Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 19, 2023 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

02:13:09

BBN, Dec 19, 2023 - Israel accused of secretly deploying NEUTRON BOMBS in Gaza...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to Brighton Broadcast News for Tuesday, December 19th, 2023.
	Mike Adams here.
	Thank you for joining me today.
	It's not that uncommon to use the term bombshell to describe news that you're breaking, but today we have a literal bombshell piece of news because this news is about neutron bombs.
	And the claim by a British scientist who I've interviewed today, the claim that Israel is using neutron bombs right now, which is leaving behind verifiable levels of enriched uranium in Gaza,
	and that the United States also possesses this weapon, and that the U.S. use it in Fallujah, And that Israel also used this in Lebanon in 2006 and in Gaza in subsequent years.
	This is going to take a little bit of science to explain, but once you understand what has been found and confirmed, you will never be able to unsee this.
	So stay tuned for that interview with Chris Busby, who is with GreenAudit.org, coming up here today.
	I'm also going to cover his most recent paper, which was just published on December 8th.
	And it is titled, Evidence for the Use by Israel of a Neutron Uranium Warhead in Palestine and Lebanon.
	So this is an eye-opening topic here with massive global implications.
	But first, let me cover some other breaking news around the world.
	I won't take long on this because we've got to get to the main topic here today.
	But remember that volcano that was about to blow in Iceland?
	Well, it has erupted and it is now being called a, quote, worst case scenario.
	That's according to Icelandic volcanologist Thorvaldur Thordarsson, if I'm getting that correct.
	It says the eruption appears big and only about two kilometers from major infrastructure.
	Hundreds of people had been evacuated in previous weeks, by the way.
	But this eruption is very close to a geothermal power plant near the town of Grindavik.
	And apparently this eruption is sending jets of lava 330 feet into the air.
	It's not clear yet whether this volcano will have global implications, but we'll keep an eye on it and keep you posted.
	Alright, next story is that applesauce products which have been sold in the United States have been found to be heavily contaminated with lead.
	These apple fruit puree pouches have been sold on Amazon and some retail outlets in the United States, including Dollar Tree and some grocery chains, including Schnucks.
	So these products, according to the Epoch Times, applesauce pouches may have been intentionally contaminated with lead.
	And the CDC says it has identified a total of 125 cases from 22 states across the nation where children in particular were exposed to alarming levels of lead and they were poisoned.
	Their blood tests showed lead levels as high as 29 micrograms per deciliter Which is way above, it's almost 10 times the blood limit that's set by the CDC in terms of lead presence in the blood.
	And because these applesauce products were packaged for children, children consume them, and many have been exposed.
	These children experience signs of headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, anemia, and changes in activity levels.
	Lead is, of course, highly toxic to human beings, and it can cause kidney problems and cardiovascular effects and so on.
	This is a reminder that it's important to make sure the food you consume has been tested for heavy metals and as you know I have a food science lab and we run heavy metals testing on all the nutrition products and food products that we sell at healthrangerstore.com.
	And we've talked previously about high lead levels in moringa.
	We've had lead and cadmium in cacao products and chocolate products that we've seen.
	And of course we reject those lots that have high heavy metals in them.
	But turmeric is very often contaminated with high levels of lead, and we've also seen it in maca root and ginger powder and so on.
	A lot of the root vegetables tend to have high levels of lead.
	But in this case, with the applesauce products, the FDA and the CDC believe that there was intentional contamination.
	And apparently this product was manufactured in Ecuador.
	It's currently believed by US authorities, although they don't have any proof of this, that there was, quote, economically motivated adulteration, which means that they believe somebody intentionally dumped lead into the applesauce vat of this manufacturer in order to destroy the company's reputation and economic viability.
	So this is a case of Economic sabotage that also involves poisoning children with lead.
	How crazy is that, huh?
	This is just one more reason, like I said, to make sure that you are consuming clean foods.
	And these particular products were not certified organic, but it is important to note.
	That USDA organic certification does not require testing for heavy metals in any way whatsoever.
	No testing required.
	So organic or non-organic, it can all be contaminated with lead, so keep your eyes open for that.
	Now speaking of poisoning children, here's a story out of childrenshealthdefense.org from The Defender.
	Fluoride linked to diabetes in kids.
	And this is citing a new study published in Environmental International, December 13, 2023, says that a Mexican-U.S. study group found that excess dietary fluoride causes a rise in biomarkers for diabetes, heart disease, and obesity in Mexican children.
	The study also points out that excess of fluoride intake is associated with dental fluorosis, Often described as cosmetic but severe cases can result in tooth decay or skeletal fluorosis which leads to bone fractures and also neurodevelopmental issues in children.
	So this is just more evidence that the fluoridation of the public water supply is another form of mass poisoning of children in the United States.
	Interestingly in Mexico they do not fluoridate the public water supplies but they do this in the United States.
	Because fluoride is a neurotoxin.
	It also dumbs down children.
	And since this has been going on for decades in the United States, we have seen the great dumbing down of the U.S. population with this neurological weapon.
	And of course, since COVID, we're hit with biological weapons as well.
	It's very clear that somebody doesn't want the U.S. population to remain viable for very long, do they?
	They've been poisoning populations with fluoride and pesticides, herbicides, gender bender chemicals, as well as glyphosate and heavy metals and vaccines for decades.
	Just in time for the replacement wave of illegal immigrants crossing the border, coming into America to replace all the Americans that are dying or being pushed out of their homes with the coming financial collapse.
	I mean, it's a blueprint, folks.
	You're watching a blueprint being played out in real time.
	And the goal is to first destroy Americans, replace them with immigrants, and then in phase two to exterminate most human beings on the planet as they roll out the robots and the automated systems, AI systems, and so on, which we've talked about in other podcasts.
	But fluoride is simply part of that equation.
	And notice that fluoride dripped into the water supply violates every premise of ethical medicine.
	Number one, the people drinking the fluoride have never been diagnosed with a fluoride deficiency.
	So how can you give them a drug, which is what fluoride is, if you've never diagnosed them?
	If they've never even seen a doctor that said, oh, you have a fluoride deficiency.
	And then second, it's the same fluoride dose for everybody.
	How can you prescribe a drug, drip it into the water supply, and give every person the same dose regardless of their existing dietary exposures of fluoride?
	Some people have much higher level of fluoride in the foods they consume.
	Some children are given fluoridated water that they buy at pharmacies because you can actually buy bottled water for babies that is poisoned with fluoride.
	It used to be sold at mainstream pharmacies across America and it probably is still sold there as well.
	So fluoride in the water is a medical crime against humanity and it's been going on for decades.
	And if you drink tap water, you might have already been lobotomized anyway.
	I mean, who drinks tap water?
	Alright, moving on to the next story.
	U.S. Steel has now been sold to Japan's largest steel maker, Nippon Steel.
	That's right, one of the largest steel producers in the United States.
	U.S. Steel has been sold for $14.9 billion dollars.
	Of course, it still requires regulatory approval for the deal to go through, but the deal has been announced.
	And this demonstrates that U.S. infrastructure is being sold off to investors from around the world.
	Notice, by the way, That the United States is already very bad at manufacturing things.
	We've talked about this with the military munitions manufacturing and the inability of the United States to keep up with weapons supplies.
	We saw this with Ukraine.
	And now we're seeing some of this with the Middle East situation, which continues to deteriorate, by the way.
	But what does the U.S. make anymore other than just fiat currency?
	And the answer is, each year there are fewer and fewer products that the United States of America manufactures and exports.
	Some of the largest are agriculture products.
	You know, grain, corn, wheat, barley, rice, things like that.
	Well, any third world country can export corn.
	That doesn't make you a world leader, just exporting a bunch of crops.
	What about the high-tech stuff?
	You know, what about...
	Infrastructure.
	What about components?
	Well, most of that comes from places like Japan or Taiwan or Korea or China, not the United States.
	And now the U.S. doesn't even have a big part of its steel infrastructure.
	At least it's not owned by the American people any longer.
	Well, the implications of this are, of course, quite dramatic because steel is one of the key components that goes into the manufacture of military equipment.
	That's right.
	Tanks, infantry fighting vehicles, and also steel for, of course, building construction.
	Steel is used in reinforced concrete, obviously, in the form of rebar.
	But steel is used in many other products, including bridges and ports and so on.
	Steel is a key infrastructure component, and the fact that foreign investors will be holding a significant portion of the United States steel infrastructure, that should be raising alarm bells in the minds of anyone paying attention.
	Now, speaking of infrastructure and the tearing down of infrastructure, you know, the World Economic Forum and the anti-human globalists, they've been wanting to tear down the food infrastructure as well as the world's energy infrastructure in order to drive human populations into poverty and famine and ultimately mass extermination.
	Well now, from dossier.today, from Jordan Schachtel, I think is the name, we have a story called, World Economic Forum demands $3.5 trillion per year to decarbonize the planet and to reach net zero and restore nature.
	Now, $3.5 trillion per year now?
	The WEF wants $3.5 trillion per year?
	I think that exceeds the entire non-business tax revenues of the United States of America from the point of view of the federal government.
	You know, personal federal taxes are, I think, two to three trillion a year or something in that range.
	So this is even higher than that.
	And from the story, it says that according to a new white paper published Wednesday by the Davos Outfit, that's the W-E-F, in partnership with McKinsey& Company, oh boy, it's time to print more money to further devalue the wealth of the common man in order to pursue the apparent noble goal of decarbonization.
	Well, decarbonization means extermination of humans, of course, because human beings are made of carbon.
	You are made of carbon.
	I am made of carbon.
	And so are your pets, by the way, and your children, if you have children.
	They're all made of carbon.
	And so are your garden plants.
	So decarbonization means exterminating life on planet Earth.
	From the report, it says...
	The world needs up to 3.5 trillion of additional investments each year to reach net zero and restore nature.
	Now, what is net zero?
	Net zero means they kill off so many human beings That there aren't enough alive to use much energy that contributes carbon dioxide to the atmosphere.
	And remember that carbon dioxide is a good thing for the atmosphere.
	It's what plants need for photosynthesis.
	It's what plants crave.
	And if you don't have carbon dioxide, you don't have photosynthesis, which means you don't have food crops, you don't have trees and grasses and rainforests or anything.
	I mean, you have total mass death across the planet if you eliminate carbon dioxide.
	But that's exactly what the globalists want to do.
	And also the climate cultist lunatics who think that carbon dioxide is bad and they can't wait to try to get rid of all of it.
	But in this story, it says, according to the white paper, private organizations should surrender their autonomy to governments in exchange for an endless amount of credit and a backstop of protection should their business fail in the open market.
	So essentially what they're doing is they're saying that if you are on board with this decarbonization agenda, then you will have access to credit.
	And if you're not on board, you will have no access to credit and good luck trying to grow your business.
	That's essentially what this is.
	They are denying credit through collusion with the banking sector.
	They're denying credit to businesses that don't push the climate cult lunatic agenda.
	That's what this is.
	So this word, decarbonization, this word is used 91 times in this memo from the WEF. They're going crazy over this term, decarbonization.
	What does this mean exactly?
	Well, obviously, they're saying that carbon is bad.
	Carbon is the basis of all life on our planet.
	And as far as we know, it's the basis of life in the cosmos.
	Carbon-based life forms are probably very common throughout many planets, you know, in our galaxy.
	Now, arguably, there could be other forms of life.
	And some people say that silicon is giving rise to AI systems right now, but that's a different discussion and debate.
	All life as we know it, as far as we know, is carbon-based life.
	And that includes plants and animals and insects and pollinators and whales and dolphins and all kinds of furry little creatures and polar bears as well.
	So when they're saying that decarbonization is the goal, they're saying that extermination of life is the goal.
	It's very clear.
	Carbon should not be on the...
	Enemies list.
	If you look at the table of elements, carbon is right there in a key location for a very important purpose.
	Almost all organic molecules that you are familiar with are carbon-based molecules.
	In fact, that's what defines the whole branch of organic chemistry is molecules that contain carbon.
	Versus, you know, inorganic matrices of elements like salt.
	Sodium chloride does not contain carbon.
	But vitamin C contains carbon.
	It's only hydrogen, carbon, and oxygen.
	That's it.
	All cannabinoids are made out of carbon.
	All anthocyanins are made out of carbon.
	Oh, hey, that reminds me.
	By the way, we have a really great anthocyanin concentrate product at our store, healthrangerstore.com.
	Where we combine all these berries, aronia berries and blueberries and blackberries and so on, and we dry them and powder them into an anthocyanin-rich powder formula.
	And if you learn about anthocyanins, you will know why this matters.
	Because anthocyanins can do amazing things to help support your immune function and your normal healthy body function.
	Let's just put it that way.
	Anyway, I don't mean to get distracted.
	But it just reminded me.
	Anthocyanins are made out of carbon.
	Sulforaphane, made out of carbon.
	You know, that's the anti-cancer nutrient in broccoli sprouts and cruciferous vegetables and so on.
	Anyway, if you go to the entire table of compounds that are found in healing foods and superfoods and herbs...
	Almost all of them are made out of carbon.
	So when these globalists say decarbonization, they're not just talking about eliminating carbon dioxide.
	They're talking about eliminating life.
	Life as we know it in the cosmos.
	And that's because these WEFers are Satanists.
	They follow Lucifer.
	I think they worship Lucifer.
	And Lucifer is giving them orders of what to do.
	And this is about exterminating life on earth because life is an extension of the miracle of God.
	You know, the gift of life is a gift from God.
	And human beings are created in the image of God.
	And this is why Satanists or Luciferians or globalists, they hate humanity because human beings remind them of God.
	This is also why they hate babies and they love abortion, child mutilations, so that those children can never have children of their own.
	That's part of what the transgender agenda is all about.
	It all goes into the bucket of Satanism.
	You know, abortions, transgenderism, climate cult, lunacy.
	Oh, anti-humanism and transhumanism, all that.
	It's in the bucket of Satanism, and that's where the globalists are operating from, and that's why they want to decarbonize the planet, because that means extermination of all human beings.
	Alright, now let's turn our attention to the feature story of the day, which is this claim by Christopher Busby, who is saying that there is evidence for the existence of neutron uranium warheads being used in Palestine by Israel.
	And that these warheads, he says, have been used before in Fallujah, as well as in Lebanon.
	And we're going to go into some detail here, but let's set the stage so you understand why this matters.
	And don't forget, by the way, that depleted uranium shells were sent by the United Kingdom to Ukrainian forces to be used in Ukraine.
	And depleted uranium is a form of uranium where certain isotopes have been removed.
	And it has very high density and it is radioactive at some relatively low level.
	But most importantly, when DU shells strike targets, they ignite because aerosolized uranium, when it's subjected to very high temperatures and pressures, I believe 600 to 700 degrees Celsius, it ignites into kind of I believe 600 to 700 degrees Celsius, it ignites into kind of a mini
	And the reason these are used by tanks is because when a depleted uranium shell strikes another tank, the DU has the density to penetrate the tank's armor.
	And once that shell penetrates the armor, the uranium material is vaporized or aerosolized.
	It's sprayed, in essence, inside the enemy tank where it ignites, creating a thermobaric bomb inside the tank, killing everybody inside instantly, not just from the explosion, but the fire and the heat.
	And as you'll hear in the upcoming interview with Chris Busby...
	The result is that you have soldiers in the tanks turned into crispy, charred carcasses.
	I mean, they're basically just turned into ash, but in a horrific way because of depleted uranium.
	Well, and then this depleted uranium continues to persist.
	In the area where it was fired, and it becomes airborne.
	Because these particles are really microscopic.
	They're on the nanoscale.
	And they become airborne, and then these particles can be inhaled by people.
	And they are.
	And when they're inhaled, then they have what are called secondary effects.
	And this is all explained by Chris Busby coming up, by the way.
	But the secondary effects include something, as I understand it...
	Being transducers of background gamma decay, radiation, and in effect translating that into photoelectric energy inside the body which can cause chromosomal damage at a small cluster of cells that are very near the uranium particles which are typically lodged in the lungs or other places inside the body, but typically in the lungs.
	So, in other words, if you use depleted uranium on a battlefield, you are blanketing that country with airborne DU particles, some of which settle on the ground, but then are reintroduced into the air, and so they're inhaled by people, and then these have long-term health effects among the people, which includes genetic damage.
	So that's one thing you need to know about depleted uranium.
	Depleted uranium consists almost entirely of uranium-238, which is the most prominent naturally occurring isotope of uranium.
	Now, uranium-238 is radioactive.
	It's not highly radioactive.
	It has a much longer half-life than other isotopes of uranium, which means that it emits less energy in any given area.
	A period of time.
	But it is radioactive.
	Now, uranium-235 is what's desired for fissable material, which means it can carry out fission.
	And this is used to make weapons, nuclear weapons, that explode and release energy through the process of atomic fission.
	Or it can also be used to make nuclear fuel rods for nuclear power plants.
	Which obviously, you know, produce heat and then electricity from the conversion of mass into energy.
	But that's uranium-235.
	Now, uranium-235, if you have a lot of it in a high concentration, that's called enriched uranium.
	The enrichment means you're enriching the U-235 isotope.
	When you enrich uranium, you are discarding non-235 uranium.
	Which is typically, like I said, 238.
	That 238 material is called depleted uranium.
	And that material is what is used by the military to make these weapon systems, or shells in particular, that are fired at enemy tanks, like I just described.
	So that's the difference between depleted uranium and enriched uranium.
	Now, what's important to understand here is that You shouldn't be finding extra enriched uranium in places like Fallujah or Lebanon or Gaza unless somebody is using some kind of a weapon system that is producing uranium-235 as a byproduct of the weapon.
	Now, simply firing depleted uranium rounds in Gaza, which consists of uranium-238, this would not produce uranium-235.
	So what you're about to hear, as I go through this study from Chris Busby and also the interview with him, what you're about to hear should understand the much higher levels of uranium-235 cannot possibly be caused simply by the use of depleted uranium weapons.
	That would only produce uranium-238 on the battlefield.
	But what's being found in Gaza and in other locations is a much higher ratio of uranium-235 than is normal.
	And when I say normal, I'm referring to what are called naturally occurring isotopic ratios.
	So if you go dig up A bunch of dirt in your backyard, let's say.
	You're going to get some small amount of uranium for every kilogram of dirt that you dig up.
	I think there's something like one or two milligrams of uranium in every kilogram of dirt, just typically speaking, as an average.
	It's a relatively small amount.
	However, if you take that uranium and you were to break it down into its isotopic ratios...
	Then you would get mostly uranium-238 and a little bit of 235 and an even smaller amount of 234.
	Those ratios are known as the naturally occurring isotopic ratios.
	And of course, many other elements, but not all, have other naturally occurring isotopic ratios as well.
	For example, lead.
	So if you look at the isotopes of lead, 208, 207, and 206 are the three most common isotopes that exist.
	I know in our lab, when we run ICP-MS analysis on lead, we typically look at 206 and sometimes 208.
	And as a food scientist, by the way, sometimes you have to choose an isotope for reasons that you may not imagine.
	Sometimes we choose 206.
	And that's because there can be isotopic interference based on, well, based on other elements that can appear as doubles, you could say, or what are called dimers.
	They can double simultaneously.
	So if you have an element at 103 or 104, and then it goes through the machine doubled up, Then two 104s can appear as 1208, which could look like lead if you don't know what's happening.
	And also you can have oxygen attached to elements, which adds the mass of oxygen to it and can make it look like the mass of lead and things like that.
	So...
	When you're working with ICP-MS instruments, and your samples are in nitric acid, and you're pumping argon into the instrument, and there's atmospheric oxygen, and so on, and there are double-charged elements, you have to know what you're doing.
	You have to look at all these different mass numbers and kind of know what you're seeing, because the instrument Actually doesn't tell you that it's seeing lead.
	It's telling you really the mass to charge ratio of what it's seeing.
	That's called M over Z, mass to charge ratio.
	That's really all it's telling you.
	And fortunately, the table of elements actually means something.
	So, you know, if you're sure that you're looking at a mass of 206, you know that's lead.
	Just like if you're looking at a mass of 238, you know that's uranium.
	Now, isotopes of lead that are 206, 207, 208, and there's also 204, these isotopes are stable.
	They're not radioactive, which means they do not decay.
	But many elements, of course, have radioisotopes that can exist, and lead, for example, has lead 209, which is radioactive, and it has a half-life of 3.2 hours.
	So it will decay to 208 lead.
	Half of it will decay in 3.2 hours.
	And then there are other isotopes such as lead 211, which will decay in 36 minutes, by the way.
	And you don't want to have radioactive lead around because, of course, the decay is driving, in this case, beta particles into your tissues, right?
	So that's why these radioactive isotopes don't exist in nature very often because they've all decayed down into stable atomic masses.
	Now, uranium isotopes, there are quite a few of them, and they're only slightly radioactive because uranium-238, the half-life on that, according to the chart I'm looking at, is 4.46 times 10 to the 9th years. is 4.46 times 10 to the 9th years.
	That's a lot of years, folks.
	So it's not going to emit much in the way of alpha particle radiation anytime soon.
	But that's not the key mechanism of how it causes damage.
	And this is something that Chris Busby speaks about.
	It's not just the radiation issue.
	It's, well, something involving secondary effects.
	Now, uranium-235, again, that's the enriched isotope of uranium that's used for fission.
	That only occurs naturally at 0.72%.
	It's kind of rare.
	That's why they have to dig up a lot of uranium and use a lot of enrichment in order to get much more of uranium-235.
	Uranium-235 has specific atomic properties and outer orbiting shells of electrons and Just all of its atomic properties that make it more fissible.
	And that's why they want 235, but they have to mine a lot of material and they have to do a lot of centrifuge operations in order to separate 238 from 235.
	And this is why...
	Nuclear material requires centrifuges, and these centrifuges have to run at very high speed for a very long period of time in order to separate atomic elements by their mass.
	All right, before I bore you with any more physics here, let's get to the paper by Chris Busby and read the abstract, which will give you a lot of information here.
	Here we go.
	Since 2003, measurements made by Green Audit in Fallujah...
	Iraq 2003, Lebanon 2006, and Gaza 2008 have provided unequivocal evidence of uranium residues which show anomalous uranium-238 to uranium-235 isotopic signature ratios.
	He's talking about higher levels of 235 versus 238, by the way.
	Continuing, results of measurements by independent laboratories in Europe and the UK using different techniques reveal the presence of enriched uranium in biological materials and environmental samples, including soil, bomb craters, and air as recorded in vehicle air bomb craters, and air as recorded in vehicle air filter dust.
	That's a pretty cool technique, you know.
	You just take air filters out of vehicles and then you can dissolve those in nitric acid solution.
	And you can use those in your lab via ICP-MS in order to get a pretty good analysis of what's in the air, by the way.
	So air filters...
	You know, block or trap the particles.
	And in effect, they're collecting samples of what's in the local atmosphere.
	Anyway, continuing from recent 2021 results published in the journal Nature, enrichment levels in background samples from Gaza show that enrichment ratios have been increasing markedly since 2008.
	Since enriched uranium is an anthropogenic substance, Which means man-made, which does not exist in nature.
	The question arises as to the source in the weapons employed by the USA, Fallujah, and Israel in Lebanon and Gaza.
	It is proposed that the only logical answer is that a uranium-based weapon exists that produces uranium-235 by neutron activation.
	And has been deployed.
	Such a weapon must be some kind of neutron bomb.
	A neutron bomb.
	So Chris Busby goes on to explain that he believes neutron bombs are being used by Israel and dropped on Gaza and were dropped on Lebanon Because neutron bombs cause extensive genetic damage to the human beings, even though they don't cause as much kinetic damage to the infrastructure, you know, compared to the genetic damage they cause.
	What he's saying is that this is a real kind of genocide.
	I mean, in the literal sense, the genotype, the genes are targeted with a genocide.
	To create long-term infertility and birth defects, mutations, cancers, and everything else that goes along with this.
	And that these neutron weapons are being used by Israel to exterminate An entire ethnic group, which is of course the Palestinians.
	So this would be, if true, considered ethnic cleansing or genocide as I mentioned, and weapons of mass destruction that are clearly illegal from the point of view of the United Nations and treaties that have been signed against these kinds of weapons.
	Let me read you something else from this paper.
	In 2009, Green Audit was contacted by doctors in Gaza who were concerned about very unusual weapon effects, seen in children and adults exposed to the flash and shock from Israeli bombs and missiles.
	Busby arranged to visit Egypt to obtain samples.
	Again, vehicle filter samples.
	Despite a cover letter from the President of International Doctors for the Environment in Belgium, the UK Foreign Office would not provide permission for Busby to visit.
	Samples were nevertheless smuggled out of Gaza to the UK via the Irish Republic.
	I mean, imagine having to smuggle soil samples or car filters just to run scientific tests.
	Measurements were made of the uranium enrichment ratio.
	And as in Lebanon, results show the presence of enriched uranium.
	And then similar results were found in Gaza in 2021 as well.
	And I can only imagine what the results might show right now.
	So this seems to indicate, at least from the point of view of Chris Busby here, who is the expert on this, seems to indicate that there are some kind of neutron bombs being detonated in these attacks on Gaza and Lebanon, and that the high presence, unusually high ratio of uranium-235 to 238 is...
	Really the irrefutable proof that neutron bombs are being used.
	Otherwise, there would not be this uranium-235.
	And in the interview, as well as in his paper, he talks about a once-secret weapon that was called red mercury.
	It was developed by the Soviet Union.
	Even though it was called red mercury, it did not involve atomic mercury, by the way.
	It involved the infusion of hydrogen atoms into a lattice of uranium in order to achieve, maybe I'll call it enhanced detonations and the release of neutrons and neutron bomb effects that are in some ways related to the way cold fusion works, which we've covered previously, cold fusion.
	Cold fusion now called low energy nuclear reactions or LENER.
	But from the paper by Busby, he says, there are pieces of evidence that strongly suggests that there is a new weapon that involves uranium, which creates enriched uranium, he's talking about at detonation, and which employs cold fusion, that it was he's talking about at detonation, and which employs cold fusion, that it was invented by the Soviet Union sometime in the 1980s, and it was produced
	And then in the 1990s, there were widely discussed reports and statements about a new radioactive weapon based on a material called red mercury.
	In the UK, Channel 4 produced a documentary about this weapon in which they consulted with Dr. Fryden, Frank Barnaby to see if there could be some explanation.
	What was red mercury?
	Could this be the basis of a bomb?
	One Russian expert told them that it was the size of a ballpoint pen cap but could destroy Moscow.
	He goes on and writes that later after this documentary the idea that such a weapon was likely or possible was dismissed by the scientific community.
	Nevertheless Sam Cohen stated that he believed it was possible.
	But there were some interesting pieces of information about red mercury that emerged for those who knew what was important.
	Cohen referred to the Ballot technique mechanism for red mercury.
	This is an explosive that releases energy on impact, purely as a result of impact pressure.
	Apparently this material, this red mercury, was being sold at 250,000 British pounds per kilogram.
	And the Soviets were selling it.
	And this material had very high density, 20 grams per cc.
	Which, I think that's very close to uranium's density, which is also very, very high.
	Uranium, I think, is even more dense than lead, but I would have to check that.
	Yeah, here it is, 70% more dense.
	Then lead, and lead is already, of course, very dense.
	So there's a scientist that's named by Busby in this paper, as well as his interview, Emilio Della Guidici.
	I'm not sure how to pronounce that.
	But this scientist says that this neutron bomb is a version of cold fusion that was discovered by Fleischmann and Pons.
	And, of course, I've followed Fleischmann and Pons ever since 1989 and the cold fusion experiments, so I was really intrigued when Busby mentioned that he worked with Fleischmann in 1979 on the Raman spectrometry experiments of adsorbed water.
	Now, the point of all of this is that Del Guidici believed that if the uranium laced with hydrogen in a lattice-type structure, you know, hydrogen interspersed inside or in between uranium atoms, which are very large, If this combination hit a target and then deformed while burning at a very high temperature, that it would achieve fusion.
	And that this fusion would produce an enormous burst of neutrons that would actually cause transmutation of the uranium-238 up to uranium-239.
	So, you know, it would add mass to the uranium.
	And then this 239 would very rapidly decay to uranium-235.
	With the emission of an alpha particle, by the way.
	So there's a reaction that's actually noted in the paper.
	Now, I do want to be clear that mainstream physicists will say that this is impossible.
	But then again, mainstream physicists say that cold fusion is impossible.
	And I've interviewed numerous experts on cold fusion.
	And cold fusion has been replicated in hundreds of laboratories all over the world.
	And it's not explainable through mainstream conventional physics.
	So just because physicists don't know about something doesn't mean it's not possible.
	Although I just wanted to make that note that if you go to a physicist and you share this podcast with that physicist, they're going to say, no, it's all nonsense.
	None of that ever happened.
	It's impossible.
	But according to Del Guadice, it is possible through a mechanism that is not fully understood.
	It's possible that a neutron bomb would be the result that would detonate with a massive wave of neutrons that would cause ultimately the creation of U-239 decaying to U-235.
	While also, of course, inundating anybody nearby with a wave of neutrons and also, of course, alpha particles from the decay of the U-239.
	So this would cause extensive genetic damage to anybody within the blast radius.
	Now Busby, by the way, he thinks that the more likely explanation for the existence of uranium-235 is that the naturally present uranium-234 Would take up a neutron during the neutron, you know, emissions blast, and that would turn it into uranium-235, which is, as we said, relatively stable.
	And that might explain the presence of uranium-235.
	But these are just theories, okay?
	We don't know for sure what's causing the uranium-235, but we know it's there.
	I mean, that's the mystery.
	Where is it coming from?
	It's not naturally occurring, and you don't have these ratios of uranium-235 in Egypt.
	Most likely, if you took samples in Saudi Arabia or Jordan or Syria, you wouldn't find these high ratios of 235 either.
	So the 235 is only being found in these areas where Israel is dropping these bombs, or where the United States dropped bombs.
	So there's something about these bombs that is producing uranium-235 in unnatural ratios.
	But Busby speculates that this is the fabled red mercury weapon, and he believes that it involves uranium reacting with tritium and deuterium in some kind of special ratio in order to produce this neutron explosion and cause these transmutations of the atomic elements.
	So there are good tools available today to look for these isotopes.
	We have some of those tools, by the way, in our lab, ICP-MS, mass spectrometry, but Busby mentions some other tools that he has.
	I think, what was it?
	A spectrometry instrument.
	I think he mentioned the sodium iodine crystal could be used for that, and that could detect things like cobalt-60.
	Now, importantly, if these neutron bombs were being used...
	Then you would expect to see very high rates of cancer and birth defects and chromosomal damage and things like that.
	So I asked Busby about that in the interview.
	I said, have there been studies showing this?
	And he said, yes, that he published studies on this.
	He says that for Fallujah, the genetic effects found were profound, and they included congenital malformations, high rates of cancer and leukemia, and a skewed birth-sex ratio, which he explained to me caused fewer males to be born versus females,
	which is very unusual because typically there are slightly more males born than females in normal circumstances, but now The number of males being born has plummeted something like 25% in terms of the ratio versus females, something in that area.
	And that's profound.
	It shows that there are genetic effects of this, which may be, of course, transgenerational.
	So this could affect people in Fallujah or in Gaza for generations to come.
	And that may be the point.
	This might be a family tree terminator weapon, you could say.
	It's designed to end the genetic line of an entire ethnic group through exposure to gene-damaging or chromosomal-damaging weapon systems.
	And then, of course, The mainstream media is ordered into silence to not talk about it at all.
	You're not allowed to talk about these kinds of things.
	And so even finding news about this is shockingly difficult.
	Now, one website called theinteldrop.org is covering this with the following title, evidence.
	Apartheid Israel is assembling a prohibited neutron bomb for Gaza.
	And this article, of course, quotes Christopher Busby and others who are experts in this area.
	So I'm not going to go through all that information again because that's what we just covered.
	But the implications of this are enormous.
	And it's a big mystery.
	Why is this Uranium-235 there in Gaza and in Lebanon and in Fallujah?
	Where did it come from?
	Why is it there?
	If it turns out that Israel is using neutron bomb weapons, then it means that Israel is quite literally carrying out crimes against humanity, war atrocities of a genocidal nature that goes beyond the mere mass bombing of residential areas and hospitals and refugee camps and so on, which is bad enough all by itself.
	Israel has...
	We've slaughtered over 25,000 civilians in Gaza so far, and the bombings continue.
	But what if in doing that, they've actually caused so much genetic damage that those people in Gaza will never have grandchildren?
	Perhaps many of them will not have healthy children, or if they do have children, those children may not be viable in terms of reproduction.
	Then this would be such a nefarious crime That it would surpass the evil nature, probably, of Adolf Hitler.
	I mean, it's bad enough for Hitler to have rounded up and exterminated six million Jews.
	But even Hitler did not possess a weapon that could expose the surviving Jews to so much radiation that they could not have grandchildren themselves.
	You know, Hitler did not have the technology to end the lineage of the Jewish people.
	If he had that technology, he probably would have deployed it, and there would be no Jews today.
	But thankfully, he did not have that technology.
	However, Israel, at least according to Busby and this analysis, Israel appears to have that technology, and they appear to be using it against...
	The Palestinian people.
	Again, carrying out some level of a genetic holocaust that even Hitler could not achieve in his wildest dreams.
	Now, if this is what's happening, the whole world should be alarmed by this.
	And let there be no mistake that if Israel possessed this technology, there's no question in my mind that they would be using it.
	We've learned quite exhaustively here in the last couple of months that Israel actively seeks the total extermination of the Palestinian people.
	They openly talk about it.
	Their political leaders, their military leaders, and their citizens openly talk about the complete extermination, killing every last Palestinian that they possibly can, women and children included, elderly hospital patients, not just Hamas, but eliminating the entire elderly hospital patients, not just Hamas, but eliminating the entire lineage of Palestinians.
	That's what Israel seeks to do.
	And it appears to be part of this agenda for a greater Israel where Israel wants to control, well, most of Saudi Arabia, Jordan, and Syria.
	And Israel wants to take over part of Egypt, and of course all of Lebanon.
	And this is called Greater Israel, and there have been maps published about this.
	But in order to do this, Israel would have to, of course, murder hundreds of millions of Arabs in all these surrounding nations that I just mentioned and others that might not go along with this, such as Iraq and Iran.
	So is this Israel's secret weapon, a genetic termination weapon that according to just what it appears to be on the surface, it appears that they're dropping bombs on apartment buildings and hospitals.
	But in reality, that's a cover story for the real weapon, which is causing chromosomal damage to such an extent that the entire ethnic group will not be viable.
	will not be able to reproduce ever again.
	And that's the Terminator agenda, in essence.
	That's the extermination of the entire group.
	I don't have the final answers on this, but it's something we all need to consider.
	Now, there are, of course, a lot of Palestinians who live outside of Gaza, and they live in Europe, and they live in the United States and Australia and many other countries.
	So even if Israel succeeded in terminating the genetic viability in Gaza, that would not end the Palestinian people because, of course, their genetics would continue elsewhere around the world.
	And it is worth noting, by the way, just from a humanitarian point of view, I think that the genetics of the Palestinian people are very good.
	And I think that when Palestinian people are given opportunities for education and economic freedom, I think they can be some of the brightest and most capable and most innovative and creative people on the planet.
	In fact, if you look at the history of civilization, and Persia in particular, the Iranian people, which I understand are not the same as Palestinian people, but the Iranian people are brilliant people.
	Highly intelligent, highly capable, and many different ethnic groups throughout the Middle East are also very intelligent, very capable people.
	It's just that they've been haunted by so much war and conflict, which appears to be, by the way, influenced by a globalist's desire to achieve first dominance and control, enslavement, and then extermination of the human race.
	So Middle Eastern ethnic groups have often not been given the chance to succeed as well as they could.
	But when you look at what certain groups are able to achieve in places like Turkey, it's quite impressive.
	Or Iran, like I said before.
	Middle Eastern people are very highly intelligent people.
	And so I believe, by the way, just from a humanitarian perspective, that, of course, an ethnic group Genocide campaign is always wrong.
	You should not seek to wipe out any group of people or to terminate their ability to reproduce.
	It doesn't matter what group of people that we're talking about.
	It's wrong.
	And so neutron bomb weapons, if they are being deployed as genetic weapons, those would qualify as crimes against humanity.
	By the way, you might consider this to be inappropriate, but so what?
	I will just add my own personal opinion that Persian people are stunningly handsome and beautiful.
	Persian men are very handsome.
	Persian women, stunningly beautiful.
	I mean, it's something about...
	The ethnicity of Persians, that not only are they highly intelligent and highly capable, but also physically very attractive and have good genes and good health and so on.
	It is really noteworthy of what these cultures are able to contribute to humanity.
	Now, I could say something positive about every culture, you know?
	Russian culture, very highly intelligent people, incredible programmers and planners.
	Japanese culture, incredibly detailed engineers and thinkers and planners and really amazing at making complex instruments and machinery and so on.
	You know, I could say nice things about Palestinian culture.
	I could say nice things about Indian culture, even American culture from time to time, although I tend to put down America because I love America and I don't want to see it go down the tubes.
	That's why I'm kind of harsh on America a lot.
	But I love what America offers the world in terms of independent thinking and creativity, innovation, entrepreneurship, freedom of speech, whatever we have left, and so on.
	You know, the American spirit is really something special.
	Look, every nation, every group has something to offer the world, and that includes Palestinian people, by the way.
	And it includes Persian people, Iranian people, you know, it includes Russians, it includes Chinese, it includes Koreans, and so on and so forth.
	It includes Western Europeans and the French and the Germans and on and on and the Italians.
	Don't forget the Italians, man.
	They're the only ones that have banned insects from their food supply, you know, and fake meat, you know.
	If you want real food, now you're going to have to go to Italy because all the fake food will be served across America and London, but you go to Italy, you get real food, you know.
	That's another good reason to go tour Italy.
	In any case, this whole neutron bomb topic is very disturbing to me because it's a bomb that targets the integrity of the human genome.
	And that makes it really a, what you could say, a human disassembly weapon system that causes humans to be disassembled at the cellular level.
	Interferes with the code of protein synthesis that defines the physical body and the repair of the physical body that obviously keeps you alive.
	So neutron bombs are sort of disassembly weapons that cause human bodies to tear themselves apart.
	And that's about as close to evil as you can probably get in the world of weapon systems.
	I wonder how many IDF soldiers are breathing in all this uranium or being exposed to some of these neutron bombs as well.
	And I wonder if Netanyahu even cares.
	I kind of get the feeling that Israel's leadership doesn't care if they sacrifice their own people.
	I mean, they shot a bunch of their own people from the helicopters on October 7th.
	And recently they shot three Israelis that were trying to escape.
	They were waving a white flag.
	And, you know, sadly the IDF shot and murdered their own people.
	So, I get the sense that Israel doesn't care if they kill their own civilians as long as they kill a bunch of Palestinians in the process.
	These are the wrong people to have control over nuclear weapons or neutron bombs, that's for sure.
	Alright, with that said, let's go into the interview with Chris Busby and he can explain all this in his own words with a lot more detail than what I've covered here.
	In the meantime, if you want to help support our platform and our work, be sure to check out healthrangerstore.com where we do testing for heavy metals and glyphosate and of course aflatoxins and we also test for microbiology.
	We have the cleanest supply of food, storable food, nutritional supplements, Superfoods, personal care products, so much more.
	The cleanest supply in the world.
	Nobody does as much testing in-house as we do.
	Nobody.
	So check it out at healthrangerstore.com.
	Check out the anthocyanin product that I mentioned before, as well as ARC seed kits.
	Those are the survival seed kits that are available now through our store.
	And we have ranger buckets, which are storable food, certified organic, lab tested, as well as mini buckets and mega buckets.
	And we've got all kinds of things in these bucket formats, as well as freeze-dried fruits and vegetables in number 10 cans.
	Which are rodent-proof cans sealed for long-term storage.
	And freeze-drying protects the nutrient value of all these items.
	So if your storable food supply doesn't yet have enough fruits like blueberries, which are very high in vitamin C and anthocyanins and many other nutrients, then get some blueberries from us.
	We've got pallets of them.
	I just saw them the other day in the warehouse.
	I was like, wow, that's pallets of number 10 cans of freeze-dried organic blueberries.
	Like, I've never seen that many here.
	It's awesome that we actually got that supply.
	I don't know how long it's going to last, but we have them right now, so take advantage while you can.
	All right, enjoy this interview with Chris Busby.
	Welcome to today's interview on brighteon.com.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and today we're joined by Chris Busby from greenaudit.org.
	And Mr.
	Busby is an expert in radioisotopes and radiation science, and he reviews a lot of scientific papers with a sense of discernment, knowledge, and skepticism about sort of the mainstream views on radiation.
	And his findings lead to the conclusion that ionizing radiation may be far more dangerous than what we're being told, and that many weapons currently being used, such as depleted uranium, may in fact expose innocent civilians to far more harm, even orders of magnitude more harm than what we are being told. even orders of magnitude more harm than what we are So, yes, this involves the United States war in Iraq in previous years, but also modern day Israel's war on Gaza and so much more.
	So welcome to the program, Mr. Busby.
	It's an honor to have you on today.
	Thank you for interviewing me.
	Thank you.
	Well, thank you for taking the time.
	I think your voice is very important for what's happening in our world right now.
	And since this is the first time that you and I have spoken, could you give our audience just a little brief background of your work and what led you to today?
	Well, I started to look at the effects of ionizing radiation on health long ago, around about 1990.
	And since then, I've written a couple of books about my findings and I've been founded by a number of charities.
	And then I moved on to working as an expert witness in various court cases in America and all over the world.
	I concluded quite early on that the health effects of ionizing radiation have been dishonestly mishandled by the organizations that are set up to protect the public from the effects of radiation.
	And these organizations, which are almost uniformly, they follow an organization called the International Commission on Radiological Protection, the ICRP.
	And they were more or less set in stone in terms of their approach to the problem of ionizing radiation and health.
	In the period of the nuclear weapons test, when there was a lot of fallout that came all over the place, landed, ended up in the food chain and so on.
	And of course, at that time, it was very important to continue to make nuclear weapons because of the Cold War.
	And also at the same time to develop nuclear power.
	And so in order for that to happen, they had to have a system that supposedly protected the public.
	And they based this system on examining the health effects from the Hiroshima bomb.
	So they set up a big study called the Lifespan Study, In which they took about 80,000 people who had been at Hiroshima at the time of the nuclear bomb in 1945, and from Nagasaki also.
	And they followed them to see what the cancer yield would be in these people, and to compare them with a control group.
	I've studied the health effects of ionizing radiation.
	I was trained as a chemical physicist, And I worked for a long time with Burroughs Wellcome, with the Wellcome Research Foundation, looking at drugs at the cellular level.
	But in the 90s, I got into being interested in ionizing radiation and health.
	This was just after Chernobyl, I started to look at it, because people were saying, oh, well, the health effects of Chernobyl are basically nothing at all, nobody's going to die, everything's fine, and all this stuff, you know.
	So I applied myself to the theories that were behind these statements, and very rapidly I figured out that they were just nonsensical and dishonest.
	And they'd been developed in order to justify the continuation of developing nuclear weapons and having...
	Is this similar to the way in which the telecom industry always manages to fund studies that say all 5G is perfectly safe, all telecom is perfectly safe, no matter what?
	Well, I've done a lot of work on that as well.
	I mean, I'm a pretty broad-spectrum person when it comes to science.
	I mean, I was a scientific speaker, if you like, the Minister of Science and Technology for the Green Party of England and Wales for about 10 years.
	Yes.
	And so, of course, I had to look into all of these things, you know, mobile phones, and I've looked at the effects of the...
	You know, the COVID vaccination and all of this stuff.
	Basically, what I do is I take a sort of forensic lens to scientific reports that support the existence or the development of things which clearly everybody thinks are dangerous and usually are dangerous.
	But there are no scientists there to sort of look at the epidemiology and to look at the numbers and to look at the statistics and so on.
	Because, by and large, the people in the Green Movement are sort of not very good when it comes to mathematics and science.
	And anybody who is any good at mathematics and science usually gets a job working for the people who are causing the problems.
	Yeah, good point.
	I'm pretty unique in that area.
	Okay.
	All right.
	So then let's talk about depleted uranium.
	And eventually we're going to talk about neutron bombs as well.
	But we've heard, I mean, you know, the official narrative about depleted uranium is that Oh, there's no risk to the civilians in the countries where our tanks are firing depleted uranium shells, even though I believe that some experts and perhaps some nations around the world say that depleted uranium is a weapon of mass destruction.
	So what's your take on DU? Yes, well, uranium, depleted uranium is not like uranium.
	It's uranium particles that are produced as a result of the high temperatures that occur when the weapons hit their target.
	And so what you're talking about here is not the same thing as uranium that you dig out of the ground as pitchblend or some ore or something, you know, because...
	That is not very radioactive.
	And of course uranium itself is not very radioactive, but when you concentrate it into its pure form and turn it into a particle which is respirable, which you can inhale and gets inside you, gets into the lymphatic system and can more or less go anywhere in the body, then it has completely different properties from the uranium that you just dig out of the ground.
	These properties are associated with two things.
	First of all, it's an alpha emitter, and the particle is very small, and alpha particles have a very short range.
	So all of the energy gets packed into a cluster of cells within the range of the particle, which is about four cells.
	So an alpha particle range is about four cells.
	So it's a bit like eating a hot coal, if you like to think of it like that, on a sort of molecular level, on a cell level.
	But the other important thing which emerged, in fact, which I used a lot, I was probably one of the first people to talk about when I was...
	I was asked to give evidence to the Royal Society, who were asked by the government to consider this point about whether depleted uranium is dangerous or not.
	And what I figured out was that uranium itself, when it gets inside the body...
	It binds to DNA. And DNA is, of course, the target for all radiation effects.
	I mean, the way in which radiation kills you is it causes genetic damage, it destroys the DNA, and then the cell can't replicate, so it dies.
	Or if it does replicate, it has a high chance of introducing a mutation which then goes down the cell line and causes cancer.
	or else in the case of children or babies or genetic damage, it can cause increases in congenital malformation and birth defects and all of those things.
	So it's generally a genetic weapon on that basis.
	And the other thing, though, which I looked into and have published a lot about, is a very, very interesting thing, which is that uranium, because it has a very high atomic number and has an awful lot of electrons, it stops gamma radiation.
	I mean, you know, people who are radiologists, they wear a lead apron so as not to get irradiated, because lead stops gamma radiation, it stops x-rays, because it has a high atomic number.
	And the stopping power of an element in the periodic table is proportional to the fourth power of the atomic number.
	So, of course, with an atomic number of 92, lead is 82, I think.
	92 has more stopping power for gamma rays.
	So somebody walking around in the environment who has this uranium on their DNA, just bound to the DNA because of its high chemical affinity, It sucks in the gamma radiation energy from the environment, what you call natural background radiation, and then it reemits it into the DNA as photoelectrons.
	This is the photoelectric effect which was written about by Einstein.
	He got the Nobel Prize for describing the photoelectric effect.
	Photoelectric effect is like the cesium photocell that measures light for your camera, and it tells you how much light there is.
	Well, it's the same with the gamma radiation.
	So what happens is when the gamma radiation hits the uranium, you get a photoelectron that shoots out, and that photoelectron, it damages the DNA in the same way as beta particles and any other internal radionuclides.
	So there are lots of reasons why uranium is very, very dangerous.
	Now...
	Well, hold a second.
	Let's see a resume.
	I mean, that's fascinating.
	So you're saying that uranium particles in the body act like transducers, in effect, taking in background gamma radiation.
	I'm just trying to summarize what you just said, because this is fascinating.
	And then converting it into, well, photons that can also damage cells.
	But, you know, you mentioned previously you also looked at vaccines, and it seems to me that it's really important that our audience understands that the chromosomal damage that you're referring to, often they're called double-strand breaks or DSBs of the chromosomes, that there is a natural biological mechanism to repair those.
	That's called, I believe, NHEJ, but that that repair mechanism, non-homologous end joining, is impaired by the presence of the spike protein.
	So that, in other words, if a person could normally repair the mutagenic damage at the chromosome level, if they've been exposed to other toxins, then their repair mechanism could be suppressed, thereby making the exposure to the radioisotopes far more dangerous.
	Does that make sense?
	No, that's true.
	I mean, there have been a number of papers.
	I've followed this business of the COVID quite closely, and there have been a number of papers that show that there is...
	Damage to the repair systems which result from getting COVID or even from the injections too.
	In fact, there's a lot of epidemiology that's beginning to show that there are increases in cancer associated with people who were injected compared to control groups that weren't.
	Of course, it's hard to find a control group that isn't, but you can do so.
	And when you do that, you find...
	So there's theoretical reasons why you would expect to get increases in cancer.
	There's also epidemiology that shows that you do get increases in cancer.
	In fact, what I've seen is that...
	That what happens is that if you have cancer, or if you have a sort of, you know, if you start, if you get diagnosed with cancer, the cancer in people who've been injected travels, moves, is much more aggressive.
	So it's much harder to stop, and it kills you much more quickly than if you haven't had that.
	So yes, all of this is true.
	All of this is together.
	It's all part of the same thing.
	But my point about the...
	Also, I'm sort of well known for a theory called the second event theory, which is an interesting example of how the...
	How the repair mechanism can be actually attacked by the radiation, because there's some radionuclides, internal radionuclides.
	One good example is strontium-90, which binds to DNA, just like DNA, just like uranium, rather.
	So it binds to DNA chemically, because strontium is like calcium, and calcium is the backbone of the DNA. So it has a calcium phosphate backbone DNA. So what happens is strontium replaces calcium in the backbone, And then it shoots off a beta particle.
	But then it turns into another element, another radioactive element called yttrium.
	So drontium-90 turns into yttrium-90, and that shoots off another bullet.
	So what you've got here is you've got a situation where the first bullet goes off, and then the cell thinks, wow, I've got to repair the damage.
	So it starts repairing the damage, and the second bullet goes off and hits it while it's repairing the damage.
	So it's a bit like you take your car into...
	You have a problem on the motor where you take your car into the garage, the guy fixes your brakes, and then somebody shoots him and destroys the brakes, you see, and so you go off thinking it's okay, but it isn't okay.
	There's a lot of subtlety here, which is just excluded completely from the risk model of the ICRP that I was talking about before.
	The risk model of the ICRP is unbelievably stupid, but extremely powerful.
	It's something that says...
	It says your dose and the effect that it has on you biologically is proportional to the energy per unit mass of tissue.
	That's it.
	So on that basis, that's called the dose.
	That's called your absorbed dose.
	So on the basis of that, you can sit in front of a fire and warm yourself and your whole body will get a nice bit of energy and you can feel really good.
	Or you can reach into the fire and take out a red hot coal and eat it.
	The amount of energy that's transferred to your body is the same.
	And under the ICRP risk model, they would say that that's the same effect.
	Of course, it's not the same effect.
	Not at all.
	There's plenty of epidemiology.
	What I've been talking about is theoretical stuff.
	But if you go to look at people who've been exposed to uranium, you find these effects.
	And I've done that.
	Can I ask you kind of a basic question about uranium?
	What are the naturally occurring isotopic ratios?
	Or, you know, what percentage of naturally occurring uranium atoms in the environment are naturally radioisotopes?
	You mean, we're talking about uranium.
	Uranium has three...
	It has three isotopes.
	It has uranium-238.
	These are natural ones now, because they can make all sorts of funny stuff in reactors, but we'll forget about that.
	So what you have is uranium-238.
	That's most of it.
	That's 99% roughly.
	I do this in terms of atom...
	Atom ratios, but most of it is U238. Then you've got a small amount of U235, which is the fissile one.
	Now U235 is the one that produces lots of neutrons, and if you get enough of it in one place, it will explode.
	It will give you a neutron shower and everything will go up bang.
	And then there's another one, U234, which is the decay product of U238. So what happens is U238 turns into U234 with two intermediate nuclides called thorium-234 and protoactinium-234M. These are beta emitters.
	So what happens is U238 is an alpha emitter, it shoots off an alpha, then it goes to protoactinium and thorium-234 one after the other very quick.
	One's 24 days, the other one's a few minutes.
	And then they go into U234. So that's one series.
	But also you have this other series, which is the exploding series, which is U235. So what happened with the Manhattan Project?
	Once they figured out that they could make an atom bomb with U235 because of the particular nature of the atom...
	They had to extract the U-235 from the uranium, and the U-235 came out together with the U-234, and that's called enriched uranium.
	and if you get really highly enriched uranium you can make a bomb because if you get to a critical mass it's about 9 kilograms it will go bang so if you take two halves of this get 4.5 kilograms at one side of the table 4.5 kilograms at the other side of the table and you whack them together they form a critical mass and then you get Hiroshima so that's how they make the atomic bomb but the stuff left behind
	when they've extracted it all using all these centrifuges or diffusion processes or whatever is U238 They can't get it all out.
	So it's got a bit of U235. And that one is called depleted uranium.
	And it's less radioactive than the natural one because the U235 is more radioactive than the U238. But it's not a lot less radioactive.
	It's just a little bit less.
	And people don't sort of...
	When the military talk about this stuff, they make out that it's completely harmless and it's got no radioactivity because it's only an alpha emitter and the alpha particles aren't strong enough to get through the skin and blah, blah.
	But actually, it contains the two daughter isotopes, the thorium-234 and the protoactinium-234.
	And they are gamma.
	They are beta-gamma emitters.
	So they give radiation off.
	And I've been to Iraq with a Geiger counter and scintillation counters and Kosovo and all over the place.
	And I can tell you, they are not not radioactive.
	One of these little bullets, the ones they fire from the Gatling guns on the A-10 Warthog aircraft, which they use to shoot the Iraqi tanks, those things, they're jolly radioactive.
	You get a Geiger counter or a scintillation counter near them and it screams.
	Yes.
	Okay, wow.
	So, in the process of both firing these rounds, which, by the way, removes some amount of the outer diameter of the bullet as it's rifling through the barrel.
	They've got a plastic sabot thing, which is about, I don't know, an inch across, I suppose.
	And that's the actual round, so it's about an inch across.
	But the bullet itself is more like the thickness of a pencil.
	So maybe, you know, what, half an inch, a bit less.
	Oh, you're talking about the core, the uranium core of it.
	So that's what actually disperses into particulate matter when it strikes the target.
	Yes, it knocks a hole through the tank.
	In fact, I've seen that stuff go through one side of the tank turret and out the other side as well and hit another tank.
	Oh, my.
	I want to give background to the audience here.
	The reason the military uses this is because it has such high density that it penetrates tank armor.
	It's not because of the density.
	It is the density, but primarily it's because it burns.
	When it hits something, it gets extremely hot.
	I think the reason is that it's got so many electrons in the uranium atoms, the 92 electrons, so when that gets compressed, it starts to burn.
	And it burns at very high temperature, thousands of degrees.
	So when it goes into the tank, it's burning.
	And when it gets inside the tank, it's burning as well.
	And that generally blows the top of the tank off because of the increased air pressure, because of the heat.
	And anybody inside the tank gets completely roasted.
	I mean, my friend Doug Rocky, who used to clean these tanks up, And dying of cancer, or has died of cancer, so I'm not quite sure.
	But anyway, so he said that they used to call the people inside the tanks when they found them crispy critters, because they were just like bits of charcoal.
	Oh my.
	Oh, that's horrifying.
	Okay, so this is...
	Well, hold on a second.
	So depleted uranium is chosen for a variety of reasons, but...
	Is it also...
	You know, it seems like the U.S. empire, in my opinion...
	Rules by coercion and force and devastation and ethnic cleansing and all these horrible things, like the U.S. did in the Middle East.
	It seems like there is an intention to inflict genetic damage to the population that is in the area that's being bombed.
	Even though, of course, publicly they say, oh no, it's surgical strikes.
	We're only hitting the water supply, the bridges, the communications, the refineries, everything that will make people die of famine.
	But they claim they're not hitting civilians.
	But in your opinion, I guess you can't read the minds of military decision makers, but in your opinion, is this a weapon against civilians also?
	I think in the case of Israel and Palestine, I think almost certainly.
	I think in the case of the earlier usage in places like Kosovo and in the Balkans and I don't think that they sit back and think, well, let's destroy all the black people because they're black people.
	I don't see this as a sort of fascist thing originally, but...
	But it has the same effect.
	And I think in the case of Fallujah, which is a place which I have studied, and this was the US attacks in 2003, I don't think there was any doubt in my mind that they were angry.
	They were angry with these people and they wanted to destroy them.
	They wanted to destroy their genetic makeup and they wanted to do horrible things to them.
	And I have to say that I think the Americans...
	I mean, I need to say this, really, that I think that they have an element of, it's not really a country, it's a psychosis.
	It's a sort of way of seeing the world, you know.
	And of course, ordinary Americans, I don't think so.
	I've been to America lots of times for court cases and so on.
	But the people who run the show there are something else.
	Oh, yeah, clearly.
	I mean, we agree with you.
	Those of us in America, we see the same thing, and we wonder why these psychopaths are in charge.
	Well, actually, what we know is they rig the elections and so on, and they are psychopaths.
	For example, Victoria Nuland, she hates ethnic Russians.
	She just wants to destroy all Russian people.
	And it's the most insane, intolerant racism that we've ever witnessed on the State Department.
	It's almost like there are two races of human beings.
	I mean, a model that works is a good model, it seems to me.
	And the model that works for me is that there are two types of people.
	There are good guys and bad guys.
	And the bad guys can be truly horrible, truly monstrous.
	And the people on the show in America are truly monstrous, I'm afraid.
	So, let's get back to DU and its post-battle As it settles, because those particles are eventually going to settle on the ground.
	They go very far.
	When you think particles, you know, people think of sand.
	But these are not particles in that sense.
	This is an aerosol.
	These things are so small and they get electrically charged that basically they can go all over the world.
	In fact, they do.
	So after the 2003 Gulf War, we found them in England.
	That's 2,000 miles away, okay?
	They were picked up by the air filters at Aldermasten at the Atomic Weapons Research Establishment, and we got the data from them under Freedom of Information Act, and there they were.
	So they came all the way from Iraq.
	So they're poisoning all of humanity.
	Yes.
	To different degrees.
	But you would also expect that there would be a higher concentration closer to the battle.
	Yeah, absolutely.
	Yes, of course.
	And that there, then uranium, once it settles into the soil, wouldn't uranium be taken up by many plants and become part of the plant cells?
	Yes, it will be.
	But that uranium is not so important.
	The important uranium is the particles when they're particles, and they land on the ground.
	And by and large, they remain there.
	They don't dissolve.
	These things are ceramic.
	So when they come back together, they form a sort of like a little glass bubble.
	But, you know, nanometers in size.
	And so when the sun shines, they get resuspended, they go up in the air, they come down, they go up and they come down.
	I've measured them in puddles in Djakova, in Kosovo.
	They end up in the puddles.
	Now, that means that they're in the snow, and when the snow falls, it forms in puddles, and then that's where they concentrate.
	So they don't go away.
	And they didn't go away in Hiroshima either, because the same thing happened there.
	And that's one of the things that I discovered, and I've written a paper about in the last five years, a few papers, showing that the Hiroshima-based ICRP model is wrong, because it's not the gamma radiation and the neutrons from the bomb that gave people cancer, it was the particles of uranium from the bomb casing.
	Really?
	Only 5% of the bomb turned into fission, and so 95% of it was a uranium tamper that surrounded the outside of the bomb to reflect the neutrons back and make it go bang even more so.
	Yes.
	And those things ended up in Hiroshima, which is a sort of basin.
	And of course, you know, there was a lot of work there because everything was smashed down and they had to rebuild things and move things and so on.
	And the dust remained there for a long time.
	So people were inhaling the dust.
	And that's why they got cancer, not because of the initial gamma rays.
	And indeed, the Japanese government now admit that.
	So there was a big court case in 2021.
	About the people who were exposed to what's called the black rain.
	The black rain with all these particles coming down, they formed nucleating centres for the rain and down they came.
	And people exposed to the black rain got cancer even though they were five, six kilometres away from the bomb and so they didn't get any gamma radiation at all.
	Wow!
	So, I mean, the implications of this are, of course, enormous.
	If you think about Israel bombing Gaza, it's clear that Israel wants to completely eliminate Gaza.
	Yes, that's right.
	That's my point about the neutron bombs.
	I mean, that's something else.
	That's the next level.
	That's like the fourth generation.
	I mean, if you're talking about depleted uranium, and incidentally, it's not just the bullets.
	They put depleted uranium in the nose cones of the Javelin missiles and And they put them into the bunker-busting bombs and all, you know, it's just basically because it's free.
	And because it's very useful, it's smashing its way through concrete and all the rest of it.
	Wow.
	But then isn't Israel creating a toxic Gaza?
	And if Israel hopes to expand and have Israelis live there and rebuild buildings, which seems to be their plan for greater Israel, then isn't Israel building on top of a radioactive, you know...
	Dump sight, in a sense.
	Really, you know, I don't think they care.
	I think they're sort of like off the leash, you know.
	From what I can see what's going on there, they really don't care.
	To them, you know, their position is that God has ordained that they have the whole of the country and that these Amalekites should be smitten hip and thigh and whatever it says in the Bible.
	And they don't really give a damn.
	They're just going to kill them all and ha-ha.
	That's it.
	And of course, they're not going to tell their own people that the place is radioactive.
	And in fact, maybe they think it doesn't matter.
	Maybe they're like these people in America who think uranium is okay.
	But it's not okay.
	Okay.
	All right.
	So, can we talk about neutron bombs and Gaza and what you believe Israel is engaged in there?
	This goes back to 2006.
	In 2006, I was contacted by a professor from the Lebanese Academy of Sciences called Ali Kobaysi.
	He's dead now.
	And he said that the Israelis were bombing Lebanon.
	There was a war then between Israel and Lebanon.
	And he said that he went out to one of the bomb craters with a Geiger counter, and he found that the levels of radiation by the crater were 20 times higher than background.
	And at that point, I had already been associated with a lot of work involving talking about depleted uranium weapons.
	I'd given evidence to the United States Congressional Committee on Depleted Uranium and various other things.
	So I said, I said, we need to get some samples.
	So I asked a friend of mine, in fact, I think it was a friend of mine that was originally contacted by this guy.
	And I said, well, why don't you go out there and get me some samples and we can have a look.
	So to cut a long story short, he did.
	And he came back with some samples.
	The other thing, I asked him to bring me an air filter from a vehicle because I'd been using vehicle air filters to look at the concentration of materials in the air.
	Because, of course, vehicles, they breathe air like people do.
	The filters are not so fantastically good, but they certainly pick up quite a lot of what's there.
	So we got these samples and we looked at them, and I was expecting to find depleted uranium, of course, but I didn't.
	I found enriched uranium, which was very, very, very weird.
	Huh.
	At the time, I thought, well, obviously the Israelis are using some new bomb in which enriched uranium is involved in some way, and goodness knows what.
	So there was lots of speculation.
	I'd already come across enriched uranium.
	No, walk back again.
	Yes, I have to come back to that.
	There was enriched uranium used in 2003 in Fallujah, but I didn't know that at the time.
	Anyway, so then go forward now from 2006.
	We go forward to 2009.
	And I had been asked by some Egyptians to look into the possibility that the Israelis were bombing Gaza.
	This was 2008 when they were bombing Gaza, using a similar bomb to the one that I had reported them using in Lebanon.
	Right.
	So I said, all right, I better come out there and get some samples.
	So they said, okay, we'll smuggle out some samples through the tunnels.
	But in the end the British government wouldn't allow me to go.
	They said, oh it's too dangerous and we're not going to allow you to have a visa and blah blah blah.
	But then what happened is that these Egyptian doctors, they managed to get the samples to me by smuggling them through Ireland.
	And they came to me, and I have to tell you, this is really funny.
	So I said, well, they said, how will we get them to you?
	I said, well, I'll meet whoever it is at Birmingham New Street Station.
	I was living in Wales then.
	And I shall be carrying a copy of the Times.
	And so what happened is I went to the station there and stood outside the chemist shop there, and this woman, head to foot in black, you know, with a slit there, like...
	It came with a bag, a carrier bag with the samples.
	Anyway, so we measured the samples and we found enriched uranium there as well.
	So now we've got enriched uranium in Gaza and we had enriched uranium in Lebanon.
	And I talked to quite a famous reporter called Robert Fiske and he put the story...
	Into the Independent, which is a newspaper in England.
	It got a big story there saying the secret of Israel's uranium bomb.
	Israel's secret uranium bomb went out as a story.
	So then I did a study later on, about a year after that, I did a retrospective study of Fallujah.
	Because people in Fallujah were reporting high levels of cancer and they were reporting congenital malformations in babies and one of these Arab women came and said, look, can we look into this?
	So we did an epidemiological study in Fallujah.
	In 2009, in which we found very high levels of cancer.
	I mean, truly enormously high levels of cancer, like 30 times the expected number.
	And we also found congenital malformation.
	We had a huge increase in babies that were born with deformities, birth defects.
	And we found a sex ratio perturbation.
	So normally the sex ratio is 1,055 boys to 1,000 girls, and that's standard human population number.
	But in Peluja, we found 800 boys to 1,000 girls, which was just an extraordinary birth alteration in the birth-sex ratio.
	So this flagged up a big level of genetic damage.
	But then, in order to see what was causing it, we took the hair from the mothers of the children, of the deformed children.
	We had a lot of these mothers, and we took hair samples from them, and we measured them using ICP-MS, inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry, looking for, well, everything, really, 52 elements, to see if we could find out what it was that was caught.
	I mean, of course, we suspected uranium.
	But we weren't certain.
	So we had a look and we found it was uranium.
	But what we also found was that it was enriched uranium and not depleted uranium.
	So this is the third instance of finding that.
	Okay, well, I mean, then nothing much happened.
	I left it at that.
	We reported it.
	We wrote a couple of papers reporting it.
	But then 2021, a couple of years ago...
	There was a study done of Gaza in which these people published it in quite a posh journal, quite a respectable journal called Nature Scientific Ports.
	And they found, they looked at 66 samples of building materials and soil and sand and plaster and, you know, all sorts of stuff from Gaza.
	And they found that 55 of these samples had enriched uranium.
	And it was much more enriched than the enrichment that we found.
	So the enrichment that I found using two separate techniques.
	We used ICP-MS and we used alpha spectrometry.
	And they both gave the same answer.
	Now, the normal atomic ratio of uranium in the environment is 137.88.
	So you can say it 138.
	So that's 138 atoms of uranium-238 to one atom of uranium-235.
	And that's everywhere in the environment.
	If you go anywhere and you dig up some soil and you measure the uranium using ICP-MS or whatever, that's what you'll find.
	But what we found in Lebanon and in Gaza was around about 108 to 116.
	So that's enriched.
	The smaller the number, the more enriched it is, of course.
	But what these people were finding were 80.
	So now you're getting pretty close to the sort of stuff that you would put into a nuclear reactor.
	So the question is, how could it be there?
	That's the question.
	How is it possible that enriched uranium suddenly exists in Gaza?
	Because, after all, enriched uranium cannot exist in the environment unless it comes from someone who created it or extracted it or produced it or whatever.
	It's impossible.
	Yes.
	Now, again, wait, let me ask, just for clarification, what's the half-life of the degradation of the radioisotopes of enriched uranium?
	It's 80,000 years.
	Oh, okay, okay.
	You know, you're not talking about something short half-life.
	These have got enormous half-lives.
	All right, so the persistence is way beyond...
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Got it.
	All right, so I just want to clarify that because I haven't memorized all the physics of uranium like that.
	No, of course not.
	I mean, it wouldn't be expected to.
	I mean, this is kind of fairly exotic knowledge, but once you've got it, and I've studied this for a long time in relation to depleted uranium, we've spent an awful lot of money and time looking for depleted uranium in Iraq and in the Balkans, and I've been there, I went there, and I took samples and so on.
	So I've been exhaustively involved In the health effects of uranium.
	Well, can I mention that perhaps we could help your search?
	I mean, in our lab, we have two ICP-MS instruments that we use daily.
	We don't look for 52 elements.
	I think we're looking for 32.
	But, you know, we can do a semi-quant, full-spectrum scan.
	Do you have gamma-spec?
	You have gamma spectrometry.
	You don't.
	No, we don't.
	So you're ICP-MS. All right.
	Okay.
	Right.
	But we run hair samples.
	We run food samples, soil, water, and so on.
	And we are ISO accredited.
	So we're 17.025 ISO, and we pass all the testing requirements to maintain that accreditation, where they send you blind samples and you have to determine the concentrations and so on.
	So we do that, but we haven't been testing for uranium-235, although I've seen 238 all It's not easy.
	I see it everywhere.
	It's not easy to do U235, and the reason is because there's not much of it.
	So you're scratching at the limits of your machine, so you need a multi-collector or something quite fancy to do it with any degree of precision.
	Unless you pre-concentrate the sample.
	I mean, there are iron exchange resin now that will pick up uranium.
	So you can put your sample, you can dissolve your sample, put it through an iron exchange level and then push it out again.
	I see.
	You can play all sorts of tricks like that.
	Well, we have, I mean, I just want to add this.
	We have sub-PPB sensitivity for most elements, you know, probably in the range of like 0.1 parts per billion, so 100 parts per trillion, something like that.
	What's the name of your machine?
	It's an Agilent 9300.
	Yeah, okay, I know.
	Yeah, that's the newer one that we have, and then we have an older one that's just the previous version of that.
	I'm just saying, if we could be of assistance, this is something that maybe we could collaborate on.
	Well, that would be good.
	I mean, our problem has got no money.
	I mean, I've got no money at all.
	I mean, I sort of do this on a shoestring.
	Right.
	Well, we could donate the lab analysis.
	But we'd have to figure out the external standard.
	Like, where do we get a standard for U-235, for example?
	But I'm sure we can find that.
	You can get U-235 samples from various places.
	Yeah.
	Yeah, we just have to do that.
	Maybe Inorganic Ventures or a company like that probably has these standards and we can get those.
	But anyway, we do it for free.
	If you can get us some samples, we run this for free.
	I'm looking for somebody to do this because I'm interested in Gaza to go forward with my story about all of this stuff because we've got to the point now where these three guys have published these results in Nature and And the results show that there are nearly all samples, but not one set of samples from Sinai Desert.
	And this is the important thing.
	So if you'd like to take the two blocks of samples, there's 66 samples, of which 55 are from Gaza, and 11 are from the Sinai Desert.
	Now, the Sinai Desert samples are not enriched.
	Right?
	So to anybody who's going to say, oh, well, there's enriched uranium all over the place and, you know, blah, blah, blah, it's not true.
	So we have a control.
	We have a control.
	The Sinai samples are very slightly enriched, I suppose, on the basis of the plus or minusness, you know, the standard deviation.
	You could more or less say, well...
	You know, they might be normal, they might be slightly enriched, whatever.
	But if you compare the two sets, if you compare all of the Gaza samples with all of the Sinai samples, and you put a T-test over it, it's not possible that that's not real.
	All right.
	But we've got to this point now where we know that there is some weapon which either uses enriched uranium or it produces enriched uranium.
	And this was my...
	This was my, I don't know what you call it, sort of like...
	Eureka moment.
	You know, rather than thinking about how it could be that they're using it, because why would anyone use it?
	It's very expensive stuff.
	It's like trying to kill your enemy by dropping diamonds on their head.
	It's $250,000 per kilogram.
	Oh, my.
	Talking lots of money here.
	Okay, so why would you use it?
	All right, but the obvious thing is it's the wrong question, is where does it come from is the right question, okay?
	Now, the point is that U238 No, to walk back now to the original Lebanon paper, which I published as a Green Audit paper, it's all up on the internet.
	I was contacted by a very famous Italian physicist called Emilio del Guidici.
	And he said, look, I want to talk to you, but I can't talk on the phone about this.
	We need to talk personally, and can you get over to London?
	So I said, all right, I'll come to London.
	So I met him in Paddington Station, and he told me the most amazing story.
	He said, look, the reason that this has got enriched uranium is because it's a neutron bomb.
	It's because they have discovered a way in which they can cause...
	Fusion.
	Now, most bombs are fission bombs.
	So what happens is you get a lot of neutrons and the atom splits.
	And so you get all these fissile, these fission products like strontium-90 and cesium-137 and a whole witch's brew, a whole Pandora's box full of these nasty things.
	And they remain radioactive for a very long time.
	And they contaminate the battlefield or wherever you've blown it up.
	But actually, if you have fusion, if you put hydrogen with hydrogen or tritium and deuterium and so on, and you turn it into helium, you get much more energy.
	I mean, that's what they're trying to do at the moment with all these tokamaks and these sort of systems for light.
	And they're always saying, oh, they're almost going to get to the point where they can do it.
	I know.
	They just need more money.
	They just need another $100 billion, yeah.
	That's right.
	Okay.
	And they have these very exciting looking things made of stainless steel with lots of, you know, pipes coming out and so forth, you know.
	It's a sort of industry called making money out of people's gullibility.
	But anyway, there we are.
	But the thing is, they're trying to make it so that it is a continuing process, you know, so light goes on and on and on and you can extract energy.
	But if you want to make a bomb, you don't have to contain anything because it just goes bang and everything flies apart, you see.
	So what this guy says to me, Del Gudici, he said that if you take hydrogen, if you dissolve hydrogen in uranium and then you smack it into the wall, the hydrogen gets caught up in the interstices between the atoms of uranium, which are very, very large.
	So if you imagine a pile of logs or ball bearings or something, there's spaces between, you know, between the atoms.
	And because hydrogen is so tiny, it can fit in there.
	And so what happens is that if you then squash it, what happens is that the hydrogen atoms in the little interstices get squashed together at tremendous, tremendous pressures.
	And the uranium, of course, has a lot of electrons on the outside of it because it's got 92 electrons.
	And so what's happening is the electrons are pushing the hydrogen together and you get what's called cold fusion.
	And in fact, some guy called, well, a guy I know, a bloke called, what's he called, Martin Fleischmann.
	Fleischmann and Pons, right.
	Yeah, yeah, yeah.
	Well, I knew Fleischmann.
	I worked with Fleischmann.
	Did you really?
	Well, yeah, I knew him personally.
	Well, I didn't know, not well, like we didn't go down the pub together, but I worked with him.
	Wow.
	I was a Raman spectroscopist looking at the surface-enhanced Raman effect.
	Wow, you're kidding me.
	Well, Fleischmann is legendary, I mean, for what he demonstrated at the University of Salt Lake City, I believe.
	Yeah, no, that was Pons.
	Yeah, yeah.
	He went there and demonstrated it, did he?
	Well, Fleischmann always maintained that the cold fusion with the palladium electrodes, that it worked.
	He said he could.
	Sometimes it worked and sometimes it didn't work.
	But then it did work sometimes and they hadn't quite figured out.
	And that was at the time that I was around.
	You know, this was in the 80s.
	And so then what happened is that it went off to Harwell.
	So the British government had this atomic energy research establishment at Harwell.
	And they went and tested the Fleischmann experiment.
	And they said, oh, well, it doesn't work.
	But then, of course, remember who these people are.
	This is the atomic energy research establishment.
	Absolutely, the hot fusion establishment.
	Right.
	Yeah, I know.
	They're the sort of rubbish, the cold fusion establishment.
	That's who they are, okay?
	That's right.
	All right, but that's by the way.
	So, I mean, as far as the story is concerned, Del Guidochi told me that you get cold fusion if you dissolve hydrogen in uranium and then you fire it at something.
	Yeah.
	But afterwards I thought about this and I looked up the chemistry and in fact hydrogen doesn't dissolve in uranium.
	Well at least it does but only to a very small amount.
	But what you can do is if you heat uranium up to 300 degrees in an atmosphere of hydrogen it forms uranium hydride, uranium trihydride, UH3. Now, the point about hydrogen is it acts as a neutron.
	Neutrons get stopped by hydrogen, so it acts as a moderator, right?
	Somebody's invented, I don't know if they've actually built one, they invented a uranium hydride reactor, because what it does is the hydrogen in the uranium hydride acts as the moderator, and then it all heats up, and then when it gets to 700 degrees, the hydrogen comes off, and so it stops itself, you see, in some way.
	Okay.
	So back to this De La Guida sheet.
	There was a bomb invented by Edward Teller in 1952 called the uranium hydride bomb.
	And it used uranium deuteride.
	So rather than reacting it with hydrogen, they reacted with deuterium and maybe tritium.
	And it worked.
	It didn't produce an enormous lot of kilotons.
	It didn't have a very high yield, but it worked.
	So it did fusion, and it worked, and it produced all the neutrons, and it blew apart, but it was a bit of a damp squib, apparently.
	And you can find all this stuff on the internet, and so forth.
	So what I thought is probably that either Della Guidici got it wrong, or his English wasn't good, and he was a physicist, not a chemist, so maybe he meant that you reacted it with hydrogen, and that you didn't dissolve it.
	But anyway, so that, I think, is what the bomb is.
	It's a fusion bomb made out of uranium deuteride, probably, or uranium triteide or whatever, and they can tune it any way they want.
	Now, the original neutron bomb was an idea...
	An early idea in which what you did was you killed people and you didn't blow things up.
	So it has a very low yield in terms of explosion, but a high yield in terms of neutrons.
	So whereas a normal bomb has a casing around it of uranium to reflect the neutrons back into the core...
	And make a much bigger bang.
	This thing didn't have a casing.
	It had a very thin casing made of aluminium or something like that.
	So when it went bang, it just released all the neutrons into the environment.
	And neutrons have a fantastically high degree of genetic damage.
	They're much more genetically damaging than gamma rays are.
	They have what's called the relative biological effectiveness of between 20 and 100 times.
	Alpha particles are 20, so neutrons are much worse than even alpha particles.
	So what I think we've got here is we've got a version of this DelGridici bomb, or whatever we want to call it.
	And the thing is that when you produce neutrons like that, what you do is you knock...
	You add the neutron to the atom and change its atomic number by a factor of plus one or two.
	So you've got U234 now in the mix, in this uranium bomb, which apparently is about the size of a tennis ball.
	And that turns the uranium-234 into uranium-235.
	It just takes up a neutron and turns into uranium-235.
	Del Guidochis had a different idea.
	He said that it knocks uranium-238 up to uranium-239, and then that decays to uranium-235 or to plutonium-239.
	And so you would expect to find a small amount of plutonium in the fallout from one of these weapons.
	And in fact, we were finding on the depleted uranium oversight board, which I sat on for the Ministry of Defence for about five years, they did find small amounts of plutonium.
	In the fallout material from the EU weapons usage.
	And also a small amount of U236, which is another isotope that you would get from 235 by adding another neutron.
	So if you put all of this stuff in a bag and shake it, what comes out is a neutron bomb.
	And in fact, I can't think of any other explanation.
	I mean, because...
	Well, hold on.
	Well, you start here.
	You start here with the fact that there cannot be U235 in the environment unless you put it there.
	Okay.
	Now, if what you're saying here is accurate with the neutron bomb, then it means that The kinetic damage that's being caused to the hospitals in Gaza and the residential buildings and what have you may be the secondary effect, but the primary effect is actually genetic damage of an ethnic group, which would be the very definition of genocide or genetic...
	Well, the same thing that they did in Fallujah.
	Exactly the same thing.
	And the other thing about neutrons, and this is why Yeltsin...
	I mean, the idea has been around for a long time.
	A bloke called Samuel Cohen in America invented a version of the neutron bomb, and the Americans built the neutron bomb.
	They have a load of them in the front of some of their missiles because of the neutrons.
	I'm sorry to interrupt, but I want our audience to understand.
	If these bombs are being dropped on Gaza, then wouldn't this mean that None of the Palestinians there, none of the Gazans will be able to have viable children.
	It'll be like Fallujah.
	Because that's where they used it as well.
	They obviously used it in Fallujah.
	Because it's the ideal weapon for killing people who are hiding behind stone walls.
	It doesn't knock down the walls, it kills the people.
	Got it.
	That's why I was going to say Yeltsin called it the capitalist bomb.
	Because it doesn't destroy property, it destroys people.
	So this is, again, this is ethnic cleansing in a whole new way to destroy the genetic integrity of a lineage of an ethnic group of people that Israel wants to destroy.
	Absolutely.
	I mean, and I think they know they're doing that, and that's why they're doing it.
	Wow.
	How do you prove this?
	I mean, you've already mentioned the discovery of U-235 there.
	Is there some other way to prove it?
	It's not difficult to prove it, all right?
	And in a sense, the U-235 does already prove it.
	But there are other...
	Neutron activation products.
	If you produce neutrons, then not only do you knock U235 up to U236 and U234 up to 235 and all that stuff, but you also knock iron up to cobalt-60 and you knock calcium up to calcium-45.
	So you get what's called...
	Activation products.
	So you can easily scan for those products.
	Have you found those?
	You can find those.
	The most remarkable one, the best one of all, is cobalt-60.
	Because cobalt-60 has two big gamma peaks around about 1,000 keV.
	And it's got a half-life of two years or two and a half years or something like that.
	So if there's any metal there, if you've got, like, a reinforcing rod in the concrete where they've blown this place, where the bomb has been used, then you cut off a piece of that and you take it home and you put it in a gamma spectrometer.
	In fact, you don't even have to put it into a cooled gamma spectrometer.
	You can just use an ordinary standard sodium iodide...
	You know, the sort of portable thing like I've got.
	And you can see those two peaks because there they are.
	They stick out like a sore thumb.
	So Cobalt-60 is the...
	But nobody's going to look, you see, until someone comes along and they say, hey, look, this could be it.
	Nobody...
	Who's going to go and look?
	Who's going to go and look?
	Okay, and I'm sorry to keep asking these basic questions, but for my sake as well as my audience, so you're saying that you take the reinforced steel bars, when they are bombarded by neutrons from a neutron bomb, then there is atomic transmutation that takes place that generates cobalt that has, it's a radio isotope with a two-year half-life, which means it's emitting quite a lot of decay there that you could detect, and that's what you're saying, that you can see the peaks.
	Yeah.
	And the other thing that will be there, which is not so easy to find, but certainly there are lots of methods of looking for it, is carbon-14, because that's another one you'll get.
	And you also get tritium.
	So there'll be a lot of tritium in the water.
	So there'll be tritiated water.
	So if you get water from the pools when it's raining and all the rest of it, And you can measure tritium using liquid scintillation counting and all sorts of ways of measuring these things.
	So those are three activation nuclides which you will get if they're using a neutron bomb.
	It could be, of course, that they're tuning it so as not to be fantastically neutronic.
	I mean, it could be that what they want is the bang rather than the neutrons.
	So I'm sure you can tune all of this stuff.
	I mean, theoretically, you could tune it to get more neutrons or less neutrons and more bang or less bang and so forth.
	You can do that.
	Looking at Fallujah, then, shouldn't we expect to see much higher rates of cancer and infertility in Fallujah?
	Well, we do.
	I mean, have those studies been done?
	Yeah, they were done by me, that very famous study that I published in 2010.
	And I took them to the, I mean, there's a huge hoo-ha, you know.
	I went to Geneva and talked to the Human Rights Council and to the International Red Cross and you name it.
	And then a lot of the Arab lawyers were behind.
	behind me and various other people and so on but we never managed anybody to get anybody to do anything except that the Iraqi government got on to me and they said will you collaborate on a study with us to check on these levels of congenital malformation I said yes certainly and I said but I need to be involved in designing the study because the problem is there's such a load of crooked epidemiology and they said oh no we can't let you do that and so that was it I said well I'm not going to work with you Okay, wow, wow.
	So then the upshot here is that we should expect to see among the surviving Gazans, who are all very, I mean, if they can survive that, that itself is an incredible feat.
	You know, because Israel said, evacuate the north, we're going to bomb the north.
	People evacuate, they get bombed while they're evacuating, then they go to the south of Gaza, and then Israel says, oh, and now, by the way, we're going to bomb the south.
	Because that's where you're all concentrated now.
	Something's wrong with that picture, you know, on a humanitarian basis.
	It's like they wanted a higher concentration of people in the same place, which actually would fit your theory here of neutrons.
	Exposure.
	What's going on in Gaza is just beyond description.
	I mean, there's no way in which I can accommodate the way in which the Israelis are behaving towards those human beings.
	I mean, it's just, and nobody's doing anything.
	I mean, everyone's sitting back on their hands, particularly the Americans, and watching, well, the American government, and watching it happen.
	I mean, it's worse than Hitler and the concentration camps and the gas chambers and all the rest of it because it's a huge population all together in one place who are being systematically destroyed with genetic weapons and, I mean, words fail me.
	Words fail me.
	But certainly it's not as if we don't know that already.
	I mean, this woman Manduka that I worked with in Fallujah recently She has gone on to get money to study the people in Gaza and study congenital malformation in Gaza.
	Because, I mean, remember, they dropped these uranium weapons on Gaza in 2008, presumably then also in 2014.
	And so we would expect some sort of downstream effects that are measurable.
	Now, it's not so easy to measure cancer effects because you need to have a controlled population.
	That's right.
	Difficult.
	But epidemiology for children is not difficult because we know the number of children because we know what the birth rate is.
	So we can take it like we did and we take the hospital and we say this year there have been 10,000 babies and look we've got 1,400 congenital malformations.
	That gives us a rate.
	So it's not difficult to do that.
	That's easy epidemiology and it's been done.
	So already in Gaza they have an enormously high level of congenital malformations there.
	One more question.
	I mean, what you've said is already quite horrifying.
	And we only have a few more minutes left in this interview.
	But most of the weapons being dropped on Gaza are manufactured by the United States.
	So this would very likely mean that...
	And by the way, I just saw an article that most of the bombs are unguided bombs.
	They're not intended to strike particular targets.
	These are area effect weapons of mass destruction being dropped on a highly dense civilian residential infrastructure with, you know, Hamas tunnels underneath.
	But this would mean that the U.S. has this technology.
	Of course, you know that from Fallujah.
	But who else has this technology in your view?
	The Russians, for sure.
	Well, I mean, they more or less developed it, in my understanding.
	They originally called it Red Mercury.
	Oh, this!
	I've heard Red Mercury before.
	Okay.
	Okay, but the way I heard it was at much, much larger definitions, but I guess it could be scaled to any size.
	No.
	According to the people that were talking to a chap called Barnaby in the 1980s when Channel 4 was looking into this red mercury question, he said it was about the size of a tennis ball, about the size of a baseball, and that's what they were all saying too.
	They wouldn't say what it was, and they were pretending it was actual mercury.
	They said it was Hg2 mercury antimony oxide, Hg2Sb2O7.
	But I think that was just some sort of cover-up, you know, because red mercury was Stalin's code for enriched uranium was red mercury.
	Oh, wow.
	Okay, so if the Russians have it, probably the Chinese have it, and now we have a whole new concern about nuclear war.
	What about terrorism?
	Could this technology be used for nuclear terrorism?
	I don't see why it can't be, really.
	But you have to have a certain degree of sophistication in manufacture, because you've got to make this hydride, you've got to get deuterium, you've got to get heavy water, or even tritium.
	So you need a reactor to get tritium, and then you've got to react it in such a way as 300 degrees.
	So it's not something you could knock up in the kitchen.
	Well, thank goodness for that, but clearly the U.S. is all about selling weapons to everybody around the world that will pay in dollars, so the proliferation of this technology is probably very widespread.
	Well, I think Mordecai Bonunu said that the Israelis had neutron bombs when he was whistleblowing in the 1980s.
	They locked him up for 18 years.
	The word is that they tested this bomb in South Africa.
	They had a deal with South Africa before apartheid stopped.
	There was a big Israeli-South African connection.
	And this guy, Cohen, talked freely about the fact that lots and lots of people had this bomb.
	It's just that nobody's identified it with what's happening at the moment.
	That's the point.
	I see.
	For me, that was the epiphany, you know.
	I mean, I said, ah, okay, right.
	Wow.
	And of course, Israel still will not publicly admit that they have nuclear weapons provided by the United States.
	Yes, of course not.
	And as far as I'm concerned, everybody thinks that I'm a nutcase anyway, so they'll just say one more piece of crazy stuff from Busby.
	And of course, I'm not going to be very popular with the Israelis, which probably is not very good for my health.
	Well, there is a lot of truth to that, but these days, I think that there's so much worldwide condemnation against Israel for its current tactics that they're probably busy with – I mean, they're even arguing with now the U.S. State Department at the moment.
	I've been public enemy number one with the nuclear industry and the nuclear military complex and all of those people for such a long time now that I've just more or less accepted that they might want to bump me off.
	What is life for if you can't tell the truth and try and make the world a better place?
	That's my position.
	Yeah, I hear you.
	I'm right there with you.
	All right, we only have a few minutes left.
	Your website, greenaudit.org, You want to tell people how they can follow your work or find your interviews?
	What I want to tell people is this.
	The most important thing that we can do now is to create a new report of the European Committee on Radiation Risk.
	This is a sort of an opposite number to the ICRP, which I set up with my friends in 1998.
	And we produced two reports that give a risk model that shows actually what the real effects of ionizing radiation and all these contaminants are.
	And the last one was in 2010.
	So we need to do a new one now.
	And I've been meaning to do that for a long time, but we've got no money.
	So I want people to go to the Green Aldert website, press the button that says, you know, give us money or whatever it says, you know, Donate, that's it.
	Little yellow button.
	And to consider just giving us a little bit of money every month so that we can function now and produce this new report, the ECRR 2024 report.
	As far as everything else is concerned, you can find me on Google.
	I mean, you just put in Dr.
	Chris Busby, and there I am, and all of the things that I do, and all the papers that I publish, and so forth, and they're all quite easy to understand and quite entertaining.
	I mean, if you can be entertained by people dying from radiation, then...
	Then that's what I do.
	That is it.
	I'm 78.
	That's my job as I see it.
	Okay.
	All right.
	Well, again, greenaudit.org is the website.
	And Chris, I will volunteer ICPMS time at our lab if we can be of help just looking at...
	Well, I think...
	I'm just going to start with taking soil from my backyard, frankly.
	And let me just take some Texas soil, put it in, and let me see what sensitivity we have at these targeted...
	Yeah, that would be useful.
	And I'll tell you one thing you might be interested in, is try and get hold of some iron exchange, this is very important, get some iron exchange resin which is uranium specific, right?
	I'll have to look into that.
	Yeah, because then you can rinse all your nitric acid solutions through that stuff, and then you can push it off and concentrate it in that way.
	Oh, okay, yeah.
	Okay, perfect.
	I'll look into that, or I'll have my chemist take a look and see what we can find there.
	But, yeah, let's keep in touch on this and see if we can do something.
	Because I'm interested in, you know, there were...
	Nuclear, you know, contamination accidents in Missouri in the United States decades ago, and I'm interested in looking at the United States.
	I've been in a number of cases on contamination.
	I mean, there's one in St.
	Louis, Coldwater Creek.
	There's one in Bridgeton.
	There's Metropolis in Illinois, and so on.
	I'm sorry to cut you off.
	We've got to wrap this up.
	We're almost out of time.
	But Chris, it's been an honor speaking with you today.
	And for everybody watching, Chris Busby here, greenaudit.org.
	I want to thank you for joining me today, Mr.
	Busby.
	It's been an honor.
	Thank you.
	All right.
	All right.
	Take care.
	And for everybody watching, feel free to share this on other platforms and channels.
	I'm Mike Adams here, the founder of brighteon.com.
	Thank you for watching today.
	Take care.
	If you'd like to support your own health and longevity while also supporting this platform, check out the products we have back in stock now at healthrangerstore.com.
	We've got superanthocyanins, which is an incredible combination of aronia berries, And it's got blueberries.
	And you know how the dark purple pigments in plants, these have special properties.
	And they're called anthocyanins.
	And you can find them in things like purple carrots or eggplant or purple corn.
	Well, we've captured those anthocyanins and put them in this format.
	It's a delicious way to add these very potent nutrients to any smoothie or recipe.
	And yes, they're very, very purple.
	So that's available now at healthrangerstore.com.
	We also have greens plus superfood.
	You see on top there, that contains spirulina and various organic grass juices as well, of course, all in powdered form.
	If you want to add greens to your diet in a convenient format, this is an easy way to do it.
	It goes into smoothies.
	You can use it in some recipes as well, but I think smoothies are the easier place to use it.
	As with all the products that we offer at HealthRangerStore.com, these are also subjected to our rigorous laboratory testing, which includes heavy metals testing, lead, cadmium, mercury, and arsenic.
	And it also includes E. coli and salmonella testing that's in our microbiology lab, as well as glyphosate testing.
	That's on our triple quad mass spec that does herbicide analysis.
	And of course, soon we're adding dioxin testing to this as well.
	So you can trust that these are clean, laboratory tested, certified organic products that are honestly labeled and honestly priced while offering tremendous nutritional value that can help support and enhance your good health.
	At the same time, you're benefiting this platform and keeping us on the air so we can continue to bring you uncensored interviews, podcasts, and content that helps enrich and enhance the lives of millions of people all over the world.
	Thank you for your support.
	I'm Mike Adams, the founder of healthrangerstore.com I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲