Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

July 25, 2024 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:23:58

BBN, July 25, 2024 – PATSY PROGRAM - So far ZERO evidence...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Well, this is one of those days where there's just too much to comment on, but welcome to Brighteon Broadcast News for Thursday, July 25th, 2024.
	I will mostly, of course, be commenting on events from yesterday, Wednesday, when Netanyahu gave a speech to...
	The applause of United States members of Congress who were kissing the ring of a genocidal war criminal.
	That's always interesting.
	Clearly they put Israel first and America last.
	So I've got a special report about that.
	But then on the other side of that, a bunch of pro-Palestine protesters were burning the American flag and marking up monuments with all kinds of horrific graffiti.
	And fighting with police and basically acting very belligerent and not at all mature.
	And I think that's a small taste of things yet to come in America, especially if Trump is elected.
	So I've got a special report on the radicalism of the left-wing activists in America.
	And I think that what you saw today just scratched the surface of that.
	And then I also pointed out that If you want to know who's really burning the American flag, it's the Democrats.
	It's not even the pro-Palestine protesters.
	It's the Democrats and some neocons on top of that, too.
	A lot of people hate America, and many of them are in Congress.
	And it's funny, because almost all those in Congress who hate America were applauding Israel.
	It's like, my goodness.
	The only member of the U.S. House of Representatives who showed any balls at all It's a woman who has no balls.
	I mean, physically, but she's got courage.
	And I'm shocked to hear myself saying this, but it's Rashida Tlaib, or I think that's how you pronounce her name, who held up a sign that said war criminal during the entire speech.
	And it's like, I disagree with her on almost everything.
	But this, she nailed it.
	So, you know, hey, you got to give people credit where it's due.
	But a lot going on in D.C. And, of course, there are also new developments on the shooting, the attempted assassination of Donald Trump.
	And as you might have guessed, I've been continuing to analyze the audio files and the evidence and the videos and so on.
	And today I have something to share with you that you may find surprising.
	I have...
	Come to a rather reluctant conclusion.
	And in order to introduce this, let me just back up.
	At first, the first audio file I analyzed was the Fox News audio file that was from Trump's microphone.
	And at the very beginning, I only analyzed the first three rounds.
	And those first three rounds are pretty easy to decode, and that's when I posted, I think, Within hours, I said, hey, the shooter is 450 feet away.
	Based on this audio data, the.22 second delay, and so on.
	And then sure enough, the shooter was found 150 yards away, or almost exactly 450 feet away, or at least the alleged shooter.
	We'll get to that.
	And at that point, I had not analyzed anything more than the first three rounds.
	So then...
	A day or two later, I started analyzing the subsequent five rounds, because there was a burst of three and then a burst of eight.
	And I'll keep this short so as not to bore you with, you know, technical ballistics details or anything, but out of these five rounds, I heard, and I analyzed it, and I shot a video for you, showing you, and we slowed it down to half speed and analyzed it, and it looked like there were two additional shooters at two different ranges.
	Because of the snap-boom patterns.
	Well then, and I put out a chart based on that.
	Then I acquired additional audio files, and some of them, thanks to Dr.
	Chris Martinson, who's running a citizens investigations group on all of this, by the way.
	Oh, and by the way, Congress voted today.
	Let me see if I can get the actual official announcement for you here.
	The U.S. House of Representatives voted...
	416 to 0 to establish a bipartisan task force investigating the attempted assassination of Trump.
	So this is going to be a 13-member panel, 7 Republicans and 6 Democrats.
	It will have subpoena authority.
	The initiative was announced by House Speaker Mike Johnson, who called Netanyahu Your Excellency, I think.
	Like, what?
	What?
	And Democratic leader Hakeem Jeffries, who's a communist, by the way, they announced this initiative, and they're going to issue a final report by December 13, 2024.
	So, okay, that's great.
	I'm glad Congress is going to be investigating this because they don't trust the FBI, or at least the Republicans don't trust the FBI. So that's good to know.
	That's actually good news.
	But anyway, back to my investigation.
	It turned out that the microphone at the podium missed a couple of the booms.
	Because of what I think, and I said this yesterday or the day before, I think that there were gating issues.
	And not gating at the mic, but gating at the control board.
	So an audio board.
	So those of you who are audio engineers...
	You know that the microphone, there's an XLR cable, goes into an audio board, right?
	And that audio board has different functions like limiters.
	You can limit the decibels.
	There's also frequency filters.
	You can filter out low frequencies, for example, get hums out of your audio feed.
	And then there's also gating on the more high-end boards.
	And a gate means that if there's a really loud sound that comes in, Then the signal is attenuated for a period of time that could be something like 100 milliseconds, let's say, or more or less.
	Usually you can set the parameters on the gates like this, but a gate is designed to attenuate loud sounds and not let them through to the recording.
	So clearly what I now know is that that microphone or that audio feed from that microphone was being gated and thus it went silent and we missed a couple of booms that otherwise would have told us a different story.
	This became apparent when I began layering these different tracks of audio.
	Again, some of them thanks to Dr.
	Chris Martinson.
	He sent me some audio files, and I also shared with him my findings and what I think it now means.
	But by layering the multi-tracks together, it became clear that...
	This burst of five rounds that I could not then discern a medium-range shooter and a long-range shooter.
	So I announced online that I'm dropping the theory of three shooters.
	I'm looking at the possibility of two shooters now because there do appear to be very stark differences in the audio qualities of, for example, the first three rounds versus the next five rounds.
	So that's kind of the history of what led me to this that I'm about to tell you.
	And this stems from the body cam video that was released yesterday, and plus FBI Director Christopher Wray and his testimony in the last 24 hours, where he said that they found eight cartridges on the roof.
	And of course, you and I both know that a cartridge is an unspent round.
	So a cartridge contains the brass, the bullet, the powder, the primer, the whole shebang, as they say.
	So he said they found eight cartridges on the roof.
	I'm thinking, wow, they found unspent ammo on the roof.
	Now, maybe you think, well, he meant brass.
	Okay.
	Shouldn't the FBI director know the difference?
	I mean, you're the director of the FBI. You get firearms training, right?
	You're around dudes that shoot guns all the time.
	And you have to qualify as an FBI agent, don't you?
	Don't you have to qualify?
	Don't you have to shoot some rounds?
	And aren't they talking about spent brass?
	And don't they issue you cartridges, which are unused rounds to load into your pistol so that you can shoot the paper target and qualify?
	I'm pretty sure they have to qualify.
	Probably annually is my guess, right?
	So either FBI Director Wray is a complete idiot, and I don't think he is, or he knew that he was saying that he found eight cartridges on the roof, or somebody in the FBI found eight cartridges.
	That's unspent rounds.
	So I began thinking about all of this, and especially about the position of the rifle.
	Why is this rifle seven feet away?
	And a lot of other questions, like that TMZ video that I showed yesterday, which clearly captures crooks during the first shot, and it shows no recoil from the rifle.
	It shows no muzzle flash, and it shows no brass being ejected.
	Maybe we couldn't see it in the video from that distance, There should have been recoil that was visible.
	You should have seen Crooks' shoulder move or his head move or the rifle move or something.
	And I realized that I haven't seen any evidence at all that Crooks fired a single round.
	Not a single round so far.
	Now, let me show you this image about the rifle position.
	In fact, I've got a series of questions here to share with you that are now leading me to really, really question whether Crooks fired any rounds.
	But let me show you this image.
	This is a drone image showing the body on the roof.
	This drone footage freeze frame shows Crooks' body on the roof.
	And the rifle at a distance.
	Now, this appears to be drone footage before law enforcement got on the roof.
	So it doesn't seem like anybody had been on the roof who could have moved the body or moved the rifle at this point.
	So it begs the question, and frankly, the Congressional Investigations group needs to be asking this question, and that is, why is the rifle not in Crookes' hands?
	Or right next to him.
	Why is the rifle estimated to be 7 plus feet away?
	And that's a really important question because if he were shooting the rifle, obviously it would be in his hands or really close to him.
	He would have had the buttstock tucked in his shoulder.
	He would be shooting.
	And I don't know if he's right-handed or left-handed, but let's just assume right-handed.
	That's about 90% of shooters are right-handed.
	And then if he was taken out by a single sniper round, which we now believe to be round number 10, the Secret Service counter shot, and if that round hit him in the face, and it appears that it did, and it would have instantly severed his brain stem and turned off the lights just like that, um...
	There is no way in this universe that he would have then had like a spasm and flung the rifle seven feet.
	No.
	When your brainstem gets blown out, you're done.
	You don't move.
	And in fact, snipers are taught a specific shot that It's called shooting right in the box.
	Actually, if someone is standing that shot, there's like a triangle that's kind of behind the nose or the upper nose and sinus area.
	And if you shoot somebody right in that triangle area, It turns off the lights instantly and they can't even squeeze a trigger.
	And that's why that shot is taught to snipers if there's a bad guy holding somebody hostage with their finger on a trigger or their finger on a detonation switch or whatever you see in Hollywood.
	If you shoot them in that triangle, they're done.
	Lights out, motor function's gone.
	So it appears they shot him in that location.
	So how did he fling this rifle seven feet?
	And you have to come to the conclusion that unless somebody from law enforcement went up there and moved the rifle and then scurried away, which would be very suspicious, you have to reach the conclusion that when he was shot, he didn't have his rifle.
	He had given up the rifle and And then it begs the question, did he ever have the rifle in his hands?
	Is it possible?
	And let me just state that we don't have all the answers yet, but I have a ton of questions.
	And we have a lot of what-if type of scenarios that need to be looked into.
	And one of those scenarios is what if he crawled up on the roof with a rifle and then he set the rifle to the side and he was peering over the roof and he didn't take any shots at all because he thought he was part of a training exercise to assess the security of this event, which would make a lot of sense of why he flew a drone over the entire event, reportedly, two hours before Trump showed up.
	He flew a drone.
	And why didn't the Secret Service ask him questions at that time?
	Because they were already there.
	They were setting up.
	It was like, wait a minute.
	There's a dude flying a drone over this.
	And then the same guy gets out a range finder and he starts ranging the place after taking a bunch of drone footage like that.
	That's detention-worthy behavior.
	If you do that, I mean, if you were to do that at a Joe Biden event, you can bet, or a Jill Biden event or whatever, you're flying drones and ranging the place, you're going to get detained.
	They're going to ask serious questions like, who are you?
	What are you doing here?
	What's your intention?
	And like, maybe we're going to detain you for the duration of this event, maybe, you know, something like that.
	Because that's very suspicious behavior.
	But this guy, Crooks, was allowed to fly a drone.
	He was allowed to carry a rifle onto the roof.
	He was apparently told which roof was available for this exercise.
	He was allowed to range the place.
	He was allowed to park his car that had some kind of complex explosives, we're told.
	The kind of explosives that a 20-year-old kid who's not ex-military probably could not manufacture himself.
	So it's like, well, who built the IEDs?
	And what's the nature of those IEDs, right?
	So what if...
	He thought this was a training exercise and they said, oh, we'll pay you on your Bitcoin accounts and they set them up for him and that's the overseas financial accounts that the media reported.
	Oh, he had three encrypted financial accounts.
	Well, that's just three Bitcoin wallets.
	You know what I mean?
	That's probably what that means and they probably set it up for him and they said, hey, you know.
	Come on out for the training exercise.
	You'll have a lot of fun and you can help us beef up security and you can play the role of an assassin and then we'll pay you a bunch of Bitcoin and you'll help us beef up security.
	See?
	Something like that.
	Now, I don't have any proof of this.
	I'm just saying this is a what-if type of exercise and that is consistent with the behavior that we're seeing.
	Where Secret Service took a photo of him, watched him walk around for apparently 26 minutes, watched him get up on the roof, watched him crawl on the roof with a rifle, and they didn't stop him.
	Why?
	Because they were walking him through the training exercise.
	That's why.
	It's becoming quite clear.
	And we now know also that a Secret Service team...
	One member named Greg is in that second-story office with the open window that overlooked the roof where Crooks was.
	So that guy, Greg, or whoever was with him, he absolutely would have seen Crooks there, would have heard him, and could have easily stopped Crooks, could have taken him out with a shot at essentially point-blank range, a shot that you can't miss.
	So let me read for you The tweet that I sent out on this, and then I'm going to go through some of the questions that I have, and then we'll play some special reports, and we'll just kind of see where all this goes, okay?
	So here's my tweet.
	Update.
	After many days of analyzing audio, video, and photographic evidence of the attempted assassination of President Trump, I cannot currently find any evidence whatsoever to support the notion that Crooks fired any shots at all.
	By the way, just to insert this, perhaps such evidence will emerge, like a video of muzzle flash from Crooks' location.
	Okay, I'm totally open to that.
	If that emerges, then okay, that's evidence.
	But so far, we don't have anything like that.
	Have you seen any video of Crooks shooting a rifle?
	Because I have not.
	Okay, anyway, continuing.
	There is overwhelming evidence, however, in support of the idea that he was a patsy.
	The rifle was found seven plus feet away from his body.
	How did it get there if he was shot dead?
	Dead men don't move rifles around.
	It's clear the rifle was not in his hands when he was shot.
	No brass locations were apparently marked on the roof by the FBI or anyone else.
	And there are no brass casings present in the police body cam footage taken from the roof shortly after the shooting.
	Thus, we have zero evidence of any spent brass on the roof at all.
	The crime scene behavior and protocols by Secret Service and law enforcement is absolutely atrocious, as if they didn't even consider it to be a real crime scene at all.
	The sniper named Greg in the second floor office of an adjacent building had a clear open view of Crooks on the roof, yet did nothing to stop him, even after photographing him.
	The TMZ video showing Crooks at the very moment the first three rounds are fired shows no recoil, no muzzle flash, no brass ejecting from the right side of the rifle.
	How did Crooks fire a rifle with no recoil?
	The 1X optic or iron sights on the rifle also would have made it extremely difficult for Crooks to make a headshot with any sort of accuracy without magnification.
	Now, let me just add a comment.
	A shot at that distance with magnification is a no-brainer.
	It's easy.
	But that same distance with no magnification is quite a bit more difficult if you're trying to take a headshot.
	Now, there are plenty of people who are capable of doing that.
	There are iron sights competitions where people are shooting with a.308.
	They're shooting targets at 600 yards with iron sights.
	And, yeah, there are people who can do that.
	But that takes a lot of training, and that's probably not...
	The kind of skill set that Crooks possesses?
	Highly unlikely.
	Okay.
	Continuing.
	Furthermore, how did Crooks manufacture explosive devices that we were told were found in his car?
	Where would he have acquired such technical expertise to work with explosives without blowing himself up?
	Why was he allowed to fly a drone over the speaking location several hours before the event?
	Oh, and by the way, Remember the Aurora, Colorado shooting event, which was no doubt an engineered MKUltra type of shooter?
	Remember that?
	Remember after the shooting, they went to the guy's apartment and they said it was heavily, heavily rigged with explosive devices, like exotic, advanced, multi-layered explosive devices.
	Yeah, seems to go along with all of these, you know, lone gunman shootings.
	That have a lot of questions about them.
	There's always a bunch of explosives that seem to be way out of the reach of the guy who supposedly did the shooting.
	This is part of the story of setting up a Patsy is they have to give them a bunch of explosives for whatever reason.
	They even said that Crooks had a remote detonator for the explosives.
	I mean, what is this?
	Is it a Batman movie?
	I mean...
	If you're a 20-year-old kid, how do you rig a remote detonator for improvised explosives in your car?
	I mean, I wouldn't even know where to begin on that, but did he just Google up a bunch of plans and learn how to solder circuits?
	I mean, how does a kid like that end up with that skill set?
	And I think the answer is, he didn't.
	I don't think it was him at all.
	I think somebody planted those explosives.
	But anyway...
	Continuing, why was he allowed to fly a drone over the speaking location several hours before the event?
	Why was he allowed to use a rangefinder to range the podium location without being detained and questioned about his intentions?
	Why was he filmed walking around the grounds with no concern at all, almost as if he believed he was there with permission?
	How did he know this particular roof would not be covered by Secret Service?
	Who told him the roof was available to him?
	What seems to be emerging, in my view, is that Crooks believed he was on a training mission, working with law enforcement to determine vulnerabilities, and he was playing along as they told him things like, here, take this rifle, climb onto that roof, and tell us what you see.
	He did as he was told, put himself in position, and then potentially somebody else took all eight shots, after which Crooks was killed to wrap up the cover story.
	I just want to say here, this is just a theory, okay?
	I'm not claiming that we have certainty that somebody else took all eight shots.
	Maybe Crooks took all eight shots, and maybe a video will emerge showing that.
	I'm just saying, maybe he didn't.
	Okay, continuing, although not yet provable and perhaps never provable, This is emerging as a more likely explanation that fits the available data we have so far.
	It's subject to change, of course, if new data points emerge, so I reserve the right to update or alter this analysis based on new data.
	Keep your thinking caps on.
	Keep crowdsourcing this investigation.
	The FB lie is now engaged in an active cover-up.
	And yeah, I borrowed that phrase from Ivan Raikland there.
	He said it's the FB lie.
	Okay, so let's go over...
	The observations that would be consistent with the idea that Crooks did not fire any rounds.
	Now, it's very possible he fired the first three and somebody else fired the next five, or vice versa.
	Maybe he fired five and somebody else fired three.
	Maybe Crooks fired one, two, three, four, five, but not six, and then seven and eight.
	Because there's something about round six that seems different to me.
	It doesn't have the same amplitude, but whatever.
	Let's just go over some of the questions.
	Okay.
	He's got IEDs in his car.
	That's a red flag.
	He was allowed to fly a drone over the site.
	No recoil from his first shot.
	And that's very clear in the TMZ video.
	No recoil.
	And we showed you that video yesterday, by the way, so it's in yesterday's podcast.
	No muzzle flash.
	In fact, in that video, we don't see a rifle at all.
	Now, the crowd is screaming he's got a gun, but we don't see a gun.
	And if a crowd is screaming he's got a gun, I don't know.
	Is that what people would scream if somebody had a rifle?
	I don't know.
	Maybe.
	There's a song from the 1980s that was supposed to be parody.
	Everybody run.
	The homecoming queen's got a gun.
	I guess it's not so funny anymore, but in the 80s it was funny because it was unthinkable that there would be school shootings.
	Anyway, when I think of a gun, I think of a pistol, but if this was a rifle, I don't know, maybe to a common person everything's a gun.
	But if I saw somebody with a rifle, I would have screamed, he's got a rifle, but I don't know, maybe that's just me.
	Anyway, The rifle was found seven feet away.
	Again, very strange.
	No explanation for that that I can think of.
	The rifle buttstock was fully extended.
	We saw that from the photo that I shared yesterday.
	In fact, let's just show that photo here one more time.
	And as I explained yesterday, that a fully extended buttstock would be too extended.
	Too extended.
	For a person, a smaller person with a smaller frame like Crooks, you would not be...
	It wouldn't be comfortable to handle it in a fully extended configuration.
	So it's like...
	And plus, it looks to me, it seems very clear, that's an 18-inch barrel.
	And most AR-15s are a 16-inch, or you could say a 16.5-inch barrel, but...
	This one seems pretty obvious to me because I've been around a lot of these and trained with a lot of them.
	It looks like an 18-inch barrel to me.
	And nobody's pushed back on that when I've said that publicly, because I think it's pretty obvious, 18-inch barrel.
	So it's a longer barrel, which is heavier up front.
	It weighs more in the front.
	And it's a fully extended buttstock, which means this is kind of an unwieldy, long rifle for such a small guy.
	And I'm highly doubtful that if he had practiced with this rifle, he would not have it in this configuration.
	So I'm very suspicious that he had this in any kind of a shooting setup.
	And then, as you can see from the photo, there are no magnified optics on the rifle.
	There may be a 1x red dot, and you can clearly see the iron sights, which, of course, is not magnified.
	So that means that a headshot would have been quite difficult from that range.
	So think about it.
	150 yards, you're looking one and a half football fields away, and you're trying to hit someone in the head with just iron sights.
	At that range...
	That's an extremely difficult shot because iron sights just don't have that kind of precision.
	You know, with iron sights, typically, especially on these older type of rifles like that, you have a stem in the front.
	So there's like a single piece of metal sticking up from the front of the rifle.
	And it's got a squared-off top, and it's not very thick.
	It's...
	Pretty thin.
	I don't know.
	What would you call it?
	Like two millimeters thick or something.
	And then closer to you, closer to your face, is the rear sight, which typically it's a circle in a piece of metal.
	And what a lot of these older sights have is you can flip it to where it's a smaller circle for a longer range shot.
	So basically you're looking through this circle and And then you're trying to center that front stem in the circle.
	And then your target, like where the bullet's supposed to hit, is just right at the very top edge of that front stem.
	But that only works if you've actually centered the stem in the circle.
	And it's pretty wishy-washy, right?
	So iron sights are not used for precision work.
	Yeah.
	Because it's, you know, again, it's wishy-washy.
	If you had a rifle like this, I mean, even me, who has, I've got a lot of experience with these rifles.
	If I were to try to hit a head-sized object at 150 yards with iron sights on the very first shot, that could be quite challenging.
	It might take several rounds to do that.
	I might not be able to do it at all on a bad day.
	I don't know.
	I haven't actually tried that.
	Because, you know, red dot sights are so much better.
	Reflex sights or magnified optics are so much better.
	But I find it hard to believe that a 20-year-old kid who was apparently kicked off the rifle team from the local school would be able to make that shot and put that first round on Trump's ear.
	I'm very skeptical of that.
	Okay.
	So the ergonomics of the rifle are wrong for him, and the iron sights or a 1X optic is also very wrong.
	Very unlikely to be able to put those rounds anywhere close to Trump in that configuration unless he had a lot more experience.
	And then finally, of course, we didn't see any brass on the roof, and we didn't see any markings by the FBI of where they found the brass.
	And I haven't seen any photos of that.
	And if you were taking a crime scene seriously, then you would take photos and you would share that at some point with the public and say, look, here's where we found the brass.
	It was all right here.
	You know, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8.
	And there'd be little markers there and evidence pictures and there'd be a chain of custody and all that.
	We haven't seen any of that stuff.
	All we've seen is an FBI guy with a water hose on the roof, which apparently is too dangerous for Secret Service to even be up there.
	So I don't know if this FBI guy is like a roof ninja or something, but apparently he had some super special skills, like he's an X-Man mutant, but his skill is he can walk on slippery, sloppery roofs or something.
	Maybe that's why he works for the FBI now.
	And he had a water hose up there hosing the place down.
	Great!
	You know, destroying evidence, right?
	So what we know so far, based on all the data, all these observations, is that, number one, we don't have any footage of crooks firing a single round.
	We don't have any evidence of recoil or muzzle flash.
	We don't have any real evidence of brass being found on the roof, other than just the testimony of the FB lie, which lies all the time.
	And The picture we have of the rifle so far looks like a very unwieldy type of rifle for such a small guy like that.
	It seems like it would have been crazy difficult for him to even wield it, and the rifle wasn't even found near his body.
	I mean, seven feet away.
	So, these are some serious questions, folks.
	Do I think Crooks was crawling around on the roof?
	Yes.
	But without the rifle in his hands?
	Clearly, without the rifle in his hands.
	So my interim conclusion here is that we need to be thinking about the possibility that Crooks didn't shoot at all.
	And that all eight rounds that we have heard came from that second floor window, the open window room, where Sniper Greg was apparently located.
	I don't even know who this Greg guy is, and I'm not accusing him of being an assassin, but...
	There could be other people in the room, and that's the most likely place from which these shots may have come.
	Now, granted, again, there could be emerging evidence that contradicts this.
	If we get a video of Crooks actually shooting, I welcome that video.
	We need some answers.
	I would like to cross this off the list of possibilities that he didn't fire any rounds at all.
	If we can eliminate scenarios, then we can get closer to what actually happened.
	But right now, As far as I know, we don't have any evidence that Crooks fired any shots at all.
	But we have lots of evidence that the Secret Service watched him get into place, get on the roof.
	They knew what he was doing.
	Somebody told him which roof to go onto and so on and so forth.
	And then we know that the Secret Service took 16 seconds after the first round was fired in order for them to take him out.
	16 seconds.
	Imagine that.
	So they gave a 20-year-old so-called lone shooter, they gave him 16 seconds to open fire on Trump.
	Pretty wild.
	I have another question, too, in all of this, by the way.
	Eight rounds were fired, right?
	That's what we believe.
	And in the audio, I mean, before the two rounds from law enforcement, right?
	So round number nine, we think, is Pennsylvania law enforcement.
	Round number 10, we believe, is Secret Service.
	So eight rounds were fired.
	I can clearly hear the snap-boom pattern on the first five of those rounds.
	Much more difficult to discern that on rounds six, seven, and eight.
	That's because the snap-boom, it appears on the microphone that was at the Trump podium.
	That's the Fox News audio that I have.
	But that microphone gated itself.
	Somewhere right around round number six, for example.
	So we don't really have the snap-boom pattern for six, seven, and eight, but we do have it for one, two, three, four, and five.
	So I can say with near 100% confidence that the first five rounds were physical, real, kinetic bullets, not blanks.
	I know some people have said, well, maybe they were just firing blanks on this whole thing.
	I mean, a lot of Democrats think the whole thing was theater and nobody got shot and they think that Trump had fake blood and it was all like World Wrestling Federation fakery.
	That's crazy.
	Clearly, Trump was shot.
	Clearly, another man was unfortunately killed, and other people were injured.
	And you've seen the videos.
	One round hit the railing, one round hit the hydraulic hose of the tractor, and so on, right?
	So we know that rounds were flying.
	And you can hear the first five rounds on the podium mic.
	You can hear the snap boom.
	So there's no question in my mind that five rounds are real.
	And it probably means that rounds 6, 7, and 8 are also real as well.
	I'm not saying they're not.
	It probably means they're all real.
	But a question I have is that burst of 5, which is rounds 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, did that hit anybody?
	And, I mean, maybe it did.
	Maybe one of those rounds hit the bystander who was unfortunately killed.
	But how come that burst of five didn't hit any Secret Service personnel who were covering Trump?
	Because as you saw in the videos and the photos and so on, that was a pretty big huddle there of Secret Service jumping on top of Trump.
	And if you were a shooter firing five more rounds of a rifle, mind you, and you were aiming at that huddle, Doesn't it seem like you would have hit at least one of those Secret Service agents?
	And yet, have you heard any reports of a Secret Service agent being hit with rifle fire?
	Because I have not.
	Now, I know those agents were wearing vests.
	Those vests don't stop rifle rounds, almost certainly.
	I mean...
	It's possible.
	Okay, it's possible depending on the kind of round that was used.
	If it's like a full metal jacket round, not like a 855 green tip or something.
	If it's just like standard off-the-shelf low-grade ammo, and if the vests had the correct rating, it's possible that a vest could have stopped that round.
	Admittedly, that's possible.
	But we haven't heard any reports of any Secret Service being hit.
	And frankly, if you're wearing a vest, that just covers, you know, the vitals in your chest cavity.
	The vest is not actually very big compared to your whole body.
	Somebody could have taken a round in the shoulder, in the leg, in the butt, you know, in the face, whatever.
	There's a lot of other parts of the body that are exposed.
	The forearms, the hands, you know, in gunfights, people get shot in their hands all the time, by the way.
	Because it's out there.
	There's no protection for the hands.
	So, my question is, why wasn't any Secret Service agent shot in that burst of five?
	And I don't have the answer to that.
	I don't know what that is.
	Was the shooter rushed?
	Was somebody shooting at some other direction?
	I don't even know.
	But it strikes me as highly suspicious that there weren't more people shot out of these eight rounds.
	Now, I'm fully aware that many people are circulating a photo that they think shows a bullet hole in Trump's jacket.
	I've seen those photos.
	I'm not sure what to make of it.
	There's a theory floating around that Trump was wearing some super high-tech, bulletproof, you know, polymer...
	Like super special undergarments or who knows?
	Like bulletproof underwear.
	I don't know.
	I'm highly doubtful that there's some super secret bullet stopping material that only Trump has access to.
	You know, there's a lot of research into material science and there's a lot of different ways to stop bullets, but stopping rifle rounds is a whole different deal and usually you can't do that.
	In fabric that moves, that's flexible, or that you can wear like a suit, you know?
	And then the other thing is that if a rifle round strikes you, and let's say you do have ballistic protection, all the energy of the rifle round still goes into your torso.
	It's just spread out.
	And typically it would break a rib or fracture a rib and it would bruise the crap out of your ribs or your sternum or wherever it happened to hit, right?
	So you're not going to just be all fine a couple hours later like Trump was.
	If Trump was hit with a rifle round, he would not have been that mobile the next day or even a few hours later.
	He would not be walking down the stairs of his jet.
	No.
	He would be taking loads of ibuprofen and hurting for days.
	I mean, if you take a rifle round and your ballistic vest stops it, You're still getting punched hard, hard, hard.
	As any cop can tell you, if they've ever been shot at, it's not a fun thing.
	I mean, you're happy the vest worked, but you're also hurting.
	So the bottom line here, folks, is we have a lot of outstanding questions.
	I'm convinced that this was a deep state coup attempt.
	It was a deep state assassination.
	And I believe that people in the federal government are involved in this.
	I think Alejandro Mayorkas is very likely the mastermind of this operation.
	I think that Kimberly Cheadle was in on it.
	That's why she was so evasive.
	I think the FBI has been tasked to run the cover-up, and very likely a special division of the FBI probably recruited Crooks to be the patsy and told him it was a training exercise and they're going to pay him in crypto and so on and so forth.
	But this also means that there had to be some members of the Secret Service team, or this was actually a division of Secret Service called the HSI or Homeland Security Investigations.
	Which my understanding is HSI has got some really nefarious people involved in it.
	And they ran a lot of the investigations of the J6 peaceful protesters responsible for throwing them behind bars.
	Oh, and by the way, John Strand has been released from prison.
	And thank God, John Strand is a free man, and we are in touch with his booking agent, and we're going to have John Strand on the show.
	So that's coming up real soon, and I've got a special surprise for John Strand, and we're going to hear from him about his entire ordeal, but he has been released, even though he was sentenced to, I think, many years.
	I think he was sentenced to, like, a decade in prison.
	But the Supreme Court decision changed that outcome, and the DOJ had to relent, and he's now a free man.
	Anyway, the HSI group of Homeland Security ran a bunch of those investigations, and apparently they were running some of the so-called security on July 13th when Trump was shot.
	So my best guess right now is that there are agents in HSI that actually ran the assassination attempt and probably carried out the shooting itself while making sure that Cooks was put in place as a patsy, making sure that he was shot in order to cover their trail.
	You've got to tie up loose ends.
	So I'm wondering if there's somebody who's going to blow the whistle on this.
	How many people knew about this?
	You would think that there had to be At minimum, four or five people who knew about this, maybe a lot more, maybe ten people who knew about this.
	Probably they're all vetted to be Trump haters and loyal to the regime and loyal to the point where they would never talk, they would never talk.
	But as the investigation gets underway now, with Congress voting to launch the investigation, and people like Ivan Raiklund saying, hey, you've got until September 3rd, To go public and blow the whistle, that's the end of your amnesty.
	Otherwise, you're going to be prosecuted.
	And he's serious about that.
	He's meeting with sheriffs and he's meeting with DAs and so on.
	There's going to be a ton of prosecutions across the country.
	There may be a lot of pressure put on people who know something, and they may decide at some point to blow the whistle, step forward, and say...
	Hey, they were part of the assassination team.
	Maybe they give a full confession in exchange for immunity.
	And maybe they start naming names.
	And I wouldn't be surprised if right now, inside that group, the higher-ups are cleaning the house.
	So do not be surprised if certain members of HSI or Secret Service or Homeland Security, what have you, if they start mysteriously vanishing, Vince Foster style and are never heard from again because that's the government cleaning house.
	Tied up loose ends, making sure that nobody can talk.
	Because sooner or later, I suspect somebody would talk unless the deep state kills them first, is my guess.
	And if they do want to talk, obviously there's all kinds of people they could go to.
	They could go to Tucker Carlson.
	They could go to Alex Jones.
	They could go to Congress.
	They could go to...
	You know, alternative media.
	They could go to Fox News.
	I don't know.
	Fox News would probably cover it up.
	They could go to anybody in alt media.
	You know, anybody with a sufficiently large audience.
	But, you know, again, Infowars would be one possible destination, which is why the deep state is trying to shut down Infowars.
	But there are a lot of others.
	There are people who have big reach, Who have big YouTube channels and so on who have not been banned.
	You know, like I've been banned for 10 years from YouTube, by the way.
	10 years.
	And they have my voice print and everything.
	So if anybody even posts one of my videos on YouTube, their channel gets a strike.
	Yeah, that's how insane it is.
	YouTube has been banning me for 10 years.
	But we are suing YouTube.
	We've named them in the lawsuit that we filed on Memorial Day.
	Just as we are suing Meta, suing NewsGuard, We're suing Twitter, too, for the continued shadow banning and banning of brighttown.com addresses, URLs.
	So our lawsuit is proceeding right now in the federal courts.
	And if you want to help support our lawsuit efforts, we don't ask for donations, but rather just we ask for your business.
	If you want to shop at healthrangerstore.com, That helps us, and we have an amazing assortment of nearly all organic products, foods, superfoods, personal care, home care, Laboratory tested, meticulously formulated with the most pristine ingredients because I personally, I hate artificial fragrance.
	I hate MSG, monosodium glutamate.
	I hate artificial sweeteners.
	I hate artificial colors.
	I mean, I despise all that crap.
	I can't stand it.
	And so I create the kind of products that I want to eat that turn out to be the cleanest products in the world.
	So healthrangerstore.com is where you can find those products, and it includes many survival products.
	We have the line of knives that we co-designed with Dawson knives, for example.
	And if you go to my discount page, which is rangerdeals.com, it gives you discount codes for many providers of custom-forming holsters, ballistic vests, if it's legal in your state, folding AR-15 firearms. if it's legal in your state, folding AR-15 firearms.
	Also, of course, you've got to go through FFL to get them.
	But I've got discount codes for you there.
	You can get ivermectin for pets.
	You can get chlorine dioxide.
	You can get de-googled phones.
	You can get satellite phones, backup, power storage systems, and a whole lot more.
	And that's all available right there.
	Discount code RANGER. Even Patriot Green Products has all the compost and products for your garden and soils, including biochar.
	So check it out, rangerdeals.com.
	All right, now I've got three special reports for you today, followed by an interview with David Dubine from ADAPT 2030.
	So let me just line up these special reports.
	I'm going to do it this way.
	First special report, the title is Pro-Palestine Protests in D.C. A Small Taste of Left-Wing Chaos Yet to Come.
	So we'll play that first.
	And then secondly, FBI Director bizarrely claims eight unspent rounds found on roof near Crooks.
	Because he said they found eight cartridges.
	Those are unspent rounds.
	Okay?
	Whatever.
	Some of that special report does overlap some things that I said earlier, but there are also some different and unique analysis points in that.
	And then finally, the third special report today is pathetic U.S. Congress kisses the ring of war criminal Netanyahu because Netanyahu is a disgusting...
	I mean, he's a sociopath.
	He's truly a war criminal.
	And did you know that he said in his speech, he said that Israel has killed 1,203 Hamas operatives.
	Really?
	1,200?
	That's it?
	Because they've killed almost 40,000 total Gazans, that's women and children of Elderly people, doctors, you know, university professors.
	They've killed almost 40,000 people there.
	And they claim they got 1,200 Hamas operatives and they say it's all worth it.
	And then he said, Netanyahu said that they killed practically none in terms of civilians.
	He thinks they haven't killed any civilians.
	But they've killed 1,200 Hamas.
	Well, what about the other nearly 40,000 people?
	Well, he doesn't count them because he doesn't consider them to be human.
	That's how disgusting Netanyahu is.
	He can bomb apartment complexes, hospitals, mosques, refugee camps, even food aid workers, UN workers.
	He can bomb them and kill them and then claim that they never existed.
	Oh, we didn't kill anybody at all.
	We just killed 1,200 Hamas.
	That's it.
	That's how insane that guy is, and it's disgusting that members of the United States Congress call him Your Excellency, which is just nauseating.
	As an American, I'm disgusted to hear that.
	We don't bow down to kings and royalty, and that's not royalty.
	He's a royal pain in the ass demon, is what he is.
	We don't bow down and kiss the rings of world leaders, for God's sake.
	We're Americans.
	We fought the British to get rid of all that crap.
	And we're not bringing it back in, that's for sure.
	Stop kissing the ring of Netanyahu, Speaker Johnson.
	Disgusting, Speaker Johnson.
	It's just, these people, they're incredible.
	So, you can tell I feel pretty passionate about this issue, but obviously, I don't want civilians killed in the name of Americans.
	Why are we providing bombs that keep killing innocent women and children?
	Why are we providing money?
	Why are we funding Israel's genocide against Gaza?
	And so we've got to ask these questions.
	And by the way, as I say in these special reports, what happened to protecting America?
	We have a problem with our open border.
	We have a crime problem.
	We have a human trafficking problem.
	We have an election integrity problem.
	We have a problem with school teachers and counselors grooming children and operating as pedophiles all day long.
	I mean, we have so many problems ourselves in this country.
	Inflation, food is not affordable.
	We've got a breakdown of society happening.
	And it seems like all that our Congress cares about is...
	I don't want to say what's coming to mind, but...
	is a pleasing servicing Netanyahu, right?
	That's all they want to do.
	It's sickening.
	Absolutely sickening.
	As I say, you know, every human being has a right to life.
	And that includes...
	Black babies, by the way.
	It includes brown people.
	It includes Hispanic people.
	It includes Palestinian people.
	It includes Asian people.
	It includes Native Americans.
	It includes everybody.
	And I will always oppose the mass killing of innocent civilians.
	And frankly, every principled person should join me in denouncing mass killings of civilians.
	And no, it's not okay to just label all those civilians Hamas.
	Like, oh, we bombed a hospital and, you know, 400 dead bodies.
	And then to say, well, there were no civilians there.
	Well, how do you know?
	Because we just call them Hamas, so there are no civilians.
	Come on, we're not playing your mind games, Netanyahu.
	You can't run around killing women and children and just saying we got a bunch of Hamas.
	No.
	You're a liar, you're a psychopath, freaking lunatic.
	And mark my words on this, folks, because anybody in the United States Congress who bows down to Netanyahu, they're betraying their oath to America.
	And that means they will betray you when they get the opportunity.
	I don't trust any of them that are all in with Netanyahu.
	Don't trust them at all.
	Thank God we have Representative Thomas Massey here.
	Who refused to attend the war celebration speech, right?
	So Thomas Massey for president, as far as I'm concerned, I would love to see Thomas Massey running for president.
	Maybe he will one day.
	Okay, one more thing before we go to these special reports.
	I read today that there's been a court decision that has reversed the ATF's designation of what are called force reset triggers as machine guns.
	A force reset trigger is a special kind of trigger you can drop into an AR-15 that fires one round when you pull the trigger, and then it fires a second round when you release the trigger.
	So every time you pull and release, you get two rounds instead of one.
	It's called a force reset trigger, and there are a number of companies that sell those triggers.
	I personally don't own a force reset trigger, and I've never actually used one.
	I've just kind of followed the legal case of it.
	I'm not sure that I would want a force reset trigger because, I mean, I don't know.
	I can pull the trigger pretty fast anyway, and I kind of like to have more control over the rounds.
	I don't like the idea of another round coming out just because I release the trigger, but for some people, maybe it's kind of a shortcut way to shoot more rounds more quickly.
	Without a lot of practice, maybe?
	I don't know.
	But in any case, I think force reset triggers are going to be legal again.
	Maybe they are right now.
	I just want to keep you in the loop on that.
	But if you choose to acquire a force reset trigger, make sure you check your local laws, you know, your state laws.
	They are probably still banned in certain states, even if federally they're not, would be my guess.
	But, you know, always check your local laws.
	And, you know, make sure you're operating well within the law.
	And by the way, one final thought on firearms and self-defense and training and everything.
	Folks, you don't need a lot of fancy stuff on a rifle.
	What you need is practice.
	Seriously.
	I would see this a lot when I used to go to like training classes and I would see people that would roll in with AR-15s all like built up with all kinds of crap on them.
	You know, it's called Tacticool.
	Like, oh man, you have a green laser designator, you have an IR illuminator, you have a rangefinder, and their rifle weighs like 15 pounds, you know?
	And then after they try to train with it for two hours, they're like, they're removing everything off of it because their arms are all tight.
	Like, yeah, why are you running around with all that crap on your rifle?
	You don't need all that crap.
	What you need is practice.
	You don't need all these special drop-in triggers and you don't need all this special stuff.
	I mean, seriously, I mean, I don't even, I don't like four grips even, uh, all that crap's in the way, as far as I'm concerned, what I do is, yeah, I put a red dot optic on it.
	It can be pretty small, pretty lightweight.
	I do put a three X magnifier that flips to the side.
	Okay.
	That's really useful, depending on your circumstances.
	That's kind of the heaviest thing that I put on a rifle, actually.
	And then other than that, it's usually a stock trigger.
	I might boost the trigger a little bit with kind of a $150 trigger or whatever.
	You don't have to go crazy on that, but...
	I don't put lasers on it.
	If you think you're going to have night engagements, it does make sense to put a light on it, but you can keep the lights really lightweight.
	One brand called Olight has some pretty easy lightweight lights that go on the Picatinny rail right up top.
	I don't like lights that are on the sides.
	I put the light right on top.
	Yeah, that's what I do.
	I actually pull the front sight back and I put the light up there instead because...
	If you've ever shot at night, you don't, I mean, shadows that are cast to the side are really creepy and they throw you off.
	So I'd rather have a light on top so I don't get weird side shadows.
	You know, if I'm clearing a room at night, you know what I'm saying?
	I want the light on top.
	So anyway, that's what I do.
	I might have a light, front sight, a red dot optic, and then the 3X magnifier, and then there's the flip up rear sight that I keep flipped down.
	And, you know, that's it.
	All the rest is just practice, practice, practice.
	Finger control, being able to move and shoot in all directions, shooting with your offhand, shooting around corners, shooting lying down, sideways on the ground, just try not to have hot brass go down your shirt, all kinds of things like that.
	I still have brass burns from some of them.
	I do.
	I've got brass burns on the back of my upper back.
	I've got hot brass that went down my shirt.
	And that's when you learn, if you're shooting rifles, you have to have really tight-fitting shirts, by the way.
	Yeah, you learn all kinds of stuff when you start getting burned by hot brass.
	It's amazing.
	And don't be the guy that shows up for training, wearing all this battle belt with all these magazines, and then all the magazines are backwards.
	I've seen that so many times.
	It's like, dude, I see what you're doing there, but have you ever actually tried to take the magazine off your belt with your left hand and then insert it into the magazine well?
	And they're like, no, okay, try that.
	Try that.
	How's that work out?
	So they pull the magazine out and, oh, it's backwards.
	Yeah.
	So why are you wearing a battle belt if you don't even know which way those mags should be facing?
	You know?
	Like, cover the basics, folks.
	Anyway, train, train, train.
	Make it just natural, like muscle memory.
	You can do it in the dark.
	And then also learn and practice rifle safety, of course.
	Because those rounds, they can go a long ways.
	So you do not want them just randomly launching, arcing into the air at 45 degrees.
	They can go over a mile.
	I mean, you don't even know where they're going.
	All right, with that said, here are the three special reports followed by the interview with David Dubine.
	Enjoy, and I'll be back with you tomorrow, God willing.
	Take care.
	So the pro-Palestine protests that are happening in Washington, D.C., They are an expression of not just frustration, but also an expression of really strong anti-America sentiment.
	And as you saw, there were protesters that were being bussed in We don't know who's funding the buses or the transportation.
	We don't know who's actually behind some of these protesters.
	I'm sure there's an element of it that's just organic, just people unhappy, and understandably so, about Israel's continued bombing of civilians and so on.
	But there's also clearly an element of this protest that is coordinated, funded, possibly by the same globalists that were behind Antifa.
	We saw American flags taken down and burned.
	A lot of videos of that out there.
	So, you know, a lot of cheering as they're burning the American flag and sit-in protests won by a lot of Jewish Americans, mostly younger, left-leaning Jewish Americans, who are, you know, in opposition, obviously, to the Israeli genocide of the Palestinian people.
	And while I always support peaceful protests, this is not that.
	This, or at least elements of it, burning the American flag, spraying graffiti all over statues, this is not okay.
	And this is a small taste, I believe, of things to come as Trump becomes our next president.
	Once he wins the election, you're going to see the radical left erupt in all kinds of ways, pushing all kinds of violence.
	And understand that just as right now a lot of these pro-Palestine protesters, they're expressing that they hate America, that they're burning the American flag or they condemn America.
	You're going to see a lot of left-wing protesters who also hate America.
	They want to see America destroyed because they're Marxists.
	I'm not talking about the pro-Palestine people, the Muslims.
	I'm talking about the radical left-wing, you know, lunatics.
	They are Marxists and they're communists and they despise America, so they want to see America destroyed.
	They were burning the American flags long before the pro-Palestine protesters were burning the American flags.
	And let me just put this out there.
	For anyone listening who is Sympathetic to Palestine as I am.
	I am sympathetic to the humanitarian issues that are at stake here.
	And I've spoken out frequently.
	I've spoken against Netanyahu and against Israel's clear genocide.
	And I've spoken out against America sending more bombs and more money to Israel and so on.
	However, that said, The methods, the behavior of these protesters, of graffiti and burning the American flag and marching around with an increasingly escalatory posture, this is not okay.
	This is not the way to go about effecting change.
	But this is very typical of the radical left.
	They want to force you to change, they want to block your bridges and your roads, and they want to burn down things, and pretty soon they'll be burning down buildings.
	They're going to escalate this.
	And it's their methods They don't want to engage in debate, typically, and that's why they push so much censorship of conservatives in America.
	I've been censored for many years.
	I'm one of the most censored voices in the world, actually.
	But the radical left just wants to censor everybody.
	They don't want to debate.
	They don't want to engage in any kind of a policy discussion, typically.
	I know there are exceptions to this.
	But this reliance on violence and destruction is really regrettable.
	I'm sad to see that because, as I said before, those who are speaking out against Israel and who are trying to halt the killing of innocent lives in Gaza and in the West Bank and so on, they have a very important principled point.
	Which is that what Netanyahu is doing, what Israel is doing, is not self-defense.
	It is aggression.
	It is genocide.
	Netanyahu is a war criminal.
	Let's be clear.
	There's no doubt about that.
	And the torture, the killing, the deliberate killing of women and children and doctors and college professors and so on throughout Gaza, these are inexcusable crimes against humanity.
	But it doesn't mean that the right way to protest that is to start destroying property and lighting things on fire and getting increasingly violent.
	So I disagree with the methods, although I agree with the underlying principle that Netanyahu is a war criminal and that he must be stopped.
	But the way to go about stopping him is not by becoming a Increasingly violent mob.
	I'm sorry.
	I can't condone that.
	The way to stop Netanyahu, I believe, number one, pressure our representatives in Congress to stop taking AIPAC money, stop defending Israel's genocide, stop sending money to Israel or weapons to Israel.
	We can provide domestic pressure.
	And by the way, if Trump does become president, And I know that Trump overall has a pro-Israel stance, and J.D. Vance also is very strongly pro-Israel.
	Well, I intend to give them an earful about this.
	If they support sending more bombs and weapons to Israel that are being used to harm or kill innocent civilians as part of this so-called war on Hamas, which is just an excuse for genocide, I'm going to yell about it.
	They're going to hear from me about that.
	I do not condone this.
	You're not doing this in my name.
	And even though, ultimately, I will vote for Trump.
	I just want to be clear.
	I've made my decision now.
	I've been back and forth on this.
	But I'm voting for Trump, Vance.
	Even though I'm doing that, because what other choice do we have in America?
	You can't vote for the America-hating Marxists.
	So I'm voting for Trump, Vance.
	And If Trump wins, I'm going to let my voice be heard on these issues that matter.
	I'll say, yes, number one, Trump, put America first.
	Close the open border first.
	And yes, we need to deport illegals, deport illegal aliens out of this country.
	We've got to restore America.
	But those pro-Palestine protesters at the universities, most of them are not illegals, by the way.
	Most of them are on student visas.
	Or they're, you know, TAs or some of them are professors and so on.
	They have student visas.
	So you can't really just deport them.
	They're here legally.
	I say focus on deporting the illegals that are carrying out crimes all across this country that are looting people's homes and squatting and carjacking and raping and all those kinds of things.
	I mean, we got to have priorities here.
	Protect our border first.
	And stop making Israel your number one priority here.
	Put America as your top priority.
	After all, it's the American people that are voting for you.
	That are voting you into power.
	We've got to not only protect our border, we have to restore the rule of law.
	We have to restore domestic energy production.
	We've got to have affordable energy in order for business to function and for food prices to fall so that food can become more affordable to the American people.
	There are so many things that we have to do first before you even think about Israel.
	But as all of that is happening, We need to send a strong message to Washington, D.C., to our senators, including Senator Ted Cruz talking to you in Texas, Senator Cruz, Stop sending bombs to Israel.
	It's destroying your reputation.
	Senator Cruz does a lot of good work on a lot of issues.
	He's on the right side of so many things.
	He's all about protecting the border.
	He's pro-Second Amendment.
	He's overall pro-freedom of speech.
	He's pro-religious freedom.
	There are many issues where Senator Cruz is really great.
	But this wholesale support for Israel's genocide, it's a failing on his part, in my view.
	And I will let him know that.
	And he'll probably say, okay, noted.
	I hear you.
	I disagree.
	And he'll say that he's going to support Israel no matter what.
	And okay, well, that's his choice.
	He's a senator.
	He got elected.
	He has free will.
	He can make up his own mind what he wants to do.
	But he's going to hear about it from me.
	That's what I'm saying.
	He's going to hear about it.
	But unlike the radical left, I don't light buildings on fire when I'm unhappy with policy.
	I don't start burning American flags.
	I don't loot and spray graffiti all over everything.
	I'll just record another podcast.
	You know what I'm saying?
	And I will do things like I will financially support the candidates that I want to win.
	And, you know, so I'll make donations to candidates as I've been doing that recently.
	It's all on the public record, by the way.
	I supported Jonathan Emord's campaign to be the United States Senator for Virginia, for example.
	I have not yet donated to the Trump Vance campaign.
	I don't even feel like my donation even matters to his campaign.
	It's more important that I talk about the principles for this country right now.
	But I will vote on Election Day.
	I will use my influence to demand adherence to fundamental humanitarian principles.
	I will continue to insist on de-escalating from these wars.
	I will repeatedly state my views and hopefully inform other people who may Incorporate some of what I'm saying into some of their own analysis, although everybody makes their own decision and everybody's got their own life experience and all the different variables that come into play.
	I get it.
	That's fine.
	This is what democracy is supposed to look like is different people, you know, reaching different conclusions sometimes.
	But I say, stop killing people.
	Stop funding the military industrial complex.
	Stop funding genocide.
	Focus on solving America's problems, which are numerous.
	And stop printing trillions of dollars.
	Otherwise, our dollar will collapse into oblivion.
	So that's where I stand on these issues.
	I am compassionate.
	I have empathy for all the pain and suffering and death that's happening right now in our world.
	I am hoping and trying and praying as best I can to help end conflicts, to de-escalate To share and teach fundamental principles of self-reliance so that people can be healthier and happier and more abundant and more free.
	I believe that if we have more true freedom, the freedom to speak, freedom of religious expression, economic freedom and so on, then that will tend to promote freedom around the world and maybe we will have fewer wars and fewer conflicts as a result.
	That's my hope.
	I hope I'm right about that.
	Can't guarantee it, but that's at least The direction I'm aiming for here.
	So join me, if you would, in praying for peace.
	Join me in denouncing violence, denouncing war escalations, and do the best that you can, as I am doing, to send a message peacefully, politely, to our representatives in Washington, D.C., that we do not support Israel's genocide.
	And most importantly, we demand you do something to protect America first.
	Protect America first.
	Otherwise, resign from Congress.
	That's my take on it.
	Thank you for listening.
	Mike Adams here, the Health Ranger, naturalnews.com, and also I'm the founder of brighteon.com.
	God bless America.
	Take care.
	Well, folks, we're into some deep cover-up territory here right now with FBI Director Christopher Wray, you know, the mastermind of the cover-up, testifying in the last 24 hours and claiming that they found eight cartridges on the roof next to the supposed shooter, Crooks.
	Now, a cartridge, we have to go over some basic terminology here.
	A cartridge is a complete round of ammunition, which consists of a piece of brass, the primer at one end of the brass, gunpowder inside the brass, which is sometimes called the brass casing, as well as the bullet, which is at the which is sometimes called the brass casing, as well as the bullet, which is at And the neck of the brass is sort of crimped around the bullet.
	Okay, so all that together, the primer, the brass, the gunpowder, and the bullet, that's called a cartridge.
	So if he's saying they found eight cartridges on the roof, then what he's saying is they found eight rounds of unused ammo, unexpended, off-the-shelf ammo on the roof.
	of.
	So if they found eight rounds that have not been fired on the roof, who fired the eight shots?
	Now remember there are 10 shots total that we can hear in the multiple audio files now.
	I originally thought that was only 9 or even 8, but now with multiple files and multi-track stacking, we can hear 10 rounds.
	We believe that the counter-sniper secret service team fired round number 10.
	We suspect that a Pennsylvania law enforcement person fired round number 9, although we can't prove that yet.
	And we think that somebody else fired rounds one through eight.
	Maybe Crooks, maybe not.
	Maybe Crooks fired three rounds and somebody else fired five.
	We don't know yet.
	But for the FBI to say, oh, we found eight cartridges on the roof, that's just like, what are you talking about?
	So it begs the question, where's the brass?
	Where's the brass from the spent rounds?
	Apparently, they haven't found any brass.
	They found cartridges.
	Now, then during this hearing, Ray is asked, so do you believe that Crooks fired eight rounds?
	And he says, yes, we think Crooks fired eight rounds.
	You know, we're still investigating.
	We can't be 100%.
	But basically, from what we know so far, we think Crooks fired eight rounds because we found eight cartridges.
	It's like, okay, now you're talking in circles.
	You don't even know what you're talking about.
	And then he was asked, Do the cartridges match the rifle?
	Oh my God, I can hear all of you who actually own rifles and who know about rifles.
	I can hear all of you just screaming and pulling your hair out right now because you know as well as I know that cartridges cannot be matched to a rifle.
	There is no such thing.
	You can't put cartridges...
	Through a rifle, fire them off, eject the brass, collect the brass, and then determine that that brass came from that rifle.
	That doesn't exist.
	Now, in the FBI, there are ballistics experts who claim that a bullet can be matched to a barrel, and that's widely believed across forensics.
	However, It turns out that's also false.
	That's complete nonsense, just pseudoscience quackery, kind of like PCR tests.
	You actually can't match bullets to barrels.
	Not in handguns, not in rifles, none of that.
	So that's all BS. But let's assume that you could.
	Even then, you can't match brass to rifles.
	So in other words, if I go to an AR-15 training event, and I've got 12 students beside me, and we're all shooting at paper targets as part of a class, We're going to go through a lot of rounds.
	There's going to be brass all over the place.
	Now, after the class, could a forensic expert go through and pick up all the brass and then using microscopy or some magic voodoo method that we don't know about, could they assign which brass belong to which rifle?
	The answer is no!
	No, that doesn't exist.
	There is no such.
	There's not even any claim that that exists.
	Nobody claims that that's possible.
	Except, FBI Director Wray, he claims that the brass was matched to the rifle, and that's impossible.
	Again, that does not exist.
	You know, just to be clear, that does not exist.
	Now, if he's claiming that the bullets were matched to the rifle, then he would be implying that the bullets have been recovered.
	But I've heard no such claim from the FBI. Have you?
	Have you heard anybody say they recovered the bullets?
	No.
	And I've been paying attention.
	I haven't heard that.
	Then the question would be, well, how many bullets did you recover?
	Right?
	How many bullets?
	If they said, well, we also recovered eight bullets, and if they actually use the term bullets, well, that would be different, but nobody's saying that.
	They're saying they found eight cartridges.
	Now, also, you're hearing this term shells thrown around a lot as if they found eight shells on the roof.
	And again, for those of you who are familiar with firearms, you're pulling your hair out and screaming.
	It's like, no, no, no, no, no.
	These are not shells, okay?
	Shells, that's from shotgun rounds.
	When you fire off a shotgun, you have shotgun shells.
	And shells are made of plastic.
	And then, you know, on one end, they've got some amount of brass with a primer in it, but the rest of it is a polymer.
	That holds the shotgun ammo, which could be a slug, could be a combination of ball ammo or birdshot or buckshot, whatever.
	That's a shell.
	You say, well, they found eight shells.
	So is there a shotgun somewhere nearby?
	Because that's what shells belong with.
	You know, it's amazing to me to hear the FBI claiming that they're conducting an investigation when they don't even know basic terminology of firearms.
	They don't know what a cartridge is.
	They don't know what a shell is.
	They probably don't know what brass is.
	They don't know what bullets are.
	But they do know how to bury evidence, though.
	They know how to cover things up and cleanse the crime scene because they were up on the roof, the super slopey, slopey roof with a water hose, hosing it down, making sure that all remaining evidence is destroyed and nobody put any markers there of where the brass was found, not that I could see.
	Where's the brass?
	Wouldn't you want to have the locations noted?
	Wouldn't that be, you know, maybe relevant to a criminal investigation to say where we recovered the brass?
	Not that they even know what brass is, but you get my point.
	You know, same thing with the actual bullets.
	If they do find the bullets, which is going to take a lot of work, but it's doable.
	You get enough guys out there with metal detectors, what have you, You start walking in straight lines, you know, you can find the bullets, probably.
	And if they find those bullets, are they going to note where they found them, or are they just going to, like, put them in a can and just say, oh, we found them out there, just out there wherever?
	Is this like the Keystone Cops investigation of the attempted assassination of Trump?
	Because if you were doing a legit investigation, you would go out there and you would note the GPS coordinates of every bullet you find, and you'd probably put a flag in the ground right there, and you'd take a photo, and then you would put each bullet into an individual little Ziploc type of bag,
	and then you would label the bag, and then you would date that, You would say, like, bullet number one or whatever, GPS coordinates, here's the date, and then the initials of the person who collected the bullet.
	So you have chain of custody of the evidence.
	You know where you got it, you know when you found it, you know who touched it.
	And then you collect all those bullets in all those little baggies.
	And that would be evidence, right?
	But we're not getting that.
	We're getting weird lingo from the FBI director saying he found cartridges and shells, none of which I think is true at all.
	So I don't know what these people are doing, but they're not conducting a legitimate investigation.
	That much is clear.
	So stay tuned.
	We'll bring you more analysis as we learn more.
	This is obviously an ongoing investigation.
	There's a massive cover-up underway.
	You saw that from Secret Service Director Cheadle.
	You're seeing it now from FBI Director Ray.
	None of the official story adds up in any way whatsoever.
	This is a massive cover-up of an attempted assassination.
	So do not be deceived.
	But stay tuned for the truth and for more analysis.
	You can find me at brighteon.com.
	I'm also on Rumble.
	I'm at naturalnews.com.
	And I'm on X. My username is HealthRanger.
	Thank you for listening today.
	God bless you all.
	Take care.
	Well, the real loyalties of the United States Congress are on display right now.
	As war criminal Netanyahu shows up, and he just gave a speech to Congress, and of course filled with standing ovations as he decried all the horrible things that have happened to Israel while completely skipping over all the horrible things Israel has done to everybody else.
	The war crimes, the genocide, the bombing of women and children, elderly people, the sniper teams that would shoot doctors in hospitals in Gaza, the bombing of universities, refugee camps, escape routes, the launching of missiles at food aid workers from international food organizations.
	I mean, the crimes that Israel is carrying out against humanity are numerous.
	Which is why the ICC has an arrest warrant out for Netanyahu, I believe.
	And yet, in the United States, Speaker Johnson, who, of course, puts America last, he puts Ukraine and Israel first, he introduces Netanyahu as His Excellency.
	Oh my God!
	Sickening.
	Makes me want to puke.
	Hey, Speaker Johnson, this is America.
	We don't call anybody Your Excellency.
	We don't bow down and kiss the ring of the king, but it's clear that Netanyahu is your king.
	Your excellency?
	Are you kidding me?
	What on earth is going on?
	And then you've got all these members of Congress, with few exceptions, few exceptions, applauding, standing ovations, yay, yay, yay, and basically Netanyahu is playing them all like a fiddle.
	Netanyahu, the manipulator, playing them, maneuvering them into a war with Iran.
	That's all this is.
	Netanyahu is a psychopathic, sociopathic master manipulator of human minds.
	And he wants America to fight Iran and destroy Iran so that Israel can expand and fulfill its vision of greater Israel.
	To have more water, more resources, more land, to slaughter everybody that's in their way, whether it's Palestinians or Jordanians, for that matter, or anybody else.
	Syrians, Iraqi people, anybody else.
	The goal of Israel is mass genocide.
	And our US Congress stood up and applauded that over and over and over again.
	It was absolutely sickening.
	And it makes you wonder, why was Elon Musk there?
	Elon Musk shows up and joins in the applause.
	I mean, Elon Musk, who otherwise has been doing a lot of really good things lately.
	He's even donating to the Trump campaign.
	He's allowing more freedom of speech on X, although not perfect yet.
	I mean, not even close to perfect, but it's improved.
	Why would Elon Musk go sit in the Senate chambers and participate in the applauding of a genocidal, lunatic party?
	Who, as history will one day show, was sort of like the modern day version of, you know, Joseph Stalin or something.
	Just mass slaughter of innocent people in order to gain political power and geographic power, resource control.
	That's what Netanyahu is.
	Congress should condemn him, not applaud him.
	He should be condemned.
	Technically, he should have been arrested on sight and handed over to the ICC, but The United States of America, its current government, is, of course, bought and controlled by the Zionist money launderers, which is, you know, AIPAC and all that foreign aid money, the billions of dollars that goes to Israel.
	Then they slice off a piece of that.
	They launder it back into the political campaigns of members of Congress.
	And there's a Twitter channel called AIPAC Tracker.
	That covers that.
	If you follow them, they'll show you how much money everybody's taken from Israel.
	And I even tweeted to Senator Ted Cruz today as a Texan.
	I said, hey, Senator Cruz, you've done a lot of great things for Texas.
	You have.
	And I appreciate Senator Cruz in his positions on so many issues, but this wholehearted support for genocide and violence against women and children and the killing of innocent civilians The bombing of universities and hospitals and refugee camps.
	This is abhorrent.
	This is not acceptable, Senator Cruz.
	We do not stand with genocide in Texas.
	We stand against genocide, which means we must stand against Netanyahu.
	And no, don't call it anti-Semitism.
	People don't even know what that word means.
	The real Semites are the Palestinians, by the way, and other people in the region.
	Who are descendants of Abraham.
	They are real Semites.
	The Zionists that move into the region from Europe, they're not Semites.
	And to criticize them is not anti-Semitism.
	And it's not about race or religion.
	It's about the fact that they are committing genocide.
	They're killing innocent women and children.
	I would condemn any religion, any race, any people that were involved in a similar action.
	You know, regardless of skin color, regardless of religion, regardless of country of origin, if you're killing tens of thousands of innocent women and children, you're engaged in evil.
	And you have to be stopped.
	The U.S. should stop Netanyahu.
	But instead, they're applauding him.
	It's really, really nauseating to see that.
	And by the way, this is one of the main things that causes me pause about supporting candidates in the GOP. And it puts people like me in a very difficult situation, I've shared this with you, where we know that the Democrats hate America.
	The Democrats want to destroy America.
	They're corrupt.
	They're evil.
	They tried to kill Trump.
	They're engaged in money laundering campaign donations right now.
	They're going to rig the election and they already stole the 2020 election and a bunch of midterms too.
	They are pure evil.
	We have to stop the Democrats.
	The only practical way to do that is to vote for Republicans.
	And yet, almost all these Republicans, except, of course, Representative Thomas Massey, who has, he's got the most sense on this.
	I applaud Representative Massey.
	And there might be a couple of others, but by and large, almost the entire GOP is all in with the Zionist agenda and applauding genocide, applauding the killing of women and children, applauding these war crimes by this war criminal named Netanyahu.
	And it's sickening to me.
	It's the one thing that would cause me to not vote for Trump is if Trump comes out and says, I'm going to support expansion of weapons and money to Israel so they can carry out their war.
	I mean, that is absolutely abhorrent to me.
	But then again, you can't vote for Kamala.
	You can't vote for the Democrats.
	So what are you going to do?
	What are you going to do?
	Is it too much to ask for a representative to put America first?
	You know, we're Americans.
	We're electing you.
	You're supposed to be an American into power to represent us, not to represent Netanyahu and represent the people of Israel.
	You got to represent America first.
	We have a border problem.
	You need to close our border first before you start talking about everybody else's borders or security problems overseas.
	You deploy the U.S. military on our border, secure our border, and then you can come to us and then talk to us about your other plans, but you have got to serve America first.
	And if you're not willing to do that, then, you know, I'm sorry, you're not qualified to be a representative in the U.S. Congress.
	Every one of these members of Congress that applauded Netanyahu is, in effect, giving the finger to America.
	And you know Netanyahu's there to ask for money, just like Zelensky.
	It's always about money.
	Oh, you gotta give us tens of billions of dollars more money so we can win.
	Well, you can't win.
	I don't even think Israel can win.
	Their Iron Dome has become a joke.
	It's called the Nylon Dome at this point.
	It doesn't stop anything.
	It's a joke.
	Israel is on a path of self-destruction.
	And, of course, their disinformation agencies and Mossad and everybody there, they're busy rolling out the same fake news story that they've been attempting to get us to swallow since 1984, literally, which is that, oh, Iran might have nuclear weapons in weeks.
	Have you seen that headline recently?
	Well, we saw the same headline in 1984.
	We saw it all through the 1990s.
	We've seen it Recently, they always run out the same headline to try to say that we have to stop Iran.
	We have to bomb Iran because Iran might have nuclear weapons within weeks.
	It's a lie.
	They've already got them.
	Iran already has nuclear weapons, by the way.
	But Netanyahu wants Americans to spill their blood to allow him to expand his genocidal empire.
	And I'm sorry.
	No deal.
	No deal, Mr.
	N. You get nothing.
	No American blood for Zionist conquest.
	And members of Congress need to stand up and say that.
	No, we're not going to fight your wars for you.
	If you want to go in and fight Iran yourself, you know, go for it.
	Good luck.
	Have fun with that.
	Your IDF is pathetic.
	They've already been defeated by Hamas and Hezbollah.
	You're not going to be able to defeat Iran.
	You got nothing.
	I mean, even the Yemeni Houthis, I think, what are they called?
	Is it the Ansarala?
	Is that the right term for them?
	They've defeated the Israeli Iron Dome.
	They're the ones taking out ships and shutting down effectively Israel's ports.
	I mean, you can't even defeat Yemen.
	How are you going to defeat Iran?
	See, this is why Netanyahu needs America to get pulled into this war.
	And right now, we've got just dumb as rocks, child-minded idiots in the White House and the State Department.
	They have no idea what they're doing.
	They have no experience or knowledge of diplomacy, negotiations of any kind.
	They are just absolutely clueless.
	They have no idea what they're doing.
	And they could very easily be dragged into a war with Iran.
	And that's exactly what Netanyahu is trying to do.
	And Netanyahu wants to take this thing nuclear, because Israel has nukes.
	And a lot of the other surrounding countries do not have nukes.
	So stay vigilant on this, folks.
	You need to watch out for where this is going.
	If Netanyahu is successful, they're going to drag America into a massive war in the Middle East.
	I don't think Trump wants that war.
	Even though Trump overall does support Israel, Trump does not support endless wars.
	He wants to get us out of the wars and get us into commerce.
	You know, Trump believes that the way out of this is through making deals and engaging in trade.
	And I agree with that.
	Instead of dropping bombs on everybody, we should buy, sell and trade with them, import and export.
	Share our goods and services, and everybody benefits.
	But if you start bombing, everybody loses.
	So hopefully Trump won't fall for this nonsense, but we'll see.
	Most of the Republicans have fallen for it, and it's disgusting to watch.
	I mean, number one, if you believe that it's wrong to kill babies in the womb, why do you think it's okay to kill them from Zionist bombs?
	If you're pro-life, don't the lives of Palestinian babies matter?
	And Palestinian children?
	I thought you're pro-life.
	So they just abandoned their principles to go all in with Israel and its mad bombing campaign.
	It just shows you they don't have principles to begin with.
	And again, that's disgusting to see this.
	So stay alert, folks.
	Be ready for almost anything because it's going to get...
	Super dicey.
	There's no question about that.
	We are into some very interesting and very troubling times.
	And the forces that are at work right now are not rational.
	They're not focused on principles.
	And overall, they're just going to get us in all kinds of trouble.
	So say no to Netanyahu.
	Don't send money to Israel.
	Don't send bombs to Israel.
	And don't get involved in a war in the Middle East.
	Fix our problems at home.
	Secure our border.
	End the left-wing war on children.
	Stop the grooming.
	Stop the pedophilia.
	Restore the rule of law in America.
	And then, when we have our problems dealt with, then if you want to at that point, you want to look overseas, okay, but put America first.
	Because we are the voters who put representatives in power.
	You better put us first.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for listening.
	You can catch more of my podcasts and interviews at brighttown.com or articles and transcripts at naturalnews.com.
	Take care.
	Welcome to today's interview on BrightTown.com.
	I'm Mike Adams, and today we're joined by a fan favorite repeat guest, David Dubine, with Adapt 2030.
	And today we're going to be talking about disruptions to the food supply chain, alignments of planets, and so much more, things stemming from the CrowdStrike IT apocalypse.
	Welcome to the show today, David.
	It's great to have you back.
	Yeah, thanks for having me on.
	It seems pertinent right now that a lot of information seems to be dovetailing or layering on top for this perfect storm of scatter wave to keep everybody distracted from the real things that are going on that would mostly affect every human on the planet.
	Yeah, people are getting a sense that there's a lot of crazy things happening.
	Let's start with this CrowdStrike.
	A situation which many people believe was deliberately caused by someone, perhaps a rogue employee or a deep state infiltrated employee.
	I'm not blaming the CrowdStrike company itself, but their infrastructure may have been exploited or hacked to allow this to happen.
	This has brought down According to the CEO, 8.5 million Windows servers that run everything from government to transportation, airlines, supply chains, bank and finance, all of that.
	So what are your thoughts of the CrowdStrike IT apocalypse and where this is headed?
	Well, if you notice, there's still a few companies that are non-operational as of today.
	So I'll just name one, Delta Airlines.
	There's so much information, you know, because I'm sort of close to Atlanta.
	It's making a lot of our news here, and I'm seeing it come across a few of my newswires.
	You know, their help desk line is over half a mile long right now.
	They're unable to get their services and booking systems, et cetera, back online.
	And the only reason I could possibly think that is because what I had done some research and watched a few videos on Sunday was they're using BitLocker in conjunction with CrowdStrike.
	That's just like a pair that goes together through this enterprise system.
	And if you don't have the keys to be able to decrypt, you can't even get in and then manually do the reboot as was suggested.
	And then with the walkthrough steps that have now solved pretty much everybody's problem.
	If you can't unlock your server, you can't get in and reset it.
	So I am going out on a limb and saying the companies that you're seeing not coming back online are the very ones that cannot locate their BitLocker encryption keys that are usually in a data file somewhere.
	But with all the turnover that we've had since the COVID started, you know, you got to wonder who's in charge of which computer systems and get something get deleted or it's off, you know, out into a black hole somewhere and never to be found.
	Because if they cannot unlock these servers that they're on, then they're bricked forever, at least.
	literally forever.
	And then what does a major company like Delta Airlines do?
	Do they bring in new equipment?
	If you say, yes, they do, well, that's going to take months, and then this is going to absolutely bankrupt and one of the largest airlines in America.
	And my whole thing with the food, as you mentioned, was there must be another company that's involved in food distribution services that's having the same problem because there's some talk already of things – Why are they setting you up for delays and spot shortages already if there weren't going to be?
	See, these things go hand in hand here.
	So we need our computers back.
	And if you can't get in and they're encrypted, then...
	It's not our fault.
	Not our fault, the food supply.
	It was the computers.
	It wasn't the food distribution system, you know, the just-in-time order delivery.
	It was something else.
	It'll never be pointed to directly as the culprit or the cause.
	There was an insurance industry analysis of this event that just came out that's currently estimating losses, real losses of over $5 billion.
	Just from this, and that the insurance industry is on the hook for about 20% of that, or about a billion dollars.
	So this is going to result in all kinds of insurance claims, loss of business continuity, things like that, which are partially paid by a lot of these policies.
	So the insurance industry is also going to take a big hit, which means they're going to be raising insurance rates on everybody else as well, all because of this.
	And many people believe this was deliberate in order to bury Trump's speech at the Republican convention because it was such an inspiring speech in many people's view, a game-changing speech, and also Trump's miraculous survival of the attempted assassination. and also Trump's miraculous survival of the attempted assassination.
	Trump was gaining so much momentum that some people believe this crowd strike hit was a malicious attack as a distraction.
	And boy, did it work because everybody immediately began talking about how everything's down.
	And we're still there in many ways.
	Just like you said, Delta's not even back.
	I mean, and by the way, this is not a problem that can be solved by just bailing out an airline, right?
	Think about it.
	They can't just print money, say, here, Delta, have a bunch of money.
	Now start flying again, right?
	Doesn't work, David.
	Yeah, indeed.
	If their computers are bricked and they really don't have those encryption keys, then you're talking about an entire leg of the airlines that has to...
	I don't know.
	It's an unknown how they would even get that airline operational again by even swapping out the computers.
	But one thing, you know, again, was you did some brilliant analysis on the, you know, the delay and the different sounds of the rounds that were coming out and the different shooters and thing.
	That was becoming a major news headline in itself because anybody with $30 audio software could replicate that and listen to the speech and then see where the shots were coming in.
	And that whole narrative, it was saying like the entire narrative of $30 software, like Audacity or something anywhere blew out all of the media across the world.
	So they kept getting caught in their own lies again and again and again and again.
	So they needed something even bigger.
	So we got CrowdStrike.
	But then we got the presidential resignation at the same time and the firing of a Secret Service person.
	These are more distractions on top of distractions.
	So, you know, as we're moving forward here, I think they're trying to get scheduled on some timelines because I would ask everybody out there this one single question.
	If there was this much problem with CrowdStrike and all of the enterprise systems across the world that are in at least Fortune 500 companies, What's going to happen with central bank digital currencies on a centralized ledger for a global initiative to have a worldwide pegged currency of one-to-one for a global reserve currency on some sort of ledger if they're coming back with the same types of encryption that's going to require some handling and a data file for
	or a JSON file.
	Look at the dangers that's presented.
	They're trying to sell you CBDCs, but we saw one of the most epic failures ever seen, but they're still trying to push forward with the CBDCs.
	Like, you've got to ask a few questions here of which narratives are getting derailed that they were bringing us down with these breadcrumbs through the last couple of years.
	Now, something has to change from this point because you can't have it all now.
	The narrative is broken.
	Yes, right.
	It's not going to take long if they try to force everybody into a CBDC. Cyber hackers around the world are going to bring that thing to its knees in no time.
	Maybe even an inside job could bring it down, just like what we saw with CrowdStrike.
	So it won't take long before CBDCs are shown to be not reliable.
	I mean, even with this CrowdStrike attack, grocery stores reverted to cash, right?
	So, oh, you want to eat?
	You better have cash.
	I mean, that's the upshot of it.
	So, yeah, go ahead, David.
	Well, another thing with that, yeah, I did a full video just on the food implications of that, because a lot of people were covering airlines, and that was the big thing, people sleeping in the terminals.
	What they weren't really showing you were the enormous amount of self-checkout counters that were rendered inoperable, and also the debit cards weren't swiping correctly.
	And then also another thing that, you know, you may have cash, but you've got to consider this.
	The bar swipe code reader, if it was inoperable or if the item you swiped didn't come up with the numerical value like one or two, like you're buying two bags of rice or one bag of rice, if it came up as a non-designated number on that, they wouldn't sell it to you because it would throw off their ordering system.
	So even if you had the cash and that item wasn't swiping correctly, they would say you can't buy that one because it would throw off all of the intricate ordering that we have right now.
	So you may have cash.
	Trader Joe's was saying that they were going to close the doors if their computer systems went totally down, that they couldn't ring cash, write it on paper, because it would back them up at least six weeks on the reorder.
	I talked to somebody there for a minute.
	Like, if it goes down any further, we're just going to simply close the store.
	And this might be repeatable across all of the United States, where if enough systems go down, where you can't check out, cards aren't working, inventory...
	barcode swipes aren't working, they're going to close you out because that's going to cause too much problem on the back end of sending out a few hundred items or a thousand items to the day that came off the shelf that nobody's going to write those barcodes down.
	So how do you balance and adjust that ordering a system again after one or two days of that?
	Right.
	Companies don't want the headache.
	You're the last thing they worry about of getting food into your children's mouth and your family's mouth.
	They don't care.
	They're worried about them having to hire extra overtime to try to balance out.
	And what's the ROI of you starving versus them having to bring in 20 extra people to do inventory?
	Frame it correctly.
	Well, yeah, exactly.
	But I'm thinking that we've reached this point in society where we've become totally dependent on technology, but now the technology has escaped our control.
	And part of that's just because of widespread incompetence and like woke DEI policies in corporations like Boeing and things like that.
	But if you think about it, How could the whole Western world have been so reliant on one company's code and have opened up all their systems to the pushing of one file from one company that brought down literally millions of systems?
	That is a crazy dangerous centralization of control and dependency on technology.
	And as you mentioned earlier, David, a lot of these companies, they never really recorded the decryption keys for the BitLocker encryption.
	I mean, I'm meticulous about recording decryptioning keys.
	I've got multiple locations.
	I do hard printouts onto waterproof, mostly indestructible, thick wax paper, things like that.
	So I can actually go get a piece of paper and I can type it back in.
	Almost nobody does that, man.
	They probably stored the encryption keys on the other servers that also got fried.
	And their BitLocker is going to be their death.
	I mean, what if Delta can never come back up without a whole new IT backbone?
	That's months away, the company's bankrupt at that point.
	Gone.
	I mean...
	Well, that would be, you know, if you have dual catalysts running at the same time where you have the complete wipeout of Delta Airlines due to this, and then a food distribution company also gets completely wiped out at the knees because they cannot come back online.
	Think about that for a moment.
	Those two running in tandem, like what damage it would do, and that could very well be that catalyst that they're looking for as an excuse to continue to treadmill down the economy to get us over to these other systems.
	Because again, I would ask everybody out there listening, look at the global level.
	What else is wired in that dominates?
	Undersea cables would be another one.
	If you take out some undersea cables, you knock out literally the internet of the world.
	But what other ones are out there that are at such a behemoth of global level where that takes out an enormous amount of businesses across the planet or communications or food systems?
	Well, Swift.
	I mean, you know, banking backbone, right?
	So, yeah, if you take out the transactional capabilities, then nothing happens.
	There's no food, there's no fuel, there's no transportation, nothing.
	And it seems like we're not far from that.
	It also seems to me like there could be an effort to deliberately unleash that upon us, especially if the deep state thinks they're going to lose in this next election.
	Yeah.
	They probably fear going to prison, and they probably...
	I've called it...
	Actually, David, I've called it a Cyber Samson option.
	Sort of referring to Israel's Samson option, which is that if they're losing badly in a war and they're going to perish, they just launch nukes and nuke everybody.
	So a cyber Samson option is the same thing in the U.S., where the deep state just says, oh, we're not going to go down, let's just nuke everything from a cyber perspective, and they bring the whole damn system down.
	I can see them doing that.
	Yeah, and the danger in that too, for those of you who are unaware out there, our agricultural system here in America revolves on credit.
	So if the farmers don't have the ability to pre-purchase seed and repair parts and fertilizers and the gamut of things, fuel, oils, et cetera, we're not going to have any food.
	So if there is such a large banking crisis where credit drives up or is not available and there is literally no liquidity out there, That is going to directly affect the farmers themselves.
	And then all those other steps in between getting from the farm to your table.
	I mean, no credit.
	We have no food.
	Right.
	We're really close to that.
	Now, you've been tracking a lot of other things that are happening as well.
	You sent me some images of the planets and things that are approaching, I think, in October of this year.
	You want to walk us through some of that?
	Yeah, I could do, in my analysis of this entire, just full-spectrum distraction wave that we're out in the middle of right now, these events are natural, they're cyclical, they're electromagnetic, and it's solar system-wide.
	So there's really nothing that we as humans or humanity on this planet can do about these larger, more powerful, heavier cycles that come and interfere with our civilization on a regular pattern, on a regular time frame, on a regular cycle.
	So what we're looking at here, I just wanted to start with the first one where it compares 2024 with 79 AD because this puts it into perspective for you.
	The four gas giants, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, and Neptune, are going to square themselves as close to a perfect square as our solar system can provide in the orbits that we have.
	Then the Earth will be in the center, and the Sun will be on the backside of us.
	So our Earth is going to loop through two different magnetic fields.
	So if you put this in perspective, and you understand that there's vast electric changes, electromagnetic changes, gravitational changes, and...
	Whether system changes and the perception of humanity on how they see reality in front of them, this screen that we call our lives in front of us, is decoded through your brain.
	But you have those two hemispheres of the brain, and Mike, you can talk about this far better than I. They're electrically connected, and you need a magnetic field for that to run in and be operable.
	No magnetic field, no electrical connections, you're dead, literally.
	There's no way for your brain to function.
	Now, we're coming into a time in the last 2,000 years where there's going to be some very strange anomalies in those same fields that I just mentioned.
	So if those are going to change or morph, even percentages, not 10%, 15%, 50%, but just small percentages up or down, you know, the way you see reality, you're actually going to see the auras of these demons around us come to life.
	And at that point, you know, How would you distract?
	Okay, you set up this entire mechanism for 50, 70 years, at least in this iteration, to get these last three generations to believe what it is that reality is.
	It's been carefully constructed for the masses to stay and do their jobs, go to war, build the roads, and then the rest stay on top with their piles of immense treasure.
	If we can see through this, even for a fleeting few seconds, then the world as we had it constructed for us completely shatters.
	Now, that's just one aspect.
	But then we're looking at the weather amplifications, the volcanic amplifications, the earth cracks, and these different sideline wind anomalies, the intense hail sizes.
	And this is record floods going on every continent at all times.
	And there is definitely a measurable uptick at the moment.
	And I absolutely say it is because we're coming into the most intense period here in October of 2024.
	And we're seeing the uptick.
	Everything you're seeing with this intensity increase is all related to that.
	Now, be the governments on the planet, and you're understanding the same timelines on this.
	And I really believe a lot of these things that we're seeing right now, they're going to have to get more grandiose, the distractions even larger.
	And perhaps, like you said, completely take grids or Internet down or electricity down to bring people to that primal fear level and then let this wave sweep by without them noticing.
	They'll be too skittish in a chaotic survival mode for them to realize that some sort of different – the way they're looking at the world is different.
	But at that point, when it comes back online again, these controllers may have upped the ante and have a different system in place by that point.
	Can we back up a little bit?
	Because you've said some very profound things, and I have a lot of questions.
	I'm not quite tracking everything here.
	So you're saying that because of the alignment of the planets and the way that their magnetic fields line up and interact with Earth, that there's going to be a change in the consciousness perception of Earth people that are going to get, like, somehow cosmically red-pilled or something?
	Or they're going to see through lies?
	You said they're going to see the auras of demons?
	Like, what do you mean exactly?
	Well, those electrical connections within our brain on those lobes, they're going to be more amplified.
	And the magnetic field of our Earth itself in relation to that magnetic transference from the Sun to that outer system of the bunching of those planets together...
	The Earth is right in the center of that.
	So electromagnetically, things are going to be moving faster in a faster vibratory field as we come through this.
	And again, will it be a permanent cognition fix?
	I don't know if it would be.
	Or would it be that you're able to see something for a short period of time?
	That way you just question that that's the way to, what am I seeing?
	And then it would come back into sort of normalcy again after we pass out of that field.
	So, yeah, there's a lot of unknowns here.
	One thing that is known is there should be higher tides during this time, like approximately one week to two weeks coming into the end of October 2024.
	There should be higher tides, like we consider king tides, but that'll just be happening everywhere on the planet where there's a seacoast, and they won't be able to explain why.
	And you just look for higher tides.
	This is another thing that's...
	Really gaining a lot of different event traction in those media that follow extreme weather events, etc.
	These abnormal tidal events are happening globally right now as well.
	And then we've got these volcanoes that are starting to go off.
	But again, that would be expected with magnetic field changes on our planet and the sun and the solar system.
	So couple all these together.
	And, you know, again, how, as a global governance system that has locked citizens down for these last several, you know, hundred years, I'll just say hundred, not thousand, but the way we've been, you know, manipulated and programmed into believing that the world is as it is now, that program is going to come unlocked there for a minute during these different magnetic field changes.
	And, Mike, I hope I could ask you a question about Like the different electrical signals between the lobes of the brain, like the interference pattern on that or the amplification on the electrical signaling coming through in a different magnetic field.
	Physiologically, how would that work inside your brain and then the way that you actually see light coming in or what you might hear coming in on the auditory senses?
	Well, I would say it would take a very strong magnetic field in order to, you know, really alter perceptions.
	So one of my questions about this, I mean, you know, people sit inside MRI scanning machines, right?
	And they scan their brains.
	And those are very strong local magnetic fields.
	I don't know.
	Are there any reports?
	Do people hallucinate when that's happening?
	Do people have altered brain function?
	I mean, that would be an interesting thing to ask.
	My thinking about what you're saying would be just that these planets are so far away, even though, of course, they're very large, obviously, much larger than Earth, but they're so far away that how could the impact on human brains be large enough to amp up cognition?
	And even if cognition were amped up, wouldn't in some cases, wouldn't that just be like seizures, you know?
	Some people, their brains would just go into overdrive and they would have seizures or they would have hallucinations.
	I mean, I'm just asking you, how do we know that this would be a good thing?
	Like, why would we say that people would see the truth about things?
	Maybe they all just go bonkers.
	Yeah, exactly.
	I'm not saying a good thing or a bad thing.
	I'm just saying it is and a possibility of an event rolling in.
	So when we're looking at this just a few months out of all this sudden, immense amplification just a couple of months out from where we sit on this, you know, solar event here that's I don't know.
	It seems that the amplification, whatever it is, is on the same timeline of the, I don't know, exponential quickening to try to move us to different systems seems to be part of this trajectory also.
	Like, I don't know if they understand something about this magnetic field pattern that allows them that we're going to go down on systems where they could, you know, think about a large CME that could come in, like a quarantine event, for example.
	You know, build in something like this on top and...
	I don't know.
	It's such a strange event and the timing on it, thousands of years apart, and then all of the sudden quick movings of our world all overlaid right on top of these months.
	It's just a little quirky and difficult for me to believe that it's all just random happenstance because geopolitically out here, somebody said something at the same time as this planetary geometry not seen in thousands of years reoccurs right now.
	So I'm just putting it out there on the event horizon for something to take a look at and be aware of.
	But one thing that is measurable are the amount of volcanoes that are increasing, the intensity of the storms, the sideline winds, the hail, and then all these earth cracks are beginning across South America.
	So this in itself overlaps and correlates on something electromagnetic that is absolutely changing our Earth.
	And the ability for us to continue to grow food on a plant-by-and-harvest date that's been, you know, scheduled out for hundreds of years.
	So, yeah, and on top of that, I mean, just getting back to earthly practical things, we see, I mean, we ran a story about how I think it's the UK government is ordering farmers to...
	or not plant food crops, but plant bird seed instead.
	So now the farms are being turned into bird seed fields.
	And of course, in the Netherlands and other countries across Europe, they're destroying farms, shutting down ranching operations.
	And in the U.S., as you know, David, there's been a lot of sabotage of food infrastructure.
	So there's a very clear, very practical effort to cause global famine.
	I mean, would you agree with that?
	I would.
	And now the first official global methane taxes have started.
	So since you mentioned over there, it's about, let's see, the UK, England wants to do a 200 pound per animal per year tax for methane.
	And then in the rest of the greater EU, it's 100 euro per cow per year as a tax in addition to for the farmer to pay just because of methane.
	And if we look at China right now, too, I don't know if you've been following, the massive floods over there have just absolutely wreaked havoc across their central growing area.
	So the numbers I have so far is China has lost 15% of its rice crops so far.
	Wow.
	Yeah.
	And the rain continues and the typhoons have just rolled in from Hainan Island.
	There was another one and the different ones coming on to Taiwan as we speak.
	But it's just nonstop rain up through the central growing area and they are absolutely going to be out on the world market looking for an enormous amount of additional imports this year because they have lost just so much.
	I encourage everybody...
	It's the first time in the Three Gorges Dam that they have opened all six sluice gates and then the three emergency spillways also.
	They're not spillways, but they're sluices also.
	They flooded so heavily downstream that the water was coming up one foot every ten minutes, and apparently over 100,000 people died because they didn't warn the floods in the middle of the night.
	China government says it's like a hundred and some, but everybody else on the ground is like, no way.
	They just blasted all that water.
	The Three Gorges Dam was the closest, I can say, at least on the surface of it, the closest it's been to overtopping or actually having physical damage to it because of the amount of rainfall.
	They had to empty as fast as they could.
	And whoever got in the way downstream, just buckle up and that's your problem because we need to save this dam.
	Wow.
	So, what percentage of the rice crop did you say was destroyed?
	About 15.
	1.5.
	Okay.
	So, that's really bad, given that China already can't feed its own people.
	I mean, it's buying up, as you know, corn and rice and soy and everything all over the world to import that just to cover its own needs.
	And now if you have these losses on top of that, that's pretty devastating for China.
	But China's not, as far as I know, China's not deliberately shutting down their farms, right?
	Right.
	On the contrary.
	They're going off into Africa and putting extra investment there to try to bring African resources online.
	Yeah.
	The below-ground water resources is a big one nobody talks about.
	I mean, Gaddafi had drilled down into the Nubian sandstone aquifer and was pumping that water above ground to irrigate like it was 100,000 acres of sorghum in their test plots out there, where the old basin of the Megalakes were, southern Libya.
	So, obviously, China and Russia understand that.
	Above-ground water is increasing, and then you can tap all those hundreds of thousands of cubic kilometers of water beneath Africa.
	And, yeah, they're going off in different places around the world.
	They're buying our farmland, but they're also over in Africa setting up all the infrastructure to grow food and then send it along the Maritime String of Pearls back to China and then unload at Jockpu Port over in northern Myanmar.
	So China is building infrastructure to feed its people, to survive, to thrive, to grow.
	The West is destroying infrastructure to starve its people and to destroy society.
	Economic collapse, shutting down energy infrastructure pipelines, coal-fired power plants, all of that.
	I mean, wow, what a contrast, huh?
	Well, it's just a transference.
	I mean, the next 80-year cycle, the next Strauss and Howe for turning, that money needs to go somewhere to restart the debt system.
	So if everybody out there is thinking this is all just like, hey, it's the bad bricks versus the good West over here, this is nothing more than a scripted transference of all wealth on the planet to a new location to restart the system.
	It's nothing more.
	Everything is choreographed and scripted.
	What you're seeing out here is the largest screenplay in real time, and everybody you see at these highest of levels is an actor.
	At least in my opinion, most.
	Not all, but most.
	It really strikes me.
	I mean, let's talk about simulation theory here for a second, because this recent shooting of Donald Trump, you notice that the supposed shooter, his name is Crooks, And then the director of the Secret Service, who is helping to cheat, her name is Cheetle.
	I feel like I'm watching a Spider-Man cartoon where all the villains are named Crook and Bad Guy and whatever.
	It's like, this is getting weird.
	They're broadcasting the moves.
	For those that have eyes to see and ears to hear...
	You know, they're broadcasting the moves.
	That's why Mike is able to jump ahead and, like, really show you that curve out into the future.
	Because if you read some of the plans, they always are very specific about the plans that they have that they want to implement.
	You know, they might not work this day because there's too many protests.
	They'll put it on the back burner.
	But two years later, it comes right back out again.
	It's just been a nonstop regurgitation of ideas that public support wasn't there for.
	And then suddenly...
	Another bevy of politicians comes in four years later and they try to run the same script.
	It got traction this time.
	Okay, it passed.
	And if you haven't noticed by now, all countries and all government leaders across the entire planet are moving like a school of fish in unison, so there's no more individuality.
	It seems like our globe has been either compromised and come under complete control, On a global level, or there's something else going on where their continuity of government is, they all understand there's a massive event inbound, and they all need to work in coordinated effort to get this, and by doing that, you know, the hopes for survival for quote-unquote humanity, the odds will be better.
	But again, that sounds like a movie also, doesn't it?
	It does, but you just said that there's a massive event inbound, and that brings up a lot of questions.
	I've interviewed other experts who say, for example, that there's a giant A planetary mass in the solar system that is on a collision, well not collision, but a near collision course with Earth that would, in its gravity orbit, would bring in a barrage of meteors that would strike, you know, many meteors.
	Many areas, many cities even on Earth, like nuclear weapons, right?
	But they're actually just rocks falling out of the sky.
	Do you think that the globalists are aware of some well-known major event, like maybe like not just a magnetic flip, but a pole shift type of event or something along those lines that they're not telling us about, but they know it's coming?
	Yeah, because, you know, just take it down to the basics here.
	And I'm a fan of truth and knowledge for those that are ready for the truth and knowledge that resonate with that and they're looking for answers.
	But to try to force it on a lot of people who are unready or unwilling, then you're just wasting your time and you're doing a disservice to both you and them because they're not ready for that.
	So you got to think if there was an event that was known, would governments come out and tell you point blank, hey, in 2045, there's going to be a micro nova.
	Hey, in 2030, this event.
	Oh, by the way, in October of this year, there's a possibility of perturbation in the electromagnetic field that will cause higher tides and disrupt quite a few weather patterns that grow our crops reliably.
	You wouldn't because people would stop investing.
	People wouldn't see the tomorrow.
	Our financial markets would collapse as everybody pulled money out to go start getting prepared for this.
	And one last thing, Mike, if there was a large gravitational body like you're referencing to Nibiru or Wormwood, that would have already altered some of the orbits of our planet.
	We would see it with a backyard telescope by now if it was that close.
	Even if it was as close in as like Saturn or Jupiter, which is still years away from.
	from coming into the inner solar system, we would see that already.
	Well, backyard telescopes and the orbits of the planets would be off kilter because another gravitational body equivalent with Jupiter coming in and unignited like dwarf star, that would already, the planets would be noticeably in different orbital positions.
	So that, just in my own personal opinion, I haven't seen any reference of it.
	Some people say they have photos, but just the way the mechanics of the solar system work, there would be a lot of disturbance already that would be noticeable, and also it would be visible by now even if it's an unignited brown dwarf.
	I mean, really, there's a lot of things that...
	I believe, you know, that maybe it's on a longer orbit, like a 1700-year orbit, but it's not here right now, in my personal opinion.
	But there's other electromagnetic cycles that are inbound, and we're starting to watch all the star field.
	Like, you know, we got a micro nova coming into view here in the next couple of weeks.
	It was called, what was the name of that?
	Let me find it here.
	I got the story up.
	It's the micro nova that we are going to be able to see for the first time here, and it's on an 80-year cycle also.
	Now, it's interesting.
	It's a pulsing micro nova, and It will be visible in about two weeks from now, two to three weeks.
	They're unsure when the light is actually going to get here.
	But it's on a pulse.
	And again, the strange thing is, this same pulse of an 80-year cycle is on the Strauss and Howe fourth turning cycle, but always at the decay or the slide down on the last leg of that four chapters of the fourth turning.
	And here it is, the micro-novas back in our sky again, which we will see.
	It'll be as bright as the North Star.
	that Nova finishes and the light dissipates and then you got to wait another 80 years to see it.
	Now that's a sign in the sky.
	Also, there's a huge amount of things happening at the moment that are both on our planet and off our planet.
	Yeah.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, clearly.
	And now, bringing back what you mentioned earlier, the psychological events that are happening, I think a lot of people listening to this would say that People are losing their minds.
	I mean, there's a lot of groups.
	Right now, what's happening in Washington, D.C., there's hundreds of thousands, I think, of pro-Palestine protesters who are taking down American flags and burning them.
	The Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson, just introduced Netanyahu as his excellency, even though Netanyahu is a genocidal war criminal.
	You have all the radical leftists who are Marxists who are engaged in transgenderism, mutilations of children.
	You know, there's a lot of craziness happening, and it seems to be amping up.
	And in your view, David, I think what you're saying is that this is not random.
	This is connected to cosmic events.
	Is that fair to say that?
	It has been.
	And, you know, there's always these segments of society, I don't care how far back in history you go, that are the sky watchers for the leaders of countries or emperors or kings, whatever that leader was called through history.
	It's always been like this.
	The only reason we have a stable climate on the planet is because our sun allows us the luxury for these last 200 years of some of the most stable climate we've had in the last 12,000 years has been in these last 200.
	Now, this is starting to vary right now where you're starting to see it.
	You're starting to see animals behave differently.
	Now, if they're behaving differently, you think the human is just another animal that we would start to resonate with that.
	Things are off.
	Magnetic fields are off.
	And it's not going to be just an instantaneous event where people start to flip their minds and just freak out and, like you say, seizures.
	So imagine if this has been a gradual uptick for the last two or three years of slow intensification, which makes sense on how the world seems to be more out of step or more out of kilter as we move toward into these events.
	But when our sun changes...
	Whatever it does, either really low solar activity bringing us into an ice age where that is a dim ball in the sky, or it's an extremely excited sun like it was in the 1990s, which is the highest solar activity we had in 3,000 years occurred in the 1990s, and that has subsequently stepped off.
	The sun drives our world.
	The sun absolutely is responsible for the apex of our civilization and the decline of our civilization over these time periods that we see of the great cultures through history have risen and fallen.
	They fell because conditions on our planet changed for the ability for us to grow food in a stable, predictable manner.
	We're back at it again, and I'm absolutely saying the elites very much understand that this cycle is here.
	Some of our world can be salvaged.
	Some of it cannot be.
	But in any business, if you're running this planet as a farm or a business, then you would already start to clip off the vine of these areas that would not survive anyway through this natural cycle.
	And you would transfer what you could to the new usable part of the earth that they think will make it through this cycle relatively unscathed.
	So from what you're saying, even thinking about politics and elections and so on, it's a distraction from the fact that Our entire planet is about to become radically overhauled, and probably billions of people won't survive this transition, I would say.
	And the future civilizations on this planet will not be named the United States of America, probably.
	I mean, you're talking about some very radical changes here.
	Oh, as it's been through history, the radical change is the one where we've had for the last 200 years of being incredibly stable.
	That's the radical.
	The normal is flip-flopping changes that are very disruptive.
	We are just so lucky and so blessed.
	You should really just be praying every day and just please let this stability in our weather hold on so we can continue to grow crops.
	Now, it could be a devastating event.
	It just depends how the media would handle it and get people on board and get them to cooperate and get people more autonomous.
	Being able to, you know, work in communities as much you do and I do to get some of our own food growing under our belts, know some of our neighbors, you know, take security into our own hands versus waiting on others to facilitate.
	And that includes firefighting, by the way.
	So when you look across the board, there's a we're in a crossroad right now where it can go either direction.
	And so that's the most hopeful message.
	It's the most opportunity in human history, but it's just how the media is going to work with us or against us to get us to cooperate or show us or teach us these different ways, at least the regular people who are unaware of this, to get them ready for the changes, both mentally, physically, spiritually.
	And I hope there is some divine guidance in this as well because we absolutely need it.
	If there's...
	Complete division, yeah, billions will die.
	If there's cohesion again, then we would continue through working.
	There would be small, small, small loss of life comparatively if we're divided.
	Well, you know, the media is trying to divide us, of course.
	We have warmongers in power.
	I don't see any sense of cohesion being pushed by the powers that be now from the grassroots up.
	Yeah, people want to get along and live peacefully together and so on.
	But sadly, they're not in charge of the power centers of our world today.
	But David, we're out of time here.
	Let me ask you to share with our viewers or listeners how they can follow you.
	Where's your work?
	Right up at brighteon.com, we have the 10 p.m.
	to midnight live show every Thursday night.
	So tomorrow night, join us there right on brighteon.com.
	We'll be streaming on the live for those two hours, and you can follow our graphics and my co-host, Ransom Godwin.
	We do this show every Thursday night.
	And thank you, Mike, for letting us come up and stream on here and adding a new platform for us to come in there.
	Everybody out there, please come and listen tomorrow night.
	We're going to talk about some of these same topics a little bit deeper into the solution side of looking for, like, gravity batteries if anybody has old wells and, you know, just different types of solutions based in.
	So we can all identify the problem, but we really want to focus on solutions as well.
	So 10 p.m.
	to midnight, brighttown.com, live feed.
	Okay, outstanding.
	Well, thank you so much, David, for your insights, for your analysis, and also for broadcasting on brighttown.com.
	And please keep me posted with any additional insight about what's coming and how people can prepare for it.
	We're definitely in for some very interesting times.
	No question about it.
	So thank you for joining me today.
	Bye for now.
	All right.
	And thank all of you for listening.
	Feel free to repost this interview on other channels and platforms.
	And thank you for listening today.
	I'm Mike Adams of Brighteon.com.
	Take care.
	Here's what we've got back in stock right now at HealthRangerStore.com.
	Check it out.
	We've got the toothpaste, the Groovy Bee brand toothpaste there that everybody loves, and we don't know if we're ever going to get any more because this is the toothpaste that the FDA Office of Importation tried to destroy or tried to get us to destroy it.
	For no reason.
	And then, of course, we had our lawyers talk to them and then they released it and said, oh, oops, we made a mistake.
	So now we have Groovy Bee toothpaste here that is back in stock at the store.
	Trail mix that people absolutely love.
	Remember, everything is laboratory tested.
	Almost all the ingredients we have are certified organic.
	We do extensive lab testing, testing for heavy metals and glyphosate and for many of our products, also testing for aflatoxins.
	For everything, we test for microbiology, E. coli, salmonella, yeast and mold and so on.
	Check out our macaroni and cheese instant meals there.
	You just boil water, you put in the macaroni, which is made out of quinoa, amaranth and organic rice, all organic ingredients.
	It's got a really great texture.
	And then the cheese powder sauce is with real organic powdered cream, real organic cheddar cheese powder, real organic butter powder, onion powder, and so on.
	It's the best macaroni and cheese you've ever had.
	Certainly the healthiest and cleanest.
	In addition, we've got quercetin supplements and our Seven Treasures Mushroom Blend, which is, of course, a combination of different functional mushrooms, including lion's mane mushroom, which is one of my favorite mushrooms because that's what I use after I severely lacerated my finger.
	But lion's mane, check out the website, by the way.
	Here's what lion's mane actually looks like growing in the wild.
	Pretty cool, right?
	We've got a lot of items here available now in stock ready to ship out at healthrangerstore.com.
	And remember that all of your purchases help support this free speech platform to support our interviews, our investigations, and our broadcasts that bring you news and analysis every single day that you just won't find on places like YouTube, which are heavily censored.
	So thank you for your support.
	I'm Mike Adams of healthrangerstore.com.
	Take care.
	Your own government has the power to activate a kill switch on all telecommunications, instantly shutting down all private phone calls and texts.
	An EMP weapon or solar flare can achieve the same result.
	Rolling blackouts or permanent power outages will also take out the power supply to cell tower antennas, rendering mobile devices all but useless.
	During these emergencies, how do you stay in touch with the important people in your life anywhere on the planet?
	The answer is the Bivy Stick at sat123.com.
	The Bivy Stick is a two-way satellite text messaging device that uses a satellite constellation, not cell towers, to send and receive text messages.
	It works anywhere on planet Earth, including in war zones or blackout areas.
	In unpredictable times, the Bivy Stick helps you stay connected when it matters most.
	Visit sat123.com to get one while they're still available.
	A global reset is coming, and that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲