All Episodes
Previous Next
May 26, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
39:11
David DuByne tells the Health Ranger about the Grand Solar Minimum and FAMINE cycles
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
And you can get a basic number of what the decline yields will be versus what mostly false USDA numbers are going to be.
And then you're going to watch the panic ensue across the planet because when a mother realizes, uh-oh, my food price is going to triple and I might not be able to feed my children, that's a game changer.
And when it becomes full awareness across the planet no later than June into July, And then the real scare comes when we get into the harvest season and they look and they go, oh, you know what?
We're getting like 10 bushels an acre.
20 bushels an acre, not 170.
This is one of really going to light up the the fear across the planet Welcome to the health ranger report on brighttown.tv.
I'm I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon.
Today, we're joined by a first-time guest, someone I'm very excited to bring to you today.
His name is David Dubine.
His channel on Brighteon and other platforms is called Adapt 2030.
He's an expert in crop yields, the grand solar minimum, Today we're going to talk about fertilizer, food shortages, and the long-term trends of a loss of crop production capabilities in North America and some other areas of the world, namely the Middle East and Northern Africa, that are actually going to be able to grow more crops.
So crop production is shifting around the world, and we're beginning to see it right now with the sanctions against Russia.
The fertilizer cutoff situation, crop yields, nations like Ukraine and Hungary banning exports of wheat and other commodities.
We'll be back with David Dubin with all that and much more.
Stay with us here on Brighteon.tv.
All right, welcome back to the Health Ranger Report on Brighton.tv.
And today we're joined by David Dubine, and he's an expert in global crop yields, fertilizer, grand solar minimum, and his channel is called Adapt 2030.
It's on multiple platforms, including Brighton.
David, welcome to the show.
It's great to have you on and to meet you for the first time as well.
Yeah, Mike, thanks for having me on.
I know we talk about a lot of the same things, and just to frame this when we get started, It's about cycles in the way that our universe operates on cycles.
Our solar system operates on cycles as we go through the year.
Our sun operates on a cycle as well through higher activity and lower activity.
Now, it doesn't have to be a 12,000-year cycle, such as a Younger Dryas impact that sets the world back to Stone Age.
But there are smaller cycles encapsulated with larger cycles.
So there are cycles riding within and on top of cycles.
If you were to know the cycle duration and the onset of a cycle, a 400-year cycle, grand solar minimum cycle, That through the past has reduced crop yields, caused massive migrations of people looking for better lifestyles and food.
You know, what you grew is what you got in the 1600s.
Then you could try to control what was going to happen.
You would know from past experiences of these grand solar minimums going back how many thousands of years that it has a certain onset.
The jet streams, cloud cells shift.
Growing seasons shrink.
Food production's lost.
You could make excuses for it, why all this is going to happen, such as global warming.
And then you could try to control the chaos on the way down.
And I think that's what's happening right now.
Elite power brokers of this planet understand this cycle's here.
They knew it was inbound.
This chaos happening this minute is because they're trying to mitigate, control the downward spiral of food production.
Because hungry people, as you know, Mike, they do strange things, don't they?
Yeah, absolutely.
Let me jump in here on this too, David.
So I just want to back up and establish a couple of things.
Now, hopefully people understand that less sunlight reaching the surface of the earth results in lower crop yields because photosynthesis requires sunlight.
Okay, so I just want to establish that.
There's a direct relationship between sunlight and crop yields.
And I know that seems obvious to you, but I just want to cover the basics.
And then, secondly, that we are in the tipping point of this current cycle with reduced sunlight.
Is that confirmed?
You mentioned this is a 400-year cycle.
Could you kind of describe where we are in this cycle?
Are we on the downward slope?
How close are we to the bottom of the solar energy reaching Earth and so on?
Well, the sun itself, as we come through the very soon-to-be short end of this solar cycle, even NASA and NOAA confirmed that solar cycle 26 will have maximum of like six sunspots.
And anybody can do the research, and that's what I encourage.
Don't listen to what I say.
Please do your own research.
I'm presenting some information here, but it's up to you to backtrack and then dig down your own rabbit hole to find what's right for you.
But anything I say, I wish everybody would double-check it and try to confirm and disprove it because then you can learn more by trying to disprove it.
Like, wow, that is in fact true.
Six spots average is what they're looking at for...
Solar cycle 26.
So the way that it's going to decline in activity very rapidly, there's going to be magnetic effects on our planet happening as well.
So the magnetic north is in a polar wander phase right now.
So is the polar south.
And this is very weak.
So our jet streams and cloud cells are not going to be held in place nearly as tightly, which gives us and establishes those grow periods, those things that we call plant and harvest dates, Are predicated on locked in jet streams and cloud cells that are predictable.
Well, this is going completely out of phase.
So we are just at the cusp in the beginning of it.
The crashes and the food insecurity, this is what topples governments every time and resets the economy.
We're just at the cusp of this.
This is the first year that it's happening.
Now, it needs to be masked.
And when I say that, you know, if you knew this cycle, just as I was referencing, was inbound, you would have to have excuses.
So we have the global warming.
But then, it only goes so far.
Then, okay, there's fertilizer shortages and herbicide shortages this year.
Okay, well then, what if there was a Manhattan Project to alleviate that and everybody focused on producing fertilizers to get it to the farmers to grow out what we need in the fields?
Then next year when we have declines, that excuse doesn't work again.
So how many layers of the cake on excuses are we here?
Now we have a global war that's even limiting, oh, almost all fertilizer coming.
We're going to lose about, what, 35% of global fertilizer access?
And, you know, Mike, in the last couple of days talking, we are not going to have the herbicides either, which are really going to dent into some yields beyond the fertilizer.
So, wow, you just said...
We may lose one third, a little over a third of access to global fertilizer.
Now, our audience should know that four billion people depend on fertilizer, fertilizer nutrients, fossil fuel created fertilizers in order to feed themselves, in order to grow the crops.
So if you lose a third Of the fertilizers, you're going to lose a third of the four billion people who depend on it.
It's just cause and effect, right?
So, you know, a third of four billion people, it's over a billion people could starve to death as this rolls out.
The second thing I want to ask you, how much longer is this grand solar minimum expected to last?
Are we talking a decade, two decades?
What's the timeline on this?
If you look back in the past to say 400 BC over the last six of these events, until about 2033-ish, 2035, we should hit the bottom somewhere around 2028 and then start to ascend out of that where things will become more stable in terms of what you see with the atmosphere.
Now as we trend into this thing over coming in now to May, June, and July, and August, you are going to see extremes that you thought were literally impossible.
And that's what's expected.
So these extremes are going to continue.
Wait, wait.
When you say extremes, you mean weather extremes?
Oh, extremes in terms of wind, the hail size, and the cold that we're seeing right now.
You're going to get record cold.
I am, too, right here in March.
It's going to wipe out a lot of our blooms that have come out onto the fruit trees already.
Okay.
These out-of-season events, wind and hail and rain.
And you mentioned the cover story, and I'm really glad you brought that up because, of course, governments always have to lie to the people about what's going on.
Now, in the late 1970s, people all over America were taught that we were about to enter an ice age.
Actually, that was the correct interpretation because the grand solar minimum was on its way.
But then they switched it, what, in the late 80s or the early 90s into global warming.
And then later on, they switched from that to climate change, which covers any crazy thing happening.
So I think you're right that they have known about this for a long time.
They've been trying to figure out...
How to create a cover story so that they could enslave the people.
Can you talk about the use or the weaponization of climate in order to enslave humanity?
Look at the things I talk about, how heavily censored it is.
So if there are true scientists out there and those who understand these cycles differently, You're almost verboten to talk about it in public discourse or on social media.
You know, if you promote the global warming, oh, you just put right to the top of the ranks everywhere.
But as soon as you say, hey, I believe climate change is absolutely going to wreak havoc across our civilization here, but it's not because of CO2. It's not you.
It's the sun.
And to come out with those kind of statements of, I can't tax the sun.
And people are going to be incredibly angry when they realize that we have squandered 20 years or more where we could have organized our communities to get off these centralized systems and become more dependent interregionally or within your communities, and we have not been allowed that.
It's actually the opposite.
Every single time that you look around, there's some weird city ordinance where You can't even grow plants in your front yard unless they're in some sort of pot.
I thought I owned my house, freest country in the world.
But everywhere you look, it seems that there's some cutaway of independence getting you back into the centralized system.
Independence starts with your own garden.
Decentralization, we could talk about crypto all day long, but decentralization is your own garden and raising your own food at the base minimum to get off of that system.
That's right.
I'm really glad you mentioned that.
Of course, I'm an advocate of decentralized food and guerrilla gardening, right?
And also understanding what goes into the food.
You have to have some fertilizer.
You have to have sunlight.
Obviously, these are necessary to grow food.
But then we have...
A globalist system that seems to want people to become helpless and dependent on them.
Now, you talk about how they're going to use this coming crisis in order to force people onto a kind of mark of the beast, social credit scoring system, transaction tracking system, in order to enforce food rationing in the United States.
Talk about that, please, if you would, David.
Yeah, I'm glad you brought that up too, because, you know, fertilizer is only one part of the whole that we're looking at here.
You have to think about herbicides as well.
Now, because of the supply chains being broken down, there was also in conjunction with the fertilizer shortages before the Russian conflict here, Herbicides were going to be short about 10% globally.
And then a lot of farmers were going to switch crops because the glyphosate was really the main thing that was in short supply.
So the corn growers need that to run the rows because grasses are really tenacious when they're coming between the rows.
And that's mainly what glyphosate was used for in the corn growing.
And corn's heavy feeding.
So a lot of farmers were moving over to beans.
So at the end of it, I'm going to make a bold call here.
You're going to have a Himalaya-sized hill of beans and a coffee cup full of corn for production in the U.S. But now...
Do the math on it.
Take away the production from fertilizers if you don't have that, and then also now take away production because you're going to have plants competing for the same nutrients that were put on the plants, if you're lucky enough to get the fertilizer, that wouldn't be taken out with traditional herbicides.
Now, it could be grasses or broadleaf, but wherever you look, and now they're trying to tell farmers, well, why don't you mix class four, class three, class 23 chemicals and do a chemistry set in the fields and then hope for the best?
Whoa.
Yeah, this is where we've gone too, excuse me.
But now you're starting to get layers on top, and it wouldn't surprise me if the pesticides went lean as well, depending on the same production facilities and supply chains.
Yeah, yeah.
That's a really good point.
And I want to clarify, of course, myself and our audience, we don't want food with pesticides and herbicides and glyphosate, but most of the world is actually eating food that is produced using those synthetic chemicals, which, as you have alluded to, It does increase crop yields per acre at the cost of then lacing those crops with these toxic chemicals.
But that is what most people eat.
Even if those of us who can afford not to, we choose not to eat those things.
But you make a very good point.
The supply chain is being disrupted.
If glyphosate is in short supply or these other herbicides, then if these farmers are going to start combining crazy experiments of toxic chemicals in the fields, then what that's going to do is subject the low-income wage earners who have to buy the cheap corn, it's going to subject them now to unknown combinations of toxic pesticides and herbicides that have really never been used that way in the history of agriculture.
Would you agree with that assessment?
I would.
And they're trying to get people to flame fields, which they have a device that drags behind and it's actually a blowtorch coming out, propane that burns the weeds.
But I mean, you're looking at propane shortages.
So I mean, we just get caught between two rocks and two hard places and then a vice on top of that to squeeze you in the middle.
Right, right.
And the low income earners are going to be impacted by far the most.
I mean, the food is going to eat up a higher and higher percentage of their take home paycheck, if not fuel on top of that.
I've read a few studies where they say right when it gets around 50%, if your input costs for food and your rent exceed 50%, that's when street protests happen.
But if you're hungry, remember, they're not going to let you walk into a store with a...
My grandparents had these ration cards from World War II. They were on paper.
And when you went in, you got a pound of sugar, a pound of butter.
They would stamp it, and that was it, and that's all you could get.
Right.
Well, this time they're not going to use paper.
They're going digital.
So you can see the progression of just watch when we come into May.
This is going to be the terrifying news headlines on top of if Russia still continues on into that time.
I'm not sure if it will.
Could, could not.
We don't know the future on that.
But May will be a pivotal month once the crop planting reports have come in and the farmers really start to tell the truth about the lack of Like inputs, fertilizer, herbicides, pesticides that they have to put in the crops.
And you can get a basic number of what the decline yields will be versus what mostly false USDA numbers are going to be.
And then you're going to watch the panic and sue across the planet because when a mother realizes, uh-oh, my food price is going to triple and I might not be able to feed my children, that's a game changer.
And when it becomes full awareness across the planet no later than June into July, And then the real scare comes when we get into the harvest season and they look and they go, oh, you know what?
We're getting like 10 bushels an acre.
20 bushels an acre, not 170.
This is when we're really going to light up the fear across the planet.
Do you think that some of this is being engineered on purpose because, of course, you know, governments say never let a crisis go to waste?
But it seems like, at least to some of our viewers, but you tell us your opinion on this, to some of our viewers, they would say, yes, of course the government's doing this on purpose because they want to drive people into rationing, which is a weaponization of food scarcity.
Do you think that's happening or is it something different?
Well, I would think of it as an offensive against humanity because, again, we wasted these years on all these other excuses when we could have gone to our own fertilizer production in our yards, in our farms, in our communities, herbicide production.
JDAM is a really good method to do a lot of these things.
Instead of having the populace incredibly angry and ferocious because...
We did not get ready.
Well, they have had the media and all these things for 20 years pushing the narrative.
So people won't see it until it's too late.
And by the time they get angry enough to cause the rest situations for governments, it's far too late by that point.
And then they're just at the beheadst of please give us food versus going on the offense and being incredibly angry, demanding change, yanking people out of their offices.
You can see how this was an offensive move.
By globalists versus allowing the populace to get the upper hand during these times, breaking off systems.
But the anger, the anger is the unaccountable.
And if we go through history, how many chapters, endless chapters, have we seen of governments overthrown when people are hungry and angry?
But now add in another 20 years of we didn't warn you, by the way, that's going to put them over the top.
Right, right.
Well, there's always Soylent Green as a...
Yes, it's on purpose.
Long-winded answer.
Yes, it's on purpose.
Okay, okay, right.
So it seems like, from what you're saying, that between now and perhaps...
May, June, July, there's a window of opportunity for early information consumers like the people watching this and the people who listen to your videos and my podcast and so on.
There's this window.
It's kind of a pre-panic window to solve your food supply problems as best you can because after the summer, all hell is going to break loose and people are going to lose their minds and then you won't be able to even find seeds, perhaps.
Does that seem like an honest assessment?
It does.
Access to food is going to be restricted.
You know, like COVID was, where you had to, you know, a certain amount of people, social distancing.
I mean, imagine if you use the same maneuvers for now food rationing.
Everybody line up, but then there's armed guards at the stores because they don't want anybody out there, you know, just flash mobbing a supermarket.
But again, they put that into our heads, flash mob, flash mob.
Now, when is it when they flash mob a supermarket that then that becomes the reason that they need troops or they flash mob a farm community with all the stored grains and then suddenly they're looking at putting troops out throughout the farmlands here because they need to protect us from the flash mobs hitting the food distribution and food storage and food production areas, grain silos, etc., grain warehouses.
So how many levels up do you want to take it?
You could go any way with this food and I'm looking at all the possibilities because I think As civil unrest starts to sweep through our cities on every single city, governments are going to move to different action than we could think.
So I'm just looking at all the possibilities out there.
You know, Barack Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act.
I believe that was in 2012.
And in that act, it specifically says the federal government can seize all farms, ranch animals, grains, commodities, farm fuel, farm tractors, equipment, everything.
And I know people, personally, after Which hurricane was it?
Katrina, I think, a few years back, where FEMA was going from ranch to ranch in central Texas asking for inventories of what farmers had on their farms because they were anticipating needing to seize grain at that time.
It didn't happen, but they were in the process of preparing for that.
Would there be payment for that, or is that just pure seizure?
Well, what do you think?
It's the government.
Yeah, they're not going to offer you anything except we won't shoot you if you give over your grain, pretty much.
I mean, this is ruled by tyranny, right?
But as you just said, it's not hard to see this happening.
They just come in, go farm to farm, and say, give us everything you have, including your fuel.
So when it comes to this, when we're having this conversation, you know that society is already near the breakdown.
If Mike and I are having this kind of conversation, we are so close that...
I can't really reiterate how close we are.
We're just within months of everything you've ever understood in your life changing, including your access to food, the most important thing.
You know, you could have a bar of gold lying next to you, but if you're too malnourished to pick it up, it's worthless.
The thing that crashes civilization and resets civilization from the Harappan Indus civilization to the Fertile Crescent and everything in between, why did they collapse?
Those were the most abundant, and you could go to Mesopotamia, Written languages, mathematics, arts, engineering, and they still collapsed.
What caused a collapse through history?
It's on a regular cycle.
And Chinese dynasties and empires collapse on a regular cycle, too.
They never last longer than 400 years, which seems to go in tandem with these grand solar minimum cycles.
And also, you know, combinations of those make a heavier, more powerful cycle themselves.
Food, food, food.
And if you don't get it, you're never going to get it.
I hate to say that, but...
If people haven't gotten to the point that If you don't have the food, you die.
If they haven't gotten to that point yet, like maybe I should go get a few extra seeds or maybe I should buy a few extra bits of something in the store, whether it's canned food or dried goods or flowers or something you can make from scratch your own foods.
If you haven't gotten a message yet, I think you're not going to get it.
And I hope you can talk somebody else out of the normalcy bias to get the message because we really just literally months, would you say, left before the tidal wave in the stores and the panic buying begins?
Well, I was looking at headlines this morning, and I believe in Iraq there are already protests on the streets today due to food prices.
So the protests have begun, at least in the Middle East.
Now, I want to say we've got about a minute and a half for this interview here, and then you're going to show us some maps as we do the extended version of this interview that airs on brighttown.com.
I want to go over those maps with you in the extended interview, so please stay with us.
But I want to ask you, CO2. So we know that one way to increase crop yields is to have higher concentrations of CO2 in the atmosphere.
Every greenhouse grower knows this.
CO2 is often the limiting factor to what you can produce.
And yet we have a global governance here where they're trying to reduce CO2 and even sequester CO2 and pull it out of the atmosphere.
What are your thoughts on CO2 and crop yields?
More the better.
If you know anything about strawberry growing, they pump their greenhouses to 1,200 parts per million to get a higher yield.
And I want to add electrofuels into that, too.
If you're going to tear apart water vapor, H2O, let's call it water, H2O, and CO2, you're going to break that down into carbon and hydrogen, and through electrolysis, you can reassemble those atoms back together, and you can create everything from gases from butane to propane.
You can create liquid fuels like the diesels and what we know, gasolines.
Anything can be reassembled as long as you have the electrolysis and the...frequency and the energy pattern to put it back together.
Well-established science.
What do you think polymers are all about?
It's really fascinating how you're tying systems of money into food production, because really, what's the value of food when you're facing starvation?
Well, it's all the money you have.
But we're out of time for this segment.
David, just stay with me here.
We're going to continue in an extended conversation that will air on Brighteon.com.
For those of you watching today on Brighteon.tv, thank you for watching.
I hope you've enjoyed this.
There's more in the full version of this.
Feel free to share this interview, and thank you for watching Brighteon.tv.
I'm Mike Adams.
Take care.
Okay, David, let's continue with the conversation here, and you sent us some maps, so let's just jump right into those.
The first map is the Cantino, what is that, the Planisphere 1502?
Talk us through that map, because it seems to show that a lot of Africa and modern-day Middle East was lush, wet farmland.
Absolutely.
So, the narrative that we've been giving geologically for changes in What we know as crustal movements or places becoming desert.
They say it takes 6,000 years for it to move over.
And you look at the mid-Holocene northern African deserts and like, oh, it was lush.
There were giraffes running around there.
But it took 6,000 years to get us to this point.
So you think, well, that, okay, 6,000 years, we'll never come back to greening.
But then I trust the cartographers of the day.
That was punishable by death, lying on maps as a cartographer.
So anything that came out as maps from cartographers for the kings and queens of that time, especially Spain.
Spain, they had some of the best.
England as well.
They never fibbed.
You know how detailed the logs were with the English Navy?
Down to the last dot, triple checked everywhere.
So anything with cartography coming from England and Spain, I really trust more than the narratives out of our history books to build a narrative of why things are changing, why they're not.
But that is incredibly green across all the coastlines.
And you'll see bodies of water in there that are no longer, they're now dried lake beds.
But then the other map that, you know, you can clearly see all the river valleys and lakes just littering North Africa, which was, according to modern history, complete desert for the last 2,000 years or so.
Okay, wait, so you're talking about the second map is the Coast of Africa map showing, what, the northwestern portion of the African continent with the rivers?
Yeah, and then if you put those two together, you can really get a good assessment of in the 1500s what it looked like all the way from Morocco clear through the Middle East.
And it's something very different as a picture print of what has been taught to us in regular indoctrination schools of first, second, third grade.
Yeah, absolutely.
Well, and you don't have to tell our audience that history, what we've been taught, is a fake narrative.
So I think you're absolutely right.
The cartographers of the 16th century are far more accurate than the propagandists of our modern age.
No doubt about that.
I'm glad you pointed it out.
Let's go to the next map, the country forecasts and crop losses and yield reductions.
This is a very alarming map.
Walk us through that.
It's the one where North America is all red.
So I did this map as I was consolidating more research from, say, 2015 to 2018.
Well, the trend was anything 45 degrees north latitude and above in the northern hemisphere was going to go offline first in terms of yield and production itself.
And the same with southern hemisphere, 45 degrees south latitude down to the South Pole.
So then you can get which countries are straddling that.
And then you started to see profiles such as Canada downward, downward, downward.
And then China just right a couple days ago said they've had the lowest winter wheat yield that they've ever recorded.
Now, I know they're probably only going back a few hundred years, not several thousand, but still, these countries are pretty easy to peg out.
And then within the United States, you can look at modern minimum temperature reconstruction maps, and you can find specific areas that are in dark blue that will be the first areas to go offline.
I sent you that in the PowerPoint presentation there.
And If you start to map these out, you know that some areas are going to decrease in yield.
So nothing goes to zero.
So you're going to have to bring on new areas on the planet, which were the peach color.
Because if you look at the colors on the map, those areas from Myanmar, which I used to do businesses and I bought coffee.
And that's how I got into this entire sphere of understanding that they were talking about freezes in a place called Burma back in 2014, 13 and 12 when I was buying coffee there.
And I went to a global warming yet a place near the equator called Burma was having crop losses in their coffee plantations because of freezes.
So I know Myanmar pretty good.
They They were only using half of their arable land.
You know, you look at Ukraine, a breadbasket of Europe.
They could have increased production as well.
And Kazakhstan was right on the border edge there.
And where's the extra production going to come from?
Because as you alluded to in your podcast yesterday or the day before, that there's just not many places to expand production currently.
We're going to have to think way outside the box here.
And the red countries are going offline as we speak.
Well, the blue is going to last a couple more years, five to seven years after, but the Tonga eruption in the southern hemisphere has now thrown that completely out the window, where Peru lost 60% of its soybean crop.
Brazil has downgraded, is going to downgrade a second time, probably 15% loss of their soybean crop.
Argentina still continues to not export corn.
You've got the massive dust storms and incredible fires down there.
Wait, how are you relating that to Tonga?
Is that because of the particulate matter?
Yes, and the sulfur dioxide and the sulfur rain or the acid rain coming down.
Okay, got it.
Yeah, and one of the things I mentioned, too, in my podcast is one way you could increase world crop production is to increase CO2 in the atmosphere.
And that would create a warmer, more lush planet.
You'd have more rainfall inland, not just rain on the coast, but then, you know, the rain land would go more inland.
You'd have deserts that could be converted into farmland.
Yes, you would raise the oceans a little bit.
So you would lose some coastal regions, but you would gain a massive amount of global food production.
So what, you know, what a fascinating tradeoff.
To think about and yet we're told lies that CO2 is just a pollution or a pollutant and that it's evil and we have to eliminate it.
Do these people realize that if they take all the CO2 out of the atmosphere that the whole planet dies?
Do they have any clue?
Yeah, I think extinction level event is 190 parts per million.
And where we sit today at around 400, please get me further away from that extinction event, just a few ticks down from where we sit right now.
We're literally some of the lowest CO2 concentrations ever recorded on the history of this planet for billions of years.
Not millions or thousands, billions.
We are so close to the cusp of wiping out all...
Plant life, humanity, and animal life as well.
If we go down toward that 190 era, 200 parts per million, that's what happens.
Well, right.
And also, think about this.
If the CO2 level goes down, and we have lower levels of plant physiology taking place, then we're going to have a lot lower levels of O2 concentrations in the atmosphere, which means that humans begin to asphyxiate, and animals as well.
I mean, oxygen levels, you start dropping into 16%, 15%, people start dropping dead, like, by the billions.
Right.
Yeah, and you see the problem with all the people that are wearing masks so frequently.
They're having hypoxia and different issues.
Can you imagine if that was on a planetary level, not on an individual choice level to mask yourself, but on that's what the air content was of oxygen?
And heaven forbid to even try to add in the crop yield reductions.
We'd be getting, you know, your apples would be that big.
Right, but it seems like, and by the way, we only have a couple minutes left, but it seems like Everything that we're talking about here, every policy by governments is designed to achieve mass extermination of life on planet Earth.
I mean, it's inescapable.
You look at what they're doing, it's the opposite of what you would do if you wanted people to live.
If the plan's chaos, it's an absolute, brilliantly unfolding plan right now.
If your plan is chaos and purposeful destruction and purposeful reset, what is happening now that you might think is absolute insanity?
Sanity on what is happening with the banking industry, the supply chains, the sanctions and everything that's cutting off our food supplies and the gold and silver supplies and everything in between starving ourselves because of the sanctions we're putting on ourselves to starve ourselves.
If you think that's insanity, that's the plan.
The plan is to break it down to start a new system.
It's perfectly working in motion if that's the plan.
And I purposely think it is because you are going to own nothing and you're going to be happy, Mike.
Well, I was just thinking, when the mass starvation and the Mad Max collapse scenario hits Los Angeles, and you could do a man-on-the-street interview, you go talk to somebody who can barely walk, and they weigh 100 pounds, starving to death, and you say, you know, what do you think about the starvation?
And some of them are so brainwashed they would say, if you think this is bad, consider how much Putin is hurting.
You know, because they've been told...
They've been told that they have to suffer in order to punish Russia.
And you hear this from a lot of Democrats right now.
It's like, yeah, we're willing to pay more as long as Putin suffers.
But you don't realize that's not what's happening.
Putin's not suffering that much.
Not as much as we are.
Or about to.
And the politicians, they're making millions off their bribes and kickbacks and business dealings.
An extra $2 a gallon at the pump is not going to hurt them.
Somebody working minimum wage, that hurts them at the pump.
But imagine when bread goes to $10, $12, $50 a loaf, then what?
You know, then they can get you on central bank digital currency and it revolves right back into you're going to need the digital health pass, which is also linked to your digital ration card, which is then going to be linked to your central bank digital currency, UBI, so you don't starve.
And then you'll be like, thank you, government, please give me more.
You know, and that's just, everything keeps linking back.
Any direction you want to go on the conversation is about control, control of the food supply and getting you in some sort of like cattle shoot to control, And that seems to be, they're trying to corral everybody into a cattle chute right now.
Absolutely.
All right, well, this has been a fascinating first discussion.
It's the first time you and I have been able to talk, and obviously we need to talk more.
There's a lot more we could get into.
But give our audience a little bit about where they can find you.
You know, your channel is Adapt2030, but you've got another channel.
Tell people how they can find your work.
Yeah, the main basis is doing the research so I can put out the videos, but at the same time having that research to understand the trends moving out.
And I also have a podcast, Many Ice Age Conversations, where I talk about these 30 minutes to go.
Try to put some things in perspectives and like you do, bring guests on and have conversations about what the solutions are too.
You know, we talked about the problems today, but there's a myriad of solutions that can be put in place right now so you don't have to go through a lot of these things that are about to unfold just because you have the information.
And I feel that's what I'm aligned with my goal and my purpose here in life by doing this, is trying to get people more informed.
Because if you're more informed and you're better prepared, then going through this reset together, because everybody's more prepared, it's going to be better for everybody.
And it's not even on a selfish day.
It's like, if everybody were prepared, we would not even be facing one-fifth of one-eighth of what we're going to face here.
Right, right.
But the oblivious masses are not going to prepare.
They're not going to be informed because they're watching the Kardashians instead of you and I. Building swimming pools.
I want to buy somebody's house.
They were building a swimming pool right now.
A swimming pool.
This chaos that we're going through, they were building a swimming pool.
Imagine the amount of money that you could have used to buy storable foods for your family instead of digging a swimming pool.
And I really just...
I lose part of my faith in humanity when I see things like this, but Adapt 2030 and the Mini Ice Age Conversations podcast.
Okay.
All right.
Well, that's it.
Mini Ice Age Podcasts or Mini Ice Age Conversations and then Adapt 2030.
And David, I want to thank you for sharing your time and your thoughts with us today.
This has been a fascinating conversation.
we'll have to have you back and talk more and especially as things unfold in the next couple of months we're going to need updates from you about like when the crop reports come in in may for example so i just want to thank you for joining us yeah thank you and And this is going to roll out so fast that it's almost going to be in real time.
So the things we discussed today will be in your face and literally a blink of an eye.
Yeah, yeah, no kidding.
All right, strong warning from David Dubine, Adapt 2030.
Check out his videos on brighteon.com and other channels.
And yeah, we're going to be talking about food a lot here with our guests in our interviews.
So check out my channel, of course, for those interviews on brighteon.com.
Thank all of you for joining us today.
Thank you again, David.
And for those of you who want to share this podcast, feel free to do so.
Go ahead and post it on your own channel.
Post it on another platform.
Transcribe it.
Post the transcription.
Share the information.
That's the only way we make it through this together.
Thank you for watching.
I'm Mike Adams, founder of Brighteon.com.
Survival Nutrition is our new free audiobook that you can download right now from survivalnutrition.com.
In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full free audiobook as MP3 files.
▲
Export Selection