Knowledge Fight Interactive Search Tool

All Episodes

Previous Next

Dec. 5, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams

01:33:59

Situation Update, 12/5/22 - Germany farmers ordered to SLASH fertilizer usage...

Large

Audio Only |

Scroll

Time	Text
	Welcome to the Situation Update.
	It's Monday, December 5th, 2022.
	I'm Mike Adams.
	Thank you for joining me.
	Wow, it's going to be an interesting week because we're already starting out with some fun, practical, but bizarre stuff.
	And let me lead it off this way.
	If you had to eat dog food to survive, what brand of dog food would you eat?
	Or what specific dog food products would you eat?
	Because, you know, I teach preparedness and I teach multi-use stockpiling of stuff.
	For example, I'm about to do an article about coconut oil and all the different multiple uses on coconut oil because it's a firearms solvent for cleaning and a firearms lubricant.
	And it's something you can put in smoothies.
	And you can even use it to oil hinges on squeaky doors and things like that.
	It's got a multitude of uses.
	Good thing, right?
	Because you can't stockpile everything.
	So if you can stockpile a few things that have multiple uses, that's smart.
	Well, what if you can stockpile dog food that you could also eat in a pinch?
	And the reason this even came up is because there's an article in the Wine Press News, which is Real Christian News, and it's called WinePressNews.com.
	This came up over the weekend.
	Steve Quayle sent this to me.
	People in Wales are eating pet food as cost of living crisis gets worse.
	So, this is crazy.
	British families are becoming so strapped for cash and desperate for food, the article says.
	Some people have begun to eat pet food instead, and they're heating it by candle lights.
	And there's a quote.
	It says, we have people who are eating pet food.
	They're people who are trying to heat their food on a radiator or a candle.
	Man, that's how you know things have gone horribly bad.
	If you're eating dog food and you're heating it with a candle, it's like, pretty much we're living in a collapse, right?
	How can you not say that's a collapse scenario?
	Unbelievable.
	So Mark Seed, the owner of a food bank in Wales, confirmed this with the BBC, who says that people are working every hour they can, but they still can't make ends meet, obviously because the electricity prices are through the roof, because, of course, there's an engineered energy collapse and engineered food inflation there's an engineered energy collapse and engineered food inflation across all of Europe, which we've talked about a thousand times.
	So this guy, Mark Seed, he's the head of Trowbridge Pantry.
	It's part of a network of food banks and charity groups that...
	They supply food to 80 neighborhoods in the UK. And the location that he runs supplies food for 160 people.
	He said he's shocked by what he's witnessing.
	And he's talking about people heating pet food with a candle He says, well, I mean, one of his customers says, quote, I usually go without to try to make things better in my house, even with my son working and he contributes as well.
	It's difficult because he has to live as well and he's got needs.
	Okay.
	Well, yeah, because again, energy is more expensive.
	Food is more expensive and increasingly scarce.
	The article goes on, many other European countries are suffering in their own ways, such as Poland, where an increasing number of households are burning trash for warmth.
	Yes, they're actually burning trash.
	And the Polish government, by the way, has rescinded temporarily its trash or environmental pollution regulations so that you can burn trash.
	And remember, I talked about this, like, what kind of trash are you allowed to burn at this point?
	People burning plastics, too?
	What do the cities smell like there right now?
	Switzerland is considering banning the use of electric vehicles.
	That's something we're going to talk about here today as well during power outages, right?
	So the power grid goes down.
	You need to get out of town in your EV, your electric vehicle.
	It will be illegal, right?
	To drive an EV when the power grid is down.
	Isn't that now the number one reason to not buy an electric vehicle?
	Because you can't bug out with it.
	You'll get arrested, I guess, or fined or something.
	The article goes on, France threatening to manually turn off the power to some areas for several hours.
	And then the Germany foreign minister not caring about her own people at all and saying she will service Ukraine first.
	Okay.
	Yeah, and Germany's been warning about rolling blackouts, and it's going to get crazy across Europe.
	So back to the question, what dog food would you eat if you had to, if you had to choose one?
	Now, The reason I mention this, you know I have dogs and I love dogs.
	I was talking about dog training and everything last week.
	So I've tried all kinds of different dog foods.
	And I'm going to warn you here.
	I'm going to say a dog food company name here that would be my choice.
	I'll just tell you up front, it is not a sponsorship.
	This company has no clue I'm going to mention them.
	I'm almost reluctant to To mention names anymore, brand names, because I never know if that's a good or a bad thing, right?
	Sometimes I mention a brand name and they love it and they reach back to us and like, yes, thank you for mentioning us.
	Other times they're like...
	So many people contacted us, and we couldn't meet demand, and we had inventory problems, and we had customer service problems, and you should have asked permission.
	I've actually got that response before.
	No kidding.
	It's crazy, right?
	But I'm going to mention them anyway.
	I just want you to know it's not a sponsorship or anything like that.
	Again, I've used a lot of different dog foods.
	There's a dog food company...
	That when I open the can, I look at it and I'm like, that looks like stew.
	I mean, it looks like human stew that you might get at Shoney's or something.
	It looks like real food.
	You can see the chunks of chicken in there or the fish or whatever.
	And I'm really impressed with this.
	The company's called Weruva.
	W-E-R-U-V-A. I don't know how you pronounce it.
	We-ru-va?
	Because their slogan is, because we love you, which is pretty cute.
	So, we ruva, because we love you.
	And they have recipes like marbella paella with mackerel and pumpkin in ospitch.
	I don't even know what that is.
	But it looks like real food.
	I mean, it...
	It's not just this, like, processed roadkill or whatever the other dog food products are.
	Processed roadkill in fake gravy thickened with guar gum that will give your dog diarrhea.
	Like, that's the normal dog food that's out there.
	This company, Wiruva, looks to me like stuff you could eat.
	Now, I'm not saying that you should eat this.
	That's not my point here at all.
	I feed this to my dogs.
	But in a pinch, if I had to choose...
	This would be my choice.
	I'm not kidding.
	It would be my choice.
	So anyway, just giving a shout out to the WeRuva company, or WeRuva, I don't even know how to say it.
	Apparently, I went on their website, WeRuva.com, W-E-R-U-V-A.com, founded by a couple named David and Stacey Foreman, who look like a really nice couple.
	They care about pets.
	They say they use a human food facility.
	Now, you know, it's not organic, but it's real food.
	That's my point.
	So...
	If you love your pets, you might want to check it out.
	They have sample variety packs.
	No, it's pricey food.
	I mean, look, all good food is pricey.
	Real food is pricey.
	There's no way around that.
	And it's not made with just a bunch of rice, which is like a lot of these dog foods today.
	You know, it's just rice or maybe lentils and then like processed, you know, cow slop or whatever goes into it.
	It's like rice and cow slop, you know.
	That's not this stuff.
	This is real food.
	Anyway.
	This is actually in the news.
	I mean, people are literally going to make this decision, or they're already making this decision this winter in the UK. They're eating dog food.
	They're literally eating dog food.
	Now, are their dogs going hungry then?
	Are they taking the food their dog would otherwise eat?
	Or what's the dog getting?
	This is my question.
	Or how bad does it get?
	Are they going to go, like, full North Korea and eat their dogs or something?
	I hope it doesn't get that bad.
	Don't eat your dogs, folks.
	Prepping is better than eating dogs.
	Hey, by the way, our interview tonight is with James Roguski, and he's on Substack.
	Super awesome guy.
	He does a lot of great articles.
	He's an expert on the WHO pandemic treaty.
	And some other things we're going to talk about, other nefarious globalist efforts to take away your health freedom and place you under some international empire treaty where you must obey.
	Yeah, that's coming.
	His Substack page is James Roguski.
	That's R-O-G-U-S-K-I, Roguski.
	JamesRoguski.substack.com.
	He's got a lot of great articles there, and I gave him my number.
	You'll hear.
	We did the interview already.
	I gave him my number because he's going to keep me posted about what's going on with the WHO and all the votes.
	There's one coming up in May of next year.
	They're going to try to hoodwink all of us and enslave us under their iron grip.
	We're going to rally people in the resistance to health fascism.
	So James Roguski will be part of that effort.
	Or I should say will be part of his effort because he's doing great work.
	I've also decided to launch a Substack page.
	So, yes, indeed, I've decided Substack is a really great place for a lot of strong intellectual arguments, debates, freedom of speech, thought processes.
	A lot of great writers there on Substack.
	So I've joined it, and it's healthranger.substack.com.
	There's not much on there yet.
	It's just basically a hello type of article.
	But you can go ahead and join my Substack.
	It's always going to be free.
	I'm not going to use the paywall option there.
	Everything's free.
	I am going to use Substack to post things like photographs from the laboratory, microscopy photos that we're doing.
	We're doing some new staining techniques using, you know, like biology stains and things that slides, you know, all kinds of things, plus our kick-ass awesome laboratory microscope.
	We're going to be posting those photos there on Substack so that you can share the links.
	Because, you know, my main website, Natural News, is banned everywhere and Brighteon links are banned everywhere.
	But you'll be able to share Substack pages.
	We're going to put some microscope photos on there and ask for your help to distribute those photos as we take a closer look at all kinds of interesting things like clots and food and fast food and pharmaceuticals and who knows what else.
	Like, zoomed in microscope photos of nasal swabs or whatever we can get our hands on.
	Should be interesting.
	Now, speaking of Substack, by the way, I just became aware of another author there named Matthew Crawford.
	And we're going to reach out to Matthew, see if we can get him on for an interview.
	He's doing a series called Chaos Agents.
	And he nails it.
	And chaos agents, as he describes them, these are the people that are infiltrating the health freedom movement or medical freedom movement, as he calls it.
	And they're trying to blow up the movement from the inside.
	Now, I love this name, Chaos Agents.
	I think he's nailed it.
	I was talking about this last week.
	I was talking about the infiltration that we're seeing and some of the backstabbing that's going on and just different weird things that are happening.
	But Matthew Crawford has nailed it down and he says, he summarizes some of the things that these so-called Chaos Agents can accomplish As they're trying to destroy so-called organic movements.
	Organic meaning genuine, authentic of the people.
	So they try to infiltrate and then here's what they do.
	First, they try to be the organizer.
	So they try to create a new organization and lead that organization and get other people involved and then, quote, a wide array of sabotage is possible.
	This is what Matthew Crawford is writing.
	And then secondly, they can spread misinformation, disinformation, or malinformation and generally sow confusion.
	So they can also intentionally put out bad information to try to discredit the very movement that they are attempting to overthrow from within.
	We've seen that technique as well.
	Thirdly, they can, quote, formulate poor plans or fail to execute their parts of agreed missions.
	So they can come in and be the organizer and say, yeah, we'll handle that, and you just count on us, and then they'll just drag it out forever and never get it done.
	Now, granted, there are things that I've wanted to do more quickly.
	Like, for example, I'm working on a documentary series right now that's already two months late, but it's coming.
	It's on its way, but sometimes it just takes longer than you think, so we can't always assign this as a nefarious intent, but it is something that chaos agents can do on purpose.
	The next thing they can do is, quote, start fights among those organizing to oppose tyranny.
	Yeah, they're good at starting fights.
	Oh, man, they're good at starting fights.
	They jump into an organization and then they start throwing accusatory grenades as if you're reliving high school or something.
	Did you hear what Bobby Sue said about you?
	And this kind of stuff.
	I don't know why I use that name, Bobby Sue, but you get the idea.
	It's just spreading a lot of mistrust around the whole community.
	And then last thing they can do is, quote, siphon funds and then redirect them to supporting their own endeavors so they can end up taking donations away from others who are actually more genuine and honest and authentic in what they're trying to do.
	So there are chaos agents at work inside this health freedom movement for sure.
	And I'm just glad that I've been around for 20 years in this, because no one can say, oh, the health ranger just showed up, and it's like, he's the new guy in town trying to take over.
	No.
	I've been doing this since 2003.
	Folks, in fact, I was, I think, the very first guy ever banned because I opposed Big Pharma.
	I was banned.
	Remember, I was banned from YouTube before Alex Jones was banned.
	That's right.
	I was doing cartoons about Big Pharma trying to kill everybody in 2007.
	They were called counterthink cartoons.
	So I think I'm beyond any kind of, you know, accusations of being an infiltrator.
	You know, I'm one of the people, myself and Dr.
	Mercola and a few others, like, we're the old school guys.
	We've been here since the beginning, you know what I mean?
	Or very nearly so.
	Actually, Dr.
	Mercola was doing this before I was doing this.
	And Steve Quayle was doing this even before that.
	Alex Jones was doing it before that.
	I mean, All of us, quote, older guys, we've been in this for decades.
	We're still here, too.
	Amazing.
	Now, shifting gears to other news, here's a headline from Newspunch.com, which continues to be, I think, a really great website.
	Neuralink test monkeys, quote, dying and chewing fingers off as Elon Musk readies human trials.
	Like, what could possibly be wrong with this?
	There's an article by Baxter Dimitri.
	And it says, Elon Musk has vowed to start human trials for his brain chip implants within six months, even though the majority of his brain chip lab monkeys either died or chewed their fingers off while experiencing horrific suffering.
	That is just sad, by the way.
	That is just sad.
	The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine filed documents with the U.S. Department of Agriculture earlier in 2022, alleging the monkeys were experiencing extreme suffering with one monkey having holes drilled in its skull.
	So, folks, the reason I even mention this, I'm sorry to bring this up because I don't like images of cruelty to animals.
	And I think this is highly, highly unethical and makes me wonder, how could Elon Musk support this, right?
	I mean, we criticize Fauci for what he did to black children in, I think, New York with the AIDS drugs and all that.
	Killed a bunch of black orphans, by the way, with his medical experiments.
	But isn't what Elon Musk is doing right now with Neuralink, I mean, technically, isn't this horrifying?
	And the thing is, if they do it to monkeys now, they're going to do it to you later.
	They test it on animals first because they intend to use it on you.
	So if you love the idea of a globalist brain implant neural link interface system that's put into your brain by drilling holes in your skull and then driving you so insane that you literally chew your fingers off, then you should love this technology.
	What could possibly go wrong?
	What could possibly go wrong?
	You know, We interviewed Dr.
	Robert Malone a couple weeks ago, and he invented mRNA, what was it, 28 years ago, I think he said, or at least the first components of it.
	He had no idea how that was going to be used right now as a biological weapon system to achieve global depopulation and infertility.
	Well, what about the people inventing this Neuralink?
	Haven't they considered the possibility of how this is going to be misused?
	I mean, what could possibly go wrong of putting implants into people's brains and controlling them and reading their minds?
	How could that possibly be abused by, you know, tyrannical regimes?
	Oh, it's just, oh my gosh.
	So from the story, a legal battle is now being pursued to force the University of California, Davis, to release 371 grisly photographs of the monkeys, Wow.
	I don't want to see those photos because I hate animal suffering.
	But this looks like, you know, this is the World Economic Forum agenda.
	Like, you will own nothing, you will be happy because it's demanded by your brain implants, and you will chew your fingers off.
	At that point, you will wish you had eaten dog food instead of your own fingers.
	I mean, that's mass starvation plus insanity.
	Oh, not a good future.
	No.
	Down with Neuralink.
	And now I promise to cover this other article here.
	This is from oilprice.com.
	Switzerland considers electric vehicle ban to avoid blackouts.
	It's like, first they tell you, everybody go out and buy an EV. It's green.
	It's good for the planet.
	And then a bunch of people run out and buy an EV. And then the government says, um...
	Okay.
	About that.
	We want to ask you not to use your EV because the grid's overloaded.
	Yeah.
	And the EV owners out there are like, you didn't think about that before you told us to go out and buy EVs?
	You didn't think that they were going to need power from the power grid?
	How did you not know that?
	How did you not consider that?
	So from that article, Switzerland could limit the use of electric vehicles in cases of electricity supply shortages this winter under a new four-step plan to prevent power cuts and blackouts.
	I love it.
	It's a four-step plan.
	Step one, you go out and blow 50 grand on an EV. Step two, we tell you you can't use it.
	Step three, you freeze to death.
	No, that's how crazy is this?
	So from the story, driving EVs could be banned in Switzerland unless in cases of, quote, absolutely necessary journeys in stage three of the power conservation plan.
	So you know what this is, right?
	You know what this whole thing is.
	They wanted you to buy an EV so that they could shut down your mobility.
	That's the whole point here, to make sure you don't travel or that you don't even have options to travel.
	They want a control grid.
	This sounds just like COVID, frankly.
	You can't be outside unless it's absolutely necessary.
	And what is necessary?
	Well, if you're visiting the doctor to get a vaccine, that's okay.
	But if you're wanting to exercise and be healthy and get sunlight to get vitamin D, oh, no, no, that's not allowed.
	That is banned behavior.
	Same thing with the EV. Not allowed to use it, and there's no electricity for you, or you're going to pay 10 times as much.
	This is akin to buying a house and then the government telling you you can't live in it.
	Oh yeah, we know you have that house, but you're not allowed to sleep in it when we say so.
	And that's today.
	This explains, by the way, how they're going to achieve the green rating from electric vehicles.
	They're really green when you're not using them.
	Because there's no power being consumed whatsoever.
	And, you know, a lot of the power comes from coal-fired power plants or, you know, natural gas, fossil fuels, and so on.
	So, yeah, if you're just not allowed to use it, it's really green.
	But then again, so is Fred Flintstone and his Flintstone mobile.
	That's really green.
	You just waddle along with your feet on the bottom, on the road, you know.
	It's like a little pedal-powered kid's car or something.
	What are you doing?
	Going to the grocery store?
	Pedal, pedal, pedal.
	Bicycle, human-powered vehicles, walking, whatever.
	The problem is it's freezing cold because it's the winter, you know?
	Oh, man.
	They didn't think through this one.
	But that's not even the craziest story today.
	Here's one from the UK Daily Mail.
	This is going to get weird.
	Planned Parenthood executive director claims children are born sexual, and this person advocates porn literacy lessons for older students and sex education from kindergarten.
	This is the executive director of Planned Parenthood's Center for Sex Education in New Jersey, and he said, he claimed that all humans are sexual beings from birth to death.
	So he thinks life is just one giant humping extravaganza or something.
	From the moment you're born, that's called pedophilia, by the way.
	That's creepy.
	Oh, man.
	And it's not really confusing to me.
	It's very confusing.
	This is going to sound kind of crude, but I'm never sure if Planned Parenthood is trying to murder babies or rape them.
	Is it a coin toss with these twisted demonic individuals?
	What is it?
	Do they want to kill them?
	Or do they want to rape them?
	Because either way, it's bad news.
	Either way, it's evil.
	And I'm not sure what he means by he wants to teach porn literacy to, what was it, 12-year-olds or 12th graders?
	What was that?
	He wants to teach porn literacy to 12th grade students.
	I got news for this guy.
	I'm pretty sure every male senior in high school is already quite literate in porn these days.
	I mean, it's accessible everywhere.
	What do you need?
	Another class?
	This is porn!
	Okay, this is where you log on.
	No.
	Please no.
	What does that even mean, by the way, porn literacy?
	I don't even get it.
	Are they going to show porn but have, like, little fact-check pop-ups underneath it like Twitter does?
	You know, if you tweet out something about vaccines and say, well, we fact-checked this vaccine thing.
	Are they going to show porn to high school seniors and have little pop-ups and say, don't try this at home?
	This is not average.
	This is not normal.
	What are they talking about?
	Being that it's Planned Parenthood, I think the message would be something like, be sure to practice safe sex.
	Always use a condom, but if you forget and you get pregnant, don't worry, we're Planned Parenthood.
	Come see us, you know, and bring your baby with you.
	After all, the FDA is looking for more samples for their humanized mice experiments.
	We'll be happy to help them out if you help us out.
	Just show up.
	Show up with your unborn baby.
	I don't know.
	It's too twisted.
	It's too twisted.
	So here's a question, a different question.
	Did you see that Elon Musk banned Ye?
	Because Ye posted a symbol on Twitter, a symbol of the Jewish star, which I think in the center of it, he had the Nazi swastika.
	And I'm not going to show you this symbol, but you can kind of imagine it.
	So it was, you know, a perversion of the...
	Was it the Star of David?
	I think that's what it was.
	I'm just going off memory.
	But anyway, swastika embedded on the inside.
	So a perversion of a sacred Jewish symbol.
	Now then Elon Musk banned yay and said, well, this is incitement to violence.
	Now...
	I completely agree that if someone posted a direct incitement to violence, like if Ye had said, you know, everybody meet up at this day, this location, and bring these weapons, and we're going to attack this specific, you know...
	I'm not even going to say it.
	But you get the idea.
	If he said that, yeah, I get it.
	Yeah, you ban him right away.
	He posted a symbol which...
	Admittedly, it's a derogatory type of symbol, a hateful symbol, you could say.
	But did he call for any violence?
	See, I'm just wondering what the rules are because I know that Black Lives Matter has posted all kinds of crazy symbols and Antifa has posted all kinds of symbols, i.e.
	the hammer and sickle, communism.
	So technically, if you go through the history of the recent world, communism has killed, what, hundreds of millions of people?
	Whereas Nazi fascism murdered 6 million Jews, right?
	That's the number that we're told by historians.
	But communism has killed hundreds of millions of people, including Stalinist Russia and China under Mao and so on.
	Hundreds of millions of people.
	So, why doesn't Elon Musk ban everybody who posts a hammer and sickle symbol?
	If symbols are going to be considered incitement to violence, then doesn't that logic have to be universally applied to all such symbols that were used by mass murderers?
	You see, it's not called logic if you can't apply it universally.
	I think Elon Musk was just mad at yay because And just kind of made up a new rule, like, oh, symbols are violence.
	But symbols are not incitement to violence necessarily unless you apply it to all those symbols, like I said, communism, hammer and sickle.
	So where's that?
	Where's that rule?
	Everybody that has a communist symbol should be banned from Twitter.
	I don't think that Elon's going to do that.
	And frankly, the...
	You know, the World Health Organization has been complicit in the mass murder of millions of people around the world.
	And Rand Paul is talking about this.
	I've got an article for you on that.
	So shouldn't anybody who posts the World Health Organization symbol, shouldn't they also be banned from Twitter for inciting violence if this is the new rule?
	If symbols are violence, then the WHO, they're a bunch of mass murderers.
	And so is the FDA and so is the CDC. And so is nearly every government in the world, come to think of it, right now.
	If symbols are violence, there's all kinds of banning that needs to take place.
	But no!
	No, no, no.
	He's only banned, you know, Ye and people like that.
	Hmm.
	Question mark, right?
	Now, for the record, I'm not defending what Ye did, and I would never do that myself.
	And I think what Ye did on the Alice Jones Show is abhorrent and crazy.
	Like, please find some help quickly and pray and bring Jesus into your life kind of crazy.
	Like, you need some help, man.
	But was it technically inciting violence?
	Clearly not.
	Because, again, he hasn't applied that rule to anybody else.
	And speaking of mass murderers, let's bring in Anthony Fauci here.
	Who, in my opinion, is complicit in mass murder.
	And I'm not the only one who thinks that.
	Senator Rand Paul, he said that Fauci caused 7 million people to die.
	He said this last week on Fox News.
	He said, quote, we've caught him red-handed.
	He won't get away.
	He said, this is right up there with decisions, some of them malevolent or military, to kill millions of people.
	I'm not sure that that was stated correctly, but you get the idea.
	He was on Fox News with Jesse Waters, and he said, quote, likely there is no public health figure who has made a greater error in judgment than Dr.
	Fauci.
	He said the error of judgment was to fund gain-of-function research in a totalitarian country, which he's referring to China and the Wuhan lab, research that allowed them to create superviruses that in all likelihood leaked into the public and caused 7 million people to die, Paul declared.
	This is right up there with decisions, some of them malevolent or military, again, that quote, to kill millions of people.
	So what about all the media outlets that have this mass murderer on as a guest, huh?
	Fauci?
	And this is, you know, getting back to Ye, and I don't mean to be preoccupied with that, but, you know, Alex Jones received a lot of criticism for having Ye on his show, but Ye didn't kill anybody.
	And Ye certainly didn't kill millions of people.
	Well, CNN has Fauci on, and Fauci is directly complicit in the mass murder of millions of people.
	And frankly, I think if you count vaccines on top of the bioweapon, because the vaccines are another type of bioweapon, so you really have two different bioweapons, you're talking tens of millions of people dead around the world.
	And that exceeds the Holocaust of history.
	It exceeds it.
	But these left-wing media outlets, corporate media, will have him on like he's some kind of a hero, you know, bowing down.
	Thank you for forcing us into lockdowns.
	The guy's a mass murderer.
	He should be imprisoned.
	We should have Nuremberg 2.0 trials here for him and a whole bunch of others.
	We even found out the masks don't work.
	And I admit, I got this one wrong at the very beginning.
	I thought, well, surely they must work to some degree.
	I mean, I always knew they didn't work 100%.
	After all, they're in 95 masks.
	And I understood that the virus particles, so-called aerosolized viral particles, were way smaller than the mesh size of the masks.
	But I thought, you know, surely, surely some of those particles must get trapped on the mesh or what have you.
	Well, turns out that was wrong.
	From JustTheNews.com, rigorous international study of N95 masks upends federal COVID narrative.
	Biden's former COVID advisor tries to discredit this randomized controlled trial that found no statistically significant real-world performance difference between surgical masks and N95s.
	And that Fauci can't cite any evidence that masks work in his deposition.
	So the masks actually don't work.
	There's a couple of studies here.
	One of them published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, AIM. It was led by researchers at Canada's McMaster University, found no statistically significant difference in protection between N95 masks versus surgical masks in healthcare facilities in Canada, Israel, Pakistan, and Egypt.
	It says funders included the Canadian government and the WHO. Which, unlike the U.S., opposes masking young children, it also found no evidence that face coverings make a difference against influenza in a 2019 study.
	And then Missouri's Attorney General Eric Schmidt, who has Fauci under deposition, Eric Schmidt tweeted this out, quote, another tidbit from the Fauci deposition.
	In February of 2020, he emailed a friend advising her that masks were ineffective.
	He confirmed it again on March 31st.
	On April 3rd, he's then adamant that masks should be worn, even though he couldn't cite a single study to prove it.
	Mask mandates then followed.
	Lives ruined.
	COVID tyranny is born.
	That's how it happened.
	It was people like Fauci, whom I consider to be a mass murderer, not following the science, but fabricating the science and saying they worked and forcing everybody to wear them.
	And then what are we getting?
	Mask Nazis all over the country.
	People are like, you've got to put your mask on.
	You know, in the early days, again, I thought, surely the masks do something.
	And we didn't know exactly what this was at that time.
	And there were all those freaky videos out of China of people dropping dead on the streets and everything.
	So yeah, I wore a mask for a week, two weeks, maybe.
	And then after that, I wore a bandana for like a month.
	And I'm like, you know what, I'm just going to take more vitamin D. I'm going to have good nutrition here.
	We're going to sort this thing out.
	And I think most people came to their senses sometime in 2020 over this and stopped wearing the silly masks.
	But some people still love them.
	They still wear masks while they're driving themselves in their own cars as if some invisible entity is going to infect them.
	Who are you protecting yourself against if you're masked in your own car and there's nobody else in there?
	Who's going to infect you?
	The ghost of Christmas past or something?
	Who's in your car?
	What kind of poltergeist is in your car?
	Is it living in your car's air conditioning system?
	Is that what you're afraid of?
	All right, now we get to the bigger story here.
	I should have mentioned this earlier.
	This one comes out of Breitbart.
	Let me just read you the headline first.
	Great Reset.
	Germany bans farmers from properly fertilizing land to serve the EU green agenda.
	All right, so do you recall Sri Lanka?
	What happened?
	Why the country collapsed?
	Why the government collapsed?
	Why they were setting their houses on fire?
	The government, you know, royalty, their homes were being burned down.
	Why did the fuel distribution collapse, the farming collapse, all of it?
	Because they banned nitrogen-based fertilizers.
	Well, from Breitbart right now, quote, Germany has banned farmers in one of its federal states from properly fertilizing large swaths of land at the behest of the EU's green agenda.
	As of Thursday, the use of nitrate fertilizers has been greatly restricted in farmland in North Rhine, Westphalia, with the green agenda change greatly angering farmers as it is likely to drastically reduce yields.
	So, you see, it's not enough that they blew up the Nord Stream pipelines.
	Well, actually, the U.S. and the U.K. did.
	It's not enough that they've shut down nitrogen production from natural gas.
	Well, you know, urea and ammonia and then nitrogen-based fertilizers.
	It's not enough they've done that.
	Now they actually have to tell farmers it's illegal to use fertilizer on your crops or more than the allotted amount of fertilizer.
	And in the Netherlands, of course, they're trying to ban or to forcibly close 3,000 farms.
	Folks, this is so obvious.
	This is an engineered mass famine that's being set up for Europe.
	This is engineered famine.
	When you tell farmers you can't use nitrogen fertilizers, you know what happens to crop yields when you don't have nitrogen fertilizer?
	I mean, you could get 20% of the normal yield if you don't fertilize it.
	Maybe if you're lucky, you know, 30%, but how are you going to feed everybody without nitrogen-based fertilizers?
	Remember, the Haber-Bosch process, I've talked about this many times, as you know, this allows 4 billion people on planet Earth to eat Without nitrogen-based fertilizers, i.e.
	ammonia and the Haberbosch process, which uses natural gas combined with atmospheric nitrogen to make NH3, which is ammonia, which is the precursor to urea and all these other nitrogen fertilizers, if you're not doing that, 4 billion people starve to death.
	And that's called being green, apparently, in the EU. It's like, you're just not going to have food.
	And you see why people are already eating dog food in Wales, was it?
	They're eating dog food?
	You won't even have that option soon if the European greenie weenies get their way.
	I wonder what they're going to eat, by the way.
	Could it be maybe each other?
	Their last option?
	Cannibalism?
	Does that count as still veganism if it's not animal meat?
	I don't know.
	Can you be a vegan cannibal?
	Well, we may soon find out.
	So according to this Breitbart story, the European Union is threatening to fine Germany if it doesn't act to reduce nitrogen use on its farms.
	So you see how this works, right?
	The EU bureaucrats say, well, you're just not allowed to grow food.
	And if you choose to grow food, we're going to fine you.
	Like, what kind of insanity is this?
	What is this?
	Why do they not want Germany to grow food?
	At a time when food scarcity is already bad and fertilizer scarcity is, frankly, at crisis levels and diesel fuels in short supply across Europe and obviously natural gas is almost non-existent probably after or towards the end of this winter when they burn through whatever they have stored in the ground.
	Why would they add on top of that, oh, you're not allowed to grow food?
	It's so obvious.
	They want people to freeze and starve to death.
	This is the dismantling of the infrastructure that keeps humanity alive.
	One political commentator named Eva Vlardinger Broek, if I'm getting that correct, says, quote, what this shows you is that the will of the people means nothing to our government.
	Despite all of the protests and international backlash they're pushing through with what I think are criminal policies, our government doesn't cater to the wishes of its own citizens.
	It caters to globalist institutions whose interest it is to control the food supply so they can control us.
	It is the great reset and full force.
	Yeah.
	Eva here gets it.
	She gets it.
	Or Eva, I don't know how they say it in Europe.
	She gets it, yeah.
	This is the weaponization of food scarcity to control populations and ultimately to achieve global extermination of much of the existing population.
	Billions will die if we don't stop this insanity.
	And they're going to criminalize.
	I mean, think about what we just covered today.
	They're going to criminalize you using your electric vehicle in certain circumstances.
	They're going to criminalize you using nitrogen fertilizer on food crops.
	In certain circumstances, right?
	In certain areas.
	That's going to expand to other areas.
	They're going to develop brain implants to monitor your brain and force you to do what they want you to do.
	You know, your brain will be connected to a central server.
	If you thought central bank digital currencies were bad, wait until they have, like, central nervous system, you know, brain control systems run by the government to make you change your mind just directly.
	They wouldn't even have to use propaganda or influencers anymore.
	They just zap.
	Oh, I agree.
	I submit.
	The vaccine's for me.
	You know, whatever.
	That's what they want.
	Human robots.
	And then there's one more thing I want to bring you here before we go to the interview with James Roguski.
	Go to this website, savebabywill.com.
	That'll take you to this article by James Roguski.
	And he says, this is the most important article I've ever written.
	Do everything in your power to share this.
	Basically, this is an infant in New Zealand, young boy, needs heart surgery.
	The parents want him to have the surgery, but they want the hospital to use blood from certain dedicated blood donors that are jab-free, okay?
	So unvaccinated blood.
	And this has already been organized.
	There are plenty of donors who can give this blood to the hospital for the baby to make it through the surgery.
	So the blood is all available from these donors.
	The hospital says they won't do that.
	They want to use blood from a standard blood bank.
	Which is full of vaccinated blood.
	Because, of course, these hospitals are in the business of murdering babies and human beings, obviously.
	That's their specialty.
	So they don't want to honor the parents' wishes for unvaccinated blood.
	And the point is that the blood that's donated from vaccinated people, it can be filled with spike protein, pathogens that can kill the baby.
	Or even make the vascular recovery far worse or far slower than it needs to be.
	So the hearing for this is happening today in New Zealand.
	It's happening today.
	Well, it's scheduled Tuesday, December 6th in New Zealand, but that'll be today, your time in the USA. So talk about health freedom.
	And we've covered the Clean Blood Banks movement.
	Where people want to receive blood from donors who are unvaccinated.
	We talked about that last week and then the mainstream media is mocking it.
	It's a conspiracy theory that vaccinated blood has spike proteins.
	No, it's not a conspiracy theory.
	That's what Moderna and Pfizer say their vaccines do, is that it causes your body to generate the spike proteins.
	Those are the antigens.
	That are generated in the ribosomes in your cells because of the mRNA.
	It's not a conspiracy theory.
	It's the scientific theory of how it works.
	So of course vaccinated blood is filled with all kinds of toxic biological weapons and things that will harm you, which is why people keep dropping dead after taking the vaccines.
	That's why.
	So who would want that blood in your body?
	Who would want that poison?
	Nobody.
	No sane person would want that poison.
	But the medical establishment, which poisoned you in the first place, or is trying to poison everybody, they won't acknowledge that their injections are poisonous, obviously, so they just end up killing more people, including babies they want to kill.
	Why are we not surprised?
	It's sad, it's sick, it's twisted, it's evil, it's demonic, and it's happening every day.
	So folks, be careful.
	Be careful with your chainsaws, you know, when you're out sawing wood, whatever you're doing.
	Be careful cutting avocados, because people stab themselves in the hands all the time by cutting avocados.
	For some reason, I've heard that.
	I cut avocados every day, and I still have all my fingers, just saying.
	You point the knife down towards the cutting board and keep your fingers out from underneath it.
	That's the key right there.
	Whatever you're doing, try not to need blood over the next, well, forever.
	Because you make blood.
	Your body makes it.
	And that's the best blood you can have.
	And if you have to undergo surgery at some future date that you can schedule, then give your own blood.
	Be your own blood bank.
	That's usually the best solution.
	Don't take vaccinated blood.
	All right, we're going to jump into the interview with James Roguski here.
	But first, let me say, I posted the Promise interview with Ivan Raiklin over the weekend.
	You can check that out.
	And I also posted, I think, a really good podcast called Slave Reparations Are Really a Cover Story for Fiscal Stimulus in a Zombie Economy.
	And then I've also posted a video from Friday when I was on the Alex Jones Show, and it's called Mouse Apocalypse Study is Key to Understanding the NWO Master Plan.
	So you can check out all those videos on my channel as well.
	And, you know, thank you for all your support.
	Now, our sponsor today is the satellite phone store, sat123.com.
	Remember, backup comms that do not need cell towers to function can be life-saving.
	They've got the bivvy sticks, which is the two-way satellite text messaging.
	They've got the satellite phones, and they've got the push-to-talk satellite walkie-talkies made by ICOM. And they've got the off-grid power stations, the EcoFlow, which are the so-called solar generators.
	When the power goes down, you can have your own power, and you can charge electronic devices.
	You can even keep some refrigerators and freezers running for a period of time off of these units.
	They come in different sizes, so size it according to your freezer or refrigerator.
	But they really work during power outages.
	And that's what I have my computer system on, by the way, is one of these units.
	Because when the power goes out, it doesn't bother me.
	I'm on the unit all the time.
	It's like a giant UPS the way I use it.
	But anyway, check it out, sat123.com.
	And here's the interview with James Roguski.
	Enjoy!
	Alright, welcome everybody.
	Mike Adams here of Brighteon.com with, I think, a really fantastic guest.
	A first-time guest.
	We probably should have had him on before because he's so informed.
	He's got such great analysis of what's going on today.
	His name is James Roguski, and he's got a Substack page.
	That is, well, jamesroguski.substack.com.
	He's also got screwthewho.com, the who being the W-H-O, screwthewho.com.
	And he joins us today to talk about the WHO's new pandemic treaty and so much more.
	Mr.
	Roguski, it's an honor to have you on.
	Thank you for all your work and welcome to the show.
	Well, Mike, the honor is mine, as I said before, and this is a pleasure.
	There's so much information about this.
	What I try to do is just do all the boring digging and try to turn it into English.
	So where do you want to start?
	Well, first of all, I just want to say I love your work on Substack.
	And you and a couple of other people inspired me, and I actually set up – I launched a Substack page today, in fact.
	So I'm there now, and I believe I added you as my first or second recommended site.
	So there we go.
	I appreciate you.
	Give us the big picture first to start with.
	How much trouble are we in if we don't stop the global health crisis?
	Well, if you want global health fascism, things are looking really grand.
	If you're opposed to that, you better get off your couch and get a move-along.
	And I'll blow everybody's mind right now.
	Give me a call.
	My phone number is 310-619-3055.
	Text me, WhatsApp, Signal, Telegram, whatever.
	I've met some of the most wonderful people.
	I am that serious about this, if that tells you anything.
	It maybe isn't Imminent in the sense that, you know, some of these bureaucratic things take time.
	But in another sense, it's already upon us because what they're really doing is setting up a framework.
	And everybody already knows the framework.
	And crazy young leaders that have been put into position all over the world, whether it's California, New York, South Africa, Australia, Canada, wherever, they're busy implementing before the treaties put together and signed.
	They all know where these two trains are headed, and they're implementing some of the craziest stuff.
	And so this is a local battle as well.
	All right.
	So tell us about the crazy stuff.
	Now, remember, we interviewed Dr.
	Francis Boyle maybe two weeks ago, and he told us about how horrified he was of the WHO pandemic treaty.
	But you mentioned to me just before we started here, there's something else that may be a bigger threat as well.
	So clue us in on what's on your radar here.
	I speak regularly with Dr.
	Boyle.
	Anytime I get any information, he's the first one on my list that I send it to.
	So thank you, Professor Boyle, and thank you for interviewing him.
	Here's what happens.
	There's only so much time to talk about all these different things, and I'll try to give a visual analogy.
	There's at least two tracks that the WHO is running on trying to change international law.
	Now, one of the tracks is analogous to a Japanese bullet train, and the reason for that is we're already, and all the other member nations of the WHO are already parties to, we've already signed on to the International Health Regulations, which are, quite frankly, misnamed.
	I don't call them the International Health Regulations anymore.
	They are actually the International Surveillance Regulations, because if you read them, they're not about health.
	You know about They're all about surveillance and monitoring and reporting and the amendments and all of the words involved are very simply on some level A reasonable system to alert the world if there's a problem, okay?
	If somebody on either side bombed, you know, a nuclear power plant in Ukraine, you know, I think an alert should go out, okay?
	And so it has its place, but they have figured out that the path is very, very slippery to amend it and use that legal structure to gain more power.
	And so in order to amend the international surveillance regulations, all that's needed is a majority vote or plus one of the World Health Assembly, which meets every May.
	Now, there's 194 nations, so 97 is half of that.
	One plus that is 98.
	So if they can coerce 98 nations to say yes, changes to the international surveillance regulations would be adopted.
	And so this the other reason that I'm really concerned about this particular aspect is they're keeping it really, really secret.
	They're busy talking about the treaty, but the amendments to the international health regulations are just under locking key.
	They may at some point, you know, I checked just before we came on, you know, they hadn't posted anything anywhere.
	We do know that now it's actually 16 nations They had reported earlier that 14 nations had submitted proposed amendments.
	Another two have been added, and those two being Malaysia and the Republic of Korea.
	And all told, they've only said which articles they wanted to amend.
	There are 66 articles in the regulations, and they wanted to amend at least 32, not quite half.
	And then the additional ones from Malaysia and Korea.
	Let me interject here.
	Give us a practical translation of what we're talking about here.
	Are these things like required surveillance of your movements and who you've been in contact with, required apps to be able to travel, and things like that?
	What is this?
	I'll keep it really simple.
	Back in 2005, when they implemented these, The attitude was, well, it's not just good enough to have TSA pat you down at the border and stop you at the airport or the cruise ship or on a border crossing or something like that.
	Not that we stop anybody at a border crossing.
	But they decided that they wanted to have that control, not at the border, but inside the country, you know, thus all of the testing and everything.
	And they leave it to the individual nation to do their lockdowns, whether it's, you know, China style or, you know, not at all like in Florida or Texas, maybe.
	And so the core of the regulations are surveillance within countries so that a country could report if there was a problem.
	Right now.
	the big problem coming either got leaked on purpose or leaked by accident, but you've probably reported, I believe you have, on at least one half of what the Indonesian health minister stated at the G20. He stated very clearly.
	quote-unquote health certificate, vaccine passport by any other name, into the international health slash surveillance regulations.
	He said this coming May, right?
	Now, that's totally doable from their perspective.
	They've got their schedule all structured so that could happen.
	That's what I've been raising the flags about for months.
	In all of their official documents, even though they're getting this all ready now, they say, oh, well, we're just going to do that in 2024.
	Well, maybe.
	Maybe they're telling the truth.
	But, you know, we need to stop it now because why in the world would anybody have a vaccine certificate when There aren't any vaccines and whatever it is they're injecting doesn't stop transmission, doesn't stop infection.
	What is that certifying other than you're compliant?
	Well, that's it.
	This is global compliance with anything they want to put into a needle, whether it's even on the outside of possibilities, transhumanism injections or whatever it is, right?
	It could be anything, literally anything.
	They just call it a vaccine.
	So But this is global compliance, but clearly, and this is my question to you about this, clearly, they intend to need such rules, right?
	I mean, they don't make frameworks that they don't ever imagine using, it seems.
	Absolutely.
	And so to make this super crystal clear, we'll move on to the next topic.
	The international health regulations are existing.
	Back in 2005, we agreed, you know, George W. Bush agreed to him, you know, after 9-11 and the Patriot Act and the anthrax scare and all that sort of stuff, you know, they signed on to it.
	I just want people to realize that You're going to have to study your constitution a little bit more closely because it isn't what you think it is.
	And there are hundreds, if not thousands, of agreements that the international community treats as being legally binding.
	And this is one of them.
	And so what is going on with the amendments to the regulations?
	It's a very slippery slope.
	It's like a bullet train.
	It could be adopted in May, okay?
	They say 2024, well, you know, be vigilant and, you know, don't let anything slip past you.
	They have not yet published anything, and believe me, you know, I'm keeping my eye out every day.
	As soon as I hear something, you know, you'll be on the list.
	The people that I tell will get that information out to people.
	In preparation for whatever they come up with, I have been working for almost two months now on the People's Amendments, thepeoplesamendments.com.
	And I won't talk to you too much about that other than I think most people, if they go and they read what's in there, they'll be like, yeah, if I was going to change international law, I would want these things.
	When they finally publish what they're doing, I firmly believe everybody's going to go, What?
	Are you out of your box?
	And so it's not good enough to say, no, no, no, no, no.
	We don't want to do what you guys want to do.
	You also have to say, no, look, this is what we want.
	This is what we demand.
	Okay?
	And so, go ahead.
	Well, you know, the pattern that we've all been observing here and living through to our horror is that every time there's some other global emergency, and the WHO was complicit in...
	You know, declaring this, quote, pandemic and, you know, pushing vaccines and all these things, horrible decisions.
	But every time this happens, we lose a little bit of our national sovereignty or a lot of it.
	And it seems like this is the slippery slope into just pure globalism where individual countries, no matter who might be president or who might be in the Senate and so on, have no power.
	Compared to the globalist dictates, and that's what Dr.
	Boyle told me as well.
	Would you agree with that assessment, that this is where we're sliding into very quickly?
	Well, anybody who relies on their government officials to protect their sovereign rights doesn't understand what sovereignty means.
	You know, it's up to us to stand up for our rights against Those government, you know, officials who think they have powers, and as long as we allow them, you know, to behave the way they've been behaving, they're going to keep doing it, right?
	And so, Professor Boyle has spoken, I know with you and many others, about the pandemic treaty.
	Now, the pandemic treaty, as opposed to the bullet train of the amendments, is a big old freight train that they're loading up with absolutely everything.
	And it hasn't gotten up to the plateau yet, so it doesn't have a chance of getting a head of steam going downhill.
	But it is something that is mind-blowing.
	So erase the blackboard of your mind, Mike, because I'm going to give you something that I don't think anybody's ever said about the treaty.
	In the talk, in the run-up over the last almost, well, it's actually been two years.
	They first started this two years ago.
	They keep saying they want to change the global health architecture, right?
	And that doesn't mean they want to build a new building, you know, in Geneva.
	What that means is, if you're familiar, and I'm sure you are, with, you know, the Climate Change Accords and what they call the Conference of the Parties.
	They just had COP27. They want to set up a whole other bureaucracy, right?
	And so it isn't build back better, it's build a bigger bureaucracy.
	In the pandemic treaty, if you go to Articles 19, 20 and on, they talk about having a conference of the parties.
	Now, what that means is it's sort of a bureaucracy to run whatever the treaty is.
	And anybody who signs on to the treaty, any nation who signs on to the treaty, would be one of the parties.
	And so if they get a minimum of 40 countries, and that could be the tiniest little nations in the world, all the little Pacific islands and everything else, then it would go into effect for the nations who are party to the treaty.
	They want to have a governing body that has two presidents and four vice presidents.
	And then they want to have...
	Right, crazy.
	It's crazy.
	Then they want to have an extended COP, and COP doesn't mean policeman, it means conference to the parties, an e-cop, and it's all of the foundations and non-profits and so forth, and so what they are trying to do is set up a massive bureaucracy,
	and here's the thing that Most people who reported on the events of what happened at the G20 and the statement made by the Indonesian health minister missed the stuff that he said afterwards, which was, he's not a doctor, he's a banker.
	And he revealed that along with the World Bank, And the Rockefeller Foundation and Bill and the Gates Foundation and the Wellcome Trust and the U.S. and I think 18 other nations and then some more piled on.
	They've created a fifth.
	And, you know, what the hell is a fifth, right?
	It's a financial intermediary fund.
	Right?
	Intermediary, middleman, right?
	Somebody's in the middle of this money, right?
	So the World Bank set up a fund, and he's a banker, and he was just so proud that they've already got pledged $1.4 billion a year for this fund.
	They want to get it up to $10 billion a year.
	And he, quite frankly, simply said, This is a fantastic investment opportunity.
	And essentially what he's signaling to the crowd, which was a bunch of business people, get investing in the companies that are going to make stuff that we're going to fund.
	And essentially what they want is they want more investment in pharma.
	Now, there's a phrase you may be familiar with.
	It actually comes from, we're talking about the treaty, but it comes from Well, I'm taking back the language,
	and P-H-E-I-C in my world stands for the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex, P-H-E-I-C. That's the ticket, people.
	They want to grow the fake, the pharmaceutical industry, in all of the smaller nations.
	So my personal opinion, and everything I've said so far I believe is fact and can be backed up, and so I'm going to venture into opinion land here.
	I don't believe that when the Biden administration's amendments were kicked to the curb in this past May, you know, he got basically nothing.
	It wasn't for the right reasons.
	I think what happened is the smaller nations saw these amendments, and what they saw was all stick, and they said, well, where's the carrot?
	What's in it for us?
	You want to have all of these requirements and all these rules, and you want to make us do all these things, well, you're going to have to pay for it.
	And so the money is starting to flow.
	They want to set up an entire structure that what most people don't realize, and this was a mind-blower for me, actually, when you come to see it, is The assessed payments for the United States on a yearly basis to the WHO is, and I know this sounds weird, but it's only $100 million.
	Their yearly budget is $4 billion.
	They want this new organization to have $10 billion a year.
	It's like two and a half times bigger than the entire WHO, and it's all about pandemic preparedness.
	Like, what are they going to do?
	Have...
	What you're describing sounds to me like a giant global pharmaceutical money laundering operation where they put this layer of what you're calling the pharmaceutical industrial complex.
	They create all this pandemic nonsense, but expand it to third world countries that so far haven't yet been sufficiently looted.
	By the pharmaceutical industrial complex, right?
	I mean, they've looted Western nations quite effectively over the last couple years, but they haven't yet looted Africa and Central America and the Middle East and so on.
	That's what it sounds like to me.
	Am I off the mark or on the mark with that?
	You're spot on.
	I would just add loot and poison.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah.
	And the delegates and everyone from those nations, they keep demanding equity.
	Okay?
	Now, don't get triggered on the word.
	Okay?
	They keep demanding equity.
	Now, I can almost guarantee that the vast majority of your audience just, oh, equity, right?
	Well, wait a minute.
	What does equity really mean?
	Okay?
	Oh, you bought a house and you paid down some of the mortgage, you have equity.
	Equity is money.
	When it's code, people, it doesn't mean they want fairness and racial balance and all that sort of fun stuff.
	When they say they want equity, it means they want money.
	That's what equity is.
	It's not equality.
	If you have equity in your home...
	It means you have money.
	And so they basically said, no, we don't want your Biden amendments back in May because it's just telling us what to do.
	You're going to tell us what to do.
	You're going to have to give us a lot of money.
	And so if all the manufacturing is coming home to Africa or smaller island nations or wherever, there's a much closer opportunity for corruption and graft and money laundering and sweetheart contracts and great jobs and positions where you make a lot of money for doing next to nothing and boards of directors there's a much closer opportunity for corruption and graft and money laundering and sweetheart contracts and great jobs and You know, they're not stupid.
	They're very smart, very savvy, good horse trading, you know, negotiating, not for their people, for the health of their people, because there's not a doctor listed.
	I did a word scan on the document.
	It never says the word doctor.
	It doesn't say nutrition.
	It doesn't say vitamins or herbs or even essential medications or early treatment.
	Or the word natural.
	I saw that on your list.
	Doesn't say natural, does it?
	In fact...
	If I did a word scan on your website, you know, natural everywhere, right?
	It's like health everywhere, you know, treatment everywhere.
	But here's...
	I'm sorry to interrupt, but this is really relevant.
	So most of the population of the world still uses complementary medicine or indigenous medicine.
	You know, in most areas.
	So what you are describing, this system looks like it's also designed, because there's a very strong component of policing, quote, misinformation and disinformation in all of this, right?
	So that's designed, in my view, to essentially outlaw or suppress any discussion of herbal medicine, natural medicine, complementary medicine, which is what has been affordable to 80% of the world And then to outlaw all that, force people to only talk about pharmaceuticals and vaccines and similar interventions, and then boom, the global pharmaceutical cartel just starts raking in money off the world's poor, whom they're also killing and making infertile in the process.
	Well, they haven't been killing and making them infertile quite to the same pace that the more wealthy nations have been doing.
	And, you know, they put it under this guise of, hey, you know, Canada bought Enough to jab everybody in Canada ten times, and the EU bought that many, and the United States has bought Israel.
	Hey, you guys are getting all the jabs.
	We want some of the jabs, okay?
	But that really isn't what they want.
	They really want the money to manufacture the drugs and jab their people that way.
	The issue, though, is they had a meeting.
	It was one of their informal-focused meetings.
	Well, you know, prior to 2020, what metrics were you using to determine whether or not individual nations had developed, you know, an effective, and this is their language, core capacity?
	You know, is the healthcare system good enough to be able to handle a serious problem, right?
	They call it core capacity.
	And the experts said, well, you know, we really don't have any metrics that played out with any accuracy because you would have thought Italy and Spain and England and Germany and the United States, you know, would have done great.
	But all the poor nations did much better.
	And so we don't really have any metrics by which to gauge preparedness.
	So let's have a preparedness treaty with no metrics.
	Why am I not surprised?
	Okay.
	And principle number 16 in the treaty says...
	That no health guidance shall be given unless backed by science.
	I guess Fauci is going to have to back this.
	But there's not a footnote anywhere in the pandemic treaty.
	They call it the WHO Convention Agreement.
	And They abbreviate it WHOCA plus or agreement and plus.
	And so I just call it the hookah plus because they got to be smoking something if they think that, you know, we're going to fall for this crazy stuff.
	And there's there's no documentation, no science behind even one line of their proposed treaty.
	But yet here we are.
	Right.
	They messed it up.
	Royal.
	And so let's give them two and a half times as much money and a whole brand new bureaucracy.
	And the only saving grace with this is it requires a two-thirds majority, not of the Senate, but a two-thirds majority of the members of the WHO at the World Health Assembly.
	They say, as before, that they're shooting for 2024.
	And, you know, we'll see what they do.
	But I think this one is like a slow freight train.
	It's trying to get up to the top of the hill.
	And we got to, you know, derail it now.
	We can't let it go any further.
	I completely agree.
	And by the way, I want to mention on your Substack site, which is jamesroguski.substack.com, You've got an article there called Three Days That Will Live in Infamy.
	And in that article, you have some clickable action items to call members of Congress, sign petitions, things like that.
	So there are action items that people could take right there and links to meetings and all kinds of things like that.
	So thank you for putting that together.
	It's very valuable.
	Yeah, you can actually send an email to each and every congressperson with one click, and then if you click over onto the little tab, it'll quickly list all of their phone numbers.
	And honestly, Mike, you know, I'm a realist, all right?
	There are a handful of...
	There are congresspeople who are aware of this.
	There have been a number of bills that have been submitted.
	And some of the congresspeople, you might want to call them up and go, hey, we see that you're on the right side of this.
	How can we help you?
	And they do deserve our help.
	There have been pieces of legislation.
	Obviously, the congress is going to switch out in January.
	Most congressmen hang around from one congress to the next.
	But ultimately, that email says we need to leave the WHO.
	We don't really need to fuss around with all these details of a treaty or amendments or any of that sort of stuff.
	The way out is to leave, to exit the WHO.
	And so people can go to exitthewho.com.
	And my favorite website, though, is screwthewho.com.
	Which in September, the WHO made a request and said, we're going to have a public comment period at the end of September.
	And, you know, I pay attention and I'm aware that they, maybe they don't lie, but they twist the words.
	And, yeah, they had something scheduled for the end of September, but two days before September 9th, on September 7th, they said, oh, starting September 9th, y'all can submit a 90-second video.
	Really?
	And they made people hold up their personal identification card and Then you could access their camera and record a 90-second video.
	And so I realized that right off, you know, that's one way of sifting out the people who are opposed to what you're doing.
	And I put up a call for people to send me their videos of whatever they thought.
	And I got a couple of hundred videos on the page now.
	I still have a hundred more.
	I got a post up there.
	I think Screw the Who is incredibly entertaining.
	Because it's just people saying whatever it is they cared to say about the WHO and their pandemic treaty.
	They ended up having to extend the deadline because I think what happened is they got blasted with a lot of negative videos.
	and you can see that all of the positive videos that they got were from organizations, and it sure looked like they called up all their buddies, and they go, hey, we're getting blasted here.
	We need somebody to say something nice about this.
	And when I was watching, what they ended up doing was they played a three-hour montage on the 29th of September and a three-hour montage on the 30th, and I stopped each video as it started to take the person's name down and determine what they were all about.
	And I was able at 100% to just by looking at the person and their background and where they were, tell whether they were going to be for or against, right?
	When someone's in their garage, right, or, you know, out on their porch or something like that, it's like, oh, they're going to be a human being, they're going to be against it.
	If they're all dressed up and they've got their organization logo behind them, you're like, oh yeah, they're going to be a shill pushing it.
	And so I'm hoping to get everybody on board for, just look, Trump did not get us to leave the WHO. He started the process, but he started it late.
	It's a year-long process.
	When Truman signed us in in 1948, The document says, you know, we'll give you one year's notice.
	Like when you leave your job, you give two weeks notice.
	And so Trump started it too late.
	Biden stopped the process.
	So we never got out.
	But the process is actually really simple.
	You just say, hey, I quit.
	I'm out of here.
	I don't want anything to do with it.
	We'll pay whatever we may owe.
	It's really chump change for anybody who's, you know, our nation could just hit a keystroke and there's all the money.
	That's how they do things these days.
	And so all we have to do is develop the public will to make the political will, you know, to make the politicians know, look, we're done.
	We're out of here.
	Leave the who.
	They're corrupt as corrupt can be.
	They're trying to create a whole new something that's two and a half times as big as the who.
	What has the Who done for you lately, Mike?
	Anything?
	Yeah.
	What has the Who done for you, says Mr.
	Magoo, while he screwed the Who.
	I mean, it's a Dr.
	Seuss book almost.
	But that's why it's great.
	It's memorable.
	It has nice alliteration.
	Screwthewho.com.
	But it's actually an Abbott and Costello routine.
	You know, who's responsible for this?
	Screwing you.
	Those aren't questions.
	Those are statements.
	Yeah, exactly.
	Yeah.
	Who's responsible for this?
	Yes.
	What do you mean, yes?
	You said who?
	That's right.
	I'm asking who.
	Who is who?
	What?
	Who are you?
	I get it.
	It could be a quieter routine.
	Let me ask you this.
	Well, first of all, you and I have to keep in touch because we want to help rally people to The focus that you are bringing to this for action items to raise awareness and get people to push back against this.
	So as these timelines approach, I mean, first of all, stand by after this so I can give you my direct mobile number so we can keep in direct touch about all this.
	But another question I want to bring in here, though, is the U.S. health care system, many Intellectually honest people would say the system is in a state of collapse right now with nursing shortages, antibiotics gone across pharmacies all across the country, not enough hospital beds and so on.
	And the vaccines did not work.
	The masks did not work.
	The lockdowns created mental health problems in children and so on.
	But how can anybody look at this and say, oh, we just need more of this?
	The only reason it didn't work is because we didn't have enough of it.
	No, the system is self-annihilating, it seems like.
	It just doesn't work.
	Insanity times insanity isn't Same.
	Okay.
	You know, two negatives don't make a positive.
	My first book was Your Doctor is a Liar.
	That was a dozen years ago.
	Everybody can have it for free on yourdoctoristheliar.com.
	It was all about the lies about cholesterol and all that sort of thing.
	Oh, yeah.
	For quite some time, you know, I cut my teeth, I guess, on this half a lifetime ago.
	I managed a couple of nutritional store, mom and pop nutritional stores.
	So I was the buyer and the manager and, you know, I got all the sales pitches and I saw all the products and, you know, we had 100 plus people a day come in asking questions about information.
	And so I have a very simple position and I think, you know, most likely, you know, I can't speak for you, but I think you share it.
	It's like, hey, I can't tell you what to do.
	I can give you information.
	You have to start taking responsibility for your own health.
	And that's the problem because the, oh, you know, there's nothing I can do.
	My doctor said there's nothing I can do.
	Well, you know, if your doctor says there's nothing you can do, it's time to find a new doctor.
	Yep.
	Yep, that's right.
	And people need to stop subjecting themselves to or just surrendering their own personal health sovereignty to their doctor.
	You know, almost they throw their bodies on the floor and say, you fix me, doc, but I'm not going to change my lifestyle.
	You know, I've literally heard people say...
	After they learned that eating ice cream raises blood sugar, causing them to have to take more insulin, instead of saying, well, I'll eat less ice cream, they would say, well, I'll just buy more insulin, right?
	It's like, what?
	Don't get me started.
	Don't get me started.
	The beauty of this, though, Mike, is, and I've been focused on natural health for quite some time, decades.
	People have to realize that That nothing that I'm talking about here today has anything to do with anyone who cares a lick about your health.
	This is a business opportunity for them.
	This is to build big pharma.
	It's to make compliance and mandates and all that sort of stuff, you know, passports and surveillance, so that you're forced to do what they want you to do, even though it's absolutely not good for your health.
	So when you realize that, I've been stealing back some of the words, and that's what the People's Amendments are really all about.
	The word effective, you know, effective could be negative.
	Okay?
	You can have something that's negatively effective, but people just say, well, it's effective.
	Well, yeah, but in the wrong direction, right?
	I don't say informed consent anymore.
	I say informed dissent.
	Because if you're informed, you should be dissenting, okay?
	And so, you know, safe?
	Well, safe is relative.
	If something, you know, if you feel safe jumping out of an airplane, you know, with a parachute, well, God bless you.
	But, you know, some people might go, well, you know, I'm not comfortable doing that.
	That doesn't feel safe to me.
	It's impossible to say that something is safe because there's 8 billion people on the planet and they all have a different level of internal security as to what they think is good or bad for them.
	And, you know, stories in the news all over the place lately about, you know, people pushing back saying, you know what, I don't believe it's safe.
	And that is the only answer.
	No one can dictate the feeling of safety.
	And if it's one out of a million, I did an analysis on a study about injecting pregnant women with a quote-unquote vaccine to protect their unborn babies against RSV. And two or three or four out of 500 people so injected, and their babies would get horrible problems.
	And they said it's safe because it's a small number, right?
	But the study is poorly powered.
	And when you add it all up, it's an abomination.
	Well, and I'd like to bring in the example of if there's a peanut butter manufacturer that sells peanut butter nationwide and three people get sick or die from E. coli in the peanut butter, it's a nationwide panic.
	It's all over the media.
	There's a forced FDA recall.
	you know, from a couple of people.
	But if it's a vaccine, oh, millions can die and it's safe.
	Right.
	And so what we're dealing with here is a cabal I recommend this, but I don't really recommend this.
	Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, and pretty much just a few hours from now, actually, because it's happening in Geneva, midnight Pacific time, 3 a.m.
	Eastern time.
	It will be the beginning of the morning on Monday morning in Geneva, and they will be meeting for three days, Monday, Tuesday, and Wednesday, 5, 6, and 7, to discuss the pandemic treaty, thus the three days that will live in infamy, because 81 years ago, we got surprised, air quotes around that one, we got surprised that At Pearl Harbor, it's the 81st anniversary of it.
	Don't let that happen again, people.
	Pay attention, spread the word, raise the awareness of your friends.
	You don't need to know every single detail.
	You just need to know that they're at it again.
	They're plotting to mess with your freedom and sovereignty and It's complicated.
	You know, I'm dedicated to this just because I find myself down this rabbit hole and it's kind of lonely.
	Now I got Mike down here with me.
	It's getting better.
	Give me a phone call anytime.
	310-619-3055.
	Go to screwthewho.com and see what other just regular people have had to say.
	And, you know, Mike, we're probably getting close to wanting to close up the interview.
	I'd like to leave with this.
	I was amazingly impressed by the intelligent comments that pretty much random people from all over the world made.
	It's not easy to summarize your thoughts in 90 seconds, but if you go to screwthewho.com, your fellow men and women, both in the United States and all around the world, will give you hope.
	People know what's going on.
	Don't think they don't.
	We just have to Be the media.
	You've got a great platform.
	Thanks for brighting on and all that sort of stuff.
	Everybody who's listening to this, take out your camera.
	Go, you know, learn some of the information that I've said, but take out your camera, make a video as long as you want.
	You don't have to keep it to 90 seconds.
	Post it up on Brighteon, you know, put the link in one of the comments on my subsec, and I'll put you up on the page.
	I want to know.
	I want to know what people have to say.
	And so be the media.
	I completely agree.
	And our audience is extremely well-informed, high IQ, very sophisticated.
	They think deeply through these issues, and I think they will take you up on your offer.
	Give out your phone number one more time then, please.
	310-619-3055.
	If you're outside the U.S., it's plus one.
	But, you know, text me, call, WhatsApp, Telegram, Signal, whatever you use.
	And, you know, be persistent.
	You know, I try to get back to everybody.
	I do it as best I can.
	But...
	Probably the best, simplest, easiest thing that everybody can do is take this broadcast, you know, the link for this.
	I guess it'll end up being a video I'm writing on.
	Share the daylight side of this.
	I don't know what your biggest video ever is, Mike.
	You might have to look that up.
	Let me add, though.
	So, you know, Brighteon URLs are banned from being shared by all the major platforms.
	So we will also post this on Bitshoot and also Rumble.
	And so if you can't share it, and I'll probably post this on my Substack page as well.
	Anyway, folks, if you can't share the Brighteon link, you might be able to share the Rumble link.
	So that's another potential workaround for that.
	I mean, people can't even direct message each other on Facebook with a URL from Brighteon.
	It's banned in private messaging.
	Yeah, that's how dangerous this talk is.
	Look how dangerous we are, James.
	Well, that's how you know something's right.
	I mean, I actually kind of appreciated it when they started putting the warnings up because they're like, oh, that's where I got to go look.
	That's wonderful.
	Thanks for the heads up.
	True.
	If things are still up on Facebook or, you know, some of the other platforms, it's like, oh, you know, that's got to be garbage.
	Let me go find something good.
	But, you know, if you, meaning your audience, if anyone in the audience ever comes across something that they think is valuable and they don't share it, They're actually being the censor.
	Okay?
	If you know something and you keep it quiet, you've become the problem.
	You've got to share the things that you think are important to share.
	I hope you think this is important to share.
	It's not just...
	Oh, yeah.
	You know, I posted it on Facebook and you're shadowbanned and it goes nowhere.
	When I've got something that I really want to share, I pull out my phone and I go to wherever I've texted somebody and I'll sit there for a couple of hours and I'll just text everybody that I've ever texted in my life.
	You know, I've done that many times and I'll go to sleep and I'll, you know, turn off my phone.
	I'll wake up in the morning and when I turn my phone on, like ding, ding, ding, ding, ding, ding.
	And everybody's like, oh, thanks for sharing.
	You know, this is wonderful.
	Send everybody an email.
	Send them a personal message.
	You know, do everything you possibly can to wake them up.
	If they disagree, just be like Santa Claus.
	Put them on your naughty list.
	Right?
	And the people who reach back to you and they go, oh, thank you so much.
	This is great.
	You know, I appreciate it.
	Put them on your nice list.
	And, you know, I'm trying really hard.
	This is my gallows humor.
	I warned you that I think maybe you might, we could appreciate each other's humor.
	I'm trying to get as big a nice list as possible.
	Okay?
	Because That's what's missing.
	That's what's been broken.
	You know, the sense of community, the sense of being connected to people that you can talk to, right?
	So anytime somebody calls me up, boom, they're on my nice list because they care, right?
	And we might as well get to know each other now because we're going to spend some time in the FEMA camps later.
	Now's a good time to get to know each other.
	Yeah, that would be an awesome gathering.
	Finally get to see everybody face to face in the same camp as we plot our escape tunneling underneath the camp.
	You know, it'd be like World War II style.
	We're going to tunnel out of here.
	Does anybody have a spoon?
	You know, whatever it takes.
	Disassemble the furniture.
	Oh, we just lost James right there.
	He'll probably come back.
	Just as we were talking about escaping FEMA, It's just like, he's gone!
	They got him!
	Man, they move fast.
	Okay, well, I'm going to assume he's not coming back on this podcast, so we were pretty much going to wrap it up there, folks.
	So, anyway, that's...
	James Roguski, who I hope is doing okay.
	Well, I'll call him after this.
	Make sure everything's cool.
	His website is jamesroguski.substack.com and also screwthewho.com and he's also got, what did he say, exitthewho.com and he's got a free book out there called Your Doctor is a Liar.
	I think that's the website too, yourdoctorisalyar.com.
	Now, Not every doctor is a liar, but yeah, a lot of the mainstream ones most certainly are, but there's plenty of good ones who are on our side, too.
	So, yeah, so maybe your doctor, you listening to this, is not a liar, but...
	A lot of others are, that's for sure.
	Anyway, this has been a fascinating interview.
	I'm going to call him, make sure everything's cool.
	But thank you for listening.
	Mike Adams here, the Health Ranger, brighteon.com, and of course, naturalnews.com.
	And check out my new Substack page.
	It's healthranger.substack.com.
	There's nothing really on there yet, just kind of a hello article, but there's more coming.
	We're going to post some interesting stuff there.
	But thanks for listening.
	Everybody take care.
	A global reset is coming.
	And that's why I've recorded a new nine-hour audiobook.
	It's called The Global Reset Survival Guide.
	You can download it for free by subscribing to the naturalnews.com email newsletter, which is also free.
	I'll describe how the monetary system fails.
	I also cover emergency medicine and first aid and what to buy to help you avoid infections.
	So download this guide.
	It's free.

▲