All Episodes
Previous Next
May 18, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
55:59
Dr. Paul Cottrell: The covid vaccine is a government bioweapons "antidote" gone awry
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
So what I'd like to cover today is the innate immune system downregulation.
From the actual vaccine from Moderna and how that leads to the antibody-dependent enhancement.
And what I'd like to do is also talk about how the artificial intelligence algorithms they are using to predict future variants, and then they would retool their vaccine to that future variant and how that's tied to the actual weapons program in the United States. and then they would retool their vaccine to that future
Welcome to the Health Ranger Report here on Brighton.tv, plus an extended conversation today with Dr. Paul.
Paul Cottrell, who we've interviewed many times since the beginning of this entire pandemic.
And today he's going to be joining us with his whiteboard explanation of what's wrong with Moderna.
He's going to reveal exactly how the Moderna COVID vaccine destroys immune function over time.
That's something that we've heard a lot about in the news.
People losing an estimated 5% of their immune function per week, at least according to some estimates and some data sets.
But it's more than that.
Moderna has ties to DARPA and the Bioweapons Program.
And in fact, there are elements of Moderna's research and design that have ties into bioweapons pathways.
And that may be very interesting for where this is headed.
But only Dr.
Paul Cottrell could explain it to us all.
He's going to do it on the whiteboard here as soon as we return.
After this break, stay with us.
This is Brighteon.tv.
We'll be right back with Dr.
Cottrell.
All right.
Welcome back, folks.
Mike Adams here, the founder of Brighteon, and we're joined today by Dr.
Paul Cottrell.
Now, Dr.
Cottrell...
First of all, thank you for joining us.
We love your whiteboard presentations.
People really want to know the mechanics of how this is happening, how these things work.
So could you give us, please, just an overview, first of all, kind of what you're going to cover today before you dive into the details?
Right, right.
So what I'd like to cover today is the innate immune system downregulation.
From the actual vaccine from Moderna and how that leads to the antibody-dependent enhancement.
And what I'd like to do is also talk about how the artificial intelligence algorithms they are using to predict future variants and then they would retool their vaccine to that future variant and how that's tied to the actual weapons program in the United States.
Okay, so as background, I think I need to mention to our audience that Moderna is a creation of DARPA, effectively.
It came out of the U.S. military weapons program.
So how is it that this became, you know, a medical...
How is it that this became medicine, injecting the American people instead of...
Right.
It's kind of simple and it's kind of complicated, but let's stick with the simplicity for today.
The simplicity is that the United States was developing weapons, biological weapons, and that you have to have an antidote for your soldiers and for your society before you drop the weapon.
Moderna, through the messenger RNA platform, through DARPA, was one of the means for the antidote for the bioweapons program in the United States.
It's not the only one.
The nanoferritin is also one of the antidotes.
Wait, so are you saying that they have an antidote right now?
The messenger RNA platform that Moderna is using in their vaccine was the antidote for the SARS-CoV-2 weapons system.
They also have an antidote that's not published that's with SARS-CoV-2 and the H protein from influenza.
And I stated on your show last time that they have been developing through Barrick's lab a weapon system that has a fully functional HIV spike protein.
There are three different viruses that have been developed in Barrick's lab.
Let me back up.
We've got to simplify this, not just, I mean, for me as well, because you are very technical, you're very high IQ. Let me just try to simplify it down.
So you're saying the mRNA platform could be used to administer both weapons and antidotes to bioweapons, correct?
No, no.
What I'm saying...
No, no, no, no.
That's not what I'm saying.
What I'm saying is that there was a virus that was made, all right?
And that virus...
It needs an antidote for our military and our society.
That antidote is the nanofurritin and the messenger RNA platform for Moderna.
The Moderna vaccine is the antidote, but there's problems with it.
Just like the vaccines they were given to the soldiers that were in Iraq during the Gulf War, you know, Desert Storm, and they had the Gulf Syndrome.
That's because the antidotes they were given, the vaccines they were given, weren't As safe and foolproof and effective as they should have been.
Okay, so then, all right, thank you for correcting me.
So then let me restate this, if I understand you correctly.
You're saying that Fauci, the NIH, EcoHealth Alliance, DAZAC, BEREC, and so on, we know they funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab.
We know that they were then part of the development of the weapon that was released on the world.
And you're saying that Moderna...
Was supposed to be the antidote to protect Americans from that biological weapon that was released upon the world that was funded by American taxpayers?
Yes.
Yes.
Wow.
Yes.
Wow.
Yes.
But it's not foolproof.
It has lots of problems.
And this is why it's really important for people to understand what is the weapon and what is, quote, the antidote and what are the problems with the antidote.
And that's what I wanted to bring up.
That's what you're going to get into.
Okay, before we get into that though, I just got to interrupt you because this is the first time I'm hearing this.
A lot of our viewers are going to have a very difficult time believing, and I have a difficult time believing, that our government would do anything to save Americans.
It seems like they're trying to kill us, not save us.
Well, they want spectral dominance.
How do you have spectral dominance, especially in biologics, unless you have an antidote to what you're going to drop in the battlefield?
Moderna was one of the companies that was contracted, and Barracks Lab was also doing it.
You know, Barracks Lab was not only developing weapons, biological weapons, but was developing the antidote for the biological weapon.
So...
I can understand them having an antidote for the politically connected elite, you know, the people they want to survive, the controllers.
But to hand out the antidote to the population at large, that doesn't...
Well, you know, I still hold my ground, Mike.
The weapon is SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-2 plus influenza, which has the H protein on it, and then SARS-CoV-2 with the fully functional glycoprotein 120 and glycoprotein 41.
Okay, one more question.
And Moderna was contracted through DARPA to develop a platform.
Remember, it's a platform.
Develop a platform so it's plug and play that they would know if they are going to drop something, that they have a means to be able to inoculate their soldiers primarily.
And because when you drop a weapon like this, you can't control where it's going to go.
That's right.
And therefore, you're eventually going to have to inoculate your society.
All right, one more question before we get into all this.
I'm sorry for all the questions up front, but we have to establish the context here.
Then do you believe that they, whoever they are, the globalists or maybe America's military leaders, are they going to drop another weapon that is far more serious than SARS-CoV-2 and that, according to your theory, that this is why they needed the population and the military to be inoculated?
They need the population inoculated for the weapons that we were going to drop and the potentiality of the weapons that the CCP would drop.
And so what's happening is there's an escalation of biologics between the CCP and the United States.
The order wants a war between the United States and the CCP. And what's going to happen is that Taiwan's going to fall.
We're not going to backstop Taiwan.
And what this will lead towards is a two-, three-, or four-decade-long Cold War Version 2.
Nile Ferguson has already done a ton of podcasts about this, that we're not going to backstop Taiwan, and that this is going to be Cold War 2.
And there's going to be a lot of money to be made in it, and there's going to be an escalation in weapon systems, especially in biologics.
That's why the order wants this.
It's money.
It's money.
Well, that is believable.
We could debate about Taiwan, I think.
If the West loses Taiwan's microchip supply, it's over for America and Europe, and also strategic base, intelligence, and so on.
The naval ports on the east coast of Taiwan, access to deep ocean waters, and so on.
Right.
To your point, there's two pathways here.
It's either the three-decade-long Cold War or what Noam Chomsky says, that if Taiwan falls, you're going to have terminal destruction very quickly.
And I think you're falling in the line with that.
If we lose the semiconductor industry, we're probably going to have to move quickly.
And then if you move quickly, then we're moving towards terminal destruction.
Okay.
All right.
Look, I want the audience to know, you and I, we didn't pre-talk about any of this.
For us, this is a real-time interaction of ideas, and I'm sorry I'm taking away time from your whiteboard.
I know you want to get into that.
that it's just that the overriding understanding now is that this is a depopulation weapon for the world because of climate change you know so-called climate change they're trying to depopulate America and depopulate the world so go ahead with your presentation No, no, no.
They're going to depopulate.
I guarantee you that.
War between China and the United States.
That's where the depopulation is going to happen.
It's not going to be through a vaccine.
Now, I do believe that the vaccine, though, is going to cause a lot of immune disorders.
And I believe that we're going to start seeing AIDS-like syndrome.
Okay, go ahead.
I'm sorry to take so much of your time.
Because of the vaccine program.
Go ahead and jump.
Hold on.
Sorry.
Okay.
Sorry about all the interruptions.
Go for it.
It's all yours.
Okay, so what I wanted to do to explain to the public here is the innate immune system side of this.
There's also an adaptive immune system side of this, down-regulating B cells and T cells.
I can go into that later on a different show, but I just wanted to focus on the innate immune system.
So quickly, because at the time, SARS-CoV-2 comes into a cell, okay?
Normal, you know, your weapon, all right?
Your biological weapon, all right?
It puts in the RNA of its genome in, and what happens is that an interferon A actually upregulates PKR, okay?
This is a protein kinase R, and what that does is it dimerizes.
When it dimerizes, it will actually phosphorylate an elongation factor.
When it phosphorylates the elongation factor, what happens is it stops protein kinase.
This is how the cell says, I've been infected by something foreign, I want to turn off.
When that happens, it has something called RNA cell.
It basically is something that eats up RNA. And when it's activated, it starts to go into an apoptosis.
So that is an innate response to something foreign, RNA or DNA from a virus foreign.
In addition, when this is happening, it is pushing out interferon A and telling other cells, this is a really important piece here, telling other cells to prime for a potential viral infection.
So what it does is it upregulates interferon receptors.
If it does get infected, it's already primed to activate the RNase L and then go into apoptosis.
This is why people didn't see influenza infections in 2020.
Because of this was happening.
You had people getting infected.
The innate immune system was activated for antiviral, and the surrounding cells were able to box it in.
Okay?
So influenza cases went down through natural infection of SARS-CoV-2.
Now, go with...
Moderna.
Okay?
And Moderna has their lipid nanoparticle.
And it comes in, and it gives you this messenger RNA. The messenger RNA from this lipid nanoparticle will actually stop this cascade and allow for elongation factor to code for the spike protein.
The reason why Moderna works is that it has to trick the body to say, I'm not foreign.
Okay?
So it has to make sure that this elongation factor 2 is not phosphorylated.
So it can get its proteins created.
Okay?
When that all happens, activated RNA cell doesn't happen.
So apoptosis doesn't happen.
And it doesn't secrete out Interferon A. So the other cells are not primed.
But then if there's some other infection happening, the body's not going to respond.
Exactly.
You got it.
And this is why you're starting to hear other infections happening.
You got it.
Mike, you got it.
100%.
Right?
Okay.
So this is the reason why you have now the CDC saying, oh, we need to multiplex for SARS-CoV-2 and influenza because we're going to see cases spike.
Well, you have a vaccine program that's actually shutting down your innate immune system.
Yeah, I do follow.
And just to add to that, NPR was even reporting today emergency rooms across America are being filled with people now who have very, very serious sickness symptoms that they say are completely unrelated to COVID. It's not COVID. It's other kinds of sicknesses.
Exactly.
So when you do a vaccine program and it spikes, you have a certain lag and then all of a sudden you start to see other cases of things.
You can see there's actually a two-and-a-half-month lag between variants, strangely enough.
That's the antibody-dependent enhancement that Malone's talking about.
But not only do you have cases spiking two-and-a-half months later, but you have a lag period because of this situation.
You have other diseases popping up.
And this is where the medical community is not talking about the negative things that are happening with this vaccine program.
Including cancer, by the way.
That's one of the big ones.
Right, right, right, right.
So now that's the innate immune system.
Now when you start downregulating B cells and T cells, then you're going to start having cancers that start to pop up.
And you're going to have this syndrome that I call AIDS-like syndrome.
It's going to start popping up because of this down-regulation of adaptive immune system.
So if you have any questions, I'll answer them on the innate immune system.
I wanted to go into the ADE, the antibody-dependent enhancement.
Well, yeah, but I actually do have a question.
So in the minds of those...
According to your theory here, in the minds of, I don't know, DARPA, the Pentagon, the government, what they are saying to themselves is, in order to protect America from the big bioweapon, they are willing to see some suppression of immunity, thinking that, okay, even if this vaccine kills a million people, it's a lot less than 100 million that would be killed by the bioweapon.
Is that kind of what you're saying?
You got it.
And it's exactly the same logic that they were using with nuclear.
They put soldiers out in the field and they detonated five-ton nuclear weapons to see what would happen to their soldiers.
That's right.
There's videos on YouTube on this, all right?
They have practiced and tested on military personnel for decades.
There is no reason why we should think they're not doing the same thing to the general public.
That's why I think that not only do we need to hold Fauci and the researchers...
For crimes against humanity.
But we have to go to the Pentagon, and we have to say, hey, you were developing weapon systems that you should not have been doing.
You've been playing around with the genome to have spectral dominance in biologics, and now you have either on purpose or accidental release.
I think it was on purpose, but, you know...
Depends on where you're from.
But you have a release that has taken place and now has changed the whole landscape in terms of economics, in terms of geopolitics, in terms of civil liberties.
This is one of the biggest events in the last 150 years.
Right now, SARS-CoV-2 is the biggest 150-year event that we've seen.
No, you're exactly right.
However, well, to add to that, With what you're describing there, the degradation of the immune response, doesn't this then make people essentially dependent on continued injections of mRNA instructions?
Is this the point that that's what I wanted to get to with the artificial intelligence?
Okay, go for it.
I'm going to jump right to the artificial intelligence.
I think that's how you pronounce it.
He's the CEO of Moderna.
What he stated is that he's coined it as Vaccine Shield.
Like he's Captain Kirk from Starship Enterprise.
What's happening is that The Pentagon is going to be developing and has developed viruses and they need vaccines.
And it's what they're developing and what they think their enemy is developing.
And we have to have antidotes for both.
So Moderna is one of the companies that are going to be making the antidotes.
So what they do is they have an AI. And that AI is taking the 30,000 genomes The 30,000 nucleotide genome of SARS-CoV-2.
And it knows what regions on the genome have high percentage of...
Variability.
Variability.
And they know areas that have low.
So they know high and low variability areas.
And then what they do is that they'll crunch it thousands of times and modify the actual nucleotides.
In the areas where there's high probability or high percentage of mutation.
From the database, it's already in CBI. So once they do that, then they can take that iteration and then model the actual spike protein.
All right?
Three-dimensional.
Then they have, in the model, they can dock it into the ACE receptor, the ACE2 receptor.
And they can test the affinity and the pull strength.
That's right.
Okay?
All right?
So they're categorizing each one of these iterations based on pull strength, based on affinity to the receptor, and they can also determine, when they model that spike protein for that iteration, What antibodies will have in silico, what antibodies are predicted to not work for the new spike protein?
So when they do that, once they figure out, once they do that thousands and thousands of iterations, they filter that.
And they say, okay, we want, you know, we look at the top 10.
The top 10 that have flying underneath the radar, that have the high affinity of the H2 receptor, have high strength.
Then what they're going to do is that they're going to create, they're going to do an in vitro study.
And that in vitro study would be Taking that, they'll create the virus.
Now they have the genome that's predicted in silico.
Now what they do is they put that RNA, not messenger RNA, the RNA, because this is an RNA virus.
And that has the spikes, the new spikes.
This is the new one.
This is the predicted in silico, but now they've made it.
They infect cells in the Petri dish.
And then now what they're doing is they're analyzing infectivity to see if their in silico model actually is happening in vitro.
Okay?
If that does happen, then what they do is, okay, they take the top five.
All right?
And then what they do is now they know the genome of the iteration that they want to work with.
All right?
That passed the in vitro analysis.
All right?
And then what they'll do is go, okay, now we're going to create a nanoparticle, and we're going to have the messenger RNA in that.
And then from there, then they'll do the animal study.
Pardon my...
Pardon my drawing of the animal.
I think that's Nopal cactus, actually.
No, I'm joking.
Well, I guess you...
No, it's all good.
Look, we're almost...
Oh, there.
Oh, it's a llama.
Okay.
But the thing is, they do an animal study, and then they test to see if it actually is stopping an infection.
So they give it...
Okay, pause.
Pause right here.
We're down to 30 seconds, Dr.
Cottrell, for this segment.
We're going to continue after this.
This is truly fascinating stuff.
For those of you watching on brighteon.tv, thank you for watching here.
This conversation is going to continue because we've got a lot more to cover.
And by the way, I've got a bunch of questions queued up in the back of my head here.
So this is going to continue on my channel, HRReport at Brighteon.com.
But for those of you watching on Brighteon.tv today, feel free to share this everywhere and just watch the rest of this.
Thank you for watching today and we appreciate you.
Take care.
All right, we're continuing, Dr.
Cottrell.
So just, thank you for your patience on all of this.
But just so I can, let me re-summarize this, if that's okay.
So, of course, they're doing permutations and combinations in silico, that is, in a computer simulation of the genetic expression of these various viruses.
And then they have a translator that translates the genetic composition into a morphological 3D modeled 3D space simulator of some kind.
And then they can actually run simulations of affinity to ACE2 receptors.
And they can also run simulations of antibodies and how they might interfere with the affinity between the virus and human tissue.
And then they take those and now they're putting them into llamas and other animals and they're running actual.
Well, first they're doing it in a Petri dish to make sure it works in the real physical 3D world.
It's not just a computer simulation.
And then they're doing it in animals.
So that's where you left off.
Is that about right?
That's right.
Once they inoculate with the messenger RNA platform, the animal, maybe a rat.
It's not a llama.
Okay, it's a rat.
Okay.
And then they give it the actual virus.
But lab llamas sounds more fun.
The predictive virus that they made to see if it can neutralize it or not.
And then if this passes, then it'll go to human clinical trials.
But the point here is that this dovetails right into what the Pentagon wants.
They're working with Moderna, and Moderna is now building this AI system to do all this predictive analysis.
So they can run this AI. And change these nucleotides in certain regions of the genome and predict what potentially the CCP is developing.
So they're making an inoculation for the CCP, and then they're making an inoculation for natural mutation.
But there's a lot of natural mutations that are happening because of antibody-dependent enhancement.
Because it goes back to this.
Because once you get...
Okay, go ahead.
Well, there are so many regions of phenotype variability because, I mean, look at the number of base pairs on the virus.
It's huge.
I mean, 30,000.
That the actual number of combinations is, you know, probably like beyond trillions.
It's huge.
It's orders of magnitude.
You can narrow it down a little.
Right.
But then we end up with vaccines built by Skynet is what you're saying.
And that's creepy.
It is.
But the thing is, they're using artificial intelligence to predict where the variants are going to be going, either through the antibody-dependent enhancement route, mutations that are happening in nature, and then the potentiality of, Well, you can figure out which one flies underneath the radar of an immune system.
You can use that information, create the virus, and now you put that into your weapon system.
Right.
But, and maybe this is where you're going to go, but then there's no way that in that simulation that they can model all the other effects of other body tissues and vascular system and neurological, right?
That's right.
So that's probably where you're going next, right?
That's right.
That's right.
And this is the problem.
This is that when you, you know, this is reductionist.
Even though it's AI and it's doing a lot of calculations and stuff and building three-dimensional models and testing poles and all this stuff, it's still reductionist.
The body is extremely complicated.
I didn't even really realize how complicated it was until I was in medical school.
But it's extremely complicated.
And so this is where we get into the Jurassic Park problem.
We're doing things that we shouldn't be doing because we don't realize what the negative externalities are downstream.
And this is why I think that we need to really push hard and slow down The vaccine program get a handle on what's really going on with how it's hurting the body.
And we really have to go really hard against these individuals that made these systems and to shut it down.
We have to shut down the DOD and its biological program.
Because what's going to happen is this is going to escalate to terminal destruction, as Noam Chomsky says.
Whoa, wait, wait, wait, wait.
What's going to escalate to terminal destruction?
There's going to be an arms race in biologists between the CCP and the United States.
And there's going to be nothing that's going to stop us There's a psychological barrier for someone pushing the nuclear button because of how much destruction happens once the bomb goes off.
With biologics, it's a slow burn.
So there's nothing in our human psyche to stop the button push, to release the biologics.
So the chances of terminal destruction is higher in biological warfare than in nuclear war.
That makes sense.
That's why everyone needs to...
All hats to Dr.
Fleming and what he's trying to do with the tribunal and the campaign for war crimes.
I'm all for that.
But here's the history.
I don't know of any war...
Well, I pointed that out myself, because after World War II... Exactly!
It was after the regime fell.
And we are living in the regime.
Right, right.
So that's why I keep on saying that we have to be aggressive.
You can't be passive.
You have to be aggressive and shut this thing down.
And unfortunately, we have lost 22 months or so of trying to shut down this program.
And it's going to get worse as they're weakening our immune system.
Okay, well, hold on.
But from what you said at the beginning of this...
These vaccines are the antidote.
Why should we stop them?
I'll make it very clear to the public.
I am against the weapons system that was being developed by the DOD. I'm against the weapons system that was being developed by the CCP. And I'm against making antidotes for the weapons systems.
I'm against biological warfare.
Period.
And the only way to stop it is to shine a light on these people and to hold them accountable.
Well, and that's what Francis Boyle has been saying from day one.
Right.
You know, arrest the thousands of scientists, he says, who are involved in all this bioweapons research.
Right, right.
But then the Fauci's of the world come along and they say, well, you know, we're trying to build antidotes against the bioweapons that the enemies might create.
If we always lean on the antidotes, then we're always going to be crunching AI systems to create more biologics.
That end up harming.
And it's an escalation.
It's an escalation.
Everybody's going to have to funnel into a pharmacy every two months to get the latest injection.
Meanwhile, cancer rates are exploding through the roof.
Exactly.
The shield that Bansel is talking about from Moderna.
The shield.
The vaccine shield.
He's saying.
We calculate the AI. We find the highest prediction that we need to make a vaccine for.
And then we give it to you a year later.
We'll give it to you for that year.
It's an annual thing.
He's designing it for an annual thing.
If you think about it, if you look at people that have served in the military, There is a process to be getting a ton of vaccines all the time.
That's true.
Right?
Now, when you are moving towards biological spectral dominance, you need to do something similar.
You have to have a similar kind of program for your citizens.
And we're starting to see that happening with the vaccine card and the vaccine passport, and you can't have a job or buy anything unless you've been fully vaccinated and all this stuff.
And now they're starting to use artificial intelligence to do predictive modeling for the next potential variant, either from your enemy or even more nefarious.
The AI tells you what's the best weapon.
To put it in an arsenal.
Right.
Clearly they're using it for that as well.
Well, right.
So the only way to shut this down is to shine a light on it and say, shut down the weapons program and hold all these people accountable.
And, you know, this is crimes against humanity.
Clearly it is.
A petition to hold Fauci accountable, that's a good start.
But I don't think it's going hard enough, fast enough.
You know, I'm a little bit of a history buff.
And I'll tell you, you know, Milosevic, there was a war after that.
You know, there was a war.
And then there was the tribunal.
All right.
Hitler committed suicide after he basically, you know, destroyed his country.
Well, you know, the Russians in the United States blew up the smithereens.
And then we had Nuremberg.
All right.
Saddam Hussein was tried after we destroyed his country.
So I see a pattern here.
And that pattern is that it's through destruction and war, then you have the tribunal.
That's what history is saying now.
It doesn't mean that we can't have a peaceful transition to the tribunal, but history doesn't show that.
Well, so what happens if 200 million Americans take the vaccine, and let's say it is an antidote, and it protects them from the far worse bioweapon, but then China bombs the vaccine factories, and suddenly your vaccine supply platform runs out, and now you're on your own and your immune system's all shut, right?
There's a problem.
Yeah, right, right.
And not only that, you had hackers that shut down cooling systems for the shipping of the trucks.
And these things have to be shipped at a certain temperature, minus four degrees Celsius.
And that's why the nanoferritin is the other antidote for the military, because it doesn't have a temperature requirement.
Ah, right.
See what I'm saying?
And that can also be assembled on the battlefield.
The messenger RNA platform from Moderna cannot be assembled on the battlefield.
But how do we know somebody's not going to, you know, at Moderna or Pfizer, is not going to just, you know, open up the file of the synthesis of the mRNA instructions and just swap it around to now it is the weapon?
Or maybe they've already done that.
That's potentiality.
Where my thinking is right now with this weapons theory that I have is that the viruses that were developed in Barrick's lab and some other labs around the world, there are 11 laboratories.
There are three main viruses that are tied to SARS-CoV-2 platform that are weapon systems.
And as they were building the weapon system, NIH was funding for the antidote.
So that was the overt operation, was the vaccine.
Why is there such a push for vaccine for HIV? Why?
I'll tell you why.
Because the weapons system has HIV. Talk to us about, if you would, antibody-dependent enhancement and sort of what we can reasonably expect to be seeing over the next six months or so.
Okay.
So what happens is that you get the antibodies from the vaccine, okay?
It's only for the S1 subunit.
And what happens is that your titer levels will be at a certain level.
At a certain level, and they start to die down.
As these titers start to die down, it can't neutralize an infection, let's say, for Delta.
Let's say you received the vaccine three months ago, or two and a half months ago, all right?
And all of a sudden, your titer levels start to die down.
What happens is it's not fully neutralizing the infection, and it can get into your system.
And what happens is that that's one mechanism for antibody-dependent enhancement.
The other mechanism is that you actually created an antibody.
This is where you can use the messenger RNA as a weapon system.
You create an antibody that actually has been modeled to have a certain affinity for a particular virus that's released.
And it helps it to come into the cell through either co-receptors or it locks in and it changes the structure just enough to lock into the ACE2 receptor or other receptors that I've been mentioning.
The CD209, the CD299, everyone keeps on saying ACE2.
It's not just ACE2, guys.
It's more.
It's more.
So what happens is as your titer levels start to go down, you're not fully neutralizing.
And certain antibodies can create a certain topology and come into the cell easier, dock easier, or work with a co-receptor and then come in.
Now, what is interesting in the data is that when you start seeing, especially in the United States, England, you know, that...
When you have a surge in vaccines, about two and a half months later, you start seeing cases go back up.
And this two and a half month is that decline in titers that Malone's talking about.
There's a lag.
See, people think, you know, because people don't think in lag terms, you know, in finance, we always think in lags.
There's a signal and then, you know, you can make profit a little bit later.
So there's a signal.
Lots of vaccines, okay, with a particular cohort.
And then all of a sudden there's a surge of a new variant and they blame it on people that didn't get vaccinated.
Well, through antibody-dependent enhancement, you're getting the surge of cases.
When the titer levels are starting to die down and the binding and changing of topology and co-receptors, there is a correlation between vaccine surge and two and a half months later, a new variant popping up.
And there was research papers way before the vaccines were released.
You know, we're to the public.
We're individuals in convalescent homes.
We're given convalescent plasma treatment because they were immune compromised.
All right, they ended up getting SARS-CoV-2.
They were in a nursing home.
They were given monoclonal antibodies or convalescent plasma treatment from individuals that had SARS-CoV-2 and recovered.
These individuals that had the plasma treatment or the monoclonal antibody treatment did recover from SARS-CoV-2, but it relapsed.
And when it relapsed, what happened?
There were variants that popped up that were very similar to alpha.
So that was a controlled group.
And through antibodies starting to get out of their system, because their immune system didn't work, as the antibodies were starting to leave their system, they relapsed, and then it gave that selection pressure for mutation.
So what happens is during this period of time, there's selection pressure for mutation.
Which leads to a new variant.
So, you know, we had Delta here.
Okay, you know, I'll just say we had Delta here and then a lot of people were saying, oh, I'm scared of Delta.
But this is exactly what Bosch was warning about, and Malone and others were warning about exactly this phenomenon.
Right, right, right.
No, this is true.
This is true.
Yeah, go ahead.
Well, let me ask you this.
We know that in addition to the spike protein itself having a pathological effect on the vascular system and neurological system and so on, antibodies to the spike protein themselves I've seen this in multiple papers.
So just to add this, even if the AI system finds the perfect antibody, the perfect key for the perfect lock, that can still cause disease in the body.
That's right.
You got it 100% right.
The antidote is...
It's a poor solution, but it is a solution from a military perspective.
It's a good solution from a military perspective.
For a civilian perspective, it's terrible.
My research goes into using the tap protein to try to reduce the inflammatory response in GBS and Guillain-Barre syndrome.
I'm all about this idea that the vaccine is And the virus, but the vaccine particularly, is causing autoimmune disorders.
I think the myocarditis is coming from an autoimmune disorder problem.
I think a lot of these issues with vascular, it's autoimmune disorder problems.
So that's my perspective.
Other people have different perspectives.
So I agree with you.
There is definitely an autoimmune disorder issue that needs to be addressed and looked at.
But see, what happens is that you do the in vivo model.
You do the in vivo model, and that passes, and then you do the animal model, and that passes, and then you do the human model.
But the human model, clinical trials, is about 15,000 per cohort group.
So you're not going to see the power of numbers of these autoimmune disorders.
You start seeing the power of numbers when you start doing 300 million doses or whatever.
Then you start seeing, oh, there's 100,000 people that are starting to show this kind of autoimmune disorder with their heart.
Right?
So through the power of numbers.
You don't see the power of numbers when you're doing all this stuff.
Well, not just the numbers, but also the time lag of the development of the autoimmune disorders, right?
So they did not do the long-term trials.
That's right.
That's exactly right.
And I even stated on, I think it was our first or second show, that I was worried about the messenger RNA from Moderna turning on oncogenes, activating oncogenes, or turning off tumor suppressor genes.
So then, I like the distinction you just said.
So you're saying this is effective from a military point of view.
If you figure soldiers are on the battlefield of biological warfare and they're going to be subjected to biobombs dropped on them, it's kind of, you might say, worth the risk of the side effects for them to be injected with this mRNA, quote, antidote.
But then from a civilian population...
It doesn't make sense because now you're talking massive numbers of people.
You're going to see these long-term effects, the oncological effects, more cancers, more autoimmune disorders, and even, of course, neurological, reproductive disorders, all kinds of things happening.
So that distinction, I think, is very important.
Right.
And the government doesn't care if you live to 70 years old.
It prefers that you don't live to 70.
They just care that you...
Live long enough to procreate and be able to raise children up to a certain point and then, you know, you exit.
And consume, consume, consume in the meantime.
Right.
Boost the GDP. Buy more stuff.
Right.
Exactly.
Exactly.
But then die as soon as you might collect Social Security.
Right.
Exactly.
So, you know, I want to make it clear, you know, I'm not for the vaccine.
I'm not.
I'm totally not for the vaccine.
All right.
But, you know, I think from a military perspective, this is what they're doing with Moderna and how Moderna is using artificial intelligence to help with developing new weapon systems, but also, you know, having some level of an antidote.
It's a bad antidote.
It has a lot of problems.
We're probably only just starting to see the Jurassic Park starting.
I'm very concerned about cancers popping up in years to come.
I think your T-cells If I can spell here.
Your T cells and your B cells, they're all going down.
All right?
And for some patients.
Now, if these things are going down, then you're going to start seeing AIDS. You're going to start seeing AIDS-like syndrome.
And this is why I've coined my show.
I've had different names for my shows.
But HIV, War Room, I'll tell you, that name that I used really solidifies this idea of the immune system being downregulated and it's causing an AIDS-like syndrome down the future.
This is very important.
Like you said earlier, this is why the CDC is calling for combining flu shots with COVID shots, more boosters.
But as you know, Dr.
Cottrell, there's no way they can cover every wild pathogen because there are so many strains and such rapid mutation.
But the thing is, don't think about what the science is saying.
Think about what the military is doing.
The military pumps a ton of stuff in these soldiers.
And you're starting to hear from Bancel, Moderna, right?
And you're starting to hear from the CDC and the FDA and Fauci that we need to have, we have to accelerate our scheduling for adults.
We have to have more, more.
This falls right in line with a military operation for its civilians, right?
It's all getting plugged in right now.
All these systems are getting plugged in as a process in our society to say, okay, to meet compliance, to work, you have to have all these different vaccines.
Did you go to your doctor and get those?
No, you can't have your job.
See, that's where we're at right now.
Well, right, but back to my point.
If they're destroying the immune function in a general sense, but having programmed specific immunity against specific pathogens, or even subdomains of those pathogens, as you know, the S1 subunit, then you have walking AIDS patients, and they're going to die from common infections in large numbers, you would think.
Right, and what's going to happen is similar to what we were hearing from the tobacco company.
Proved to me that those lung cancers were caused from cigarettes.
And so it takes decades of analysis, and then eventually you can say, yeah, all these carcinogens, the 7,000 of them that are in a cigarette, actually gave you the emphysema that you have, or the lung cancer.
So if I could extrapolate from what you're saying, we're going to see hospitals probably flooded.
Actually, it's already happening, as NPR reported.
Flooded with people with common infections, but expressing far more serious symptomatic responses to them.
Does that make sense?
Like, it used to be that it would just be a sniffle and they would be okay, but now it's seven days on an IV and they might die.
See, people don't realize that even for someone healthy like you and I, we have pathogens on us.
And because we're in homeostasis, our immune system is fighting those pathogens and we're not sick.
The moment you have a weakened immune system or you take, you know, let's say immune suppressants, then you start seeing all these odd infections that start to take place.
Because you're out of homeostasis.
This is what's going to happen.
You're going to start seeing more and more of this shutdown of the innate immune system and the adaptive immune system, and you're going to start seeing individuals getting out of homeostasis, and they're going to start showing signs of disease, and it's worse because It's a disease that's presenting itself clinically worse than normal.
So I'm 100% with you on this.
We are going to start seeing worse infections that normally could be treated with just a simple antibiotics.
Or simple corticosteroids.
And then after 14 days, it goes away.
You're going to start seeing that there's...
Infections that are coming back, they're reinfecting, and then it gets even worse.
If your system isn't working very well and fighting, even if you give them the antibiotic and you get the reinfection, you're adding to the probability of getting antibiotic-resistant bacteria.
Great.
So superbugs on top of failed immune function.
I think you should rename your podcast just Nightmare Scenario with Dr.
Paul Cottrell.
I want to find hope.
I know.
I know you do.
The only hope I see is that you have to shut down the DOD. Oh my goodness.
Okay.
You have a lot of people that were doing crazy things that they should have never done.
And you had even congressmen and senators approving it.
They couldn't do the gain of function.
And this came out of Grandpa's mouth.
You couldn't do the gain of function unless you had the congressional...
Right.
And then Congress gave you the authority for the gain of function.
Where Fauci went wrong is that he was flying underneath the radar on some of this stuff.
Okay, look, we're out of time for today, but obviously we've got to talk again soon.
But number one, you're totally freaking me out.
I'm going to have to drink some more bok choy here soon, just because now that I know what's coming, we're going to be surrounded by a bunch of sick people Who are vaccinated and sick with other things.
And plus, China's going to drop more biobombs on us.
Wow, it's going to be an amazing winter with the food supply shortage and everything else.
But tell people where they can find you and your work and your video channels and so on, please.
Yeah, I have three channels on YouTube.
It's Paul Cottrell or Dr.
Paul Cottrell.
I'm on, obviously, Brighteon.
It's Dr.
Paul Cottrell and Brighteon.
That's growing and I'm putting my back catalog on there.
And then I'm on Rumble.
And then you can go to my website, which is the-studio-rekovic.com and take a look at my work and what I offer.
But what is important is finding solutions.
And my hat's off to you.
If it wasn't for Brighteon, honestly, if it wasn't for Brighteon, there were many people like myself, because of the censorship on YouTube, would not be able to have an audience to explain some of the complexity that's going on.
It's not simple.
It's not simple.
There's nuances.
What's good is bad and what's bad is good.
It gets confusing.
I really appreciate you putting your life on the line and your finances on the line to having a platform like Brighton for me to have an outlet to communicate with the public.
Well, Dr.
Cottrell, look, I built this platform so that we can have conversations exactly like this.
So you are fulfilling the purpose of why we built this, so thank you for having this conversation today.
No one has ever presented it like this, and obviously we've just scratched the surface, so let's schedule to get together again soon.
We have to end this conversation today, but folks, I'm going to have to watch this myself again, and I hope you appreciate the fact that this is real.
This is a live interaction between Dr.
Cottrell and I. I'm asking questions that I think you might be asking, and all of humanity is at stake here.
So spread the word.
You can repost this video anywhere you want.
Check out Dr.
Cottrell's other videos on Brighteon and Rumble, and he's still got some YouTube channels somehow that probably won't last long.
But thank you for joining me today, Dr.
Cottrell.
It's always an honor to speak with you.
Thank you.
And my artwork needs to improve.
No, no.
We need to end this with some happy llamas and rabbits, some kind of simple sketches and doodles because it was such an ominous show.
So maybe next time you can just flip in another whiteboard that's got happy animals on it and say, no, but everything's fine.
Right, right.
You know, we have to be engaged citizens, and I believe that only through telling the government no will we be able to slow this thing down.
Because I'll tell you, Ansel is using artificial intelligence, and he's designing his company to be giving you a vaccine every year.
Okay, great.
Any problems with that?
Freaking Skynet in our bloodstream now.
Okay, just what we needed, little nanoscale terminators.
Okay.
Thank you, Dr.
Cottrell.
We've got to run.
We'll talk to you again soon.
Thank you.
Thank you.
In this nearly 8-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full free audiobook as MP3 files.
Keep a copy of all these files on your local hard drive and print out the full guide just in case we lose the power grid.
▲
Export Selection