911 truth architect Richard Gage unloads irrefutable evidence of Building 7 controlled demolition
|
Time
Text
Welcome to today's interview on Brighteon.com.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, the free speech platform.
And today we're going to exercise that freedom to speak in a very special way as we interview Richard Gage.
He's the original founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth.
But now he has his own website here.
It is richardgage911.org or 9-11.
richardgage911.org.
I'm showing you on screen.
Richard has been an architect for 30 years, and he's a member of the American Institute of Architects, and I'll let him tell you more about his background.
Welcome, Mr.
Gage.
It's an honor to have you on.
Thank you for all your work on the 9-11 issue and much more.
Thank you, Mike.
Honored to be here with you.
It's great to have you on, and wow, I mean, I can't believe, what's it been, 22 years since 9-11 now?
Indeed.
And we're still rolling.
We're still trying to wake up the public and the media, our elected representatives and just our colleagues, professionals, architects and engineers.
Very few people are aware of what really happened on 9-11.
Yeah, I've always found this as a big litmus test to see whether people are easily brainwashed or whether they look at facts.
Because if you look at facts, again, you're an architect, and again, you founded Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth.
But there's no way that Building 7 could have simply fallen in its own nearly perfect footprint just from a few office fires that is chemically and physically impossible.
Shall we start there?
Let's do it, Mike, because most architects and engineers are completely unaware of this, the third worst structural failure in modern history.
And this should be the most studied building failure ever.
After all, this building was not hit by a plane.
That's right.
That's right.
About 5.20 in the afternoon.
I mean, the building was standing fine for seven hours after the towers were hit.
And then after...
Witnesses hear explosions, a lot of witnesses.
This building drops like a rock, straight down, uniformly, suddenly, into its own footprint in under seven seconds.
Now, we've all seen this before, like the old hotels in Las Vegas, we've seen it on TV. I mean, it's a perfect match, Mike, and yet seven years later, NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology,
who was tasked by Congress to explain these collapses to the American people, they have this new hypothesis, this never-before-heard-of phenomena for building collapses called thermal expansion.
They claim that these fires which were in the building, and they were few and small and scattered, they...
Say that these were extraordinary fires, just blowing them all up out of proportion.
And they say that these fires expanded these beams and pushed this girder off of its seat on this column 79.
We can go through all of that, but then it ensued in a progressive collapse, according to NIST, and none of that could have happened.
But, you know, fires have never in history brought down a steel frame fire-protected building.
Yeah, exactly.
I mean, this is extraordinary because engineers, they know very well the thermal expansion coefficients of different materials, metals and concrete and so on.
I mean, it's common knowledge in the trade.
And if what the NIST is saying is true, then it would mean that we should be seeing thousands of buildings collapse all over the world in similar fashion, which we don't.
Or the codes should have changed, which they didn't.
Exactly, exactly.
But this, to me, and I know this isn't your area that you focus on, but to me this smacks of the U.S. Navy reaching for explanations about TWA Flight 800 to try to say, no, it couldn't possibly have been a missile that shot down TWA Flight 800.
So they came up with this elaborate, just this delusional fairytale explanation that, and that's what Building 7 looks like to me, but I can't believe to this day there are still people Who fall for the nonsense that's being pushed by the government's official explanation and the NIST, by the way.
Well, they've never seen on TV Building 7 coming down.
It's been shown two times, only shortly after 9-11.
And so, again, architects and engineers, we weren't even told about it.
The American Institute of Architects, of which I'm one of 90,000 members, never even issued one bulletin.
On this, after the Twin Towers, again, the third worst structural failure in modern history.
I was shocked in 2006, and I heard this in a radio interview.
I was listening to David Ray Griffin, who's now written 14 books on this subject.
He was being interviewed by Bonnie Faulkner in the San Francisco Bay Area, and I was just shocked, because I'm hearing for the first time ever, in 2006, May 29th it was, This theory as to this third tower,
how it came down, according to NIST, and Professor Griffin was telling us that not only that, the Twin Towers had these laterally ejected structural steel sections weighing four tons, ejected 80 miles an hour out of the Twin Towers, landing 600 feet in every direction.
And I'm going, what are you talking about?
I would have known about this.
I'm an architect.
I would have known if there was a third tower that came down.
Nope, they're kept completely in the dark.
So what have we done for the last 18 years?
We've gone around the country, indeed around the world, We've gone to architecture conferences, engineering conferences.
We show Building 7 on the TV monitor in our evidence booth.
And we show it dropping like a rock, just like the old hotels in Las Vegas.
And we show the witnesses of explosions.
Like, I wanted to grab onto something, one of them says.
I know that was an explosion, you know.
There's explosions on video in the late afternoon of 9-11.
And let me just, for our audience, if they're not familiar with this, those explosions, we believe, and I think you believe as well, but correct me if I'm wrong, those were actually detonations of the structural support columns.
Would that be correct?
Well, yeah.
I mean, just looking at the building coming down, you know that in order to have a building come straight down suddenly at freefall acceleration, even as NIST finally admitted that After we embarrassed them publicly in their own tech conference in 2008, To have it come down symmetrically, you have to take out all of the 24 core columns at once.
Exactly.
Yeah, followed about a second later by the exterior columns.
That's the only way you can bring a building straight down.
And fire doesn't have that level of precision whatsoever.
No.
And how does it come down at freefall?
That's as fast as...
As a bowling ball falling out of the sky.
Well, let me ask you to clarify.
So there's no resistance.
So not one of those 80 columns on any of the floors gave any resistance to that fall.
What happened to them?
Yeah, that's extraordinary.
Okay, but first question.
So are you saying that from the video you can confirm that I believe regular 1G free fall is 9.8 meters per second per second?
Does that sound right?
And is that what the building was falling at?
It was falling at 9.8 meters per second squared.
So it's getting faster and faster without any resistance.
And that's confirmed from the video?
Oh, yeah.
David Chandler, a physics teacher, has a beautiful interview at 911speakout.org.
in which he tracks the building itself.
This is how he embarrassed NIST into admitting that it did indeed come down, came down at freefall.
But before that, they were denying it because if they were to admit that, it would mean what happened to the columns, all of them, at once.
Right.
So logically then, and I know you've been through this a thousand times, but I'm just trying to help the audience here track what you're saying.
But in order for there to be no resistance in the free fall, it means that none of those 24 core support columns offered any resistance whatsoever.
And the only way for that to happen is there had to be, in some way, simultaneous cataclysmic structural failure of 24 core columns.
That's the only way physically that can happen.
And followed a second later by all of the perimeter columns.
Exactly.
Don't forget those.
This is extraordinary.
And guess what?
We have the physical evidence given to us on a silver platter by FEMA, who did the original analysis on this building, and by the U.S. Geological Survey, who did the analysis on the dust.
What did FEMA find?
They found in their metallurgical examination, which was included in their report in May of 2002 in Appendix C of Building 7's collapse, they found hot sulfur corrosion attack on the steel.
The steel was the one or two pieces that they had, because everything else was shipped to China to be destroyed before forensic investigators could get their hands on it and do a proper investigation.
But the steel that they had showed liquid molten iron invading the grain boundaries of the steel.
Now, wait a minute.
There's a lot.
Let's unpack that.
Liquid molten iron is 2,800 degrees, first of all.
That's the melting point of iron.
So how did we get liquid molten?
The office fires are only about 500 or 600 degrees in all likelihood.
This is 2,800 degrees.
Orders of magnitude hotter.
Where is all this heat coming from?
Well, they give us that too.
Hot sulfur corrosion attack on this steel.
That's thermite.
Thermite is an incendiary used by the military to cut through steel like a hot knife through butter.
And we have that evidence not only in this metallurgical examination of the steel.
By the way, the author is fire protection engineer Jonathan Barnett.
He says the ends of the beams were partly evaporated in extraordinarily high temperatures.
Wow.
That's a quote.
So how does that have?
It takes 4,000 degrees Fahrenheit to evaporate Steel.
So, without any explanation of the obvious implications of these statements and written and verbally, they've given the whole thing away.
We're talking about thermite here and the USGS helps also.
The US Geological Survey does a detailed analysis of all of the dust and what do they find in every sampling?
Billions of Previously molten, there's that word again, 2800 degrees.
Iron, not steel, but iron, elemental iron.
We haven't used iron in our skyscrapers for 100 years.
Where's the iron coming from?
Microspheres.
Previously molten iron microspheres.
Those are spheres about the diameter of a human hair.
On average, they have no idea where they came from, but they're so ubiquitous everywhere.
There's tons and tons of them throughout all the World Trade Center dust, comprising up to 6% of some of these samples.
And the EPA says it's a signature element of the World Trade Center dust.
In other words, it's not even World Trade Center dust unless it has these Plentiful billions of previously molten iron microspheres, and they don't know where they came from either.
But guess what?
If you take thermite in a controlled experiment and you burn it, it takes a hot, very hot temperature to burn this.
Thermite's basically iron oxide, rust, and aluminum powder mixed together.
If you burn that, it creates an incredible fiery substance like plasma.
It's 4,500 degrees or so.
And so that's how we get the 4,000 degree temperatures that can evaporate steel.
That's how we get the molten iron because molten iron is a byproduct of thermite.
And so this is...
And so, because of the pressure, it emits all of these liquid molten iron spheres, and they cool.
Well, before they cool, they're formed by surface tension into droplets, like rain droplets, like out of an aerosol tube.
You get spheres.
And so in the case of molten iron, they cool and they fall.
And this is what could explain the toasting of the tops of the cars also around the perimeter of the World Trade Center.
You know, this evidence is incredible.
And it's overwhelming.
And by the way, I don't know if you've ever heard this, but the other place where we find these so-called microspherials, as I've heard them called in geological samples, is in the aftermath of impacts of meteors, high-velocity impacts, which release extraordinary amounts of energy, and they create microspherials of different elements.
You know, sometimes silicon, sometimes tungsten, whatever, depends on the composition.
But clearly, in fact, I think that physicists can probably calculate, to some degree, the amount of energy that would be released in order to create spherules of iron of a specific size.
In other words, the more the energy, the smaller the particles end up being, because they just get blasted, not quite atomized.
It's not atomic scale.
It's still a particle that you could see, but you said maybe human hair.
What is that, one-tenth of a millimeter or something like that?
They're small.
Yeah.
Very small.
So that evidence is all evidence of ignited thermite.
Well then, a small team of scientists asked themselves, could there be any evidence of unignited thermite in the World Trade Center dust also?
Because they would know what to look for, iron oxide and aluminum powder.
So they collect eight Samples which were sent to them from all different places.
One was collected on the Brooklyn Bridge, one in the apartment across the street from the South Tower, and on the street and on police cars, and they did detailed analysis on these in the laboratory.
And they found, first of all, that they're attracted by a magnet.
These are small red-gray chips, about a sixteenth of an inch long, the largest of them.
They thought they were paint because they're red on one side, gray on the other.
The red side is curious because they realized it had a high iron content.
That's what is attracted to magnets.
So they do an X-ray energy dispersive spectroscopy analysis on it, and they find what?
Iron oxide and aluminum powder, the ingredients of thermite.
It's incredible.
So they go, whoa, we got to get into this now.
They get a nuclear microscope.
They zoom in 40,000 times, 50,000 times, and they find these iron oxide crystals, rhomboidal shaped, at the nanoscale, a thousand times smaller than the diameter of a human hair.
This is very sophisticated stuff, and they find the aluminum platelets also about the same size.
So they've found in this matrix of oxygen, silica, and carbon, organic material, which is used, by the way, in TNT to expand with gases and knock things over.
That's what explosives do.
Whereas incendiaries are destroyed by means of heat.
So here we have an incendiary that appears to have been engineered to become more explosive.
At the nanoscale, the particles are so small that the surface volume increases exponentially.
So this is not made in a cave in Afghanistan, this stuff.
This is extremely sophisticated materials made only in the most advanced defense contracting laboratories.
And here's the kicker.
When they put these materials in a differential scanning calorimeter, a heater that measures resultant energy, at 420 Celsius, 758 Fahrenheit, they ignite, producing what?
Molten iron microspheres with the exact same chemical signature as the molten iron microspheres in the World Trade Center dust found by the U.S. Geological Survey and R.J. Lee and other scientists.
Environmental consulting firms.
So you see, we know exactly where all those molten iron microspheres came from.
They came from these chips, red-grade chips of nanothermite.
It's called superthermite in the peer-reviewed literature.
This has been developed by Lawrence Livermore well before 9-11 and produced in the peer...
They call it superthermite, and they build it with...
With sol gels.
It's a very, very sophisticated form of stuff.
So all of this analysis has been put in 2009.
We've had it, you know, for more than a decade now, in the peer-reviewed paper by the Bentham Open Chemical Physics Journal.
And it stands uncontested.
No one's put forth their own peer-reviewed paper to challenge the results of this one.
So the conclusion is, this is active thermitic materials.
It's a pyrotechnic or explosive In all the World Trade Center dust samples, it should not be there, Mike.
This is as clear as it can be.
Well, so clearly, I mean, we have to follow the logic here.
Someone installed thermite material.
The fingerprint is undeniable.
Someone installed it.
Perhaps we'll get to that.
But let me step back for a second and mention that I've found that since...
Since the COVID pandemic, as I call it, since the lockdowns, all of the follow the science, two weeks to flatten the curve, which turned out to be three years, and pushing vaccine mandates, lockdowns, masks, social distancing, all of this, I have found that a lot more people...
Are now willing to look back at 2001 and ask bigger questions about 9-11 because now they realize, holy cow, our government is lying to us on big things.
Not just the government.
Yes, the media too.
The media too, of course.
They control us with all of this propaganda, the march to the war, the march to fear, the march to the vaccines.
It's vaccines with quotes...
Bioweapons.
This is an attack on all of us.
And yes, I believe along with you that it has been set up by 9-11.
An orchestrated false flag attack on the American people and largely on Middle Easterners who were, of course, blamed for these attacks.
And what did we do?
We launched wars to reshape the Middle East with invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq 2 million killed and a $6.5 trillion global war on terror that is still going on that our great-grandchildren will be paying for.
That's right.
That's right.
And I would say that until recently, in a lot of people's minds, it was inconceivable that the government and the media and even the military industrial complex or the deep state, whatever you want to call it, would engage in such heinous crimes in order to achieve their goals.
But now we see, for example, that the entire surveillance apparatus that was approved after 9-11, involving the Patriot Act and other acts, has now been used to surveil people who are vaccine skeptics.
So perhaps Middle Easterners were the target in the later years of the Bush administration, and now it's the vaccine skeptics who are the target or...
Anybody that questions the establishment narrative is now targeted with those same surveillance tools that were justified in the aftermath of 9-11.
Well, justified.
And Snowden gave it to us on a silver platter also because we know now, most all of us know, we're not out on the streets about it, but we know that our phone calls, our emails, our texts are systematically, illegally, unconstitutionally being swept up and stored and used against many of us.
That's right.
So that set the stage for what I think we're heading toward with the World Health Organization and the pandemic treaty, where with this digital ID, the real ID, and worse where with this digital ID, the real ID, and worse that's coming, We're just accepting it.
We accepted the contact tracing to a large extent across this country.
And the parallels between 9-11 and COVID, they're extraordinary.
Agreed.
And a great 9-11 researcher, Kevin Ryan, has assembled these parallels to And he did an amazing job because now the COVID truth movement, who didn't know about 9-11, upon seeing each of these dozen parallels, will be able to open their eyes like a lot bigger and vice versa.
There's many in the 9-11 truth movement who have taken the vaccine who still can't imagine a conspiracy.
On the scale of controlling not only every hospital in this country, but around the world, as well as all the media around the world, convincing us to be afraid.
One of the parallels creating this incredible climate of fear in which people can then be controlled.
Well, of course, that happened big time in 9-11 with the orange and red meter as it would go across.
How afraid should I be today?
Oh, there's a lot of chatter out there, you know, terrorism.
Same thing, of course.
We're told there's a million people that died in the country.
Well, nobody died as a result of the flu.
In that first year, the flu just disappeared.
They create fear by manipulating all these statistics.
We have foreknowledge of these events in advance.
There's insider trading with suspicious benefits for well-placed billionaires and corporations.
There's predictive programming put forth about COVID, about 9-11.
A decade before 9-11, the attacks on the towers.
Yeah, Steve Jackson Games.
I remember Steve Jackson Games had that card about the Twin Towers.
I forgot the name of that.
The Illuminati cards?
Yeah, the Illuminati cards, right, that predicted so many events that we're seeing, including 9-11.
But the thing, Richard, that's so shocking to me, and I want to remind people of your website, RichardGage.com.
And that's G-A-G-E. It's not spelled with a U. RichardGage911.org is the website.
But the extraordinary upshot of this, Richard, is that most Americans are living in a fairy tale fantasy land of false narratives.
And they've been believing lies for decades and perhaps earlier.
And these lies very often determine Yeah, and remdesivir.
And so they also put forth drills because they need a structure around which to organize taking it live.
And so we had drills before 9-11 with the hijackers and on 9-11 where the radar techs were confused at 9-11.
Northcom.
They were told that this exercise...
And then they're going, well, wait a minute.
We're being told there's a real-world exercise, a real-world event also.
And they're asking, is this real?
They're just totally confused.
The jets were sent in drills up to Canada and Alaska, leaving our vulnerable corridor in the Northeast vulnerable for things like airplanes that are out of...
We also have drills in the case of COVID, Event 201, which I think you've covered also, where we have a complete tabletop exercise bringing in experts from all over the world To tell us, three months before COVID hit, that we're going to be practicing for a potential pandemic of coronavirus.
Yes.
Sure enough, it happens.
Well, they also planned another drill called catastrophic contagion for 2015, in which it not only will be worse in terms of the quantity of deaths, but it will be Targeting children, this particular virus.
So can we count on that?
I mean, is that predictive programming or is that a drill?
And they target also the vaccine hesitant and the people providing misinformation like yourself in these drills also.
They're getting very sophisticated.
We have a complete abuse of science in the case of NIST. We've gone over that with regard to Building 7.
And abuse of science, of course, on the COVID. We don't have to go through all of the manipulations of statistics trying to put ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine down as ineffective and even dangerous.
Let me interrupt you there for a second, Richard.
But how they're able to get away with this for so many years is that they control the narratives through censorship and also now with the weaponization of their so-called fact-checking, or as they say, oh, they're trying to stop disinformation or misinformation.
If you're flagged as misinformation, which simply means you told the truth about something, Then you could be targeted, you could be shut down, you could be surveilled, you could be put on a watch list.
Frankly, you could be put on a kill list if you say something about Ukraine and Russia that the establishment doesn't like.
We just found out that Tucker Carlson is on a Kiev-run kill list, which is endorsed and supported by the U.S. State Department, in effect.
I mean, not publicly, but behind the scenes it is.
And so...
This is how they control all of these narratives.
But in every case, what they have in common is that it is the establishment.
It's our own government, our own media, our own corporations waging a war against us, against we, the people.
The terrorists are right here in America, and they're running the country.
It's bad, Mike.
And they do it through these parallels that It's just so awakening because they create...
How do they do it?
They create a solution that's far worse than the problem.
Invading the Middle East after 9-11, for instance.
The Patriot Act, in which any of us can be arrested without a right to a lawyer, a trial, a jury.
We can be tortured and we can be assassinated constitutionally.
Some of us have.
American citizens.
Without any due process whatsoever.
So that's a solution that That, again, far worse than the original problem.
Same with the mandated genetic therapy that they have foisted upon the world.
Half the world, at least, has taken this without any notification that it's an experiment, all because there's emergency authorization in both cases of 9-11, and they invoke that with regard to the COVID, too.
And then we have false accounts provided by officials.
These are the lies.
The virus came from a bat.
Oh, no, it might not have come from a bat.
It might have been leaked from the lab.
But we didn't create it.
It's like one step of the...
Of the scenes, the false scenery falls down one at a time.
They have an extreme control of the narrative that shifts over time.
That is after people just don't buy it anymore.
We're not talking about fundamentalist Muslims anymore with these FBI instigated terror cells that That they arrest before they can do anything just to show us that there is something we should be afraid of.
No, we're shifting to white supremacists now in the United States.
They said that's our biggest threat to our security now without anything to prove that it actually ever happened.
Well, in fact, the number one group out there, I think it's called Patriot Front.
These guys that wear the khaki pants and march around.
Right down the street from me in Coeur d'Alene, Idaho.
That's just roll call for the FBI. I mean, that's just FBI people dressing up and running around marching and pretending to be white supremacists.
I mean, in every case, they have to create the facade of the enemy that they then claim to be attacking.
I mean, even about the Muslim Americans, how many innocent Muslim Americans were Well, we just learned that through the release of the unredacted court filing, which is the investigation of Dan Canestrero, And the Guantanamo Military Commission.
And he's interviewed all of these FBI agents and they're saying, my God, the CIA is controlling this.
They're in control of a Saudi intelligence official who paid the rent and got the driver's license for Al-Hazmi and Al-Midar, two of the hijackers on Flight 77, allegedly.
So the CIA is fingered not only as facilitating these hijackers, the FBI is complaining, many of them, that the CIA kept them inside of this Alex Station CIA facility that was specifically dedicated to tracking al-Qaeda.
The FBI could not tell their headquarters about these two hijackers that just come, by the way, from an al-Qaeda summit in Kuala Lumpur 18 months before 9-11.
They're immediately then let into the United States with multiple entry visas.
So then the FBI can't tell headquarters, but then two weeks before 9-11, the CIA finally tells the FBI, oh, there's these guys in the country.
They're your problem now.
We've lost them.
And they were in charge of them all along.
They probably were orchestrating their flight school training, which went very badly because they all failed Cessna flying school.
So they couldn't even obviously fly a large jet.
So that's the kind of thing that's getting exposed, and that was just a couple of weeks ago from Florida Bulldog, the news outlet.
Dan Christensen did a great job there.
But the other thing they do is they have no real investigation.
It's a fake investigation.
It's a cover-up.
It's a whitewash.
The 9-11 Commission didn't even...
We try to follow where the put options went when millions were bet against the fate of the airliners the next day, that they would go down by these put options.
And they said in the 9-11 commission report, well, we tracked this and it didn't go to Al-Qaeda, so we didn't have to go any farther than insider trading.
What worries me about this, Richard, I mean, multiple things do, but the scale of deaths involved in each of these operations appears to be expanding.
So in 9-11, the official tally of American deaths were in the low single-digit thousands.
But then with COVID... We now have, according to reliable estimates by people like Ed Dowd and others, we have approaching 1 million dead Americans and over 5 million disabled, injured, or maimed.
In fact, those are low numbers as well.
It could very well be many more.
If this continues, and it seems like we're living under an empire that is increasingly desperate, regardless of which party.
This is not a party, you know, Republican versus Democrat.
They're increasingly desperate at the top, and they need bigger and bigger emergencies in order to maintain control.
Well, if we plot where this is going, doesn't it mean that the next crazy thing they could try might kill tens of millions of Americans?
I mean, are there any limits to what these people won't do if they already blew up our buildings in New York City and they unleashed a bioweapon that they built in the military?
They built it, and then they unleashed it on us?
I mean, where does this ever end?
Yeah, and they're engineering a nuclear war in Ukraine with this increasing provocation.
Against Russia, which all of this could have been avoided with negotiation before it even began.
So we're quite concerned.
But that's not...
The enemy that they...
Really enjoy is the elusive, powerful enemy, Kevin Ryan's parallel number nine.
Because in the case of terror cells, you know, they hide.
They don't wear turbans.
They could be next door.
And they could be a terror cell.
And you better, by God, put tape and plastic over your windows because there could be a biochemical attack.
In your neighborhood.
We were all, you know, really concerned about that.
And now with COVID, you have this little virus, right?
You can't see it.
You could be touching an ATM machine and then all of a sudden you're a super spreader without even knowing it, which is illogical.
But you could kill grandma if you visit her and you better wear a mask and keep your distance and stay outside and And not gather in groups.
I mean, this whole thing is based on fear and not science.
The science of all of those measures that they forced upon us has been disproven.
They also have a complete media censorship, a clampdown, a ridicule of those who are trying to get the truth out, in our case about 9-11, In the case of the COVID truth movement, any part of the massive quantities of truth that need to be told and are being told, but not getting through on mainstream media.
What happens when they try?
Look at Tucker Carlson.
He's all of a sudden, after questioning COVID, questioning Building 7, a week before he got fired, questioning all kinds of narratives from the official Mainstream sources, he gets fired.
And they call all of us conspiracy theorists.
So this censorship is engineered in uniformly, what does Donald Rumsfeld call it, complete total spectrum dominance.
Full spectrum dominance.
It's surprising how well Project Mockingbird has done in the last 30 or 40 years.
It is extraordinary.
Let's go to your website, richardgage911.org.
Walk us through what people can find on your site, what you have available for people to get educated about all this.
Oh, you bet.
At the top, we have our film, which we're in the tail end of making, 9-11 Crime Scene to Courtroom.
We need about, by the way, $9,000 to complete the film.
We've raised...
$37,000 of our $54,000 goal, by the way.
But all of this evidence is being put in a series, a film series, 9-11 crime scene to courtroom, taking the hard evidence to court.
So here we've got Mick Harrison, a litigation director of the Lawyers Committee for 9-11 Inquiry, and I, in the film, I'm bringing the evidence, I'm bringing two or three dozen experts in their fields, high-rise architects, structural engineers, metallurgists, chemists, physicists, controlled demolition experts, All laying out this evidence, Mick will then analyze the evidence for the benefit of the grand jury and bring it to their attention legally, giving them their opportunities, their obligations.
What can they do?
What does this evidence mean?
What are the statute of limitations, etc., etc.?
So all this is going to a special grand jury for investigation via a federal judge in a court, which we'll be finding and making sure that that happens.
So wait a second.
Before you go on, you're only lacking $9,000 to finish that film?
Yeah.
Well, we're not sitting on it.
We did book our Phase II program.
We're a filming session in Washington, D.C. with the best film crew who did phase one for us, but we do need that money to complete post-editing following our return on July 11th.
Wow.
Well, I mean, we should talk because we'd love to be able to do some special features on Brighteon.com and maybe help you with some fundraising there because $9,000 these days isn't much.
That's pretty achievable.
I think so, too.
And I'm grateful for your help, Mike.
This is one of the most important film projects of the 9-11 Truth Movement, the most important, I believe, because it puts the evidence in the hands of the grand jury.
And they're going to respond to that a whole lot more easier than the 60 exhibits of evidence that's already been submitted to them via the U.S. Attorney in Lower Manhattan.
Okay.
All right.
Excellent.
But as a practical matter, for those watching, if they want to help support your film, can they just do that on your website?
What do they click to donate?
Go to the top here, and I'll show you.
It's upper right.
You just click on this big banner.
It takes you right to the article where we explain all about the film project, and there's a couple of donate buttons.
I see.
There's one.
That's where you end up, and you can...
Donate to monthly if you'd like, or one time.
If you have $9,000, we'll call it a day right now.
Okay, well, let me ask you, Richard, if we could help you get $9,000, can we get some early trailers and snippets from the film and we could feature them on Brighteon?
Let's do it, Mike.
Let's do it.
We'll give you exclusive access to the early trailers Delivery of these clips.
We would be honored to have your participation in that Well, outstanding.
We'd love to do that.
We'll feature them right here on the show.
We'll feature them on the platform and work with you on that to help you get the funds.
Okay, so in addition to this film, then on your website, oops, let me bring it up again.
What else can people find?
I mean, do you have social media channels?
Do you have video channels on platforms?
How can people follow your work?
Oh, you bet.
We're on Rumble, Odyssey, Rockfin, Band.video, and Bridey on TV as well.
So we're getting it out there.
We're on Twitter, Facebook, and...
We also have the opportunity for everybody to see our most recent film, 9-11, which is 10 years old now, which is why we're redoing it.
But it's excellent.
It's 9-11 Explosive Evidence.
Experts speak out.
You can watch it right on the website, richardgage911.org, and see the evidence that we didn't get to today for the Twin Towers.
I mean, if we have...
Another five or ten minutes, I'll go through it, but I think we're short.
We'll have to come back.
Well, actually, I have another five to ten minutes if you do.
Oh, this is extraordinary information, Mike.
Yeah, I'd love to hear it.
But wait, real quick, though, before we go there...
I want to make sure I ask you the question.
You're the founder of Architects and Engineers for 9-11 Truth, but now you're doing your own website.
Are you just doing your own focus now, or what's the story?
I found it necessary to talk about what's particularly relevant today to people.
And by today, I mean a couple of years ago now, when I started talking about COVID. And this doesn't look right, you guys.
There's something wrong with this picture.
I saw Kevin Ryan's parallels of 9-11, and I said, look at this, AABBCC, right across the board.
It's a playbook, and they're using it.
And I started talking about that, and the concern was that the 3,600 architects and engineers who signed a petition demanding a new investigation into the destruction of all three World Trade Center skyscrapers were not demanding an investigation.
And investigation of COVID also.
So I was actually getting off mission.
And so it became apparent that we need an organization with a broader spectrum of mission.
Because it's not just COVID as you know yourself.
Well, yeah, that makes perfect sense.
And I can imagine a lot of the architects and engineers, they want to stay focused on where their licensing is and their expertise.
They're not doctors.
They're architects and engineers.
So that makes sense.
But I'm glad that you're doing your own site, richardgage911.org, because this is...
What happened on 9-11 is just indicative of a much larger real-world cover-up or conspiracy that is quite real.
And the world needs to know about all of this that's happening.
And more and more people are waking up because of COVID. In fact, I can't believe that anybody who knew the truth about 9-11 would take the vaccine.
How could someone do that?
If you know they lied to you then...
We've got these blind spots, Mike.
Even though we can be aware of the tail of the elephant, we're just not seeing the whole thing.
Many of us are just not built to see the whole thing.
Well, I think it's like a thousand screaming elephants, and they're screaming, and it's like, just don't trust any of them.
The default position should be, they're lying to us.
If you navigate the world with that default understanding, you'll actually make the right decision almost all the time.
I hear you.
That is so true.
That's my view anyway.
But go ahead.
Well, in nowhere, believe it or not, it's more clear the evidence at the Twin Towers than it was even for Building 7.
But I always start with Building 7 because nobody's, many people have not heard about it.
And when we, and nobody died there.
We're not laced with this trauma, you know, post-hypnotic stress disorder about it because we weren't in shock about it on 9-11.
So people go, oh, tell me about that.
So now they say, oh, that's a controlled demolition.
Well, wait a minute.
That happened on 9-11.
It was part of the conspiracy at the World Trade Center.
Are you ready to see what the evidence yields for the Twin Towers?
Okay, okay, I'm ready.
Now they're ready, right?
You can't just talk about the Twin Towers with a lot of people, especially firefighters.
They are injured psychologically.
Most New Yorkers are, in fact.
But NIST, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, tells us that each of the towers was destroyed by fire, mostly some broken columns by the airplanes, and then through weakening of structural Steel,
at the point of jet plane impacts, we have then the upper part, which was very heavy, driving the entire rest of the building down to the ground and then destroying itself.
Now, that alone, that theory completely violates the laws of physics because there's an equal and opposite destructive force when two bodies collide.
The upper part is the lightest.
It's the weakest.
It's damaged by fire.
An airplane.
So how could it drive the rest of the building down to the ground at near free-fall acceleration?
Again, almost as fast as a bowling ball falling out of the sky.
It's not slowing down at all when it meets the cold, hard, intact steel.
It doesn't slow down.
So it's the same thing again.
Those columns, in this case 300, including 47 massive core columns, That are increasing in size and weight as you get all the way down to the bottom where they're 52 inches by 22 inches and almost solid steel.
So this little light, it's like a Volkswagen running into a Mack truck.
It's not going to destroy the Mack truck, right?
It doesn't matter if you turn them up and you drop the Volkswagen onto the Mack truck.
No, it's going to do a little bit of damage to the front of the Mack truck and then maybe fall off.
But now let's look at the evidence given to us, the eyewitness testimony, by 156 first responders who are on record, orally, talking about what?
Explosions.
Explosions mostly before the towers even come down.
Explosions that blew them around in the towers also.
Explosions That they see in the form of flashing of lights between the 10th and the 15th floor, many of them.
They're talking about firecrackers, like going out, pop, pop, pop, pop.
You know, like you see in a controlled demolition.
I mean, I can't tell you all 156 of them, but they're almost all like that.
And they talk about explosions before the tower comes down.
Many, many of them.
A very specific sequence of order of events.
Because NIST says, oh no, what they're hearing is the tower coming down.
No.
The tower comes down after they hear these explosions.
And as it's coming down, it's hurling four-ton and eight-ton structural steel sections at 80 miles an hour clocked by physicists laterally.
Landing 600 feet in every direction.
This is an amazing display of fireworks, almost like the volcanic eruption in the Tongan Sea in 2009, where you have upward-outward arching streamers freely flying molten objects, because these steel frames from the towers are huge.
Are trailed by thick white smoke clouds.
But wait!
Steel is not flammable in office fires.
It's only flammable in incredibly hot situations like thermite.
So once again, you have more evidence for the thermite theory, which is completely...
That body of evidence is completely irrefutable.
You also have Below this zone of destruction, you have squibs or isolated explosive ejections coming out of the towers, 20 stories, 40 stories, even 60 stories down below.
These aren't being caused by any kind of a natural or progressive collapse, as claimed by NIST. Besides, if there was this pile driver that NIST says drove the rest of the building down to the ground, it would have destroyed that spire that we see sticking up a thousand feet above the ground after the towers fell,
and then about six seconds later, it begins its descent through the smoke.
No, it would have been destroyed, obviously, by this upper block of the South Tower or the North Tower.
But no, we know that that upper block was, in fact, destroyed itself in the first three or four seconds.
It's destroyed.
You can see squibs erupting out of the side of the upper block of the South Tower in the first three seconds, destroying its structural integrity internally.
And we see the North Tower telescoping almost to nothing.
Before then, we see these rich body of explosions, which we've got close-ups of.
You can see dozens of explosions coming out of the towers, floor by floor by floor, all the way down to the ground.
And guess what?
If all of that steel is distributed in a 1,200 or 1,400 foot diameter around each of the towers, What's driving the building down?
That was a third of the weight of each tower.
It's not available.
It's not in a pile at the bottom.
It's 90%, 98% or so of the steel is outside, well outside the perimeter of the tower.
So how could NIST use, in its calculations, And based on Zdenek Bazant of Chicago Northwestern University, who two days after 9-11 submitted this incredibly complex paper that he wrote.
Tried to show that the upper block drove the rest of the building down.
So all the rest of us are in shock, right?
After 9-11, we're going, when's the next thing coming?
He's in his den creating this magic calculation that finally, years later, structural engineers were able to decode and found it completely fraudulent.
They had three times the mass up above.
They had...
Four times the capability of the structure below to resist that mass.
It's complete fraud.
It's rigged like 24 to 1 in favor of a collapse.
No surprise.
But let me interrupt you, because speaking of rigging, you know, a lot is coming out now about how the intelligence community was involved in a lot of significant events in American history in order to seize more control over the population, you know, surveillance powers, and so on.
This is just one of them, but recently, presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr., Stated that the CIA did assassinate his uncle, JFK, which I believe absolutely that is the case.
And I was a friend of the late Jim Mars who wrote about that extensively.
And there's another case where you have to, in order to believe the official explanation, you have to believe in magical physics.
Like make-believe nonsense, which is exactly what you were just describing in that paper.
They have to make up numbers.
Same thing with COVID, gain of function, SARS-CoV-2, vaccine efficacy.
In every case, whether it's 9-11 or the assassination of JFK, they roll out this bogus fake science, fake physics, fake math, and then they try to confuse the public and get people to buy it and call everybody else a conspiracy theorist.
Yep.
That's the plan.
Yep.
And it's been working less and less so, though, right?
I mean, most people, 90% of Americans believe that JFK was assassinated by the CIA. Robert Kennedy Jr.
is simply having the courage, based on that public awareness, to voice it on the media as he can.
And now, I think we're breaking through, Mike.
There's so many of us, including...
Alex Jones and yourself and all of the other voices.
Alex started out almost singularly alone, right?
With the Coast to Coast AM gentleman who would put some of this out there.
But then you came and others came and now it's given me courage to talk out as an architect, even though I get ridiculed by my own profession here and there.
There's thousands in the alternative media.
So I think we're drowning them out.
And the ratings on CNN have fallen, as well as Fox, of course, now, so dramatically that you've got Joe Rogan, of all people, has greater viewership than CNN. So we're making progress.
Joe needs more progress, especially on 9-11.
He seems...
I'm quite afraid to touch this subject.
We've got to give him well, you guys.
And, you know, our platform Brighteon alone has more views than CNN, by the way.
But of course, that's, you know, hundreds of thousands of channels and users across the platform.
But to the point, you know, we no longer we, the American people, no longer have to trust in three networks or trust just CNN as the one dominant news source.
Now people can choose their news sources and they can choose to listen to interviews like this, which we probably do need to wrap up now come to think of it.
You know, with freedom of information because of alt media or independent media, now truths are coming out about so many issues that it seems like the deep state or the intelligence community, maybe is a better term, is getting more and more desperate.
To have bigger cover-ups, bigger things.
Again, you mentioned nuclear war.
If they can provoke Putin into launching nukes, then they can maybe achieve a nuclear strike on an American city and use that to have a bigger emergency, bigger martial law, bigger crackdown on everything.
And I think that that's what the leaders are driving us into if they can achieve it.
That's what they want.
It's quite a concern.
Russia is...
Yeah, we'll use nukes if we need to.
And so all we have to do now is set them up.
Of course, Nord Stream is an interesting example.
Exactly.
It's obvious that Russia wouldn't have sabotaged their own pipeline.
And Biden said he would do it if Russia invaded Ukraine.
And so Russia invaded Ukraine and the pipeline goes bad.
Duh!
What's going on here?
That's a false, classic, false flag flag.
Not even well executed.
Yeah, I'm glad you brought up Nord Stream because not only did Biden say that we're going to do that, but Victoria Nuland bragged about it.
I mean, you have Homeland Security basically saying, yeah, we won't let that pipeline function if Russia moves on Ukraine.
We'll find a way to destroy it.
I mean, it's all out there.
And then, of course, it gets blown up and then the left-wing media covers up for the administration and says...
No, it was two guys with a sailboat and a rubber band or whatever.
Really, MacGyver blew up the Nord Stream pipelines?
I don't think so.
But anyway, fascinating, Richard.
What's your takeaway from this?
This has been a fascinating interview.
Obviously, we've got to have you back on, but what do you want people to take away from this conversation today?
Well, my hope is that people will, realizing the evidence that you were probably unaware of much of this, get a hold of the DVD that we do have at richardgage911.org.
Share it with every architect and engineer that you can find.
Everybody else that you know, because this has to get out.
There's brochures.
You can buy a hundred of them for like ten bucks.
You can pass them out.
They have all this evidence available.
In summary form that we've gone over today, we've done everything we can do to provide everything you need to wake up everybody you know, if you have the courage.
Mike has the courage, but how about the rest of you?
Don't just watch Mike, don't just watch me.
Get out there and share this information, the DVDs, I mean the videos on Mike's channels, including our own about 9-11.
Just share it massively.
This is what's going to saturate the public.
And once we get the public over the edge, you know, a certain percentage of them, we will begin to have the peaceful revolution that has to happen in this country, or we will end up in a slave state.
It's already happening.
Mike's been warning you about this for years and years.
It's heading in that direction, guys.
There's no question.
What are you going to do about it is the question.
How are you going to look your children and grandchildren in the eye when they ask you, what did you do, daddy or mommy, about this tragedy, this takeover of our country?
Yeah, we've been living under a government crime syndicate for generations, I believe.
It's very clear.
And I have to admit that when 9-11 happened, I was not, quote, red-pilled.
I had no idea what was going on.
I believed the narrative at the time, the official explanation.
And it's a process for people to wake up and realize what's going on.
But the nice thing about that process is once you've been...
Once you've been exposed to the truth about a big subject like COVID, then you can take that knowledge and that realization or that presence of mind and you can look back in time.
You can go back to 9-11.
You can go back to JFK's assassination.
You can look at Ronald Reagan being shot and then drugged and then controlled and all the different things that happened throughout history that have led up to this point, which is America as a slave nation.
I think we're almost there right now.
Where law-abiding citizens have no rights, but if you're a shoplifter, you have legal immunity.
Just go steal whatever you want.
That's where we are.
It's pretty wild.
It really is, Mike.
Yeah.
But thank you, Richard.
Your website again, richardgage911.org.
This is fascinating.
I hope to have you back on.
And let's talk after this about getting some clips from your film.
And we'll help spread the word for you on the fundraising.
And folks, if you're watching...
He only needs $9,000 to finish this film.
This is history in the making.
This is a game changer.
So if you can, donate $20, $50, $100 if you'd like to see that.
And we'll work with Richard Gage's organization to broadcast some of those clips on brighttown.com.
Thank you so much, Richard.
We really appreciate you today.
Beautiful.
Thank you, Mike.
Appreciate it so much.
All right.
You too.
Take care now.
And for those of you watching, thank you for watching and for your interest in this topic.
Again, visit Richard Gage's website.
RichardGage911.org is the site.
And watch for us.
Hopefully, we'll be featuring some clips on Brighttown.com maybe later this year.
We'll see what happens with that documentary.
And I will keep you posted as well.
You can always share this video interview on other channels, your own channel, other platforms.
Go ahead.
We just want to get the word out.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon.com, but I support all the free speech video platforms that exist out there, so go ahead and share this everywhere.
Thanks for watching today.
I'm Mike Adams, founder of Brighteon.
Take care, everybody.
So, as the apps accelerates all around us, it's important to have a backup plan for your assets.
Gold and silver may be a very rational choice for many of you.
And our sponsor in that space is the Treasure Island Coins and Precious Metals Company.
I've worked with them for several years.
I've got their website up here.
They have real-time pricing, so you can go on their site and check their pricing right now to see that they are very, very competitive.
They've got U.S. Mint and other mints, gold and silver coins.
They're happy to help.
They also have silver IRAs that are IRS compliant as well, and they offer insured, discreet delivery and assistance with your purchase, and they are trustworthy.
I don't know how many thousands of our people get squared away with gold and silver.
And remember, I don't recommend gold and silver as a speculation.
This is not about it going up in price.
This is about a safety backup plan for not losing assets as the dollar collapses and inflation gets worse all around us.
If you understand that our government appears to be at war with we the people, you know that they continue to print money and devalue the dollars that you and I have.
The one thing that has stood the test of time is precious metals, gold and silver.
So check it out at metalswithmike.com.
That gets you straight to the Treasure Island website, metalswithmike.com.
And for the record, they do not pay us any kind of commission.
There's no room for commissions and affiliate commissions of any kind because their prices are so good.
So check them out, metalswithmike.com, and thank you for considering the sponsors that help support this broadcast.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.