All Episodes
Previous Next
Feb. 8, 2024 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
53:19
John Beaudoin joins Mike Adams to reveal DEATH CERTIFICATE PROOF of COVID conspiracy...
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Welcome to today's interview on Brighteon.com.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and today we have a brand new guest for you, but someone who has done some amazing research and work on what's really happening with excess mortalities and things related to pandemics.
Well, you're about to find out because he's got a new book coming out called The Real CDC that exposes a lot of this.
His name is John Bodwin.
He's an engineer and now an author and analyst.
Welcome to the show, John.
Great to have you on today.
Thank you very much, Mike.
Good to be here.
Well, it's a pleasure to be able to speak with you.
This is our first interview, so you want to give our audience just a little bit of background of who you are and what you're doing?
Yeah, sure.
Well, it goes back a long way, but I'll go right up to the COVID era.
My career was in engineering.
I put together large contracts, and at that point, it became...
Necessary to show my sons that education was important.
So I went back for an MBA. Just as I graduated, I lost my son.
He wanted to buy a motorcycle, so he bought a motorcycle.
Yeah, I was on the couch for a couple of years, depressed, and then COVID hit.
And my middle son said, it's all BS. And I was like, well, gotta be a good dad, even though I thought he was right.
Like, oh, you have to take this seriously, Charlie.
And I looked into the data and I found some, I'll just say, nefarious behavior by the CDC. I can't prove anything, so there's no point in talking about that.
But it kind of set me off.
And I went to law school at 56 years old because I had sued the governor over the mask mandate.
The governor then changed the order for the entire state of Massachusetts to get around my lawsuit because it was a unique lawsuit.
Nobody had brought a case like that.
I'm deaf in one ear from getting a...
A shot of streptomycin and penicillin mixed together in 1968 for the Hong Kong flu.
And it made a bunch of kids go deaf because they never tested those two in combination.
And that's how they learned by, you know, we want to make some money, we don't have a vaccine, so let's just give them a bunch of antibiotics.
And they made a bunch of kids go deaf.
I said, you're depriving me of receiving free speech from others because you're ordering them to cover their mouths.
I need to see their lips move.
And so that's, you know, free speech, not just speaking, but the right to receive free speech from others.
Good point.
And in order to get around the lawsuit, he rescinded Order 31, reissued the Order 31 was in May.
So he reissued it in November under Order 55.
And there was an exception in Paragraph 2B. That's a buyer between anybody hearing impaired doesn't have to wear a mask, meaning no one speaking to me had to wear a mask and I didn't have to wear a mask.
And in doing so, the way standing doctrine works is I don't have a particularized complaint to me because I had nothing to complain about.
I didn't have to wear one.
Nobody speaking to me had to wear one.
And the case was dismissed based on that.
But, hey, I got the governor to change the order for the whole state.
If any kid in a class had like 10% hearing loss, he could have said, nobody in the class has to wear a mask.
It's a fragment strategy in military or sales strategy where you pick off pieces.
Eventually, you could get rid of the hole, but Massachusetts loves their masks.
They sure do.
Yeah, well, Massachusetts, I mean, you know, I'm in Texas, I'm a Texan, and we here in Texas, we view Massachusetts as an authoritarian, tyrannical, you know, woke regime that's gone insane.
It's insane.
You know, I'm behind the blue wall, as I say, and I can't wait to move to New Hampshire.
But just to give you an idea, I don't know if you want to go here yet, but I'll just say Massachusetts.
$47 billion in venture capital financing across 600 companies.
10 companies over a billion in revenue each year in Massachusetts Pharma.
50 companies over 100 million in revenue, Massachusetts in Pharma.
Moderna's headquarters is here.
Manufacturing and R&D is here.
Pfizer's divisional headquarters for the mRNA vaccine is also in Massachusetts.
Walensky, you know, the old CDC person, she's retired recently, but she's from Massachusetts.
And then my congressman is Jake Auchincloss.
He is the son of Hugh Auchincloss, a couple of decades under Fauci as the number two guy in the NIAID. So everything to do with Massachusetts.
Now, if also if you look at Wall Street, right, you got all the holders of stocks, BlackRock and so forth.
They live in New York and New Jersey.
So at the beginning of the pandemic, you had New York, New Jersey and Massachusetts running away from the world in purported COVID deaths.
They lied.
All these COVID deaths are occurring.
And they were so far ahead of the world that Belgium was a distant fourth.
Massachusetts was 50 percent more than Belgium.
And it was New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts leading the world.
What are the odds that a virus starts halfway around the world and yet the most deaths in the world occur in the three states that have the most to gain financially from the vaccines?
Right.
So what was it?
Large-scale vaccine compliance by the people there?
No.
So the deaths that they were talking about with COVID, saying that they had so many COVID deaths here, I have...
A million unredacted death certificates, half a million from Massachusetts, and then balance from Minnesota and Vermont.
Okay.
And of the 500,000 Massachusetts death certificates, I can go in and look at anything because it's unredacted.
I'm the only, you know, we have a few that we now share the data, but to have that much unredacted data, there's very few of us in the world who have that.
So wait a second.
Let me stop you there.
First, how did you acquire these half a million unredacted death certificates?
Well, I put in...
Was it a FOIA thing?
Yeah, public records request is the Massachusetts term for that, but yes, a state FOIA. And I put in eight.
Seven were denied.
And the one that hit was the entire death certificate database from Massachusetts.
I was shocked.
He gave me the whole thing, but you wouldn't answer the subset questions that were within it, right?
You can't have, you know, an ice cube, but here's a glass of water with ice in it.
Right.
So then as an engineer, obviously a sharp-minded analyst, you've been able to go through these half a million death certificates.
And what have you found?
Yeah, so, well, the fraud.
First of all, we'll talk about acute fentanyl intoxication in the setting of SARS-CoV-2 positivity.
They tested dead bodies for COVID, people that died from fentanyl overdose.
Blunt force trauma to the head, blunt force trauma to the torso, old people who fell down the stairs.
Or car accidents.
We know that they were doing this.
Everybody says, yeah, we know that.
Okay, well, I have proof.
I have proof what they were doing from the medical examiner's office.
Now, you have to extrapolate because if they're willing to take accidental deaths and label them COVID, what do you think they're willing to do to 90- and 80-year-olds who die of a heart attack?
COVID, COVID, COVID.
It's impossible for New York and Massachusetts and New Jersey to have had that many COVID deaths from COVID when it does not act that way, the disease itself, anywhere else in the world.
Okay, so I have so many questions, but I'm sorry about the interruption, But just to summarize what you're saying is that you believe that Massachusetts misattributed these deaths to COVID because of some kind of statewide pro pharma bias to to to protect or enhance the interests of the pharmaceutical giants that are in Massachusetts.
Is that is that a fair sort of summary so far?
That's a very good assessment.
And to lend credibility to why I think that, you have to go to the behavior of people and how it can be changed through policy.
So if you incentivize something, you will get more of it.
That's an economics principle.
Walter E. Williams, Thomas Sowell, Milton Friedman all said the same thing.
Oh, I love the people you're citing right there.
Yeah.
They subsidized COVID being put on death certificates.
And Massachusetts being at the forefront of the whole pharma thing and understanding what was going on nefariously, that policy rolled out in Massachusetts hospitals before other state hospitals.
So, say, Minnesota didn't have as big a first wave.
I have their death certificates as well.
They have a big second wave.
They caught on.
Okay, this is what we should do later.
Now, in addition to the fraud, there was also murder.
Hold on a second.
Again, I'm sorry to interrupt, but I want to clarify, when you say they subsidized this, what you're saying, I believe, is that when hospitals dishonestly altered death certificates to say that cause of death was COVID, then those hospitals were given extra reimbursement by the government.
Is that correct?
Oh, yeah.
The CARES Act reimburses them.
It's an intricate, you know, it's very difficult to get the accounting.
You need a whistleblower.
You have to have a whistleblower within the hospital to get the accounting, and I don't have one.
It's very difficult, but it's in black and white in the CARES Act and the acts that flow from that.
If you look at the CMS.gov site and you look for the NCTAP payout for, say, remdesivir and baricitinib, you can look at the November 2 date and you know that they started Prescribing more remdesivir and baricitinib because acute renal failure deaths skyrocketed at the time, not with the EUA, the lower age EUA, and then, excuse me, the older people were April, and then there was a May, then there was an October 22nd one.
But when the November 2nd date, when the money kicked in for remdesivir and baricitinib, the acute renal failure deaths started happening.
So I know I'm jumping around.
I was talking COVID. There's incentives for COVID too.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez was bragging on TV that she was the one who got the $9,000 payout for funerals for anybody who died from COVID. Now, what does that do?
Everybody wants to treat the family, right?
Here's an extra $9,000.
You lost your son, you lost your daughter.
Okay, that's great.
great, but what about the kid who's been dying from cancer for like 10 years and he dies at 12 years old?
He doesn't get the $9,000.
Unless they market COVID.
Exactly.
But, and the COVID kid who got hit by a car, that family gets the $9,000.
It's insane.
Now, when I interrupted you though, you were about to talk about, I believe hospital murder.
Yeah.
Yeah.
I have two publications coming out.
The real CDC doesn't deal as much with that, but the CDC memorandum, it's written as a notice of criminal liability.
It's going to be sent in an unredacted form with all actual names to the directors of the CDC, NIH, FDA, 12 of their subordinates, It's going to be copied to at least six attorneys general, and I'm trying to get it before grand juries to investigate those entities, where it has not only all of the fraud from writing COVID when it wasn't COVID, covering up vaccine deaths by calling vaccine deaths COVID deaths.
Yes.
It also has, I have some case files.
I have about five or six case files that are several thousand pages each.
Wow.
You know, for example, a 28-year-old woman is brought in by her mom, and 95% oxygen, okay?
97.9 temperature.
Pulse rate, normal.
Blood pressure, normal.
Breathing rate, normal.
She tested positive for COVID, so they hit her with remdesivir immediately, 200 milligrams.
And then she's got to stay for five days to finish the course, 100, 100, 100, 100.
And then...
The vital signs were still good, but they started prepping her for ventilation.
Uh-huh.
Right.
We've heard this story.
Yep.
Lorazepam, indazolam, propofol, dexmedetomidine, I'm missing some fentanyl.
And then you get the infection, the lung infection from the ventilator.
And then, oh, it's sepsis.
And now it's vancomycin.
So a lot of people will say remdesivir causes kidney failure.
And that may be true.
But I think vancomycin causes kidney failure or vancomycin and remdesivir.
The problem is the doctors don't really know.
I don't really know.
Why?
Because the government won't study it.
And we're talking 100,000 excess deaths across the United States from a single cause of death, acute renal failure.
Okay, it's 100% increase in Massachusetts and Minnesota, 2,000 excess in Massachusetts, 1,600 in Minnesota, and the national U.S. data shows about 100,000 excess of renal failure.
Why?
Now, the fact that the government isn't looking into the greatest single cause of death in 100 years tells you that they don't want to know, and that's willful disregard for human life.
And they have a legal duty to act.
Now, their legal duty, and this is what the CDC memorandum gets into, it's 172, I think, factual allegations in enumerated paragraphs, and then a legal analysis of uttering involuntary manslaughter, felony murder, and depraved heart murder.
When are you releasing this?
Within a few weeks.
I mean, you mentioned that you're sending this to attorneys general, but are you in conversations with any attorneys general to consider actual prosecutions?
Not yet, no.
I live in Massachusetts.
Right, right.
Your AG there is not going to do anything.
And, of course, our AG here in Texas is trying to stop an invasion at the moment, so he's kind of busy.
He's definitely getting a copy.
He's one of the six for sure.
Absolutely.
Well, make sure you get it to the AG of Missouri as well.
He's on the list.
Okay, he's on the list.
All right.
Now, the website, let me remind the audience here.
The website here is called therealcdc.com, and that's where this book will be available.
And John, what's the timeline on, or how do people get the book and when can they get the book?
Okay, they can pre-order it now, and I apologize to those who've already pre-ordered and have been waiting.
I took control of the operation in the past two days, and I just talked to a new book designer.
It's done.
I just applied for the Library of Congress number, so tomorrow...
It should go to the printer and it'll take two weeks for the printer and then the fulfillment house about a week to ship.
So we're looking, I'm saying outside February 21st for the print version and the ebook I hope to be in people's hands within a week.
Okay.
All right.
Fantastic.
And so that's, again, therealcdc.com.
And we'll mention that again here.
But I have a question for you, John.
Since I have not seen these Massachusetts death certificates, I have a question that perhaps you can clarify.
So do some of these death certificates say things like blunt force trauma, like the description, and then at the bottom conclusion, COVID? I'll explain it all.
Okay, please do.
Thank you.
Yeah, yeah.
So death certificates are, they have part one and part two.
Part one is causes of death.
Part two is conditions contributing, that may have contributed to death.
So part one is supposed to be in backwards time order.
And that means the immediate cause of death, the last thing that happened before death is cause A. If there's nothing else, that is also the underlying cause or the root cause of death.
The government calls it an underlying cause of death.
I don't like the terminology.
I would rather say the root cause, the thing that began the causal chain that cascaded.
So if it's A, cardiac arrest, B, pneumonia, C, COVID, you would say that COVID caused the pneumonia that caused the cardiac arrest.
And COVID might be in weeks or it'll be like weeks or days.
And then the pneumonia would be, you know, days.
And then the cardiac arrest might say five minutes, right?
Their heart stopped and they tried to restart it.
So that's how they're supposed to be written.
That's the instructions.
But because not everybody's a medical examiner and does 400 a year, a lot of doctors attending to a patient at time of death fill out death certificates.
And many of them, they do it wrong.
They get them backwards.
They put stuff in, like diabetes, smoking, things like that should be in part two.
Unless the diabetes really did contribute to the death, then you can put it in Part 1 as the last cause listed, which would be the UCOD. So because they all get them wrong, when I do my analyses, I just look at any codes that are applied to all those.
And I'll explain the codes in a minute.
But anything that's on there, I don't care where it is in Part 1 or Part 2.
And there you get into ketris paribus, which is all other things being equal in Latin, right?
So if you're holding everything else constantly, the same people filling out death certificates are filling out death certificates.
They have mostly the same medical examiner staff and doctor staff at care homes who fill out a lot of these.
And so with all that being equal, I'm just going to use all the codes.
So all the causes.
Now, the problem is The WHO creates these codes, and the CDC adopts them.
And you have a code like I46.9, which is cardiac arrest unspecified, or I49.9, cardiac arrhythmia unspecified.
I26.9 was that pulmonary embolism without mention of acute core pulmonale.
So everything has a code.
And that's how you can track them.
Here's the problem, Mike.
There's a single point of failure for all this in the United States, and that is the CDC. The states send the death certificates, death records, I'll call them, they send the records, electronic records of death, to the CDC for coding.
The CDC becomes a single point of failure, and they run them through a program called TransAx and another one called ACMI. And the TransAx and ACMI software takes the prose, the English words, from the death certificates and converts it into those international codes.
Now, you mentioned blunt force trauma.
Yes, the death certificates do say blunt force trauma to the head, blunt force trauma to the torso.
To give you another example, one would say, let's see, acute bronchopneumonia in the setting of idiopathic thrombocytopenia in a person recently vaccinated.
In other words, they have no idea what just caused that.
Well, this time, well, it's under causes of death.
For that particular, the one I just told you about, by the way, is the only death certificate coded for vaccine death in Massachusetts.
Oh, wow.
Okay, and that was January 16, 2021.
Two weeks into the vaccine, it killed Solomon.
Solomon was 60 years old.
And so...
As these medical examiners or doctors write on the lines A, B, C, D, they often don't write like what's in A, what's in B. They just write sentences across the open frames that they have.
And the program has to sort out, it has to apply the, let's see, acute bronchopneumonia.
So it does a J code for the pneumonia, J18 something for the pneumonia, probably J18.9.
And then it'll be the one for, it mentioned thrombocytopenia.
It's a D6, maybe 69.5 maybe.
And then the vaccine...
This time it was coded Y59.0 viral vaccines.
So they really did code it.
And they also used T88.1, which is other complications from immunization not elsewhere classified.
It's more of a generic, you injected somebody with something and immunization and it killed them.
So that was an honest death certificate.
The interesting thing is that after that point in time, there are another eight in Massachusetts.
use it.
Some of them say like a recent vaccine on date of death died from cardiac arrhythmia.
It wasn't coded.
And then this other one like died, died the day after died two days after one guy was five minutes.
He didn't make it out of the clinic and they were, they didn't put the codes on.
So what you have there is it's an automatic software program.
So the fact that they're missing the codes when the words are there, whoever certified those death certificates were honest people who wrote that the vaccine was causal in the death.
And yet the codes aren't there.
That means either somebody turned off that feature at the CDC, or they deleted those codes once they were generated by the software.
Wow, so we're talking...
Sorry, go ahead.
Well, I would characterize this as a CDC cybercrime.
Absolutely.
These are 20-year federal felonies.
18 U.S.C., 1035, 1040, 1043.
That's false statements in health care matters, fraud and disaster relief, and fraud by wire.
There's plenty more.
It's a big conspiracy.
These are felonies.
And how many death certificates just in Massachusetts do you think were affected by what you and I are characterizing as a crime carried out by the CDC? Well, so I have a lawsuit against the governor, the public health commissioner, the chief medical examiner, and four individual medical examiners with 123 pages that identified basically felony fraud.
How many?
I mean, I have no idea.
You can't tell.
I have to get into discovery, which probably won't happen.
I mean, my case was dismissed.
Now I'm on appeal at the First Circuit.
Of course, based on standing, the same thing that Texas and Missouri was dismissed on when they sued Pennsylvania trying to Make Pennsylvania adhere to their own election laws, and they use the same case, Iqbal v.
Ashcroft, against them as they did me.
That case has to go.
It's highly unconstitutional.
So this is a cover-up that also appears to involve the judicial system as well.
I mean, they're not letting the government be held accountable for these crimes.
Crimes that are associated with, I mean, let's just call it what it is.
This is homicide of Americans.
Yes.
Absolutely.
So, you know, homicide includes both manslaughter and murder, and that's why I draw the analysis in the CDC memorandum across both involuntary manslaughter and then felony murder.
And then, well, felony murder is like somebody who dies unnaturally during the commission of an inherently dangerous felony.
The needle in the arm, you're breaking the skin, it's a medical battery that's inherently dangerous in itself.
But then knowing that the results of your fraud will cause the deaths of others, there's an argument to be made that's inherently dangerous.
But then I do an analysis of depraved heart murder.
They know.
They know that people are going to die, and yet they're covering them up anyway.
I mean, that is depraved heart murder.
Wow.
But I want to get back to something you said about the judiciary.
People talk about the right to free speech being held most sacred, right?
It's most important.
Well, it's not.
Because the only way you have that right, or the right to religion, freedom of religion, or the right to peacefully assemble, you don't have any rights unless you have a right to redress them in court and you have a stable society with a functional court system.
So your right to petition the government for redress of grievances is, in my opinion, even higher.
Because without that, you get nothing.
I can go punch somebody in the mouth because they're talking too much and say, shut up.
And they better shut up.
Because, you know, there's not going to be any court around to prosecute me or for him to sue me.
So the only thing that keeps society as stable and orderly and civil is a functional court system, which we do not now have.
So by using this standing doctrine, they've taken our First Amendment rights, and in Massachusetts it's Article 15, that right, and the U.S. Constitution was mostly based on the Massachusetts Constitution.
People don't realize that.
But that Article 15 says the right to a jury trial and to redress your grievances is to be held most sacred, most, above all others, most sacred.
And yet they're trampling it.
They're trampling the most sacred First Amendment right of our people by using case law from Iqbal versus Ashcroft, who was a guy they grabbed in New York City.
They threw him in prison for 9/11 because he had a bad immigration paperwork or something.
They beat the hell out of him, apparently, and they deported him to Pakistan.
He then sued not only the prison guards, but through Respondet Superior, let the master respond.
He used that to sue all the way up to Attorney General John Ashcroft.
Now, instead of using simple attenuation to say that, hey, that's ridiculous, this case is dismissed, they created new language.
And they said that, you know, it's not a plausible claim and used some other, you know, highly subjective language that now the Supreme Court and all the other courts everywhere, you know, there's probably 100,000 cases in the last few years that have been dismissed on standing.
where you don't even get to have a substantive argument.
And getting dismissed based on standing means the judge didn't like your case.
Right.
The subjective whim of any judge can flick you right out of their court against your First Amendment rights.
That's insane.
Yeah, that is insane.
I mean, how can we not have standing when we are directly affected by this?
Absolutely.
So I go through an analysis of that actually in the book, The Real CDC. Okay.
All right.
Yeah.
So you seem like a very intelligent person who's willing to follow the evidence.
Just from talking with you, that's my assessment here.
What conclusion have you come to about how this could possibly be?
How could the CDC and the FDA and the government and the judicial system and the hospitals and so on all be simultaneously corrupted to carry out homicide and to cover up for each other?
How do you explain this?
Well, that's in my wheelhouse because I say I'm a systems engineer.
My career was in electrical engineering, but it's really systems engineering.
And then on top of that, the MBA. I understand the finances, the accounting, also a lot of training in organizational behavior.
And I mean, when you're selling, you're kind of manipulating people.
It might be ethically fine.
You're giving honest information.
So I don't like the negative connotation of the word manipulation.
But my point here is I understand various interrelated systems, and if you look at the CARES Act, it's nothing more than a behavior modification.
Having been written in 2018 and then tweaked a few variables in March of 2020, it's like, oh, okay, everybody stay inside.
All the things they did were all manipulation of people, and the financial incentives that we talked about a few minutes ago With regard to remdesivir, varicitinib, we didn't even talk about the ventilator.
But yeah, that's a big number, too.
The incentive of putting COVID on a death certificate.
All those things were done on purpose.
The COVID numbers were driven and the ventilators were driven to, well, make the world afraid.
I mean, we were numbers one, two, and three.
Massachusetts, New York, New Jersey, with Belgium a distant fourth, as I mentioned before.
How the heck does that happen?
And it scared the world.
So whenever Europeans or Asians looked, oh, how many deaths are in the world?
They tend to look at the United States as a single entity, single nation, even though we're 3,000 miles wide, 1,500 miles tall, north to south.
We have 330 million people spread across multiple cultures as well as climates, which all make a difference in how diseases propagate.
So, without looking at any of the variables, they look and they say, oh, wow, USA is burning.
Look at all these people dying.
Not realizing that it was just three states in the little corner of the northeast that had the most to gain.
So how do they do it?
They do it through incentive programs, which is solicitation of fraud.
And they also do it through coercion.
The administrators of the hospital said that they would, you know, come down on the doctor's heart, take their medical licenses, fire them.
The American Board of Internal Medicine, American Board of Family Medicine, American Board of Pediatrics, you can go right now online.
And you can find at their website, there's an open letter to all the doctors in the country that if they spread medical misinformation about the vaccine, their license will be suspended or revoked.
Right.
Now, if that ain't coercion, I don't know what is.
That's highly illegal.
It's been up there for two years, maybe closing on three years now.
It's insane what we allow in our society because nobody understands law or how to take them to task.
But your explanation makes a lot of sense.
We're talking about this financial incentive infrastructure that was deliberately engineered and then propagated and, of course, obediently followed by those who benefited from it.
But that doesn't explain the judicial corruption.
The judges...
You presumably don't get paid one way or another.
I mean, the way the court case goes.
I mean, in reality, we know there's a lot of backroom deals and so on.
But how do you explain the fact that they circled the wagons in courtrooms all across America?
Do you think that those judges were being issued commands to just make sure that the vaccinations continue no matter what?
Okay, that's at the intersection of law and economics.
Okay, so you have a theory of judicial economy where the courts can't handle all the cases coming in, so they have to dismiss some.
So they get into a habit and a mode and a behavior that then becomes persistent.
And in that behavior, they're dismissing cases based on standing because they don't want to hear them.
Now, what happened was there was an increase.
I have the numbers in my book.
I can't remember them.
I wrote the book, you know, like eight months ago.
But let's say around 100,000 extra cases in 2020.
I didn't even look at 2021.
There's even more.
But with that number of extra cases, the system couldn't handle it.
So they're using the standing doctrine to dismiss a bunch of cases that otherwise might have been heard in another time.
But in that time, through judicial economy, they get rid of them.
Now, the problem with that argument, and I plan to, you know, someday maybe I'll write a book on this.
I'd like to talk to, say, like Richard Epstein at the Chicago School of Law and Economics, see if we can get together a good crew, put together an economics paper to study this.
Very simply, if they were to adjudicate the first 50 cases, Then many of the issues would be solved in law.
The interpretation of law with regard to those cases and those issues would be solved, and the subsequent cases would either be brought or not brought based on that law.
And so the 100,000 of cases that they're taking time to go through, you know, standing doctrine dismissals, where people file a complaint, you go through a motion to dismiss, an opposition memorandum, and then a decision.
All that stuff can be avoided by making decisions on cases early.
So do you want to pay later or do you want to pay sooner?
The analysis must be done to show that standing doctrine doesn't even make any sense for judicial economy because they're creating more cases that are never solved and people just keep bringing cases and getting dismissed.
So there's a systemic problem from a kind of a top level.
I hope I answered the question, but a lot of these answers are – the understanding comes from an understanding over all systems.
Well, that does help answer it, but I'm also struck by the fact that most of the victims of this are dead and therefore cannot be active, obviously, in bringing these cases up.
I mean, it's one of the, quote, advantages of the pharmaceutical parties is that they kill their victims and dead people don't sue.
Yeah, well, yeah, I mean, it's kind of hard.
I've got my picture of my son right here.
Yeah, I wanted to sue over my son.
He died in a motorcycle accident.
And, you know, I wanted to take Yamaha on.
Yeah.
But I was happy to wait the three years for the statute of limitations.
And when the day went by, I was relieved because I just don't want to have to deal with that in court.
And what I'm telling you is that, you know, for the living people who've lost family members, some of them are angry and they're going to sue.
But most of the people just like are just so devastated like I was.
And I sat on the couch.
I didn't want to talk to anybody, you know.
So it's tough.
I know for people who haven't lost a kid or something, everybody says, oh, I'd do this.
Oh, I'd go after them.
You don't know what you're going to do.
Your life is just shattered.
And, you know, for the COVID stuff, when people were dying, like I have kids, records of kids who've died.
And the parents not only haven't come forward, some of them are still dying.
I'll give you an example.
A 16-year-old girl running cross-country dies of lymphohistiocytic myocarditis while running.
And a doctor then gets together some other, I don't know, med students or lower-level doctors to write a paper.
She advises them.
So this doctor, Sarah Goff, was the advisor on the paper.
And the paper was about doctors spreading...
Vaccine misinformation on social media.
She wants to stop it.
She wants to censor them.
That's what the paper was about.
Well, the 16-year-old girl who died of myocarditis was her daughter.
So some people just don't...
It's like a religion to them.
They won't get it through their head.
The vaccine might have caused death.
And then there's the 7-year-old girl who they said died from COVID. That's why I got the death certificate database.
I got it because there's no way that she died from COVID. And when I looked into it, I found a VAERS report And there's only one seven-year-old girl in Massachusetts matching that exact time frame where she was injected on January 13, 2022 on the VAERS report.
The VAERS report ends on the 15th, and it says, you know, she's in bad shape.
Her first vaccine was started vomiting in five minutes, vomited for eight to ten hours.
And the second vaccine the report is about, it says stomach pain, 103 degree fever, didn't have a bowel movement for three days, and then it ends.
The report ends.
Well, Cassidy died.
The first chapter of my book is Cassidy.
Died on January 18, five days after.
And the only thing in Part 1, causes of death, the only thing in Part 1 is complications of coronavirus 19 viral infection.
That's the exact phraseology.
Wow.
Complications of what?
I mean, you've got to say what the complications are of, right?
Is it pneumonia or is it cardiac arrest?
I mean, what is it?
Nothing else.
And only...
That medical examiner is Michelle Matthews.
She's a named defendant in the lawsuit I have.
She's the only one to use that phraseology, and she used it a lot.
And a lot of times there was nothing else listed, which is ridiculous.
We're paying these people to record public data.
Honestly, and they have to certify it with their signature in their capacity, and they're lying.
So the real danger moving forward from what you're describing is the fact that this has all been swept under the rug.
There hasn't been accountability.
There hasn't been any truthful accounting of what's happened, and thus they can do it again.
And with all this buzz now about so-called disease X, I don't know if that's just something made up, a scare story or something real or a bioweapon or what.
I don't know.
But if something does come along, they already have a playbook.
They already have court precedent.
They already have the CDC crimes.
I mean, they can roll out the same template again at the CDC and just delete all the issues that they don't want to show up in the database.
I mean, nothing's stopping them at this point.
Right.
Yeah.
Well, there's a lot in there.
Let me just say that I wrote a bill for New Hampshire.
It's now House Bill 1661.
Had a hearing on it last week or the week before.
I think it was last week.
On Thursday, it went pretty well.
The House member, Jason Gerhard, who submitted the bill, he gave me a lot of time to speak to the committee members.
And I think I was there 15 minutes or something.
Following me was the opposition by the Department of Health and Human Services of New Hampshire.
And it was revealing.
Because they were asked, are you concerned about the amount and ages of excess deaths that are now occurring?
And the answer was, well, we go through and we look at data.
And then she asked again, no, aren't you concerned about a 27-year-old or a teenager dying more than normal?
These are two bureau chiefs, and he deferred to the woman who said, well, before I came here, I had my staff look up code U12.9, and we didn't find any.
U2.12.9 is death or injury from COVID vaccine.
The problem is there's no reference to that in the CDC. That code was made by the WHO. I'm not sure the US even adopted it, and if they did, no one has ever used it that I can tell.
You can't find it on the CDC's website.
I'm sorry to interrupt, but this is the whole point, that the CDC is blocking the capturing of such codes.
Yes.
So if they're citing that and saying, well, you know, we checked with the people who carried out the crimes to see whether they had recorded their crimes in the database and it wasn't there.
Therefore, they're innocent.
I mean...
Well, it's worse, okay?
This is how...
I said that I would give them a few days to respond after I sent a letter a couple days ago.
So, you know, I'm saying I'm breaking it on your show here, but...
Y59, so UK and Germany adopted that code.
But in adopting that code, there's a note on it.
There's a notation.
It says it's a subcategory to Y59. It's like poisoning by, you know, drugs that were given, not like on the street, but, you know, lawfully and in the course of a treatment.
So Y59.0 means viral vaccines.
T88.1, I told you about that one earlier.
So these codes are available.
They are used on Massachusetts and Minnesota death certificates.
They are spit out by TransAx and Acme software by the CDC. And yet this woman who works for the Department of Health and Human Services of New Hampshire Didn't seem to know about that code, and she cited a code that the U.S. doesn't even use.
So, like, you have the whole state, like, that's who you're relying on?
That's your single point of failure in the state of New Hampshire looking for excess deaths in children and young people?
That shouldn't happen?
So, in other words, you've turned a blind eye to all these deaths, and you're not investigating them at all.
And that was their testimony to the House committee.
I was shocked.
I was shocked.
I came home.
It took me days to write the four-page letter.
And when I wrote it, all the excuses they gave were so ridiculous as to why not pass my bill.
But what my bill does is it forces the Department of Health to provide transparency to public health data so that the citizens can see what people are dying from.
Well, of course, I mean, but transparency is the very last thing they would ever want to happen because that would destroy their whole business model in pharma and the vaccine industry for sure.
I mean, vaccines are inherently dangerous.
Yes.
And these vaccines are killing a large number of people.
And the cover-up is quite real.
But, you know, it strikes me that...
What you're describing here in this interview today is exactly why the public has lost faith in so-called health authorities.
If anybody believes anything that the FDA says or the CDC says or a state health authority, you know, you're insane.
You can't believe anything they say.
They're either incompetent or they're lying.
Almost never do they tell the truth, it seems.
Absolutely.
The lying is just very frustrating as an engineer.
The numbers are supposed to be the numbers, but they're not.
A lot of them are lies.
You have to sift through to find the behavior.
That's why people talk about US statistics.
You can't look at it that way because Minnesota is different from Massachusetts.
It's different from Texas.
You have different culture and practice, custom and practice on how to write the words.
The words are translated differently.
So whereas in Minnesota, you might have bone and articular cartilage, C4-1 going up, or is it 1-4?
I think it's 4-1.
In Massachusetts, you have C7-7.
And by the way, secondary malignant neoplasm of the lymph nodes in Massachusetts alone is...
More than 400% of normal in 2023.
400%.
258% in 2022.
That's the whole turbo cancer thing.
But I do want to get back to the whole vaccine market.
So there's good news and bad news.
The good news is they threw the vaccine market under the bus.
The people who did this, they knew that public confidence would wane in the vaccines and that a lot of people would die.
They used it to usher in policies to mess with the election and to take control of the people of the United States.
So I don't want to get all a conspiracy theory, but you may agree or not.
There were things that were done at a higher level where they knew that the vaccines would look bad.
In fact, if you ask people, I know people who took the flu vaccine for the last, I don't know, 30 years, every year, religiously, they won't take another flu vaccine because of the COVID stuff.
And this guy was telling me I was wrong and he was following, you know, John Campbell.
And I'm like, John Campbell's a year and a half behind me.
Stop listening to him.
John Campbell, he's eventually correct.
It just takes a couple of years.
Yeah.
I like the guy.
I'm sorry.
I don't know if he's a competitor.
I probably shouldn't have brought him up.
Oh, no, no, no.
I like the guy, too.
It's like, hey, where have you been?
He does a really good job communicating to people over 60 years old.
Really does.
That's my group, man.
I'm going to be 60 this year.
A lot of people I worked with are in their 60s.
They listen to them.
And I hope...
I hope he can come up to speed because, Mike, we only scratched the surface of what I have.
I can look at every single cause of death.
What I did is I found that the respiratory causes were up in 2020.
This is the first thing I did.
I wrote a script to highlight which year I had columns, 2020 and 2021, which would go into higher excess.
And when I put all the codes in, and I had it conditionally turn yellow if it was the higher one of the two years.
Well, all the J codes, which are respiratory, they all went high in 2020.
Then all of a sudden in 2021, I look at the circulatory, which begin with I, and the blood, which begin with D, those are all high in 21.
Everything just switched.
It's like, okay, wait a minute.
If you look at the spectrum profile of a disease, I call it the symptom spectrum profile, and you see that All of a sudden, on a year boundary, when we introduce a vaccine, the excess deaths go from more respiratory to more circulatory in blood.
It's not a disease that did that.
Diseases don't say, okay, it's 2021 now.
We're going to change how we kill the human body.
It's ridiculous.
So there's that, the age spectrum profile.
This is the thesis of my book.
I said the symptom spectrum profile, the age spectrum profile, and the seasonality profile.
So when in the year do people die?
You know, and respiratory in the winter.
I'm in New England.
So, you know, the further north you go, the more seasonality curves take effect and the more like almost like sinusoidal deaths curves occur in the upper ages.
So with all that analysis, I determined that everything changed and there's no way it can be COVID. It can't be COVID. Okay.
It has to be the vaccine.
Well, I'm really glad that you've done so much analysis, and I look forward to taking a look at your book.
And I want to remind the audience that your website is therealcdc.com.
That's it, right?
Yep.
Therealcdc.com, and that's the name of your book coming out shortly in just a few days.
We're out of time, but I want to thank you, John, for joining us today.
This has been a really enlightening conversation.
I hope we get a chance to talk again.
Thank you much.
I can talk for four hours.
Well, we've just done one, so we'll work on the second one coming up soon.
But I want to see your report, I mean, what you're sending to the Attorney General.
So send that to my producer, if you would, please.
And I'd love to take a look at that.
And maybe from that, depending on what the AGs do, maybe we can get you back on for a follow-up.
That sounds great.
We'd love to do that.
We've got to get the word.
Well, we'll do it.
We'll have editorial coverage as well.
So, all right.
Well, thank you, John.
Pleasure to meet you today.
Thanks for your time.
Thanks.
Have a good day.
Thank you.
Okay, folks, John Bodwin there, a fascinating man who's really passionate about looking at this and trying to uncover the truth.
We need more people like that across America.
If not for the corruption of the judicial system like we talked about and the medical system and the pharmaceutical giants and so on, we would have already been, we would expose all this already.
But here we are living in interesting times.
But thank you for watching today here on Brighton.com.
Of course, I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighton Uncensored.
As you can see here, feel free to repost this interview on other channels or other platforms as well.
Just give a link back to John's website, therealcdc.com.
Thank you for watching today.
God bless you all and take care.
Today's segment is brought to you by Goldbacks, which is what I'm holding in my hands right here.
This is a stack of Goldbacks, and these contain actual, verified, physical gold in every one of the Goldbacks.
These are labeled ones, and they contain one one-thousandth of a troy ounce of gold.
It's actually built into the...
You can find more information about this at my website, verifiedgoldbacks.com, which is our affiliate site.
We do earn a small percentage on your purchases here that helps support the program.
This shows my laboratory testing results where I tested using a kiln method, an ICP-MS mass spec method, and also an acid stone method.
I tested the gold mass, there it is on analytical balance, and the gold purity for each of the different bills that are available here, the denominations.
Now, gold backs are available in 1s, 5s, 10s, 25s, and 50s.
And what's amazing about them is that they make gold spendable and highly divisible.
You know, normally you can't take a gold coin and just hand somebody one one-thousandth of a coin.
That's almost impossible to carry out.
But with goldbacks here, I can do that.
This is one one-thousandth of an ounce of gold.
In my hands, verified, I know the gold is actually in here.
You can melt it down and get the gold.
And so I can give this to somebody as a gift or as payment or in exchange, and it makes gold spendable.
And unlike crypto, it doesn't require the power grid to function.
It doesn't require the internet to function.
This is off-grid money.
It's outside the banking system, and it doesn't require electricity to function.
This is a stack of 100 of the Goldback Ones, and you can buy these stacks at verifiedgoldbacks.com.
Let me show you actually the recovery percentages here.
If you scroll down, oh, there's some of the gold foil that you get when you melt a 50.
That's what it looks like in my hand there.
This is one of the kilns that we use.
And continuing, here's the recoveries right here.
We recovered 102% on the minimum and about 107% maximum from these gold-backed bills.
So in every case, we recovered more than 100%.
And that's what these masses are here.
Phase two, this is the final mass.
And it shows you how that's more than what was expected.
So you're actually getting all the gold that's promised and a little bit more.
And here's the purity numbers.
We found very small parts per million traces of magnesium, iron, copper, zinc, silver, and lead, which shows that this is over 24 karat gold.
And, by the way, this is always very common in gold.
You're going to get some impurities, and that's why it's called 24 karat and not 100% pure gold.
Anyway, we did acid stone test results and so on.
You can check out all of this at verifiedgoldbacks.com.
Get these into your hands.
They're gorgeous to look at.
People absolutely love them.
They love them as gifts.
And, again, it's instantly spendable gifts.
Assets with real physical gold in them, which means you don't have to have faith and trust in a government for these to hold value.
No government issues these.
No government even recognizes them as currency.
No, they're gold, which transcends every government and has outlasted every government in the history of the world.
Gold will be here when the dollar collapses.
Gold will be here when the yen collapses, when the euro collapses, when the United States of America, as a government, collapses.
Gold will still be here, and gold will still hold value.
So do your own research.
Don't take this as financial advice, of course.
I'm not your financial advisor, but I'm adding these to my own preparedness activities because I recognize the practical utility of these.
And in my experience, everybody that I've handed them to has instantly recognized their value, and frankly, they want more of them.
So check it out, verifiedgoldbacks.com.
Thank you for watching today.
I'm Mike Adams.
Take care.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection