All Episodes
Previous Next
Dec. 5, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
46:37
James Roguski unveils WHO's global health SURVEILLANCE tyranny agenda
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
Alright, welcome everybody.
Mike Adams here of Brighteon.com with, I think, a really fantastic guest.
A first-time guest.
We probably should have had him on before because he's so informed.
He's got such great analysis of what's going on today.
His name is James Roguski, and he's got a Substack page.
That is, well, jamesroguski.substack.com.
He's also got screwthewho.com, the who being the W-H-O, screwthewho.com.
And he joins us today to talk about the WHO's new pandemic treaty and so much more.
Mr.
Roguski, it's an honor to have you on.
Thank you for all your work and welcome to the show.
Well, Mike, the honor is mine, as I said before, and this is a pleasure.
There's so much information about this.
What I try to do is just do all the boring digging and try to turn it into English.
So where do you want to start?
Well, first of all, I just want to say I love your work on Substack.
And you and a couple of other people inspired me, and I actually set up – I launched the Substack page today, in fact.
So I'm there now, and I believe I added you as my first or second recommended site.
So there we go.
I appreciate you.
Give us the big picture first to start with.
How much trouble are we in if we don't stop the global health crisis?
Well, if you want global health fascism, things are looking really grand.
If you're opposed to that, you better get off your couch and get a move-along.
And I'll blow everybody's mind right now.
Give me a call.
My phone number is 310-619-3055.
Text me, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, whatever.
I've met some of the most wonderful people.
I am that serious about this, if that tells you anything.
It maybe isn't imminent in the sense that, you know, some of these bureaucratic things take time.
But in another sense, it's already upon us because what they're really doing is setting up a framework.
And everybody already knows the framework.
And crazy young leaders that have been put into position all over the world, whether it's California, New York, South Africa, Australia, Canada, wherever.
Okay.
They're busy implementing before the treaties put together and signed.
They all know where these two trains are headed, and they're implementing some of the craziest stuff.
And so this is a local battle as well.
All right.
So tell us about the crazy stuff.
Now, remember, we interviewed Dr.
Francis Boyle maybe two weeks ago, and he told us about how horrified he was of the WHO pandemic treaty.
But you mentioned to me just before we started here, there's something else that may be a bigger threat as well.
So clue us in on what's on your radar here.
I speak regularly with Dr.
Boyle.
Anytime I get any information, he's the first one on my list that I send it to.
So thank you, Professor Boyle, and thank you for interviewing him.
Here's what happens.
There's only so much time to talk about all these different things, and I'll try to give a visual analogy.
There's at least two tracks that the WHO is running on trying to change international law.
Now, one of the tracks is analogous to a Japanese bullet train, and the reason for that is we're already, and all the other member nations of the WHO are already parties to, we've already signed on to the International Health Regulations, which are, quite frankly, misnamed.
I don't call them the International Health Regulations anymore.
They are actually the International Surveillance Regulations, because if you read them, they're not about health.
They're all about surveillance and monitoring and reporting and the amendments and all of the words involved are very simply on some level a reasonable system To alert the world if there's a problem, okay?
If somebody on either side bombed, you know, a nuclear power plant in the Ukraine, you know, I think an alert should go out, okay?
And so it has its place, but they have figured out that the path is very, very slippery to amend it and use that legal structure to gain more power.
And so in order to amend the The international surveillance regulations, all that's needed is a majority vote, or plus one, of the World Health Assembly, which meets every May.
Now, there's 194 nations, so 97 is half of that, one plus that is 98.
So if they can coerce 98 nations to say yes, changes to the international surveillance regulations would be adopted.
And so...
The other reason that I'm really concerned about this particular aspect is they're keeping it really, really secret.
They're busy talking about the treaty, but the amendments to the international health regulations are just under lock and key.
They may at some point, you know, I checked just before we came on, you know, they hadn't posted anything anywhere.
We do know That now it's actually 16 nations.
They had reported earlier that 14 nations had submitted proposed amendments.
Another two have been added, and those two being Malaysia and the Republic of Korea.
And all told, they've only said which articles they wanted to amend.
There are 66 articles in the regulations, and they wanted to amend at least 32, not quite half, And then the additional ones from Malaysia and Korea.
Let me interject here.
Give us some practical translation of what we're talking about here.
Are these things like required surveillance of your movements and who you've been in contact with, required apps to be able to travel, and things like that?
What is this?
I'll keep it really simple.
Back in 2005 when they implemented these, The attitude was, well, it's not just good enough to have TSA pat you down at the border and stop you at the airport or the cruise ship or on a border crossing or something like that.
Not that we stop anybody at a border crossing.
But they decided that they wanted to have that control, not at the border, but inside the country, you know, thus all of the testing and everything.
And they leave it to the individual nation to do their lockdowns, whether it's, you know, China style or, you know, not at all like in Florida or Texas, maybe.
And so the core of the regulations are surveillance within countries so that a country could report if there was a problem.
Now, the big problem coming either got leaked on purpose or leaked by accident, but you've probably reported, I believe you have, on at least one half of what the Indonesian health minister stated at the G20. He stated very clearly,
quote unquote health certificate vaccine passport by any other name into the international health surveillance regulations.
He said this coming May.
Right.
Now, that's totally doable from their perspective.
They've got their schedule all structured so that could happen.
That's what I've been raising the flags about for months.
In all of their official documents, even though they're getting this all ready now, they say, oh, well, we're just going to do that in 2024.
Well, maybe.
Maybe they're telling the truth.
But, you know, we need to stop it now because why in the world would anybody have a vaccine certificate when There aren't any vaccines and whatever it is they're injecting doesn't stop transmission, doesn't stop infection.
What is that certifying other than you're compliant?
Well, that's it.
This is global compliance with anything they want to put into a needle, whether it's even on the outside of possibilities, transhumanism injections or whatever it is, right?
It could be anything, literally anything.
They just call it a vaccine.
But this is global compliance, but clearly, and this is my question to you about this, clearly, they intend to need such rules, right?
I mean, they don't make frameworks that they don't ever imagine using, it seems.
Absolutely.
And so to make this super crystal clear, we'll move on to the next topic.
The international health regulations are existing.
Back in 2005, we agreed, you know, George W. Bush agreed to him, you know, after 9-11 and the Patriot Act and the anthrax scare and all that sort of stuff, you know, they signed on to it.
I just want people to realize that You're going to have to study your constitution a little bit more closely because it isn't what you think it is.
And there are hundreds, if not thousands, of agreements that the international community treats as being legally binding.
And this is one of them.
And so what is going on with the amendments to the regulations?
It's a very slippery slope.
It's like a bullet train.
It could be adopted in May, okay?
They say 2024, well, you know, be vigilant and, you know, don't let anything slip past you.
They have not yet published anything, and believe me, you know, I'm keeping my eye out every day.
As soon as I hear something, you know, you'll be on the list of people that I tell.
We'll get that information out to people.
In preparation for whatever they come up with, I have been working for almost two months now on the People's Amendments, thepeoplesamendments.com.
And I won't talk too, too much about that other than I think most people, if they go and they read what's in there, they'll be like, yeah, if I was going to change international law, I would want these things.
When they finally publish what they're doing, I firmly believe everybody's going to go, What?
Are you out of your mind?
And so it's not good enough to say, no, no, no, no, no.
We don't want to do what you guys want to do.
You also have to say, no, look, this is what we want.
This is what we demand.
Okay?
And so, go ahead.
Well, you know, the pattern that we've all been observing here and living through to our horror is that every time there's some other global emergency, and the WHO was complicit in...
You know, declaring this, a quote, pandemic and, you know, pushing vaccines and all these things, horrible decisions.
But every time this happens, we lose a little bit of our national sovereignty or a lot of it.
And it seems like this is the slippery slope into just pure globalism where individual countries, no matter who might be president or who might be in the Senate and so on, have no power compared to the globalist dictates.
And that's what Dr. Boyle told me as well.
Would you agree with that assessment that this is where we're sliding into very quickly?
Well, anybody who relies on their government officials to protect their sovereign rights doesn't understand what sovereignty means.
You know, it's up to us to stand up for our rights against those government officials who think they have powers.
And as long as we allow them to behave the way they've been behaving, they're going to keep doing it.
And so, Professor Boyle has spoken, I know with you and many others, about the pandemic treaty.
Now, the pandemic treaty, as opposed to the bullet train of the amendments, is a big old freight train that they're loading up with absolutely everything.
And it hasn't gotten up to the plateau yet, so it doesn't have a chance of getting a head of steam going downhill.
But it is something that is mind-blowing.
So erase the blackboard of your mind, Mike, because I'm going to give you something that I don't think anybody's ever said about the treaty.
In the talk, in the run-up over the last almost, well, it's actually been two years.
They first started this two years ago.
They keep saying they want to change the global health architecture, right?
And that doesn't mean they want to build a new building, you know, in Geneva.
What that means is, if you're familiar, and I'm sure you are, with, you know, the climate change accords and what they call the conference of the parties, they just had COP27. They want to set up a whole nother bureaucracy, right?
And so it isn't build back better, it's build a bigger bureaucracy.
In the pandemic treaty, if you go to Articles 19, 20 and on, they talk about having a conference of the parties.
Now, what that means is it's sort of a bureaucracy to run whatever the treaty is.
And anybody who signs on to the treaty, any nation who signs on to the treaty, would be one of the parties.
And so if they get a minimum of 40 countries, and that could be the tiniest little nations in the world, all the little Pacific islands and everything else, then it would go into effect for the nations who are party to the treaty.
They want to have a governing body that has two presidents and four vice presidents.
And then they want to have...
Right, crazy.
It's crazy.
Then they want to have an extended COP, and COP doesn't mean policemen, it means conferences of parties, an e-cop, and, you know, it's all of the foundations and non-profits and so forth, and so what they are trying to do is set up a massive bureaucracy,
and here's the thing that Most people who reported on the events of what happened at the G20 and the statement made by the Indonesian health minister missed the stuff that he said afterwards, which was, he's not a doctor, he's a banker.
And he revealed that along with the World Bank, And the Rockefeller Foundation, and Bill and the Gates Foundation, and the Wellcome Trust, and the U.S., and I think 18 other nations, and then some more piled on.
They've created a fifth.
And, you know, what the hell is a fifth, right?
It's a financial intermediary fund.
Right?
Intermediary, middleman, right?
Somebody's in the middle of this money, right?
So the World Bank set up a fund, and he's a banker, and he was just so proud that they've already got pledged $1.4 billion a year for this fund.
They want to get it up to $10 billion a year.
And he, quite frankly, simply said, This is a fantastic investment opportunity.
And essentially what he's signaling to the crowd, which was a bunch of business people, get investing in the companies that are going to make stuff that we're going to fund.
And essentially what they want is they want more investment in pharma.
Now, there's a phrase you may be familiar with.
It actually comes from, we're talking about the treaty, but it comes from Well, I'm taking back the language, and PHEIC, in my world, stands for the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex, PHEIC. Love it.
Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex.
That's the ticket, people.
They want to grow the fake, the pharmaceutical industry, in all of the smaller nations.
So my personal opinion, and everything I've said so far I believe is fact and can be backed up, and so I'm going to venture into opinion land here.
I don't believe that when the Biden administration's amendments were kicked to the curb in this past May, you know, he got basically nothing.
It wasn't for the right reasons.
I think what happened is the smaller nations saw these amendments, and what they saw was all stick, and they said, well, where's the carrot?
What's in it for us?
You want to have all of these requirements and all these rules, and you want to make us do all these things, well, you're going to have to pay for it.
And so the money is starting to flow.
They want to set up an entire structure that what most people don't realize, and this was a mind-blower for me, actually, when you come to see it, is The assessed payments for the United States on a yearly basis to the WHO is, and I know this sounds weird, but it's only $100 million.
Their yearly budget is $4 billion.
They want this new organization to have $10 billion a year.
It's like two and a half times bigger than the entire WHO, and it's all about pandemic preparedness.
Like, what are they going to do?
Have...
What you're describing sounds to me like a giant global pharmaceutical money laundering operation where they put this layer of what you're calling the pharmaceutical industrial complex.
They create all this pandemic nonsense, but expand it to third world countries that so far have Haven't yet been sufficiently looted by the pharmaceutical industrial complex, right?
I mean, they've looted Western nations quite effectively over the last couple of years, but they haven't yet looted Africa and Central America and the Middle East and so on.
That's what it sounds like to me.
Am I off the mark or on the mark with that?
You're spot on.
I would just add loot and poison.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah.
And the delegates and everyone from those nations, they keep demanding equity.
Okay?
Now, don't get triggered on the word.
Okay?
They keep demanding equity.
Now, I can almost guarantee that the vast majority of your audience just, oh, equity, right?
Well, wait a minute.
What does equity really mean?
Okay?
Oh, you bought a house and you paid down some of the mortgage, you have equity.
Equity is money.
When it's code, people, it doesn't mean they want fairness and racial balance and all that sort of fun stuff.
When they say they want equity, it means they want money.
That's what equity is.
It's not equality.
If you have equity in your home, You have money.
And so they basically said, no, we don't want your Biden amendments back in May because it's just telling us what to do.
You're going to tell us what to do.
You're going to have to give us a lot of money.
And so if all the manufacturing is coming home to Africa or smaller island nations, There's a much closer opportunity for corruption and graft and money laundering and sweetheart contracts and great jobs and positions where you make a lot of money for doing next to nothing and boards of directors and corporate executives and all that kind of thing.
They're not stupid.
They're very smart, very savvy, good horse trading, negotiating, not for their people, for the health of their people because there's not a doctor listed.
I did a A word scan on the document, it never says the word doctor.
It doesn't say nutrition.
It doesn't say vitamins or herbs or even essential medications or early treatment.
Or the word natural.
I saw that on your list.
It doesn't say natural, does it?
If I did a word scan on your website, natural everywhere, right?
It's like health everywhere, treatment everywhere.
I'm sorry to interrupt, but this is really relevant.
So most of the population of the world still uses complementary medicine or indigenous medicine in most areas.
So what you are describing, this system looks like it's also designed because there's a very strong component of policing, quote, misinformation and disinformation in all of this, right?
So that's designed, in my view, To essentially outlaw or suppress any discussion of herbal medicine, natural medicine, complementary medicine, which is what has been affordable to 80% of the world, and then to outlaw all that, force people to only talk about pharmaceuticals and vaccines and similar interventions, and then boom, the global pharmaceutical cartel just starts raking in money off the world's poor, whom they're also killing and making infertile in the process.
Well, they haven't been killing and making them infertile quite to the same pace that the more wealthy nations have been doing.
And, you know, they put it under this guise of, hey, you know, Canada bought enough to jab everybody in Canada ten times and the EU bought that many and the United States has bought, you know, Israel.
Hey, you guys are getting all the jabs.
We want some of the jabs, okay?
But that really isn't what they want.
They really want the money to manufacture the drugs and, you know, jab their people that way.
The issue, though, is they had a meeting.
It was one of their informal-focused meetings where they actually had four separate experts, and they asked them, Well, you know, prior to 2020, what metrics were you using to determine whether or not individual nations had developed, you know, an effective, and this is their language, core capacity, right?
You know, is the healthcare system good enough to be able to handle a serious problem, right?
They call it core capacity.
And the experts...
Well, you know, we really don't have any metrics that played out with any accuracy because you would have thought Italy and Spain and England and Germany and the United States, you know, would have done great.
But all the poor nations did much better.
And so we don't really have any metrics by which to gauge preparedness.
So let's have a preparedness treaty with no metrics.
Why am I not surprised?
Okay, and principle number 16 in the treaty says that no health guidance shall be given unless backed by science.
Okay, that, you know, I guess Fauci's going to have to back this.
But there's not a footnote anywhere in the pandemic treaty, okay?
They call it the WHO Convention Agreement.
And they abbreviate it WHOCA +, or agreement and plus.
And so I just call it the hookah plus, because they've got to be smoking something if they think that, you know, we're going to fall for this crazy stuff.
And there's no documentation, no science behind even one line of their proposed treaty.
But yet, here we are.
Right.
They messed it up royal.
And so let's give them two and a half times as much money and a whole brand new bureaucracy.
And the only saving grace with this is it requires a two-thirds majority, not of the Senate, but a two-thirds majority of the members of the WHO at the World Health Assembly.
They say, as before, that they're shooting for 2024.
And, you know, we'll see what they do.
But I think this one is like a slow freight train.
It's trying to get up to the top of the hill.
And we got to, you know, derail it now.
We can't let it go any further.
I completely agree.
And by the way, I want to mention on your Substack site, which is jamesroguski.substack.com, You've got an article there called Three Days That Will Live in Infamy, and in that article you have some clickable action items to call members of Congress, sign petitions, things like that.
So there are action items that people can take right there and links to meetings and all kinds of things like that.
So thank you for putting that together.
It's very valuable.
Yeah, you can actually send an email to each and every congressperson with one click, and then if you click over onto the little tab, it'll quickly list all of their phone numbers.
And honestly, Mike, you know, I'm a realist, all right?
There are a handful of...
There are congresspeople who are aware of this.
There have been a number of bills that have been submitted.
And some of the congresspeople, you might want to call them up and go, hey, we see that you're on the right side of this.
How can we help you?
And they do deserve our help.
There have been pieces of legislation.
Obviously, the congress is going to switch out in January.
Most congressmen hang around from one congress to the next.
But ultimately, that email says we need to leave the WHO.
We don't really need to fuss around with all these details of a treaty or amendments or any of that sort of stuff.
The way out is to leave, to exit the WHO.
And so people can go to exitthewho.com.
And my favorite website, though, is screwthewho.com.
Which in September, the WHO made a request and said, we're going to have a public comment period at the end of September.
And, you know, I pay attention and I'm aware that they, maybe they don't lie, but they twist the words.
And, yeah, they had something scheduled for the end of September, but two days before September 9th, on September 7th, they said, oh, starting September 9th, y'all can submit a 90-second video.
And they made people hold up their personal identification card and Then you could access their camera and record a 90-second video.
And so I realized that right off, you know, that's one way of sifting out the people who are opposed to what you're doing.
And I put up a call for people to send me their videos of whatever they thought.
And I got a couple of hundred videos on the page now.
I still have a hundred more.
I got a post up there.
I think Screw the Who is incredibly entertaining.
Because it's just people saying whatever it is they cared to say about the WHO and their pandemic treaty.
They ended up having to extend the deadline because I think what happened is they got blasted with a lot of negative videos.
and you can see that all of the positive videos that they got were from organizations, and it sure looked like they called up all their buddies, and they go, hey, we're getting blasted here.
We need somebody to say something nice about this, and when I was watching, what they ended up doing was they played a three-hour montage on the 29th of September and a three-hour montage on the 30th, and I stopped each video as it started to take the person's name down and I stopped each video as it started to take the person's name down and determine what
And I was able at 100% to just by looking at the person And their background or where they were tell whether they were going to be for or against.
When someone's in their garage or out on their porch or something like that, it's like, oh, they're going to be a human being.
They're going to be against it.
If they're all dressed up and they've got their organization logo behind them, you're like, oh, yeah, they're going to be a shill pushing it.
And so I'm hoping to get everybody on board for just look.
Trump did not get us to leave the WHO. He started the process, but he started it late.
It's a year-long process.
When Truman signed us in in 1948, the document says, you know, we'll give you one year's notice.
Like, when you leave your job, you give two weeks' notice.
And so Trump started it too late.
Biden stopped the process.
So we never got out.
But the process is actually really simple.
You just say, hey, I quit.
I'm out of here.
I don't want anything to do with it.
We'll pay whatever we may owe.
It's really chump change for anybody who's, you know, our nation could just hit a keystroke and there's all the money.
That's how they do things these days.
And so all we have to do is develop the public will.
To make the political will, to make the politicians know, look, we're done.
We're out of here.
Leave the who.
They're corrupt as corrupt can be.
They're trying to create a whole new something that's two and a half times as big as the who.
What has the Who done for you lately, Mike?
Anything?
Yeah.
What has the Who done for you, says Mr.
Magoo, while he screwed the Who?
I mean, it's a Dr.
Seuss book almost, but that's why it's great.
It's memorable.
It has nice alliteration, screwthewho.com.
But it's actually an Abbott and Costello routine.
You know, who's responsible for this?
Screwing you.
Those aren't questions.
Those are statements.
Yeah, exactly.
Yeah.
Who's responsible for this?
Yes.
What do you mean, yes?
You said who?
That's right.
I'm asking who.
Who is who?
What?
Who are you?
I get it.
It could be a quieter routine.
Let me ask you this.
Well, first of all, you and I have to keep in touch because we want to help rally people to The focus that you are bringing to this for action items to raise awareness and get people to push back against this.
So as these timelines approach, I mean, first of all, stand by after this so I can give you my direct mobile number so we can keep in direct touch about all this.
But another question I want to bring in here, though, is the U.S. health care system, many Intellectually honest people would say the system is in a state of collapse right now with nursing shortages, antibiotics gone across pharmacies all across the country, not enough hospital beds and so on.
And the vaccines did not work.
The masks did not work.
The lockdowns created mental health problems in children and so on.
But how can anybody look at this and say, oh, we just need more of this?
The only reason it didn't work is because we didn't have enough of it.
No, the system is self-annihilating, it seems like.
It just doesn't work.
Insanity times insanity isn't Same.
Okay.
You know, two negatives don't make a positive.
My first book was Your Doctor is a Liar.
That was a dozen years ago.
Everybody can have it for free on yourdoctoristheliar.com.
It was all about the lies about cholesterol and all that sort of thing.
Oh, yeah.
For quite some time, you know, I cut my teeth, I guess, on this half a lifetime ago.
I managed a couple of nutritional store, mom and pop nutritional stores.
So I was the buyer and the manager and, you know, I got all the sales pitches and I saw all the products and, you know, we had 100 plus people a day come in asking questions about information.
And so I have a very simple position and I think, you know, most likely, I can't speak for you, but I think you share it.
It's like, hey, I can't tell you what to do.
I can give you information.
You have to start taking responsibility for your own health.
And that's the problem.
Because, oh, there's nothing I can do.
My doctor said there's nothing I can do.
Well, if your doctor says there's nothing you can do, it's time to find a new doctor.
Yep, that's right.
And people need to stop subjecting themselves to...
We're just surrendering their own personal health sovereignty to their doctor.
They throw their bodies on the floor and say, you fix me, doc, but I'm not going to change my lifestyle.
I've literally heard people say, after they learn that eating ice cream raises blood sugar, causing them to have to take more insulin, instead of saying, well, I'll eat less ice cream, they would say, well, I'll just buy more insulin, right?
It's like, what?
Don't get me started.
Don't get me started.
The beauty of this, though, Mike, is, and I've been focused on natural health for quite some time, decades.
People have to realize that nothing that I'm talking about here today has anything to do with anyone who cares a lick about your health.
This is a business opportunity for them.
This is to build big pharma.
It's to make compliance and mandates and all that sort of stuff, you know, passports and surveillance, so that you're forced to do what they want you to do, even though it's absolutely not good for your health.
So when you realize that, I've been stealing back some of the words, and that's what the People's Amendments are really all about.
The word effective, you know, effective could be negative.
Okay?
You can have something that's negatively effective, but people just say, well, it's effective.
Well, yeah, but in the wrong direction, right?
I don't say informed consent anymore.
I say informed dissent.
Because if you're informed, you should be dissenting, okay?
And so, you know, safe?
Well, safe is relative.
If something, you know, if you feel safe jumping out of an airplane, you know, with a parachute, well, God bless you.
But, you know, some people might go, well, you know, I'm not comfortable doing that.
That doesn't feel safe to me.
It's impossible to say that something is safe because there's 8 billion people on the planet and they all have a different level of internal security as to what they think is good or bad for them.
And, you know, stories in the news all over the place lately about, you know, people pushing back saying, you know what, I don't believe it's safe.
And that is the only answer.
No one can dictate the feeling of safety.
And if it's one out of a million, I did an analysis on a study about injecting pregnant women with a quote-unquote vaccine to protect their unborn babies against RSV. And two or three or four out of 500 people so injected, and their babies would get horrible problems.
And they said it's safe because it's a small number, right?
But the study is poorly powered.
And when you add it all up, it's an abomination.
Well, and I'd like to bring in the example of if there's a peanut butter manufacturer that sells peanut butter nationwide and three people get sick or die from E. coli in the peanut butter, it's a nationwide panic.
It's all over the media.
There's a forced FDA recall.
from a couple of people.
And then, but if it's a vaccine, oh, millions can die and it's safe.
Right.
And so what we're dealing with here is a cabal I recommend this, but I don't really recommend this.
Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, and pretty much just a few hours from now, actually, because it's happening in Geneva, midnight Pacific time, 3 a.m.
Eastern time.
It will be the beginning of the morning on Monday morning in Geneva.
And they will be meeting for three days, Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, five, six, and seven, to discuss the pandemic treaty.
Thus, the three days that will live in infamy, because 81 years ago, we got surprised, you know, air quotes around that one.
We got surprised at Pearl Harbor.
It's the 81st anniversary of it.
Don't let that happen again, people.
Pay attention, spread the word, raise the awareness of your friends.
You don't need to know every single detail.
You just need to know that they're at it again.
They're plotting to mess with your freedom and sovereignty.
It's complicated.
You know, I'm dedicated to this just because I find myself down this rabbit hole and it's kind of lonely.
Now I got Mike down here with me.
It's getting better.
Give me a phone call anytime.
310-619-3055.
Go to screwthewho.com and see what other just regular people have had to say.
And, you know, Mike, we're probably getting close to wanting to close up the interview.
I'd like to leave with this.
I was amazingly impressed by the intelligent comments that pretty much random people from all over the world made.
It's not easy to summarize your thoughts in 90 seconds, but if you go to screwthewho.com, your fellow men and women, both in the United States and all around the world, will give you hope.
People know what's going on.
Don't think they don't.
We just have to You know, be the media.
You know, you've got a great platform.
Thanks for writing on and all that sort of stuff.
Everybody who's listening to this, take out your camera.
Go, you know, learn some of the information that I've said, but take out your camera, make a video as long as you want.
You don't have to keep it to 90 seconds.
Post it up on Brighteon, you know, put the link in one of the comments on my subsec, and I'll put you up on the page.
I want to know.
I want to know what people have to say.
And so be the media.
I completely agree.
And our audience is extremely well-informed, high IQ, very sophisticated.
They think deeply through these issues, and I think they will take you up on your offer.
Give out your phone number one more time then, please.
310-619-3055.
If you're outside the U.S., it's plus one.
But, you know, text me, call, WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, whatever you use.
And, you know, be persistent.
You know, I try to get back to everybody.
I do it as best I can.
But...
Probably the best, simplest, easiest thing that everybody can do is take this broadcast, you know, the link for this.
I guess it'll end up being a video I'm writing on.
Share the daylight side of this.
I don't know what your biggest video ever is, Mike.
You might have to look that up.
Let me add, though...
So, you know, Brighteon URLs are banned from being shared by all the major platforms.
So we will also post this on Bitshoot and also Rumble.
And so if you can't share it, and I'll probably post this on my Substack page as well.
Anyway, folks, if you can't share the Brighteon link, you might be able to share the Rumble link.
So that's another potential workaround for that.
I mean, people can't even direct message each other on Facebook with a URL from Brighton.
It's banned in private messaging.
Yeah, that's how dangerous this talk is.
Look how dangerous we are, James.
Well, that's how you know something's right.
I mean, I actually kind of appreciated it when they started putting the warnings up because they're like, oh, that's where I got to go look.
That's wonderful.
Thanks for the heads up.
True.
If things are still up on Facebook or, you know, some of the other platforms, it's like, oh, you know, that's got to be garbage.
Let me go find something good.
But, you know, if you, meaning your audience, if anyone in the audience ever comes across something that they think is valuable and they don't share it, They're actually being the censor.
Okay?
If you know something and you keep it quiet, you've become the problem.
You've got to share the things that you think are important to share.
I hope you think this is important to share.
It's not just...
Oh, yeah.
You know, I posted it on Facebook and you're shadow banned and it goes nowhere.
When I've got something that I really want to share, I pull out my phone and I go to wherever I've texted somebody and I'll sit there for a couple of hours and I'll just text everybody that I've ever texted in my life.
You know, I've done that many times and I'll go to sleep and I'll, you know, turn off my phone.
I'll wake up in the morning and when I turn my phone on, like ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding.
And everybody's like, oh, thanks for sharing.
You know, this is wonderful.
Send everybody an email.
Send them a personal message.
You know, do everything you possibly can to wake them up.
If they disagree, just be like Santa Claus.
Put them on your naughty list.
And the people who reach back to you and they go, oh, thank you so much.
This is great.
I appreciate it.
Put them on your nice list.
And I'm trying really hard.
This is my gallows humor.
I warned you that I think maybe we could appreciate each other's humor.
I'm trying to get as big a nice list as possible because That's what's missing.
That's what's been broken.
You know, the sense of community, the sense of being connected to people that you can talk to, right?
So anytime somebody calls me up, boom, they're on my nice list because they care, right?
And we might as well get to know each other now because we're going to spend some time in the FEMA camps later.
Now's a good time to get to know each other.
Yeah, that would be an awesome gathering.
Finally get to see everybody face to face in the same camp as we plot our escape tunneling underneath the camp.
You know, it'd be like World War II style.
We're going to tunnel out of here.
Does anybody have a spoon?
You know, whatever it takes.
Disassemble the furniture.
Oh, we just lost James right there.
He'll probably come back.
Just as we were talking about escaping FEMA. It's just like, he's gone!
They got him!
Man, they move fast.
Okay, well, I'm going to assume he's not coming back on this podcast, so we were pretty much going to wrap it up there, folks.
So anyway, that's James Roguski, who I hope is doing okay.
Well, I'll call him after this, make sure everything's cool.
His website is jamesroguski.substack.com and also screwthewho.com and he's also got, what did he say, exitthewho.com and he's got a free book out there called Your Doctor is a Liar.
I think that's the website too, yourdoctorisalyar.com.
Now, Not every doctor is a liar, but...
Yeah, a lot of the mainstream ones most certainly are.
But there's plenty of good ones who are on our side, too.
So, yeah.
So maybe your doctor, you listening to this, is not a liar, but...
A lot of others are, that's for sure.
Anyway, this has been a fascinating interview.
I'm going to call him, make sure everything's cool.
But thank you for listening.
Mike Adams here, the Health Ranger, brighteon.com, and of course, naturalnews.com.
And check out my new Substack page.
It's healthranger.substack.com.
There's nothing really on there yet, just kind of a hello article, but there's more coming.
We're going to post some interesting stuff there.
But thanks for listening.
Everybody take care.
A global reset is coming.
And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
So download this guide.
It's free.
▲
Export Selection