All Episodes
Previous Next
May 16, 2022 - Health Ranger - Mike Adams
01:04:47
Dr. Paul Cottrell warns that Fauci is "hardwiring" humanity for mass death
| Copy link to current segment

Time Text
I just want to be very clear for the ones that are listening to this.
Having a third booster would help.
But if you think that you're going to be doing a fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a seventh, it is going to be almost a guarantee that your IgMs and your IgGs are going to be less responsive and that it will lead to more escape variants and it is going to be almost a guarantee that your IgMs and your IgGs
Welcome to the Health Ranger Report on Brighton.tv.
Today I've got another special guest for you, Dr.
Paul Cottrell, who's in medical school and was forced to take the vaccine.
But unlike most people who take it, Dr.
Paul Cottrell is an expert in nutrition and he understands the molecular mechanisms that are at work.
So he was able to protect himself from the vaccine in some very innovative ways.
And we're going to ask him about that in this segment coming up.
Also, as he's a doctor, a PhD doctor right now, he's in medical school to become a physician doctor.
In addition to that, he's in multiple degrees.
And he's going to talk to us today about the problem with booster shots.
What happens epidemiologically over time when you administer booster shots to a population with a high transmissivity but low fatality viral infection?
Very interesting and sometimes cautious effects happen.
We'll be here to talk about that with Dr.
Paul Cottrell right after this break.
All right, welcome back.
Mike Adams here, Health Ranger Report on Brighton.tv.
We're going to welcome to the show Dr.
Paul Cottrell, who is our guest today.
Dr.
Cottrell, it's been a few months.
I've been looking forward to speaking with you again.
A lot has happened.
Welcome to the show.
Thank you for having me, Mike.
I like doing these shows with you, but I've just been very busy with medical school and my research and actually autoimmune disorders.
Oh, I totally get it.
Yeah, I love doing these shows with you as well.
We always learn so much.
The audience is fascinated.
By the way, I've watched so many of your interviews and podcasts on brighttown.com over the last several months, so I've been kind of keeping up with what you're looking at.
But the thing that really stood out for me, and what I want to ask you right up front, is that you had to take the vaccine to stay in medical school, so please tell our audience what you took and how you protected yourself.
Okay, so medical school stated that we had to be fully vaccinated by August 28th, or we would not be able to attend this current semester.
So for me, I took the Johnson& Johnson vaccine.
It's a one-shotter for right now, but it was a one-shotter.
I took it on July 25th.
In New York City.
It didn't cost me anything.
It was free.
And when they put the shot in, into the arm, into the deltoid area, it was pretty painful.
It was actually pretty painful.
Probably more painful than anything that I've had before.
I chose the Johnson& Johnson 1 because it's the adenovirus.
I did not want to take the messenger RNA platform at all.
And it was a one-shotter.
So that was my reason for taking the Johnson& Johnson 1.
Now, in terms of continued pain in the deltoid, my pain went away the day of the shot.
Now, I took beforehand...
I took higher doses of turmeric.
I take turmeric every day.
But I took six tablets of turmeric days before and then several days after the shot and the day of the shot.
Just for the anti-inflammatory properties?
Right, exactly.
The anti-inflammatory properties of turmeric.
So higher doses of turmeric, several days before, several days after, to keep that inflammatory response down.
That is something what I saw in my research with using the TAT protein to reduce GBS symptoms.
So the TAP protein also calms down the immune system and brings down those pro-inflammatory cytokines.
It's very similar to what turmeric does.
In addition, I also took higher doses of C60. And C60 is a very strong antioxidant.
So you want to kind of keep that mitochondrial health there.
So you have that ATP creation.
There's been cases in VAERS where actually people start feeling lethargic and out of energy and all this stuff.
There is some evidence to suggest that the mitochondrial health is somewhat deterred, either transitory or more permanent, with ones that take the vaccine.
So taking the C60 as the antioxidant and reducing the ROS, reactive oxygen species, will bring down and help calm that effect.
In addition to that, your normal nutritional regimen is quite extensive, so can you also cover that as well?
Right, right, right.
I've been doing this since I was 16, but I've been very into antioxidants and health and nutrition and exercise.
Multivitamin, I take zinc in the morning.
Then D3 with K2, but it's the MK7 version.
There's an MK4 and MK7 version.
So I take D3, about 10,000 individual units of D3. So I take it in the morning and at night.
I take K2 and K7 in the morning.
Then the tumerics, normally in the afternoon, I take ashwagandha to maintain my blood sugar levels and take the C60 in the afternoon and NMN coupled with resveratrol.
This is the research that was coming from Dr.
Sinclair that's dealing with Sirtuins, mitochondrial health, and anti-aging protocol.
So I kind of mixed all these together, and that's what I do.
So you're right.
It's not just the extra stuff I did just before and just after taking the Johnson& Johnson shot, but it was this long journey of...
Proper nutrition, proper exercise and diet, and these anti-aging supplementation regimen that I do.
Right.
And also, I also coupled it with the nano-silver.
I take bananas every day.
I take bananas every day.
You probably take it well as well with water and juice and things like that.
Are there any particular, just so that people know, I mean you're a very health conscious individual, but So people know, are there any particular foods that you avoided specific to approaching this vaccine?
For example, fried foods or anything that might cause blood sludge effects?
Well, this is a good question you're bringing up.
So for me...
The evidence was showing that there may be blood clotting with Johnson& Johnson and some inflammatory response.
So sometimes these cytotoxic T cells actually produce more inflammatory cytokines and create this leaky syndrome of the vessels.
Well, the tumerics are supposed to bring down that.
C60 is also anti-inflammatory.
It helps with individuals that have Hashimoto's syndrome.
So it calms down those antibodies from attacking.
So what I did was the day after, I felt fine.
I actually went to the gym and I biked moderately, not intense, but moderately.
I cycled for 15 minutes, moderate cycling, and then I rode on a rowing machine 1,000 meters.
I felt fine.
Now, my thinking was this.
You gotta remember, I'm, you know, somewhat fit.
So, my thinking was this.
I wanted to get my blood moving And getting around, instead of having that vaccine just sitting there, spread it out and just make sure that my blood was pumping so it reduced the chances of clotting, especially in the legs.
So you wouldn't get some sort of, you know, deep vein thrombosis and maybe a blood clot that leads, you know, goes right into the lung.
So that was my thinking on this.
Now, some people can't do that, but I was thinking anti-inflammatories and get the blood moving.
Well, that makes a lot of sense, actually.
And a theory I've had for a while, and I'd like your thoughts on this, is that the people who suffer blood clotting from either Johnson& Johnson or AstraZeneca, typically in Europe, my theory has been that those are people who are on the verge of clotting anyway because of their lifestyle and dietary habits or dehydration or food choices and so on.
And then the vaccine is just that tipping point And also perhaps combined with a sedentary lifestyle and so on.
What do you think about that theory?
I agree with you.
In addition, if you take the D3 and the K2 and K7, what happens is individuals do get a plaque buildup that's more lipid-related, but they also get plaque buildup that's calcium-related.
And what happens is that it starts to dissolve some of that calcium and puts it back into the blood.
And then if you're working out, the body will remodel some of those joints and bones in the resistant areas that you're training in and actually deposit calcium.
So this is the reason why D3, taking high doses of D3 to treat arthritis works.
When you do it over a long period of time and you're doing light resistance training on the injured joint.
And Dr.
Groot did a few videos on his channel about five years ago about this.
Listen, athletes that were getting arthritis, they were taking 50,000 to sometimes even 100,000 individual units.
Now, they're, you know, a bigger body and, you know, it all depends on, you know, body size.
But for me, when I was, I used to do triathlons when I was in my 20s and 30s, mid-30s, mid-20s to mid-30s.
And I did start getting arthritis in the knees, right?
I did that protocol that he suggested.
My max for D3 at that time was 25,000 individual units over a seven-month period, and the arthritis went away.
So I started becoming really a believer that you can target Some of these ailments, they just say, oh, it's just old age and you can't deal with it.
No, the body can heal itself if you give it the proper nutrition at the proper dosages and you let the body produce those growth factors.
And it's magic.
The body will heal.
Instead of just saying, oh, you know, take a cortisone and rub it on your knee and then, you know, and all this stuff.
That's just masking symptoms, yeah.
Right?
And the thing is, is that research also showed that D3, taking D3 prophylactically will help To do apoptosis of cells that end up getting infected by viral infections.
Period.
So this is part of the reason why D3 was one of the magic ingredients, including zinc and other things, that helped with this crisis, the SARS-CoV-2 crisis.
It helps with apoptosis, which also is something that one can use with resveratrol.
Resveratrol, it's an antioxidant, but it also helps with apoptosis.
Because you have senesce cells.
So you want to get rid of those senesed cells.
And what happens is that your body repopulates that tissue with adult stem cells.
And now the telomere lengths for those individual cells are longer.
So when you do a sample of the tissue after taking the resveratrol and it cleans out all the senesed cells, the tissue is actually younger than before taking the resveratrol based on telomere length.
Absolutely.
Now, I know you've got a chart behind you.
Why too many boosters hurt?
We're going to get to that in just a second, but I've got one more question for you.
And also, for those watching on Brighteon.tv, this interview continues in an extended format on my channel on Brighteon.com.
That's the HR Report channel.
But I want to mention, since you brought up resveratrol, I've been taking resveratrol daily for years, but I also take serrapeptase, which is an enzyme, and then natokinase.
Are you familiar with those two?
Is that something that I'm not familiar with those two.
I followed the protocol from Dr.
Sinclair.
He did his PhD thesis, actually, on why bacteria die.
And then he started studying the sirtuin stuff.
He started with NR and NMN and resveratrol combinations.
So I followed his line of thought and just did the resveratrol and the NMN combo.
Okay, okay.
What happens is that that's like a precursor to the NAD plus that allows you to get more energy.
Check out natto kinase, N-A-T-T-O. And it's a fermented Japanese, I guess, superfood natto.
It actually starts out as soy.
It's fermented into this natto format, which tastes horrible, but then they do an extract from that and they get this natto kinase.
Very interesting history on that.
But you've already shared a lot with us here.
Thank you for doing that.
That's going to help a lot of people.
So one more thing.
So just to point out, you specifically avoided the mRNA vaccines, which means your body wasn't turned into a factory to produce antigens.
Right, right.
I stayed away from it for a multitude of reasons.
I didn't want to have a two-shotter because it adds to the probability of autoimmune disorder.
I didn't want to take something that is coming from a company that is tied to DARPA That's well known.
That's public fact.
You know, tied to DARPA and never had long-term testing of any vaccine coming out of that company, let alone that platform.
And then when you have one of the inventors, because there were many inventors that were tied to this vaccine, the messenger RNA vaccine, through the lipid nanoparticle and And how to make the messenger RNA package.
Malone is one of those inventors.
He's telling us, one of the inventors, saying the data doesn't show that it's safe yet.
So beware.
Now, when one of the inventors is saying that, then you have to take notice and go, you know what?
Maybe this is something we should really watch carefully and don't just assume that what Fauci is saying is the gospel.
I personally think that, and still think this, that the messenger RNA platform, especially with Moderna, that platform was designed for cancer patients.
And that long-term, I'm concerned about oncogenes being activated or tumor suppressor genes being turned off.
So until I see longitudinal data over a five-year period, I'm still putting the messenger RNA platform as very experimental, even if the FDA approves it.
Yeah, exactly.
Well, let's get to your chart here because that's the next obvious question.
So we've seen now Israel is probably the best example, 80% vaccine uptake rate among adults there, but now record high cases and hospitalizations and so on among the fully vaccinated for the most part.
Israel has rolled out a third booster shot.
They're giving 100,000 injections a day right now, mostly of that third booster shot.
And they've just recently announced, well, they're going to have to have a fourth booster shot and probably going to have to have one every five to six months from here forward.
Oh, surprise!
Of course, we all predicted that, but now the public is seeing it.
So tell us, what is this path that people are going down and what's the result?
Where does this lead us, this never-ending booster shot parade?
Right, exactly.
This is probably one of the most important things I can say to individuals at this juncture of the crisis.
We are hearing in the media that it's a never-ending booster.
We need a third booster, a fourth booster, maybe it's every year.
Now, here's the problem, and doctors and nurses have been seeing this The ones that have been practicing for 20 years and are trying to stay compliant, a lot of them, a lot of them cannot get to the tighter levels to, quote, give them compliance for certain vaccines because they were boosted too much.
For example, Hep B. Another example, MMR. So what happens, and because of my age, I look young, but I'm 49.
So because of my age and when I started to take all these boosters while I was in pre-med and now in medical school, they're starting to see the same problem for me, for the hep B and the MMR. I finished my second regime of MMR in 2017.
And when they did the titers in August, the data was showing that I was below the threshold for mumps.
So you're not having the immune response.
Exactly.
So doctors and nurses know exactly what I'm going to be showing on here.
But for the main public to understand, the more boosters you get, the less your body will...
Respond to it.
So, there's two things that happen when you get a shot.
The first shot, or even if you get the first exposure naturally, you have something called an IgM, aminoglobin M, produced.
Okay?
And that spikes a little bit.
And then shortly after that, you get your body producing IgGs, aminoglobin Gs.
Takes about 14 days, roughly.
Okay?
Maybe a little bit earlier, a little bit later, depending on the person.
Assuming a normal immune system.
Then it dies out.
Normally after about four to six weeks.
And then you take another boost.
This is why they say take a second shot, especially for hep B or MMR. And then that second shot will boost the IgMs a little bit, but below the peak of the first shot.
But the IgMs are lower.
But the IgGs really spike.
And this is the reason why on the second shot...
They're seeing higher titers for the serum dilutions for Moderna and for Pfizer.
But what happens is that when you continually do shots, your IgM And IgM and IgG start to peak at a lower point and eventually oscillate down farther and farther and farther.
So the response of the body is a negative slope from peak to peak.
So it's a downward trend.
So this goes down to and dovetails right into IgM.
Antibody dependent enhancement.
There's a few different things in the antibody.
Well, hold on a second.
Sorry to interrupt, but what does natural immunity look like on this chart?
All right.
Natural immunity...
Natural immunity would be...
Natural exposure.
Right.
Natural exposure.
You would have the IgG.
All right?
And then it will hold...
Assuming only one time that you receive the real infection.
It'll last longer.
It'll last longer.
So...
In time, you know, around here, the gap is much more for the natural exposure, but it still will go down.
And the data was showing that with Israel.
Israel had two important things.
They said that natural infection, your antibodies actually are better than through the vaccine.
I've also heard this described as, with the Pfizer or the Moderna vaccine, that it's destroying your immune response over time.
As you just described, with the downward slope of boosters, your immune response becomes one-half and then one-fourth and then one-eighth and so on.
Exactly.
And this is what Bosch was saying.
Bosch was saying this, but it wasn't so clear.
But the thing is that he went a little bit too far.
He was speaking a little bit in hyperbole.
He was like, this is going to be a never-ending runaway train.
I don't believe it's a never-ending runaway train.
That doesn't happen in nature.
They could do another release.
That's a different story, which is very possible.
But eventually, this crisis will get to some sort of attenuation and just be an endemic.
But right now, we're just kind of focused on boosters.
And you're right.
It is a downward slope in that your immune system slowly becomes less reactive to the vaccines, right?
Okay, we've got only a minute left in this segment, so go ahead and wrap it up, and then we'll do the bonus material after this.
I just want to be very clear for the ones that are listening to this.
Having a third booster would help, but if you think that you're going to be doing a fourth and a fifth and a sixth and a seventh, it is going to be almost a guarantee that That your IgMs and your IgGs are going to be less responsive and that it will lead to more escape variants and lead to antibody-dependent enhancement.
Wow.
Okay, so it's almost like they're now on a track, but the track is a, well, I call it a suicide track, but look, those are my words, not yours.
But we'll continue with you in our bonus extended interview that, folks, you can find at Brighteon.com.
But this is all the time we have today here on Brighteon.tv.
Thank you for watching.
We'll continue more.
Okay, okay.
We are now continuing.
So, sorry about that, but that's just the time format that we have there for Bright10.tv.
Okay, so continue.
They're on a track.
They take a third booster shot.
Maybe that one helps them.
But then, after that, go ahead.
Right, so it is important to understand the historical context that we're in.
We have to learn from history.
And that is what happened in the Spanish flu period.
Of 1918, right?
Crisis.
All right.
So what I'm going to do is I'm going to quickly, just quickly explain it to the audience.
All right.
So over time, the number of deaths of the Spanish flu, okay, of 1918, starts really in 1880, right?
In 1880 to 1890, there were individuals that had natural exposure to H1N1 from horses and chickens that were working on the farm.
And they were in their 20s or 30s, okay, at that time.
And this is what happens, okay?
Then it starts to die down, and you had...
A younger generation, around 1900 to about 1910, 1915 or so, that get exposed.
The first exposure was H1N1. The younger crowd gets H3N3. Now, when that happens, they have the epitope, the shape of the protein.
So influenza has two spikes.
It has the N-spike and the H-spike.
So those are epitopes, right?
So their antibodies for the older group are tooled for H1N1. The younger crowd is H3N3 epitope.
Then all of a sudden, 1918 happens, and there's a big spike in deaths.
These deaths were not of, and this was H1N1, were not from the older crowd because they were pre-exposed through an infection from horses and chickens.
And the ones that died were hardwired.
And you're going to see why the boosters is a problem here.
H3N3. They get exposed to H1N1, but they had memory cells for H3N3. This group is the group that died.
Okay?
So when you get...
It's called the Hoskins effect.
Okay?
So when you first get exposed to an epitope, you're hardwired with your memory B cells.
Even if you get a variant that's close, like H1N1, your body will say, oh, I recognize it as H3N3 and produce more H3N3 antibodies.
But it's not neutralizing it.
A.K.A. Delta.
See?
The connection.
And so what happens is they pass away because they can't neutralize and the infection takes hold and there's mass die-off.
How does this play into what's going on with this crisis?
Okay, so we erase the dates.
We erase the epitopes for the influenza.
Now, this is...
This is the COVID crisis.
Right now is where we're here.
We're getting, through the vaccine, what I call the P4 variant.
The alpha.
Well, there was actually before alpha.
Alpha technically is the UK variant.
But it's before alpha.
It's pre-alpha.
So I'll just call it the P4. That's the release.
That's the original template.
That's where all the vaccines are made off of.
So that's the original epitope.
So we're getting this.
And down here, over time, you have delta...
Lambda.
And, you know, a whole bunch of other different variants.
Mu.
They're talking about mu all over the planet.
Mu?
Right, right, right, right.
That's...
Yeah, right.
That's...
Is that from Columbia?
I forgot.
No.
I saw a story today that said it's in 49 U.S. states now.
Oh, really?
Already?
I mean, it's crazy.
So, okay.
But as these variants are drifting away from P4 epitope, all right, it's like the H1N1. And this is getting closer and closer to H3N3 kind of dynamic.
So as these epitopes are moving away from the P4 epitope, what will happen is that I call it variant 12, V12, okay?
V12 eventually will pop up.
And what will happen is this earlier group of people that We had hardwired through the vaccine for the original epitope will not be able to produce antibodies for V12. And when that happens, they get the infection, the body will say, oh, I sort of recognize the S1 subunit, so what I'm going to do is I'm going to activate the memory B cells and make more P4 variants.
Antibodies.
But what happens is that this has drifted off so far off the ranch that it's a killer.
So I am thinking somewhere, maybe it's 10 years from now, maybe it's 5 years from now, that there's going to be a variant.
Variant 12 or whatever you want to call it that pops up and then all these people that had the vaccine this cookie cutter vaccine ends up Getting clipped because they are hardwired to the old epitope.
I believe in choice.
I believe the idea that you look at your own risk exposure and if you want to take it, then it should be your choice.
You should never be forced to take it.
But when Fauci and the mainstream media are saying that the same epitope needs to be provided in the vaccine for everybody, you're hardwiring everyone else.
To not be able to fight V12. And the exact same dynamic will happen as the Spanish flu.
Right, right.
Makes perfect sense.
But natural immunity, my understanding is that it's more broad spectrum.
It's more general.
So would natural immunity be able to fight V12 or variant 12?
Yeah, right, right, right.
Here's the thing.
The Israeli data is showing that you have longer-lasting antibodies, and it's a wider spectrum, as you're saying, through natural infection than through vaccines.
Part of the reason is this.
When you get the natural infection, you're getting all of the spike.
You're getting the S2 subunit and the S1. What they provided in the vaccine is just the S1. And so the thinking was, well, just the docking area, the binding domain, the regional binding domain, right?
So when you get a natural infection, your body will start chewing up some of this spike protein and package it to the MHC. So you're getting more different antibodies.
Some of it will be on the side of So your spike, this is the stalk, and then you have some topology like that, right?
This is the S1 subunit.
This is the S2 subunit.
You get the whole thing through natural infection.
You only get this part of it through the vaccine.
And so when your body is chewing this up, sometimes they'll have an antibody here, sometimes they'll have an antibody here, sometimes they'll have an antibody here.
It's broader spectrum.
But it's possible, because it is broader spectrum, it is possible that you're You're causing a higher potential for autoimmune disorder because there's more areas that you can create antibodies.
You can get autoimmune disorder through natural infection.
GBS can be through a natural infection, but you can also get it through a vaccine.
There's lots of people that get autoimmune disorders through vaccines.
But the problem comes in is that as these variants start to drift away from P4, they're becoming more lethal.
And so it would have been...
Yeah, go ahead.
Well, but also, as Bosch says, isn't the mass vaccination providing the viral evolutionary pressure to create more variants more quickly than what happened in 1918?
Yes, and the reason for that...
Is you're starting to have those titers go down.
They're lasting longer with natural infection.
But when you're doing the vaccine, the titers are going down quicker.
And because of that, you'll have partial...
If you're vaccinated, you get partial neutralization of the virus that you have in your body.
But what happens is that it still gets into the cell.
Now, because of the Hoskins effect, your body will first go, oh, wait a minute, my antibodies are low.
I'm going to activate my memory hardwire B cells and create P4 antibodies.
Because you're hardwired to that, right?
And what will happen is that the virus will then present itself, this new one, this new variant, the Delta, will present itself on the MHC, and you'll get some response with retooling for naive B cells, right?
So you'll get a lot of IgG of the hardwired P4 epitope and some response.
Of the delta epitope.
And then eventually you clear it out.
But when you couple that with multiple boosters, it's adding to the probability of helping that get into the cell because it's not fully neutralized.
And then there's that selection pressure, that downward slope.
In that range, that selection pressure will produce more variance here.
Now, the ones that get the infection naturally and survive, they'll probably be better off for V12. But the ones that are hardwired to the original epitope, we're not going to be faring well with V12. So when Fauci says everyone needs to take the vaccine, even the ones that had the infection already, he's literally hardwiring us for death.
When V12 pops up.
Because everyone keeps on thinking, oh, it's just, you know, delta or around delta.
No, that's not the game.
The game is what evolves off of delta, you know, three generations off of delta, or four generations off of delta, or, you know, some other variant family.
So I'm glad you've explained this.
And then just if we get through this coming winter without mass death, we're not out of the woods.
From what you've explained, this could happen five years later or three or ten, right?
If I'm right with the Hoskins effect, if I'm right about this, what's going on with the boosters, the never-ending boosters and how it's going to weaken your immune system, If I'm right, what we are going through right now is going to be a firecracker compared to what is going to happen.
Like in a magnitude of like 10.
Right, but the timetable is unknown because it depends on the variance and...
The speed of that, right.
Now, if we use history, it took from 1890...
You know, to 19, you know, 1918.
All right.
From H1N1 to peak with another H1N1. So you're talking about, you know, a 20, 30 year lag there.
But you have selection pressure.
Faster travel.
More population density, more interactions.
You got it.
All that, right.
Probably, you can take that 20 years and divide it by three or four, and that's the amount of time it takes.
That's why I'm saying five-year period.
Close to a five-year, six, eight-year period, somewhere in there.
Wow.
Yeah.
Here's the thing.
This is a second year medical student and a guy that has a PhD in chaos theory modeling financial markets.
This is kind of why I see it this way, right?
Because I see the chaos building up.
So There's an emergent property that's coming out of this.
Why aren't the Sanjay Gupta's on CNN or some of the other quote famous Dr.
Oz and all these famous physicians?
They're making tons of money pushing an agenda and they're not bringing up the real science.
That's taking place.
The historical stuff that was going on with influenza, let alone what's going on with the diminished titer levels that doctors and nurses are seeing every day because they have to fall into a compliance bucket and just check the box.
Did you get your head beat shot yet?
Oh, your titers don't work anymore?
Oh, that doesn't matter.
Just keep on taking it.
Oh, now we've given you the MMR so many times you're not responsive?
Oh, it doesn't matter because corporate lawyers are saying, click the box.
But let me ask you that there's also a conspiracy side to this, which is that after they weaken everybody's immune system with four or five booster shots, you know, technically there could be a deliberate release of an engineered strain that's designed to evade the immune antibodies, right?
That's designed to carry out mass deaths.
So...
Oh, and it just came out.
The FOIA documents just came out.
Fauci did fund the gain-of-function research.
That just came out.
So he's a liar.
He committed perjury.
He should be arrested, but that's a different topic.
Peter Daszak was caught on C-SPAN in 2016, mentioning that Dr.
she was developing this virus.
That's right.
And it goes back to what I was saying on your show, the first show that we did, that it goes back to the original paper that was published in 2008, where they made a chimera between bad SARS and SARS with HIV homology.
I want everybody listening, HIV homology in this case...
It is gain of function.
When they say gain of function, this would not have happened.
We would not have had this crisis if it wasn't for HIV homology.
100%.
That is gain of function for SARS-CoV-2.
Now, with Barak, Barak worked with Dr.
Sheet right after that paper was published in 2008 because he had a cell passage line, an animal passage line to be able to fine-tune the virus.
That Dr.
Xi didn't have.
So Barrick gets funding through Fauci to do a...
Check this out.
A coronavirus vector vaccine.
What's for?
While he's working with Dr.
Xi.
What is it for?
Influenza and HIV. That means that he's got a coronavirus.
Okay?
Right?
And they have an ACE2 vaccine.
Receptor, you know, a spike, the S spike, right?
And inside the code for the vaccine, this vaccine vector is coding for the H protein and influenza and or the Spike protein, fully functional spike protein for HIV, the glycoprotein 120 and the glycoprotein 41.
So what that does is that when it gets into the cell, this is like a venovirus vaccine, but it's a coronavirus vaccine.
So what do we hear in the news with the multiplexing with the CDC? They keep on saying multiplex with influenza and with SARS-CoV-2.
Now, last I looked, influenza was low in 2020.
So why do they assume, when nothing else has changed except the vaccine numbers, the number of people who have been vaccinated in the United States, why do they assume that influenza is now going to surge?
I believe this.
During Barrett's research, this was funded.
He has the HIV version of this, and he has the flu version of this, influenza version of this.
That's the overt research, the vaccine vector research.
To inoculate you for the protein in HIV. Okay?
The covert, I believe, is the DOD weapons program.
This is why I say it's a USA CCP virus.
And what was going on is it was a three cocktail, what I call a three cocktail and a five cocktail.
The three cocktail was the spike protein, That had the HIV homology.
So that hybrid was BASARS, SARS, and the HIV homology.
That's the three cocktail.
The five cocktail is the three cocktail plus the HIV spike and the The age spike for influenza.
And if you look at what was going on, she goes dark when she's working with Barrick.
Between 2008 to 2014, the magic year where they, quote, stop the game of function and transfer it over to the Chinese.
All right.
2015 pops up.
She surfaces again with Dr.
Barrick and publishes a paper.
What about the emergence of MERS? All right?
The emergence of MERS. What was going on in 2015 and 2016?
A surgence in Syria.
Right?
We were trying to destabilize Syria.
So what I think the DOD was doing was building a weapons system It was through biologics, covert, and they were going to drop it into the Middle East.
And it was going to be in areas that were urban.
Okay, this is fascinating.
Let me just add that MERS, M-E-R-S, for people who don't know, M-E stands for Middle East.
Right.
I need to make that connection for people.
Right, right.
Okay, so continue.
It's a SARS family.
It's a SARS family.
So SARS is coming from Asia, and MERS is coming from the Middle East, right?
But who's the characters?
Beric and she...
Publish the paper together about MERS, but yet from 2008 to 2014, they've been working on this three and five cocktail.
And then Barrick was working with Dr.
Sims in the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, for the vaccine vectors.
So they had the antidote for the weapons program.
Right, right.
And they've always used vaccines as the cover story for building weapons because it's illegal to make these weapons.
But from what you're saying, you believe that the DOD, and by the way, I've confirmed this with other guests, the DOD started this.
They did the intellectual property sharing with the CCP and the PLA, by the way.
But are you saying that you think they did deploy this as a bioweapon in the Middle East or that it just got out or what?
I think what was going to happen was after the election of 2016, they thought that Hillary Clinton was going to win and that they planned on dumping a combination, either the four cocktail, the three cocktail, or the five cocktail, in Syria.
And so what would happen is it would weaken the forces in Syria.
In that urban environment, wait 14 to 21 days, you know, 15 to 21 days or so, they weaken.
The U.S. military would be inoculated either through the BRICS system, which is the coronavirus vector system, or the nanoferritin vector system that came out of Walter Reed.
Where you take the nanoperitin and you just mix the protein that you want, you shake it in the field, and you inoculate your soldiers.
It's actually a more robust system than what Bera created.
But either way, they had an inoculation for the soldiers.
So what would happen is that you don't have the attrition now when we go in to sweep the urban environment like we were seeing in Iraq.
So that's why, and if you listen to these old generals on Fox News, the ones that happened to be generals in 2008 to 2014, what are they saying?
They're saying, we need to up our game in biologics and in cyber warfare.
And that there was a general, this must have been about two months ago now, that stated on Fox News that if he was doing war planning, he would do a simultaneous biologic weapon drop With a cyber attack on a country.
So then, but everything you're saying, and this is truly fascinating and kind of dark too, but I think you're onto it.
But then when Trump gets in after the 2016 election, then this entire weapons program shifts to attacking America.
Right.
Then now the Chinese come in.
Right, exactly.
So we lose the ball, and they have the football now in the CCP, and then they release it on us.
Because what did Trump do?
Trump weakened them economically.
That's right.
He did economic warfare against China, which was devastating their...
Well, it was taking away their cheating through currency manipulation and export manipulation and so on.
So yeah, China couldn't handle that.
In fact, China was on the path to imploding Exactly.
Because if you bring the rest of the world down into the pit, you have at least a chance to have a 21st century China.
Trump was guaranteeing that it would still be a USA 21st century.
And the Chinese national capitalists do not want that.
Right.
So the weapon, which was initially created by the Department of Defense under DARPA, and then refined through BEREC and funded through DASAC funneling and FAUCI NIH intellectual property to the CCP, then this weapon ultimately is designed to bring down the United States, but also to usher in medical authoritarianism, which also serves their interests, right?
You got it.
You got it.
That's exactly what this is.
This is a technocracy.
This is a medical technocracy.
Because what do you keep on hearing?
Well, we're the medical professionals.
If you say anything outside the box, you're banned on social media.
Some of the videos that I put up, even of the stuff that we did together, were taken down.
So, you know, it's nonstop.
I was talking just recently to a 30-year-old that was doing graduate studies at Wayne State University in Detroit, and he was told that he had to take a vaccine.
He eventually said he was not going to take it, and he was going to suspend his graduate studies.
Now, it's his choice and I, you know, I back him on that totally.
So he was explaining what was happening to him.
You know what YouTube did on that video?
They took it down.
It just happened two days ago.
Another strike on a channel that's now, you know, being at risk of getting nuked.
Right, but what you're describing though, you think about the extreme censorship, the extreme control over the narrative.
Logically, I mean, through deduction, something much larger and much more nefarious than business as usual is taking place here.
Clearly, they have a plan for, I mean, I believe it's depopulation.
I think this is mass extermination, but clearly there's a plan.
I mean, if they wanted to help people overcome this, why would they smear ivermectin, for example?
Yeah.
Exactly.
If you're in a crisis, if you're in battle, you don't just use a BB gun.
You use F-16s, you use Abram tanks, use everything in your arsenal to make sure that you are alive and winning on the battlefield, right?
That's the kind of mentality we need with this crisis.
Instead, you have people saying, it's like Vietnam.
You know what?
You've got to fight with one hand behind your back, and you can only use an M-16 on Tuesdays.
I'll tell you, it gets me to the point where you remember that V12 spike because everyone's hardwired with the cookie-cutter vaccine epitope.
It's either one of two things.
You have a medical community that is completely oblivious of the emergent properties of the Hoskins effect.
Which is possible.
Or you have ones that are making decisions, such as Fauci, actually want mass death through V12. And I'm thinking that it's actually the latter.
I think that they want mass death.
Now, I've been really shocked.
I've had private conversations with practicing physicians, some GPs and some specialists and so on.
I have been shocked at their utter ignorance about any of this stuff.
They don't understand the technical aspects.
They don't understand the FDA only approved community, not the EUA Pfizer vaccine.
They don't understand what's in a vaccine.
They don't know about polyethylene glycol.
They don't know about ADE. I mean, it's just on and on and on.
I have to teach them About medical reality here.
It's shocking to me how they can practice with such ignorance.
They have a responsibility to be in the know, as you are doing.
You know, you're doing what doctors should do, which is to stay informed.
But they are not.
Exactly.
Exactly.
You know, and so they just fit in that dog.
They have that horse blinders, and they just keep on pushing the dogma.
Vaccines are good.
Always.
Always.
Well, no.
Especially if you have issues with autoimmune disorders or you're immune-compromised.
We did a show together, if you remember.
Maybe it was our fourth one.
I said that there was a paper that came out with elderly and immune-compromised individuals that were getting plasma treatment, convalescent plasma treatment.
They contracted SARS-CoV-2.
This was early on in the crisis.
They were given the conlessin plasma treatment.
They healed.
They cleared out the virus, but then it resurged, and it had similar mutations to alpha, or the UK variant.
I don't remember which amino acid changed, but they had a very similar convergent motif.
That was evidence, and the scientific community, the doctors out there, should have said, wait, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa, wait a minute here.
As we are putting and creating these antibodies, we are building the chances of escape and further antibody-dependent enhancement.
That's when the alarm bells, massive in the community, should have said, hold off.
We need to fully understand the potentiality of this hardwiring to the old epitope.
Because if you mass vaccinate everybody, everyone is literally screwed because they can't get high titers to the V12 because they're hardwired.
No one said that.
If someone like Sanjay Gupta on CNN explained that to the people, that there are benefits and there are drawbacks, then people would have an informed choice.
But that's not what they're doing.
They're just saying, take it because we say it's good.
No, but it's got to be their intention.
And we're almost out of time for the hour here, so we've got to wrap this up.
But it's got to be their intention to cause mass harm, suffering, and death.
Because think about the extremes, especially look at Australia.
Look at, you're only allowed one hour of exercise.
You have to get government permission to go visit a family member.
You only allowed one person out of your home to buy groceries.
They're doing door-to-door medical kidnappings of people who, quote, test positive.
Daniel Andrews, the Victorian premier, just announced that unvaccinated people would be locked out of society, whatever that means.
I guess you can't even go to a hospital or a grocery store or anything.
This level of tyranny would not be justifiable in the context of the government wanting to help people.
This is only explainable if they are desperately attempting to mass inject people in some kind of ulterior motive that they're not admitting to.
You know, we can game theory this.
It could be that, well, if you inoculate, you know, one way of looking at this is the DoD is saying, okay, we have a war plan that we're going to drop.
And once you drop it, it's going to go around the world.
You can't contain it.
All right?
And so we have to inoculate our population for everything that's in the five cocktail.
And this is part of the reason why you're hearing about the multiplexing people.
You know, they're pushing for influenza vaccines.
And in the news, almost on a weekly basis, you're hearing about HIV vaccination.
All right?
They may be trying to inoculate our population because they're going to do a biological trial.
Wow.
So you're saying it could be...
Wow.
So there are really two big possibilities here.
They're either trying to save us all or kill us all.
Right.
One or the other.
Right.
Or maybe a little bit of both.
Maybe a little bit of both.
And I think this goes back to the white hats and the black hat.
It's a complicated thing and doctors out there need to rub their eyes and get out of the sand and basically say, you know what?
There's something more going on than just the science.
There's human intervention here.
It's dealing with big geopolitics and big finance and that trumps That trumps science.
When you're talking about the war between the United States and China, or us trying to deal with the Middle East.
If they're trying to save us all.
Who are they trying to kill?
Because they're pushing the vaccine globally.
And by the way, the central nations in Africa are using ivermectin so effectively that they're having a very low fatality rate from anything related to COVID. So I know that historically, even President Nixon and his science advisors, they were always trying to depopulate Africa.
But that hasn't worked because Africa's using ivermectin.
So, I mean, who are they trying to kill then if they're inoculating or attempting to inoculate everybody?
It's 2.5 billion people have already been vaccinated.
It's going to be 3 billion soon.
Who are they trying to kill?
I mean, there's white papers that have been passed around since the 60s that, you know, talks about they're more worried of population growth than actually a nuclear war.
And so, you know...
And Nigeria is...
And that group is thinking, well, let's try to depopulate the world.
But in any complex system, it doesn't go as planned.
And it may actually be the reverse.
Who they're trying to hurt actually are...
The ones that survived this crisis and the ones they're trying to help are the ones that died from the crisis.
So it's a complex system that is going to emerge.
And we've got Jurassic Park going on here.
And when you have Jurassic Park going on, you don't know what to expect.
That's the whole idea.
There's an emerging property.
And that the scientific community that thinks they know what they're doing, they need to look in the mirror and say...
You know what?
We know a lot, but we know less than what we need to know.
And so we have to tread lightly and be forthright to the population.
But I personally believe that Fauci knows what I'm talking about, and he was a part of it, and that he's the ringleader, and he's going to keep on having this circus continue.
Well, just as with...
Yeah, go ahead.
Just as with Jurassic Park, they may accidentally unleash the viral version of T-Rex, right?
Maybe it's VT, VT, right?
Exactly, yeah, variant Rex, you know, instead of variant 12.
But that's the thing, you know, science, how many times has science been humbled in the past, even in medicine with thalidomide, for example, right?
How many times have mistakes been made, or with Resilin, with liver damage?
Or even just today, off-the-shelf acetaminophen and liver damage.
I mean, it's incredible that the media is attacking ivermectin, which has been prescribed billions of times, been approved in humans since 1996, even in the U.S., but they never talk about ivermectin and liver damage, which kills, you know, probably tens of thousands a year.
It's just so bizarre.
Artificial world.
Exactly.
Exactly.
And, you know, and then the whole big pharma with OxyContin, you know, the opioid crisis and everything.
So there's, there's, and the doctors were a part of that, you know, over prescribing.
Yeah, certain doctors, the pill pushers.
But thank you, Dr.
Cottrell, for, number one, for staying in medical school and learning all this and being, I think, what doctors are supposed to be, which is informed, compassionate people that are trying to solve problems and remembering the Hippocratic Oath.
But also just thank you for spending the time with us.
This has been fascinating.
We've got to continue this conversation.
Yeah, definitely.
Thank you for having me.
Give out your websites, too.
I'm sorry.
I forgot to mention that.
Go ahead.
Yeah, my website is the-studio-breakovic.com, and you can watch my work.
I've been uploading my back catalog and my new stuff on Brighteon.
I have over 600 videos there, so please watch my stuff on Brighteon.
That's where you're going to see the live stuff, and please comment, and we need to document what's going on.
Need to preserve the record, just like what was happening in 9-11.
You know, we had to preserve the record for that and what was going on there.
We have a crisis here that we need to preserve the record and be part of the conversation instead of being censored.
Also, you're interviewing a lot of interesting people on your channel as well.
And so I want to encourage people to watch your video interviews.
Some of them are quite technical, but that's fine.
That's your realm.
But they're fascinating as well.
So thank you for all that you're doing.
Let's get together again soon and continue this conversation.
Definitely.
All right.
Thank you for joining me today, Dr.
Cottrell.
And for those of you watching, feel free to share this video, repost it anywhere you'd like.
And thank you for watching today.
I'm Mike Adams, the founder of Brighteon.com.
Take care.
Take care.
In this nearly eight-hour audiobook, you will learn life-saving secrets of how to use food, nutrients, plant molecules, trace minerals, and chemical compounds to save your life, even in a total collapse scenario.
I'm Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, and I'm the author of Survival Nutrition.
I founded and run a multi-million dollar food science laboratory, and I'm the author of the best-selling science book, Food Forensics.
I'm also a prepper, a patriot, and a survivalist.
I can teach you how to survive what's coming by growing your own food, medicine, and antibiotics that can help keep you healthy and alive even during the worst of times.
At survivalnutrition.com, you'll be able to instantly download the full free audiobook as MP3 files.
▲
Export Selection