All Episodes
Previous Next
May 19, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
43:42
COVID Legal USA founder Brian Wilkins joins Mike Adams to talk vaccine injuries and mandates
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
You have to just look at what you need versus what you want.
And if people start doing that, instead of thinking they need two cars, that they need two phones, that they need satellite and cable TV, no, you need food, water and shelter.
And when it comes to a decision where you're going to essentially commit suicide with these lethal injections to save a job that you're not going to be able to work anyway if you have an adverse reaction, you really have to just reevaluate everything in life and make the best decision for yourself and your family.
Welcome to the Health Ranger Report on Brighteon.TV.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon, and I built this platform so that we can have conversations like the one you're going to hear today.
As a first-time guest, but someone you have probably heard of because he's been doing amazing work on documenting not only the legal parameters surrounding vaccine mandates and mask mandates and forced social distancing and so on, But also his blog, which is called thecovidblog.com, has been documenting some of the people who appear to have passed away after often pushing COVID vaccines on others and then they themselves have expired.
It's not anything to celebrate, but it is important to document what's happening for our world so that we can help save lives.
His name is Brian Wilkins.
COVIDLegalUSA.com is the website.
We're going to bring him in right after this coming break.
So just stay tuned right here on Brighton.tv.
I'm Mike Adams.
We'll be right back with Brian Wilkins.
Stay with us.
All right.
Welcome back, folks.
Mike Adams here at Brighttown.tv.
We're going to bring in Brian Wilkins here from COVIDLegalUSA.com, and he's also the editor-in-chief of TheCOVIDBlog.com.
And don't forget the word the in front of that.
That's TheCOVIDBlog.com.
Brian, welcome to the show today.
It's an honor to have you on.
I'm a fan of your work, and it's great to speak with you.
Hey, Mike.
Thank you for having me on.
I really appreciate it.
I was looking forward to it for quite a while.
Well, this is a fantastic opportunity for us to talk about things that are on so many people's minds.
So you founded covidlegalusa.com.
And in fact, until today, I wasn't even fully aware of what that site offers and how it can help people who are handling some of these, frankly, illegal mandates.
Give us a quick overview, if you would, please, about what is COVID Legal USA and how can it help ordinary Americans fight this battle and win?
Well, so I founded COVID Legal USA in January of this year, because I've worked as a legal writer and legal researcher for attorneys across the country for the last 12, 15 years.
I'm a journalist by trade, but good journalists are good researchers, they're good writers, and that's essentially all law is.
So long story short, I was fired from a radio station in 2007, and I filed a pro se lawsuit.
And 21 days later, I got a five-figure settlement from it.
So I figured, well, hey, if I can make this kind of money off of a lawsuit, well, this is what I should do.
But several lawyers in Arizona saw that, and they started asking me to write their court briefs, do their research, even write some amicus briefs, ghostwrite them, and then somebody else signs them.
So as COVID picked up, I was trying to incorporate it into one of my existing sites, but it just turned into something that needed to be its own entity.
So what COVID Legal USA started as is I was just doing document preparation for COVID. For people who wanted to prepare exemptions for vaccine mandates, mask mandates.
Their businesses were being shut down.
They needed some sort of recourse.
But I met up with a really cool guy who is a great programmer.
He's one of those data analytics guys.
And we started building this database out.
Where I can load in, we hire paralegals all over the country, and what we're trying to do is load as much legal precedent from every state into the database so the people that come to COVID Legal, they can just log right in to the platform, ask questions, and a robot will answer them because it's a fine line between practicing law and not practicing law.
What you do is if you remove the human element, then you're not practicing anything.
So it's kind of like a search algorithm of an ever-increasing data set that you're gathering of legal precedent and legal arguments that other people could use in their own cases.
Not just legal precedent and arguments, but rules of civil procedure, rules of evidence.
So people can, because people have some crazy questions, and I'm not going to give them legal advice.
But if they want to put it into the system, they can do that.
Now, right now, the system is in ultimate beta mode.
We're just trying to get enough loaded in there so people can use it on their own.
So we're still doing a lot manually.
But since a lot has come in from New York and California, those two databases are the most built up right now and are kind of working on their own.
But as people come in from other states, we have to build those databases from the ground up.
So we're still doing a lot manually right now as far as document preparation for potential clients.
So someone who has been, let's say, fired from their job for not taking the vaccine, if they were to hire their own local attorney to represent them, they could direct that attorney to your site and probably save that attorney quite a bit of time in doing research.
Does that sound correct?
That's happened a few times, but what you'll learn is that there's not a lot of attorneys that are going to help anybody with these particular kind of cases.
They're afraid of being canceled.
They're afraid of being, you know, kind of blacklisted in their profession.
And many people come to COVID Legal USA after they've tried to get attorneys to help them and they can't find them or they just don't know how to handle these type of cases because they're just regurgitating the Okay,
so a lot of people are representing themselves is what you're saying because they can't find attorneys.
That's exactly what COVID Legal USA was created for because there just simply aren't enough attorneys that will help you.
It's just like the medical profession.
Once you get these injections, these doctors not only can't help you, but they won't help you because if they do, they're kind of stepping on, you know, biting the hand that feeds them and they can't do that.
And lawyers are, you know, they're doing the same thing if they can't They can't turn their back on their profession, and they have to do what they're supposed to do as far as the blueprint that's been written for them.
But this is extraordinary, what you're describing right now.
I mean, you know, I'm a scientist and we've watched this in the realms of science where you're not allowed to speak against the official narrative, whether that's climate change or that vaccines are safe and effective for everyone, which is a complete lie.
Of course, you know, the government's own statistics show that that's not the case.
You just look at VAERS. But you're saying that this is also happening in the legal profession where attorneys are...
Seemingly intimidated or making their own decision to not even risk having their license yanked.
Isn't this an affront to the very premise of law?
You're supposed to be able to sue figures of authority or institutions of authority to at least bring the case and have the evidence heard.
That's the principle of law.
And that's also the same as doctors not upholding their Hippocratic oaths anymore.
It's the same thing with attorneys.
And I'll give you an example, because I have a client now that she just recently got divorced, and it's a divorce case.
But her husband has received the injections, and now he wants their 12-year-old son to receive the injections, but she does not.
But the only attorney that would help her has no idea about any of this stuff.
And when he's responding to the briefs that her husband's attorney are filing, just regurgitating what he hears on television, and he's not making the arguments that he needs to.
And that's why...
So I send her what...
She'll essentially record every meeting she has with him.
I'll listen to them.
And then I'll give her some talking points that she can give to her attorney, send her some documents that he can use.
And hopefully, he kind of not only reads it himself and learns what's actually happening, but can actually represent her in a way that's actually going to...
Yield something positive.
But that's happening a lot, that people are hiring attorneys.
They just don't know what to do because there's just not enough of them that are paying attention outside of the mainstream narrative.
Well, I know I've interviewed Attorney Thomas Renz several times.
I was speaking with him earlier, and he said just in the time that he and I are talking on the phone, he'll get like 25 emails from people begging for help with similar situations, family situations, people who have typically an elderly family member in the hospital, And the hospital is denying treatment with prescribed ivermectin, for example, or denying the ability of the family member to accompany that person and serve as their advocate in a health care setting and so on.
There are, you know, people are suffering their emergencies every minute of every day across this country.
And I'm sure you're seeing that.
You know, thank God you're helping people, but you can't possibly help everybody that needs it.
It's just too many, right? - Well, and that's the thing.
I mean, I feel kind of bad because sometimes I'm two weeks behind answering emails because people just simply don't know where to turn.
But they'll read a story on the COVID blog.
You mentioned ivermectin.
They'll read a story on the COVID blog how, you know, someone was on their last breath and they got ivermectin.
And next thing you know, two days later, they were completely healthy.
But doctors cannot prescribe it.
They will not prescribe it.
That petulant, childish tweet that the FDA put out calling it horse dewormer, CNN calling it horse dewormer.
I mean, people actually, you know, those that aren't, that don't look outside of mainstream sources, they believe that.
And they just don't, you know, they're afraid to try something, a Nobel Prize winning medicine, but they'll, you know, inject an experimental shot into themselves.
But as far as ivermectin now, I believe there's now 82 peer-reviewed studies showing that it is not only the most effective prophylaxis, but also the best treatment for advanced COVID-19 So there's really just at this point...
I don't want to call it willful ignorance, but the bottom line is, and the thing I also wanted to bring up is ivermectin is an antiparasitic.
So that alone, I don't really know what COVID-19 is, because if it's truly a virus and an antiparasitic shouldn't be that effective against it, yet there's all these studies that are showing that people that are deathly ill with so-called COVID-19, two days later, they take ivermectin, they're 100% healthy.
So again, you know, this isn't, we're not going to get into that discussion, but if If COVID is caused by some sort of virus, then an antiparasitic drug shouldn't be that effective against it, and yet it is.
So that just raises more questions.
Well, you're right.
And there are many questions being raised right now.
And I think the good news is, it's not just people like yourself or myself who are raising the questions.
We're starting to see a lot of backlash, even from pop culture, from United States senators like Senator Rand Paul, for example.
Many, many questions, a lot of evidence coming out.
But let me shift gears for a second and ask your take on this.
A lot of the so-called vaccine mandates are being pushed through what I would characterize as gaslighting.
They're just bluffing their way through this.
And the perfect example is Joe Biden announcing the federal mandate via executive order and putting a December 8th deadline, I think, for companies that do business with the government to force their own employees to be vaccinated.
And yet he bases this on the promise that OSHA will publish some future rule, which has not been published.
And according to the attorneys that I've spoken with, the moment it's published, they're going to be hit with multiple lawsuits and probably a judge will order it to be suspended pending further evidentiary hearings and so on.
So yet you see corporate CEOs across America saying, well, there's a federal mandate.
But there really isn't, is there?
Well, there hasn't been an act of Congress.
No, there is no federal mandate.
The governor of Arizona is currently challenging the so-called Biden mandate.
That's what it is.
It's not a vaccine mandate in federal court.
And we've been talking about...
You know, the executive orders have become this big thing really ever since the Obama administration where U.S. presidents have become more and more powerful really ever since, you know, 9-11, since George W. Bush.
And, you know, we never really heard about executive orders prior to that.
But some of the most dramatic changes in our society have happened through these things called executive orders that are not laws.
And they can easily be challenged because, yes, they do have some level of authority, but Joe Biden's vaccine mandate, his executive order, is not a law.
It's not an act of Congress.
Congress makes the laws.
The courts interpret the laws.
And the president is sort of the mediary between those two.
So the president is not a king.
The president cannot just say, well, this is what we're going to do, and that's how it is.
I mean, I believe that whole DACA thing was an executive order by President Obama, and that's being challenged on the same grounds.
Congress did not pass that law.
And as long as people keep that in mind, that until there is legislative action, On these mandates, which there really hasn't been anywhere, there are a lot of states that have taken legislative action to ban vaccine passports, to ban mandates, to ban mask mandates.
Like I said, I'm from the state of Iowa.
We have no mask mandates.
There's healthcare mandates for vaccines, but you don't really see that stuff anywhere, and that's frankly why I'm back here.
It's interesting that when states pass laws that are signed by their governors into law to achieve things such as banning private employers from requiring vaccines among their employees, then you have Jen Psaki, the White House spokesperson, saying, well, the federal government trumps state government.
But in this case, the federal government has not passed a law like you just said.
It's a federal executive order Versus a state legislative law that has been signed and affirmed.
And how can they claim federal supremacy with executive orders over state laws that have been passed?
It's the same thing.
Like I said, ever since the turn of the 21st century, just presidents have had more power than they've ever had.
I mean, the U.S. Department of Defense, and I just want to go back a little further, was created by the NSA Act in 1947.
And before that, it was the War Department.
And the United States had been in two overseas wars total in the I guess 200, 300 years that the War Department existed.
And ever since 1947, 48, we've been in perpetual war.
And now presidents can essentially send troops wherever they want.
There's no such thing as a declaration of war.
There's no such thing as, I mean, presidents have so much more power, but the people don't really understand how The power of and really the structure of US government.
And that's why they're able to get away with it, especially with a monopolized media that sort of reinforce everything that the presidents are doing.
But I would characterize it as saying that these presidents are asserting Power that they don't have and then the people are going along with it.
So a lot of this doesn't come out of the oblivious consent of the people who are going along with something that they don't have to go along with.
Now, for example, when Trump was president and you had leftists in Well, that was widely accepted by the entire media and by, you know, political opponents of Trump, for example, and they simply nullified it.
Given that action, isn't that a perfect demonstration that when the people say, hey, we're not going to go along with this, that those so-called powers have no power?
You could have states that declare themselves to be FDA sanctuary states.
They're like, we're not going to follow the FDA anymore.
Well, I just published an article last week on the entire depopulation agenda, and if you haven't read that one, I think you'll really like it.
But we've gotten to a point, and I believe that September 11th was sort of the testing ground as far as what the government and media can get away with as far as what the public is going to believe and how much they can get away with.
We all saw with our own eyes what happened that day, but the 19 Muslims with box cutters thing really stuck, and then the Patriot Act was passed, and Americans were scared into getting used to giving up their rights.
And if the government says it, and if the media say it, then it must be correct.
And it just keeps going deeper and deeper into this point where we're at now that you can see a human being with a beard and a bulge, but they'll say they're a woman.
And if you don't go along with that, there's something wrong with you.
And really, in these last two decades, these PSYOPs, they're so powerful and you I've worked in media for a long time.
I had to quit myself because I saw firsthand what goes on in mainstream media, and I wanted no part of it.
But the CIA has admitted for 60 years that they use media to manipulate narratives.
The government goes along with it.
And right now, the U.S. populace and really the global populace, at least in the Western world, they're going along with it so well that the powers that be don't even really have to do much.
I mean, it's kind of on autopilot right now, and there's only a small portion of the population of people like yourself, myself, that are trying to keep the truth coming out.
And it's just kind of just working against the grain here.
Well, you're exactly right, and you pointed out something really important, which is that this process began decades ago, well, 20 years ago in the case of 9-11, and yet now it seems that they've abandoned even the facade of having a legal structure that is an institutional pillar of society.
So now they just do whatever they want to do, and then almost as an afterthought, they kind of pretend that it has some legal basis.
You know, whether it's vaccine mandates or lockdowns.
How about this idea of lockdowns where a governor like Newsom can come along and say, well, you can't run your hair salon or your restaurant because of whatever reason.
Therefore, you know, boom, you just can't do it.
And there's no legal basis.
There's not even a scientific basis for it.
If you go to the PCR tests that are used to diagnose, quote, cases, they are fraudulent.
Yet it doesn't seem to matter.
At this point, you can show people just documented evidence of what's happening, and they either want to believe it, they'll think critically, or they just simply don't want to be told that they were wrong this whole time.
And like you said, Dr. Kahneman.
Kerry Mullis back in, I'm sure you've seen those videos of him, the Nobel Prize winning scientist who created the PCR test, has straight up said on video and in documents that these tests do not diagnose anything and they can essentially make You can essentially make PCR tests, say whatever you want them to say.
And even Dr.
Fauci on a podcast admitted that any PCR cycles above 30, and I believe the US for most of 2020 was using 40 PCR cycles, which is essentially you're going to find anything you want at that point.
But even Dr.
Dr. Fauci in a podcast admitted over 30 cycles, you're pretty much looking at dead nucleotides.
But the U.S. and Britain and most of Europe have been using these 40 to 45 cycle thresholds.
And that's where all these cases are coming from.
And there's a manuscript, a peer-reviewed manuscript, that found that if all of the PCR tests and all the COVID cases from 2020 were done with a threshold of 30 cycles, then the number of COVID cases would have been 90% less than what then the number of COVID cases would have been 90% less than what they're reporting for Well, exactly right.
And that's the PCR tests, which are even more accurate than the field swab tests, which are a complete joke.
They're so riddled with false positives and false negatives that even if you take two or three tests, you still have no confidence of the results.
And many times those tests will contradict each other.
Now, we're about out of time for this segment here on Brighttown.tv.
I want to encourage the viewers, stick with us here.
We're going to have an extended conversation on Brighttown.com, on my channel, Health Ranger Report.
Brian's website, he's the founder, is covidlegalusa.com.
And then there's also thecovidblog.com, which is actually the site that I've been watching.
And we even spider that site and list it on censored.news because there's such great coverage there on thecovidblog.com.
So thank you for watching brighttown.tv today, and this continues on brighttown.com.
Okay, Brian, thank you for sticking with me here now in the extended conversation.
I'd like to talk about thecovidblog.com for a minute, because you seem to cover stories Where people, you'll find their social media where they have, in some cases, mocked non-vaccinated people, in other cases celebrated themselves taking the vaccine, and then they died or they were seriously maimed or one of those combinations.
Why are you looking at these stories and what do you think the function is of publicizing these?
So we're all learning everything about these shots in real time.
The doctors don't know.
Moderna doesn't know.
Pfizer doesn't know.
We're all learning this in real time.
What I'm doing is compiling data that at the end of this year and the end of every year, God willing, I'm going to produce reports on everything that I'm finding.
And with those cases you're talking about, the virtue signalers, the really vitriolic, nasty people...
There's an established pattern that these people really are regular, normal folks until they get their first shot.
And then once they get that shot, their personalities completely change.
They turn into these nasty, just vile people that curse every other word.
They wish death on everybody.
But prior to the shots, that didn't happen.
And there's plenty going on as far as that body activity data apparatus that was patented by Microsoft last year.
And then when you look at the patent documents...
It says that something has to be inside or on the human body for this thing to work.
And I don't know if it's just being under the influence of the mRNA or viral vector DNA solutions.
I don't know if there's something that is, you know, from some central...
I mean, not to get into conspiracies or whatever, but there is an established pattern that once these normal people get these shots, they turn into nasty individuals, and that has to have something to do with the injections that they're putting into their bodies.
Well, that's extraordinary, and it is a plausible conclusion because we know the spike protein.
Well, first of all, we know the vaccine circulates throughout the body.
It doesn't stay localized at the injection site.
We know that the spike protein attacks vascular cells, but also neurological cells.
So we know that there are ACE2 receptors on certain neurological cells throughout the body.
We also know that people who have suffered from spike protein exposure or infections can at times suffer a temporary or permanent loss of hearing and olfactory senses, both of which involve neurology, obviously, tied to the both of which involve neurology, obviously, tied to the brain, obviously.
But so I'm just adding that it is plausible that these vaccines may be causing selective cognitive changes that could be expressed as personality differences.
And that's what you believe that you are seeing, correct?
I have no other, like I said, I'm a journalist.
I'm not a doctor.
All I'm doing is looking at the data that I've compiled for myself.
And there's just too many of these cases that look exactly the same.
And there's also the fact that...
Some of these, they'll get the injections.
Nothing's wrong with them for, you know, 12 to 16 weeks.
These are the cases I call the near-term cases where everything's fine with them for 12 to 14 weeks.
Then suddenly they become very nasty.
A week later, they have a stroke or a heart attack and they end up, you know, and they end up dead.
The other thing that I have to believe in my soul is that a lot of the shots, the injections that are being administered now, a large portion of them have to be placebos because there's no way that the variance and how people are reacting to these can be this wide.
Now, of course, I can only cover so many of these.
VAERS can only cover so many of these.
If we trust that Harvard Pilgrim study from, I believe, 2001, then we can multiply the 17,000 deaths in VAERS by 100, and that's probably closer to the real number.
But even then, that's still low.
So I just have to believe that they didn't want to...
We've totally released the real injections in January 2021.
If everybody's dropping dead, coming down with neurological disorders all at once, then everybody's going to know.
But right now, media are controlling the narrative well enough that...
Even when people come to my blog, they're still going to be skeptical because CNN's not saying it, because MSNBC's not saying it.
So they have to hear it from one of their mainstream sources to even accept that this is really happening.
Well, I almost think that brain damage from vaccines makes people more qualified to watch CNN. It's like suddenly they fit right in.
But...
You also have covered many pilots that are suffering accidents while flying small aircraft.
And the reason that's notable for those of you watching here is because in small aircraft, it's typically just one pilot.
It's just one person flying.
So you don't have a backup co-pilot like you typically have in commercial aircraft.
I think I'm going to go.
It goes from a cognitive aware state to suddenly they're talking like a stroke victim and nothing's making sense and they're disoriented and they fly right into a neighborhood house or other terrain.
Tell us about what are your thoughts on pilots and small aircraft crashing?
Well, that story you're talking about, I just published that one this morning.
And here's what, and I'm not an expert in anything.
I'm a journalist.
I have to be a jack of all trades.
But from what I understand, those smaller planes aren't pressurized on the inside like the large commercial planes, and I could be wrong on them.
No, you're correct.
I'm a pilot, and you're right.
They're not pressurized.
Okay.
And what happened in the instant case that you're talking about?
You're right.
You could hear him audibly speaking.
Everything was fine.
And then at about two minutes in, you can kind of hear him talking like...
And that's exactly what happens when somebody has a stroke.
We've also covered several cases of post-injection strokes on the site where people start talking funny, and the next thing you know, they just collapse to the ground.
That's what I believe happened here.
Now, I put a disclaimer at the beginning of that article.
There's no definitive proof that his name is Dr.
Das.
There's no definitive proof he's had the injections, but he is a doctor in Arizona.
That's the only profession that is allowed to do vaccine mandates in the healthcare profession.
The American Medical Association released a survey that found that 96% of doctors in the United States are fully vaccinated.
So just going by the circumstantial evidence and the fact that his friends at the Yuma Regional Medical Center said that Dr.
Das had flown that route hundreds of times and everything was fine and then all of a sudden this happens.
Well, there's only one thing that's really different that's happened.
So Again, I put those disclaimers right in there.
There's no definitive evidence.
It's circumstantial, but it's just right in line with so many other cases that we've covered.
Well, thank you for that explanation and also for the disclaimers.
And it's important to note that, of course, doctors are a profession that probably has the highest vaccination rates of any profession in America right now.
It also happens that many doctors own small aircraft because they have the financial means to do so.
And also from that video that you posted as part of your article there, I should note that, you know, non-pressurized aircraft are limited to altitude of 12,500 feet.
And this crash took place under 3,000 feet.
I think it was around 2,800 was somewhere around there, if I remember that correctly, where that was ground level.
And he hit a residential area, even though there were mountains and fields and things around this kind of suburb.
You know, he wasn't committing suicide.
Or he would have chosen to fly into one of those mountains or hills nearby.
He actually killed someone, I think a UPS driver, that was parked at a house, and he set two homes on fire, didn't he?
Yeah.
Well, and he was 17 miles from the airport where he was going to land.
So I assume he had started to descend several miles prior to that.
Because the air traffic controllers didn't seem to believe anything was wrong when he was at the 2,800 feet.
They were guiding him in.
They even told him which runway to use when he did get there.
But Again, as the audio went on, they started saying, well, you seem like you're veering off course.
And then the panic in their voice, you could hear it.
Okay, sir, you're descending.
We need you to go up to 4,000 feet.
And then they start yelling louder.
We need you to go to 5,000 feet.
And he just kept descending.
Yeah, and what's interesting about that is he kept replying in the affirmation.
The air traffic control would say, climb to 4,000, and you would hear him say something like, 4,000.
And in other words, this wasn't a communications failure.
And this did not seem to be a mechanical failure of the aircraft.
There were no indications of that.
He was communicating with air traffic control, but he lost...
Awareness or cognitive...
He basically turned into Joe Biden right there in the cockpit is what happened.
He started mumbling.
Again, all we can do is go by what we have.
What I heard is a normal landing from a layman's perspective.
I've spoken to a flight instructor.
He's emailed me back and forth about this story.
Even he says that from what he heard in that audio and a couple of mainstream media people have said that he was obviously disoriented.
Well, how did that happen so suddenly?
And the only way that's going to happen is if he's having some sort of stroke.
Well, this man was healthy.
And he was fine on this landing, and then literally in a matter of 90 seconds, his whole demeanor changed.
And that's how strokes happen.
And I also found a study out of Tokyo that found that 62% of stroke victims who exhibit slurred speech right before they, I mean, they essentially die, 62% of them do, if they exhibit slurred speech.
Well, yes, the blood is no longer going to the parts of the brain that control speech.
So, yes, very typical symptomatic.
But what's interesting about this, and we only have a few minutes left, and I thank you for spending extra time with us.
But what's interesting or relevant to society is that we are told by the authorities that vaccines make the public safer.
But in this case, and also we could argue with drivers on roads and we're seeing vac-cidents.
I mean, I witnessed it just the other day on the interstate here in Texas.
I couldn't believe how many accidents I saw.
I've never seen that before.
But if vaccinated people are behind the wheel or behind the yoke in a cockpit, they are a danger to others.
And in this case, that pilot killed a man and injured a couple other people, burned down people's homes, could have wiped out families.
And maybe that's yet to come.
So this is highly alarming of the risks to society of vaccinated pilots and drivers.
Well, we've already covered two stories of drivers within two, three days having seizures behind the wheel.
And luckily, nobody was hurt in those situations, but they're having seizures within days after the shots.
And calling authorities and luckily so far, at least from my perspective, we haven't covered anybody being injured.
But at this point, you either want to know what's going on or you don't.
You can look at how...
States that have high vaccination rates have the highest COVID case counts, if you trust all the Johns Hopkins and the CDC numbers.
And if these vaccines, if that's what we're calling them, truly do anything, then it should be an inverse correlation and not a positive correlation.
But in every state, in every country, as these vaccination rates go up, the so-called Delta variant rates go up.
COVID goes up.
And you can present this to people, and it still doesn't matter.
And that's where we're at, like we were talking about a little earlier, that most of the population, I believe, is just too far gone.
And you can't save them.
They don't want to save themselves.
They believe they're doing society a favor.
They believe they're doing it for the greater good.
I tell so many people that write me that, you know, because it's probably three weeks sometimes at COVID Legal where we can actually get back to them.
I mean, why get the shot?
If you're dead or maimed, your job doesn't matter anyway.
Right?
I say the same thing.
So just quit.
And I don't tell people, I mean, you know, make your employer fire you, but I don't tell people to do stuff that I wouldn't do myself.
You have to re you have to rethink life.
You have to you have to just look at what you need versus what you want.
And if people start doing that, instead of thinking they need two cars, that they need two phones, that they need satellite and cable TV, no, you need food, water and shelter.
And when it comes to a decision where you're going to essentially commit suicide with these lethal injections to save a job that you're not going to be able to work anyway, if you have an adverse reaction, you really have to just reevaluate everything in life and make the best decision for yourself you really have to just reevaluate everything in life and make the best Words of wisdom.
Very well stated, Brian.
Thank you for sharing that with us.
And just one final thought before we go.
And again, thank you for your time.
I did a song back in 2011 called Vaccine Zombie.
And it's like we're now seeing vaccine zombies in society.
And we know that the vaccines are erasing people's immune systems over time.
What if the neurological damage is progressive?
With each passing week, more personality changes, more loss of cognition, more loss of motor control, more risk of just passing out.
It's going to be inescapable if we start to see that.
Well, I mean, we're starting to see it, but it's going to be inescapable if it gets even larger here over the next few months.
So that's just my final comment.
Brian, I want to thank you so much for your time.
It's been a pleasure to speak with you today.
I really appreciate what you're doing.
I think the world appreciates you too as well.
Thank you so much for joining us today.
Mike, thank you very much for having me on.
It was a great conversation.
Thank you very much.
Absolutely.
I love having conversations with brilliant people, and I consider you that, Brian.
And I love your mind.
You're a very structured thinker, and you are going through the details here.
So, folks, if you want Brian's help, go to covidlegalusa.com and also check out the covidblog.com.
Brian does offer his services for compensation.
For those who need consultancy or help in various ways, you can get details about that at his website, COVID Legal USA. And also feel free to repost this interview anywhere you'd like, folks.
Thank you for your time today, for watching.
Thank you, Brian, for your time.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon.com.
Everybody stay safe out there and take care.
Survival Nutrition is our new free audiobook that you can download right now from survivalnutrition.com.
In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, The Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full, free audiobook as MP3 files.
▲
Export Selection