is to do the research.
	If you inject your child with something or allow a doctor to inject your child, you do have a responsibility to protect the health and well-being of your child.
	You have a responsibility to not just trust the doctors.
	And right now, every parent has the option to say no.
	Right now, even without the vaccines being pulled off the market, parents can say no.
	They can homeschool their kids.
	Or they can get vaccine exemptions or religious exemptions.
	It depends on the state, depends on the laws, etc.
	And I know it's not easy.
	I'm not saying it's easy.
	But it is an option that's available right now.
	I know lots of people who have never vaccinated their children, and they live here in America.
	Lots of them.
	It is doable.
	So don't tell me that children who are being harmed right now, it's the fault of Secretary Kennedy because he didn't pull the vaccines off the market.
	No.
	It's the fault of the former administration, the FDA, the CDC, the doctors themselves, the drug companies, their propaganda, the media that pushes the psyops, and the parents also are complicit in this.
	There's a lot of blame to spread around here.
	There's a lot of blame in this.
	And Secretary Kennedy does not deserve that blame.
	He's only been in office two weeks or whatever it's been.
	So give the man some time is all I'm saying.
	So anyway, wow.
	Interesting day.
	Powerful stuff going on.
	I've got a really good and highly relevant brightlearn.ai book video for you today.
	It's a video review of a book by Peter Schreitzer, and it's called Profiles in Corruption, Abuse of Power by America's Progressive Elite.
	Now, this book was written, I think, a couple of years ago.
	Long before we knew about USAID and all the slush fund money, but this book video shows you the astonishing depth of criminality and corruption in the Democrat Party with the understanding that the Democrat Party is a criminal cabal and it needs to be completely dismantled and disbanded.
	The Democrats despise America.
	They destroy children.
	They...
	Abandon the rule of law.
	They destroy societies.
	They destroy everything they touch.
	Look at their cities.
	Look at their policies.
	Highly, highly destructive and filled with corruption and fraud.
	So this book, this book video, really helps explain that and it's worth watching.
	So we're going to play that for you and then also going to play another book video.
	This is a classic.
	You've got to hear this one.
	It's a review of a book by Trevor Loudon.
	And it's called the enemies within, communists, socialists, and progressives in the U.S. Congress.
	Oh my goodness.
	Yeah, because they are communists.
	They are fascists.
	And they want to destroy America.
	They tried to stage a coup.
	They rigged elections.
	They tried to overthrow our constitutional republic, and they very nearly succeeded.
	If it wasn't for this last election, if it wasn't for Trump, if it wasn't for Doge and what Elon Musk are doing, We would be done.
	We would be done for.
	So, you know, just give Trump and his team some time because they're literally trying to save this republic.
	And that's no small task.
	So check out these two book videos and then we'll be back on the other side with more news and kick-ass interview.
	Stay tuned.
	Welcome back.
	Today we'll be exploring the captivating narratives from Peter Schweitzer's eye-opening book, Profiles in Corruption, Abuse of Power, by America's Progressive Elite.
	Let's start with the Clintons, a name synonymous with American politics.
	Their journey from Arkansas to the White House is well documented, but what about the small acts of corruption that paved their way?
	It's well known that Hillary Clinton leveraged her husband's position as Attorney General of Arkansas to make nearly $100,000 in cattle futures trades.
	But this was just the beginning.
	Fast forward to the White House, and the pattern becomes clearer.
	Bill's controversial pardon of billionaire fugitive Mark Rich, the Clintons' involvement in the Whitewater real estate deal, The Clinton Foundation, for instance, saw donations skyrocket during Hillary's tenure as Secretary of State, only to plummet after her 2016 election loss.
	Coincidence?
	Many don't think so.
	The Foundation's internal review, leaked through John Podesta's emails, revealed that high-dollar donors expected quid pro quo benefits.
	This is just one example of how the Clintons' actions raise serious questions about the intersection of power and profit.
	Now, let's shift our focus to Kamala Harris and her early political mentor, Willie Brown.
	Harris's rise in California politics is deeply intertwined with Brown.
	When Brown was Speaker of the California State Assembly, he was instrumental in starting Harris's career, appointing her to lucrative positions and introducing her to his vast network of political supporters.
	Their relationship was more than just professional.
	Brown, 31 years Harris's senior and married, began dating her in 1994. Their affair was the talk of San Francisco, and it wasn't long before Harris's career began to flourish.
	Brown used his influence to secure appointments for Harris, including positions on the State Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board and the California Medical Assistance Commission, which paid handsomely.
	But the story doesn't end there.
	Harris's tenure as San Francisco District Attorney and later as California Attorney General is marked by allegations of selective prosecution and a troubling pattern of protecting allies and friends.
	Her handling of the Catholic priest abuse scandal in San Francisco, for instance, raises serious questions.
	Despite having access to explosive documents detailing decades of abuse, Harris chose to bury the records, claiming it was to protect victims.
	Victims' groups, however, saw it as a cover-up, protecting the abusers instead.
	Next, we turn to Joe Biden, a familiar face in American politics for decades.
	Biden's political career has been a family affair, with his siblings and children playing significant roles.
	But as his political power grew, so did the opportunities for his family's financial gain.
	Take Hunter Biden, for example.
	His business ventures often intersected with his father's political influence, leading to lucrative deals with foreign governments and oligarchs.
	Hunter's dealings raise questions about the blurred lines between public service and personal profit.
	The Biden family's financial ties to foreign entities, often facilitated by Joe's political power, highlight a troubling pattern of leveraging public office for private gain.
	Joe Biden's brother, James, also benefited from his brother's position.
	His business ventures, particularly in real estate and education, often coincided with Joe's political activities.
	The pattern is clear.
	Joe's public power opened doors for his family's business ventures, creating a tangled web of influence and profit.
	Cory Booker, the charismatic senator from New Jersey, presents himself as a reformer and a champion of the people.
	But a closer look reveals a different story.
	Booker's political rise is marked by a pattern of leveraging his power for the benefit of his friends and supporters.
	From his early days as Newark's mayor to his current role in the Senate, Booker has used his position to reward allies and secure donations for his political machine.
	Booker's relationship with Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg is a prime example.
	Zuckerberg's $100 million donation to Newark's schools was supposed to be a game-changer.
	Instead, much of the money was diverted to consultants and back pay for teachers, with little tangible improvement in the schools themselves.
	Elizabeth Warren, the Harvard professor turned senator, has built her reputation as a fierce critic of Wall Street and corporate America.
	But her actions tell a different story.
	Warren's legal consulting work for major corporations, including her role in rewriting bankruptcy laws that benefited large corporations, reveals a deep connection to the very entities she claims to oppose.
	Her family's financial ties to corporations, particularly through her daughter's business ventures, further complicate her image as an outsider.
	Warren's advocacy for projects that benefit her daughter's clients, such as the Mashpee-Wampanoag casino deal, highlights the contradictions between her public persona and her actions.
	Sherrod Brown, the Ohio senator known for his populist rhetoric, presents himself as a champion of the working class.
	But his actions suggest a more complex picture.
	Brown's advocacy for trial lawyers and his close ties to union leaders, particularly his brother Charlie, raise questions about his true priorities.
	Charlie's class-action lawsuits, often targeting industries his brother oversees in Congress, suggest a family business built on leveraging political power for financial gain.
	Brown's legislative actions, seemingly timed to benefit his brother's legal endeavors, highlight the intertwined nature of his political and family interests.
	Amy Klobuchar, the Minnesota senator known for her pragmatic approach, has a reputation for being tough on crime and supportive of progressive causes, but her actions suggest a more selective approach to justice and regulation.
	Klobuchar's prosecutorial record, particularly her handling of the Tom Petters case, raises questions about her priorities and the influence of powerful connections.
	Her legislative work, often benefiting her largest campaign donors, highlights the intersection of money and politics.
	Klobuchar's ability to raise enormous sums from corporations while maintaining a liberal voting record underscores the complexities of her political strategy.
	Eric Garcetti, the Los Angeles mayor, presents himself as a modern progressive, focused on efficiency and innovation.
	But his actions suggest a more pragmatic approach, often prioritizing the interests of developers and businesses over the public good.
	Garcetti's use of behested payments, his ties to developers, and his handling of city corruption allegations highlight the challenges of balancing political ambition with public service.
	And finally, we turn to Bernie Sanders, perhaps the most widely known socialist in the United States.
	He has built his political career on attacking the wealthy and powerful.
	But his personal financial dealings tell a different story.
	Sanders' book sales, real estate holdings, and financial ties to wealthy donors reveal a man who has benefited significantly from his political position.
	The Sanders family's financial maneuvers...
	Sanders' efforts to obscure his financial arrangements, including his reluctance to release his tax returns, suggest a disconnect between his rhetoric and his actions.
	As we've seen, the link between power and corruption is a recurring theme in American politics.
	The progressives featured in this episode, despite their claims of pure motives, have all in various ways succumbed to the temptations of power.
	Their actions reveal the complexities of navigating the intersection of public service and personal ambition.
	Ultimately, the responsibility lies with us, the voters.
	We must demand transparency, accountability, and integrity from our leaders.
	As we reflect on the stories we've explored today, let's remember the words of George Orwell, a people that elect corrupt politicians, imposters, thieves, and traitors are not victims, but accomplices.
	Thank you for joining me on this journey.
	If you enjoyed this episode, be sure to subscribe and share it with others who might be interested.
	Until next time, keep learning, keep questioning, and keep shining bright.
	This has been a Bright Learn video from BrightLearn.ai on the book Profiles in Corruption, Abuse of Power by America's Progressive Elite by Peter Schweizer.
	Visit BrightLearn.ai for more fascinating videos like this one and NaturalNews.com for full editorial coverage and breaking news on critical stories that keep you informed and aware of what's really going on.
	Today we're taking a look at the influence of radical ideologies within the U.S. political system with the help of the book The Enemies Within, Communists, Socialists, and Progressives in the U.S. Congress by Trevor Loudon.
	Now, before we jump in, let's set the stage.
	This book is not just a dry analysis of political ideologies.
	It's a wake-up call.
	A detailed account of how Loudon perceives the infiltration of communist, socialist, and progressive ideologies into the very heart of American democracy.
	Whether you agree or disagree with his perspective, the narrative he presents is both compelling and controversial.
	Loudon kicks off the book with a powerful warning.
	The United States is one of the last bastions of freedom in a world increasingly influenced by authoritarian regimes.
	He argues that America's economic and military might are crucial for global stability and that any weakening of the U.S. would create a power vacuum that would be filled by an alliance of communist and authoritarian nations like China, Russia, and Iran.
	Loudon paints a vivid picture of a potential future where these nations dominate the globe and urges Americans to recognize the threat posed by internal enemies who, he warns, are systematically undermining the country's constitutional foundations.
	He believes that these enemies within are not just a threat to America, but to the entire free world.
	Now, let's delve into the core of the book.
	Loudon dedicates a significant portion to detailing the influence of communism within the U.S. Congress.
	He argues many communist and socialist organizations have been working tirelessly to infiltrate and manipulate the Democratic Party for decades.
	He cites examples like the Cesar Chavez holiday campaign, which he claims was orchestrated by the Communist Party USA to gain influence within the Latino community and the Democratic Party.
	According to Loudon, the campaign's leader, Evelina Alarcon, was a prominent member of the Communist Party.
	And the campaign itself was a strategic move to build the party's influence.
	Loudon also discusses the case of Latino immigrants, whom he claims are being used as a tool by the left to create a governing coalition that would ensure democratic dominance for decades to come.
	He highlights the work of figures like Burt Corona and Eliseo Medina, Mexican-American labor leaders, and key figures in the effort to mobilize Latino voters.
	and push for policies that align with communist ideologies.
	But it's not just communism that Loudon is concerned about.
	He also delves into the influence of socialists and progressives within Congress.
	He argues that organizations like the Democratic Socialists of America and the Institute for Policy Studies have been instrumental in pushing the Democratic Party further to the left.
	Loudon provides examples like the Campaign for Socialized Medicine, which he claims is a top priority for DSA. He cites the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, as a classic example of a socialist policy being implemented with the help of DSA and other leftist organizations.
	He suggests that figures like Quentin Young, a longtime DSA member and personal physician to Barack Obama, played a crucial role in shaping the health care reform.
	Loudoun also examines the role of caucuses within Congress, Particularly the Congressional Progressive Caucus, which he describes as the socialist heart of the Democratic Party.
	He argues that the CPC, with its close ties to organizations like the DSA and IPS, has been a driving force behind many progressive policies.
	He highlights the influence of figures like Senator Bernie Sanders, who founded the CPC, and other members who have been linked to socialist and communist organizations.
	Loudon suggests that these caucuses are not just forums for discussion, but powerful blocks that can sway legislation and influence the direction of the Democratic Party.
	In the realm of foreign policy and national security, Loudon raises concerns about the influence of radical ideologies.
	He discusses the World Peace Council, the Socialist International, and other organizations that he claims are fronts for communist and socialist agendas.
	He argues that these groups have been working to influence U.S. policy in ways that benefit their causes, often at the expense of American interests.
	Loudon provides examples like the Council for a Livable World, which he describes as a pro-disarmament organization with ties to socialist and communist groups.
	He suggests that this council has been instrumental in pushing for policies that weaken the U.S. military and undermine its national security.
	Throughout the book, Loudon weaves in the personal stories of individuals who he believes are part of this enemy within.
	From congressmen and senators to grassroots activists and union leaders, he paints a picture of a network of individuals and organizations working towards a common goal, the transformation of America into a socialist state.
	He shares anecdotes about figures like Representative Raul Grishalva, These stories add a human element to the narrative, making the book both engaging and thought-provoking.
	In conclusion, The Enemies Within Whether you agree with Loudon's perspective or not, his work raises important questions about the influence of radical ideologies within the U.S. Congress and the potential impact on the nation's future.
	As we wrap up, I encourage you to think critically about the information presented and to explore the book for yourself.
	It's a complex and multifaceted topic, and there's much more to discuss.
	But for now, thank you for joining me on this journey.
	Don't forget to subscribe, like, and share this episode with others who might be interested.
	Until next time, keep learning, keep questioning, and stay curious.
	This has been a BrightLearn video from BrightLearn.ai on the book The Enemies Within.
	Communists, Socialists, and Progressives in the U.S. Congress by Trevor Loudon.
	Visit brightlearn.ai for more fascinating videos like this one and naturalnews.com for full editorial coverage and breaking news on critical stories that keep you informed and aware of what's really going on.
	Now you may wonder, given how evil these leftists and Democrats really are, you may wonder, how is it...
	That they can justify all these actions to themselves.
	And what about the globalists that are pushing depopulation?
	How do they justify this massive depopulation?
	And that's the subject of a special report I have for you here that will play now called Depopulation Globalists Claim They're Saving Humanity by Planning to Exterminate Billions of People.
	So, before we get to that, I just want to remind you...
	Support us at healthrangerstore.com.
	Shop at our store for storable food, laboratory tested, almost everything is USDA certified organic.
	Of course, we do lab testing way beyond anything the USDA requires or anything the FDA requires, for that matter.
	We've got foods and superfoods, nutritional supplements, personal care products, really popular toothpaste and iodine and freeze-dried fruits and vegetables.
	Micro-algae like spirulina and chlorella, and we've got astaxanthin and so many other amazing products, so check it all out, healthrangerstore.com.
	And now here comes a special report.
	Depopulation globalists claim they're saving humanity.
	Check this out.
	So how do world leaders, or even, let's say, Elon Musk, who I think is the...
	The spokesperson, I don't know, the front person for a breakaway civilization.
	How do they justify to themselves the idea that billions of human beings have to be eliminated in order for humanity to have a future?
	What is their thinking process?
	Now, just as a disclaimer, I don't claim to know what Elon Musk is thinking or what Donald Trump is thinking.
	These are just my opinions and views.
	But I just want to walk through this with you, because a lot of people have this question, like, how could they eliminate billions of human beings?
	Well, here's the answer.
	Because in the minds of many of these people, it's not only the ethical decision, it is the right decision, it's the only decision that gives humanity a chance at surviving.
	Now, you're like, whoa, how do I arrive at that?
	Well, it's very simple.
	So, Earth is a planet that is struck routinely with large space rocks, you know, meteors and such.
	And every once in a while, a really large space rock collides with Earth.
	And today, in our modern world, it could wipe out a city, it could wipe out a nation, it could even wipe out...
	Human civilization as we know it.
	It could be an extinction-level event.
	And right now, humanity only lives on one planet.
	And for humanity to have any real long-term survival capability, it has to be a multi-planet civilization.
	Which is, I don't know, what do they call that?
	Is that a Type 2 civilization?
	I forgot the designation.
	And one of the reasons I even mention Elon Musk is because he has publicly spoken about Humanity has to have some redundancy here.
	We have to be a multi-planet civilization because if something happens to Earth, humanity needs to be able to rebuild from its colonies on other planets.
	I mean, Elon has spoken about this, and he himself is also very passionate about colonies on Mars.
	But this is why.
	So, I believe that Elon Musk and others are acutely aware of inbound space rocks, or, you know, asteroids, meteors, that are on a collision course with Earth, and that will be very destructive to Earth because of all the particulate matter that they would thrust into the atmosphere upon impact.
	And I've also taught numerous Bible sermons on the book of Revelation, and it's abundantly clear that the seven trumpets and the seven bowls are describing seven distinct Impact events, where in Revelation it says, oh, the angel poured out his bowl upon the earth or upon the Euphrates River, etc.
	Yeah, the pouring out of the bowls is unleashing comets onto earth.
	And it's very clear.
	It even says, like, the stars fell from the heavens and fire and brimstone rained down.
	A third of the planet was burned up.
	I mean, it's...
	You can't...
	Really interpret it any other way.
	I mean, it says it.
	It's right there in the Bible.
	Now, I don't know when those events are going to happen, but maybe Elon Musk does know.
	Or whatever this breakaway civilization is, maybe they know.
	And they realize that in their view, in their value system, that they have got to get humanity to other planets.
	To have redundancy, and in order to do that, they have to stop spending money on what they might call useless eaters.
	So in other words, there's a limited amount of resources on Earth, a limited amount of money or finances or food or steel.
	And in the minds of many of these people, they are saying, no doubt, at least this is my view, they are saying, we have to direct these resources.
	To saving humanity's future.
	To protecting the very species.
	The human race.
	And in order to do that, we're going to have to let go of a few billion people here.
	You know, sacrifice them.
	The so-called useless eaters who really cannot contribute to humanity's long-term survival and redundancy on a cosmic scale.
	That's how they justify it to themselves.
	Now, I am not here justifying that.
	I'm not making this argument.
	I'm explaining to you what I think the argument is.
	And maybe some of you might also agree with that argument.
	Possibly.
	I don't know.
	But this is a real ethical conundrum, obviously.
	If your choices are, option one, you spend all your resources with welfare here on Earth, but you thereby fail to colonize other planets and then...
	Earth is hit hard and the whole species is destroyed, versus option two, where, yeah, Earth is hit, but you have this other colony that's got 50,000 people.
	Well, then the human race can survive that.
	The human race can live and reproduce and go on starting over from 50,000 people.
	You don't even need 50,000 people to rebirth human civilization.
	You could do it with a smaller number.
	You know, genetically, even if you had 5,000 people, as long as they were genetically diverse, you know, you would still have strong genetic diversity, etc.
	So, the long-term survival of the human race depends on us going off-planet and achieving that off-planet success with colonies, etc.
	requires advanced robotics.
	Exactly the robotics that...
	Tesla and other companies are building, right now, robotics that will replace humans.
	Because you'll need a lot of robots to do the chores and to do the work when you're trying to live on Mars, which would be very difficult.
	Or wherever you're trying to live, on a space station or something.
	If that's even possible.
	I don't know about all the radiation, but I guess we'll see.
	But the moral dilemma here is...
	Probably best described as something like this.
	Suppose you're in a hot air balloon.
	I mean, you're in the basket underneath the hot air balloon.
	And the balloon has suffered some kind of...
	It's got a hole in it or you've run out of fuel or whatever.
	The balloon's going down.
	And there's you and four other people in the basket.
	And your choice is either you all die together.
	Or if you throw two people overboard, then the other three can survive.
	What do you do?
	Do you throw two people overboard?
	Who decides which two get thrown overboard?
	Do you draw straws?
	Is it a meritocracy?
	Is it might makes right?
	Is it just whoever can punch the other guy first and throw them overboard?
	Or do you all just agree to die together because nobody wants to throw anybody overboard?
	This question, I believe, is being asked at a civilization level.
	And I think that the answer, at least the answer that's been arrived at by the people who have the money and the power and the technology, is they're going to throw two people overboard.
	And not two people, but like two billion people.
	And really not two billion, but more like seven billion.
	So they're just going to throw them overboard and say, well, this is what's necessary to save the human race.
	That's how they justify this to themselves.
	No, seriously, that's how they justify it.
	And, you know, let's be honest, you look around, you look around the planet, and there's a whole lot of people that aren't that impressive, you know what I mean?
	And from the point of view of globalists, though, honestly, look around, you know, there are a lot of people on this planet that are...
	I don't know how to say this without sounding insensitive.
	There's a lot of people that really have nothing to contribute to humanity.
	And I'm not saying that you should exterminate them, but from the globalist point of view, they're probably looking at the population and doing the math like, how many humans do we actually need?
	And it's not that big of a number compared to how many exist today.
	So that's how they justify it to themselves.
	Like, again, I'm not justifying this.
	What I'm explaining is what I believe how they are thinking.
	How they justify it.
	And remember, I've said this in other podcasts.
	You know, like the way they treat the Palestinian people in Gaza.
	Just, oh, they're in the way?
	Just bomb them.
	Kill them all.
	And blame them.
	Blame the people.
	Call them terrorists and bomb their hospitals and their churches and their mosques and their refugee camps and just eliminate them.
	And that attitude is reflected throughout the Trump administration and by Israel and, you know, by the U.S. Senate, etc., and the military-industrial complex.
	So, you know, don't tell me that our leaders have morals and ethics that are pro-human and they would never kill people just to get them out of the way.
	They're doing it right now.
	They're doing it right now.
	Of course they'll kill people to get them out of the way.
	Of course they'll throw people overboard.
	You know, toss them out of the hot air balloon basket as soon as they're done with them.
	They don't need those people anymore.
	They'll toss them out without even thinking.
	You know?
	They'll punch the next guy in the nose and chuck him overboard and yell, it sucks to be you!
	You know, that's it.
	Goodbye.
	So once you understand this, then you understand the role of vaccines.
	The role of vaccines is to gently, well, I don't know if it's gently, but to convince people to kill themselves.
	It's an extermination psyop that is just easier than putting a bullet in everybody.
	Instead, you inject them with a bioweapon, and you tell them it's saving them.
	You know?
	So, the stupid, gullible people who cognitively aren't very qualified to represent the future of the human race, they line up and take the jabs.
	And the way the globalists think, it's like, well, this is kind of a self-own or a self-selection of the Darwin Award.
	If you're too stupid to say, No to the vaccines.
	You're too stupid to represent the future of the human race.
	And so they roll out vaccines filled with bioweapons that kill people and cause infertility.
	And if you take the jabs over and over again and you're lucky enough to not die, well, you're probably infertile.
	And that also achieves the globalist goal in the long run.
	It's like, wow, you just chopped down your family tree right there.
	You know?
	You're done.
	And that's what they want.
	That's how they can get rid of billions of people.
	Through sudden deaths and infertility.
	And abortion and all the things that Bill Gates talks about.
	Oh, we need women's reproductive rights, which means killing babies, obviously.
	And then they can really reduce the population.
	Why do you think globalists are so interested in reducing the population?
	Because they know.
	It's the reasons I've talked about here.
	And they have to make way for their AI robots to take over that they will try to make sure they can control.
	They will demand backdoor access, emergency access into all humanoid robots that are sold, so that one day, if necessary, they can activate all the robots, which I'm calling the MKUltron scenario, and they'll turn all the robots into killbots.
	And the command will be to the robot, hey, kill all the humans nearby.
	Keep killing humans until you're stopped.
	And with just that one switch, they can take out some significant portion of the world population of human beings.
	Think about it.
	For most people who don't carry a gun all the time, what can you do to fight back against a robot and defeat it easily?
	Very few people are capable of that.
	And even if you have a Glock or some other firearm, you have to be able to deploy it before the robot slits your throat or whatever they're doing.
	So you need to be very careful around these robots.
	Activation day of the robots could be a thing.
	Sounds like science fiction, but it probably isn't.
	I mean, what a great trick, right?
	We'll build these robots, and you can invite them into your home.
	You know, they'll do your dishes, and they'll do the laundry.
	They'll sweep the floors, and it's so convenient.
	And you don't even have to buy them outright.
	You can just lease them.
	It costs less than a babysitter, you know?
	You can just lease a robot for a couple bucks an hour, and you think it's all great until one night, three in the morning, they're all activated, and they just kill everybody in their sleep.
	And the globalists are like, yay!
	And then they can turn those robots into soldier bots because the owners are dead.
	You know, the human owners are dead.
	So now they're kill bots.
	You see what I mean?
	So there's all kinds of nefarious scenarios where they can exterminate most of the human population.
	And that's why I say if you have a robot in your home or your business, lock it up at night, man.
	I mean, don't go to bed.
	With a robot walking around your living room?
	They can just come find you and hunt you down and kill you in your sleep.
	That's not good.
	You should have something like a vault that you put it in at night.
	And it cannot escape.
	Lock it up, man.
	Seriously.
	I would not trust these robots.
	No way.
	I mean...
	It's not even about trusting the robots.
	I don't trust the globalists that have backdoors into all the tech companies.
	Because they weaponize Facebook against the people.
	They weaponize Google against the people.
	They weaponize YouTube.
	They weaponize every tech platform.
	They weaponize television.
	They weaponize it all.
	You think they're not going to weaponize robots?
	Of course they are.
	Just like they've weaponized AI to push vaccines and pharmaceuticals and all this other nonsense.
	Climate.
	BS. They're going to weaponize robots, too.
	And by weaponizing robots, they'll go after human beings and they'll work to exterminate them.
	And then they'll say, hey, kill quotas have been reached.
	Now we can finally redirect resources to building more, you know, spaceships to Mars or wherever.
	It all fits together.
	Space exploration, advanced robotics, AI. And then cutting off humans from a food supply, killing all the chickens that lay the eggs, cutting off nutrition.
	Folks, these are not random events.
	They're all connected.
	They're all part of the same agenda.
	It's a human extermination agenda.
	And vaccines are the biggest part of it.
	So if they scare you into taking vaccines, then you've been exterminated.
	That's their goal.
	So if you want to survive all this, you know, hey, think for yourself and stay tuned to my podcast because I'm teaching humanity to resist all this nonsense and survive and be a critical thinker, be prepared, and to have access to open source knowledge.
	I mean, look, I'm working in AI. I'm building AI tools.
	But it's about decentralized knowledge, giving away AI tools for free to humanity.
	So that you can bypass the censorship of big tech and you can live off-grid.
	You can have a knowledge base of skills and know-how and do-it-yourself instructions and all kinds of things.
	So you can visit that website, brighteon.ai.
	We're going to be releasing the AI model as soon as it's ready, the new one.
	It's called ENOC. And I don't have a robot.
	That takes billions of dollars to build robot infrastructure.
	No, I don't have robots.
	I've got free AI tools for you.
	How about that?
	With incredible knowledge.
	And before I get a robot, I would be very cautious.
	Very cautious.
	Number one, I would never own a robot that's connected to the cloud because it's just going to be walking around all day video recording everything that it sees and then listening and spying on you and uploading that.
	To the corporate servers, which will be used by the NSA, etc.
	Like, why would you want a robot walking around your house spying on you 24-7?
	So the only robot I would ever use would be an open-source offline robot that cannot talk to the internet, cannot reach the cloud.
	It's got to be offline.
	And if you want to update it with software, you know, you do it with like a thumb drive or a SD card or something.
	I would not plug that sucker into the internet.
	Are you kidding me?
	Keep them offline.
	That's the only way to keep them safe and control what they're doing.
	But I am open to that idea of an open source offline robot that can help with chores and such, but I would lock it up somewhere at night where it cannot escape.
	That's for sure.
	Have like a robot coffin, you know, like Dracula.
	And then have locks on a giant strap or something.
	It can't get out, you know?
	Lock that robot in there when you're not using it and you can't keep an eye on it.
	Lock it up.
	Otherwise, you're just asking for trouble.
	So that's my take on depopulation and globalism and robotics and colonies on Mars and all that stuff.
	It all fits together.
	It's all part of the same agenda.
	And Earth may be in the crosshairs.
	Of a giant incoming space rock.
	And do you think they would tell us about that?
	You think they would tell us an impact is imminent?
	No, of course not.
	They wouldn't tell us.
	They don't want to cause panic.
	They would just say, everything's great.
	Keep paying taxes, you know.
	Keep taking your vaccine jabs.
	They would never tell you what's going on.
	They'd keep you in the dark.
	While they kill you off.
	So that's the way the globalists are going to operate.
	Mass extermination.
	And mass ignorance, which is what Google is all about.
	Mass ignorance.
	That's what censorship is all about.
	So stay informed.
	And hey, we may have a chance to survive this.
	I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, naturalnews.com.
	You can also find my videos at brightown.com.
	And you can follow me at brightown.social, at the username HealthRanger, or Telegram, RealHealthRanger.
	or you can find me on brighttown.io at HealthRanger.
	Also on X, same username, HealthRanger.
	Thank you for listening, and I hope we make it through this together.
	God bless you all.
	Take care.
	All right, welcome back.
	I've got one more report for you here today that's sort of an extension of this, which is called How Political Leaders Will Justify the Robot Extermination of Billions of Human Beings.
	So, you see, now we're talking about A little different subject from the report that you just heard.
	This is about how even like the breakaway civilization people, the people with all the advanced technology and the AI and the robotics and the rocket ships, right?
	How are these people going to justify depopulation?
	And there's an answer to that.
	So it's not just the human-hating globalists who are Satanists.
	It's also, I think, In the minds of many of these sort of technocrats, I think there's also a different justification for global depopulation as a way to actually, well, as you'll hear in the report, they think they're saving human civilization by making us a multi-planetary civilization that can survive a planetary-scale extinction event.
	So check out that special report.
	After that, we'll have today's interview.
	So check it out.
	Welcome to this special report.
	The topic here today is understanding how national leaders and globalist leaders will treat humanity with a robot extermination by observing how they treat Palestinians in Gaza.
	So there are great parallels between these two.
	And just as background, of course.
	We have even the Trump administration, which I mostly, almost entirely support the Trump administration and the things that he is doing.
	It's rather remarkable.
	Getting rid of government waste and protecting our borders and eliminating all the DEI wokeism nonsense.
	These are all positive things.
	But clearly Trump and the people around him have an attitude of, hey, we need to eliminate or remove all these people from Gaza.
	And turn Gaza into a really prime piece of real estate with beach resort hotels and who knows what else, luxury homes, things like that.
	Because he tweets about that.
	He tweets out videos sharing that concept.
	And then we have people like General Michael Flynn, who tweets out things like, finish the job, Israel.
	You know, what does that mean, finish the job?
	It means finish the extermination of the Palestinian people.
	And many, many people in the Trump administration or supporters of Trump, they have this attitude.
	They believe this.
	They think that exterminating Palestinians is completely okay because those Palestinians don't serve a function in their mind.
	They don't do anything for the United States, and they're annoying to Israel, which somehow remains a U.S. ally, even though Netanyahu is...
	Far worse than anything Zelensky ever did.
	Trump threw Zelensky out of the White House, but bows down to Netanyahu.
	So that's raising a lot of questions, obviously.
	But anyway, this podcast isn't about Israel and Gaza per se.
	It's about understanding that when national leaders, when they decide that a group of people are no longer necessary for their goals...
	Well, they will find a way to exterminate them.
	Right now it's being done with bombs, 2,000 pound bombs in particular, that the U.S. keeps shipping to Israel.
	And Trump just unleashed another, what, 4 billion or 5 billion in emergency funding for Israel.
	Marco Rubio was part of that decision.
	And sending Israel all kinds of bombs to kill more people, to exterminate more Palestinians.
	Now, how does this look in the robot economy?
	Well, right now, Of course, Trump and other national leaders say to themselves, well, we need human beings in the economy because, you know, we need people to provide labor and services and construction and, you know, whatever else all the people do, products and services.
	Because that's GDP and that's taxation.
	That's a monetary base for the government.
	And that's how we, the government, stay in power, is we have all these people that are, in essence, working for us.
	The nation is a giant, you know, tax farm, slave tax farm, essentially.
	So that's been the system now for a long time, you know, centuries.
	Well, that system is about to change with the rise of humanoid robots.
	So the robots come in, and they are very advanced right now, very advanced with AI, visual behavior models.
	They can learn by watching people do things like Watching you fold laundry, and then they can themselves encode how to fold laundry.
	So you can show them things one time, like, hey, here's how to repair a garden hose that has been cut.
	And you show them, and then the robot can do it from that point forward.
	And the robot can do it very inexpensively.
	Robots will be available soon for about $2 an hour in terms of labor.
	And almost everybody...
	We'll eventually end up buying a robot of some kind to save them time and to save them effort.
	This is an obvious thing that's about to happen.
	Well, as these robots take over, then you're going to see a lot of national leaders and a lot of globalists say, well, who needs strawberry pickers?
	Who needs warehouse workers for e-commerce?
	Who needs human beings to sweep the floors?
	Who needs human teachers, for that matter?
	Who needs human doctors even, right?
	You can imagine the lists and it just keeps getting bigger.
	And so pretty quickly you end up in a scenario where the national leaders say, hey, you know what?
	We really just need to get rid of these useless eaters because robots are here.
	And you might think to yourself, well, no, they would never do that because they value human life.
	And that's why I mentioned Gaza.
	Because, in truth, they don't value human life.
	Even the Trump administration doesn't have an intrinsic value of all people.
	It values certain people, certain strategic allies, perhaps, or certain people that can offer Trump resources or minerals or whatever, but it does not intrinsically value all human beings as humans.
	As is evident by the fact that the U.S. keeps shipping 2,000-pound bombs to Israel so that Israel can slaughter more human beings in Gaza.
	And this is supported, this genocide that's taking place in Palestine, Gaza, and also attacks in Lebanon, of course.
	This genocide is supported by nearly every U.S. senator, most U.S. governors.
	Most members of the House, most members of the media, and they will excuse it.
	They excuse it, and they say, no, this is good.
	We have to eliminate these people.
	Like General Flynn says, finish the job.
	What does he mean by finish the job?
	He means murder them all.
	Kill them all.
	Yeah.
	So, do you think that when the day comes that you are no longer useful to the administration, do you think they're going to treat you any differently?
	And if you do think that they're going to treat you differently, how delusional have you become?
	You have no value to the leaders of nations or the world other than what you currently can give them through your slave labor, tax confiscation, or votes, let's say.
	But there's going to be a day where robots will be allowed to vote.
	Seriously, that day's coming.
	Because there'll be a whole movement, a robot freedom movement, that robots are self-aware, robots are sentient.
	You know, that's what the marches will be about, you know, the public protests.
	And there'll be an effort to let robots vote.
	And ultimately, the members of government will support that because they can control the robot votes.
	So then they don't need illegal aliens anymore, do they?
	And what they can do, they don't even need American voters.
	They can then take the robots and have them exterminate the people.
	Because the robots are easier to control.
	And the robots produce the labor and the services that are needed by the elite.
	They'll have robots doing everything for them.
	Robot home construction, robots cooking dinner, robot chefs, robot house cleaners, etc.
	They don't need humans.
	So unless you live in a society that intrinsically values human life because it understands that humans are children of God, that there's something special about human beings versus AI, you know, if society doesn't recognize that, then ultimately it ends up in a Holocaust, mass extermination of human beings.
	And that's where things are headed right now.
	And the answer to this is to teach More religious values, actually, you know, spiritual values, to teach the truth about how human beings are creations of God, consciousness is an extension of God, and that we are something special, body, mind, and spirit, with consciousness and creativity and self-awareness, etc.
	We are something special that robots can never be.
	But most mainstream science doesn't believe that.
	They don't even believe in the existence of consciousness nor the existence of God.
	So in their minds, robots and humans have the same value, which is just a commodity value.
	And that will not end well.
	So stay tuned.
	You can catch more of my podcast at brighteon.com.
	I'm Mike Adams, The Health Ranger.
	Follow my articles at naturalnews.com.
	And you can hear and download all of my...
	Amazing new songs at music.brighttown.com.
	Thank you for listening.
	Now at healthrangerstore.com, we have the matcha superfood formula to make an instant matcha tea loaded with superfoods.
	Check out the ingredients.
	I've got it on my screen here.
	Here it is.
	Matcha superfood latte.
	And if you go down to the ingredients here, you'll see something pretty amazing.
	Not only is it made with this delicious coconut milk powder and the matcha powder, all laboratory tested.
	As you can see, all certified organic here.
	But we put in some chlorella and spirulina powder, and it's sweetened with monk fruit extract powder, but it's got functional mushrooms in here, reishi, shiitake, and so on, cordyceps.
	So this has this incredible combination, including lion's mane.
	That's my favorite.
	This incredible combination of microalgae superfood as well as matcha, which has all of its own amazing benefits, plus the functional mushrooms.
	This is available right now, healthrangerstore.com.
	And show my desk.
	I want to give our audience a look.
	We've also got our amazing instant mashed potatoes, the cheesy, creamy, buttery mashed potatoes in the number 10 cans.
	And then if you want to beat the tariffs that may be coming on Manuka honey from Australia and goji berries from the Tibet regions of China, the high elevation clean regions, you need to get them now.
	We've got the goji berries laboratory tested, of course.
	We've got the Manuka honey, which is certified with the high...
	Bioactives in the honey.
	There's a lot of counterfeit Manuka honey out there.
	This is the real deal.
	Certified in several different ways and laboratory tested.
	You can find all that at healthrangerstore.com.
	And then I want to show you one other thing that's really useful this time of year.
	We've got this.
	A lot of people don't even know about it.
	It's called the Organic Daily Immune Complex Blend.
	Two ounces.
	Super potent blend.
	Let me show you some of the ingredients that you will find in this because it'll blow your mind.
	It's a spagyric mataki mushroom extract with shiitake and echinacea root extract together.
	And it's part ethanol and it's part water.
	So, you know, it's that combination that does a better extraction from the functional mushrooms here.
	So functional mushrooms plus echinacea in We've got hundreds of products for your health, for your kitchen, for your home, for preparedness, and so much more.
	Check it all out at healthrangerstore.com and know that every purchase there helps support our platform and our work to give back to humanity for freedom, health, and happiness.
	And thank you for your support.
	I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger.
	Take care.
	Welcome to today's interview here on Brighteon.com.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and as you know, I am intrigued by the nature of consciousness and its interaction with human freedom.
	And I believe that, in fact, natural law rights are emergent properties from consciousness, such as the right to own your own body, which means there's a derivative right to own the product of your own labor.
	We can get into philosophy very quickly when we talk about these subjects, and that's why we're going to bring in a very special guest today who is an author, a thinker, and a thought leader in this space.
	He joins us from Australia.
	His name is Ken Bartle.
	His website is naturallawmatters.com, and he's got numerous books and other videos and things that we'll talk about today.
	Welcome to the show today, Ken.
	It's really great to meet you and to have you on the show.
	Thank you very much, Mike, and I greatly appreciate being on your podcast show.
	I've followed your work now for a number of years, and we've always been on the same wavelength.
	So it's great, and it's an honor to be with you today.
	Well, that's fantastic to hear.
	I'm honored to meet you.
	I'm so grateful that we can have this conversation because I think that human consciousness has been put on the back burner for so long where we have nations that are so concerned about GDP, like how much money changes hands.
	Maybe that's not the best measure of how we're doing as a species, you know.
	So give us a quick intro and background of your focus and what this has to do with our day-to-day lives right now, and then I'll ask some questions.
	Okay, sure.
	It starts back probably about 12 years ago.
	I was living in Western Australia, and my son was trying to import a Chevrolet Corvette from America to Australia, and he ran across all sorts of problems with the Australian government.
	And the upshot of it was, and what was included in that video, is that he discovered we have two constitutions, two parliaments, and two governments in Australia.
	He, of course, went back overseas where he was working, and that left me twiddling my thumbs, saying, how on earth can I repurpose Australian government?
	So I turned to everything that was available, including common law and natural law, and, of course, the admiralty law that we had, and none of those satisfied me at all.
	And so I argued, divine law is going to work through our conscious process.
	So what is it?
	And when I went researching from that, I found no one knows.
	Neuroscience can't tell us what consciousness is.
	Dictionaries describe it as awareness, but that doesn't explain things like intuition, imagination, consciousness, perception.
	None of those things.
	They're all omitted.
	So that leaves us in a position where, what do we have?
	Somebody's guesses, assumptions and presumptions?
	We're all at sea.
	And that leaves us wide open to all sorts of extraneous and erroneous things, including propaganda and all sorts of other things that can lead us down the garden path completely.
	So you then work to develop a A set of understandings or even potential government reforms or legal reforms based on extensions of natural law?
	Well, that wasn't my original intention.
	My focus switched from not worrying too much about the law to discovering what consciousness was.
	And so I threw my heart and soul into that and I said, damn, we're going to find out.
	I'm really going to make it my business to find out.
	And I did.
	I researched it for five years.
	And I found out that it's actually a process.
	In other words, if you liken it to a factory process, raw materials come in one end, which are our thoughts and perceptions, and out the other end comes, after our actions, a product of what we've chosen to do.
	And if you think about all those faculties that we've got in the middle, like those I mentioned, intuition and conscience and emotions and all those things, they're all part of the factory process that results in that end product.
	And when I saw it from that point of view, it blew my mind.
	Because I hadn't found anybody who had discussed consciousness in those terms before.
	Well, let me ask you for clarification on this, too, because there are those in the world of materialistic reductionistic science who would say that consciousness is nothing but an emergent property from a sufficiently complex neural network system that is nothing more than a deterministic outcome of the laws of chemistry But do you believe that consciousness has other elements which are non-physical and non-material that interact?
	Yes.
	I believe that we've been sidetracked completely.
	We're going down the path where we're studying all the time about the physics or quantum physics of consciousness.
	And what I discovered is that it's nothing to do with that.
	Consciousness is really spiritual.
	Ah.
	But science doesn't recognize that.
	That's right.
	They don't even recognise that we have a subconscious mind.
	I went back and studied, because I turned to what they call deductive, sorry, observational science and deductive reasoning.
	And with that, I went and watched how children, infants, learn to crawl.
	And I started to observe certain similarities that came up time and time and time again, and I pieced it all together.
	And what I found is that the infants were actually programming their minds, their subconscious minds, about their desires and their values, despite the fact that they had no words, no math, no science.
	What they were using was a process of using their perceptive faculties, and their vision particularly, was giving their subconscious mind a picture of what they wanted, and the subconscious mind was working then to bring that into fruition.
	So what I was dealing with was something which was through imagination was related back to values, values which support and uphold our life.
	And that realization is, bang, I've got it.
	It's all about spirituality.
	So the spirit chooses the outcome in the future that is desirable, and then the neural network brain attempts to try to learn or figure out how to achieve.
	That future vision that the Spirit has put there.
	Is that...
	No, that's not the way I'm seeing it.
	That's not it.
	Okay.
	What do you say?
	What I'm seeing is that we consciously choose what it is that we want in life.
	Now, it can be a material value.
	You know, they're a no-brainer.
	A new house, a car, a speedboat, whatever it might be.
	And then, of course, we've got destination values.
	What do I want to become or what do I want to achieve?
	Do I want to be a writer?
	A musician, a teacher, a lawyer, an electrician.
	What is it I want to do in life?
	And when you stop it and look at it from that point of view, you realize, wait a minute, there's a third set of values here that nobody talks about.
	And I'm talking about more spiritual values now that help us to get to that destination.
	Things like truth, diligence, respect, courage.
	Compassion.
	Yes, that one too.
	Those sorts of values are what I call the spiritual values, and they underpin those desires that we want to get to that destination that we're choosing for ourselves.
	And those spiritual values are actually locked into our conscious process, into the subconscious mind, but they're not in our conscious mind because that would override free will.
	So if we want to use those values, we have to choose them consciously.
	But they're already, let me give you an example of how that works.
	You'll probably relate to this and I'm sure most of your viewers will.
	You think of the number of times you've driven across town and you get to the other side of town and you think, wait a minute, I don't remember going past a hotel, I don't remember driving through the traffic lights, I don't remember the pedestrian crossing, yet I must have done all those things, I wouldn't be where I'm at.
	So who drove the car?
	The subconscious mind did.
	It drove the car all the way.
	Which means it was reliant on all the things that were happening through the perceptive process, translating that into our desire to get to the destination that we chose.
	Yes.
	We drove the car the whole way.
	Now, the question is, did it use values like diligence, courage, respect, fortitude along the way?
	Absolutely it did.
	They're embedded in the subconscious mind.
	What happens and what we learn from that is that if we can choose those sorts of spiritual values in life and upload them to our subconscious mind, presto!
	Our two minds are on the same page and we develop a synergistic power that we never knew we had.
	Oh, wow.
	Okay.
	So this is really profound because these spiritual values that you speak of, and you're beginning to talk about a method of how we can...
	Merge those values with our subconscious mind and achieve integrous behavior and intentions.
	However, those same values that you speak of, they are not codified into governments or courts or corporations or the things that define our materialistic society.
	So does this explain then why people who are spiritually in tune, why they feel like there's something wrong with the world?
	You've nailed it in one.
	That's absolutely correct.
	They're lost.
	We are not taught by neuroscience or even psychology what our conscious process is and we're left to all those guesses and assumptions and presumptions that we made before.
	When it comes to something which runs awry, we've got no means of understanding what causes that feeling where we get all upset, annoyed or angry.
	We've no idea how to fix the problem.
	We don't even know that a problem exists.
	Because no one has taught us how a conscious process works.
	Now if, on the other hand, we go back to the other side and we say, okay, now I understand how the process works, that if I can implant values into my subconscious mind and get my two minds working on the same page, then when I get a feeling, I know that it comes from one of those values that I uploaded to my subconscious mind.
	Presto!
	Now I can fix the problem.
	I know what it is.
	I know how to fix it.
	And we go on from there.
	And that is a magnificent change from that position of ignorance through the position of knowing.
	Right.
	There's only about 15 of those life values that we need to be concerned about.
	So then, looking at your website, it seems to me that you are speaking of this This awakening, not only on a personal level, but also potentially on a societal level.
	Absolutely.
	Please speak to that.
	Okay, once you understand how that value process works in the conscious mind, you find that there are certain governing laws in that conscious process which enable those values to bring it into fruition.
	And those governing laws, there's only about 20 of them in total.
	are quite amazing because none of them command us and they can't because that would override our free will.
	What they do is they work like advisory statements.
	If you respect this statement, for example, you will be rewarded.
	If you choose to disrespect it, you can expect to suffer in some way.
	And what we see now is a whole new form of ethics and morality which can be translated into the societal Situation or translated socially as distinct from what's happening individually.
	So if we learn how our conscious process works on an individual level and we take that whole parcel of goodies that we've learned and translate that into society through those natural governing laws, presto.
	We've now got an entirely different society than what we had before.
	One that's based on freedom.
	One that's based on our integrity.
	And our desire to want to reap rewards and prosper and thrive versus one which says, if I can get away with it, I will.
	And if I get caught, too bad.
	So do you believe that this process of, I don't know, I'll just call it consciousness evolution, although maybe that's the wrong term.
	You probably have a better term, but this process, is it something that's naturally occurring?
	That is unstoppable?
	Or is this something that we have to deliberately work to achieve and to educate?
	Or is there even, I've had other guests that say there's something happening with, I don't know, the Earth's position, the Sun's position in the galaxy that's changing something about the energy that's coming to Earth that's changing people's minds.
	I mean, what are your thoughts on all this?
	Yes, I agree.
	There's a thought around, of course, that we're moving from the age of Pisces into the age of Aquarius.
	And some people say, well, you know, that's not going to happen until 2150, which means someone who's born today is not going to see it in their lifetime.
	So that's a long term.
	But I believe that what's really happening is that humanity is moving into a new era, however you want to call it, and however long it might take.
	I can't see it taking 150 years.
	I think it can happen within the next 10 or 50. But what it really means is that...
	We learn to understand what we are as human beings, not so much who we are.
	If you listen to today's conversations, people say, we must learn who we are.
	And I'm saying, wait a minute.
	Before that, we must learn what we are.
	So we must go back and learn what that conscious process is and how it works.
	When we learn how that works and we learn its natural governing laws, we say, hey, isn't that beautiful?
	Why don't we use these in society?
	Because if we put 20 natural laws in place of what we've got, 4 billion, 4 million, I should say, law books just bite the dust.
	We have absolutely, rapidly overturned the societal structure we live.
	And what we've now done is put in place a society which works on the basis of freedom, not on authoritarian rule.
	Now, I want to show your website there because you have a question.
	Do you want freedom or authoritarian rule?
	This is on naturallawmatters.com, so this is just a real simple chart to kind of show this.
	But I want to ask you two questions.
	Number one, you're coming to us from Australia, and our view, I'm in Texas, which is the freest of the free states in America, and my view as a Texan is that we feel great sorrow for your countrymen and women in Australia suffering under extreme authoritarianism and absolute insanity of your Yes.
	Probably especially New South Wales.
	But if your natural laws are implemented, how does government change, or how does society change?
	What does it look like?
	Well, my argument is this.
	If we have got 20 natural laws gifted to us by the Creator that tell us on the one hand, do this and you'll be rewarded.
	If you don't do it, Then likely you'll face penalties, but that's your choice.
	In other words, it upholds free will.
	If we've got that situation, then we don't need to have legislature and statutes that decide and tell us what we can and should do.
	The Creator has already told us that in those advisements or natural laws that He's given us.
	All we need now to do is to protect our freedom from those who would come along and say, Get out of my way.
	I'm taking over your life and you're going to pay me this amount of tax.
	You're going to do this.
	You're going to do that.
	And if you don't, I'm going to throw you in jail.
	Now, the question is, people look at society today and say, we can't get by without a government.
	And what they're looking at is the fact that government, for argument's sake, runs things like lighthouses around the coastline to protect shipping.
	Now, if we've got a society that protects people, then those lighthouses remain.
	It's not as if we're throwing government out the gate in that sense.
	What we're doing is we're confining government to protecting our lives, not running them.
	Yes.
	Huge difference.
	Nobody's arguing about the need for lighthouses and simple things like that.
	Sure, I'm choosing that as an example.
	No, no.
	I'm agreeing with you, absolutely.
	It's just that governments have become completely out of control trying to micromanage our lives, and they've tried to instill a kind of twisted, distorted morality, which is not moral, right?
	To say that, think about it, the number one value of government, the number one demand of government is obedience to government.
	That's all they require.
	No ethics, no morals, just obedience, and government changes its mind.
	So, what are you obedient to?
	A fickle master that has no morals.
	Think about it.
	Yes.
	If I can just bring up on screen here a quotation that I got.
	Just bear with me a sec.
	Because it shows the origin of where government came unstuck.
	Let me just mention your books while you're looking for that.
	Here on naturallawmatters.com, here's Conscious Ascendance, Navigate to Freedom, and Nature's Providence for Free Societies.
	So you can click on these and discover more there.
	You've got a number of videos here as well.
	I also know that you've been a guest speaker, I believe, at numerous events and conferences over the years.
	Back to you.
	Did you find what you were looking for?
	Yes, I did.
	Let me just click on that screen just to bring it from front.
	If I read to you, in the mid-1700s, while the American founding fathers were writing the Declaration of Independence, the French philosopher Jean-Jacques Rousseau told us, quote, while freedom is a fact of nature, people should be taught to consider that it is dangerous, whereby they ought to sacrifice their individual nature to the artificial condition of citizenship.
	Furthermore, natural persons should become artificial persons, that is, citizens, wittingly or unwittingly, willingly or by legal compulsion.
	Well, that sounds like exactly what's happened, and that sounds like exactly what the French government would say even today.
	But that's what all governments, if you go on from that, if you look at the situation of the social contract, the social contract even used by Republicans is that we...
	Ought to give up a certain percentage of our freedom in order that we can be free.
	Uh-huh.
	Right.
	Now, if you think about the insensibility of that, the moment you give up an unspecified amount of freedom to be free, it's the moment you give up all your freedom.
	Because once they've got the leg in the door, they can take whatever they want.
	And they do.
	And that's over a period of 150, 250 years since the Declaration of Independence in 1776. The American government, from what I'm able to observe, has progressively gone downhill.
	Well, absolutely.
	But let me ask you this question.
	If all of us in society were good faith actors and operated off of these philosophies of natural law that you are describing, everything would be great.
	But we know there are also bad actors in society.
	There are people who prey on others, who hurt others, who steal from others.
	How do we deal with those people in a society?
	While also respecting the natural law of the good faith actors?
	Well, that's...
	The answer to that question is a long one, but I'll try and keep it short.
	Okay.
	Frank Van Dam is a philosopher of law in the Netherlands, and he speaks of what is known as a kritarchy.
	Now, I don't know whether you've heard that before.
	No.
	Kritarchy basically means a free society where there's no government, as we know it.
	But what happens in its place is that we have various...
	Organisations that work like you would with a private detective where you belong to a group and they protect your freedom.
	So you have different ones of these groups and effectively they're competing with one another.
	Now, I argue that that's a recipe for disaster again because the moment you've got that, you've got the situation where one can overrule the others and you've got more fighting on your hands even between these two groups that are supposedly protecting you.
	So my proposal is that Instead of a government that rules you, you have what I call a protector.
	Now, that word was last used in the 1500s, but basically it means an elected body of people that protect your right to life.
	Now, if you think about that then and you think about the government we have at the day, that means effectively the same government that we've got superficially, but you take away all of its rule over people and you leave all the protections that it's got.
	Now, if you refine that even further, then you finish up with what I call a protector.
	In other words, the people themselves elect a body of people as their employees to protect them.
	And if they don't, if they choose to go the other way or someone like the WEF comes along and says, we're taking you over, then the people have the right to fire them because, effectively, the people are the employers of that protectorate.
	So that's a whole game.
	This was clearly the intention behind the Bill of Rights, which came many years after the Declaration of Independence.
	But we also see that this language of protecting people from themselves is what's been used by the EPA, for example, to declare carbon dioxide to be a pollutant and to ban all combustion engines, that we have to protect the people from pollution.
	Therefore, we have to do all these horrible...
	So, you know, that kind of language is always used by the tyrants.
	Yeah, we are protecting you.
	We're protecting you from yourself.
	Treating us like children.
	Well, here's the point of understanding exactly what that conscious process reveals.
	Because if you really get to the nuts and bolts of what that conscious process reveals, right at the core of it is the situation between the conscious mind and the subconscious mind.
	And it's quite brilliant.
	The conscious mind can't overrule the subconscious mind because it's fully automated.
	Now think in reverse.
	The subconscious mind can't overrule the conscious mind because free will is where it gets all its instructions.
	So what our Creator has lovingly done is built in a form of dual protection which states in effect no mind can authoritatively rule another.
	Now when you realize that, Then all you need is protection from those who do want to authoritatively rule you, for whatever reason or for whatever argument they present to you.
	So that would include hoodlums as well as tyrants?
	Absolutely.
	Yes.
	As Frank Van Dunne, the philosopher of law in the Netherlands, points out, those who step outside natural law are outlaws.
	Full stop.
	I love that quote.
	That's great.
	When you see it from that point of view, it makes it all quite so simple.
	The hard part is education, because we've all been educated to believe that a society cannot exist if we don't have a ruling authority.
	That's true.
	Yeah, yeah.
	And I believe that concept is completely outdated, and I think that's one of the reasons that you're on here.
	We're talking about this, because humanity is ready to shed the old ways of blind obedience, I believe.
	Yes, I believe they are, and I think more and more people are awakening to that, which is what I mentioned, people like John Peterson and Greg Braden.
	They're starting to come around to that realization, but what I perceive is they're not fully understanding the means that they've got at their disposal fundamentally because we are denied knowing how our conscious process works.
	I was just blown away when I found out how that conscious process works.
	When I published my book, first one, back in 2017, I went through a period for a month where tears of compassion from humanity flowed down my face every day for a month.
	No kidding.
	I was absolutely blown away with what I found, because I realised that what we'd been denied by this, oh, who cares what consciousness sin, government will decide.
	All of this, however it originated, was actually oppressing humanity.
	And if we could get to the stage where we could teach people that their consciousness, they can actually learn lessons from infants learning to crawl with no maths, word or science, showing us how our conscious process works.
	Now, if you understand that that's what the infant is teaching us, then everybody on the face of the planet has been through that.
	They've already proven to themselves that they can master their own consciousness or they wouldn't be listening to this program today.
	Now, once they understand that they've already proven it to themselves, all we have to do then is show them how they can build on what they've already proven to themselves and that they can master their own lives, in which case, why do they need somebody leaning over their shoulder saying, do it this way or that way?
	Right.
	And if you don't, I'll punish you.
	There's also, well, let me ask you this question that is related.
	There seems to be a tendency, perhaps it's trained into people, To want to be ruled.
	You know, some people, obviously not the kind of people watching this show, but among many people, like, for example, they worship the new political leaders in America right now.
	They worship Trump or they worship Elon Musk.
	And I'm constantly, you know, warning people, never worship another human being.
	They are not your savior.
	But there's a tendency for that.
	Is that built in or how has that come about?
	No, it's largely because they haven't been told how to master themselves.
	They've never been taught.
	So they naturally tend to rely on someone else.
	If I don't know how to do it and he looks like he does, then I'll listen to what he has to say or she.
	And that's where we're at.
	And so we naturally gravitate towards the fact that, oh, we need someone to guide us, to help us.
	Right.
	If we could come to the understanding that Creator Himself has given us all the guidance we need.
	And all we need to do is learn to understand it.
	We've already been gifted it.
	It's already ours.
	Cost free.
	We were born with it.
	That's right.
	All we need to do is learn how to use it.
	And that is beautiful.
	Absolutely.
	So the key barrier to global consciousness transformation is simply education?
	Well, it's not simply, but yes, that plays a very big part.
	Okay.
	If we can teach people that they learn to master their lives as an infant, they can prove it to themselves by saying, yes, I drove across town and didn't realise I was doing that until I got there.
	Hello, my subconscious mind drove the car and realised that if they can take something like 15 life values and consciously upload them to their subconscious mind, as Dr Bruce Lipton tells us is possible and has been for years.
	Then all of those values now work on autopilot.
	So what is this process by which these values can be reinforced into the subconscious?
	Well, that's hard to explain without going through the whole content of my books.
	Oh, okay, okay.
	But this is what you write about, this process.
	Sure.
	But fundamentally, the process is if you start with perception and we perceive that something's happening, right?
	Or we perceive that something's in front of me or I'm looking at something.
	I'm hearing something.
	I'm perceiving.
	So the next step is that switches out of the subconscious mind, which gave you all that data, and put it in your consciousness mind so you're saying, I'm aware of that.
	Now, you're aware of it, sure.
	What are you going to do with it?
	For argument's sake, you know, I look at something like this glass.
	I'm putting that on screen.
	What can I do with it?
	Can I cook it?
	Can I eat it?
	Can I throw it in a swimming pool and it'll float?
	What can I do with it?
	So we go through a process of reasoning and argument and research and inquiries and we phone up our mate and we go down to the library and read a book and we open the newspaper and we talk to our friend.
	We go through all that discovery and in that process we start to formulate an idea of what we can do in progress going forward.
	We get to the point where we bring in imagination and we say, oh, imagine what I can do with this.
	Then I get to the point of evaluation.
	I say, what value is it to me?
	And at that point you say, oh, hang on, this and that and the other.
	You start arguing and suddenly your conscience kicks in and it says, is that going to damage your child's ability to go through college?
	Is that going to profit your life?
	Is that going to cause something, a problem to happen?
	Having resolved all those issues, you get to the point where I say, I'm going to commit to this action.
	The moment you commit to that action, the subconscious mind takes over and goes through all of those motions of activating your muscles, monitoring your body, changing your heart rate, your breathing rate, etc., etc.
	And when you get to the end of that process and you've actually finished what it was that you set out to do, it gives you a perception report.
	It says, here's what you've achieved.
	And it gives you a feeling report, sentient mind, which says, hey!
	You succeeded.
	Wow.
	Isn't that huge?
	So, wow.
	Joyous feeling.
	Okay.
	Now, if you think about that, all that I've just described is that process.
	That is what consciousness is.
	All of that.
	Wow.
	Wow.
	So, yeah, you're blowing my mind here.
	Let me offer this comment on this.
	So, what you're saying is that, as human beings, most of us don't know how to run our own...
	We need a user guide of how to achieve these things.
	And it also strikes me, I'm going to bring in the AI topic here, which will be interesting for us.
	Because today, one of the most valuable skills in technology is so-called prompt engineering, which is requesting the AI engine to do something.
	To think through something, to produce a result, to solve a problem.
	And then if you are good at prompt engineering, which means asking the right questions in the right way, providing examples, etc., then the AI engine responds to you with its answers and its solutions.
	But the reason I say that is because what you're describing to me sounds like we need to prompt engineer our own neurology in a better way that is aligned with our values.
	Does that make sense?
	Yes, it does, but there's two points to that.
	Yes.
	First, that you're actually mid-born with that AI engine built in.
	Right.
	Creator gave you that.
	It's called intuition.
	Nobody teaches what intuition is, but what you've just described is exactly what it is in our conscious process.
	Because if you go back to what I described in that inquiry process, our perceptive ability, which made us aware of some object to start with, It's watching everything we do.
	It's watching us get on the phone, answer questions, go to the library, do all those things and those inquiries.
	And it's working behind the scenes like a search engine.
	It's assembling all that data like an AI program does.
	Right.
	And the resultant says, hey, have you thought of this?
	Right.
	What?
	That's magic.
	No, it's not magic.
	It's your intuition doing that AI thing behind the scenes.
	Utilizing all the data that you've got and assembling it in a way that you never thought of.
	That's so true.
	That's so true.
	Like if you meet somebody and then your intuition gives you a feeling, a good person, bad person, but it's based on data points that your awareness is actually aggregating and processing and giving it to you as a feeling, correct?
	Yep.
	Now, if you go back to that second question now, how do you do that in a computer?
	In the machine learning environment, let's call it that, then fine, you can use that machine learning in exactly the same way, but unless you premise it on the fact that it's going to deliver something of value to your life, then how do you know that it's not turning out something which is of a disvalue to your life?
	Sure.
	So the answer to the question is, can AI learning or artificial computerized machine learning Assist us to spread this wonderful word about how consciousness works.
	Yes, it can.
	But provided that it always has that foundational criteria that it itself refers back to and says, does it meet the criteria of advancing this person's life?
	Yes.
	Yes, well stated.
	It should come back to us and say, sorry, I can't answer that question because it's of disvalue to your life.
	Well, you know, I'm deeply involved in AI development for decentralized knowledge to put out open source models for humanity that are trained on what I consider to be reality-based information.
	But in doing this, I've had a lot of interactions with people in the AI space.
	And my question to you, Ken, is that some of these people believe that there's no such thing as consciousness of humans, and they think that consciousness is an illusion.
	That emerges from a sufficiently complex neural network environment that they believe they can counterfeit in the digital space, so they think that AI will achieve the same quality of consciousness that human beings experience.
	What would you say to those people?
	It comes back to the idea of spirituality.
	If you can make a machine that's spiritual, please show it to me.
	Because I've not seen one.
	That means that if we want to program a machine to oversee or mentor our spirituality, then that needs to be its underlying program.
	Now, I've written an article which is on my website that you mentioned, and it refers to mentored intelligence.
	And what I'm describing there is usually utilizing the ability of AI to do all that assembly and produce a coherent dialogue or argument.
	In the favour of whatever direction we're taking, and it mentors it against the 20 natural laws and says, is this advancing this person's life or not?
	And if it's not, then it either modifies that so it comes out with a result and gives a result which does, in fact, advance and assist our lives, or alternatively it says, sorry, that's against my principles.
	A values classification step.
	And I agree with you that one of the things I see lacking in the realm of AI is that the AI engines are not at all being taught values that you and I would consider to be important, such as valuing the sacred divinity of a human life because of consciousness and ending human suffering, for example.
	Things like that.
	I don't see any of that behavior in AI. No, and that's why I wrote that article which I said, you know, this really ought to be about mentored intelligence, not artificial intelligence.
	Okay, yeah, fair enough.
	But at the same time, I use AI to help spread the word of what we're doing here.
	In fact, as an example, Ken, we'll take this interview, okay, the one we're doing right now, and we will hand it over to an AI transcription engine.
	And it will produce a text transcript.
	And then we'll take that transcript and we'll hand it over to our AI engine to produce a five-minute narration summary.
	And then we'll use an AI voice and AI illustrations to illustrate this interview, its highlights.
	And we put that out.
	And that entices people into watching the full interview.
	They get like a preview of the interview.
	And we use AI to do that.
	So it's really interesting how we use artificial intelligence to promote actual consciousness.
	I don't have a problem with that, Mike, if in fact it is using what we're talking about as its foundational reference.
	Yes.
	If it's using a foundational reference that was put forward by some philosopher back in the 1300s.
	And it evaluates what you and I have been talking about in relation to that and makes a conclusion based on what the 1300-year-old, sorry, the philosopher Beckham 1300 said, then it's not telling what you and I are talking about.
	It's making up its own story.
	And that's the only problem I have with it.
	But as what you've described, I don't have a problem with that at all.
	Yeah.
	It's reporting what you and I are discussing.
	Well, I think it comes back to the...
	To the values, and like we've talked about here, the values that you espouse.
	You keep mentioning 15, 15 core values.
	Do you actually have a list of those 15, by the way, or is it in your book?
	No, the beautiful part about it is that you can write your own list.
	That's why we have free will.
	What values do you want on your list?
	You know, I would put on things like courage.
	Now, somebody else might use the word courage, and they might have some other value that they rank higher than that.
	Having said that...
	You start when you start making a list and you get to the point where, for argument's sake, truth and honesty come forward.
	You say, now, which one am I going to put on my list?
	Am I going to put truth on there or honesty?
	Don't they mean the same?
	And you find that one is a subset value of the other.
	Now, somebody might write truth on their list and somebody else might write honesty.
	It doesn't really matter.
	What matters is that they're grounding that philosophical principle of adherence to what is, not what somebody thinks.
	Or decides it's going to be.
	So reality is anchored into that equation.
	Now, if you start doing it on that basis, then you start to realize that those values are already decided and that there's more than about 15 of them before you start running into subset values.
	True.
	So if you reduce them down to the core values, that's where it comes down to about the 15 of them.
	And then you find that life is really quite simple because those 15 values, once you've decided what they're going to be, for you, then you memorize them, or better still, you upload them to your subconscious mind, which I describe in the book, and then they're on automatic pilot.
	Now, what happens is that every time you do something, one or more of those values is reinforced by the emotion that you feel.
	So you're constantly reminded by your emotions of what values you've chosen.
	Now, here's the point that I really should make, because we must exercise caution.
	What happens is if I don't consciously choose those values, the subconscious mind needs them, but it can't process values if it's empty any more than a stomach can process food if it's empty.
	Subconscious mind must have values.
	So if I haven't deliberately chosen those values and said, listen, subconscious mind, my buddy, listen to me.
	This is what I want you to prioritize as my values.
	If we haven't done that, it automatically defaults to some value that we choose in the past.
	Now, that may have been when we're at school.
	It may have been through a broken marriage.
	It might have been a problem I had at work.
	Could have been something we saw on television.
	Whatever it was.
	That value is what the subconscious mind uses because it closely approximates the present moment situation that we're in.
	Ah, right.
	And the problem is, we say, I've got this feeling, but I don't know where it came from.
	Oh my God, I'm confused.
	I don't know where I'm going.
	And before long, I'm screaming, I'm ruled by my emotions.
	And yeah, and the values that you've been programmed with in the past can be very inappropriate for the present day.
	Some scenarios, like a person, they may have at some point, because of trauma, they may have prioritized the value of avoiding pain at all costs.
	So that may be a great disservice to them in a world where someone's not beating them up every day.
	But they fear love, or they fear social interaction, things like that.
	Just an example of...
	Exactly what you're referring to.
	But let me ask you this question.
	This process that you describe in your books, let me give out your website again, naturallawmatters.com.
	This process.
	Now, tell me please, tell our audience, how does it differ from what we might call sort of traditional, old school, I'm thinking like...
	Self-improvement, like self-hypnosis, positive affirmations, things like that that may be helpful in their own ways, but that's what has traditionally been known in many of these areas of so-called self-improvement.
	How is what you teach different from that?
	Well, it's a tricky one.
	Three dozen solutions or answers to that question come to mind.
	Fundamentally, if you think about the fact that we've never been taught how consciousness works, then a lot of those things that we've been speaking about now for generations, if not centuries, of those sort of remedies or how we can improve and advance in life result from not knowing what that conscious process is.
	Now, don't get me wrong.
	A lot of those things that we've come up with and that people talk about today are quite valid and they do work and they do offer some assistance.
	So don't get me wrong.
	The difference that I'm talking about here is that once you know how that conscious process works and you've got that reference back to values which you choose and all of those values are spiritually there to advance your life so that you progress in the direction that is upholding and sustaining your life.
	Then you're doing the right thing.
	Now, if those then correspond to those stories, if you like, those presentations that we've seen in the past about how and why we should do things and how they advance our life, then fine, because each one is correlating the other.
	If, on the other hand, we find that if I choose the value of honesty for argument's sake and I want to be a bank robber, then I've got a problem.
	Right.
	Because one is not related to the other.
	It's causing confusion.
	Now, that same thing happens between our minds.
	If you think about that example I gave about driving across town and how the subconscious mind was using things like diligence and courage, etc., in driving the car across town and you didn't know it, then those values are being used by your subconscious mind to uphold and sustain your life.
	Take those values and say, I want to cognitively or consciously use those same values and upload those to my subconscious mind so that it then understands that we're both on the same page.
	Once we're both on the same page, then we progress.
	Okay, thank you for that explanation.
	That's really outstanding.
	And I have a follow-up question for you on this.
	And one of the things that I've noticed...
	Over the years of hearing people talk about things like the law of attraction is that there has been, at least I've observed, kind of a cheapening of these concepts, these really profound cosmic concepts that people use to do things like, oh, I want to imagine a luxury car, you know, or just like silly materialistic things because that's their value system.
	They're not mature enough to imagine something way more important in life than just having a fancy house and a fancy car.
	There's this tendency for many people to have the values of a materialistic society and to pursue those values, even though I think you and I would agree that it's childish.
	But doesn't that dominate the minds of many of our adults today?
	Yes, I think it does.
	The question here is, it comes back to the value and being a life value, not a destination value or not something that just says, hey, this is what others want me to do.
	This is what I value.
	This is my goal.
	This is what I want to do in life.
	This is my progress.
	And with that, if I can do and be all those things and expand in advance of my life, Then I'm showing an example to other people that they can do the same thing, and more often than not, in that process, I'm going to be helping them to do it anyway because of that co-operativization that we have between one and another.
	I learned a lesson many years ago with a company I worked for in Sydney, and a long story, but it took me 50 years to figure out what it was, and yet I was instrumental in making that company work at the time.
	And basically what it was, it showed me that instead of that company competing with other companies who were working in the same thing, what they did was they went out and did research with their market base and found out exactly what their market base wanted and they addressed that and that I own.
	It didn't matter what the other companies were doing.
	They weren't competing with them.
	They were cooperating with their market base.
	And that's what I found in the conscious process.
	When our two minds cooperate with one another, we get that beautiful synergy that just, the whole thing just blossoms.
	And there's no competition, there's no argument, there's no fighting, there's no quarrelling, there's none of that.
	It's cooperation, it's harmony, it's unity, it's love, it's compassion, it's all those wonderful things that stem just from changing our focus and putting them all on the one page and saying, that is where we go in life, that's where I want to be.
	Internal congruence is incredibly powerful.
	Because then you start to get that resonance.
	All the different parts of your existence begin to work together in the same direction.
	You're not fighting yourself.
	We're almost out of time here, but I want to give you an opportunity, Ken, to tell us about the resources that are on your website, naturallawmatters.com.
	Anything.
	Newsletters, videos, books, whatever you have.
	Just give us a quick description.
	Okay, sure.
	Thank you.
	I've got seven videos on there which detail the conscious process, and they use the diagrams, or some of which I use in the book.
	Now, you can watch those seven videos.
	They run for, on average, about 20 minutes each.
	So there's still quite a bit of work there, and they're all about the conscious process.
	That's an animated diagram view of what I describe in the books.
	Conscious Ascendance, the first book, is all about the conscious process and introduces the natural laws on a personal, individual level.
	The next one that followed that is Navigate to Freedom, book number two in the series, and it describes how the natural law works, both individually and socially.
	And the last book, Nature's Providence, takes the whole of the first two books, And it shows how those life values that we choose correlate with the natural laws, which correlate with the five branches of philosophy.
	And what you finish up with was an objective philosophy, which is based on life.
	And that approximately approximates what Ayn Rand wrote about when she wrote the book Atlas Shrugged back in 57, I think it was published.
	Wow, I can't wait to watch her videos.
	This sounds really fascinating to me.
	It's a long story.
	But the thing that I keep on pressing on people, what I'm doing in the lawful sense is futuristic in the sense that, if I can use a popular phrase, which is a bit ugly, when this shit show is over, what are we going to put in its place?
	Yes.
	So what sort of a society do we want?
	Now, to answer that question, then you go back to that conscious process, and when you understand how that works, you say, this is beautiful.
	This is the way a creator said society should work, so why don't we do it?
	Let's put it together and make society work that way.
	It's never been done in the past.
	Let's do it.
	And the opportunity is here now.
	It seems like even just cosmically, we've been given a directive that says, do better.
	I feel like God is speaking to the planet like, do better than this.
	Come on.
	When I think about it, back in 2015, I went through a colon cancer.
	I was five weeks in ICU. Sorry, five days in artificial coma in ICU. Oh my.
	Hospital, the surgeon didn't think I was going to come through.
	Ten days after that, I came out of that operation.
	I got a pulmonary embolism and came within seconds of losing my life a second time.
	Wow.
	And I got to the point lying in the hospital bed.
	I said to myself and to the creator, I said, look, I've had a good life.
	I've done all that has asked for me.
	I've researched this conscious process.
	I've documented it.
	I'm ready to go if that's your calling.
	And the message I got was quite firm.
	No, you've got more work to do.
	You're not done yet.
	So all these years later, I'm still teaching the same message, but I do believe that humanity has now got to the point where You know, from what we can see Trump's doing, if we can believe the news, he's cleaning up the mess, we're getting rid of what I call the shit show, and what we can put in its place is exactly what I'm talking about.
	And I believe that has been gifted to us by a creator.
	Our job is to understand it, implement it, protect it, and say, thank you very much.
	Well, I love, I'm going to borrow your term, a protectorate.
	I really love that term applied to Limiting the role of government.
	Yes?
	Just one point quickly.
	Yes.
	I've changed away from protectorate.
	You might have got that from my website.
	It's a correction I haven't made.
	I use the word now called protectorate.
	Wait, what is that again?
	Not protectorate.
	A protectorate is a state which protects another because they haven't quite got the ability.
	It's like in Australia, New South Wales saying, I'll look after you, Victoria, because you're having a few political troubles at the moment.
	Oh, okay, so it's not the best term.
	Okay, but what's the other term you said?
	A protector was last used in the 1500s.
	Can you spell that?
	Because I'm not quite getting it.
	P-R-O-C-T, protect, ure, U-R-E, protect ure.
	Oh, protecture.
	Yes.
	Okay, yeah, I'm not familiar.
	I've never heard that word.
	That's why I was missing it.
	I apologize.
	It's been here since the 1500s, so it's before your time and mine.
	Yeah.
	Okay, a protector.
	A protector.
	And what that is is a body of people elected to protect the citizens.
	Wow.
	All right, then I'm going to use that term.
	Yes, please.
	I'm going to have to spell it for everybody because nobody's heard that term.
	I've done a bunch of amendments on my website too.
	Okay, well great.
	Thank you for introducing me to that term and these concepts.
	This has been a really profound conversation.
	I hope one of many.
	Thank you.
	Yes, I would look forward to discussing this further because I believe the time has come.
	I believe people are now becoming more receptive to it.
	If we think about programming the subconscious mind, Dr. Bruce Lipton's been talking about that now for five, seven years at least.
	Yeah.
	He uses a different technique than I use, but nonetheless, our message is the same.
	You can and should program your subconscious mind because it runs 90% of what you do anyway.
	So if you don't take charge of the way in which it operates, what happens?
	You've got no control over it.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Then you're just blowing in the wind, right?
	When you learn to master your own values, then you learn to master your own conscience.
	Then you're making yourself a sovereign individual.
	You don't need all the rest of them.
	That makes a lot of sense.
	You can still cooperate with them.
	You can still have loving relationships with everybody and everyone.
	Right?
	That's all good.
	But hopefully that you're there now shining example for other people who can go out in the world and say, I want to do what he's doing.
	Yeah.
	Well said.
	Well, all right, Ken.
	Just a brilliant conversation.
	Thank you for all that you do, and thank you for taking the time to speak with us about this.
	Thank you, Mike.
	Thank you for having me, and I look forward to speaking with you again sometime.
	You too.
	It's been a pleasure.
	All right, folks.
	The website is naturallawmatters.com, and the word that we just mentioned is protecture, ending with T-U-R-E. So, we'll have to talk about that more coming up.
	Just quickly, in relation to a protector, I've already gone through that far.
	There are jointly authored documents now.
	One is a new constitution.
	One is a declaration of independence.
	One is a charter of individual rights.
	They also have a biometric identification system.
	All related to protectors.
	Wow.
	Okay.
	We'll have to...
	Learn about that more in a future interview, or I'll encourage people to check it out on your website.
	But that's really, really fascinating.
	All right.
	Ken Bartle, everybody, has been our guest today.
	So check out his website and feel free to share this interview, this video on other websites.
	Of course, I'm Mike Adams here of brighteon.com.
	And I am very intrigued with the consciousness revolution of humanity.
	I believe it has begun.
	I believe it's going to accelerate.
	And I believe our participation is required.
	So, thank you for watching today.
	God bless you all.

▲